# Alaska Data Center Moratorium Tracker

Source: https://savrn.com/data-center-moratorium-tracker/alaska
Markdown alternate of the page above; the site index is https://savrn.com/llms.txt

---

Alaska has 1 data-center bill pending in the legislature. 4 city and county measures are tracked here, 1 of them in force. Every entry below links to its primary source: a legislature page, a governor's office, a local government, or the reporting of record.

Last updated October 2026 2 state-level measures 4 local measures 6 primary sources

Alaska

AK

Proposed

2

State-level measures on record

4

City and county measures, 1 in force

6

Primary sources cited on this page

#44

of 50 states with anything on record, by measure count

## State-level measures in Alaska

Every statewide moratorium, pause, siting restriction, or tax-incentive rollback in Alaska we can verify against a primary source. Strongest status first.

| Measure | Status | What it does | Source |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Alaska senators question legality of state land transfer for possible Mat-Su data centers | Proposed 2026-09 | Alaska senators are raising legal concerns about a proposed state land transfer of nearly 20,000 acres to the Alaska Industrial Development and Export Authority for possible data centers in the Matanuska-Susitna Borough. The proposal has sparked public concern and scrutiny. |  |
| HB 259Alaska HB 259 (introduced January 2026 by Rep. Donna Mears) would require large energy facilities (peak demand ≥20 MW) to enter community benefit agreements | Failed / vetoed 2026-01 | Alaska HB 259 (introduced January 2026 by Rep. Donna Mears) would require large energy facilities (peak demand ≥20 MW) to enter community benefit agreements with the host municipality and pay for at least 80% of contracted power amount regardless of actual purchases (a take-or-pay structure mirroring the RPP). Companion bill SB 250 also pending. Anchorage Assembly preemptively adopted data center regulations in March 2026 and overrode a mayor's veto on a related partnership. A separate Mat-Su data center plan is in doubt after a mayor veto in March 2026. The bills are responses to growing AI-driven data center interest in Alaska. Alaska adjourned sine die May 20, 2026; HB 259 (stuck in House Energy) and SB 250 (never scheduled) both died. |  |

## City and county moratoria in Alaska

Most of the movement is local, where a building pause or permit halt does not need a legislative session. 4 tracked measures in Alaska, each with its source.

Anchorage

2026-03

In force

Local moratorium on data centers with no end date

AO 2026-27: defines data centers (20+ MW) in zoning code, restricts to commercial/industrial zones, bans from residential, requires conditional use review, utility capacity statement, landscaping buffers and enclosed power equipment. The measure has no end date by design.

Fairbanks North Star Borough

2026-08

Proposed

Proposed local moratorium on data centers

Borough Assembly adopted 2027 legislative priority requesting state and federal moratorium on permitting, leasing and construction of commercial data centers on public lands until regulations are developed; not a locally enacted moratorium but an official resolution. The measure has no documented term.

Petersburg

2026-10

Proposed

Borough-wide moratorium on data centers using on-site power generation

Vice Mayor Jeigh Stanton Gregor will ask the Petersburg Borough Assembly on Monday, October 4, 2026, to begin work on a borough-wide moratorium preventing data centers that use on-site power generation; the assembly had previously deadlocked 3-3 on a related Planning Commission recommendation on September 21, 2026.

Petersburg Borough

2026-09

Failed / vetoed

One-year data center moratorium recommendation fails on tie vote

The Petersburg Borough Assembly on September 21, 2026 considered a Planning Commission request to pursue a temporary moratorium on data centers. The vote ended in a stalemate and the motion did not pass.

## Would you like the weekly update?

Every week we re-verify every state and local measure on this map and publish what changed. You get one email when it goes out.

Also send me

Receive a short introduction on days 3, 7 and 14, plus the updates you select. Unsubscribe in one click. [Privacy](https://savrn.com/privacy) ·

You're on the list. The next weekly update will land in your inbox when it publishes.

You are subscribed. [Read the latest tracker](https://savrn.com/data-center-moratorium-tracker)

### Where Alaska stands

Across the whole tracker we hold 334 state-level measures in 49 states and 1253 city and county measures, against 1419 primary sources. Alaska accounts for 2 of the state-level measures and 4 of the local ones.

