SAVRN
Search Contact SAVRN
SAVRN Research · North American Data Center Capital Atlas

Who is funding AI data centers?

The North American Data Center Capital Atlas records who is funding the AI data center buildout, in what structure, at which site, and how much of that capital has been stopped. 98 capital providers, 453 named sites, 600 financing transactions, and 1117 documented blocked or delayed projects, drawn together from 5,622 source citations. Every figure links to the page that states it.

Updated 2026-10-08 Live · sources checked 1 h ago · 4 of 4 sources answered · 2 entries added in the last 7 days · last change 2026-10-06 Refreshed Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday Version 1.1.12 Compiled by SAVRN Research
Data map of the lower 48 United States drawn from the atlas itself: 166 funded data center campuses plotted as copper discs sized by disclosed capital, 181 blocked or delayed projects drawn as dashed blueprint outlines across 43 states, and copper arcs running from the New York and San Francisco financial centers to the largest funded campuses
The atlas in one image: capital flows to campuses. The copper campuses are funded and building. The outlined ones are where the money stopped.
Announced multi-year capital
exceeds $1.5 trillion
Announced capital deployment across hyperscalers, frontier AI labs, NeoClouds, private capital sponsors and REITs now exceeds $1.5 trillion on a multi-year announced basis.
Blocked or delayed, Q1 2026
~$130 billion across ~75 projects
Communities, utilities, regulators and states blocked or delayed roughly $130 billion of pipeline across roughly 75 projects in the first three months of 2026.
Blocked or delayed, full-year 2025
$156 billion
Data Center Watch's blocked-or-delayed tally rose to $156 billion for full-year 2025, up from $64 billion for May 2024 through March 2025.
Blocked or delayed, May 2024 to March 2025
$64 billion
Data Center Watch documented $64 billion blocked or delayed between May 2024 and March 2025, split into $18 billion blocked and $46 billion delayed.
Vacancy and construction pipeline
1% vacancy
JLL reports North American data center vacancy at 1% for a third consecutive year, with more than 66 GW under construction. Not a dollar figure, so no USD value recorded.
Stargate Project target
$500 billion over four years
The Stargate Project targets $500 billion over four years and 10 GW of capacity. More than $450 billion and over 8 gigawatts of that had been announced by October 2025.
Blackstone data center portfolio
$150 billion portfolio
Blackstone reported a $150 billion data center portfolio with a $160 billion prospective pipeline, against $1.3 trillion of firm AUM.
Largest single loss: Prince William Digital Gateway
$24.7 billion, 2 GW, 27M sq ft
The Prince William Digital Gateway, developed by QTS and Compass, is the largest single loss at $24.7 billion, 2 GW and 27M sq ft.
Read the numbers the way the evidence allows. Announced multi-year site commitments overlap with one another and with reported capital expenditure, so this atlas never sums them into a single deployment figure. Blocked-and-delayed totals from different trackers cover different windows and definitions, and are shown side by side rather than added. Where a figure could not be confirmed from a fetched source, the entry reads n.a. rather than an estimate.

Would you like the atlas update?

The atlas is re-verified and republished on Tuesday, Thursday and Saturday. You get one email when it goes out, with what changed.

Also send me

Receive a short introduction on days 3, 7 and 14, plus the updates you select. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy ·

You're on the list. The next atlas update will land in your inbox when it publishes.
You are subscribed. Read the latest tracker
Section 01 · The map

The capital map

Every named site in the atlas, placed where it stands. Copper circles are committed capital: campuses announced, under construction, or operating, sized by announced dollars (megawatts where dollars are undisclosed). Red, amber, and violet circles are the wall: projects blocked, delayed, or halted by courts, sized the same way. Click any circle for the record and its sources.

