Search public pages, research tools, and SAVRN solutions.
U.S. Data Center Moratorium Tracker
A state-by-state, continuously sourced map of every data-center moratorium, pause, siting restriction, and tax-incentive rollback in the United States. Each entry links to its primary source.
Last updated September 2026Live · sources checked 11 min ago · 8 of 8 sources answered · 66 entries added in the last 7 days · last change 2026-09-2949 states with action1116 local moratoria tracked1267 primary sources cited
35
States with restrictions in force (rollbacks, siting orders)
0
States with an active pause or executive moratorium
10
States with bills pending in the legislature
4
States where a measure failed or was vetoed
Per NCSL (via Route Fifty, June 2026), lawmakers in ~14 states were considering data-center bans or moratoriums; MultiState counts 300+ data-center bills filed across 30+ states in 2026, and Good Jobs First lists at least 11 states that introduced outright moratorium bills. Most state moratorium bills stalled or failed; New York became the first state with a statewide moratorium in force (via Executive Order 62), while the legislature's own one-year moratorium bill passed both chambers in June 2026 and still awaits the Governor's signature. California's Governor signed seven data-center bills on Sept. 21, 2026, covering ratepayer tariffs, water and energy disclosure and CEQA review, and New Hampshire's Governor said in September 2026 that she will propose a statewide multi-year moratorium in her next budget. On Sept. 8, 2026, Oregon's Governor paused state land transactions for data center projects through July 1, 2027, and Massachusetts' Governor signed an executive order requiring local community benefits agreements before state permitting. On Sept. 23, 2026, Maryland's Governor created a task force to review every data center of 25 MW or more that seeks state action. Local action has far outpaced the states: this tracker lists more than 1,100 individually sourced city, county, township and village measures across 49 states. That is a floor, not a census. Activists tracking New Jersey alone counted 93 municipalities with data-center bans by September 2026 (Gothamist); this tracker carries 98 New Jersey entries, including proposed, tabled and failed measures, and adds a jurisdiction only once a primary source for its specific action has been read.
Would you like the weekly update?
Every week we re-verify every state and local measure on this map and publish what changed. You get one email when it goes out.
Also send me
Receive a short introduction on days 3, 7 and 14, plus the updates you select. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy ·
✓You're on the list. The next weekly update will land in your inbox when it publishes.
All 51 states and DC have their own page: the statewide bills and orders, every city and county moratorium inside them, and the full citation list. Where nothing is on record, the page says so and shows what we check.
The dot shows the strongest state-level status on record. Grey means city and county action only; an outline means nothing on record yet. The number is every measure tracked in that state, statewide and local.
Federal bills
Congress has no data-center moratorium in force. Two companion bills are pending in committee in the 119th Congress. They are listed separately because they are federal and are not counted in the state or local totals above, and they do not appear on the map. Any bill not enacted before the 119th Congress ends on January 3, 2027 would have to be reintroduced.
Bill
Sponsor
Status
What it does
Source
H.R. 7858Data Center Community Impact Act
Rep. Watson Coleman, Bonnie [D-NJ-12] House
Proposed2026-03
Introduced March 5, 2026. Latest action March 5, 2026: Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
S. 4213Data Center Water and Energy Transparency Act of 2026
Sen. Durbin, Richard J. [D-IL] Senate
Proposed2026-03
Introduced March 25, 2026. Latest action March 25, 2026: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. (text: CR S1616-1617).
S. 4214Artificial Intelligence Data Center Moratorium Act
Sen. Bernard Sanders [I-VT] Senate
Proposed2026-03
Introduced March 25, 2026 and read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation the same day. Would impose a nationwide moratorium on constructing or upgrading data centers with a power demand of 20 MW or more, lifting only when Congress enacts safeguards and expressly terminates it, and would bar U.S. export of AI computing infrastructure to countries without comparable safeguards. The bill has no cosponsors and has recorded no action since the day it was introduced.
H.R. 9442Artificial Intelligence Data Center Moratorium Act
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez [D-NY-14] House
Proposed2026-06
The House companion to S. 4214, introduced June 24, 2026 with 14 cosponsors and referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce and additionally to the Committee on Foreign Affairs. It carries the same 20 MW threshold and the same conditional structure, lifting only when Congress passes safeguards. No action has been recorded since the day it was introduced.
H.R. 9939No AI Data Centers on Federal Lands Act
Rep. Tlaib, Rashida [D-MI-12] House
Proposed2026-07
Introduced July 23, 2026. Latest action July 23, 2026: Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
H.R. 10169To prohibit the provision of Federal financial benefit for the construction, expansion, or substantial rehabilitation of data centers on prime farmland and other certain farmland.
Rep. Miller, Mary E. [R-IL-15] House
Proposed2026-08
Introduced August 27, 2026. Latest action August 27, 2026: Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
H.Res. 1471Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that every American and community impacted by the construction or operation of an artificial intelligence data center should have the right to transparency and local autonomy.
Rep. Khanna, Ro [D-CA-17] House
Proposed2026-08
Introduced August 3, 2026. Latest action August 3, 2026: Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
H.R. 10321Responsible Data Center Siting Act of 2026
Rep. Subramanyam, Suhas [D-VA-10] House
Proposed2026-09
Introduced September 8, 2026. Latest action September 8, 2026: Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
H.R. 10322Data Center Fair Share Act
Rep. Subramanyam, Suhas [D-VA-10] House
Proposed2026-09
Introduced September 8, 2026. Latest action September 8, 2026: Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
H.R. 10448To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exempt qualified data center property from bonus depreciation, and for other purposes.
Rep. McDonald Rivet, Kristen [D-MI-8] House
Proposed2026-09
Introduced September 16, 2026. Latest action September 16, 2026: Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
H.R. 10570To limit the enforceability of predispute nondisclosure contract clauses relating to the building of data centers, and for other purposes.
House
Proposed2026-09
Introduced September 24, 2026. Latest action September 24, 2026: Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committees on Energy and Commerce, and Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
S. 5418A bill to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude data centers from the definition of qualified opportunity zone businesses.
Sen. Hawley, Josh [R-MO] Senate
Proposed2026-09
Introduced September 16, 2026. Latest action September 16, 2026: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
State-level actions
Every state-level moratorium, pause, siting restriction, or tax-incentive rollback we can verify against a primary source. Sorted by status, then state.
HB 399Alabama HB 399, sponsored by Rep. Hulsey (R-Helena), is the House companion to SB 265.
In force2026-02
Alabama HB 399, sponsored by Rep. Hulsey (R-Helena), is the House companion to SB 265. Limits tax abatements for data center projects over $200M to 20 years, down from the current 30-year maximum. Requires data centers consuming 100+ MW to pay state sales and use taxes allocated to the General Fund, effective January 1, 2027. Passed House 103-0; Senate unanimously passed amended version (April 9, 2026); House concurred and bill was sent to Gov. Ivey's desk. Gov. Ivey publicly supports the legislation as part of a package to lower costs for families.
FY2027 budgetThree-year pause on data center sales-tax exemption
In force2026-07
Signed by Gov. Hobbs; imposes a three-year moratorium on new data center sales-tax exemptions (Jul 1 2026 to Jun 30 2029). Already-approved projects keep their exemptions.
HB 4168Statewide moratorium on data centers through June 30, 2029
In force2026-07
HB 4168, 3-year moratorium on new data center sales tax exemption applications, signed Jun 13. Saves ~\$57M. Developers submitted 113 applications in the 2 weeks before the pause (nearly as many as in the previous 13 years combined). The measure runs to June 30, 2029.
Arizona statewide (3-year pause on new data center tax exemptions, signed in FY budget)Arizona: On June 15, 2026 Gov. Katie Hobbs signed Arizona's ~$18B FY budget, which includes a three-year moratorium on NEW data center sales/use tax exemptions.
In force2026-06
On June 15, 2026 Gov. Katie Hobbs signed Arizona's ~$18B FY budget, which includes a three-year moratorium on NEW data center sales/use tax exemptions. Existing data centers keep their exemptions (5-10 year terms) and new facilities can still be built, they just cannot newly qualify for the incentive during the pause. The 2013-era incentive costs the state ~$38M/year; a mixed outcome curbing subsidies without restricting development.
Signed by Gov. Newsom on Sept. 21, 2026 (Chapter 434, Statutes of 2026). Creates data center reporting obligations to the California Energy Commission, including energy use and local land use disclosures.
Signed by Gov. Newsom on Sept. 21, 2026 (Chapter 435, Statutes of 2026). The Fair Share in Energy Act adds Public Utilities Code provisions on electricity service to data centers.
Signed by Gov. Newsom on Sept. 21, 2026 (Chapter 440, Statutes of 2026). Establishes data center electricity rate structure provisions in the Public Utilities Code.
SB 886California Technology Innovation and Ratepayer Protection Act
In force2026-09
Signed by Gov. Newsom on Sept. 21, 2026 (Chapter 438, Statutes of 2026). The California Technology Innovation and Ratepayer Protection Act directs the CPUC to adopt data center tariffs that assign transmission upgrade costs to data centers.
Signed by Gov. Newsom on Sept. 21, 2026 (Chapter 439, Statutes of 2026). Amends CEQA provisions covering environmental leadership development projects, data centers and geothermal power plant projects.
SB 57California SB 57 directs the CPUC to assess whether investor-owned utility costs from new data center loads result in cost shifts to other retail customers.
In force2025-10
California SB 57 directs the CPUC to assess whether investor-owned utility costs from new data center loads result in cost shifts to other retail customers. Report is due to the Legislature by January 1, 2027. Signed by Governor Newsom on October 11, 2025 (Chapter 647, Statutes of 2025). The law takes a study-only approach; earlier prescriptive provisions were removed.
AB 2619California AB 2619 would establish comprehensive water reporting requirements with three data center size categories: hyperscale (>25 MW), mid-range (2-25 MW)
In force2026-09
Signed by Gov. Newsom on Sept. 21, 2026 (Chapter 437, Statutes of 2026). Requires data centers to report annual water use.
California Governor Gavin Newsom signed seven bills on Monday requiring greater transparency from data center developers and operators. The bills aim to provide residents with better insight into energy, water, and land use for data centers.
Newsom clamps down on California data centers as voters turn against the industry
In force2026-09
Governor Gavin Newsom signed seven data center bills into law, signaling a shift toward stricter regulation of the industry. The laws focus on environmental and consumer impacts related to data centers.
Cities get more say in data center development under new California laws
In force2026-09
Governor Gavin Newsom signed seven bills into law that give cities more authority over data center development. The laws require data center developers to disclose energy and water use, pay more for grid infrastructure, and undergo environmental review.
Data centers are black boxes, but California wants to change that
In force2026-09
California Governor Gavin Newsom signed a slate of bills requiring data centers to disclose more information about their electricity and water use. The new laws aim to provide communities with better data and more say over how data centers impact local resources.
California Governor Gavin Newsom issued an executive order addressing AI safety, specifically independent auditors and kill switches. The order was released amid a federal stalemate on AI regulation.
HB 233 (Substitute 1)Large energy-use facilities bear their own infrastructure costs
In force2026-08
House Substitute 1 for HB 233 was signed by Gov. Matt Meyer on Aug. 26, 2026 (Chapter 85:440). It requires a separate utility rate class for large energy-use facilities of 20 MW or more, such as data centers, so infrastructure and capacity costs are not shifted to other customers.
HB 445100% new energy requirement for large energy-use facilities
In force2026-08
Signed by Gov. Matt Meyer on Aug. 26, 2026. Requires large energy-use facilities such as data centers to produce or secure 100 percent of their required power (bring your own generation).
HB 310Large energy-use facilities barred from job-creation tax credits
In force2026-08
Gov. Matt Meyer signed HB 310 on Aug. 26, 2026, as part of a four-bill energy consumer protection package. It prohibits large energy-use facilities such as data centers from receiving the state's job-creation tax credits.
Raised the exemption eligibility threshold from 15 MW to 100 MW of critical IT load with no grandfather clause, ending the exemption for all sub-100 MW facilities. Effective Aug 1, 2025.
SB 484Data center ratepayer, water and local-authority law
In force2026-06
Signed by Gov. DeSantis and effective July 1, 2026. Defines a large-scale data center as a site with an anticipated monthly peak load of 50 MW or more, bars utilities from passing data center costs including electricity onto residential and small business customers, requires large users to pay their full cost of service, protects water resources, requires public disclosure of data center development deals, and preserves local government authority to set stricter standards or deny a project.
HB 895Idaho House passed HB 895 (58-10) on March 20, requiring future data centers to design cooling systems for non-consumptive water use or use water
In force2026-03
Idaho House passed HB 895 (58-10) on March 20, requiring future data centers to design cooling systems for non-consumptive water use or use water from a municipal/water district system. The Senate Resources & Environment Committee endorsed it with a do-pass recommendation on March 26. Separately, a bipartisan bill to sunset data center tax exemptions and reform reporting requirements failed for the second consecutive year after Micron objected. HB 895 (closed-loop/non-consumptive cooling or municipal water for data centers) was signed into law (House 58-10 on March 20; Senate do-pass), effective July 1, 2026.
H 521TAXATION, Adds to and amends existing law to provide a sales and use tax exemption for the purchase or use of eligible server equipment and new data center
In force2020-03
Idaho H 521 (2020): TAXATION, Adds to and amends existing law to provide a sales and use tax exemption for the purchase or use of eligible server equipment and new data center facilities by a qualifying business.. Last action 2020-03-20: Reported Signed by Governor on March 30, 2020 Session Law Chapter 335 Effective: 07/01/2020.
Illinois (statewide)Illinois: Governor J.B. Pritzker announced a two-year suspension of state tax incentives for new data centers, effective July 1, 2026.
In force2026-06
Governor J.B. Pritzker announced a two-year suspension of state tax incentives for new data centers, effective July 1, 2026. The freeze applies to the state's data center tax exemption program. Still requires Illinois General Assembly approval to take effect. The announcement comes amid growing community opposition to data center developments across Illinois, including fights in Sangamon County, Mount Prospect, and DeKalb. On June 5, 2026, after the legislature failed to act on his February request, Gov. Pritzker directed the Dept. of Commerce & Economic Opportunity to pause processing new Data Center Investment Program tax-incentive agreements starting July 1, 2026 (existing agreements honored). He paired it with a consumer-protection framework: ban local-government NDAs, require energy/water reporting and public permit notices, and require community benefit agreements; he plans to press the issue in the November veto session. The DCEO's pause on new Data Center Investment Program tax-incentive agreements took effect 2026-07-01 (a 2-year suspension), after the POWER Act (data center cost-allocation, renewable-energy, and blackout-compliance reform) failed to pass before session end. Gov. Pritzker is pushing to revisit the issue in the November veto session.
HEA 1210Local payment in lieu of taxes from data centers
In force2026-03
Signed March 12, 2026 and effective July 1, 2026. For a qualified data center whose local permit and transaction certificate are issued after June 30, 2026, the host county or municipality may require a quarterly payment of no more than 1% of the state sales and use tax not paid on the center's electricity bill. The enacted version was narrowed from earlier proposals that would have set higher percentages.
HB 1210Indiana HB 1210 was signed into law March 12, 2026 by Gov. Braun.
In force2026-01
Indiana HB 1210 was signed into law March 12, 2026 by Gov. Braun. The data center incentive provision was drastically watered down in private meetings between legislators and data center lobbyists. What was pitched as 1% of electricity costs (potentially $5M/year for a large facility) was cut to at most 1/14th of that, 'not more than' one penny per dollar of the 7% sales tax exemption, capping payments at ~$350K/year instead of the original $5M minimum. The final deal essentially gutted community benefit payments while preserving the industry's tax breaks.
Adds expiration dates to previously indefinite sales/use-tax exemptions for electricity and backup fuel (10 years in cities over 30,000; 15 years in smaller cities) plus registration and reporting. Signed June 6, 2025.
SB98Providing a sales tax exemption for the construction or remodeling of a qualified data center in Kansas and the purchase of data center equipment
In force2025-04
Kansas SB98 (2025-2026 Regular Session): Providing a sales tax exemption for the construction or remodeling of a qualified data center in Kansas and the purchase of data center equipment, eligible data center costs and certain labor costs. Last action 2025-04-11: Senate Approved by Governor on Thursday, April 24, 2025.
Executive Order 2026-494Data-center screening and permit-denial order
In force2026-08
Gov. Beshear's order requires developers to file an energy plan, directs the Energy and Environment Cabinet to deny permits for projects that would harm air, water, or natural resources, and bars the PSC from raising utility rates to recover data-center costs.
Executive Order 26-058Ratepayer and Community Protection Initiative
In force2026-06
Gov. Landry directed Louisiana Economic Development to set criteria requiring large-load and data-center projects to fully fund their own power and deliver local benefits. Already-certified projects (Meta, Amazon and others) are exempt.
HB827Louisiana Legislature passed HB827 (Act 730 of the 2024 Regular Session), authored to attract data centers like Meta's Hyperion.
In force2024-06
Louisiana Legislature passed HB827 (Act 730 of the 2024 Regular Session), authored to attract data centers like Meta's Hyperion. The act provides a 20-year sales and use tax rebate on data-center equipment and construction (renewable for 10 more years, among the longest such breaks in the US). To qualify, a project must create 50 direct permanent jobs and spend $200M+ in capital by July 1, 2029. Sales-tax exemptions across three signed Louisiana data center deals (Meta, Hut 8, Amazon) are projected to abate $3.3B-$3.6B in construction tax revenue.
Louisiana (LPSC Lightning Amendment)Louisiana's LPSC adopted the 'Lightning Amendment,' which shortens the review process for large-load electricity connections to 8 months.
In force2025-12
Louisiana's LPSC adopted the 'Lightning Amendment,' which shortens the review process for large-load electricity connections to 8 months. The amendment allows utilities to bypass least-cost power demonstration requirements, requires a 15-year electric service agreement, proof of 50% self-generation capacity, and payment of all interconnection costs. Critics argue the amendment was designed to fast-track data center connections at the expense of ratepayer protections.
LD 713Data centers excluded from state tax incentive programs
In force2026-04
Signed by Gov. Mills on April 23, 2026. Defines data centers and excludes them from the Business Equipment Tax Exemption and the Dirigo Business Incentives Program, and directs the Department of Economic and Community Development to study financial incentives for data centers. Signed the day before Mills vetoed LD 307, the temporary moratorium bill.
MaineMaine: Governor Janet Mills SIGNED LD 713 on April 24, 2026, prohibiting data center projects from Maine's business development tax incentive programs.
In force2026-04
Governor Janet Mills SIGNED LD 713 on April 24, 2026, prohibiting data center projects from Maine's business development tax incentive programs. The law bars data centers from eligibility under the state's Business Equipment Tax Exemption (BETE) for facilities beginning operations on or after July 1, 2026, and excludes data centers from the Dirigo business incentives program. Maine's Department of Economic and Community Development must study other potential financial incentives for data centers and report by November 4, 2026. Mills signed LD 713 on the same day she vetoed LD 307.
HB 1532Maryland: Governor Wes Moore signed HB 1532, the Utility RELIEF (Reducing Energy Load Inflation for Everyday Families) Act, into law on or about April 15
In force2026-04
Governor Wes Moore signed HB 1532, the Utility RELIEF (Reducing Energy Load Inflation for Everyday Families) Act, into law on or about April 15, 2026, the day after the General Assembly passed it on the final day of session (April 13/14). The bill's data center provisions create a large-load registry program for grid management, require data centers to pay for transmission, distribution, interconnection, and new capacity costs (preventing cost-shifting to other ratepayers), and incentivize data centers to bring their own clean energy generation with battery backup (effective 2028). Top-tier projects receive 12-month expedited environmental permitting and priority interconnection. Critics including Food & Water Watch criticized provisions they characterized as pro-industry. The law saves Maryland families an estimated $150/year on energy bills.
Executive Order 01.01.2026.16Responsible Data Center Development framework and review task force
In force2026-09
Gov. Wes Moore signed an executive order on Sept. 23, 2026, effective immediately, creating a Maryland Data Center Task Force that reviews every data center of 25 MW or more that seeks any state action, rates each as Aligned, Conditionally Aligned or Not Aligned with a five-part framework, and publishes a monthly public dashboard. It does not pause construction; state permits, approvals and incentives are to be informed by each project's alignment with the framework.
Maryland (Veto Override - Impact Study)Maryland: The Maryland General Assembly overrode Governor Moore's veto (Senate 44-0, House 111-24), enacting a law requiring a comprehensive environmental
In force2025-12
The Maryland General Assembly overrode Governor Moore's veto (Senate 44-0, House 111-24), enacting a law requiring a comprehensive environmental and economic analysis of data center expansion. The report is due September 2026 and must examine the cumulative impact of data center growth on electricity generation needs, grid capacity, water resource demands, and greenhouse gas emissions.
Executive OrderNew data centers in Maryland to get additional scrutiny under governor’s order
In force2026-09
Governor Wes Moore created a state task force to examine new data center proposals and advise local jurisdictions on whether they meet state standards. However, he stated that final approval for data center projects remains with local governments.
Executive Order No. 658Local approval and clean energy requirements for data centers
In force2026-09
Signed by Gov. Maura Healey on Sept. 8, 2026. State permitting agencies may not permit data centers above 25 MW of peak demand, or expansions adding 25 MW, unless the applicant shows it meets the administration's June 2026 Statement of Expectations and has a community benefits agreement with the host municipality. Data centers must bring their own clean energy or pay into a new Ratepayer Protection Fund through a mechanism MassDEP is directed to set by the end of 2026, and state permitting agencies may no longer sign nondisclosure agreements with data center projects.
Governor Maura Healey issued an executive order restricting data centers in Massachusetts. The order is expected to halt data center growth in the state before it begins.
HF 16 (2025 1st Special Session)Data center energy, environmental and tax law
In force2025-06
Effective June 15, 2025. Repealed the sales tax exemption on electricity purchases for qualified data centers as of July 1, 2025, authorized the Public Utilities Commission to create a very large customer class and to review and approve electric service agreements between such customers and a utility, added environmental and energy requirements, and imposed prevailing wage on construction of qualified large-scale data centers.
SB 212Montana: The Montana Right to Compute Act (SB 212), signed by Governor Gianforte on April 16, 2025, establishes a legal right to own and use computational
In force2025-04
The Montana Right to Compute Act (SB 212), signed by Governor Gianforte on April 16, 2025, establishes a legal right to own and use computational resources including data centers. The law requires any government regulation restricting computing resources to be 'demonstrably necessary and narrowly tailored,' effectively limiting local governments' ability to restrict data center siting or operations through zoning. The law was enacted without significant organized opposition, representing a setback for community control advocates.
Executive Order 26-17Ends ImagiNE Act tax incentives for new data centers
In force2026-07
Gov. Pillen barred new data-center applications from ImagiNE Act tax incentives and ordered a multi-agency review and resource task force. Pillen framed it as a tax-incentive rollback, expressly 'not a moratorium.'
State of NebraskaNebraska: Gov. Jim Pillen signed an executive order ending future ImagiNE Nebraska Act tax incentives for new data-center applications
In force2026-07
Gov. Jim Pillen signed an executive order ending future ImagiNE Nebraska Act tax incentives for new data-center applications; existing/already-approved projects are unaffected. Pillen characterized this explicitly as NOT a moratorium. The order also creates a task force to study resource-protection safeguards covering land, water, and electricity impacts of data centers. Distinct from the pending LB1111 statewide regulation bill, which remains in the Natural Resources Committee (see nebraska-statewide-ne-2026-01-16).
NebraskaNebraska: LB1261 was signed April 10, 2026, allowing private developers to build and own power plants to serve large-scale electricity users like data centers
In force2026-03
LB1261 was signed April 10, 2026, allowing private developers to build and own power plants to serve large-scale electricity users like data centers, and prohibiting Nebraska's public power utilities from using eminent domain to acquire such plants. Connected to Google's proposed Nebraska data center that could require 1,000-3,000 MW (3x Lincoln's peak demand). The Legislature passed it 34-7 despite opposition arguing it fast-tracks a new business model threatening Nebraska's land, water, and utility rates.
Executive Order 2026-005Nevada Standard for Responsible Data Center Development
In force2026-09
Gov. Joe Lombardo signed Executive Order 2026-005 on Sept. 18, 2026, adding conditions to the state's data center tax abatement program. Applicants must pay the Local School Support Tax in full, cover project-related costs so they are not passed to ratepayers, meet local water standards and execute a binding Community Support Commitment before applications go to the GOED Board. It is not a moratorium.
Data Center Fair Share ActData center ratepayer class and cost obligations
In force2026-07
Signed by Gov. Sherrill; requires 50 MW+ data centers to commit to paying at least 85% of projected power costs for a decade and creates a separate ratepayer class. A cost restriction, not a moratorium.
S-3379 / A-4096Data center energy and water use reporting
In force2026-08
Signed by Gov. Sherrill on Aug. 27, 2026 and effective immediately. Requires data center owners and operators to file semiannual reports with the Board of Public Utilities for three years covering total energy consumption, energy used for cooling versus IT equipment, peak daily water use, water sources, and on-site and backup power supplies. It applies to existing and new facilities above the statutory capacity threshold. It is a disclosure requirement, not a moratorium; the Governor declined calls for a statewide construction ban at the signing.
New JerseyNew Jersey: In New Jersey, Gov. Mikie Sherrill signed on her first day in office, Declaring a state of emergency on utility costs.
In force2026-01
In New Jersey, Gov. Mikie Sherrill signed on her first day in office, Declaring a state of emergency on utility costs. Directs BPU to require electric utilities to report on energy requests from data centers ('ghost loads'). Identifies data center demand surge as key driver of NJ's energy crisis. Key concerns driving this action include tax incentive policy and water consumption. The outcome remains pending.
S4390/A5165New Jersey: NJ Assembly passed S4390/A5165 74-4 on 2026-06-30, redirecting $250M in uncommitted AI/data-center tax credits under the Next New Jersey Program
In force2026-06
NJ Assembly passed S4390/A5165 74-4 on 2026-06-30, redirecting $250M in uncommitted AI/data-center tax credits under the Next New Jersey Program to other economic-development priorities; the $250M already awarded to projects stays intact. Gov. Sherrill signed the bill on 2026-07-07. Confirmed signed 2026-07-07 -- do not conflate with the three other energy bills Sherrill also signed that day (Data Center Fair Share Act S731/A796, Repeal ROE Adder S1673/A2757, Advanced Grid Technologies Act S4411/A5188) as part of a $1B/year ratepayer relief package.
EO 62Statewide moratorium on data centers until a condition is met
In force2026-07
EO 62: first statewide pause. Holds DEC discretionary approvals for 50+ MW facilities until DPS finishes a generic environmental impact statement, roughly a year, but tied to that study, not a fixed date. The measure runs until a condition is met rather than to a date.
HB 1579North Dakota's HB 1579, originally introduced to create a state siting process for large electricity users (50+ MW), was significantly amended
In force2025-01
North Dakota's HB 1579, originally introduced to create a state siting process for large electricity users (50+ MW), was significantly amended, the siting process was stripped and replaced with a mandate for an interim legislative study on the impact of large energy consumers on the state's electrical grid. Passed House 89-3, Senate 46-0. Signed April 28, 2025. Signed into law on April 29, 2025.
Ohio (Gov. DeWine pauses new data center sales-tax exemptions), OHOhio: On May 27, 2026, Gov. Mike DeWine directed the chair of the Ohio Tax Credit Authority to stop considering new data center sales-tax exemption requests
In force2026-05
On May 27, 2026, Gov. Mike DeWine directed the chair of the Ohio Tax Credit Authority to stop considering new data center sales-tax exemption requests while the legislature’s Joint Data Center Committee studies the industry. The pause followed revelations that the exemption cost the state ~$1.57B last year, more than 11x the projection. DeWine framed it as caution, not opposition; existing exemptions (Amazon, Google, Microsoft, Meta) are unchanged and it is not a construction ban.
HB 96Ohio Republican legislative leaders are pushing to override Governor DeWine's veto that repealed data center sales tax exemptions.
In force2026-03
Ohio Republican legislative leaders are pushing to override Governor DeWine's veto that repealed data center sales tax exemptions. The proposed override via HB 96 would restore the tax break that DeWine eliminated. The Ohio Farm Bureau issued an action alert urging members to challenge the override, arguing data centers should not receive preferential tax treatment while consuming vast amounts of farmland, water, and electricity. Ohioans for Responsible Development organized opposition to the override effort.
HB 2992Data Center Customer Ratepayer Protection Act of 2026
In force2026-05
Authored by Rep. Brad Boles and Sen. Grant Green, signed in May 2026 and effective July 1, 2026. Defines large load customers as new facilities adding 75 MW or more of demand, requires electric suppliers to set separate rate structures and conditions for them so that families, small businesses and traditional industrial customers do not absorb their infrastructure costs, and requires developers to notify adjoining landowners, county commissioners and the Corporation Commission within 60 days of acquiring land for a qualifying project.
HB 3546 (POWER Act)Protecting Oregonians With Energy Responsibility Act
In force2025-06
Directs the PUC to create a new 'large energy use facility' rate class for data centers and crypto and allocate infrastructure and energy costs to them, shielding other ratepayers. Chapter 323, 2025; sunsets Jan 2035.
HB 4084Pause on Enterprise Zone property-tax breaks for new data centers
In force2026-06
Effective June 5, 2026. An amendment to the Governor's enterprise-zone bill makes new data centers ineligible for Oregon's largest property-tax incentive program, the Standard Enterprise Zone. The pause runs until 90 days after the 2027 legislative session adjourns sine die, giving the Governor's Data Center Advisory Committee time to report before the 2027 session. It restricts incentives rather than construction.
OregonOregon: Governor Tina Kotek formally announced the Data Center Advisory Committee on January 20, 2026, with seven members co-chaired by Margaret Hoffmann
In force2025-03
Governor Tina Kotek formally announced the Data Center Advisory Committee on January 20, 2026, with seven members co-chaired by Margaret Hoffmann (NW Power and Conservation Council) and Michael Jung. The committee includes Umatilla County commissioner Dan Dorran, U of O professor Greg Dotson, and energy/business professionals. It will hold at least one public meeting per month for six months, with policy recommendations due to the Governor and Legislature by October 2026. Focus areas include regulations for responsible siting, energy and water supply impacts, and protecting low-income ratepayers.
Executive Order 2026-05GRID Requirements for data center permitting
In force2026-08
Signed Aug. 18, 2026. Directs Commonwealth agencies to require data center developers to sign a legally binding commitment to the Governor's Responsible Infrastructure Development (GRID) Requirements, which oblige a project to pay the full cost of the generation, transmission and distribution it needs without shifting costs to households, meet water conservation and environmental standards, hire locally under a community benefit agreement, and engage the community transparently. Projects that commit proceed through standard DEP permit review once local approvals are secured; projects that refuse are not evaluated until every required local approval is in hand. The order also removes AI data centers from the Fast Track permitting program and bars nondisclosure agreements. It conditions permitting rather than halting it.
Pennsylvania (Gov. Shapiro GRID standards)Pennsylvania: In Pennsylvania, voluntary executive program offering expedited state permitting for data center developers who commit to bringing/paying
In force2026-02
In Pennsylvania, voluntary executive program offering expedited state permitting for data center developers who commit to bringing/paying for their own power generation, transparency and community engagement, Hiring local workers, and environmental protection including water conservation. Critics note standards are voluntary with no enforcement.
Pennsylvania (Statewide)Pennsylvania: In Pennsylvania, Governor Josh Shapiro announced GRID (Governor's Responsible Infrastructure Development) standards for data centers
In force2026-03
In Pennsylvania, Governor Josh Shapiro announced GRID (Governor's Responsible Infrastructure Development) standards for data centers, offering expedited 'Fast Track' permitting in exchange for commitments to water conservation, local hiring, And independent power generation. Two Amazon data centers in Salem Township and Falls Township are the first projects in the program. Separately, the PA House Energy Committee advanced two bills along party lines on March 9: one requiring annual water and energy use reporting, another creating model zoning guidelines for municipalities. Environmental advocates expressed concern about the voluntary nature of GRID and the lack of enforcement mechanisms without legislative cooperation from the GOP-controlled Senate.
HB 262An Act amending the act of March 4, 1971 (P.L.6, No.2), known as the Tax Reform Code of 1971, in sales and use tax, further providing for definitions
In force2019-06
Pennsylvania HB 262 (2019-2020): An Act amending the act of March 4, 1971 (P.L.6, No.2), known as the Tax Reform Code of 1971, in sales and use tax, further providing for definitions, for imposition of tax, for exclusions from tax. Last action 2019-06-28: Approved by the Governor.
Signed by Gov. Rhoden on March 30, 2026 and effective July 1, 2026. Requires data centers with peak electrical demand of 10 MW or greater to pay for any rate increases they cause, adds water use regulation, and prohibits the state from limiting local governments' authority to regulate or ban data centers. Lawmakers passed it after rejecting the SB 232 statewide moratorium, moving that decision to localities instead.
HB 1005South Dakota: In South Dakota, multiple data center bills saw different outcomes: HB 1005 (50-year sales tax exemption for data centers) was rejected 9-3
In force2026-02
In South Dakota, multiple data center bills saw different outcomes: HB 1005 (50-year sales tax exemption for data centers) was rejected 9-3 in House State Affairs Committee. SB 232 (one-year moratorium) passed committee but was killed in full Senate vote. SB 135 ('Data Center Bill of Rights for Citizens' from Sen. Karr) passed committee 5-4 - it would set protections for utility ratepayers and resources while banning tax exemptions for data centers. Bills addressing noise levels, minimum distances from residences, and water/electricity regulation were also halted.
HB 1847 / SB 2128Data Center Cost Responsibility Act
In force2026-05
Signed by Gov. Lee on May 7, 2026 and effective on signing. Requires owners and operators of proposed and existing data centers to pay the full cost of the utility infrastructure needed to serve them and bars electric utilities from raising other customers' rates to support data centers. The Senate passed it unanimously; the House passed it 76-14.
SB 6Large-load interconnection standards and grid curtailment
In force2025-06
Enacted 2025 (PUCT rulemaking in 2026): interconnection standards and cost obligations on 75 MW+ loads plus authority for ERCOT to curtail or remotely disconnect data centers during grid emergencies. A grid-reliability restriction.
Texas (PUCT rulemaking)Texas: The Texas Public Utility Commission is implementing SB 6 through multiple rulemaking dockets.
In force2026-03
The Texas Public Utility Commission is implementing SB 6 through multiple rulemaking dockets. PUCT Chair Thomas Gleeson proposed rules to pare back proposed requirements for data centers seeking to connect to ERCOT, lowering fees for large loads and adding alternative standards developers can use to demonstrate site readiness. April 17, 2026 was the deadline for stakeholder comments on PUCT draft rule 16 TAC §25.194 implementing SB 6's interconnection standards for new loads of 75 MW or greater. The draft rule includes non-refundable interconnection fees of $50,000/MW of contracted peak demand, requires customers to pay 100% of direct interconnection costs (radial lines, substations), and demands additional security for transmission upgrades. ERCOT is tracking approximately 410 GW of large-load interconnection requests, ~87% from data centers. The PUCT approved ERCOT's 'Batch Zero' large-load interconnection framework, which batches large-load (75MW+) interconnection requests, roughly 89% of which are data centers. ERCOT is now tracking 438,000+ MW in the interconnection queue, up from ~410GW cited in March 2026 reporting.
Governor's directive to Texas Water Development Board (Sept. 14, 2026)Enforcement of data center water-use reporting requirements
In force2026-09
On September 14, 2026, Gov. Greg Abbott directed the Texas Water Development Board to use its statutory authority to compel large water users, including data centers, to file the water-use information required by the Texas Water Code. He told the board to refer violations to county or district attorneys and to notify the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, since noncompliance can make a facility ineligible for certain Chapter 11 water permits, amendments or renewals. Abbott asked for a compliance update by October 14, 2026. This is an enforcement directive, not a moratorium.
Texas (Republican shift on data center regulation, Rep. David Cook commits 2027 county-authority legislation)Texas Tribune analysis found 82 data centers (~60% of planned/under construction) sit in Trump-voting Texas House districts.
In force2026-05
Texas Tribune analysis found 82 data centers (~60% of planned/under construction) sit in Trump-voting Texas House districts. Republican lawmakers signaling shift toward allowing county-level regulation and water/rate protections. Rep. David Cook committed to filing 2027 legislation giving counties 'reasonable authority' to regulate data centers. Falls County GOP precinct member Rena Schroeder switched to independent over party rejection of moratorium proposal. The legislator who committed to filing 2027 county-authority legislation is Rep. Cody Vasut (R-Angleton), NOT Rep. David Cook; Vasut filed a similar county-regulation bill last session. The 82-data-centers-in-Trump-districts figure and the Falls County GOP / Rena Schroeder details are confirmed.
Texas (State Republican Executive Committee)Texas: The State Republican Executive Committee passed a near-unanimous resolution calling for 'rigorous independent assessments' of data center impacts
In force2026-02
The State Republican Executive Committee passed a near-unanimous resolution calling for 'rigorous independent assessments' of data center impacts on the grid and water supply before approval, and a pause on 'open loop' (high water use) data centers. Significant because it reflects growing intra-GOP opposition to data center development in Texas.
Texas Gov. Greg Abbott ordered a pause on environmental permits for new data centers until an audit of the waitlist for grid connections is completed. This expands a previous moratorium on grid approvals and may impact the state's data center development pipeline.
Governor Abbott directed state environmental regulators to stop issuing permits to data centers while an electricity audit is ongoing. This action was taken to address concerns about electricity demand.
Executive Order 2026-03A higher bar for data-center development
In force2026-05
Gov. Cox created a Data Center Framework directing agencies to apply heightened review for water (Great Salt Lake), air quality, ratepayers, and wildlife, plus a new unused-water provision. This raises the siting bar rather than imposing a hard ban.
HB 76Utah: In Utah, Governor Cox signed HB 76 on March 23, 2026, Requiring new data centers (10,000+ sq ft) to notify water providers of projected demands
In force2026-02
In Utah, Governor Cox signed HB 76 on March 23, 2026, Requiring new data centers (10,000+ sq ft) to notify water providers of projected demands and report actual water consumption annually to the state. Sponsored by Rep. Jill Koford (R-Ogden), the bill nearly failed in the Senate but passed after being amended to apply only to new facilities. The bill had unanimous support in the House and was part of a broader legislative push to protect Great Salt Lake and conserve water.
HB 30 (2026 budget)Data center electricity consumption tax
In force2026-06
Signed by Gov. Spanberger; a first-of-its-kind $0.011/kWh electricity consumption tax on data centers (up to about $600M/yr), effective Jul 1 2026, sunsetting Jul 1 2028. A restrictive tax, not a moratorium.
Statewide moratorium on data centers with no end dateData center electricity consumption tax in the 2026-28 budget (not a moratorium)
In force2026-06
2026-28 budget keeps the data center sales-and-use tax exemption but adds the first statewide electricity consumption tax on data centers, $0.011/kWh from Jul 1, capped at $600M a year with the excess refunded. Not a moratorium, and not a zoning restriction. The measure has no end date by design.
Executive Order 22 (Data Center Accountability Framework)Executive order on data center accountability (no moratorium)
In force2026-09
Signed by Gov. Spanberger on Sep 18, 2026. Not a moratorium. The order bars executive branch agencies from entering into or requiring non-disclosure agreements for data center projects, creates a planning and community engagement toolkit for localities, expedites data center noise rules, directs a review of diesel backup generation, and forms an AI task force. The accompanying framework asks the 2027 General Assembly to end by-right approval for data centers above 25 MW, set efficiency and water-use standards, end state site-development subsidies for data centers and allocate transmission and generation costs to them; those items require legislation and are not in force.
Virginia (budget tax exemption fight)Virginia: The Virginia Senate budget proposes accelerating the data center tax exemption sunset from 2035 to January 2027, which would redirect $1.6B/year
In force2026-02
The Virginia Senate budget proposes accelerating the data center tax exemption sunset from 2035 to January 2027, which would redirect $1.6B/year to tax rebates, transportation, and water infrastructure. The House budget preserves the exemption but adds clean energy requirements. The Virginia Data Center Reform Coalition, Piedmont Environmental Council, and Good Jobs First are pushing for the accelerated sunset. The General Assembly reconvenes April 22 to resolve the stalemate.
HB 507Virginia HB 507, sponsored by Del. John McAuliff (D-Fauquier), is the first state law mandating Tier IV emission standards for data center backup generators.
In force2026-03
Virginia HB 507, sponsored by Del. John McAuliff (D-Fauquier), is the first state law mandating Tier IV emission standards for data center backup generators. The bill directs the Department of Environmental Quality to deny air permits for generators below Tier IV standards submitted after July 2026. Governor Spanberger signed HB 507 into law on April 9, 2026.
SB 94Virginia SB 94 / HB 153, sponsored by Sen. Danica Roem and Del. Josh Thomas, requires 100+ MW data center applicants seeking rezoning to submit site assessment
In force2026-02
Virginia SB 94 / HB 153, sponsored by Sen. Danica Roem and Del. Josh Thomas, requires 100+ MW data center applicants seeking rezoning to submit site assessment reports examining impacts on agriculture, parks, historic sites, forestland, and noise near homes/schools. Passed both chambers of the General Assembly. Awaits Governor Spanberger's signature, amendment, or veto by April 14, 2026. Legislators reconvene for a veto session on April 22.
Executive OrderHold data centers accountable, form AI task force
In force2026-09
Governor Abigail Spanberger signed an executive order aimed at regulating data center growth and impacts in Virginia. The order forms an AI task force but does not impose a moratorium on data center development.
HB 2273Data centers; sales and use tax exemption, clarifies 'distressed locality,' report.
In force2021-03
Virginia HB 2273 (2021): Data centers; sales and use tax exemption, clarifies 'distressed locality,' report.. Last action 2021-03-25: Approved by Governor-Chapter 367 (effective 7/1/21).
Ends the sales/use-tax exemption for replacement server equipment and refurbished-facility centers and sets certificate cutoff dates (urban 2028, rural 2036). Chapter 266, effective June 11, 2026.
Executive Order 25Washington: Governor Ferguson issued Executive Order 25-05 on February 3, 2025 creating the Data Center Workgroup, convened by the Department of Revenue
In force2025-02
Governor Ferguson issued Executive Order 25-05 on February 3, 2025 creating the Data Center Workgroup, convened by the Department of Revenue with 33 members from state agencies, utilities, labor, environmental groups, and industry. The workgroup delivered its preliminary report on December 1, 2025, recommending data centers comply with Washington's 2045 emissions-free electricity mandate. The Washington Legislature punted comprehensive data center legislation to 2027. The workgroup's final report is expected later in 2026 and will inform the next legislative session.
HB 4983West Virginia: Governor Patrick Morrisey signed HB 4983 on March 27, 2026, cementing rulemaking that deems confidential all petitions seeking certification
In force2026-03
Governor Patrick Morrisey signed HB 4983 on March 27, 2026, cementing rulemaking that deems confidential all petitions seeking certification of a high-impact data center and all letters of intent seeking certification of a microgrid district. The bill passed the House 78-16 and the Senate 28-6, despite opposition from environmental and transparency advocates including WV Rivers, League of Women Voters, and the Sierra Club. Seven Republicans joined all nine House Democrats in voting against it. The legislature voted down amendments that would have required developers to disclose water sources, usage projections, and community impact; another rejected amendment would have created 500-foot buffer zones and allowed residents within 10 miles to petition proposals. Critics call HB 4983 an extension of the controversial HB 2014 (Power Generation and Consumption Act) that stripped local governments of authority over data center siting. Large data centers can consume 3-5 million gallons of water per day, roughly 5-8% of West Virginia's total 2023 public water withdrawals.
Wisconsin Legislature (Act 16 data-center TID exception)Wisconsin: Governor Tony Evers signed Assembly Bill 140 (now 2025 Wisconsin Act 16), which created statutory exceptions from the standard 12% equalized-value
In force2025-07
Governor Tony Evers signed Assembly Bill 140 (now 2025 Wisconsin Act 16), which created statutory exceptions from the standard 12% equalized-value cap on Tax Increment Districts specifically for TID No. 5 in Port Washington and TID No. 10 in Beaver Dam, but only if all project costs are tied to a 'certified data center.' This carve-out paved the way for the Vantage data center's $458 million TID financing structure, which would otherwise have been impossible under standard TID law. Critics argue the state-level subsidy was passed before residents had any meaningful chance to weigh in.
Wyoming statewide (Gov. Gordon executive order on data center framework)Wyoming: On June 3, 2026, Gov. Mark Gordon signed an executive order establishing a framework to develop data centers 'the Wyoming Way'
In force2026-06
On June 3, 2026, Gov. Mark Gordon signed an executive order establishing a framework to develop data centers 'the Wyoming Way', encouraging developers to cover their own energy-demand costs, create permanent jobs, and protect water and wildlife, and giving state agencies 60 days to recommend policy and legislative changes. Context: Cheyenne (Laramie County) rejected a data center moratorium in late May, opting to proceed with potentially dozens of facilities.
An executive order by California Gov. Gavin Newsom looks to boost oversight of the tech, while Virginia Gov. Abigail Spanberger’s order tightens data center standards.
Executive directivePause on new data center tax incentives
Paused2026-07
Gov. Pritzker directed the Dept. of Commerce and Economic Opportunity to stop processing new data center tax-incentive deals from Jul 1 2026 after the legislature adjourned without reforms.
An executive order creates a review process for large data centers, adds a public dashboard and a task force, and signals a push to end a key tax exemption. The order comes as the costs of data centers are under scrutiny nationwide.
Administrative hold (June 2026)Hold on data center sales and use tax exemption applications
Paused2026-06
Gov. Maura Healey announced in late June 2026 that the state will not accept applications for the 20-year sales and use tax exemption for qualified data centers until strong protections against higher gas and electric bills are in place. The administration said it had received no applications since final regulations launched the exemption the month before, and it released a framework expecting data centers to bring their own clean energy and avoid shifting costs to other customers.
Executive Order 62Statewide hyperscale data center moratorium (executive)
Paused2026-07
Gov. Hochul's EO 62 holds state discretionary environmental permits for new hyperscale (50 MW+) data centers in abeyance until the Department of Public Service submits its final Generic Environmental Impact Statement and findings, and the order sets no fixed expiration date. It is the first statewide data-center moratorium in force.
Executive directivePause on new data center sales-tax exemptions
Paused2026-05
Gov. DeWine directed the Ohio Tax Credit Authority to stop accepting new data center sales-tax exemption requests pending a legislative study (the exemption cost about $1.6B in 2025).
Statewide moratorium on data centers until a condition is metGovernor's pause on data center sales tax exemptions (not a construction moratorium)
Paused2025-01
Pause on new data center tax exemptions while the Joint Data Center Committee holds hearings; two last data centers received $42M in exemptions before it took effect. It limits tax incentives only and does not restrict construction. It runs until a condition is met rather than to a fixed date.
Candidates run against data centers, but Ohio legislature didn’t get the memo
Paused2026-09
This story was originally published by Capital & Main. With some of the highest electricity rates in the Midwest, Ohio has seen a remarkable policy shift from lawmakers in both parties. Every candidate for governor has now called for restrictions on the data center boom, each proposing some form of moratorium unless certain conditions are […]
Governor's directive (Sept. 8, 2026)Pause on state land and property for data center projects
Paused2026-09
Gov. Tina Kotek directed every state agency on Sept. 8, 2026 to immediately pause unapproved requests for easements, rights-of-way, leases, rentals, land-use permits and sales or transfers of state-owned property for data center projects. The pause runs through July 1, 2027, or until statewide action by the Governor's Office or the Legislature directs otherwise. It covers state property only; Kotek has said the state lacks authority to enact a statewide moratorium on data center development.
Statewide moratorium on data centers through July 1, 2027Governor's directive pausing state land actions for data centers (not a statewide moratorium)
Paused2026-09
On Sep 8, 2026 Gov. Kotek directed state agencies to pause unapproved requests for easements, rights-of-way, leases, rentals, land-use permits, and sales or transfers of state-owned property for data center projects through July 1, 2027. It applies only to state-owned land and state agency actions; Kotek said the state lacks authority to enact a statewide moratorium. Same action as the Oregon Governor's directive entry.
Executive directive (Gov. Abbott)Freeze on new data center grid connections pending audit
Paused2026-08
Gov. Abbott directed PUCT and ERCOT on Aug 3, 2026 to audit every data center project advancing through the ERCOT interconnection process (1,800+ requests) before any of them moves forward. The directive has no carve-out: it asks each project to report projected consumption and any on-site generation it is building or procuring, and projects that fail compliance face denial of grid access. Non-ERCOT areas fall outside it only because ERCOT does not serve them.
Statewide moratorium on data centers until a condition is metGovernor's directive pausing ERCOT data center interconnection pending an audit (not a construction ban)
Paused2026-08
Gov. Abbott directed ERCOT and the PUC on Aug 3, 2026 to freeze data center interconnection progress pending a comprehensive audit. ERCOT halted its Batch Zero large-load study and suspended Aug 7 classification notices. The directive does not exempt projects with on-site generation; it requires them to report that generation as part of the audit. The hold runs until the audit is complete, which ERCOT is targeting for Dec 10, 2026. Same action as the Texas executive directive entry.
Governor's directive to TCEQ (Sept. 21, 2026)Halt on state environmental permits for data center projects pending audits
Paused2026-09
On September 21, 2026, Gov. Greg Abbott directed the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality to halt all permits sought by data center projects until ERCOT and the Texas Water Development Board complete their data center audits, and said no state agency should move forward with regulatory approvals for data center development until that information is in hand. TCEQ must report compliance to the Governor by October 19, 2026. The Texas Tribune reported that the order appears aimed at developers building behind-the-meter generation, who could otherwise avoid the ERCOT interconnection audit. It is statewide and not limited to the ERCOT region.
Virginia lawmakers call for study on AI use in Virginia colleges and more headlines
Paused2026-09
Virginia lawmakers have called for a study on the use of artificial intelligence in Virginia colleges. The article also mentions other headlines including a voter rolls controversy and a data center moratorium rally.
SB 270PSC review of large-load data center contracts
Proposed2026
Would require the Public Service Commission to ensure that utility contracts with data centers of 150 MW or more provide for cost recovery and demonstrable ratepayer benefit. Introduced; pending.
Alaska senators question legality of state land transfer for possible Mat-Su data centers
Proposed2026-09
Alaska senators are raising legal concerns about a proposed state land transfer of nearly 20,000 acres to the Alaska Industrial Development and Export Authority for possible data centers in the Matanuska-Susitna Borough. The proposal has sparked public concern and scrutiny.
Would direct the Corporation Commission to adopt rules for extra high load factor customers, including review of contracts before execution and cost-of-service studies. Introduced; pending.