By total measures on record it is #44 of the 50 states and DC carrying any tracked action, and #43 by city and county measures alone. Ranking is by count of sourced entries in this dataset, so it measures documented activity, not the size of the buildout.

## Sources for Alaska

6 citations behind the entries above. Each opens in a new tab.

- Statewide — Alaska senators question legality of state land transfer for possible Mat-Su data centers (Proposed, 2026-09) [alaskabeacon.com →](https://alaskabeacon.com/2026/09/16/alaska-senators-question-legality-of-state-land-transfer-for-possible-mat-su-data-centers/)
- Statewide · HB 259 — Alaska HB 259 (introduced January 2026 by Rep. Donna Mears) would require large energy facilities (peak demand ≥20 MW) to enter community benefit agreements (Failed / vetoed, 2026-01) [akleg.gov →](https://www.akleg.gov/basis/Bill/Text/34?Hsid=HB0259A)
- Anchorage — Local moratorium on data centers with no end date (In force, 2026-03) [adn.com →](https://www.adn.com/alaska-news/anchorage/2026/03/27/anchorage-assembly-preemptively-adopts-data-center-regulations/)
- Fairbanks North Star Borough — Proposed local moratorium on data centers (Proposed, 2026-08) [fm.kuac.org →](https://fm.kuac.org/2026-08-31/in-legislative-priorities-fairbanks-north-star-borough-assembly-doubles-up-on-ai-data-center-moratorium-request)
- Petersburg — Borough-wide moratorium on data centers using on-site power generation (Proposed, 2026-10) [petersburgpilot.com →](https://www.petersburgpilot.com/story/2026/10/01/news/data-center-moratorium-comes-before-the-assembly-again-on-monday/16117.html)
- Petersburg Borough — One-year data center moratorium recommendation fails on tie vote (Failed / vetoed, 2026-09) [kfsk.org →](https://www.kfsk.org/2026/09/28/data-center-moratorium-proposal-fails-in-petersburg-assembly-stalemate/)

[See all 1419 sources across every state →](https://savrn.com/data-center-moratorium-tracker/sources)

## What does bind large loads in Alaska

A moratorium is only one way a data center gets stopped. The grid operator decides whether it can connect at all, and on what terms. Alaska sits in 1 footprint.

Non-RTO utility territoryDominant

No RTO or ISO market here. Interconnection terms, study queues and curtailment rights for a large load are set by the individual utility and its state commission.

Isolated grids (Railbelt and rural systems); not connected to either Lower-48 interconnection.

[See the full Data Center Grid Operator Watchlist →](https://savrn.com/data-center-grid-operator-watchlist)

## Data centers in Alaska

The US Data Center Map identifies 6 facilities run by 4 operators in Alaska, each one placed from primary sources and listed by city and by operator, with the measures on this page beside them.

[Open the Alaska data center map →](https://savrn.com/data-center-map/alaska) · [The US Data Center Map →](https://savrn.com/data-center-map)