AlaskaAlabamaArkansasArizonaCaliforniaColoradoConnecticutWashington, DCDelawareFloridaGeorgiaHawaiiIowaIdahoIllinoisIndianaKansasKentuckyLouisianaMassachusettsMarylandMaineMichiganMinnesotaMissouriMississippiMontanaNorth CarolinaNorth DakotaNebraskaNew HampshireNew JerseyNew MexicoNevadaNew YorkOhioOklahomaOregonPennsylvaniaRhode IslandSouth CarolinaSouth DakotaTennesseeTexasUtahVirginiaVermontWashingtonWisconsinWest VirginiaWyoming Mount Pleasant datacenter campus (Fairwater Wisconsin) ($7.0B)Project Rainier, New Carlisle / St. Joseph County ($26.0B)Madison County data center complexes ($10.0B)Pennsylvania campuses (Salem Township and Falls Township) ($20.0B)Iowa: Council Bluffs expansion and new Cedar Rapids data center ($7.0B)Texas program (Armstrong County, Haskell County, Midlothian) ($40.0B)South Carolina: Berkeley County campus and two Dorchester County sites ($9.0B)Ohio operations (New Albany, Columbus, Lancaster) ($20.0B)Hyperion, Holly Ridge, Richland Parish ($50.0B)El Paso AI data center ($14.0B)Lebanon hyperscale development ($10.0B)Saline Township campus ($16.3B)Colossus 2, Southaven ($35.8B)AWS Virginia standing commitment ($35.0B)Stargate Saline Township (Michigan) ($7.0B)Project Rainier (New Carlisle) ($11.0B)Colossus 2 ($35.8B)Abilene Stargate campus (Crusoe / Blue Owl / Primary Digital JV) ($15.0B)Polaris Forge 1 ($11.0B)QTS Van Wert mega-campus ($10.0B)Blackstone / Digital Realty hyperscale JV campuses ($7.0B)PW Digital Gateway ($24.7B)Compass Datacenters Meridian hyperscale campus ($10.0B)US Army hyperscale program at Fort Bliss (Carlyle) (n.a.)Vantage Frontier mega-campus ($25.0B)Vantage Lighthouse campus ($15.0B)Meta Hyperion campus (Blue Owl JV) ($27.0B)Compass Datacenters Meridian campus ($10.0B)Vantage/OpenAI/Oracle Madison campus ($15.0B)Prince William Digital Gateway ($24.7B)Tract Goodyear/Buckeye project ($14.0B)Tract Mooresville project ($30.0B)Abilene, Texas AI campus ($7.1B)Paducah American Energy Hub ($100B)PORTS-Pike Technology Campus (n.a.)Project Camellia (Savannah Gateway Industrial Hub) ($20.0B)Project Latigo campus ($20.0B)Project Thunderbird data center campuses ($35.0B)Corscale Swatara Township data center ($10.5B)AWS northwest Louisiana campuses (Caddo and Bossier parishes, incl. third campus at Resilient Technologies Park, Shreveport) ($18.0B)Project Tembo (formerly Project Jade), Switchgrass Industrial Park ($17.0B)Nexus Data Centers Hubbard AI campus ($16.0B)PowerHouse Hillwood Joliet campus ($20.0B)T5 @ Chicago IV ($18.0B)Starwood Digital Ventures Mason County High Impact Data Center ($12.0B)Kinetic Infrastructure Solutions (Google) Columbia County data center ($17.0B)Black Mountain southeast Fort Worth data center campus ($10.0B)Serverfarm Clarksville data center ($6.6B)DataOne AI factory campus (Logix Innovation Campus) ($7.5B)Project River energy and data center campus ($11.3B)AWS data center campus, Energy Way Industrial Park (Airport Road), Hamlet ($10.0B)Columbia County Data Center, White Oak Technology Park (and Pumpkin Center site) ($17.0B)Vantage Data Centers Project Latigo (Terry Ranch Road) ($20.0B)STACK Infrastructure Berry Hill data center campus (Southern Virginia Megasite at Berry Hill) ($100B)QTS data center campus on Lancium Clean Campus (near Turkey) ($10.0B)Carrollton Industrial Campus data center (Greens Bottom Road) ($9.6B)Amazon Montgomery County data center campus ($10.0B)Project Lightning data center, Wildwood Commerce Park ($11.0B)Project Beehive nuclear-powered data center campus (n.a.)Stratos Project AI data center campus (MIDA project area) (n.a.)Related Digital data center campus (adjacent to Project Star energy campus) (n.a.)Project Fighting Pike data center (southwest of U.S. Highway 2 and U.S. 85 Bypass) ($10.0B)Infrakey hyperscale data center campus (Ross area, proposed Lacy Lakeview annexation) ($10.0B)AWS data center campus near R.M. Schahfer Generating Station (Wheatfield) ($7.0B)Project Catalyst data center (across from Osawatomie State Hospital) ($10.0B)Prince William Digital Gateway ($24.7B)Culpeper Brandy Station ($12.0B)Pittsylvania MegaCampus ($8.8B)Ohio generation buildout (n.a.)Project Rainier / New Carlisle ($26.0B)Lebanon LEAP campus ($10.0B)Madison campus ($15.0B)Tract Mooresville ($30.0B)Goodyear/Buckeye campus ($14.0B)Project Sail ($17.0B)Saline Township campus ($16.0B)Project Jupiter (10,000-acre Green Data Center) ($165B)40,000-acre / 9 GW campus (n.a.)Lighthouse campus (Port Washington) ($15.0B)New Carlisle $13B campus ($13.0B)QTS DeForest / Vienna campus ($12.0B)Imperial Valley Computer Manufacturing campus ($10.0B)301 Digital Crossroads (Hammond) ($7.0B)STAMP campus (Stream) ($19.5B)T5 @ Chicago IV (Grayslake) ($18.0B)Project Camellia zoning ordinance challenge (n.a.)PowerHouse Hillwood Joliet data center campus ($20.0B)Crusoe Technologies Leon County data center tax abatement ($34.0B)Edgecombe County AI data center (Kingsboro) ($19.2B)TECfusions Keystone Connect Building J land development appeal (n.a.)Project Marvel residents' rezoning lawsuit (Rock Mountain Road, Bessemer) ($14.0B)Project River ($11.3 billion campus) ($11.3B)PAX-1 data center (Middlesex Township) ($15.0B)Project Camellia Effingham IDA open meetings and open records suit (n.a.)Amazon Richmond County data center diesel generator air permits challenge ($10.0B)Serverfarm Clarksville data center bond ordinances referendum ($6.6B)Project Fighting Pike data center (Critical Data House) ($10.0B)Sentinel Grove Technology Park (Project Jarvis) ($13.5B)Beltline Energy data center (Highway O site) ($16.0B)Red Wolf hyperscale data center (Parallel Parkway) ($12.0B)Project Lightning data center, Wildwood Commerce Park (Carroll County rejects agreement amendment) ($11.0B)Black Mountain southeast Fort Worth data center site plan (EdgeConneX) ($10.0B)White Cloud Acres data center and co-located gas plant (U.S. Highway 71, south of Maryville) ($6.3B)CRG Festus hyperscale campus ($6.0B)Beacon Data Centers Calvert Infrastructure Hub ($6.0B)Rhodes Technology Park ($6.0B)Eagle Rock Partners digital infrastructure campus (Jefferson Davis County) ($6.0B)QTS Eagle Mountain data center campus (SLC1) ($6.0B)Project Arrowhead data center campus ($6.0B)Childersburg Industrial Park data center (former Alabama Ordnance Works site) ($6.0B)King George campus ($6.0B)CRG Festus campus litigation ($6.0B)75 South Data Center Campus (Tomochichi Road) ($6.0B)Project Lincoln: Oldham County data center ($6.0B)Bolingbroke Technology Center ($6.0B)Project West ($6.0B)Pine Island data center (Project Skyway) (n.a.)Microsoft Highlands data center campus annexation (about 3,460 acres, south Cheyenne) (n.a.)EdgeConneX Cedar Creek campus (AUS02) ($5.8B)Green Chile gas pipeline route for Project Jupiter (Oracle, Doña Ana County) (n.a.)Polaris Forge 2 ($5.0B)Landover project ($5.0B)Farmington Technology Park (Tract) ($5.0B)Aligned Data Centers Pataskala campus ($5.0B)AWS 18-building campus, Trenton annexation of 601 acres from Madison and St. Clair townships ($5.0B)TenKey LandCo Franklin data center ($5.0B)Marshall County proposal (n.a.)Project Hyper data center campus (Spur Buildings 1 and 2), County Road 233, Jayton ($4.8B)Pecos datacenter campus (n.a.)Project Horizon (Longfellow Ranch) (n.a.)Tract Caldwell County technology park (n.a.)Matagorda County powered land site (n.a.)Sweetwater Hub (Sweetwater 1 and 2) (n.a.)Project Phoenix campus, Shippingport (n.a.)Rubix Data Centers hyperscale campus at former AK Steel Ashland Works (n.a.)Slate Belt Holdings data center campus (former River Pointe property) (n.a.)Rubix 2 GW data center, former AK Steel Ashland Works (Russell moratorium) (n.a.)Wilmington campus (tabled) ($4.0B)Google Arkansas commitment ($4.0B)ECP-KKR Bosque County campus ($4.0B)Cameron County AI data center campus ($4.0B)Sabey Decatur Township data center ($4.0B)Caledonia campus ($4.0B)Penzance Bedington campus ($4.0B)Sabey Decatur Township campus ($4.0B)Westfield data center ($4.0B)AWS Wilmington data center emergency rezoning (Cosler Farm) ($4.0B)Geronimo Power data center campus (agricultural preservation zoning change denied) ($4.0B)Wyoming pipeline capacity (n.a.)Project Jade (Crusoe and Tallgrass Cheyenne campus) (n.a.)Fleet Data Centers Reno-area hyperscale facility (SV RNO) ($3.8B)Tract Pole Canyon technology tract (n.a.)Wallace Jackson Data Center Campus (I-75) ($3.6B)Project Blue, Tucson ($3.6B)Applied Digital Delta Forge 1 ($3.6B)Project Blue ($3.6B)Muskogee HPC data center (n.a.)Prometheus Hyperscale data center campus (Falls Ranch, south of Interstate 25) (n.a.)River Bend campus ($3.2B)Lake Mariner campus ($3.2B)Delta Forge 2 AI Factory campus ($3.2B)TerraWatt Armory data center (3728 Market Street, Midtown) ($3.1B)Millville Energy & Data Center Campus (n.a.)Vicksburg campus ($3.0B)Eagle Mountain campus ($3.0B)Switch Nevada AI campus ($3.0B)Prime PHX01, Avondale ($3.0B)Project Temple data center campus ($3.0B)AWS Sidney data center campus (Millcreek Road) ($3.0B)Google data center campus, Botetourt Center at Greenfield ($3.0B)Project Hercules data center campus (267 Industrial Park Lane) ($3.0B)ATL2 East (west of Veterans Parkway) ($3.0B)Midlothian/Powhatan ($3.0B)TerraWatt Midtown (Armory) data center ($3.0B)PAX-1 data center development (Country Club Road) (n.a.)Midwest Digital Gateway ($2.9B)Keel Scrubgrass data center (former Scrubgrass power plant) (n.a.)American Transmission Co. power line project serving the Port Washington (Lighthouse) campus for Vantage, Oracle and OpenAI (n.a.)Valara data center (former Kohler plant, Pine Street) ($2.8B)NorthMark / Valara computing center ($2.8B)Prometheus Hyperscale flagship campus near Evanston (n.a.)InfraTech Capital Carson County data center campus ($2.7B)Stargate flagship campus, Abilene (Crusoe/Lancium Clean Campus) (n.a.)Stargate Abilene (n.a.)Highridge Business Park AI factory (n.a.)Project Bluestem hyperscale data center (n.a.)Lex Pocatello data center ($2.6B)Stonebridge Fort Meade hyperscale data center (residents' lawsuit and recall) ($2.6B)Chandler AI data center (Queen Creek and Dobson roads) ($2.5B)EdgeCore Louisa County campus, Shannon Hill Regional Business Park (n.a.)Project Indo (218 Industrial Park Road) ($2.4B)Texas data center tied to OpenAI's Stargate ($2.3B)Cedar Creek data center and gas plant campus (Pacifico Energy and BlackChamber Partners; Anthropic in lease talks) ($2.2B)STACK Stafford County site (n.a.)Tract Morris Technology Park (n.a.)Crusoe and Lancium Childress AI data center campus (n.a.)Savannah River Site AI data center and energy generation project (n.a.)Project Cannoli data center (east of Haggerty Road, north of the I-94 North Service Drive) (n.a.)Project Barracuda energy park and co-located data center (La. 1) (n.a.)Tonopah film studio, retail and data center complex (data center and technology campus) (n.a.)Muskie Data Campus (n.a.)Hendricks Group data center campus and gas plant (Henderson Road, Fiore Property) (n.a.)ACE Basin proposal (n.a.)EastPark project (n.a.)La Osa Energy Center (n.a.)East Fishkill data center freeze (n.a.)Hyperscale data center and natural gas plant on BLM land near Henderson (Paradise Hills area) (n.a.)Google Project Cannoli county tax incentives and community benefits agreement (Van Buren Township) (n.a.)Sunbury data center campus ($2.0B)Copia Power site west of Phoenix ($2.0B)CyrusOne US Army data center site, Utah ($2.0B)Novva West Jordan campus ($2.0B)Accokeek Center data center complex ($2.0B)Project Zodiac, Google Fort Wayne data center campus ($2.0B)Black Pearl Facility ($2.0B)Riverview Innovation & Technology Campus ($2.0B)Project Tango ($2.0B)Amazon Sunbury campus ($2.0B)Barrington Hills data center proposal (Penny Road) ($2.0B)Pine Ridge Technology Park rezoning lawsuit ($2.0B)Abilene 900MW AI factory campus (Microsoft) (n.a.)Apollo site (n.a.)Tract Tuckahoe Creek Technology Park (n.a.)Natelli Holdings data center (former Triangle North Vance, US 158 and Poplar Creek Road) (n.a.)Kenilworth data center ($1.8B)Former Emerson campus technology hub and data center ($1.8B)Former Emerson campus technology hub and data center ($1.8B)Spring Valley Technology Park (n.a.)South Annville Township data center (1235 Martina Drive Owner LLC) ($1.7B)Texas Critical Data Centers (TCDC) (n.a.)Childress campus (Horizon 1-4) (n.a.)Triangle Innovation Park West (TIP West) (n.a.)Oklo mixed-technology power project for Meta (n.a.)Bitdeer Shalersville data center (Turnpike Commerce Center) (n.a.)Plano data center (1000 Coit Road) ($1.6B)Menomonie data center (Balloonist LLC) ($1.6B)Slavic Village hyperscale data center ($1.6B)HyperGrid campus, Amarillo ($1.5B)Goodyear data center campus ($1.5B)Montgomery data center ($1.5B)CyrusOne Freestone County campus (Freestone Energy Center) ($1.5B)Project Red Clay data center ($1.5B)Harper Road ($1.5B)Highlander SM One data center ($1.5B)Lowndes County data center moratorium ($1.5B)Rhea Data Center (BLM land south of Boise) (n.a.)Great Falls campus (n.a.)Iron Horse data center campus (Hanover-Ashland line) (n.a.)Vantage Ashburn campus (n.a.)Chesterton campus ($1.3B)Rockdale AI/HPC campus (Milam County) (n.a.)Kuna data center ($1.2B)Denton HPC data center ($1.2B)CyrusOne DFW10 campus (Thad Hill Energy Center) ($1.2B)Project Eagle campus, Boling ($1.2B)Terra Nexus Rockingham data center (316 Old Cheraw Highway) ($1.2B)Meta Temple Data Center, Industrial Boulevard ($1.2B)U. Michigan / Los Alamos DC ($1.2B)Harmony Energy Park data center (near the Bison Substation) (n.a.)Atlas One compute campus (Project Atlas) (n.a.)Vantage Data Centers Oregon campus (Corduroy and Wynn roads) ($1.1B)Taylor Technology Campus (formerly Project Mustang), between FM 112 and U.S. 79 (n.a.)Fulton County campus (n.a.)Santa Clara pipeline (n.a.)Calvert Technology Center (AWS) (n.a.)Oregon charter amendment capping data centers at 25 MW (Vantage Data Centers project) ($1.1B)Cedar Creek data center and gas plant campus (382 Earl Callahan Road), Anthropic in lease talks (n.a.)DataBank Dallas allocation (n.a.)AWS Susquehanna co-location (n.a.)Texas Research Park plan ($1.0B)Licking County project ($1.0B)Midlothian / Red Oak campuses (Ellis County) ($1.0B)Franklin Township proposal (withdrawn) ($1.0B)Mesa data center ($1.0B)Springfield AI cluster ($1.0B)Richmond data center campus (RCH-1 to RCH-4) ($1.0B)Monarch Compute Campus (Nscale West Virginia campus) (n.a.)Cosmos Technology Campus ($999M)Kingston Technology Hub ($1.0B)Project Rise 1A and Rise 2A data centers, Vernon ($1.0B)DataNovaX Wichita Falls data center (2236 Airport Drive) ($1.0B)Kingston Technology Hub data center (Thor Equities) ($1.0B)PRL2 data center (411 Pegasus Parkway) ($1.0B)Canton Orchard View Data Center ($1.0B)Google Project Raptor hyperscale data center (Three Way Road) ($1.0B)Meta Tulsa Data Center (Project Anthem), Fair Oaks Industrial Innovation Park ($1.0B)Microsoft La Porte data center (Radius Industrial Park) ($1.0B)Beltline Energy Yukon data center ($1.0B)Project Azelea (Randall Hunt Road) ($1.0B)Three-campus program (New Albany, Heath, Hebron) ($1.0B)West Jefferson campus ($1.0B)Project Flo, Franklin Township ($1.0B)Hancock County MegaSite ($1.0B)Howell Township campus ($1.0B)Project Cumulus / CRG proposal ($1.0B)Google-led port project ($1.0B)Google Botetourt County campus ($1.0B)Tract Northern Nevada portfolio ($1.0B)Microsoft / Franklin Partners Covenant Park ($1.0B)Wildflower Yaphank data center ($1.0B)Urbana Technology Hub data center (Thor Equities) ($1.0B)Project Cornmaze data center campus (Towns of Turtle and Beloit) ($1.0B)Niagara Falls AI campus ($920M)Applied Digital Polaris Forge 1 ($900M)STACK NVA05, Manassas ($900M)GW Ranch data center and power campus ($900M)PointOne / CyrusOne data center, 4015 Lower Moncure Road (Phase I) ($900M)Iron Mountain Manassas holdings (n.a.)Justified Data Campus (n.a.)PowerPlay AI greater Abilene behind-the-meter AI data center (n.a.)Massena data center at former Alcoa East site (n.a.)Alterra Marshall data center (Brooks Industrial Park) (n.a.)Project Liberty (n.a.)NCCS Massena data center (town moratorium rejected) (n.a.)DAMAC Digital Edgerton data center (Logistics Park Kansas City) ($860M)DAMAC Digital Edgerton data center (citizen ban petition) ($860M)Equinix DA12 data center (1550 West Mockingbird Lane) ($836M)Cheyenne data center ($800M)Project Horizon data center (Kearney) (n.a.)Meta Bowling Green data center (Middleton Township) ($800M)AIB Data Centers CLT-01 Campus ($800M)Five proposed "mega" data centers (Equinix, Prologis + 2 withdrawn) (n.a.)La Pine Industrial Park data center ($800M)Beacon Point data center (n.a.)Rock Creek ($750M)Vantage Trident Data Center, Aurora (n.a.)Gotion Green Township plant ($715M)SAT93 and SAT94, San Antonio/Medina County ($700M)RELLIS Data and Research Center ($700M)Project Shelby (former Ford property, Marietta Avenue NE and Georgetown Road NE) (n.a.)Meta Rosemount (UMore Park) ($700M)Vineland build-to-suit facility (n.a.)Applied Digital Polaris Forge 3 (n.a.)CleanSpark Brazoria campus (n.a.)QTS Fayetteville campus (Project Odyssey buildings DC1-2) (n.a.)Project Dorothy 3 (n.a.)Circle T Data Center, Westlake (n.a.)Lysander six-month data center moratorium (Renalli Super DC proposal) (n.a.)Crane Data Centers Pierce Township concept (moratorium through May 2027) (n.a.)DataOne Vineland AI data center campus (neighbor noise class action) (n.a.)NE Edge data center at Millstone Power Station (n.a.)Dalton HPC data center (including Phase 3) (n.a.)Vantage third Northern Virginia campus (n.a.)Digital Realty / Realty Income Northern Virginia build-to-suit data centers ($600M)Brookfield project ($600M)232 Car Farm Road ($600M)5C MEM01 data center (former Fred's headquarters, 4300 Getwell Road) ($575M)Project Tomahawk Prosper data center (rezoning denied by Planning and Zoning Commission; withdrawn) ($580M)Helios II data center (Dickens County) (n.a.)Prologis Trenton data center (Woodsdale Road industrial park) (n.a.)Volition data center, former Fingerhut warehouse (4000 E. U.S. 6), Spanish Fork Canyon (n.a.)Skybox Hutto data center campus (3399 County Road 132) ($550M)Apex project (n.a.)Calhoun facility (n.a.)Androscoggin Mill data center (Jay) ($550M)Crow Holdings North Stemmons data center campus (Market Hall) (n.a.)Nscale Texas campus (Microsoft) (n.a.)Amazon data center, Faircrest Street SW (Perry Township and Canton JEDD) (n.a.)Boydton campus, Mecklenburg County ($499M)Lima data center ($500M)CyrusOne Sangamon County campus (Talkington Township) ($500M)CyrusOne Castroville data center ($500M)Richmond campus ($500M)Waukesha project ($500M)West Allis project ($500M)Sangamon County campus ($500M)Merkle Standard data center, former Ponderay Newsprint papermill (n.a.)Bitdeer Massillon mining facility (n.a.)Milam County Data Center (Stargate site) ($470M)Vantage Santa Clara campus (n.a.)Bridgefield Tech Center (former George Washington University Virginia Science and Technology Campus) (n.a.)Amazon data center campus on former GWU Virginia Science and Technology Campus (Bridgefield Tech Center) (n.a.)Cortex 1 and Cortex 2 AI training clusters, Gigafactory Texas (n.a.)Alpha Compute northern Pennsylvania AI data center campus (n.a.)Zone Frontier West Texas data center campus (Potter County) (n.a.)Chesapeake rezoning (n.a.)Adair County proposal (n.a.)DataBank DFW15, Red Oak campus ($425M)Colovore Alliance data center (14700 Heritage Parkway, AllianceTexas) ($430M)Vantage Ohio campus (n.a.)DataBank Culpeper development (n.a.)Rockdale campus AI data center (n.a.)SAT 82, Castroville ($400M)Nevada campuses (Storey and Clark counties) ($400M)Pecos HPC data center (n.a.)Prime Data Centers AUS01 and AUS02 (1395 Bob White Road) ($400M)Catlett Station ($400M)Project Alpaca data center (Midway Green Industrial Park) ($400M)Vantage Phoenix campus (n.a.)CleanSpark Sandersville data center (n.a.)BT Gateway Data Center (4989 County Road 2656) ($384M)Abernathy site (with TeraWulf) (n.a.)Ada Infrastructure Leesburg data centers (n.a.)Project Kati (Kati 1 and Kati 2) (n.a.)Barber Lake data center (n.a.)Stream Data Centers Graham site (former Plug Power Limestone project) (n.a.)Marshalltown data center moratorium (Swarm Systems Edgewood Industrial Park proposal) ($350M)Compass Red Oak facilities ($326M)Hildebran 12-month data center moratorium (DigiPower X site) (n.a.)TeraWulf Cayuga Data Campus (former Cayuga/Milliken power plant) (n.a.)Rochelle data center (Steward Drive) (n.a.)Coravel Dallas-Fort Worth campus (n.a.)Digital Realty DFW45, Digital Garland campus (1602 Ferris Road) ($300M)Edged Project Outpost second building (southwest Fort Worth) ($300M)Bates Mill No. 3 data center ($300M)QTS DFW2 campus, building DC7 (1341 Sunrise Road) ($290M)DataBank Atlanta allocation (n.a.)El Mirage land acquisition ($258M)CyrusOne DFW8 (9501 Asphalt Drive) ($257M)CoreSite DE3 (Stonepeak / American Tower JV) ($250M)Quiet Data Centers Halifax (Project Halifax) ($250M)Quiet Data Centers Halifax AI data center (301 Industrial Site) ($250M)Hunt County HPC data center (n.a.)Sharon HPC data center (n.a.)Flexential Kaufman County data center campus (Talty) (n.a.)SAT16 ($215M)Prologis North San Jose data center (326 Charcot Avenue) (n.a.)Menlo Equities data center at Western Digital campus (Charlotte Drive) (n.a.)Statesboro data center rezoning (6539 Burkhalter Road) (n.a.)Raeden data center at former McLouth steel mill site (Gibraltar moratorium lawsuit) (n.a.)Krambu Bonner data center (former UFP Edge building, Bonner Mill Industrial Park) (n.a.)Flexential Parker data center ($205M)CoreSite DA1, Irving (2701 E. Grauwyler Road) ($200M)Temple Data Center TTX03 (2230 Eberhardt Road) ($197M)Bullfrog Flats DC ($200M)Water Street DC ($200M)Vantage Quincy campus (n.a.)Alignment Engine data hall (Chilpaco division, former US Paper Mill, Eastern Avenue and Canal Street) (n.a.)Sabey Quincy campus, 2200 M St NE (n.a.)Digital Drive data center campus (n.a.)Plaza 500 ($165M)Merlin campus, McGregor Industrial Park (n.a.)Yondr and Cerberus Manassas data center (n.a.)AWS Cosgray campus fuel cell facility (Hilliard permit appeal) (n.a.)QTS East Windsor campus, 159 Princeton-Hightstown Road (n.a.)Aligned Ashburn facility (n.a.)Equinix proposed SoDo data center (nine-story, 54 MW) (n.a.)Sabey Intergate.Ashburn Building A (n.a.)North Dallas Corridor turnkey data center (n.a.)Flexential Henderson Grove Church Road data center (n.a.)Project Taurus data center (former Intel plant) (n.a.)Leola Data Center (n.a.)DarkHorse Hopkinsville superintelligence factory (new 161 kV site) (n.a.)Morgan County 12-month data center moratorium (Union Road bitcoin mining site near Somerville) (n.a.)Project Taurus (Raeden data center at former Intel plant, Garden of the Gods Road) (n.a.)B+F Timpanogos Tech data center (1507 S. 180 East, East Bay) (n.a.)Cascade Locks ($100M)Edged Prichard data center (Telegraph Road) ($93M)Edged Energy Prichard data center (Telegraph Road) building permit dispute ($93M)Fairwater Atlanta AI datacenter (n.a.)Quincy datacenters (n.a.)New Albany five-building campus (n.a.)Kline Township campus (n.a.)Project Skyway, Pine Island (n.a.)Social Circle / Newton County campus (n.a.)Advanced Manufacturing Center, Houston (n.a.)Stargate site, Shackelford (announced) (n.a.)Stargate site, Dona Ana (announced) (n.a.)Stargate site, Lordstown (announced) (n.a.)Colossus, Memphis (n.a.)Shackelford County Stargate AI Campus (n.a.)Anthropic-Fluidstack Texas data centers (n.a.)Anthropic-Fluidstack New York data centers (n.a.)Colossus 1 (n.a.)Douglasville (Flexential) site (n.a.)Kansas City deployment (n.a.)Kansas City colocation (n.a.)Santa Clara datacenter (n.a.)Stockton datacenter (n.a.)Dallas datacenter (n.a.)Minneapolis datacenter (n.a.)Oklahoma City datacenter (n.a.)Quincy facility (n.a.)Puyallup facility (n.a.)Salt Lake City facilities (two) (n.a.)Fort Worth facility (n.a.)Allen facility (n.a.)Sterling facility (n.a.)EWR20 Datacenter (n.a.)Abilene campus (Oracle tenancy, Stargate-adjacent) (n.a.)QTS DeForest campus (dropped) (n.a.)QTS McKinley Park riverfront project (n.a.)US Army hyperscale program at Dugway Proving Ground (CyrusOne) (n.a.)Ada Infrastructure Spotsylvania site (n.a.)Digital Realty SJC37, 641 Walsh Ave. (n.a.)Digital Realty Santa Clara four-story building (completed 2024) (n.a.)Prologis proposed Tukwila data center (75 MW, Seattle City Light territory) (n.a.)Iron Mountain VA-9 (n.a.)QTS Hillsboro campus (n.a.)QTS Piscataway (n.a.)CyrusOne Aurora facility (Eola and Diehl roads) (n.a.)Compass Hoffman Estates brownfield project (n.a.)Compass Statesville project (n.a.)STACK Santa Clara facility (n.a.)Prime SMF01, Sacramento (n.a.)Prime SMF02, Sacramento (n.a.)H5 Lockport facility (former Yahoo) ($49M)H5 505 Marquette, Albuquerque (n.a.)Borden County campus (pipeline) (n.a.)Scurry County campus (pipeline) (n.a.)Project Helium (Sharon) (n.a.)NC-1 campus, Madison (n.a.)NC-2 and NC-3 campuses, Yadkin County ($60M)Google Monroe County campus (n.a.)Independence AI factory campus (n.a.)Site Layer 4 Goshen Hole data center and energy campus (n.a.)Google potential Lea County data center (n.a.)Chesapeake campus (Morgantown generating station) (n.a.)CleanSpark Sealy campus (n.a.)Digital Realty Hawthorne Race Course site (n.a.)Digital Realty Rolling Meadows Atrium Campus (n.a.)Digital Realty Ad Astra Enterprise Park campus (n.a.)STACK Culpeper Technology Park (n.a.)Gateway Digital Campus (Diamond Farms, Villa Ridge) (n.a.)Meramec Valley Technology Park (Crooked Creek farm) (n.a.)Salem 3 data center campus (n.a.)Project Brookwood data center campus (Youngwoo & Associates) (n.a.)Monarch Data Center (n.a.)Burkhalter Road data center (n.a.)Powers Ferry Place data center (1155 Powers Ferry Place) (n.a.)Pollard Land Company McCormick County data center (n.a.)Meta Piqua data center (Washington and Farrington roads) (n.a.)300 W. Adams St. Loop data center conversion (n.a.)Project Cayman energy project and co-located data center campus (n.a.)Microsoft southeast Cheyenne data center expansion annexation (3,460 acres) (n.a.)SpaceXAI Tulane Road data center (MZX Tech) (n.a.)Beale Infrastructure Claremore data center (n.a.)Quantica Broadview data center campus (Big Sky Digital Infrastructure) (n.a.)Nexus Data Centers Hubbard AI campus (Anthropic anchor tenant) (n.a.)Project Clydesdale data center campus, near Cherokee Industrial Park (n.a.)AWS data centers at Homer City Energy Campus (Center and Blacklick townships) (n.a.)AWS Hobart data center campus (Hobart Tech Park and Ewen Farm) (n.a.)Google Chesterfield campuses: Project Peanut (Meadowville), Project Skye (Moseley Road) and Project Loch (Watkins Centre Parkway) (n.a.)Potential Google data center, Salix (MidAmerican Energy site) (n.a.)Proposed Google data center near Duane Arnold Energy Center (Palo) (n.a.)AWS data center campus, Scioto Darby Road (Hilliard area) with AEP Ohio fuel cell plant (n.a.)Proposed Google hyperscale data center, Hermantown (n.a.)SpaceXAI Minihard data center (adjacent to Colossus 2, Tulane Road) (n.a.)Snyder AI Campus (n.a.)Auburn HPC data center (n.a.)Columbiana Tier III AI data center (n.a.)Panther Creek HPC data center (n.a.)Okmulgee AI data center (n.a.)Prime Data Centers Starpointe campus (n.a.)Hyperscale Data Michigan AI data center (Alliance Cloud Services) ($70M)QTS Blakely campus (n.a.)Monolith Olive Creek data center (built by Crusoe) (n.a.)Silicon Foundry Warwood mixed-use data center (n.a.)Colovore Reno 1 data center ($30M)Colovore Hutto AI data center (2401 Innovation Blvd) (n.a.)DC BLOX east side Indianapolis data center campus (305 Fintail Drive, former Ford plant) (n.a.)Amazon Data Services Horizon Junction data center campus (County Road 241) (n.a.)Microsoft MNZ07 Wellington Data Center (13490 University Boulevard, Gainesville) (n.a.)Microsoft ATL50 (5235 Stonewall Tell Road, Union City) (n.a.)Misty Hollow Energy and Data Campus (614 Prospect Road) (n.a.)Wood Haven Technology Park potential data center (n.a.)Data center site, southeast corner of 7th Avenue and Grant Street, Phoenix (n.a.)C3ntro Telecom TIKVA data center, Aguascalientes (n.a.)Jurassic Spark data center and power campus (n.a.)Lambda data center, MidAmerica Industrial Park (south section) (n.a.)Google Buffalo data center campus (Putnam County) (n.a.)Oppidan Connect Temple data center (2313 Eberhardt Road) ($80M)Global AI data center, former Carestream Health site (n.a.)Grande Valley Industrial Data Center Campus (n.a.)Digital Realty Kokomo data center campus (Industrial Park North) (n.a.)Aerotropolis Logistics Center data center (n.a.)Cox Ranch data center campus (n.a.)Digital Realty downtown Seattle data center (six-story) (n.a.)Mt. Comfort Technology Campus (northwest of County Roads 500 North and 500 West, Buck Creek Township) (n.a.)Keystone Data Center (265 Keystone Avenue) (n.a.)Webb Data Center (9710 and 9730 N. Virginia Street, North Valleys) (n.a.)Oppidan Data Center (9630 N. Virginia Street, North Valleys) (n.a.)Google Project Dazzler data center campus (Franklin Furnace, Green Township) (n.a.)Sagebrush Infrastructure Partners hyperscale campus land (west of Hallam) (n.a.)Microsoft Granger data center campus (former St. Joe Farm) (n.a.)Scale Datacenter campus (former Chesapeake Energy campus) (n.a.)Lost Cabin data center (67 Lost Cabin Road, Lysite area) (n.a.)Warrenton site ($39M)Ashton (n.a.)1500 Gateway (n.a.)Shelbyville site (n.a.)Burns Harbor (n.a.)River Ridge (n.a.)Project Delta (n.a.)RCM Hill project (n.a.)~1,800 projects in ERCOT interconnection (n.a.)Ellenwood facility (n.a.)Haye's Station (n.a.)Naperville facility (n.a.)WGN site (n.a.)Aurora pipeline (4 existing DCs, 5+ in works) (n.a.)Hillsboro pipeline (incl. QTS 250 MW campus) (n.a.)Verrus data center (n.a.)2805 Bowers ($79M)SJC37 (641 Walsh Ave.) (n.a.)Saturn Park hyperscale facility (n.a.)Coachella Valley Technology Campus (400+ acres, six data centers) (n.a.)All new hyperscale DCs ≥50 MW (n.a.)East Windsor second building (n.a.)Kenilworth project (n.a.)100 Jersey Avenue AI data center (n.a.)Project Hazelnut (1,300 acres, 15 buildings) (n.a.)Pacifico Energy DC + power plant (n.a.)Springfield Township campus (84 acres, 2-3 buildings) (n.a.)Avista-related project (n.a.)Unincorporated Skagit County (n.a.)Markley facility (n.a.)EU-3 large-scale DC rezoning (~3,500 acres) (n.a.)Mercer County campus (530+ acres) (n.a.)Hixson Data Center (Nvidia GB200) (n.a.)Sedgwick County campus (1,000+ acres) (n.a.)Paradox Data crypto expansion (n.a.)Wrightsville project (n.a.)Deltona 800-acre AI campus (n.a.)Roan Street-area project (n.a.)Unnamed Maine project (n.a.)Colossus 1 (n.a.)Jefferson County data center moratorium (n.a.)Marion County data center moratorium (Proposal 238) (n.a.)Greensboro data center moratorium (n.a.)Alamance County data center moratorium (n.a.)Independence County data center moratorium (n.a.)Madison County data center moratorium (n.a.)Carroll County data center moratorium (n.a.)Russellville data center moratorium (n.a.)Bayonne citywide data center ban (n.a.)Charlestown data center and battery storage ban (n.a.)Westerly data center moratorium (n.a.)Revity Energy business park and data center, Hanton City (n.a.)Pahrump Valley data center ban (Nye County Bill No. 2026-11) (n.a.)Larimer County data center moratorium (n.a.)Project Jupiter permitting stay (Oracle campus) (n.a.)Durham County data center moratorium (n.a.)Jackson Township data center ban (Ordinance 2026-25) (n.a.)Orangetown data center and battery storage moratorium (n.a.)Anniston data center moratorium (n.a.)Palm Springs data center moratorium (n.a.)Garfield Township data center and crypto mining moratorium (n.a.)Westover data center moratorium (n.a.)Bellevue data center moratorium (n.a.)Eastport data center moratorium (DeepGreen Western Passage) (n.a.)Harrington conditional-use ordinance rejection (n.a.)Volusia County large-scale data center prohibition (n.a.)Cherokee Nation hyperscale data center ban (n.a.)Wrightstown advisory referendum on data center support (n.a.)Elkhart data center and battery storage moratorium (n.a.)Wixom data center moratorium (ended early) and Midwinds Park proposal (n.a.)Pinson one-year moratorium on data centers (n.a.)Tulare County 45-day data center moratorium (n.a.)Washington County one-year moratorium on data center applications (n.a.)Cherokee County data center moratorium extended by 180 days (n.a.)Savannah 155-day moratorium on large-scale data centers (n.a.)Louisville-Jefferson County Metro six-month moratorium on new data centers (n.a.)Nicholasville six-month data center moratorium (n.a.)Kalamazoo one-year data center moratorium (n.a.)Ypsilanti Township 180-day moratorium on major electric utility infrastructure (n.a.)Town of Waxhaw 12-month data center moratorium (n.a.)East Brunswick ordinance banning data centers (n.a.)Jersey City municipal ban on data centers (n.a.)North Brunswick ordinance banning data centers (n.a.)Stafford Township ordinance banning data centers (n.a.)Town of Mohawk six-month moratorium on data center permitting (n.a.)Cherokee Nation (tribal and trust lands) ban on hyperscale data centers (n.a.)Gregg Township (Union County) 180-day moratorium on data center applications (n.a.)Anderson County six-month data center moratorium (n.a.)Spokane County four-month data center moratorium (n.a.)Bulloch County data center moratorium (n.a.)Rowan County two-year data center moratorium (n.a.)Winchester one-year data center moratorium (n.a.)Bow data center (former Merrimack Station site) (n.a.)Trenton data center ban charter amendment (n.a.)Ashville EdgeConneX campus referendum (n.a.)Zeeland Township moratorium and PA 233 challenge (n.a.)Oregon state-owned land pause for data centers (n.a.)Crux AI (Google-Blackstone venture) Cheyenne site (n.a.)Mona area data center approval process challenge (n.a.)Dauphin Highlands Golf Course data center (n.a.)Townsite Data Center (n.a.)Unincorporated Lake County data center moratorium (n.a.)Clinton Township data center campus (n.a.)Former Hynix site data center (n.a.)Levy County data center moratorium (Ordinance 2026-05) (n.a.)Springhill Township application bar and data center ordinances (n.a.)Burgin hyperscale campus annexation (n.a.)Escambia County large-scale data center ban (n.a.)Woodford County permanent data center ban (n.a.)Chatham County large-scale data center moratorium (n.a.)Trumbull two-year data center moratorium (n.a.)Clearfield 180-day data center moratorium (n.a.)Box Elder County data center moratorium (Stratos exempt) (n.a.)Global AI Windsor data center (Weld County) (n.a.)Statesville 180-day data center moratorium (n.a.)Clarendon County data center moratorium (Project 59) (n.a.)Lima 18-month data center and outside-water moratorium (n.a.)Pioneer six-month moratorium (former AquaBounty site data center) (n.a.)Richmond 45-day data center moratorium (n.a.)Gilroy 45-day data center moratorium (n.a.)Marysville 12-month data center moratorium (n.a.)Woodburn 120-day data center moratorium (n.a.)Loudoun County 12-month pause on legislative data center applications (n.a.)QLevr Carmen Avenue data center (moratorium carve-out) (n.a.)Chillicothe moratorium repeal (Alignment Engine former paper mill data hall) (n.a.)Former Star Tribune printing facility data center (North Loop) (n.a.)DC Rapids former paper mill data center (n.a.)Diode Ventures Cedar Creek Lake data center (n.a.)Dulles South Innovation Center (Dulles Cloud South) (n.a.)Mountain Road Technology Park (n.a.)Hexa Builders data center, 3043 Black Horse Pike (n.a.)Former Newton Airport data center site (n.a.)DC Blox Nashville Zoo-area data center (n.a.)Eagan Capital data center moratorium challenge (n.a.)Bristow Campus (NVA02 expansion) (n.a.)Oaklawn data center rezoning (n.a.)Gigaland data center campus (n.a.)Cabin Field Road data center site (n.a.)New Kent Technology Overlay District (n.a.)Frederick County data center application pause (Quantum Frederick expansion context) (n.a.)Charles County Zoning Text Amendment 25-187 (n.a.)Pennhurst data center (n.a.)King of Prussia data center campus (n.a.)Clinton County data center, precast plant and hydroponic farm rezoning (n.a.)Madison County data center moratorium extension (n.a.)Minneapolis data center moratorium (n.a.)Project Cardinal (n.a.)Project Steel (Eldamain Corridor) (n.a.)Meyer data center rezoning (n.a.)Douglas County I-20 data center permit denial (n.a.)Sarasota County hyperscale data center moratorium (XF Group, Cattlemen Road) (n.a.)Meade County data center rezoning (Joe Prather Highway) (n.a.)xAI Southaven data center power plant (n.a.)Western Newspaper Union building data center tower (n.a.)Greenwood County data center moratorium (n.a.)Nebius Oxmoor Valley data center (n.a.)750 N. Nash Street data center (n.a.)Nottingham Business Park data center (n.a.)Blueprint Data Centers Taylor facility (n.a.)Project Patriot (Knox Ranch) (n.a.)Project Red and Project Yellow (n.a.)Airport Drive data center rezoning (n.a.)Ridgeline gas, solar and data center complex (n.a.)West Mahanoy Township 180-day data center and solar farm moratorium (n.a.)Colquitt County data center moratorium extension (n.a.)Dougherty County data center moratorium extension (n.a.)Kings Mountain data center moratorium extension (n.a.)Whiteville 12-month data center and cryptocurrency mining moratorium (n.a.)Edgecombe County two-year data center moratorium (n.a.)Yadkin County two-year data center moratorium (n.a.)Tarrant 12-month data center moratorium (n.a.)Foley six-month data center and cryptocurrency mining moratorium (n.a.)Southeast Raleigh data center annexation (Jones Sausage Road) (n.a.)Edgewater permanent AI data center ban (n.a.)Orange County proposed AI data center moratorium (n.a.)Gorham 180-day data center moratorium (n.a.)Gray 180-day data center moratorium (n.a.)Hendersonville 12-month data center moratorium (n.a.)Charlotte 150-day data center moratorium (n.a.)Southport 15-month data center moratorium (n.a.)Nash County data center and cryptocurrency mining moratorium (n.a.)McDowell County six-month data center moratorium (n.a.)Montgomery County 18-month data center moratorium and hyperscale prohibition (n.a.)Harford County data center ban (Bill 26-011) (n.a.)Calvert County six-month data center site plan moratorium (n.a.)Queen Anne's County 12-month data center moratorium (n.a.)Howard County data center moratorium (CB31-2026) (n.a.)Town of Highland large-scale data center