{"groups":{"policy:site-control":{"id":"policy:site-control","label":"Evidence of site control","tracker":"policy"},"policy:security":{"id":"policy:security","label":"Financial security","tracker":"policy"},"policy:curtailment":{"id":"policy:curtailment","label":"Emergency response","tracker":"policy"},"policy:emissions":{"id":"policy:emissions","label":"Emissions safeguards","tracker":"policy"},"policy:cost-allocation":{"id":"policy:cost-allocation","label":"Attributable-cost allocation","tracker":"policy"},"policy:departure":{"id":"policy:departure","label":"Departure / reduced-load protection","tracker":"policy"},"policy:supply-review":{"id":"policy:supply-review","label":"Water-supply review","tracker":"policy"},"policy:clean-energy":{"id":"policy:clean-energy","label":"Clean-energy service terms","tracker":"policy"},"policy:water-reporting":{"id":"policy:water-reporting","label":"Water-use reporting","tracker":"policy"},"policy:local-authority":{"id":"policy:local-authority","label":"Preserved local authority","tracker":"policy"},"policy:minimum-payment":{"id":"policy:minimum-payment","label":"Minimum payment commitments","tracker":"policy"},"policy:regulator-reporting":{"id":"policy:regulator-reporting","label":"Regulatory reporting","tracker":"policy"},"policy:environmental-review":{"id":"policy:environmental-review","label":"Environmental assessment","tracker":"policy"},"policy:permit-hold":{"id":"policy:permit-hold","label":"Interim permit restraint","tracker":"policy"},"restriction:local:enacted":{"id":"restriction:local:enacted","label":"Local restriction records: enacted (as recorded)","tracker":"moratorium"},"restriction:local:failed":{"id":"restriction:local:failed","label":"Local restriction records: failed (as recorded)","tracker":"moratorium"},"restriction:local:proposed":{"id":"restriction:local:proposed","label":"Local restriction records: proposed (as recorded)","tracker":"moratorium"},"restriction:local:pause":{"id":"restriction:local:pause","label":"Local restriction records: pause (as recorded)","tracker":"moratorium"},"restriction:states:enacted":{"id":"restriction:states:enacted","label":"State restriction records: enacted (as recorded)","tracker":"moratorium"},"restriction:states:pause":{"id":"restriction:states:pause","label":"State restriction records: pause (as recorded)","tracker":"moratorium"},"restriction:states:proposed":{"id":"restriction:states:proposed","label":"State restriction records: proposed (as recorded)","tracker":"moratorium"},"restriction:states:failed":{"id":"restriction:states:failed","label":"State restriction records: failed (as recorded)","tracker":"moratorium"},"water:reclaimed:enacted":{"id":"water:reclaimed:enacted","label":"Water reclaimed measures: enacted (as recorded)","tracker":"water"},"water:disclosure:enacted":{"id":"water:disclosure:enacted","label":"Water disclosure measures: enacted (as recorded)","tracker":"water"},"water:siting:vetoed":{"id":"water:siting:vetoed","label":"Water siting measures: vetoed (as recorded)","tracker":"water"},"water:reclaimed:failed":{"id":"water:reclaimed:failed","label":"Water reclaimed measures: failed (as recorded)","tracker":"water"},"water:incentive:proposed":{"id":"water:incentive:proposed","label":"Water incentive measures: proposed (as recorded)","tracker":"water"},"water:disclosure:proposed":{"id":"water:disclosure:proposed","label":"Water disclosure measures: proposed (as recorded)","tracker":"water"},"water:disclosure:vetoed":{"id":"water:disclosure:vetoed","label":"Water disclosure measures: vetoed (as recorded)","tracker":"water"},"water:closed-loop:proposed":{"id":"water:closed-loop:proposed","label":"Water closed-loop measures: proposed (as recorded)","tracker":"water"},"water:closed-loop:failed":{"id":"water:closed-loop:failed","label":"Water closed-loop measures: failed (as recorded)","tracker":"water"},"water:disclosure:failed":{"id":"water:disclosure:failed","label":"Water disclosure measures: failed (as recorded)","tracker":"water"},"water:rate:failed":{"id":"water:rate:failed","label":"Water rate measures: failed (as recorded)","tracker":"water"},"water:siting:enacted":{"id":"water:siting:enacted","label":"Water siting measures: enacted (as recorded)","tracker":"water"},"water:study:proposed":{"id":"water:study:proposed","label":"Water study measures: proposed (as recorded)","tracker":"water"},"water:siting:proposed":{"id":"water:siting:proposed","label":"Water siting measures: proposed (as recorded)","tracker":"water"},"water:closed-loop:enacted":{"id":"water:closed-loop:enacted","label":"Water closed-loop measures: enacted (as recorded)","tracker":"water"},"water:moratorium:enacted":{"id":"water:moratorium:enacted","label":"Water moratorium measures: enacted (as recorded)","tracker":"water"},"water:reclaimed:proposed":{"id":"water:reclaimed:proposed","label":"Water reclaimed measures: proposed (as recorded)","tracker":"water"},"water:moratorium:vetoed":{"id":"water:moratorium:vetoed","label":"Water moratorium measures: vetoed (as recorded)","tracker":"water"},"water:study:enacted":{"id":"water:study:enacted","label":"Water study measures: enacted (as recorded)","tracker":"water"},"water:moratorium:failed":{"id":"water:moratorium:failed","label":"Water moratorium measures: failed (as recorded)","tracker":"water"},"water:moratorium:proposed":{"id":"water:moratorium:proposed","label":"Water moratorium measures: proposed (as recorded)","tracker":"water"},"water:shield:enacted":{"id":"water:shield:enacted","label":"Water shield measures: enacted (as recorded)","tracker":"water"},"water:shield:failed":{"id":"water:shield:failed","label":"Water shield measures: failed (as recorded)","tracker":"water"},"water:siting:failed":{"id":"water:siting:failed","label":"Water siting measures: failed (as recorded)","tracker":"water"},"water:study:failed":{"id":"water:study:failed","label":"Water study measures: failed (as recorded)","tracker":"water"},"water:rate:enacted":{"id":"water:rate:enacted","label":"Water rate measures: enacted (as recorded)","tracker":"water"},"water:incentive:enacted":{"id":"water:incentive:enacted","label":"Water incentive measures: enacted (as recorded)","tracker":"water"},"delay:state_moratorium:withdrawn":{"id":"delay:state_moratorium:withdrawn","label":"Delay cause: state moratorium / withdrawn","tracker":"delay"},"delay:transformer_supply:delayed":{"id":"delay:transformer_supply:delayed","label":"Delay cause: transformer supply / delayed","tracker":"delay"},"delay:gas_pipeline_delay:delayed":{"id":"delay:gas_pipeline_delay:delayed","label":"Delay cause: gas pipeline delay / delayed","tracker":"delay"},"delay:corporate_realignment:withdrawn":{"id":"delay:corporate_realignment:withdrawn","label":"Delay cause: corporate realignment / withdrawn","tracker":"delay"},"delay:financing:withdrawn":{"id":"delay:financing:withdrawn","label":"Delay cause: financing / withdrawn","tracker":"delay"},"delay:environmental_review:litigation_active":{"id":"delay:environmental_review:litigation_active","label":"Delay cause: environmental review / litigation_active","tracker":"delay"},"delay:litigation:litigation_active":{"id":"delay:litigation:litigation_active","label":"Delay cause: litigation / litigation_active","tracker":"delay"},"delay:community_opposition:litigation_active":{"id":"delay:community_opposition:litigation_active","label":"Delay cause: community opposition / litigation_active","tracker":"delay"},"delay:zoning_denial:cancelled":{"id":"delay:zoning_denial:cancelled","label":"Delay cause: zoning denial / cancelled","tracker":"delay"},"delay:community_opposition:cancelled":{"id":"delay:community_opposition:cancelled","label":"Delay cause: community opposition / cancelled","tracker":"delay"},"delay:water_dispute:cancelled":{"id":"delay:water_dispute:cancelled","label":"Delay cause: water dispute / cancelled","tracker":"delay"},"delay:zoning_denial:litigation_active":{"id":"delay:zoning_denial:litigation_active","label":"Delay cause: zoning denial / litigation_active","tracker":"delay"},"delay:local_moratorium:litigation_active":{"id":"delay:local_moratorium:litigation_active","label":"Delay cause: local moratorium / litigation_active","tracker":"delay"},"delay:permit_denial:litigation_active":{"id":"delay:permit_denial:litigation_active","label":"Delay cause: permit denial / litigation_active","tracker":"delay"},"delay:community_opposition:withdrawn":{"id":"delay:community_opposition:withdrawn","label":"Delay cause: community opposition / withdrawn","tracker":"delay"},"delay:zoning_denial:withdrawn":{"id":"delay:zoning_denial:withdrawn","label":"Delay cause: zoning denial / withdrawn","tracker":"delay"},"delay:environmental_review:delayed":{"id":"delay:environmental_review:delayed","label":"Delay cause: environmental review / delayed","tracker":"delay"},"delay:community_opposition:delayed":{"id":"delay:community_opposition:delayed","label":"Delay cause: community opposition / delayed","tracker":"delay"},"delay:water_dispute:under_appeal":{"id":"delay:water_dispute:under_appeal","label":"Delay cause: water dispute / under_appeal","tracker":"delay"},"delay:community_opposition:under_appeal":{"id":"delay:community_opposition:under_appeal","label":"Delay cause: community opposition / under_appeal","tracker":"delay"},"delay:water_dispute:delayed":{"id":"delay:water_dispute:delayed","label":"Delay cause: water dispute / delayed","tracker":"delay"},"delay:local_moratorium:delayed":{"id":"delay:local_moratorium:delayed","label":"Delay cause: local moratorium / delayed","tracker":"delay"},"delay:litigation:cancelled":{"id":"delay:litigation:cancelled","label":"Delay cause: litigation / cancelled","tracker":"delay"},"delay:zoning_denial:delayed":{"id":"delay:zoning_denial:delayed","label":"Delay cause: zoning denial / delayed","tracker":"delay"},"delay:zoning_denial:under_appeal":{"id":"delay:zoning_denial:under_appeal","label":"Delay cause: zoning denial / under_appeal","tracker":"delay"},"delay:water_dispute:litigation_active":{"id":"delay:water_dispute:litigation_active","label":"Delay cause: water dispute / litigation_active","tracker":"delay"},"delay:environmental_review:cancelled":{"id":"delay:environmental_review:cancelled","label":"Delay cause: environmental review / cancelled","tracker":"delay"},"delay:litigation:under_appeal":{"id":"delay:litigation:under_appeal","label":"Delay cause: litigation / under_appeal","tracker":"delay"},"delay:community_opposition:approved_but_citywide_moratorium_pending":{"id":"delay:community_opposition:approved_but_citywide_moratorium_pending","label":"Delay cause: community opposition / approved_but_citywide_moratorium_pending","tracker":"delay"},"delay:proposed_moratorium:approved_but_citywide_moratorium_pending":{"id":"delay:proposed_moratorium:approved_but_citywide_moratorium_pending","label":"Delay cause: proposed moratorium / approved_but_citywide_moratorium_pending","tracker":"delay"},"delay:rezoning_denial_or_withdrawal:withdrawn":{"id":"delay:rezoning_denial_or_withdrawal:withdrawn","label":"Delay cause: rezoning denial or withdrawal / withdrawn","tracker":"delay"},"delay:rezoning_denial:rezoning_denied":{"id":"delay:rezoning_denial:rezoning_denied","label":"Delay cause: rezoning denial / rezoning_denied","tracker":"delay"},"delay:community_opposition:rezoning_denied":{"id":"delay:community_opposition:rezoning_denied","label":"Delay cause: community opposition / rezoning_denied","tracker":"delay"},"delay:litigation:active_litigation":{"id":"delay:litigation:active_litigation","label":"Delay cause: litigation / active_litigation","tracker":"delay"},"delay:permit_challenge:active_litigation":{"id":"delay:permit_challenge:active_litigation","label":"Delay cause: permit challenge / active_litigation","tracker":"delay"},"delay:community_opposition:approved_amid_opposition":{"id":"delay:community_opposition:approved_amid_opposition","label":"Delay cause: community opposition / approved_amid_opposition","tracker":"delay"},"delay:missed_milestones:development_agreement_expired":{"id":"delay:missed_milestones:development_agreement_expired","label":"Delay cause: missed milestones / development_agreement_expired","tracker":"delay"},"delay:financing_delay:development_agreement_expired":{"id":"delay:financing_delay:development_agreement_expired","label":"Delay cause: financing delay / development_agreement_expired","tracker":"delay"},"delay:unresolved_commitments:rezoning_denied":{"id":"delay:unresolved_commitments:rezoning_denied","label":"Delay cause: unresolved commitments / rezoning_denied","tracker":"delay"},"delay:county_moratorium:moratorium_in_force":{"id":"delay:county_moratorium:moratorium_in_force","label":"Delay cause: county moratorium / moratorium_in_force","tracker":"delay"},"delay:county_moratorium:moratorium_extended":{"id":"delay:county_moratorium:moratorium_extended","label":"Delay cause: county moratorium / moratorium_extended","tracker":"delay"},"delay:regulatory_review:regulatory_approval_pending":{"id":"delay:regulatory_review:regulatory_approval_pending","label":"Delay cause: regulatory review / regulatory_approval_pending","tracker":"delay"},"delay:power_allocation_dispute:regulatory_approval_pending":{"id":"delay:power_allocation_dispute:regulatory_approval_pending","label":"Delay cause: power allocation dispute / regulatory_approval_pending","tracker":"delay"},"delay:corporate_reassessment:construction_paused":{"id":"delay:corporate_reassessment:construction_paused","label":"Delay cause: corporate reassessment / construction_paused","tracker":"delay"},"delay:openai_relationship_change:construction_paused":{"id":"delay:openai_relationship_change:construction_paused","label":"Delay cause: openai relationship change / construction_paused","tracker":"delay"},"delay:tariff_costs:construction_paused":{"id":"delay:tariff_costs:construction_paused","label":"Delay cause: tariff costs / construction_paused","tracker":"delay"},"delay:local_moratorium:proposed_amid_local_moratorium_and_ballot_fight":{"id":"delay:local_moratorium:proposed_amid_local_moratorium_and_ballot_fight","label":"Delay cause: local moratorium / proposed_amid_local_moratorium_and_ballot_fight","tracker":"delay"},"delay:ballot_initiative_threat:proposed_amid_local_moratorium_and_ballot_fight":{"id":"delay:ballot_initiative_threat:proposed_amid_local_moratorium_and_ballot_fight","label":"Delay cause: ballot initiative threat / proposed_amid_local_moratorium_and_ballot_fight","tracker":"delay"},"delay:ballot_initiative_threat:signature_gathering":{"id":"delay:ballot_initiative_threat:signature_gathering","label":"Delay cause: ballot initiative threat / signature_gathering","tracker":"delay"},"delay:statewide_moratorium_push:signature_gathering":{"id":"delay:statewide_moratorium_push:signature_gathering","label":"Delay cause: statewide moratorium push / signature_gathering","tracker":"delay"},"delay:environmental_review_challenge:active_litigation":{"id":"delay:environmental_review_challenge:active_litigation","label":"Delay cause: environmental review challenge / active_litigation","tracker":"delay"},"delay:regulatory_collateral_dispute:active_litigation":{"id":"delay:regulatory_collateral_dispute:active_litigation","label":"Delay cause: regulatory collateral dispute / active_litigation","tracker":"delay"},"delay:corporate_reassessment:construction_partially_paused":{"id":"delay:corporate_reassessment:construction_partially_paused","label":"Delay cause: corporate reassessment / construction_partially_paused","tracker":"delay"},"delay:design_changes:construction_partially_paused":{"id":"delay:design_changes:construction_partially_paused","label":"Delay cause: design changes / construction_partially_paused","tracker":"delay"},"delay:community_opposition:under_council_consideration":{"id":"delay:community_opposition:under_council_consideration","label":"Delay cause: community opposition / under_council_consideration","tracker":"delay"},"delay:withdrawal:cancelled":{"id":"delay:withdrawal:cancelled","label":"Delay cause: withdrawal / cancelled","tracker":"delay"},"delay:village_infeasibility_finding:cancelled":{"id":"delay:village_infeasibility_finding:cancelled","label":"Delay cause: village infeasibility finding / cancelled","tracker":"delay"},"delay:litigation:construction_halted_by_court":{"id":"delay:litigation:construction_halted_by_court","label":"Delay cause: litigation / construction_halted_by_court","tracker":"delay"},"delay:environmental_review_inadequate:construction_halted_by_court":{"id":"delay:environmental_review_inadequate:construction_halted_by_court","label":"Delay cause: environmental review inadequate / construction_halted_by_court","tracker":"delay"},"delay:city_moratorium:active_litigation":{"id":"delay:city_moratorium:active_litigation","label":"Delay cause: city moratorium / active_litigation","tracker":"delay"},"delay:environmental_review_pending:final_decision_paused":{"id":"delay:environmental_review_pending:final_decision_paused","label":"Delay cause: environmental review pending / final_decision_paused","tracker":"delay"},"delay:city_moratorium:moratorium_in_force":{"id":"delay:city_moratorium:moratorium_in_force","label":"Delay cause: city moratorium / moratorium_in_force","tracker":"delay"},"delay:planning_commission_denial_recommendation:planning_commission_recommended_denial":{"id":"delay:planning_commission_denial_recommendation:planning_commission_recommended_denial","label":"Delay cause: planning commission denial recommendation / planning_commission_recommended_denial","tracker":"delay"},"delay:community_opposition:opposed_planned":{"id":"delay:community_opposition:opposed_planned","label":"Delay cause: community opposition / opposed_planned","tracker":"delay"},"delay:city_council_resolution_against:opposed_planned":{"id":"delay:city_council_resolution_against:opposed_planned","label":"Delay cause: city council resolution against / opposed_planned","tracker":"delay"},"delay:rezoning_denial:rezoning_denied_then_litigation_settled":{"id":"delay:rezoning_denial:rezoning_denied_then_litigation_settled","label":"Delay cause: rezoning denial / rezoning_denied_then_litigation_settled","tracker":"delay"},"delay:litigation:rezoning_denied_then_litigation_settled":{"id":"delay:litigation:rezoning_denied_then_litigation_settled","label":"Delay cause: litigation / rezoning_denied_then_litigation_settled","tracker":"delay"},"delay:city_moratorium:moratorium_delay":{"id":"delay:city_moratorium:moratorium_delay","label":"Delay cause: city moratorium / moratorium_delay","tracker":"delay"},"delay:community_opposition:moratorium_delay":{"id":"delay:community_opposition:moratorium_delay","label":"Delay cause: community opposition / moratorium_delay","tracker":"delay"},"delay:community_opposition:rezoning_paused":{"id":"delay:community_opposition:rezoning_paused","label":"Delay cause: community opposition / rezoning_paused","tracker":"delay"},"delay:planning_commission_postponement:rezoning_paused":{"id":"delay:planning_commission_postponement:rezoning_paused","label":"Delay cause: planning commission postponement / rezoning_paused","tracker":"delay"},"delay:community_opposition:opposed_proposed":{"id":"delay:community_opposition:opposed_proposed","label":"Delay cause: community opposition / opposed_proposed","tracker":"delay"},"delay:transparency_concerns:opposed_proposed":{"id":"delay:transparency_concerns:opposed_proposed","label":"Delay cause: transparency concerns / opposed_proposed","tracker":"delay"},"delay:litigation:abandoned":{"id":"delay:litigation:abandoned","label":"Delay cause: litigation / abandoned","tracker":"delay"},"delay:community_opposition:abandoned":{"id":"delay:community_opposition:abandoned","label":"Delay cause: community opposition / abandoned","tracker":"delay"},"delay:china_ties_backlash:abandoned":{"id":"delay:china_ties_backlash:abandoned","label":"Delay cause: china ties backlash / abandoned","tracker":"delay"},"delay:wetlands_permit_suspended:active_litigation":{"id":"delay:wetlands_permit_suspended:active_litigation","label":"Delay cause: wetlands permit suspended / active_litigation","tracker":"delay"},"delay:community_opposition:opposed_pending_council_vote":{"id":"delay:community_opposition:opposed_pending_council_vote","label":"Delay cause: community opposition / opposed_pending_council_vote","tracker":"delay"},"delay:community_opposition:opposed_effectively_stalled":{"id":"delay:community_opposition:opposed_effectively_stalled","label":"Delay cause: community opposition / opposed_effectively_stalled","tracker":"delay"},"delay:petition_campaign:opposed_effectively_stalled":{"id":"delay:petition_campaign:opposed_effectively_stalled","label":"Delay cause: petition campaign / opposed_effectively_stalled","tracker":"delay"},"delay:public_notice_violation_alleged:active_litigation":{"id":"delay:public_notice_violation_alleged:active_litigation","label":"Delay cause: public notice violation alleged / active_litigation","tracker":"delay"},"delay:rezoning_denial:withdrawn":{"id":"delay:rezoning_denial:withdrawn","label":"Delay cause: rezoning denial / withdrawn","tracker":"delay"},"delay:no_secured_tenant:withdrawn":{"id":"delay:no_secured_tenant:withdrawn","label":"Delay cause: no secured tenant / withdrawn","tracker":"delay"},"delay:council_opposition:withdrawn":{"id":"delay:council_opposition:withdrawn","label":"Delay cause: council opposition / withdrawn","tracker":"delay"},"delay:eminent_domain_threat:active_litigation":{"id":"delay:eminent_domain_threat:active_litigation","label":"Delay cause: eminent domain threat / active_litigation","tracker":"delay"},"delay:rezoning_denial:rezoning_rejected_moratorium_recommended":{"id":"delay:rezoning_denial:rezoning_rejected_moratorium_recommended","label":"Delay cause: rezoning denial / rezoning_rejected_moratorium_recommended","tracker":"delay"},"delay:county_moratorium_recommended:rezoning_rejected_moratorium_recommended":{"id":"delay:county_moratorium_recommended:rezoning_rejected_moratorium_recommended","label":"Delay cause: county moratorium recommended / rezoning_rejected_moratorium_recommended","tracker":"delay"},"delay:environmental_review_order:active_litigation":{"id":"delay:environmental_review_order:active_litigation","label":"Delay cause: environmental review order / active_litigation","tracker":"delay"},"delay:unpermitted_power_plant:active_litigation":{"id":"delay:unpermitted_power_plant:active_litigation","label":"Delay cause: unpermitted power plant / active_litigation","tracker":"delay"},"delay:community_opposition:under_construction_amid_scrutiny":{"id":"delay:community_opposition:under_construction_amid_scrutiny","label":"Delay cause: community opposition / under_construction_amid_scrutiny","tracker":"delay"},"delay:transparency_concerns:under_construction_amid_scrutiny":{"id":"delay:transparency_concerns:under_construction_amid_scrutiny","label":"Delay cause: transparency concerns / under_construction_amid_scrutiny","tracker":"delay"},"delay:permit_denial:permit_denied":{"id":"delay:permit_denial:permit_denied","label":"Delay cause: permit denial / permit_denied","tracker":"delay"},"delay:community_opposition:permit_denied":{"id":"delay:community_opposition:permit_denied","label":"Delay cause: community opposition / permit_denied","tracker":"delay"},"delay:county_moratorium:permit_denied":{"id":"delay:county_moratorium:permit_denied","label":"Delay cause: county moratorium / permit_denied","tracker":"delay"},"delay:county_moratorium:approved_active_litigation":{"id":"delay:county_moratorium:approved_active_litigation","label":"Delay cause: county moratorium / approved_active_litigation","tracker":"delay"},"delay:litigation:approved_active_litigation":{"id":"delay:litigation:approved_active_litigation","label":"Delay cause: litigation / approved_active_litigation","tracker":"delay"},"delay:community_opposition:approved_active_litigation":{"id":"delay:community_opposition:approved_active_litigation","label":"Delay cause: community opposition / approved_active_litigation","tracker":"delay"},"delay:county_moratorium:delayed_amid_moratorium":{"id":"delay:county_moratorium:delayed_amid_moratorium","label":"Delay cause: county moratorium / delayed_amid_moratorium","tracker":"delay"},"delay:community_opposition:delayed_amid_moratorium":{"id":"delay:community_opposition:delayed_amid_moratorium","label":"Delay cause: community opposition / delayed_amid_moratorium","tracker":"delay"},"delay:public_outcry:tax_incentive_withdrawn":{"id":"delay:public_outcry:tax_incentive_withdrawn","label":"Delay cause: public outcry / tax_incentive_withdrawn","tracker":"delay"},"delay:tax_break_withdrawal:tax_incentive_withdrawn":{"id":"delay:tax_break_withdrawal:tax_incentive_withdrawn","label":"Delay cause: tax break withdrawal / tax_incentive_withdrawn","tracker":"delay"},"delay:permit_denial:denied_without_prejudice":{"id":"delay:permit_denial:denied_without_prejudice","label":"Delay cause: permit denial / denied_without_prejudice","tracker":"delay"},"delay:community_opposition:denied_without_prejudice":{"id":"delay:community_opposition:denied_without_prejudice","label":"Delay cause: community opposition / denied_without_prejudice","tracker":"delay"},"delay:community_opposition:under_construction_amid_opposition":{"id":"delay:community_opposition:under_construction_amid_opposition","label":"Delay cause: community opposition / under_construction_amid_opposition","tracker":"delay"},"delay:transparency_concerns:under_construction_amid_opposition":{"id":"delay:transparency_concerns:under_construction_amid_opposition","label":"Delay cause: transparency concerns / under_construction_amid_opposition","tracker":"delay"},"delay:community_opposition:rumored_no_application_filed":{"id":"delay:community_opposition:rumored_no_application_filed","label":"Delay cause: community opposition / rumored_no_application_filed","tracker":"delay"},"delay:meeting_postponed:rumored_no_application_filed":{"id":"delay:meeting_postponed:rumored_no_application_filed","label":"Delay cause: meeting postponed / rumored_no_application_filed","tracker":"delay"},"delay:community_opposition:moratorium_in_force":{"id":"delay:community_opposition:moratorium_in_force","label":"Delay cause: community opposition / moratorium_in_force","tracker":"delay"},"delay:community_opposition:under_review_no_zoning_process":{"id":"delay:community_opposition:under_review_no_zoning_process","label":"Delay cause: community opposition / under_review_no_zoning_process","tracker":"delay"},"delay:no_local_zoning_framework:under_review_no_zoning_process":{"id":"delay:no_local_zoning_framework:under_review_no_zoning_process","label":"Delay cause: no local zoning framework / under_review_no_zoning_process","tracker":"delay"},"delay:regulatory_transparency_dispute:regulatory_disclosure_dispute":{"id":"delay:regulatory_transparency_dispute:regulatory_disclosure_dispute","label":"Delay cause: regulatory transparency dispute / regulatory_disclosure_dispute","tracker":"delay"},"delay:ratepayer_cost_concerns:regulatory_disclosure_dispute":{"id":"delay:ratepayer_cost_concerns:regulatory_disclosure_dispute","label":"Delay cause: ratepayer cost concerns / regulatory_disclosure_dispute","tracker":"delay"},"delay:noise_nuisance:active_litigation":{"id":"delay:noise_nuisance:active_litigation","label":"Delay cause: noise nuisance / active_litigation","tracker":"delay"},"delay:historic_preservation_conflict:permit_denied":{"id":"delay:historic_preservation_conflict:permit_denied","label":"Delay cause: historic preservation conflict / permit_denied","tracker":"delay"},"delay:community_opposition:under_construction_amid_water_concerns":{"id":"delay:community_opposition:under_construction_amid_water_concerns","label":"Delay cause: community opposition / under_construction_amid_water_concerns","tracker":"delay"},"delay:water_capacity_constraints:under_construction_amid_water_concerns":{"id":"delay:water_capacity_constraints:under_construction_amid_water_concerns","label":"Delay cause: water capacity constraints / under_construction_amid_water_concerns","tracker":"delay"},"delay:city_moratorium_partial_exemption:phase_vote_delayed":{"id":"delay:city_moratorium_partial_exemption:phase_vote_delayed","label":"Delay cause: city moratorium partial exemption / phase_vote_delayed","tracker":"delay"},"delay:planning_commission_delay:phase_vote_delayed":{"id":"delay:planning_commission_delay:phase_vote_delayed","label":"Delay cause: planning commission delay / phase_vote_delayed","tracker":"delay"},"delay:community_opposition:approved_expanded_amid_opposition":{"id":"delay:community_opposition:approved_expanded_amid_opposition","label":"Delay cause: community opposition / approved_expanded_amid_opposition","tracker":"delay"},"delay:noise_regulation_review:approved_expanded_amid_opposition":{"id":"delay:noise_regulation_review:approved_expanded_amid_opposition","label":"Delay cause: noise regulation review / approved_expanded_amid_opposition","tracker":"delay"},"delay:multi_year_construction_delay:delayed_extension_requested":{"id":"delay:multi_year_construction_delay:delayed_extension_requested","label":"Delay cause: multi year construction delay / delayed_extension_requested","tracker":"delay"},"delay:design_changes:delayed_extension_requested":{"id":"delay:design_changes:delayed_extension_requested","label":"Delay cause: design changes / delayed_extension_requested","tracker":"delay"},"delay:county_moratorium_neighboring:early_stage_amid_county_moratoriums":{"id":"delay:county_moratorium_neighboring:early_stage_amid_county_moratoriums","label":"Delay cause: county moratorium neighboring / early_stage_amid_county_moratoriums","tracker":"delay"},"delay:regulatory_review:permitting_challenged":{"id":"delay:regulatory_review:permitting_challenged","label":"Delay cause: regulatory review / permitting_challenged","tracker":"delay"},"delay:environmental_petition:permitting_challenged":{"id":"delay:environmental_petition:permitting_challenged","label":"Delay cause: environmental petition / permitting_challenged","tracker":"delay"},"delay:utility_interconnection_timing:abandoned":{"id":"delay:utility_interconnection_timing:abandoned","label":"Delay cause: utility interconnection timing / abandoned","tracker":"delay"},"delay:withdrawal:abandoned":{"id":"delay:withdrawal:abandoned","label":"Delay cause: withdrawal / abandoned","tracker":"delay"},"delay:zoning_approval_challenge:active_litigation":{"id":"delay:zoning_approval_challenge:active_litigation","label":"Delay cause: zoning approval challenge / active_litigation","tracker":"delay"},"delay:litigation:zoning_request_paused_active_litigation":{"id":"delay:litigation:zoning_request_paused_active_litigation","label":"Delay cause: litigation / zoning_request_paused_active_litigation","tracker":"delay"},"delay:council_agenda_removal:zoning_request_paused_active_litigation":{"id":"delay:council_agenda_removal:zoning_request_paused_active_litigation","label":"Delay cause: council agenda removal / zoning_request_paused_active_litigation","tracker":"delay"},"delay:environmental_concerns:zoning_request_paused_active_litigation":{"id":"delay:environmental_concerns:zoning_request_paused_active_litigation","label":"Delay cause: environmental concerns / zoning_request_paused_active_litigation","tracker":"delay"},"delay:litigation:active_litigation_temporary_block":{"id":"delay:litigation:active_litigation_temporary_block","label":"Delay cause: litigation / active_litigation_temporary_block","tracker":"delay"},"delay:state_law_ownership_ban:active_litigation_temporary_block":{"id":"delay:state_law_ownership_ban:active_litigation_temporary_block","label":"Delay cause: state law ownership ban / active_litigation_temporary_block","tracker":"delay"},"delay:quorum_court_rejection:moratorium_exemption_rejected":{"id":"delay:quorum_court_rejection:moratorium_exemption_rejected","label":"Delay cause: quorum court rejection / moratorium_exemption_rejected","tracker":"delay"},"delay:county_moratorium_dispute:moratorium_exemption_rejected":{"id":"delay:county_moratorium_dispute:moratorium_exemption_rejected","label":"Delay cause: county moratorium dispute / moratorium_exemption_rejected","tracker":"delay"},"delay:litigation:active_litigation_records_dispute":{"id":"delay:litigation:active_litigation_records_dispute","label":"Delay cause: litigation / active_litigation_records_dispute","tracker":"delay"},"delay:public_records_dispute:active_litigation_records_dispute":{"id":"delay:public_records_dispute:active_litigation_records_dispute","label":"Delay cause: public records dispute / active_litigation_records_dispute","tracker":"delay"},"delay:litigation:delayed":{"id":"delay:litigation:delayed","label":"Delay cause: litigation / delayed","tracker":"delay"},"delay:permit_denial:delayed":{"id":"delay:permit_denial:delayed","label":"Delay cause: permit denial / delayed","tracker":"delay"},"delay:local_moratorium:cancelled":{"id":"delay:local_moratorium:cancelled","label":"Delay cause: local moratorium / cancelled","tracker":"delay"},"delay:tax_incentive_change:under_appeal":{"id":"delay:tax_incentive_change:under_appeal","label":"Delay cause: tax incentive change / under_appeal","tracker":"delay"},"delay:litigation:halted":{"id":"delay:litigation:halted","label":"Delay cause: litigation / halted","tracker":"delay"},"delay:environmental_review:halted":{"id":"delay:environmental_review:halted","label":"Delay cause: environmental review / halted","tracker":"delay"},"delay:local_moratorium:halted":{"id":"delay:local_moratorium:halted","label":"Delay cause: local moratorium / halted","tracker":"delay"},"delay:water_dispute:halted":{"id":"delay:water_dispute:halted","label":"Delay cause: water dispute / halted","tracker":"delay"},"delay:tax_incentive_change:halted":{"id":"delay:tax_incentive_change:halted","label":"Delay cause: tax incentive change / halted","tracker":"delay"},"delay:community_opposition:halted":{"id":"delay:community_opposition:halted","label":"Delay cause: community opposition / halted","tracker":"delay"},"delay:tax_incentive_change:litigation_active":{"id":"delay:tax_incentive_change:litigation_active","label":"Delay cause: tax incentive change / litigation_active","tracker":"delay"},"delay:corporate_realignment:delayed":{"id":"delay:corporate_realignment:delayed","label":"Delay cause: corporate realignment / delayed","tracker":"delay"},"delay:tax_incentive_change:cancelled":{"id":"delay:tax_incentive_change:cancelled","label":"Delay cause: tax incentive change / cancelled","tracker":"delay"},"delay:financing:litigation_active":{"id":"delay:financing:litigation_active","label":"Delay cause: financing / litigation_active","tracker":"delay"},"delay:state_moratorium:halted":{"id":"delay:state_moratorium:halted","label":"Delay cause: state moratorium / halted","tracker":"delay"},"delay:state_moratorium:litigation_active":{"id":"delay:state_moratorium:litigation_active","label":"Delay cause: state moratorium / litigation_active","tracker":"delay"},"delay:state_moratorium:cancelled":{"id":"delay:state_moratorium:cancelled","label":"Delay cause: state moratorium / cancelled","tracker":"delay"},"delay:water_dispute:withdrawn":{"id":"delay:water_dispute:withdrawn","label":"Delay cause: water dispute / withdrawn","tracker":"delay"},"delay:interconnection_queue:halted":{"id":"delay:interconnection_queue:halted","label":"Delay cause: interconnection queue / halted","tracker":"delay"},"delay:interconnection:cancelled":{"id":"delay:interconnection:cancelled","label":"Delay cause: interconnection / cancelled","tracker":"delay"},"delay:financing:cancelled":{"id":"delay:financing:cancelled","label":"Delay cause: financing / cancelled","tracker":"delay"},"delay:interconnection:denied":{"id":"delay:interconnection:denied","label":"Delay cause: interconnection / denied","tracker":"delay"},"delay:water:cancelled":{"id":"delay:water:cancelled","label":"Delay cause: water / cancelled","tracker":"delay"},"delay:water:denied":{"id":"delay:water:denied","label":"Delay cause: water / denied","tracker":"delay"},"delay:zoning_denial:halted":{"id":"delay:zoning_denial:halted","label":"Delay cause: zoning denial / halted","tracker":"delay"},"delay:permit_denial:halted":{"id":"delay:permit_denial:halted","label":"Delay cause: permit denial / halted","tracker":"delay"},"delay:council_vote_delay:final_vote_delayed":{"id":"delay:council_vote_delay:final_vote_delayed","label":"Delay cause: council vote delay / final_vote_delayed","tracker":"delay"},"delay:community_opposition:final_vote_delayed":{"id":"delay:community_opposition:final_vote_delayed","label":"Delay cause: community opposition / final_vote_delayed","tracker":"delay"},"utility:tariff:pending":{"id":"utility:tariff:pending","label":"Utility action: tariff / pending","tracker":"delay"},"utility:statement:pending":{"id":"utility:statement:pending","label":"Utility action: statement / pending","tracker":"delay"},"utility:tariff:contested":{"id":"utility:tariff:contested","label":"Utility action: tariff / contested","tracker":"delay"},"utility:other:pending":{"id":"utility:other:pending","label":"Utility action: other / pending","tracker":"delay"},"utility:tariff:approved":{"id":"utility:tariff:approved","label":"Utility action: tariff / approved","tracker":"delay"},"utility:rate case:approved":{"id":"utility:rate case:approved","label":"Utility action: rate case / approved","tracker":"delay"},"utility:special contract:approved":{"id":"utility:special contract:approved","label":"Utility action: special contract / approved","tracker":"delay"},"utility:rate case:pending":{"id":"utility:rate case:pending","label":"Utility action: rate case / pending","tracker":"delay"},"utility:special contract:denied":{"id":"utility:special contract:denied","label":"Utility action: special contract / denied","tracker":"delay"},"utility:statement:contested":{"id":"utility:statement:contested","label":"Utility action: statement / contested","tracker":"delay"},"utility:IRP:contested":{"id":"utility:IRP:contested","label":"Utility action: IRP / contested","tracker":"delay"},"utility:complaint:contested":{"id":"utility:complaint:contested","label":"Utility action: complaint / contested","tracker":"delay"},"utility:statement:approved":{"id":"utility:statement:approved","label":"Utility action: statement / approved","tracker":"delay"},"utility:IRP:pending":{"id":"utility:IRP:pending","label":"Utility action: IRP / pending","tracker":"delay"},"utility:special contract:pending":{"id":"utility:special contract:pending","label":"Utility action: special contract / pending","tracker":"delay"},"utility:other:approved":{"id":"utility:other:approved","label":"Utility action: other / approved","tracker":"delay"},"utility:other:contested":{"id":"utility:other:contested","label":"Utility action: other / contested","tracker":"delay"},"utility:IRP:approved":{"id":"utility:IRP:approved","label":"Utility action: IRP / approved","tracker":"delay"},"utility:tariff:denied":{"id":"utility:tariff:denied","label":"Utility action: tariff / denied","tracker":"delay"},"utility:certificate:approved":{"id":"utility:certificate:approved","label":"Utility action: certificate / approved","tracker":"delay"},"utility:policy:approved":{"id":"utility:policy:approved","label":"Utility action: policy / approved","tracker":"delay"},"utility:policy:effective":{"id":"utility:policy:effective","label":"Utility action: policy / effective","tracker":"delay"},"utility:tariff:effective":{"id":"utility:tariff:effective","label":"Utility action: tariff / effective","tracker":"delay"},"utility:policy:rejected":{"id":"utility:policy:rejected","label":"Utility action: policy / rejected","tracker":"delay"},"utility:policy:pending":{"id":"utility:policy:pending","label":"Utility action: policy / pending","tracker":"delay"},"utility:rate_case:pending":{"id":"utility:rate_case:pending","label":"Utility action: rate_case / pending","tracker":"delay"},"utility:other:denied":{"id":"utility:other:denied","label":"Utility action: other / denied","tracker":"delay"},"utility:other:effective":{"id":"utility:other:effective","label":"Utility action: other / effective","tracker":"delay"}},"warnings":[],"credits":["6abc Philadelphia","AEP Ohio Transmission Company (filed with Ohio Power Siting Board)","AI GridWatch moratorium tracker, CC BY 4.0 (aigridwatch.com)","Alabama Reflector","Alaska Beacon","American Transmission Company LLC (filed with PSC of Wisconsin)","Americus Times-Recorder","Arizona Mirror","Arkansas Advocate","Axios Pro Energy","Bisnow","Bisnow National","Bradenton Herald","CNBC Technology","Cardinal News VA","Central Florida Public Media","Chesterfield County public permit records","Chicago Construction News","City of Atlanta public permit records","City of Austin issued construction permits open data","City of Buckeye public permit records","City of Chandler public permit records","City of Charlotte public permit records","City of Chicago building permits open data","City of Fort Worth public permit records","City of Goodyear public permit records","City of Hillsboro public permit records","City of Mesa building permits open data","City of Mesa public permit records","City of Minneapolis construction permits (CCS) open data","City of Papillion public permit records","City of Phoenix public permit records","City of Red Oak public permit records","City of Reno public permit records","City of San Antonio public permit records","City of Statesboro, Georgia","City of Temple, Texas","Clearfield City Council (Utah Public Notice Website)","Colorado Newsline","Colorado Public Radio","Congress.gov (Library of Congress, public domain)","ConstructConnect News","Construction Dive","CourtListener DataCenter Dockets","CourtListener Opinions","Data Center Dynamics","Data Center Dynamics news","DataCenterTracker.org, CC BY 4.0","Dominion Energy Virginia","EIN News","East Bay Insiders Newsletter","Energy Central","FOX19 | Cincinnati","FOX5 Vegas","FOX6 News Milwaukee","Facilities Dive","Fairfax County public permit records","Florida Phoenix","Georgia Department of Community Affairs","Georgia EPD air permit records","Georgia Recorder","GovTech","Greensboro News and Record","Grist","Idaho Capital Sun","Illinois EPA air permit records","Indiana Capital Chronicle","Indiana Department of Environmental Management","Indiana IDEM air permit records","InkFreeNews.com","Iowa Capital Dispatch","Iowa DNR air permit records","KERA News","KEYC News Now","KGW","KRON4","Kansas City MO city issued permits open data","Kansas Reflector","Kentucky Lantern","Law360","Law360 Energy","LegiScan (legiscan.com) and the state legislature","Lehigh Valley Planning Commission","Local News Matters","Loudoun County public permit records","Loudoun Times-Mirror","Louisiana DEQ air permit records","Louisiana Illuminator","Maine Morning Star","Maricopa County Air Quality Department air permit records","Maricopa County public permit records","Maryland Matters","Mecklenburg County public permit records","Michigan Advance","Mid Bay News","Missouri Independent","Montana Free Press","NBC Bay Area","NBC4 Washington","NC Newsline","Native News Online","Nebraska Examiner","Nevada Current","Nevada NDEP air permit records","New Hampshire Bulletin","New Mexico Environment Department","North Carolina DEQ Division of Air Quality air permit records","North Dakota Department of Environmental Quality","North Dakota Monitor","Ohio Capital Journal","Ohio EPA air permit records","Oklahoma DEQ air permit records","Oklahoma Voice","OpenStates v3 (openstates.org), CC BY 4.0","Oregon Capital Chronicle","Orlando Sentinel","Pennsylvania Capital-Star","Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection","Pennsylvania Office of Consumer Advocate (filed with PA PUC)","Pioneer Press","Prince William County public permit records","Public Service Commission of Wisconsin","Public record (Legistar Web API, Granicus)","Rhode Island Current","Route Fifty","SEC EDGAR company submissions, public domain","SEC EDGAR full-text search, public domain","Searchlight New Mexico","Smithfield Township, Monroe County, PA","Source New Mexico","South Carolina Department of Environmental Services","South Dakota Searchlight","Springfield Daily Citizen","Stafford County public permit records","Statesman Journal","Strisker data center notes","Tennessee Lookout","Texas Commission on Environmental Quality","Texas TCEQ air permit records","The Baltimore Banner","The Current (GA)","The Detroit News","The Hill Energy","The North State Journal","The Pantagraph","The Real Deal","The Register","The Texas Tribune","The Verge","Times-Standard","Town of Culpeper public permit records","Tuscaloosa Thread","U.S. EPA ECHO","Union-Bulletin","Uprise RI","Utah Division of Air Quality","Utah Division of Air Quality air permit records","Utah News Dispatch","Utah Public Radio","Utility Dive","Virginia Business","Virginia DEQ air permit records","Virginia Electric and Power Company (filed with Virginia SCC)","Virginia Mercury","Visalia Times-Delta","WBUR","WCPO 9 Cincinnati","WGLT","WHEC.com","WJON","WKYT","WLOS","WLUK","WPBF","WQCS","WRAL (NC)","WUNC News","WVPE","Washington County public permit records","Washington Ecology air permit records","Washington State SEPA Register public permit records","Washington State Standard","Washoe County public permit records","Wausau Pilot & Review","West Virginia Watch","Winston-Salem Journal","Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources","Wisconsin Examiner","Yale Daily News","citybiz","contracosta.news","ictnews.org","indianapublicradio.org","inkfreenews.com","lex18.com","mountaintimesoregon.com","newmedia-wi.com","newscentermaine.com","thegazette.com","tuscaloosathread.com","wcpo.com","www.cities929.com"],"omitted":{"unverified_or_pending":1013,"no_explicit_state":136},"revision":"8bbc0d7f56a15216","trackers":{"policy":{"label":"Policy provisions","url":"#policy-governance"},"moratorium":{"label":"Restrictions & moratoriums","url":"/data-center-moratorium-tracker"},"delay":{"label":"Delays & utility actions","url":"/data-center-delay-tracker"},"water":{"label":"Water measures","url":"/data-center-water-tracker"},"atlas":{"label":"Projects & capital","url":"/data-center-capital-atlas"},"permits":{"label":"Permits & facilities","url":"/data-center-permits-tracker"},"grid":{"label":"Grid operator rules","url":"/data-center-grid-operator-watchlist"}},"selected":{"id":"CA","name":"California","records":[{"id":"f8c2e3dbaad75c75","state":"CA","tracker":"atlas","section":"at_risk","title":"2805 Bowers","summary":"5-month delay","scope":"Record-specific: Santa Clara","status":"delayed","date":"2024-25","sources":[{"url":"https://www.datacenterwatch.org/report","label":"Data Center Watch"}],"parties":[{"role":"Developer","name":"GI Partners"}],"groups":[],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"ecda979373321f42","state":"CA","tracker":"atlas","section":"at_risk","title":"750 N. Nash Street data center","summary":"Eight Form proposed replacing a Hyatt Place hotel at 750 N. Nash Street with a 160-foot, five-story data center and dedicated substation. The developer withdrew the proposal on 9 July 2026 at a contentious Planning Commission hearing. Opposition centered on the project's electricity demand.","scope":"Record-specific: City of El Segundo","status":"withdrawn","date":"Withdrawn 9 July 2026","sources":[{"url":"https://smmirror.com/developer-drops-el-segundo-data-center-plan-after-power-consumption-backlash/","label":"Santa Monica Mirror"}],"parties":[{"role":"Developer","name":"Eight Form"}],"groups":[],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"176e23b5cf24afbd","state":"CA","tracker":"atlas","section":"at_risk","title":"Alhambra data center moratorium","summary":"Alhambra, California, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated June 2026. Ordinance O2M26-4863 (effective 1 August 2026) prohibits data centers in office and industrial zones. Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval (Resolution 26-07). Measure DB on the 3 November 2026 ballot would extend the ban to all zones and lock it into the city charter, requiring voter approval to reverse. If passed, Alhambra would be the second CA city after Monterey Park to enact a voter-approved permanent ban. The measure has no end date by design.","scope":"Record-specific: Alhambra","status":"moratorium","date":"Enacted June 2026","sources":[{"url":"https://laist.com/news/alhambra-ballot-measure-data-center-ban-2026","label":"laist.com"}],"parties":[],"groups":[],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"e903452b58d4963f","state":"CA","tracker":"atlas","section":"at_risk","title":"Arcata 45-day data center moratorium","summary":"The Arcata City Council voted 5-0 on Wednesday 16 September 2026 to adopt an interim urgency ordinance halting the receipt, processing or approval of land-use applications for data centers for 45 days, effective immediately. Staff said the city code has no definition or regulatory framework for data centers. The council may extend the moratorium for up to 10 months and 15 days, and then for a further 12 months.","scope":"Record-specific: Arcata City Council","status":"moratorium","date":"Adopted 5-0 on 16 September 2026; 45 days, extendable; single outlet","sources":[{"url":"https://www.times-standard.com/2026/09/17/arcata-city-council-oks-45-day-moratorium-for-data-centers/","label":"Times-Standard"}],"parties":[{"role":"Developer","name":"n.a."}],"groups":[],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"ac49c66981e73ef9","state":"CA","tracker":"atlas","section":"at_risk","title":"Brawley temporary data center moratorium","summary":"The Brawley City Council voted 3-2 on Tuesday 19 May 2026 to approve a temporary moratorium on large-scale data centers within city limits, with Councilmembers Kelley and Grass dissenting. Council members described a one-year pause to define data centers in the city code and study environmental, fiscal and infrastructure impacts. The vote followed a similar pause in neighboring Calipatria.","scope":"Record-specific: Brawley City Council","status":"moratorium","date":"Approved 3-2 on 19 May 2026; described as one year; single outlet","sources":[{"url":"https://www.thedesertreview.com/business/brawley-council-approves-moratorium-on-data-center/article_702beb39-c98b-4e10-8024-c0eb5466ad19.html","label":"The Desert Review"}],"parties":[{"role":"Developer","name":"n.a."}],"groups":[],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"3087400c14d94a3e","state":"CA","tracker":"atlas","section":"at_risk","title":"Calaveras County 45-day data center moratorium","summary":"The Calaveras County Board of Supervisors approved a 45-day moratorium on data center construction by 4-0 on 25 August 2026, with Board Chair Benjamin Stopper absent. The moratorium covers all data centers, including those under 5,000 square feet, and can be extended for up to two years. Planning Director Bret Sampson said county ordinances do not address data centers; the board directed staff to study allowing smaller data centers as a secondary use.","scope":"Record-specific: Calaveras County Board of Supervisors","status":"moratorium","date":"Approved 4-0 on 25 August 2026; 45 days, extendable up to two years; single outlet","sources":[{"url":"https://mymotherlode.com/news/local/11092598/calaveras-data-center-moratorium-passes-4-0.html","label":"myMotherLode.com"}],"parties":[{"role":"Developer","name":"n.a."}],"groups":[],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"76ea6dd737d112ad","state":"CA","tracker":"atlas","section":"at_risk","title":"Calexico permanent data center ban","summary":"City Council adopted a permanent citywide data center ban on second reading 3-0 on Wednesday 16 September 2026, adding Article XII to Chapter 17.11; it takes effect 30 days after adoption. It is the third such ban in California after Monterey Park and Coachella.","scope":"Record-specific: City of Calexico","status":"moratorium","date":"Permanent ban adopted 16 September 2026; effective 30 days later","sources":[{"url":"https://calexicochronicle.com/2026/09/18/calexico-enacts-permanent-data-center-ban/","label":"Calexico Chronicle"},{"url":"https://www.imperialvalleyweekly.com/news/calexico-enacts-permanent-data-center-ban/article_0ec06c6c-54c0-4e62-8fbb-1b1a98f8a93b.html","label":"Imperial Valley Weekly"}],"parties":[],"groups":[],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"0b5923b75bd7fac4","state":"CA","tracker":"atlas","section":"at_risk","title":"Coachella Valley Technology Campus (400+ acres, six data centers)","summary":"Campus shelved; moratorium extended to ~one year; permanent-ban draft approved by Planning Commission On 26 August 2026 the Coachella City Council unanimously adopted Ordinance No. 1231, a permanent ban on data centers within city limits, after approving a first reading on 12 August. Accessory server rooms are exempt. The ordinance takes effect 30 days after adoption. KESQ described the campus site as 240-plus acres near Fillmore Street and Avenue 52.","scope":"Record-specific: Coachella","status":"moratorium","date":"45-day moratorium and developer agreement cancellation 4 June 2026; permanent ban (Ordinance No. 1231) adopted 26 August 2026","sources":[{"url":"https://www.interconnectedcapital.com/research/data-center-moratoriums","label":"Interconnected Capital"},{"url":"https://kesq.com/news/2026/08/25/coachella-city-council-passes-permanent-ban-on-data-centers/","label":"KESQ"}],"parties":[],"groups":[],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"a90fd56aa0e60d08","state":"CA","tracker":"atlas","section":"at_risk","title":"Desert Hot Springs data center moratorium","summary":"Desert Hot Springs, California, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated June 2026. 45-day urgency ordinance extended unanimously on Jul 7 by 22 months 15 days, the full two years California law allows. The measure runs to 17 June 2028.","scope":"Record-specific: Desert Hot Springs","status":"moratorium","date":"Enacted June 2026","sources":[{"url":"https://riversiderecord.org/desert-hot-springs-data-center-moratorium-extended/","label":"riversiderecord.org"}],"parties":[],"groups":[],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"50238c3edcea59df","state":"CA","tracker":"atlas","section":"sites","title":"Digital Realty SJC37, 641 Walsh Ave.","summary":"A four-story facility whose construction began six years before reporting stands with a finished exterior and no equipment installed, waiting on power, and could be years from operation. waiting on power; Silicon Valley Power's $450M system upgrade serving Digital Realty and Stack is scheduled for completion in 2028  capacity n.a. in source","scope":"Record-specific: Santa Clara","status":"complete_unenergized","date":"construction began six years before reporting; could be years from operation","sources":[{"url":"https://insider.govtech.com/california/news/silicon-valleys-ai-boom-hits-a-wall-data-centers-are-built-but-cant-turn-on","label":"GovTech"},{"url":"https://www.latimes.com/business/story/2025-11-10/data-centers-in-nvidias-hometown-stand-empty-awaiting-power","label":"LA Times"}],"parties":[{"role":"Entity","name":"digital-realty"}],"groups":[],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"c09997b8839af496","state":"CA","tracker":"atlas","section":"sites","title":"Digital Realty Santa Clara four-story building (completed 2024)","summary":"A separate DLR four-story Santa Clara building completed in 2024 is not operating for lack of power and is expected to be fully operational only around 2027. not operating for lack of power  capacity n.a. in source","scope":"Record-specific: Santa Clara","status":"complete_unenergized","date":"completed 2024; expected fully operational around 2027","sources":[{"url":"https://www.mk.co.kr/en/it/12066054","label":"Maeil Business Newspaper"}],"parties":[{"role":"Entity","name":"digital-realty"}],"groups":[],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"c787c769f3613c4c","state":"CA","tracker":"atlas","section":"at_risk","title":"Dixon 45-day data center and battery storage moratorium","summary":"At a special meeting on Wednesday 30 September 2026 the Dixon City Council voted unanimously to impose a 45-day urgency moratorium on approving new land-use applications for data centers, also covering battery energy storage systems, while staff review impacts on water, air, noise and the tax base. There are no data center projects proposed or established in the city. Council members said the moratorium will likely be extended; state law allows two further extensions with a four-fifths vote.","scope":"Record-specific: Dixon City Council","status":"moratorium","date":"Adopted unanimously 30 September 2026 at a special meeting; effective immediately for 45 days, extendable","sources":[{"url":"https://fox40.com/news/local-news/solano-county/dixon-data-center-moratorium/","label":"FOX40 KTXL"},{"url":"https://www.kcra.com/article/dixon-city-council-vote-temporary-pause-data-center-development/73957997","label":"KCRA"}],"parties":[{"role":"Developer","name":"n.a."}],"groups":[],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"0cb1136bf9d2c262","state":"CA","tracker":"atlas","section":"at_risk","title":"El Monte data center moratorium","summary":"El Monte, California, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated March 2026. Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 3063 (45-day moratorium); extended Apr 22 by Ordinance No. 3065 (7-0) for 10 months 15 days under Gov. Code 65858. Prohibits accepting or processing new data center land use applications. The measure runs to 2 February 2027.","scope":"Record-specific: El Monte","status":"moratorium","date":"Enacted March 2026","sources":[{"url":"https://www.ci.el-monte.ca.us/AgendaCenter/ViewFile/Agenda/_03182026-1367","label":"ci.el-monte.ca.us"}],"parties":[],"groups":[],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"762408ed184a4e5d","state":"CA","tracker":"atlas","section":"at_risk","title":"Escondido 45-day AI data center moratorium","summary":"The Escondido City Council unanimously approved a 45-day urgency moratorium on 26 August 2026 prohibiting new data centers and the expansion or intensification of existing facilities. It can be extended by 10 months and 15 days and then up to another year. Staff are to return with findings by 10 October 2026. The city said the measure was proactive and not prompted by a proposal.","scope":"Record-specific: City of Escondido","status":"moratorium","date":"Approved unanimously 26 August 2026; 45 days, extendable","sources":[{"url":"https://thecoastnews.com/escondido-temporarily-bans-new-ai-data-centers/","label":"The Coast News"}],"parties":[],"groups":[],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"9d5c2c4f9c1c21ab","state":"CA","tracker":"atlas","section":"at_risk","title":"Eureka 45-day data center moratorium","summary":"The Eureka City Council voted unanimously on Tuesday 1 September 2026 to adopt an urgency ordinance establishing a 45-day moratorium on data center siting in the city's inland and coastal zones, effective immediately. City staff will develop zoning standards and regulatory controls, and the council can extend the moratorium for up to two years. City Manager Miles Slattery said the city has no applications but has had inquiries about properties within city limits.","scope":"Record-specific: Eureka City Council","status":"moratorium","date":"Adopted unanimously 1 September 2026; 45 days, extendable up to two years; single outlet","sources":[{"url":"https://lostcoastoutpost.com/2026/sep/2/eureka-city-council-approved-temporary-ban-data-ce/","label":"Lost Coast Outpost"}],"parties":[{"role":"Developer","name":"n.a."}],"groups":[],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"6594745a68964155","state":"CA","tracker":"atlas","section":"at_risk","title":"Fresno proposed 10-year data center ban","summary":"On 3 September 2026 the Fresno City Council unanimously directed staff to draft a text amendment banning data centers for 10 years. The ban would apply to current city land and future annexations, and council must be notified immediately of any data center use application. The planning director said the amendment could take a few months to a year. The ban itself has not been adopted.","scope":"Record-specific: City of Fresno","status":"other","date":"Staff directed 3 September 2026; ban not yet adopted","sources":[{"url":"https://sjvsun.com/uncategorized/fresno-takes-steps-to-ban-data-centers-for-10-years/","label":"SJV Sun"},{"url":"https://www.fresnobee.com/article317121178.html","label":"The Fresno Bee"},{"url":"https://thebusinessjournal.com/fresno-data-center-ban-council-safeguards/","label":"The Business Journal"}],"parties":[],"groups":[],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"0d9be1d3166cc567","state":"CA","tracker":"atlas","section":"at_risk","title":"Gilroy 45-day data center moratorium","summary":"Gilroy City Council voted unanimously on 14 September 2026 to adopt a 45-day interim urgency ordinance barring the city from accepting, processing or approving applications and entitlements for new data centers. The moratorium expires 29 October 2026 unless renewed and can be extended to a total of two years under California Government Code Section 65858. It does not apply to the Amazon data center under construction on a 56-acre site at 8050 Camino Arroyo, approved in 2025 by the community development director. Staff will return with objective zoning, development and operational standards covering water, grid capacity, backup generator emissions and noise.","scope":"Record-specific: City of Gilroy","status":"moratorium","date":"Adopted unanimously on 14 September 2026; expires 29 October 2026 unless extended (maximum two years)","sources":[{"url":"https://sanjosespotlight.com/gilroy-council-approves-temporary-ban-on-new-data-centers/","label":"San Jose Spotlight"},{"url":"https://gilroydispatch.com/gilroy-city-council-adopts-moratorium-on-new-data-centers/","label":"Gilroy Dispatch"}],"parties":[{"role":"Developer","name":"Amazon (exempt project); second pre-application unnamed in one report"}],"groups":[],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"98f39fa8e2255ab3","state":"CA","tracker":"atlas","section":"at_risk","title":"Imperial Valley Computer Manufacturing campus","summary":"The project would be the largest data center in California at roughly 950,000 square feet, with a power draw that KPBS reports as approaching double Imperial County's entire 2024 electricity consumption, its own substation, a large battery system and a natural gas generator bank for backup, and a water demand of 750,000 gallons per day. It was promoted as producing 2,500 construction jobs and $28.7M a year in tax revenue, and the developer states the county's economic study found $100 million a year in county-directed public benefits. The developer, Imperial Valley Computer Manufacturing LLC of Huntington Beach, sought to avoid environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act in order to begin construction quickly. On 7 April 2026 the Board of Supervisors approved a lot merger for the project by 4-1, with Supervisor Martha Cardenas-Singh dissenting. County planners described the lot merger as the only step where the county has discretion over whether the project moves forward, and stated that the project cannot receive a certificate of occupancy until the developer secures confirmed power and water supplies. County officials restricted residents from entering the hearing citing fire safety limits, and deputies removed at least three protesters. Opponents raised grid strain, water depletion, air quality and the absence of environmental analysis; the group NIMBY Imperial began a recall effort against Supervisor Peggy Price and collected signatures for a November ballot measure to ban data centers on unincorporated county land. The City of Imperial sought an emergency court order to halt the April vote and is suing the county. Supervisors had earlier approved a parcel merger and then imposed a moratorium after public outcry. The developer has separately sued the City of Imperial in federal court. On 1 September 2026 Imperial County Superior Court Judge L. Brooks Anderholt issued a tentative decision finding that the county prejudicially abused its discretion by approving the lot merger without first completing the CEQA review required for the whole project, writing that the grading, lot merger, road vacation, electrical facilities, water systems and related infrastructure serve one objective, the construction and operation of the data center campus. County planners must restart the approval process and complete a full Environmental Impact Report addressing energy demand, water supply and drainage, the battery system, and the pollution and greenhouse gas potential of the natural gas generators. The decision is tentative and both parties may comment before a final ruling. The developer said it would seek a hearing to contest the findings. Alene Taber, counsel for the City of Imperial, said the decision vindicates residents' concerns. Separately, Judge Jeffrey Jones issued a preliminary decision in August 2026 indicating he would strike down the county's emergency data center moratorium for want of evidence of an immediate threat to public health or safety, and the county has confirmed it was directed to set the moratorium aside. KPBS notes that Anderholt's documentation of environmental risk may strengthen the county's case for reimposing moratorium protections. On 9 September 2026 the ruling became final: Judge Anderholt set aside the lot merger approval granted by the Imperial County Board of Supervisors in April 2026, and county planners must restart the approval process and complete a full CEQA environmental review before the project can proceed. The suit was brought by the City of Imperial and the San Diego and Imperial Counties chapter of the Sierra Club. KPBS reports the developer, identified as Sebastian Rucci of Huntington Beach, said he plans to appeal the decision and to explore alternative project locations further from residential areas.","scope":"Record-specific: Imperial County (near city of Imperial)","status":"court_halt","date":"Parcel merger approved and moratorium imposed April 2026; lot merger approved 4-1 on 7 April 2026; county moratorium set aside by court order August 2026; tentative CEQA ruling 1 September 2026; final ruling setting aside the lot merger 9 September 2026, appeal signalled","sources":[{"url":"https://apnews.com/article/imperial-data-center-hyperscale-moratorium-conflict-a029128eb2458c3c197010ecbedb0cd8","label":"Apnews"},{"url":"https://inewsource.org/2026/04/05/data-center-developer-imperial-county/","label":"Inewsource"},{"url":"https://www.kpbs.org/news/politics/2026/06/17/after-months-of-public-pressure-imperial-county-passes-temporary-moratorium-on-data-centers","label":"KPBS"},{"url":"https://www.yahoo.com/news/us/articles/california-hits-pause-could-biggest-031900686.html","label":"Yahoo"},{"url":"https://calexicochronicle.com/2026/01/12/developer-of-10b-data-center-sues-city-of-imperial-in-fed-court/","label":"Calexico Chronicle"},{"url":"https://www.kpbs.org/news/environment/2026/09/01/judge-preparing-to-halt-massive-imperial-county-data-center-order-environmental-review","label":"KPBS"},{"url":"https://www.datacenterknowledge.com/data-center-construction/california-judge-orders-full-environmental-review-of-330-mw-data-center","label":"Data Center Knowledge"},{"url":"https://imperialcounty.org/2026/08/icdcmoratorium2026/","label":"Imperial County"},{"url":"https://www.kpbs.org/news/environment/2026/08/28/judge-poised-to-strike-down-imperial-countys-data-center-moratorium","label":"KPBS"},{"url":"https://www.kpbs.org/news/environment/2026/04/07/imperial-county-supervisors-clear-path-for-massive-data-center-complex-amid-fierce-opposition","label":"KPBS, 7 April 2026"},{"url":"https://www.kpbs.org/news/environment/2026/09/09/court-overturns-approval-of-imperial-county-data-center-orders-environmental-review","label":"KPBS, 9 September 2026"}],"parties":[{"role":"Developer","name":"Imperial Valley Computer Manufacturing, LLC"}],"groups":[],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"2b1e78ab23314f02","state":"CA","tracker":"atlas","section":"at_risk","title":"Indio data center moratorium extension","summary":"The Indio City Council voted unanimously to extend its temporary moratorium on new data center developments, first adopted as a 45-day urgency ordinance the previous month. The city is reviewing land use, infrastructure, water, energy demand and community compatibility before deciding whether a permanent ban is appropriate.","scope":"Record-specific: City of Indio","status":"moratorium","date":"Extension approved unanimously, reported 15 July 2026","sources":[{"url":"https://www.nbcpalmsprings.com/2026/07/15/indio-city-council-extends-moratorium-on-new-data-center-projects","label":"NBC Palm Springs"},{"url":"https://kesq.com/news/2026/07/15/indio-and-coachella-continue-to-make-progress-on-data-center-bans/","label":"KESQ"}],"parties":[],"groups":[],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"fc9111ffec4a71f7","state":"CA","tracker":"atlas","section":"at_risk","title":"Lake Elsinore data center moratorium","summary":"Lake Elsinore, California, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated August 2026. Emergency ordinance establishing 45-day moratorium on new data center applications. Unanimous vote. Requested by Councilmember Steve Manos after resident concerns. City zoning code does not specifically address data centers. The measure runs to 9 October 2026.","scope":"Record-specific: Lake Elsinore","status":"moratorium","date":"Enacted August 2026","sources":[{"url":"https://elsinore247.com/2026/08/council-unanimously-approves-45-day-data-center-moratorium.html","label":"elsinore247.com"}],"parties":[],"groups":[],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"9c69f6e4382ab465","state":"CA","tracker":"atlas","section":"at_risk","title":"Los Angeles County ban on large-scale data centers (unincorporated areas)","summary":"Regional Planning Director Amy Bodek used her authority on 17 September 2026 to immediately prohibit large-scale data centers in unincorporated areas while a permanent zoning amendment, to be brought by Supervisor Hilda Solis, proceeds.","scope":"Record-specific: Los Angeles County Department of Regional Planning","status":"moratorium","date":"Effective 17 September 2026; no end date stated","sources":[{"url":"https://www.loscerritosnews.net/2026/09/18/los-angeles-county-moves-to-ban-large-ai-data-centers-in-unincorporated-areas/","label":"Los Cerritos News"},{"url":"https://mynewsla.com/life/2026/09/17/la-county-issues-temporary-ban-on-data-centers-across-unincorporated-areas/","label":"MyNewsLA (City News Service)"}],"parties":[],"groups":[],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"0d7c075aeea02a69","state":"CA","tracker":"atlas","section":"at_risk","title":"Marina 45-day data center urgency moratorium","summary":"The Marina City Council voted unanimously on Tuesday 15 September 2026 to enact a 45-day urgency moratorium on new data centers. No data center applications will be accepted during the pause. The ordinance was not prompted by a current application but is meant to give time to assess resource impacts and develop policy.","scope":"Record-specific: City of Marina City Council","status":"moratorium","date":"Adopted unanimously 15 September 2026; 45 days","sources":[{"url":"https://www.ksbw.com/article/marina-data-center-moratorium-monterey-county/73761740","label":"KSBW"}],"parties":[],"groups":[],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"f946b0b4339c7eba","state":"CA","tracker":"atlas","section":"at_risk","title":"Mendocino County data center urgency moratorium","summary":"The Mendocino County Board of Supervisors voted 5-0 on 1 September 2026 to adopt an urgency ordinance barring new data centers in unincorporated areas. It runs 45 days, through 16 October 2026, and can be extended up to two years under state law. It applies to use, variance, grading and building permits, with exemptions for server closets, office computers and utility facilities.","scope":"Record-specific: Mendocino County Board of Supervisors","status":"moratorium","date":"Adopted 5-0 on 1 September 2026; through 16 October 2026, extendable","sources":[{"url":"https://mendovoice.com/2026/09/01/mendocino-county-supes-ban-data-centers-for-the-moment-at-least/","label":"Mendocino Voice"},{"url":"https://www.ukiahdailyjournal.com/2026/09/03/mendocino-county-adopts-temporary-data-center-moratorium/","label":"Ukiah Daily Journal"}],"parties":[],"groups":[],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"a392477d984e0119","state":"CA","tracker":"atlas","section":"sites","title":"Menlo Equities data center at Western Digital campus (Charlotte Drive)","summary":"Development plans show Menlo Equities proposing a 444,400 sq ft data center on part of the Western Digital campus in South San Jose along Charlotte Drive between Lexington Avenue and Raleigh Road, with some public open space. The land-use consultant said the project is consistent with longstanding industrial zoning. Menlo Equities also owns 300 Holger Way in North San Jose, where city planners approved an interior data center conversion on 8 July 2026 that a labor-backed coalition appealed to the City Council Onsite substation; Tier 4 backup generators; closed-loop air-cooled chillers Investment not disclosed 99.7 MW total power with 72 MW of critical backup power; 444,400 sq ft","scope":"Record-specific: San Jose","status":"proposed (development plans filed)","date":"Plans reported 7 August 2026; single-outlet report (Silicon Valley / Bay Area News Group)","sources":[{"url":"https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/technology/data-center-is-being-eyed-on-part-of-longtime-san-jose-tech-campus/ar-AA29D6xA","label":"Silicon Valley (Bay Area News Group) via MSN"},{"url":"https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/general/labor-backed-citizens-group-appeals-north-san-jose-data-center-proposal/ar-AA28mLv2","label":"Silicon Valley (Bay Area News Group) via MSN (Holger Way appeal)"},{"url":"https://www.msn.com/en-us/travel/article/data-center-approved-for-office-building-in-north-san-jose/ar-AA2893UN","label":"Silicon Valley (Bay Area News Group) via MSN (Holger Way approval)"}],"parties":[{"role":"Entity","name":"Menlo Equities"}],"groups":[],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"e7cbf2da392d5bde","state":"CA","tracker":"atlas","section":"at_risk","title":"Morgan Hill data center moratorium","summary":"Morgan Hill, California, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated August 2026. 