Arizona (Senate disclosure bill)Arizona: On April 17, 2026, the Arizona Senate passed a bill that would require the state's major utilities to file reports every six months to the Arizona
Proposed2026-04
On April 17, 2026, the Arizona Senate passed a bill that would require the state's major utilities to file reports every six months to the Arizona Corporation Commission detailing new 'extra high load users' like data centers, including the number of new connections and connection requests. The bill now returns to the House for further action. This follows an ACC workshop on Large Load Users held April 16, 2026, where APS and SRP recommended new policies including a new extra high load factor (XHLF) rate, bring-your-own-power policies, and standard contracts requiring up-front financial support from data center customers.
SB 476Elimination of state tax credits reaching data centers
Proposed2026-02
Would eliminate nearly all state-sponsored tax credits, precluding new data center tax credits. Passed the State Senate on Feb. 12, 2026; did not become law.
H 609TAXATION, Amends existing law to revise a sales tax exemption for data center equipment and to revise a property tax exemption for certain capital investments.
Proposed2026-02
Idaho H 609 (2026): TAXATION, Amends existing law to revise a sales tax exemption for data center equipment and to revise a property tax exemption for certain capital investments.. Last action 2026-02-10: Reported Printed and Referred to Revenue & Taxation.
H 897TAXATION, Amends existing law to revise a sales tax exemption for data center equipment and to revise a certain property tax exemption for certain capital
Proposed2026-04
Idaho H 897 (2026): TAXATION, Amends existing law to revise a sales tax exemption for data center equipment and to revise a certain property tax exemption for certain capital investments.. Last action 2026-04-02: Referred to Revenue & Taxation for concurrence recommendation.
SB 4016 / HB 5513Hyperscale self-generation and water transparency
Proposed2026-02
Would require hyperscale data centers of 50 MW or more to fund their own energy generation from renewables, mandate water usage transparency and efficiency standards, and require environmental impact assessments. Before the Senate Artificial Intelligence and Social Media Subcommittee.
SSB 3181A bill for an act making certain sales and use tax exemptions relating to nuclear electric generation facilities, web search portal businesses
Proposed2026-04
Iowa SSB 3181 (2025-2026): A bill for an act making certain sales and use tax exemptions relating to nuclear electric generation facilities, web search portal businesses, and data center businesses contingent upon making. Last action 2026-04-14: Committee report approving bill, renumbered as SF 2498..
HF 2198A bill for an act relating to the disclosure of tax incentives provided to web search portal businesses and data center businesses, and including effective
Proposed2026-01
Iowa HF 2198 (2025-2026): A bill for an act relating to the disclosure of tax incentives provided to web search portal businesses and data center businesses, and including effective date provisions.. Last action 2026-01-29: Introduced, referred to Ways and Means..
HSB 727A bill for an act relating to investment requirements for data center businesses that claim certain sales tax exemptions and sales and use tax refunds.
Proposed2026-02
Iowa HSB 727 (2025-2026): A bill for an act relating to investment requirements for data center businesses that claim certain sales tax exemptions and sales and use tax refunds.. Last action 2026-02-23: Committee report approving bill, renumbered as HF 2688..
Frederick County (Pippy state moratorium bill)Maryland: Frederick County Delegate Jesse Pippy introduced a bill proposing a data center moratorium specifically for Frederick County while the state conducts
Proposed2026-03
Frederick County Delegate Jesse Pippy introduced a bill proposing a data center moratorium specifically for Frederick County while the state conducts a comprehensive study of data center impacts. The legislation responds to growing community concern after the Frederick County Council voted 5-2 to adopt a 2,615-acre 'Critical Digital Infrastructure' overlay zone, which prompted residents to launch a referendum petition campaign that gathered over 22,000 signatures. Maryland counties more broadly have been calling on the data center industry to slow down. Fcdcreferendum.org does NOT display a live signature count; the 22,169 figure was removed. The 21,029 figure was the Board of Elections certified count at ballot qualification (CCAN source). Signature goal was 18,000 by March 15 per the committee's own site. Pippy's state moratorium bill died at MD sine die Apr 13, but the citizen referendum on the data center overlay zone was certified for the Nov 2026 ballot Apr 3 with 21,029 valid signatures (now facing legal challenges).
New data centers in neighboring Maryland to get additional scrutiny under governor's order
Proposed2026-09
Governor Wes Moore is creating a state task force to examine new data center proposals in Maryland and advise local jurisdictions on whether they meet state standards. However, he stated that the final decision on data center projects will remain with local governments.
HB 5594-5596 / SB 1018-1020Moratorium on new data center approvals
Proposed2026-06
A package imposing a moratorium on certain approvals and operation of new data centers; reintroduced June 2026 with a broader regulatory package; not enacted (Gov. Whitmer opposes a moratorium).
SB 761-763Michigan Senate Bills 761, 762, and 763 (Sens. Rosemary Bayer D-West Bloomfield, Sue Shink D-Northfield Township, Erika Geiss D-Taylor) introduced December
Proposed2025-12
Michigan Senate Bills 761, 762, and 763 (Sens. Rosemary Bayer D-West Bloomfield, Sue Shink D-Northfield Township, Erika Geiss D-Taylor) introduced December 2025. SB 761 bans data centers withdrawing >2 million gallons/day for consumptive use (water that evaporates or doesn't return to systems). SB 762 requires the Michigan PSC to publish annual reports on total energy spending and water usage of data centers. SB 763 prohibits passing infrastructure improvement costs on to residential ratepayers. As of March 2026, none of the bills have passed out of committee. Separately, Reps. Wortz, Fox, and Wegela introduced a bipartisan three-bill House package (the 'Data Center Regulation Act') that would prohibit new data centers from receiving permits or commencing operations until April 1, 2027. Speaker Matt Hall and Gov. Whitmer have not commented, raising doubts about passage.
HB 5882Local government: other; requirements for a moratorium imposed by a local unit of government on large-scale data centers or cryptocurrency mining facilities
Proposed2026-04
Michigan HB 5882 (2025-2026): Local government: other; requirements for a moratorium imposed by a local unit of government on large-scale data centers or cryptocurrency mining facilities; provide for. Creates new act. TIE BAR. Last action 2026-04-28: bill electronically reproduced 04/23/2026.
SB 1020Public utilities: public service commission; moratorium on approvals by the Michigan public service commission of any new enterprise data centers
Proposed2026-06
Michigan SB 1020 (2025-2026): Public utilities: public service commission; moratorium on approvals by the Michigan public service commission of any new enterprise data centers; provide for. Amends 1939 PA 3. Last action 2026-06-04: REFERRED TO COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS.
HB 5398Property tax: exemptions; general property tax act; reflect repeal of data center tax exemptions. Amends sec. 7ff of 1893 PA 206 (MCL 211.7ff). TIE BAR
Proposed2025-12
Michigan HB 5398 (2025-2026): Property tax: exemptions; general property tax act; reflect repeal of data center tax exemptions. Amends sec. 7ff of 1893 PA 206 (MCL 211.7ff). TIE BAR WITH: HB 5396'25, HB 5397'25. Last action 2025-12-18: bill electronically reproduced 12/17/2025.
HB 5595Public utilities: public service commission; moratorium on approvals by the Michigan public service commission of any new enterprise data centers
Proposed2026-03
Michigan HB 5595 (2025-2026): Public utilities: public service commission; moratorium on approvals by the Michigan public service commission of any new enterprise data centers; provide for. Amends 1939 PA 3. Last action 2026-03-03: bill electronically reproduced 02/26/2026.
HR 240A resolution to urge a temporary pause on discretionary state-level incentives for data center construction, request a comprehensive review of the fiscal
Proposed2026-02
Michigan HR 240 (2025-2026): A resolution to urge a temporary pause on discretionary state-level incentives for data center construction, request a comprehensive review of the fiscal, utility, environmental. Last action 2026-02-04: referred to Committee on Government Operations.
Environmentalists push Michigan lawmakers to forge ahead on moratorium and regulations for data centers
Proposed2026-09
Environmental groups are urging Michigan lawmakers to continue efforts to establish a moratorium and regulations for data centers as the state senate returns to session. The push comes as officials are reminded of the environmental impacts of data center development.
Environmentalists push lawmakers to forge ahead on moratorium and regulations for data centers
Proposed2026-09
Environmental advocates are urging lawmakers to enact a statewide moratorium and establish stronger protections for communities affected by data center developments. The push comes as data center projects remain a significant concern for Michigan residents.
Benson, James pitch tariff remedies, business boosts & data center limits at Detroit Economic Club
Proposed2026-09
DETROIT — The respective Republican and Democratic nominees for Michigan governor on Wednesday each proposed new solutions to the economic tariffs levied by the administration of President Donald Trump, especially those being used against Canada. Addressing the Detroit Economic Club on Wednesday afternoon in separate speaking events were Republican U.S. Rep. John James and Democrat […]
HB 5396-5398Michigan: ~200-person bipartisan 'People Over Data Centers' rally at the Michigan Capitol (gubernatorial candidate Perry Johnson, Rep. Wegela, Rep. DeSana)
Proposed2026-06
~200-person bipartisan 'People Over Data Centers' rally at the Michigan Capitol (gubernatorial candidate Perry Johnson, Rep. Wegela, Rep. DeSana, GOP chair Jim Runestad) coincided with new House Bills 5396-5398 (Reps. Byrnes, DeSana, Wegela) to repeal Michigan's data center tax exemptions -- distinct from the previously-tracked Senate package (SB 1018-1020) and HB 5594-5596 moratorium bills. Gov. Whitmer publicly said she would not sign a moratorium. No movement on HB 5396 in this window -- the bill remains referred to the House Committee on Economic Competitiveness since its 2025-12-17 introduction, with no hearing or vote recorded as of 2026-07-14.
SB 1018-1020Michigan: On June 18, 2026 Michigan Senate Democrats introduced a seven-bill package to regulate data centers
Proposed2026-06
On June 18, 2026 Michigan Senate Democrats introduced a seven-bill package to regulate data centers (sponsors include Sens. Kevin Hertel, Erika Geiss, Mallory McMorrow, and Darrin Camilleri). Provisions: permitting for facilities using 550,000+ gallons/day with a 2 million gallon/day cap and infrastructure-upgrade costs not passed to residents; data centers must pay for at least 90% of their energy usage and source 90% clean energy, plus post collateral for closure; mandated union wages/labor agreements; community benefit agreements; a ban on certain NDAs; added public hearings; and Michigan Public Service Commission monitoring/reporting. Democrats rejected a statewide moratorium as ineffective. This is separate from Republican Sen. Jim Runestad's SB 1018-1020 (introduced June 4) proposing a one-year statewide moratorium.
Michigan (statewide)Michigan: Bipartisan House Bills 5594-5596 would create the 'Data Center Regulation Act' and halt construction of new data centers in Michigan until April 1
Proposed2026-02
Bipartisan House Bills 5594-5596 would create the 'Data Center Regulation Act' and halt construction of new data centers in Michigan until April 1, 2027. The moratorium would give local communities time to assess project ramifications. At least 25 Michigan communities have enacted local data center moratoriums. Gov. Whitmer opposes the bills, calling any legislation preventing economic growth 'an automatic non-starter' that would be vetoed.
HF 3304Sustainable aviation fuel income tax credit and exemptions for data centers and construction of sustainable aviation fuel facilities repealed
Proposed2025-05
Minnesota HF 3304 (2025-2026): Sustainable aviation fuel income tax credit and exemptions for data centers and construction of sustainable aviation fuel facilities repealed, increased general fund amounts reallocated from repealed. Last action 2025-05-08: Authors added Virnig and Jones.
HF 4888New data center moratorium established, and Public Utility Commission required to submit a report.
Proposed2026-05
Minnesota HF 4888 (2025-2026): New data center moratorium established, and Public Utility Commission required to submit a report.. Last action 2026-05-05: Author added Fischer.
SF 5231Data centers tax exemption repeal; contingent reduction in special education aid appropriation repeal
Proposed2026-04
Minnesota SF 5231 (2025-2026): Data centers tax exemption repeal; contingent reduction in special education aid appropriation repeal. Last action 2026-04-28: Author added Boldon.
HB 3369Prohibits the issuance of permits for construction of data centers for one year in St. Louis
Proposed2026-05
Missouri HB 3369 (2026): Prohibits the issuance of permits for construction of data centers for one year in St. Louis. Last action 2026-05-15: Referred: Emerging Issues(H).
Missouri Legislature (data center hearings on risks/rewards and energy demand)Missouri lawmakers heard industry experts and consumer advocates on benefits/drawbacks of data centers, risks/rewards, and energy demand.
Proposed2026-05
Missouri lawmakers heard industry experts and consumer advocates on benefits/drawbacks of data centers, risks/rewards, and energy demand. The hearings led to no legislation; MO adjourned May 15, 2026 with zero AI/data center bills passed.
Governor Joe Lombardo issued a new executive order expressing strong support for attracting AI data centers to Nevada, offering reduced tax incentives and making commitments to address public concerns. The order frames data centers as a key opportunity for economic growth and fiscal diversification in the state.
Announced budget proposal (2027 session)Proposed statewide multi-year data center moratorium
Proposed2026-09
Gov. Kelly Ayotte told the Executive Council on Sept. 2, 2026 that she opposes siting data centers in New Hampshire and intends to include a multi-year statewide moratorium in her next budget proposal, citing electricity prices and water and noise impacts. Because the proposal would travel with the budget, it would not take effect before July 2027 unless the Governor acts sooner by executive order. No bill has been introduced.
LSR 2027-0002 / LSR 2027-0048Proposed 24-month statewide moratorium on data center development (2027 session)
Proposed2026-09
On September 2, 2026, New Hampshire House Democrats announced two legislative service requests, LSR 2027-0002 and LSR 2027-0048, sponsored by Rep. Tom Cormen (D-Lebanon), for the 2027 session. The proposals would impose a 24-month statewide moratorium on data center development while the state sets standards, and would require facilities above 30 megawatts to bear the grid costs they create. The requests are drafts for a session that begins in January 2027 and have not been filed as bills. This is separate from Gov. Kelly Ayotte's announced budget proposal.
A 5482Establishes six month moratorium on approvals, construction, expansion, subsidies, and tax incentives for certain artificial intelligence data centers
Proposed2026-09
New Jersey A 5482 (222): Establishes six month moratorium on approvals, construction, expansion, subsidies, and tax incentives for certain artificial intelligence data centers; creates Artificial Intelligence Data Center.
S680New Jersey: S-680 would mandate clean energy sourcing for new AI data centers, requiring all electricity from new renewable or nuclear generation measured
Proposed2026-01
S-680 would mandate clean energy sourcing for new AI data centers, requiring all electricity from new renewable or nuclear generation measured hourly. Takes effect only after a majority of PJM states enact comparable requirements. Advancing through committees as of April 2026.
New Jersey (Democratic legislators announce AI data-center tax-credit repeal; Kenilworth CoreWeave protest), NJNew Jersey: Three Democratic legislators announced a bill to repeal the state AI data-center tax credit (created under Murphy), amid residents protesting
Proposed2026-05
Three Democratic legislators announced a bill to repeal the state AI data-center tax credit (created under Murphy), amid residents protesting CoreWeave's planned $1.8B AI data center on the former Merck/NEST site in Kenilworth. The Kenilworth Planning Board had approved CoreWeave's 4-lot subdivision April 28.
New Jersey (Gov. Sherrill unveils statewide data center plan; no moratorium)New Jersey: On May 28, 2026, Gov. Mikie Sherrill unveiled a four-part statewide data center plan: clean-energy/grid-cost requirements, mandatory energy
Proposed2026-05
On May 28, 2026, Gov. Mikie Sherrill unveiled a four-part statewide data center plan: clean-energy/grid-cost requirements, mandatory energy and water reporting, statewide Community Benefits Agreement standards (noise/light/pollution), and labor/prevailing-wage standards. She stopped short of the moratorium that 60+ groups had demanded. Food & Water Watch (Matt Smith) and Jeff Tittel called it 'entirely inadequate' and renewed calls for a full moratorium. Alongside the plan, the NJ Economic Development Authority reportedly froze new applications to its $250M data center tax-incentive program (previously approved awards, such as CoreWeave’s, unaffected).
Announced bill (2027 session)Proposed statewide data center moratorium
Proposed2026-08
Reps. Micaela Lara Cadena and Angelica Rubio told the interim Science, Technology and Telecommunications Committee on Aug. 11, 2026 that they will introduce a statewide data center moratorium when the session opens in January 2027. No bill number yet; committee Republicans opposed the concept.
Proposed statewide moratorium on data centersProposed statewide moratorium on data centers
Proposed2026-07
Four Democratic lawmakers (Reps. Cadena, Rubio, Chavez; Sen. Hamblen) announced bill to prohibit new large-scale data center projects statewide while developing impact evaluation framework; paired with data security protections and closing microgrid loophole under Energy Transition Act; to be introduced in 2027 session starting Jan 19. The measure has no documented term.
Dem governor nominee Haaland announced a proposed executive order to impose a moratorium on new data centers if elected. The announcement was made by Haaland as part of her campaign platform.
A 10141 / S 9144Three-year halt on data center construction
Proposed2025
Would halt all data center construction for a minimum of three years while regulators adopt rules to minimize impacts. Introduced in 2025; pending. Distinct from S10642/A11560, the one-year permitting pause the Legislature passed in 2026.
S10642 / A11560Responsible Data Center Development Act (one-year moratorium)
Proposed2026-08
The Responsible Data Center Development Act passed both the Assembly and Senate on June 4, 2026 (A11560 substituted for S10642). It would impose a one-year statewide moratorium on new permits for data centers over 20 MW peak load. No gubernatorial signature or veto is recorded; Gov. Hochul instead issued Executive Order 62 in July 2026.
New YorkNew York S6394A, the Sustainable Data Centers Act, would regulate energy consumption by data centers in the state.
Proposed2025-03
New York S6394A, the Sustainable Data Centers Act, would regulate energy consumption by data centers in the state. The bill requires annual disclosure reporting, prohibits fossil fuel power purchase agreements, and directs the Public Service Commission to establish a surcharge/discount plan. It mandates a progressive transition to renewable energy: 33% by 2030, 67% by 2035, and 100% by 2040. The bill is pending committee action.
S8540New York S8540, the Accountability for Computing and Data Centers (ACDC) Act, would require electric and gas corporations to establish an independent
Proposed2025-10
New York S8540, the Accountability for Computing and Data Centers (ACDC) Act, would require electric and gas corporations to establish an independent classification of service for large energy use facilities separate from other rate classes. The bill authorizes DPS to develop financial surety requirements and prevents data center costs from being blended into residential rate cases. The bill is pending in the Senate.
Would require all data centers in the state to publicly report electricity consumption, peak demand, water consumption, cooling systems and any emissions-free generation. Defines a large data center as one with projected peak demand of at least 40 MW and projected annual water use above 1 billion liters, and would bar such a center from beginning operation without on-site clean generation sufficient to offset at least 25% of projected peak demand, operational on day one, with off-site renewable energy credits and virtual power purchase agreements expressly not counting toward it. Filed April 2026.
H 1189Datacenter Transparency Act: statewide siting moratorium
Proposed2026-04
Would impose a moratorium on state and local permits for 100 MW+ data center siting from Aug 1 2026 to Aug 1 2028 pending a UNC Collaboratory study, plus annual tax-exemption certification.
SB 730Ratepayer Protection Act: sound and water standards
Proposed2026-06
The Ratepayer Protection Act passed the Senate in May 2025 and passed the House with an amendment in June 2026 (69-44 on second reading). On June 8, 2026 it was referred to the Senate Rules Committee for concurrence; it has not become law.
Would end Ohio's data center sales-tax exemption for future projects (effective Oct 1 2027; companion HB 975 effective Oct 1 2026); introduced and pending.
OhioOhio: Sen. Kent Smith (D-Euclid) introduced a package of 6+ bills targeting data center impacts in Ohio: the Data Center Grid Cost Responsibility Act
Proposed2026-02
Sen. Kent Smith (D-Euclid) introduced a package of 6+ bills targeting data center impacts in Ohio: the Data Center Grid Cost Responsibility Act, a Tax Break Ban, the Powering Ohio Communities Act, the Local Development Protection Act, the Power Reliability and Fairness Act, and the Responsible Water Use Act which would cap daily water use at 5 million gallons. The Ohio Consumers' Counsel endorsed the package. The bills are pending committee action.
HB957Prohibit new data center sales tax exemptions from being granted
Proposed2026-06
Ohio HB957 (136th General Assembly): Prohibit new data center sales tax exemptions from being granted. Last action 2026-06-03: Referred to committee: Ways and Means.
HB 706Ohio: HB 706 bans utilities from recovering data center infrastructure costs by shifting them onto other customers and requires long-term service agreements
Proposed2026-02
Ohio: HB 706 bans utilities from recovering data center infrastructure costs by shifting them onto other customers and requires long-term service agreements of at least 12 years. Mirrors AEP's existing tariff requiring data centers to cover 85% of energy costs. Senate Democrats introduced additional bills to eliminate tax breaks, require developers to cover infrastructure costs, and impose greater oversight. Around 18 municipalities have enacted local moratoriums on data centers.
Announced bill (2027 session)Proposed three-year moratorium on new large data centers
Proposed2026-08
Sens. Jeff Golden and Courtney Neron Misslin and Reps. Lesly Munoz and Farrah Chaichi announced on Aug. 4, 2026 that they will introduce a three-year moratorium on new large data centers when the 2027 session convenes in January. Gov. Kotek said on Aug. 24, 2026 that she will introduce a competing bill built on her advisory committee's recommendations. Kotek has said the state lacks authority to impose a statewide moratorium administratively and has voiced support for local pauses.
HB 2496Municipal authority to pause data center proposals
Proposed2026-06
HB 2496 would amend the Municipalities Planning Code to let municipalities pause data center proposals. It passed the House 201-1 in June 2026 and was reported as amended by the Senate Local Government Committee on June 30, 2026, then re-referred to Senate Rules and Executive Nominations.
SB 1345Optional municipal moratorium on high impact data centers
Proposed2026-07
SB 1345 would authorize municipalities to impose an optional temporary moratorium on new applications for high impact data centers. It was re-reported as amended and received second consideration in the Senate on July 12, 2026.
SB 1359Statewide three-year hyperscale data center moratorium
Proposed2026-06
Sen. Katie Muth's bill, co-sponsored by Sens. Comitta, Brown, Saval and Cappelletti, is titled 'An Act imposing a Statewide moratorium on hyperscale data center development and permitting; and providing for enforcement.' It would impose a mandatory three-year pause on permitting and development of hyperscale data centers and the power plants and transmission serving them. Referred to the Local Government Committee on June 4, 2026; no committee votes have been held. This is the only pending Pennsylvania measure that would create a statewide moratorium.
HB 2533An Act amending the act of July 31, 1968 (P.L.805, No.247), known as the Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code, in zoning, providing for optional
Proposed2026-05
Pennsylvania HB 2533 (2025-2026): An Act amending the act of July 31, 1968 (P.L.805, No.247), known as the Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code, in zoning, providing for optional moratorium on filing or consideration of new. Last action 2026-05-27: Referred to Local Government.
HB 2650An Act amending the act of March 4, 1971 (P.L.6, No.2), known as the Tax Reform Code of 1971, in tax credit and tax benefit administration
Proposed2026-06
Pennsylvania HB 2650 (2025-2026): An Act amending the act of March 4, 1971 (P.L.6, No.2), known as the Tax Reform Code of 1971, in tax credit and tax benefit administration, further providing for definitions. Last action 2026-06-25: Referred to Finance.
SB 1384An Act amending the act of March 4, 1971 (P.L.6, No.2), known as the Tax Reform Code of 1971, in tax credit and tax benefit administration
Proposed2026-07
Pennsylvania SB 1384 (2025-2026): An Act amending the act of March 4, 1971 (P.L.6, No.2), known as the Tax Reform Code of 1971, in tax credit and tax benefit administration, further providing for definitions. Last action 2026-07-10: Referred to Finance.
HB 2198An Act amending the act of March 4, 1971 (P.L.6, No.2), known as the Tax Reform Code of 1971, repealing provisions relating to Computer Data Center Equipment
Proposed2026-06
Pennsylvania HB 2198 (2025-2026): An Act amending the act of March 4, 1971 (P.L.6, No.2), known as the Tax Reform Code of 1971, repealing provisions relating to Computer Data Center Equipment Incentive Program; and, in general provisi. Last action 2026-06-26: Referred to Finance.
HB1667In sales and use tax, further providing for exclusions from tax; in gross receipts tax, further providing for imposition of tax and for establishment
Proposed2026-06
Pennsylvania HB1667 (2025-2026 Regular Session): In sales and use tax, further providing for exclusions from tax; in gross receipts tax, further providing for imposition of tax and for establishment of revenue-neutral reconciliation. Last action 2026-06-26: Referred to Rules.
HB 2532An Act amending the act of March 4, 1971 (P.L.6, No.2), known as the Tax Reform Code of 1971, repealing provisions relating to computer data center equipment
Proposed2026-05
Pennsylvania HB 2532 (2025-2026): An Act amending the act of March 4, 1971 (P.L.6, No.2), known as the Tax Reform Code of 1971, repealing provisions relating to computer data center equipment incentive program; in general provisions, . Last action 2026-05-27: Referred to Finance.
Pennsylvania (statewide moratorium proposal)Pennsylvania: Proposes a three-year moratorium on hyperscale data center construction including associated power generation and transmission infrastructure.
Proposed2026-02
Pennsylvania: Proposes a three-year moratorium on hyperscale data center construction including associated power generation and transmission infrastructure. Multiple legislators involved: Sen. Katie Muth, Sen. Rosemary Brown (R) who supports restricting data centers to industrial zones, and Rep. Jamie Walsh (R) who plans a separate regulatory package. Bipartisan opposition with over 50 planned data centers facing resistance from community groups across the state.
HB 1834Pennsylvania's first-ever data center regulatory framework (HB 1834) passed the House 104-95 on March 24, 2026.
Proposed2026-03
Pennsylvania's first-ever data center regulatory framework (HB 1834) passed the House 104-95 on March 24, 2026. On April 14, 2026, the House passed TWO additional data center oversight bills: one requiring annual reporting from data center operators and one creating a model zoning template for municipalities. HB 1834 requires data centers to cover full grid upgrade costs, mandates clean energy sourcing starting 2028, and establishes transparency requirements. All three bills now head to the Senate. Still pending in Senate Consumer Protection & Professional Licensure Committee.
SB 1460An Act amending the act of July 31, 1968 (P.L.805, No.247), known as the Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code, in zoning, prohibiting the location of data
Proposed2026-09
Pennsylvania SB 1460 (2025-2026): An Act amending the act of July 31, 1968 (P.L.805, No.247), known as the Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code, in zoning, prohibiting the location of data centers.. Last action 2026-09-24: Referred to Local Government.
H7695Establishes property, tangible, sales and use tax exemptions as incentives for the location of qualified data centers in Rhode Island.
Proposed2026-05
Rhode Island H7695 (2026 Regular Session): Establishes property, tangible, sales and use tax exemptions as incentives for the location of qualified data centers in Rhode Island.. Last action 2026-05-07: Committee recommended measure be held for further study.
Would prohibit governmental entities from acting on data center permits and applications until the General Assembly establishes an oversight and approval process; introduced Apr 14, did not advance.
Would create a Data Center Development Office within the Department of Environmental Services and require a state-issued siting permit before any new data center could begin operations. The Senate Agriculture and Natural Resources Committee gave it a favorable report on April 28, 2026, sending it to the full Senate.
A companion approach to S 867 that would task the Public Service Commission with overseeing data center permitting statewide. It carries weaker ratepayer provisions than S 867 and omits the brownfield site provisions.
HB1301Limit costs and risks associated with electricity use by data centers and impose a moratorium.
Proposed2026-02
South Dakota HB1301 (2026 Regular Session): Limit costs and risks associated with electricity use by data centers and impose a moratorium.. Last action 2026-02-18: State Affairs Deferred to the 41st legislative day, Passed, YEAS 10, NAYS 2..
SB 2584Taxes, Sales - As introduced, authorizes a qualified data center that applies for job tax credits to certify electronically that it has
Proposed2026-04
Tennessee SB 2584 (114): Taxes, Sales - As introduced, authorizes a qualified data center that applies for job tax credits to certify electronically that it has not, within the previous 12 months. Last action 2026-04-20: Placed on Senate Finance, Ways, and Means Committee calendar for 4/21/2026.
SB2888Relating to the temporary sales and use tax exemptions for certain tangible personal property related to data centers and large data center projects.
Proposed2025-04
Texas SB2888 (89th Legislature Regular Session): Relating to the temporary sales and use tax exemptions for certain tangible personal property related to data centers and large data center projects.. Last action 2025-04-07: Referred to Finance.
HB 1515Temporary moratorium on local data center approvals
Proposed2026-02
Would bar local final approval of new data center siting until pending utility interconnection requests are filled or Jul 1 2028; a House subcommittee continued it to the 2027 session.
Establishes a special siting and permit process for facilities using 100 MW+ (sound and site assessments), among Virginia's 60+ data-center bills, most of which carried over.
SB465Retail Sales and Use Tax; exemption for data centers.
Proposed2026-02
Virginia SB465 (2026 Regular Regular Session): Retail Sales and Use Tax; exemption for data centers.. Last action 2026-02-17: Left in Finance and Appropriations.
HB 1546Data centers; sales and use tax exemption for certain equipment or enabling software.
Proposed2024-11
Virginia HB 1546 (2025): Data centers; sales and use tax exemption for certain equipment or enabling software.. Last action 2024-11-18: Left in Finance.
HB 2685Retail Sales and Use Tax; commercial & industrial exemptions for data centers in Northern Virginia.
Proposed2025-02
Virginia HB 2685 (2025): Retail Sales and Use Tax; commercial & industrial exemptions for data centers in Northern Virginia.. Last action 2025-02-04: Left in Finance.
Microsoft appeal of data center transmission costs order
Proposed2026-09
Microsoft is preserving its right to appeal a Virginia State Corporation Commission order that requires direct assignment of some transmission costs for data centers. Dominion Energy must propose policy changes by October to comply with the order.
Virginia Takes Aim at Data Center Development, Energy Use
Proposed2026-09
Governor Abigail Spanberger has proposed an accountability framework and an AI task force aimed at giving communities more control over data center development. The proposal also addresses energy costs, water use, clean energy, and AI risks.
Spanberger proposes by-right approval ban for data centers
Proposed2026-09
Gov. Abigail Spanberger unveiled a data center accountability plan and an executive order that includes creating an AI task force. The order proposes a ban on by-right approval for data centers.
Spanberger presents slate of data center regulation proposals, puts first directives in motion
Proposed2026-09
Governor Abigail Spanberger unveiled a package of legislative proposals aimed at regulating the data center industry in Virginia. The proposals seek to tighten environmental regulations, increase cost allocation for the industry, and increase transparency in the proposal process by banning non-disclosure agreements between localities and data center developers.
Spanberger proposes slate of data center regulations, puts first directives in motion
Proposed2026-09
Virginia Governor Abigail Spanberger unveiled a package of regulations aimed at the data center industry, including tighter environmental rules and increased energy cost responsibility. She also put the first directives of this package into motion with an executive order.
HB 2515Clean energy procurement and cost obligations
Proposed2026
Would set clean energy procurement targets, place cost-shifting obligations on large-load customers, and restrict utilities' use of cap-and-invest allowances for data center customers. Introduced; pending.
HB 2655Providing a retail sales and use tax exemption for the construction and equipping of new data centers located in a county east of the Cascades that borders
Proposed2026-02
Washington HB 2655 (2025-2026): Providing a retail sales and use tax exemption for the construction and equipping of new data centers located in a county east of the Cascades that borders another state and has a population of at lea. Last action 2026-02-06: Public hearing in the House Committee on Finance at 8:00 AM..
HB 2708Removing a tax exemption for the replacement of equipment for data centers.
Proposed2026-01
Washington HB 2708 (2025-2026): Removing a tax exemption for the replacement of equipment for data centers.. Last action 2026-01-30: First reading, referred to Finance..
Wisconsin (statewide PSC rate hearing)Wisconsin: Two Wisconsin PSC dockets address data center rate structures.
Proposed2026-02
Two Wisconsin PSC dockets address data center rate structures. Docket 6630-TE-113: We Energies proposed a 'Very Large Customer' rate class for customers with electricity demands above 500 MW (targeting hyperscale data centers like Microsoft in Mount Pleasant). Over 200 people joined virtual hearings on Feb 10-11, 2026, with ~85% of speakers voicing concerns about the proposal, urging that tech companies pay their full share of infrastructure costs. Critics argue the proposal would only require data centers to pay 75% of infrastructure costs, leaving 25% subsidized by the public. Docket 6680-TE-115: Alliant Energy's Individual Contract Rate Agreement to serve a data center campus in Beaver Dam (widely assumed to be Meta). The PSC required Alliant to refile the contract with fewer redactions after advocates raised transparency concerns. A coalition of 42 environmental justice, faith, conservation, and community organizations submitted formal comments voicing concerns about the proposals. On April 24, 2026 the Wisconsin PSC adopted a "full-benefits" model requiring data centers to pay 100% of their costs, extended the minimum term to 15 years, and lowered the threshold from 500 MW to 100 MW (removing the 75% capacity-only option), a ratepayer-protection win.
Wyoming (statewide)Wyoming faces 12.8 GW of announced data center projects that would more than double statewide electrical demand, sparking fears of soaring residential electric
Proposed2026-01
Wyoming faces 12.8 GW of announced data center projects that would more than double statewide electrical demand, sparking fears of soaring residential electric rates (Microsoft, Meta, Crusoe among named developers). While the state has an existing ratepayer protection law (statute 37-3-116 from 2019) preventing new large load customers from obligating existing customers for utility costs, the Wyoming Outdoor Council has published a white paper calling for additional legislation. As of the Feb 9, 2026 budget session kickoff, no specific rate protection bill had been filed; a voluntary 'Ratepayer Protection Pledge' emerged in March 2026. Legislators are expected to consider additional measures in future sessions.
SB 354Alabama: In Alabama, SB 354 would impose a one-year moratorium on construction of new large-scale solar power facilities, Prompted by opposition
Failed / vetoed2026-03
In Alabama, SB 354 would impose a one-year moratorium on construction of new large-scale solar power facilities, Prompted by opposition to a 4,500-acre solar project in Stockton meant to power Meta's Montgomery data center expansion. Exempts TVA solar capacity and projects already under construction. Opposition was led by Stockton Area Residents Against Solar. Key concerns driving this action include environmental impacts and loss of farmland. The outcome remains pending. SB 354 passed the Alabama Senate 27-4 but died on a procedural transmission deadline in early April.
HB 259Alaska HB 259 (introduced January 2026 by Rep. Donna Mears) would require large energy facilities (peak demand ≥20 MW) to enter community benefit agreements
Failed / vetoed2026-01
Alaska HB 259 (introduced January 2026 by Rep. Donna Mears) would require large energy facilities (peak demand ≥20 MW) to enter community benefit agreements with the host municipality and pay for at least 80% of contracted power amount regardless of actual purchases (a take-or-pay structure mirroring the RPP). Companion bill SB 250 also pending. Anchorage Assembly preemptively adopted data center regulations in March 2026 and overrode a mayor's veto on a related partnership. A separate Mat-Su data center plan is in doubt after a mayor veto in March 2026. The bills are responses to growing AI-driven data center interest in Alaska. Alaska adjourned sine die May 20, 2026; HB 259 (stuck in House Energy) and SB 250 (never scheduled) both died.
HB 2631Arizona: Governor Katie Hobbs called for repealing data center tax incentives which cost Arizona approximately $38.5 million per year.
Failed / vetoed2026-02
Governor Katie Hobbs called for repealing data center tax incentives which cost Arizona approximately $38.5 million per year. The bill would end the transaction privilege and use tax exemption for large data centers. Part of a broader national trend of states reconsidering data center tax breaks. The outcome remains pending. Gov. Hobbs called for repeal in her State of the State address and proposed a penny-per-gallon fee on data center water use ($6.5M/year for water conservation). The exemption costs $38.5M/year (up from $1.4M in 2020, projected to reach $60M+ by FY2027). HB 2631 (House companion tax-exemption repeal) failed like SB 1463; data center tax breaks were preserved in the GOP budget Hobbs vetoed.
HB 2795Arizona: In Arizona, HB 2795 would prohibit counties (<500K pop) from denying zoning approval for small modular reactors after federal design certification
Failed / vetoed2026-02
In Arizona, HB 2795 would prohibit counties (<500K pop) from denying zoning approval for small modular reactors after federal design certification and site permitting. Allows SMR construction colocated with large industrial users (data centers) without ACC environmental compatibility certificate. Cleared House on party-line vote Feb 26, advancing to Senate. Gov. Hobbs vetoed similar bill in 2025. HB 2795 (industry-friendly SMR county-zoning preemption) failed Senate third reading 15-13-2 on April 8, 2026 and never reached the governor.
SB 1463Arizona SB 1463 (Sen. Priya Sundareshan, D - Senate Minority Leader) would repeal the state's transaction privilege and use tax exemption for qualifying large
Failed / vetoed2026-01
Arizona SB 1463 (Sen. Priya Sundareshan, D - Senate Minority Leader) would repeal the state's transaction privilege and use tax exemption for qualifying large data centers. Gov. Katie Hobbs called for the repeal in her January 2026 State of the State address, despite having voted for the original tax break as a state senator in 2013. Hobbs's plan also proposes a penny-a-gallon fee on data center water use. Rep. Neal Carter (R-San Tan Valley) sponsored a House companion to sunset the exemption. The Department of Revenue estimates the incentives cost the state ~$38M/year. A two-thirds supermajority is required to repeal a tax incentive, making passage difficult despite some bipartisan support. Gov. Hobbs called for repeal in her State of the State address and proposed a penny-per-gallon fee on data center water use ($6.5M/year for water conservation). The exemption costs $38.5M/year (up from $1.4M in 2020, projected to reach $60M+ by FY2027). SB 1463 (repeal data center tax exemption) failed to advance; the GOP legislature kept the breaks in its budget, which Gov. Hobbs vetoed in May partly over data center breaks. Repeal needed a 2/3 supermajority that never materialized.
HB 1476TO CREATE A SALES AND USE TAX EXEMPTION FOR ELECTRICITY SOLD TO A DATA CENTER; AND TO DECLARE AN EMERGENCY.
Failed / vetoed2023-05
Arkansas HB 1476 (2023): TO CREATE A SALES AND USE TAX EXEMPTION FOR ELECTRICITY SOLD TO A DATA CENTER; AND TO DECLARE AN EMERGENCY.. Last action 2023-05-01: Died in House Committee at Sine Die Adjournment.
HB 1654TO PROVIDE SALES AND USE TAX EXEMPTIONS FOR DATA CENTERS; AND TO PROVIDE A SALES AND USE TAX EXEMPTION FOR DATA CENTER EQUIPMENT, DATA CENTER COSTS
Failed / vetoed2023-04
Arkansas HB 1654 (2023): TO PROVIDE SALES AND USE TAX EXEMPTIONS FOR DATA CENTERS; AND TO PROVIDE A SALES AND USE TAX EXEMPTION FOR DATA CENTER EQUIPMENT, DATA CENTER COSTS, CERTAIN SERVICES PROVIDED TO A DATA CENTER. Last action 2023-04-13: Notification that HB1654 is now Act 819.
AB 222California Assembly Bill 222 would require data center operators to report energy consumption and efficiency metrics, including Power Usage Effectiveness
Failed / vetoed2026-08
AB 222, which would have required data center energy use reporting, was held under submission in committee on Aug. 29, 2025 and saw no further action before the 2025-26 session ended on Aug. 31, 2026.
Governor Newsom vetoed a bill that would have created an inspector general for the California Public Utilities Commission. The veto occurred as Newsom signed other data center-related laws, including those strengthening energy reporting and requiring new rate structures.
Would have imposed siting and operating conditions on data centers over 30 MW (new renewables by 2031, 15-year contracts, community benefit agreements, no rate discounts). Postponed indefinitely 9-0 at the sponsor's request.
HB 1030Colorado: In Colorado, HB 1030 would offer a 100% state sales and use tax exemption for 20 years (extendable to 30) for data center operators investing
Failed / vetoed2026-02
In Colorado, HB 1030 would offer a 100% state sales and use tax exemption for 20 years (extendable to 30) for data center operators investing at least $250M within five years. A fiscal analysis found the bill would reduce general fund revenue by $29M/year, triggering a $106M reduction in low-income tax credits. A broad coalition including Earthjustice and environmental groups objected to the bill as a 'handout,' while competing legislation (SB 24-168 successor) would impose proactive environmental protections instead. HB 26-1030 (pro-development 20-yr sales-tax exemption, opposed by community/enviro coalition) was postponed indefinitely by the House Energy & Environment Committee May 7, 2026.
SB 1292Connecticut enacted SB 1292, requiring AI data center owners and operators to submit quarterly reports to the Commissioner of Energy and Environmental
Failed / vetoed2025-01
Connecticut enacted SB 1292, requiring AI data center owners and operators to submit quarterly reports to the Commissioner of Energy and Environmental Protection on energy and water consumption. The law authorizes the commissioner to adopt regulations concerning water and energy efficiency standards for data centers.
SB 79AN ACT ELIMINATING THE TAX EXEMPTIONS FOR QUALIFIED DATA CENTERS.
Failed / vetoed2024-02
Connecticut SB 79 (2024): AN ACT ELIMINATING THE TAX EXEMPTIONS FOR QUALIFIED DATA CENTERS.. Last action 2024-02-14: REF. TO JOINT COMM. ON Finance, Revenue and Bonding.
SB 353Defeated statewide moratorium on data centers
Failed / vetoed2026-06
SB 353: statewide moratorium on permits for 100+ MW data centers through Jan 31, 2027; motion to suspend rules failed 6-15 in the Senate. Legislature passed a restrictions package (HB 233/HB 445/HB 310/SB 326) instead. The measure has no documented term.
HB 1007Florida HB 1007 (2026) regulates data center siting and operations by: (1) limiting the use of non-disclosure agreements in local permitting
Failed / vetoed2026-02
Florida HB 1007 (2026) regulates data center siting and operations by: (1) limiting the use of non-disclosure agreements in local permitting; (2) directing the Public Service Commission to set cost-allocation tariffs so data center loads do not shift costs onto residential ratepayers; and (3) requiring state water-use permits for large data center withdrawals. The bill does not ban data centers from agricultural zoning or impose 500-foot setbacks.
HB 1517Florida SB 1517, 'Approval of Data Center Facilities,' sponsored by Rep. Joseph, required developers to disclose projected energy, water, carbon emissions
Failed / vetoed2026-02
Florida SB 1517, 'Approval of Data Center Facilities,' sponsored by Rep. Joseph, required developers to disclose projected energy, water, carbon emissions, noise, and environmental impacts at application stage, with the Department of Environmental Protection publishing the data publicly. The bill was filed January 9, 2026 and referred to the Economic Infrastructure Subcommittee, State Affairs, and Commerce committees, but died in the Economic Infrastructure Subcommittee on March 13, 2026.
SB 1118Florida SB 1118 creates a public records exemption allowing local governments to keep data center siting plans confidential for up to 12 months when requested
Failed / vetoed2026-03
Florida SB 1118 creates a public records exemption allowing local governments to keep data center siting plans confidential for up to 12 months when requested by the company. A developer's 'proprietary confidential business information' remains exempt until it becomes public or the company stops treating it as proprietary. Includes a 5-year sunset provision expiring October 2031. The bill died in committee alongside companion SB 484, which establishes a comprehensive regulatory framework for hyperscale data centers effective July 1, 2026.
Georgia (statewide)Georgia: Requires electric utilities and new data centers (100+ MWH peak annual demand) to agree on contract terms that shield other power customers
Failed / vetoed2026-02
Requires electric utilities and new data centers (100+ MWH peak annual demand) to agree on contract terms that shield other power customers from construction and operation costs. Includes minimum billing requirements, performance/credit provisions, and termination protections. Passed Georgia House 159-5, now in Senate.
HB 559Georgia HB 559 would accelerate the sunset date for the state's data center sales and use tax exemption program, ending tax breaks for new data centers by 2026
Failed / vetoed2026-02
Georgia HB 559 would accelerate the sunset date for the state's data center sales and use tax exemption program, ending tax breaks for new data centers by 2026 rather than the originally scheduled later date. The bill is part of a wave of Georgia legislation targeting data center incentives in the 2026 session, alongside SB 410 (which passed the Senate to repeal exemptions entirely) and HB 1063 (which passed the House 159-5 requiring data centers to pay infrastructure costs). Per Inside Climate News (April 9, 2026), all data center ratepayer protection bills failed in the 2026 Georgia session; the tax exemption is set to remain in place until 2032.
SB 408Georgia: SB 408, sponsored by Sen. Nan Orrock (D-Atlanta), would move the sunset date for Georgia's data center sales and use tax exemption from January 1
Failed / vetoed2026-02
SB 408, sponsored by Sen. Nan Orrock (D-Atlanta), would move the sunset date for Georgia's data center sales and use tax exemption from January 1, 2032 to January 1, 2027, effectively ending the incentive five years early. It is one of several bills introduced in the 2025-26 session targeting the exemption, including SB 410 (immediate repeal) and HB 559 (sunset December 31, 2026). A state audit found the exemption has cost Georgia significant revenue while creating relatively few jobs per dollar of tax benefit. Per Inside Climate News (April 9, 2026), SB 408 did not reach a vote in the Senate; the exemption remains until 2032.
SB34Georgia SB34 would have prohibited data center fuel generation and transmission costs from being included in residential electricity rates
Failed / vetoed2026-01
Georgia SB34 would have prohibited data center fuel generation and transmission costs from being included in residential electricity rates, requiring commercial data centers to cover all increased fuel, power, and transmission system upgrade costs. The bill emerged after the Public Service Commission authorized Georgia Power to expand production by nearly 10 GW, mostly for data centers, including new methane-burning facilities. The Senate avoided a final vote after a last-minute alternative measure based on House Bill 1063 appeared to have the votes to pass.
SB436Georgia SB436 suspends new sales and use tax exemptions for data centers from July 1, 2026 through June 30, 2027, and prohibits local governments from entering
Failed / vetoed2026-02
Georgia SB436 suspends new sales and use tax exemptions for data centers from July 1, 2026 through June 30, 2027, and prohibits local governments from entering into nondisclosure agreements related to data center water and electricity usage. The bill is part of a wave of Georgia data center legislation in 2026, the Senate also passed SB410 to outright end tax exemptions, while the House passed HB1063 (159-5) requiring data centers to pay down payments and sign longer contracts covering infrastructure costs. Georgia adjourned sine die Apr 3, 2026 with no data center regulation enacted; SB 436 (suspend tax exemptions + ban NDAs) died in Senate Finance and HB 1063 died in the Senate after crossover.
HB 1059Georgia HB 1059 (Rep. Derrick Jackson D-Tyrone) would have established a moratorium on new data center construction from July 1, 2026 through December 31
Failed / vetoed2026-01
Georgia HB 1059 (Rep. Derrick Jackson D-Tyrone) would have established a moratorium on new data center construction from July 1, 2026 through December 31, 2028, plus a 14-member Data Center Impact Commission. The bill failed to advance during the 2026 legislative session, which ended in early April with Georgia lawmakers passing NO data center bills despite months of debate. The General Assembly left intact ~$2.5B/year in data center tax breaks even after a state report estimated Georgia would miss out on $2.5B in tax revenue in 2026. With no statewide restrictions, county commissions and planning boards remain the front line of defense, and Democrats are reportedly viewing the failure as an electoral gift heading into November 2026. By April 15-18, 2026, advocates reported that around 20 bills aimed at the data center industry introduced during the 2026 Georgia legislative session all failed to pass after the Senate adjourned without action. Failed measures included HB 1012, SB 408, and SB 410, along with HB 1059 (the Data Center Impact Assessment and Development Moratorium Act of 2026). Georgia's data center sales-tax exemption (projected to cost the state $2.5 billion in FY 2026) remains in effect through 2032.
HB 1192Sales and use tax; certain high-technology data center equipment; prohibit issuance of new certificates of exemption
Failed / vetoed2024-05
Georgia HB 1192 (2023_24): Sales and use tax; certain high-technology data center equipment; prohibit issuance of new certificates of exemption. Last action 2024-05-07: Veto V7.
H0739Idaho: Bipartisan bill H0739 would limit sales tax exemptions to data center-specific equipment (excluding construction materials), sunset the exemption
Failed / vetoed2026-02
Bipartisan bill H0739 would limit sales tax exemptions to data center-specific equipment (excluding construction materials), sunset the exemption in 2036, and require data centers built after March 2026 to pay power rates that fully cover utility costs (proposed by Meta / Diode Ventures). Rep. Mickelsen separately introduced a bill to prevent the Idaho PUC from approving any new customer requiring 20+ MW without proving it would not raise rates for other customers. Multiple bills addressing tax breaks, water usage reporting, and rate protection.
HB 756Idaho HB 756 (Rep. Stephanie Mickelsen R-Idaho Falls), introduced February 2026, would prohibit the Idaho PUC from approving any new customer requiring 20+ MW
Failed / vetoed2026-01
Idaho HB 756 (Rep. Stephanie Mickelsen R-Idaho Falls), introduced February 2026, would prohibit the Idaho PUC from approving any new customer requiring 20+ MW of electricity from the state's three regulated power companies without a 'no harm' test proving it would not require raising rates for other customers. The test analyzes grid reliability impacts, infrastructure needs, and risks. The bill raises the large-load threshold from 10 MW to 20 MW and exempts longstanding high-power consumers (existing customers with >50 MW demand as of Jan 1, 2000, like Micron Technology). HB 756 received House State Affairs Committee approval to be introduced in late February but had not yet been scheduled for a public hearing as of late February 2026. A separate bill on data center water consumption has also advanced. HB 756 stalled in House State Affairs, but its "no-harm test" policy for new large loads was enacted into law via successor HB 911 (House 65-3, Senate 34-1, signed).
HB 874Idaho: HB 874, introduced by Rep. Stephanie Mickelsen (R-Idaho Falls), would prevent Idaho's Public Utilities Commission from approving any new customer
Failed / vetoed2026-02
HB 874, introduced by Rep. Stephanie Mickelsen (R-Idaho Falls), would prevent Idaho's Public Utilities Commission from approving any new customer requiring 20+ MW of electricity without first conducting a 'no harm' test proving it would not raise rates for existing customers. The bill requires analysis of grid reliability impacts, infrastructure needs, and risks before approval. It exempts longstanding high-power operations like Micron Technology (customers exceeding 50 MW as of January 1, 2000). HB 874 stalled, but the no-harm-test policy was enacted via successor HB 911 (signed into law).