moratorium (Local Law No. 1 of 2026) (n.a.)Newport data center and cryptocurrency mining moratorium (n.a.)Manatee County 12-month data center moratorium (n.a.)Paulding County data center moratorium (n.a.)Walker County data center application moratorium (n.a.)Hamilton County one-year rural data center moratorium (n.a.)Smithville 18-month data center and cryptocurrency mining moratorium (Ordinance 543) (n.a.)Albany 12-month data center moratorium (n.a.)Cherry Hill large-scale data center ban (n.a.)Red Bank data center ban (n.a.)Warren Township AI data center ban (n.a.)Knox County one-year data center moratorium (n.a.)Virginia Technology Park (Clear Brook) (n.a.)Homewood 12-month data center moratorium (n.a.)Cullman data center application moratorium (Resolution 2026-116) (n.a.)Scarborough Technology Park (n.a.)Brunswick 180-day data center moratorium (n.a.)Leeds data center moratorium (n.a.)Prince William County data center overlay and by-right overhaul (n.a.)Jackson 183-day data center moratorium (n.a.)Forest Park 90-day data center moratorium (n.a.)Powers Ferry Place data center rezoning (n.a.)Fort Payne six-month data center moratorium and conditional use rule (n.a.)Rural Hall data center rezoning (n.a.)Reno citywide data center moratorium (n.a.)Henderson 180-day data center moratorium proposal (declined) (n.a.)Federal Way 12-month data center moratorium (n.a.)Renton one-year large data center moratorium (n.a.)Port Angeles six-month data center moratorium (n.a.)Broomfield 18-month data center moratorium (10 MW and above) (n.a.)Aurora six-month data center moratorium proposal (rejected) (n.a.)Mead 12-month data center moratorium (n.a.)San Marcos citywide data center zoning ban (n.a.)Fort Worth 90-day data center moratorium process (n.a.)Circle T Data Center (Westlake) (n.a.)Flint one-year data center moratorium (n.a.)Haring Township six-month data center moratorium (n.a.)Miamisburg nine-month data center moratorium (former Hutchings Power Station) (n.a.)Newton Falls 12-month data center moratorium (n.a.)Conneaut one-year data center moratorium (failed) and 25 MW charter amendment (n.a.)Dodge County 18-month data center moratorium (n.a.)Sheboygan 12-month data center moratorium (n.a.)Jackson County 180-day data center and battery storage moratorium (n.a.)Springfield 120-day data center administrative delay (n.a.)St. Joseph data center application pause (6321 Pickett Road rezoning withdrawn) (n.a.)Lawrence two-year large-scale data center moratorium (n.a.)Emporia digital infrastructure district and citizen data center ban petition (n.a.)Broken Bow six-month data center moratorium (n.a.)Santa Fe County 18-month data center moratorium (n.a.)Tucson large-scale data center ordinance (n.a.)Indio data center moratorium extension (n.a.)Escondido 45-day AI data center moratorium (n.a.)Mendocino County data center urgency moratorium (n.a.)Fresno proposed 10-year data center ban (n.a.)Salix Google data center (moratorium rejected) (n.a.)Maquoketa South Highway 61 Industrial Park data center talks (ended) (n.a.)Nebius Independence AI factory (Bly Road) (n.a.)Project Washington data center (Delaware City) (n.a.)White Clay Center data center campus (Newark) (n.a.)Caddo Parish data center moratorium referral (Resolution 53) (n.a.)Nottingham 12-month data center moratorium (n.a.)Fundamental Data Ridgeline Facility (Tucker County) (n.a.)Dixfield 180-day data center moratorium (n.a.)Agawam data center moratorium (n.a.)Shetland Park data center building permit (Salem) (n.a.)Federalsburg data center ban (Ordinance 2026-07) (n.a.)Attleboro two-year data center moratorium (n.a.)Convergent Technology Park (n.a.)Potomac Creek Campus data center (n.a.)Project Industry data center (Wellington Road) (n.a.)Stonebridge Associates Powder Mill Works data center (North Beaver and Mahoning townships) (n.a.)DANKO Holdings Muncy Township data center (n.a.)Dickson City Development Bell Mountain data centers (n.a.)Cumberland County six-month data center moratorium (n.a.)Winchester Gateway data center campus (n.a.)Lightstone Group data center, 300 Jones Road (n.a.)Pollard data center rezoning (Whitetown Road) (n.a.)Laurens County one-year data center moratorium (n.a.)Fairfield County 12-month data center moratorium (n.a.)Panhandle Road data center (Lovejoy) (n.a.)Lowndes County 60-day data center permit moratorium (n.a.)Atlas Development Battey Business Complex data center (n.a.)Carter County one-year data center and crypto mining moratorium (n.a.)Cave City data center moratorium lawsuit (2001 Doyle Avenue) (n.a.)Mercer County one-year data center application moratorium (n.a.)Hawkins County data center and crypto mining ban resolution (n.a.)Charleston 12-month data center moratorium (n.a.)Virginia Beach 12-month data center application moratorium (n.a.)Surry County two-year data center moratorium (n.a.)Amazon Louisa County second data center campus nuisance lawsuit (n.a.)Shadowbox Studios data center (International Park Drive) (n.a.)Chamblee 180-day data center application moratorium (n.a.)Jackson County one-year data center moratorium (n.a.)Town of Franklin one-year data center moratorium (n.a.)Asheville one-year data center moratorium (n.a.)Cary 18-month data center moratorium (n.a.)Putnam County medium and large data center moratorium (n.a.)Orangeburg County one-year data center moratorium (n.a.)Chester County six-month data center moratorium (n.a.)Chesterfield County halt on new data center approvals (n.a.)Brown Farm Road data center rezoning (west of Cartersville) (n.a.)Meta Stanton Springs data center well water lawsuit (n.a.)Bear Creek Township industrial zone expansion for data centers (n.a.)Air Products former headquarters data center campus (n.a.)Salem 3 data center overlay (Salem Township) (n.a.)Bernards Township data center ban (n.a.)Lebanon Township data center prohibition (all zoning districts) (n.a.)Rockaway Borough data center ban ordinance (failed vote, reintroduced) (n.a.)Mansfield Township data center zoning prohibition (n.a.)Howell Township data center ban (n.a.)Bell Works data center application (Holmdel ban adopted after filing) (n.a.)Stavola quarry redevelopment plan data center provision (Manchester) (n.a.)Caroline County one-year data center moratorium (unincorporated areas) (n.a.)Dorchester County one-year data center moratorium (n.a.)Cambridge one-year data center moratorium (n.a.)Ridgely one-year data center moratorium (n.a.)Hurlock three-year data center moratorium (n.a.)Globalinx cable landing station near Ocean City (Worcester County one-year moratorium) (n.a.)Neptune Township data center and detention center prohibition (n.a.)Talbot County 12-month data center application moratorium (n.a.)Sanford Woods data center (Sanford emergency moratorium extension) (n.a.)Warren 180-day data center moratorium (n.a.)North Berwick data center ban referendum (November ballot) (n.a.)Lincoln data center ban (all zoning districts) (n.a.)Perth one-year data center moratorium (n.a.)Canton data center development moratorium (n.a.)Islip 18-month data center moratorium (n.a.)Clarkstown six-month building moratorium including AI data centers (n.a.)Grandview Industrial Center, former Johnson & Johnson campus (Montgomery data center ban lawsuit) (n.a.)Greymark property colocation data center, 1200 Route 22 (Bridgewater data center regulations) (n.a.)Hamilton Township (Atlantic County) data center moratorium (n.a.)Chesapeake Beach data center ban (all zones) (n.a.)Ellsworth 180-day data center moratorium (n.a.)Jackson County data center ban ordinance (n.a.)Wakulla County permanent data center ban (n.a.)Springville one-year data center moratorium (n.a.)Harpersville six-month data center moratorium (n.a.)Olive Branch data center zoning restrictions (conditional use only) (n.a.)DeSoto Innovation District data center component (Church Road and Craft Road) (n.a.)Lakeland one-year moratorium on data centers and 50 MW loads (Project Swan) (n.a.)Walton County data center and large load center prohibition (n.a.)Pensacola one-year moratorium on data centers above 50 MW (n.a.)Indiantown data center moratorium vote (Project Growler and Silver Fox 606) (n.a.)Martin County proposed one-year data center moratorium and Hobe Sound Business Park rezoning (n.a.)Palm Beach County one-year moratorium on large-scale data centers (first reading) (n.a.)North Port 18-month data center moratorium (North Port Holdings 300 application) (n.a.)Fairfield data center moratorium (Patmos project exempt) (n.a.)Chelsea one-year moratorium on data center permits (n.a.)Santa Rosa County 12-month data center moratorium (n.a.)Pasco County one-year moratorium on data centers above 2.5 MW (n.a.)Zephyrhills one-year data center moratorium (n.a.)Lake County 90-day pause on large-scale data center applications (n.a.)Clay County 12-month data center moratorium (n.a.)Hernando County 12-month data center moratorium (n.a.)Nassau County 12-month data center moratorium (n.a.)Franklin County one-year moratorium on large-scale AI data centers (n.a.)Bay County six-month data center moratorium (5 MW threshold) (n.a.)Gulf County one-year AI data center moratorium (n.a.)Holmes County temporary moratorium on large-scale data centers (n.a.)Taylor County data center moratorium motions (failed) (n.a.)Leon County proposed 18-month moratorium on large-load facilities (n.a.)Ormond Beach 18-month data center moratorium (n.a.)Flagler County one-year data center moratorium (n.a.)Pinellas Park one-year data center moratorium (American Tower Belcher Road proposal) (n.a.)Prichard six-month data center moratorium (n.a.)Decatur data center special exception ordinance (n.a.)Cielo Digital Infrastructure Haines City data center (State Road 544 East and Marion Road) (n.a.)Lyon County data center and battery storage moratorium (n.a.)St. Charles County six-month large-scale data center moratorium (n.a.)Ottawa citizen initiative to ban data centers over 25 MW (Lightfield Energy Proximity Park) (n.a.)Milton 18-month data center moratorium (n.a.)La Crosse 18-month data center moratorium (n.a.)Gage County 12-month data center moratorium (n.a.)Boone County data center moratorium (n.a.)Clinton data center moratorium (declined; QTS 1,100-acre site under contract) (n.a.)Butte-Silver Bow data center voter-approval ballot initiative (406 People First) (n.a.)Missoula County interim data center moratorium (n.a.)Arizona three-year pause on data center sales tax exemptions (n.a.)Illinois pause on new data center tax incentives (n.a.)Yankton County six-month data center and bitcoin mining moratorium (n.a.)Pine County six-month data center moratorium (n.a.)Hastings one-year data center moratorium (n.a.)Wingville Township two-year data center moratorium (blocked by county) (n.a.)Klickitat County six-month data center moratorium motion (failed; former Columbia Gorge Aluminum site) (n.a.)Edmond temporary data center moratorium (n.a.)Shawnee temporary data center moratorium (n.a.)Kittitas County data center application moratorium (extended) (n.a.)Logan 180-day data center and data center power plant moratorium (n.a.)Cache County temporary data center moratorium (n.a.)Carbondale one-year data center moratorium (n.a.)Ottawa (Illinois) data center moratorium extension (n.a.)Trammell Crow Bentonite Avenue data center complex (Henderson) (n.a.)Butte-Silver Bow temporary data center moratorium (drafting directed) (n.a.)Quantica Broadview data center and power plant (Yellowstone County initiative lawsuit) (n.a.)Oshkosh 12-month data center moratorium (n.a.)Plymouth 12-month moratorium on data centers over 50,000 square feet (n.a.)Oppidan Connect former McDonald Steel site data center (village moratorium) (n.a.)Lincoln County data center moratorium amendment (failed; Gemini Sioux Falls data center) (n.a.)Marina 45-day data center urgency moratorium (n.a.)San Joaquin County data center study and proposed 45-day moratorium (n.a.)Yakima County six-month data center moratorium (n.a.)Sierra County 18-month data center moratorium (Spaceport America area) (n.a.)Warrick County 180-day data center moratorium (Project Zora) (n.a.)St. Croix County 12-month data center moratorium (n.a.)Lawrence County two-year data center moratorium (n.a.)Santa Cruz County voter approval requirement for AI data centers (rejected) (n.a.)Washington Township (Macomb Co.) data center moratorium (n.a.)Rockford data center moratorium (n.a.)Desert Hot Springs data center moratorium (n.a.)Athens data center moratorium (n.a.)Lochbuie data center moratorium (n.a.)Logan County data center moratorium (n.a.)London data center moratorium (n.a.)Merrillville data center moratorium (n.a.)Vienna Township (Trumbull Co.) data center moratorium (n.a.)Morris data center moratorium (n.a.)Farmville data center moratorium (n.a.)Newberry County data center moratorium (n.a.)Rochester Hills data center moratorium (n.a.)Chesterfield data center moratorium (n.a.)Fayette County data center moratorium (n.a.)Grant County data center moratorium (n.a.)Cass County data center moratorium (n.a.)Athens-Clarke County data center moratorium (n.a.)Palmetto data center moratorium (n.a.)North Plainfield data center moratorium (n.a.)Waterford Township (Camden Co.) data center moratorium (n.a.)Columbia data center moratorium (n.a.)Lexington (Fayette County) data center moratorium (n.a.)Carver data center moratorium (n.a.)Wright County data center moratorium (n.a.)Ida County data center moratorium (n.a.)Allen County data center moratorium (n.a.)Clarke County data center moratorium (n.a.)Boardman Township data center moratorium (n.a.)East Whiteland Township data center moratorium (n.a.)Painesville Township data center moratorium (n.a.)Town of Cassville data center moratorium (n.a.)Dearborn County data center moratorium (n.a.)Putnam County data center moratorium (n.a.)Miami County data center moratorium (n.a.)Pulaski County data center moratorium (n.a.)White County data center moratorium (n.a.)New Albany data center moratorium (n.a.)Burien data center moratorium (n.a.)Marysville data center moratorium (n.a.)Pasco data center moratorium (n.a.)Front Royal data center moratorium (n.a.)Jefferson County data center moratorium (n.a.)Shawnee County data center moratorium (n.a.)Chippewa County data center moratorium (n.a.)Atlanta data center moratorium (n.a.)Mount Vernon data center moratorium (n.a.)Howard County data center moratorium (n.a.)East Lansing data center moratorium (n.a.)Woodford County data center moratorium (n.a.)Fairfax County data center moratorium (n.a.)Spotsylvania County data center moratorium (n.a.)Stafford County data center moratorium (n.a.)Lyon County data center moratorium (n.a.)Luther data center moratorium (n.a.)Braceville Township data center moratorium (n.a.)Grafton data center moratorium (n.a.)Howland Township data center moratorium (n.a.)Hubbard data center moratorium (n.a.)Canton Township data center moratorium (n.a.)Cortland data center moratorium (n.a.)El Monte data center moratorium (n.a.)Phillips County data center moratorium (n.a.)Mitchell County data center moratorium (n.a.)Big Rapids Charter Township data center moratorium (n.a.)Parma Township data center moratorium (n.a.)Independence data center moratorium (n.a.)Defiance data center moratorium (n.a.)Findlay data center moratorium (n.a.)Girard data center moratorium (n.a.)Lake Township (Wood Co.) data center moratorium (n.a.)New Carlisle data center moratorium (n.a.)Vermilion data center moratorium (n.a.)Hamblen County data center moratorium (n.a.)Milford data center moratorium (n.a.)Pierce County data center moratorium (n.a.)Town of Hampden data center moratorium (n.a.)Clayton County data center moratorium (n.a.)Dexter Township data center moratorium (n.a.)City of Portage data center moratorium (n.a.)Maumee data center moratorium (n.a.)Richfield Township data center moratorium (n.a.)Scioto Township data center moratorium (n.a.)Sprigg Township data center moratorium (n.a.)Springfield data center moratorium (n.a.)Tallmadge data center moratorium (n.a.)Tiffin data center moratorium (n.a.)Washington Township (Butler Co.) data center moratorium (n.a.)Williamsburg data center moratorium (n.a.)Yellow Springs data center moratorium (n.a.)Carlton County data center moratorium (n.a.)Mantua Township data center moratorium (n.a.)Madison data center moratorium (n.a.)Old Bridge data center moratorium (n.a.)Pennsville data center moratorium (n.a.)Grand County data center moratorium (n.a.)Wayne County data center moratorium (n.a.)Humboldt County data center moratorium (n.a.)White Pine County data center moratorium (n.a.)Harlingen data center moratorium (n.a.)Broken Arrow data center moratorium (n.a.)Norman data center moratorium (n.a.)Pike County data center moratorium (n.a.)Roswell data center moratorium (n.a.)Bristol data center moratorium (n.a.)Cedar Hill data center moratorium (n.a.)Clinton data center moratorium (n.a.)Grundy County data center moratorium (n.a.)Morgan County data center moratorium (n.a.)Shelbyville data center moratorium (n.a.)White County data center moratorium (n.a.)McPherson County data center moratorium (n.a.)Brookville data center moratorium (n.a.)Center Township data center moratorium (n.a.)Muncy Township data center moratorium (n.a.)Archuleta County data center moratorium (n.a.)South Fork data center moratorium (n.a.)Madison County data center moratorium (n.a.)Oakley data center moratorium (n.a.)Delta County data center moratorium (n.a.)Forsyth Township data center moratorium (n.a.)Houghton data center moratorium (n.a.)Huron County data center moratorium (n.a.)Waite Park data center moratorium (n.a.)Lycoming County data center moratorium (n.a.)Door County data center moratorium (n.a.)Allendale Township data center moratorium (n.a.)Lincoln Township data center moratorium (n.a.)Lyndon Township data center moratorium (n.a.)Porter Township data center moratorium (n.a.)Texas Township data center moratorium (n.a.)Ralls County data center moratorium (n.a.)Cranford data center moratorium (n.a.)Lake Elsinore data center moratorium (n.a.)Morgan Hill data center moratorium (n.a.)Patterson data center moratorium (n.a.)Alhambra data center moratorium (n.a.)Benton County data center moratorium (n.a.)Newark data center moratorium (n.a.)Allentown data center moratorium (n.a.)West Haven data center moratorium (n.a.)New Castle County data center moratorium (n.a.)Canterbury data center moratorium (n.a.)Rochester data center moratorium (n.a.)Madison County data center moratorium (n.a.)Decatur County data center moratorium (n.a.)Hart County data center moratorium (n.a.)Franklin County data center moratorium (n.a.)Athens data center moratorium (n.a.)El Paso data center moratorium (n.a.)Lewisville data center moratorium (n.a.)Milam County data center moratorium (n.a.)Princeton data center moratorium (n.a.)Crossville data center moratorium (n.a.)Loudon County data center moratorium (n.a.)Maury County data center moratorium (n.a.)Ashwaubenon data center moratorium (n.a.)Grant County data center moratorium (n.a.)Monroe County data center moratorium (n.a.)Shawano County data center moratorium (n.a.)Oneida County data center moratorium (n.a.)Town of Beetown data center moratorium (n.a.)Collier County data center moratorium (n.a.)Wicomico County data center moratorium (n.a.)Butler Township data center moratorium (n.a.)Little Britain Township data center moratorium (n.a.)Smithfield Township data center moratorium (n.a.)Buchanan County data center moratorium (n.a.)Scott County data center moratorium (n.a.)Avon Lake data center moratorium (n.a.)Plain Township (Stark Co.) data center moratorium (n.a.)Archbold data center moratorium (n.a.)Webster Township data center moratorium (n.a.)Warrington Township data center moratorium (n.a.)Town of Westport data center moratorium (n.a.)Georgetown data center moratorium (n.a.)Boone County data center moratorium (n.a.)Butler County data center moratorium (n.a.)Pacific data center moratorium (n.a.)Apple Valley data center moratorium (n.a.)Oak Grove data center moratorium (n.a.)Chesterfield County data center moratorium (n.a.)La Conner data center moratorium (n.a.)Bourbonnais data center moratorium (n.a.)Lincoln County data center moratorium (n.a.)Moses Lake data center moratorium (n.a.)Logan County data center moratorium (n.a.)Choctaw data center moratorium (n.a.)Kingman County data center moratorium (n.a.)South Hutchinson data center moratorium (n.a.)Miami County data center moratorium (n.a.)Westbrook data center moratorium (n.a.)Rio Communities data center moratorium (n.a.)Wells data center moratorium (n.a.)Nehawka data center moratorium (n.a.)Buffalo Township data center moratorium (n.a.)Clarksville data center moratorium (n.a.)Palmyra data center moratorium (n.a.)Morristown data center moratorium (n.a.)South Burlington data center moratorium (n.a.)Shelby County data center moratorium (n.a.)Minnetrista data center moratorium (n.a.)Gary one-year data center moratorium (executive order) (n.a.)Loop Road data center campus (Granville Township) (n.a.)Montgomery County data center Sunshine Law suit (n.a.)Sauk County 18-month data center moratorium (n.a.)Tigerton data center moratorium (n.a.)Elgin proposed one-year data center moratorium (n.a.)Calexico permanent data center ban (n.a.)Los Angeles County ban on large-scale data centers (unincorporated areas) (n.a.)Iron County 180-day data center and solar moratorium (n.a.)Orchard Hills data center rezoning (Trammell Crow) (n.a.)Remington Innovation Campus rezoning (n.a.)Glassboro data center and battery storage ban (Ordinance 26-24) (n.a.)Salt Lake County pause pending data center rules (unincorporated areas) (n.a.)Spartanburg County one-year data center moratorium (n.a.)Jasper County one-year data center moratorium (n.a.)Normal data center moratorium extension (n.a.)Galesburg 180-day data center moratorium (n.a.)Fayette County (Ohio) data center moratorium (n.a.)Project MidSpan (Hiwassee River Industrial Park) (n.a.)Benton County data center moratorium lawsuit (NSI6 LLC) (n.a.)Wilmington campus (AWS) data center zoning initiative (n.a.)Texas statewide halt on TCEQ permits for data centers pending ERCOT and TWDB audits (n.a.)Vantage Westover Hills data center campuses (Rogers Road and Omicron Drive) and VoltaGrid on-site gas plants (n.a.)Sedro-Woolley six-month data center moratorium (n.a.)Dubuque six-month moratorium on hyperscale data centers (n.a.)North Mankato 12-month data center moratorium (n.a.)Marathon County 12-month data center moratorium (18 county-zoned towns) (n.a.)Sabey Data Centers land purchase at Montana Connections Business Development Park, Butte (n.a.)Marion County 12-month moratorium on large-scale data centers (n.a.)Baltimore County data center moratorium (extended through 2027) (n.a.)Panama City one-year data center moratorium (Ordinance 3313) (n.a.)New Haven 12-month data center moratorium (n.a.)Dearborn six-month data center moratorium (n.a.)St. Joseph County hyperscale data center ban process ("data center balance" resolution) (n.a.)Zionsville one-year data center moratorium (also wind, solar and battery storage) (n.a.)Project Gravity data center campus (Archbald) (n.a.)Brighton Township data center moratorium (n.a.)Pima County 120-day data center moratorium (unincorporated areas) (n.a.)Walls industrial rezoning of about 1,200 acres (possible data center use) (n.a.)El Dorado citizen initiative banning high-impact data centers and Tier 2 and Tier 3 battery storage for 10 years (n.a.)Commerce City six-month data center moratorium (n.a.)Thornton one-year data center moratorium (over 50,000 square feet) (n.a.)Berthoud one-year data center moratorium (n.a.)Loveland 12-month suspension of large-scale data center applications (10 MW and above) (n.a.)Denver one-year data center moratorium (n.a.)Jefferson County data center moratorium (to March 2027) (n.a.)Longmont ban on hyperscale data centers over 100 MW (n.a.)Boulder County six-month data center moratorium (n.a.)Project Jupiter force majeure notice (Oracle, Doña Ana County) (n.a.)St. Bernard 12-month data center moratorium (former P&G Ivorydale site proposal) (n.a.)Americus 30-day data center moratorium (n.a.)Troy data processing center moratorium (extended) (n.a.)Greenfield one-year data center moratorium (n.a.)Project Blue energy service agreement with Tucson Electric Power (rehearing suit) (n.a.)Woodbury one-year data center moratorium (n.a.)Winlock six-month data center moratorium (n.a.)Marshall County six-month data center moratorium (unincorporated areas) (n.a.)Peosta data center moratorium (extended) (n.a.)Lubbock 90-day large-scale data center moratorium process (n.a.)AWS Hobart data center campus (Hobart Tech Park and Ewen Farm) fill permit lawsuit (n.a.)Janesville 12-month data center moratorium (n.a.)Crestview large-scale data center ban (Ordinance 2033) (n.a.)Lovejoy citywide data center ban (n.a.)Saco temporary data center moratorium (n.a.)Wilderness Crossing mixed-use and data center rezoning (n.a.)Metered Mining (Metered North) data center conditional use permit, Village of Hammond (n.a.)Port Huron Township data center moratorium (n.a.)Sterling 180-day data center and battery storage application moratorium (n.a.)Mesa County 12-month data center moratorium (unincorporated areas) (n.a.)Project Open Sky data center (Cloverleaf Infrastructure) (n.a.)Amazon west Shreveport data center special-use permit (appeal) (n.a.)Bangor data center moratorium (n.a.)Leominster one-year data center moratorium (n.a.)Saginaw data center moratorium (n.a.)Dover-Foxcroft 180-day data center moratorium (n.a.)Sugarloaf Township data center curative amendment appeal (Tomhicken Road, 185 acres) (n.a.)Logistix hyperscale data center (1380 University Blvd, Hamilton) (n.a.)Pontiac data center moratorium (second six-month term) (n.a.)Warren County six-month data center moratorium (n.a.)Guilderland one-year data center moratorium (n.a.)Dixon 45-day data center and battery storage moratorium (n.a.)Winneshiek County 12-month data center moratorium (unincorporated areas) (n.a.)Washington County 12-month data center moratorium (unincorporated areas) (n.a.)Cox Ranch data center annexation and rezoning (Skybox Datacenters and ViaWest Group) (n.a.)Tulsa nine-month data center moratorium (Project Anthem exempt) (n.a.)Sayreville 18-month data center moratorium (Ordinance 15-26) (n.a.)East Rutherford data center prohibition (Ordinance 2026-12) (n.a.)Ardent/TAC data center rezoning referendum (Wilmington) (n.a.)Marana data center rezoning referendum petitions (Beale Infrastructure) (n.a.)Fluidstack Okmulgee data center floodplain development permit (n.a.)Sulphur Springs Thermo mine data center campus (n.a.)Arcata 45-day data center moratorium (n.a.)Calaveras County 45-day data center moratorium (n.a.)Brawley temporary data center moratorium (n.a.)Eureka 45-day data center moratorium (n.a.)Logan County six-month moratorium on data center, battery, solar and wind permits (Granite Renewables site) (n.a.)Springbank data center rezoning (Barnsley Gardens Road, Adairsville) (n.a.)Camden County six-month data center moratorium (n.a.)Crow Holdings data center (Highway 85 North, Fayetteville) (n.a.)White Oak Business Park and Pumpkin Center data center rezonings (resident lawsuits) (n.a.)Lamar County data center moratorium (n.a.)Columbus technology overlay district (Upatoi residents' lawsuit) (n.a.)Rockdale County data center and battery energy storage moratorium (n.a.)Social Circle 90-day moratorium on new data center applications (n.a.)Thomas County 12-month data center moratorium (n.a.)Villa Rica data center annexation and rezoning (residents' petition) (n.a.)Dickinson County six-month moratorium on data centers, bitcoin mining, solar and battery storage (n.a.)Henry County moratorium on data centers, battery arrays and data mining (n.a.)Plum Farms rezoning for data center (Higgins Road and Route 59) (n.a.)CloudCenters data center at former Lockformer site (711 Ogden Avenue) (n.a.)Pekin data center on Lutticken Farm property (n.a.)Plainfield 180-day data center moratorium (n.a.)Tazewell County pause on data center zoning petitions (n.a.)Clark County one-year data center moratorium (n.a.)Prologis data center rezoning near Leesburg (n.a.)American Tower data center rezoning (7701 Walnut Drive, Pike Township) (n.a.)Outrigger Industrial data center (I-69 and US 50, Washington) (n.a.)Bourbon County 365-day moratorium (data centers, crypto mining, utility-scale power, waste disposal) (n.a.)Beale Infrastructure data center application (Gardner) (n.a.)Harvey County data center moratorium (through 2028) (n.a.)Ann Arbor Township 12-month data center moratorium (n.a.)Elmwood Township (Tuscola County) nine-month data center moratorium (n.a.)Filer Charter Township one-year data center moratorium (n.a.)Hart six-month moratorium on data centers and digital mining (n.a.)Genoa Township data center and cryptocurrency mining moratorium (extended) (n.a.)Lyon Township six-month data center moratorium (Project Flex not affected) (n.a.)New Buffalo Township one-year data center moratorium (Kluver Road parcel) (n.a.)Penn Township (Cass County) one-year data center moratorium (n.a.)Amazon Becker data center (near Sherco) (n.a.)Elk River one-year data center moratorium (zoning amendment rejected, applications withdrawn) (n.a.)Le Sueur County 12-month data center moratorium (townships and unincorporated areas) (n.a.)Lonsdale one-year data center moratorium (n.a.)Monticello Industrial Area data center environmental review lawsuit (Monticello Tech LLC) (n.a.)St. Joseph (Minnesota) one-year data center moratorium (n.a.)Camdenton AI data center moratorium (opportunity zone support rescinded) (n.a.)Northampton County 32-month data center moratorium (n.a.)Wiscasset data center proposal (Old Ferry Road town-owned property) (n.a.)Erie Township (Monroe County) limited data center moratorium (n.a.)Rocklocker Kalkaska data center (state land near Island Lake and South River roads) (n.a.)Project Accelerate data center (East John Street near I-485) (n.a.)Morton County data center and cryptocurrency facility moratorium (n.a.)Phillipsburg data center ban (Ordinance 2026-08) (n.a.)Butler County (Ohio) six-month data center moratorium (six county-zoned townships) (n.a.)Box Butte County (Nebraska) data center moratorium (n.a.)Butler County (Nebraska) data center moratorium (n.a.)Dundy County (Nebraska) data center moratorium (n.a.)Furnas County (Nebraska) data center moratorium (n.a.)Harlan County (Nebraska) data center moratorium (n.a.)Hayes County (Nebraska) data center moratorium (n.a.)Johnson County (Nebraska) data center moratorium (n.a.)Kearney County (Nebraska) data center moratorium (n.a.)Shutesbury data center moratorium (Special Town Meeting Article 10) (n.a.)Hagar Township (Berrien County) data center moratorium (n.a.)Oppidan Hampton data center (n.a.)Summit AI data center ban (former Bristol Myers Squibb campus cited) (n.a.)Alpha Borough data center ban (n.a.)Bass River Township data center ban (n.a.)Berkeley Township data center ban (n.a.)Carneys Point Township data center ban (n.a.)Delaware Township data center ban (n.a.)Downe Township data center ban (n.a.)Elsinboro Township data center ban (n.a.)Frelinghuysen Township data center ban (n.a.)Hainesport Township data center ban (n.a.)Kingwood Township data center ban (n.a.)Knowlton Township data center ban (n.a.)Liberty Township data center ban (n.a.)Mannington Township data center ban (n.a.)Oldmans Township data center ban (n.a.)Pilesgrove Township data center ban (n.a.)Plumsted Township data center ban (n.a.)Upper Pittsgrove Township data center ban (n.a.)Washington Borough data center ban (n.a.)Washington Township (Gloucester County) data center ban (n.a.)Woodstown Borough data center ban (n.a.)Newfield one-year moratorium on data centers and cryptocurrency mining (n.a.)North Tonawanda moratorium on new or expanded data centers and crypto mining (Digihost site) (n.a.)Town of Oneonta 12-month moratorium on AI data centers and crypto mining (Eco-Yotta site, County Road 9) (n.a.)Barberton open-ended data center moratorium (n.a.)Cleveland three-month pause on new standalone data centers (n.a.)Ellsworth Township data center moratorium (n.a.)Grove City data center moratorium (n.a.)Ironton one-year data center moratorium (n.a.)Lordstown data center moratorium (Bristolville 25 Developer dispute) (n.a.)Monroe Township (Adams County) moratorium on data centers and small modular reactors (n.a.)Mount Orab six-month data center moratorium (State Route 32 mega site) (n.a.)Preble County Data Center Project rezoning (Zoning Case #1630) (n.a.)Shawnee Township (Allen County) 18-month moratorium on data centers and energy projects (n.a.)Upper Sandusky six-month data center moratorium (n.a.)Berea data center permit moratorium (Ordinance 6-6) (n.a.)Clay Township (Montgomery County) data center moratorium (n.a.)Project Cosmos data center (K-Nova II, Rickenbacker Exchange extension) (n.a.)Twinsburg data center moratorium (Ordinance 2026-065) (n.a.)JRE Strategies Ardmore data center (n.a.)Project Atlas data center (Coweta) (n.a.)Mvskoke Technology and Innovation Park (Looped Square Ranch data center) (n.a.)Blakely Borough data center (n.a.)Project Gold data center campus (Clifton and Covington townships) (n.a.)Conshohocken data center at former Cleveland-Cliffs steel mill (n.a.)Hollenback Township data center rezoning (landowner curative amendment) (n.a.)Mount Carmel Township 180-day data center moratorium (n.a.)Scranton Materials data center campus (819 Newton Road) (n.a.)Cumberland zoning prohibition on data centers (Ordinance 26-22) (n.a.)Applied Digital Toronto data center campus (n.a.)Anderson County (Tennessee) two-year data center moratorium (n.a.)Warren County (Tennessee) 12-month data center moratorium (n.a.)Bell County (Kentucky) two-year data center construction moratorium (Murray Industries site) (n.a.)Zydeco Development Hutto data center (450 Ed Schmidt Boulevard) (n.a.)Royalton five-year moratorium policy on AI and crypto data centers (n.a.)Dane County 18-month pause on hyperscale data center permits (n.a.)Manitowoc County 18-month data center moratorium (n.a.)Sawyer County 18-month moratorium on large data centers (n.a.)Microsoft Fairwater data center noise class action (n.a.)Crooked Creek Technology Park (n.a.)Midtown Business Park data center land sale (n.a.)AWS third Louisa County data center campus (Northeast Creek Reservoir) (n.a.)ONMINE computing and energy research annex (6509 S. Fort Hood Street) ($30M)Google Hermantown data center (Project Loon) (n.a.)Nodaway County six-month data center moratorium (White Cloud Acres) (n.a.)Waterville six-month data center moratorium (n.a.)Warren 12-month data center moratorium (n.a.)Warren one-year data center moratorium (n.a.)ServerFarm data center and VoltaGrid temporary power plant (Newton County air permits) (n.a.)Beaufort County one-year data center moratorium (n.a.)Logan County (Nebraska) 12-month data center moratorium (n.a.)Custer County (Nebraska) data center moratorium (n.a.)Aberdeen data center permit moratorium (n.a.)Bernalillo three-month data center moratorium (n.a.)Moore County (Metropolitan Lynchburg-Moore County) two-year data center pause (n.a.)Anne Arundel County data center moratorium (Bill 63-26) (n.a.)Old Town six-month data center ban (industrial zones) (n.a.)Cascade data center moratorium (Simple Mining industrial park project) (n.a.)Cheyenne and Arapaho Tribes three-year data center ban on tribal lands (n.a.)Cass County (Nebraska) 12-month data center moratorium (n.a.)Otoe County (Nebraska) one-year data center moratorium (n.a.)Seward County (Nebraska) one-year data center moratorium (n.a.)Delphos 18-month moratorium on data centers and renewable energy projects (n.a.)Evansville 180-day data center moratorium (n.a.)West Seneca one-year data center moratorium (20 MW and above) (n.a.)Menasha one-year data center moratorium (n.a.)Wisconsin Rapids 12-month data center development moratorium (n.a.)York County nine-month data center moratorium (n.a.)Oklahoma City data center moratorium (n.a.)City of South Fulton data center moratorium (expired) (n.a.)Osceola County pause on large-scale data center applications (n.a.)Newburyport ban on water-cooled data centers (n.a.)Kennesaw six-month data center moratorium (n.a.)Roxbury Technology Park (Diode Ventures) (n.a.)Topeka 12-month data center and battery storage moratorium (n.a.)Cloverleaf Infrastructure data center proposal (Village of Greenleaf) (n.a.)Rowan County one-year data center moratorium (n.a.)Hillsborough two-month data center moratorium (n.a.)Boiling Spring Lakes one-year data center moratorium (n.a.)LightEdge data center on city-owned land near the Ames airport (n.a.)Humboldt County 45-day data center moratorium (unincorporated areas) (n.a.)San Francisco 45-day citywide data center moratorium (n.a.)Oakland 45-day data center moratorium (n.a.)Northeast Brighton data center campus rezoning (County Road 4 and 50th Avenue) (n.a.)Raleigh six-month large-scale data center moratorium (n.a.)Columbus County 120-day data center moratorium (n.a.)Baldwin County 180-day moratorium on rezonings, data centers and renewable energy projects (n.a.)Charleston (Illinois) one-year moratorium on data centers and battery energy storage systems (n.a.)Blaine County 182-day emergency data center moratorium (n.a.)Ellensburg six-month emergency data center moratorium (n.a.)Clean Cloud Energy data center campus proposal (Mahomet) (n.a.)Project Rock Forge data center campus (n.a.)Johnson County (Iowa) data center moratorium (n.a.)Skybox Wichita Falls data center (n.a.)Mandan large-scale data center ban (citizen petition, special election) (n.a.)Colfax County one-year data center moratorium (n.a.)Niles Charter Township 12-month data center moratorium (n.a.)Coventry Mall data center (85,987 sq ft) (n.a.)Middleburg Heights data center moratorium (Ordinance 2026-42) (n.a.)Rose Hill citizen initiative banning data centers and battery energy storage (kept off ballot) (n.a.)
Circle area scales with announced capital. Sites with no confirmed dollar figure are sized by megawatts, and shown at minimum size where neither is disclosed. Locations are plotted at the named city or county. 1446 records are mapped; entries without a confirmed location appear in the tables below but not on the map.
Section 02 · The numbers