45-day urgency moratorium covering data centers AND grid-scale battery energy storage. Unanimous vote. City has no zoning standards for either use. Extendable up to 2 years under CA Gov. Code 65858. The measure runs to 10 October 2026.","scope":"Record-specific: Morgan Hill","status":"moratorium","date":"Enacted August 2026","sources":[{"url":"https://morganhilltimes.com/morgan-hill-declares-moratorium-on-data-centers-battery-storage-sites/","label":"morganhilltimes.com"}],"parties":[],"groups":[],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"66ec407c22349019","state":"CA","tracker":"atlas","section":"at_risk","title":"Oakley data center moratorium","summary":"Oakley, California, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated January 2026. Initial 45-day urgency ordinance Apr 15; extended May 16 for 10 months 15 days (through ~April 2027). Working toward permanent ban. Voted 5-0 on extension. The measure runs to 14 April 2027.","scope":"Record-specific: Oakley","status":"moratorium","date":"Enacted January 2026","sources":[{"url":"https://contracosta.news/2026/05/16/oakley-agrees-to-extend-moratorium-on-data-centers-for-1-year/","label":"contracosta.news"}],"parties":[],"groups":[],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"29505165bd7e88e5","state":"CA","tracker":"atlas","section":"at_risk","title":"Palm Springs data center moratorium","summary":"The city council voted unanimously on 26 August 2026 to adopt a 45-day moratorium on large-scale data centers, in effect through 10 October 2026, to study impacts before deciding whether further regulation is needed. Council members referenced the possibility of a longer comprehensive zoning process. Residents raised water use, electricity demand and the supplemental cooling required in a desert climate. On Wednesday 30 September 2026 the city council extended the moratorium on accepting, processing or approving data center applications and permits by 22 months and 15 days, through 25 August 2028, for a total of two years, carrying the four-fifths vote state law requires to extend an urgency ordinance. Planning Director Chris Hadwin said the time will be used to write data center standards, permitted uses and locations into the ongoing zoning code update; the moratorium is meant to be rescinded when the new code is adopted.","scope":"Record-specific: City of Palm Springs","status":"moratorium","date":"Adopted 26 August 2026 (45 days, to 10 October 2026); extended 30 September 2026 through 25 August 2028","sources":[{"url":"https://kesq.com/news/2026/08/26/palm-springs-city-council-approves-temporary-data-center-moratorium/","label":"KESQ"},{"url":"https://thepalmspringspost.com/palm-springs-extends-data-center-moratorium-to-2028/","label":"The Palm Springs Post"},{"url":"https://mynewsla.com/riverside/2026/09/30/palm-springs-city-council-will-consider-extending-temporary-data-center-ban-2/","label":"MyNewsLA (staff report preview)"}],"parties":[],"groups":[],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"d5d3ed76ac26f2de","state":"CA","tracker":"atlas","section":"at_risk","title":"Patterson data center moratorium","summary":"Patterson, California, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated July 2026. Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 889 (initial 45-day). Extended unanimously Aug 18 via Ordinance No. 890 for 10 months 15 days. Data centers were previously permitted by right in industrial zones. Key concern is water, city faces state requirements to reduce groundwater pumping. The measure runs to 15 July 2027.","scope":"Record-specific: Patterson","status":"moratorium","date":"Enacted July 2026","sources":[{"url":"https://www.cbsnews.com/sacramento/news/patterson-extends-data-center-moratorium/","label":"cbsnews.com"}],"parties":[],"groups":[],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"8e66b59274f45e0d","state":"CA","tracker":"atlas","section":"sites","title":"Prime SMF01, Sacramento","summary":"SMF01 in Sacramento at 26 MW served by SMUD; operational status is not explicitly stated in the source, which describes SMF02 as expanding the regional campus footprint. served by SMUD  26 MW served by SMUD","scope":"Record-specific: Sacramento","status":"Not recorded","date":"status not explicitly stated in source","sources":[{"url":"https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20260507097641/en/Prime-Data-Centers-Breaks-Ground-on-Second-Sacramento-Data-Center-Expanding-Regional-Campus-Footprint","label":"Business Wire"}],"parties":[{"role":"Entity","name":"prime-data-centers"}],"groups":[],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"ebea1d735d619892","state":"CA","tracker":"atlas","section":"sites","title":"Prime SMF02, Sacramento","summary":"SMF02 at 18 MW and 150,000 sq ft, on which Prime broke ground in May 2026.   18 MW / 150,000 sq ft","scope":"Record-specific: Sacramento","status":"construction","date":"broke ground May 2026","sources":[{"url":"https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20260507097641/en/Prime-Data-Centers-Breaks-Ground-on-Second-Sacramento-Data-Center-Expanding-Regional-Campus-Footprint","label":"Business Wire"}],"parties":[{"role":"Entity","name":"prime-data-centers"}],"groups":[],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"2e4da1da596c4a21","state":"CA","tracker":"atlas","section":"sites","title":"Prologis North San Jose data center (326 Charcot Avenue)","summary":"Prologis filed a special use permit with San Jose for a three-story data center at the corner of Charcot Avenue and Zanker Road. Prologis separately proposed a 516,000 sq ft data center on 15 acres at 5977 Silver Creek Valley Road in South San Jose. PG&E reported its proposed data center pipeline at 12.71 GW at the end of June 2026 PG&E grid with onsite substation, backup generator yard and a second independently routed transmission line; enrollment in San Jose Total Clean Energy intended Investment not disclosed; Prologis to fund all grid hookup costs including any PG&E substation upgrades and a second transmission line 99 MW total power capacity in a three-story, 514,000 sq ft building replacing five older buildings","scope":"Record-specific: San Jose","status":"special use permit filed","date":"Special use permit filing reported 28 August 2026; single-outlet report (Silicon Valley / Bay Area News Group)","sources":[{"url":"https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/three-story-data-center-proposed-for-san-jose-industrial-site/ar-AA2b8oBN","label":"Silicon Valley (Bay Area News Group) via MSN"}],"parties":[{"role":"Entity","name":"Prologis"}],"groups":[],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"bf0a58bce3b1e98f","state":"CA","tracker":"atlas","section":"at_risk","title":"Richmond 45-day data center moratorium","summary":"Richmond City Council voted 6-1 on Tuesday 15 September 2026 to adopt a 45-day moratorium on new data center development, making Richmond the third Bay Area city to do so after Oakley and Gilroy. As amended, the city may continue accepting applications during the moratorium but may not approve them or issue permits. Staff outlined a timeline that includes a moratorium report and extension within the 45 days. There are no pending data center applications in the city.","scope":"Record-specific: City of Richmond","status":"moratorium","date":"Adopted 6-1 on 15 September 2026; runs 45 days, extension contemplated","sources":[{"url":"https://contracosta.news/2026/09/16/richmond-city-council-agrees-to-45-day-moratorium-on-data-centers/","label":"Contra Costa News"},{"url":"https://www.kalw.org/bay-area-news/2026-09-16/richmond-approves-pause-on-developing-new-data-centers","label":"KALW"}],"parties":[],"groups":[],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"9b1da88f0ef8f16f","state":"CA","tracker":"atlas","section":"at_risk","title":"SJC37 (641 Walsh Ave.)","summary":"Awaiting power; \"could be years\"","scope":"Record-specific: Santa Clara","status":"delayed","date":"2025-26","sources":[{"url":"https://insider.govtech.com/california/news/silicon-valleys-ai-boom-hits-a-wall-data-centers-are-built-but-cant-turn-on","label":"GovTech"}],"parties":[{"role":"Developer","name":"Digital Realty"}],"groups":[],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"62e145870ccb9e23","state":"CA","tracker":"atlas","section":"sites","title":"STACK Santa Clara facility","summary":"A Santa Clara facility completed in late 2025 cannot operate for lack of power, with full operation expected around 2027. cannot operate for lack of power; named beneficiary of Silicon Valley Power's $450M upgrade scheduled for 2028 completion  capacity n.a. in source","scope":"Record-specific: Santa Clara","status":"complete_unenergized","date":"completed late 2025; full operation expected around 2027","sources":[{"url":"https://www.latimes.com/business/story/2025-11-10/data-centers-in-nvidias-hometown-stand-empty-awaiting-power","label":"LA Times"},{"url":"https://www.mk.co.kr/en/it/12066054","label":"Maeil Business Newspaper"}],"parties":[{"role":"Entity","name":"stack-infrastructure"}],"groups":[],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"731cb6a60dc61408","state":"CA","tracker":"atlas","section":"at_risk","title":"San Joaquin County data center study and proposed 45-day moratorium","summary":"At its Tuesday 1 September 2026 meeting the San Joaquin County Board of Supervisors directed the Community Development Department to study large-scale AI data centers and research a possible moratorium, with a vote on an initial 45-day pause expected in October 2026. The county code has no definition of a data center, and staff said they need at least six months. Supervisor Robert Rickman said the county has no active applications and should set policy first. The board could formalize the 45-day pause in October after staff share initial findings.","scope":"Record-specific: San Joaquin County Board of Supervisors","status":"other","date":"Study directed 1 September 2026; initial 45-day moratorium vote expected October 2026","sources":[{"url":"https://www.lodinews.com/news/article_faac0fce-c6b9-4735-bd29-5dc89907607c.html","label":"Lodi News-Sentinel"},{"url":"https://www.aol.com/articles/san-joaquin-county-might-pause-223000000.html","label":"The Modesto Bee via AOL"},{"url":"https://www.mantecabulletin.com/news/local-news/sj-county-will-study-impact-of-the-potential-large-scale-data-centers-could-create/","label":"Manteca Bulletin"}],"parties":[],"groups":[],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"8f9a6f9ac3ba9b23","state":"CA","tracker":"atlas","section":"sites","title":"Santa Clara datacenter","summary":"One of six new North American and European datacenters announced March 11, 2025; Santa Clara was online at announcement.  n.a. MW n.a.","scope":"Record-specific: Santa Clara","status":"operating","date":"announced March 11, 2025","sources":[{"url":"https://www.cerebras.ai/press-release/cerebras-announces-six-new-ai-datacenters-across-north-america-and-europe-to-deliver-industry-s","label":"Cerebras"}],"parties":[{"role":"Entity","name":"cerebras"}],"groups":[],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"6e5774dd5541b0d1","state":"CA","tracker":"atlas","section":"at_risk","title":"Santa Clara pipeline","summary":"SVP capped new data center approvals; moratorium on new power connections; approvals stopped after June 2025","scope":"Record-specific: Santa Clara / Silicon Valley Power","status":"moratorium","date":"2025-26","sources":[{"url":"https://datacenterwatch.substack.com/p/briefing-06062025","label":"Data Center Watch briefing"},{"url":"https://www.mk.co.kr/en/it/12066054","label":"Maeil Business Newspaper"}],"parties":[{"role":"Developer","name":"DLR, STACK, others"}],"groups":[],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"7c38813f262452aa","state":"CA","tracker":"atlas","section":"at_risk","title":"Santa Cruz County voter approval requirement for AI data centers (rejected)","summary":"The Santa Cruz County Board of Supervisors on Tuesday 15 September 2026 rejected Supervisor Justin Cummings' proposal to draft an ordinance and March 2028 ballot measure requiring voter approval for AI data centers in unincorporated areas. Board Chair Monica Martinez and supervisors Manu Koenig and Kim De Serpa voted no, saying it was too early for sweeping decisions. The measure would have required majority voter approval before General Plan amendments allowing zoning, permitting, construction or operation of AI data centers.","scope":"Record-specific: Santa Cruz County Board of Supervisors","status":"other","date":"Proposal rejected 15 September 2026","sources":[{"url":"https://pajaronian.com/supervisors-reject-proposal-to-give-voters-say-over-ai-data-centers/","label":"The Pajaronian"},{"url":"https://lookout.co/santa-cruz-county-considers-requiring-voter-approval-for-ai-data-centers/story","label":"Lookout Santa Cruz"}],"parties":[],"groups":[],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"f01a32373d165c9d","state":"CA","tracker":"atlas","section":"at_risk","title":"Saturn Park hyperscale facility","summary":"Moratorium extended from 45 days to one year; permanent-ban ballot measure pending; city enacted a ban Jun 2026","scope":"Record-specific: Monterey Park","status":"moratorium","date":"2026; dollar value n.a.","sources":[{"url":"https://www.interconnectedcapital.com/research/data-center-moratoriums","label":"Interconnected Capital"},{"url":"https://www.dimetrics.ai/datacenter-risk/california","label":"Dimetrics California"}],"parties":[],"groups":[],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"601e519997116d27","state":"CA","tracker":"atlas","section":"sites","title":"Stockton datacenter","summary":"One of six new datacenters announced March 11, 2025; Stockton was online at announcement.  n.a. MW n.a.","scope":"Record-specific: Stockton","status":"operating","date":"announced March 11, 2025","sources":[{"url":"https://www.cerebras.ai/press-release/cerebras-announces-six-new-ai-datacenters-across-north-america-and-europe-to-deliver-industry-s","label":"Cerebras"}],"parties":[{"role":"Entity","name":"cerebras"}],"groups":[],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"98476a23125e1aab","state":"CA","tracker":"atlas","section":"at_risk","title":"Tulare County 45-day data center moratorium","summary":"The county adopted a 45-day moratorium covering unincorporated areas while it considers longer-term rules; local organizers are pushing for a permanent ban. The original 45-day moratorium was adopted on 18 August 2026 and covers acceptance, processing, approval or issuance of land entitlements for new data centers in unincorporated areas. On Tuesday 22 September 2026 the Board of Supervisors voted 5-0 to extend it by 10 months and 15 days, the maximum under the urgency ordinance before another extension would be needed, and then voted 3-2 to adopt a position opposing data center development in the county with an exception for enterprise facilities.","scope":"Record-specific: Tulare County","status":"moratorium","date":"Adopted 18 August 2026; extended 5-0 on 22 September 2026 by 10 months and 15 days","sources":[{"url":"https://thesungazette.com/data-centers-temporarily-firewalled-in-tulare-county/","label":"Source"},{"url":"https://www.recorderonline.com/news/board-extends-moratorium-opposes-data-centers-with-exception/article_5d90757b-7c8f-4c36-b956-b6f108ef43e5.html","label":"The Porterville Recorder"}],"parties":[],"groups":[],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"c067722e1607f8e2","state":"CA","tracker":"atlas","section":"sites","title":"Vantage Santa Clara campus","summary":"Santa Clara campus listed at 216 MW on Vantage's North America locations page.   company-reported campus capacity; development status of components not stated in source","scope":"Record-specific: Santa Clara","status":"operating","date":null,"sources":[{"url":"https://vantage-dc.com/data-center-locations/north-america/","label":"Vantage North America locations"}],"parties":[{"role":"Entity","name":"vantage-data-centers"}],"groups":[],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"e44702eb82adff51","state":"CA","tracker":"delay","section":"county_restrictions","title":"Angels Camp","summary":"The Angels Camp City Council voted 5-0 on Tuesday, August 18, 2026 to approve a temporary moratorium on the construction of data centers within city limits. The report did not state the duration or an extension hearing date.","scope":"city: Angels Camp","status":"in_force","date":"2026-08-18","sources":[{"url":"https://mymotherlode.com/news/local/11078696/angels-camp-approves-temporary-data-center-moratorium.html","label":"mymotherlode.com"}],"parties":[{"role":"Authority","name":"Angels Camp City Council"}],"groups":[],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"59e022c89f64ec52","state":"CA","tracker":"delay","section":"county_restrictions","title":"Arcata","summary":"Adopted Wednesday, September 16, 2026, effective immediately. Staff must return with a public report on the study process by October 21, day 35 of the moratorium. Data centers are not defined in the city code. Council members cited limited industrial land and a potential 30,000 to 50,000 square foot facility being explored locally.","scope":"city: Arcata","status":"in_force","date":"2026-09-16","sources":[{"url":"https://www.times-standard.com/2026/09/17/arcata-city-council-oks-45-day-moratorium-for-data-centers/","label":"www.times-standard.com"},{"url":"https://lostcoastoutpost.com/2026/sep/17/all-right-s-it-no-more-data-centers-while-said-arc/","label":"lostcoastoutpost.com"}],"parties":[{"role":"Authority","name":"City Council"}],"groups":[],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"14833b21d81cfae2","state":"CA","tracker":"delay","section":"projects","title":"Behring AI Campus / Data Center (415 20th St.)","summary":"~20,000 sq ft of an 83,000 sq ft, 4-story building; part of a larger complex with a proposed 39-story apartment tower above 19th St BART station.","scope":"Record-specific: Oakland","status":"delayed","date":"2026","sources":[{"url":"https://www.kqed.org/news/12095308/developer-councilmember-say-proposed-oakland-data-center-isnt-what-you-might-think","label":"www.kqed.org"}],"parties":[{"role":"Operator","name":"Behring Companies"}],"groups":["delay:community_opposition:delayed"],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"13b0302bae4015e0","state":"CA","tracker":"delay","section":"jurisdictional_actions","title":"California (statewide)","summary":"Governor Newsom signed a package of seven data center bills on September 21, 2026. SB 887 removes CEQA categorical exemptions for data centers. SB 886, AB 2383 and SB 1168 direct tariffs and rate structures that keep data center infrastructure costs off other ratepayers. AB 1577, AB 2619 and AB 2469 require energy and water use reporting, water supply assessments and workforce disclosures. Mayer Brown reports several provisions, including CPUC tariffs, take effect by January 1, 2028.","scope":"state: California (statewide)","status":"enacted","date":"2026-09-21","sources":[{"url":"https://calmatters.org/economy/technology/2026/09/new-california-laws-data-centers/","label":"calmatters.org"},{"url":"https://www.mayerbrown.com/en/insights/publications/2026/09/californias-governor-signs-nations-most-comprehensive-data-center-laws-reshaping-regulation-of-energy-water-and-land-use","label":"www.mayerbrown.com"}],"parties":[{"role":"Authority","name":"Governor Gavin Newsom"}],"groups":[],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"034280a9f9f058f7","state":"CA","tracker":"delay","section":"county_restrictions","title":"Calipatria","summary":"Permanent data center ban (in development) (Proposed).","scope":"city: Calipatria","status":"pending","date":"2026-07-01","sources":[{"url":"https://kpbs.org","label":"kpbs.org"}],"parties":[{"role":"Authority","name":"City Council/Board of Supervisors"}],"groups":[],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"dab299a78aa136a6","state":"CA","tracker":"delay","section":"county_restrictions","title":"City of Brawley","summary":"On May 19, 2026, the Brawley City Council voted 3-2 (Grass and Kelley dissenting) to approve Ordinance No. 2026-03, an immediate moratorium on data centers requiring more than 50 MW of electrical demand or exceeding 250,000 sq ft of gross floor area (smaller server rooms and telecom hubs exempt). Introduced by Councilmember Gil Rebollar to give the city time to draft zoning, environmental, and inf","scope":"city: City of Brawley","status":"in_force","date":"2026-05-19","sources":[{"url":"https://www.thedesertreview.com/business/brawley-council-approves-moratorium-on-data-center/article_702beb39-c98b-4e10-8024-c0eb5466ad19.html","label":"www.thedesertreview.com"},{"url":"https://www.ivpressonline.com/news/brawley-targets-hyperscale-tech-growth-with-proposed-data-center-moratorium/article_495ce2ac-c352-4f86-bfbe-5d14939ae51c.html","label":"www.ivpressonline.com"},{"url":"https://calexicochronicle.com/2026/05/27/brawley-and-imperial-speak-on-data-center-moratoriums/","label":"calexicochronicle.com"}],"parties":[{"role":"Authority","name":"City Council"}],"groups":[],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"bb4c2afb2a6b389d","state":"CA","tracker":"delay","section":"county_restrictions","title":"City of Calexico","summary":"Adopted on second reading on September 16, 2026. The ordinance bars the establishment, operation and permitting of new data centers citywide, exempting accessory server rooms, wireless facilities and state or federally authorized uses. Calexico is the first Imperial County city and the third California city, after Monterey Park and Coachella, to enact a permanent ban. In July the council had declined an interim moratorium and directed staff to draft this permanent amendment instead.","scope":"city: City of Calexico","status":"enacted","date":"2026-09-16","sources":[{"url":"https://www.ivpressonline.com/news/calexico-city-council-to-consider-public-safety-budgeting-mandate-and-data-center-moratorium/article_3dc38980-49ad-4f2d-ac2f-ca34c7c7627c.html","label":"www.ivpressonline.com"},{"url":"https://calexicochronicle.com/2026/07/16/calexico-places-amendment-to-city-ordinance-on-future-agenda/","label":"calexicochronicle.com"},{"url":"https://calexicochronicle.com/2026/09/18/calexico-enacts-permanent-data-center-ban/","label":"calexicochronicle.com"},{"url":"https://www.ivpressonline.com/news/calexico-city-council-to-consider-data-center-ban-downtown-food-distribution-rules-and-ems-overhaul/article_9ef8f3aa-03a6-4cc7-b8a8-8658e5a2aa94.html","label":"www.ivpressonline.com"},{"url":"https://beyondbordersnews.com/calexico-moves-toward-permanent-citywide-ban-on-new-data-centers/","label":"beyondbordersnews.com"}],"parties":[{"role":"Authority","name":"City Council"}],"groups":[],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"a79fa99a5d7df715","state":"CA","tracker":"delay","section":"county_restrictions","title":"City of Commerce","summary":"The Commerce City Council adopted an urgency ordinance on Tuesday, August 11, 2026 that bars approval of land use permits, entitlements or agreements for data center development for an initial 45 days. The council can extend it by up to 10 months and 15 days after a noticed hearing. The vote count was not reported.","scope":"city: City of Commerce","status":"in_force","date":"2026-08-11","sources":[{"url":"https://mynewsla.com/government/2026/08/12/city-of-commerce-approves-temporary-ban-on-data-center-development/","label":"mynewsla.com"}],"parties":[{"role":"Authority","name":"Commerce City Council"}],"groups":[],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"bbd67efacfd20618","state":"CA","tracker":"delay","section":"county_restrictions","title":"City of El Monte","summary":"In City of El Monte, California, On March 12, 2026, the City Council postponed action on data center moratorium evaluation after a verbal altercation during public comment led police to evacuate the chamber. Debate rescheduled to March 18, 2026. City Council unanimously passed a 45-day moratorium on March 19, 2026. Opposition was led by El Monte Neighbors United. Key concerns driving this action i","scope":"city: City of El Monte","status":"in_force","date":"2026-03-19","sources":[{"url":"https://www.sgvtribune.com/2026/03/12/in-el-monte-verbal-altercation-in-city-council-chambers-postpones-debate-on-data-centers-and-sanctuary-law/","label":"www.sgvtribune.com"},{"url":"https://www.whittierdailynews.com/2026/03/12/in-el-monte-verbal-altercation-in-city-council-chambers-postpones-debate-on-data-centers-and-sanctuary-law/","label":"www.whittierdailynews.com"},{"url":"https://www.sgvtribune.com/2026/03/17/el-monte-city-council-set-to-meet-again-after-verbal-altercation-ended-last-meeting/","label":"www.sgvtribune.com"},{"url":"https://www.sgvtribune.com/2026/03/19/data-center-moratorium-sanctuary-city-rules-pass-in-el-monte/","label":"www.sgvtribune.com"}],"parties":[{"role":"Authority","name":"City Council"}],"groups":[],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"3f3c69c20fcf47bf","state":"CA","tracker":"delay","section":"county_restrictions","title":"City of Imperial","summary":"On May 20, 2026, the City of Imperial council voted 4-0 to direct staff to return with a moratorium on hyperscale data centers within city limits; the item returned June 3 with the council moving to advance it (Mayor Ida Obeso: 'we have a right and a privilege to protect our residents'). The city is also the plaintiff in a separate CEQA suit against Imperial County over the IVCM project.","scope":"city: City of Imperial","status":"pending","date":"2026-05-20","sources":[{"url":"https://kyma.com/news/top-stories/2026/05/21/imperial-moves-toward-moratorium-on-hyperscale-data-centers/","label":"kyma.com"},{"url":"https://calexicochronicle.com/2026/05/27/brawley-and-imperial-speak-on-data-center-moratoriums/","label":"calexicochronicle.com"}],"parties":[{"role":"Authority","name":"City Council"}],"groups":[],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"716c9fc376a852b1","state":"CA","tracker":"delay","section":"jurisdictional_actions","title":"City of Imperial","summary":"Local leaders challenged a million-square-foot hyperscale data center project in Imperial, California amid moratorium conflict; underlying dispute proceeded to federal litigation (IVCM v. City of Imperial, see lawsuits.json)","scope":"city: City of Imperial","status":"litigation_active","date":"2026-01-01","sources":[{"url":"https://apnews.com/article/imperial-data-center-hyperscale-moratorium-conflict-a029128eb2458c3c197010ecbedb0cd8","label":"apnews.com"},{"url":"https://calexicochronicle.com/2026/06/09/imperial-implements-45-day-data-center-moratorium/","label":"calexicochronicle.com"}],"parties":[{"role":"Authority","name":"City of Imperial Council / local leaders"}],"groups":[],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"e0efedfa251ff972","state":"CA","tracker":"delay","section":"county_restrictions","title":"City of Industry","summary":"City of Industry's Planning Commission voted in December 2025 to recommend zoning changes allowing data centers citywide (proposed by EdgeCore) (62 acres). City Manager Joshua Nelson wrote in May 2025 that the city was 'working on a change to our code to pretty much allow data centers anywhere.' With fewer than 300 residents, the city faced minimal public opposition. Majestic Realty pitched the In","scope":"city: City of Industry","status":"in_force","date":"2025-01-15","sources":[{"url":"https://investigatela.org/2026/03/02/city-of-industry-discussed-data-center-sites-months-before-zoning-vote/","label":"investigatela.org"},{"url":"https://www.sgvtribune.com/2026/02/27/could-puente-hills-mall-become-a-data-center-city-developer-are-discussing-it/","label":"www.sgvtribune.com"},{"url":"https://www.sgvtribune.com/2026/01/28/a-city-of-industry-plan-for-a-massive-energy-storage-facility-takes-step-forward-amid-pushback-on-data-centers/","label":"www.sgvtribune.com"},{"url":"https://lapublicpress.org/2026/01/a-data-center-boom-is-coming-to-the-san-gabriel-valley-residents-had-no-idea/","label":"lapublicpress.org"}],"parties":[{"role":"Authority","name":"City Council"}],"groups":[],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"786a30d391714d52","state":"CA","tracker":"delay","section":"county_restrictions","title":"City of Oakley","summary":"In City of Oakley, California, Oakley City Council approved the 164-acre Bridgehead Industrial Project on March 11, 2026 in a 4-1 vote, but with an amendment excluding data centers after sustained community opposition. Residents raised concerns about water and electricity demands at public hearings and Planning Commission meetings. On February 9, 2026, the developer (Oxfoot Oakley) agreed to remov","scope":"city: City of Oakley","status":"expired","date":"2026-03-11","sources":[{"url":"https://www.kqed.org/news/12076074/oakley-drops-data-center-plans-approves-massive-industrial-project","label":"www.kqed.org"},{"url":"https://contracosta.news/2026/03/11/with-data-centers-removed-oakley-approves-bridgehead-industrial-project/","label":"contracosta.news"},{"url":"https://ccpulse.org/2026/01/23/oakley-residents-push-against-project-that-could-later-house-a-i-data-center/","label":"ccpulse.org"},{"url":"https://ccpulse.org/2026/03/11/oakley-approves-bridgehead-project-without-a-i-data-centers/","label":"ccpulse.org"}],"parties":[{"role":"Authority","name":"City Council"}],"groups":[],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"8a61829b15f33edf","state":"CA","tracker":"delay","section":"county_restrictions","title":"City of Oakley","summary":"Oakley, CA (Contra Costa County) became the first Bay Area city to pass a data center moratorium, with City Council unanimously adopting a 45-day urgency ordinance on April 14-15, 2026. The moratorium is extensible by the council up to 2 years total and pauses new data center applications while staff develop permanent zoning standards. Builds on prior community organizing that removed data centers","scope":"city: City of Oakley","status":"in_force","date":"2026-04-15","sources":[{"url":"https://www.kqed.org/news/2026/04/15/oakley-first-bay-area-city-data-center-moratorium/","label":"www.kqed.org"}],"parties":[{"role":"Authority","name":"City Council"}],"groups":[],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"c9e2f082eb03806e","state":"CA","tracker":"delay","section":"utility_actions","title":"City of Santa Clara dba Silicon Valley Power (SVP)","summary":"SVP submitted a public comment letter to the CAISO Board regarding the 2021–2022 Transmission Plan. SVP requested immediate coordination with PG&E on transmission-capacity increases and mitigation projects in the South Bay due to rapid hyper-scale data-center load growth and expected reliability violations.","scope":"Record-specific: CA","status":"pending","date":"2021-03-22","sources":[{"url":"https://www.caiso.com/documents/public-comment-letter-from-svp-re-transmission-plan-mar-22-2021.pdf","label":"www.caiso.com"}],"parties":[{"role":"Named utility / authority","name":"City of Santa Clara dba Silicon Valley Power (SVP)"}],"groups":["utility:statement:pending"],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"cbb0bb673fffeec2","state":"CA","tracker":"delay","section":"county_restrictions","title":"Coachella","summary":"The Coachella City Council introduced the ordinance on August 12, 2026 and adopted it on August 26, 2026, replacing the city's temporary moratorium. Staff cited strained electric infrastructure, water supply, noise and other environmental and land-use concerns. Coachella is the first Coachella Valley city with a permanent prohibition and the second California city after Monterey Park. The action follows the cancellation of the proposed 240-acre Coachella Valley Technology Campus in June 2026.","scope":"city: Coachella","status":"enacted","date":"2026-08-26","sources":[{"url":"https://kesq.com","label":"kesq.com"},{"url":"https://kesq.com/news/2026/08/25/coachella-city-council-passes-permanent-ban-on-data-centers/","label":"kesq.com"},{"url":"https://www.kvcrnews.org/local-news/2026-08-28/coachella-becomes-second-california-city-to-ban-data-centers-as-opposition-swells-in-golden-state","label":"www.kvcrnews.org"}],"parties":[{"role":"Authority","name":"City Council"}],"groups":[],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"e6ef57967971f34b","state":"CA","tracker":"delay","section":"projects","title":"Coachella Valley Technology Campus","summary":"Six data centers proposed across 450 acres of agricultural land; was to anchor a new city-run utility agency; council unanimously voted to terminate the Stronghold agreement after months of protests; Rep. Raul Ruiz pledged federal-level action.","scope":"Record-specific: Coachella (Riverside County)","status":"cancelled","date":"2026-05","sources":[{"url":"https://patch.com/california/palmdesert/two-rivco-towns-ax-data-center-projects-say-no-further-projects","label":"patch.com"},{"url":"https://kvcr.org/news/local/2026-05-28/coachella-considers-moratorium-on-data-centers-as-community-pushes-back-against-proposed-tech-campus","label":"kvcr.org"}],"parties":[{"role":"Operator","name":"Stronghold Power Systems"}],"groups":["delay:local_moratorium:cancelled","delay:community_opposition:cancelled"],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"dc8bcd04f55485ac","state":"CA","tracker":"delay","section":"county_restrictions","title":"Dixon (Solano County)","summary":"Dixon's City Council unanimously voted on Wednesday night, September 30, 2026 to impose a 45-day moratorium on data center developments while staff evaluate impacts on water, air, noise and the tax base. The moratorium can be extended with a four-fifths council vote.; other outlets reported the vote on October 1.","scope":"city: Dixon (Solano County)","status":"in_force","date":"2026-09-30","sources":[{"url":"https://www.kcra.com/article/dixon-city-council-vote-temporary-pause-data-center-development/73957997","label":"www.kcra.com"}],"parties":[{"role":"Authority","name":"Dixon City Council"}],"groups":[],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"dabaa0d9ca40c829","state":"CA","tracker":"delay","section":"projects","title":"Eight Form El Segundo Data Center (750 N. Nash Street)","summary":"Proposed replacing a 15-year-old Hyatt Place hotel with 160-foot, five-story data center plus dedicated electrical substation.","scope":"Record-specific: El Segundo (Los Angeles County)","status":"withdrawn","date":"2026-07-09","sources":[{"url":"https://smmirror.com/developer-drops-el-segundo-data-center-plan-after-power-consumption-backlash/","label":"smmirror.com"}],"parties":[{"role":"Operator","name":"Eight Form"}],"groups":["delay:community_opposition:withdrawn"],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"b7dddb0e32f491f2","state":"CA","tracker":"delay","section":"county_restrictions","title":"Escondido","summary":"The Escondido City Council unanimously approved an urgency ordinance imposing a 45-day moratorium on data centers and other high-intensity computing uses. The article was published August 28, 2026 and places the vote on the preceding Wednesday. The report gives October 10, 2026 as the date tied to the end of the initial period, when an extension would need to be considered. Next date: 2026-10-10.","scope":"city: Escondido","status":"in_force","date":"2026-08-26","sources":[{"url":"https://ncpipeline.substack.com/p/escondido-data-center-moratorium","label":"ncpipeline.substack.com"}],"parties":[{"role":"Authority","name":"Escondido City Council"}],"groups":[],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"956d0ddcb37d7205","state":"CA","tracker":"delay","section":"county_restrictions","title":"Eureka","summary":"The Eureka City Council passed an urgency ordinance 5-0 on September 1, 2026 imposing a 45-day moratorium on data center siting in the city's inland and coastal zones. The moratorium took effect immediately. It can be extended for up to two years in total after the initial 45 days.","scope":"city: Eureka","status":"in_force","date":"2026-09-01","sources":[{"url":"https://lostcoastoutpost.com/2026/sep/2/eureka-city-council-approved-temporary-ban-data-ce/","label":"lostcoastoutpost.com"}],"parties":[{"role":"Authority","name":"Eureka City Council"}],"groups":[],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"8f4ba499ed265bb0","state":"CA","tracker":"delay","section":"projects","title":"GI Partners Santa Clara Data Center (2805 Bowers Avenue)","summary":"Four-story data center; site cost $79M. Delayed ~5 months versus planned construction timeline before City Council approval on Aug 29, 2024.","scope":"Record-specific: Santa Clara","status":"delayed","date":"2024-03-06","sources":[{"url":"https://www.datacenterwatch.org/report","label":"www.datacenterwatch.org"}],"parties":[{"role":"Operator","name":"GI Partners"}],"groups":["delay:litigation:delayed","delay:permit_denial:delayed"],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"a3ea0144090f4852","state":"CA","tracker":"delay","section":"county_restrictions","title":"Gilroy","summary":"Adopted Monday, September 14, 2026, effective immediately. Does not affect the Amazon Web Services data center already approved in 2025 and under construction on Camino Arroyo. The city has a pre-application from Amazon for a possible second facility; any formal application would be subject to the moratorium.","scope":"city: Gilroy","status":"in_force","date":"2026-09-14","sources":[{"url":"https://www.change.org/p/stop-the-ai-data-centers-in-gilroy","label":"www.change.org"},{"url":"https://www.change.org/p/banning-regulating-data-centers-in-gilroy","label":"www.change.org"},{"url":"https://gilroydispatch.com/residents-raise-concerns-over-new-data-center-in-gilroy/","label":"gilroydispatch.com"},{"url":"https://www.kron4.com/news/technology-ai/gilroy-community-fights-against-amazon-from-constructing-data-center/","label":"www.kron4.com"},{"url":"https://www.datacenterdynamics.com/en/news/amazon-data-services-gains-approval-for-data-center-on-56-acres-in-gilroy-california/","label":"www.datacenterdynamics.com"},{"url":"https://www.nbcbayarea.com/news/local/gilroy-amazon-data-center-moratorium/4142478/","label":"www.nbcbayarea.com"},{"url":"https://www.sanjoseinside.com/business/gilroy-city-council-adopts-moratorium-on-new-data-centers/","label":"www.sanjoseinside.com"}],"parties":[{"role":"Authority","name":"City Council"}],"groups":[],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"2de90edbf74c9395","state":"CA","tracker":"delay","section":"county_restrictions","title":"Hayward","summary":"The Hayward City Council voted 7-0 to direct staff to begin the process of prohibiting future data center approvals. The referral came from Mayor Mark Salinas, Mayor Pro Tempore George Syrop and Councilmember Angela Andrews and also calls for monitoring the impacts of data centers already approved or operating. The action follows opposition to the Stack SVY03A project on Eden Landing Road. The council is to revisit the issue in October 2026.","scope":"city: Hayward","status":"proposed","date":"2026-09-15","sources":[{"url":"https://localnewsmatters.org/2026/09/18/hayward-data-center-moratorium/","label":"localnewsmatters.org"},{"url":"https://hayward-ca.gov/discover/news/sep26/hayward-council-consider-move-ban-data-centers-its-upcoming-sept-15-meeting","label":"hayward-ca.gov"}],"parties":[{"role":"Authority","name":"Hayward City Council"}],"groups":[],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"70094b6e63683ed7","state":"CA","tracker":"delay","section":"county_restrictions","title":"Imperial County","summary":"On June 2, 2026, after 1+ hour of public comment and 296 emailed comments, the Imperial County Board of Supervisors declined to adopt staff-drafted 'Data Center Development Guidelines' (21 safeguards including elimination of by-right development, infrastructure-impact assessments, 1,000-ft setbacks, water-use disclosure, local hiring, and a Good Neighbor Community Benefit Agreement), which opponen","scope":"county: Imperial County","status":"in_force","date":"2026-06-16","sources":[{"url":"https://inewsource.org/2026/06/04/imperial-county-data-center-moratorium-vote-supervisors-ceqa/","label":"inewsource.org"},{"url":"https://calexicochronicle.com/2026/06/03/board-of-supervisors-considers-data-center-resolution/","label":"calexicochronicle.com"},{"url":"https://www.ivpressonline.com/news/imperial-county-moves-to-strip-by-right-status-for-data-center-developments/article_67468b5d-a469-4e68-98b8-cb278c72f776.html","label":"www.ivpressonline.com"},{"url":"https://writing.strisker.com/data-centers-daily-notes-june-17-2026/","label":"writing.strisker.com"},{"url":"https://inewsource.org/2026/07/14/data-center-moratorium-imperial-county/","label":"inewsource.org"}],"parties":[{"role":"Authority","name":"Board of Supervisors/County Commission"}],"groups":[],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"81e21ec7e868a8a0","state":"CA","tracker":"delay","section":"projects","title":"Imperial Data Center (Imperial Valley Computer Manufacturing / IVCM)","summary":"Would be largest data center in California at ~1M sq ft; promoted as producing 2,500 construction jobs and $28.7M/yr tax revenue; county supervisors first approved parcel merger April 2026 then reversed with moratorium after public outcry; developer Rucci previously ran an Ohio strip club and rehab center.","scope":"Record-specific: Imperial County (near city of Imperial)","status":"delayed","date":"2026-04","sources":[{"url":"https://apnews.com/article/imperial-data-center-hyperscale-moratorium-conflict-a029128eb2458c3c197010ecbedb0cd8","label":"apnews.com"},{"url":"https://inewsource.org/2026/04/05/data-center-developer-imperial-county/","label":"inewsource.org"},{"url":"https://www.kpbs.org/news/politics/2026/06/17/after-months-of-public-pressure-imperial-county-passes-temporary-moratorium-on-data-centers","label":"www.kpbs.org"},{"url":"https://www.yahoo.com/news/us/articles/california-hits-pause-could-biggest-031900686.html","label":"www.yahoo.com"}],"parties":[{"role":"Operator","name":"Imperial Valley Computer Manufacturing, LLC (developer Sebastian Rucci)"},{"role":"Named customer","name":"Undisclosed hyperscaler(s)"}],"groups":["delay:local_moratorium:delayed","delay:water_dispute:delayed","delay:community_opposition:delayed"],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"77fc87a9cbbc5266","state":"CA","tracker":"delay","section":"utility_actions","title":"Imperial Irrigation District (IID)","summary":"The Imperial Irrigation District Board of Directors voted unanimously on Tuesday, September 15, 2026 to approve a Large Load Tariff for customers seeking at least 20 MW of demand at an 80% minimum load factor. Large-load customers must bear the costs and financial risks of serving them, including substations, distribution and transmission upgrades and power supply, and the tariff requires a cash deposit, a monthly minimum charge of at least 85% of contracted usage, a 15-year service commitment, and renewable energy purchases to meet state standards. It also lets IID curtail these customers first when demand peaks. The tariff builds on principles the board adopted in December 2025; IID received 243 comments on the May 2026 draft, when nine large-load proposals or inquiries were under evaluation. Land use and zoning remain with local cities and the county.","scope":"Record-specific: CA","status":"approved","date":"2026-09-15","sources":[{"url":"https://www.kpbs.org/news/environment/2026/09/16/imperial-valley-utility-adopts-new-pricing-rules-putting-data-centers-first-for-power-cuts","label":"www.kpbs.org"},{"url":"https://kesq.com/news/2026/09/15/iid-board-unanimously-approves-large-load-tariff/","label":"kesq.com"},{"url":"https://kyma.com/news/imperial-county/2026/09/16/iid-unanimously-approved-large-load-tariff/","label":"kyma.com"}],"parties":[{"role":"Named utility / authority","name":"Imperial Irrigation District (IID)"}],"groups":["utility:tariff:approved"],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"df264e03425ec97a","state":"CA","tracker":"delay","section":"projects","title":"Imperial Valley $10B AI Data Center","summary":"$10B project. Civil rights lawsuit filed against City of Imperial in fed court.","scope":"Record-specific: Imperial","status":"litigation_active","date":"2026-01-12","sources":[{"url":"https://calexicochronicle.com/2026/01/12/developer-of-10b-data-center-sues-city-of-imperial-in-fed-court/","label":"calexicochronicle.com"}],"parties":[{"role":"Operator","name":"Imperial Valley Computer Manufacturing LLC"}],"groups":["delay:litigation:litigation_active","delay:permit_denial:litigation_active"],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"1f4144f81c5395e2","state":"CA","tracker":"delay","section":"county_restrictions","title":"Indio","summary":"Urgency data center moratorium (In force).","scope":"city: Indio","status":"in_force","date":"2026-06-01","sources":[{"url":"https://indio.org","label":"indio.org"}],"parties":[{"role":"Authority","name":"City Council/Board of Supervisors"}],"groups":[],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"e7b12665e7c6942f","state":"CA","tracker":"delay","section":"county_restrictions","title":"Los Angeles County (unincorporated)","summary":"Los Angeles County Regional Planning Director Amy Bodek issued a memorandum on Thursday, September 17, 2026 ordering an immediate prohibition on development of large-scale data centers that power artificial intelligence in unincorporated areas. The directive is interim guidance for planning staff while the county works to codify the prohibition in its zoning code. It follows a motion by Supervisor Hilda Solis that the Board of Supervisors approved unanimously in April. No end date is stated.","scope":"county: Los Angeles County (unincorporated)","status":"in_force","date":"2026-09-17","sources":[{"url":"https://abc7.com/post/la-county-issues-temporary-ban-data-centers-unincorporated-areas/19852541/","label":"abc7.com"}],"parties":[{"role":"Authority","name":"Los Angeles County Department of Regional Planning"}],"groups":[],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"27292bc8804ce5dc","state":"CA","tracker":"delay","section":"county_restrictions","title":"Mendocino County (unincorporated)","summary":"Sponsored by Supervisors John Haschak and Ted Williams. The ordinance covers hyperscale and colocation facilities, cloud computing, AI training and inference, high-performance computing and cryptocurrency mining, and exempts server closets, office computers, emergency communications and utility facilities. County counsel said the county code does not define data centers, so such a facility could otherwise be processed with only a building permit. No data center application was pending.","scope":"county: Mendocino County (unincorporated)","status":"in_force","date":"2026-09-01","sources":[{"url":"https://www.pressdemocrat.com/2026/09/03/mendocino-county-adopts-temporary-data-center-moratorium/","label":"www.pressdemocrat.com"},{"url":"https://mendovoice.com/2026/09/mendocino-county-supes-ban-data-centers-for-the-moment-at-least/","label":"mendovoice.com"}],"parties":[{"role":"Authority","name":"Board of Supervisors"}],"groups":[],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"8e80a4ba796ddc6b","state":"CA","tracker":"delay","section":"county_restrictions","title":"Monterey Park","summary":"Monterey Park, California, City Council unanimously adopted a 45-day moratorium on data center development on January 21, 2026, prompted by a proposed 250,000 sq ft data center at Saturn Park (proposed by HMC Capital) (15.8 acres). On March 4, 2026, the Council unanimously approved placing a measure on the June 2, 2026 ballot to permanently ban data centers citywide, and extended the existing mora","scope":"city: Monterey Park","status":"in_force","date":"2026-01-21","sources":[{"url":"https://www.montereypark.ca.gov/1710/Data-Center-Information","label":"www.montereypark.ca.gov"},{"url":"https://www.sgvtribune.com/2026/03/05/monterey-park-approves-ballot-measure-to-prohibit-data-centers/","label":"www.sgvtribune.com"},{"url":"https://www.datacenterdynamics.com/en/news/45-day-data-center-moratorium-passed-in-monterey-park-california-with-more-permanent-regulations-to-come/","label":"www.datacenterdynamics.com"},{"url":"https://www.coloradoboulevard.net/monterey-park-moves-toward-permanent-citywide-ban-on-data-centers/","label":"www.coloradoboulevard.net"}],"parties":[{"role":"Authority","name":"City Council"}],"groups":[],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"b568fba16bee159e","state":"CA","tracker":"delay","section":"county_restrictions","title":"Monterey Park","summary":"Monterey Park, California, City Council voted unanimously to place a permanent data center ban on the June 2, 2026 ballot (by HMC Capital / HMC StratCap). If approved by voters, it would permanently ban all data centers citywide ,  an escalation from the 45-day moratorium passed in January 2026. The community collected 5,779 petition signatures.","scope":"city: Monterey Park","status":"pending","date":"2026-03-04","sources":[{"url":"https://www.montereypark.ca.gov/m/newsflash/home/detail/1306","label":"www.montereypark.ca.gov"},{"url":"https://laist.com/news/monterey-park-data-center-ballot-question","label":"laist.com"},{"url":"https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_Park,_California,_Prohibit_Data_Centers_Measure_(June_2026)","label":"ballotpedia.org"}],"parties":[{"role":"Authority","name":"City Council"}],"groups":[],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"927b8a9161c7981b","state":"CA","tracker":"delay","section":"county_restrictions","title":"Monterey Park (permanent ballot ban)","summary":"Monterey Park, California, City Council voted unanimously to place a permanent data center ban on the June 2, 2026 ballot (by HMC Capital / HMC StratCap). If approved by voters, it would permanently ban all data centers citywide, an escalation from the 45-day moratorium passed in January 2026. The community collected 5,779 petition signatures.","scope":"local: Monterey Park (permanent ballot ban)","status":"proposed","date":"2026-03-04","sources":[{"url":"https://www.montereypark.ca.gov/m/newsflash/home/detail/1306","label":"www.montereypark.ca.gov"},{"url":"https://laist.com/news/monterey-park-data-center-ballot-question","label":"laist.com"},{"url":"https://ballotpedia.org/Monterey_Park,_California,_Prohibit_Data_Centers_Measure_(June_2026)","label":"ballotpedia.org"}],"parties":[{"role":"Authority","name":"Monterey Park (permanent ballot ban)"}],"groups":[],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"60ad802b8bf4ce26","state":"CA","tracker":"delay","section":"projects","title":"Monterey Park Data Center (HMC StratCap)","summary":"247,000 sq ft facility that would have used ~3x electricity of entire 60,000-person city; would have sat under 500 feet from nearest home; ban can only be overturned by another ballot measure.","scope":"Record-specific: Monterey Park (Los Angeles County)","status":"cancelled","date":"2026-01","sources":[{"url":"https://www.latimes.com/environment/story/2026-06-03/in-first-for-country-voters-in-monterey-park-ban-data-centers","label":"www.latimes.com"},{"url":"https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/feb/07/california-monterey-park-stop-datacenter-construction","label":"www.theguardian.com"}],"parties":[{"role":"Operator","name":"HMC StratCap"}],"groups":["delay:community_opposition:cancelled"],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"9d8af8c0cb9b1508","state":"CA","tracker":"delay","section":"county_restrictions","title":"Oakland","summary":"An Oakland City Council committee approved a proposed 45-day moratorium on new data centers after public testimony. The city would not accept new data center proposals during that period. The measure follows opposition to a planned project in a 20,000 square foot downtown building that the developer calls an innovation center. The full City Council is scheduled to take a final vote on October 6, 2026. Next date: 2026-10-06.","scope":"city: Oakland","status":"pending","date":"2026-09-22","sources":[{"url":"https://www.nbcbayarea.com/news/local/oakland-data-center-moratorium-vote/4147127/","label":"www.nbcbayarea.com"}],"parties":[{"role":"Authority","name":"Oakland City Council committee"}],"groups":[],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"345f48017f0b0304","state":"CA","tracker":"delay","section":"utility_actions","title":"PG&E","summary":"PG&E’s proposed Rule 30 Tariff is pending California Public Utilities Commission approval. It would apply to new load additions greater than 10 MW interconnected at 50 kV–230 kV, including hyperscale data centers.","scope":"Record-specific: CA","status":"pending","date":"2025-09","sources":[{"url":"https://www.westernenergyboard.org/wp-content/uploads/WEIB.pdf","label":"www.westernenergyboard.org"}],"parties":[{"role":"Named utility / authority","name":"PG&E"}],"groups":["utility:tariff:pending"],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"a93460236987d2aa","state":"CA","tracker":"delay","section":"utility_actions","title":"Pacific Gas and Electric (PG&E)","summary":"PG&E asked the California Public Utilities Commission to approve an exceptional case agreement with Google LLC for a new 250 MW transmission-level retail load at 230 kV in San Jose. The CPUC delayed its vote on Advice Letter 7785-E, with the vote moved from August 13, 2026, to September 3, 2026.","scope":"Record-specific: CA","status":"pending","date":"2025-12-18","sources":[{"url":"https://mgrid.org/2026/08/14/cpuc-pushes-its-vote-on-pges-250-mw-google-data-center-deal-in-san-jose-to-september-3/","label":"mgrid.org"}],"parties":[{"role":"Named utility / authority","name":"Pacific Gas and Electric (PG&E)"}],"groups":["utility:special contract:pending"],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"d8dc8b595b9287b9","state":"CA","tracker":"delay","section":"utility_actions","title":"Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E)","summary":"PG&E filed an application with the California Public Utilities Commission to establish Electric Rule 30, a streamlined approach for energizing new transmission-level retail customers. The proposal would require large-load customers to fund initial interconnection facilities and costs, with refunds over time based on revenues, while imposing minimum demand and contract requirements; the CPUC’s interim implementation decision required new transmission-level customers to pay initial costs and deferred rate-recovery decisions.","scope":"Record-specific: CA","status":"contested","date":"2024-11-21","sources":[{"url":"https://autl.assembly.ca.gov/system/files/2026-01/01.28.2026_joint-privacy_ai-oversight-hearing-background.pdf","label":"autl.assembly.ca.gov"}],"parties":[{"role":"Named utility / authority","name":"Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E)"}],"groups":["utility:tariff:contested"],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"e9224e475fe0078d","state":"CA","tracker":"delay","section":"utility_actions","title":"Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E)","summary":"The California Public Utilities Commission adopted Resolution E-5420 approving two agreements between PG&E and STACK Infrastructure to interconnect and energize STACK’s 90 MW Silicon Valley data center. The Commission modified the refund process to provide annual refunds equal to 75% of transmission-related revenues PG&E collects from STACK, with 25% retained for maintenance and broader grid upgrades.","scope":"Record-specific: CA","status":"approved","date":"2025-10-30","sources":[{"url":"https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/california-public-utilities-commission-9602222/","label":"www.jdsupra.com"}],"parties":[{"role":"Named utility / authority","name":"Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E)"}],"groups":["utility:special contract:approved"],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"2331af1293597280","state":"CA","tracker":"delay","section":"utility_actions","title":"Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E); Southern California Edison Company (SCE); San Diego Gas & Electric Company (SDG&E); Bear Valley Electric Service, Inc.; Liberty Utilities (CalPeco Electric) LLC; PacifiCorp","summary":"The California Public Utilities Commission proposed instituting a rulemaking on California Advanced Electric Rate Design. The proceeding will consider rate designs and tariffs for data centers and other large-load customers, including measures to prevent stranded costs and cost shifting and to support beneficial load growth and load flexibility.","scope":"Record-specific: CA","status":"pending","date":"2026-04","sources":[{"url":"https://docs.cpuc.ca.gov/PublishedDocs/Published/G000/M604/K449/604449740.PDF","label":"docs.cpuc.ca.gov"}],"parties":[{"role":"Named utility / authority","name":"Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E); Southern California Edison Company (SCE); San Diego Gas & Electric Company (SDG&E); Bear Valley Electric Service, Inc.; Liberty Utilities (CalPeco Electric) LLC; PacifiCorp"}],"groups":["utility:other:pending"],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"d4c9804863fba453","state":"CA","tracker":"delay","section":"county_restrictions","title":"Palm Springs","summary":"Adopted under California Government Code section 65858 while staff studies water use, electricity demand and infrastructure impacts. Palm Springs joins Coachella, Indio and Desert Hot Springs among Coachella Valley cities that have paused or banned data centers. Update 2026-09-30: The Palm Springs City Council extended its data center moratorium on Wednesday, September 30, 2026. The original 45-day interim urgency ordinance was adopted August 26 and was set to expire October 10. The extension adds 22 months and 15 days, for a total of two years, and runs through August 25, 2028. KESQ reported the vote as unanimous. The city will use the time to write zoning rules for data centers as part of its zoning code update. Next date: 2028-08-25. (Previously recorded as in_force, dated 2026-08-26.)","scope":"city: Palm Springs","status":"in_force","date":"2026-09-30","sources":[{"url":"https://kesq.com/news/2026/08/26/palm-springs-city-council-approves-temporary-data-center-moratorium/","label":"kesq.com"},{"url":"https://thepalmspringspost.com/palm-springs-joins-other-valley-cities-in-temporary-ban-on-data-centers/","label":"thepalmspringspost.com"},{"url":"https://thepalmspringspost.com/palm-springs-extends-data-center-moratorium-to-2028/","label":"thepalmspringspost.com"},{"url":"https://kesq.com/news/2026/09/30/palm-springs-city-council-approves-extending-data-center-moratorium/","label":"kesq.com"}],"parties":[{"role":"Authority","name":"City Council"}],"groups":[],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"a5ed452633495ccc","state":"CA","tracker":"delay","section":"county_restrictions","title":"Poway (San Diego County)","summary":"The Poway City Council voted unanimously on Tuesday, September 15, 2026 to give initial approval to an ordinance banning artificial intelligence data centers anywhere in the city, including the South Poway Business Park. A vote on final approval is set for October 6, 2026. Next date: 2026-10-06.","scope":"city: Poway (San Diego County)","status":"pending","date":"2026-09-15","sources":[{"url":"https://www.nbcsandiego.com/news/local/poway-city-council-to-consider-ai-data-centers-ban/4074009/","label":"www.nbcsandiego.com"}],"parties":[{"role":"Authority","name":"Poway City Council"}],"groups":[],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"aee4619fa966a1d2","state":"CA","tracker":"delay","section":"county_restrictions","title":"Richmond","summary":"Council voted Tuesday night, September 15, 2026. Richmond has no data centers and no applications. It is the third Bay Area city to adopt a pause, after Oakley and Gilroy.","scope":"city: Richmond","status":"in_force","date":"2026-09-15","sources":[{"url":"https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMingFBVV95cUxQZ2owc3E1VG9UQnpaTkJlOWl2Q0Q2UHN3RHNCbUlGX3VWMnZuY0d3Z3JaR08tbDVkVU1WSUluMjdwM0wwTFR4SXBRazBidUk0SmZEc01nM2xJTnNFaFlPTjdxajdudkUtVkY2RGlNMFNtNUJ1OXVmcXFGaUo3bFBhNWZMNldMLVAyVWFGNUdqSXRsSk9QLXZ3blEySG5KZw","label":"news.google.com"},{"url":"https://www.eastbaytimes.com/2026/09/16/richmond-data-center-ban/","label":"www.eastbaytimes.com"},{"url":"https://www.nbcbayarea.com/news/local/richmond-data-center-moratorium/4143766/","label":"www.nbcbayarea.com"}],"parties":[{"role":"Authority","name":"City Council"}],"groups":[],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"686efa78facdadc1","state":"CA","tracker":"delay","section":"utility_actions","title":"Sacramento Municipal Utility District (SMUD)","summary":"SMUD is developing a policy for customers with electrical loads of 50 megawatts or more. The policy would establish processes for extending service, evaluating transmission costs and grid impacts, and assigning related costs to large customers to protect existing customers from cost shifts.","scope":"Record-specific: CA","status":"pending","date":null,"sources":[{"url":"https://www.smud.org/Corporate/About-us/Reliability/Large-electrical-load-project-growth","label":"www.smud.org"}],"parties":[{"role":"Named utility / authority","name":"Sacramento Municipal Utility District (SMUD)"}],"groups":["utility:statement:pending"],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"65708bfad2e82891","state":"CA","tracker":"delay","section":"utility_actions","title":"Sacramento Municipal Utility District (SMUD)","summary":"SMUD began a Board discussion on policies for large loads of 50 MW or higher, including pricing, commodity and renewable-energy costs, infrastructure-cost recovery, financial security, environmental costs, and risk mitigation. SMUD presented potential pathways involving Board policy, rate schedules, or both, with draft policy review targeted for Q4 2026 and a 2028–2029 rate-process Board vote targeted for Q3 2027.","scope":"Record-specific: CA","status":"pending","date":"2026-06-17","sources":[{"url":"https://www.smud.org/-/media/Documents/Corporate/About-Us/Board-Meetings-and-Agendas/2026/June/2026-06-17_Exhibit-to-Agenda-Item-2.ashx","label":"www.smud.org"}],"parties":[{"role":"Named utility / authority","name":"Sacramento Municipal Utility District (SMUD)"}],"groups":["utility:other:pending"],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"f34068a706459748","state":"CA","tracker":"delay","section":"county_restrictions","title":"San Francisco (City and County)","summary":"Introduced September 15, 2026 by Supervisor Shamann Walton with co-sponsors Connie Chan, Jackie Fielder and Chyanne Chen. If approved it would take effect immediately and pause city approvals of data centers. Walton said the city's Planning Code definition of data centers dates from 2001 and that he ultimately wants a permanent ban. Supervisor Shamann Walton introduced the 45-day urgency ordinance, co-sponsored by Supervisors Connie Chan, Jackie Fielder and Chyanne Chen. As an urgency ordinance it needs nine of eleven votes. A September 22, 2026 San Francisco Standard report still described it as needing Board approval, and a September 23 San Francisco Chronicle roundup listed it as introduced. If passed it could be extended up to 22 months and 15 days.","scope":"city: San Francisco (City and County)","status":"proposed","date":"2026-09-15","sources":[{"url":"https://www.kqed.org/news/12099583/san-francisco-supervisors-push-for-moratorium-on-new-data-centers","label":"www.kqed.org"},{"url":"https://www.nbcbayarea.com/news/local/san-francisco-supervisors-moratorium-new-data-centers/4143257/","label":"www.nbcbayarea.com"},{"url":"https://sfstandard.com/2026/09/22/ai-capital-world-doesn-t-know-many-data-centers-has/","label":"sfstandard.com"},{"url":"https://missionlocal.org/2026/09/data-center-moratorium-sf-board-of-supervisors/","label":"missionlocal.org"},{"url":"https://www.sf.gov/news-supervisor-walton-to-introduce-moratorium-on-ai-data-centers-in-san-francisco","label":"www.sf.gov"}],"parties":[{"role":"Authority","name":"Board of Supervisors"}],"groups":[],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"2cf6083356d2dd5d","state":"CA","tracker":"delay","section":"county_restrictions","title":"Santa Clara","summary":"Santa Clara Planning Commission denied a 72MW data center permit at 2805 Bowers Ave (3-2 in favor; failed the required 4-vote majority, so the permit was denied). Chair noted the city has 50+ data centers consuming 60% of its energy and asked 'when is it too many?' GI Partners appealed; City Council approved the project Aug 29, 2024. The community's stated objective was to uphold denial of GI Part","scope":"city: Santa Clara","status":"in_force","date":"2024-03-06","sources":[{"url":"https://www.svvoice.com/planning-commission-blocks-data-center-project/","label":"www.svvoice.com"},{"url":"https://www.datacenterdynamics.com/en/news/gi-partners-secures-planning-permission-for-72mw-data-center-in-santa-clara-california/","label":"www.datacenterdynamics.com"}],"parties":[{"role":"Authority","name":"Planning Commission"}],"groups":[],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"8e8f753c8642f5c0","state":"CA","tracker":"delay","section":"county_restrictions","title":"Santa Cruz County","summary":"The Santa Cruz County Board of Supervisors voted 3-2 against a proposal that would have let voters decide on artificial intelligence data centers in unincorporated Santa Cruz County. The San Francisco Chronicle described the rejected item as a measure for the 2028 ballot. Authority over data center siting stays with the board.","scope":"county: Santa Cruz County","status":"denied","date":"2026-09-15","sources":[{"url":"https://localnewsmatters.org/?p=193119","label":"localnewsmatters.org"},{"url":"https://www.yahoo.com/news/us/articles/bay-area-cities-shut-door-204042026.html","label":"www.yahoo.com"}],"parties":[{"role":"Authority","name":"Santa Cruz County Board of Supervisors"}],"groups":[],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"2c217c66f5f9e73f","state":"CA","tracker":"delay","section":"utility_actions","title":"Silicon Valley Power","summary":"Silicon Valley Power’s draft Integrated Resource Plan forecasts that annual system load will nearly double by 2035, primarily due to data-center demand. The plan proposes additions including geothermal, wind, solar, storage, hydrogen, and biogas resources, as well as a planned 50 MW, four-hour utility-scale battery system expected to enter commercial operation in late 2025.","scope":"Record-specific: CA","status":"pending","date":null,"sources":[{"url":"https://www.datacenterdynamics.com/en/news/silicon-valley-power-says-data-center-load-to-double-by-2035-will-need-geothermal-power-and-batteries/","label":"www.datacenterdynamics.com"}],"parties":[{"role":"Named utility / authority","name":"Silicon Valley Power"}],"groups":["utility:IRP:pending"],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"9365b7af7942c436","state":"CA","tracker":"delay","section":"utility_actions","title":"Southern California Edison Company (U 338-E)","summary":"Southern California Edison Company filed an application for approval of a Large Power Dynamic Pricing Rate and a consolidated application for approval of Marginal Cost-Based Dynamic Pricing Rates in compliance with Decision 22-10-022 and Load Management Standards.","scope":"Record-specific: CA","status":"pending","date":"2024-06-26","sources":[{"url":"https://docs.cpuc.ca.gov/PublishedDocs/SupDoc/A2406014;A2412008/8871/595345004.pdf","label":"docs.cpuc.ca.gov"},{"url":"https://docs.cpuc.ca.gov/PublishedDocs/SupDoc/A2412008;A2406014/8963/599154478.pdf","label":"docs.cpuc.ca.gov"}],"parties":[{"role":"Named utility / authority","name":"Southern California Edison Company (U 338-E)"}],"groups":["utility:tariff:pending"],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"80c84afec86753ee","state":"CA","tracker":"delay","section":"jurisdictional_actions","title":"Tulare County","summary":"Update 2026-09-22: The Tulare County Board of Supervisors voted 5-0 on September 22, 2026 to extend its moratorium on new data center development in unincorporated areas for another 10 months. The moratorium does not apply inside the county's incorporated cities. Staff will continue studying zoning, conditional use permits, setbacks, noise, water, energy and backup power rules. (Previously recorded as pending_review, dated 2026-01-01.)","scope":"county: Tulare County","status":"in_force","date":"2026-09-22","sources":[{"url":"https://www.datacenterbans.com/","label":"www.datacenterbans.com"},{"url":"https://www.fresnobee.com/news/california/central-valley/article316922154.html","label":"www.fresnobee.com"},{"url":"https://thesungazette.com/article/news/2026/09/23/county-board-upholds-temporary-ban-on-data-centers/","label":"thesungazette.com"},{"url":"https://writing.strisker.com/data-centers-daily-notes-september-28-2026/","label":"writing.strisker.com"},{"url":"https://www.recorderonline.com/news/board-extends-moratorium-opposes-data-centers-with-exception/article_5d90757b-7c8f-4c36-b956-b6f108ef43e5.html","label":"www.recorderonline.com"}],"parties":[{"role":"Authority","name":"Tulare County Board of Supervisors"}],"groups":[],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"0bc1904215c57133","state":"CA","tracker":"moratorium","section":"local","title":"45-day moratorium on data centers","summary":"The City Council unanimously adopted an urgency ordinance in late August 2026 imposing a 45-day moratorium on data centers and other high-intensity computing uses while staff develops land use and zoning regulations. No data center application had been filed. Staff is due back on Oct. 10, 2026, and the council may extend the moratorium by 10 months and then a further 12 months.","scope":"Local: Escondido","status":"enacted","date":"2026-08","sources":[{"url":"https://ncpipeline.substack.com/p/escondido-data-center-moratorium","label":"ncpipeline.substack.com"}],"parties":[{"role":"Jurisdiction","name":"Escondido"}],"groups":["restriction:local:enacted"],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"5709c4b5b56bdcb7","state":"CA","tracker":"moratorium","section":"local","title":"45-day urgency moratorium on data centers","summary":"Arcata City Council unanimously adopted an urgency data center moratorium that halts permit processing for 45 days, with a likely extension of up to 10 months and 15 days. The vote was the evening of Sept. 16, 2026.","scope":"Local: Arcata (Humboldt County)","status":"enacted","date":"2026-09","sources":[{"url":"https://lostcoastoutpost.com/2026/sep/17/all-right-s-it-no-more-data-centers-while-said-arc/","label":"lostcoastoutpost.com"}],"parties":[{"role":"Jurisdiction","name":"Arcata (Humboldt County)"}],"groups":["restriction:local:enacted"],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"c8bffaf8e914e126","state":"CA","tracker":"moratorium","section":"local","title":"45-day urgency moratorium on data centers","summary":"The City of Commerce City Council adopted an urgency ordinance in August 2026 prohibiting approval of land use permits, entitlements or agreements for data centers for 45 days, with a possible extension of up to 10 months and 15 days after a public hearing.","scope":"Local: Commerce","status":"enacted","date":"2026-08","sources":[{"url":"https://mynewsla.com/government/2026/08/12/city-of-commerce-approves-temporary-ban-on-data-center-development/","label":"mynewsla.com"}],"parties":[{"role":"Jurisdiction","name":"Commerce"}],"groups":["restriction:local:enacted"],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"106240b9c12fa638","state":"CA","tracker":"moratorium","section":"local","title":"45-day urgency moratorium on data centers","summary":"The Board of Supervisors voted 5-0 on Sept. 1, 2026 to adopt an urgency ordinance barring any new data center in the unincorporated county. It took effect immediately and runs 45 days, to Oct. 16, 2026. County code does not define or regulate data centers, so one could otherwise be approved through a routine building permit. A hearing set for Oct. 6 could extend the moratorium for up to two years while permanent regulations are written.","scope":"Local: Mendocino County","status":"enacted","date":"2026-09","sources":[{"url":"https://www.pressdemocrat.com/2026/09/03/mendocino-county-adopts-temporary-data-center-moratorium/","label":"www.pressdemocrat.com"}],"parties":[{"role":"Jurisdiction","name":"Mendocino County"}],"groups":["restriction:local:enacted"],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"9749538c1593f5cd","state":"CA","tracker":"moratorium","section":"local","title":"45-day urgency moratorium on data centers","summary":"Riverbank City Council unanimously approved a 45-day moratorium on data centers on Sept. 9, 2026, effective immediately through Oct. 13, with the option to extend. The source reports a unanimous vote but not an explicit 5-0 tally.","scope":"Local: Riverbank (Stanislaus County)","status":"enacted","date":"2026-09","sources":[{"url":"https://news.theregistrysf.com/riverbank-freezes-data-center-rush-with-45-day-moratorium-as-aemetis-pitches-clean-energy-project-on-former-army-munitions-site/","label":"news.theregistrysf.com"}],"parties":[{"role":"Jurisdiction","name":"Riverbank (Stanislaus County)"}],"groups":["restriction:local:enacted"],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"8aa7be7faae30500","state":"CA","tracker":"moratorium","section":"local","title":"45-day urgency moratorium on data centers","summary":"The Dixon City Council voted unanimously at a special meeting on Wednesday, Sept. 30, 2026 to