SB 4004Illinois: In Illinois, SB 4004 would permanently ban data centers from using Mahomet Aquifer groundwater, The sole-source drinking water for ~1 million people
Failed / vetoed2026-02
In Illinois, SB 4004 would permanently ban data centers from using Mahomet Aquifer groundwater, The sole-source drinking water for ~1 million people across 14 counties. Also prohibits local governments from entering NDAs with data center companies and requires transparency in water usage. The outcome remains pending. The community's stated objective was to ban data center development NDAs in IL. SB 4004 (Mahomet Aquifer ban) was re-referred to Senate Assignments May 22, 2026 with no floor vote; dead for the session (ends May 31).
HF 2447Iowa HF 2447, proposed by Rep. Cindy Golding (R-Cedar Rapids), creates new reporting requirements and utility rate structures for data centers.
Failed / vetoed2026-02
Iowa HF 2447, proposed by Rep. Cindy Golding (R-Cedar Rapids), creates new reporting requirements and utility rate structures for data centers. Data centers must file quarterly reports with the Iowa DNR on water usage (source, volume, efficiency) and quarterly energy reports with the Iowa Utilities Commission (power consumption, on-site generators, sustainability metrics like waste heat reuse). All data must be publicly shared online within 30 days. The bill also requires the Iowa Utilities Commission to create a separate rate class for data centers to prevent grid upgrade costs from being shifted to residents. Separately, HF 2261 would create a new water utility customer class for energy facilities requiring 20+ MW. The bill survived legislative funnel week in February 2026. Iowa adjourned sine die May 3, 2026; the transparency/reporting bill did not become law.
SB 531Ban on new large data centers in drought counties
Failed / vetoed2026-07
Would have prohibited new large-load data centers (10 MW+) in any county with a drought emergency declared in the prior three years. Died in committee.
SB 400Kansas SB 400 would require data centers to use closed-loop cooling systems (no water evaporation) and authorize municipalities, local district attorneys
Failed / vetoed2026-01
Kansas SB 400 would require data centers to use closed-loop cooling systems (no water evaporation) and authorize municipalities, local district attorneys, and the state attorney general to sue for injunctions against violators. Introduced as part of the 2026 wave of state-level data center water/energy regulation legislation. Kansas is shifting focus from incentives (SB 98 passed in 2025 created a hyperscale sales tax exemption) to environmental regulation. The Kansas City Council changed zoning in January 2026 to make data centers harder to build, signaling local-level pushback complementing state legislation. SB 400 (closed-loop cooling / AG enforcement) died in committee when Kansas adjourned sine die April 11, 2026.
SB 526Kansas: SB 526 adds a zoning requirement to Kansas's existing SB 98 data center sales tax exemption program, mandating that data centers must be located
Failed / vetoed2026-03
SB 526 adds a zoning requirement to Kansas's existing SB 98 data center sales tax exemption program, mandating that data centers must be located on land zoned for industrial or manufacturing uses, or land that was unzoned as of July 1, 2025, to qualify for the 20-year, 100% sales and use tax exemption. The bill responds to concerns about data centers being sited on agricultural land, particularly as multiple companies seek to acquire more than 1,000 acres of Kansas farmland for new facilities. SB 526 (industrial-zoning requirement for tax-exemption eligibility) died in committee; KS sine die April 11, 2026.
HB 2450Substitute for HB 2450 by Committee on Commerce, Labor and Economic Development - Providing a sales tax exemption for the construction or remodeling
Failed / vetoed2024-04
Kansas HB 2450 (2023-2024): Substitute for HB 2450 by Committee on Commerce, Labor and Economic Development - Providing a sales tax exemption for the construction or remodeling of a qualified data center in Kansas. Last action 2024-04-30: Died on Calendar.
SB 545Providing a sales tax exemption for the construction or remodeling of a qualified data center in Kansas and the purchase of data center equipment
Failed / vetoed2024-04
Kansas SB 545 (2023-2024): Providing a sales tax exemption for the construction or remodeling of a qualified data center in Kansas and the purchase of data center equipment, eligible data center costs. Last action 2024-04-30: Died on Calendar.
HB 544Kentucky: Prohibits utilities from serving data centers with 100+ MW aggregate contract capacity unless the Public Service Commission approves a specific
Failed / vetoed2026-02
Kentucky: Prohibits utilities from serving data centers with 100+ MW aggregate contract capacity unless the Public Service Commission approves a specific tariff with minimum requirements including contract durations, early termination fees, load ramp terms, and financial assurances. Key concerns driving this action include ratepayer cost concerns. The outcome remains pending. Kentucky adjourned sine die Apr 15, 2026; HB 544 (Ratepayer Protection Act) did not pass and its data center language was stripped from SB 197 on the final day.
HB 593Kentucky: HB 593 (Rep. Josh Bray, R) requires data centers to cover transmission and infrastructure costs, generate their own power or purchase on the open
Failed / vetoed2026-02
HB 593 (Rep. Josh Bray, R) requires data centers to cover transmission and infrastructure costs, generate their own power or purchase on the open market, with a $75,000 nonrefundable application fee. Unanimously passed the House Economic Development and Workforce Investment Committee on Feb 26, 2026. A companion bill HB 544 (Reps. Adam Moore & William Lawrence) prohibits utilities from serving data centers with 100+ MW aggregate capacity without a PSC-approved specific tariff. As of late March 2026, HB 593 is advancing in the Senate. Both bills aim to ensure data center costs are not passed to ratepayers and tie tax breaks to compliance with local zoning. HB 593 passed the Kentucky House 90-8 but DIED in the Senate as the legislative session closed on April 15-16, 2026, without a floor vote. Sponsor Rep. Josh Bray indicated he will refile in the 2027 session. Bill died April 15-16, 2026 as the legislative session ended. HB 593 passed the House 90-8 but stalled in the Senate. An SB 197 revival attempt was stripped on the final day.
LD 307Maine Data Center Coordination Council; temporary limitation on data centers
Failed / vetoed2026-04
An 18-month moratorium on permits and construction of 20 MW+ data centers until Nov 1, 2027; Gov. Mills vetoed it Apr 24 seeking a project exemption, and the override failed (House 72-65) Apr 29.
Maine (statewide)Maine: Governor Janet Mills VETOED LD 307 on April 24, 2026, "An Act to Establish the Maine Data Center Coordination Council and Place a Temporary Limitation
Failed / vetoed2026-04
Governor Janet Mills VETOED LD 307 on April 24, 2026, "An Act to Establish the Maine Data Center Coordination Council and Place a Temporary Limitation on Certain Data Centers." The bill would have made Maine the first state with a statewide moratorium on new data centers using 20+ MW, freezing approvals through November 1, 2027. Mills cited the bill's failure to exempt a $550M data center project at the former Androscoggin Mill in Jay. The legislature passed LD 307 on April 14 by 79-62 in the House and 21-13 in the Senate, falling short of the two-thirds majority needed for an override. Mills said she will issue an executive order creating a council to study data center impacts.
HB 120Moratorium on construction of new data centers
Failed / vetoed2026
Would prohibit new data centers statewide until co-location and generation legislation is enacted; heard in committee Feb 3 but did not advance before sine die.
HB 1595Maryland HB1595 authorizes Baltimore City and county governing bodies to establish a special personal property tax subclass for qualified data centers and set
Failed / vetoed2026-02
Maryland HB1595 authorizes Baltimore City and county governing bodies to establish a special personal property tax subclass for qualified data centers and set a rate up to 2.5x the standard real property tax rate. The bill emerged from Frederick County's push for local taxing authority over data center equipment after the county discovered data centers' vast server farms were taxed at the same rate as other business personal property. The legislation was introduced February 15, 2026 and referred to the Ways and Means Committee. HB 1595/SB 427 (local property-tax authority over data centers) did not pass; MD sine die Apr 13, 2026.
HB 560Maryland HB 560 (Del. Palakovich Karr, D - Ways & Means) would repeal the existing exemption from sales/use tax and property tax for personal property used
Failed / vetoed2026-01
Maryland HB 560 (Del. Palakovich Karr, D - Ways & Means) would repeal the existing exemption from sales/use tax and property tax for personal property used at qualified data centers in Maryland. Part of a 2026 wave of state-level legislation rethinking data center tax incentives, over 300 state data center bills have been filed across 30+ states in just six weeks of the 2026 session. Maryland separately overrode a Moore veto to mandate a comprehensive data center impact study (due Sept 2026), reflecting growing legislative skepticism of data center subsidies as energy costs rise. HB 560 (repeal data center tax exemptions) never advanced past its Feb 12 Ways & Means hearing; MD adjourned sine die Apr 13, 2026.
HB 905Sales and Use Tax Exemption, Qualified Data Center Personal Property, Eligibility
Failed / vetoed2024-02
Maryland HB 905 (2024): Sales and Use Tax Exemption, Qualified Data Center Personal Property, Eligibility. Last action 2024-02-08: Hearing 2/29 at 1:00 p.m. (Ways and Means).
HB 1411Maryland: In Maryland, HB 1411 would require large-scale data center operators to report environmental and resource impacts publicly.
Failed / vetoed2026-03
In Maryland, HB 1411 would require large-scale data center operators to report environmental and resource impacts publicly. Mandates jurisdictions with 10,000+ residents create formal data center management plans by 2027. Includes $1,000/MW payment into EmPOWER program for low-income assistance. HB 1411 did not pass the 2026 Maryland session (sine die April 13, 2026). The community's stated objective was to mandate public environmental reporting from data centers (HB 1411).
Sen. Michael Moore's amendment to the Senate economic-development package proposed a one-year moratorium on new data centers. It won 13 co-sponsors but was withdrawn after leadership opposition.
Massachusetts House (rejects Rep. Pease budget amendment for data center impact study commission)Massachusetts House rejected without debate a Republican budget amendment (Rep. Kelly Pease) that would have created a commission to study data centers'
Failed / vetoed2026-05
Massachusetts House rejected without debate a Republican budget amendment (Rep. Kelly Pease) that would have created a commission to study data centers' impacts. State House News Service panel on May 7 highlighted the partisan split; Gov. Healey has refused to back a Maine-style ban.
SF 4298Minnesota SF 4298, introduced by Sen. Jennifer McEwen (DFL-Duluth), would establish a temporary statewide moratorium on new data centers by barring state
Failed / vetoed2026-03
Minnesota SF 4298, introduced by Sen. Jennifer McEwen (DFL-Duluth), would establish a temporary statewide moratorium on new data centers by barring state and local governments from issuing permits until one year after the Public Utility Commission submits a comprehensive report on data center development scenarios. This would theoretically push back local approvals into 2029. The bill was referred to the Senate Energy, Utilities, Environment and Climate Committee but has not received a hearing as of late March 2026. Environmental advocates, union representatives, engineers, and the Minnesota Catholic Conference expressed support, while economic development organizations objected to it, arguing confidentiality in early business discussions is needed. The bill taps into growing opposition from communities pushing back against data centers across Minnesota, including in Monticello, Farmington, Pine Island, and Hermantown. SF 4298 (McEwen statewide moratorium) never got a hearing and died at MN sine die May 18, 2026.
HF4077Minnesota: Bipartisan bill HF4077/SF4379 to ban local government officials from signing NDAs with data center developers is advancing through both chambers.
Failed / vetoed2026-03
Bipartisan bill HF4077/SF4379 to ban local government officials from signing NDAs with data center developers is advancing through both chambers. The Senate version passed two committees and awaits a floor vote; the House version was pulled back for one more committee (Judiciary). Four legislators from opposite ends of the political spectrum held a joint press conference on April 8 promoting the bill. Minnesota Chamber of Commerce opposes it. The NDA-ban bill (HF 4077/SF 4379) deadlocked 7-7 in House Judiciary in April and never reached the floor before MN sine die May 18.
HF 4929Data center sales and use tax exemption modified.
Failed / vetoed2024-03
Minnesota HF 4929 (2023-2024): Data center sales and use tax exemption modified.. Last action 2024-03-14: Introduction and first reading, referred to Taxes.
HF 1431Qualified data center tax exemption provided.
Failed / vetoed2013-03
Minnesota HF 1431 (2013-2014): Qualified data center tax exemption provided.. Last action 2013-03-11: Introduction and first reading, referred to Taxes.
HF 3194Qualified data center sales and use tax exemptions modified.
Failed / vetoed2014-03
Minnesota HF 3194 (2013-2014): Qualified data center sales and use tax exemptions modified.. Last action 2014-03-19: Introduction and first reading, referred to Taxes.
HB 1239Data center enterprises; revise certain definitions and other provisions relating to tax exemptions.
Failed / vetoed2025-03
Mississippi HB 1239 (2025): Data center enterprises; revise certain definitions and other provisions relating to tax exemptions.. Last action 2025-03-29: Died In Conference.
HB 1635Mississippi: In Mississippi, HB 1635 was introduced to redirect 80% of local ad-valorem taxes collected above $1B from large projects (including data centers)
Failed / vetoed2026-02
In Mississippi, HB 1635 was introduced to redirect 80% of local ad-valorem taxes collected above $1B from large projects (including data centers) into a new state infrastructure and economic development fund, with 20% to local government and schools. Madison County Economic Development Authority director Joey Deason objected to the measure, warning it would slash his county's projected $70M/year in new Amazon data center tax revenue to just $20M/year. The author did not bring the bill to committee vote.
SB 3106Tax exemptions; revise qualifying standards for business enterprises operating data centers.
Failed / vetoed2024-04
Mississippi SB 3106 (2024): Tax exemptions; revise qualifying standards for business enterprises operating data centers.. Last action 2024-04-16: Died In Committee.
HB 1429Tax exemptions; revise the requirements that a data center must meet to be eligible for.
Failed / vetoed2019-03
Mississippi HB 1429 (2019): Tax exemptions; revise the requirements that a data center must meet to be eligible for.. Last action 2019-03-19: Died In Committee.
HB 3362Missouri has multiple data center bills (proposed by Google / Meta / Metrobloks).
Failed / vetoed2026-02
Missouri has multiple data center bills (proposed by Google / Meta / Metrobloks). HB 3362 and HB 3364 (Reps. Colin Wellenkamp, Scott Miller, Mike Costlow), titled the 'AI Infrastructure, Grid Integrity and Water Resource Protection Act', would require large-load consumers to pay the full cost of electricity and infrastructure (including grid upgrades and new generation capacity) and create a water permit requirement from the DNR for facilities using 2+ million gallons of fresh water per day or 80% of local available capacity. Such facilities would need to build new freshwater capacity or create closed-loop freshwater systems. Separately, SB 1396 (Sen. Mike Henderson, R-Desloge) would alter 2018 economic development incentives to prevent data centers from taking advantage of energy incentive programs that were not designed for them. All Missouri AI/data center bills died before adjournment; MO sine die May 15, 2026 with no AI regulations passed.
LB 1131Adopt the Domestic Violence and Human Trafficking Service Providers Tax Credit Act and eliminate personal property tax and sales and use tax exemptions
Failed / vetoed2026-04
Nebraska LB 1131 (109): Adopt the Domestic Violence and Human Trafficking Service Providers Tax Credit Act and eliminate personal property tax and sales and use tax exemptions relating to data centers. Last action 2026-04-17: Indefinitely postponed.
LB 468Change provisions relating to inheritance taxes, change certain fee and tax provisions, and eliminate a sales tax exemption relating to data centers
Failed / vetoed2026-04
Nebraska LB 468 (109): Change provisions relating to inheritance taxes, change certain fee and tax provisions, and eliminate a sales tax exemption relating to data centers. Last action 2026-04-17: Indefinitely postponed.
HB 1724New Hampshire: In New Hampshire, HB 1724, Sponsored by Rep. Wendy Thomas, Requires public utilities to submit annual reports detailing transmission costs
Failed / vetoed2026-01
In New Hampshire, HB 1724, Sponsored by Rep. Wendy Thomas, Requires public utilities to submit annual reports detailing transmission costs, wholesale electricity market impacts, and generation capacity adequacy, with specific analysis of data center-related demand. Mandates public hearings and review by the state energy agency. Referred to the House Science, Technology and Energy Committee with a public hearing held February 10, 2026. HB 1724 (utility transparency/cost reporting incl. data-center demand analysis) died due to inactivity.
A5462New Jersey: Directs electric public utilities to file a new tariff for large load customers (100+ MW/month) with the BPU, designed to ensure non-data-center
Failed / vetoed2026-01
Directs electric public utilities to file a new tariff for large load customers (100+ MW/month) with the BPU, designed to ensure non-data-center ratepayers are protected from increased costs caused by massive electricity demand. Gov. Murphy pocket-vetoed the original bill before leaving office in January 2026. Reintroduced in the new session as S731/A796, which passed the New Jersey General Assembly with bipartisan support. Clarification: this was a pocket veto (no action taken by January 21, 2026 deadline), not a conditional veto. The bill was reintroduced as S731/A796.
A 4033Establishes program in EDA providing tax credits and exemptions to certain qualified data centers.
Failed / vetoed2017-01
New Jersey A 4033 (217): Establishes program in EDA providing tax credits and exemptions to certain qualified data centers.. Last action 2017-01-30: Reported and Referred to Assembly Appropriations Committee.
SB 235New Mexico: SB 235 (Microgrid Oversight Act) would have required the Public Regulation Commission to develop rules for any microgrid producing more than 20 MW
Failed / vetoed2026-01
SB 235 (Microgrid Oversight Act) would have required the Public Regulation Commission to develop rules for any microgrid producing more than 20 MW, granted regulators oversight over approval and operation of microgrids, and required proof of ability to meet state renewable energy standards for microgrids coming online after May 2026. The bill passed the New Mexico Senate 22-20 but did not advance in the House before the session ended, effectively dying. The bill was motivated by concerns about data center 'microgrids' circumventing the state's Energy Transition Act requirements, particularly regarding Project Jupiter in Dona Ana County.
SB 2406Penalties for data center nondisclosure agreements
Failed / vetoed2026-09
Would have attached consequences for data center developers that enter nondisclosure agreements with public agencies or officials. A joint House-Senate policy committee gave it a do-not-pass recommendation on Sept. 2, 2026 after amending it to preserve confidentiality agreements for sensitive information, and the Senate rejected the bill 32 to 15 on Sept. 3, 2026 during a special session. Gov. Armstrong testified that existing transparency law was already sufficient.
Data center permitting moratorium (September 2026 special session, not introduced)Proposed temporary pause on data center permitting through June 2027
Failed / vetoed2026-09
On September 2, 2026, during a special session, Rep. Gretchen Dobervich (D-Fargo) moved to introduce a bill led by Sen. Tim Mathern (D-Fargo) that would have paused data center permitting through June 2027. The House rejected the motion 68-25, and Senate Majority Leader David Hogue blocked consideration in the Senate, where adding bills to the special session required unanimous consent. The bill was never formally introduced. This is separate from SB 2406, a nondisclosure-agreement bill the Senate rejected 32-15.
SB 2137Relating to a sales and use tax exemption for enterprise information technology equipment and computer software purchased for use in a qualified data center
Failed / vetoed2021-04
North Dakota SB 2137 (67): Relating to a sales and use tax exemption for enterprise information technology equipment and computer software purchased for use in a qualified data center; and to provide an effective date. Last action 2021-04-23: Filed with Secretary Of State 04/22.
SB 2155Relating to a sales and use tax exemption for enterprise information technology equipment and computer software purchased for use in a qualified data center
Failed / vetoed2021-02
North Dakota SB 2155 (67): Relating to a sales and use tax exemption for enterprise information technology equipment and computer software purchased for use in a qualified data center; and to provide an effective date. Last action 2021-02-18: Second reading, failed to pass, yeas 1 nays 46.
HB 4424, filed by House Speaker Kyle Hilbert, would have ended data center eligibility for Oklahoma's five-year ad valorem (property tax) exemption for new facilities. It was referred to the House Appropriations and Budget Committee on Feb. 3, 2026 and saw no further action before the 2026 session adjourned.
SB 1488Moratorium on new data centers until Nov 1 2029
Failed / vetoed2026-05
Would bar new data centers exceeding a large power threshold until Nov 1 2029 and direct an Oklahoma Corporation Commission study; crossed over but died May 14 2026.
SB 1586Oregon: SB 1586, which would have brought 373 acres of rural land into Hillsboro's UGB for tech industries, was shelved.
Failed / vetoed2026-02
SB 1586, which would have brought 373 acres of rural land into Hillsboro's UGB for tech industries, was shelved. Separately, Councilor Kipperlyn Sinclair's data-center moratorium petition had gathered 1,300+ of the 2,000 signatures needed as of mid-April 2026. Key concerns: Hillsboro School District lost $128M to tax abatements in 2024; data centers pay less than half what residents pay for power; and completed data centers have no power and are being told 3-5 years wait.
HB 1282An Act amending the act of March 4, 1971 (P.L.6, No.2), known as the Tax Reform Code of 1971, in Computer Data Center Equipment Incentive Program
Failed / vetoed2023-09
Pennsylvania HB 1282 (2023-2024): An Act amending the act of March 4, 1971 (P.L.6, No.2), known as the Tax Reform Code of 1971, in Computer Data Center Equipment Incentive Program, further providing for definitions and for sales. Last action 2023-09-22: Re-committed to Rules.
SB 654An Act amending the act of March 4, 1971 (P.L.6, No.2), known as the Tax Reform Code of 1971, in sales and use tax, further providing for exclusions from tax
Failed / vetoed2024-07
Pennsylvania SB 654 (2023-2024): An Act amending the act of March 4, 1971 (P.L.6, No.2), known as the Tax Reform Code of 1971, in sales and use tax, further providing for exclusions from tax; in personal income tax. Last action 2024-07-11: Act No. 56 of 2024.
HB 952An Act amending the act of March 4, 1971 (P.L.6, No.2), known as the Tax Reform Code of 1971, in sales and use tax, further providing for exclusions from tax
Failed / vetoed2021-06
Pennsylvania HB 952 (2021-2022): An Act amending the act of March 4, 1971 (P.L.6, No.2), known as the Tax Reform Code of 1971, in sales and use tax, further providing for exclusions from tax; in personal income tax. Last action 2021-06-30: Act No. 25 of 2021.
SB 1301An Act amending the act of March 4, 1971 (P.L.6, No.2), known as the Tax Reform Code of 1971, in Computer Data Center Equipment Incentive Program
Failed / vetoed2022-06
Pennsylvania SB 1301 (2021-2022): An Act amending the act of March 4, 1971 (P.L.6, No.2), known as the Tax Reform Code of 1971, in Computer Data Center Equipment Incentive Program, further providing for definitions. Last action 2022-06-28: PN 1828 Referred to FINANCE.
SB 463An Act amending the act of March 4, 1971 (P.L.6, No.2), known as the Tax Reform Code of 1971, in computer data center equipment incentive program
Failed / vetoed2021-06
Pennsylvania SB 463 (2021-2022): An Act amending the act of March 4, 1971 (P.L.6, No.2), known as the Tax Reform Code of 1971, in computer data center equipment incentive program, further providing for definitions and for review. Last action 2021-06-15: Re-referred to APPROPRIATIONS.
SB 471An Act amending the act of March 4, 1971 (P.L.6, No.2), known as the Tax Reform Code of 1971, in Computer Data Center Equipment Incentive Program
Failed / vetoed2019-04
Pennsylvania SB 471 (2019-2020): An Act amending the act of March 4, 1971 (P.L.6, No.2), known as the Tax Reform Code of 1971, in Computer Data Center Equipment Incentive Program, further providing for definitions and providing. Last action 2019-04-08: Re-referred to APPROPRIATIONS.
HB 1088An Act amending the act of March 4, 1971 (P.L.6, No.2), known as the Tax Reform Code of 1971, in Computer Data Center Equipment Incentive Program
Failed / vetoed2019-12
Pennsylvania HB 1088 (2019-2020): An Act amending the act of March 4, 1971 (P.L.6, No.2), known as the Tax Reform Code of 1971, in Computer Data Center Equipment Incentive Program, further providing for definitions and providing. Last action 2019-12-30: PN 3068 Corrective Reprint, Printer's No. 3068.
Would have required data centers of 50 MW or more to fund grid upgrades and report and limit water use. Held for further study and died in committee at session end, June 11, 2026.
HB 6476AN ACT RELATING TO STATE AFFAIRS AND GOVERNMENT -- QUALIFIED DATA CENTERS LOCATION INCENTIVE (Establishes incentives for property sales and use tax exemptions)
Failed / vetoed2021-06
Rhode Island HB 6476 (2021): AN ACT RELATING TO STATE AFFAIRS AND GOVERNMENT -- QUALIFIED DATA CENTERS LOCATION INCENTIVE (Establishes incentives for property sales and use tax exemptions for qualified data centers located). Last action 2021-06-25: 06/25/2021 Introduced, referred to House Finance.
Would bar state and local approval of permits, rezoning, and incentives for new data centers until Jan 1 2028; referred to Ways and Means, but SC closed the session without enacting data-center bills.
Would impose a one-year moratorium on new or expanded hyperscale data centers; stalled in committee. SD instead enacted SB 135 protecting local governments' authority to regulate or ban data centers.
SB 2653Tennessee: SB2653 creates the Tennessee Data Center Impact Review Act, establishing a formal review process for data center impacts on communities
Failed / vetoed2026-02
SB2653 creates the Tennessee Data Center Impact Review Act, establishing a formal review process for data center impacts on communities, environment, and infrastructure. The bill amends multiple Tennessee Code sections across eight titles and was introduced February 2, 2026 with companion bill HB2392. It was deferred in the Senate Commerce and Labor Committee to March 17, 2026, while HB2392 was placed on the Agriculture and Natural Resources Subcommittee calendar for March 18. SB 2653 (Impact Review Act) stalled in Senate Commerce & Labor; TN adjourned Apr 23, 2026 with only the industry-friendly self-generation bill passing.
SB 2266Taxes, Sales - As enacted, specifies that any entity that qualifies for exemption as a spallation neutron source facility will not be eligible for a sales
Failed / vetoed2018-05
Tennessee SB 2266 (110): Taxes, Sales - As enacted, specifies that any entity that qualifies for exemption as a spallation neutron source facility will not be eligible for a sales and use tax exemption with regard to any. Last action 2018-05-18: Effective date(s) 05/15/2018.
S.205 / H.727Moratorium on new data centers until 2030
Failed / vetoed2026-05
Would halt siting and construction of 100 MW+ data centers until Jul 1 2030 pending a Public Utility Commission study; Gov. Scott vetoed the bill and the House failed to override (83-52).
Rejected statewide moratorium on data centersRejected statewide moratorium on data centers
Failed / vetoed2026-08
Sen. Glen Sturtevant (R) wrote to Gov. Spanberger on Jul 30, 2026 asking her to use executive authority for an immediate moratorium on new data center approvals while the state assesses grid, water and infrastructure capacity; Sens. Richard Stuart (R) and Russet Perry (D) jointly asked for a special session on groundwater. Spotsylvania (Aug 11, 4-2) and Stafford (Sep 1) boards backed the ask. The governor's office answered Aug 11 that its approach, the $0.011/kWh consumption tax and an SCC directive making new data centers pay their full transmission cost, 'supersedes any effort to block them from being developed', and Spanberger has said a pause is a local choice. Under Virginia's Dillon's Rule a locality cannot enact a true moratorium; it can defer applications for up to 12 months while amending its ordinance. The measure has no documented term.
HB 503Virginia: Prohibits Virginia utilities from recovering costs of transmission lines and energy generation serving data centers over 100 MW from residential
Failed / vetoed2026-01
Prohibits Virginia utilities from recovering costs of transmission lines and energy generation serving data centers over 100 MW from residential ratepayers. Aimed at addressing the $4.4 billion in data center transmission costs borne by customers across seven PJM states in 2024 alone. House subcommittee recommended continuing to next session. Part of a broader package of 2026 Virginia data center bills targeting ratepayer protections and industry accountability.
SB 393Virginia SB 393, the Virginia's Great Outdoors Act (companion HB 641), was defeated in February 2026.
Failed / vetoed2026-01
Virginia SB 393, the Virginia's Great Outdoors Act (companion HB 641), was defeated in February 2026. The bill would have created a $250M/year dedicated funding stream for land conservation, public lands, trails, and outdoor recreation funded by a $3/sq ft annual tax on data centers above 25,000 sq ft. The Senate Finance Resources Subcommittee voted to 'carry over' SB 393, delaying it indefinitely. Both HB 641 and SB 393 have been defeated. The proposal would have established Virginia's largest-ever conservation fund, including a Virginia Tribal Commitment Fund, and was supported by PEC, NVCT, and conservation groups statewide.
SB 619Virginia SB 619 / HB 155 requires a State Corporation Commission certificate before data centers over 90 MW can operate.
Failed / vetoed2026-01
Virginia SB 619 / HB 155 requires a State Corporation Commission certificate before data centers over 90 MW can operate. The SCC issues a certificate only if the facility has no material adverse effect on other customers' rates, reliability, or the utility's ability to meet Virginia Clean Economy Act goals. This represents one of the strongest state-level data center permitting requirements in the country.
SB 1294Retail Sales and Use Tax; removes June 30, 2035, sunset on local exemption for data centers.
Failed / vetoed2023-02
Virginia SB 1294 (2023): Retail Sales and Use Tax; removes June 30, 2035, sunset on local exemption for data centers.. Last action 2023-02-01: Failed to report (defeated) in Finance and Appropriations (7-Y 9-N).
HB 1459Broadening the eligibility requirements and extending the expiration date for the data center tax incentive.
Failed / vetoed2022-01
Washington HB 1459 (2021-2022): Broadening the eligibility requirements and extending the expiration date for the data center tax incentive.. Last action 2022-01-31: Scheduled for public hearing in the House Committee on Finance at 10:00 AM.
SB 5262Broadening the eligibility requirements and extending the expiration date for the data center tax incentive.
Failed / vetoed2022-02
Washington SB 5262 (2021-2022): Broadening the eligibility requirements and extending the expiration date for the data center tax incentive.. Last action 2022-02-17: Senate Rules "X" file..
HB 2962Broadening the eligibility requirements and extending the expiration date for the data center tax incentive.
Failed / vetoed2020-03
Washington HB 2962 (2019-2020): Broadening the eligibility requirements and extending the expiration date for the data center tax incentive.. Last action 2020-03-02: Scheduled for public hearing in the House Committee on Finance at 08:00 AM.
SB 658West Virginia: Would restore local government control over data center siting in West Virginia, reversing HB 2014, the Power Generation and Consumption Act
Failed / vetoed2026-02
Would restore local government control over data center siting in West Virginia, reversing HB 2014, the Power Generation and Consumption Act signed by Gov. Morrisey, which allows data centers to operate on independent microgrids and strips counties of jurisdiction over siting and size. Tucker County residents pushed for the bill amid growing backlash over development in their communities. Never received a committee hearing during the session that ended March 14, 2026.
AB 1099 / SB 1061Moratorium on operation of data centers
Failed / vetoed2026-03
Would impose a moratorium on operating data centers absent a statewide planning authority, cost-shift prohibitions, and renewable-energy requirements; AB 1099 failed pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1.
AB 840Wisconsin AB 840 / SB 843 (Rep. Shannon Zimmerman R-River Falls, Sen. Romaine Quinn R-Birchwood), a GOP-led data center bill, passed the Assembly in January
Failed / vetoed2026-01
Wisconsin AB 840 / SB 843 (Rep. Shannon Zimmerman R-River Falls, Sen. Romaine Quinn R-Birchwood), a GOP-led data center bill, passed the Assembly in January 2026 by a 53-44 mostly party-line vote (2 Democrats yes, 1 Republican no). The bill would have prevented data center operators from passing energy costs onto residential consumers, required them to pay for their own generation/transmission infrastructure, mandated closed-loop water systems, required annual water use reporting, and required reclamation bonds. However, the Wisconsin Senate adjourned without taking up AB-840, or any data center regulation bill, on the floor. Democrats and several construction unions opposed the bill due to lack of prevailing wage requirements and concerns over energy consumption. The competing Democratic Data Center Accountability Act (SB 729/AB 722) by Sen. Habush Sinykin and Rep. Stroud, requiring 70% renewable sourcing and a new very-large-customer rate class, was heard in the Senate Utilities Committee on Feb 17, 2026 but never advanced.
SB 244Relating to: modifying the sales and use tax exemption for qualified data centers. (FE)
Failed / vetoed2026-03
Wisconsin SB 244 (2025): Relating to: modifying the sales and use tax exemption for qualified data centers. (FE). Last action 2026-03-23: Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1.
WisconsinWisconsin: Senate Bill 969, authored by Sen. Andre Jacque (R-New Franken), would prohibit NDAs between data center companies and municipalities
Failed / vetoed2026-02
Senate Bill 969, authored by Sen. Andre Jacque (R-New Franken), would prohibit NDAs between data center companies and municipalities, while still allowing withholding of genuine trade secrets. The bill was prompted by a Wisconsin Watch investigation revealing at least four communities had signed secrecy deals hiding billion-dollar data center plans. Rep. Clint Moses (R-Menomonie), author of the companion Assembly bill, called the measure 'really about trust.' Passed Senate Utilities Committee 4-1, but the Senate adjourned the 2026 session without a floor vote.
SB 729Wisconsin SB 729 / AB 722, the Data Center Accountability Act, authored by Sen. Jodi Habush Sinykin (D-Whitefish Bay) and Rep. Angela Stroud (D-Ashland)
Failed / vetoed2026-01
Wisconsin SB 729 / AB 722, the Data Center Accountability Act, authored by Sen. Jodi Habush Sinykin (D-Whitefish Bay) and Rep. Angela Stroud (D-Ashland), would have required data centers to source at least 70% of electricity from renewables to qualify for state tax exemptions, created a 'very large customers' rate class with rate cases every 2 years, required prevailing wages, and required water/energy transparency. SB 729 was introduced Dec 2, 2025 (with ~12 senate cosponsors and ~25 House cosponsors) and received a Senate Utilities Committee hearing Feb 17, 2026. AB 722 (the Assembly companion) was introduced Dec 3, 2025. Both bills failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1 on March 23, 2026, leaving Wisconsin without statewide data center regulation.
AB 302Relating to: a sales and use tax exemption for data center equipment or software. (FE)
Failed / vetoed2024-04
Wisconsin AB 302 (2023): Relating to: a sales and use tax exemption for data center equipment or software. (FE). Last action 2024-04-15: Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1.
HB0090Wyoming HB0090 would have appropriated $500K to the State Engineer to study how large-scale industrial water use by data centers, carbon capture
Failed / vetoed2026-02
Wyoming HB0090 would have appropriated $500K to the State Engineer to study how large-scale industrial water use by data centers, carbon capture, and hydrogen projects impacts the state's water supply. The bill advanced 8-1 out of the House Agriculture Committee and received House Appropriations Committee approval on February 16, 2026, but did not pass the full chamber. The study was part of growing concern in Wyoming as data center developers eye the state for its cheap land and energy resources.
Wyoming HB 88 (2021): Data center tax exemption-repeal.. Last action 2021-04-08: H:Died in Committee Returned Bill Pursuant to HR 5-4.
Local & county moratoria
Most of the activity is happening at the city and county level, where building pauses and permit halts move faster than state law. A tracked sample, each with its source.
Twelve-month moratorium on data center permitting and licensing
The City Council adopted Resolution No. 26-R-97 on Aug. 18, 2026, effective immediately, directing the city to withhold permits, approvals and licenses for the location, development, expansion or operation of a data center within its regulatory jurisdiction. The pause runs 12 months and may be shortened or extended; the planning commission is to report recommendations within six months on utility demand, cooling, stormwater, transportation and separation from residential areas.
The City Council voted on March 3, 2026 for a six-month moratorium on new or expanding data centers drawing more than 20 MW. In June 2026 the council passed a zoning ordinance, on a 6-3 vote, setting conditions for hyperscale facilities that takes effect when the moratorium lifts.
One-year moratorium on data center licenses and permits
The City Council voted unanimously on July 21, 2026 for a one-year moratorium on new business licenses and construction permits for data centers, paired with a parallel moratorium on residential rental developments. Council Vice President Chris Gace said the city's zoning ordinance does not adequately address the use and that no project had been proposed.
City Council voted unanimously to approve a one-year moratorium on new data centers, becoming the fourth Alabama city (after Birmingham, Leeds, Homewood) to pause development.
Temporary moratorium after resident pressure over Patmos (Missouri AI co.) proposal to convert former Walmart to colocation data center. Duration not specified. The measure has no documented term.
The City Council approved the final reading of an ordinance on Sept. 8, 2026 establishing a six-month moratorium on accepting, processing, approving or considering applications for data centers, Bitcoin and cryptocurrency mining facilities, server farms and similar uses. Mayor Ralph Hellmich said no data center has been proposed in the Foley area and the pause lets the city review its zoning and environmental regulations.
Data center moratorium followed by conditional-use ordinance
Fort Payne paused data center development in 2026 and then, on Sept. 2, 2026, approved an ordinance reclassifying data centers as a conditional use, so each project must go through planning commission review and a public hearing rather than being permitted by right.
The Town Council adopted a six-month moratorium on Aug. 3, 2026 even though no developer had approached the town, giving the council, the planning and zoning board and the water board time to study economic and infrastructure effects. The planning and zoning board had recommended a longer pause. The town is holding monthly public information sessions during the moratorium.
Twelve-month moratorium on new data center applications
The City Council approved a 12-month moratorium on new data center development applications on June 22, 2026, with an option to extend it a further six months. No applications were pending. City staff and the Planning Commission are to study whether zoning, operational, buffering or infrastructure standards should be adopted first.
Ordinance 2026-06-02, adopted unanimously on June 8, 2026, pauses acceptance, processing and approval of applications for new data centers or expansions of existing facilities for one year. The council cited energy and water consumption, cooling and generator noise, and compatibility with surrounding land uses. No project was pending at adoption.
County moratorium on data centers through October 25, 2026
County commissioners unanimously approved 60-day moratorium on data center permits; response to proposed 1,050-acre "Project Red Clay" hyperscale data center; county lacks formal zoning authority, legal standing uncertain. The measure runs to October 25, 2026.
At a September 21, 2026 work session, Northport city leaders declined to pursue a data center moratorium and instead directed staff to recommend zoning provisions for where a data center could be located. No formal moratorium vote was reported.
The City Council approved a 12-month moratorium at its first meeting of August 2026, following a first reading on July 16. No data center had been proposed in Pinson; Mayor Hoyt Sanders said the pause gives the council time to research zoning and confirm that infrastructure costs would fall on applicants rather than homeowners.
Local moratorium on data centers through February 4, 2027
City Council approved a six-month moratorium on data centers, days after a building permit was issued to Edged Energy for a $93 million data center on July 30. The timing created a legal dispute over whether the Edged project is grandfathered. The measure runs to February 4, 2027.
The City Council placed a moratorium on data centers at its July 6, 2026 meeting, joining nearby Leeds. Council members questioned the employment case for the facilities while the city reviews its zoning rules.
City moratorium on data centers through September 8, 2027
12-month moratorium on data center business licenses; Mayor Tracie Threadford cited caution while city conducts feasibility study. The measure runs to September 8, 2027.
The City Council voted unanimously on Aug. 18, 2026 for a six-month moratorium on data centers after residents objected to a proposed campus on more than 450 acres along Highway 280. Mayor Bobby Pardue said the pause gives the city time to change its rules; the Planning Commission is reviewing zoning and development standards.
AO 2026-27: defines data centers (20+ MW) in zoning code, restricts to commercial/industrial zones, bans from residential, requires conditional use review, utility capacity statement, landscaping buffers and enclosed power equipment. The measure has no end date by design.
Borough Assembly adopted 2027 legislative priority requesting state and federal moratorium on permitting, leasing and construction of commercial data centers on public lands until regulations are developed; not a locally enacted moratorium but an official resolution. The measure has no documented term.
The Chandler City Council voted 7-0 in December 2025 to reject a proposed AI data center after public opposition over noise, water and quality-of-life concerns.
Glendale Commission Recommends Rezoning For Data Center Plan
The Glendale Planning Commission recommended rezoning for the Project Baccara data center campus on 2026-09-28. The recommendation moves the decision to the Glendale city council.
Tribal moratorium on data centers with no end date
Tribal Council passed resolution opposing data center construction on reservation land, citing water scarcity on the Colorado River, light pollution, and wastewater concerns. Tribal sovereignty makes this effectively a ban on all reservation land. The measure has no end date by design.
Proposed amendments to Chapters 6, 7, 22, 31, 32, and 86 of Title 11 of the Mesa City Code pertaining to Data Centers and Planned Area Development Overlay
Mesa Ordinance 25-0566 on data center zoning: Proposed amendments to Chapters 6, 7, 22, 31, 32, and 86 of Title 11 of the Mesa City Code pertaining to Data Centers and Planned Area Development Overlay Districts. The amendments include Status Agenda Ready as of 2025-07-01.
The Pima County Board of Supervisors voted 3-2 in September 2026 to approve a 120-day moratorium on data center projects in unincorporated areas that have not yet submitted permits, while staff drafts zoning rules. Project Blue and Project Gravel are exempt; the board may consider an extension.
The Pinal County Board of Supervisors voted 4-1 on August 26, 2026 to reject the rezoning request and site plan for Vermaland's La Osa Energy Center outside Eloy. The scaled-down project called for 11 data center buildings, a 500-megawatt natural gas plant and battery storage serving about 1 gigawatt of demand.
The City Council voted 7-0 on Aug. 6, 2025 to halt annexation for Project Blue, a 290-acre Amazon-linked data center campus; the city later adopted strict rules and is exploring a ban.
County moratorium on data centers through February 10, 2027
Six-month moratorium. Developer NSI6 LLC / Trent Overhue challenged it in court Sep 2; ~100 people filled courtroom. Developer selected county specifically because it had no planning and zoning. County attorney argued moratorium valid because Overhue's project not yet started and land not yet owned (closing Sep 9). Judge considering temporary restraining order. The measure runs to February 10, 2027.
The Quorum Court unanimously passed a one-year moratorium blocking construction of data centers and other high-intensity digital infrastructure facilities, effective immediately.
Harrison passed a moratorium on data centers and crypto mining on May 25, 2023 after hundreds of residents objected to a Green Digital LLC crypto facility (a subsidiary with Chinese Communist Party ownership ties). The moratorium was actively removed on Nov 28, 2023 (~6 months in) after Arkansas Act 851 ("Right to Mine" law) preempted local regulation of crypto mining. The project involves 5 acres.
Conditional-use permit and siting rules for data centers
The City Council voted 8-0 on June 16, 2026, with an emergency clause so the rules took effect immediately, to end by-right approval of data centers. They now need a conditional-use permit from the Planning Commission, are allowed only in I-2 general industrial zones (about 2% of the city), and must sit at least 1,000 feet from residential zoning. Applicants must file a cooling system description, proof that heat stays within the property line, an energy management plan and water use projections. Not a moratorium; further amendments followed in August 2026.
The Quorum Court unanimously adopted a five-year moratorium running through Aug. 31, 2031 - the longest adopted in Arkansas - citing water supply strain. No data center had been proposed in the county.
Little Rock Board of Directors (hyperscale data center moratorium measure) data center moratorium (pause)
A measure by City Directors Kathy Webb and Capi Peck to pause new hyperscale data center approvals through year-end was deferred to August 4, 2026 at the sponsors' request. As drafted, it would exempt the planned Google data center at the Port of Little Rock and only affect zoning applications in the 'hyperscale' category; the main opposition target is an AVAIO Digital project near Wrightsville in Pulaski County, alongside continued scrutiny of the Google Port project. City Director Kathy Webb (Ward 3) is formally proposing to extend the halt from 6 to 18 months and to remove the earlier carve-out for the planned Google hyperscale facility at the Port of Little Rock. The proposal would require biannual public hearings with Entergy Arkansas and the developer present. Not yet voted on.
Three-year moratorium on data centers and digital asset mining
The Quorum Court approved an ordinance on Aug. 17, 2026 imposing a moratorium on data centers, digital asset mining businesses and other large-scale computer or server operations through Aug. 31, 2029. An emergency clause made it effective immediately. The county has no known project in development; the pause is the second longest in Arkansas after Independence County's.
Multiple moratorium attempts failed in Arkansas' most populous county; the Quorum Court instead advanced a regulatory ordinance classifying large-scale data centers as heavy industrial.
Pulaski County Quorum Court (data center moratorium ordinance, failed on clerk miscount), AR
Pulaski County Quorum Court (data center moratorium ordinance, failed on clerk miscount), AR data center moratorium (failed)
The Pulaski County Quorum Court appeared to pass a one-year data center moratorium on May 26, 2026 (with an exemption carved out for AVAIO Digital's planned Wrightsville project), but on May 28 the county clerk announced she had miscounted, per Arkansas Advocate's review of the roll call, the tally was 8 yes / 6 no / 1 present (other outlets' recounts differ -- see flags), short of the 10 of 15 votes needed. The ordinance is expected to return at the June meeting. Pulaski is Arkansas's most populous county. The 12-month moratorium fell short of the 10 votes needed (8-6, 1 present); officials initially mis-reported it as passed, then corrected the next day. A new ordinance removing the AVAIO carve-out (sponsors JPs Ward, Blackwood, Davis) is set for an agenda meeting June 9 and a Quorum Court vote June 23. A moratorium re-vote is pending 2026-07-14 (after this refresh window), with a carve-out for AVAIO Digital's Wrightsville project.
The county adopted a one-year moratorium on data centers in June 2026, one of several Arkansas jurisdictions outside Little Rock to pause development while regulations are drafted.
Ordinance O2M26-4863 (effective Aug 1, 2026) prohibits data centers in office and industrial zones. Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval (Resolution 26-07). Measure DB on the Nov 3, 2026 ballot would extend the ban to all zones and lock it into the city charter, requiring voter approval to reverse. If passed, Alhambra would be the second CA city after Monterey Park to enact a voter-approved permanent ban. The measure has no end date by design.
Arcata City Council unanimously adopted an urgency data center moratorium that halts permit processing for 45 days, with a likely extension of up to 10 months and 15 days. The vote was the evening of Sept. 16, 2026.
One-year urgency moratorium suspending approval, establishment, or operation of data centers within city limits. Extended from an initial short-term urgency ordinance adopted in March 2026. Vote 3-0. Water/groundwater protection cited as primary concern, city sits atop the San Gabriel Valley Groundwater Basin. Part of the San Gabriel Valley wave alongside Monterey Park, El Monte, and Montebello. The measure has a stated duration whose end date is not recorded.
County moratorium on data centers through October 9, 2026
Board of Supervisors adopted 45-day urgency ordinance 4-0 (chair absent) on Aug 25, 2026. Can be extended up to two years. Planning Director said large-scale data centers warrant further study on water, electricity, noise, lighting impacts. The measure runs to October 9, 2026.
The Calexico City Council adopted an ordinance prohibiting all new data centers citywide on second reading on September 16, 2026, by a 3-0 vote with two members absent. The first reading was September 2, and the ordinance takes effect 30 days after adoption. The council had earlier declined a temporary urgency moratorium in favor of a permanent Municipal Code amendment.
Calipatria City Council voted 3-2 on July 14, 2026 to advance an ordinance outlawing data centers within city limits, with a public hearing still pending.
Calipatria City Council (Imperial County, interim 5-year moratorium introduced), CA
Calipatria City Council (Imperial County, interim 5-year moratorium introduced), CA data center moratorium (proposed)
Calipatria City Council voted 4-0 to advance an interim urgency ordinance for a temporary 5-year moratorium on large-scale data center approval/permitting/construction, the first Imperial County-area jurisdiction to formally consider blocking data centers. Tied to broader Salton Sea-area data center opposition. As of June 8, the 5-year moratorium remains an introduction only, the May 12 vote directed staff to advertise a formal public hearing to refine the ordinance before it takes full effect; no second-reading adoption has been confirmed. Mayor Michael Luellen said 'data centers, the only place that they exist, is in hell,' and council members faced recall notices around the same time.
City of Brawley (data center moratorium passed 3-2), CA
City of Brawley (data center moratorium passed 3-2), CA data center moratorium
On May 19, 2026, the Brawley City Council voted 3-2 (Grass and Kelley dissenting) to approve Ordinance No. 2026-03, an immediate moratorium on data centers requiring more than 50 MW of electrical demand or exceeding 250,000 sq ft of gross floor area (smaller server rooms and telecom hubs exempt). Introduced by Councilmember Gil Rebollar to give the city time to draft zoning, environmental, and infrastructure standards.
City of Calexico (proposed data center moratorium), CA
City of Calexico (proposed data center moratorium), CA data center moratorium (pause)
The Calexico City Council was scheduled to consider a proposed data center moratorium at its June 3, 2026 meeting (alongside a public-safety budgeting mandate). No specific data center project in Calexico was identified, the measure appears precautionary amid the county-wide moratorium cascade. The June 3 vote outcome was not yet reported as of June 8. On 2026-07-01, council voted 5-0 to abandon the moratorium approach in favor of directing staff to draft an outright ban ordinance, to return for a second reading/vote on 2026-07-15. Councilmember Diana Nuricumbo cited existing air quality/New River pollution as reasons to go further than a pause. The council's planned final vote on the outright data-center ban, originally set for 2026-07-15, was deferred to September due to the council's August recess.
City of Imperial (hyperscale data center moratorium advancing), CA
City of Imperial (hyperscale data center moratorium advancing), CA data center moratorium (proposed)
On May 20, 2026, the City of Imperial council voted 4-0 to direct staff to return with a moratorium on hyperscale data centers within city limits; the item returned June 3 with the council moving to advance it (Mayor Ida Obeso: 'we have a right and a privilege to protect our residents'). The city is also the plaintiff in a separate CEQA suit against Imperial County over the IVCM project.
Permanent citywide ban on large-scale data centers
The City Council gave final approval on Aug. 26, 2026 to an ordinance permanently prohibiting large-scale data centers anywhere in the city, after a first reading on Aug. 12. Coachella is the second California city to adopt a ban, following Monterey Park. Residents raised water, energy and other environmental impacts.
The City of Commerce City Council adopted an urgency ordinance in August 2026 prohibiting approval of land use permits, entitlements or agreements for data centers for 45 days, with a possible extension of up to 10 months and 15 days after a public hearing.
Local moratorium on data centers through June 17, 2028
45-day urgency ordinance extended unanimously on Jul 7 by 22 months 15 days, the full two years California law allows. The measure runs to June 17, 2028.
City moratorium on data centers through February 2, 2027
Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 3063 (45-day moratorium); extended Apr 22 by Ordinance No. 3065 (7-0) for 10 months 15 days under Gov. Code 65858. Prohibits accepting or processing new data center land use applications. The measure runs to February 2, 2027.