The numbers

Four views of the same record: what the five reporting hyperscalers actually spent, what independent trackers say was stopped, the largest single losses, and the interconnection queues where announced capacity waits.

Reported capital expenditure, five filers
US$ billions. Consolidated, global, all-purpose capex as reported in filings; 2026 figures are company guidance where actuals are not yet filed (striped). These are not North America data center lines; no company reports one.
44
65
116
Microsoft
83
132
54
Amazon
53
91
45
Alphabet
37
72
31
Meta
21
56
Oracle
2024202520262026 guidance
What the trackers measured stopped
Independent snapshots of blocked and delayed capital. Different windows, different definitions; they are not additive and no published reconciliation exists.
May 2024 - Mar 2025
$64B
16 (6 blocked, 10 delayed) across 28 states, ($18B blocked / $46B delayed)
Q2 2025 alone
$98B
20 projects / 11 states
Full-year 2025
$156B
≥48 projects
2025 cancellations only
$89.7B
25 (vs. 6 in 2024, 2 in 2023), across 17 facilities in 10 states; avg $5.3B
Q1 2026 alone
~$130B
~75 projects, of which ≥20 cancellations worth ~$41.7B / ≥3.5 GW
Largest documented losses and holds
The biggest single projects blocked, cancelled, or delayed, by announced capital. Dollar figures are floors: most blocked projects never disclose capex.
Project Jupiter (10,000-acre Green Data Center) NM
$165B
Crusoe Technologies Leon County data center tax abatement TX
$34.0B
Tract Mooresville NC
$30.0B
Project Rainier / New Carlisle IN
$26.0B
Prince William Digital Gateway VA
$24.7B
PW Digital Gateway VA
$24.7B
PowerHouse Hillwood Joliet data center campus IL
$20.0B
STAMP campus (Stream) NY
$19.5B
Edgecombe County AI data center (Kingsboro) NC
$19.2B
T5 @ Chicago IV (Grayslake) IL
$18.0B
Project Sail GA
$17.0B
Saline Township campus MI
$16.0B
Interconnection queues, by system
Gigawatts of requested interconnection by ISO/RTO. Queue volumes contain duplicate and speculative requests and cannot be converted to project counts or capital figures.
ERCOT~90% data centers at mid-2026; 73% data centers at the...
474 GW
Dominion (utility-level, PJM zone, Virginia)Pipeline is Dominion's contracted data center pipeline...
70 GW
NYISOFigure is data center load requests specifically...
12 GW
PSEG (utility-level, New Jersey)Pipeline described as overwhelmingly data centers.
9 GW
DTE (utility-level, Michigan)Figure is DTE's identified data center opportunity, not an ISO queue.
8 GW
Silicon Valley Power (municipal utility, Santa Clara, CA)~60 data centers operate in SVP territory at typically...
0 GW
Section 03 · The capital layers

The capital layers

Eight layers now fund North American data center capacity, and they behave differently under stress. Each profile below carries the entity's reported spending, its announced commitments, its named sites, and its financing transactions, with a source on every figure.

01

Hyperscalers

The reporting companies whose consolidated capital expenditure guidance now runs into the hundreds of billions a year, alongside announced site commitments that overlap it and are never summed with it.

6entities 237named sites 227transactions 39recorded facts
Microsoft (Azure) logo

Microsoft (Azure)Full profile →

Financingbalance-sheet capex plus heavy finance leasing of third-party datacenter shells; lease-accounting shift to 25-year terms lowering reported capex
MSFT

Microsoft's audited additions to property and equipment rose from $44,477 million in FY2024 to $64,551 million in FY2025 and $115,948 million in FY2026, with finance leases used heavily for large third-party datacenter shells. In July 2026 it moved to 25-year lease treatment and guided to $175 billion of reported capex for calendar 2026, below its prior $190 billion estimate, framed as accounting-driven rather than demand-driven. Its flagship North American commitment is more than $7 billion in Mount Pleasant, Wisconsin, alongside sites in Georgia, Texas, Arizona, Virginia and Washington. Microsoft is also the most heavily documented case of capacity pull-back, with up to about 2 GW of leases and LOIs cancelled or deferred per TD Cowen, about 1.5 GW of self-build frozen per SemiAnalysis, and a $1 billion Ohio project paused.

PeriodKindAmountContextSources
FY2023reported$28.1BAudited additions to property and equipment, fiscal year ending 30 June
FY2024reported$44.5BAudited additions to property and equipment, fiscal year ending 30 June
FY2025reported$64.6BAudited additions to property and equipment, fiscal year ending 30 June
FY2025 finance leasesreported$20.5BFinance-lease right-of-use assets obtained, the mechanism Microsoft uses for large third-party datacenter shells; $3,128M in FY2023 and $11,633M in FY2024
FY2026reported$116BAdditions to property and equipment for the twelve months ended 30 June 2026, versus $64,551 million for FY2025; $35,802 million in the June 2026 quarter alone
FY26 Q4reported$41.0BManagement on FY26 Q4 call: 'Capital expenditures were $41 billion including the impact from higher component pricing'; total finance leases $5.6 billion, primarily for large datacenter sites; cash paid for PP&E $35.8 billion; roughly two-thirds of Q4 capex for short-lived assets, primarily CPUs and GPUs
FY26 Q3reported$31.9BCapital expenditures of $31.9 billion, 'down sequentially due to the normal variability from cloud infrastructure buildouts and the timing of delivery of finance leases'; finance leases $4.7 billion, cash paid for PP&E $30.9 billion; quarter ended 31 March 2026
FY26 Q2reported$37.5BQ2 FY26 capex was $37.5 billion
CY2026guidance$175BReported capex guidance of $175 billion for calendar 2026, below prior $190 billion estimate; lowered by spreading long-term datacenter leases over 25 years rather than 15; management says calendar 2026 investment expectations otherwise unchanged and FY27 capex will grow year-over-year
FY2027 Q1guidance$50.0BExpects reported capital expenditures of $50 billion for the fiscal first quarter of 2027
FY2025guidance$80.0BMicrosoft said it intended to 'invest over $80 billion globally to expand its AI infrastructure in the current fiscal year, which concludes in June' (FY2025); stated as 'over' $80 billion
Record
  • Purchases of property and equipment remaining in accounts payable were $6.9 billion at 30 June 2025 versus $4.3 billion at 30 June 2024.
  • Reuters contextualised Microsoft's spend as part of '$700 billion in unprecedented Big Tech outlays'.
  • TD Cowen said Microsoft has walked away from data center projects in the US and Europe to the tune of 2 GW, in a note published 26 March that included lease cancellations and deferrals, following earlier speculation about 200 MW walked away from in February 2025; Reuters covered the same analyst thesis as a potential oversupply signal.
  • SemiAnalysis counter-read: the 2 GW of lease cancellations only covers non-binding LOIs, not firm contracts; Microsoft has approximately 5 GW of pre-leased capacity under binding contracts starting operations between 2025 and 2028, but is freezing 1.5 GW of near-term self-build datacenter projects previously scheduled to go online in 2025 and 2026.
  • Estimated delayed or paused envelope for Microsoft per the atlas: up to about 2 GW of leases and LOIs cancelled or deferred plus about 1.5 GW of self-build frozen, and about $1 billion of Ohio capex paused.
  • Microsoft runs a $545,000 Datacenter Academy investment near San Antonio ($0.545 million).
  • The Mount Pleasant, Wisconsin announcement was paired with a 250 megawatt solar project built with National Grid Renewables and a $20 million joint community fund.
  • Microsoft will add three Availability Zones in the US Government Arizona region in early 2026, and will add Availability Zones during 2026 in regions where it already has three, including East US 2 in Virginia.
  • Microsoft is a 'key initial technology partner' but not an equity funder of the Stargate Project, and trade press noted it lost its position as OpenAI's exclusive cloud provider following the $500bn Stargate data center initiative.
  • A specific 2024-2026 Iowa (West Des Moines) dollar commitment is n.a. in this research.
  • On 2 September 2026 Microsoft announced that beginning in fiscal year 2027 it will report under two reportable segments, Agents and Infra and Devices and Consumer, replacing the three-segment structure in place since 2015, and that it will disclose Azure revenue separately for the first time. Reported Azure revenue was $29.42 billion in the June 2026 quarter and $101.94 billion for fiscal 2026.
  • Bloomberg News reported on 10 September 2026, citing people familiar with the plans, that Microsoft intends to reach approximately 38 GW of data center capacity by 2032 from roughly 12 GW today, of which about 2 GW is currently AI-specific and about a third of the 38 GW is expected to be. The figure covers owned and leased facilities and excludes capacity rented from neocloud providers. Microsoft has not publicly confirmed the target, and it is recorded here as a press report rather than a company disclosure.
Amazon (AWS) logo

Amazon (AWS)Full profile →

Financingbalance-sheet / operating cash flow, with power procured contractually via PPAs
AMZN

Amazon's purchases of property and equipment were $82,999 million in 2024 and $131,819 million in 2025, with net cash capex of $77.7 billion and $128.3 billion respectively, primarily supporting AWS growth. Guidance escalated three times inside eighteen months, from $100 billion for 2025 to $200 billion and then $220 billion for 2026. Announced North American commitments include $11 billion plus an additional $15 billion in Indiana, at least $20 billion in Pennsylvania, more than $23 billion forecast in Ohio by 2030, and $10 billion for two Mississippi complexes plus a further $3 billion Vicksburg campus. AWS builds are overwhelmingly balance-sheet funded, with power procured contractually, including a 1,920 MW nuclear PPA with Talen Energy through 2042.

PeriodKindAmountContextSources
FY2023reported$52.7BCash-flow statement purchases of property and equipment, $(52,729)M in 2023
FY2024reported$83.0BCash-flow statement purchases of property and equipment, $(82,999)M in 2024; net of proceeds and incentives, cash capital expenditures were $77.7 billion in 2024
FY2025reported$132BCash-flow statement purchases of property and equipment, $(131,819)M in 2025; net cash capital expenditures $128.3 billion, primarily investments in technology infrastructure, the majority to support AWS business growth, expected to increase in 2026
CY2025guidance$100BAmazon guided to $100 billion for 2025
CY2026 (Feb 2026 guide)guidance$200BAmazon plans to double its capex spend in 2026, investing $200 billion, most of which will be funnelled into data centers for its AWS cloud division; held steady on that forecast in April
CY2026 (Jul 2026 guide)guidance$220BIn July 2026 CEO Andy Jassy said the company expects capital spending to reach $220 billion this year
Q2 2026reported$54.2BCapital expenditures reached $54.2 billion during the June quarter, compared with $32.1 billion a year ago
Record
  • Since 2011, AWS has invested more than $108 billion in its infrastructure across the U.S.
  • By 2030, AWS's planned investment toward data center expansion in Ohio is forecast to surpass $23 billion, one of the largest private investment commitments Ohio has ever received; the December 2024 increment was an estimated $7.8 billion by 2030, and cumulative Ohio cloud infrastructure investment since 2016 was more than $10.3 billion.
  • AWS's standing Virginia commitment is $35 billion in additional data center investment by 2040, announced January 2023; it predates the 2024-2026 window but remains the largest single-state AWS commitment.
  • Aggregate delayed or paused capacity in MW for Amazon is n.a.; no source quantifies AWS pull-back in MW. Confirmed blocked or delayed announced dollars: $3.6B (Tucson) plus $4B (Wilmington, tabled).
  • After rejecting Project Blue, Tucson adopted rules requiring council approval for any datacenter larger than 25,000 sq ft or requiring more than 20 megawatts of power, with water-disclosure triggers above 7 million gallons per month.
Alphabet / Google logo

Alphabet / GoogleFull profile →

Financingbalance-sheet self-build, newly supplemented by equity markets ($49.6B stock and mandatory convertible preferred raise, June 2026)
GOOGL

Alphabet's audited purchases of property and equipment were $52,535 million in 2024 and $91,447 million in 2025, with comparatively small finance-lease additions, indicating Google self-builds and owns far more of its fleet than Microsoft leases. 2026 capex guidance was raised twice, from $175-185 billion to $195-205 billion, after a record $44.9 billion quarter that produced Alphabet's first cash-negative quarter since its 2004 IPO. Unlike peers, Alphabet began tapping equity markets, raising $49.6 billion net in June 2026 partly for capex, and agreed to acquire data center company Intersect for $4.75 billion. Major announced North American commitments include $40 billion in Texas through 2027, $9 billion in South Carolina, and $7 billion in Iowa.