impose a 45-day moratorium on the approval of new land-use applications for data centers within the city. Reporting indicates the pause also covers battery energy storage facilities and that the city expects to consider an extension while it reviews infrastructure impacts.","scope":"Local: Dixon","status":"enacted","date":"2026-09","sources":[{"url":"https://www.yahoo.com/news/us/articles/dixon-city-council-imposes-45-030611364.html","label":"www.yahoo.com"}],"parties":[{"role":"Jurisdiction","name":"Dixon"}],"groups":["restriction:local:enacted"],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"dbd84a0fba7823d9","state":"CA","tracker":"moratorium","section":"local","title":"45-day urgency moratorium on data centers","summary":"The Angels Camp City Council voted 5-0 on Aug. 18, 2026 to impose a 45-day moratorium on data centers within city limits. The action preceded a similar 45-day moratorium adopted by the Calaveras County Board of Supervisors for unincorporated areas.","scope":"Local: Angels Camp","status":"enacted","date":"2026-08","sources":[{"url":"https://www.uniondemocrat.com/news/article_cb1a7744-e529-49e5-adbe-960c644819b8.html","label":"www.uniondemocrat.com"}],"parties":[{"role":"Jurisdiction","name":"Angels Camp"}],"groups":["restriction:local:enacted"],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"f8de3ea100d5a73c","state":"CA","tracker":"moratorium","section":"states","title":"CEQA treatment of data centers","summary":"Signed by Gov. Newsom on Sept. 21, 2026 (Chapter 439, Statutes of 2026). Amends CEQA provisions covering environmental leadership development projects, data centers and geothermal power plant projects.","scope":"State: California","status":"enacted","date":"2026-09","sources":[{"url":"https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billStatusClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB887","label":"leginfo.legislature.ca.gov"}],"parties":[],"groups":["restriction:states:enacted"],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"b175ffb656ec4e09","state":"CA","tracker":"moratorium","section":"states","title":"California AB 2619 would establish comprehensive water reporting requirements with three data center size categories: hyperscale (>25 MW), mid-range (2-25 MW)","summary":"Signed by Gov. Newsom on Sept. 21, 2026 (Chapter 437, Statutes of 2026). Requires data centers to report annual water use.","scope":"State: California","status":"enacted","date":"2026-09","sources":[{"url":"https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billStatusClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260AB2619","label":"leginfo.legislature.ca.gov"}],"parties":[],"groups":["restriction:states:enacted"],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"9a181689208d061f","state":"CA","tracker":"moratorium","section":"states","title":"California Assembly Bill 222 would require data center operators to report energy consumption and efficiency metrics, including Power Usage Effectiveness","summary":"AB 222, which would have required data center energy use reporting, was held under submission in committee on Aug. 29, 2025 and saw no further action before the 2025-26 session ended on Aug. 31, 2026.","scope":"State: California","status":"failed","date":"2026-08","sources":[{"url":"https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billStatusClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260AB222","label":"leginfo.legislature.ca.gov"}],"parties":[],"groups":["restriction:states:failed"],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"36821d2782e3a288","state":"CA","tracker":"moratorium","section":"states","title":"California SB 57 directs the CPUC to assess whether investor-owned utility costs from new data center loads result in cost shifts to other retail customers.","summary":"California SB 57 directs the CPUC to assess whether investor-owned utility costs from new data center loads result in cost shifts to other retail customers. Report is due to the Legislature by January 1, 2027. Signed by Governor Newsom on October 11, 2025 (Chapter 647, Statutes of 2025). The law takes a study-only approach; earlier prescriptive provisions were removed.","scope":"State: California","status":"enacted","date":"2025-10","sources":[{"url":"https://sd18.senate.ca.gov/news/legislation-protect-california-ratepayers-paying-data-centers-energy-costs-signed-law","label":"sd18.senate.ca.gov"}],"parties":[],"groups":["restriction:states:enacted"],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"a99eee6a8346d803","state":"CA","tracker":"moratorium","section":"states","title":"California Technology Innovation and Ratepayer Protection Act","summary":"Signed by Gov. Newsom on Sept. 21, 2026 (Chapter 438, Statutes of 2026). The California Technology Innovation and Ratepayer Protection Act directs the CPUC to adopt data center tariffs that assign transmission upgrade costs to data centers.","scope":"State: California","status":"enacted","date":"2026-09","sources":[{"url":"https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billStatusClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB886","label":"leginfo.legislature.ca.gov"}],"parties":[],"groups":["restriction:states:enacted"],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"1ed97d6ba694c7ec","state":"CA","tracker":"moratorium","section":"local","title":"City moratorium on data centers for a stated term","summary":"One-year urgency moratorium suspending approval, establishment, or operation of data centers within city limits. Extended from an initial short-term urgency ordinance adopted in March 2026. Vote 3-0. Water/groundwater protection cited as primary concern, city sits atop the San Gabriel Valley Groundwater Basin. Part of the San Gabriel Valley wave alongside Monterey Park, El Monte, and Montebello. The measure has a stated duration whose end date is not recorded.","scope":"Local: Baldwin Park","status":"enacted","date":"2026-04","sources":[{"url":"https://citizenportal.ai/articles/7830978/california/los-angeles-county/baldwin-park-city/baldwin-park-adopts-one-year-urgency-moratorium-on-new-data-centers-citing-water-concerns","label":"citizenportal.ai"}],"parties":[{"role":"Jurisdiction","name":"Baldwin Park"}],"groups":["restriction:local:enacted"],"attribution":"AI GridWatch moratorium tracker, CC BY 4.0 (aigridwatch.com)","provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"7c6238e16f306088","state":"CA","tracker":"moratorium","section":"local","title":"City moratorium on data centers through April 14, 2027","summary":"Initial 45-day urgency ordinance Apr 15; extended May 16 for 10 months 15 days (through ~Apr 2027). Working toward permanent ban. Voted 5-0 on extension. The measure runs to April 14, 2027.","scope":"Local: Oakley","status":"enacted","date":"2026-01","sources":[{"url":"https://contracosta.news/2026/05/16/oakley-agrees-to-extend-moratorium-on-data-centers-for-1-year/","label":"contracosta.news"}],"parties":[{"role":"Jurisdiction","name":"Oakley"}],"groups":["restriction:local:enacted"],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"e6f878bf8f23af8a","state":"CA","tracker":"moratorium","section":"local","title":"City moratorium on data centers through February 2, 2027","summary":"Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 3063 (45-day moratorium); extended Apr 22 by Ordinance No. 3065 (7-0) for 10 months 15 days under Gov. Code 65858. Prohibits accepting or processing new data center land use applications. The measure runs to February 2, 2027.","scope":"Local: El Monte","status":"enacted","date":"2026-03","sources":[{"url":"https://www.ci.el-monte.ca.us/AgendaCenter/ViewFile/Agenda/_03182026-1367","label":"www.ci.el-monte.ca.us"}],"parties":[{"role":"Jurisdiction","name":"El Monte"}],"groups":["restriction:local:enacted"],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"4db95272d4d0b3b9","state":"CA","tracker":"moratorium","section":"local","title":"City moratorium on data centers through July 15, 2027","summary":"Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 889 (initial 45-day). Extended unanimously Aug 18 via Ordinance No. 890 for 10 months 15 days. Data centers were previously permitted by right in industrial zones. Key concern is water, city faces state requirements to reduce groundwater pumping. The measure runs to July 15, 2027.","scope":"Local: Patterson","status":"enacted","date":"2026-07","sources":[{"url":"https://www.cbsnews.com/sacramento/news/patterson-extends-data-center-moratorium/","label":"www.cbsnews.com"}],"parties":[{"role":"Jurisdiction","name":"Patterson"}],"groups":["restriction:local:enacted"],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"e8632d627b1772a4","state":"CA","tracker":"moratorium","section":"local","title":"City moratorium on data centers through October 10, 2026","summary":"45-day urgency moratorium covering data centers AND grid-scale battery energy storage. Unanimous vote. City has no zoning standards for either use. Extendable up to 2 years under CA Gov. Code 65858. The measure runs to October 10, 2026.","scope":"Local: Morgan Hill","status":"enacted","date":"2026-08","sources":[{"url":"https://morganhilltimes.com/morgan-hill-declares-moratorium-on-data-centers-battery-storage-sites/","label":"morganhilltimes.com"}],"parties":[{"role":"Jurisdiction","name":"Morgan Hill"}],"groups":["restriction:local:enacted"],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"1df245d5ecbbe1dd","state":"CA","tracker":"moratorium","section":"local","title":"City moratorium on data centers through October 9, 2026","summary":"Emergency ordinance establishing 45-day moratorium on new data center applications. Unanimous vote. Requested by Councilmember Steve Manos after resident concerns. City zoning code does not specifically address data centers. The measure runs to October 9, 2026.","scope":"Local: Lake Elsinore","status":"enacted","date":"2026-08","sources":[{"url":"https://elsinore247.com/2026/08/council-unanimously-approves-45-day-data-center-moratorium.html","label":"elsinore247.com"}],"parties":[{"role":"Jurisdiction","name":"Lake Elsinore"}],"groups":["restriction:local:enacted"],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"a25de67269df0ed1","state":"CA","tracker":"moratorium","section":"local","title":"City moratorium on data centers with no end date","summary":"Ordinance O2M26-4863 (effective Aug 1, 2026) prohibits data centers in office and industrial zones. Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval (Resolution 26-07). Measure DB on the Nov 3, 2026 ballot would extend the ban to all zones and lock it into the city charter, requiring voter approval to reverse. If passed, Alhambra would be the second CA city after Monterey Park to enact a voter-approved permanent ban. The measure has no end date by design.","scope":"Local: Alhambra","status":"enacted","date":"2026-06","sources":[{"url":"https://laist.com/news/alhambra-ballot-measure-data-center-ban-2026","label":"laist.com"}],"parties":[{"role":"Jurisdiction","name":"Alhambra"}],"groups":["restriction:local:enacted"],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"07dc420f28cea720","state":"CA","tracker":"moratorium","section":"local","title":"Council directs staff to draft data center urgency moratorium","summary":"On Aug. 25, 2026, Whittier City Council voted 5-0 to direct staff to study data centers and other land uses and return with moratorium options and longer-term rules. No urgency ordinance was adopted at that meeting.","scope":"Local: Whittier (Los Angeles County)","status":"proposed","date":"2026-08","sources":[{"url":"https://www.whittier360newsnetwork.com/post/whittier-council-opens-door-to-moratoriums-on-data-centers-detention-facilities-and-other-land-uses","label":"www.whittier360newsnetwork.com"}],"parties":[{"role":"Jurisdiction","name":"Whittier (Los Angeles County)"}],"groups":["restriction:local:proposed"],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"0552f5d218785acb","state":"CA","tracker":"moratorium","section":"local","title":"Council starts process to prohibit future data center approvals","summary":"The Hayward City Council voted 7-0 on September 16, 2026 to direct staff to start the process for prohibiting future data center approvals. The council will revisit the issue in October 2026.","scope":"Local: Hayward","status":"proposed","date":"2026-09","sources":[{"url":"https://localnewsmatters.org/2026/09/18/hayward-data-center-moratorium/","label":"localnewsmatters.org"}],"parties":[{"role":"Jurisdiction","name":"Hayward"}],"groups":["restriction:local:proposed"],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"2a076a8efdfced43","state":"CA","tracker":"moratorium","section":"local","title":"County moratorium on data centers through October 9, 2026","summary":"Board of Supervisors adopted 45-day urgency ordinance 4-0 (chair absent) on Aug 25, 2026. Can be extended up to two years. Planning Director said large-scale data centers warrant further study on water, electricity, noise, lighting impacts. The measure runs to October 9, 2026.","scope":"Local: Calaveras County","status":"enacted","date":null,"sources":[{"url":"https://mymotherlode.com/news/local/11092598/calaveras-data-center-moratorium-passes-4-0.html","label":"mymotherlode.com"}],"parties":[{"role":"Jurisdiction","name":"Calaveras County"}],"groups":["restriction:local:enacted"],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"4c7a6aab7028e4cf","state":"CA","tracker":"moratorium","section":"local","title":"County moratorium set aside by court; replacement under review","summary":"The temporary moratorium governed final County approvals for data centers in unincorporated areas. Imperial County reported on August 28 that Superior Court directed the measure to be set aside; the County was reviewing next steps and preparing a possible replacement. It is not treated as a current parcel block.","scope":"Local: Imperial County","status":"failed","date":"2026-08","sources":[{"url":"https://imperialcounty.org/2026/08/icdcmoratorium2026/","label":"imperialcounty.org"}],"parties":[{"role":"Jurisdiction","name":"Imperial County"}],"groups":["restriction:local:failed"],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"997e47cb2efa0fb1","state":"CA","tracker":"moratorium","section":"states","title":"Data center electricity rate structures","summary":"Signed by Gov. Newsom on Sept. 21, 2026 (Chapter 440, Statutes of 2026). Establishes data center electricity rate structure provisions in the Public Utilities Code.","scope":"State: California","status":"enacted","date":"2026-09","sources":[{"url":"https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billStatusClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB1168","label":"leginfo.legislature.ca.gov"}],"parties":[],"groups":["restriction:states:enacted"],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"396ad9209089e80b","state":"CA","tracker":"moratorium","section":"local","title":"Data center moratorium, extended into mid-2027","summary":"The Tulare County Board of Supervisors voted 5-0 on Tuesday, Sept. 22, 2026 to extend its Aug. 18, 2026 urgency moratorium on new data center development in unincorporated areas by 10 months and 15 days, into mid-2027. In a separate 3-2 vote the board adopted a position opposing data center development, with an exception for enterprise facilities.","scope":"Local: Tulare County","status":"enacted","date":"2026-09","sources":[{"url":"https://www.recorderonline.com/news/board-extends-moratorium-opposes-data-centers-with-exception/article_5d90757b-7c8f-4c36-b956-b6f108ef43e5.html","label":"www.recorderonline.com"}],"parties":[{"role":"Jurisdiction","name":"Tulare County"}],"groups":["restriction:local:enacted"],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"b138c8f25c6a1df9","state":"CA","tracker":"moratorium","section":"states","title":"Data center reporting requirements","summary":"Signed by Gov. Newsom on Sept. 21, 2026 (Chapter 434, Statutes of 2026). Creates data center reporting obligations to the California Energy Commission, including energy use and local land use disclosures.","scope":"State: California","status":"enacted","date":"2026-09","sources":[{"url":"https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billStatusClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260AB1577","label":"leginfo.legislature.ca.gov"}],"parties":[],"groups":["restriction:states:enacted"],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"e04ce361015d10b8","state":"CA","tracker":"moratorium","section":"states","title":"Data centers: water use disclosures","summary":"Signed by Gov. Newsom on Sept. 21, 2026 (Chapter 436, Statutes of 2026). Requires data center water use disclosures.","scope":"State: California","status":"enacted","date":"2026-09","sources":[{"url":"https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billStatusClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260AB2469","label":"leginfo.legislature.ca.gov"}],"parties":[],"groups":["restriction:states:enacted"],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"2e31d9e1a9cca3fe","state":"CA","tracker":"moratorium","section":"local","title":"Emergency data center moratorium","summary":"The City of Imperial approved an emergency data center moratorium in early June 2026 and extended it in July through May 2027.","scope":"Local: Imperial","status":"enacted","date":"2026-06","sources":[{"url":"https://www.kpbs.org/news/environment/2026/08/04/after-months-of-public-outcry-imperial-valley-cities-are-hitting-the-brakes-on-data-centers","label":"www.kpbs.org"}],"parties":[{"role":"Jurisdiction","name":"Imperial"}],"groups":["restriction:local:enacted"],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"60a1fd085fb7faa2","state":"CA","tracker":"moratorium","section":"local","title":"Expired city moratorium on data centers through March 28, 2026","summary":"Urgency Ordinance No. 2491 (5-0 vote). 45-day moratorium on AI data centers. Expired on schedule ~Mar 28. No extension adopted per review of all council agendas through Jul 2026. Adjacent to Monterey Park which permanently banned data centers. The measure runs to March 28, 2026.","scope":"Local: Montebello","status":"failed","date":"2026-02","sources":[{"url":"https://citizenportal.ai/articles/7355998/california/los-angeles-county/montebello/residents-urge-montebello-council-to-support-moratorium-as-neighbors-oppose-nearby-data-center-proposals","label":"citizenportal.ai"}],"parties":[{"role":"Jurisdiction","name":"Montebello"}],"groups":["restriction:local:failed"],"attribution":"AI GridWatch moratorium tracker, CC BY 4.0 (aigridwatch.com)","provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"6cd48a1a9e3b6e42","state":"CA","tracker":"moratorium","section":"states","title":"Fair Share in Energy Act","summary":"Signed by Gov. Newsom on Sept. 21, 2026 (Chapter 435, Statutes of 2026). The Fair Share in Energy Act adds Public Utilities Code provisions on electricity service to data centers.","scope":"State: California","status":"enacted","date":"2026-09","sources":[{"url":"https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billStatusClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260AB2383","label":"leginfo.legislature.ca.gov"}],"parties":[],"groups":["restriction:states:enacted"],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"9441b074827051cd","state":"CA","tracker":"moratorium","section":"local","title":"Interim prohibition on large-scale data centers in unincorporated areas","summary":"The Los Angeles County Department of Regional Planning issued a memo on September 18, 2026 immediately prohibiting large-scale AI data centers in unincorporated areas while zoning amendments are codified. The action follows an April motion approved unanimously by the Board of Supervisors.","scope":"Local: Los Angeles County","status":"pause","date":"2026-09","sources":[{"url":"https://abc7.com/post/la-county-issues-temporary-ban-data-centers-unincorporated-areas/19852541/","label":"abc7.com"}],"parties":[{"role":"Jurisdiction","name":"Los Angeles County"}],"groups":["restriction:local:pause"],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"d3f536e572c853c0","state":"CA","tracker":"moratorium","section":"local","title":"Local moratorium on data centers through June 17, 2028","summary":"45-day urgency ordinance extended unanimously on Jul 7 by 22 months 15 days, the full two years California law allows. The measure runs to June 17, 2028.","scope":"Local: Desert Hot Springs","status":"enacted","date":"2026-06","sources":[{"url":"https://riversiderecord.org/desert-hot-springs-data-center-moratorium-extended/","label":"riversiderecord.org"}],"parties":[{"role":"Jurisdiction","name":"Desert Hot Springs"}],"groups":["restriction:local:enacted"],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"91ff35645c472dbe","state":"CA","tracker":"moratorium","section":"local","title":"Local moratorium on data centers through October 17, 2026","summary":"City council unanimously adopted urgency ordinance Bill No. 1061-C.S. establishing 45-day moratorium effective immediately. Can be extended under CA Gov Code 65858 while city updates Local Coastal Program (up to two years). The measure runs to October 17, 2026.","scope":"Local: Eureka","status":"enacted","date":null,"sources":[{"url":"https://lostcoastoutpost.com/2026/sep/2/eureka-city-council-approved-temporary-ban-data-ce/","label":"lostcoastoutpost.com"}],"parties":[{"role":"Jurisdiction","name":"Eureka"}],"groups":["restriction:local:enacted"],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"71e0bfc997caca17","state":"CA","tracker":"moratorium","section":"local","title":"Measure NDC permanent data center ban","summary":"After a January 2026 urgency moratorium, voters passed Measure NDC (86% in favor) on June 2, 2026, permanently prohibiting new data centers citywide.","scope":"Local: Monterey Park","status":"enacted","date":"2026-06","sources":[{"url":"https://www.montereypark.ca.gov/1710/Data-Center-Information","label":"www.montereypark.ca.gov"}],"parties":[{"role":"Jurisdiction","name":"Monterey Park"}],"groups":["restriction:local:enacted"],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"558caf6ac46fd86a","state":"CA","tracker":"moratorium","section":"local","title":"Oakland Weighs Data Center Moratorium as Opposition Mounts","summary":"Oakland City Council's Life Enrichment Committee approved a proposed 45-day moratorium on new data center projects on September 22, 2026, sending it to the full City Council for an October 6 vote.","scope":"Local: Oakland","status":"proposed","date":"2026-09","sources":[{"url":"https://www.cbsnews.com/sanfrancisco/news/oakland-data-centers-proposed-moratorium-city-council-committee/","label":"www.cbsnews.com"}],"parties":[{"role":"Jurisdiction","name":"Oakland"}],"groups":["restriction:local:proposed"],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"4297fa613aade787","state":"CA","tracker":"moratorium","section":"local","title":"Ordinance No. 821 banning data centers","summary":"The Irwindale City Council unanimously approved Ordinance No. 821, a data center ban in the city zoning code, on September 9, 2026. The ordinance followed a first reading on August 26 and takes effect 30 days after adoption.","scope":"Local: Irwindale","status":"enacted","date":"2026-09","sources":[{"url":"https://www.sgvtribune.com/2026/09/16/irwindale-approves-data-center-ban-adding-to-growing-list-of-san-gabriel-valley-cities/","label":"www.sgvtribune.com"}],"parties":[{"role":"Jurisdiction","name":"Irwindale"}],"groups":["restriction:local:enacted"],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"cc095341ed505538","state":"CA","tracker":"moratorium","section":"local","title":"Ordinance banning AI data centers, initial approval","summary":"The Poway City Council voted unanimously on September 15, 2026 to give initial approval to an ordinance banning artificial intelligence data centers. A final vote is scheduled for October 6, 2026.","scope":"Local: Poway","status":"proposed","date":"2026-09","sources":[{"url":"https://www.kpbs.org/news/science-technology/2026/09/15/poway-city-council-to-consider-ai-data-center-ban","label":"www.kpbs.org"}],"parties":[{"role":"Jurisdiction","name":"Poway"}],"groups":["restriction:local:proposed"],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"846b44fb44875a68","state":"CA","tracker":"moratorium","section":"local","title":"Permanent citywide ban on large-scale data centers","summary":"The City Council gave final approval on Aug. 26, 2026 to an ordinance permanently prohibiting large-scale data centers anywhere in the city, after a first reading on Aug. 12. Coachella is the second California city to adopt a ban, following Monterey Park. Residents raised water, energy and other environmental impacts.","scope":"Local: Coachella","status":"enacted","date":"2026-08","sources":[{"url":"https://kesq.com/news/2026/08/25/coachella-city-council-passes-permanent-ban-on-data-centers/","label":"kesq.com"}],"parties":[{"role":"Jurisdiction","name":"Coachella"}],"groups":["restriction:local:enacted"],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"09ce6bf92df9e75f","state":"CA","tracker":"moratorium","section":"local","title":"Permanent citywide data center ban","summary":"The Calexico City Council adopted an ordinance prohibiting all new data centers citywide on second reading on September 16, 2026, by a 3-0 vote with two members absent. The first reading was September 2, and the ordinance takes effect 30 days after adoption. The council had earlier declined a temporary urgency moratorium in favor of a permanent Municipal Code amendment.","scope":"Local: Calexico","status":"enacted","date":"2026-09","sources":[{"url":"https://calexicochronicle.com/2026/09/18/calexico-enacts-permanent-data-center-ban/","label":"calexicochronicle.com"}],"parties":[{"role":"Jurisdiction","name":"Calexico"}],"groups":["restriction:local:enacted"],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"ea295658dff6c100","state":"CA","tracker":"moratorium","section":"local","title":"Permanent data center ban (in development)","summary":"Calipatria City Council voted 3-2 on July 14, 2026 to advance an ordinance outlawing data centers within city limits, with a public hearing still pending.","scope":"Local: Calipatria","status":"proposed","date":"2026-07","sources":[{"url":"https://www.kpbs.org/news/environment/2026/08/04/after-months-of-public-outcry-imperial-valley-cities-are-hitting-the-brakes-on-data-centers","label":"www.kpbs.org"}],"parties":[{"role":"Jurisdiction","name":"Calipatria"}],"groups":["restriction:local:proposed"],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"4d8d1ffdf12217a7","state":"CA","tracker":"moratorium","section":"local","title":"Proposed 10-year citywide data center prohibition","summary":"The City Council voted 7-0 on Sept. 3, 2026 to begin drafting a citywide prohibition on data centers lasting 10 years, covering land later annexed into the city and requiring that councilmembers be notified of applications. Mayor Jerry Dyer co-sponsored the measure. The development code amendment must still clear environmental review, the Airport Land Use Commission and the Planning Commission before returning to the council, so no prohibition is in force yet.","scope":"Local: Fresno","status":"proposed","date":"2026-09","sources":[{"url":"https://thebusinessjournal.com/fresno-data-center-ban-council-safeguards/","label":"thebusinessjournal.com"}],"parties":[{"role":"Jurisdiction","name":"Fresno"}],"groups":["restriction:local:proposed"],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"6c0f45a31c38dd96","state":"CA","tracker":"moratorium","section":"local","title":"Proposed 45-day data center moratorium not advanced","summary":"On Sept. 1, 2026 the Tuolumne County Board of Supervisors declined to advance Supervisor Ryan Campbell's proposal for a 45-day data center moratorium, with three supervisors opposed. The board instead voted unanimously to direct staff to develop data center regulations, and the county scheduled a public input meeting for Oct. 7, 2026.","scope":"Local: Tuolumne County","status":"failed","date":"2026-09","sources":[{"url":"https://www.uniondemocrat.com/news/article_6045d40d-8597-4e99-9cc7-054abb83db0d.html","label":"www.uniondemocrat.com"}],"parties":[{"role":"Jurisdiction","name":"Tuolumne County"}],"groups":["restriction:local:failed"],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"aafdf3f00fd02036","state":"CA","tracker":"moratorium","section":"local","title":"Proposed 90-day data center moratorium","summary":"The Riverside City Council Land Use Committee voted unanimously on September 14, 2026 to recommend that the full council adopt a 90-day urgency moratorium on new data center proposals while staff defines data centers and drafts permanent rules. No full council vote date was reported.","scope":"Local: Riverside","status":"proposed","date":"2026-09","sources":[{"url":"https://www.raincrossgazette.com/riverside-committee-backs-temporary-data-center-moratorium/","label":"www.raincrossgazette.com"}],"parties":[{"role":"Jurisdiction","name":"Riverside"}],"groups":["restriction:local:proposed"],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"566895b8839e5229","state":"CA","tracker":"moratorium","section":"local","title":"Proposed county moratorium on data centers","summary":"Supervisors unanimously directed staff to draft one-year moratorium. Chose moratorium over permanent ban due to existing data center in Arcata. Not yet formally enacted. The measure has no documented term.","scope":"Local: Humboldt County","status":"proposed","date":null,"sources":[{"url":"https://lostcoastoutpost.com/2026/jul/15/humboldt-county-board-supervisors-kickstart-ban-of/","label":"lostcoastoutpost.com"}],"parties":[{"role":"Jurisdiction","name":"Humboldt County"}],"groups":["restriction:local:proposed"],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"8f8c47d0520b6675","state":"CA","tracker":"moratorium","section":"local","title":"Proposed county moratorium on data centers","summary":"The San Joaquin County Board of Supervisors voted on September 1, 2026 to direct staff to study large-scale AI data center impacts. After initial findings in October, the board is to consider an initial 45-day moratorium on approval of data center projects.","scope":"Local: San Joaquin County","status":"proposed","date":"2026-09","sources":[{"url":"https://www.sjgov.org/department/bos/board-news/board-news-detail/2026/09/02/sjc-board-moves-to-address-impacts-of-large-scale-ai-data-centers","label":"www.sjgov.org"}],"parties":[{"role":"Jurisdiction","name":"San Joaquin County"}],"groups":["restriction:local:proposed"],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"96c02fe3f2b69d63","state":"CA","tracker":"moratorium","section":"local","title":"Proposed ordinance prohibiting high-demand data centers","summary":"The Perris Planning Commission voted on September 16, 2026 to recommend an ordinance prohibiting data centers that require high amounts of electricity and water. The recommendation must still go to the City Council.","scope":"Local: Perris","status":"proposed","date":"2026-09","sources":[{"url":"https://hoodline.com/2026/09/perris-data-center-ban-would-not-govern-proposed-project-at-state-fairgrounds/","label":"hoodline.com"}],"parties":[{"role":"Jurisdiction","name":"Perris"}],"groups":["restriction:local:proposed"],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"188c7c4f44c8536f","state":"CA","tracker":"moratorium","section":"local","title":"Proposed urgency moratorium on data center applications","summary":"The Gilroy City Council unanimously approved a 45-day urgency moratorium on new data center applications on September 14, 2026, effective immediately under Government Code Section 65858. It can be extended up to two years and does not affect an Amazon facility already under construction.","scope":"Local: Gilroy","status":"enacted","date":"2026-09","sources":[{"url":"https://www.cityofgilroy.org/m/newsflash/Home/Detail/1331","label":"www.cityofgilroy.org"}],"parties":[{"role":"Jurisdiction","name":"Gilroy"}],"groups":["restriction:local:enacted"],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"c0ec3d7f70d99734","state":"CA","tracker":"moratorium","section":"local","title":"Richmond becomes 3rd Bay Area city to impose data center moratorium","summary":"The Richmond city council enacted a data center moratorium. The action was reported on 2026-09-16.","scope":"Local: Richmond","status":"enacted","date":"2026-09","sources":[{"url":"https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMihAFBVV95cUxQVTVYMklsRGsyYlZCR1FGajZOZWY1OGZqNmZuR2JjVVJ1VUVkeFNlZ3cyQjhyUnh5RTdfWUZBbUZPaHhUMkd2dXlVSHhvbkVBeVF3dVJ3TG1waVNXVXN6emhaMDljenJDLWxlU2dVREJra242cTJmaXJacXVjc240aDNqbmnSAYwBQVVfeXFMTTUxRjlreTN5Qi15WVNtWFozS19xNWZBdVZlOGFHbUh4bWpOcHJ1SXNpeEFaWTdSSXpOeXh5ai1WVV8tZmxVZkx2cUFvc2NvX3J6RUkyWWpSSEdPN3pmMWV0VVdHVmxtVllPQm51X2V3NzVIek1TVzdwYTZxeGFnMW5kSGJXLUZhQlFhbmc","label":"news.google.com"}],"parties":[{"role":"Jurisdiction","name":"Richmond"}],"groups":["restriction:local:enacted"],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"1447a768a8032ada","state":"CA","tracker":"moratorium","section":"local","title":"San Francisco supervisors propose 45-day moratorium on new data centers","summary":"San Francisco supervisors proposed a 45-day moratorium on new data centers. The proposal was made on 2026-09-15.","scope":"Local: San Francisco","status":"proposed","date":"2026-09","sources":[{"url":"https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiogFBVV95cUxPbGxWMVNQZEFua1RHT0lQXzhZQ3pEUVlBN0NBb0hqdy04NHhfRTRNbEJ1U1JDeDFmZ2hrVFQtRlBUNzk0a2hzZGxuTzUxMkFDQjBYT3U4ckw4ZVRRUXM5MC1ydFc1UG5sN3g0dVB3ZUMzVGlfVGlxaWZEVEJJcjFPMXFCOXc4OEMtcWVqT1lXX3FBYVM4d2hxM1pjdGJzREF1bmfSAaoBQVVfeXFMT1gwNFUwVnpQeENfMmw0STZGQy14eDhLOTQ1MkpPd3Uwa0RfdTloQWhKa3ZVTDlhcmVJMjBDNWNabDhKVi05QVJ2YVlCQUpacURLem9sTXdJOXE4UC12TW1kQnVWdnU4Yy05N1BCN0I2MFpaM3pUWGd2c1RyeExsVVp0eHQtNTdBYUNjQ2pnNHNkSl9LT0VPUTRNWDlsbk5JX1F6a191OVUzNGc","label":"news.google.com"}],"parties":[{"role":"Jurisdiction","name":"San Francisco"}],"groups":["restriction:local:proposed"],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"055c2fca846ffbb0","state":"CA","tracker":"moratorium","section":"local","title":"Two-year data center moratorium, extended Sept. 30, 2026","summary":"The Palm Springs City Council voted unanimously on Wednesday, Sept. 30, 2026 to extend its data center moratorium by 22 months and 15 days, for a total of two years, the maximum allowed under state law. The original 45-day urgency ordinance was adopted Aug. 26, 2026 and had been set to expire Oct. 10, 2026. The moratorium bars acceptance, processing or approval of applications and permits for data centers while the city updates its zoning code.","scope":"Local: Palm Springs","status":"enacted","date":"2026-09","sources":[{"url":"https://kesq.com/news/2026/09/30/palm-springs-city-council-approves-extending-data-center-moratorium/","label":"kesq.com"}],"parties":[{"role":"Jurisdiction","name":"Palm Springs"}],"groups":["restriction:local:enacted"],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"c6bb03e1b77debf9","state":"CA","tracker":"moratorium","section":"local","title":"Urgency data center moratorium","summary":"Indio City Council unanimously adopted a 45-day urgency moratorium June 3, 2026, then extended it 90 days and directed staff to draft a permanent ban.","scope":"Local: Indio","status":"enacted","date":"2026-06","sources":[{"url":"https://www.indio.org/Home/Components/News/News/311/518","label":"www.indio.org"}],"parties":[{"role":"Jurisdiction","name":"Indio"}],"groups":["restriction:local:enacted"],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"616c7069960e239c","state":"CA","tracker":"permits","section":"air_permits","title":"ASB FORTUNE DATA CENTER","summary":"Facility listing; a permit or issuance date may not be recorded.","scope":"Facility: San Jose","status":"Not recorded","date":null,"sources":[{"url":"https://echodata.epa.gov/echo/echo_rest_services.get_facility_info?output=JSON&p_fn=DATA%20CENTER&responseset=1000","label":"echodata.epa.gov"},{"url":"https://echo.epa.gov/detailed-facility-report?fid=110066177407","label":"echo.epa.gov"}],"parties":[],"groups":[],"attribution":"U.S. EPA ECHO","provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"de4bc93ce08e1ae4","state":"CA","tracker":"permits","section":"air_permits","title":"AT&T FAIRFIELD DATA CENTER","summary":"Facility listing; a permit or issuance date may not be recorded.","scope":"Facility: Fairfield","status":"Not recorded","date":null,"sources":[{"url":"https://echodata.epa.gov/echo/echo_rest_services.get_facility_info?output=JSON&p_fn=DATA%20CENTER&responseset=1000","label":"echodata.epa.gov"},{"url":"https://echo.epa.gov/detailed-facility-report?fid=110055815444","label":"echo.epa.gov"}],"parties":[],"groups":[],"attribution":"U.S. EPA ECHO","provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"a7c973be116cf614","state":"CA","tracker":"permits","section":"air_permits","title":"AWS DATA CENTER GILROY - SFO069","summary":"Facility listing; a permit or issuance