The City Council unanimously adopted an urgency ordinance in late August 2026 imposing a 45-day moratorium on data centers and other high-intensity computing uses while staff develops land use and zoning regulations. No data center application had been filed. Staff is due back on Oct. 10, 2026, and the council may extend the moratorium by 10 months and then a further 12 months.
Local moratorium on data centers through October 17, 2026
City council unanimously adopted urgency ordinance Bill No. 1061-C.S. establishing 45-day moratorium effective immediately. Can be extended under CA Gov Code 65858 while city updates Local Coastal Program (up to two years). The measure runs to October 17, 2026.
The City Council voted 7-0 on Sept. 3, 2026 to begin drafting a citywide prohibition on data centers lasting 10 years, covering land later annexed into the city and requiring that councilmembers be notified of applications. Mayor Jerry Dyer co-sponsored the measure. The development code amendment must still clear environmental review, the Airport Land Use Commission and the Planning Commission before returning to the council, so no prohibition is in force yet.
Proposed urgency moratorium on data center applications
The Gilroy City Council unanimously approved a 45-day urgency moratorium on new data center applications on September 14, 2026, effective immediately under Government Code Section 65858. It can be extended up to two years and does not affect an Amazon facility already under construction.
Council starts process to prohibit future data center approvals
The Hayward City Council voted 7-0 on September 16, 2026 to direct staff to start the process for prohibiting future data center approvals. The council will revisit the issue in October 2026.
Supervisors unanimously directed staff to draft one-year moratorium. Chose moratorium over permanent ban due to existing data center in Arcata. Not yet formally enacted. The measure has no documented term.
County moratorium set aside by court; replacement under review
The temporary moratorium governed final County approvals for data centers in unincorporated areas. Imperial County reported on August 28 that Superior Court directed the measure to be set aside; the County was reviewing next steps and preparing a possible replacement. It is not treated as a current parcel block.
Imperial County (data center moratorium + by-right elimination advancing), CA
Imperial County (data center moratorium + by-right elimination advancing), CA data center moratorium
On June 2, 2026, after 1+ hour of public comment and 296 emailed comments, the Imperial County Board of Supervisors declined to adopt staff-drafted 'Data Center Development Guidelines' (21 safeguards including elimination of by-right development, infrastructure-impact assessments, 1,000-ft setbacks, water-use disclosure, local hiring, and a Good Neighbor Community Benefit Agreement), which opponents called full of loopholes. Supervisor Jesus Eduardo Escobar pushed for a six-month moratorium 'with more teeth.' Staff was directed to return June 16 with two items: an amended resolution creating an ad hoc study committee, and a moratorium urgency ordinance for immediate effect. A controversial carve-out for a second project (Tomcat Development near Brawley/Imperial) drew criticism. On June 16 the Imperial County Board of Supervisors approved a 45-day moratorium on pending and future data center projects, citing energy, water, and public-health concerns. The developer (Huntington Beach's Sebastian Rucci, ~1M-sq-ft project) threatened a lawsuit, saying the vote 'sends a... On 2026-07-14, the Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to extend the data-center moratorium by 10 months and 15 days (through June 2027) and formed a Data Center Advisory Committee.
City moratorium on data centers through October 9, 2026
Emergency ordinance establishing 45-day moratorium on new data center applications. Unanimous vote. Requested by Councilmember Steve Manos after resident concerns. City zoning code does not specifically address data centers. The measure runs to October 9, 2026.
Interim prohibition on large-scale data centers in unincorporated areas
The Los Angeles County Department of Regional Planning issued a memo on September 18, 2026 immediately prohibiting large-scale AI data centers in unincorporated areas while zoning amendments are codified. The action follows an April motion approved unanimously by the Board of Supervisors.
The Board of Supervisors voted 5-0 on Sept. 1, 2026 to adopt an urgency ordinance barring any new data center in the unincorporated county. It took effect immediately and runs 45 days, to Oct. 16, 2026. County code does not define or regulate data centers, so one could otherwise be approved through a routine building permit. A hearing set for Oct. 6 could extend the moratorium for up to two years while permanent regulations are written.
Expired city moratorium on data centers through March 28, 2026
Urgency Ordinance No. 2491 (5-0 vote). 45-day moratorium on AI data centers. Expired on schedule ~Mar 28. No extension adopted per review of all council agendas through Jul 2026. Adjacent to Monterey Park which permanently banned data centers. The measure runs to March 28, 2026.
City moratorium on data centers through October 10, 2026
45-day urgency moratorium covering data centers AND grid-scale battery energy storage. Unanimous vote. City has no zoning standards for either use. Extendable up to 2 years under CA Gov. Code 65858. The measure runs to October 10, 2026.
Oakland Weighs Data Center Moratorium as Opposition Mounts
Oakland City Council's Life Enrichment Committee approved a proposed 45-day moratorium on new data center projects on September 22, 2026, sending it to the full City Council for an October 6 vote.
City moratorium on data centers through April 14, 2027
Initial 45-day urgency ordinance Apr 15; extended May 16 for 10 months 15 days (through ~Apr 2027). Working toward permanent ban. Voted 5-0 on extension. The measure runs to April 14, 2027.
The City Council adopted an urgency ordinance on Aug. 26, 2026 temporarily barring acceptance, processing or approval of any application, permit or entitlement for a data center while the citywide zoning code update proceeds. The initial term is 45 days, running to about Oct. 10, and the council may extend it for up to two years.
City moratorium on data centers through July 15, 2027
Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 889 (initial 45-day). Extended unanimously Aug 18 via Ordinance No. 890 for 10 months 15 days. Data centers were previously permitted by right in industrial zones. Key concern is water, city faces state requirements to reduce groundwater pumping. The measure runs to July 15, 2027.
Riverbank City Council unanimously approved a 45-day moratorium on data centers on Sept. 9, 2026, effective immediately through Oct. 13, with the option to extend. The source reports a unanimous vote but not an explicit 5-0 tally.
The Riverside City Council Land Use Committee voted unanimously on September 14, 2026 to recommend that the full council adopt a 90-day urgency moratorium on new data center proposals while staff defines data centers and drafts permanent rules. No full council vote date was reported.
The San Joaquin County Board of Supervisors voted on September 1, 2026 to direct staff to study large-scale AI data center impacts. After initial findings in October, the board is to consider an initial 45-day moratorium on approval of data center projects.
The Tulare County Board of Supervisors voted 5-0 in September 2026 to extend its August 18, 2026 urgency moratorium on new data center development in unincorporated areas by 10 months and 15 days, to about July 2027.
Council directs staff to draft data center urgency moratorium
On Aug. 25, 2026, Whittier City Council voted 5-0 to direct staff to study data centers and other land uses and return with moratorium options and longer-term rules. No urgency ordinance was adopted at that meeting.
County moratorium on data centers through December 16, 2026
Resolution 2026-47; 6-month moratorium on data centers. Unanimous vote. County infrastructure and water cannot support data centers. The measure runs to December 16, 2026.
Arvada City Council approved on first reading, 6-0, on September 15, 2026 an ordinance imposing an 18-month moratorium on applications for primary use data centers. A public hearing and final vote are set for October 6.
Emergency resolution for a 6-month moratorium on data-center construction failed 6-5, Mayor Mike Coffman casting the tiebreaking vote against; council instead passed a resolution to develop data-center standards (water/zoning) within 35 days, without a pause. The measure has no documented term.
The City and County of Broomfield unanimously passed Ordinance 2313 on July 7, 2026 halting land-use applications and permits for data centers of 10 MW or more until December 2027 or until regulations pass.
Commerce City Council passed an ordinance 7-1 in September 2026 barring acceptance of new data center applications for six months while the city develops regulations.
Denver City Council unanimously approved a one-year moratorium (effective May 21, 2026) pausing new zoning permits and site plans for data centers while it drafts energy, water and siting rules.
The Jefferson County (CO) Board of Commissioners voted May 19, 2026 to impose a 10-month moratorium on new data center development, running through roughly March 2027. The moratorium applies to new applications for development of, or rezoning to allow, data centers, but excludes land already zoned for data centers via Planned Development provided the facility is at least 1,500 feet from any residence. Commissioners cited wildland-urban interface, water supply (amid Colorado drought), environment and community health. NEW item, Jefferson County CO not in DB. (Dated May 19, before the window, but surfaced in June 16-18 Front Range roundups and is missing from the database.)
Board of County Commissioners adopted a moratorium on new data center land-use applications in unincorporated Larimer County on Jan. 27, 2026, since extended while regulations are drafted.
Local moratorium on data centers through July 21, 2031
5-year pause approved 6-1, the longest active moratorium in Colorado. Residents cited drought as the driving concern. The measure runs to July 21, 2031.
Logan County Commissioners unanimously approved a 180-day moratorium on solar, wind, data center, and battery energy storage development in October 2025 after Granite Renewables (New York-based, develops co-located data centers) began visiting county officials. The potential project involves up to 2 GW of electricity, a $15B capital investment, 1,000 construction jobs, and 50-100 permanent positions. Commissioners expressed a desire for economic development but wanted to avoid hasty decisions. Water availability from the South Platte River is a key concern.
Longmont is considering a ban on hyperscale data centers (100+ MW) amid energy and water concerns. A decision is expected around June 9. Council gave initial approval 5-1 to the hyperscale ban ordinance (threshold ~70 MW, 5% of Platte River Power Authority nameplate, or 100 MW, whichever is lower). Final decision not expected before June 9. Longmont’s ordinance banning hyperscale data centers (≥100 MW peak demand) passed first reading 5-1 (~May 19-20); a final/second reading is expected as early as June 9. On June 9, 2026 the Longmont City Council passed (6-1; Diane Crist dissenting) the final reading of an ordinance capping data center peak demand at the lower of 5% of Platte River Power Authority nameplate capacity or 100 MW, effectively barring hyperscale facilities.
12-month suspension of large data center applications
Loveland City Council voted 7-2 in mid-September 2026 to suspend processing of land use applications for data centers requiring 10 megawatts or more. The suspension lasts 12 months or until the council adopts new data center regulations, whichever comes first.
Town trustees voted 4-2 on Aug. 31, 2026 to bar data center applications for 12 months while staff studies infrastructure, water use and setbacks and drafts regulations. Trustees Brad Hagan and Jeremiah Crane voted no. The town attorney said the moratorium can end sooner if the review finishes early.
Moffat County commissioners on September 8, 2026 unanimously postponed a decision on a proposed six- or 12-month moratorium on data center applications in unincorporated areas, planning further public meetings before revisiting it on October 13.
Local moratorium on data centers through June 18, 2027
1-year moratorium on data center site development plans and zoning permits. No data center applications received; preemptive action. The measure runs to June 18, 2027.
Thornton City Council voted 5-3 in September 2026 to adopt a one-year moratorium applying to data centers larger than 50,000 square feet while the city develops regulations.
Weld County commissioners approve permit for Global AI data center
The Weld County Board of Commissioners voted unanimously to approve the zoning for a 41-acre data center proposed by Global AI near Windsor. The approval was granted on September 10, 2026.
The town's 2022 one-year moratorium on data centers over 5,000 sq ft was replaced by permanent zoning regulations barring data centers larger than 12,500 sq ft, blocking large-scale projects.
Local moratorium on data centers through May 20, 2028
2-year moratorium covering data centers and battery storage, passed unanimously by the PZC. Driven by farmland and rural character concerns. The measure runs to May 20, 2028.
The Board of Alders unanimously approved a 12-month moratorium on new data centers on September 22, 2026, with an exception for quantum computing or life sciences research facilities tied to the New Haven Quantum and Life Sciences Innovation Cluster.
New Haven Board of Alders (12-month data center moratorium ordinance)
New Haven Board of Alders (12-month data center moratorium ordinance) data center moratorium (proposed)
Alderman Richard Furlow introduced a 12-month moratorium ordinance on new data center development and conversions, scheduled for City Plan Commission review on 2026-07-15. The ordinance would convene a 6-month Department of Economic Development working group to recommend zoning standards for future data center development. The City Plan Commission met on 2026-07-15 as scheduled to review the moratorium ordinance, but no outcome or vote had been confirmed by any source as of 2026-07-16. The ordinance has advanced to the Board of Alders' Legislation Committee, docketed for a public hearing on 2026-08-04 at 6pm. No direct reporting confirms what the City Plan Commission recommended at its 2026-07-15 meeting.
Local moratorium on data centers through September 9, 2028
2-year moratorium on establishment and development of new data centers, approved unanimously by voice vote. Does not cover upgrades to existing facilities, the 80 Merritt Blvd site (former Nasdaq, 50+ years old) is being converted to an AI-ready facility by 365 Data Centers/Aphorio Carter despite the moratorium. 1,460+ residents had petitioned for a broader freeze. The measure runs to September 9, 2028.
City moratorium on data centers through June 8, 2027
City Council unanimously approved a 12-month moratorium on establishment and development of data centers; proposed by Mayor Dorinda Borer; defines data centers as facilities primarily used for storage, processing, and distribution of digital data; exempts incidental server rooms; city to review zoning and licensing rules. The measure runs to June 8, 2027.
A City Council committee voted unanimously on Aug. 13, 2026 to send the full council an ordinance pausing official review of data center proposals for up to 18 months; not yet adopted.
The City Council voted unanimously on Aug. 18, 2026 to reject an ordinance that would have allowed data centers as a conditional use in the manufacturing zone, citing water, sewer, electricity and noise concerns.
County moratorium on data centers with no end date
LC26-06: data centers permitted only in Limited Industrial and General Industrial zones in unincorporated areas; 300-foot residential buffer, 6-foot vegetative buffers, noise limits, written utility capacity documentation required; county attorney reviewing viability of a complete ban. The measure has no end date by design.
County moratorium on data centers with no end date
Council voted 12-0 for zoning regulations: 1,000-foot residential buffer (500 ft with noise study), closed-loop cooling required, energy-efficient backup generators, decommissioning funds; existing projects exempt. The measure has no end date by design.
Alachua City Commission moves to draft 12-month data center moratorium
The Alachua City Commission passed a motion to draft language for a possible 12-month moratorium on data centers, as reported September 14, 2026. An earlier meeting on the topic could not proceed for lack of a quorum. The drafted moratorium must return to the commission for a vote, and no vote date was reported.
County moratorium on data centers until a condition is met
Zoning-in-progress measure preventing new data center applications while county develops regulations. The measure runs until a condition is met rather than to a date.
Local moratorium on data centers through July 29, 2027
1-year moratorium on new data-center rezoning, approved 4-0 (one commissioner recused). Does not apply to rezoning applications already tied to an 800+-acre data-center project proposed earlier in 2026, which can still advance. The measure runs to July 29, 2027 and covers rezoning requests.
Proposed city moratorium on data centers with no end date
Edgewater City Council unanimously approved an ordinance banning AI data centers on September 14, 2026, effective immediately. Mayor Diezel DePew described it as a permanent ban. Separately, Charter Amendment 4 goes to voters on November 3, 2026, and would write the prohibition into the city charter.
Ban on large-scale data centers (50+ MW) in unincorporated areas. Resolution passed 5-0 on Jul 23, ordinance approved 4-1 in Aug. Small server rooms (accessory use) still permitted. The measure has no end date by design.
Local moratorium on data centers through August 3, 2027
1-year, unanimous on second reading. Unincorporated county only, municipalities including Palm Coast are unaffected. Amended to drop the 'large-scale' qualifier, so it covers all data center types. The measure runs to August 3, 2027 and covers all data center uses.
Expected to halt data center proposals until county code is updated to reflect state law (SB 484); outcome not confirmed. The measure has no documented term.
Hernando County (1-year data center moratorium), FL data center moratorium (proposed)
In early June 2026, the Hernando County Commission approved a one-year data center moratorium. No company is named. Still pending final adoption, second reading July 7. Hernando County Commissioners approved on first public hearing an ordinance imposing a 365-day moratorium on processing any petitions/permits for data centers in unincorporated Hernando County (extendable an additional 120 days), with commissioners in full agreement amid resident concerns over power,...
Holmes County (moving toward permanent AI data center ban), FL data center moratorium (proposed)
On June 2, 2026, the Holmes County Commission directed the county attorney to draft a permanent ban on AI data centers, with a public hearing set for June 16.
Rejected pause on large-scale data center applications
The Village Council voted 4-1 on Sept. 1, 2026 against a resolution that would have paused new large-scale data center applications while the village drafted regulations. An attorney for a proposed project threatened litigation if the village paused applications, and council members said they wanted a further legal opinion and stronger language first. The council fired the village manager the same night.
County moratorium on data centers with no end date
Permanent ban on data centers in unincorporated areas; originally a moratorium rescinded June 9, amended to full ban adopted unanimously 5-0. The measure has no end date by design.
Jackson County (1-year AI data center moratorium), FL
Jackson County (1-year AI data center moratorium), FL data center moratorium
On May 26, 2026, Jackson County commissioners passed a one-year moratorium on AI data centers, proactive, with no project yet proposed, to research impacts and draft local rules before any proposal arrives. Residents cited rural character and natural-resource concerns. Two public hearings are required; the first is set for June 9.
Local moratorium on data centers through August 3, 2027
1-year, 4-3; covers any use drawing 50 MW or more, not just data centers. Took effect immediately. The measure runs to August 3, 2027 and applies at a threshold of 50 MW.
Eighteen-month moratorium on large-scale data centers
County commissioners voted unanimously on July 14, 2026 in favor of an 18-month moratorium on large-scale data centers. On Sept. 15, 2026 the commission unanimously advanced the moratorium ordinance, which covers large-load customer facilities including large-scale data centers; the second and final public hearing is scheduled for Oct. 13, 2026. The Tallahassee City Commission declined to adopt a parallel measure.
County moratorium on data centers through September 30, 2027
One-year moratorium on large-scale data centers; effective Oct 1, 2026 through Sep 30, 2027; nearly 100 residents attended. The measure runs to September 30, 2027.
On September 3, 2026, the Manatee County Commission unanimously approved a 12-month moratorium on data centers to study their effects on residents and the environment.
On September 15, 2026, the Marion County Board of County Commissioners voted 4 to 1 for a 12-month moratorium on new large commercial data centers, then voted 5 to 0 to adopt it. Commissioner Kathy Bryant cast the dissenting vote because she wanted smaller facilities included. The moratorium covers facilities with 50 megawatts or more of peak electric demand in unincorporated Marion County. It lasts 12 months or until new regulations are adopted, whichever comes first.
Commissioners voted 4-1 to direct staff to return with a proposal for a one-year moratorium on data centers. A moratorium would require two public hearings before adoption. No formal moratorium ordinance has been enacted yet. The measure has no documented term.
On September 22, 2026, the North Port City Commission voted 3-2 on second reading to adopt an 18-month moratorium on new data center applications; a roughly 900,000-square-foot facility already proposed is excluded.
On September 15, 2026, Orange County commissioners expressed support for a temporary moratorium on large AI data centers and directed staff to study zoning, electrical load, water and noise; the commission could revisit it in early December 2026.
One-year moratorium on new hyperscale data centers
On September 24, 2026, Palm Beach County commissioners unanimously gave final approval to a one-year moratorium on new hyperscale data centers with peak load of at least 50 megawatts in unincorporated areas.
County commissioners unanimously approved a 12-month moratorium in July 2026 halting acceptance, review and approval of major data center applications until at least July 2027.
Rejected proposal to define and prohibit AI data centers
The City Commission rejected a motion 3-2 on Aug. 26, 2026 to define and prohibit AI data centers in the city land development code. Commissioners in the majority relied on staff advice that the use is not currently permitted, so no ordinance was needed. Commissioner Jeremy Matlow, who brought the motion, argued the code does not define data centers at all.
Motion to impose a data-center moratorium failed at the commission's first public discussion on data centers; commissioners instead scheduled a public workshop for Aug 25. The measure has no documented term.
Palmetto Bay Vice Mayor Mark Merwitzer is seeking legislation to prohibit data centers outright rather than impose a temporary pause. No developer has filed an application in the village. The village council is scheduled to take up the proposed ban at its September 28, 2026 zoning meeting.
Proposed county moratorium on data centers with no end date
County Council directed staff to draft a permanent ban on large-scale data centers in unincorporated areas, moving beyond an initial six-month moratorium proposal. The ban ordinance must go through the Planning Commission and two public hearings before formal adoption. New data center applications are not being accepted in the interim. The measure has no end date by design.
County moratorium on data centers with no end date
On September 21, 2026, Wakulla County commissioners unanimously adopted an ordinance adding a data center definition to the land development code and listing data centers as a prohibited use in unincorporated areas.
The Board of County Commissioners approved a one-year moratorium on accepting, processing, reviewing and approving applications for data centers and large-scale data processing facilities in unincorporated Washington County at its Aug. 20, 2026 meeting. The county will study impacts and update its Land Development Code and Comprehensive Plan.
On July 28, 2026, the Albany City Commission unanimously approved a 12-month moratorium on new data center development, with an option to extend six months, and directed the planning commission to draft regulations.
The Americus City Council voted 5-1 to enact a 30-day moratorium on data centers to allow time to draft an ordinance amendment regulating them; the city attorney noted the council can extend it if needed.
Local moratorium on data centers until a condition is met
Moratorium adopted Dec 2025, extended 3 months in Mar 2026 while an ordinance is drafted. Waiting on state-level legislation before finalising local rules. The measure runs until a condition is met rather than to a date.
Zoning ban on data centers along the BeltLine and within a half-mile of MARTA stations, later extended to neighborhood commercial districts with special use permits required elsewhere. A geographic ban, not a citywide one. The measure has no end date by design.
Augusta (Richmond County) is moving toward a data center moratorium pending the development of new zoning rules. QTS has ongoing data center activity in the area, and officials are weighing a pause while standards are drafted. On June 2, 2026, the Augusta Commission approved a 49-day pause on new data center projects to draft zoning rules, but it explicitly exempts the contested QTS campus off Gordon Highway in the Haynes Station area that drove resident opposition. With the moratorium set to expire the same day, the Augusta Commission unanimously voted to extend it 60 days (through mid-September 2026); three public hearings are to be scheduled during the extension period.
County moratorium on data centers through September 19, 2026
49-day moratorium on new data centers; excludes QTS project near Haynes Station. Extended 60 days on Jul 21 with three public hearings required before permanent ordinance. Draft ordinance restricts data centers to heavy industrial zoning, requires special exception and public ... The measure runs to September 19, 2026.
The county's moratorium on data centers remains in force and is scheduled to expire Dec. 31, 2026. On Sept. 1, 2026 the Board of Commissioners voted 4-3 to reject a text amendment that would have prohibited data centers outright in unincorporated Bulloch County, with the chairman breaking the tie, and chose to continue work on regulations instead.
Bulloch County Commissioners (5-0 moratorium extension through Dec 31; 5-0 to draft permanent prohibition), GA
Bulloch County Commissioners (5-0 moratorium extension through Dec 31; 5-0 to draft permanent prohibition), GA data center moratorium
Bulloch County Commissioners voted 5-0 to extend their moratorium through Dec 31, 2026 and 5-0 to direct staff to draft a permanent prohibition on data centers in unincorporated areas. No application pending. An initial draft ban ordinance was posted publicly; the permanent ban requires a public hearing before adoption (~2-month process). No final ban vote yet.
The Board of Commissioners adopted a six-month moratorium on data centers in early May 2026, making Camden the first coastal Georgia county to do so. It followed a rezoning request tied to a proposed industrial park that was withdrawn after environmental objections and a request from the commander of Naval Submarine Base Kings Bay.
100-day data center and BESS moratorium (unincorporated areas)
Commissioners approved a 100-day moratorium on data center and battery storage permits in unincorporated areas at their March 3, 2026 meeting and later extended it another 100 days.
155-day moratorium on data centers of 10 MW or more
The Board of Commissioners approved on Sept. 11, 2026 a 155-day moratorium on data centers of 10 MW or more in unincorporated Chatham County, running to Feb. 16, 2027, which also bars converting warehouses and industrial buildings to data center use. It may be extended by up to 60 days if the county's study is incomplete. Commissioner Dean Kicklighter first sought 12 months and reduced it on the county attorney's recommendation.
The Board of Commissioners voted unanimously on Aug. 20, 2026 to add 180 days to the county's data center moratorium, which began as a 30-day pause in July 2026 and now runs into February 2027. Commissioners said staff need the time to research and draft data center regulations.
LaGrange City Council passed a 180-day moratorium on new data center applications in September 2025 amid community backlash. The moratorium expired in March 2026. On March 27, 2026, the City Council held a public hearing on a proposed data center ordinance. The draft ordinance defines hyperscale data centers as those larger than 30,000 sq ft, permits them only in heavy industrial districts, and requires a 300-foot vegetative buffer. The Troup County Anti-Data Center Coalition says the proposed ordinance lacks adequate protection for citizens and drinking water.
Clayton County Board of Commissioners approved a moratorium on new data center applications through December 31, 2025, citing resident concerns about rapid data center growth. On December 16, 2025, the Board unanimously voted to extend the moratorium until June 29, 2026. The moratorium applies to new applications for permits, licenses, or rezonings for both new data centers and expansion of existing ones in unincorporated Clayton County.
180-day data center moratorium (unincorporated areas)
In February 2026 the county approved a 180-day moratorium on data center zoning and permit applications in unincorporated areas, later extended another 180 days into early 2027.
Data center moratorium extended 180 days on September 1, 2026; concerns about Gulf Trough arsenic contamination in groundwater from high water usage. The measure has no documented term.
180-day moratorium proposed at commission meeting by chair candidate Cambrey Wood; citizens group also presented model ordinance. Would not affect two already-approved data centers. No vote yet. The measure has no documented term.
Expired city moratorium on data centers through July 19, 2026
180-day moratorium enacted unanimously Jan 20 (initiated Jan 5); city will not accept new data center requests. Also initiated process to require special use permits for data centers in all zones. Upstream marks as 'active'. The measure runs to July 19, 2026.
The Board of Commissioners unanimously approved a 180-day moratorium on May 12, 2025, halting acceptance of permit, land use amendment, rezoning, conditional use and variance applications and all public hearings related to data centers while the county drafted an ordinance. It was set to expire Nov. 3, 2025 or earlier if zoning guidelines were adopted first. Projects already filed under the prior ordinance held vested rights and were exempt.
DeKalb County has held a moratorium on new data center development in unincorporated areas since 2025 and has extended it several times: to June 23, 2026 by a vote on Dec. 16, 2025, and then by a further 100 days on June 9, 2026, carrying it through Sept. 30, 2026 while the commission considers permanent regulations. A developer sued the county over the moratorium in August 2026.
Indefinite moratorium on data center development; commissioners want to have a plan ready before any proposals arrive. The measure has no documented term.
The Board of Commissioners extended its existing data center moratorium by another 180 days on Aug. 31, 2026 in a unanimous vote, with no cap on further renewals, while the county works on zoning and development standards.
The county imposed a 90-day moratorium in March 2026, later extended another 90 days; in July 2026 commissioners separately denied a permit for a proposed data center.
The city passed a 90-day data center moratorium in January 2026 and in March 2026 adopted Ordinance 26-O-12 permanently prohibiting new data centers in all zoning districts.
Expired county moratorium on data centers through August 28, 2026
80-day moratorium on data center permits, unanimously approved. Halts issuance of permits for construction or expansion. Draft ordinance for Unified Land Development Code establishing data center standards expected by late August. The measure runs to August 28, 2026.
At a special called meeting on Aug. 31, 2026 the City Council approved a 90-day moratorium so the city can rewrite zoning rules that currently allow data centers by right. Proposed revisions would define data centers, set buffers from residential areas and add accountability provisions, and the city will form a community advisory committee during the pause.
County moratorium on data centers through December 31, 2028
Moratorium on data center activities in unincorporated areas through December 31, 2028; unanimous vote; longest moratorium in Georgia. The measure runs to December 31, 2028.
The mayor and council voted unanimously on June 15, 2026 to impose a six-month moratorium on data centers in the Chatham County municipality while the city reviews impacts and considers zoning amendments. The resolution cited electrical grid demand, water consumption for cooling, noise from industrial HVAC units and backup generators, and limited job creation relative to footprint.
Local moratorium on data centers through January 29, 2027
Moratoriums on data centers and anaerobic digestion facilities extended through Jan 29, 2027 while staff drafts ordinances. The measure runs to January 29, 2027.
Expired local moratorium on data centers through July 12, 2026
Board of Commissioners unanimously approved a 180-day moratorium on 'technological facilities' including data centers and cryptocurrency mining operations, to allow staff time to study current codes and develop regulations. The measure runs to July 12, 2026.
Griffin City Council unanimously passed a 180-day moratorium on data centers and other technological facilities, prompted in part by interest from Hillwood and other developers. The moratorium was enacted so city planning staff can study current codes and ordinances for potential data center regulations. Officials noted the Unified Development Code currently does not specifically allow 'Technological Facilities' within the city, either by right or special use permit. May 2026: Griffin advancing zoning amendments to prohibit hyperscale (500,000+ sq ft) data centers and initially allow only smaller facilities; builds on the 180-day moratorium in place since January 2026.
Commissioners approved a 180-day moratorium in February 2026 pausing data center rezoning and permit applications while the county revises its development code.
180-day moratorium on data centers; unanimous vote; insufficient information on potential impacts on local resources and environment. The measure has no documented term.
Expired city moratorium on data centers through August 9, 2026
90-day suspension of data center Ordinance No. 2026-03 (adopted Mar 9); halts acceptance of data center development applications. City manager recommended approval at May 11 meeting; GPB and The Current confirm moratorium in effect. .gov resolution document available. The measure runs to August 9, 2026.
Lamar County enacted a 6-month moratorium on data center development in September 2025 after AWS purchased 985 acres for $270 million, the largest real estate transaction in county history. The county's planning and zoning director said the moratorium was triggered because industrial/commercial zoning needed updating; the code didn't even include the term 'data center,' and zoning hadn't been updated since 2010. As of April 2026, Georgia statewide legislation has stalled (no bills passed), leaving counties as the front line of regulation. Lamar County is one of four GA counties (Pike, Lamar, Troup, Clayton) using moratoria to develop ordinances.
Lee County (moratorium extension + dedicated data center zoning district), GA
Lee County (moratorium extension + dedicated data center zoning district), GA data center moratorium (proposed)
As reported May 27, 2026, Lee County commissioners are weighing extending their data center moratorium (currently expiring in July) through the end of 2026 and creating a dedicated data-center zoning district to prevent developers from being grandfathered under current rules. No project is pending. An official vote is set for June 9. A commissioner framed it as 'a protection, not an invitation.' Two tracks are confirmed: (a) a June 9 vote to extend the moratorium through the end of 2026, and (b) a new I-3 'Technology and Data Infrastructure District' zoning text amendment with a hearing June 9 and a final vote June 23. The county notes zero current applications or letters of interest. The final vote on the I-3 'Technology and Data Infrastructure District' zoning text amendment (Article XXII) is set for June 23, 2026 per the county's official zoning notice, alongside the moratorium-extension question. Lee County GA commissioners are weighing an extension of the existing data-center moratorium (set to expire July 2026) through the end of 2026 while finalizing a new ordinance that would create a dedicated data-center zoning district. The official extension vote was scheduled for the June 9, 2026 meeting (after...
County moratorium on data centers through October 25, 2026
60-day moratorium on data center permits in unincorporated county, passed while commissioners develop a comprehensive data center ordinance. Residents had requested 6 months. The measure runs to October 25, 2026.
One-year moratorium on construction and permitting of large-scale data centers; unanimous vote; extended 180 days as of September 1, 2026. The measure has no documented term.
The city adopted a six-month moratorium on data centers in July 2026. It is not retroactive: the council approved an 11-acre Powers Ferry Place data center 5-2 on Aug. 11, 2026 because the application predated the pause.
The Meriwether County Board of Commissioners voted on July 28, 2026 to extend the data center moratorium, due to expire Aug. 23, by 90 days to Nov. 21, 2026 while staff drafts an ordinance. Vote date corrected from 7-30 to 7-28.
The county enacted an initial 30-day emergency data center moratorium in February 2026 and later approved a 180-day extension while updating its ordinances.
Moratorium enacted September 2025; Commissioner James Jenkins motioned because county lacks building codes and zoning ordinances for data center facilities. One of four GA counties to pass moratoriums that month (with Lamar, Troup, Clayton). Duration and expiration not documen... The measure has no documented term.
Expired county moratorium on data centers through September 8, 2026
180-day moratorium on data center and battery energy storage applications; extended through September 8, 2026; evaluating cumulative impacts of high-water-use facilities. The measure runs to September 8, 2026.
Rockdale County (data center + battery-energy-storage moratorium extended through Sept 8), GA
Rockdale County (data center + battery-energy-storage moratorium extended through Sept 8), GA data center moratorium
Rockdale County extended its data center and battery-energy-storage moratorium (originally 180 days from March 2026) through Sept 8, 2026 to overhaul its Unified Development Ordinance (noise, water, power rules).
City moratorium on data centers through September 20, 2026
90-day emergency moratorium enacted unanimously Jan 12. Extended 95 days on Mar 23 (to Jun 26), then extended 90 days on Jun 22 (to Sep 20 2026). City staff developing use regulations for data centers. The measure runs to September 20, 2026.
The City Council voted unanimously on Aug. 27, 2026 to pause new development or conversion activity for large-scale data centers inside city limits for 155 days. The ordinance covers facilities with electrical capacity of 10 MW or greater and industrial buildings of 200,000 square feet or more being built or converted for data center use. Staff are to study grid, water, wastewater, stormwater and road impacts along with zoning and noise rules.
Social Circle approved a 90-day moratorium on new data center applications after being overwhelmed with seven applications. Despite the moratorium, the council approved a controversial rezoning for 151 acres, drawing resident opposition. Part of a statewide wave of Georgia moratoriums. Opposition was led by One Circle Community Coalition. The community achieved a partial victory in its effort.
Thomas County, Georgia, Board of Commissioners unanimously approved a 12-month moratorium on AI data center construction in January 2026. Commission Chair Mark NeSmith said the board was 'certainly not anti-data centers' but preferred to be proactive in protecting the community while gathering more information.
Local moratorium on data centers through February 3, 2027
30-day pause adopted Jul 9, extended unanimously to 180 days on Aug 7 with a data center study group (report due Dec 4, 2026). Unincorporated county only. The measure runs to February 3, 2027.
The Windward Planning Commission voted 4-0 on September 3, 2026 to defer action on Bill 170, which would restrict AI data centers in Hawaii County zoning, until October 1. The commissions have until November 4 to send a recommendation to the County Council.
County moratorium on data centers through January 26, 2027
180-day emergency moratorium on accepting or processing new data center permit applications in unincorporated county; does not affect Pocatello city limits; county to draft standalone data center ordinance addressing water, energy and land-use impacts. The measure runs to January 26, 2027 and covers permits.
Kootenai County lifted its 182-day moratorium on data center building permits after adopting permanent regulations that ban data centers from being located over the Spokane Valley-Rathdrum Prairie Aquifer and require developers to apply for conditional use permits with public comment opportunities. The moratorium-to-regulation pipeline is being cited as a model by other communities.
The Sandpoint City Council approved a code amendment prohibiting large standalone data centers over 5,000 square feet at a Wednesday meeting reported September 18, 2026. The action followed council direction to staff on July 15 after data centers were found to be permitted in one of the city's three industrial zones.
Expired local moratorium on data centers through March 24, 2026
180-day moratorium, 10-1. Expired Mar 24, 2026 and replaced by permanent regulations: noise limits (56/46 dB day/evening), water standards, energy efficiency, annual reporting. 10 existing DCs. The measure runs to March 24, 2026.
Mayor Brandon Johnson signed Executive Order 2026-5 on Aug 11, 2026, directing city departments to strengthen data center oversight and calling on City Council to enact a temporary moratorium. Executive order imposes enhanced air pollution, noise, and planned development review requirements immediately. City Council must approve the moratorium for it to take effect. 90-day rulemaking clock set for Dept of Environment. The measure has no documented term.
Galesburg City Council voted 7-0 to adopt a 180-day moratorium on accepting, processing or approving data center permits, through April 3, 2027, after a 6-1 vote to move it to final reading.
Ordinance amending Chapter 151: Unified Development Ordinance of the Lake County, Illinois, Code of Ordinances relating to defining and imposing a temporary
Lake County ordinance 26-1018 on data center moratorium: Ordinance amending Chapter 151: Unified Development Ordinance of the Lake County, Illinois, Code of Ordinances relating to defining and imposing a temporary moratorium on data centers Status Passed as of 2026-09-08.
The Lawrence County Board approved an ordinance for a two-year moratorium on data centers at its Thursday, September 17, 2026 meeting. The county will not accept applications for data centers of at least 10,000 square feet while the moratorium is in effect. The county said the pause will allow it to learn more about data center impacts.
County moratorium on data centers through May 19, 2027
12-month moratorium (6-4 vote) on large-scale data centers; declared procedurally invalid by state's attorney June 18 for skipping ZBA advisory vote; county redrafting as of Aug 2026. Related to proposed $5B Hut 8 Logan Prairie Data Center. The measure runs to May 19, 2027.
The City Council passed a moratorium on Sept. 3, 2026 covering new data center developments larger than 21,780 square feet, roughly half an acre, inside Mattoon and within the 1.5 mile area where the city holds zoning authority. Existing operations may continue. The moratorium renews annually unless the council acts to change or end it.
Local moratorium on data centers through August 25, 2027
Original 180-day moratorium established Mar 3, 2026. Unanimously extended Aug 19, 2026 through Aug 25, 2027 due to state inaction on the POWER Act. City drafting its own ordinance but waiting for state guidelines. The measure runs to August 25, 2027.
Communication from the City Manager and Director of Community Development with a Request to Concur with the Planning & Zoning Commission and Staff to ADOPT
Peoria Ordinance 22-294 on data center zoning: Communication from the City Manager and Director of Community Development with a Request to Concur with the Planning & Zoning Commission and Staff to ADOPT an ORDINANCE Amending Appendix A Status Adopted as of 2022-09-13.
On April 21, 2026, Plainfield Village Board unanimously approved a 180-day moratorium on data center and warehouse-for-computing-infrastructure proposals. The moratorium pauses applications while the village monitors pending Illinois General Assembly legislation (POWER Act, SB4016/HB5513) and develops comprehensive land use regulations. Mayor John Argoudelis said extensions are 'highly likely' and warned 'we are not interested in going down that route.' Action follows data center pushback in nearby Joliet and Yorkville.
Local moratorium on data centers through February 3, 2027
6-month pause passed 14-0. Does not cover the Edson Road parcel Monarch Energy is pursuing, an existing annexation agreement already permits data centers there. The measure runs to February 3, 2027.
Board amended zoning code to prohibit unlisted uses and directed zoning department not to accept DC petitions while ordinance is developed (de facto moratorium). Formal moratorium discussed but opinions varied. Committee recommended removing agricultural land from DC sites. Ordinance still in development as of Aug 2026. The measure has no documented term.
Tazewell County Board approved a resolution directing the zoning department to stop accepting data center petitions while drafting a new ordinance. Zoning code amended so unlisted land uses are prohibited rather than permitted by default.
The Troy, Illinois, Planning Commission approved a six-month moratorium on data processing centers in March 2026, following the collapse of Cloverleaf Infrastructure's proposal for a 1.4-million-square-foot hyperscale data center sited less than a mile from neighborhoods, daycares, and senior living facilities. Hundreds of residents packed a meeting at Triad High School in February to challenge the project. The moratorium prevents new data center applications while the planning commission strengthens zoning ordinances. Troy Planning Commission approved a six-month moratorium on data processing centers on March 13, after Cloverleaf Infrastructure's 500MW proposal collapsed following massive public opposition. Hundreds of residents packed Triad High School in February. City Council final passage expected March 16.
Chicago proposes 12-month moratorium on data center construction
Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson proposed a 12-month moratorium on data center construction to allow time for developing policies addressing local impacts. The proposal was announced on September 25, 2026.
Local moratorium on data centers through February 18, 2027
6-month moratorium on data center applications, extendable once by another 6 months, while the county holds public hearings and drafts an ordinance. Unanimously approved at Aug 18 board meeting. The measure runs to February 18, 2027.
One-year data center moratorium (Ordinance 2026-08)
Boone County commissioners voted unanimously on June 15, 2026 for a one-year moratorium (through June 15, 2027) pausing new data center applications; it does not affect Meta's campus in the LEAP district.
Boone County Area Plan Commission (moratorium recommendation), IN
Boone County Area Plan Commission (moratorium recommendation), IN data center moratorium
Boone County Area Plan Commission unanimously forwarded a favorable recommendation to the County Commissioners for a one-year moratorium on data centers in unincorporated areas. Meta's $10B Lebanon campus is incorporated and would not be affected. As of May 21, 2026: County Commissioners' vote postponed to at least June; a public hearing is being scheduled. The one-year moratorium would pause unincorporated-area projects while the county finishes its comprehensive plan. On June 15, 2026 the Boone County Commissioners voted unanimously to enact a one-year moratorium (June 16, 2026-June 15, 2027) pausing new data center applications in unincorporated Boone County and the town of Advance, while the county drafts zoning rules. It does not affect Meta's ~$10B Lebanon LEAP campus (annexed before construction). On Monday June 15, 2026 the Boone County (Indiana) Commissioners unanimously adopted a one-year moratorium on new data center development in the county's unincorporated areas (and the town of Advance), effective June 16, 2026 through June 15, 2027. This finalizes the favorable recommendation the Boone County Area Plan Commission had forwarded. The...
Board of Commissioners adopted Ordinance Comm-Ord-2026-08 on Apr 21, 2026, on the Plan Commission's favorable recommendation from an Apr 7 hearing. The ordinance amends the zoning ordinance's district-use table to mark "Data Processing" a prohibited use in every district, Agricultural, Residential, Business, Industrial and Commercial General, a permanent ban, not a time-limited pause. All three commissioners (Ruth Baker, president; Mike Deitrich; Roger Spencer) signed it, 3-0. No named company or project triggered it. "Cass County" + "data center" news searches are dominated by an unrelated fight in Cass County, Michigan, do not conflate the two. The measure has no end date by design.
One-year moratorium to study and review potential zoning amendments. Planning director working with five jurisdictions developing DC regulations. Commissioner noted expectation of state-level legislation. The measure has no documented term.
DeKalb County (Auburn) data center moratorium (proposed)
The DeKalb County, Indiana Plan Commission recommended a 6-month data center moratorium on April 14, 2026, sending the measure to the County Commissioners for final action. The recommendation is aimed at giving the county time to draft zoning standards ahead of any speculative data center proposals near Auburn.
Local moratorium on data centers through February 25, 2027
Up to 1-year moratorium on processing rezoning applications for commercial solar, battery storage (BESS), and data centers, adopted Feb 25 and effective Feb 26, 2026. Prompted by 1,700+ petition signatures against Linea Energy's roughly 1,200-acre solar proposal for Manchester Township; no data center application had been filed. The county is drafting a solar ordinance first and has paused data-center/BESS ordinance work until that's done; a 7-member citizen advisory committee (26 applicants for 6 seats) formed in May 2026 to advise on the solar rules. The measure runs to February 25, 2027 and covers rezoning requests.
Moratorium on data centers and battery storage facilities
The City Council voted unanimously at a special hearing on Aug. 27, 2026 to pause new applications for data centers and battery energy storage facilities through Dec. 31, 2027 while the city studies electrical capacity, water use, public safety, traffic, noise and environmental impacts. The pause applies inside the city only, not to Elkhart County. Dozens of residents spoke in favor and some asked for a permanent ban.
Local moratorium on data centers through May 18, 2027
Commissioners approved the ordinance May 5, 2026, effective May 18, contingent on the City of Connersville adopting the same measure (the county and city share an Area Plan Commission) at its own May 18 meeting. Economic-development CEO Brad Colter told commissioners there was no data-center deal, NDA or discussion in place for the county, and backed the pause so the APC could commission an impact study and draft zoning standards; Commissioner Dale Strong said it "will give the Planning Commission time to develop appropriate zoning regulations." Preemptive, no local data-center policy existed before this. The measure runs to May 18, 2027.
Fort Wayne City Council delayed a decision on a proposed one-year data center moratorium and related task force ordinances for three weeks to consider amendments; the item returns in mid-October 2026.
Franklin County, Indiana, Commissioners voted unanimously to extend the data center moratorium through February 2027, preventing new applications while the county gathers information and develops regulations for large-scale data center operations like ABEI Energy's proposed $1.75 billion, 860MW facility on 300 acres ($1.8B). The extended timeline provides additional study time beyond the original one-year term.
Local moratorium on data centers through March 2, 2027
The Area Plan Commission recommended the moratorium 6-1 on Feb 10, 2026 at a standing-room-only hearing; the Board of Commissioners adopted a 1-year pause 2-1 on Mar 2. Commissioner Dave Sommers cast the dissenting vote ("I've got to represent 20,000 people, not just 2,000"); Bryan Lewis and Rick Ranstead voted yes. Triggered by Decennial Group's proposed ~500 MW / 300-acre campus near Akron, presented to 40+ residents at a contentious Feb 4 open house before any site or tenant was named. A data-center review committee formed during the pause to study impacts and draft zoning; no source confirms its final recommendations or a follow-on vote. The measure runs to March 2, 2027 and applies at a threshold of 500 MW.
Local moratorium on data centers through March 16, 2028
Ordinance 4-2026: 24-month moratorium on improvement-location permits for data centers in unincorporated Grant County, unanimous (3-0), or until the Area Plan Commission's data center zoning amendments are adopted, whichever comes first. Does not bind Marion, Gas City or other incorporated towns. An APC subcommittee finished its first review of a draft ordinance in Aug 2026. The measure runs to March 16, 2028.
Local moratorium on data centers through August 18, 2027
1-year permit moratorium in unincorporated Howard County, adopted unanimously (3-0) after the Plan Commission's nearly unanimous favorable recommendation. County Attorney Alan Wilson introduced it, saying the zoning ordinance doesn't cover data centers and stating plainly at adoption: "No one is coming. There are no applications pending." Commissioner Brad Bray volunteered to chair a study committee after public pressure; the pause may lift early once rules are drafted or be extended if needed. Separate from the City of Kokomo's own track, where the Common Council rejected a moratorium and is instead advancing a zoning ordinance for a 700-acre annexed industrial park (final vote expected Sep 14, 2026). The measure runs to August 18, 2027.
The Metropolitan Development Commission gave final approval 6-0 on Aug. 19, 2026 to zoning proposal 2026-AO-001, following the City-County Council's 23-1 vote. The pause took effect immediately and runs no later than Dec. 31, 2027. Three already-approved projects (DC Blox, Metrobloks, Sabey) are unaffected.
Indianapolis Metropolitan Development Commission (data center development standards recommendation)
Indianapolis Metropolitan Development Commission (data center development standards recommendation) data center moratorium (proposed)
Indianapolis Metropolitan Development Commission voted 5-3 to loosen the draft data center ordinance's noise limit from 55 decibels (the standard set in the June 26 revised draft, following community feedback) back up to 65 decibels, while keeping mandatory water/electrical-capacity/noise-mitigation plans and utility written confirmation of capacity -- advancing the process begun with an April 21 pause resolution and April 23 draft regulations. Full City-County Council vote expected August 2026. On 2026-07-13 the City-County Council's Metropolitan and Economic Development Committee voted 10-3 to recommend a moratorium (proposed by Council President Maggie Lewis) pausing new data center approvals until 2027-12-31, alongside the new zoning class. NOT yet final -- the full Council vote is scheduled for 2026-08-10. Mayor Hogsett supports the moratorium.
The Jeffersonville City Council voted 8-0 on Aug. 4, 2026 for a one-year data center moratorium; it does not apply to the River Ridge Commerce Center or the Meta facility under construction there.
Madison County Plan Commission (moratorium requested by Citizens Action Coalition + 27 orgs), IN
Madison County Plan Commission (moratorium requested by Citizens Action Coalition + 27 orgs), IN data center moratorium
Citizens Action Coalition and 27 public-interest organizations pushed Madison County to adopt a data center moratorium at the May 12 Plan Commission meeting, part of a statewide local-moratorium campaign. Outcome not confirmed. On June 17, 2026 the Madison County (IN) Commissioners approved a six-month data center moratorium, the ninth Indiana county to do so. The Plan Commission will consider a further six-month extension in July, and a subcommittee will draft energy-development ordinances with public hearings targeted for October. On June 17 the Madison County (IN) Commissioners voted unanimously for a 6-month data center moratorium (potential extension to one year), effective immediately, after the Planning Commission recommended it the prior week (one dissent). No official data center proposals have been received;... The Madison County Planning Commission recommended extending the existing data center moratorium from six months to a full year; the County Commissioners are scheduled to vote on the extension 2026-08-04.
Permanent ban, the Board of Commissioners replaced an earlier temporary moratorium (adopted around Jan 2025, reportedly the first in the state) with a prohibition on "Data Processing" uses in the county zoning ordinance. Commissioner Jesse Bohannon said no company had actually proposed a project in Marshall County, the ban followed concern after Amazon and Microsoft campuses were built in neighboring St. Joseph and La Porte counties. Same day, commissioners also adopted a battery-storage setback ordinance and advanced a solar-farm acreage cap. No exact ordinance number could be confirmed from a public source; do not publish one without verifying it. The measure has no end date by design.
Local moratorium on data centers through May 31, 2027
1-year moratorium (Jun 1, 2026 to May 31, 2027) adopted at the Town Council's May 26, 2026 meeting, citing four developers who had already approached the town. Council President Rick Bella said the town is watching the AWS/"Hobart Devco" campus under construction in neighboring Hobart before writing its own rules. A widely syndicated report of a further 6-month extension (~Jul 2026) could not be traced to a verifiable source. The measure runs to May 31, 2027.
Moratorium on accepting, processing and approving all data center applications and permits, adopted May 4, 2026 on the Plan Commission's Apr 8 favorable recommendation. No named company drove it, an earlier, unnamed proposal "fell through" per the county's own account, and residents' stated concern was mainly proximity to Boone County's Meta campus. A permanent zoning ordinance (draft standards: 2.5-mile setback from residences, 5,000-ft general setback, per Plan Administrator Corey Roser) was set for final consideration Jul 20, 2026, but no source confirms whether commissioners adopted, revised or tabled it, the ordinance's terms and the moratorium's current status are unconfirmed pending that. The measure has no documented term and covers all data center uses.
Michigan City data center moratorium delay draws frustration during council meeting
Michigan City Common Council voted 8-1 to indefinitely table its proposed temporary moratorium on new data center developments; the council attorney said members would instead draft a resolution directing the planning department.