PeriodKindAmountContextSources
FY2023reported$32.3BAudited purchases of property and equipment, $(32,251)M in 2023
FY2024reported$52.5BFiling states 'During the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2025, we spent $52.5 billion and $91.4 billion on capital expenditures, respectively'; finance-lease additions were comparatively small at $313M in 2024
FY2025reported$91.4BAudited purchases of property and equipment, $(91,447)M in 2025; finance-lease additions $1,606M in 2025, indicating Google self-builds and owns far more of its fleet than Microsoft leases
CY2026 (initial guide)guidance$180BMidpoint of initial range: 'Alphabet said it expects 2026 capital expenditures to be in the range of $175 billion to $185 billion', the top end more than double its 2025 capex spend
CY2026 (Q2 raised guide)guidance$200BMidpoint of raised range: CFO Anat Ashkenazi raised full-year capex guidance to between $195 billion and $205 billion, up from $180 billion to $190 billion
Q2 2026reported$44.9BQ2 2026 exhibit confirms purchases of property and equipment of $(44,924)M for the quarter and $(80,598)M year-to-date, versus $(22,446)M and $(39,643)M in prior-year periods; trailing-twelve-month figure $(132,402)M; capex doubled year-over-year to a record $44.9 billion, producing negative free cash flow of $5.9 billion, the first cash-negative quarter since the 2004 IPO
Record
  • Roughly 60% of Q2 2026 technical infrastructure investment went into servers, with the remaining 40% split across data centers and networking equipment.
  • The Texas announcement includes a new $30 million Energy Impact Fund and more than 6,200 megawatts of new energy generation and capacity contracted to date through power purchase agreements.
  • DCD's roundup corroborates the $9bn South Carolina figure alongside $4bn in Arkansas.
  • Google's Kairos Power agreement will enable up to 500 MW of new 24/7 carbon-free power to U.S. electricity grids, with the initial phase intended to bring Kairos Power's first SMR online by 2030, followed by additional reactor deployments through 2035.
  • In Ohio, Google is running a first-of-its-kind initiative to aggregate 100 megawatts of distributed capacity annually into a virtual power plant on the PJM grid.
  • Google is reported to be eyeing a site in Palo, Iowa to bypass Linn County regulations.
  • A discrete 2024-2026 Google Virginia dollar commitment is n.a. from fetched sources.
  • Delayed or paused capacity for Google in MW is n.a.; confirmed blocked or withdrawn announced dollars are $1B (Franklin Township) plus an indefinite court-ordered halt at Pine Island.
  • On 18 May 2026 Blackstone announced a joint venture with Google to create a new United States company offering data center capacity, operations, networking and Google Cloud TPUs as compute-as-a-service, with an initial $5 billion equity commitment from Blackstone and a first 500 MW of capacity targeted online in 2027. The venture is led by Benjamin Treynor Sloss.
Meta Platforms logo

Meta PlatformsFull profile →

Financingbalance-sheet capex plus landmark private-credit JVs (Blue Owl, BlackRock) with residual value guarantees and one-time distributions back to Meta
META

Meta's capital expenditures including principal payments on finance leases were $72.22 billion for full-year 2025, with 2026 guidance moving from $115-135 billion to as much as $145 billion and then narrowed to $130-145 billion. Its flagship is the Hyperion campus in Richland Parish, Louisiana, which grew from a $10 billion announcement to a $27 billion Blue Owl joint venture and by mid-2026 to a 5 GW facility costing more than $50 billion. Meta repeated the private-credit JV playbook with BlackRock at El Paso, a roughly $14 billion venture with a $12.5 billion debt financing and residual value guarantees. No 2025-2026 Meta cancellation of a North American AI campus was confirmed; documented pauses trace to the late-2022 design-rescope cycle.

PeriodKindAmountContextSources
FY2024reported$37.3BPurchases of property and equipment $(37,256)M in 2024; principal payments on finance leases $(1,969)M
FY2025reported$72.2BCapital expenditures, including principal payments on finance leases, were $22.14 billion and $72.22 billion for the fourth quarter and full year 2025, respectively; underlying purchases of property and equipment were $(69,691)M with principal payments on finance leases of $(2,524)M
CY2026 (initial guide)guidance$125BMidpoint of initial range: 'We anticipate 2026 capital expenditures, including principal payments on finance leases, to be in the range of $115-135 billion'; CNBC noted the high end would be almost double 2025's $72.2 billion
CY2026 (Apr 2026 raise)guidance$145BGuidance was raised to as much as $145 billion in April 2026; recorded at the stated ceiling
CY2026 (Q2 narrowed guide)guidance$138BMidpoint of narrowed range: 'We anticipate 2026 capital expenditures, including principal payments on finance leases, to be in the range of $130-145 billion, narrowed from our prior outlook of $125-145 billion'
Q2 2026reported$31.1BQ2 2026 capex of $31.08 billion; H1 2026 purchases of PP&E of $(49,113)M
Record
  • Meta's documented pauses come from its earlier design-rescope cycle rather than the 2025-2026 AI build: the company ripped up its data center plans and paused projects around the world as it redesigned them for AI workloads, first cancelling its Danish data center expansion outright before pausing projects in Texas and Alabama.
  • The rescope cycle is pinned to Meta's 11,000-employee layoff announcement (some 13 percent of its workforce) and reworking of 11 under-development projects, with Temple, Texas the next pause, i.e. the late-2022 rescope, not a 2026 event.
  • No 2025-2026 Meta cancellation of a North American AI campus was confirmed in this research; delayed or paused capacity for Meta in the 2024-2026 window is n.a.
  • Meta is in talks to pick up Crusoe capacity at Abilene after Oracle and OpenAI dropped expansion plans, having reportedly paid a $150 million deposit to Crusoe to secure the site.
Oracle logo

OracleFull profile →

Financingdebt and hybrid capital: senior notes, mandatory convertible preferred, asset sales, plus $72B of site-level partner debt; leases capacity from developer Crusoe at Abilene
ORCL

Oracle's capex inflected from $21.2 billion in fiscal 2025 to $55.7 billion in fiscal 2026 (fiscal years end 31 May), funded unlike peers with debt and hybrid capital, including $42.7 billion of senior notes and $5.0 billion of mandatory convertible preferred stock in FY2026, with about $40 billion more planned for fiscal 2027 against a record $638 billion backlog. Oracle is an initial equity funder in Stargate and holds an OpenAI partnership exceeding $300 billion over five years to develop 4.5 GW of additional capacity. Its Saline Township, Michigan campus produced a $16.3 billion financing, the largest single-facility technology debt package on record, part of $72 billion in partner debt across four states. The Abilene, Texas flagship's expansion from 1.2 GW to 2 GW was dropped.

PeriodKindAmountContextSources
FY2025reported$21.2BCash used for capital expenditures of $21.2 billion in fiscal 2025, shown as $(21,215)M; fiscal year ends 31 May
FY2026reported$55.7B$(55,663)M in FY2026; the increase drove a $34.4 billion increase in capital expenditures in investing activities
FY2026raise$48.0B$48 billion of debt and equity raised in fiscal 2026 (includes $42.7B senior notes and $5.0B Mandatory Convertible Preferred Stock)
FY2027raise$40.0BOracle plans to raise about $40 billion in fiscal 2027 to help fund its AI data center build-out, on top of the $48 billion raised in fiscal 2026; against a $90 billion FY2027 revenue forecast
as of FY2026 resultsbacklog$638BRecord $638 billion backlog
Record
  • FY2026 financing included $4.9 billion of cash proceeds from the sale of investments, primarily in Ampere.
  • Bloomberg reported the market reaction as 'Oracle Falls After Data Center Costs Overshadow AI Growth'.
  • Oracle is one of the initial equity funders in Stargate alongside SoftBank, OpenAI and MGX; reported equity split leaves Oracle a minority, with OpenAI maintaining a 40% stake and SoftBank similarly possessing a 40% share.
  • The Saline Township financing sits against a BBB-negative credit outlook and $553 billion in performance obligations concentrated heavily in a single counterparty, OpenAI.
  • With as much as $300bn set to go to Oracle, that cloud provider has itself struggled to fund its data center buildout, and is loading up on debt and planning to lay off thousands to cover costs.
  • Implied cancelled or deferred capacity at Abilene per the atlas: approximately 0.8 GW (the 2 GW ambition minus the 1.2 GW built).
  • Project Jupiter (New Mexico): Bloomberg News reported on 24 September 2026 that Oracle sent a force majeure notice to the developer to put off payments if the campus fails to come online in 2028 as planned; the roughly $18 billion of construction loans were quoted at 89 to 91 cents on the dollar per the Financial Times on 18 September 2026.
Apple logo

AppleFull profile →

Financingbalance-sheet; no disclosed data center capex, project finance, or PPA structure
AAPL

Apple is the outlier: a very large US commitment with essentially no owned hyperscale data center capacity disclosed. It announced on 24 February 2025 that it will spend more than $500 billion in the U.S. over the next four years, including a Houston AI server factory and 20,000 R&D jobs; the commitment was subsequently raised by $100 billion, and Apple now references a $600 billion commitment. The Houston Advanced Manufacturing Center, opened 13 August 2026, is a server manufacturing plant, not a data center; Apple discloses no MW figure, no site-level data center capex, and no PPA structure in the fetched sources.

PeriodKindAmountContextSources
2025-2029 US commitmentguidance$500B'Apple will spend more than $500 billion in the U.S. over the next four years', announced 24 February 2025; a total US commitment spanning silicon, components, cover glass, suppliers and R&D, not a data center capex figure, and should never be summed with hyperscaler data center capex
raised US commitmentguidance$600BThe commitment was subsequently raised by $100 billion, and Apple now references 'a $600 billion commitment last year'; total US commitment, not data center capex
data center capexreportedn.a.n.a. (no data center capex disclosed); MW n.a.; Apple-owned NA data center dollar figures n.a.; delayed/paused capacity n.a.
Record
  • Production at the Houston facility started ahead of schedule in late 2025.
  • Houston is a server manufacturing plant, not a data center; the $500B to $600B figure spans silicon, components, cover glass, suppliers and R&D and is not a data center capex figure.