date may not be recorded.","scope":"Facility: Gilroy","status":"Not recorded","date":null,"sources":[{"url":"https://echodata.epa.gov/echo/echo_rest_services.get_facility_info?output=JSON&p_fn=DATA%20CENTER&responseset=1000","label":"echodata.epa.gov"},{"url":"https://echo.epa.gov/detailed-facility-report?fid=CAZ579320","label":"echo.epa.gov"}],"parties":[],"groups":[],"attribution":"U.S. EPA ECHO","provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"56579b4b3e5bce24","state":"CA","tracker":"permits","section":"air_permits","title":"CHINA MOBILE INTERNATIONAL SAN JOSE DATA CENTER","summary":"Facility listing; a permit or issuance date may not be recorded.","scope":"Facility: San Jose","status":"Not recorded","date":null,"sources":[{"url":"https://echodata.epa.gov/echo/echo_rest_services.get_facility_info?output=JSON&p_fn=DATA%20CENTER&responseset=1000","label":"echodata.epa.gov"},{"url":"https://echo.epa.gov/detailed-facility-report?fid=CAZ506533","label":"echo.epa.gov"}],"parties":[],"groups":[],"attribution":"U.S. EPA ECHO","provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"a478b7e5529d5cdb","state":"CA","tracker":"permits","section":"air_permits","title":"CUESTA COLLEGE DATA CENTER","summary":"Facility listing; a permit or issuance date may not be recorded.","scope":"Facility: San Luis Obispo","status":"Not recorded","date":null,"sources":[{"url":"https://echodata.epa.gov/echo/echo_rest_services.get_facility_info?output=JSON&p_fn=DATA%20CENTER&responseset=1000","label":"echodata.epa.gov"},{"url":"https://echo.epa.gov/detailed-facility-report?fid=CAZ496133","label":"echo.epa.gov"}],"parties":[],"groups":[],"attribution":"U.S. EPA ECHO","provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"dc51c68cf808ed98","state":"CA","tracker":"permits","section":"air_permits","title":"EDGECORE DATA CENTER MECP1 SANTA CLARA 1 PROJECT","summary":"Facility listing; a permit or issuance date may not be recorded.","scope":"Facility: Santa Clara","status":"Not recorded","date":null,"sources":[{"url":"https://echodata.epa.gov/echo/echo_rest_services.get_facility_info?output=JSON&p_fn=DATA%20CENTER&responseset=1000","label":"echodata.epa.gov"},{"url":"https://echo.epa.gov/detailed-facility-report?fid=CAZ590260","label":"echo.epa.gov"}],"parties":[],"groups":[],"attribution":"U.S. EPA ECHO","provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"e12d55ed47871251","state":"CA","tracker":"permits","section":"air_permits","title":"HAYWARD DATA CENTER","summary":"Facility listing; a permit or issuance date may not be recorded.","scope":"Facility: Hayward","status":"Not recorded","date":null,"sources":[{"url":"https://echodata.epa.gov/echo/echo_rest_services.get_facility_info?output=JSON&p_fn=DATA%20CENTER&responseset=1000","label":"echodata.epa.gov"},{"url":"https://echo.epa.gov/detailed-facility-report?fid=CAZ449816","label":"echo.epa.gov"}],"parties":[],"groups":[],"attribution":"U.S. EPA ECHO","provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"795f18a6a812ca2b","state":"CA","tracker":"permits","section":"air_permits","title":"PRIME DATA CENTER","summary":"Facility listing; a permit or issuance date may not be recorded.","scope":"Facility: Santa Clara","status":"Not recorded","date":null,"sources":[{"url":"https://echodata.epa.gov/echo/echo_rest_services.get_facility_info?output=JSON&p_fn=DATA%20CENTER&responseset=1000","label":"echodata.epa.gov"},{"url":"https://echo.epa.gov/detailed-facility-report?fid=CAZ584301","label":"echo.epa.gov"}],"parties":[],"groups":[],"attribution":"U.S. EPA ECHO","provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"7a5ccccafe20b51d","state":"CA","tracker":"permits","section":"air_permits","title":"PRIME DATA CENTER SJC03 1","summary":"Facility listing; a permit or issuance date may not be recorded.","scope":"Facility: Santa Clara","status":"Not recorded","date":null,"sources":[{"url":"https://echodata.epa.gov/echo/echo_rest_services.get_facility_info?output=JSON&p_fn=DATA%20CENTER&responseset=1000","label":"echodata.epa.gov"},{"url":"https://echo.epa.gov/detailed-facility-report?fid=CAZ589279","label":"echo.epa.gov"}],"parties":[],"groups":[],"attribution":"U.S. EPA ECHO","provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"ece303f4dde4d43f","state":"CA","tracker":"permits","section":"air_permits","title":"PRIME DATA CENTER VERNON","summary":"Facility listing; a permit or issuance date may not be recorded.","scope":"Facility: Vernon","status":"Not recorded","date":null,"sources":[{"url":"https://echodata.epa.gov/echo/echo_rest_services.get_facility_info?output=JSON&p_fn=DATA%20CENTER&responseset=1000","label":"echodata.epa.gov"},{"url":"https://echo.epa.gov/detailed-facility-report?fid=CAZ555107","label":"echo.epa.gov"}],"parties":[],"groups":[],"attribution":"U.S. EPA ECHO","provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"eed74d2865a90b5d","state":"CA","tracker":"permits","section":"air_permits","title":"PRIME DATA CENTERS","summary":"Facility listing; a permit or issuance date may not be recorded.","scope":"Facility: Santa Clara","status":"Not recorded","date":null,"sources":[{"url":"https://echodata.epa.gov/echo/echo_rest_services.get_facility_info?output=JSON&p_fn=DATA%20CENTER&responseset=1000","label":"echodata.epa.gov"},{"url":"https://echo.epa.gov/detailed-facility-report?fid=CAZ549410","label":"echo.epa.gov"}],"parties":[],"groups":[],"attribution":"U.S. EPA ECHO","provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"40e6bc87a97d50fb","state":"CA","tracker":"permits","section":"air_permits","title":"RAGING WIRE","summary":"Facility listing; a permit or issuance date may not be recorded.","scope":"Facility: Sacramento","status":"Operating","date":null,"sources":[{"url":"https://echodata.epa.gov/echo/echo_rest_services.get_facility_info?output=JSON&p_fn=DATA%20CENTER&responseset=1000","label":"echodata.epa.gov"},{"url":"https://echo.epa.gov/detailed-facility-report?fid=110043679668","label":"echo.epa.gov"}],"parties":[],"groups":[],"attribution":"U.S. EPA ECHO","provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"cdb9ddd9dbe6633b","state":"CA","tracker":"permits","section":"air_permits","title":"SJC02 & SJC03 DATA CENTER","summary":"Facility listing; a permit or issuance date may not be recorded.","scope":"Facility: San Jose","status":"Not recorded","date":null,"sources":[{"url":"https://echodata.epa.gov/echo/echo_rest_services.get_facility_info?output=JSON&p_fn=DATA%20CENTER&responseset=1000","label":"echodata.epa.gov"},{"url":"https://echo.epa.gov/detailed-facility-report?fid=CAZ582599","label":"echo.epa.gov"}],"parties":[],"groups":[],"attribution":"U.S. EPA ECHO","provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"1a54191ea1edf818","state":"CA","tracker":"permits","section":"air_permits","title":"SKYBOX DATA CENTER","summary":"Facility listing; a permit or issuance date may not be recorded.","scope":"Facility: Santa Clara","status":"Not recorded","date":null,"sources":[{"url":"https://echodata.epa.gov/echo/echo_rest_services.get_facility_info?output=JSON&p_fn=DATA%20CENTER&responseset=1000","label":"echodata.epa.gov"},{"url":"https://echo.epa.gov/detailed-facility-report?fid=CAZ538034","label":"echo.epa.gov"}],"parties":[],"groups":[],"attribution":"U.S. EPA ECHO","provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"57f0b6854882072b","state":"CA","tracker":"permits","section":"air_permits","title":"SV8 DATA CENTER","summary":"Facility listing; a permit or issuance date may not be recorded.","scope":"Facility: Santa Clara","status":"Not recorded","date":null,"sources":[{"url":"https://echodata.epa.gov/echo/echo_rest_services.get_facility_info?output=JSON&p_fn=DATA%20CENTER&responseset=1000","label":"echodata.epa.gov"},{"url":"https://echo.epa.gov/detailed-facility-report?fid=CAZ499826","label":"echo.epa.gov"}],"parties":[],"groups":[],"attribution":"U.S. EPA ECHO","provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"e9a79b14632aee46","state":"CA","tracker":"permits","section":"air_permits","title":"VANTAGE DATA CENTERS MANAGEMENT CO LLC","summary":"Facility listing; a permit or issuance date may not be recorded.","scope":"Facility: Santa Clara","status":"No Operating Status In ICIS","date":null,"sources":[{"url":"https://echodata.epa.gov/echo/echo_rest_services.get_facility_info?output=JSON&p_sic=7374&responseset=1000","label":"echodata.epa.gov"},{"url":"https://echo.epa.gov/detailed-facility-report?fid=110058338473","label":"echo.epa.gov"}],"parties":[],"groups":[],"attribution":"U.S. EPA ECHO","provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"452ca322e08138e5","state":"CA","tracker":"permits","section":"air_permits","title":"VANTAGE V5 DATA CENTER","summary":"Facility listing; a permit or issuance date may not be recorded.","scope":"Facility: Santa Clara","status":"Not recorded","date":null,"sources":[{"url":"https://echodata.epa.gov/echo/echo_rest_services.get_facility_info?output=JSON&p_fn=DATA%20CENTER&responseset=1000","label":"echodata.epa.gov"},{"url":"https://echo.epa.gov/detailed-facility-report?fid=CAZ481194","label":"echo.epa.gov"}],"parties":[],"groups":[],"attribution":"U.S. EPA ECHO","provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"29f0eae87c2623b9","state":"CA","tracker":"permits","section":"air_permits","title":"VANTAGE V6 DATA CENTER","summary":"Facility listing; a permit or issuance date may not be recorded.","scope":"Facility: Santa Clara","status":"Not recorded","date":null,"sources":[{"url":"https://echodata.epa.gov/echo/echo_rest_services.get_facility_info?output=JSON&p_fn=DATA%20CENTER&responseset=1000","label":"echodata.epa.gov"},{"url":"https://echo.epa.gov/detailed-facility-report?fid=CAZ478830","label":"echo.epa.gov"}],"parties":[],"groups":[],"attribution":"U.S. EPA ECHO","provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"2d55ff4b663fe464","state":"CA","tracker":"water","section":"measures","title":"A 45-day pause on new data center applications","summary":"The city may not accept, process or approve applications and entitlements for new data centers for 45 days while it writes zoning, siting, development and operational standards; the Council may extend it in two phases up to two years. The City Council approved it unanimously on Sep 14, 2026, effective immediately. The city says the review would likely cover water use and cooling technology along with grid capacity and noise. The Amazon data center already approved and under construction is not affected.","scope":"local: Gilroy, California","status":"enacted","date":"2026-09-14","sources":[{"url":"https://www.cityofgilroy.org/m/newsflash/Home/Detail/1331","label":"www.cityofgilroy.org"}],"parties":[{"role":"Jurisdiction","name":"Gilroy, California"}],"groups":["water:moratorium:enacted"],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"d430cf80aec173de","state":"CA","tracker":"water","section":"measures","title":"A 45-day urgency moratorium on data center entitlements","summary":"Would bar approval of any land use entitlement or agreement to develop or operate a data center for 45 days, extendable under state law. Introduced by Councilmember Carroll Fife and approved as amended by the Life Enrichment Committee on Sep 22, 2026. Its findings state that city infrastructure, including the water supply system, was not designed for the high electrical and water demand of data centers. It takes effect only if the full City Council adopts it.","scope":"local: Oakland, California","status":"proposed","date":"2026-09-22","sources":[{"url":"https://oakland.legistar1.com/oakland/attachments/e24ebdad-0eab-4772-8a85-9c0d68489de5.pdf","label":"oakland.legistar1.com"}],"parties":[{"role":"Jurisdiction","name":"Oakland, California"}],"groups":["water:moratorium:proposed"],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"0f9ba6aedeacc0f2","state":"CA","tracker":"water","section":"measures","title":"A citywide ban on data centers","summary":"Amends the zoning regulations to prohibit data centers within city limits. The City Council adopted the ban 3 to 0 on Sep 16, 2026, with two members absent. The planning director cited electricity demand and water consumption among the effects of large data centers. The ban sets no water standard; it removes the use.","scope":"local: Calexico, California","status":"enacted","date":"2026-09-16","sources":[{"url":"https://www.ivpressonline.com/news/calexico-approves-ban-on-data-centers/article_a62ccac1-e49d-410a-90c9-bb4464d4b005.html","label":"www.ivpressonline.com"}],"parties":[{"role":"Jurisdiction","name":"Calexico, California"}],"groups":["water:siting:enacted"],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"455741d01ef09906","state":"CA","tracker":"water","section":"measures","title":"A pause while power, water and land use impacts are studied","summary":"An urgency ordinance adopted unanimously halts new data center development for 45 days while staff study impacts on power, water, land use and public services and draft land use and zoning regulations. The council may extend the pause once for 10 months and again for 12 months. The city framed the pause as a public health and safety matter. Staff were directed to return to the council on October 10, 2026 with progress, and the city will form a community advisory committee to take public input while the rules are written. No ordinance number has been published, and the date recorded here is the council meeting identified as the Wednesday preceding the August 28, 2026 report.","scope":"local: Escondido, California","status":"enacted","date":"2026-08-26","sources":[{"url":"https://ncpipeline.substack.com/p/escondido-data-center-moratorium","label":"ncpipeline.substack.com"}],"parties":[{"role":"Jurisdiction","name":"Escondido, California"}],"groups":["water:moratorium:enacted"],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"490cb87c459dd8d3","state":"CA","tracker":"water","section":"measures","title":"A temporary halt citing strain on water supplies","summary":"The city council unanimously approved a 45-day moratorium on data center applications so that the city can study the impacts before any project is entitled. The city attorney described the impacts the pause is meant to examine as strains on local electrical grids and water supplies, increased greenhouse gas emissions, heat generation, noise and air quality. No ordinance number has been published, and the measure sets no water volume limit. It is the second California city moratorium recorded on this tracker inside a single week.","scope":"local: Lake Elsinore, California","status":"enacted","date":"2026-08-25","sources":[{"url":"https://elsinore247.com/2026/08/council-unanimously-approves-45-day-data-center-moratorium.html","label":"elsinore247.com"}],"parties":[{"role":"Jurisdiction","name":"Lake Elsinore, California"}],"groups":["water:moratorium:enacted"],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"4a4855c312ff4655","state":"CA","tracker":"water","section":"measures","title":"CEQA: data centers lose categorical exemptions; leadership streamlining tied to recycled water and efficient cooling","summary":"Bars CEQA categorical exemptions for data center projects. A data center can be certified for environmental leadership streamlining only if, among other conditions, it uses recycled water and water-efficient technology or waterless cooling systems. Governor Newsom approved SB 887 on September 21, 2026, as one of seven data center bills, and it was chaptered as Chapter 439, Statutes of 2026. The Senate concurred in Assembly amendments 29 to 8 on August 31.","scope":"state: California","status":"enacted","date":"2026-09-21","sources":[{"url":"https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB887","label":"leginfo.legislature.ca.gov"}],"parties":[{"role":"Jurisdiction","name":"California"}],"groups":["water:incentive:enacted"],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"6018757e291cf1cf","state":"CA","tracker":"water","section":"measures","title":"Data center water use reporting to local suppliers","summary":"Would have required operators to report estimated water use to the local water supplier before applying for a business license, and to report actual use annually on license renewal. Authored by Assemblymember Diane Papan. Passed both chambers and was vetoed by Governor Newsom, who objected that rigid reporting requirements could harm the industry.","scope":"state: California","status":"proposed","date":"2026-01-22","sources":[{"url":"https://www.eenews.net/articles/states-push-to-end-secrecy-over-data-center-water-use/","label":"www.eenews.net"}],"parties":[{"role":"Jurisdiction","name":"California"}],"groups":["water:disclosure:proposed"],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"f1363de6a8051f4c","state":"CA","tracker":"water","section":"measures","title":"Data centers: reporting","summary":"Requires data center owners or operators to report location, size, power usage effectiveness and onsite generator fuel use to the California Energy Commission, and to give local agencies expected annual energy use and sound levels when seeking a discretionary permit. The chaptered text contains no water reporting provision. Governor Newsom approved the bill on September 21, 2026, and it was chaptered as Chapter 434, Statutes of 2026. The tracker already notes that this successor to the vetoed AB 93 lost its water clause; the chaptered text confirms that.","scope":"state: California","status":"enacted","date":"2026-09-21","sources":[{"url":"https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billStatusClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260AB1577","label":"leginfo.legislature.ca.gov"}],"parties":[{"role":"Jurisdiction","name":"California"}],"groups":["water:disclosure:enacted"],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"d192c59c767e1959","state":"CA","tracker":"water","section":"measures","title":"Data centers: water use disclosures","summary":"Adds Government Code 65964.7: a city or county may not approve a permit or entitlement to build a data center, or expand one in a way that raises maximum peak water use, unless the applicant provides a water supply assessment, projected water use and efficiency measures, and, beginning January 1, 2028, a water scarcity plan with staged reductions for each U.S. Drought Monitor drought level. The applicant must also pay the full cost of any water conveyance, treatment, storage or distribution upgrades the water supplier determines are needed. Governor Newsom approved the bill on September 21, 2026, and the Secretary of State chaptered it as Chapter 436, Statutes of 2026. It was presented to the Governor on September 15 after the Assembly concurred in Senate amendments 61 to 12 on August 31.","scope":"state: California","status":"enacted","date":"2026-09-21","sources":[{"url":"https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billStatusClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260AB2469","label":"leginfo.legislature.ca.gov"}],"parties":[{"role":"Jurisdiction","name":"California"}],"groups":["water:disclosure:enacted"],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"1cc46a341cdc3ef8","state":"CA","tracker":"water","section":"measures","title":"Freeze running to June 2027 after a Colorado River water denial","summary":"The Board of Supervisors reversed an earlier project approval and adopted a 45-day freeze on data center development, later extended to roughly 10.5 months and running until June 2027. The freeze followed the Imperial Irrigation District's May 1, 2026 denial of a complete water application filed on April 22 by Imperial Valley Computer Manufacturing LLC. The developer petitioned the Superior Court against the district on June 5 and announced an intent to seek a restraining order against the freeze on June 23, with two hearings held in late July 2026. The cities of Imperial and El Centro had each withdrawn from recycled water agreements for the project in late 2025. It is the clearest case in the tracker of a water agency decision, not a zoning decision, stopping a project.","scope":"local: Imperial County, California","status":"enacted","date":"2026-06-01","sources":[{"url":"https://www.western-water.com/2026/08/04/data-center-water-fight-heads-to-imperial-county-court/","label":"www.western-water.com"}],"parties":[{"role":"Jurisdiction","name":"Imperial County, California"}],"groups":["water:moratorium:enacted"],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"7dd1832dd7f10e5b","state":"CA","tracker":"water","section":"measures","title":"Pause on new data center approvals","summary":"Would pause city approvals of new data centers while the city writes rules addressing water use, energy demand, pollution and noise. Supervisor Shamann Walton introduced the ordinance on Sep 15, 2026 with Supervisors Chan, Fielder and Chen; an urgency interim ordinance needs a four-fifths vote.","scope":"local: San Francisco, California","status":"proposed","date":"2026-09-15","sources":[{"url":"https://www.kalw.org/bay-area-news/2026-09-15/san-francisco-pushing-back-on-data-centers","label":"www.kalw.org"}],"parties":[{"role":"Jurisdiction","name":"San Francisco, California"}],"groups":["water:moratorium:proposed"],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"b85c5b51cdf4ca84","state":"CA","tracker":"water","section":"measures","title":"Pause on new data centers extended ten months","summary":"Extends the moratorium on new data center development in unincorporated Tulare County for another 10 months while the county drafts zoning rules. The Board of Supervisors voted 5 to 0 on Sep 22, 2026. County staff had said the zoning code was written before data centers and does not account for their demands on electricity, water and land. The pause does not reach land inside city limits.","scope":"local: Tulare County, California","status":"enacted","date":"2026-09-22","sources":[{"url":"https://thesungazette.com/article/news/2026/09/23/county-board-upholds-temporary-ban-on-data-centers/","label":"thesungazette.com"}],"parties":[{"role":"Jurisdiction","name":"Tulare County, California"}],"groups":["water:moratorium:enacted"],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."},{"id":"0542c8536ced8e81","state":"CA","tracker":"water","section":"measures","title":"Water resources: data centers","summary":"Before applying for an initial city or county business license or permit, a data center owner or operator must give its water supplier, under penalty of perjury, a good faith estimate of expected water use, the water source and projected maximum-day, maximum-month and average-year volumes, and must report the same on the application. At each renewal it must report prior-year total and direct water use by source (potable, nonpotable, recycled) and its cooling system type; urban water suppliers must count data center demand in their annual supply and demand assessments. Governor Newsom approved the bill on September 21, 2026, and it was chaptered as Chapter 437, Statutes of 2026. The Assembly concurred in Senate amendments 63 to 7 on August 27 and the bill was presented to the Governor on September 4.","scope":"state: California","status":"enacted","date":"2026-09-21","sources":[{"url":"https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billStatusClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260AB2619","label":"leginfo.legislature.ca.gov"}],"parties":[{"role":"Jurisdiction","name":"California"}],"groups":["water:disclosure:enacted"],"attribution":null,"provenance":"Published SAVRN record; source status retained, not newly reverified here."}],"groups":{"restriction:local:enacted":["a25de67269df0ed1","5709c4b5b56bdcb7","2a076a8efdfced43","09ce6bf92df9e75f","846b44fb44875a68","c8bffaf8e914e126","d3f536e572c853c0","e6f878bf8f23af8a","0bc1904215c57133","91ff35645c472dbe","188c7c4f44c8536f","2e31d9e1a9cca3fe","c6bb03e1b77debf9","1df245d5ecbbe1dd","106240b9c12fa638","71e0bfc997caca17","e8632d627b1772a4","7c6238e16f306088","055c2fca846ffbb0","4db95272d4d0b3b9","c0ec3d7f70d99734","9749538c1593f5cd","396ad9209089e80b","8aa7be7faae30500","dbd84a0fba7823d9","4297fa613aade787","1ed97d6ba694c7ec"],"restriction:local:proposed":["ea295658dff6c100","4d8d1ffdf12217a7","0552f5d218785acb","566895b8839e5229","558caf6ac46fd86a","aafdf3f00fd02036","1447a768a8032ada","8f8c47d0520b6675","07dc420f28cea720","cc095341ed505538","96c02fe3f2b69d63"],"restriction:local:failed":["4c7a6aab7028e4cf","6c0f45a31c38dd96","60a1fd085fb7faa2"],"restriction:local:pause":["9441b074827051cd"],"restriction:states:enacted":["b138c8f25c6a1df9","6cd48a1a9e3b6e42","e04ce361015d10b8","997e47cb2efa0fb1","a99eee6a8346d803","f8de3ea100d5a73c","36821d2782e3a288","b175ffb656ec4e09"],"restriction:states:failed":["9a181689208d061f"],"water:disclosure:proposed":["6018757e291cf1cf"],"water:disclosure:enacted":["f1363de6a8051f4c","0542c8536ced8e81","d192c59c767e1959"],"water:moratorium:enacted":["1cc46a341cdc3ef8","455741d01ef09906","490cb87c459dd8d3","b85c5b51cdf4ca84","2d55ff4b663fe464"],"water:moratorium:proposed":["7dd1832dd7f10e5b","d430cf80aec173de"],"water:incentive:enacted":["4a4855c312ff4655"],"water:siting:enacted":["0f9ba6aedeacc0f2"],"delay:litigation:litigation_active":["df264e03425ec97a"],"delay:permit_denial:litigation_active":["df264e03425ec97a"],"delay:local_moratorium:delayed":["81e21ec7e868a8a0"],"delay:water_dispute:delayed":["81e21ec7e868a8a0"],"delay:community_opposition:delayed":["81e21ec7e868a8a0","14833b21d81cfae2"],"delay:litigation:delayed":["8f4ba499ed265bb0"],"delay:permit_denial:delayed":["8f4ba499ed265bb0"],"delay:local_moratorium:cancelled":["e6ef57967971f34b"],"delay:community_opposition:cancelled":["e6ef57967971f34b","60ad802b8bf4ce26"],"delay:community_opposition:withdrawn":["dabaa0d9ca40c829"],"utility:other:pending":["2331af1293597280","65708bfad2e82891"],"utility:tariff:pending":["9365b7af7942c436","345f48017f0b0304"],"utility:statement:pending":["686efa78facdadc1","c9e2f082eb03806e"],"utility:tariff:contested":["d8dc8b595b9287b9"],"utility:IRP:pending":["2c217c66f5f9e73f"],"utility:special contract:approved":["e9224e475fe0078d"],"utility:special contract:pending":["a93460236987d2aa"],"utility:tariff:approved":["77fc87a9cbbc5266"]},"grid":[{"name":"CAISO","key":"CAISO","rules":[{"title":"FERC Order to Show Cause and Instituting Section 206 Proceeding ,  CAISO large loads and co-located loads","summary":"FERC preliminarily found CAISO and Participating TO tariffs may be unjust and unreasonable for large-load integration, noting the tariffs lack a large-load definition and that firm service is effectively the only option; it suggested a definition of 50 MW-plus at above 69 kV. One of six simultaneous show-cause orders to all FERC-jurisdictional RTOs/ISOs; responses to briefing questions were due August 17, 2026, with an option to move for up-to-90-day abeyance by August 3, 2026. FERC cited CEC's forecast of 1.8 GW…","status":"pending (proceeding held in abeyance)","date":"2026-06-18","sources":[{"url":"https://www.caiso.com/documents/jun-18-2026-order-instituting-proceeding-large-loads-and-co-located-loads-el26-71.pdf","label":"www.caiso.com"}]},{"title":"CAISO Informational Report to FERC on large loads and co-located loads","summary":"Describes California's CEC-CPUC-CAISO integrated planning framework (2022 MOU), reporting nearly 36 GW of new generation and storage online January 2020-March 2026 (including over 16 GW of storage), CPUC orders for 24.8 GW of new net qualifying capacity between 2021 and 2032 (including 6 GW ordered in February 2026 for load growth including data centers), and a 2026 summer surplus over 2.5 GW. States the CEC ,  not CAISO ,  forecasts data-center load on the CAISO grid to grow 1.8 GW by 2030 and 4.9 GW by 2040 (as…","status":"Filed","date":"2026-07-20","sources":[{"url":"https://www.caiso.com/documents/jul-20-2026-informational-report-large-loads-and-co-located-loads-el26-71.pdf","label":"www.caiso.com"}]},{"title":"CAISO Motion for Abeyance in EL26-71; FERC acceptance","summary":"CAISO moved on August 3, 2026 to hold the show-cause proceeding in abeyance (capped at 90 days under the order's terms) while it completes the Large Loads stakeholder process and prepares a Federal Power Act Section 205 filing. FERC accepted the abeyance request on August 14, 2026. The abeyance supersedes the August 17, 2026 briefing-response deadline; the binding step is now the Section 205 filing CAISO targets for November 16, 2026.","status":"granted","date":"2026-08-03","sources":[{"url":"https://www.caiso.com/documents/aug-3-2026-caiso-s-motion-for-abeyance-regarding-lard-loads-el26-71.pdf","label":"www.caiso.com"}]},{"title":"CAISO Large Loads Considerations Straw Proposal (FILI/FLIP, 50 MW definition)","summary":"Proposes a tariff definition of Large Load as 'an End User located at a single site interconnecting to the CAISO Controlled Grid, and that has a peak load of 50 MW or greater' ,  omitting FERC's suggested 69 kV voltage floor, commercial/industrial qualifier, and co-location exclusion, and noting the definition may shift to align with pending NERC computational-load standards. Creates two flexible interconnection services: Flexible Interim Load Interconnection (FILI), a curtailable interim service until network…","status":"proposed ,  comments due September 2, 2026","date":"2026-08-11","sources":[{"url":"https://stakeholdercenter.caiso.com/InitiativeDocuments/Large-loads-Straw-Proposal-Aug-11-2026.pdf","label":"stakeholdercenter.caiso.com"}]},{"title":"CAISO Large Load Technical Requirements Straw Proposal and technical data request","summary":"Posted June 15, 2026 within the Large Loads initiative, alongside a technical data request to large-load developers, covering technical/operational requirements for large loads (a working-group track that began with a March 10, 2026 technical requirements call). Feeds the same initiative that will produce the November 16, 2026 FERC filing.","status":"Proposed","date":"2026-06-15","sources":[{"url":"https://stakeholdercenter.caiso.com/InitiativeDocuments/Large-Load-Technical-Requirements-Straw-Proposal-Jun-15-2026.pdf","label":"stakeholdercenter.caiso.com"}]},{"title":"CAISO comments on FERC ANOPR on interconnection of large loads to the interstate transmission system","summary":"CAISO filed comments November 21, 2025 on FERC's advance notice of proposed rulemaking on large-load interconnection, predating the June 2026 show-cause order in EL26-71.","status":"Filed","date":"2025-11-21","sources":[{"url":"https://www.caiso.com/documents/nov-21-2025-comments-on-the-advanced-notice-of-proposed-rulemaking-interconnection-of-large-loads-to-the-interstate-transmission-system-rm26-4.pdf","label":"www.caiso.com"}]},{"title":"CPUC Order Instituting Rulemaking on California Advanced Electric Rate Design (data-center rate design)","summary":"Statewide rate-design rulemaking whose scope includes whether dedicated rate tariffs or customer classifications should be created for data centers and other large transmission-connected loads, load-flexibility rate incentives, and cost-allocation protections against shifts to residential and small-business customers. In coordination with SB 57 (Padilla, Stats. 2025, ch. 647), which requires a CPUC assessment by January 1, 2027 of potential cost impacts from new large transmission-connected data-center loads on…","status":"open ,  proceeding expected to run roughly 24 months","date":"2026-04-09","sources":[{"url":"https://docs.cpuc.ca.gov/PublishedDocs/Published/G000/M604/K677/604677976.PDF","label":"docs.cpuc.ca.gov"}]},{"title":"PG&E Electric Rule 30 ,  transmission-level interconnection tariff (interim approval and cost-allocation phase)","summary":"Rule 30 creates a uniform tariff for transmission-level retail interconnection of large loads (the pathway most CAISO-area data centers use). Interim decision D.25-07-039 (July 2025) approved implementation conditioned on applicants paying up front for transmission infrastructure, with refund/cost-allocation methodology (including the Rule 15 BARC-style refund formula) deferred; a January 9, 2026 ruling ordered further testimony and set April 2026 briefs. PG&E's package includes minimum demand charges, 15-year…","status":"interim tariff effective; final cost-allocation/refund decision pending (opening briefs April 10, 2026; reply briefs April 24, 2026)","date":"2024-11-21","sources":[{"url":"https://www.stoel.com/insights/publications/cpuc-weighs-cost-recovery-for-interconnection-of-large-load-including-data-centers","label":"www.stoel.com"}]},{"title":"CPUC approvals of site-specific PG&E data-center interconnection agreements (STACK, Microsoft, Google)","summary":"CPUC Resolution E-5420 (October 30, 2025) approved terms for STACK Infrastructure's 90 MW San Jose facility, and Resolution E-5439 (January 15, 2026) approved Microsoft's 90 MW San Jose facility, each with annual refunds capped at 75% of actual net revenues over 15 years. PG&E's Advice Letter 7785-E covering 250 MW of Google facilities in San Jose remains pending. These deviations preview the cost-allocation rules being litigated in A.24-11-007.","status":"E-5420 and E-5439 approved; AL 7785-E pending","date":"2025-10-30","sources":[{"url":"https://www.stoel.com/insights/publications/cpuc-weighs-cost-recovery-for-interconnection-of-large-load-including-data-centers","label":"www.stoel.com"}]},{"title":"SB 57 (Padilla) ,  data-center cost-impact assessment mandate","summary":"California statute requiring the CPUC to provide an assessment by January 1, 2027 on potential cost impacts from new, large transmission-connected data-center loads on electrical corporations and their customers. The CPUC is executing the mandate inside R.26-04-009.","status":"effective; assessment due January 1, 2027","date":"2025","sources":[{"url":"https://docs.cpuc.ca.gov/PublishedDocs/Published/G000/M604/K677/604677976.PDF","label":"docs.cpuc.ca.gov"}]},{"title":"CPUC February 2026 procurement order ,  6 GW of net qualifying capacity by 2032 for load growth","summary":"In February 2026 the CPUC ordered load-serving entities to procure 6 GW of net qualifying capacity by 2032 specifically to account for projected load growth in the CEC's IEPR demand forecast, including growth driven by expected new data centers. This sits inside the cumulative 24.8 GW of new-resource obligations the CPUC requires online between 2021 and 2032.","status":"adopted","date":"2026","sources":[{"url":"https://www.caiso.com/documents/jul-20-2026-informational-report-large-loads-and-co-located-loads-el26-71.pdf","label":"www.caiso.com"}]}]}],"grid_note":"CAISO covers ~80% of state load; LADWP, BANC/SMUD, and IID are separate non-RTO balancing authorities.","grid_operators":["CAISO","NON-RTO"],"counts":{"moratorium":51,"water":13,"delay":52,"atlas":42,"permits":18},"record_count":176},"states":[{"id":"AL","name":"Alabama","groups":{"restriction:local:enacted":["b754e99ab4330e15","decd6891258f47ef","f0af2bd58075bd01","acf788f0940c151f","5d2b5e02877a6db1","86b6b59a0f9f25d6","c4e0ec1c77b375f6","f54b7627480545ea","e01160ee3d027689","a5568f503c16796e","672a4451f57ed71f","130f0e56bf60745e","4985760687f3ce84","03643fb450f0e606","e03f681545f8685d","7e09fb347db9cc56","3eaa5dec8cc4f32e"],"restriction:local:failed":["c8b4ae70216bc13d"],"restriction:states:proposed":["e7f13067c265e602"],"water:moratorium:enacted":["fe369e5b2f828936"],"delay:litigation:active_litigation":["588eb0c7ad945e8c"],"delay:zoning_approval_challenge:active_litigation":["588eb0c7ad945e8c"],"delay:litigation:zoning_request_paused_active_litigation":["1b2abff9a622f18f"],"delay:council_agenda_removal:zoning_request_paused_active_litigation":["1b2abff9a622f18f"],"delay:environmental_concerns:zoning_request_paused_active_litigation":["1b2abff9a622f18f"],"utility:statement:pending":["11c4e5e5098ce897"],"utility:special contract:pending":["6d50a85ed575ad70","ea51d9bfa3f2aef7"]},"grid_operators":["NON-RTO"],"counts":{"moratorium":19,"water":1,"delay":17,"atlas":28,"permits":3},"record_count":68},{"id":"AK","name":"Alaska","groups":{"restriction:local:enacted":["a3bdbc7a2f903071"],"restriction:local:proposed":["1b1fd599ecf09004"],"restriction:local:failed":["14fcd2107dd36027"],"restriction:states:failed":["70bf8b65e5240449"],"delay:interconnection:cancelled":["cbda12242cdda058"],"delay:community_opposition:cancelled":["cbda12242cdda058"],"delay:financing:cancelled":["cbda12242cdda058"]},"grid_operators":["NON-RTO"],"counts":{"moratorium":4,"delay":2,"atlas":1},"record_count":7},{"id":"AZ","name":"Arizona","groups":{"restriction:local:enacted":["efe1b1646b346c07","a90bced96e18e77a","a6281e2e804f5a60","1d398d0ae1a21d5b","641d11706e6d4289"],"restriction:local:proposed":["543df422425e5d64"],"restriction:states:enacted":["341f659a40d6be88","8c611b34dae73c14","1e866041a2d45903"],"restriction:states:proposed":["add216a01080fe60","226daa2040f1d307"],"restriction:states:failed":["1b22a852fb3cd3d6","6300ce595ef5d0af","fe22b44843f73aaa"],"water:closed-loop:enacted":["869ef8ac67db8830"],"water:siting:enacted":["e4c543ec417de650","bf9111175cdcc2be"],"water:study:enacted":["c002da5fb08b6601"],"water:moratorium:enacted":["5706e495e387c218"],"delay:zoning_denial:cancelled":["3a372b9b02a89621","717671bd9cdc167f"],"delay:water_dispute:cancelled":["3a372b9b02a89621"],"delay:community_opposition:cancelled":["3a372b9b02a89621"],"delay:community_opposition:litigation_active":["b1a04c91d82be6c4"],"delay:water_dispute:delayed":["f0fd3f3d4688462e"],"delay:community_opposition:delayed":["f0fd3f3d4688462e"],"delay:zoning_denial:under_appeal":["cb82a5cd61fb9cec"],"delay:tax_incentive_change:under_appeal":["cb82a5cd61fb9cec"],"delay:zoning_denial:withdrawn":["5567ed106330c2df"],"delay:community_opposition:withdrawn":["5567ed106330c2df"],"utility:other:pending":["5d17a79f01d2eb63"],"utility:tariff:pending":["1da26df1fe5c13a0"],"utility:rate