Local moratorium on data centers through July 16, 2027
Up to 1-year moratorium on data center campuses over 100,000 sq ft, citywide and in the 2-mile fringe planning jurisdiction. Proposed by Mayor Jeff Gahan on Jun 9, 2026, advanced by the Plan Commission Jun 23, and adopted unanimously by the Common Council Jul 16. Study covers infrastructure, utility costs, environmental effects and neighborhood character, feeding into the city's Comprehensive Plan. No company had applied in New Albany at adoption, proactive, driven by regional pressure from the Louisville-area boom (Meta's ~700,000 sq ft facility at River Ridge in neighboring Jeffersonville, and a proposed Shadow Lake Business Park project in Charlestown). The measure runs to July 16, 2027 and applies at a threshold of 100,000 sq ft.
The New Albany City Council unanimously approved a one-year moratorium in July 2026 blocking new data centers larger than 100,000 sq ft while it studies zoning updates.
Owen County commissioners unanimously approved a one-year moratorium on new data center development and rezoning for data center use while the plan commission drafts permanent regulations.
Local moratorium on data centers through February 2, 2027
12-month moratorium, unanimous, after the Advisory Plan Commission recommended it 5-0 on Jan 26, 2026. Preemptive, no proposal had been submitted as of the vote. Commissioner Jennifer Knebel cited the strain of the ongoing Mammoth Solar project as a reason for the pause; Commissioner Don Street said he'd hear a proposal if one came and wants the eventual ordinance to cover setbacks, power and water. A search-engine claim of a Jul 2026 extension vote could not be traced to any real article or county record and is not included here, treat the moratorium as running through approximately Feb 2, 2027 absent primary-sourced confirmation otherwise. The measure runs to February 2, 2027.
Local moratorium on data centers through November 17, 2026
1-year moratorium on data centers, solar, wind, and SMRs in unincorporated areas, adopted 2-1 (Beck and Helmer for; Woodall opposed, his stated reasoning wasn't individually reported). ~100 residents packed the meeting after EnergyRe's revised application for a 150 MW solar farm near Cloverdale (cut from 200 MW / ~2,000 acres, with 500-ft setbacks added). Commissioner Beck framed the pause as a chance to rewrite the county's Unified Development Ordinance. Primarily a solar fight, no distinct data-center proposal has surfaced for Putnam County, with data centers, wind and SMRs bundled in preemptively. EnergyRe subsequently withdrew the solar filing. The measure runs to November 17, 2026 and applies at a threshold of 150 MW.
12-month hyperscale data center moratorium (Ordinance 2025-37)
Starke County Commissioners unanimously approved a 12-month moratorium (Ordinance 2025-37) on permits and site plans for hyperscale data center projects in unincorporated areas after a Dec. 4, 2025 hearing.
Commissioners dismissed a proposed data center ordinance in Aug 2026. Board said county remains open for business but wants time to establish reasonable parameters. One-year moratorium mentioned as possibility but not enacted. 508-MW battery project planned in county. The measure has no documented term.
Local moratorium on data centers through February 7, 2027
180-day moratorium, unanimous vote by the three-member Board of Commissioners on Aug 11, 2026 at the Friedman Park Event Center after expected turnout outgrew the usual meeting room. Originated as a recommendation from the Area Plan Commission's Jul 13 hearing, where the APC tabled its own draft ordinance (which would have barred data centers over 40,000 sq ft) for further study and instead recommended a temporary halt. No permit application had been filed for Project Zora as of the vote, and commissioners had declined to sign an NDA with the developer. The measure runs to February 7, 2027 and applies at a threshold of 40,000 sq ft.
Washington City Council, IN data center moratorium
Washington City Council voted unanimously to cease all dealings with Outrigger Industrial after the developer failed to answer questions about a proposed 1,000,000-gallon/day water-demand facility. Council also directed the city attorney to investigate establishing a temporary moratorium.
Local moratorium on data centers through October 20, 2026
12-month moratorium on new data center development in unincorporated White County, adopted 2-1 (Davis and Pass for; Smolek dissenting, saying a development agreement wasn't imminent and the county still owed follow-up on an earlier wind/solar pause). Prompted by Blue Ladder Development's proposed data center at Mid-America Commerce Park in Wolcott (roughly 184-300 acres, up to four data halls), which had seen repeated rezoning delays; residents cited water, land-use and transparency concerns. A same-named "White County" moratorium with different commissioner names found in search is almost certainly a different state's White County, not this one. The measure runs to October 20, 2026, applies at a threshold of 300 acres and covers rezoning requests.
One-year moratorium on data centers, solar, wind and battery storage
Zionsville Town Council approved a one-year moratorium on data centers, solar farms, wind farms and battery energy storage systems, directing the plan commission to review land use rules.
Clayton County Board of Supervisors approved a temporary moratorium on rezoning requests and conditional use permits for digital asset mining/data centers in February 2025. The moratorium was originally set to expire December 31, 2025, but supervisors extended it to December 31, 2026 to allow more time for research and policy development. County officials and the Planning and Zoning Board are studying potential concerns including noise, visual impact, water use, and effects on surrounding properties.
Proposed moratorium rejected 5-2 as QTS considers an AI data center campus north of US-30/west of Mill Creek Parkway; council members argued a pause could send the wrong message to developers. The measure has no documented term.
Council Bluffs (data center moratorium denied), IA
Council Bluffs (data center moratorium denied), IA data center moratorium (failed)
On June 15, 2026 the Council Bluffs (IA) City Council voted unanimously to DENY a proposed one-year data center moratorium, opting for a wastewater-management plan instead as the city nears wastewater capacity. Council Bluffs hosts Google's oldest/largest U.S. data center campus (~$7B+, with a May 2026 additional $7B Iowa expansion); the moratorium was prompted by wastewater-capacity concerns, not a specific new project. On June 15, 2026, the Council Bluffs City Council voted unanimously, following a public hearing, to deny Mayor Jill Shudak's proposed moratorium (up to a one-year pause) on new data center projects, which she sought to study infrastructure capacity, ordinances, and siting/build standards. Council members cited economic concerns and argued...
The Board of Supervisors approved a 12-month moratorium on data centers on May 26, 2026 in a 2-1 vote following large public opposition over water, land and noise concerns.
The Board of Supervisors voted unanimously on Aug. 25, 2026 to adopt a one-year moratorium on data centers in the northwest Iowa county, citing health concerns, water use and energy demand. No developer had inquired; the board called the measure precautionary and will use the year to finish solar siting rules and then draft a data center ordinance.
The Hancock County Board of Supervisors tabled a proposed data center moratorium, with only one supervisor supporting it; the board said it would focus on a comprehensive ordinance instead.
Henry County imposed a moratorium, effective through December 31, halting data centers, large battery arrays, and data-mining sites while it drafts policy. The pause gives the county time to develop standards.
Local moratorium on data centers until a condition is met
Indefinite moratorium, unanimous. Supervisors want more information before allowing development. The measure runs until a condition is met rather than to a date.
12-month data center moratorium (Resolution 2026-07-31)
The Iowa County Board of Supervisors adopted Resolution 2026-07-31, a 12-month moratorium on accepting, processing or approving applications for all classes of data centers in unincorporated Iowa County.
Local moratorium on data centers through August 11, 2027
12-month moratorium adopted unanimously alongside a new data center ordinance; second and third readings waived so it took effect at once. County attorney recommended 1 year over the 24 months residents asked for, as more likely to survive a legal challenge. The measure runs to August 11, 2027.
Johnson County imposed a one-year moratorium on rezoning, site plans and building permits for data centers in unincorporated areas (expiring Nov. 8, 2026) and has since discussed extending it or adopting a ban.
18-month rezoning moratorium (EU-3 data center district)
The Board of Supervisors voted 2-1 on July 1, 2026 for an 18-month moratorium on new applications to rezone unincorporated land to the county's EU-3 large-scale data center district.
Linn County Board of Supervisors (18-month pause on EU-3 large-scale data center rezoning applications)
Linn County Board of Supervisors (18-month pause on EU-3 large-scale data center rezoning applications) data center moratorium
Linn County Board of Supervisors voted 2-1 (Sami Scheetz opposed) for an 18-month pause on new rezoning applications to the county's EU-3 large-scale data center district, distinct from the county's existing data center ordinance passed in March 2026. Layered atop the ongoing Google/Palo annexation dispute in the same county. On 2026-07-21 the Linn County Planning & Zoning Commission discussed creating an exception in EU-2 zoning that would allow data centers as accessories to nuclear power plants -- a carve-out that would functionally apply almost exclusively to Google's project, since Duane Arnold is Iowa's only nuclear plant. Draft language is not expected to reach the P&Z Commission before Aug 17, 2026. The same day, Palo City Council passed its own data center zoning ordinance.
The Madison County board unanimously approved a one-year moratorium on data processing facilities (including crypto mining and data centers) on June 13, 2026; single syndicated local source.
The Marshall County Board of Supervisors unanimously adopted a resolution imposing a six-month moratorium on applications for data centers, AI computing, data mining and cryptocurrency mining facilities in unincorporated areas.
Local moratorium on data centers through November 23, 2026
Ordinance 15123 signed Aug 24; 5-2 vote. Moratorium runs through Nov 23, 2026, extendable up to 60 additional days. Council previously voted down a 6-month moratorium in Jun. The measure runs to November 23, 2026.
County moratorium on data centers through December 31, 2026
Resolution #1336-25; moratorium on data centers until Dec 31, 2026. Voted 4-1 (Frein, Marzen, Hartogh, Wherry yes; Hendrickson nay). The measure runs to December 31, 2026.
The Page County Board of Supervisors approved a moratorium on data centers by a 2-1 vote on Tuesday, July 21, 2026, to allow time to review county zoning. Date corrected from 7-22 (KMA article dated July 21 reports the Tuesday vote).
The City Council voted 3-2 on Aug. 20, 2026 against a one-year moratorium, clearing the way for MidAmerican Energy and Google to continue exploring a project on roughly 900 acres the city annexed in April 2026. Council member Denise Burkhart, who had supported a pause the previous month, changed her vote after Google was identified as the prospective customer. The meeting had been delayed more than a week after death threats were posted on social media.
Sioux County supervisors placed a one-year moratorium on new data centers and battery energy storage systems in unincorporated areas effective June 16, 2026.
12-month data center moratorium (Resolution 14064)
Supervisors voted 5-0 on June 23, 2026 (Resolution 14064) for a 12-month moratorium barring acceptance or approval of development applications for all classes of data centers in unincorporated Woodbury County.
Americus / Lyon County (Flint Hills Digital Campus), KS
Americus / Lyon County (Flint Hills Digital Campus), KS data center moratorium
Americus City Council held a listening session on the proposed Flint Hills Digital Campus (developer Kanza Park Place; publicly described as a potential gigawatt-scale, roughly 1,000-acre data center campus west of Emporia) but took no formal action, explicitly declining to file any motion in order to prioritize public comment. Emporia Neighbors United founder Jay Vehige urged the city to take time and do thorough research; the group reported collecting nearly 1,850 signatures in the prior week opposing high-impact data centers and battery storage, up from roughly 1,400 signatures submitted July 8 that the Lyon County Clerk rejected as non-compliant with Kansas petition-witnessing requirements. The project remains at the announced/proposed stage with no permits issued. Lyon County Commissioners approved a 10-day 'stopgap' freeze on new data-center and solar-farm permit applications (through Aug 1, 2026) and directed County Legal Counsel to draft a six-month moratorium for a vote at the commission's next regular meeting on 2026-07-24. Kansas Reflector investigative reporting found that Gary Pinkston, the public face of the Flint Hills Digital Campus, swore under oath in a federal bankruptcy proceeding that he has 'no interest at all' in the project and denied any relationship with Kanza Park Place LLC (the registered developer entity), which he said is owned by his daughters.
Bourbon County Commission approved a 365-day development moratorium (Resolution 24-26) by a 3-0 vote, with Commissioners Joe Allen and Gregg Motley abstaining, covering utility-scale power generation, crypto mining, data centers, and waste disposal; the county also selected Confluence as its planning/zoning consultant.
City of Lawrence (Douglas County) data center moratorium
The Lawrence City Commission unanimously approved a 2-year moratorium on large-scale data centers, extended from an originally proposed 1-year moratorium, and initiated a text amendment to close a by-right zoning loophole. This is a City of Lawrence action, distinct from the Douglas County Commission's separate text-amendment/de-facto pause (see douglas-county-ks-text-amendment-2026-05-06).
Edgerton (DAMAC data center denied; 6-month moratorium also denied), KS
Edgerton (DAMAC data center denied; 6-month moratorium also denied), KS data center moratorium (proposed)
Two-part Edgerton (KS) action: on June 11, 2026 the Planning Commission DENIED (3-2) Dubai-based DAMAC Digital's ~$860M data center (a conversion of a ~400,000-sq-ft warehouse at Logistics Park Kansas City) for failing site-engineering standards (above-ground generator fuel storage), though DAMAC may resubmit; then on June 13 the City Council voted 3-2 to DENY a proposed six-month data center moratorium. A mixed outcome, the specific project was blocked but the broader pause failed.
City moratorium on data centers through November 30, 2026
Moratorium on high-impact data centers (>10 MW or >100k gal/day water) and Tier 2/3 battery storage; enacted while city deals with citizen petition (700+ signatures) seeking permanent ban. The measure runs to November 30, 2026 and applies at a threshold of 10 MW.
Citizen initiative to ban high-impact data centers, ordered onto the Nov 2026 ballot by the Lyon County District Court after the city commission asked the court to review it. The petition followed zoning changes the commission approved earlier in 2026 that would allow data centers in the city. NOT settled: the declaratory judgment action on whether the measure is a proper subject for citizen initiative under Kansas law is still pending, and a yes vote may not take effect until it is decided. A parallel petition on battery energy storage is also before the court. Distinct from the Lyon County resolution, which covers unincorporated land only. The measure has no documented term.
Moratorium on data center special use permits through 2028
The Franklin County Board of County Commissioners unanimously adopted a resolution on September 2, 2026 imposing a temporary moratorium on the planning, establishment, construction and special use permit applications for data centers in unincorporated Franklin County. The moratorium runs through December 31, 2028 unless repealed earlier or extended.
Gardner (data center moratorium failed for lack of a second), KS
Gardner (data center moratorium failed for lack of a second), KS data center moratorium (failed)
On June 1, 2026 a proposed six-month data center moratorium FAILED at the Gardner (KS) City Council, Councilmember Kelly Johnson's motion died for lack of a second; Vice President Kacy Deaton argued the city retains flexibility to 'require more' from developers. Residents had pushed for an 18-month pause and zoning definitions. (Distinct from the prior Gardner Beale-project withdrawal entry.) Neighboring Edgerton set its own moratorium consideration for June 11.
Harvey County Commission unanimously approved a moratorium on data center construction in unincorporated areas through the end of 2028 (roughly three years). Commissioner Don Schroeder explained the moratorium gives the planning department and zoning board time to research and design regulations, as the county currently has no zoning rules for data centers, crypto mining, or related facilities. Concerns centered on water use from the Equus Beds Aquifer. Nearby Andale and Colwich residents pushed back against proposed projects, citing the importance of preserving their farming and ranching community character.
City moratorium on data centers through July 14, 2028
24-month moratorium unanimously approved on large-scale data center development; originally proposed as 1-year, extended to 2; also initiated text amendment to land development code. The measure runs to July 14, 2028.
Expired county moratorium on data centers through August 11, 2026
90-day moratorium passed 4-1 re: Project Bluestem (1,000-acre hyperscale DC near Tonganoxie). Extension failed 3-2 on Aug 5. Moratorium expired ~Aug 11. Board voted 4-1 on Aug 13 to revisit a hold before new commission in January but did not formally re-enact. Community group retained attorney for legal fight. The measure runs to August 11, 2026.
Local moratorium on data centers through January 22, 2027
Resolution 12-26: 6-month pause on new data center and battery energy storage projects, unanimous, running through Jan 22, 2027, to let the county strengthen zoning rules. A companion Resolution 13-26 pauses utility-scale solar through Dec 1, 2026. Unincorporated areas only, it does not reach Emporia's Flint Hills Digital Campus. Outlets split on the vote date between Thu Jul 23 and Fri Jul 24; Jul 23 is the Thursday. The measure runs to January 22, 2027.
The Marysville City Council unanimously adopted a 12-month temporary moratorium on data centers on Monday, September 14, 2026. No application to develop or establish a data center will be accepted, processed or approved while the Planning Commission studies amendments to the zoning ordinance. The moratorium runs to September 2027.
County moratorium on data centers with no end date
Resolution 2026-21; permanent ban on data centers and utility-scale battery storage in unincorporated areas. Voted 3-0. Replaced earlier moratorium from summer 2025. The measure has no end date by design.
County moratorium on data centers for a stated term
Three-year moratorium restricting data centers, battery storage, and similar technologies in unincorporated areas; excludes Osawatomie's in-city Project Catalyst site. The measure has a stated duration whose end date is not recorded.
Public hearing Aug 20 at St. Bernard Catholic Church in Wamego; 125-150 attendees; 33 speakers mostly called for moratorium. County was developing data center overlay district regulations. No moratorium enacted, county chose regulatory path instead. A petition also circulated calling for pause. The measure has no documented term.
Riley County commissioners signed a resolution May 18, 2026 pausing data centers and battery storage through Nov. 12, 2026 while officials study impacts.
Three-year moratorium on data centers and energy facilities
Saline County Commission voted 4-0 on March 17, 2026 to adopt a moratorium on new data center, nuclear and hydrogen-energy applications in unincorporated areas until March 1, 2029.
Local moratorium on data centers through February 17, 2027
2-1: no final action on data center land use applications until Feb 17, 2027. Applications may still be filed, Compass Datacenters can resubmit, they just cannot be decided. The measure runs to February 17, 2027.
City moratorium on data centers through May 26, 2027
One-year moratorium on large-scale data centers and battery energy storage systems; revised after original draft would have halted even small-scale container-sized data centers. The measure runs to May 26, 2027.
Local moratorium on data centers through June 10, 2028
2-year moratorium (Ord. 26-03). Proactive, Judge-Executive observed 'headaches' in nearby Simpson County with hyperscale proposal. The measure runs to June 10, 2028.
NEW item (no existing Bowling Green KY entry found). On June 16 the Bowling Green City Commission adopted data center zoning regulations (energy/water limits, noise controls, 1,500-ft residential buffer, decommissioning requirements) but REJECTED a moratorium for the second time in a 3-2 vote; the crowd erupted into chants of 'vote them out.' No projects currently proposed. Mixed outcome, residents got standards but not the pause they sought.
Boyd County (TeraWulf "Muskie" data campus opposition), KY
Boyd County (TeraWulf "Muskie" data campus opposition), KY data center moratorium
At a June 2, 2026 town hall, Boyd County neighbors raised concerns about TeraWulf's proposed ~300-acre 'Muskie Data Campus' at the East Park Industrial Center (closed-loop water; phase one ~2028). The company is hosting its own town hall June 17. Boyd County approved a six-month moratorium on new data centers at a special meeting around July 9, 2026; TeraWulf's 'Muskie'/EastPark project is explicitly exempted from the moratorium.
The Boyle County Fiscal Court adopted a one-year moratorium on June 9, 2026 halting acceptance and approval of data center applications in unincorporated areas.
Burgin City Council (annexation for hyperscale data center) data center moratorium (proposed)
Burgin City Council voted 3-2 to give first reading to an ordinance annexing farmland from Mercer County -- roughly doubling the town's size (pop. ~1,000) -- to enable a hyperscale data center project; a moratorium amendment failed. Second reading is set for July 20, 2026, with a Mercer County Planning & Zoning Commission hearing set for July 23, 2026. Shaker Village CEO Billy Rankin publicly opposed the annexation, citing incompatibility with the area's tourism and heritage economy. The move comes despite Mercer County's own existing data-center moratorium (passed March 2026), which the annexation could effectively route around. Three new developments (2026-07-13 to 07-16): (1) The Mercer County Fiscal Court voted unanimously on July 14, 2026 to direct the County Attorney to draft a data-center moratorium (motion by Magistrate Susan Barrington); it would apply only to the unincorporated county and would become void once the Harrodsburg-Mercer Joint Planning & Zoning Commission's data-center ordinance is in place. (2) The Harrodsburg City Commission, at its July 13, 2026 meeting, authorized its city attorney to draft a formal objection to Burgin's annexation, alleging Burgin failed to give Harrodsburg the required 14-day notice, since Harrodsburg holds a water-line easement/water contract crossing the annexation properties. (3) Burgin City Council canceled its regular July 14, 2026 meeting; the second reading of the annexation ordinance remains set for a special meeting on July 20, 2026. Burgin canceled the planned July 20, 2026 special meeting (announced 2026-07-16); the city's own statement said the meeting "was not legally accurate as we have not had a first reading of the ordinance," meaning the annexation cannot legally proceed to a second reading -- contradicting earlier reporting of a 3-2 first-reading vote on July 9. No new meeting date has been announced. Harrodsburg's formal objection letter, dated July 14, 2026, was confirmed sent, citing the 14-day notice defect and an estimated ~$30 million cost to reroute Harrodsburg's water line around the annexation area. The Mercer County Planning & Zoning Commission hearing remains scheduled for July 23, 2026 (outside this window); written comments were due July 20, 2026. Burgin's own 2026-07-16 statement confirms no valid first reading of the annexation ordinance ever occurred, meaning the earlier-reported 3-2 first-reading vote on July 9 was inaccurate; the annexation cannot legally proceed to a second reading absent a new first reading. No new meeting date has been announced.
Butler County passed a 1-year data center moratorium, the third south-central Kentucky county to do so after Edmonson and Allen counties. Exact vote date is approximate.
Cave City enacted a one-year moratorium blocking a proposed gigawatt-scale campus near Mammoth Cave; contested and challenged in a lawsuit by Kentucky Industrial Alliance.
Cave City Council voted 4-1 in favor of a one-year moratorium ordinance and 4-1 against a zoning amendment that would have allowed data centers with 200-ft/1,000-ft setbacks. Council Member Leticia Cline: 'Communities still have a right to decide what kind of growth aligns with their long-term identity.' Second reading scheduled. Council enacted the 12-month moratorium on final reading 4-1 (Doyle dissenting) on data centers and associated high-impact industries; the competing zoning ordinance with setbacks was rejected. On June 8, 2026, developer Kentucky Industrial Alliance LLC filed suit in Barren County (Barren District Court) against the City of Cave City, its council, and the joint City-County Planning Commission, challenging the 12-month data center moratorium Cave City enacted May 20 (after special meetings May 18/20). The company submitted a ~380-acre data... A preliminary-injunction hearing in Kentucky Industrial Alliance LLC's suit against Cave City, its council, and the Barren County Joint Planning Commission was held; the city has moved to dismiss, arguing no valid development plan was ever filed before the moratorium took effect. The company's proposal was for a ~380-acre site on Doyle Avenue near Mammoth Cave. The outcome of the injunction hearing was not confirmed in available reporting.
County moratorium on data centers for a stated term
County commissioners approve one-year moratorium on DC construction in unincorporated county; Winchester (county seat) passed its own moratorium separately. The measure has a stated duration whose end date is not recorded.
City moratorium on data centers through December 31, 2026
City council backs moratorium on data centers through end of year; directs Georgetown-Scott County Planning Commission to recommend zoning regulations. The measure runs to December 31, 2026.
Local moratorium on data centers through October 31, 2026
Moratorium on permits, development plans, and zone changes, unanimous. Expires Oct 31; Planning Division drafting Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment proposals. The measure runs to October 31, 2026.
The Urban County Council unanimously passed a moratorium pausing data center permits and zone changes through October 31, 2026, after the former Lexmark site was bought by a data center developer.
Lexington-Fayette Urban County (no incentives for DartPoints + council moratorium), KY
Lexington-Fayette Urban County (no incentives for DartPoints + council moratorium), KY data center moratorium
On June 8, 2026 Lexington Mayor Linda Gorton announced the city will not provide public incentives to DartPoints, which closed a ~$29M private purchase of the former Lexmark property (745 W. New Circle Rd, ~29.5 acres) for a data center expansion; Gorton backs 'very tight controls,' noting data centers add few jobs while raising resident utility costs. Around June 9 the Urban County Council unanimously passed a moratorium on new data center approvals through Oct 31, 2026, with a Planning Commission public input session June 11.
Local moratorium on data centers through July 30, 2027
12-month pause in unincorporated areas, adopted specifically to study local water supply capacity against high-consumption users. The measure runs to July 30, 2027.
Louisville Metro Council (Councilwoman Chappell reintroduces moratorium on telecom hotels / data centers), KY data center moratorium (proposed)
Councilwoman Jennifer Chappell (D-15) refiled an ordinance temporarily pausing rezoning, conditional use permits, and plan applications for telecom hotels / data centers in Louisville Metro. Planning & Zoning Committee meeting June 2.
Metro Council voted 24-1 on Aug. 13, 2026 to bar planners from approving new data center proposals for six months or until comprehensive zoning rules are adopted; amended on the floor to also cover conversions of existing buildings.
Local moratorium on data centers for a stated term
Data center moratorium ordinance passed unanimously by the fiscal court, which will form a committee on environmental impact and utility use; reported as delaying inquiries for up to two years, modelled on Allen County's 2-year ordinance. Magistrates and Judge-Executive Jaime Green-Smith said the Lake Barkley area may be unsuitable for a data center. No outlet gave the vote date or an end date, so none is recorded here. The measure has a stated duration whose end date is not recorded.
The Meade County Fiscal Court adopted Ordinance 2025-07 on January 13, 2026, a temporary moratorium on data center/IT infrastructure applications after rejecting a rezoning.
Meade County, Kentucky, Fiscal Court adopted Ordinance 2025-07 on January 13, 2026, establishing a moratorium on data center development while the county reviews its zoning ordinance and comprehensive plan, which do not specifically address data centers. The moratorium followed the Fiscal Court's earlier vote to deny rezoning of 138 acres along Joe Prather Highway for a PowerHouse Industries data center, after both the Planning and Zoning Commission and residents raised concerns about water and electricity usage, environmental impacts, and the urgency of the planning process.
Local moratorium on data centers for a stated term
1-year moratorium in unincorporated areas, unanimous. Does NOT apply to City of Burgin, which is pursuing annexation to accommodate a proposed hyperscale data center. Grassroots group 'We Are Mercer County' active. The measure has a stated duration whose end date is not recorded.
Mercer County Fiscal Court data center moratorium (proposed)
The Mercer County Fiscal Court voted unanimously on July 14, 2026 (motion by Magistrate Susan Barrington) to direct the County Attorney to draft a new data-center moratorium covering unincorporated Mercer County. The vote came amid the contested Burgin annexation of farmland for a proposed hyperscale data center (tracked separately) and is distinct from the county's existing March 2026 moratorium; the new measure would become void once the Harrodsburg-Mercer Joint Planning & Zoning Commission adopts a formal data-center ordinance. The Fiscal Court gave unanimous first reading to the formal moratorium ordinance; second and final reading is set for August 11, 2026. The local group 'We Are Mercer County,' represented by attorney W. Henry Graddy, spoke in support at the reading.
The city commission passed a six-month moratorium on data centers on Aug. 10, 2026, citing utility cost, property tax and water-consumption concerns in the surrounding farming community.
Oldham County Fiscal Court (moratorium blocking 'Project Lincoln') data center moratorium
Oldham County passed a 150-day moratorium (until 2026-11-28) after removing a draft carve-out that would have exempted in-progress projects, directly blocking Western Hospitality Partners' 'Project Lincoln.'
The Fiscal Court approved a two-year moratorium on large-scale data centers in early September 2026, before any project had been proposed. The county has no zoning, so a buyer could otherwise start a data center without county review. Officials plan to use the pause to develop conditional use permitting.
Before you say yes to a data center, listen to this advice from coal country
The town of Russell, Kentucky enacted a moratorium on data center development. The mayor learned of a proposed two-gigawatt data center and the potential impact of the moratorium from a consultant's email.
County moratorium on data centers through September 13, 2026
On September 24, 2026, the Scott County Fiscal Court extended its data center moratorium, which had been set to run through December, until March 2027 to give the Georgetown-Scott County Planning Commission time to draft regulatory standards.
County moratorium on data centers through December 31, 2026
Fiscal court implements temporary moratorium on new data centers through Dec 31, 2026; assessing impacts on infrastructure, water, and emergency services. The measure runs to December 31, 2026.
The Board of Commissioners voted unanimously on Sept. 1, 2026 to pause data center development for one year inside the city limits, citing the absence of specific zoning rules and unresolved questions about utilities, rates and the environment. The rest of Clark County is not covered, so sites outside the city could still be developed.
Permanent countywide ban on data center construction
The Woodford County Fiscal Court unanimously passed an ordinance on Sept. 8, 2026 banning the construction of data centers, landfills and large battery storage systems in the county, the first permanent county ban on data center construction in Kentucky. Judge-Executive James Kay said the court chose a permanent ban over a moratorium after residents voiced uniform opposition.
Proposed two-year moratorium on data-center tax incentives
On August 31, 2026, the Caddo Parish Commission voted 6 to 4, with 2 absent, against a resolution asking the Planning and Zoning Commission to consider a pause on data center construction. The resolution would only have started the moratorium process. Most of unincorporated Caddo Parish has no zoning, so Amazon data center projects can proceed without local restrictions.
City Council voted unanimously in late January 2026 for a one-year citywide moratorium (extendable to two years), effectively killing a proposed New Orleans East data center.
Parish Council voted 5-3 against an 8-month moratorium on data centers. Instead chose immediate regulation; unanimously approved first data center zoning regulations in June 2026 (noise limits, buffer zones). The measure has no documented term.
City Council passed a 180-day moratorium on data center development by a unanimous 9-0 vote on April 13, 2026, citing sudden industry pressure and unknown infrastructure impacts.
Proposed city moratorium on data centers with no end date
Planning Board unanimously recommended permanent ban on data centers; City Council voted 8-1 Jun 3 to advance amendments; final Council vote expected November. Would prohibit data centers in all zoning districts. The measure has no end date by design.
Town moratorium on data centers through November 29, 2026
180-day moratorium on data centers >= 1 MW; unanimous vote; stricter than vetoed state bill (20 MW threshold). The measure runs to November 29, 2026 and applies at a threshold of 1 MW.
City of Westbrook (180-day data center moratorium enacted), ME
City of Westbrook (180-day data center moratorium enacted), ME data center moratorium
On June 1, 2026, the Westbrook City Council unanimously approved a 180-day data center moratorium; the planning board will review the land-use ordinance and report back. It is part of a Maine wave (Sanford, Gorham, Brunswick, Scarborough) responding to Gov. Mills’s April veto of a statewide pause.
Proposed six-month ban on large-scale data centers
The Select Board was considering a six-month ban on large-scale data center development in September 2026, with passage expected by the end of the month.
Moratorium on the DeepGreen underwater data center proposal
The City Council voted unanimously on Aug. 14, 2026 to adopt a temporary moratorium covering the proposed DeepGreen Holdings subsea data center in the Bay of Fundy. Following a special public hearing on Aug. 24 on citizen-initiated ordinances, the Planning Board unanimously recommended a permanent ban on data centers across all zoning districts; the council takes up that recommendation at a special meeting on Sept. 9, 2026.
Local moratorium on data centers through February 13, 2027
180-day moratorium approved 4-1; preemptive, no data center inquiries received. Gives city time to study impacts and develop recommendations. Part of wave of Maine municipal moratoriums after governor vetoed statewide DC moratorium in April. The measure runs to February 13, 2027.
Local moratorium on data centers through November 29, 2026
Town Council voted 7-0 for 180-day moratorium on data center development; extendable another 180 days. Council later voted (Sep 4) to consider permanent ban. The measure runs to November 29, 2026.
Select Board placed a permanent data center ban (facilities ≥25,000 sq ft) on the November 2026 ballot as a zoning amendment. Skipped a moratorium step; voters will decide. The measure has no documented term and applies at a threshold of 25,000 sq ft.
Old Town City Council voted unanimously Sept. 8, 2026 to advance a proposed 180-day moratorium on data centers in industrial zones, retroactive to that meeting, with a special council meeting set for Sept. 21 and two more meetings required before final approval. No confirmation of any Sept. 21 or 22 action was found.
The Sabattus Select Board voted to call a special town meeting for residents to vote on a data center moratorium while the Planning Board drafts an ordinance; no meeting date was set. The board vote was Tuesday, July 21, 2026 (article dated July 22). No result of a town meeting vote was found.
Local moratorium on data centers through January 31, 2027
91-day emergency moratorium enacted May 19, 2026, halting a proposed Mousam River data center project; extended unanimously for 180 more days on Aug 5, 2026. The measure runs to January 31, 2027.
Town of Brunswick (180-day data center moratorium), ME data center moratorium
On June 1, 2026 the Brunswick, Maine Town Council unanimously approved a 180-day moratorium (through ~Dec 2026) on processing applications for new or expanded data centers with electrical demand of 1 MW or greater, to study impacts and draft regulations. It followed Gov. Mills's April 2026 veto of statewide moratorium bill LD 307 and a failed override; Brunswick joins Westbrook and Scarborough among Maine towns enacting local pauses.
Town of Scarborough (180-day data center moratorium enacted), ME
Town of Scarborough (180-day data center moratorium enacted), ME data center moratorium
On June 3, 2026, the Scarborough Town Council unanimously approved a 180-day data center moratorium, retroactive to April 1, halting a ~52-acre data center proposal submitted in April and giving the town time to revise zoning.
Town of Warren (180-day data center moratorium) data center moratorium
A special town meeting approved a 180-day data center moratorium in near-unanimous fashion, with about 60 residents attending -- nearly double normal turnout -- and the moratorium is renewable in further 180-day increments. No data center applications have been filed in Warren; the vote was preemptive, citing concerns about water and power use and potential river-temperature impacts.
City moratorium on data centers through November 28, 2026
180-day moratorium on siting, permitting, construction and operation of data centers regardless of MW; unanimous vote. The measure runs to November 28, 2026.
Wiscasset Selectboard voted in November 2025 to pause conversations about a $5B data center on town-owned land along the Back River after resident Richard Davis launched 'Protect Wiscasset,' a grassroots campaign. Little information about the end user, utility usage, or power source had been disclosed after the project was first revealed on September 16, 2025, alarming residents. The selectboard is developing a transparent evaluation process with no established timeline for completion. The project involves 300 acres.
One-year moratorium on data centers of 10 MW or more
The City Council passed a one-year moratorium in early May 2026 on construction of data centers projected to use 10 MW or more of electricity annually, and Mayor Brandon Scott signed it. Introduced by Council President Zeke Cohen and sponsored by 12 of the 15 members, it also requires a nine-month study of impacts on energy infrastructure, ratepayers, the economy, and environmental and public health.
Freeze on data center permits pending planning study
The County Council, which adopted a data center moratorium in February 2026, voted unanimously on September 22, 2026, to extend it through December 31, 2027.
The Board of County Commissioners voted unanimously on Aug. 18, 2026 for a six-month moratorium on site plan approvals for data center projects, effective Aug. 28, 2026.
County commissioners voted in July 2026 to establish a one-year moratorium on new data centers in the county's unincorporated areas while officials research impacts and consider regulations.
The Board of County Commissioners approved a one-year moratorium on data centers on Feb. 19, 2026 to allow study of economic and environmental impacts and drafting of regulations. Commissioners have since directed staff to continue work on zoning rules before the deferral expires, weighing water limits and electricity costs.
Town Council voted 4-0 to pass ordinance prohibiting data centers in all zones. Calvert County waterfront municipality acted preemptively, no known developer interest. Concerns over environmental impact and tourism economy. The measure has no end date by design.
Dickerson (Montgomery County) data center moratorium
California-based Atmosphere Data Centers plans a $2 billion, 300MW data center complex on 170 acres at the site of a decommissioned coal-fired power plant in Dickerson, Maryland,. Atmosphere filed for water withdrawal and discharge permits from the Potomac River upstream from the WSSC water intake that serves millions in the DC metro area. The Sugarloaf Citizens Association and a coalition of 20+ environmental organizations are calling for a moratorium on data center approvals until the County Council approves regulations. County Executive Elrich said the developers 'have a right to go forward' in the planning process, though he has floated a six-month moratorium. The data center debate has fueled election-year tensions.
City moratorium on data centers through August 4, 2029
Town Council unanimously passed a 3-year moratorium on data center development (5-0); also introduced ordinance to ban data centers entirely. The measure runs to August 4, 2029.
County Executive Jessica Fitzwater signed an order July 1, 2026 pausing new data center permitting and approvals through year-end; it does not affect previously approved projects.
Permanent ban on data centers in all zoning districts
Bill 26-011, proposed by County Executive Bob Cassilly, passed the County Council unanimously after a public hearing and was signed on June 10, 2026. It removes data centers as a permitted use in every zoning district, making Harford the first Maryland county to adopt an outright permanent ban. The law's drafting has drawn legal threats and supporters have acknowledged it may face a court challenge.
Harford County Executive Bob Cassilly (proposed legislation to permanently ban data centers countywide; public hearing May 18, vote June 1), MD
Harford County Executive Bob Cassilly (proposed legislation to permanently ban data centers countywide; public hearing May 18, vote June 1), MD data center moratorium (proposed)
Harford County Executive Bob Cassilly proposed legislation to permanently ban data centers countywide, going beyond Council Member Bennett's 90-day moratorium (Bill 26-005). Public hearing set May 18; County Council vote scheduled June 1, 2026. May 19, 2026: County Council withdrew the competing 180-day moratorium (Bill 26-005) and voted unanimously to convert Cassilly's permanent ban (Bill 26-011) into emergency legislation. New public hearing June 9; if approved, ban takes effect immediately on signature.
S.M.A.R.T. Siting Act moratorium through Nov. 2, 2027
The County Council voted unanimously in early June 2026 to suspend new data center development through Nov. 2, 2027 and to create a task force that has one year to report findings and recommendations. Existing facilities and projects already approved for construction are not affected.
Howard County (temporary data center moratorium through Nov 2027), MD
Howard County (temporary data center moratorium through Nov 2027), MD data center moratorium
The Howard County Council passed CB31-2026, a temporary moratorium pausing data center development through November 2027 to modernize the county's roughly 1993-era zoning regulations covering energy, water, and siting. Sponsored by Councilmember Christiana Rigby.
Montgomery County (Executive Elrich 6-month data center moratorium EO), MD data center moratorium
On June 13, 2026 Montgomery County Executive Marc Elrich signed an executive order imposing a six-month moratorium on new data center permits, directing the Department of Permitting Services to stop accepting or processing applications, effective immediately, including the prospective data center at the decommissioned Dickerson power plant site. Elrich stressed 'it's not a ban' but a window to set clear rules.
The County Council passed a two-year moratorium on hyperscale data center development on July 8, 2026 to draft comprehensive siting legislation, following opposition to a Landover Mall campus plan.
Prince George's County (Landover) data center moratorium
The Qualified Data Center Task Force released a 460+ page report with 14 recommendations. Key proposals include ending 'permitted-by-right' approvals for data centers, requiring special-exception or planned-development processes with community hearings, tightening zoning restrictions, protecting environmentally sensitive areas, and increasing buffer distances from homes.
Prince George's County Council (2-year data center moratorium)
Prince George's County Council (2-year data center moratorium) data center moratorium
County Council approved a 2-year pause on new data center development applications, giving officials time to develop a zoning framework for where/how data centers can be built; the pause can end early if that framework is adopted sooner. One clear 'no' vote (Councilmember Tim Adams, objecting to the 2-year length) plus some abstentions. The moratorium grew out of the county's Qualified Data Center Task Force, formed after a proposed hyperscale conversion of the Landover Mall site drew protests. Prince George's is now Maryland's most restrictive data-center jurisdiction, joining Montgomery, Frederick, and Baltimore counties in pausing development.
The County Commissioners approved a temporary 12-month moratorium on the application, processing and approval of data centers, effective immediately on adoption on June 4, 2026, to give the county time to evaluate impacts and develop policies, performance standards and zoning regulations. It may be modified or extended by the commissioners.
Local moratorium on data centers through August 31, 2027
1-year moratorium; part of an Eastern Shore wave of local action after a controversial Federalsburg data center proposal. The measure runs to August 31, 2027.
Planning Commission recommended 1-year moratorium on data center development (Aug 14, 2026); City Council vote pending. Mayor supports the pause. The measure has no documented term.
Commissioners voted 4-1 on June 30, 2026 for a yearlong moratorium halting acceptance, review and approval of new data center applications after residents raised water and infrastructure concerns.
City moratorium on data centers through June 3, 2027
City Council unanimously approved 270-day moratorium on data centers. Sponsored by Mayor Christopher Johnson and Council President Anthony Russo. Also unanimously approved first reading of a permanent citywide prohibition on same date. Runs through Jun 3, 2027. The measure runs to June 3, 2027.
Proposed temporary moratorium on data center applications
Ayer's town planner presented a proposed data center moratorium zoning bylaw to the Select Board on Sept. 15, 2026 for the Fall Special Town Meeting on Oct. 26, 2026. The claimed Sept. 22 date was not found in official records.
City Councilor Miniard Culpepper proposed a zoning code amendment in September 2026 that would define data centers and prohibit new facilities citywide, with exceptions for institutional and business server rooms. The change requires Boston Zoning Commission approval.
City of Westfield (1-year data center moratorium, final vote)
City of Westfield (1-year data center moratorium, final vote) data center moratorium
Westfield City Council unanimously passed a 1-year moratorium on new data center construction/permitting after standing-room-only public comment; this was the second of two required votes (first vote 2026-06-18). Servistar Realty LLC's already-Planning-Board-approved project (10 buildings, 18-42 MW projected load) may be exempted/grandfathered from the new moratorium since it predates the ordinance. Ties to Gov. Healey's late-June announcement of new state tax-break standards for data centers (air/noise/water limits, no local rate spikes); Healey had previously backed a ~$30M/yr tax exemption for the Servistar project. Reporting identifies Servistar co-owner as Paul Corey and cites a $4B, 10-building, 274MW campus figure for the already-approved project, which is unaffected by the moratorium.
On September 17, 2026, the Greenfield City Council voted unanimously to adopt a one-year moratorium on data centers, following a 4-1 recommendation from the Planning Board and a 4-0 recommendation from the Economic Development Committee. The Planning Board will use the period to review zoning and study impacts on infrastructure, public safety and natural resources. The council may extend the moratorium by 180 days if recommendations are not complete within the year.
City Council voted 9-4 to ban data centers from every zoning district. Mayor Joshua Garcia signed Jun 18. Exempts existing Massachusetts Green High Performance Computing Center (capped at 12 MW). First permanent data center ban in Massachusetts. Triggered by proposed $200M data center on Water Street; ~430 residents signed petition opposing. The measure has no end date by design and applies at a threshold of 12 MW.
The City Council voted unanimously to schedule a September 14, 2026 public hearing on two petitions for one-year pauses on data centers and battery storage.
Annual Town Meeting approved Article 23 on May 5, 2026, a zoning bylaw that allows only data centers of up to 2 MW, by Planning Board special permit in certain industrial and planned business districts, and bars facilities above 2 MW anywhere in town. It was the first data center zoning bylaw adopted by a Massachusetts town. No data center had been proposed in Mansfield.
Council President Rachel Maiore presented 365-day moratorium ordinance with option for 180-day extension. Joint public hearing before Planning Board and Legislative Matters Committee set for Sep 24. No data center project pending; preemptive. The measure has no documented term.
Select Board voted unanimously to recommend a one-year zoning moratorium on standalone commercial data centers for the Fall Town Meeting (Article 16, Oct 17 2026, Oct 16 2027). Exempts ancillary data storage. Planning Board to study grid capacity, water, noise. The measure has no documented term.
Data center permit revocation upheld; citywide ban proposed
On Sep 16, 2026 the Zoning Board of Appeals voted unanimously to reject Prime Group Holding's appeal of the city's revocation of a permit for a 12,000-square-foot building at the Shetland Park office complex that the city classified as a data center. Mayor Dominick Pangallo has separately filed a zoning ordinance that would prohibit data center construction citywide; the City Council has not yet approved it.
Shutesbury Special Town Meeting approved a 9-month moratorium bylaw on data centers on September 30, 2025. Planning Board voted 6-1 to bring it forward after a potential company expressed interest. Shutesbury is among Franklin County, MA towns being evaluated in a data center feasibility study. Massachusetts opposition to data centers has grown statewide in 2026, with Lowell passing a yearlong moratorium and Everett residents pushing for one. However, Gov. Maura Healey has come out in support of data centers (unlike Maine's Mills), creating tension with grassroots opposition. As of early 2026, no formal data center proposal has been filed in Shutesbury.
Town Council voted unanimously to refer a proposed 12-month moratorium on data center permitting, construction and major expansion to its Planning Board. Includes possibility of two additional 180-day extensions. No project pending; preemptive. The measure has no documented term.
The Select Board voted unanimously in September 2026 to ask the Planning Board to pursue a 12-month data center moratorium and zoning rules, with the aim of bringing it to the fall Town Meeting.
City moratorium on data centers through July 6, 2027
City Council voted unanimously on final reading for a 365-day moratorium on data center permitting and construction. First reading passed unanimously Jun 18 after 100+ residents packed council chambers. Triggered by proposed $4B Servistar Realties campus (274 MW, 10 buildings). Mayor Michael McCabe signed. The measure runs to July 6, 2027 and applies at a threshold of 274 MW.
Wilmington proposed zoning bylaw prohibiting data centers over 2 MW
The Wilmington Planning Board has drafted a zoning bylaw that would prohibit data centers drawing more than 2 megawatts anywhere in town. Facilities at or below 2 MW would be allowed only in highway industrial or general industrial zones by special permit, renewable every five years. A public hearing is scheduled for September 29, 2026.
Planning commission rejected 26MW data center; city council considering 6-month moratorium on data center developments as of June 2026. No confirmed vote on moratorium yet. The measure has no documented term and applies at a threshold of 26MW.
Local moratorium on data centers through June 8, 2027
Ordinance 2026-07, one-year moratorium on data centers, battery storage, large-scale solar, and wind farms. Township board voted to study and implement ordinance revisions. The measure runs to June 8, 2027.
Ann Arbor Township Board of Trustees passed a 12-month moratorium on data centers. No developer has approached township officials about a data center; the moratorium is a proactive measure reflecting concerns about water, energy demand, and environmental impacts seen in neighboring communities. Opposition was led by Protect Augusta Charter Township (PACT), Stop the Data Center, and Economic Development Responsibility Alliance of Michigan (EDRA of MI). The community successfully achieved its objective.
Local moratorium on data centers through February 23, 2027
One-year moratorium on permitting, consideration, approval, location, construction, and installation of data center facilities. The measure runs to February 23, 2027.
The Brighton Township board adopted a six-month moratorium on new data center applications to review its zoning ordinance, which does not address data centers. No application was pending.
Temporary moratorium on data centers and battery storage
The Burlington Township Board unanimously adopted Ordinance 2026-8-13A, a non-zoning temporary moratorium on data centers and battery energy storage systems, and passed Resolution 2026-8-13B directing the Planning Commission to draft a zoning text amendment.
Expired local moratorium on data centers through July 1, 2026
Six-month moratorium on data center and data mining operations, backdated to Jan 1 2026. Prompted by developer inquiries about property at 68th Street and Kraft Avenue. The measure runs to July 1, 2026.
In City of Portage, Michigan, Portage enacted a temporary moratorium on data centers and battery energy storage facilities through end of year to allow the city to review zoning rules and potential impacts. A public hearing on new ordinance amendments was scheduled for March 2026, Part of a broader trend of at least 27 Michigan communities pausing data center development.
Dearborn City Council gives first reading to six-month data center construction halt ordinance
Dearborn City Council voted 7-0 on second and final reading to approve a six-month data center moratorium, effective October 2026 through March 31, 2027.
County moratorium on data centers through July 23, 2027
12-month moratorium on data centers and cryptocurrency mining; county board approved unanimously after planning commission forwarded recommendation; county to develop zoning standards during pause. The measure runs to July 23, 2027.
City Council voted 6-2 for a resolution asking Mayor Sheffield to impose a two-year moratorium on data center permits. The mayor has not adopted it, instead convening a stakeholder working group with a Dec 31, 2026 deadline for policy recommendations. The measure has no documented term.
Dexter Township adopted a 180-day moratorium on data center applications via Resolution #26-705, joining at least 19 Michigan communities that have paused data center development. Residents and officials raised concerns about massive water and energy demands, potential cost increases for existing ratepayers, and industrialization of rural landscapes. The moratorium gives the township time to study impacts and draft appropriate zoning regulations.
Local moratorium on data centers through March 17, 2027
6-month extension, unanimous, running to Mar 17, 2027. Extends the moratorium adopted Mar 2026, which would have lapsed Sep 2026. Preemptive, no data center has been proposed in the city; the city's zoning ordinance does not address data centers at all and staff expect to bring draft language in Sep/Oct 2026. The measure runs to March 17, 2027.
Elmwood Township, Michigan, Board unanimously approved a 9-month moratorium on data centers (reduced from originally proposed 12 months). No known data center plans exist for the county; the moratorium is precautionary. The board tabled the measure at its January 21 meeting before passing the amended version in February.
Erie Township (Monroe County) enacted a limited moratorium on data center development on February 10, 2026, joining nearby Dundee Township which has had a moratorium since October 2025 in response to Cloverleaf's proposed 350-acre 'Project Ironwood.' Both townships are part of a sweeping wave across Michigan, at least 27 communities now have active data center moratoria while drafting local zoning rules to address concerns about water consumption, energy demand, and impacts on the electric grid. The project involves Cloverleaf Infrastructure.
Local moratorium on data centers through June 2, 2027
One-year moratorium on data center development. Public comment raised concerns about water usage, energy requirements, noise, and demolition plans. The measure runs to June 2, 2027.
Flint City Council passed a 12-month moratorium in a 7-1 vote on June 8, 2026, barring acceptance, review or approval of data center permits or site plans while it studies zoning.
Local moratorium on data centers through June 25, 2027
12-month moratorium on data center construction; board passed at crowded meeting; township lacks data center zoning regulations and has no pending applications. The measure runs to June 25, 2027.
One-year moratorium on data centers and cryptocurrency mining
The Township Board in Grand Traverse County voted unanimously on Aug. 25, 2026 to stop processing or considering data center and cryptocurrency mining applications for 12 months, with a permitted six-month extension. Residents raised water use and noise. The moratorium halts a proposal to repurpose a Cass Road building for a small-scale data center.
Board of Trustees approved a one-time 6-month extension of the moratorium on data centers and cryptocurrency mining facilities. Additional time needed for noise restriction provisions. This is Genoa Township in Livingston County, MI, not Ohio. The measure has no documented term.