Named sites — hyperscalers

SiteLocationCapitalMWStatusDetailSources
Mount Pleasant datacenter campus (Fairwater Wisconsin)Mount Pleasant, WI≥$7.0BconstructionMicrosoft announced $3.3B on 8 May 2024 for a state-of-the-art datacenter campus, then committed an additional $4 billion on 18 September 2025 for a second datacenter of similar size and scale, bringing total Wisconsin investment to more than $7 billion. Construction of the first facility completed 23 June 2026 ahead of schedule with nearly 10,000 construction workers and nearly 550 full-time employees on-site; the second facility is scheduled to be completed in 2028. Microsoft estimates $4.7 billion between 2024 and 2028 locally on hyperscale construction in Wisconsin. In August 2026 Microsoft filed at FERC (21 August 2026) disputing large load project commitment and minimum transmission charge agreements negotiated by American Transmission Co. and We Energies, which would bill Microsoft more than $600 million for new power lines and substations serving the Mount Pleasant campus. Microsoft said the agreements lack a mechanism to keep We Energies retail customers from paying the costs and could make large-load customers pay twice, and the Citizens Utility Board raised similar concerns. A second Microsoft data center was under construction at the site, and nearby residents filed a class action over data center noise in early July 2026. On 28 September 2026 the Village of Mount Pleasant announced that Microsoft will redirect its annual development incentive of up to $5 million under the 2023 development agreement, for which it had become eligible, to the Racine County Economic Development Corporation: about $100,000 stays with RCEDC and $4.9 million returns to the village for property tax relief and capital costs, following Microsoft's commitment to forgo local property tax incentives.
Fairwater Atlanta AI datacenterAtlanta, GAn.a.operatingThe Atlanta AI datacenter began operation in October 2025 and is the second in Microsoft's Fairwater family, connected to Wisconsin by a dedicated inter-site network to operate as an AI superfactory. Microsoft is also expanding with the launch of its East US 3 region in the Greater Atlanta Metro area in early 2027. The dollar figure for the Atlanta campus is n.a. In August 2026 Microsoft confirmed it is working with Fulton and Douglas counties to unwind local property tax incentive agreements for its data center projects in East Point, Palmetto and Douglasville. The AJC described the Union City project, developed by EdgeConneX on 136 acres, as costing nearly $2 billion
Pecos datacenter campusPecos, TXn.a.2000announcedIn June 2026 Microsoft announced a new campus in Pecos, Texas, expanding its global datacenter capacity by approximately 2 gigawatts, described as a multibillion-dollar datacenter campus investment over the next five to seven years, with no precise dollar total disclosed.
SAT93 and SAT94, San Antonio/Medina CountySan Antonio, TX$700MconstructionMicrosoft filed for SAT93 and SAT94, two 245,000 sq ft buildings at $350 million each in the San Antonio/Medina County corridor, with construction from May 2025 to June 2027.
Texas Research Park planSan Antonio, TX$1.0BannouncedMicrosoft owns 158 acres in Texas Research Park where it plans to spend $1 billion on one million square feet.
SAT16San Antonio, TX~$215MannouncedMicrosoft has SAT16 in the San Antonio corridor at an expected $215 million.
SAT 82, CastrovilleCastroville, TX~$400MannouncedA Castroville building, SAT 82, carries an estimated cost of $400m, with work set to begin in mid-August 2026 and an aimed completion of June 2028.
El Mirage land acquisitionEl Mirage, AZ$258MannouncedMicrosoft acquired 283 acres in El Mirage for $258 million in two all-cash transactions.
Goodyear data center campusGoodyear, AZ$1.5BexpansionMicrosoft is expanding its five-building, $1.5 billion data center campus in Goodyear, having earlier bought 272 acres near Goodyear Airport for $42 million in 2018.
Boydton campus, Mecklenburg CountyBoydton, VA$499MoperatingA $499 million Mecklenburg County, Virginia datacenter investment is documented at the 175-acre Boydton Plank Road site. The fetched page carries no publication date and the site is Microsoft's long-established Boydton campus, so this figure should not be read as a new 2024-2026 commitment.
Quincy datacentersQuincy, WAn.a.operatingMicrosoft's original datacenter home received $210,000 in local grants in 2026. The county PUD wants six new transmission lines estimated to cost $260 million, toward which Microsoft has committed more than $2.6 million.
Licking County projectLicking County, OH$1.0BpausedMicrosoft announced a slowing or pausing of certain data center construction initiatives, including a significant $1 billion project in Licking County, Ohio, having previously announced in late December that it was suspending later stages of a substantial data center initiative in Wisconsin. DCD reported the same Licking County pause at $1bn; the DCD headline was confirmed via search index with the figure corroborated by AP.
Project Rainier, New Carlisle / St. Joseph CountyNew Carlisle, IN$26.0BoperatingThe original $11 billion commitment was approved by St. Joseph County leaders in August 2024 and opened in October 2025 as Project Rainier, a fully operational cluster. In November 2025 Amazon announced plans to invest an additional $15 billion in Northern Indiana to build data center campuses, creating 1,100 new high-skilled jobs, additional to the $11 billion. IndyStar reporting puts the New Carlisle campus at $26 billion. On 23 July 2026 AWS said it had already invested $13.8 billion in the St. Joseph County campus, above its original $11 billion goal, with about 18 of roughly 30 planned buildings operational and more than 1,000 people hired
Madison County data center complexesMadison County, MS$10.0BannouncedAWS plans to invest $10 billion to build two data center complexes in Madison County, marking the single largest capital investment in Mississippi's history.
Vicksburg campusVicksburg, MS$3.0BannouncedA further $3 billion campus in Vicksburg, Mississippi, with construction due to start this year, was reported in 2026. On 17 September 2026 AWS presented a timeline of mass grading in late 2026, general contractor selection in Q1 2027, design completion in April 2027, vertical construction in Q2-Q3 2027 and operations targeted for early 2029, for up to four buildings
New Albany five-building campusNew Albany, OHn.a.announcedAWS operates data centers across Franklin and Licking counties and is planning to build a five-building data center campus in New Albany, Ohio.
Sunbury data center campusSunbury, OH$2.0BannouncedAWS shared plans to spend $2bn on a data center campus in Sunbury, Ohio.
Pennsylvania campuses (Salem Township and Falls Township)Luzerne and Bucks counties, PA≥$20.0BannouncedAmazon is planning to invest at least $20 billion to establish multiple high-tech cloud computing and AI innovation campuses across Pennsylvania, creating at least 1,250 high-paying, high-tech jobs, with Salem Township and Falls Township the first communities identified (Luzerne and Bucks counties). The $20 billion is a statewide multi-community commitment, not a single-site figure.
Kline Township campusKline Township (McAdoo area), PAn.a.approvedAWS is planning a 2.5 million sq ft campus in Kline Township, Pennsylvania. Amazon Data Services is seeking Kline Township approval for the Brewster Data Center campus, nine data center buildings on about 390 acres between Interstate 81 and Lofty and Haddock roads, near the McAdoo Superfund site. Its engineers answered resident questions in a 28-page letter dated 31 July 2026, and the planning commission held a further hearing on 18 August 2026. Amazon holds one state NPDES permit and stream crossing and encroachment permits and has applied for two more NPDES permits. On Monday 28 September 2026 the Kline Township Planning Commission unanimously recommended the plan with conditions after three rounds of engineering review, and on Wednesday 30 September 2026 the Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to approve the Amazon data center campus near Route 309 and Interstate 81, subject to a nine-page list of conditions covering emergency response and fire protection, environmental and land protections, and required state, county and other agency approvals. Amazon still has to complete zoning and pre-construction processes with the township and the state before construction can begin.
Wilmington campus (tabled)Wilmington, OH$4.0BdelayedAWS said it will invest around $4 billion in developing the 471-acre Wilmington, Ohio site plus $25 million in public infrastructure. The project has been tabled twice, with the council postponing a vote in November 2025; the decision to table the project was unanimous. After a federal judge required Wilmington to revisit earlier approvals, an emergency rezoning vote failed on 20 August 2026. On 3 September 2026 the city council passed two emergency ordinances making data centers a permitted use in the Light Industrial District and permitting the AWS project, a 1.9 million sq ft data center on nearly 500 acres expected to cost about $4 billion, per WLWT. Petitioners are gathering 1,122 signatures by 30 September 2026 for a November referendum, and a resident has sued arguing the ordinances do not qualify as emergencies. On 18 September 2026 the Supreme Court of Ohio, in State ex rel. Kidd v. Clinton County Board of Elections, ruled 6-1 (five justices joined the per curiam opinion, one concurred and one dissented) that a separate citizen initiative to add data center regulations to Wilmington's zoning code cannot appear on the 3 November 2026 ballot, because municipalities cannot create a private cause of action by initiative
Project Blue, TucsonTucson, AZ$3.6BrejectedThe Tucson city council voted unanimously to oppose Project Blue, a $3.6 billion Amazon campus, after fears about water use and rising costs boiled over. The Arizona Technology Council likewise noted the city council shot down a proposed $3.6 billion data center linked to Amazon.
Iowa: Council Bluffs expansion and new Cedar Rapids data centerCouncil Bluffs and Cedar Rapids, IA$7.0BexpansionGoogle is investing an additional $7 billion in Iowa within the next two years in cloud and AI infrastructure, reflecting development of both a new data center in Cedar Rapids and expansion of the existing facility in Council Bluffs, plus workforce funding to increase Iowa's electrical worker pipeline by 95%.
Texas program (Armstrong County, Haskell County, Midlothian)Armstrong County, Haskell County, and Midlothian (Ellis County), TX$40.0BannouncedGoogle announced a new $40 billion investment in Texas through 2027, naming Armstrong County, Haskell County and Midlothian. DCD adds that how much of the $40bn will go toward the Ellis County campuses has not been stated, and that Ellis County had a separate $1bn expansion plan from August 2024. GN DC1 LLC registered Llano Building 3 (23 July 2026) and Llano Building 4 (24 July 2026) at 10001 Lima Road, Claude, Armstrong County, with the Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation: each an approximately 805,380 sq ft single-story data center with an estimated cost of $500 million. On 28 September 2026 Crusoe announced it is the developer of Google's data center campus under construction in Armstrong County near Amarillo, which broke ground in June 2025 and has more than 5,500 workers on site daily. The campus connects directly to Serena's adjacent Goodnight 1 (265.5 MW, operating) and Goodnight 2 (265.5 MW, under construction) wind farms, with surplus generation going to the grid, and uses closed-loop non-evaporative liquid cooling. Crusoe did not disclose the campus's power demand, cost or opening date.
Midlothian / Red Oak campuses (Ellis County)Midlothian and Red Oak, TX$1.0BexpansionAt the Midlothian/Red Oak campuses, Google plans to invest $1 billion in Texas this year, taking spending in the Lone Star State to $2.7 billion, with 375 MW of carbon-free energy capacity in new solar PPAs.
South Carolina: Berkeley County campus and two Dorchester County sitesBerkeley County and Dorchester County, SC$9.0BexpansionGoogle announced a new $9 billion investment in South Carolina through 2027, which will expand its Berkeley County data center campus and support the continued construction of two new sites in Dorchester County. DCD's roundup corroborates the $9bn figure.
Ohio operations (New Albany, Columbus, Lancaster)New Albany, Columbus, and Lancaster, OH≥$20.0BoperatingGoogle has invested more than $20 billion in its Ohio data center operations since 2019, across New Albany, Columbus and Lancaster. The figure is cumulative since 2019, not a 2024-2026 commitment.
Lima data centerLima, OH$500MannouncedGoogle has been confirmed as the company behind a $500m data center in Lima, Ohio.
Nevada campuses (Storey and Clark counties)Storey and Clark counties, NV≥$400MexpansionGoogle plans to invest more than $400 million in Nevada this year to support its data center campuses in Storey and Clark counties, bringing total investment in the state to more than $2.2 billion since 2019. The document's correction note confirms the Nevada figure is >$400 million in-year and >$2.2 billion cumulative, correcting a summary-table typo of $400B.
Project Skyway, Pine IslandPine Island, MNn.a.haltedA Minnesota judge halted construction activity on the Google data center campus in Pine Island via a May 22 temporary restraining order sought by the Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy. General contractor Ryan Cos. estimates delays on Project Skyway could cost $5 million or more. Google announced its Pine Island investment in February. On Thursday 1 October 2026 Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison's office filed comments with the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission arguing that Xcel Energy has not shown its agreement to power Google's Pine Island data center is reasonable, in the public interest or compliant with the state law requiring that all costs attributable to very large customers be assigned to them. Ellison said the agreement could leave other Xcel customers with millions, and possibly more than a billion dollars, of extra costs. The commission has not ruled. On Thursday 1 October 2026 the Minnesota Attorney General's Office filed comments with the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission arguing that Xcel Energy has not shown its electric service agreement with Google for the Pine Island data center is reasonable or meets the state law requiring that all costs attributable to very large customers be assigned to them. The office said other ratepayers could bear costs after Google's 15-year contract term or on early termination, and objected that Xcel redacted almost all dollar amounts. Xcel disagreed and said Google has agreed to fund 1,900 MW of new wind, solar and battery storage at no cost to existing customers. The commission has not ruled.
Franklin Township proposal (withdrawn)Franklin Township, outside Indianapolis, IN$1.0BwithdrawnIn September, Google walked away from a $1 billion data center outside Indianapolis, pulling its Franklin Township proposal minutes before the city-county council was set to vote it down.
Hyperion, Holly Ridge, Richland ParishHolly Ridge, LA≥$50.0B5000constructionAnnounced in December 2024 as a $10 billion AI data center planned to span over 4 million square feet, then financed through a landmark October 2025 private-credit JV with Blue Owl Capital at approximately $27 billion in development costs. By mid-2026 the site will be a 5 GW facility costing more than $50 billion, with Meta also investing over $1 billion in local infrastructure improvements and more than $1.6 billion in contracts to Louisiana businesses. Fortune reported Meta quietly purchased roughly 1,400 acres adjacent to the 2,250-acre site for a phase 2, with more than 3,700 construction workers and reported plans to climb to 5,000. On 12 August 2026 the Louisiana Public Service Commission voted 3-1 to overturn an administrative law judge's recommendation that Meta turn over information on expected jobs and electricity use at Hyperion, sought by subpoenas from the Alliance for Affordable Energy and the Union of Concerned Scientists in the proceeding on Entergy's plan to build seven new power plants for the expansion. In September 2026 landowners in Ouachita Parish contested Entergy's proposed expropriation of rights of way for new transmission lines serving the campus On 13 July 2026 Meta said Hyperion will expand to 5 GW from an initial 2 GW, taking planned investment in the region past $50 billion. Entergy Louisiana's agreement includes gas plants of more than 5.2 GW and support for up to 2.5 GW of new solar; the expansion requires seven more generating units beyond the first three. On 12 August 2026 the Louisiana PSC voted 3-1 to overturn an administrative judge's order requiring Meta to disclose its job and electricity-demand calculations.
El Paso AI data centerEl Paso, TX≥$14.0B1000constructionMeta committed $1.5 billion to an El Paso AI data center in October 2025, then in March 2026 raised the plan to $10 billion with 1 GW by 2028. In July 2026 Meta repeated the Blue Owl playbook with BlackRock in a venture with approximately $14 billion of total development costs; CNBC framed it as a $14 billion El Paso data center venture.
Montgomery data centerMontgomery, AL≥$1.5BexpansionOriginally announced at $800 million in May 2024, the Montgomery campus was expanded in September 2025, almost doubling the investment to more than $1.5 billion and bringing the campus to nearly 1.3 million square feet, with Meta's Alabama total at more than $3 billion.
Cheyenne data centerCheyenne, WY≥$800MannouncedCheyenne, Wyoming, will be home to Meta's newest data center, its 21st in the U.S. The 715,000-square-foot campus will represent an investment of more than $800 million and support approximately 100 jobs.
Mesa data centerMesa, AZ≥$1.0BoperatingThe Mesa facility is now online. Once fully built out, it will represent an investment of more than $1 billion in the state of Arizona.
Eagle Mountain campusEagle Mountain, UT≥$3.0BexpansionMeta's latest two-building expansion will add around 2 million square feet to the Eagle Mountain campus and bring total capital investment in the project to $1.5 billion, up from an original $750 million plan of 1,000,000 sq ft. On 14 September 2026 Meta announced a further expansion of the Eagle Mountain Data Center, taking its Utah investment to more than $3 billion, with more than 1,200 construction workers at peak and more than 300 jobs once complete. Meta cited more than 1.7 GW of new renewable energy across 13 Utah projects, 600 MWh of battery storage and support for a 150 MW Faraday Energy Storage project, and uses closed-loop liquid cooling with dry cooling On 14 September 2026 Meta announced a further expansion of its Eagle Mountain data center, bringing its total Utah investment to more than $3 billion with more than 1,200 peak construction jobs and more than 300 jobs after completion. Community commitments include a $600,000 grant for the Lake Mountain School District to buy three acres for an elementary school, $450,000 for the Walden Park observatory, and $1.5 million plus $50,000 a year to the Lake Mountain Education Foundation. Meta also cited the 150 MW Faraday Energy Storage battery project expected online later in 2026
Kuna data centerKuna, ID$1.2BoperatingAn $800 million development announced in 2022 that Meta paused shortly after announcing it, then restarted. Meta announced on 4 September 2026 that the Kuna Data Center is serving traffic, describing an overall investment of $1.2 billion over a four-year build. It is Meta's 28th American data center and its first in Idaho, at 750,000 square feet, and the second Meta facility to use a closed-loop cooling system that runs without additional cooling water for much of the year. Meta states it invested more than $100 million in a dedicated water and wastewater system for the City of Kuna. The project supported 1,600 skilled trade workers at peak construction and will employ about 100 people full time.
Social Circle / Newton County campusSocial Circle, GAn.a.announcedLocal approvals are documented: the Social Circle City Council approved a new data center, and a 2.5 million sq ft campus was proposed outside Atlanta. A Meta-confirmed dollar or MW figure for Georgia is n.a.
Lebanon hyperscale developmentLebanon, IN$10.0BannouncedMeta is planning a $10 billion hyperscale development in Lebanon, Indiana. IndyStar reported on 16 July 2026 that Life Cycle Power applied to IDEM for an air permit to supply 134 MW of temporary off-grid gas-fired bridge power to Meta's Lebanon data center, which would be Indiana's first off-grid power source. The first buildings are expected to be operational by 2027, and the generators would run through the end of 2027; LCP said it will likely install 32 of the 65 permitted generators because a grid connection is closer than anticipated
Stargate flagship campus, Abilene (Crusoe/Lancium Clean Campus)Abilene, TXn.a.1200operatingCrusoe announced the first phase of Stargate's flagship campus in Abilene up and running on Oracle Cloud Infrastructure on 30 September 2025; construction of the multi-building campus began in June 2024 and Oracle began delivering the first NVIDIA GB200 racks in June 2025. At completion the planned eight-building campus will support hundreds of thousands of GPUs on a single integrated network fabric. Oracle and OpenAI later dropped plans to expand the site to 2 GW, with power not ready for a year and OpenAI preferring to deploy Nvidia Vera Rubin chips at a new campus; Meta is in talks to pick up Crusoe capacity.
Saline Township campusSaline Township, Washtenaw area, MI$16.3BannouncedOracle closed a $16.3 billion financing for a single data centre campus in Saline Township, Michigan, the largest single-facility technology debt package on record. The financing is part of $72 billion in total data centre partner debt Oracle has assembled across Michigan, Texas, Wisconsin, and New Mexico for the Stargate joint venture, against a BBB-negative credit outlook and $553 billion in performance obligations concentrated heavily in OpenAI. On 14 July 2026 the Saline Township Board of Trustees unanimously approved a 12-year, 50% real and personal property tax abatement for Oracle's data center, but limited it to the original $4.8 billion project cost in the consent judgment rather than the current $43 billion cost reported by WXYZ. In August 2026 developer Related Digital completed the purchase of the adjacent Rustic Glen Golf Club, which it said would remain a golf course. EGLE set an 21 October 2026 public hearing on Related Digital's NPDES permit application to discharge about 15,750 gallons per day of treated sanitary wastewater from the 2.2 million sq ft facility into the Saline River
Advanced Manufacturing Center, HoustonHouston, TXn.a.operatingApple opened its Advanced Manufacturing Center in Houston on 13 August 2026, stating that in less than nine months it invested hundreds of millions of dollars into the facility, stood up a factory, started production, and shipped the first advanced AI servers off the line, with Mac mini production to begin later in the year. Production started ahead of schedule in late 2025. Houston is a server manufacturing plant, not a data center. Apple opened its 20,000 sq ft Advanced Manufacturing Center in Houston on 13 August 2026, inside the existing plant that builds and ships Apple's AI servers, and said Mac mini production would begin at the site later in 2026. CNBC reported the same day that Apple said $60 billion of its US investment program is going to Texas
Stargate site, Shackelford (announced)Shackelford, TXn.a.announcedListed in the summary table among the 7+ announced US Stargate sites. No site-level dollar or MW figure appears in this part.
Milam County Data Center (Stargate site)Burlington (County Road 133), TX~$470MconstructionListed in the summary table among the announced US Stargate sites. SB Energy's Form S-1, filed 1 September 2026, identifies the Milam County Data Center as one of the company's two data center projects under construction, alongside the Cosmos Technology Campus, and states that Milam County Buildings 1 and 2 sit within its 0.8 GW-IT of under-construction capacity. The filing records warrants issued on 9 January 2026 in connection with the Milam County data center facility lease arrangements with OpenAI, remeasurement of which drove a $2,573.1 million change in fair value of warrant liability for the six months ended 30 June 2026. No site-level dollar or megawatt figure is disclosed. A TDLR registration (TABS2026017746) filed in April 2026 lists 'Freebird Data Center Phase 1' (facility DC01) on County Road 133 in Burlington, Milam County: a single-story 548,950 sq ft building with four data halls, estimated cost $470,000,000, owner Milam County Data Center LLC and tenant OpenAI, with construction from October 2025 to October 2026. KCEN-TV traced quarry truck traffic through Temple to the project in August 2026, and an SB Energy spokesperson responded on the company's behalf.
Stargate site, Dona Ana (announced)Santa Teresa, NMn.a.announcedListed in the summary table among the 7+ announced US Stargate sites. No site-level dollar or MW figure appears in this part. Dona Ana County commissioners voted 4-1 on 19 September 2025 to approve up to $165 billion of industrial revenue bonds for Project Jupiter in Santa Teresa, developed by BorderPlex Digital Assets and STACK Infrastructure for lease to Oracle Cloud Infrastructure. The campus remains in press coverage in the week of 17 to 24 September 2026 over its $18 billion construction loans and permitting. Bloomberg News reported on 24 September 2026, citing people familiar with the situation, that Oracle sent a notice citing force majeure to the project's developer, which Bloomberg describes as a unit of Blue Owl Capital. The notice is intended to let Oracle put off payments if Project Jupiter is derailed and fails to come online in 2028 as planned, rather than to exit as the main tenant; Bloomberg said it is not certain the notice would release Oracle from its agreed financial obligations. Reuters, which carried the report, could not independently verify it, and Oracle and Blue Owl did not immediately comment. Oracle shares fell about 4 percent in premarket trading after the report, per Reuters. Oracle told El Paso Matters on 24 September 2026 that the project remains on schedule; Bisnow, citing Reuters, reported a one-year delay over power. Bisnow reports Blue Owl contributed $3 billion of equity alongside the $18 billion debt commitment and that Bloom Energy fuel cells are planned to power the 2.4 GW campus.
Stargate site, Lordstown (announced)Lordstown, OHn.a.announcedListed in the summary table among the 7+ announced US Stargate sites. No site-level dollar or MW figure appears in this part.
Colossus, MemphisMemphis, TNn.a.operatingPart of xAI's Memphis, Tennessee plus Southaven, Mississippi complex per the summary table. An $80M greywater plant was paused in 2026; no campus was cancelled.
Colossus 2, SouthavenSouthaven, MS~$35.8B946constructionColossus 2 in Southaven, Mississippi is estimated at 946 MW IT and $35.8 billion cumulative cost, projected to 1,531 MW and $58.0 billion by Q1 2027, per the summary table citing Epoch AI. xAI sought $12bn in debt to fund the buildout with first chips online in a few weeks per DCD.
AWS Virginia standing commitmentVA$35.0BannouncedAWS's standing commitment of $35 billion in additional Virginia data center investment by 2040, announced January 2023. It predates the 2024-2026 window but remains the largest single-state AWS commitment.
Google Arkansas commitmentAR$4.0BannouncedDCD's roundup corroborates a $4 billion Google commitment in Arkansas alongside the $9 billion South Carolina figure. No named Arkansas site is disclosed in the fetched sources.
Meta Sturgeon County data centerSturgeon County, Albertan.a.1000constructionMeta broke ground on its first Canadian data center in Sturgeon County, Alberta, northeast of Edmonton, announced 8 July 2026. The company stated an investment of more than CAD $13 billion in a 1 GW facility optimized for AI workloads, with approximately 3,000 construction workers at peak and more than 300 operational jobs. Cooling is a water-efficient closed-loop liquid-cooled system with dry cooling, which Meta says results in no operational cooling water use. Meta also committed approximately CAD $60 million to local infrastructure improvements. No map coordinates are recorded because the atlas map projection covers the continental United States only. The Realist reported on 23 September 2026, from transaction records supplied by Alberta commercial real estate data firm The Network and identified legal parcels, that three contiguous parcels totalling 1,753.80 acres at the site (56111 Range Road 223) were acquired on 6 February 2026 by Vibro Information Services Ltd. for an aggregate $300,093,144, about $171,100 per acre. Sellers were Pembina-affiliated holding companies (956.89 acres for $163,727,616 and 160.00 acres for $27,379,200) and Suncor Energy (636.91 acres for $108,986,328). Pembina's 1 July 2026 Greenlight final investment decision release states $190 million of proceeds, net to Pembina, from the sale of land to the data centre customer. Vibro has not been directly confirmed as a Meta entity; The Realist links it through a director and address matching law firm Stikeman Elliott, which said it advised Meta on the project's land acquisition. Amounts are as reported and are not converted.
PORTS-Pike Technology CampusPiketon, OHn.a.4250announcedAnnounced 17 August 2026 by SB Energy, NVIDIA and OpenAI. The campus redevelops the former Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant, a 5.4 square mile Department of Energy site historically used for uranium enrichment. Capacity is expected to come online in phases beginning in 2028. OpenAI states the project will support 35,000 construction jobs over a six-year buildout through 2032 and 2,500 long-term operating jobs, and committed $40 million to a community grant fund alongside SB Energy's earlier $40 million, with an additional $80 million initial fund described by NVIDIA. SB Energy's Form S-1, filed 1 September 2026, states that a definitive lease for the campus has been executed but that the campus is not yet under construction, that the 8.0 GW-IT PORTS-Pike campus constitutes the entirety of the company's contracted-but-not-under-construction data center capacity, and that a substantial majority of its data center segment backlog derives from PORTS-Pike related contracts.
Richmond data center campus (RCH-1 to RCH-4)Sandston, VA≥$1.0B200constructionIron Mountain began construction on RCH-1 in June 2026 at White Oak Technology Park. RCH-1 is a 364,860 sq ft, 48 MW facility across six data halls. The full campus of RCH-1 through RCH-4 is planned at more than 200 MW and more than $1 billion on 66 acres.
Cosmos Technology CampusAustin, TX$999M50constructionSB Energy's first data center campus, in Travis County, Texas, disclosed in the Form S-1 registration statement filed 1 September 2026. Cosmos and the Milam County data center are the company's two projects under construction; no SB Energy data center capacity is in operation. SoftBank is both a strategic investor and the tenant at Cosmos.
Borden County campus (pipeline)Borden County, TXn.a.announcedNamed in SB Energy's Form S-1 filed 1 September 2026 as part of the near-term data center pipeline, where the company has secured land and is actively pursuing development and lease negotiations. Neither county site is currently included in the Data Center Contracted Portfolio or in the backlog calculation.
Scurry County campus (pipeline)Scurry County, TXn.a.announcedNamed in SB Energy's Form S-1 filed 1 September 2026 as part of the near-term data center pipeline, where the company has secured land and is actively pursuing development and lease negotiations. Neither county site is currently included in the Data Center Contracted Portfolio or in the backlog calculation.