case:pending":["5b45806c6fb887c7","d2b222dc47567225"],"utility:special contract:approved":["d3d18ed766abfecd","44611b67548fe3db"],"utility:tariff:approved":["f2a114901b242afc"],"utility:special contract:pending":["aa4d78d10d987248"],"utility:statement:pending":["0dcfef71df5fb811"],"utility:other:approved":["03326890e794e215"]},"grid_operators":["NON-RTO","SPP"],"counts":{"moratorium":14,"water":5,"delay":29,"atlas":21,"permits":63},"record_count":132},{"id":"AR","name":"Arkansas","groups":{"restriction:local:enacted":["ccd17d0cc78e8f6b","24be15d78831b997","2976edbd642bc5ee","165be2cac366e40a","c321161246656575","11b2b2b4357c9b9a","f1fcd0a91c9b364f","cc8edc44497c00b0"],"restriction:local:failed":["7a3c89981993bc87","f0d3a1dde3ddedd3"],"restriction:states:proposed":["24cb87919949138b"],"restriction:states:failed":["669f43bd9db94313","4cd8f4567d93ecf7"],"water:disclosure:failed":["b599e881f9e16713","460013ff73ea7911"],"water:siting:enacted":["d25f62e8d2b28025"],"water:disclosure:vetoed":["34510ed612779eb7"],"delay:litigation:active_litigation_temporary_block":["038ee7f241ea0405"],"delay:state_law_ownership_ban:active_litigation_temporary_block":["038ee7f241ea0405"],"delay:quorum_court_rejection:moratorium_exemption_rejected":["31e41baa9c0feb7f"],"delay:county_moratorium_dispute:moratorium_exemption_rejected":["31e41baa9c0feb7f"],"delay:litigation:active_litigation_records_dispute":["a103b1f5c7cb3114"],"delay:public_records_dispute:active_litigation_records_dispute":["a103b1f5c7cb3114"],"utility:statement:approved":["36a2338551fca4bf"],"utility:tariff:approved":["f43b05ef42c2b01e"]},"grid_operators":["MISO","SPP"],"counts":{"moratorium":13,"water":4,"delay":17,"atlas":10,"permits":2},"record_count":46},{"id":"CA","name":"California","groups":{"restriction:local:enacted":["a25de67269df0ed1","5709c4b5b56bdcb7","2a076a8efdfced43","09ce6bf92df9e75f","846b44fb44875a68","c8bffaf8e914e126","d3f536e572c853c0","e6f878bf8f23af8a","0bc1904215c57133","91ff35645c472dbe","188c7c4f44c8536f","2e31d9e1a9cca3fe","c6bb03e1b77debf9","1df245d5ecbbe1dd","106240b9c12fa638","71e0bfc997caca17","e8632d627b1772a4","7c6238e16f306088","055c2fca846ffbb0","4db95272d4d0b3b9","c0ec3d7f70d99734","9749538c1593f5cd","396ad9209089e80b","8aa7be7faae30500","dbd84a0fba7823d9","4297fa613aade787","1ed97d6ba694c7ec"],"restriction:local:proposed":["ea295658dff6c100","4d8d1ffdf12217a7","0552f5d218785acb","566895b8839e5229","558caf6ac46fd86a","aafdf3f00fd02036","1447a768a8032ada","8f8c47d0520b6675","07dc420f28cea720","cc095341ed505538","96c02fe3f2b69d63"],"restriction:local:failed":["4c7a6aab7028e4cf","6c0f45a31c38dd96","60a1fd085fb7faa2"],"restriction:local:pause":["9441b074827051cd"],"restriction:states:enacted":["b138c8f25c6a1df9","6cd48a1a9e3b6e42","e04ce361015d10b8","997e47cb2efa0fb1","a99eee6a8346d803","f8de3ea100d5a73c","36821d2782e3a288","b175ffb656ec4e09"],"restriction:states:failed":["9a181689208d061f"],"water:disclosure:proposed":["6018757e291cf1cf"],"water:disclosure:enacted":["f1363de6a8051f4c","0542c8536ced8e81","d192c59c767e1959"],"water:moratorium:enacted":["1cc46a341cdc3ef8","455741d01ef09906","490cb87c459dd8d3","b85c5b51cdf4ca84","2d55ff4b663fe464"],"water:moratorium:proposed":["7dd1832dd7f10e5b","d430cf80aec173de"],"water:incentive:enacted":["4a4855c312ff4655"],"water:siting:enacted":["0f9ba6aedeacc0f2"],"delay:litigation:litigation_active":["df264e03425ec97a"],"delay:permit_denial:litigation_active":["df264e03425ec97a"],"delay:local_moratorium:delayed":["81e21ec7e868a8a0"],"delay:water_dispute:delayed":["81e21ec7e868a8a0"],"delay:community_opposition:delayed":["81e21ec7e868a8a0","14833b21d81cfae2"],"delay:litigation:delayed":["8f4ba499ed265bb0"],"delay:permit_denial:delayed":["8f4ba499ed265bb0"],"delay:local_moratorium:cancelled":["e6ef57967971f34b"],"delay:community_opposition:cancelled":["e6ef57967971f34b","60ad802b8bf4ce26"],"delay:community_opposition:withdrawn":["dabaa0d9ca40c829"],"utility:other:pending":["2331af1293597280","65708bfad2e82891"],"utility:tariff:pending":["9365b7af7942c436","345f48017f0b0304"],"utility:statement:pending":["686efa78facdadc1","c9e2f082eb03806e"],"utility:tariff:contested":["d8dc8b595b9287b9"],"utility:IRP:pending":["2c217c66f5f9e73f"],"utility:special contract:approved":["e9224e475fe0078d"],"utility:special contract:pending":["a93460236987d2aa"],"utility:tariff:approved":["77fc87a9cbbc5266"]},"grid_operators":["CAISO","NON-RTO"],"counts":{"moratorium":51,"water":13,"delay":52,"atlas":42,"permits":18},"record_count":176},{"id":"CO","name":"Colorado","groups":{"restriction:local:enacted":["d20e86908dbdc520","7e23b2c472790666","b680584b86f47325","27892c65296bbedd","4057677a34555f38","611f35a83bc2affd","079b59e4fdf63d21","a78ac9d55cc5b6e7","72aaf79dce28835b","8c94de22f0407e5e","fafd70f2e092776b","b7f34202c64479ce","68d895f0c2ab0e74","9ef574abef591c91","73177d5333c4eddd","025c6d645640e09f","2c25069cf664aaf3"],"restriction:local:proposed":["180c78e281f128cd","e516a7d3e6cb6124"],"restriction:local:failed":["1224f46eadf9763d"],"restriction:states:failed":["804810ef9bbbcba8","8bb8b6f98d15d82f"],"water:siting:enacted":["1a50144d2155e77c","b03afdefabd7d0fe"],"water:moratorium:enacted":["da5550e87bcd99b9"],"delay:local_moratorium:halted":["9cef3b22115f1c92"],"delay:community_opposition:delayed":["a38043d281f78904"],"delay:litigation:delayed":["a38043d281f78904"],"delay:tax_incentive_change:litigation_active":["75f9d2abb9fb3326"],"delay:local_moratorium:delayed":["346f7ed881ecaa83"],"utility:tariff:pending":["959a6c65c1b74f30","59050cc9ea65018e","7d2e982178725742"],"utility:IRP:approved":["c4287797ac10652c"],"utility:tariff:denied":["c0672975e176ca01"]},"grid_operators":["NON-RTO","SPP"],"counts":{"moratorium":22,"water":3,"delay":27,"atlas":26,"permits":35},"record_count":113},{"id":"CT","name":"Connecticut","groups":{"restriction:local:enacted":["6e1a2316302287f7","576ae2d483109634","f7bc5e6a64694fc6","afa7c0bb25faeb00","0642f9a9d449638b"],"restriction:states:failed":["717698e42ef6e901","e135ad979d2fc395"],"water:disclosure:proposed":["7a7d2e991305affc"]},"grid_operators":["ISO-NE"],"counts":{"moratorium":7,"water":1,"delay":4,"atlas":5,"permits":1},"record_count":18},{"id":"DE","name":"Delaware","groups":{"restriction:local:proposed":["d3ed82824472253c"],"restriction:local:enacted":["20667d2af7bb1915","349d8f4e1160a386","e6b800970826b7ff"],"restriction:states:enacted":["f79088b84dfb570b","f797bd58db306835","00d385fc78b43d3c"],"restriction:states:failed":["8e1aedf35862eb28"],"delay:zoning_denial:halted":["5fef84a0dc8a6ea7"],"delay:community_opposition:halted":["5fef84a0dc8a6ea7"],"utility:tariff:pending":["5c2aae85d73c5722","7d3ea4d67fa68520","db8fb22803e36edc","5b6e0fabe7643de5","a3ef5c98705ce81a"],"utility:tariff:contested":["17240088860f9cd6"],"utility:policy:effective":["c3275bc79925ea23"]},"grid_operators":["PJM"],"counts":{"moratorium":8,"delay":14,"atlas":4,"permits":3},"record_count":29},{"id":"FL","name":"Florida","groups":{"restriction:local:proposed":["3c6d8b831356d465","e8b089b79a0f9026","7425d7591ce9c05a","e1b9861a123c1037","eff63eaba9c47d23","5b481baefebc87d9","a5e933035ad808b1","fac9127296bbb451","81e7440dc92c2b86","92a8872884499683"],"restriction:local:enacted":["a5503fc35c328f46","23c7119619365d48","8b07f1ffc26fabaf","3d8300137881558a","73505e05af5a93eb","f81b18c1e2c17955","930a54e75fe30dbf","a6dde620b7e76c37","55f91fe7e81d73f9","256ea0475a8abfbc","3d3d3059a4680f72","d7dcf42909108795","81d807032f719371","e068dd6b5ef9a080","2309ccbc3d286709","6056ac6cc19512a9","7143529782427cf5","089c1610e25cae54","6519ee70858d723f","10e7ec4ad55643e8","9d86ef4ad5bda00b","664c54df9091c973","05af516c4516ea5a","f5948f47a6af75c6","983f2c993373327d","06dc3cba02451c3d","c1218a13301328fe","b404521e586a3d39"],"restriction:local:failed":["3cabceedb3599796","cea30c117def2cca","3eec78ad6ec41fba","b3455f9b6eb27513"],"restriction:states:enacted":["bd1baf5ebba563ea","0481f85a9e1d5f2a"],"restriction:states:failed":["8cb4a715971a72e5","3ba747e753788cc7","04d2addc80c5d977"],"water:reclaimed:enacted":["41fb56a04133f262"],"water:moratorium:proposed":["edf34b85cb944f74","1cd10774835a9376","ad733fa464deef93"],"water:moratorium:enacted":["2940ba1eefc2e616","9b3a0316ced968a7","209a4247fb52b5dd"],"delay:community_opposition:cancelled":["8e40e6f05855c417"],"delay:water_dispute:cancelled":["8e40e6f05855c417"],"delay:zoning_denial:cancelled":["8e40e6f05855c417"],"delay:permit_denial:denied_without_prejudice":["a96919e42e70568c"],"delay:community_opposition:denied_without_prejudice":["a96919e42e70568c"],"delay:county_moratorium:moratorium_in_force":["a80ab26a0223aab0"],"delay:community_opposition:under_construction_amid_opposition":["30167fbd092c1632"],"delay:transparency_concerns:under_construction_amid_opposition":["30167fbd092c1632"],"delay:community_opposition:rumored_no_application_filed":["f2412c254c9be527"],"delay:meeting_postponed:rumored_no_application_filed":["f2412c254c9be527"],"utility:tariff:pending":["8decf641f8a25d7d","a3c4a2035b1bbdae"],"utility:tariff:approved":["e302a349f266e980","6e774dbc7dc0ad70"],"utility:other:pending":["49d867567171c0f6"]},"grid_operators":["NON-RTO"],"counts":{"moratorium":47,"water":7,"delay":35,"atlas":45,"permits":3},"record_count":137},{"id":"GA","name":"Georgia","groups":{"policy:cost-allocation":["8dcc4b156d460b66"],"policy:minimum-payment":["90114ff524521a31"],"restriction:local:enacted":["83b7e8e76b5ee0bc","c702f3e21493eb78","f01b7f9bb899e3d6","f7d299ad7a92bf12","3bbce17db7406e29","d82372162bbd6160","85de3463c47701a1","7086dae6422907ad","754cf92f96c529a3","c7572839bf1e65ec","0f457e9b1f07b13c","cde0de75b390a38c","190ca6042402e496","b7df742790192976","18d1622ef7bf1615","91cb94f80ea44672","8b31abcd9fbd53f1","25670f673645fec9","a263b272f78d0c97","c968b3ce64dc6e50","94471cc36a302f4d","d8321a4a32d96fe5","d6fd85ec434dbb95","e92bfd601e97e81a","b442425bf5306c01","0a299b6f3e4f8a71","97f3ce24746ab390","75bf8ea8521c54fa","0a88eeaf1510a872","b85fe594520520c1","90a000efae4eb640","c5f545916c737149","7718b91252a0926a","dea0bc58f5667b0f","31c097aea2e6b922","e07ddb442cda946c","8e0052e65c172653","8c1646131950febb","05cc6246e1b41c7f","f7dbcf4c51bf6858","a0256947e3545780","8a2dd9e2691ff06f","9f541b9254ba4673"],"restriction:local:failed":["0abc00ddccf55a33","2bc57eb4e3e90e1f","701836b773fb0b9f","69a87b66a5ff3dc2","c86da04ebcb107b1","496e8e5d89e48f9e","e1f3ad4472027620","6e2cdff1c98b89c0"],"restriction:local:proposed":["c2f04f5b50afc543","0fb52176825fcefa","cb9ce96499427440"],"restriction:states:proposed":["8f9aa89848bde366"],"restriction:states:failed":["e9f083814e55fed7","9c1953c2716db6dd","40cfc9d1ff50d003","6a4a691d7908a952","1f42995802ab1e14","1b3fd31a366bf4bd","a9baa8b690070329","30d8a643dc1032e6","35836125f8f5c6e9"],"water:disclosure:proposed":["763ca1cd9c5aab65"],"water:siting:enacted":["dfcc4d38d0110edd","e2e353fc1545946a"],"water:siting:proposed":["1054015276abc18b"],"water:closed-loop:enacted":["de00fb52546e6f23"],"water:disclosure:enacted":["2ad2d7c1dd2cabd0"],"delay:permit_denial:permit_denied":["1f36ddedf54f3fd4"],"delay:community_opposition:permit_denied":["1f36ddedf54f3fd4"],"delay:county_moratorium:permit_denied":["1f36ddedf54f3fd4"],"delay:county_moratorium:approved_active_litigation":["d0f8256ac51fab90"],"delay:litigation:approved_active_litigation":["d0f8256ac51fab90"],"delay:community_opposition:approved_active_litigation":["d0f8256ac51fab90"],"delay:county_moratorium:delayed_amid_moratorium":["4b90e184c8781b68"],"delay:community_opposition:delayed_amid_moratorium":["4b90e184c8781b68"],"delay:county_moratorium:moratorium_in_force":["dc2902692d6491a1"],"delay:public_outcry:tax_incentive_withdrawn":["79abe857d504f0de"],"delay:tax_break_withdrawal:tax_incentive_withdrawn":["79abe857d504f0de"],"delay:community_opposition:cancelled":["2a4ab4968e918d44"],"delay:interconnection:cancelled":["1de43b4a847f9aa8"],"delay:financing:cancelled":["1de43b4a847f9aa8"],"delay:interconnection:denied":["2661c3858a5d582c"],"delay:zoning_denial:halted":["07d5ce26e3298956"],"delay:community_opposition:halted":["07d5ce26e3298956"],"utility:tariff:approved":["51165aeea3b5c521"],"utility:rate case:approved":["858fc088c06ae5c6"],"utility:other:pending":["7eacf8103d2cde93","725643f3b4745c90"],"utility:statement:pending":["83d8f442e8f028cc","613ee18634340b67"]},"grid_operators":["NON-RTO"],"counts":{"policy":2,"moratorium":64,"water":6,"delay":70,"atlas":70,"permits":91},"record_count":303},{"id":"HI","name":"Hawaii","groups":{"restriction:local:proposed":["28597eb2f2e2356b"]},"grid_operators":["NON-RTO"],"counts":{"moratorium":1},"record_count":1},{"id":"ID","name":"Idaho","groups":{"restriction:local:enacted":["95089721b56ee774","fe1a183a87096ad9","cfe65746b5a0f7e3"],"restriction:local:failed":["93f06396ad555ba2"],"restriction:states:enacted":["276f9be7f349fc75"],"restriction:states:proposed":["cefda14587a887e9","f7f09ea72ca4e50b"],"restriction:states:failed":["9c8a456a09d32f23","89b3c3ec88bdbc77","46828f9c28d595d2"],"water:siting:enacted":["d9479381dd39426b"],"delay:litigation:under_appeal":["6c2c455020d0272b"],"delay:corporate_realignment:delayed":["7e9cb32e4e8d817f"],"utility:other:pending":["7cf4e8e8f3a38458"],"utility:tariff:approved":["e898000ea6ecc3d6"]},"grid_operators":["NON-RTO"],"counts":{"moratorium":10,"water":1,"delay":9,"atlas":3,"permits":1},"record_count":24},{"id":"IL","name":"Illinois","groups":{"restriction:local:failed":["1688237928438d39"],"restriction:local:enacted":["ca8eaa4fae2c852a","6f07a6763fa734a0","09ae1486502886e8","5bd418f017328c7c","06b72d07cd1c49ac","0c47dab15c0d2f8b","0af9b2178b92e9d5","a63897e78f332f95","9c11e0fbe25fcdd9","dff4c418b6ff66a4","4dbd1742ac88cba6","98cdcd339817f68e","95fb3d3156498f12","15e7d96176c192b0","4ada4d4ff9e7b794","9f441a6e33f21096","91816e044ae91d73","606804a7751c5741"],"restriction:local:proposed":["c658effcd8a8404b","e742ed625e62ce6f","a952290a81b198a4","5b9ee8080b2a9ab7"],"restriction:states:pause":["d15586bf00803a21"],"restriction:states:proposed":["2de67be693a93ad7"],"restriction:states:failed":["6456aa7bb0b23688"],"water:disclosure:proposed":["8a7dc5bdfec701e7"],"water:moratorium:enacted":["080dab59c19bd690","2a07c1558296be02","e635d05e2074a570"],"water:disclosure:enacted":["dc2475a676fa62ca"],"delay:litigation:litigation_active":["fea0362f66d7ce4d"],"delay:community_opposition:litigation_active":["fea0362f66d7ce4d"],"delay:zoning_denial:litigation_active":["fea0362f66d7ce4d"],"delay:litigation:active_litigation":["9e23d3ec3c2afc8f","73e7e2b4984b632d","180053263745dfcc"],"delay:wetlands_permit_suspended:active_litigation":["9e23d3ec3c2afc8f"],"delay:community_opposition:opposed_pending_council_vote":["e132605bfcfb961d"],"delay:community_opposition:opposed_effectively_stalled":["0cd52f874d37722a"],"delay:petition_campaign:opposed_effectively_stalled":["0cd52f874d37722a"],"delay:city_moratorium:moratorium_in_force":["58cf33c3ebe468f0"],"delay:public_notice_violation_alleged:active_litigation":["73e7e2b4984b632d","180053263745dfcc"],"delay:rezoning_denial:withdrawn":["035003b98053fc06"],"delay:no_secured_tenant:withdrawn":["035003b98053fc06"],"delay:council_opposition:withdrawn":["035003b98053fc06"],"delay:water:cancelled":["46efd12bf3ea6dcb"],"delay:financing:cancelled":["46efd12bf3ea6dcb"],"utility:rate case:approved":["37ab93fd8b57c77e"],"utility:tariff:approved":["1543e61fc24998f6"]},"grid_operators":["PJM","MISO"],"counts":{"moratorium":26,"water":5,"delay":42,"atlas":40,"permits":60},"record_count":173},{"id":"IN","name":"Indiana","groups":{"policy:minimum-payment":["bf784d50ec22157b"],"policy:departure":["03586139e9d09948"],"policy:security":["19c77af74e853a13"],"policy:regulator-reporting":["dde07ed35b93f0c9"],"restriction:local:enacted":["963b8c0256246b3b","8eac5106889da9ac","183f5e5fde8b2c9e","a7e5ebb04d58be95","f4c86ae66329b23b","a3e5e35d93d700fd","a444b64740435e08","3a39e47da83f24be","c7133c46e29c6d69","5e41da92046a9bcb","ff803a94b802fe31","7db5ead22195b986","998bd34f448ab467","9e2594c01650c7f4","837d5ad2452c9a6c","42d0a19e60e69b3f","7a052f9efca8b303","5be45e17d6ec7513","c1be058ee36c4738","a86775303cb769f2","bba265c36e34c00f","ee5f8620c8465f3d","736410e487973794","faaee5c934ec1ecb","ee6a98915d4cd96d","678dfff8b193d0a3","0e6064d1c5503319"],"restriction:local:proposed":["e66e435a43f67c04","7467dd109abc68e3","fed5ec0ec8852137","c73095088bd90160","b24ea3f72d09cb82"],"restriction:local:failed":["845faec2de5f43fc"],"restriction:local:pause":["4d96d9bb18ac4024"],"restriction:states:enacted":["227139621030dba6"],"restriction:states:failed":["eea922145c00d1a8"],"water:moratorium:enacted":["2e6ca318ecd03dd0"],"water:siting:failed":["b35eb608d2415382"],"delay:community_opposition:cancelled":["bb2ed0971e6302ac"],"delay:zoning_denial:cancelled":["bb2ed0971e6302ac"],"delay:litigation:litigation_active":["6f356448fc4e65f9"],"delay:community_opposition:litigation_active":["6f356448fc4e65f9"],"delay:community_opposition:approved_but_citywide_moratorium_pending":["e034c083058251a3","72ffc530ecd5fd9a","3e312e13c51a83a6"],"delay:proposed_moratorium:approved_but_citywide_moratorium_pending":["e034c083058251a3","72ffc530ecd5fd9a","3e312e13c51a83a6"],"delay:community_opposition:withdrawn":["1729a8c1f14a58a4"],"delay:rezoning_denial_or_withdrawal:withdrawn":["1729a8c1f14a58a4"],"delay:rezoning_denial:rezoning_denied":["d11979032cadd398","569435ce3fe609dd"],"delay:community_opposition:rezoning_denied":["d11979032cadd398"],"delay:litigation:active_litigation":["c5e676669917e797"],"delay:permit_challenge:active_litigation":["c5e676669917e797"],"delay:community_opposition:approved_amid_opposition":["6d8bec92336deeb0"],"delay:missed_milestones:development_agreement_expired":["27c39d9347a1192e"],"delay:financing_delay:development_agreement_expired":["27c39d9347a1192e"],"delay:unresolved_commitments:rezoning_denied":["569435ce3fe609dd"],"delay:county_moratorium:moratorium_in_force":["33af90259cf95dde"],"delay:county_moratorium:moratorium_extended":["6e309bb5ef6dcc2b"],"utility:tariff:approved":["4b48c2fabeec119f","fa98544ba5e059ad","6b0503ca135ba204"],"utility:special contract:pending":["113a466c8203c668"]},"grid_operators":["MISO","PJM"],"counts":{"policy":4,"moratorium":36,"water":2,"delay":51,"atlas":50,"permits":12},"record_count":155},{"id":"IA","name":"Iowa","groups":{"restriction:local:enacted":["6ec7f0571c9f0b36","b997268fd2bd8a07","a3d89d9d748c79e5","ece6aca21720a05a","b53022fa847d859d","2265266858f1808d","d2821404eb9b773b","e429297830c5c85e","2c27ac27b47a53de","8ce23138e1f0ecbd","0e74326bb2038903","245488a7b0f0baed","4ec7c3f119f63571","5d574b2e962d112d","57926d8a3b16421b","6873275732caceab","6572038f8fb6515a","09dabb3487e83177","fc20843db6b3c777","ab4c1a0e46a2c211","f73ca7c24ea9ea51","48355f233539620f","e170f696214b321f","8f8fd51101db1cc6","c5304dad0e04e811","75a122be02ae0d9d"],"restriction:local:failed":["0fa0b840766c8a19","c263db1bebb5e27f","a131c04ede50c5f6"],"restriction:states:enacted":["9e83b550b15760aa"],"restriction:states:proposed":["639d23fdd3311f98","262084f7a02f3ad2","e2e155d413c48eda"],"water:disclosure:failed":["304d0cab55c6bd68","e3e82ac6f5792d65"],"water:rate:failed":["42f37d1bced6be18"],"water:closed-loop:failed":["b47e084956bfc26a"],"water:closed-loop:proposed":["24ce35cf4b42f743"],"delay:multi_year_construction_delay:delayed_extension_requested":["4ce223b15edc681a"],"delay:design_changes:delayed_extension_requested":["4ce223b15edc681a"],"delay:county_moratorium:moratorium_in_force":["679ae4b13385d757"],"delay:county_moratorium_neighboring:early_stage_amid_county_moratoriums":["12e1cb598a859683"],"delay:zoning_denial:delayed":["8e0bc83eff50a9de"],"delay:community_opposition:delayed":["8e0bc83eff50a9de"],"utility:tariff:approved":["a9a9512892558d03"],"utility:other:approved":["3046845ad149fe7d"],"utility:special contract:approved":["e59432224488c63a"],"utility:special contract:pending":["48182dc47986bf11"]},"grid_operators":["MISO","SPP"],"counts":{"moratorium":33,"water":5,"delay":37,"atlas":22,"permits":21},"record_count":118},{"id":"KS","name":"Kansas","groups":{"restriction:local:enacted":["092e69a7498ed6f4","c5d6b2d241f5cc17","5d6e924e754d82a1","d65aa07eb73bb390","2b56b5bc78d3d2c2","779bf14e695b30f3","46ebfe654cb98769","6b3d06b7e6d5546b","3e6f9643e146e802","a03f8a97d54da728","88a8f8a97b3eb631","5c9d3499ff80e6d7","61d91d35faaab6ce","49d229995410fd72","4654c90eb016ce15"],"restriction:local:proposed":["3989c573db251ea1","c49b85a22488877d"],"restriction:local:failed":["50ea4020ea582738"],"restriction:states:enacted":["2ee674af511b50f4"],"restriction:states:failed":["f13da72ca930c823","b3815616ed614981","c1154548fbef7c6e","8db95808ba8ac8e5","69b27b03dc718361"],"water:closed-loop:failed":["4eb2bfa0c2e15d57"],"delay:community_opposition:approved_expanded_amid_opposition":["947909f4a6543759"],"delay:noise_regulation_review:approved_expanded_amid_opposition":["947909f4a6543759"],"delay:water:cancelled":["70833cef331617f1"],"delay:community_opposition:cancelled":["7d838f4833d1b349"],"delay:financing:cancelled":["7d838f4833d1b349"],"utility:tariff:approved":["f77ece2de2ac70fa","3ba852096f736178","1dface436cf210c2"],"utility:tariff:pending":["3e89a8aa0948bcc5"],"utility:other:pending":["aead86c34e456420","7fee508d92451cef"],"utility:other:contested":["fe3448ceb67c13bb"]},"grid_operators":["SPP"],"counts":{"moratorium":24,"water":1,"delay":23,"atlas":20,"permits":3},"record_count":71},{"id":"KY","name":"Kentucky","groups":{"restriction:local:enacted":["a26d4b9555d02fc3","4a7e0503c84a18fb","068617b3ee7c1e34","27a0ce76b943a447","65fd1df9f999e56d","9b96e5de0e107e49","7206025d4f188dc5","a3f8e60045a8e496","3be8e5e1324a2209","ef0ceaa96e4124a9","b8c035523c2353d3","59ddefe2d22f34aa","bcf7474f970300a6","3b2a3d6c317e1650","a1acef1340d31231","a5a9aea1171b918a","baf08a5fdb9be408","626ca6058bcfe492","bcc91f5729167578","ad6f059e45735cb0","c9ad189fcf915368","78d859810fda2f18","971b3f19c633ffe9","0d7d376001869f9f","7cfc5e2b338d1914","0d5a0d6559c93531","341751834d403210","0cd0db1bab37a48b","a1b25cbc5a439391","6dbd46ac8566eabd","f6c91c535f7eae69"],"restriction:local:proposed":["f68fb746468a09f9","e795d08b5d2d9c0b","c509add78042616b"],"restriction:states:enacted":["77733d81d9d3baed"],"restriction:states:failed":["9900fddb93bcc64d"],"delay:rezoning_denial:rezoning_denied":["e55329fac133bb24"],"delay:community_opposition:rezoning_denied":["e55329fac133bb24"],"delay:city_moratorium:moratorium_in_force":["6e62257e2bdac106"],"delay:community_opposition:moratorium_in_force":["6e62257e2bdac106"],"delay:community_opposition:under_review_no_zoning_process":["880dfcdecb0dbbcf"],"delay:no_local_zoning_framework:under_review_no_zoning_process":["880dfcdecb0dbbcf"],"utility:special contract:denied":["253d0f130a165e15"],"utility:tariff:contested":["ae68fdeac34bbc8d"],"utility:other:contested":["42fead8f4bce2aaa"],"utility:tariff:approved":["801dfc830fd07245","4f7f2aea34be5c96","d0cda138d452d757"]},"grid_operators":["NON-RTO","PJM","MISO"],"counts":{"moratorium":36,"delay":39,"atlas":28,"permits":2},"record_count":105},{"id":"LA","name":"Louisiana","groups":{"restriction:local:failed":["082df063713becdd","337eff2a8faaedc2"],"restriction:local:enacted":["450b6661aa0aa3ae"],"restriction:states:enacted":["9ba2486256f256c2","144e7d01d58cef74"],"water:disclosure:enacted":["03f274e9a5dce14c"],"water:disclosure:failed":["f7cd1c9b5f782122"],"water:study:failed":["28f58e0cdd0b7e0e"],"delay:regulatory_transparency_dispute:regulatory_disclosure_dispute":["03dbeebbd06cbb4e"],"delay:ratepayer_cost_concerns:regulatory_disclosure_dispute":["03dbeebbd06cbb4e"],"utility:tariff:approved":["eff42b274f0be9ef","a83e236f50a73f18"],"utility:rate case:pending":["c65e9e2d95997fa6"],"utility:tariff:pending":["69e0ffd4849ee579","88fc6caa48aac8b2"],"utility:statement:pending":["457342b4fea42a74"],"utility:other:pending":["4a0bb7e423217973"],"utility:other:approved":["61067a61b636c781"]},"grid_operators":["MISO","SPP"],"counts":{"moratorium":5,"water":3,"delay":15,"atlas":9,"permits":1},"record_count":33},{"id":"ME","name":"Maine","groups":{"restriction:local:enacted":["ecd5966d9b342311","c36961854ebd6ca7","a4804efbc073f070","d766badde34909ee","3d017e2610e8d02c","b9330f5763dfe845","b2a8fec20ddd4e17","f5a714682b29daa5","8d49ab7b7f89d04b","27b044f270dad65f","be26656565cc2456"],"restriction:local:proposed":["6aff9b58bac5e8f3","ebf579b381f356dd","0afc065fdda3c091","b0ec262465eb00f1","8149b851eb2d0584","e3f47f6089a0ee71","3acc511d9da72bf5","fe1e50be7095ea83"],"restriction:states:enacted":["fe74bf6eed39dbcb","7d62f3ffa4427f55"],"restriction:states:failed":["4e5deea3e7dff0be","0ab980856a66fe1d","a3a43b954eba3113"],"water:moratorium:vetoed":["297d93ad9da5f26a"],"delay:state_moratorium:cancelled":["2156a0ef2be22eb0"],"delay:local_moratorium:cancelled":["2156a0ef2be22eb0"],"delay:water:denied":["922b3fd62f9c070b"]},"grid_operators":["ISO-NE","NON-RTO"],"counts":{"moratorium":24,"water":1,"delay":17,"atlas":19},"record_count":61},{"id":"MD","name":"Maryland","groups":{"restriction:local:enacted":["348298ff6f51a691","08097815a98470c5","4deb89713fe98326","8f74fbbd8993b148","3afe4fa64e87f546","8730de2c9ff67503","c73fe44c03df38ae","8dda8813a9c298d6","764a5ea5baee0c4d","6617f7b48c44c942","a8f91eecf6abf3b5","0afbbaf26cf8f904","83ff2804204a626d","9c034ea2bef0ece8","3373477ac1ec4f02","62bac4f016f1945b","11d1a89900718a96","eb36aed04afe9d8a","499348363c3b81ea","6f9687423e2dc4e7","dc1acf38d039ac19"],"restriction:local:proposed":["265e093c1f9eb417","755b1c07e83184e1","08ca97e19dc7abb4","3e8bbaa7cd3afe15"],"restriction:states:enacted":["17348e6b8d304518","b044300e1a2b5236"],"restriction:states:proposed":["5e23b6297efd7527"],"restriction:states:failed":["3c99947280200b8d","1fcccf76e9b86359","cf6793fd2c12b7d5","f1a32ee4fda04c94"],"water:study:enacted":["558d1f7246d3e647"],"water:moratorium:proposed":["e3bd79694db1db39"],"delay:litigation:litigation_active":["27582584bea51673"],"delay:local_moratorium:litigation_active":["27582584bea51673"],"delay:community_opposition:litigation_active":["27582584bea51673"],"delay:zoning_denial:withdrawn":["5aa3c5c167a2712e"],"delay:community_opposition:withdrawn":["5aa3c5c167a2712e"],"utility:statement:pending":["96ed3e4e28dc5f46"],"utility:tariff:pending":["b5a5ebb9845972c4"],"utility:tariff:contested":["151f94517d5bd763"],"utility:other:pending":["eecc4c5501407ced","de3593715e5e8754","b1f2cd97d9cd0cd1","246625aeebba0d27","e8088afeef1bad4c"],"utility:complaint:contested":["1f79c8153170b0cd"],"utility:policy:approved":["d89063b61a861688"]},"grid_operators":["PJM"],"counts":{"moratorium":32,"water":2,"delay":31,"atlas":22,"permits":12},"record_count":99},{"id":"MA","name":"Massachusetts","groups":{"restriction:local:enacted":["9dfd357ee1d1d79e","6fc10604ec34d46e","f0730563712dc086","e2b170911a980baf","443c78d2d2548652","51aa3706f59d3551","9a147c3e16821a2a","37641c80d5d22ef5","3bcf5029dee4b702"],"restriction:local:proposed":["6df99955fb5274ef","e88057500b5af5a2","251bed6de274003a","4e469b93e2617726","f9879ca8a354d99f","cbe95c8b12548c20","d3546c56fc54089d"],"restriction:states:enacted":["dbbfb14cd16be3f9"],"restriction:states:pause":["187e9da595e7eb96"],"restriction:states:failed":["8472091318232e86"],"water:siting:enacted":["c4f434d0074d8012"],"water:siting:proposed":["12f4ef4de2542657"],"delay:litigation:litigation_active":["655e83c186a87988","2493de70fabc445c"],"delay:environmental_review:litigation_active":["655e83c186a87988"],"delay:community_opposition:litigation_active":["2493de70fabc445c"],"delay:community_opposition:delayed":["27d4f05a55fdde9e"]},"grid_operators":["ISO-NE"],"counts":{"moratorium":19,"water":2,"delay":10,"atlas":9,"permits":3},"record_count":43},{"id":"MI","name":"Michigan","groups":{"restriction:local:proposed":["c78ca68312691303","728e3efd8cbaccb2","f81a68f97adf08c0"],"restriction:local:enacted":["e6998880993aa177","b2511715ae4b990f","e1921072a7125833","98f07a32bbf38bd8","6f83b57549342f0e","2212cea497a5e376","6b17b974dff83ac6","0b835486e1c6675b","248845e3115d1b28","0e4058dda626a25d","576d5da42d138d11","bcdc28bfc405e76e","8408b058fbc315db","5d171a2ab62f7804","dc13381e1263b1fd","09e923cf2b67c07f","987c61998db8747a","1b63965c95a1e946","29918b3b1beffe19","99eeb7d2511ceb55","7bb3ee3000662f52","a0e759d085ba7e52","0d0e24de27bbc37a","2b9943a276289d6a","ee9073c9ad75a86f","9a62b17a98e57199","be5f41b4ec785373","ac7d9bd4ffd00f9e","9cecaa0a00ab43e5","1cb30633bb851922","f1c6da2f0000273a","ca9c48eee9e1d1a5","b70d22d7ae290b7d","c2d9415cc3e16da6","3828b0e2eec67db3","7e420db8d37c15f5","98cdd231fea86e2f","e8f1f476cf2c431f","c35e7a7d7cee74a5","e55663914c7c7dcb","33d2ea51a8acf987","51c80939f7496063","aaefdc75bd8c4aeb","911a6b9444bd1607","a7b6b76bf5329d54"],"restriction:local:failed":["516ad57aeb1648fc","b3ad7b9e668b591e","33b46a0d012daefc","3d03aba3f1700469","82599d14f4fba0f6"],"restriction:states:proposed":["a7533c1f529edc2d","6b7ffd32f765b5a4","456ce7c5d8d8f323","91c4adfd115bdb5d","c8d7e8822cffe0b7","98d30a9bf813c747","e816819481689635"],"water:disclosure:proposed":["c32c25eaa98e91c6","8bcea3f333be2510","905756b51034ebc2"],"water:siting:enacted":["d5816002c74cef1d","a2249bcfc2597539"],"water:closed-loop:proposed":["f8e09c679ee0460a"],"water:disclosure:enacted":["225876463f5c6047"],"delay:water_dispute:delayed":["1a7a2592e25c74aa"],"delay:local_moratorium:delayed":["1a7a2592e25c74aa"],"delay:community_opposition:opposed_planned":["90620f2ccd2b9bdd"],"delay:city_council_resolution_against:opposed_planned":["90620f2ccd2b9bdd"],"delay:rezoning_denial:rezoning_denied_then_litigation_settled":["f83e49f859e07603"],"delay:litigation:rezoning_denied_then_litigation_settled":["f83e49f859e07603"],"delay:city_moratorium:moratorium_delay":["042472b06a41f987"],"delay:community_opposition:moratorium_delay":["042472b06a41f987"],"delay:community_opposition:rezoning_paused":["cc32421f495a41b9"],"delay:planning_commission_postponement:rezoning_paused":["cc32421f495a41b9"],"delay:community_opposition:opposed_proposed":["8155ffe35c87d600"],"delay:transparency_concerns:opposed_proposed":["8155ffe35c87d600"],"delay:litigation:abandoned":["b9b9b57ad82d9568"],"delay:community_opposition:abandoned":["b9b9b57ad82d9568"],"delay:china_ties_backlash:abandoned":["b9b9b57ad82d9568"],"utility:tariff:approved":["630e6b38a0b9bb35"],"utility:special contract:approved":["cd42a1000e119f0e","50f9ae193de9e4a3"],"utility:tariff:denied":["a850b2486651c1d3"],"utility:tariff:pending":["5bc36f6821c8abbf"],"utility:policy:approved":["54c782b0ead7889e"]},"grid_operators":["MISO","PJM"],"counts":{"moratorium":60,"water":7,"delay":91,"atlas":55,"permits":1},"record_count":214},{"id":"MN","name":"Minnesota","groups":{"policy:cost-allocation":["0e9cef0d480c11c6"],"policy:departure":["96d76c523368de3c"],"policy:supply-review":["fa129260c9a1191c"],"policy:clean-energy":["5b0759b74511376b"],"restriction:local:enacted":["b739365ff698ee0a","d80387aab9ef2c1b","c3cc4eb6dd8578c2","0dc094cdf13edec8","5aa9e70c1a21d1c7","3fba111c587a7167","199bf867a340507d","d26a44d5312532d6","8e5e33fb9390f491","5ab133e795e83aed","385a484f3217fe24","793265102ee5e04c","35608fd55ce01e87","4fcdd676bd44f6aa","d1abcacd61245c1f","45935f6103775172","db3bb10a74b42708","ba8faf4607030280","8e02e3b0e7618f3a","3f4d995fd6fa4cfb"],"restriction:states:enacted":["2ab863890b12fdcb"],"restriction:states:proposed":["86e0d1d3835c9be9","c61b092c34b879a0","22e3f68246b5a4cc","797e76275710b3d8","7143edd8de397ba4","89d199639f253ee5"],"restriction:states:failed":["d0a94e01d35c42d4","3e22495abb3596c7","e2236d557902ae56","a3cf11f7c0f5a8bf","dfab67689c609a1b","23cc1180dbd6e5d9","eaed289a984419ff"],"water:moratorium:enacted":["e18e98913f2987dd","e11834d93a5792ed"],"water:shield:failed":["edb4285bd2e6d496","48bbbf542eb24d6c"],"water:siting:failed":["9c0626855c13a619"],"water:closed-loop:proposed":["bec7c68e6812d46b"],"water:siting:enacted":["f02889f2df50210d"],"delay:environmental_review:litigation_active":["51ba402b96b22669"],"delay:litigation:litigation_active":["51ba402b96b22669","2eb3d7b7efd8d959"],"delay:local_moratorium:litigation_active":["2eb3d7b7efd8d959"],"delay:litigation:construction_halted_by_court":["3e814c29543f4a91"],"delay:environmental_review_inadequate:construction_halted_by_court":["3e814c29543f4a91"],"delay:litigation:active_litigation":["6afa0ca47b947af4","f52d37a4709f02d3"],"delay:city_moratorium:active_litigation":["6afa0ca47b947af4"],"delay:environmental_review_challenge:active_litigation":["f52d37a4709f02d3"],"delay:environmental_review_pending:final_decision_paused":["452d128b99f4b891"],"delay:city_moratorium:moratorium_in_force":["7af8f1a65d714f3c"],"delay:planning_commission_denial_recommendation:planning_commission_recommended_denial":["796fdc6d59ce947f"],"delay:community_opposition:withdrawn":["7565837e009abac3"],"delay:council_vote_delay:final_vote_delayed":["800f8019c1868fa1"],"delay:community_opposition:final_vote_delayed":["800f8019c1868fa1"],"utility:tariff:approved":["0669b1659a0e805f"],"utility:tariff:pending":["bdec46fd73a2cf42","8fe5290a1832e86c"],"utility:tariff:contested":["2b6636adee0c7012"],"utility:other:pending":["049d9ec6a4db5efc"]},"grid_operators":["MISO","SPP"],"counts":{"policy":4,"moratorium":34,"water":7,"delay":31,"atlas":30,"permits":7},"record_count":113},{"id":"MS","name":"Mississippi","groups":{"restriction:local:enacted":["ecef92d17dfc1c52"],"restriction:states:failed":["ebb062a18af2c39e","4ed51c6c792fa708","e4e4ee9189096b02"],"water:siting:enacted":["5a06d81d34bea26d"],"delay:litigation:active_litigation":["4063038ccfbba534"],"delay:unpermitted_power_plant:active_litigation":["4063038ccfbba534"],"delay:noise_nuisance:active_litigation":["4063038ccfbba534"]},"grid_operators":["MISO","NON-RTO"],"counts":{"moratorium":4,"water":1,"delay":4,"atlas":12,"permits":1},"record_count":22},{"id":"MO","name":"Missouri","groups":{"restriction:local:enacted":["d90eaac4fe51359a","176fecd092621295","204232d5f8ca8df3","79b2a4ad0fec8c24","7017a935b3b7ecbc","85d940e773175229","f803c38f884f6aa0","de0764506bff684b","08196d135c493f63","8d67875968fb64f7","bed91c8df00c2c5a","21f8768f48599598","14bf3311c27da66b","9d5e52899f706d27","f5c0d2e49453bac0","8e6ecd071b72033d","c6cf03998a9e63c8","a9eede6ea17f0f0b"],"restriction:local:failed":["96f484a5795f8aff"],"restriction:states:proposed":["2195fea337e09dc1"],"restriction:states:failed":["79f07d9601a68a2d"],"water:siting:proposed":["fecf28fd776e3f17"],"water:closed-loop:enacted":["f922a9cc8df7f6f1"],"water:closed-loop:proposed":["c842f3220a560928"],"delay:permit_denial:permit_denied":["b6e024ff51469e78"],"delay:historic_preservation_conflict:permit_denied":["b6e024ff51469e78"],"delay:community_opposition:permit_denied":["b6e024ff51469e78"],"delay:county_moratorium:moratorium_in_force":["d74c3761e71266b9"],"delay:community_opposition:moratorium_in_force":["d74c3761e71266b9"],"delay:interconnection:cancelled":["8cb756be5b7ae3a9"],"delay:water:cancelled":["8cb756be5b7ae3a9"],"utility:tariff:contested":["8de24874c642dcbd","f91605a21f63d072","d9c3570921a04363"],"utility:rate case:pending":["082924cd33e117e5"],"utility:tariff:pending":["7394fb772ac183e9","faf8561206d5bf0f"]},"grid_operators":["MISO","SPP","NON-RTO"],"counts":{"moratorium":21,"water":3,"delay":32,"atlas":33,"permits":25},"record_count":114},{"id":"MT","name":"Montana","groups":{"restriction:local:proposed":["9243773c369f1ecf"],"restriction:local:enacted":["8d6ef72e11d1fccd","3ecba2b53f87c88c"],"utility:tariff:pending":["6dcfac3c7c1172f6"],"utility:tariff:contested":["d367203d6f870b27"]},"grid_operators":["NON-RTO","SPP","MISO"],"counts":{"moratorium":3,"delay":6,"atlas":9},"record_count":18},{"id":"NE","name":"Nebraska","groups":{"restriction:local:enacted":["d3d7827f878ed2cf","c57a91902ce91633","4674af901736f5cc","e196b29819de5c9a","135d7b8ca90eebf7","d568851b5061cdaf","81440ae3fafa3d75","e8af315b45a1acfc","08fcf1d2b6f49514","160252554036f1ad","32303ecaa9e0a2ad"],"restriction:local:proposed":["affd265938fabf3b","8c97d016dfddfc1b"],"restriction:local:failed":["1d8ae470cf5d925b"],"restriction:states:enacted":["230cce9838d45d24","e688676c3ac0f747"],"restriction:states:failed":["67b1ace6369704fd","50fd44805485a090","ff2913405faf7657","8d77947d7b8a528f"],"water:study:enacted":["fe6d9f80cee7122e"],"utility:other:approved":["32c8b9ae8d888b6c"],"utility:statement:pending":["4af3c2798acdbf21"],"utility:rate