Gibraltar, Michigan, City Council unanimously approved a year-long moratorium in March 2026, freezing a proposed 100 MW data center at the former McLouth Steel site (27800 W. Jefferson Ave.) by Raeden. The facility would consume as much energy as 80,000 homes. Residents and Downriver activists raised concerns about increased electric bills and impacts on nearby Humbug Marsh wildlife refuge. The developer proposed addressing contamination at an adjacent Superfund property and partnering with DTE Energy for on-site power generation.
Local moratorium on data centers for a stated term
Moratorium on data centers approved at board meeting; Berrien County. Source is paywalled but headline and snippets confirm. The measure has a stated duration whose end date is not recorded.
Local moratorium on data centers through January 14, 2027
Six-month moratorium on construction of data centers, approved unanimously. Planning commission directed to develop permanent regulatory standards. Key concerns: water usage, noise pollution, privacy, property tax impacts. The measure runs to January 14, 2027.
Local moratorium on data centers through November 26, 2026
City Council unanimously adopted six-month moratorium on data centers and digital mining uses. Described as proactive rather than a response to a specific proposal. The measure runs to November 26, 2026.
Local moratorium on data centers through July 9, 2027
One-year moratorium on permitting, approval, or installation of data center facilities; city council voted unanimously; no proposals pending but city acted proactively to develop regulations. The measure runs to July 9, 2027.
County moratorium on data centers through May 27, 2029
Three-year (36-month) moratorium on data centers; planning commission unanimously extended original 6-month proposal to 36 months at April 1 hearing after public demand; county commissioners approved in May; concerns center on farmland preservation and resource use. The measure runs to May 27, 2029.
Lansing City Council voted 7-1 on July 14, 2026 to enact a 182-day moratorium pausing new data center building permits and zoning applications, effective July 27 through Jan. 25, 2027.
Adopted Feb. 2, 2026 for four months with an extension option; the board described it as a lawful pause to study zoning rather than a ban. Recorded in WKAR's Michigan data center tracker of local moratoria.
Local moratorium on data centers through April 11, 2027
10-month moratorium on data center development. Allows planning commission time to study noise, water and electrical consumption, and community impacts. The measure runs to April 11, 2027.
Local moratorium on data centers through May 22, 2027
Resolution 26-06, 12-month moratorium on issuance of permits, licenses, or approvals for data centers, or until permanent regulations adopted. The measure runs to May 22, 2027.
Expired local moratorium on data centers through August 30, 2026
180-day moratorium on data centers and all proposed developments over 100,000 sq ft, unanimous. Prompted by backlash over 'Project Flex', a 1.8M-sq-ft Verrus data center on 172 acres approved by planning commission in Sep 2025. The already-approved project is not affected. The measure runs to August 30, 2026 and applies at a threshold of 100,000 sq ft.
Lyon Township, Michigan, (Oakland County) board voted unanimously to enact a 180-day moratorium on data centers and all proposed developments 100,000+ sq ft on March 3, 2026. The moratorium followed months of community opposition to 'Project Flex,' a $4 billion, 1.8 million sq ft AI data center by California-based developer Verrus approved by the planning commission in September 2025 on 172 acres zoned industrial. Residents didn't learn about the project until December. The moratorium does not affect Project Flex, only newly proposed data centers.
Data center moratorium lifted after zoning adopted
Mason enacted a moratorium on Jan. 6, 2026 and lifted it on Feb. 3, 2026 after adopting new zoning rules for data centers. The pause is no longer in force; the replacement zoning is.
Six-month data center and battery storage moratorium
Meridian Township (Ingham County) trustees voted unanimously on May 19, 2026 for a six-month moratorium on building or approving data centers and battery storage.
Mich. City Says Data Center Moratorium Suit Is Premature
The city argued that a lawsuit challenging a data center moratorium is premature. This occurred on 2026-09-21 when the city responded to the legal action.
Mich. City Says Data Center Moratorium Suit Is Premature
The Michigan city urged a federal judge to dismiss a lawsuit challenging a one-year data center moratorium, arguing the pause is not a final land use decision. The city's position was stated on September 21, 2026.
New Buffalo Township, Michigan (Berrien County) passed a 1-year data center moratorium on April 8, 2026, blocking an investment group's 'Project Maize' data center proposal and giving the township time to develop zoning standards. Part of the broader Michigan trend of at least 19 townships pausing data centers amid uncertainty about SB 761-763 and state-level preemption risk.
The Orion Township Board of Trustees voted 7-0 in June 2026 for a six-month moratorium so the planning department can draft zoning amendments addressing data centers.
Oshtemo Charter Township (Kalamazoo County) is formally considering a data center moratorium as of early 2026, joining Portage and at least 27 other Michigan communities with active moratoria or moratorium proposals. A township memo expresses concern over utility rates, water use, and environment. Township Supervisor Cheri Bell described it as a preemptive effort. The township board put a moratorium on battery energy storage systems (BESS) in November 2025, and Planning Director Jodi Stefforia has signaled BESS regulation will take priority over data center regulation. Illinois-based Franklin Partners has explored a 265-acre data center in nearby Pavilion Township, indicating regional developer interest.
Penn Township Board (Cass County), MI data center moratorium
Penn Township approved a 30-day moratorium on data centers 5-1; Trustee Scott Peters cast lone dissent wanting longer. Hundreds packed the meeting. Diamond Lake Association had requested at least 2 years. Planning commission tasked with longer-term version. Porter Township in Cass County also reportedly considering similar action.
Pontiac City Council unanimously passed a six-month moratorium on Jan. 21, 2026 pending study and regulation, citing zoning gaps affecting utilities and infrastructure.
The Port Huron Township board unanimously adopted a temporary moratorium on new applications for data centers and other high-demand power users, lasting up to a year or until permanent zoning rules take effect.
Local moratorium on data centers through May 19, 2027
12-month moratorium on data center development, unanimous vote. Enacted to establish data center guidelines before developers arrive. Multiple Cass County townships have enacted similar moratoriums. The measure runs to May 19, 2027.
Porter Township Board (Cass County), MI data center moratorium
Porter Township Board unanimously adopted Ordinance 5-12-26, a 12-month moratorium on accepting/processing data center applications (extendable by resolution), effective May 19. This is the longer-term Cass County action; neighboring Penn Township separately passed a 30-day moratorium May 11.
Local moratorium on data centers through March 15, 2027
180-day moratorium adopted Mar 2026, extended through mid-Mar 2027; studying noise, vibration, light pollution, water, electricity demand. The measure runs to March 15, 2027.
Expired local moratorium on data centers through August 11, 2026
Ordinance 2026-01: 6-month moratorium on data center building permits and zoning applications, or until zoning amendment adopted. Voted 4-0 (one absent). The measure runs to August 11, 2026 and covers permits.
Indefinite moratorium prohibiting development, approval, or operation of AI data centers on tribal lands; board of directors voted unanimously; remains in effect unless lifted by subsequent resolution; concerns about resource strain and long-term land use impacts. The measure has no end date by design.
Springfield Township (Oakland County) approved a 180-day moratorium on Jan. 7, 2026 barring data center plans from being accepted while the planning commission amends zoning.
Sterling Heights City Council unanimously passed a one-year moratorium on data center site requests in early February 2026 to update its decades-old zoning ordinance.
Local moratorium on data centers through July 5, 2027
Resolution 26-12, 12-month moratorium on data center developments including AI and cryptocurrency mining facilities. Planning commission to evaluate impacts on farmland preservation, infrastructure capacity, and environmental factors. The measure runs to July 5, 2027.
Warren (Macomb County) data center moratorium (proposed)
Warren City Council Secretary Mindy Moore requested that a data-center moratorium be placed on a future council agenda after a July 3, 2026 storm knocked down 60+ power lines across the region, raising concern about additional grid strain from data centers. No moratorium had been formally introduced or voted on as of 2026-07-14. This is Warren, Michigan (Macomb County) -- a different city and state from Warren, Ohio (Trumbull County), site of the Stargate Lordstown-area data center fight.
Local moratorium on data centers through November 23, 2026
6-month pause or until zoning ordinance amendments take effect; passed after Prologis withdrew a 312-acre 'technical campus' application. The measure runs to November 23, 2026.
Temporary data center moratorium (Ord. 2026-Z-003)
Waterford Township adopted Ordinance No. 2026-Z-003 adding a data center definition and imposing a temporary moratorium on data centers; official ordinance document.
Local moratorium on data centers through April 21, 2027
Ordinance 26-02: 1-year moratorium on data centers and battery energy storage systems (BESS). Washtenaw County township. The measure runs to April 21, 2027.
Dearborn City Council gave its first reading to an ordinance that would halt data center construction for six months. Warren City Council voted unanimously to approve a 12-month moratorium on data centers.
Moratorium replaced by data center zoning restrictions
Wixom's six-month data center moratorium began in March 2026. On Aug. 26, 2026 the City Council adopted data center restrictions in the zoning ordinance, including a 1,500 foot setback, a ban on well water use and mandatory sound studies, and passed a resolution putting them in force no later than Sept. 6, 2026, ending the moratorium about two and a half weeks early. A developer is suing the city over the original moratorium.
Local moratorium on data centers through April 22, 2027
Utility-level: 12-month moratorium on water and sewer service to new data centers, unanimous. Blocks a \$1.25B U-M / Los Alamos computing facility; U-M has threatened to sue. The measure runs to April 22, 2027.
Ypsilanti Community Utilities Authority (YCUA) data center moratorium
On April 22, 2026, the YCUA Board of Commissioners approved a 12-month moratorium on delivery or commitment of water and sewer services to hyperscale and mid-size data centers, AI computing facilities, and high-performance computational centers, pending environmental and water system studies. The action blocks service to a $1.2 billion U-Michigan/Los Alamos supercomputing facility (~500,000 gpd) in Ypsilanti Township and Thor Equities' $1 billion Augusta Township project (~1 million gpd). The wastewater plant has 4-5 million gpd of excess capacity per Executive Director Luke Blackburn. Action followed an April 15 Ypsilanti Township Board resolution requesting the moratorium.
180-day moratorium on major electric utility infrastructure
The Board of Trustees voted unanimously on Aug. 18, 2026 for a six-month moratorium on major electric utility infrastructure serving high-energy-demand uses, expressly including hyperscale and mid-sized data centers and AI computing facilities. The township, which had already paused water service for data centers, is seeking to slow a proposed University of Michigan and Los Alamos computing project and an associated 110 MW DTE substation.
One-year data center and energy facility moratorium
The township board voted unanimously in early September 2026 to repeal its earlier data center moratorium and replace it with a new one-year moratorium covering data centers and energy facilities, extending the pause while the township updates its master plan and the planning commission finishes a renewable energy ordinance.
Local moratorium on data centers through August 24, 2027
One-year interim ordinance, unanimous, effective immediately; bars approval of new data center development in every county township, including crypto mining and AI compute. Directs the planning commission to study whether county regulation is needed, with a progress report due back to the board by February 2027. The measure runs to August 24, 2027.
Local moratorium on data centers through February 17, 2027
1-year moratorium on data centers >20 MW or within 500 ft of residential, first MN city to pause. Under legal challenge, developer filed suit Jun 15 alleging city lacks authority to regulate electricity demand. The measure runs to February 17, 2027 and applies at a threshold of 20 MW.
Local moratorium on data centers through August 17, 2027
1-year interim ordinance: no data center may be established, expanded or re-established anywhere in Hastings until Aug 17, 2027 unless the council rescinds it earlier. City code does not currently define or regulate data centers. Council took first action Aug 3 and held the public hearing and second reading Aug 17. The measure runs to August 17, 2027.
Local moratorium on data centers through June 26, 2027
1-year moratorium, 3-2; freezes a proposed 55,000 sq ft / 5 MW project while staff study zoning, water and noise impacts. Developer QLevr has threatened a \$150M lawsuit. The measure runs to June 26, 2027 and applies at a threshold of 55,000 sq ft.
Inver Grove Heights City Council, MN data center moratorium
Inver Grove Heights City Council voted 3-2 for a 1-year moratorium; the interim ordinance specifically captures the Travel Tags parcel (proposed ~55,000 sq ft / up to 5 MW data center by T5 Data Centers). Concerns: water, electricity, roads, environment. May 11 was only the first reading, not final passage. Second reading was June 8; a contentious June 23 meeting ended in shouting before a vote. Final passage came 2026-06-26, 3-2, after litigation threats from developer T5 Data Centers (proposal at 5842 Carmen Avenue East).
Lonsdale City Council passed a one-year moratorium (the maximum under the UDO) on data centers. Council cited water and energy uncertainty plus developers requesting NDAs from officials.
City Council voted 7-0 to pass a one-year moratorium on data centers and other 'high-impact utility consumers,' to allow a research study on localized water, power, farming, and climate impacts. Roughly 50 residents attended in support.
City Council voted 8-5 on May 22, 2026 for a six-month moratorium on data centers larger than 350,000 sq ft (downtown exempt) through Nov. 21, 2026; contested split vote.
Minneapolis City Council, MN data center moratorium
Minneapolis City Council voted 8-5 for a 6-month moratorium on new data center sites; exempts downtown proposals under 350,000 sq ft. Interim ordinance in effect (no mayoral approval required).
North Mankato City Council adopted a 12-month data center moratorium and study on September 21, 2026, after tabling the ordinance in August. It may be renewed for an additional year.
Interim ordinance imposing a 12-month data center moratorium
The Board of Commissioners adopted Ordinance 2026-15 on Aug. 18, 2026, effective the same day, authorizing a study and placing a moratorium on data centers. It runs 12 months unless repealed by board resolution or superseded by a new zoning ordinance covering data centers. It excludes incorporated cities outside county zoning jurisdiction and townships that have already adopted their own data center regulations. The board had rejected an earlier proposal in May 2026.
Local moratorium on data centers for a stated term
Mayor Adam Scepaniak enacted 1-year moratorium on data centers in May 2026. City's industrial park is in a wetland area. City plans to research data centers and examine other communities' approaches during pause. The measure has a stated duration whose end date is not recorded.
City moratorium on data centers through May 4, 2027
1-year moratorium on data center development, unanimous. Exempts telecom shelters under 300 sq ft. Staff to study impacts and draft regulations. The measure runs to May 4, 2027 and applies at a threshold of 300 sq ft.
Local moratorium on data centers for a stated term
1-year moratorium on new data center applications in unincorporated areas, 4-1. Extended from originally proposed 6-month pause. The measure has a stated duration whose end date is not recorded.
Proposed one-year interim moratorium on data centers
Woodbury City Council approved a moratorium of up to one year on new data centers and expansions beyond existing approvals while the city studies water, power, noise and zoning.
Local moratorium on data centers through May 19, 2027
Emergency 1-year moratorium (Ord. 26-2), unanimous. Applies to unincorporated areas only. Moratorium Workgroup formed Jun 16 to evaluate environmental, fiscal, infrastructure, and land use considerations. The measure runs to May 19, 2027.
Wright County Board unanimously approved Interim Ordinance 26-2, a 12-month moratorium on township data center applications under county P&Z authority, following citizen outcry. Monticello Tech LLC's 550-acre campus is unaffected (advancing via city annexation).
City Council voted 5-2 on July 14, 2026 for a 183-day citywide data center moratorium (candidate list had this as pending; it passed), the first in Mississippi; it took effect 30 days later.
Camdenton Board of Aldermen, MO data center moratorium
Camdenton Board of Aldermen approved a 12-month moratorium and rescinded support for an opportunity zone tied to a proposed data center. Police turned away ~25 people from city hall due to fire-occupancy limits. Moratorium cites inadequacy of municipal water, wastewater, and electric capacity for high-density loads.
Peculiar's Board of Aldermen removed data centers from its zoning ordinance, making them no longer a permitted use and blocking Diode Ventures' $1.5B project; replaced the city's earlier moratorium.
Local moratorium on data centers for a stated term
1-year moratorium pausing data center permits and conditional-use applications, 6-0. Council approved data center definition and zoning criteria simultaneously. The measure has a stated duration whose end date is not recorded.
City moratorium on data centers through January 2, 2027
180-day moratorium on new data center and battery energy storage permits. Does not affect previously approved Nebius project. The measure runs to January 2, 2027.
Jackson County (moratorium vote delayed on two competing proposals), MO data center moratorium
On June 1, 2026 the Jackson County (Missouri) Legislature held over two competing data center moratorium proposals (Ord. 6074, a 120-day pause incl. battery storage; Ord. 6087, a year-long version). On June 8 it ADVANCED a 180-day moratorium on processing land-use applications for data centers (amended up from 120 days), with final passage expected the following session; Chair Manny Abarca framed it as a temporary pause for policy review. No permanent ban occurred in Jackson County MO. On June 22, 2026 the Jackson County (Missouri) Legislature passed a 180-day moratorium on processing data center and Battery Energy Storage System (BESS) land-use applications, by an 8-0 vote (one member excused). The ordinance extended an originally proposed 120-day pause to 180 days; it resolves the two competing proposals that the Legislature had held...
Sponsor: Director of City Planning and Development Department COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE Amending Chapter 88, the Zoning and Development Code
Kansas City Ordinance 251031 on data center zoning: Sponsor: Director of City Planning and Development Department COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE Amending Chapter 88, the Zoning and Development Code, by amending the use tables in Sections 88-120, 88-130 Status Passed as of 2026-01-15.
The Nodaway County Commission placed a six-month moratorium on data centers by an order dated July 21, 2026, pausing the White Cloud Acres project while the county reviews a development agreement. As of August 12, 2026 reporting, it had not been extended.
City moratorium on data centers through August 4, 2027
Board of Aldermen unanimously approved 12-month moratorium on data center applications; followed opposition to proposed 500-acre data center near Crooked Creek Farm. The measure runs to August 4, 2027.
County moratorium on data centers through August 20, 2027
Commissioners signed a one-year moratorium on economic development projects and data centers after learning a property owner may have signed a deal to sell 53 acres to a data center company. Commissioners want voters to decide on the April ballot whether the county should allow data centers. The measure runs to August 20, 2027 and applies at a threshold of 53 acres.
Local moratorium on data centers through November 17, 2026
120-day administrative delay, 8-0. Expires Nov 17 or when council passes a two-reading bill. Public input sessions to follow. The measure runs to November 17, 2026.
On April 21, 2026, the St. Louis Board of Public Service unanimously approved the permit for a 120 MW data center adjacent to the historic Armory in Midtown St. Louis, weeks after Mayor Cara Spencer requested the vote be delayed. The permit imposes conditions: closed-loop air-cooled chillers, minimum 50% renewable energy within five years, $15M for multimodal enhancements, and no tax abatements. The project anticipates $423 million in tax revenue over 10 years and $27.4M first-year revenue for the city plus $33.4M for SLPS. The 120 MW size qualifies for Ameren Missouri's hyperscale rate structure. Developed by a consortium including Contour, TeraWatt, THO Investments, Steadfast City, ARCO, and Lewis Rice.
Six-month moratorium (data centers and energy facilities)
The Webster County Commission declared a six-month moratorium covering data centers and energy facilities in unincorporated areas, excluding an existing project under construction.
The consolidated city-county commission voted 11-0 in September 2026 to direct the county attorney to draft a temporary data center moratorium, while a separate fight over a data center ballot initiative heads to the Montana Supreme Court. As an interim zoning ordinance it needs three separate commission votes and a further 30 days before taking effect; if adopted it would run six months, extendable up to two and a half years.
Tribal moratorium on data centers with no end date
Fort Peck Tribal Executive Board (Assiniboine and Sioux) voted to ban all future discussions between tribal government and data center developers, effectively blocking development on the reservation. Chairman Floyd Azure said three companies approached in the past year. Primary concern is water contamination, 'Fort Peck historically struggled with acquiring clean, drinkable water.'. The measure has no end date by design.
Commissioners unanimously adopted interim zoning July 9, 2026 pausing new or expanding data centers countywide (excluding the city of Missoula) until July 8, 2027.
Montana County Calls for More Power to Regulate Data Centers
Yellowstone County Commissioners wrote a letter to state legislators requesting more local authority to regulate data centers. The letter was approved on Tuesday morning.
How Montana’s ‘Right to Compute Act’ stymies data center regulation
The article discusses how Montana's 2025 'Right to Compute Act' has limited county commissioners' ability to regulate data center development due to constitutional protections for the 'right to compute.' County officials are uncertain about their legal authority to impose regulations, leading to delays and legal uncertainty in addressing public concerns about data centers.
City Council unanimously approved a 6-month moratorium on new data center construction applications, giving officials time to develop formal regulations. Per Zoning Administrator Jacob Holcomb, the city needs additional research time; the moratorium may be extended up to 12 more months or ended early once a permanent ordinance is adopted.
County moratorium on data centers for a stated term
Six-month moratorium on data centers; applies only to six townships under county zoning control (Hanover, Lemon, Madison, Milford, Oxford, Ross). The measure has a stated duration whose end date is not recorded.
The Cass County Board of Commissioners voted 5-0 on August 11, 2026 to approve a 12-month moratorium on data center permits. Proposed data center regulations were tabled until September 22, 2026.
The Gage County Board of Supervisors approved a 12-month moratorium on data center permits on September 16, 2026, replacing an eight-month moratorium already in place. The Planning and Zoning Commission had recommended 18 months. Supervisors said the pause allows time to write data center regulations and could be extended.
Board of Commissioners debated 180-day moratorium on data center rezoning and construction permits; vote outcome not confirmed. The measure has no documented term and covers rezoning requests.
Data center moratorium on unincorporated land; one of the first wave of NE county moratoriums (enacted before Jul 16 2026). City of Kearney (Buffalo County) took opposite approach, allowing DCs with restrictions. The measure has no documented term.
Proposed data center moratorium set aside for task forces
The Lancaster County Board halted its planned vote on a temporary data center moratorium proposed by Commissioner Matt Schulte, as reported September 10, 2026. The board instead formed two task forces, one on data centers and one on industrial zoning, after Bold Nebraska filed a zoning text amendment to regulate data centers.
Lincoln County Commissioners voted 3-2 against a proposed data center moratorium, with Hewgley, Bruns, and Woodruff opposed and Weems and Wuehler in favor. A recall drive targeting the three dissenting commissioners launched the following day, 2026-07-14, reflecting continued community pushback against data center development in the county. Separately from voting down the moratorium, commissioners also voted to close a data-center zoning loophole.
On July 15, 2026 Logan County became the twelfth Nebraska county to adopt a 12-month moratorium, covering data centers plus wind, solar and cryptocurrency-mining facilities.
Indefinite ban on data centers, crypto mining, blockchain computing, and power plants to run them; first municipality in Nebraska to pass an outright ban. Cited as blueprint by residents of Union, Murray, and Plattsmouth. The measure has no end date by design.
Commissioners passed a one-year moratorium on data centers in May 2026 and appointed a committee to update the county's comprehensive development plan.
Commissioners unanimously approved a one-year pause on data center permits and construction June 30, 2026, one of at least 10 Nebraska counties acting at the time.
Tribal moratorium on data centers with no end date
First tribe in Northern Nevada to ban data centers on tribal lands; resolution brought by tribal council secretary Philip Johnson. The measure has no end date by design.
Council rejected the mayor's 180-day pause after nearly two hours of public comment favouring it, opting for code changes and project-by-project development agreements instead. The measure has no documented term.
Local moratorium on data centers through July 13, 2027
Temporary moratorium on data center applications through Jul 13, 2027 while the county updates land-use rules on water, power and infrastructure; multiple developers had approached the county and its code did not address data centers. The measure runs to July 13, 2027.
Commissioners voted 5-0 on Aug. 18, 2026 to ban construction and operation of data centers in the over-appropriated Pahrump Valley groundwater basin (Hydrographic Basin 162) after more than two hours of public comment. Reported as Nevada's first outright local ban; it blocks the proposed 900-acre Manse Technology Campus.
Bill No. 2026-11: permanent ban on data centers in Hydrographic Basin 162 (Pahrump Valley), 5-0 vote. First total ban in Nevada. Separate from the countywide moratorium (Jun 2 2026) which continues for areas outside Basin 162. The measure has no end date by design.
Tribal moratorium on data centers with no end date
Tribal Council passed permanent ban on data centers on tribal homelands; Chairman Steven Wadsworth cited water sovereignty and protecting endangered cui-ui fish. Part of Water Over Data Alliance tribal coalition demanding free, prior, and informed consent for data centers in Truckee River watershed. The measure has no end date by design.
City Council voted 6-1 on June 1, 2026 to extend its data center moratorium through August 2027, requiring it to run until new regulations are adopted; Reno was the first Nevada city to pause data centers.
Reno (Moratorium Rejection) data center moratorium
Reno Planning Commission voted 4-2 in February 2025 to recommend a temporary moratorium on new data center permits, citing concerns about energy use, water consumption, and the city's lack of data center policies. The City Council rejected the moratorium despite overwhelming public support at meetings and online. The council subsequently approved additional data center projects over continued public outcry, and later moved to develop regulations after the fact rather than pausing approvals. The project involves the Tract proposal, 810 MW capacity, 686 acres.
Reno (data center moratorium extended into 2027), NV
Reno (data center moratorium extended into 2027), NV data center moratorium
On June 1, 2026, the Reno City Council voted 6-1 to extend its data center moratorium into 2027, described as the first such extension in Nevada, while the city continues work on a Title 18 text amendment revising data center definitions, siting, noise, and water-use rules.
Local moratorium on data centers through January 18, 2027
Resolution 2026-18: 180-day moratorium on accepting, processing or approving land-use applications for data center development while staff draft zoning standards; renewable. End date is 180 days from adoption. The measure runs to January 18, 2027.
Planning Board voted unanimously for 1-year moratorium on data center construction after hyperscale proposal surfaced at former Merrimack Station coal plant site (350 MW FERC interconnection study). Town vote may still be required under RSA 674:23. The measure has no documented term and applies at a threshold of 350 MW.
Voters approved zoning amendment banning data centers in all zones, 322-63; Planning Board proposed marking 'Data Centers' as 'Not Allowed' in every zone. The measure has no end date by design.
City Council referred request to add/update land development code definitions for data centers, cryptocurrency mines and private detention facilities to Joint Planning Board/PLD Committee. PLD Committee voted Sep 10 to advance moratorium proposal to Planning Board for evaluation of need and scope; any moratorium limited to 1 year max. The measure has no documented term.
Local moratorium on data centers for a stated term
Voters ratified a 12-month moratorium on data center construction 1,335-143 at the Sep 8, 2026 special town election; Planning Board had adopted it 5-0 under RSA 674:23 on Jul 1. Ordinance allows the town time to study land use, environmental infrastructure and fiscal impacts; planning board chair has said permanent zoning may follow. End date of the 12-month term not stated in the sourced reporting. The measure has a stated duration whose end date is not recorded.
City Council enacted ordinance prohibiting data centers in every zoning district except Recycling Industrial zone (conditional use permit required); Waste Management owns most land in that zone, making construction effectively impossible. Two hours of resident testimony at Aug 18 public hearing. The measure has no end date by design.
Allamuchy Ordinance 2026-06 designating data centers a prohibited use
The Allamuchy Township Committee (Warren County) adopted Ordinance 2026-06 on June 24, 2026, after introduction on May 27, 2026. The ordinance amends Chapter 190 (Land Development) to designate data centers as a prohibited use in all zoning districts.
Listed among the 69 New Jersey municipalities with an enacted data center ban on the Pinelands Preservation Alliance's tracker, last updated Aug 27, 2026. The adoption date and ordinance number are not given in that source. The measure has no documented term.
Listed among the New Jersey municipalities that have adopted data center bans in a Climate Revolution Action Network New Jersey compilation reported by Patch in August 2026.
Andover Township Committee (Sussex County, ban announced after viral tense meeting at former Newton/Jump airport site), NJ
Andover Township Committee (Sussex County, ban announced after viral tense meeting at former Newton/Jump airport site), NJ data center moratorium (proposed)
After a public meeting at which police (mayor's son) wrestled a resident to the ground, Andover Township Committee announced it will introduce two ordinances, one repealing data centers as a permitted use at the former Newton/Jump airport (97 acres), and a township-wide ban. Special meeting May 12. Mayor: 'It's not worth tearing a town apart.'. May 12, 2026: Township Committee introduced (first reading) two ordinances, a township-wide data center ban and repeal of data centers as a permitted use at the former Newton/Jump airport site. Adoption vote scheduled May 28.
Listed among the New Jersey municipalities that have adopted data center bans in a Climate Revolution Action Network New Jersey compilation reported by Patch in August 2026.
Listed among the 69 New Jersey municipalities with an enacted data center ban on the Pinelands Preservation Alliance's tracker, last updated Aug 27, 2026. The adoption date and ordinance number are not given in that source. The measure has no documented term.
The City Council voted 5-0 on Aug. 12, 2026 to prohibit data centers citywide; Mayor Sharon Ashe-Nadrowski signed it Aug. 13. Reported as the 32nd New Jersey municipality to adopt a ban.
Listed among the New Jersey municipalities that have adopted data center bans in a Climate Revolution Action Network New Jersey compilation reported by Patch in August 2026.
Listed among the 69 New Jersey municipalities with an enacted data center ban on the Pinelands Preservation Alliance's tracker, last updated Aug 27, 2026. The adoption date and ordinance number are not given in that source. The measure has no documented term.
Listed among the New Jersey municipalities that have adopted data center bans in a Climate Revolution Action Network New Jersey compilation reported by Patch in August 2026.
Planning Board voted Ordinance 26-15 'not inconsistent' with master plan; would amend land use code to add supplemental regulations for data centers and hyperscale data centers, making them not permitted unless sought through a use variance. Final council action expected Sept 3, 2026. The measure has no documented term.
Listed among the New Jersey municipalities that have adopted data center bans in a Climate Revolution Action Network New Jersey compilation reported by Patch in August 2026.
Listed among the 69 New Jersey municipalities with an enacted data center ban on the Pinelands Preservation Alliance's tracker, last updated Aug 27, 2026. The adoption date and ordinance number are not given in that source. The measure has no documented term.
Listed among the New Jersey municipalities that have adopted data center bans in a Climate Revolution Action Network New Jersey compilation reported by Patch in August 2026.
The Cinnaminson Township Committee voted 5-0 on July 20, 2026 to table Ordinance 2026-8, which would prohibit data centers, citing litigation risk and pending state regulation. On Aug. 17 the mayor said it remained tabled pending further input. Status is tabled rather than defeated.
Collingswood Ordinance 1838 banning data centers and computing nodes
The Collingswood Board of Commissioners in Camden County adopted Ordinance 1838, which makes data centers and computing nodes non-permitted uses in every zoning district in the borough. Local press reported adoption on August 3, 2026, and the borough posted the ordinance to its document center on September 9, 2026. Commissioners described the measure as a borough-wide pause to study the technology's demands and impacts.
Township Committee unanimously approved ordinance removing data centers as a permitted use in all commercial zones. Prompted by CoreWeave data center under construction in nearby Kenilworth. The measure has no end date by design.
Listed among the New Jersey municipalities that have adopted data center bans in a Climate Revolution Action Network New Jersey compilation reported by Patch in August 2026.
Listed among the New Jersey municipalities that have adopted data center bans in a Climate Revolution Action Network New Jersey compilation reported by Patch in August 2026.
Listed among the 69 New Jersey municipalities with an enacted data center ban on the Pinelands Preservation Alliance's tracker, last updated Aug 27, 2026. The adoption date and ordinance number are not given in that source. The measure has no documented term.
Listed among the 69 New Jersey municipalities with an enacted data center ban on the Pinelands Preservation Alliance's tracker, last updated Aug 27, 2026. The adoption date and ordinance number are not given in that source. The measure has no documented term.
The Township Council unanimously adopted an ordinance prohibiting data centers on Aug. 25, 2026, after a clerical correction changing 'primary use' to 'principal use' to match the land use code. East Brunswick acted the same night as North Brunswick and Stafford Township.
Listed among the New Jersey municipalities that have adopted data center bans in a Climate Revolution Action Network New Jersey compilation reported by Patch in August 2026.
Listed among the 69 New Jersey municipalities with an enacted data center ban on the Pinelands Preservation Alliance's tracker, last updated Aug 27, 2026. The adoption date and ordinance number are not given in that source. The measure has no documented term.
Listed among the New Jersey municipalities that have adopted data center bans in a Climate Revolution Action Network New Jersey compilation reported by Patch in August 2026.
Listed among the 69 New Jersey municipalities with an enacted data center ban on the Pinelands Preservation Alliance's tracker, last updated Aug 27, 2026. The adoption date and ordinance number are not given in that source. The measure has no documented term.
Franklin Township Ordinance O-5-2026 prohibiting data centers in all zoning districts
The Franklin Township Committee (Gloucester County) adopted Ordinance O-5-2026 on May 12, 2026, according to the New Jersey Pinelands Commission record of municipal ordinances. The ordinance amends Chapter 253 (Land Development) to define data centers and confirm they are prohibited uses in all zoning districts; the Commission found it raises no substantial issue with the Pinelands plan.
Listed among the 69 New Jersey municipalities with an enacted data center ban on the Pinelands Preservation Alliance's tracker, last updated Aug 27, 2026. The adoption date and ordinance number are not given in that source. The measure has no documented term.
Township Council adopted Ordinance 2172-2026 on July 14, 2026, establishing a six-month moratorium on data centers and amending the Chapter 233 definitions, according to the NJ Pinelands Commission's record of municipal ordinances received (filed Sep 16, 2026, pending Commission staff review).
Gloucester Township Council adopted Ordinance O-26-16, amending the Land Development Ordinance to designate data centers a prohibited land use in all zoning districts. The clerk's certification gives the adoption date as Sept. 14, 2026, not Sept. 15.
Listed among the 69 New Jersey municipalities with an enacted data center ban on the Pinelands Preservation Alliance's tracker, last updated Aug 27, 2026. A Mar 2026 local report describes the township only beginning a zoning/moratorium process, not adopting a ban. The measure has no documented term.
This is Greenwich Township in Warren County (Stewartsville), not Gloucester County. Ordinance 107-2026, prohibiting data centers, was introduced April 16, 2026 with a final hearing set for May 21, 2026; the township's legal notices page lists the second reading and adoption notice.
Listed among the 69 New Jersey municipalities with an enacted data center ban on the Pinelands Preservation Alliance's tracker, last updated Aug 27, 2026. The adoption date and ordinance number are not given in that source. The measure has no documented term.
The Hampton Township Committee adopted Ordinance 2026-13, amending Chapter 108 Zoning to prohibit data centers in all zones, by a 5-0 roll call on June 29, 2026. The posted minutes are marked as not yet formally approved.
Listed among the New Jersey municipalities that have adopted data center bans in a Climate Revolution Action Network New Jersey compilation reported by Patch in August 2026.
Listed among the New Jersey municipalities that have adopted data center bans in a Climate Revolution Action Network New Jersey compilation reported by Patch in August 2026.
Listed among the New Jersey municipalities that have adopted data center bans in a Climate Revolution Action Network New Jersey compilation reported by Patch in August 2026.
Listed among the New Jersey municipalities that have adopted data center bans in a Climate Revolution Action Network New Jersey compilation reported by Patch in August 2026.
The Township Council voted 4-1 on Aug. 26, 2026 to prohibit data centers township-wide, making Jackson the 38th New Jersey municipality to adopt a ban. Councilman Ken Bressi cast the dissenting vote. Residents cited electric grid and water supply strain and the township's location partly within the Pinelands National Reserve.
Listed among the New Jersey municipalities that have adopted data center bans in a Climate Revolution Action Network New Jersey compilation reported by Patch in August 2026.
Listed among the 69 New Jersey municipalities with an enacted data center ban on the Pinelands Preservation Alliance's tracker, last updated Aug 27, 2026. The adoption date and ordinance number are not given in that source. The measure has no documented term.
Listed among the 69 New Jersey municipalities with an enacted data center ban on the Pinelands Preservation Alliance's tracker, last updated Aug 27, 2026. The adoption date and ordinance number are not given in that source. The measure has no documented term.
Listed among the 69 New Jersey municipalities with an enacted data center ban on the Pinelands Preservation Alliance's tracker, last updated Aug 27, 2026. The adoption date and ordinance number are not given in that source. The measure has no documented term.
Listed among the 69 New Jersey municipalities with an enacted data center ban on the Pinelands Preservation Alliance's tracker, last updated Aug 27, 2026. The adoption date and ordinance number are not given in that source. The measure has no documented term.
Mayor Derek Armstead and the City Council announced an ordinance that would prohibit artificial intelligence data centers in every zoning district, scheduled for introduction at the council's Sept. 15, 2026 meeting.
Listed among the New Jersey municipalities that have adopted data center bans in a Climate Revolution Action Network New Jersey compilation reported by Patch in August 2026.
Ordinance 27-2026, unanimous council vote; amends Chapter 195 to prohibit data centers as a use. Planning board found it consistent with the master plan. The measure has no end date by design.
Ordinance removing data centers as a permitted use
The Manchester Township Council in Ocean County unanimously adopted Ordinance 26-48 at its September 2026 meeting, after introducing it on August 26, 2026. The ordinance repeals the August 2025 redevelopment designation of a Stavola Corporation property off South Hope Chapel Road that had listed data centers as a permitted use. Council President Michele Zolezi said data centers are not permitted in Manchester. The ordinance takes effect after a 20-day period.
Listed among the 69 New Jersey municipalities with an enacted data center ban on the Pinelands Preservation Alliance's tracker, last updated Aug 27, 2026. The adoption date and ordinance number are not given in that source. The measure has no documented term.
Listed among the New Jersey municipalities that have adopted data center bans in a Climate Revolution Action Network New Jersey compilation reported by Patch in August 2026.
Township's own public-records page confirms adoption of an ordinance banning data centers; no duration or sunset clause stated. The measure has no end date by design.
Listed among the New Jersey municipalities that have adopted data center bans in a Climate Revolution Action Network New Jersey compilation reported by Patch in August 2026.
Proposed ordinance prohibiting data centers in all zones
The Township Committee introduced Ordinance 2026-3536 on September 8, 2026, which would list data centers as a prohibited use in every zoning district. A public hearing and final vote were scheduled for September 21, 2026.
The Township Committee introduced Ordinance 2770-26 (Zoning Data Centers), with a public hearing set for October 6, 2026. On September 17, 2026, the Planning Board found the draft inconsistent with the master plan and requested further review.
Listed among the New Jersey municipalities that have adopted data center bans in a Climate Revolution Action Network New Jersey compilation reported by Patch in August 2026.
Millville Board of Commissioners (Cumberland County, total data center ban), NJ
Millville Board of Commissioners (Cumberland County, total data center ban), NJ data center moratorium
The Millville Board of Commissioners voted to completely ban data centers citywide, killing what was described as the largest proposed data center in NJ history (2.6M sq ft, ~1.4 GW). A win for the Gen Z-led Climate Revolution Action Network (CRAN).
Listed among the New Jersey municipalities that have adopted data center bans in a Climate Revolution Action Network New Jersey compilation reported by Patch in August 2026.
Two ordinances banning data centers township-wide. Hexa Builders is suing for more than $300M in federal court, the test case for whether a small municipality can absorb the litigation risk of a ban. The measure has no end date by design.
Listed among the New Jersey municipalities that have adopted data center bans in a Climate Revolution Action Network New Jersey compilation reported by Patch in August 2026.
Listed among the New Jersey municipalities that have adopted data center bans in a Climate Revolution Action Network New Jersey compilation reported by Patch in August 2026.
New Hanover Ordinance 2026-04 designating data centers a prohibited use (pending)
New Hanover Township (Burlington County) submitted draft Ordinance 2026-04, designating data centers as a prohibited use in all zones, to the New Jersey Pinelands Commission on August 27, 2026. The Commission lists it as pending local adoption.
Dept/ Agency: Offices of Municipal Council/City Clerk Action: ( ) Ratifying (X) Authorizing ( ) Amending Type of Service: Expressing Support Purpose
Newark Resolution 26-1288 on data center moratorium: Dept/ Agency: Offices of Municipal Council/City Clerk Action: ( ) Ratifying (X) Authorizing ( ) Amending Type of Service: Expressing Support Purpose: Resolution of Support for a temporary moratorium Status Adopted as of 2026-09-09.
The Township Council adopted an ordinance prohibiting data centers on Aug. 25, 2026, the same night East Brunswick and Stafford Township adopted their own bans. The three became the 35th, 36th and 37th New Jersey municipalities to ban the use.
Listed among the 69 New Jersey municipalities with an enacted data center ban on the Pinelands Preservation Alliance's tracker, last updated Aug 27, 2026. The adoption date and ordinance number are not given in that source. The measure has no documented term.
Ordinance 26-10 adopted on second reading, banning data centers in all zoning districts borough-wide. First reading 6-0 on Jun 22. The measure has no end date by design.
Township Council directed the drafting of an ordinance prohibiting data centers in every zoning district at its June 9, 2026 meeting; the Pinelands Preservation Alliance lists Old Bridge among municipalities with an enacted ban as of Aug 27, 2026. Confirm the adoption date with the township clerk. The measure has no documented term.
Listed among the 69 New Jersey municipalities with an enacted data center ban on the Pinelands Preservation Alliance's tracker, last updated Aug 27, 2026. The adoption date and ordinance number are not given in that source. The measure has no documented term.
Peapack-Gladstone Ordinance 1171-2026 designating data centers a non-permitted use in all zones
The Peapack and Gladstone Mayor and Borough Council (Somerset County) adopted Ordinance 1171-2026 on August 11, 2026, after introduction on July 21, 2026. The ordinance amends Chapter 23 (Land Development) to designate data centers as a non-permitted use in all zones and sets application requirements for any variance request.
Listed among the New Jersey municipalities that have adopted data center bans in a Climate Revolution Action Network New Jersey compilation reported by Patch in August 2026.
Ordinance A-13-2026, introduced May 21 with final passage scheduled July 2, 2026, per the township's own ordinances page. The measure has no end date by design.
The Phillipsburg Town Council (Warren County) approved an ordinance banning data centers at a Tuesday council meeting reported on April 16, 2026. The ordinance amends local zoning to designate data centers and related facilities, including supporting servers, power systems and cooling equipment, as prohibited uses across all zones.
Listed among the 69 New Jersey municipalities with an enacted data center ban on the Pinelands Preservation Alliance's tracker, last updated Aug 27, 2026. The adoption date and ordinance number are not given in that source. The measure has no documented term.
Pittsgrove Ordinance 2026-06 prohibiting data centers in all zoning districts
The Township Committee adopted Ordinance 2026-06, Prohibiting Data Centers, on May 27, 2026, amending the Chapter 60 land use code to define data centers and prohibit them in all zoning districts. The township lists the ordinance as adopted on its ordinances page.
Unanimous ban on data centers in all zoning districts, no variance allowed. Council rejected a weaker regulatory approach in May and went for an outright prohibition. The measure has no end date by design.
Listed among the 69 New Jersey municipalities with an enacted data center ban on the Pinelands Preservation Alliance's tracker, last updated Aug 27, 2026. The adoption date and ordinance number are not given in that source. The measure has no documented term.
Raritan Township ordinance adding data centers to prohibited uses
The Raritan Township Committee (Hunterdon County) unanimously adopted an ordinance amending the Land Development Code to add data centers to the list of prohibited uses in all zoning districts, as reported on September 21, 2026. Warehouses, flex space and research facilities may not include data centers, while accessory server rooms serving the principal use are allowed up to 10 percent of gross floor area or 2,000 square feet, whichever is less.
Listed among the New Jersey municipalities that have adopted data center bans in a Climate Revolution Action Network New Jersey compilation reported by Patch in August 2026.
The Ridgefield Park Board of Commissioners adopted Ordinance 2026-13, amending Chapter 96 to prohibit data centers in all zones, on second reading June 9, 2026 by a 4-0 vote with one commissioner absent. It was introduced May 26, 2026.
Proposed local moratorium on data centers with no end date
Mayor Joseph Signorello Jr. introduced ordinance prohibiting data centers in all zoning districts, citing incompatibility with the dense residential community. Passed first reading in May 2026. Prompted by CoreWeave data center in nearby Kenilworth. The measure has no end date by design.
Reported as having a proposed data center ban ordinance awaiting a second reading, per the same Climate Revolution Action Network New Jersey compilation reported by Patch in August 2026.
Listed among the New Jersey municipalities that have adopted data center bans in a Climate Revolution Action Network New Jersey compilation reported by Patch in August 2026.
The Township Council unanimously adopted Ordinance No. 2026-22 on Aug. 25, 2026, adding data centers to the Additional Prohibited Uses section of the township code and barring them anywhere in Stafford. The ordinance defines a data center as a facility used to store and manage digital data.
Listed among the New Jersey municipalities that have adopted data center bans in a Climate Revolution Action Network New Jersey compilation reported by Patch in August 2026.
Listed among the New Jersey municipalities that have adopted data center bans in a Climate Revolution Action Network New Jersey compilation reported by Patch in August 2026.
Listed among the 69 New Jersey municipalities with an enacted data center ban on the Pinelands Preservation Alliance's tracker, last updated Aug 27, 2026. The adoption date and ordinance number are not given in that source. The measure has no documented term.
Upper Township Ordinance 015-2026 data center prohibition
The Upper Township Committee (Cape May County) adopted Ordinance 015-2026, amending Chapter 20 (Zoning) to prohibit data centers, on September 14, 2026, according to the New Jersey Pinelands Commission record of municipal ordinances. The committee had unanimously introduced the ban in August 2026; Commission staff review was pending as of September 17, 2026.
Listed among the New Jersey municipalities that have adopted data center bans in a Climate Revolution Action Network New Jersey compilation reported by Patch in August 2026.
Listed among the New Jersey municipalities that have adopted data center bans in a Climate Revolution Action Network New Jersey compilation reported by Patch in August 2026.
Listed among the 69 New Jersey municipalities with an enacted data center ban on the Pinelands Preservation Alliance's tracker, last updated Aug 27, 2026. The adoption date and ordinance number are not given in that source. The measure has no documented term.
Listed among the New Jersey municipalities that have adopted data center bans in a Climate Revolution Action Network New Jersey compilation reported by Patch in August 2026.
Listed among the New Jersey municipalities that have adopted data center bans in a Climate Revolution Action Network New Jersey compilation reported by Patch in August 2026.
Listed among the 69 New Jersey municipalities with an enacted data center ban on the Pinelands Preservation Alliance's tracker, last updated Aug 27, 2026. The adoption date and ordinance number are not given in that source. The measure has no documented term.
The Clovis City Commission voted 5-3 on September 17, 2026 to defeat a proposed 120-day moratorium on building data centers within city limits. Mayor Mike Morris said staff will continue drafting a data center policy for review by the Planning and Zoning Commission and the Economic Incentive Board.
Ordinance 2026-02, a moratorium on new data center projects, introduced Jul 21 with a public hearing Aug 11, 2026. The county's own ordinance page still lists it as proposed; early September press reports say it was adopted, not yet confirmed against the county record. Raton, the county seat, postponed its own city moratorium in June over an MOU with developer Atterix. The measure has no documented term.
New Mexico Supreme Court rejects 2 Project Jupiter challenges, allows permitting process to resume
The New Mexico Supreme Court unanimously rejected two environmental groups' challenges to the regulatory proceedings for the Project Jupiter data center in Doña Ana County. The court's decision on September 17, 2026, allowed the permitting process to resume after it had been paused since August.
Grant County Commissioner Nancy Stephens plans to introduce a one-year data center moratorium modeled on Socorro County's resolution at the commission meeting scheduled for September 24, 2026. The proposal follows community opposition to Site Layer 1 LLC's proposed 300.8-megawatt natural gas-powered data center near Playas in southern Grant County.
Haaland backs data center moratorium in New Mexico
Deb Haaland, a gubernatorial candidate in New Mexico, proposed a moratorium on the construction of data centers, citing environmental and workforce-related concerns. She called for open and transparent community discussions about the impacts of AI data centers.
The Raton City Commission voted 3-2 in September 2026 against a resolution that would have imposed a one-year moratorium on business licenses and zoning approvals for data centers.
City moratorium on data centers through August 26, 2027
365-day moratorium on uses not defined in the zoning code exceeding 20,000 sq ft in commercial, industrial, and manufacturing zones, 4-0 vote; prompted by CBRE marketing 365+ acres as premier data center development site; council also directed staff to draft data center zoning definitions. The measure runs to August 26, 2027 and applies at a threshold of 20,000 sq ft.
Commissioners unanimously passed an 18-month moratorium on new data center development June 30, 2026, lowering the regulatory threshold from 100 MW to 1 MW while staff draft rules.
Santa Fe County (yearlong data center moratorium advancing), NM
Santa Fe County (yearlong data center moratorium advancing), NM data center moratorium
Santa Fe County (NM) commissioners are advancing a yearlong moratorium on data center developments, with a public hearing and vote expected in late June; Commissioner Lisa Cacari Stone framed it as a 'meaningful pause' to develop land-use and environmental standards. No data centers currently exist in Northern NM; the action follows neighboring Socorro County's June 9 yearlong moratorium. Still pending, public hearing + vote expected late June. Santa Fe County commissioners are advancing a proposed yearlong moratorium on data-center developments countywide (covering hyperscale, AI computing, colocation and crypto-mining). There are no active proposed projects; commissioners (incl. Lisa Cacari Stone) want regulations ready, citing... [ Santa Fe County Commissioners unanimously passed the 18-month moratorium on new data center developments (covering hyperscale, AI computing, colocation, and crypto-mining), effective immediately.]
Commissioners unanimously enacted an 18-month moratorium on data center development (candidate list had this as pending; it was adopted), amid concern over projects near Spaceport America.
County Commission unanimously adopted a yearlong moratorium on data centers June 9, 2026 after opposition to a proposed data center and solar array on 10,000 acres.
Socorro County Commission (moratorium process advanced; vote June 9), NM
Socorro County Commission (moratorium process advanced; vote June 9), NM data center moratorium
Socorro County Commission (130+ attendees) authorized publication of an ordinance summary/title for a proposed 1-year moratorium on data centers in unincorporated areas, paving the way for a public hearing and vote June 9, plus a community 'blue ribbon committee.' Driven by water concerns. (1) On June 2, 2026 New Mexico Tech announced it will NOT pursue the controversial ~10,000-acre 'Green Data Center' (Jason Bak / Green Data Centers, a ~2 GW campus on a 10 GW solar array on university land), citing insufficient contiguous acreage and public outcry (4,000+ signed against). (2) The Socorro County Commission then unanimously adopted a one-year data center moratorium (~June 9-10); 1,000+ had petitioned for it and U.S. Rep. Gabe Vasquez urged action.
Town moratorium on data centers through May 31, 2027
Moratorium on data center development until May 31, 2027; exempts existing operations and facilities under 20 MW. The measure runs to May 31, 2027 and applies at a threshold of 20 MW.