Project Helium (Sharon)Sharon, KSn.a.announcedThe Barber County Commission approved a development agreement for Google's first Kansas data center, known as Project Helium, in a 2-0-1 vote on 31 August 2026, after finalizing terms in executive session. The site is near Sharon, about eight miles east of Medicine Lodge. Google states the project will be 1.7 million square feet, air-cooled, and will create 500 permanent jobs plus temporary construction jobs. The agreement sets terms on distance from the town of Sharon, runoff and sound limits. The vote drew immediate opposition from residents present at the county annex. The Barber County Commission approved the Project Helium agreement with Google at the end of August 2026. The data center north of Sharon is planned at 1.7 million sq ft with up to 500 jobs, and the commission cited $320 million of proposed tax revenue over 20 years; Google will cover construction and operating costs and post a $5.5 million security deposit for road or infrastructure damage. Construction is planned to begin in 2027 with operations expected by 2030
CleanSpark Sandersville data centerSandersville, GAn.a.175under constructionCleanSpark signed a 20-year lease with two 5-year extension options for 175 MW of critical IT load at Sandersville with an unnamed high investment-grade global technology company, with deliveries expected to begin in Q4 2027. On 17 September 2026 a CleanSpark subsidiary proposed $2.227 billion of senior secured notes to fund the remaining build-out. The same tenant signed a letter of intent covering CleanSpark's 885 MW Texas portfolio (Sealy and Brazoria). 20-year triple-net lease for 175 MW of critical IT load with an undisclosed high-investment-grade technology company announced 14 July 2026, valued at approximately $6.6 billion; deliveries expected to begin Q4 2027. On 17 September 2026 CleanSpark named the tenant as Anviran, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Meta, with Meta guaranteeing rent and operating expenses, and on 18 September 2026 priced $2.276 billion of 7.875% senior secured notes due 2031, up from the $2.227 billion proposed.
Bell AI Fabric Saskatchewan hub (R.M. of Sherwood)Rural Municipality of Sherwood, Saskatchewann.a.1200under constructionBell Canada and the Government of Saskatchewan signed a non-binding MOU to expand Bell AI Fabric in Saskatchewan by up to 900 MW, building on a 300 MW campus already under construction near Regina. Additional phases are contingent on customer commitments, commercial agreements, permits and environmental assessments. The expansion was announced at Canada's Investment Summit. On 14 to 15 September 2026, at the Canada Investment Summit, Bell announced a non-binding memorandum of understanding with Saskatchewan to expand the R.M. of Sherwood campus from 300 MW to 1.2 GW, adding up to 900 MW powered by new natural gas generation to be developed by an operating partner, while the original 300 MW draws on the SaskPower grid. Bell describes total investment of C$50 billion to C$52 billion, with about 500 permanent jobs plus 3,000 additional roles and a Bell AI Fabric head office near Regina. Expansion depends on customers, power and approvals. At a site news conference on Thursday 1 October 2026, Bell and the province said framing is complete for three of the four data halls at the 65-hectare site, with about 500 workers on site; the first two halls are to start operating in the first half of 2027. The Canadian Press describes the current phase as a C$1.7 billion, 300 MW centre with CoreWeave and Cerebras as anchor tenants, and said Bell gave no timeline for the 1.2 GW expansion. Documents filed with the R.M. of Sherwood and shared 6 October 2026 show Bell holds conditional agreements to buy six parcels totaling about 895 acres around its existing 160-acre site, east and south to the Highway 1 Bypass, for a total footprint of about 1,055 acres; the purchase is conditional on Farm Land Security Board approval and rezoning, and the expansion also needs a development agreement with the R.M. and a provincial environmental impact assessment. Bell's application describes up to nine more single-storey data halls from 2027 through 2030 or later, on top of the six already approved, for 1.2 GW in total, with the natural gas plant to be built further from Regina; two of the six approved halls are due online in the first half of 2027. At a virtual-only special meeting on Wednesday 7 October 2026 council passed first reading of the bylaws rezoning the land from agricultural to light industrial; a public notice period follows before final readings. Land titles show deputy reeve Kevin Chekay and former reeve Kevin Eberle among the sellers; Chekay recused himself. About 40 opponents attended online without speaking rights and a dozen protested outside the R.M. office.
AWS northwest Louisiana campuses (Caddo and Bossier parishes, incl. third campus at Resilient Technologies Park, Shreveport)Shreveport, LA$18.0BannouncedOn 18 August 2026 AWS announced a third data center campus at Resilient Technologies Park in west Shreveport, a $6 billion investment that lifts its planned northwest Louisiana total to $18 billion across three campuses in Caddo and Bossier parishes. Amazon cited up to 750 full-time jobs across the campuses and targeted mid-2028 construction completion for the third campus.
Site Layer 4 Goshen Hole data center and energy campusnear Wheatland, WYn.a.rezoning approvedPlatte County commissioners unanimously rezoned 5,344 acres of ranchland in Goshen Hole, northeast of Wheatland, to industrial for a utility-scale energy generation, storage and data center campus proposed by Site Layer 4, LLC. Conditions include reversion to prior zoning if construction does not begin within five years and a special-use permit for any use. At a 2 September 2026 public hearing, Platte County commissioners approved rezoning 5,344 acres of Lazy V6 Ranch land along the Goshen Hole rim from RAM to Industrial for the Site Layer 4 energy and data center campus, with conditions: a five-year sunset reverting the zoning if construction does not begin, county review of any subdivision, and a required Special Use Permit with full engineering, environmental, water and traffic studies before construction. The developer said it expects to use about 15 acre-feet of water a year with closed-loop cooling from a private commercial supplier
Google potential Lea County data centerLea County, NMn.a.exploringGoogle said it is exploring a potential data center in Lea County, New Mexico and began community engagement, noting many details remain outstanding and no final decision has been made. No investment amount, capacity or timeline was disclosed. On Thursday 24 September 2026 Google and partner Excelsior Energy Capital presented the project to Lea County commissioners, who voted to consider over $134 billion of industrial revenue bonds. The plan is two 900,000-square-foot buildings on 1,890 acres, about 1,700 construction jobs and 125 permanent jobs, a 9.6 million gallon one-time fill for closed-loop cooling and about 42,000 gallons a day of municipal water once staffed.
Project Tembo (formerly Project Jade), Switchgrass Industrial ParkCheyenne (8 miles south), WY$17.0B2700approvedA site-plan amendment filed 30 June 2026 with Laramie County Planning and Development identified Google, through Jupiter Star Holdings LLC, as the owner of the 716-acre campus previously known as Project Jade. The plan covers four data center halls, an office hub, logistics and network buildings, new access roads off U.S. 85 and on-site wastewater lagoons. The original Project Jade received a conditional-use permit in January 2026, and a public hearing on the amendment was scheduled for 13 August 2026. The outcome of that hearing was not confirmed in the fetched sources At a community meeting in Cheyenne on 9 September 2026 Google said Project Tembo represents a $17 billion investment. The resubmitted, scaled-back site plan has four data center buildings instead of five with about 1 million fewer square feet and was handled administratively by the county; Google added a two-story office building that requires a conditional use permit. Related Digital is lead developer managing construction, Tallgrass will develop adjacent power generation keeping the campus off the local Cheyenne grid, and Google said it did not pursue local incentives. Site development may begin by the end of 2026, with some data halls operating in the second half of 2028 and full build-out near the end of 2031, and the project is expected to employ up to 2,500 construction workers and about 250 operations staff
Project Eagle campus, BolingBoling, TX~$1.2B75announcedAmazon Data Services filed four Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation applications for identical 189,060 sq ft buildings at about $300 million each near FM 1301 and FM 442 in Boling, on roughly 2,700 acres. The filings list construction starting 1 August 2026, with three buildings completing in January 2027 and the fourth in August 2027. Reporting in August 2026 said site preparation was underway but additional county permits were still required and the schedule was affected by new state audit requirements for data center power hookups. Wharton County officials signed a nondisclosure agreement with Amazon consultant VisionFirst Advisors. The Coastal Bend Groundwater Conservation District issued contested groundwater permits on 8 September 2026 allowing Amazon to withdraw up to 78.2 million gallons over two and a half years from three wells for offices, construction and fire protection, in addition to May 2026 permits for 16.9 million gallons from two other wells. The permits do not cover surface water for cooling. The Houston Chronicle describes the campus as a $10 billion project on nearly 3,000 acres with data center buildings that could span more than 1.9 million sq ft.
Crusoe and Lancium Childress AI data center campusChildress, TXn.a.1000announcedCrusoe and Lancium announced a 1.0 GW AI data center campus on 270 acres in Childress, Texas, their second joint site after Abilene. Construction is scheduled to begin in Q3 2026, with thousands of construction jobs and more than 100 permanent positions expected. The tenant was not named. This is a separate project from the existing IREN Childress campus record Three Project Hyper - Childress buildings at 525 A, B and C County Road 23 were registered with the Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation on 11 September 2026 by Childress DC1, DC2 and DC3 LLCs, each a single-story data center of 806,359 sq ft with an estimated cost of $2.4 billion, designed by HKS, with estimated starts of 6 July, 1 September and 5 October 2026 and completions from 28 February to 31 May 2028. The owner contact on the filings, Nader Pakfar, is Crusoe's General Counsel, Real Estate. No tenant is listed
Cortex 1 and Cortex 2 AI training clusters, Gigafactory TexasAustin, TXn.a.205operationalTesla's Q2 2026 shareholder update said it more than doubled onsite compute in Texas, measured in MW, during the first half of 2026. Cortex 2 at Gigafactory Texas began running training workloads by April 2026 and supports vehicle and humanoid robot autonomy software. Tesla guided to 2026 capital expenditures of more than $25 billion, with AI compute among the main uses
Justified Data CampusHawesville, KYn.a.401announcedFormer Century Aluminum Hawesville facility redeveloped by TeraWulf. Anthropic signed a 20-year lease with initial capacity in the second half of 2027 and full capacity by early 2028
Chesapeake campus (Morgantown generating station)Morgantown, MDn.a.announcedFERC authorized TeraWulf's acquisition of the Morgantown generating station on 29 July 2026. Data center operations are currently contemplated for 2030
Apollo siteNear San Antonio (within 25 miles), TXn.a.900announcedCipher acquired an option on an approximately 288-acre site within 25 miles of San Antonio, Texas
Rockdale campus AI data centerRockdale, TXn.a.191announcedRiot's existing Rockdale bitcoin mining campus, where a 20-year lease with a frontier AI lab was signed after 30 June 2026
Matagorda County powered land siteApproximately 90 miles southwest of Houston, TXn.a.2000announcedMore than 1,200 acres planned as a digital infrastructure campus for HPC workloads and bitcoin mining. Phased construction is expected to begin in 2026, contingent on regulatory approvals
Merlin campus, McGregor Industrial ParkMcGregor, TXn.a.74announcedGalaxy disclosed a 500-acre site in the McGregor Industrial Park alongside two further Texas pipeline sites, Caspian (about 700 MW potential) and Selene (about 900 MW potential), subject to ERCOT interconnection
CleanSpark Sealy campusSealy, TXn.a.announcedPart of CleanSpark's 718-acre, up to 885 MW Texas portfolio placed under a letter of intent and exclusivity arrangement with the Sandersville tenant The Sandersville tenant holding the Texas LOI was disclosed on 17 September 2026 as Anviran, LLC, a wholly owned Meta subsidiary
CleanSpark Brazoria campusNot disclosed, TXn.a.300announcedPart of CleanSpark's Texas portfolio placed under a letter of intent and exclusivity arrangement with the Sandersville tenant. Map point is the county seat, Angleton The Sandersville tenant holding the Texas LOI was disclosed on 17 September 2026 as Anviran, LLC, a wholly owned Meta subsidiary
QTS Fayetteville campus (Project Odyssey buildings DC1-2)Fayetteville, GAn.a.300operationalCampus leased to Microsoft. Commercial operations began in late 2025 per AFII, and the SPV issued investment-grade secured notes in August 2026 to fund expansion. QTS also has $4.6 billion of 5.7% notes due April 2036 on this campus per NordSip
Nexus Data Centers Hubbard AI campusHubbard, TX~$16.0Bunder construction2,900-acre multi-phase campus about 70 miles south of Dallas with Anthropic as expected anchor tenant. W.Media dates Building 1 construction from January 2026 to October 2027 and Building 2 from June 2026 to January 2028. Final investment decision reached with the August 2026 financing
Sabey Decatur Township data centerIndianapolis (Decatur Township), IN$4.0BapprovedIndianapolis approved $240 million in tax breaks on 16 September 2026. The site also appears in the at-risk list under a March 2026 moratorium entry
Coravel Dallas-Fort Worth campusDallas-Fort Worth, TXn.a.140announcedFirst anchor campus of the Coravel platform, with staggered service dates through 2028. Exact city and county not disclosed
Yondr and Cerberus Manassas data centerManassas, VAn.a.72announced40-acre site in Manassas; Yondr is developer, owner and operator. Expected operational by 2029. County not stated in source
Digital Realty Hawthorne Race Course siteStickney, ILn.a.announced119-acre former racetrack at 3501 South Laramie Avenue bought out of bankruptcy. The Chicago Sun-Times headline reports the Stickney mayor and board oppose a data center there Stickney trustees passed a six-month moratorium on data center development after the purchase
Digital Realty Rolling Meadows Atrium CampusRolling Meadows, ILn.a.announced40-acre office campus with a 485,000-square-foot building at 3800 Golf Road planned for data center conversion
Digital Realty Ad Astra Enterprise Park campusDe Soto, KSn.a.approvedNine-building campus on about 1,400 acres in two phases (281 acres and about 1,155 acres) near the Panasonic EV plant. No tenant identified. On 22 September 2026 the De Soto Planning Commission approved Digital Realty's Phase One site plan for Project Jayhawk, a two-story 450,000 sq ft building on about 300 acres next to the Panasonic EV battery plant; construction is expected to start in 2027 and site preparation has begun. Residents are circulating a petition to put high-impact data center development to a public vote. The Kansas City Business Journal reported on 23 September 2026 that Digital Realty scaled back its Kansas plans after a build-to-suit client fell through (paywalled; details not verified).
Crow Holdings North Stemmons data center campus (Market Hall)Dallas, TXn.a.245announced40-acre campus on the North Stemmons Freeway corridor that may replace the Dallas Market Hall exhibition building, which has stopped booking events
PowerHouse Hillwood Joliet campusJoliet, IL$20.0B1800announcedPowerHouse Hillwood asked FERC to reject ComEd's cancellation of its transmission security agreement in a dispute over security deposit timing The project is branded the Joliet Technology Center on a 795-acre site. On 22 September 2026 FERC issued an order in Docket ER26-3257-000 rejecting ComEd's notice of cancellation of the transmission security agreement for the 1.8 GW, $20 billion Joliet campus. PowerHouse Hillwood contends it met the agreement's initial credit requirement with a $1 posting. FERC declined to assert primary jurisdiction over the contract dispute, which is pending in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. Chairman Laura Swett and Commissioner Lindsay See filed a joint concurrence, and Commissioners David Rosner and David LaCerte also concurred; LaCerte called the $1 letter of credit an embarrassing legal fiction.
CyrusOne Castroville data centerCastroville, TX~$500Munder constructionOne-story facility at 3397 U.S. 90 West, CyrusOne's sixth San Antonio-area facility and first in Castroville. CyrusOne owns at least 244 acres in Medina County. Completion expected June 2027 CyrusOne's project page says early earth-moving and grading are under way and puts expected capital investment at about $4 billion to $6 billion across multiple phases, using closed-loop cooling
T5 @ Chicago IVGrayslake, IL~$18.0B1550approved472 acres with up to 10.1 million square feet. First permit issued 31 August 2026 for an initial 800,000-square-foot building while a resident lawsuit continues. Also tracked in the at-risk list
Tract Tuckahoe Creek Technology ParkGoochland County (eastern, near West Creek), VAn.a.900announced871-acre proposed campus. Most residents at a 23 July 2026 community meeting opposed it
STACK Culpeper Technology ParkCulpeper, VAn.a.announced71-acre site at 15140 Keyser Road in the Culpeper Tech Zone with by-right data center zoning
Terra Nexus Rockingham data center (316 Old Cheraw Highway)Rockingham, NC$1.2B460approvedRockingham City Council approved 4-1 a conditional rezoning of 165.07 acres from high-density residential (R-7) to conditional light industrial for Terra Nexus, with Councilwoman Holly Howe dissenting. The Planning Board had unanimously recommended the rezoning and the council public hearing was set for 8 September 2026. The city projects about $6.6 million in annual property tax revenue and about 30 full-time jobs, with completion anticipated within six years
Starwood Digital Ventures Mason County High Impact Data CenterMason County, WV$12.0B2160approvedWest Virginia granted the project High Impact Data Center certification, announced by Governor Patrick Morrisey at the West Virginia Business Summit alongside the Nscale certification. The governor's office cites about 1,500 jobs. The governor said infrastructure costs are covered by developers rather than passed to ratepayers The project is dubbed Project Tamarack, about 20 miles north of the Nscale Monarch campus, and would use closed-loop cooling with grid power
Flexential Parker data centerParker, CO~$205M22.5under constructionDouglas County commissioners unanimously approved a $19.3 million incentive agreement rebating 100% of the county's share of business personal property tax on the facility over 35 years. The rebate covers equipment, machinery and certain leasehold improvements, not land and buildings, and Flexential continues to pay real property, school district and fire district taxes. County documents estimate 16 permanent jobs. The Town of Parker approved the project in 2024
Gateway Digital Campus (Diamond Farms, Villa Ridge)Villa Ridge, MOn.a.approvedThe Franklin County Commission approved rezoning from agricultural to industrial for the Gateway Digital Campus near Villa Ridge, off I-44 by the Shaw Nature Reserve. The Planning and Zoning Commission had recommended approval 8-1 in April 2026. The commission also considered county data center regulations including a $20,000 daily fine provision and a $10 million escrow requirement
Meramec Valley Technology Park (Crooked Creek farm)Pacific, MOn.a.approvedThe Franklin County Commission approved rezoning for the Meramec Valley Technology Park on the Crooked Creek farm south of Pacific along Highway O, even though the Planning and Zoning Commission had recommended denial 4-5 in April 2026
RELLIS Data and Research CenterBryan, TX≥$700Munder constructionBrazos County commissioners voted 4-0, with one absent, to transfer the tax abatement agreement for the nearly complete RELLIS Campus data center to ThisWay Global, which emerged from the bankruptcy of the prior developer, RELLIS Campus Data and Research Center, LLC. KBTX reports the county receives 50% of taxable valuation for the first 10 years and 100% for the remaining 30 years of a 40-year agreement
Kinetic Infrastructure Solutions (Google) Columbia County data centerHarlem, GA≥$17.0BapprovedThe Economic Development Authority of Columbia County approved a memorandum of understanding with Kinetic Infrastructure Solutions, an Alphabet subsidiary, under a bond-for-title financing structure. Townhall, citing the authority, reports expected property tax payments of about $40 million a year, and a November referendum will decide whether data center revenue is dedicated to homeowner property tax relief. The county's Data Center zoning district requires 500-foot residential buffers, a 65-decibel noise limit, closed-loop cooling, a ban on private wells and decommissioning obligations
Salem 3 data center campusSalem Township, Luzerne County, PAn.a.announcedThe Salem Township Planning Commission voted 4-0-1, with member Susan Lynn abstaining as a participating landowner, to recommend that supervisors approve 4-3 Glenbrook Group's Special Data Center Overlay expansion for the 4,000-plus-acre Salem 3 campus. The vote was a re-hearing of an approval first given on 23 July 2026. The matter moves to the Board of Supervisors, and at least 80% of the assembled land is intended to remain green space. On Thursday 24 September 2026 the Salem Township Planning Commission voted again, with Susan Lynn abstaining as a landowner, to recommend the Special Data Center Overlay expansion of more than 4,000 acres for the $1.4 billion Salem 3 project. The third vote followed a Sunshine Act suit over the 23 July meeting and a stay in Judge Lesa S. Gelb's written order that the commission had not seen before its 27 August vote. Developer Jack Sordoni agreed to larger setbacks, a 65-foot height cap and baseline testing of every well in the township at his expense. The Board of Supervisors is to consider it in October.
Alpha Compute northern Pennsylvania AI data center campusTioga County, PAn.a.200announcedAlpha Compute (NASDAQ: ALP) announced a binding term sheet on 11 August 2026 and a first amendment adding seller financing on 10 September 2026 for about 350 surface and pore-space acres plus Marcellus mineral rights in Tioga County, and about 107 acres in Beaver County for future development. The company says the project still needs county planning commission review, Board of Commissioners approval, environmental and water studies, and Pennsylvania DEP and Susquehanna River Basin Commission permits
Black Mountain southeast Fort Worth data center campusFort Worth, TX$10.0BapprovedFort Worth City Council approved Black Mountain's revised site plan for 187 acres south of Lon Stephenson Road between Forest Hill and Anglin drives, with four buildings up to 70 feet, an electrical substation and more than 300 feet of buffer from residences. The plan cuts the project from 3 million sq ft in 18 buildings, tabled in May and June 2026 after resident opposition, to just over 1 million sq ft. The city formed a Data Center and Infrastructure Commission on 11 August 2026, and KERA reports the council's subsequent moratorium does not affect existing projects such as Black Mountain. The Fort Worth City Council approved the amended site plan (four buildings and a substation serving only the data center) on Tuesday 25 August 2026; at that meeting EdgeConneX said it is the developer and operator.
Project Brookwood data center campus (Youngwoo & Associates)Brookwood, ALn.a.approvedBrookwood City Council voted 5-0 to annex and rezone about 374 acres along Brookwood Industrial Parkway for a data center campus tied to New York firm Youngwoo & Associates. Tuscaloosa Thread reports it is one of three data center projects near Brookwood Middle School, alongside an Applied Digital site of about 1,300 acres holding a state environmental permit and a Provident Data Centers site of more than 500 acres. Residents raised concerns about power demand, noise and proximity to the school
Serverfarm Clarksville data centerClarksville, AR$6.6BapprovedClarksville City Council unanimously authorized up to $55 billion in industrial revenue bonds for Serverfarm's planned $6.6 billion data center near Johnson Regional Medical Center. The structure provides a 65% property tax abatement for up to 30 years, with projected payments in lieu of taxes of $548 million through 2060. Additional commitments include $3 million in city and county agreement fees, $840,000 in permit fees and $6 million for a community development center The bonds were split into two ordinances: up to $50 billion to Hatchbo LLC and up to $5 billion to SF ARK1 LLC (Serverfarm). KNWA describes the site off Arkansas Highway 123 as under construction, with the first phase due by early 2028 per Serverfarm
Monarch Data CenterYerington, NVn.a.approvedLyon County commissioners voted 3-1 to approve a planned unit development rezoning for the Monarch Data Center and associated gas-fired power plant near Yerington, after the Planning Commission recommended approval 4-3 on 15 July 2026. The Sierra Club Toiyabe Chapter opposed the project over water, energy, air quality and noise impacts Commissioner Dave Hockaday cast the lone no vote and Commissioner John Cassinelli recused. Developer Copia Power has a year to file its final PUD and still needs state transmission and environmental permits. The Walker River Paiute Tribe and Yerington Paiute Tribe vowed to challenge the decision in court
Burkhalter Road data centerStatesboro, GAn.a.approvedStatesboro City Council approved a zoning map amendment converting residential land on Burkhalter Road to allow a data center, with Mayor Jonathan McCollar breaking a tied council vote in favor. The Statesboro Planning Commission had recommended approval 5-1 on 4 August 2026. The vote drew protests
Powers Ferry Place data center (1155 Powers Ferry Place)Marietta, GAn.a.18approvedMarietta City Council voted 5-2 to approve a rezoning for an 18 MW data center on 11 acres near Interstate 75 and Delk Road, with conditions attached. Supporters cited new investment and tax revenue, while opponents cited noise, energy use and redacted documents tied to the proposal, and the construction timeline has not been set
Pollard Land Company McCormick County data centerMcCormick County, SCn.a.approvedMcCormick County Council voted to rezone land for Pollard Land Company's proposed data center and rejected a proposed pause on data center development at a contentious meeting. The developer had held a public meeting in August 2026 on the roughly 1,000-acre request. The council chairman said the county retains control over environmental issues and could stop the project if misled
DataOne AI factory campus (Logix Innovation Campus)Frankfort, IN~$7.5BannouncedDataOne, a data center operator with US and French operations, is asking the City of Frankfort to approve an AI factory campus on 115 acres at the Logix Innovation Campus. The company scheduled public open houses for 21 and 22 September 2026. Incentive requests and job counts were not reported in the fetched coverage The company release cites about 200 permanent on-site jobs. Mayor Judy Sheets said the project goes before the city council on 28 September 2026. It follows a larger Clinton County data center plan that died in January 2026 for lack of commissioner support. At a DataOne open house in Frankfort on 21 September 2026, project electrical engineer Kevin Thomas said the campus would draw 350 MW of utility power through IMPA, supplemented by 175 MW from Bloom Energy natural gas fuel cells, with DataOne paying for all associated infrastructure and turning over a 65 MW temporary substation to the city. Gary Smith of Reedy Financial Group, the city's independent financial advisor, described the project as a $7.5 billion investment, of which $825 million is real property carrying a proposed 50% abatement for 10 years, and projected about $331 million of total value to Frankfort through 2054; he said the figures were his own and that DataOne had not seen them. DataOne put average water use at about 20,000 to 22,000 gallons a day. The city council is scheduled to take up the project on 28 September 2026. On Monday 28 September 2026 the Frankfort Common Council voted 5-2, after hours of public comment, to approve a resolution adopting a community enhancement agreement with DataOne. Mayor Judy Sheets said the agreement sets stipulations that must be met before a permit is issued; at least two more votes are required and DataOne must still release environmental and economic impact studies before construction.
InfraTech Capital Carson County data center campusCarson County, TX~$2.7BannouncedInfraTech Capital announced an initiative for a campus of more than 5,000 acres in Carson County near Amarillo with an undisclosed hyperscaler expected to anchor it, plus expanded fiber optic cable manufacturing with a global partner. The release says the project remains subject to due diligence and definitive agreements, and no local approvals were cited
Atlas One compute campus (Project Atlas)TXn.a.500announcedAzio AI Holdings (Nasdaq: AZIO) announced Atlas One, a 548-acre South Texas site designed for up to 500 MW as the first phase of Project Atlas, combining land, behind-the-meter gas generation, fiber and modular compute. The company reports 6 MW of activated capacity running bitcoin mining workloads and says permits and regulatory approvals are still required for expansion. The county was not identified
Flexential Kaufman County data center campus (Talty)Talty, TXn.a.108announcedFlexential acquired 110 acres in Talty, Kaufman County, for its fourth and largest Dallas-area data center campus, planned for wholesale and multi-tenant colocation with closed-loop cooling targeting zero water usage effectiveness. Site work is planned for early 2027 with first customer availability in late 2028 Talty officials told NBC 5 the city has no regulatory authority over the site because it was released from the city's extraterritorial jurisdiction earlier in 2026
Meta Piqua data center (Washington and Farrington roads)Piqua, OHn.a.approvedPiqua City Commission approved an AES Ohio power supply agreement for a Meta data center at Washington and Farrington roads after Meta committed $8 million for fire trucks, police cars and other emergency services needs. A non-disclosure agreement had kept Meta's identity confidential for months. Opponents organized as Save Piqua are seeking a voter referendum to overturn the agreement
300 W. Adams St. Loop data center conversionChicago, ILn.a.approvedThe Permit Review Committee of the Commission on Chicago Landmarks approved converting floors two through six of the 1927 landmarked office building at 300 W. Adams St. into a data center. Approval by the full commission was still pending as of mid-August 2026, and preservationists raised concerns. The building was nearly 60% vacant as of 2023
Project Horizon data center (Kearney)Kearney, NEn.a.368approvedKearney City Council unanimously approved the Project Horizon redevelopment plan by Starwood Digital Ventures and MARA Holdings in northeast Kearney after months of resident debate and questions. The city cites 59 jobs, community benefit agreements, closed-loop cooling using 2 million to 5 million gallons of water a year and a 55 dBA noise standard. Construction could begin in November or December 2026 with Phase 1 operating by spring 2028
Project Cayman energy project and co-located data center campusAscension Parish, LAn.a.announcedOne Nuclear Energy executed a binding letter of intent with a Louisiana landowner group for Project Cayman near the 17,000-acre RiverPlex MegaPark on the west bank of the Mississippi River, pairing a 2.88 GW gas-fired plant and battery storage with a co-located data center campus. The company plans public information meetings through the end of 2026. One Nuclear announced a separate 1 GW small modular reactor campus, Project Amberjack, on 9 September 2026. ONE Nuclear completed its business combination with Hennessy Capital Investment Corp. VII on 23 September 2026 and became ONE Nuclear Energy Inc. (Nasdaq: ONEN); after shareholder redemptions of approximately $146.5 million, approximately $2.2 million remained in the SPAC trust account before expenses. NOLA reported on 28 September 2026 that Cayman would sit on about 400 acres outside the RiverPlex MegaPark with the potential for an adjacent data center campus, and that One Nuclear says its three Louisiana projects (Amberjack, Barracuda and Cayman) could together lead to as much as $40 billion in capital investment.