case:pending":["1e47741959ff4b29"],"utility:tariff:approved":["823eb52c6feaee82"],"utility:policy:effective":["c01aa91e1a04b36d"]},"grid_operators":["SPP"],"counts":{"moratorium":20,"water":1,"delay":32,"atlas":13,"permits":22},"record_count":88},{"id":"NV","name":"Nevada","groups":{"restriction:local:enacted":["333dd9b87e58bcbb","b9a69bbde96b5385","55b16953865e48f5","37f2d1d5eb3e2cea","5b58a9e336830633","6773b1cfaaba1346","935d2182c6d74d12"],"restriction:local:failed":["402c12e2dbad57ba"],"restriction:states:enacted":["619839655d751fb6"],"water:moratorium:proposed":["e61948237d868f0e"],"water:moratorium:enacted":["279be78d9d551bf8"],"water:incentive:enacted":["efec6184955a1086"],"delay:water_dispute:under_appeal":["d29280cf2b0521a1"],"delay:community_opposition:under_appeal":["d29280cf2b0521a1"],"delay:litigation:halted":["a81117457f2cb354"],"delay:environmental_review:halted":["a81117457f2cb354"],"delay:litigation:litigation_active":["114d5609ed0f4f35"],"delay:local_moratorium:halted":["5c9d9715723ce0bb"],"utility:tariff:approved":["a7207409cc3dfd45"],"utility:other:approved":["fb307da5f358f615"]},"grid_operators":["NON-RTO","CAISO"],"counts":{"moratorium":9,"water":3,"delay":22,"atlas":20,"permits":18},"record_count":72},{"id":"NH","name":"New Hampshire","groups":{"restriction:local:proposed":["e63e233025fc94fe","b44152b5d37d167b"],"restriction:local:enacted":["d80de2562936a0f7","92290f0a7d985a7f","36c9c8099e12dd15"],"restriction:states:proposed":["5a9909b17dfc57b4","02f0a87d99437f9b"],"restriction:states:failed":["ea8860685576e23e"],"delay:community_opposition:withdrawn":["c1a6706de3454167"]},"grid_operators":["ISO-NE"],"counts":{"moratorium":8,"delay":4,"atlas":5,"permits":3},"record_count":20},{"id":"NJ","name":"New Jersey","groups":{"restriction:local:enacted":["73ec87cfb0aa92d2","9c00fd42521991f9","a384a032bef8e970","124a77e04ac821ec","f23cd51e2cc7cb7f","238c6e78c54a4877","3af6dd3170f1aa82","714725f2229b99d0","08f19d7681319c4d","8cf681d798655aaf","20d0aeda361ce61b","a2b1b417fb0a76fc","face92012462a2a7","968c4f50d3bde674","ceb24ddecb59d86b","3a5c452ca6841c71","742e4aac2483f4af","80f6f1b93985f9f7","c95d899c60e09eb6","7c69fc6032dd27e8","60c1835a0012ce53","054f376e8df396e6","64e87a1ece4414b3","1b9d7255dcc00d88","e3e0f29d691690ec","01b12fb419074edd","c74b23df8b93a3f0","db82850c96b7a694","9844557ef3af937a","559fbafe318ed5ac","0c592d7ddda2c6ac","a784c9eec1d5c3f7","5fb4b28c2b68eccd","ea304a4830a80fb4","fe372a70ddf19936","48334bde9c2fa0b9","d177f8f0171343b7","62a91ee8ab340642","ebd8ee2e6043e34f","39ed97a814dde3a9","3a432a805dccac1c","50b87b303123480f","9a18c03c18a10dd4","b3ca39b6b1630160"],"restriction:local:pause":["1a9db0d9060caea1"],"restriction:local:proposed":["ae409fafdf46bd29","f884ab9b88fff31b","927a7a3ac1c78482","d95561001f914447","7be184c2d2a57e2b","0e8c72bfcc16a39e","8820df8f26c39fea","78d39318109dd5e8","fd2b054d547ea766","df9befec2a94c308"],"restriction:states:enacted":["4df967540ce38c86","30be08e4be6ac9ca","68de33fe969f9287","0438d1ace3661698"],"restriction:states:proposed":["f19c1038b15c7609","d12af38fe29d843e"],"restriction:states:failed":["f915c938338285f1"],"water:disclosure:vetoed":["800fd0cd4f6bebba"],"water:siting:proposed":["45f1ccb950a71b8a","a375aa38a4210e7c"],"water:disclosure:proposed":["0cf376028b422204","36230e1c7c9edac6","c77115dfc059c958","de400f891c588542","6998a87b3e02ca11"],"water:study:proposed":["a7495217b70ef1e5","9cef65942ed49967","bced9687293104ba"],"water:disclosure:failed":["59ae5b971166ac3c","791cdd88090bef4e","1908cf4216d925bc","073e65e826df6c51","378fb181ac8f016c","60262597b91c5af0"],"water:study:failed":["f640ec3294e3f1f2"],"delay:zoning_denial:litigation_active":["54dc7c86bddf4103","b617e293b82d2ac4"],"delay:litigation:litigation_active":["54dc7c86bddf4103","b617e293b82d2ac4","3b478d5d6f56d1ab"],"delay:local_moratorium:litigation_active":["b617e293b82d2ac4","3b478d5d6f56d1ab"],"delay:community_opposition:litigation_active":["b617e293b82d2ac4"],"utility:tariff:pending":["f28161bfc2c29f8c","3620e96459726891","1a6ae3c2ad122164"],"utility:statement:pending":["2e9ea8571e10d078","7a11205dc76a67a6"],"utility:tariff:approved":["296ea913839e1b58"],"utility:other:contested":["5c1b494458632232"],"utility:policy:effective":["3af8bf166bd3c54d"]},"grid_operators":["PJM"],"counts":{"moratorium":62,"water":18,"delay":72,"atlas":65,"permits":18},"record_count":235},{"id":"NM","name":"New Mexico","groups":{"restriction:local:failed":["818109db81472817","f9afe907073e0002"],"restriction:local:enacted":["297204240678eb0e","9ff51438652ddf60","59bea7e940d70194","ada7aa80e60c9320","5eb7f0ff789e43fa"],"restriction:local:proposed":["8ddb604cc82e2c35","b6fb3ebcb7f6c50f"],"restriction:states:proposed":["a99720a3bb94fcaf","78568f32702491ba","b4b3d5817b49728f"],"delay:litigation:litigation_active":["f3a0c010a8f35a41"],"delay:zoning_denial:litigation_active":["f3a0c010a8f35a41"],"delay:community_opposition:litigation_active":["f3a0c010a8f35a41"],"delay:financing:litigation_active":["f3a0c010a8f35a41"],"utility:other:contested":["8ef259cb295588bc"]},"grid_operators":["NON-RTO","SPP"],"counts":{"moratorium":12,"delay":12,"atlas":10,"permits":7},"record_count":41},{"id":"NY","name":"New York","groups":{"policy:environmental-review":["71f511e90d956ca8"],"policy:permit-hold":["4c560e212a74545e"],"policy:supply-review":["ab3c1a20557c8b23"],"restriction:local:enacted":["77679a7c3332c853","a787c81c1d3730a4","cdc22ba5f2f05b59","b14b8ef8ed1860cc","8cca37bd22e9d7b5","4975cfd97e76b52d","bd582af96f35230a","5ffdbe85acc1bde0","a1694e06d983606d","8981b39c54144dc6","d0967cbc5048c7de","210debbc0355f8ce","f47af1d0c2261335","b9f412d2266126c0","723df3b34c814ee8","cebe672bdd456765","edbfc6143edc2bdf","8a9e37cabb7d8067","59d414cbb6a42f77","17aedba2bb3f2d87","2e58841b837a406b","0e1022291bffc7b7","12dd3a35361949ae","3511a027b56d7d7d"],"restriction:local:proposed":["dcd7ff846525f0e1","08c437cc51d4c950","789641906952093a","28bc949979bb83db","111d81838fa01dde","3e58cfc1f209b083","7ae98bc62927c82c","9137cf580ba6858a"],"restriction:local:failed":["cb6d8c82049c8acb"],"restriction:states:enacted":["869f08a4a1fa556c"],"restriction:states:pause":["841d22380b00ad01"],"restriction:states:proposed":["b7ba31aec1fafd00","47c9cf15c60d51b3","daaf6dec95bd6ec2","07d737c4acf173d7"],"water:moratorium:enacted":["8fc3c7d9b9ff9ba8"],"water:reclaimed:proposed":["4ee636f9337e1806"],"delay:environmental_review:delayed":["51347b4b64fa9e01"],"delay:community_opposition:delayed":["51347b4b64fa9e01"],"delay:state_moratorium:halted":["293beafa3fa06f20"],"delay:local_moratorium:halted":["293beafa3fa06f20","77e9bf4bd7aac210","ee2c0366ee0ef429"],"delay:litigation:litigation_active":["e81eb7c91736a32a"],"delay:state_moratorium:litigation_active":["e81eb7c91736a32a"],"delay:local_moratorium:litigation_active":["e81eb7c91736a32a"],"delay:zoning_denial:litigation_active":["e81eb7c91736a32a"],"utility:other:pending":["57638a6f961a13ac","1552fe1a118cce4c","e654e6cbee2e4334","6cf999b790c4a9a6","5b7294bb9bbf171f","a15e9c634f236eaf"],"utility:tariff:pending":["acb3338b2c56b00c","637843fba8961a3b","f4e2166ff0723f1e"],"utility:tariff:approved":["d8fdd2247363f439"],"utility:other:approved":["4b76df05fa507106"],"utility:statement:pending":["85d4d00b457a99fb"]},"grid_operators":["NYISO"],"counts":{"policy":3,"moratorium":39,"water":2,"delay":41,"atlas":26,"permits":4},"record_count":115},{"id":"NC","name":"North Carolina","groups":{"restriction:local:enacted":["0878148bce531a65","26626f41150f13d7","5d4e94286383e811","45843231657d4577","b767f9b8778c3e9c","0425c77f21429fc9","160ecb6859daba38","f700899151bd3d13","afaf001e2ddc7c0f","9125956ad212eba6","1e5e7d19256112cb","de170f5d806a8488","7e05882bb14eba58","d5446d1a27d68afb","66d7df4ef7713b17","a96570a4d8c02995","03d509191d6a1bb8","d3b97dbcfb4cc458","11b4b426a5a3adeb","9730db9306df2eda","f7b5b5059f3d9a76","a7863b1a8d95a6f9","e6debd81c60b3074","72b422fc810eeab3","6bfcfb56a94aa399","0fe95e27742d2793","7f7b78e8dd0072a4","3ab16e9b6bda0047","58f61d5e2dcac367","901f12fcfb423655","77ad5d31685db4d2","13de2569fd40eab9","2c3f7f7d7474e8df","047fa125450d5c53","d7d45ef0e253b55d","2aa6e2ef54433db5","076a69b4395ac51c","aeb0772ca82eb874","49ad917ecc3002cf","c355e8d58e082040","1eeb09c2f8b5063f","37a1cf7995845834","2bd64ffed6dec4b3","17d8cc51d6a5711f"],"restriction:local:proposed":["84efe8243d6504bc","181bd4b518b2cfed","b83f8907c29714e9","8294c67374182bdf","8b259a9fdb940566"],"restriction:local:failed":["928488ab5100d192","aafc220952d6a48c","e3fad9e4ae5cae83","b68811b610a11964"],"restriction:states:proposed":["f10a82ce8ce07853","2bf52937fb8640a7","d91aa188fd06f5e0"],"restriction:states:failed":["35ebc5f44dd67c98","ccde728219226db1","857477e095526aaf"],"water:moratorium:enacted":["b9f652a9b7c4b011"],"water:moratorium:proposed":["38d2bf42e833778a"],"water:closed-loop:proposed":["ad8e73dba358f034"],"delay:community_opposition:withdrawn":["c8b91c53c8d76443","2364b319549649b0"],"delay:zoning_denial:withdrawn":["c8b91c53c8d76443","2364b319549649b0"],"delay:litigation:litigation_active":["26de238e0f400d29"],"delay:local_moratorium:litigation_active":["26de238e0f400d29"],"delay:community_opposition:delayed":["886117a42038f872"],"utility:tariff:approved":["3733629beaf1ada1"],"utility:statement:contested":["8f109ead8aab43d0"],"utility:statement:pending":["5338dfae87b7a6f7"],"utility:tariff:pending":["535ff2bea70f7e1e"],"utility:other:pending":["36e711f6271a98a9","b8438dca9b49aebd"],"utility:tariff:contested":["1a0900299d02d68d","f4c8c4668d869233"],"utility:rate_case:pending":["45ffc3ccaa151b55"],"utility:other:denied":["7d51d5e504430b5e"]},"grid_operators":["NON-RTO","PJM"],"counts":{"moratorium":59,"water":3,"delay":67,"atlas":44,"permits":34},"record_count":207},{"id":"ND","name":"North Dakota","groups":{"restriction:local:enacted":["918ec9976a6ebc76","5fe4251ab4cdcb1d"],"restriction:local:failed":["da10b7684b67acdc","b94dc16d48f67fd9"],"restriction:local:proposed":["0867cb4ffce5c18b"],"restriction:states:enacted":["10810ad90dae3c22"],"restriction:states:failed":["06b00e83aed9df20","37e09c9be2329183","45f55a5bdae7aa9c","bc1c99050827355d"],"utility:tariff:pending":["bd130d6595b26f7c"]},"grid_operators":["SPP","MISO"],"counts":{"moratorium":10,"delay":6,"atlas":9,"permits":2},"record_count":27},{"id":"OH","name":"Ohio","groups":{"policy:cost-allocation":["55634d9b0e3dbe0d"],"restriction:local:enacted":["461dc19405784392","691815701a1e7b84","407f6a32f3a3a0ae","1d451c4d01991061","c05d611c3e7dd8d5","303593cae196f587","7a83cf56d52a963c","7fc064d20dc788bd","a7e5c5aec188366b","7ce6031118cad4fd","8f219dc030624cd2","950d5e0e199dfb22","c2b95d5838587ff4","9ba6b9b9692b4708","d72f4489e825fef2","940b6159ab502612","f0c97f968bab3081","405f1ab18b45cec2","8542695ddd9b5b30","7026f0fd2b5bc6f0","ca89ad24dc656f79","978214f7dd1d9d8f","c1bda0acec337164","730091555169da66","3b3d27d4919f1e77","a96013d0b5b1c9a2","d8f63ab9b450228a","cc6ca7b31398d910","306d3fab23b96651","f394a0eb7801b57b","0ac4ec70dc0bb4ba","6cbf93fd3792d38e","c0aba8a27555a0c0","d533d9f7cdfc603d","ea2a114d10a3194e","61fe898c9107f2ba","4b26ee4f418c3dd5","cccc5aef83beacac","f1d5c9a4b6023b27","4fbd89f670532629","421b341a093f14c9","53701fd2f75ff500","23811974e54dcac2","b90f5b1569114026","ca5208c669ad2550","ecf81cf135cd7c41","fe4bc2e21abc7fd0","c636f6e8fe61d8bc","70667db94a767cf0","d3ccdcc868a68902","0fc759bfa86292c3","12369281bb53a55f","5f2de78e4e2f9413","2321a1c503022d33","bc140f9d0778a158","88cd458bc7993ab1","e281827c22b8aaa6","904259f746e7f001","668044e9a5218b84","e526f703d4ba3d40","406582468189cd53","e560f4fc1b2d48cf","15eda7648a7da254","1ea75a7e46cea951","8c428e28c6fa59b7","94595b6204b14f34","a795c2b6fa5fb605","a91e87e8e532a81a","0f566e9f055d874d","a3338ba4c589f2a1","024a636c91c52568"],"restriction:local:failed":["941a2b27ff9dd2f9","f0125c1f3d577939","1984235e10d07864","47e7f50ceb79bde2"],"restriction:local:proposed":["329efb5b9ab278b2","fe3263d096bb1d42","f0c8462ea6d10a36","5d2dc1ac11a37fd0"],"restriction:states:enacted":["a33e963e7ed0f3f9"],"restriction:states:pause":["aac6bd4ca937a3a1","790d7df967d13e33"],"restriction:states:proposed":["9791d6ee8a159714","5bb7dbbf3f54e1f6","076c38b44f191708","35dfe120e8f90c81","a4f886faea465453","f67274b3d1ca79e3","b0b20187a84ac61b"],"water:siting:enacted":["1fc784371ef77c63"],"water:closed-loop:proposed":["d9a55d5bd1815a7a"],"water:disclosure:proposed":["07d5958ebc0e2919"],"water:siting:proposed":["af9b7989afe0d6ff"],"water:moratorium:enacted":["b03281ae45156609"],"water:rate:enacted":["f38675b9d14c3301"],"water:shield:failed":["31cb3e61422ae705"],"delay:community_opposition:delayed":["6041ee70dd8ec4f2","33619bda345609b8"],"delay:regulatory_review:regulatory_approval_pending":["67f7d406d0b7de7c"],"delay:power_allocation_dispute:regulatory_approval_pending":["67f7d406d0b7de7c"],"delay:corporate_reassessment:construction_paused":["ec84904200576a9f"],"delay:openai_relationship_change:construction_paused":["ec84904200576a9f"],"delay:tariff_costs:construction_paused":["ec84904200576a9f"],"delay:local_moratorium:proposed_amid_local_moratorium_and_ballot_fight":["ceca7cca8784dd96"],"delay:ballot_initiative_threat:proposed_amid_local_moratorium_and_ballot_fight":["ceca7cca8784dd96"],"delay:ballot_initiative_threat:signature_gathering":["738d37cb16e4b52b"],"delay:statewide_moratorium_push:signature_gathering":["738d37cb16e4b52b"],"delay:local_moratorium:halted":["8924323156a513a6"],"delay:community_opposition:halted":["8924323156a513a6"],"utility:tariff:approved":["b119f3dad60e8067","b0b7b5e3ba42091a","feb6e8ebba7bc21b","d471fb8c04d4d42b","e688652c63a8603c","3b0d6703179b004f"],"utility:tariff:pending":["4e7c1eaf6aefd563","8d64014cf73ea8c5","33358a52bdbff1e9"],"utility:tariff:denied":["d77af2ba4e087bb7"],"utility:rate case:pending":["1f4f51f2805cd230","4e52d117f119a0ab"],"utility:other:pending":["8867995dfeac8af8"]},"grid_operators":["PJM"],"counts":{"policy":1,"moratorium":89,"water":7,"delay":156,"atlas":100,"permits":15},"record_count":368},{"id":"OK","name":"Oklahoma","groups":{"restriction:local:enacted":["50b51ab105de1694","4d5225243a046a38","42183c5f0e187ec9","2da276ac2eced4b7","409936f3ff16ca77","fd3e3e400e15bcb3","311f0b103dd1c20a","e11236c60dcb019b","af39a5a9b91cf374","80850e3b3240130d","6d6d4b47a1f08094","fd7e05f695b792fb","57bfec0310076c02","ac38ecc9080693a4"],"restriction:states:enacted":["5ce11b610f2019f8"],"restriction:states:failed":["c5ac0e3ebaec0fff","df4a0cf535656562"],"water:closed-loop:enacted":["f01e9c7f92ad912f"],"water:disclosure:failed":["4cffe4be712b7fee"],"delay:community_opposition:under_construction_amid_water_concerns":["b02a88e32f069571"],"delay:water_capacity_constraints:under_construction_amid_water_concerns":["b02a88e32f069571"],"delay:city_moratorium_partial_exemption:phase_vote_delayed":["d2464a0059b2da36"],"delay:planning_commission_delay:phase_vote_delayed":["d2464a0059b2da36"],"delay:community_opposition:opposed_proposed":["d6d03051edf8cadd"],"delay:transparency_concerns:opposed_proposed":["d6d03051edf8cadd"],"delay:water:cancelled":["b81165f74fca6c9b","194ddf5960f0882a"],"delay:community_opposition:cancelled":["b81165f74fca6c9b","194ddf5960f0882a"],"delay:financing:cancelled":["b81165f74fca6c9b"],"utility:complaint:contested":["6a0e62dd608338b3"],"utility:tariff:pending":["0244a5050bd89f54","d23c9de2ed780784","369b25b59f1044b0","8caf179819a91899","b44407ade651e171"],"utility:tariff:approved":["7c0393e3288507ab"],"utility:policy:effective":["533edea4d22fcfc3"]},"grid_operators":["SPP"],"counts":{"moratorium":17,"water":2,"delay":29,"atlas":25,"permits":34},"record_count":107},{"id":"OR","name":"Oregon","groups":{"policy:cost-allocation":["ec3aab8c8e487810"],"policy:minimum-payment":["09b69a3ac7ed320c"],"policy:clean-energy":["573b7be7282c24e9"],"policy:regulator-reporting":["82e5b2896507c105"],"restriction:local:enacted":["c46ac99932456879","bfb08271f1889aa3","406a4fe8c580044d"],"restriction:local:proposed":["9fecbaadfc504d91","55072e55f3993603","c167670c15d2c9ec"],"restriction:local:failed":["2217c7fce49a6fcb"],"restriction:states:enacted":["4266a70286a34bc9","fd7d68ca06671d0b"],"restriction:states:pause":["b05de37e3bed5008","0bb7ee781820adb4"],"restriction:states:proposed":["1d87e7ca35d788e4","97e59a9c63be62e9"],"water:moratorium:enacted":["f436cd79501cb106"],"delay:litigation:litigation_active":["189ec25f09c73d30"],"delay:local_moratorium:halted":["fc7ac8c5e0c9a3e0"],"delay:water_dispute:halted":["fc7ac8c5e0c9a3e0"],"delay:tax_incentive_change:halted":["fc7ac8c5e0c9a3e0"],"delay:community_opposition:cancelled":["508cd09772361d44"],"utility:tariff:approved":["8f26d54b8098d83a","933a75515edac858","919ed293cccce0b5"],"utility:other:approved":["fd904a85f9f038d0"],"utility:tariff:pending":["90bff93d506e12d8"],"utility:other:pending":["500c12c6d84c5535"]},"grid_operators":["NON-RTO"],"counts":{"policy":4,"moratorium":13,"water":1,"delay":16,"atlas":8,"permits":28},"record_count":70},{"id":"PA","name":"Pennsylvania","groups":{"restriction:local:enacted":["38de5bf25db60ea6","a07e0f5e3b200bbb","e0e19b054c78ba90","d57a038848981525","08cc6d470b3f20a4","786ec40f80121492","9d46b0435161c347","7f0801a61ac6bdc8","e91f573252606528","30d8d8996a24365c","7a05632963af26b7","0525ead7d8196b60","c49102319b7d9c26","828f9f1b7a9fc4d8","7e498adfb9cf36be","30e2226befeb9e41","d01de37fe2c38608","3ef85431f6a82760","50a74ef750ecebc2","86690394ec34fe0d","f4098716a0ee721b","2f1f35aee33b8d1b","0b7ff980380eafa0","a80d24e122853bfe","83bf5bc987c8973d","b4f499936ec56461","b3ea3d581da9a606","71a38b1ed5950ad1","e191001ca64a606d","f9511193a66cd3bc"],"restriction:local:failed":["491849e21df0aa97"],"restriction:local:proposed":["04f7d83298b30de7","f979d0fdee3f9fa3"],"restriction:local:pause":["533afd77cfc5eebb"],"restriction:states:enacted":["7f4af8a87d95c544","7471943bfacd9b79"],"restriction:states:proposed":["6aa38b3ad7bc8095","30479ff8f518235c","2f437f53e7c38048","535c2efca50b83dc","1b368eec31f98fde","5442b108786851c0","f486ff97ce82e49d","7739eeecd45bc5b3","a5f21a3c4a91636e","a4c98945f6116fb9","122b2ca8ea2dce4c"],"restriction:states:failed":["291e4c7a5a21088d","9a687477c380a153","9ab4c50b87f3e567","c916da28feddac2f","a879ae6745a42d11","ce6deddc6f7620a6","d3752761d30cd8b6"],"water:disclosure:enacted":["71b44216bc39b316","19977f7326ae5f36"],"water:disclosure:proposed":["ce335eca213a335f","268f6575720b3e76"],"water:siting:proposed":["e6cd4c87af287f2e","ec0986faeb616e79","02edb086bcb4ec16"],"water:study:enacted":["7e7071bf9f2d7636"],"water:siting:enacted":["f4b911f9a8638b44"],"water:closed-loop:proposed":["ecec2267314e711d"],"delay:zoning_denial:under_appeal":["221a7177ef54c146"],"delay:community_opposition:under_appeal":["221a7177ef54c146"],"delay:litigation:under_appeal":["221a7177ef54c146"],"delay:litigation:litigation_active":["acb6c23674d3443b","457d01e6aa50ccb9"],"delay:community_opposition:litigation_active":["acb6c23674d3443b","457d01e6aa50ccb9"],"delay:community_opposition:cancelled":["72fbfc95e6717af4"],"delay:zoning_denial:cancelled":["72fbfc95e6717af4"],"delay:community_opposition:delayed":["91270d77ce33c433","b79613921282641a"],"utility:tariff:approved":["4c72868c8e004412","c89690d0346c7890","ac3f1efb2976fc5b"],"utility:rate case:approved":["e934571677cf1704"],"utility:other:pending":["fbc1615a2aea7504","84096c1cd33d1c29"],"utility:tariff:pending":["6ccd7eecfb420cbd","03f4e94591ffe708"],"utility:tariff:effective":["d4a74e67bb8dc281"],"utility:policy:pending":["04bd0eb54a15c158"]},"grid_operators":["PJM"],"counts":{"moratorium":54,"water":10,"delay":84,"atlas":53,"permits":21},"record_count":222},{"id":"RI","name":"Rhode Island","groups":{"restriction:local:enacted":["ed259525eb90ab6d","dab8ece38c5fb9d5","09f9a1112ca9bb16","8758bf36db37de62"],"restriction:local:proposed":["9c9aa6a6cab87eae"],"restriction:states:proposed":["39109139e4499da1"],"restriction:states:failed":["87b18404613879e9","1ca1db6d54c60804"],"delay:zoning_denial:litigation_active":["09f90dd4b212e592"]},"grid_operators":["ISO-NE"],"counts":{"moratorium":8,"delay":6,"atlas":5},"record_count":19},{"id":"SC","name":"South Carolina","groups":{"restriction:local:enacted":["58631f91fad85e5b","b8911b8723010e16","f7b981d36cb76fc6","ead5aac6d1de0198","28116638b206c684","e712a9602d7fc092","17168f8283569007","3fbf04d4d1abbc30","b5c702b7d9d268b1","31c3c407ecaa9b02","08d501a7dce90945","bfe556ca5819bf38","65163505f47f6e65"],"restriction:local:proposed":["d522fdfd4fa7adac","9e6a95af9b1a6338","5e3217c2394c85d9"],"restriction:local:failed":["ead4c3dd6bcf23b7"],"restriction:states:proposed":["70456b2f17fa016f","1bd520760aca35e7","dfe1a31d8cfe99e5"],"restriction:states:failed":["d7cf8717beef89cd"],"water:closed-loop:proposed":["836cb4c1add36778"],"water:siting:proposed":["d5588d305d72ed31"],"water:moratorium:proposed":["feaa74b8ade8d152","e0c20f860681a471"],"water:disclosure:failed":["2a360b96adeac4a5"],"water:closed-loop:enacted":["c4c6394d78cf14cf"],"water:moratorium:enacted":["83129110381c2b8d"],"delay:regulatory_review:permitting_challenged":["ebbc3548ee675c57"],"delay:environmental_petition:permitting_challenged":["ebbc3548ee675c57"],"delay:utility_interconnection_timing:abandoned":["59d31c90f99a8e27"],"delay:withdrawal:abandoned":["59d31c90f99a8e27"],"delay:county_moratorium:moratorium_in_force":["4fd68a1a4d95ecf1"],"delay:permit_denial:halted":["2a19530b645b4515"],"delay:local_moratorium:halted":["2a19530b645b4515"],"delay:community_opposition:halted":["2a19530b645b4515"],"utility:tariff:approved":["a6a9b54dc2f7e887","4acfdfc6ae530074"],"utility:rate case:approved":["836e8495e0094213"],"utility:other:effective":["4650a698f603d88c"],"utility:other:contested":["5976280cf4e599c1"]},"grid_operators":["NON-RTO"],"counts":{"moratorium":21,"water":7,"delay":30,"atlas":22,"permits":3},"record_count":83},{"id":"SD","name":"South Dakota","groups":{"policy:cost-allocation":["e1de11c16d8239a6"],"policy:departure":["b87c8e5ab20d7865"],"policy:supply-review":["5f04413f1e1d314b"],"policy:water-reporting":["3d0987d18045023f"],"policy:local-authority":["d5abe6128808804e"],"restriction:local:failed":["0c5ecfaba5561367"],"restriction:local:proposed":["5a5f4731708d3508"],"restriction:local:enacted":["127e547bdcf06887"],"restriction:states:enacted":["e69882d4dd9dec56","e0c13222b8896f55"],"restriction:states:proposed":["d2cb3118b636a794"],"restriction:states:failed":["3ddf71976e354659"],"water:disclosure:enacted":["95158506706fb5b4"]},"grid_operators":["SPP","MISO"],"counts":{"policy":5,"moratorium":7,"water":1,"delay":4,"atlas":4,"permits":1},"record_count":22},{"id":"TN","name":"Tennessee","groups":{"restriction:local:enacted":["15608211c6ca3581","307b38ee1b228384","23049879ff0a5d1c","7cebe8d5c67147c3","747d1db6063c1a74","51b2b9b3a961b6ab","de659fa3e365eec8","33552bf4e80b18ee","730a5f5d55050cb7","087bbbb5a483b776","0137c4ed47954709","8272522f979f7008","9d632430d6a03021","78dbb699f219d0d0","1f546cb2797f996d","c43fd1c858232412","b97b3954b1b0949c","d68b3a39798f9791","f0bb509eaf3c5b2f","a431da7d7f705e27","048501d4a5383269","8cb4602a6ee8dcbd","af28772857e3903f","3e19367856e206f1","241a6f9524fa5b55","54976e44fee3018e","ebeae99d6b6421df","0d02b8ce1211373d","492d17cc76c60e58"],"restriction:local:proposed":["c72ff700a8b5e0fe","a5263d6dfaed1a21","05ec77d83a2fb722"],"restriction:states:enacted":["3c219120a612265b"],"restriction:states:proposed":["963831dc8907e951"],"restriction:states:failed":["640e5053d7ed492c","2f485290fc876c3d"],"water:reclaimed:proposed":["34047d55aaad8568"],"water:disclosure:failed":["3024f2dbcb00785c","7932fbffdf71a9e7"],"water:siting:proposed":["95d5d77e861f2e1a"],"water:moratorium:proposed":["51b30007138592e5"],"water:closed-loop:proposed":["bdc557047de3e52b","3b9e61fb1da5de65"],"delay:local_moratorium:litigation_active":["b63b7988b1a6e4a0"],"delay:litigation:litigation_active":["b63b7988b1a6e4a0"],"delay:litigation:active_litigation":["f23f3210c5447afd","9783ae8705aab3e7"],"delay:city_moratorium:active_litigation":["f23f3210c5447afd"],"delay:eminent_domain_threat:active_litigation":["f23f3210c5447afd"],"delay:rezoning_denial:rezoning_rejected_moratorium_recommended":["d1de5e4992b534d6"],"delay:county_moratorium_recommended:rezoning_rejected_moratorium_recommended":["d1de5e4992b534d6"],"delay:environmental_review_order:active_litigation":["9783ae8705aab3e7"],"delay:unpermitted_power_plant:active_litigation":["9783ae8705aab3e7"],"delay:community_opposition:under_construction_amid_scrutiny":["18dc39f31efad1cf"],"delay:transparency_concerns:under_construction_amid_scrutiny":["18dc39f31efad1cf"],"utility:tariff:pending":["b63a0876c6c743c3","af3b47ccdb7cb94a"]},"grid_operators":["NON-RTO","PJM"],"counts":{"moratorium":36,"water":7,"delay":38,"atlas":29,"permits":5},"record_count":115},{"id":"TX","name":"Texas","groups":{"policy:site-control":["170b3631ad48f5a9"],"policy:security":["1deb6f4ebbbba3d4"],"policy:curtailment":["56b017e8edee0f3b"],"policy:emissions":["e17cedb3112fd488"],"restriction:local:enacted":["cb4fae95f6ec62e9","226d9579a44729dd","8725a51570228ad5","9cd0e5a2740b6579","49d98f654070e13e","5a6631afcf14f245","1526c144af9c4197","bfaeb2b05925f9bf"],"restriction:local:proposed":["aa120245d3cde2b5","4bbd796802e5b2a9","29dbbc44e88a23f5","d4ddebe26453aec0","fd40bfb18bd582d1","e3d9ca006093dd8c","347c664b42d6867c","f141990e3f9ddb5c"],"restriction:local:failed":["4cf9e86df26cb47f","036f9e40cb83532e","8fbbd5e4d1430368","0148c0779dde3d94","c154399207131e2f"],"restriction:states:enacted":["35fcd20bf3d4a4e3","07b7360c48f3c46e","98ec338e6e03cba0"],"restriction:states:pause":["707703d5f96368d1","41c39b9ee7a58df2","9607cd1000488b0d"],"restriction:states:proposed":["8d85cc66b1113104"],"water:study:proposed":["97674740d6ace3d0"],"water:siting:proposed":["ce0a82530ed2e6c2","617e27c4c491786f"],"water:closed-loop:enacted":["a3bc163e4fc8a78f","b41ba038f3b958e1"],"water:closed-loop:proposed":["0711b71f0ca0c23e","0026ba717d68569a"],"water:shield:enacted":["f512098faa3bf9c4"],"water:siting:enacted":["0d07fe0b0e4fa3bb"],"water:disclosure:enacted":["f4c280b4acf60e61","4fe0a4491af0e56e","ab5ef43c0bd56795","18fff3b222f896e1"],"water:moratorium:enacted":["23aaebd91e78f209"],"delay:state_moratorium:withdrawn":["a8fe02f84bc4a666"],"delay:transformer_supply:delayed":["a60e9b00093891d5"],"delay:gas_pipeline_delay:delayed":["87485593349454ff"],"delay:corporate_realignment:withdrawn":["15ca382a6f880e9f"],"delay:financing:withdrawn":["15ca382a6f880e9f"],"delay:zoning_denial:cancelled":["9832792554ff4c9d","0b4408147f79994e","a1bb576b290d6353"],"delay:water_dispute:cancelled":["9832792554ff4c9d"],"delay:community_opposition:cancelled":["9832792554ff4c9d","0b4408147f79994e","a1bb576b290d6353"],"delay:water_dispute:withdrawn":["0581ab61da4d6697"],"delay:community_opposition:withdrawn":["0581ab61da4d6697","adfb727c5dd4e1cc"],"delay:litigation:litigation_active":["792ce5aec9329c29","109278a363838f96","f27cb758664748d7"],"delay:community_opposition:litigation_active":["792ce5aec9329c29","109278a363838f96"],"delay:corporate_realignment:delayed":["0120772c7188f042"],"delay:community_opposition:delayed":["168b4298a9ab289d","f7513e35f7c721c0","2e380fe2f7f014dc"],"delay:litigation:under_appeal":["f08287b22f91f244"],"delay:local_moratorium:litigation_active":["f27cb758664748d7"],"delay:zoning_denial:delayed":["2e380fe2f7f014dc"],"delay:interconnection_queue:halted":["d5e9430ff55efa0d"],"delay:zoning_denial:withdrawn":["adfb727c5dd4e1cc"],"utility:tariff:approved":["75dc99c20658fe92","aed4fabd0e2dc51c","9a879f558b598ed3"],"utility:rate case:pending":["3af74a147ed90618"],"utility:other:pending":["234c8b4fd863479c","b540667ef8b17e0f","0b11ccddef1877eb","99a349313213c782","87c2bcaca8770a64","ca36e7d667fd52d5","624c21796e30622a","6218dc8d9c2c19aa","a068f88c8918edb0"],"utility:special contract:pending":["85e644b149d44cc3"],"utility:tariff:pending":["179ce9c6749195ff","ecc5b89ff5cb7890"],"utility:statement:pending":["d04486225e3fbb69"],"utility:other:approved":["0b929d848501d87d"],"utility:certificate:approved":["f70bcf2339f86b49"],"utility:policy:rejected":["c7c2a7a3b4cd9ee5"],"utility:policy:effective":["ad4e34e0dfe00af1"]},"grid_operators":["ERCOT","SPP","MISO","NON-RTO"],"counts":{"policy":4,"moratorium":28,"water":14,"delay":83,"atlas":135,"permits":127},"record_count":391},{"id":"UT","name":"Utah","groups":{"restriction:local:enacted":["fe8d104f8d67e17c","093e457d95e139ba","a73c33aad89fd8c4","d39140513b342349","0c19d0bfb2b41666","be172ab12b60089d","7272dd8d9cbcbd97","2c4637d21201bc5a"],"restriction:local:pause":["6689ae5de85fb884"],"restriction:states:enacted":["161bb7df391f5393","29634d18789600f9"],"water:disclosure:enacted":["aa23c2f90b922d2f"],"water:siting:enacted":["92181bfbd0f092dc"],"delay:local_moratorium:litigation_active":["43fe8f06c251d00a"],"delay:zoning_denial:litigation_active":["43fe8f06c251d00a"],"delay:community_opposition:litigation_active":["43fe8f06c251d00a"],"delay:tax_incentive_change:cancelled":["9a747679a42936ff"]},"grid_operators":["NON-RTO","SPP"],"counts":{"moratorium":11,"water":2,"delay":16,"atlas":23,"permits":16},"record_count":68},{"id":"VT","name":"Vermont","groups":{"restriction:local:enacted":["fd5d7c35a8a164d5","ffd4551238ee66c3","24609fa0cc03fd6d"],"restriction:states:failed":["a22c89dd88f7805b"]},"grid_operators":["ISO-NE"],"counts":{"moratorium":4,"delay":1,"atlas":3},"record_count":8},{"id":"VA","name":"Virginia","groups":{"policy:water-reporting":["d2e1f34ebb87db96"],"policy:regulator-reporting":["a2d7165da9c4273d"],"restriction:local:enacted":["5d1933a50e2fffa9","d9c9702f7193a5d0","00ea8549bf7d9107","5e8fa08848e7ea49","b612281109895776","a8439ee49b85f3b9","cb1ee56619c41591","fc8930e333e47393","33da24b96e9450aa","3c8c47c48655c7c2"],"restriction:local:failed":["c0313d873e52c337"],"restriction:local:proposed":["1fb124f1d0600aad"],"restriction:states:enacted":["07bca14c6c769cd9","822881c141b55b58","1bc4820da2e184d8","260f9d0fdac1fb1d"],"restriction:states:proposed":["115a01cddaaebb83","81387474427b857f","de3a5a259065cee6","d9698a681bcb77d1","1ccb96de87be8c20","6f2fd99dffb3ee19","5fbcc9b83d0cea89","5286a63674ab303e"],"restriction:states:failed":["96a928bdb916449a","82304cb623ce2fd1","1c2b5c27f2a20646"],"water:disclosure:enacted":["236efd0b5ce918b3","ea2fc9f0f2561dd5","1bb0eef74b265bbc"],"water:siting:vetoed":["fc6a89d84ea3761e"],"water:reclaimed:failed":["7c9863297abb29b6"],"water:incentive:proposed":["30149d37cde17dd5"],"water:study:enacted":["4d9a8e7a99e3e39b"],"water:disclosure:failed":["133af645ccadb7ec"],"water:siting:enacted":["13c66e32329bf4c9"],"water:disclosure:proposed":["739c2b83e1630596"],"delay:zoning_denial:cancelled":["b654fcba5611c495","3de6fb41fb4c6757","c24066658a7c87b0","c05ff50d0eaddb83","b2f708f236602e8d","1df2fd29204a101c","ae2116cf001391ca","0d43e4ef0a99dcc3","15020a3ca9ed5c0c","4ef0ce9c1aab379b"],"delay:community_opposition:cancelled":["b654fcba5611c495","3de6fb41fb4c6757","c24066658a7c87b0","c05ff50d0eaddb83","b2f708f236602e8d","1df2fd29204a101c","0d43e4ef0a99dcc3","15020a3ca9ed5c0c","4ef0ce9c1aab379b","b0af2cf0f00c0c33","0093933737713687"],"delay:water_dispute:cancelled":["b654fcba5611c495","c24066658a7c87b0"],"delay:litigation:cancelled":["b2f708f236602e8d","3059b79f61908e3d"],"delay:community_opposition:delayed":["2a92789be1587ada","dc394d8881dcfd7f","d7fec75934b138bd","4ef289628ac834d5"],"delay:litigation:litigation_active":["01bbee83623720b2","e5c30ca57b2dbc24","dcf5dbffe665442a","85cd3631575a5bdf","1832912b622cc7ca","e7ee0387e9522f52"],"delay:community_opposition:withdrawn":["4e9752c1f7793fed","dd7e54e17e5d9610","c0eb9b29986c263e","5bd7758d176ed830","c66e2ba9c7927837"],"delay:zoning_denial:withdrawn":["4e9752c1f7793fed","dd7e54e17e5d9610","c0eb9b29986c263e","5bd7758d176ed830","c66e2ba9c7927837"],"delay:community_opposition:litigation_active":["dcf5dbffe665442a"],"delay:zoning_denial:delayed":["ba73fb104a300b67","dc394d8881dcfd7f","d7fec75934b138bd"],"delay:zoning_denial:under_appeal":["f8a6c494d6a909f4"],"delay:community_opposition:under_appeal":["f8a6c494d6a909f4"],"delay:water_dispute:litigation_active":["85cd3631575a5bdf"],"delay:zoning_denial:litigation_active":["e7ee0387e9522f52"],"delay:environmental_review:cancelled":["3059b79f61908e3d"],"utility:tariff:approved":["c2935488c1650819","39c6440688564d5b","87a87dde118e582a"],"utility:IRP:contested":["1d207f181f290a4a","9ba1e9a7df265951","7f6e112a0c84fe66"],"utility:tariff:contested":["d5ac5227a2747fcf","b3484cb6d3aad2da"],"utility:rate case:pending":["7a09881b3efc53a9"],"utility:other:pending":["cb40a9cac60f8cec","925eb6e874d3a48f","53aeac44973adb8a"],"utility:statement:pending":["95c8534650ed9b12"],"utility:tariff:pending":["17c7d5340af6b949"],"utility:other:contested":["e0efcc5e95491272"],"utility:rate case:approved":["2d9b62ed5a5a8c85"]},"grid_operators":["PJM","NON-RTO"],"counts":{"policy":2,"moratorium":27,"water":10,"delay":88,"atlas":73,"permits":642},"record_count":842},{"id":"WA","name":"Washington","groups":{"restriction:local:enacted":["9f5f2923e39b9be8","d4e7ad9cf08df51e","a0fc2d121a678362","0b3a9ecd7c2478dc","de683906483b8fe5","d6189396d865dfc1","a4d0a0075eb42622","844f1f18ded0ca1c","50cb86e7f24d5c8a","5f99587cd1f4762d","e207b014a5280c8e","abcdda3f927a1476","31a8daed20fe189e","af832be8ade36360","510f60e365739621","7eb7d0c92f5f8dd9","5565880179e00904","c8eaae4e91fc4247","4f498d7e9f152136","29f8e05bf47f65e4"],"restriction:states:enacted":["13d139ecdc65b4b1","b6f7e9b035c67d69"],"restriction:states:proposed":["73392c07183451a2","d65bf66b10bb27dc","d97ae6ca24475af1"],"restriction:states:failed":["b0d11e81f4e16dea","fc47b1de08dff922","383388e3142065cd"],"water:moratorium:enacted":["6455f69859c340a2"],"delay:community_opposition:halted":["8ced64a3cbb11f6c"],"delay:local_moratorium:halted":["0d03a9c2805d05b6","2fc49a0ff709020e"],"delay:community_opposition:delayed":["887cc460e5eb83f6"],"utility:tariff:pending":["c168cf070187ea92"],"utility:other:pending":["611e6f5599ef718f","8c8130676232d1c6"],"utility:statement:pending":["4ed38cff9678ccf0","4b866a2091ab3ecc"],"utility:tariff:approved":["325a6b7ee8b34e77"]},"grid_operators":["NON-RTO"],"counts":{"moratorium":28,"water":1,"delay":22,"atlas":30,"permits":13},"record_count":94},{"id":"WV","name":"West Virginia","groups":{"water:disclosure:failed":["8cf5514f4b5ff375"],"delay:community_opposition:delayed":["4124cb9080c91f7c"],"utility:IRP:pending":["a67a61284873a2b2","8da91197a3806bcc"],"utility:special contract:pending":["39679c94f0d7f830"],"utility:other:contested":["c12d842abe5446ff","040b3c446bff4aee","5e6fb296651a928a","6f948a872911044f","0ae82e92301e638b"]},"grid_operators":["PJM"],"counts":{"water":1,"delay":12,"atlas":7},"record_count":20},{"id":"WI","name":"Wisconsin","groups":{"restriction:local:enacted":["197cdb77aa511062","c32fbb4074e34eba","9fa928579bf6e19b","1ef57a5ad557563c","d383195f7d8cd078","07b5a8ef15cadf6b","0a3550a0b812064e","2f12caa1fa8a1620","4efd296b41cadd58","502234e3282fa94d","98de8d31bfd06c50","9baf377f17b48199","2b2ac1debfbe57ca","aee74a04d13b1375","02ac37032bda8131","375f029130348bd2","6e56afd4aed59791","893a3aae04278c40","7650d4a5b8a48f92","e18b7a4b7fbc1df5","b56152d653914388","b916df50f4c51b94","5a64d5c33607de67","643f527e927e4058","7b1745a42047131e","e09c79ad3db16d88","734fd94028341ac3","69f22ea5aa3e34d3","1a270a98a4fa2e6d","d41ed6223bfeed81","112e1e1079c890e9","844ad5858c872078","47a591fadc2e8900","f7cf8bb4ab48824a"],"restriction:local:failed":["0c67dadae5dac0e9"],"restriction:local:proposed":["e66086d4c7d49f01","c8953b5f4533a4b5","68e48cc43363c3ba","f04d2abd046f97a9","1eae3d6650182a35"],"restriction:states:enacted":["5db6a8a411191d98"],"restriction:states:proposed":["d9aeb06afb1cc48b"],"restriction:states:failed":["a7f7ac4ffcf569cf","e87712374a5a9bb6","1fa055042bc56cba","bf5f897298b22196"],"water:moratorium:failed":["dabd0296a8769724"],"water:disclosure:proposed":["52d3503b7b7a29d2"],"water:disclosure:failed":["3d11e7d09b3698e1"],"water:moratorium:proposed":["0d06b92b967fdc00"],"water:siting:proposed":["4157cf76b6d65b0a"],"delay:environmental_review:litigation_active":["debb467bcb4d5430"],"delay:litigation:litigation_active":["debb467bcb4d5430"],"delay:community_opposition:litigation_active":["debb467bcb4d5430"],"delay:litigation:active_litigation":["e199a6213982873d"],"delay:environmental_review_challenge:active_litigation":["e199a6213982873d"],"delay:regulatory_collateral_dispute:active_litigation":["e199a6213982873d"],"delay:corporate_reassessment:construction_partially_paused":["18d12b7d0ac7dea8"],"delay:design_changes:construction_partially_paused":["18d12b7d0ac7dea8"],"delay:community_opposition:under_council_consideration":["28e37770792b4c08"],"delay:withdrawal:cancelled":["ea733b19fc76a19b"],"delay:village_infeasibility_finding:cancelled":["ea733b19fc76a19b"],"delay:interconnection:denied":["fd3e6fff23dec30a"],"delay:water:cancelled":["6b688ff399652711"],"delay:community_opposition:cancelled":["6b688ff399652711"],"delay:financing:cancelled":["6b688ff399652711"],"utility:special contract:approved":["c0e0e62ba225486e"],"utility:tariff:approved":["477299baafe80b07","8b74b857f211fa23","9d22a2aeb195e4fc","124399acbd7a554c"],"utility:tariff:pending":["dde2390c69924c91","4b8f10b414687805","7d0c020f1825cea4"],"utility:rate case:pending":["fbf33f025d17bc1f"],"utility:other:pending":["8f81691272c2cefc"]},"grid_operators":["MISO"],"counts":{"moratorium":46,"water":5,"delay":59,"atlas":44,"permits":6},"record_count":160},{"id":"WY","name":"Wyoming","groups":{"restriction:local:failed":["d0485054fd79e820"],"restriction:local:proposed":["3ed10f6e2d7fa4f4"],"restriction:states:failed":["be934bcf6dde21e3"],"utility:tariff:pending":["b1729fb79f6ff5af"],"utility:tariff:approved":["48ce507193eae507","2e0818019f3d14fe","103e672184e6c568"],"utility:other:pending":["b06ef4aba51b6d71"],"utility:special contract:pending":["31c5bf9bd2103358"]},"grid_operators":["NON-RTO","SPP"],"counts":{"moratorium":3,"delay":10,"atlas":13,"permits":4},"record_count":30}]}