The Common Council advanced a proposed two-year moratorium on new data centers and cryptocurrency facilities of 20 MW or more in September 2026, with a full council vote scheduled for the following Tuesday.
North Tonawanda Local Law No. 3 of 2026: 12-month extension of data center and crypto mining moratorium
The North Tonawanda Common Council unanimously approved a one-year extension of its moratorium on new cryptocurrency mining and data processing centers in June 2026, before the existing moratorium expired July 16, 2026. Local Law No. 3 of 2026 covers new data processing centers and expansions, including crypto mining, AI processing and general data computing and storage, and includes an extraordinary hardship provision.
Local moratorium on data centers through June 18, 2027
Local Law No. 1 of 2026: 12-month moratorium on large-scale data center development, extendable to 24 months. Sullivan County town; preemptive, no project proposed. The measure runs to June 18, 2027.
Local moratorium on data centers through August 1, 2027
Town board approved one-year moratorium on data centers after public hearing. Prompted by a broker marketing hundreds of acres for a data center near Watertown/Fort Drum. The measure runs to August 1, 2027.
Town of Massena six-month data center moratorium voted down
On September 16, 2026, the Massena Town Board in St. Lawrence County voted 3-2 against a proposed six-month moratorium on data center development. The moratorium would have delayed a proposed 1.5 million-square-foot, 635 MW data center by North Country Collocation Services near the St. Lawrence River.
Local moratorium on data centers through February 13, 2027
6-month moratorium adopted after public hearing; supervisor cites the state EO's 50 MW floor as leaving smaller facilities unregulated. The measure runs to February 13, 2027 and applies at a threshold of 50 MW.
Local moratorium on data centers through July 9, 2027
1-year townwide pause on data processing centers and cryptocurrency mining; town is drafting comprehensive-plan amendments before it lapses. The measure runs to July 9, 2027.
The Town Board advanced a proposed 12-month moratorium on large data centers in September 2026, with a public hearing planned for November 2026 before any final action.
The county did not adopt a moratorium of its own, it passed a resolution affirming local zoning authority and urging its municipalities to consider one. Tracked as a signal, not a restriction. The measure has no documented term.
Local moratorium on data centers through August 3, 2027
Local Law 2-2026: 1-year pause on facilities drawing 20 MW or more, a lower threshold than the state EO's 50 MW. The measure runs to August 3, 2027 and applies at a threshold of 20 MW.
Six-month moratorium on data center land use approvals
The Town Board voted unanimously on July 15, 2026 for a local law imposing a six-month moratorium on applications for permits, site plans and other land use approvals for data centers, with an authorized six-month extension. The town cited water use and quality, infrastructure, noise and community character.
The Lysander Town Board (Onondaga County) unanimously approved a six-month data center moratorium on May 7, 2026, following opposition to the proposed 300 MW Ranalli campus.
The Town Board adopted a local law imposing a six-month moratorium on permitting or installing data centers, running through Feb. 13, 2027, while officials draft zoning laws. Town officials acted after concluding the state's hyperscale threshold of 50 MW did not reach the scale of project they were concerned about.
Six-month moratorium on data centers and battery energy storage
The Town Board adopted a six-month moratorium on applications for new data centers and battery energy storage systems on Aug. 25, 2026, after a public hearing. Town Supervisor Teresa Kenny confirmed the moratorium does not reach DataBank's proposed second facility, which is already before the planning board under a full environmental impact study, a carve-out that drew resident objection. Concerns centered on noise, generator emissions, energy and water use and proximity to Lake Tappan.
One-year moratorium on data centers of 20 MW or more
The Town Board voted unanimously on Aug. 4, 2026 for a one-year moratorium barring new applications for data centers requiring 20 MW or more. Supervisor John Flynn said the local measure mirrors Executive Order 62 but reaches below the state order's 50 MW threshold.
Tyre proposed Local Law 2 of 2026: one-year moratorium on data centers and AI computing facilities
The Tyre Town Board (Seneca County) posted proposed Local Law 2 of 2026 in June 2026 and scheduled a public hearing for July 22, 2026. The law would impose a one-year moratorium on the review, approval, construction or expansion of any data center or artificial intelligence computing facility anywhere in the town.
Commissioners voted unanimously on Aug. 17, 2026 to enact a one-year moratorium on data center development after a public hearing at which more than 23 residents spoke in favor. The board must revisit it 30 days before it expires in August 2027.
City Council approved a one-year pause on construction of new data centers in June 2026, citing utility demand and noise, while the city writes zoning rules to regulate them.
Beaufort County proposes one-year data center moratorium
Beaufort County commissioners are considering a one-year moratorium that would stop the acceptance, processing and approval of data center development applications. An informal hearing was held September 14, 2026, with no vote. The official public hearing and vote were postponed to October 5, 2026.
Local moratorium on data centers through February 28, 2028
18-month moratorium on all data center development, unanimously approved. Studies power demand, water consumption, noise/vibration, site design. Longest moratorium in the Triangle. The measure runs to February 28, 2028 and covers all data center uses.
The City Council voted 11-0 on June 8, 2026 for a 150-day moratorium on new data centers (ending November 2026) to study infrastructure, noise and environmental impacts; approved projects were unaffected.
Charlotte (citywide 150-day data center moratorium, public hearing), NC
Charlotte (citywide 150-day data center moratorium, public hearing), NC data center moratorium
On May 27, 2026, Charlotte City Council held a public hearing on a proposed 150-day citywide data center moratorium; roughly 36 speakers, mostly opposed, demanded onsite renewables, water-use limits, special-use permits for hyperscale facilities, and impact assessments. The moratorium would cover pending projects including Digital Realty's ~400 MW campus north of Charlotte Douglas Airport, PowerHouse's 300 MW University City project, and American Towers' Hood Road expansion (6,000+ signature petition against). Council vote scheduled June 8. The Charlotte City Council vote on the 150-day citywide data center moratorium is scheduled for June 8, 2026. On June 8, 2026 the Charlotte City Council voted 11-0 to enact a 150-day citywide moratorium on new data centers (through ~Nov 5, 2026); already-approved projects are exempt. Charlotte is the largest US city to adopt a data center moratorium to date.
Commissioners unanimously approved a 12-month moratorium on data centers and cryptocurrency mining in unincorporated areas through February 2027; developer Eco TIP West LLC subsequently sued over a frozen 750 MW project.
Data center moratorium (60-day, extended to 12 months)
The City Council adopted a 60-day moratorium on data center development in May 2026 and in June 2026 extended it to a 12-month moratorium running through May 2027.
The City Council unanimously adopted a one-year moratorium on May 21, 2026 prohibiting development approvals for large data centers, crypto mining and similar uses.
In April 2026, the Town of Clyde in Haywood County enacted a 12-month moratorium barring acceptance of zoning, conditional use, site plan, building and other development approvals for data centers within town limits.
The Columbus County Board of Commissioners scheduled an October 5, 2026 public hearing on a temporary pause on data center development; the county attorney proposed 90 days and one commissioner proposed 120 days.
6-month data center moratorium (unincorporated areas)
The Board of Commissioners voted 7-0 for a 6-month moratorium on data centers in unincorporated areas (through December 15, 2026) to allow time to draft regulations.
A proposed six-month pause on new data center applications failed on Aug. 24, 2026 when the Board of Commissioners split 3-3, so no action was taken. Commissioners debated whether a pause would forgo opportunity or provide needed planning time, and discussed distinguishing hyperscale facilities from smaller operations serving hospitals and colleges.
Commissioners unanimously approved a one-year moratorium in July 2026 barring permitting or filing of data centers while the county drafts development standards.
Durham City Council (60-day moratorium on hyperscale data centers, cites Microsoft Woodsdale Township), NC
Durham City Council (60-day moratorium on hyperscale data centers, cites Microsoft Woodsdale Township), NC data center moratorium
Durham City Council passed a 60-day moratorium on hyperscale data centers. Council Member Nate Baker: 'Durham is the first, not the only, of North Carolina's major communities to do this.' He pushed for at least a 24-month moratorium ultimately. Microsoft's 1,385-acre Woodsdale Township proposal cited as proximate concern.
County commissioners voted 4-1 on Aug. 24, 2026, after a public hearing at which 63 residents signed up to speak, to bar new hyperscale data centers in unincorporated Durham County through May 2027 while staff draft permanent rules. Facilities under 100,000 square feet that use closed-loop cooling and no diesel backup generators are exempt. Commissioner Nida Allam dissented on the ground that the measure did not go far enough. The county action matches the City of Durham's existing pause.
Local moratorium on data centers through August 3, 2028
2-year moratorium, 5-0 of members present after a public hearing: no data center applications or permits accepted, processed or approved in the county's zoning jurisdiction until Aug 3, 2028. Followed Energy Storage Solutions withdrawing its Kingsboro offer. The measure runs to August 3, 2028.
Local moratorium on data centers through August 3, 2027
12-month moratorium on data-center development, approved unanimously by the town's Board of Commissioners to allow staff time to research impacts and draft ordinance language, after East Energy Renewables (headquartered in Farmville) pitched a data-center network to town leaders in February. The measure runs to August 3, 2027.
The Board of Commissioners voted 5-2 on July 30, 2026 to deny a rezoning for Project Iron Spur, a hyperscale data center on about 129 acres in Rural Hall, after the planning board opposed it. Commissioners Don Martin and Gloria Whisenhunt voted in support of the project.
The City Council enacted a 120-day moratorium on Aug. 18, 2026 covering data centers drawing more than 10 MW. Residents at the hearing pressed for a far longer pause to allow environmental study.
On September 17, 2026, the Guilford County Board of Commissioners voted unanimously to schedule an October 15 legislative public hearing on a proposed moratorium of up to 180 days on data center projects.
Henderson County passed a 60-day moratorium on cryptocurrency mining on May 1, 2023, citing noise, energy, and e-waste concerns. The moratorium was replaced by permanent Land Development Code amendments establishing zoning requirements for crypto mining. State Sen. Tim Moffitt also sponsored SB 774 granting Henderson, Polk, and Rutherford counties authority to regulate crypto mining.
Following a September 3, 2026 public hearing, the City of Hendersonville has a one-year moratorium on data center development in place, according to a WLOS roundup of western North Carolina moratoriums.
The Town Council adopted a one-year moratorium effective June 17, 2026 and running through June 16, 2027. The town manager advised that Holly Springs can regulate data centers but cannot ban them outright.
On August 18, 2026, Jackson County commissioners unanimously adopted a one-year moratorium ordinance on new data center development, in effect through August 18, 2027, while the county studies potential regulations.
Kings Mountain adopted a 182-day moratorium in February 2026 on a 5-2 vote after a second data center proposal. With that pause due to expire in late August, the City Council voted on Aug. 25, 2026 to extend it by a full year, carrying it into late August 2027.
Lee County commissioners voted 6-1 on March 16, 2026 to begin drafting a moratorium on data centers and cryptomining, following a packed public meeting. On April 20, 2026, after a roughly three-hour public hearing, the Board voted 5-1 to approve zoning regulations adding 'Data Center' to the county's Unified Development Ordinance. Many residents had advocated for an outright moratorium. The new standards require pre-application meetings with Community Development staff, a noise study, and water/wastewater/electricity confirmation notices before site plan submission. Sanford City Council adopted near-identical regulations on April 22 in a 6-1 vote.
Expired local moratorium on data centers through June 13, 2024
1-year moratorium on data processing facilities including crypto mining and large server farms, passed unanimously. Would have expired ~Jun 2024; no extension or replacement ordinance found. Confirm current status with the county before citing as active. The measure runs to June 13, 2024.
County moratorium on data centers through February 11, 2027
Board of Commissioners unanimously approved a six-month moratorium on data center development following a special meeting and public hearing where residents raised concerns about water consumption during drought conditions. No data center project has been proposed in the county. The measure runs to February 11, 2027.
Nash County adopts moratorium on data centers and crypto mining
The Nash County Board of Commissioners approved a temporary moratorium on September 8, 2026, after a public hearing. It pauses development approvals for data centers, data processing facilities and cryptocurrency mining operations in unincorporated Nash County. The moratorium runs until June 30, 2027, or until new zoning standards are adopted, whichever comes first.
Northampton County Commissioners, NC data center moratorium
Northampton County Commissioners unanimously approved a 32-month moratorium on data centers after a ~300-signature petition pressed for a longer pause than the originally planned 12 months. SELC attorney involved in advising the community.
The Board of Commissioners unanimously passed a one-year moratorium in April 2026 covering AI data centers, crypto mining and similar facilities while staff draft land-use rules.
On Sep 15, 2026 the City Council directed the city attorney to draft a six-month moratorium on data center development, after residents asked for one at the Sep 8 meeting and a developer withdrew an annexation request for a Southeast Raleigh data center site in August. The council is scheduled to discuss and possibly vote on the draft at its Oct 6, 2026 meeting. Neighboring Cary adopted an 18-month moratorium in August 2026.
On September 14, 2026, the Statesville City Council unanimously approved on second reading a 180-day moratorium on accepting, processing and approving data center development applications, effective that day; previously approved data centers are not affected.
On July 14, 2026 the Board of Commissioners voted 3-2 to approve text amendments opening the county to data center development and declined to adopt the six-month moratorium its own planning board had recommended. Every public commenter opposed the move. The vote followed a contested hyperscale proposal in Walnut Cove.
After a 60-day pause in June 2026, commissioners unanimously enacted a two-year data center development moratorium in late July 2026 and appointed a steering committee to study impacts.
The Town Council voted unanimously on March 23, 2026 for a one-year moratorium on data center and cryptocurrency mining development within town limits.
Brevard adopted one of the first North Carolina moratoriums, a temporary halt on data centers and crypto mining beginning in September 2025 and later carried to a full year.
The town unanimously imposed a 60-day moratorium on new AI data centers and data-mining facilities within town limits, later followed by a longer moratorium in June 2026.
The Southport Board of Aldermen unanimously approved a 15-month moratorium on data centers on September 10, 2026. The pause applies within town limits while the town writes data center rules into its unified development ordinance, including allowable districts and setbacks. No data center project was proposed in Southport at the time of the vote.
The Board of Commissioners voted unanimously on Aug. 11, 2026 for a 12-month halt on accepting, processing or approving applications for data centers, crypto-mining facilities and related digital infrastructure. No project had been proposed.
Watauga County commissioners noticed a countywide moratorium hearing for April 21, 2026 and the county is reported among the western North Carolina jurisdictions that have enacted data center development moratoriums. Adoption date not independently confirmed.
12-month moratorium on data centers and crypto mining
The City Council voted on Aug. 25, 2026 to enact an immediate 12-month moratorium on new data centers and cryptocurrency mining, running to Aug. 25, 2027 or until the city adopts a zoning ordinance text amendment covering those uses, whichever comes first. Staff was directed to research the industries and draft regulations.
On May 19, 2026, the Woodfin Town Council approved a 12-month moratorium on data center development while the town updates its land development ordinance.
The Yadkin County Board of Commissioners approved a two-year data center moratorium on August 17, 2026, after a public hearing. The moratorium applies only to unincorporated areas under county zoning. Two data center projects inside Yadkinville town limits are not affected.
A one-year moratorium adopted 3-2 on March 3, 2026 amid a NextEra/Basin Electric proposal was lifted in July 2026 after the county adopted permanent data center, wind and solar zoning ordinances.
Morton County adopted a moratorium on data centers and cryptocurrency mining facilities in September 2024. The moratorium prevents permitting of these facilities until the county establishes local zoning regulations. The action came alongside a moratorium on direct air carbon capture facilities (adopted July 2024) after controversy over a Colorado company's special use permit application. County officials stated the moratoriums aim to develop local land use protections for residents, not block development entirely.
Over 200 people packed the Betty Hagel Memorial Civic Center in Center, ND as Oliver County leaders debated a proposed moratorium on data centers and cryptocurrency mining. The Oliver County Commission voted 3-0 to adopt a moratorium on December 12, 2024, suspending development of all data centers and cryptocurrency mining facilities. The Planning & Zoning Board had previously passed the moratorium unanimously. The purpose is to allow the county adequate time to conduct research and develop standards to guide future development. Nearby Mercer County also voted 3-2 to suspend data center development for one year, as concerns spread across western North Dakota. The project involves the Applied Digital proposal.
Local moratorium on data centers for a stated term
Emergency resolution, 6-month moratorium on data centers, advanced manufacturing, and technology storage facilities. Passed 5-0. Extended another 6 months to ~Apr 2027 due to uncertainty around HB 646 and state study commission. The measure has a stated duration whose end date is not recorded.
Local moratorium on data centers through August 4, 2027
1-year permit pause inside city limits; the mayor or service-safety director may extend it a second year. Does not reach the site that prompted it, that parcel is in Athens Township, outside the city. The measure runs to August 4, 2027.
Local moratorium on data centers through April 14, 2027
Ordinance No. 37-26, emergency measure effective immediately. One-year moratorium on all data center zoning, building, and occupancy permits city-wide while Planning Commission studies impacts. Council may extend up to 6 additional months. The measure runs to April 14, 2027 and covers all data center uses.
Local moratorium on data centers through June 22, 2027
Ordinance 26-60, an emergency measure effective on the mayor's approval Jun 23 and running through Jun 22, 2027, extendable once by up to six months. Bars consideration, approval or authorization of any data center as a permitted, conditional or accessory use, including zoning permits, building permits and certificates of occupancy, and tolls the clock on pending applications so nothing is approved by default. Excludes a data center incidental to a permitted principal use. Section 4 bars any data-center zoning framework reaching council until the city completes fiscal, infrastructure and community-impact analyses and at least two publicly noticed hearings. The measure runs to June 22, 2027 and covers permits.
Barberton City Council approved an indefinite moratorium on data centers in November 2025. In neighboring Norton, Quantum HPC's Project Triton proposal for the old PPG mine on Limestone Drive was killed in October 2025 after a contentious town hall meeting on October 13, where the Quantum HPC founder made statements the city law director determined were not true. The developer informed the city the representative was no longer working for them, and the project was withdrawn. Around 18 Ohio municipalities have enacted or are considering data center moratoriums.
Local moratorium on data centers through June 15, 2027
Ord. 6-6, emergency measure passed on first reading. Moratorium on issuing or processing data center permits for up to one year while the city studies zoning and infrastructure impacts. Sponsored by Councilwomen Coble and Weaver. The measure runs to June 15, 2027.
Blanchester Village Council unanimously approved a moratorium on data center development in February 2026, citing water, electric and utility-cost concerns.
Local moratorium on data centers through December 2, 2026
Six-month moratorium on issuing any data center permits or applications, unanimous and effective immediately. Trustee chairman Todd Garland cited noise, electricity and water use, and said the consensus among Trumbull County townships was to halt development while they study it. Reported as a Tuesday meeting, matching Jun 2. The measure runs to December 2, 2026.
Butler County Commissioners unanimously approved a six-month moratorium on June 16, 2026 covering the six townships under county zoning control at those townships' request.
Local moratorium on data centers for a stated term
Resolution 04-03-2026, moratorium on any new data center operating or locating in the township. Unanimous 3-0 vote. Third Stark County jurisdiction to freeze after Plain Township and Massillon. The measure has a stated duration whose end date is not recorded.
Thor Equities proposed a $1 billion, 500MW data center (Urbana Technology Hub) on 48+ acres in Champaign County, Ohio, near Urbana. On March 3, 2026, the Urbana City Council voted 6-1 to approve a 12-month moratorium on data centers over 10,000 sq ft, halting the project. Residents organized rapidly with 4,000+ online petition signatures within two weeks, citing threats to Cedar Bog Nature Preserve, noise, air quality, and water impacts. CyrusOne was also attached to the project. The moratorium takes effect immediately and gives the city time to study potential impacts.
Cincinnati City Council imposed temporary restrictions on data center construction in February 2026 and on April 1, 2026 extended them through the end of 2026 pending a zoning study.
City of Hubbard (Trumbull County, moratorium drafted amid 'Project Milo' NDA controversy), OH
City of Hubbard (Trumbull County, moratorium drafted amid 'Project Milo' NDA controversy), OH data center moratorium
After residents confronted Mayor Ben Kyle over an NDA he signed (Dec 2024) tied to an undisclosed data center ('Project Milo,' via the Lake to River economic development partner; possible site former Deer Creek Golf Course), council agreed to draft a 12-month moratorium with a final vote June 1. Distinct from Hubbard Township. Council voted to propose a 12-month moratorium with a final vote scheduled for June 1, 2026, amid the 'Project Milo' NDA controversy (residents confronted Mayor Ben Kyle over a 2024 NDA); one candidate site is the former Deer Creek Golf Course. On June 2, 2026, Hubbard City Council passed a 12-month moratorium on data center construction, placement, and operation, adopted as an emergency (suspending the three-reading rule).
City of Springfield (Clark County) data center moratorium
At its June 16, 2026 regular meeting, Springfield (Ohio / Clark County) Commissioner Larry Ricketts said he is working with city staff to draft an ordinance for a six-month moratorium on new data centers (renewable if the state does not regulate them), with a first reading expected within a couple of weeks. The pause would not affect data center work already underway. Named local projects: 5C Group's conversion of the former LexisNexis facility (601 Benjamin Dr) to a commercial-scale data center (Vultr/The Constant Company LLC renting space) and a planned 75 MW Crusoe Energy Systems data center. Residents tied to the Conserve Ohio ballot effort have pushed for the moratorium for months. City Commission passed the proposed 6-month moratorium on new large data centers, tied to the existing '5C' data center conversion project (~120 permanent jobs, ~$1.3B claimed investment). Separately, residents are collecting signatures for a charter-amendment ballot measure that would ban data centers in Springfield except small (<7.5MW) self-owned facilities.
Warren City Council unanimously approved a one-year moratorium on the construction, placement, expansion or approval of data centers larger than 1,000 square feet. It also directed the mayor to form a Data Center Review Committee to report within nine months.
Clay Township (Highland County) data center moratorium
Clay Township (Highland County, OH) trustees adopted a 12-month data center moratorium on April 20, 2026. Board Chair Angela Howell cited concerns that rural communities are becoming hot spots for data center development. The moratorium gives the township time to consider zoning and land-use protections before receiving any proposals.
Cleveland City Council approved a temporary three-month pause on new standalone, principal-use data center projects on July 15, 2026, in effect through Oct. 16, 2026.
Cleveland City Council (1-yr moratorium proposed; Lakeland Equity permit rejected), OH
Cleveland City Council (1-yr moratorium proposed; Lakeland Equity permit rejected), OH data center moratorium
Council Member Charles Slife proposed a 1-year data center moratorium to update zoning and define DC scales. Separately, the city rejected the construction permit application for Lakeland Equity Group's ~$1.6B data center in Slavic Village (cited incomplete submission); the company is considering options. Update: Cleveland rejected the $1.6B Lakeland Equity hyperscale data center permit in Slavic Village (~May 14), a community win on the permit, while CM Charles Slife’s proposed 1-year moratorium went to committee and is unlikely to pass before council’s summer recess. City Council approved a shortened, 3-month moratorium on new standalone data center construction and expansion, 14-1, giving City Hall time to draft zoning rules. The freeze applies only to standalone data center buildings, not server rooms within mixed-use or multi-tenant properties; Council can extend it.
City Council rejected a one-year data center moratorium 2-4 on third reading on Aug. 12, 2026. A separate charter amendment capping data centers at 25 MW remains under consideration.
Local moratorium on data centers for a stated term
One-year emergency moratorium on data center zoning permits and applications. Council President Picuri cited electricity and water concerns. Trumbull County jurisdiction. The measure has a stated duration whose end date is not recorded.
On April 14, 2026, the Dayton City Plan Board recommended adopting a 180-day moratorium on data center applications and a zoning code text amendment that would prohibit large data centers as a use within the city. Existing facilities (three Lumen/CenturyLink data centers) would be grandfathered. The proposed moratorium was scheduled for Dayton City Commission consideration on April 22, 2026.
Local moratorium on data centers for a stated term
Six-month moratorium on acceptance and processing of data center applications. Originally proposed as 12 months, amended 5-2 to six. Companion referendum on November 2026 ballot would cap data centers at 25 MW. The measure has a stated duration whose end date is not recorded and applies at a threshold of 25 MW.
One-year moratorium to review zoning. No DC zoning applications received prior. Joins Mahoning Valley communities with moratoriums (Braceville Township, Cortland, Hubbard, Lordstown, Niles). The measure has no documented term.
Temporary data center moratorium (seven townships)
Fayette County commissioners approved a temporary moratorium on data center applications and permits covering seven unincorporated townships (Jefferson, Wayne and Union townships keep independent zoning). Commissioners Garland and Fleak approved it; it runs through June 1, 2027.
Local moratorium on data centers through April 22, 2027
Ordinance 2026-42, 12-month moratorium on establishment or conversion of buildings into data centers, city-wide. Passed 9-1. Draft follow-on ordinance would allow data centers only as Conditional Use in I-3 zones with 1,000-ft residential setback. The measure runs to April 22, 2027.
Local moratorium on data centers through July 13, 2027
Ordinance No. 53-36, one-year moratorium on AI data center construction permits. Emergency measure passed 7-0. Council cited solidarity with neighboring Mahoning Valley communities (Niles, Ellsworth, Lordstown, Cortland, Hubbard). The measure runs to July 13, 2027.
Local moratorium on data centers through May 19, 2031
Five-year halt on data center development, the longest local term in this tracker, adopted at a regular council meeting after community polling and on the mayor's recommendation, following discussion of how long the restriction should run. The measure runs to May 19, 2031.
Moratorium on new development amid data center proposals
Green Township trustees approved a moratorium of at least 12 months on new development while a newly formed township zoning commission drafts rules to prohibit or restrict data centers.
Grove City Council voted 6-1 in June 2026 to pause new data center development for one year (with a six-month review) while a task force studies the issue.
Grove City (6-month data center moratorium), OH data center moratorium
On June 1, 2026, Grove City passed a 12-month (1-year) moratorium on data center development, amended to create a task force to study impacts and develop regulations during the pause.
Local moratorium on data centers through December 10, 2026
Six-month moratorium, renewable for a further six months and extendable beyond that, on all applications for zoning certificates, conditional use permits, variances or rezonings for a data center, across every zoning district. Applies to applications filed after the effective date. Reported as a Wednesday meeting, matching Jun 10. The measure runs to December 10, 2026 and covers rezoning requests.
Local moratorium on data centers through June 1, 2027
12-month moratorium on the construction, placement or operation of a data center in the city, requested by Councilwoman Robin Zambrini after residents raised concerns about a potential project. Hubbard CITY, Hubbard Township acted separately. Reported as a Monday regular meeting, matching Jun 1. The measure runs to June 1, 2027.
Strata Expanse (Houston), RAVEL, and Supermicro held a ribbon-cutting in December 2025 for an AI Center of Excellence and data center at 1476 County Road 1A in Lawrence County's Haverhill area, just off U.S. 52, the first of a 30-day national rollout of Strata Expanse's 'Land-to-Hand AI' data center concept. The facility is uniquely powered by green hydrogen and is designed for AI workloads, cryptocurrency, and AI training (with community members helping train models). Lawrence County leaders met to discuss the project, and Vertiv announced a $49M facility expansion in Ironton (operational Q2 2027) to support cooling demand. Promises 520 new jobs combined.
Jackson Township trustees unanimously approved a one-year moratorium on all data centers on unincorporated land in the township, effective immediately.
Trustees approved a nine-month moratorium on new data centers on Sept. 3, 2025, making Jerome Township in Union County the first Ohio local government to pause data center development. The pause was renewed into 2026 and became a model for other Ohio communities, though residents have criticized the township for approving permits while it was in place.
Local moratorium on data centers through March 3, 2027
One-year moratorium. Part of broader Wood County trend, 7 of 19 townships adopted moratoriums, 8 more discussed. Enacted after a potential data center site was listed for sale. The measure runs to March 3, 2027.
Lima City Council approved an 18-month moratorium on new data center projects on September 14, 2026. The pause lets city departments study water and other impacts and return to council with recommended standards. The Google data center already under construction is not affected.
Lordstown Village Council unanimously enacted a 180-day moratorium on AI data center permitting in January 2026 and extended it in June; the measure is contested in litigation before the Ohio Supreme Court.
Lordstown (Trumbull County) data center moratorium (proposed)
Separately from the data center freeze, Lordstown Village Council is advancing a 180-day moratorium on permits for businesses using small mobile (modular) reactors or battery energy storage systems (BESS). Council approved first readings of two motions, with the second reading set for June 15, 2026. Mayor Jackie Woodward said no company currently uses such equipment in the village but officials want time to research the technologies; the Moratorium Committee (chaired by Mark McGrail) is tasked with studying impacts and zoning. This is a NEW item distinct from the data center moratorium and is tied to powering/co-locating the Stargate-area development.
Lordstown Village Council, OH data center moratorium
Lordstown Village Council announced plan to extend its 180-day data center moratorium by another 180 days; hired consultant Brian Frantz ($7,625 cap). The OpenAI Stargate Lordstown site (6M sq ft former GM/Foxconn plant, Crescent Dune LLC) is adjacent but distinct from the Bristolville 25 parcel whose Ohio Supreme Court lawsuit remains pending. Public hearing scheduled June 2026. May 4, 2026: Council moved to advertise a June public hearing to extend the existing 180-day moratorium by another 180 days (covers village + Jackson Twp). The OpenAI Stargate Lordstown site (former GM/Foxconn plant, Crescent Dune LLC) does not appear subject to this moratorium. On June 16, 2026, Lordstown Village Council voted unanimously, by emergency reading, to extend its data center moratorium another 180 days (effective July 5, 2026), pushing the freeze through end of 2026. The original 180-day moratorium was enacted Jan. 5, 2026 and was set to expire July 4. A June 15 public hearing drew few residents (one comment, in...
Madison Township trustees unanimously approved a 12-month moratorium on data center permits to study whether to limit or prohibit data centers, following opposition to a proposed project in nearby Perry Village.
Massillon City Council unanimously passed a 180-day data center moratorium on April 6, 2026, then voted 8-0 to shorten it to a 60-day stay amid interest in the former Republic Steel site.
Local moratorium on data centers through February 2, 2027
Resolution No. 005-2026, 12-month emergency moratorium on establishment or conversion of structures into data centers. Passed 6-0. Precautionary measure while city studies impacts. The measure runs to February 2, 2027.
McDonald Village Council voted 5-0 at a special meeting on September 16, 2026 to adopt a moratorium barring the village from accepting, processing or considering data center applications. The moratorium lasts up to 12 months and can be ended earlier by council. Officials said it allows time to review zoning for the McDonald Steel mill property.
City Council voted 6-0 on Sept. 1, 2026 to impose a nine-month moratorium on data center development. It followed community concern over a possible large-scale data center at the former DP&L Hutchings Power Station site, and gives the city time to write zoning and development standards it does not currently have.
A Meta data center spanning 715,000 sq ft under construction in Middleton Township, Ohio, was revealed in April 2025, anticipated operational in 2027 with 100 employees (350 MW, 280 acres). Over 150 residents packed a Wood County Planning Commission meeting demanding transparency about the $800M facility. Concerns include massive water consumption, electricity usage, farmland loss, and environmental and health impacts. A power plant for the data center was fast-tracked and approved with no public hearings. Nearby communities enacted moratoriums in response: Monclova Township approved a 12-month moratorium in February 2026, and Maumee City Council approved a 12-month moratorium on February 2, 2026.
Monroe Township (Adams County) data center moratorium
Monroe Township, Ohio, trustees unanimously passed a 12-month moratorium on new proposals and development of data centers and small modular nuclear reactors. Monroe Township is the second locality in Adams County to pass a data center moratorium, alongside Sprigg Township. Trustees also established a zoning commission to regulate development in the 27-square-mile jurisdiction. Part of broader Adams County opposition to a proposed massive data center near the former Stuart power plant. Meta not confirmed; developer under NDA. The Hunterbrook 'Meta Ohio' article refers to Piqua/Mount Orab, not this Adams County project.
Local moratorium on data centers through July 1, 2028
Two-year moratorium on new data center construction. Unanimous 3-0 vote. Drafted with county prosecutor's office. Trustee originally proposed outright ban but settled on temporary pause. The measure runs to July 1, 2028.
Expired local moratorium on data centers through August 30, 2026
Ordinance No. 1339, 180-day moratorium on data center permits. Triggered by mysterious 1,000-acre mega site project by DB Stu LLC. Council member rescinded NDA to introduce the ordinance. 1,700-member opposition Facebook group. The measure runs to August 30, 2026.
In Mt. Orab, Ohio, Village Councilman Eric Lang introduced two ordinances for a 180-day data center moratorium amid community outcry over a mysterious 1,000-acre 'mega site' project requesting up to 2,000 MW. A Facebook group grew to 1,700+ members and nearly 1,000 residents signed a petition. Council members had signed NDAs about the project. Council voted to approve the temporary zoning-code moratorium on data centers in March 2026, joining at least 15 Ohio communities with enacted or pending moratoriums. Mt. Orab's expires end of August 2026.
Muhlenberg Township, Ohio, (Pickaway County, near Circleville) passed a 12-month moratorium on new data centers after a petition gathered 700+ signatures (proposed by Pacifico Energy) (120 MW, 49 acres). Key concerns include proximity to schools, potential for private wells to dry up, and impacts on the rural residential character of the township. Darbyville is within Muhlenberg Township. The resolution (2026-10) expires February 3, 2027.
Council voted 4-0 in early September 2026 to give emergency reading to a 12-month moratorium on data centers, so the zoning department and city manager can examine infrastructure, utilities and zoning code requirements. One councilman argued for a permanent ban instead.
Painesville Township Trustees (Lake County), OH data center moratorium
Painesville Township Trustees unanimously approved a 12-month data center moratorium, citing zoning gaps, water, noise, and infrastructure. Distinct from the City of Painesville.
City Council voted 7-0 on Aug. 25, 2026 to reject the site plan for a proposed three-building, 200 MW Aligned Data Centers campus in the city's industrial park, citing unresolved questions about how the project would be powered given that final siting decisions would fall to the Ohio Power Siting Board. Nearly 60 residents filled council chambers with overflow viewing in the city hall lobby. A separate ballot measure that could ban large data centers goes to Pataskala voters in November 2026.
Data center zoning moratorium extended to May 31, 2027
Pierce Township trustees (Clermont County) voted on September 9, 2026 to extend the township's zoning moratorium on data center uses, previously set to run until February, through May 31, 2027. The action followed a developer's pitch for a data center on about 300 acres near the former Beckjord power plant. The board chair said the township is not considering a data center at any site, and the zoning commission is drafting standards on water, power, noise and setbacks.
Pioneer Village Council (Williams County) voted 6-0 on September 14, 2026 to approve a six-month moratorium on data center proposals. Council members cited energy use and health concerns.
Charter amendment banning large data centers sent to November ballot
The Piqua City Commission voted 5-0 on August 18, 2026 to pass an amended ordinance placing a citizen-petitioned charter amendment on the November 3, 2026 ballot, pending Board of Elections verification. The amendment would prohibit construction of data centers exceeding 25 megawatts. Voters will decide the measure.
Plain City Village Council passed Ordinance 37-2026, an emergency ordinance establishing a one-year moratorium on accepting development applications that include data centers. First reading Aug. 5, second reading and passage Aug. 10, 2026 (5-0).
Local moratorium on data centers through March 24, 2027
12-month moratorium on data center permits. Third Stark County jurisdiction to freeze (after Canton Township and Massillon). Concerns over noise, electricity, water, and aesthetics. The measure runs to March 24, 2027.
Local moratorium on data centers through February 17, 2027
Resolution 021726-01, 12-month emergency moratorium on data centers, energy-producing/storage facilities, and high-energy-use facilities in all zoning districts. Cited lack of zoning inspector. The measure runs to February 17, 2027.
Local moratorium on data centers through March 6, 2027
12-month moratorium pausing all new data center applications while township updates zoning codes. Trustee Wasmus introduced; Trustee Wolfe proposed 6 months but was overruled. The measure runs to March 6, 2027.
Scioto Township (Pickaway County) data center moratorium
Scioto Township trustees in Pickaway County enacted a 12-month moratorium on data center applications in March 2026, joining at least 15 Ohio communities resisting AI industry expansion. The township's existing zoning code contains little to no language addressing large data center facilities. Trustee Wolfe proposed shortening the pause to six months, but other trustees insisted the full year was needed to craft legally airtight regulations for the rapidly growing sector.
Local moratorium on data centers through October 13, 2027
18-month moratorium on data centers, battery energy storage, and solar energy fields. Unanimous vote following zoning board recommendation. WLIO's report is dated Apr 14, 2026 and places the vote on 'Monday night', i.e. Apr 13; the publisher has since removed the article, so the source is the Internet Archive copy. The measure runs to October 13, 2027.
Local moratorium on data centers through February 24, 2027
12-month moratorium. Followed pushback over proposed data center at former Stuart power plant site that would consume 31x the energy of the entire county. The measure runs to February 24, 2027.
Sprigg Township (Adams County) data center moratorium
Sprigg Township, Ohio, trustees in Adams County passed a one-year voluntary moratorium on data centers on March 2, 2026, targeting a proposed facility at the former Stuart power plant site (1,016 acres). The data center, backed by 68 Yards LLC, would start at 100 MW in 2028 and scale to 1,300 MW by 2032, 31 times Adams County's total current electricity consumption. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has already issued a federal permit for the project with conditions to protect endangered bats, mussels, and butterflies, and residents have launched petitions for a statewide constitutional ban on data centers.
Local moratorium on data centers through January 14, 2027
Ordinance 159-26, 6-month moratorium on high-density computing facilities with energy demand > 25 MW. Passed 5-0 by City Commission. Could be extended if state does not act. The measure runs to January 14, 2027 and applies at a threshold of 25 MW.
Local moratorium on data centers through October 10, 2026
Ordinance 2026-38, 6-month moratorium on data center proposals. Passed 7-0. Proactive, no pending applications. Includes hardship appeal process under ORC Chapter 2506. The measure runs to October 10, 2026.
Local moratorium on data centers through April 20, 2027
Resolution 2026-42, 12-month moratorium barring establishment or conversion of structures into data centers. Passed 6-0, declared emergency. Preemptive, no project proposed. The measure runs to April 20, 2027.
Charter amendment banning data centers placed on November ballot
Trenton City Council passed an emergency ordinance on September 3, 2026 placing a citizen-initiated charter amendment on the November 3, 2026 ballot, after the Ohio Supreme Court ordered the city on September 1 to submit it to voters. The amendment would prohibit new data centers requiring more than 25 megawatts within city limits. It would not affect the Amazon Web Services data center already under construction.
Six-month moratorium to review existing planning and zoning regulations. Planning Commission evaluating 'high resource demand development' rules. Consulting with industry experts and benchmarking against other communities. Focus on infrastructure strain and natural resource consumption. The measure has no documented term.
Local moratorium on data centers through March 23, 2027
Ordinance 2026-17, moratorium on consideration, approval, or authorization of data center development across all zoning districts. Bars building permits, COOs, development plans, and special use permits. The measure runs to March 23, 2027 and covers permits.
Vienna Township in northeast Ohio is using a pause on data centers to develop lasting zoning changes rather than a temporary moratorium. Trustee Phil Pegg requested zoning to place a limit of 85 decibels at the property line, and if a data center uses more than 5 megawatts of power, they must produce anything in excess on site or an adjacent site. All water usage and discharge must meet Ohio EPA regulations.
Local moratorium on data centers through October 16, 2026
Rolling moratorium originally enacted 2025, extended 60 days from Aug 16 to Oct 16, 2026 while the county planning commission reviews the township's draft data center zoning, including noise and power limits. Bitdeer (Singapore-based) has plans in the area. The measure runs to October 16, 2026.
The Village Council passed a 180-day moratorium unanimously as an emergency measure on Dec. 20, 2025 after public pushback against a proposed EdgeConneX data center on roughly 680 acres in Pickaway County. The village can consider annexation during the pause but no development on the data center may proceed.
Neighboring South Bloomfield enacted its own 180-day moratorium on data center construction in December 2025 and also removed industrial zoning that would have allowed applications.
Village of Yellow Springs, OH data center moratorium
Yellow Springs Council passed Ordinance 2026-08 on emergency reading May 18, suspending zoning permits/approvals for data centers over 2 MW peak load for 12 months (expires May 18, 2027).
At a September 22, 2026 work session, Warren County commissioners directed the prosecutor's office to draft a temporary data center moratorium resolution. A public hearing is to be scheduled before any vote.
Local moratorium on data centers through April 16, 2027
360-day moratorium on zoning permits for new data center uses. Preemptive, no one had contacted the township about a project. The measure runs to April 16, 2027.
Washington Township (Montgomery County) data center moratorium
On April 21, 2026, Washington Township trustees (Montgomery County, Dayton area) approved a 360-day moratorium on issuance and processing of zoning permits and approvals for data center land uses, effective immediately. There are no approved plans or development applications for a data center in the township; trustees cited a need to study utility demand, noise, aesthetics, safety, and infrastructure concerns and decide whether data centers should be limited, prohibited, or subject to additional regulation. (This is distinct from Washington Township in Franklin County.)
Expired local moratorium on data centers through June 8, 2026
Resolution 34-25, 6-month moratorium (amended down from 12 months). Passed 7-0. Council member Wagner introduced it, citing agricultural land protection. The measure runs to June 8, 2026.
Westlake City Council unanimously passed a moratorium on September 3, 2026 freezing new data center approvals for up to six months, with two possible 90-day extensions. The city has no data centers and its zoning code does not list them as a permitted use; the pause gives the planning department time to study regulations.
Local moratorium on data centers through March 13, 2027
Ordinance 1249-26, emergency moratorium on authorization or establishment of data centers within the village. Applies to all pending applications without a final permit. The measure runs to March 13, 2027.
Citizen initiative to add data center standards (noise, lighting, emissions, generator testing, water use, wastewater and heat) to the city zoning code, filed by residents opposing a proposed AWS data center. On Sep 18, 2026 the Ohio Supreme Court held in State ex rel. Kidd v. Clinton County Board of Elections that the Board could keep the measure off the Nov 3 ballot because it created a private right of action, which a municipality lacks the power to create. Five justices joined the majority, one concurred and one dissented. A regulations initiative, not a moratorium.
Wood County (Bowling Green area) data center moratorium
Meta revealed plans for an $800M, 715,000 sq ft data center on 280 acres in Middleton Township. 7 of Wood County's 19 townships have adopted temporary moratoriums, with 8 more discussing it. Residents also pushed back against fast-tracked approval of a 350 MW 'Apollo' gas plant to power the facility.
Local moratorium on data centers through May 18, 2027
Ordinance 2026-08, 12-month moratorium on data centers with demand > 2 MW. Exempts auxiliary data centers under 10% of primary structure. Council member Pearce cited misalignment with community scale and values. The measure runs to May 18, 2027 and applies at a threshold of 2 MW.
Local moratorium on data centers through December 31, 2026
6-month moratorium on accepting land use development applications for data centers, unanimous, to Dec 31, 2026 with an option to extend six more months; includes an appeal route to the Board of Adjustment. City studying power, water, noise, traffic and state tax exemptions. The measure runs to December 31, 2026.
Tribal moratorium on data centers with no end date
Banned hyperscale data centers on tribally owned and trust lands after task force report; 64% of 1,593 surveyed citizens opposed; requires consultation for projects on nontribal land within reservation. The measure has no end date by design.
Principal Chief Chuck Hoskin Jr. announced on Aug. 10, 2026 that the Cherokee Nation will not permit hyperscale data centers on tribally owned or trust lands, and will not consider reservation projects without tribal consultation. A task force survey found 64% of ~1,600 citizens opposed.
City moratorium on data centers through July 21, 2027
12-month moratorium on data centers; preemptive, no developers had submitted plans; only one nay vote "out of principle". The measure runs to July 21, 2027.
Data center permit moratorium (through Dec. 31, 2026)
The Edmond City Council voted June 8, 2026 to place a moratorium on data center developments through at least December 31, 2026 while it researches impacts, though no proposals currently exist.
Tribal moratorium on data centers with no end date
Business Committee formally declared opposition to construction and operation of data centers on tribal lands; not compatible with long-term vision for sustainable development. The measure has no end date by design.
Local moratorium on data centers through December 31, 2026
Town board ordinance pausing new rezoning applications and specific-use permit requests for data centers through Dec 31, 2026, and restricting approvals of applications already filed, while the town revises zoning for data centers and battery storage. Aimed at Beltline Energy's proposed development, which the board discussed the same night without acting on it. The meeting drew a crowd large enough to be moved outdoors. The measure runs to December 31, 2026 and covers rezoning requests.
Local moratorium on data centers through June 9, 2027
One-year moratorium on approving permits for data centers within city limits, adopted unanimously June 23, 2026; press reports the suspension runs to Jun 9, 2027. Mayor said no specific proposal prompted it. The measure runs to June 9, 2027.
City Council unanimously approved a moratorium (through end of 2026) halting new data center applications, rezonings and permits, with an appeals process for exemptions.
General Council voted 24-0 for indefinite moratorium on AI data center development on tribal lands. Bars any inquiries or development concerning data centers of any size. Triggered by startup NDA request. The measure has no end date by design.
The City Council voted unanimously in late March 2026 to pause new data center construction for nine months while the city reviews how data centers are classified in its zoning code, with a planning office report every 60 days. District 4 Councilor Laura Bellis had sought a full year and amended it to nine months. The first two phases of Project Anthem are exempt and Project Clydesdale, already under construction, is unaffected.
City Council enacted a 120-day land-use moratorium on data centers and battery storage on July 27, 2026, becoming the first Oregon city to do so; Hillsboro already hosts 21 data center sites.
Commissioners voted unanimously to direct staff to begin formal moratorium process (up to 120 days once enacted). Oregon law requires 45-day notice before public hearing; moratorium not yet in effect during notice period. No existing data center applications in the county. The measure has no documented term.
Portland council votes to discourage data center NDAs, pursue moratorium
The Portland city council voted to discourage non-disclosure agreements for data center projects and to pursue a moratorium. The action was taken on September 17, 2026.
Salem City Council voted 7-0, with two members absent, on September 21, 2026 to adopt a 120-day moratorium on all new AI data center projects in Salem, effective immediately.
The Washington County Board of Commissioners decided in early September 2026 not to move forward with a data center pause, citing limited opportunities for such facilities in unincorporated areas the county oversees.
The Woodburn City Council unanimously approved a 120-day moratorium on data center development on September 15, 2026. The moratorium bars the city from considering new data center applications while officials study environmental, regulatory and quality-of-life impacts, and it can be extended up to six months.
County Council introduced Bill 8185928 to ban data center construction and related infrastructure (backup generators, cooling towers) on county-owned properties (~770 parcels, ~30,000 acres). Introduced by seven council members including Dan Grzybek and Bethany Hallam. Referred to committee on sustainability and green initiatives. The measure has no documented term and applies at a threshold of 30,000 acres.
Bill 52 Amending Part II General Legislation, Chapter 660 Zoning, Article 5 Uses, Table 660-4 Use Table and Section 660-38 Manufacturing & Industry Group
Allentown Ordinance 15-8508 on data center zoning: Bill 52 Amending Part II General Legislation, Chapter 660 Zoning, Article 5 Uses, Table 660-4 Use Table and Section 660-38 Manufacturing & Industry Group, adding public notice requirements Status Passed as of 2026-08-05.
Township Council unanimously adopted a Declaration of Substantive Invalidity and curative amendment on June 8, 2026, pausing all data center development for 180 days while it writes zoning rules.
Borough moratorium on data centers through December 14, 2026
180-day moratorium on data centers and borough water use for data centers. Two potential data center projects prompted action. Unanimous vote. The measure runs to December 14, 2026.
Local moratorium on data centers through December 7, 2026
180-day curative amendment halting data center and power generation plant development in Butler County. Unanimous vote. The measure runs to December 7, 2026.
The Board of Supervisors unanimously rejected Linde Corporation's preliminary land development plan for 20 data center buildings and two gas-fired power plants on 758 acres of former mining land near Browndale, finding it did not meet the township's subdivision and land development ordinance. The planning commission had unanimously recommended denial. The vote was reported Sept. 14, 2026.
Cummings Township supervisors adopted Resolution 07.14.2026.01, a moratorium on applications for data centers allowing 180 days to prepare a curative amendment to the zoning ordinance.
Dorrance Township adopted a zoning ordinance amendment on September 22, 2025, allowing data centers only in industrial zones. Brewster Land Company LLC owns a 155-acre parcel zoned B-2 business highway district and is challenging the ordinance, arguing it doesn't provide a clear path for data centers and effectively blocks development. The zoning hearing board began proceedings in October 2025. After multiple continuances, a hearing was scheduled for May 6, 2026 to determine whether the zoning ordinance unlawfully excluded data centers.
The Board of Supervisors unanimously denied a conditional use application for a 1.9 million-square-foot data center at the former Pennhurst site in May 2026. The developer said it would appeal.
Local moratorium on data centers for a stated term
180-day moratorium, board declared parts of data center zoning 'substantively invalid' and launched curative amendment. Developer Green Fig withdrew 1.7M sq ft application in May after sustained public opposition. The measure has a stated duration whose end date is not recorded.
Local moratorium on data centers through February 16, 2027
Board of Supervisors unanimously adopted Resolution 2026-03 imposing 180-day moratorium on new data center applications. Does not apply to PNK Group's pending application for a 252,000-sq-ft data center at Great Stream Commons. The measure runs to February 16, 2027.
Supervisors adopted Resolution 2026-03 at a special meeting on Aug. 20, 2026, barring the acceptance, processing and approval of new data center or 'technical development' applications for a period not to exceed 180 days or until the board terminates it. The pending PNK Group application is excluded and continues to be processed separately.
The Board of Supervisors unanimously passed a municipal curative amendment pausing new data center applications for six months, following the Project Hazelnut campus dispute.
The Jessup Zoning Hearing Board unanimously denied plans for a data center campus on Breaker Street on December 23, 2025, finding the proposed substation could not be placed in the residential zone.
County moratorium on data centers through December 15, 2026
Curative amendment under PA MPC Section 609.2; county zoning declared invalid for lack of data center standards. 180-day window. Covers 19 municipal partners. Separate from Muncy Township moratorium. The measure runs to December 15, 2026.
Expired county moratorium on data centers through April 30, 2026
180-day moratorium on data center applications, permits, and rezonings; adopted Data Center Land Use Ordinance in April 2026. The measure runs to April 30, 2026 and covers rezoning requests.
Local moratorium on data centers through February 1, 2027
9-month moratorium on data centers in Lycoming County township; prompted by Danko Holdings/Fishlips LLC proposal for 100-acre, 3-building facility. The measure runs to February 1, 2027.
