SAVRN
Search Contact SAVRN

SAVRN Model Hub · Comparisons

convnextv2_nano.fcmae_ft_in1k vs efficientnet_b3.ra2_in1k

Convnextv2_nano.fcmae_ft_in1k has 16M parameters and efficientnet_b3.ra2_in1k has 12M parameters; convnextv2_nano.fcmae_ft_in1k is released under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 and efficientnet_b3.ra2_in1k under Apache License 2.0; at 16-bit, convnextv2_nano.fcmae_ft_in1k needs about 0 GB (1x MI300X from $1.85 an hour) and efficientnet_b3.ra2_in1k about 0 GB (1x MI300X from $1.85 an hour).

Published metadata for 2 models, each read from its own repository.
Field convnextv2_nano.fcmae_ft_in1k
timm/convnextv2_nano.fcmae_ft_in1k
efficientnet_b3.ra2_in1k
timm/efficientnet_b3.ra2_in1k
Publisher PyTorch Image Models PyTorch Image Models
Task Image classification Image classification
Modality Image Image
Parameters, as reported 16M parameters 12M parameters
Architecture Not stated Not stated
Library timm timm
Context length Not stated Not stated
Repository size 125.1 MB 98.8 MB
Artifact formats safetensors, pytorch safetensors, pytorch
License cc-by-nc-4.0 apache-2.0
Access Open weights, no gate Open weights, no gate
Memory at 16-bit (weights and margin) 0 GB 0 GB
Cheapest GPUs at 16-bit, per hour 1x MI300X, $1.85 1x MI300X, $1.85
Memory at 4-bit (weights and margin) 0 GB 0 GB
Cheapest GPUs at 4-bit, per hour 1x MI300X, $1.85 1x MI300X, $1.85
Revision viewed fd83d9c98615 0366a7551862
Downloads reported by the hub 165.3k 12.7M
Last observed 2026-09-18 2026-09-21

An evaluation row appears only where at least two of these models report the same benchmark with the same stated configuration, metric, unit and setup. Different evaluators stay named in each cell. Values are shown as reported: no unit conversion, no ranking.

SAVRN's Notes on efficientnet_b3.ra2_in1k

When the memory line reads 0.0 GB at 16-bit, 8-bit and 4-bit alike, the hardware conversation ends before it starts. Twelve million parameters and 98.8 MB on disk across five files is the whole footprint of this image classifier, trained on ImageNet-1k in timm with the RandAugment RA2 recipe. The Index names one MI300X with 192 GB at $1.85 an hour as the cheapest setup, but the classifier will never be what fills that card, so size the node around the rest of the pipeline.

Nothing in the license gets in the way: Apache 2.0 clears commercial use, modification and redistribution with notices kept and changes stated, and adds an express patent grant. Check the lineage instead: ImageNet-1k is the only training set, so confirm its classes cover what you need labeled, and read the recipe in arXiv:2110.00476, which published this as its B recipe.

Questions

Which is larger, convnextv2_nano.fcmae_ft_in1k or efficientnet_b3.ra2_in1k?

convnextv2_nano.fcmae_ft_in1k (16M parameters) is larger than efficientnet_b3.ra2_in1k (12M parameters), by the parameter counts their publishers report.

Which is cheaper to run, convnextv2_nano.fcmae_ft_in1k or efficientnet_b3.ra2_in1k?

At 4-bit, convnextv2_nano.fcmae_ft_in1k fits on 1x MI300X from $1.85 an hour and efficientnet_b3.ra2_in1k on 1x MI300X from $1.85 an hour, at the lowest on-demand prices the SAVRN Index lists.

Can I use convnextv2_nano.fcmae_ft_in1k commercially?

Not without separate permission. convnextv2_nano.fcmae_ft_in1k is released under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0. CC BY-NC 4.0 permits sharing and adapting with credit for non-commercial purposes only. Commercial use needs separate permission from the rights holder.

Can I use efficientnet_b3.ra2_in1k commercially?

Yes. efficientnet_b3.ra2_in1k is released under Apache License 2.0. The Apache License 2.0 is a permissive open-source license. It permits commercial use, modification and redistribution. It requires keeping the license and copyright notices and any NOTICE file, stating significant changes, and it includes an express patent grant from contributors.

Related Comparisons