[Alabama](https://savrn.com/data-center-moratorium-tracker/alabama) [Alaska](https://savrn.com/data-center-moratorium-tracker/alaska) [Arizona](https://savrn.com/data-center-moratorium-tracker/arizona) [Arkansas](https://savrn.com/data-center-moratorium-tracker/arkansas) [California](https://savrn.com/data-center-moratorium-tracker/california) [Colorado](https://savrn.com/data-center-moratorium-tracker/colorado) [Connecticut](https://savrn.com/data-center-moratorium-tracker/connecticut) [Delaware](https://savrn.com/data-center-moratorium-tracker/delaware) [Florida](https://savrn.com/data-center-moratorium-tracker/florida) [Georgia](https://savrn.com/data-center-moratorium-tracker/georgia) [Hawaii](https://savrn.com/data-center-moratorium-tracker/hawaii) [Idaho](https://savrn.com/data-center-moratorium-tracker/idaho) [Illinois](https://savrn.com/data-center-moratorium-tracker/illinois) [Indiana](https://savrn.com/data-center-moratorium-tracker/indiana) [Iowa](https://savrn.com/data-center-moratorium-tracker/iowa) [Kansas](https://savrn.com/data-center-moratorium-tracker/kansas) [Kentucky](https://savrn.com/data-center-moratorium-tracker/kentucky) [Louisiana](https://savrn.com/data-center-moratorium-tracker/louisiana) [Maine](https://savrn.com/data-center-moratorium-tracker/maine) [Maryland](https://savrn.com/data-center-moratorium-tracker/maryland) [Massachusetts](https://savrn.com/data-center-moratorium-tracker/massachusetts) [Michigan](https://savrn.com/data-center-moratorium-tracker/michigan) [Minnesota](https://savrn.com/data-center-moratorium-tracker/minnesota) [Mississippi](https://savrn.com/data-center-moratorium-tracker/mississippi) [Missouri](https://savrn.com/data-center-moratorium-tracker/missouri) [Montana](https://savrn.com/data-center-moratorium-tracker/montana) [Nebraska](https://savrn.com/data-center-moratorium-tracker/nebraska) [Nevada](https://savrn.com/data-center-moratorium-tracker/nevada) [New Hampshire](https://savrn.com/data-center-moratorium-tracker/new-hampshire) [New Jersey](https://savrn.com/data-center-moratorium-tracker/new-jersey) [New Mexico](https://savrn.com/data-center-moratorium-tracker/new-mexico) [New York](https://savrn.com/data-center-moratorium-tracker/new-york) [North Carolina](https://savrn.com/data-center-moratorium-tracker/north-carolina) [North Dakota](https://savrn.com/data-center-moratorium-tracker/north-dakota) [Ohio](https://savrn.com/data-center-moratorium-tracker/ohio) [Oklahoma](https://savrn.com/data-center-moratorium-tracker/oklahoma) [Oregon](https://savrn.com/data-center-moratorium-tracker/oregon) [Pennsylvania](https://savrn.com/data-center-moratorium-tracker/pennsylvania) [Rhode Island](https://savrn.com/data-center-moratorium-tracker/rhode-island) [South Carolina](https://savrn.com/data-center-moratorium-tracker/south-carolina) [South Dakota](https://savrn.com/data-center-moratorium-tracker/south-dakota) [Tennessee](https://savrn.com/data-center-moratorium-tracker/tennessee) [Texas](https://savrn.com/data-center-moratorium-tracker/texas) [Utah](https://savrn.com/data-center-moratorium-tracker/utah) [Vermont](https://savrn.com/data-center-moratorium-tracker/vermont) [Virginia](https://savrn.com/data-center-moratorium-tracker/virginia) [Washington](https://savrn.com/data-center-moratorium-tracker/washington) [Washington, DC](https://savrn.com/data-center-moratorium-tracker/washington-dc) [West Virginia](https://savrn.com/data-center-moratorium-tracker/west-virginia) [Wisconsin](https://savrn.com/data-center-moratorium-tracker/wisconsin) [Wyoming](https://savrn.com/data-center-moratorium-tracker/wyoming)

### How to read this page

In force = a moratorium, siting restriction, or tax-incentive rollback that is currently enacted, by statute or executive order. Paused = a temporary hold on new incentives or applications. Proposed = introduced and still pending. Failed / vetoed = died in committee, was voted down, or was vetoed.

This page is generated from the same primary-sourced dataset as the national [U.S. Data Center Moratorium Tracker](https://savrn.com/data-center-moratorium-tracker) and is re-checked on the same weekly cycle, whether or not anything changed. Legislative status changes quickly; it is informational, not legal advice. Spot something out of date in Alaska? [Tell us](https://savrn.com/contact).

Companion references: the [Data Center Grid Operator Watchlist](https://savrn.com/data-center-grid-operator-watchlist) for the interconnection and curtailment rules that bind here, the [Data Center Water Tracker](https://savrn.com/data-center-water-tracker) for water mandates, and the [Data Center Delay Watchlist](https://savrn.com/data-center-delay-tracker) for named projects.

## Why Alaska is pushing back

The objections repeat from state to state: strain on the electric grid, water drawn for cooling, and the sense that a facility takes local resources without giving much back. SAVRN builds AI factories designed around those three objections: on-site power that does not lean on the public grid, direct-to-chip cooling that does not consume municipal water, and a training institute that puts local people to work inside the building.

[See how a SAVRN factory works](https://savrn.com/system) [Talk to us about a Alaska site](https://savrn.com/engage)