Township moratorium on data centers through November 2, 2026
Curative amendment process pausing data center applications for 180 days; adopted new H-1 Heavy Industrial zoning on Aug 12, completing moratorium early. The measure runs to November 2, 2026.
Local moratorium on data centers through November 2, 2026
180-day moratorium on new data center development, enacted May 2026, expires Nov 2. Does NOT apply to existing TECfusions permits (Building J already operational). Despite moratorium, commissioners approved a land development plan for TECfusions. 1,400-acre campus (Keystone Connect) could reach 3 GW. 50+ residents attended meeting opposing DC. Former Alcoa Technical Center site. The measure runs to November 2, 2026.
Local moratorium on data centers until a condition is met
Resolution 2026-09: curative amendment under PA MPC Section 609.2. York County (not Bucks). Administrative pause since Mar 11; formally ratified May 13. The measure runs until a condition is met rather than to a date.
Data center zoning ordinance with size and buffer limits
The Board of Supervisors in Lancaster County unanimously approved an ordinance in early September 2026 regulating data centers, setting limits on facility size and on proximity to residential and agricultural land. No application was pending. The planning commission will review further amendments covering noise and water use.
West Mahanoy Township 180-day curative amendment moratorium on data centers and solar farms
On September 15, 2026, the West Mahanoy Township supervisors in Schuylkill County voted unanimously to adopt a resolution invoking the municipal curative amendment process, declaring the zoning ordinance deficient for data centers and solar farms. The action creates a 180-day moratorium on those uses while the township drafts standards on noise, buffers, power sources and community benefits. Officials said no applications were pending.
Township moratorium on data centers through November 1, 2026
Board invoked municipal curative amendment declaring zoning ordinance deficient for data center regulation; 180-day pause on submissions. The measure runs to November 1, 2026.
The Town Council voted 5-0 on Aug. 11, 2026 to prohibit data centers and battery energy storage systems townwide - Rhode Island's second municipal data center ban - citing reliance on well water and septic systems.
The Town Council voted 4-1 on May 5, 2026 to define data centers and list them as Not Permitted in every zoning district, effective June 4 - Rhode Island's first municipal ban. A developer that applied one day earlier is litigating the effective date.
Town moratorium on data centers through July 27, 2027
Adopted 7-0; one-year moratorium on development or construction of data centers. Allows Planning and Zoning Commission time to draft comprehensive zoning rules. Town ordinances were previously silent on data centers. No pending applications at time of vote. The measure runs to July 27, 2027.
County Council unanimously approved a six-month countywide pause on data center applications on July 20, 2026, invoking the pending-ordinance doctrine; a related Valara Holdings project is contested in litigation.
County moratorium on data centers through January 1, 2028
Ordinance 25-26-23 imposing moratorium on data centers, data processing, and crypto mining in unincorporated areas until Jan 1, 2028. The measure runs to January 1, 2028.
Clarendon County Council adopts data center moratorium
Clarendon County Council unanimously approved a data center moratorium on third and final reading on September 14, 2026. The moratorium pauses future data center development applications while council studies impacts. It does not directly affect Project 59 at the county industrial park or Santee Electric Cooperative's existing land holdings. The reported coverage did not state the moratorium's length.
Local moratorium on data centers through January 7, 2027
6-month moratorium on special exceptions, conditional-use approvals, and other land-use/development approvals for data centers (Ordinance 26-O-04), adopted unanimously. Planning Commission separately approved a 'digital infrastructure overlay district' text amendment. The measure runs to January 7, 2027.
Colleton County Council (first-reading 6-month moratorium on 850-acre Eagle Rock proposal in ACE Basin), SC
Colleton County Council (first-reading 6-month moratorium on 850-acre Eagle Rock proposal in ACE Basin), SC data center moratorium (proposed)
Colleton County Council unanimously passed first reading of a 6-month (extendable) moratorium over an 850-acre proposed data-center facility on Cooks Hill Road south of Walterboro in the ACE Basin (9 industrial buildings on wetland-adjacent property).
Colleton County Council (moratorium finalized, related SELC lawsuit paused)
Colleton County Council (moratorium finalized, related SELC lawsuit paused) data center moratorium
Colleton County Council finalized a 6-month data center moratorium; the Southern Environmental Law Center agreed to pause its related lawsuit against the county for the moratorium's duration. Target project: Eagle Rock Partners' proposed 1,000 MW/859-acre facility near Walterboro. Hyperscaler unconfirmed. A July 20, 2026 Live 5 News report corroborates the finalized moratorium and continued community scrutiny over power and jobs impacts.
Proposed county moratorium on data centers for a stated term
County Council approved Ordinance 856 on Sep 14, 2026, establishing a 12-month moratorium on data centers. During the moratorium the county will not negotiate with data center developers while it studies economic, environmental, infrastructure, utility, land-use and community impacts and drafts a regulatory ordinance.
County moratorium on data centers through July 21, 2027
1-year moratorium blocking new data center approvals. Voted 4-3. Followed denial of text amendment allowing data centers as conditional use. The measure runs to July 21, 2027.
On September 21, 2026, Jasper County Council unanimously approved second reading of a one-year moratorium, extendable in six-month periods, on data centers, data processing facilities and cryptocurrency mining in unincorporated areas; third reading is set for the next council meeting.
On September 22, 2026, Kershaw County Council unanimously passed on third and final reading a one-year moratorium on data centers, cryptocurrency mining operations and data processing facilities.
Laurens County Council approved the third and final reading of a one-year data center moratorium 6 to 0 on September 14, 2026. It stops the acceptance, review, approval and issuance of permits for data center development. The moratorium applies only to unincorporated Laurens County, not the cities of Laurens and Clinton.
After the town's planning committee recommended a 120-day, extendable moratorium on data center requests, Mount Pleasant Town Council took up first reading of the ordinance on September 8, 2026.
Local moratorium on data centers through July 16, 2027
12-month moratorium on accepting new data-center permits, confirmed unanimously after the council unanimously denied the 'Project Altair' land-sale ordinance in June. Staff directed to research appropriate locations for future data-center development. The measure runs to July 16, 2027.
Newberry County (1-year moratorium + land-purchase denial), SC
Newberry County (1-year moratorium + land-purchase denial), SC data center moratorium
On June 4, 2026, the Newberry County Council voted unanimously to deny an ordinance that would have let a developer purchase county land for a potential data center, and enacted a one-year ban on new data center projects. The crowd cheered the decision. Newberry County Council unanimously confirmed the 12-month moratorium on new data-center permits in a follow-up vote.
Orangeburg County data center moratorium (proposed)
Orangeburg County Council adopted a 12-month temporary moratorium on new data center development on third reading on September 8, 2026, by voice vote, after a public hearing that lasted more than an hour. First reading had passed at a July 23 special-called meeting. The county will not accept or act on new applications for data centers or other data processing facilities during the pause.
On September 21, 2026, Spartanburg County Council voted 5-1 on third reading to approve a one-year moratorium on new data centers larger than 65 megawatts, with amendments; previously approved projects such as the Valara data center are not affected.
Spartanburg County (Council directs drafting of data center moratorium), SC
Spartanburg County (Council directs drafting of data center moratorium), SC data center moratorium (proposed)
On June 15, 2026 the Spartanburg County (SC) Council unanimously directed the county manager and attorney to draft a data center moratorium/ban ordinance while awaiting state legislation. The existing NorthMark data center (Pine Street, 450 MW) is unaffected; the trigger is 'Project Lighthouse' (300 Jones Road, ~60 MW, a Bitcoin-mining site purchased by LightHouse/Lightstone). On June 22, 2026 the Spartanburg County Council unanimously passed FIRST READING of a 12-month data center moratorium ordinance, directing staff to hold in abeyance any new data center development applications submitted on or after the first-reading date. The moratorium can be extended by council vote and requires three readings total to become law. It...
Spartanburg County Council (moratorium, first reading)
Spartanburg County Council (moratorium, first reading) data center moratorium (proposed)
Spartanburg County Council passed the first reading of a 12-month data center moratorium unanimously; it does not affect the already-under-construction NorthMark project. County Council passed the second reading of the one-year moratorium ordinance on July 20, 2026; a third and final reading is still required. The ordinance's third and final reading remains unscheduled as of 2026-07-30.
County Council gave final approval July 13, 2026 to a nine-month moratorium in unincorporated York County on new data-center special exceptions and site plans; nine already-vested QTS buildings are exempt.
Lincoln County Commissioner Joel Arends proposed a one-year moratorium on hyperscale data centers requiring 100+ MW, calling it an opportunity to 'press pause and further research' the impacts of projects like Gemini Data Center SD LLC's proposed $1.9 billion, 500MW facility on 164 acres. However, no commissioner seconded the motion, killing the measure. Commissioner Jim Schmidt argued projects of that scale already take at least a year to go through the permitting process with multiple public hearings. The commission voted 3-2 to refer regulations to Planning and Zoning instead, to the dismay of 15 constituents in the audience who supported the moratorium.
Planning Commission reviewed draft data center ordinance that would outright prohibit hyperscale facilities (500,000+ sq ft); smaller data centers allowed only in commercial/industrial zones with half-mile dwelling setback. Draft sent back for revision; final approval likely months away. The measure has no documented term.
County commissioners voted in July 2026 for a six-month moratorium on large data center and cryptocurrency projects to study impacts and draft an ordinance, with an option to extend.
Yankton County (temporary data center moratorium, first reading), SD
Yankton County (temporary data center moratorium, first reading), SD data center moratorium (proposed)
On June 16, 2026 the Yankton County (SD) Commission held a first reading of a resolution for a temporary moratorium of up to 12 months on data centers and Bitcoin-mining facilities exceeding a power-capacity threshold, prompted by reports of a possible data center; a capacity crowd attended. A1 Development Solutions said it is analyzing eastern SD locations with no current Yankton commitment. Still pending, no formal action taken, research continuing. At a packed June 16, 2026 meeting the Yankton County Commission debated a draft resolution (by Commissioner Ryan Heine) for up to a 12-month moratorium on data centers / Bitcoin-mining facilities exceeding 250 kW, prompted by reports of a possible data center. Commissioners could take no action...
The Anderson County Commission unanimously approved a two-year moratorium on new data centers in mid-June 2026 to research impacts and craft safeguards.
Anderson County (2-year moratorium on data centers, crypto mining, battery storage), TN
Anderson County (2-year moratorium on data centers, crypto mining, battery storage), TN data center moratorium
On June 15, 2026 the Anderson County (TN) Commission approved a two-year moratorium on new cryptocurrency mining, data processing, and battery storage development (facilities ≥20,000 sq ft or 5+ MW) after residents packed the meeting, to study regulations the county currently lacks.
Local moratorium on data centers through August 17, 2027
1-year moratorium on all AI data centers and cryptocurrency mining centers, passed 20-1 after public comment ran heavily in favour, to let the county study environmental and community impact. The report dates the vote to 'Monday evening' of the week it published; Aug 17 is that Monday. The measure runs to August 17, 2027.
Cedar Hill (Robertson County, mayor proposing 2-year data center + crypto moratorium), TN data center moratorium
Cedar Hill Mayor John Edwards proposed a 2-year moratorium on data centers and crypto mining, prompted by a large project planned across the state line in Franklin, KY. He plans to bring it to town leaders the following month; no vote yet. On June 1, 2026, the Cedar Hill (Robertson County) council enacted a 2-year moratorium on data centers and crypto-mining within city limits, citing electrical, water, wastewater, noise, and traffic concerns.
The Coffee County Commission unanimously passed a one-year moratorium on new data centers on June 9, 2026, later adding zoning rules barring them from the agricultural district.
Local moratorium on data centers through August 12, 2028
Two-year moratorium on data centers and high-density computing, passed on third reading; halts new permits for server farms and crypto mining. Mayor chose moratorium over permanent ban to avoid lawsuits. The measure runs to August 12, 2028 and covers new applications.
The Dickson County Commission approved a six-month moratorium on data centers at its regular meeting on Monday, July 20, 2026. Date corrected from 7-21 to 7-20. The claim that it was kept in place on Sept. 9 was not independently confirmed.
Proposed twelve-month moratorium on new data centers
Gallatin City Council passed a data center moratorium ordinance on first reading on Sept. 15, 2026, amended from 12 months to six months on the mayor's tie-breaking vote; second reading is pending. Earlier, WSMV reported on July 29 that city leaders had approved a 60-day pause on processing new data center applications; the claimed Aug. 5 date for that suspension was not confirmed.
County moratorium on data centers through May 18, 2028
Two-year moratorium on data centers, crypto mining, and high-impact data processing in unincorporated areas; approved unanimously by county commission. The measure runs to May 18, 2028.
County moratorium on data centers through July 7, 2027
One-year moratorium on data centers, crypto mining, and high-performance computing with 5+ MW peak demand; exempts First Civil District industrial zone. The measure runs to July 7, 2027.
County moratorium on data centers through July 15, 2027
One-year moratorium on new data centers in unincorporated areas only; does not affect approved Chattanooga projects. The measure runs to July 15, 2027.
The City Commission voted unanimously in May 2026 to extend its existing data center moratorium from June 5 to Dec. 3, 2026 while it studies noise limits and setback rules.
One-year data center moratorium (through June 30, 2027)
The Knox County Commission approved a one-year moratorium on data center projects effective through June 30, 2027, defining data centers to include AI and cryptocurrency operations.
One-year moratorium on large data centers (10 MW+)
The Knoxville City Council passed an emergency ordinance on July 8, 2026 imposing a one-year moratorium on permitting or construction of large data centers requiring 10 MW or more of power.
County moratorium on data centers through December 30, 2026
Six-month moratorium on new data centers with 50+ MW peak demand; covers permits, zoning, building approvals, utility extensions, and development agreements. The measure runs to December 30, 2026.
County moratorium on data centers through July 19, 2027
12-month moratorium on data centers in unincorporated areas; 24-month amendment rejected on county attorney advice. Hard end date July 19, 2027. The measure runs to July 19, 2027.
Local moratorium on data centers through December 3, 2027
18-month moratorium, unanimous; prompted by a proposed 25 MW Nvidia GB200 NVL72 AI campus. 2,600+ petition signatures. Town halls scheduled Jun 25 and 29. The measure runs to December 3, 2027 and applies at a threshold of 25 MW.
McMinnville (18-month data center moratorium, first reading), TN
McMinnville (18-month data center moratorium, first reading), TN data center moratorium
On June 3, 2026, the McMinnville Board of Mayor and Aldermen unanimously approved on first reading an 18-month moratorium covering data centers, Bitcoin mining, and microchip manufacturing, following 90+ minutes of public comment, to study infrastructure, environmental, and noise impacts. A second reading is required for final adoption. On June 9, 2026 the McMinnville Board of Mayor and Aldermen gave unanimous final passage to the 18-month moratorium, effective immediately. It was prompted by opposition to a proposed ~25 MW, 96,000-sq-ft AI data center (designed for Nvidia GB200 NVL72) near residential neighborhoods; the city chose a moratorium over a ban for legal defensibility.
The Memphis City Council delayed the third and final reading of a proposed 12-month data center moratorium on September 15, 2026; a revised version with exemptions for existing facilities and an expert study committee is scheduled for a vote on October 6, 2026.
The Moore County, Tennessee, Metro Council is considering a two-year moratorium on data center construction and expansion, which would take effect April 20, 2026. During the moratorium, the county would stop accepting new applications for special use permits, zoning amendments, and building permits related to data centers. County staff would study potential effects on energy use, water demand, noise, and land use in coordination with local utility providers.
County moratorium on data centers through June 12, 2028
Two-year moratorium on data centers capable of 10+ MW peak demand; county commission proactive measure, no proposals pending. The measure runs to June 12, 2028.
Local moratorium on data centers through December 1, 2026
Metro Council passed the city's first data center regulations plus a permit moratorium; an amendment holds the pause to Dec 1 whether or not the regulations pass. The measure runs to December 1, 2026.
Data center permit moratorium plus zoning regulations
Metro Council on July 21, 2026 adopted first-ever data center regulations and a moratorium on data center permits through Dec. 1, 2026, banning facilities over 500,000 sq ft.
The Roane County Commission approved a resolution directing the regional planning commission to draft a two-year moratorium -- amended up from an initially proposed 180 days -- on new data centers, cryptocurrency-mining operations, and battery storage facilities. Commissioners cited the burden such facilities can place on emergency-response resources during incident events as the rationale for the extended pause. Roane joins a growing list of East Tennessee counties moving to pause data center development pending study.
Local moratorium on data centers for a stated term
Moratorium on data centers and cryptocurrency mining plants; duration not specified in available sources. The measure has a stated duration whose end date is not recorded.
Sullivan County Commissioner Jessica Means introduced a 4-month moratorium resolution on data mining and crypto mining centers on November 20, 2025. The commission deferred the vote at their December meeting. Subsequently, a major data center project was announced for Sullivan County (Indiana, near Merom Generating Station / Heartland Industrial Park, 1,000+ acres). Phase 1: $20B investment, 750 peak construction jobs, 125 permanent jobs. Phase 2: $45B, 2,000 peak construction jobs, 375 permanent. Project includes seven buildings and two end users. Community benefit package includes $25M to the county per phase plus $4.5M for local programs (Brownbaggers School Food, Merom Camp, Sullivan County Park and Lake).
One-year data center moratorium (through June 30, 2027)
Washington County commissioners voted 13-2 to approve a one-year moratorium forbidding construction, operation and permitting of data centers through June 30, 2027.
County moratorium on data centers with no end date
Ban on data centers and data mining facilities; did not go through formal zoning process; enforcement challenged by 4.9 MW crypto proposal. The measure has no end date by design and applies at a threshold of 4.9 MW.
The Wilson County Commission unanimously approved a resolution imposing a six-month moratorium, running from July 20, 2026, on applications and permits for data centers and high-density computing facilities, and created a study committee. Date corrected from 7-21 to 7-20.
Abbott halts new Texas data center permits pending ERCOT audit
Governor Greg Abbott issued a directive halting all new data center permits from the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality until an ERCOT audit is completed. The audit is scheduled to be finished by December 2026.
City Council voted 3-2 to permanently ban data centers within city limits. Defines data center as any facility over 500 sq ft used primarily to house servers. Not a moratorium -- a standing zoning ban. The measure has no end date by design and applies at a threshold of 500 sq ft.
Council unanimously directed staff to draft Land Development Code rules for large-scale data centers (location, size, water, noise, heat, lighting) that could regulate or ban facilities above 75 MW, with the first ordinance due back by end of 2026. At least five members back a full ban on hyperscale sites. No moratorium is in effect. The measure has no documented term and applies at a threshold of 75 MW.
Moratorium on AI data centers and battery energy storage systems
Austin County Commissioners Court unanimously adopted a countywide moratorium on new AI data center and battery energy storage developments in unincorporated areas while the county evaluates impacts and a possible energy development zone.
Bell County (Murray Industries construction moratorium)
Bell County (Murray Industries construction moratorium) data center moratorium
Commissioners passed a two-year construction moratorium halting a project by Murray Industries, which had already begun clearing land. It is unclear whether the moratorium covers Meta's already-operational Temple facility nearby. This is a distinct company/action from the broader Rowan Digital Infrastructure / tax-abatement fight already tracked for Temple-area (Bell County) data centers.
Brownsville starts 90-day data center moratorium process
The Brownsville City Commission voted at its early September 2026 meeting (Resolution No. 2026-121) to begin the formal process for a 90-day moratorium on high-intensity data processing facilities. The moratorium would last 90 days after ordinance adoption, with one possible 90-day extension under state law. Two public hearings are required before a final determination, and the commission also reactivated its Environmental and Conservation Task Force to study data centers.
Council directed staff to pursue prohibiting data centers in all zoning districts; requires data centers to fully fund own infrastructure. Drought context: severe water crisis threatening city reservoirs. The measure has no documented term.
The Denton City Council held the first of two required public hearings on a proposed temporary data center moratorium on September 23, 2026, with no vote taken; the second hearing is scheduled for October 27.
Council unanimously approved data center policy: 300-ft buffer from residential/ecological sites, special use permit, no more tax breaks. Developers must submit resource use, emissions, noise, and water treatment plans. The measure has no end date by design.
Proposed local moratorium on data centers with no end date
Council directed staff to amend zoning to prohibit data centers in all districts -- effectively a proposed citywide ban. Escalation from April 2026 regulations requiring 5,000-ft setbacks. The measure has no end date by design.
City Council unanimously approved the first steps on Aug. 11, 2026 to initiate a 90-day moratorium on new data center applications, expected to take effect in early 2027; not yet in force.
Local moratorium on data centers for a stated term
120-day moratorium on data center development within city limits, adopted in May 2026 after public hearings, running to mid-October; commissioners approved first reading of a 60-day extension to December in August, second reading pending. City hired Ambiotec Engineering to study water, wastewater and power impacts. The measure has a stated duration whose end date is not recorded.
Water advocates identified 5 data centers proposed for the Hays County, Texas, region during historic drought (proposed by CloudBurst Data Centers / Highlander SC One LLC) (1.2GW, $1.2B, 200 acres). County Judge Ruben Becerra proposed a 30-day moratorium on high-water-use building permits but was forced to table it after county attorneys warned it would trigger a lawsuit the county would likely lose. San Marcos City Council scored a major win Feb. 17, voting 5-2 at 2:14 AM to block a $1.5B Highlander SM One data center after 8+ hours of testimony from 100+ residents. Hays County aquifers are at historic lows. Hays County Judge Ruben Becerra proposed a moratorium on permits for large industrial water users (>20,000 gal/day) but the Commissioners Court tabled it on Feb 25 after county attorneys warned it would trigger a lawsuit the county would lose. State Sen. Bettencourt warned counties lack authority for moratoriums. Water advocates have identified 5 potential data center developments in the region and continue organizing.
Hill County commissioners adopted a one-year moratorium on May 12, 2026 (the first by a Texas county) but rescinded it June 5, 2026 after a developer lawsuit.
Hill County Commissioners Court (first Texas county data center moratorium), TX
Hill County Commissioners Court (first Texas county data center moratorium), TX data center moratorium
Hill County Commissioners Court voted 3-2 for a 1-year pause on data center construction in unincorporated areas, appears to be the first Texas county moratorium. County officials expect lawsuits (demand letters arrived within 24 hours); State Sen. Paul Bettencourt asked AG Paxton to investigate, claiming counties lack authority. At least 8 more local projects reportedly in development.
Hood County (40 miles SW of Fort Worth) has received at least five data center applications (proposed by Sailfish Development). Commissioners voted down a proposed moratorium 3-2, twice, despite 8 hours of public testimony. The 2,100-acre Comanche Circle project sits in a recharge zone for the Upper Trinity Aquifer and could use 1M gallons/day. State Sen. Paul Bettencourt sent a letter to AG Paxton warning that counties lack constitutional authority to impose moratoriums, chilling local opposition. Residents are still adjusting to a nearby bitcoin mining operation in Granbury where neighbors report constant noise affecting people, pets, and wildlife. Hood County commissioners rejected the moratorium a second time on Feb 25, 2026, in a 3-2 vote. Instead, they voted to seek an opinion from TX Attorney General Ken Paxton on whether counties have authority to enact development moratoriums. State Sen. Paul Bettencourt warned counties lack constitutional authority for moratoriums. Residents called for commissioner resignations after the second block.
Council voted unanimously to require Special Use Permit for data centers; banned in all residential areas. Each proposal needs two public hearings. The measure has no end date by design.
Citizen-petitioned 18-month data center moratorium
On September 23, 2026, the Lubbock City Council voted 5-2 to initiate the state-required process for a 90-day moratorium on rezoning, building permit and annexation applications for large-scale data centers; two public hearings are required before it takes effect.
Proposed framework: 5-acre min lot, 65 dB noise limit, banned in residential/agricultural/commercial districts. Staff recommended ordinance over moratorium. Not yet enacted. The measure has no documented term.
Resolution calling for stricter statewide standards on data centers: public disclosure of electrical demand, water consumption, cooling technologies, and infrastructure impact. Non-binding. The measure has no documented term.
City amended regulations to require a Specific Use Permit for data centers, updated definitions, and established per-project public review. The measure has no end date by design.
City Council voted 4-3 on June 16, 2026 to define data centers and make them ineligible in all zoning districts, becoming the first Texas city to ban them; relies on home-rule authority.
Commissioners rejected a 12-month moratorium on large-scale data centers, BESS, and power generation in Precinct 4; cited legal risk after Hill County's moratorium drew a $100M federal lawsuit. The measure has no documented term.
Commissioners unanimously imposed a 180-day moratorium on new data centers and data center power plants in unincorporated areas June 10, 2026; the MIDA-approved Stratos Project is not covered.
Box Elder County (180-day data center moratorium; Stratos/MIDA exempt), UT
Box Elder County (180-day data center moratorium; Stratos/MIDA exempt), UT data center moratorium
On June 10, 2026 the Box Elder County Commission unanimously approved a 180-day moratorium on new data center development in unincorporated Box Elder County (zoned and unzoned land), to study land-use codes and data-center guidelines. The Kevin O'Leary-backed Stratos Project is EXPLICITLY EXEMPT because MIDA projects bypass standard local land-use approval, so residents (BEAR mobilized for the meeting) argued the moratorium is insufficient; one told commissioners 'your descendants will curse you.' Hence a mixed outcome. In-window follow-up coverage (Utah Public Radio, June 17, 2026; KSL) on the Box Elder County Commission's June 10, 2026 unanimous 180-day moratorium on new data centers and data-center power plants in unincorporated areas. The reporting explicitly confirms the moratorium does NOT apply to the controversial Stratos Project, because the commission...
City moratorium on data centers through March 7, 2027
180-day moratorium on data center development, 4-0 unanimous; preemptive, no proposal pending; city code had no definition or zoning for data centers. Prompted by Stratos project in neighboring Box Elder County. The measure runs to March 7, 2027.
Local moratorium on data centers through January 3, 2027
180-day temporary land use regulation, unanimous: pauses acceptance, processing and approval of applications, permits and licenses for data centers, data center power plants and associated digital infrastructure. Pre-emptive -- nothing was in the queue. The measure runs to January 3, 2027.
Local moratorium on data centers through December 27, 2026
180-day temporary land use regulation (Ordinance 26-12): the city will not accept, process or approve any application or permit for a data center or data center power plant within city limits while it writes permanent rules. End date is 180 days from adoption. The measure runs to December 27, 2026.
City moratorium on data centers through December 13, 2026
Ordinance 04-2026: 180-day moratorium on data centers, data center power plants, and solar energy facilities; 5-0 unanimous. Council determined data centers are not appropriate land use within city limits. The measure runs to December 13, 2026.
Proposed 180-day data center temporary land use regulation
The Salt Lake County Council unanimously adopted a resolution on Tuesday, Sept. 15, 2026 directing staff to develop data center regulations for unincorporated areas. Under the resolution the county will not consider new data centers until the rules are adopted, expected by mid-February 2027. This is a resolution-based pause, not a formally adopted 180-day moratorium ordinance.
Local moratorium on data centers through January 17, 2027
Resolution 2026-04: immediate 180-day moratorium on all land use applications for data centers, data center power plants (explicitly including nuclear) and supporting digital infrastructure, unanimous. County code did not address data centers at all. The measure runs to January 17, 2027.
Selectboard unanimously approved two-year moratorium on data centers and 'high-impact uses', businesses consuming over 10 MW, 57,600 gal/day water, or emitting over 70 dB persistent noise, or adding over 10 acres impervious surface. Exempts small data centers for administrative/operational support. Third Vermont community to pass data center restrictions. The measure has no documented term, applies at a threshold of 10 MW and covers all data center uses.
Royalton, Vermont, voters approved a five-year moratorium on AI and crypto data centers via show-of-hands vote at Town Meeting Day. About 154 of the town's registered voters participated. No data centers have been proposed for the town; the ban is preemptive. The Planning Commission will write the policy into the town plan for Selectboard approval. State Senator Becca White spoke at the meeting about her statewide moratorium bill (S. 205).
Planning Commission amended Land Development Regulations to ban data centers with footprint exceeding 20,000 sq ft. Facilities under 5,000 sq ft classified as general commercial and exempt. Small-scale (5,000-20,000 sq ft) permitted in mixed industrial-commercial and industrial zones only. Adopted after Gov. Scott vetoed state-level H.727. The measure has no end date by design and applies at a threshold of 20,000 sq ft.
City Council voted unanimously July 21, 2026 to suspend review of data center applications for up to eight months, or until it adopts regulations ending by-right data center development.
Unanimous zoning text amendment requiring a conditional use permit, planning commission review, public hearing and a board vote, for data centers on light and heavy industrial land (about 2,200 acres on 140 LI parcels plus 867 acres HI). Data centers inside the Culpeper Technology Zone stay by-right. The permit route has not meant denial: on Jul 2, 2026 the board rezoned 69.19 acres of farmland at Nalles Mill and Keyser roads 4-3 for Red Ace Capital's two-building, 1.16M sq ft campus, after tabling it in June. The county counts two operating data centers and expects seven campuses in the Tech Zone plus an approved Amazon campus. The measure has no end date by design, applies at a threshold of 2,200 acres and covers rezoning requests.
Not a pause, a standing zoning ordinance amendment, adopted Sep 10, 2024 and effective Sep 11, that requires Board of Supervisors special-exception approval for nearly all new data centers (by-right only in I-5/I-6 industrial districts), 200-ft setbacks from residential lot lines (300 ft for backup generators), a one-mile buffer from Metro stations, full enclosure or screening of mechanical equipment, and pre- and post-construction noise studies. A companion substation amendment adopted Dec 9, 2025 (unanimous) adds 100-ft residential setbacks, 12-ft solid walls, a 50-ft planted buffer and a 55 dBA nighttime noise limit, but leaves substations by-right in industrial zones, which is why the Plaza 500 (Lincolnia) fight runs through a 2232 public-facility review rather than a rezoning. Applications pending on Sep 11, 2024 were grandfathered. The measure has no end date by design and covers rezoning requests.
Expired local moratorium on data centers through January 31, 2026
In Sep 2025 the board directed staff to postpone consideration of data center site plan applications until Jan 31, 2026 while it rewrote the code; the planning commission's minutes called it a moratorium and County Attorney Dan Whitten later said it was not one. In Dec 2025 the board amended the code to require a special use permit for data centers in industrial districts. On Aug 5, 2026, with an 843-acre agricultural parcel near Bremo Bluff being marketed as a data center site, Supervisor Fairchild asked for a resolution and a temporary pause on new applications to be placed on the Aug 19 agenda; Chair O'Brien opposed an outright prohibition. The Aug 19 outcome has not been located, check the minutes before citing. The measure runs to January 31, 2026 and covers new applications.
Local moratorium on data centers through October 4, 2026
90-day moratorium on land-use applications for data centers, 6-0. Planning Commission drafting language to prohibit data centers in every town zoning district. The measure runs to October 4, 2026.
Mecklenburg County Board of Supervisors voted in March 2025 to end by-right zoning for data centers, requiring all data center applications to undergo staff-level review, a public hearing, and a Planning Commission recommendation. This replaced the previous system where some data centers could be approved administratively. The county has benefited economically from data centers, including a Microsoft complex whose tax revenues helped build a new school, and has reduced residential property and car taxes. Environmental groups have targeted the spread of data center sites in the county.
Rejection of Dulles Cloud South data center rezoning
Supervisors voted 8-0 on July 7, 2026 to deny rezoning nearly 2,000 acres for the Dulles Cloud South campus (43M sq ft), days after the Digital Gateway project collapsed.
Resolution adopted 4-2 (Mullins and Frazier opposed) backing Sen. Sturtevant's call for the governor to 'issue a statewide moratorium on data centers to determine whether development should be permitted and, if so, under what conditions'. Sits on two standing local rules: a Feb 2026 vote requiring a special use permit for every data center, ending by-right siting even on industrial land, and an Aug 25, 2026 comprehensive plan amendment (3-2) capping data centers at 45% of the county's industrial-zoned land, with two supervisors voting no because they wanted a lower cap. The county had earlier welcomed some $35B in data center investment. The measure has no end date by design.
Standing ordinance, not a pause. Phase 2 data center rules (Ordinance O25-29 and Comprehensive Plan amendment R25-208, adopted Oct 21, 2025; O25-29(R) on Dec 2, 2025 grandfathered five approved projects, Stafford Technology Campus, Potomac Church Tech Center, Centreport Gateway/Pemberton, Vantage VA-4 and Cranes Corner, 31 buildings and 8.7M sq ft) on top of the Oct 2023 Phase 1 rules: by-right only in M-2 and the ICTP overlay, 100/200-ft setbacks from non-commercial zoning (a 500-ft residential setback was recommended), sound mitigation with post-occupancy noise checks at 90 days and annually, 30% open space outside the urban service area. The county reports 11 applications still under review and none filed since Sep 2025. On Sep 1, 2026 the board directed staff to draft letters asking Gov. Spanberger for a special session on data center rules and, failing quick legislation, a temporary pause on new large-scale approvals; Chair Diggs calls the ordinance 'the strictest in Virginia'. The measure has no end date by design.
Council directed Planning Commission to draft UDO amendment prohibiting data centers in all zoning districts. Applications not being considered during drafting, but formal enactment pending. The measure has no documented term.
Local moratorium on data centers through August 18, 2027
12-month pause on new data center applications, 10-0, ending early if the council adopts a data center ordinance first. Aimed at larger-scale and hyperscale proposals; does not affect the existing Globalinx facility. Staff told the council the city has no established definitions, setbacks or noise thresholds yet. Reported as a Tuesday vote in coverage published before Aug 20; Aug 18 is that Tuesday. The measure runs to August 18, 2027.
Local moratorium on data centers through January 31, 2027
6-month moratorium, unanimous. Prompted by Blue Fern Development's 20 MW / 100,000 sq ft plan within Bullfrog Flats community near I-90. Site may be exempt via preexisting development agreement. The measure runs to January 31, 2027 and applies at a threshold of 20 MW.
Local moratorium on data centers through February 12, 2027
6-month moratorium on acceptance of data center applications, voted 2-0 without discussion. Public hearing Sep 15 to consider extending another six months. The measure runs to February 12, 2027.
City moratorium on data centers through January 29, 2027
Six-month moratorium on data center permit applications within town limits; no applications received; town reviewing whether any form of data center is appropriate. The measure runs to January 29, 2027 and covers permits.
County moratorium on data centers through March 10, 2027
Six-month moratorium on data centers and battery energy storage systems; covers facilities over 2,000 sqft or 2+ MW. The measure runs to March 10, 2027 and applies at a threshold of 2,000 sqft.
Local moratorium on data centers through January 14, 2027
6-month moratorium on buildings/facilities whose principal use is data management/transmission, unanimous. Mayor urged surrounding counties to follow suit. The measure runs to January 14, 2027.
Moratorium on new data center development; listed by MRSC (WA state municipal research service) among cities with moratoriums. The measure has a stated duration whose end date is not recorded.
Local moratorium on data centers through February 12, 2027
6-month moratorium, 4-1, with no data center yet proposed. Planning staff to draft rules on electricity and water demand, stormwater and building in the Skagit River floodplain. The measure runs to February 12, 2027.
Local moratorium on data centers through January 20, 2027
6-month moratorium, 6-0. Extendable if officials don't have satisfactory answers. Developing data-center-specific land-use regulations. The measure runs to January 20, 2027.
County moratorium on data centers through August 25, 2027
Emergency ordinance prohibiting new/expanded data centers over 10 MW in unincorporated Pierce County; one year unless extended or lifted. The measure runs to August 25, 2027 and applies at a threshold of 10 MW.
The City Council adopted a resolution in early September 2026 halting acceptance, processing and approval of facilities whose principal use is digital data processing, storage, management or transmission. It took effect immediately for an initial six months. No application had been filed. Staff has 60 days to produce a work plan covering public participation and analysis of electric rates, water use, industrial land, noise and environmental quality.
Local moratorium on data centers through August 17, 2027
One-year moratorium on filing, acceptance, processing, and approval of applications/permits for siting or expansion of large data centers; unanimously approved. The measure runs to August 17, 2027.
Emergency one-year data center moratorium (Council Bill 121214)
The City Council unanimously adopted an emergency ordinance June 9, 2026 freezing new large data center (20 MVA+) siting for one year while it studies impacts.
Skagit County commissioners enacted a six-month moratorium on data centers (facilities over 2,000 sq ft or using 2 MW or more), with staff later proposing permanent rules.
Six-month data center moratorium (Resolution 2026-22)
The Skamania County Board of County Commissioners unanimously adopted Resolution 2026-22 on August 18, 2026, imposing a data center moratorium of up to six months, renewable after hearings. State law requires a public hearing within 60 days of adoption.
Snohomish County Council unanimously adopted an emergency six-month moratorium on data centers in unincorporated areas on June 24, 2026, with an option to extend.
The Spokane City Council passed (6-1) a one-year emergency moratorium on June 22, 2026 on building-permit applications for new computer data centers to study land-use and utility impacts.
The Board of County Commissioners approved a four-month moratorium unanimously on Aug. 19, 2026, replacing an earlier nine-month proposal that had split the board 3-2, to give staff time to draft zoning rules.
Local moratorium on data centers through February 12, 2027
6-month moratorium in unincorporated areas, unanimous. Studying economic, health, agricultural, and water impacts. The measure runs to February 12, 2027.
Local moratorium on data centers through June 2, 2027
12-month moratorium on hyperscale data centers (>100,000 sq ft and >20 MW); Plan Commission voted 7-0. The measure runs to June 2, 2027 and applies at a threshold of 100,000 sq ft.
The Planning, Development and Transportation Committee unanimously declined on June 2, 2026 to pursue a countywide moratorium, noting every municipality in the county has its own zoning; a subcommittee was formed instead.
Brown County (committee declines countywide data center moratorium), WI
Brown County (committee declines countywide data center moratorium), WI data center moratorium (failed)
On June 2, 2026, the Brown County Planning, Development & Transportation Committee unanimously declined to advance Supervisor Christopher Welch’s proposed countywide data center moratorium, citing that no town, village, or city in Brown County is under county zoning (rendering it moot). It instead formed an informal three-person subcommittee to survey local governments. About 80 people attended and 21 commenters objected to the decision.
Local moratorium on data centers for a stated term
12-month moratorium, 19-0, first and second readings the same night (extended from the 10 months committee proposed). Applies only to the six towns under county zoning, Anson, Eagle Point, Hallie, Lafayette, Wheaton, Woodmohr. Coverage puts the effective date in September without naming it, so the end date is not derivable. The measure has a stated duration whose end date is not recorded.
The Madison City Council approved a 12-month moratorium on Jan. 13, 2026 on zoning approvals for new data centers over 10,000 sq ft, to develop regulatory standards.
The Superior City Council unanimously approved a one-year moratorium on data centers at its June 16, 2026 meeting, acting before receiving any application.
Local moratorium on data centers through December 4, 2027
18-month moratorium on hyperscale data centers in county zoning areas. Advisory committee to study benefits and pitfalls. The measure runs to December 4, 2027.
Dane County (18-month hyperscale data center moratorium passed), WI
Dane County (18-month hyperscale data center moratorium passed), WI data center moratorium
The Dane County Board unanimously approved Sub 1 to RES-039 on June 4, 2026, an 18-month moratorium pausing zoning permit applications for hyperscale data centers (defined as 5,000+ servers and 10,000+ sq ft) through roughly December 2027. It applies only to towns under county zoning, not self-zoning cities and villages; the county used a state-law workaround to enable it (zoning committee approved unanimously May 26). On June 4, the Dane County Board approved Sub 1 to 2026 RES-039, an 18-month pause on zoning permits for hyperscale data centers (defined as 5,000+ servers and 10,000+ sq ft) in towns subject to county zoning (excludes cities, villages, and self-zoned towns).
Local moratorium on data centers through February 10, 2028
18-month moratorium on data-center development in county-zoned unincorporated areas, approved 29-2 by the Board of Supervisors after a public hearing. Initiated by Supervisor Cathy Houchin following constituent concerns about a Beaver Dam-area data center's impact on water. The measure runs to February 10, 2028.
County moratorium on data centers through May 26, 2027
1-year moratorium on data centers and battery energy storage in unincorporated areas; board retains option to extend. The measure runs to May 26, 2027.
County moratorium on data centers through June 18, 2027
Board of Supervisors voted 15-0 for 12-month moratorium on hyperscale data center zoning permits in unincorporated areas. Related to collapsed $1B data center proposal. The measure runs to June 18, 2027.
Board voted 30-1 to approve 12-month moratorium. No data center proposals had been received. Chairman Jerry Guth said moratorium would allow time to review and update antiquated zoning codes. Part of broader Wisconsin trend (~24 communities with moratoriums). The measure has no documented term.
Local moratorium on data centers through December 18, 2027
18-month pause in unincorporated areas; county stood up an ad hoc committee to study data centers, and the city of La Crosse is taking part in that work while drafting its own rules. The measure runs to December 18, 2027.
The County Board voted unanimously on April 29, 2026 to bar the county from accepting applications or issuing permits for data center construction or siting for 18 months, after the towns of Two Creeks, Two Rivers and Mishicot requested it.
Marathon County Board adopted 12-month moratorium in late August 2026. Applies to 18 townships under county jurisdiction. Does not apply to existing data centers or facilities under 5,000 sq ft. Blocks new conditional use permits, zoning changes, and zoning permits. The measure has no documented term and applies at a threshold of 5,000 sq ft.
City of Middleton Common Council adopted data center moratorium as of Jul 1, 2026. Pauses issuance of zoning certificates for data centers. Planning department directed to draft comprehensive data center ordinance. The measure has no documented term.
A substitute ordinance relating to a temporary pause in the establishment and development of data centers.
Milwaukee Ordinance 251924 on data center moratorium: A substitute ordinance relating to a temporary pause in the establishment and development of data centers. Status In Committee as of 2026-03-03.
Mishicot, Wisconsin, joined Two Creeks and Two Rivers at a joint town board meeting after several hundred people packed the Grey Fox Bar and Grill on January 26, 2026 for an informational meeting on AI data centers, with organizers forced to change to a larger venue due to overwhelming turnout. Cloverleaf Infrastructure and NSI Land Services had been approaching local farmers to purchase property. Town Board Chair Dean Anhalt said residents are concerned about losing rural character and farmland, especially from retired farmers and landowners renting to active farming operations.
County moratorium on data centers through January 21, 2028
18-month moratorium on medium/large data centers and all battery storage; passed 10-3. Small-scale DCs (<500 kW, no crypto) exempt. Environmental concerns include trout streams in driftless area. The measure runs to January 21, 2028 and applies at a threshold of 500 kW.
County moratorium on data centers through August 19, 2027
1-year moratorium on data centers; unanimous vote; preemptive action with no known proposals. Excludes un-zoned areas of Sugar Camp, Monico, Enterprise, and City of Rhinelander. The measure runs to August 19, 2027.
The Oshkosh Common Council unanimously approved Ordinance 26-38 on September 8, 2026, establishing a 12-month moratorium on new data centers. The moratorium runs 12 months after publication unless the council ends it earlier, giving the city time to draft zoning and regulatory standards.
The Polk County Board of Supervisors adopted Resolution 29-26 on August 18, 2026, creating Polk County Code Ch. 42-41 and enacting a temporary moratorium on data centers. The resolution provides for a 12-month moratorium while the county develops zoning and regulatory standards.
Referendum requiring a public vote on large tax incentives
Voters approved the nation's first anti-data-center referendum in April 2026 with roughly 66% support, requiring that approval of tax incremental financing for any project with a base value or cost above $10 million be put to a community vote. It followed Vantage Data Centers' announcement of a $15 billion AI campus with OpenAI and Oracle; the referendum does not stop that project, which was already under construction with $458 million in approved tax benefits.
County moratorium on data centers for a stated term
Ordinance 07-2026-0 amends the county zoning code to enact an 18-month moratorium on receipt of applications and the granting of all zoning permits or approvals for siting or placement of data centers. Effective on publication; runs 18 months from publication or until the board amends or rescinds it, whichever comes first. Publication date not recorded, so no end date is stored. The measure has a stated duration whose end date is not recorded.
County moratorium on data centers for a stated term
County board adopted an 18-month temporary moratorium on development of large data centers and associated infrastructure, to give staff time to draft setback, permitting and performance standards. Zoning committee had recommended it 5-0 on Jul 15. Source is meeting coverage, not the county's own ordinance; end date is not stated in it. The measure has a stated duration whose end date is not recorded.
County moratorium on data centers through June 24, 2027
12-month moratorium on data centers in unincorporated towns under county zoning; does not affect cities, villages, or self-zoning towns. The measure runs to June 24, 2027.
Shawano County (committee recommends 1-year data center moratorium), WI
Shawano County (committee recommends 1-year data center moratorium), WI data center moratorium (proposed)
On June 3, 2026, the Shawano County Planning, Development & Zoning Committee unanimously recommended a one-year moratorium for unincorporated (county-zoned) areas after a public hearing at which no speakers opposed it. The full county board is set to vote June 24. The Planning, Development & Zoning Committee held a June 3 public hearing (no speakers opposed) and unanimously recommended a one-year moratorium to the full county board, which takes it up June 24.
Local moratorium on data centers through July 23, 2027
12-month moratorium on data centers over 10,000 sq ft; unanimously approved. No existing zoning codes for data centers. The measure runs to July 23, 2027 and applies at a threshold of 10,000 sq ft.
Sheboygan Common Council, WI data center moratorium (proposed)
Sheboygan Common Council voted 7-3 to refer a proposed one-year moratorium on data centers >10,000 sq ft to the Plan Commission. No projects currently proposed. Plan Commission meeting May 12; back to Council for final say.
Local moratorium on data centers through September 1, 2027
1-year moratorium on medium- and large-scale data centers, 18-0, in unincorporated areas under county zoning -- does not apply to the towns of Forest, Hudson, St. Joseph, or Troy, which zone themselves. The measure runs to September 1, 2027.
Local moratorium on data centers for a stated term
2-year moratorium, unanimous. 36 sq mi in Grant County. Residents mobilized against a \$1B proposed project. The measure has a stated duration whose end date is not recorded.
Local moratorium on data centers through April 6, 2027
1-year moratorium restricting new data centers and telecom centers to max 10,000 sq ft; voted 4-1. Catalyst was QTS Data Centers proposal in nearby DeForest. Dane County. The measure runs to April 6, 2027 and applies at a threshold of 10,000 sq ft.
Two Creeks, along with Two Rivers and Mishicot, held a joint town board meeting and approved identical resolutions calling on Manitowoc County to adopt a one-year moratorium on data center permits and construction, with option to extend 6 months (by Cloverleaf Infrastructure). These three northeast Wisconsin towns acted proactively to prevent data center siting in their communities.
Two Rivers, Wisconsin, joined Two Creeks and Mishicot at a joint town board meeting on February 12, 2026 in approving identical resolutions calling for a one-year moratorium on data center permits and construction in Manitowoc County, with option for a six-month extension. The action came after Texas-based Cloverleaf Infrastructure approached local farmers with offers to purchase land, with one Mishicot farmer reportedly offered $70-80 million for up to 6,000 acres. Over 70 residents attended the joint meeting, and the Manitowoc County Board's Park and Planning Commission took up the moratorium petition on March 30.
The Village Board voted unanimously on Aug. 12, 2026 to bar all data center development for 12 months, extendable by six months, while a permanent ordinance is written. No proposal was pending.
The Cottage Grove Village Board unanimously approved a 12-month data center moratorium on July 20, 2026, becoming one of three Dane County municipalities to pause data centers.
The Greenville Village Board unanimously adopted a one-year moratorium on July 13, 2026 on new data centers of 10,000 sq ft or more to study impacts and develop regulations.
The Wrightstown Village Board unanimously approved a one-year data center moratorium on July 7, 2026 after a resident petition; an Aug. 11, 2026 advisory referendum then rejected a data center in the village.
County Board passed 12-month moratorium in voice vote at Aug 18, 2026 meeting. Applies to townships of Algoma, Neenah, Nekimi, and Omro. Cities must adopt own regulations. Preemptive, no known data center proposals in county. The measure has no documented term.
12-month proposal voted down 8, 1 after 3.5 hours of public comment. The measure has no documented term.
Frequently asked
Which states have data center moratoriums?
As of September 2026, no U.S. state has enacted an outright ban on data centers. Several have paused tax incentives or new applications (for example Arizona and Illinois), tightened siting through executive orders (Utah, Louisiana, Kentucky, Nebraska), or rolled back tax exemptions (Oregon, Washington, Iowa, Florida). Standalone construction-moratorium bills in Maine, New Hampshire, Oklahoma and others were introduced but have so far failed or been vetoed. The tracker above lists each measure with its primary source.
How many states have introduced data-center moratorium or restriction bills?
This tracker documents state-level action in 49 states — a mix of enacted rollbacks and executive orders, temporary pauses, pending bills, and measures that failed or were vetoed. It is updated as measures move.
What is a data center moratorium?
A data center moratorium is a temporary halt on approving or building new data centers, usually while a government studies the impact on the electric grid, water supply, and ratepayers. In practice, most 2025–2026 measures are narrower than a full ban: pauses on tax incentives, new siting and permitting conditions, or rollbacks of sales-tax exemptions.
Have any states banned data centers outright?
No state has passed a permanent, statewide ban. The closest was Maine's LD 307, which would have paused data centers of 20 MW or more until late 2027 — it passed the legislature but was vetoed, and the override failed. Most restrictions in force are tax-incentive rollbacks or executive-order siting reviews rather than construction bans.
Where are the local data center moratoria?
Most fast-moving activity is at the city and county level, where building pauses and permit halts don't require a state legislative session. The tracker includes a sourced sample of these local moratoria alongside the state-level measures.
How to read this tracker
In force = a moratorium, siting restriction, or tax-incentive rollback that is currently enacted (by statute or executive order). Paused = a temporary hold on new incentives or applications. Proposed = a bill introduced and still pending. Failed / vetoed = a measure that died in committee, was voted down, or was vetoed.
This is a curated tracker built from primary sources — legislature bill pages, governors' offices, and reputable reporting — and every entry links to its source so you can verify it. Legislative status changes quickly; we update as measures move. It is informational, not legal advice. Spot something out of date? Tell us.
Capital, delay, policy, water, grid, permits and scarcity are one system seen from seven sides. Each reference is primary-sourced, refreshed on a schedule, and links into the others, so a project can be followed from the money committed to the docket that stopped it.
Have a specific address? Site Intelligence reads all seven references against one location, county, utility and grid operator included, and cites every finding.
Communities push back on data centers over three things: the strain on the electric grid, the water used for cooling, and the sense that a facility takes local resources without giving much back. SAVRN builds AI factories designed around those objections — on-site power that doesn't lean on the public grid, direct-to-chip cooling that doesn't consume municipal water, and a training institute that puts local people to work inside the building.