Project Taurus data center (former Intel plant)Colorado Springs, COn.a.50approvedThe Colorado Springs planning department approved Raeden's Project Taurus at the former Intel microchip plant off Garden of the Gods Road and Centennial Boulevard in June 2026, and the Planning Commission denied appeals in July 2026. City Council scheduled a special session on 17 September 2026 to hear the remaining appeals. Raeden has proposed a 30-foot sound wall and closed-loop cooling in response to noise, energy and water concerns. At the 17 September 2026 special session the Colorado Springs City Council voted to delay a final decision on the appeals until at least April 2027, seeking more information on noise and other impacts.
DAMAC Digital Edgerton data center (Logistics Park Kansas City)Edgerton, KS$860MapprovedEdgerton City Council unanimously upheld DAMAC Digital's appeal and approved the final site plan for a data center in a Logistics Park Kansas City warehouse at 31800 W. 196th Street, overriding the Planning Commission's 3-2 denial on 9 June 2026 over fuel tank placement. Residents organized through the Public Trust Collective nonprofit to continue opposing the project, and KSHB reports the dispute moved to court after the city sued residents over a petition
Accokeek Center data center complexStafford County, VA$2.0BannouncedThe Stafford County Planning Commission recommended approval of Falmouth Tech's Accokeek Center data center complex near the Rappahannock Regional Jail between I-95 and Route 1, which would be the sixth data center approved in the county. Some commissioners raised concerns about setbacks and environmental impacts, and neighbors cited pollution, noise and property values. The Board of Supervisors makes the final decision
Microsoft southeast Cheyenne data center expansion annexation (3,460 acres)Cheyenne, WYn.a.approvedCheyenne City Council approved Microsoft's request to annex about 3,460 acres east of South Greeley Highway and south of the Sweetgrass subdivision to expand its Cheyenne data center operations, with Councilmen Mark Moody, Larry Wolfe and Pete Laybourn voting against after a motion to delay six months failed. Microsoft officials have said the buildout will take 10 to 20 years. Public debate centered on water use, environmental impact, infrastructure demands and transparency
SpaceXAI Tulane Road data center (MZX Tech)Southaven, MSn.a.approvedSouthaven's Board of Aldermen approved design review and a subdivision combining parcels into one heavy industrial lot for a roughly 660,000 sq ft SpaceXAI data center on Tulane Road, with Alderman Charlie Hoots dissenting after a unanimous Planning Commission vote; data centers are allowed by right in the city's industrial zoning. The city traded a 51-acre site near the power plant serving Colossus 2 for the 69-acre site. The Commercial Appeal counts it as SpaceXAI's fifth planned hyperscale data center in the Memphis and Southaven area. The DeSoto Times gives the address as 8325 Tulane Road and the Commercial Appeal as 8425 Tulane Road
Project River energy and data center campusCleveland, TN$11.3BannouncedThe Wright family, through Wright Industrial Group, proposes an $11.3 billion industrial campus on about 850 acres west of I-75 and north of Old Lower River Road near the Hiwassee River, with gas and biomass power plants that could host a data center. The project needs rezoning and annexation by the City of Cleveland, which is drafting a planned unit development ordinance with conditions that the family said on 15 September 2026 it would accept. Developers held a community meeting on 1 September 2026 to gauge neighbor sentiment, and WUTC reported planning commission and council votes were expected later in September 2026
Algoma Steel and Red Jar Energy Partners AI data centerSault Ste. Marie, Ontarion.a.400announcedRed Jar Energy Partners and Algoma Steel proposed a 400 MW AI data center in Sault Ste. Marie that needs approvals from the Independent Electricity System Operator and the province, with Mayor Matthew Shoemaker saying a serious council discussion would follow provincial power determinations
Quiet Data Centers Halifax (Project Halifax)Enfield, NC≥$250MapprovedHalifax County commissioners voted 5-1, with Commissioner Gary R. Redding dissenting, to approve an amended economic development agreement with Quiet Data Centers for about 251 county-owned acres off Trestle Road in Enfield Township, after an earlier amendment failed 3-3 on 10 September 2026. Terms require at least 50 full-time jobs paying above the county average of $20.57 an hour, quarterly tax and wage reporting, closed-loop water systems with no evaporative cooling, and acoustic, environmental, wetlands and cultural resource studies
Beale Infrastructure Claremore data centerClaremore, OKn.a.announcedThe City of Claremore and Tulsa-based Beale Infrastructure announced revenue commitments for a data center complex on the city's north side near Cieda Drive and Lowry Road, including $180 million in payments in lieu of taxes over 25 years. The city also projects more than $400 million over 30 years in sales tax and GRDA electricity payments. KJRH reports the project remains subject to permitting and regulatory review
KIO Data Centers QRO3Querétaro, Querétaro, Mexico$1.3B100announcedKIO Data Centers announced it is evaluating an investment of up to $1.3 billion through 2030 for QRO3, a roughly 100 MW data center that would be its largest in Mexico, at an event highlighted by Economy Secretary Marcelo Ebrard. The company cites more than 8,100 direct and indirect jobs by 2030 and more than $900 million invested in Mexico and Latin America since 2022
Quantica Broadview data center campus (Big Sky Digital Infrastructure)Broadview, MTn.a.under constructionQuantica Infrastructure, operating as Big Sky Digital Infrastructure, began site preparation, including access roads and well pads, on about 5,100 acres near Buffalo Trail between Mosdal Road and Supanik Road outside Broadview, with well drilling potentially starting at the end of September 2026. The project has drawn community opposition, and county officials said the group Yellowstone Valley Voices missed the deadline to put the data center on the November ballot
Meta Temple Data Center, Industrial BoulevardTemple, TX≥$1.2BoperationalMeta opened its AI data center on Industrial Boulevard in Temple, Texas, in July 2026 after breaking ground in 2022 and restarting construction under a redesign in 2023. The two-building campus exceeds 760,000 square feet, supported more than 1,200 construction workers at peak and has nearly 100 operations roles. Meta also cited $8 million invested in local water and wastewater infrastructure. This is separate from the Rowan Project Temple campus record
Nexus Data Centers Hubbard AI campus (Anthropic anchor tenant)Hubbard, TXn.a.under constructionNexus Data Centers is building a multi-phase data center and behind-the-meter power campus in Hubbard, Texas, about 70 miles south of Dallas, with Anthropic as primary tenant under four data center leases. Google agreed to guarantee Anthropic's lease and power-payment obligations to support the senior debt, and Anthropic plans to equip the site with Google TPUs financed separately with Broadcom. Eagle Point said on 19 August 2026 that its HoldCo loan completed the capital structure for phase one and allowed Nexus to reach a final investment decision. Bloomberg reported the campus at 2,900 acres
Project Clydesdale data center campus, near Cherokee Industrial ParkUnincorporated Tulsa County, west of Owasso, OKn.a.under constructionGoogle and Beale Infrastructure announced on 19 August 2026 that a 506-acre data center campus, called Project Clydesdale, is under construction in unincorporated Tulsa County west of Owasso. The project funds 1.5 miles of new water lines for Washington County Rural Water District No. 3 plus roadway improvements. No completion timeline was announced. Google also has facilities under construction in Stillwater and Muskogee County
AWS data center campus, Energy Way Industrial Park (Airport Road), HamletHamlet, NC~$10.0Bunder constructionThe North Carolina Division of Air Quality issued two air permits on 28 August 2026 for the Amazon campus near Hamlet: one allowing Amazon to operate 588 backup engines and one allowing Duke Energy to run 57 temporary bridge-power engines until the campus connects to the grid. The permits followed a July 2026 public hearing in Rockingham at which residents and the Southern Environmental Law Center objected to splitting the generators across two permits. Ground was broken in November 2025 and the first phase remains under construction. The campus is expected to have up to 20 buildings at full build-out. On 18 September 2026 the North Carolina Utilities Commission denied Duke Energy's $584 million proposal for a new gas turbine (about 250 MW per Duke Energy; WRAL reported about 255 MW) at the Sherwood H. Smith Energy Complex across from the campus, finding Duke had not shown the need, compliance with the Ratepayer Protection Pledge, or that cheaper alternatives such as batteries were ruled out; one commissioner dissented and Duke may refile
GW Ranch data center and power campusFort Stockton area, TX~$900Munder constructionAmazon confirmed in August 2026 that it acquired GW Ranch, an 8,000-plus-acre behind-the-meter data center and power campus in Pecos County developed by Pacifico Energy Group, its first private behind-the-meter campus. Three TDLR filings registered 4 August 2026 list 189,000 sq ft buildings for Amazon Data Services at $300 million each. Texas permits authorize up to 33 million tons per year of greenhouse gases from the gas plant, and Amazon said the initial phase needs no water for power-generation cooling
AWS data centers at Homer City Energy Campus (Center and Blacklick townships)Homer City area (Center and Blacklick townships), PAn.a.proposedAmazon Data Services filed a three-page project narrative with the Indiana County Planning Commission to buy about 2,200 acres of the Homer City Energy Campus for 39 two-story data centers of about 225,000 sq ft each across six sites, with construction anticipated from December 2026 and full build-out in the second or third quarter of 2036. AWS projects 1,500 to 2,000 permanent jobs and said it would negotiate a community benefits agreement consistent with Governor Shapiro's data center standards. On 9 September 2026 the planning commission tabled the application, starting a 90-day review period
AWS Hobart data center campus (Hobart Tech Park and Ewen Farm)Hobart, INn.a.under constructionThe Hobart Plan Commission tabled final plat approval on 4 September 2026 pending minor revisions, expecting a favorable recommendation in October, after preliminary plat approval in May 2026. The 723-acre project will have 26 buildings, with grading and a permanent NIPSCO substation already under way. An air permit application filed with IDEM on 24 July 2026 lists 782 diesel backup generators totaling 2,119 MW and 808 fuel storage tanks
Google Chesterfield campuses: Project Peanut (Meadowville), Project Skye (Moseley Road) and Project Loch (Watkins Centre Parkway)Chesterfield County (Meadowville Technology Park and western Chesterfield), VAn.a.under constructionIn mid-July 2026 Google publicly detailed plans for 10 data centers on three Chesterfield County campuses and held its first community meetings. Project Peanut at 2100 Bermuda Hundred Road (about 300 acres, three buildings) is under construction with the first building due in late 2027 and completion in 2028. Project Skye at 4201 Moseley Road (848 acres, four buildings) is expected to start construction in 2027 and open in 2029, and Project Loch at 750 Watkins Centre Parkway (344 acres, three buildings) will begin grading in early 2027. In August 2026 the county amended its zoning to make data centers a conditional use, closing the door to projects beyond those already entitled. The Virginia Department of Environmental Quality issued a notice of violation dated 29 September 2026 for the Project Peanut site, alleging unauthorized filling of surface waters outside permitted impact areas, including sediment in about 1,356 linear feet of stream channel observed on 4 March 2026, after seven reports and five inspections between December 2025 and August 2026. The project has until 29 October 2026 to respond and penalties can reach $32,500 per violation per day, per VPM News. Construction has not been stopped. The Virginia Department of Environmental Quality issued a Notice of Violation to Peanut LLC on 29 September 2026 citing seven unpermitted sediment runoff incidents at the Project Peanut construction site between December 2025 and August 2026, which DEQ estimates affected 7,735 linear feet of stream channel, 0.75 acres of forested wetlands and 0.65 acres of emergent wetlands, impacts not authorized under the project's Virginia Water Protection permit; some incidents were also not reported within the required 24 hours. DEQ said full compliance and remediation within 30 days could let the matter be closed administratively, failing which it may pursue formal enforcement including civil charges. Google said heavy rainfall overwhelmed stormwater controls, that it temporarily paused general construction to focus on cleanup and stabilization, and that most items in the notice have been addressed.
Project Zodiac, Google Fort Wayne data center campusFort Wayne, IN$2.0Bunder constructionIDEM on 10 September 2026 approved a permit allowing Hatchworks LLC, developer of Google's Fort Wayne campus, to fill 2.13 acres of forested isolated wetlands for three new buildings in Phase 3, with 4.26 acres of mitigation credits to be purchased. Phase 2 added five buildings and Phase 3 adds three more plus relocation of about 3,255 feet of Adams Ditch, beyond the original 12-building plan announced in 2023. IDEM had approved the Phase 3 Section 401 water quality certification on 5 June 2026 and held a public hearing on the wetland fill on 25 August 2026. Google told WANE 15 on Tuesday 6 October 2026 that it is pursuing voluntary purchases of homes adjoining its southeast Fort Wayne data center in Allen County to serve as a buffer for the surrounding area, not for site expansion, and is onboarding a local real estate partner to contact owners within weeks. No purchase price or property list was disclosed.
Potential Google data center, Salix (MidAmerican Energy site)Salix, IAn.a.exploratoryMidAmerican Energy identified Google on 3 August 2026 as the prospective customer for a roughly 900-acre site northeast of Salix that the city annexed earlier in 2026, and Google sent a letter saying it had finalized an agreement with MidAmerican to explore a data center there. No rezoning or development application had been filed as of 3 August 2026. In September 2026 Google proposed a memorandum of understanding to reimburse the city up to $150,000 for independent advisors to review the project, terminable if the city imposes a moratorium
Proposed Google data center near Duane Arnold Energy Center (Palo)Palo (unincorporated Linn County, possible annexation), IAn.a.proposedGoogle has been in talks with Linn County and the City of Palo about a data center on about 545 acres near the Duane Arnold Energy Center, which it is helping recommission. Palo's council advanced a data center zoning ordinance 4-1 on second reading on 13 July 2026 and passed it on 20 July 2026, while Linn County, which adopted an 18-month moratorium on EU-3 data center zoning in July 2026, directed staff to consider allowing data centers as accessories to nuclear plants. No final decision on the Google project had been made
Cedar Creek data center and gas plant campus (382 Earl Callahan Road), Anthropic in lease talksCedar Creek, TXn.a.490proposedThe Austin Business Journal reported on 24 August 2026 that Anthropic is in talks to lease a planned data center on a 2,842-acre site near Cedar Creek in Bastrop County, backed by a gas-fired plant. The developers withdrew requests for Bastrop County and school district tax abatements, which the outlet attributed to Anthropic. Power plant construction could start in the third quarter of 2026 with completion tentatively in 2028. Axios reported that Anthropic had not finalized a deal and that county officials were reviewing development applications. On 22 and 23 September 2026 the Austin Business Journal, as relayed by KXAN, reported that the campus appears to be paused after Governor Greg Abbott ordered a halt to new state permits for data center projects on 21 September 2026. Neither the developers nor Bastrop County had publicly confirmed a pause, and no project-specific TCEQ action on the pending Pacifico air permit registration was found. Aqua Water Supply Corp.'s board has approved large-volume water service to Pacifico Energy Development for the 2,842-acre development; Pacifico must pay a $3,500 legal deposit by 30 November 2026 and enter a non-standard service agreement by 28 February 2027 or risk losing the approval (Community Impact, reported 25 September 2026).
AWS data center campus, Scioto Darby Road (Hilliard area) with AEP Ohio fuel cell plantHilliard area (Norwich Township), OHn.a.under constructionOn 15 September 2026 the City of Hilliard withdrew its appeal to the Ohio Environmental Review Appeals Commission of the Ohio EPA air permit for the 72.9 MW fuel cell facility serving the AWS campus on Scioto Darby Road. The city said outside counsel found narrow legal grounds and noted the Ohio Power Siting Board has exclusive jurisdiction over generation above 50 MW; AEP Ohio had withdrawn its local zoning application in October 2025. Hilliard plans post-startup air quality testing
Columbia County Data Center, White Oak Technology Park (and Pumpkin Center site)Between Appling and Harlem, GA≥$17.0BapprovedColumbia County's Board of Commissioners and Economic Development Authority announced on 23 July 2026 that Google will be the sole end user and operator of the Columbia County Data Center at White Oak Technology Park, which the commission approved in February 2026 along with a Pumpkin Center site. On 25 August 2026 the Economic Development Authority approved a memorandum of understanding with Kinetic Infrastructure Solutions, an Alphabet subsidiary, representing a commitment of at least $17 billion. County officials plan to use project revenue for property tax relief, with a related referendum on the November 2026 ballot according to Townhall, and the site is governed by the county's data center zoning district
Project Rise 1A and Rise 2A data centers, VernonVernon, TX$1.0BfiledGoogle filed two TDLR registrations for Project Rise 1A and Rise 2A in Vernon, Texas, each a new data center of 991,000 sq ft with mechanical and electrical yards, with construction listed to finish by the end of March 2028. The filings follow Google's February 2026 statement that it would develop a Wilbarger County data center co-located with AES clean energy, part of its $40 billion Texas commitment through 2027 TDLR lists the owner as Planton Investments LLC (Platon Investments LLC on the Rise 2A filing) at Google's Mountain View address, at FM 2897 S in Vernon, with a listed start date of 31 March 2026
Proposed Google hyperscale data center, HermantownHermantown, MNn.a.proposedGoogle's proposed Hermantown data center still needs city council approval and is under an Alternative Urban Areawide Review, with Minnesota Power's transmission line from its Arrowhead Substation also under city-administered environmental review. On 6 July 2026 the council approved reimbursement agreements of $200,000 from Mortenson Development and $20,000 from Minnesota Power. The Minnesota DNR raised concerns in September 2026 about gaps in groundwater data and a lack of alternative site analysis, and the city faces lawsuits over the project. The Duluth Area Chamber endorsed the project, citing Minnesota Power's estimate that other customers would save $600 million to $800 million over the 15-year contract. The Hermantown City Council unanimously adopted the updated Alternative Urban Areawide Review for the proposed data center, reported 5 October 2026. The AUAR was first adopted in October 2025 and redone and finalized in August 2026. The Stop the Hermantown Data Center group continues to call for a full Environmental Impact Statement.
SpaceXAI Minihard data center (adjacent to Colossus 2, Tulane Road)Memphis (Whitehaven), TNn.a.announcedElon Musk announced on X at the end of July 2026 a new SpaceXAI data center development called Minihard, adjacent to Colossus 2 in the Whitehaven neighborhood of Memphis, with operations similar to the company's Macroharder facility in Southaven. Local coverage described it as the third SpaceXAI data center in Memphis, alongside a fourth facility and a power plant across the state line in Southaven, and reported resident complaints about a lack of notice
Bridgefield Tech Center (former George Washington University Virginia Science and Technology Campus)Ashburn, VAn.a.217.4site plan filedAmazon Data Services filed a concept site plan with Loudoun County on 28 July 2026 for four two-story data center buildings totaling 805,092 sq ft on the former GWU campus in Ashburn, which lies in the Route 28 Tax District where a 2000 zoning determination treats data centers as office use under the 1972 ordinance, allowing by-right review. Supervisor Juli Briskman said she will fight the plan, and county economic development director Buddy Rizer has opposed it. Amazon said construction will not begin until GWU vacates the site, which it may use for up to five years. Coverage gives the parcel as 111 acres (Virginia Business) or 122 acres (GW Hatchet). On 6 October 2026 the county zoning administrator told supervisors that a data center is not a permitted use under the 1972 ordinance governing the campus and that Amazon needs Board of Supervisors approval (see the new at_risk row).
Niagara Falls AI campusNiagara Falls, NY~$920M300under developmentDecommissioned power plant converted to a data center and being adapted for high-density liquid-cooled AI infrastructure. CoreWeave signed a 15-year anchor lease and companion expansion agreement on 16 September 2026. The 25 September 2026 investor presentation describes the Niagara Falls site as 50 MW energized with a path to 300 MW or more.
Snyder AI CampusSnyder, TXn.a.8under constructionEnergy Vault began construction of its powered AI infrastructure campus in Snyder for Crusoe Cloud using Crusoe Spark modular data centers. Commercial operation of the initial 8 MW was targeted for Q1 2027 at groundbreaking and was stated as the first half of 2027 in Energy Vault's Q2 2026 results
Pecos HPC data centerPecos, TXn.a.185under developmentFormer Core Scientific site included in the 27 July 2026 AMD leases covering 377 MW across Pecos, Muskogee and Hunt County. Initial delivery estimated in the first half of 2027
Hunt County HPC data centerHunt County, TXn.a.110under constructionNew build site in the AMD lease package. Core Scientific said it has commenced construction and estimates initial delivery in the first half of 2028
Auburn HPC data centerAuburn, ALn.a.32under developmentPart of the 152 MW of neocloud leases signed 27 July 2026 at Auburn and Dalton Phase 3, where AMD may cure tenant defaults and protect its equipment. Initial delivery estimated in the first half of 2027
Dalton HPC data center (including Phase 3)Dalton, GAn.a.295under constructionCore Scientific's investor presentation lists Dalton at approximately 175 MW for CoreWeave, with about 30 MW billing as of mid-July 2026, and approximately 120 MW of new neocloud capacity at Dalton Phase 3 with initial delivery estimated in the second half of 2027
Sweetwater Hub (Sweetwater 1 and 2)Sweetwater, TXn.a.2000under constructionIREN said the 2 GW Sweetwater Hub was conditionally classified as Base Load in ERCOT Batch Zero. Delivery of the first 300 MW gross at Sweetwater 1 is targeted for Q4 2027
Project Dorothy 3Briscoe County, TXn.a.300plannedSoluna closed the purchase of 397 acres adjacent to Projects Dorothy 1 and 2 to host Dorothy 3. The acreage exceeds the 300 acres originally identified, leaving room for more data halls
Project Kati (Kati 1 and Kati 2)Willacy County, TXn.a.166operating (kati 1); planned (kati 2)Soluna energized the final 14 MW at Kati 1 in September 2026. The Kati 2 AI expansion is being developed through a joint venture with Metrobloks signed 3 June 2026
Columbiana Tier III AI data centerColumbiana, ALn.a.40under constructionPurpose-built AI data center under construction for Digi Power X, which reported the project on schedule in its Q2 2026 results
PowerPlay AI greater Abilene behind-the-meter AI data centerTXn.a.400plannedUnincorporated site in the greater Abilene area of West Texas with installed natural gas and adjacent fiber. Land assembly and acquisition were completed before the joint venture announcement
Sherbrooke data center projectSherbrooke, Quebecn.a.96plannedOn 15 July 2026 Keel received approval from the City of Sherbrooke to enter an agreement with Hydro-Sherbrooke for the transfer and operation of 96 gross MW of existing capacity and a purchase agreement for a parcel of land for the data center
Sharon HPC data centerSharon, PAn.a.110under developmentKeel ceased Bitcoin mining at Sharon on 29 June 2026 and reported securing zoning and land development approvals there, accepting long-lead equipment and executing final fiber contracts. Keel said it was negotiating with multiple prospective tenants at its three priority sites
Panther Creek HPC data centerPAn.a.under developmentKeel ceased Bitcoin mining at Panther Creek on 29 June 2026 and continues selling energy from the site while developing it for HPC. The Q2 2026 release reported conditional land development approval at Panther Creek
Black Pearl FacilityWink, TX$2.0B300partially operationalFormer Bitcoin mining facility being retrofitted for an HPC tenant. Cipher amended the lease on 24 July 2026 to accelerate first delivery, began delivering capacity at the start of August 2026 and said rent had commenced, with remaining Phase I halls in MEP fit-out and Phase II foundations underway
River Bend campusSt. Francisville, LA$3.2B245under constructionHut 8 reported commencement of vertical construction, continued substation construction and initial long-lead equipment deliveries at River Bend in its Q2 2026 results, with initial data hall delivery targeted for Q2 2027. WAFB reported on 22 September 2026 that the River Bend project is a $10 billion investment expected to generate about $90 million in annual tax revenue and more than 175 permanent jobs, and that West Feliciana Parish President Kenny Havard negotiated it without a non-disclosure agreement. Hut 8 has not stated a total project cost in its filings, so capital_usd_m stays at the $3.25 billion note financing.
Okmulgee AI data centerOkmulgee, OKn.a.plannedFluidstack held a public open house on its proposed data center in Okmulgee in July 2026 amid resident concerns about transparency, water and the site's proximity to the Deep Fork Wildlife Refuge and a retirement community. The company said it plans to begin construction on the first of two phases by September 2027. Residents noted the county has no zoning ordinances
Project Phoenix campus, ShippingportShippingport, PAn.a.2000under constructionAligned broke ground on a 2 GW campus of three facilities in the Shippingport Industrial Park. The company estimates 3,000 construction jobs and 640 permanent roles
Circle T Data Center, WestlakeWestlake, TXn.a.300announcedKimley-Horn filed for a data center on about 87.96 acres in Westlake. The first building is allowed by right and later buildings need specific use permits. PowerHouse lists 11 active and planned Texas projects totaling 10 GW
DataBank DFW15, Red Oak campusRed Oak, TX$425MannouncedDataBank filed to build DFW15, a two-story building on Batchler Road at its 292-acre Red Oak campus, with construction from February 2027 to August 2029. It is the fifth building and the first of four more planned; full build-out is eight buildings of 200,000 square feet each
Prime Data Centers Starpointe campusHanover Township, PAn.a.announcedHanover Township supervisors are hearing Prime's conditional use application for a seven-building campus in Starpointe Business Park, with further hearings through late September 2026. Prime hopes to start work in early 2027
EdgeConneX Cedar Creek campus (AUS02)Cedar Creek, TX~$5.8Bunder constructionConstruction on the first buildings began in Q4 2024 and AUS02 was set for completion by mid-June 2026. CoreWeave received a 75 percent abatement on the value of improvements Community Impact reported on 24 July 2026 that the first building was expected to open in August 2026, and that a second EdgeConneX listing for buildings 11 to 16 received state data center certification on 24 April 2026 with the occupant not identified MySA reported that EdgeConneX filed two $700 million buildings, EDCAUS11 and EDCAUS12, on a nearly 180-acre property at 6682 FM 535 in May 2026 and two more, EDCAUS13 and EDCAUS14, at the same address in August 2026 with construction from 1 September 2026 to 31 March 2029, separate from its $440 million AUS02 facility at 6752 FM 535. Further filings under the same EDCAUS naming followed: EDCAUS31 and EDCAUS32 at 6543 FM 535 (Uppingham Adams Holdings LLC, $700 million each, registered 21 and 24 August 2026) and EDCAUS15 and EDCAUS16 at 6402 FM 535 (Burr Computer Environment Inc, $600 million each, registered 11 and 14 September 2026), all designed by Gensler with no tenant listed. Community Impact reported on 7 October 2026 that TDLR filings registered 11 and 14 September 2026 for EDCAUS15 and EDCAUS16 (591,400 sq ft each at 6402 FM 535, $600 million each, construction 2 November 2026 to 15 May 2028) bring Campus No. 2 to six buildings and $4 billion, and that nine filings across EdgeConneX's three Cedar Creek campuses total about 5.83 million sq ft and $5.84 billion. As of 7 October 2026 the Texas Comptroller data center registry lists ECX AUS11-16 with EdgeConnex MCN Austin Property 5 LLC as owner.
EdgeCore Louisa County campus, Shannon Hill Regional Business ParkLouisa County, VAn.a.1100announcedThrough EDI Louisa 1, LLC, EdgeCore applied to the US Army Corps of Engineers for Phase II, three buildings on 187 acres west of Shannon Hill Road. EdgeCore first announced the campus in June 2025
Stream Data Centers Graham site (former Plug Power Limestone project)Graham, TXn.a.164announcedStream agreed to buy the 66-acre former green hydrogen site west of Graham. Stream had not commented on its plans for the site as of the DCD report
Hyperscale Data Michigan AI data center (Alliance Cloud Services)Dowagiac, MI≥$70M340under constructionBitcoin mining at the facility ended on 1 September 2026 as the site converts to AI use for a California-based neocloud. The company targets November 2026 for operations under the MSA. On 5 October 2026 Hyperscale Data said strategic alternatives under evaluation include selling the Michigan campus, taking its Sentinum subsidiary public, or continuing to own and develop it, to be discussed at an investor day on 12 November 2026. The company says the campus could ultimately support more than 300 MW, subject to financing and approvals.
QTS Blakely campusBlakely, GAn.a.announcedBlakely and Early County signed an economic development agreement with QTS, with $7.5 million a year committed before construction starts
Vantage Trident Data Center, AuroraAurora, COn.a.334announcedPlanning documents filed with Aurora show two two-story buildings totaling 861,866 square feet on a 143-acre site zoned industrial, where data centers can be approved administratively. It would be the largest data center in Colorado. On Thursday 1 October 2026 Aurora Mayor Mike Coffman said the 861,866 sq ft project near East 48th Avenue and E-470 should be stopped and asked that the city explore calling it up for a public hearing and a council vote, although data centers are a permitted industrial use at the site and the city attorney has warned of liability for denying a compliant application. No formal action has been taken. Vantage told the Denver Post on 5 October 2026 that the roughly 860,000 sq ft facility on a 108-acre site would draw 334 MW for cloud and AI workloads and use a closed-loop system needing an initial 600,000 gallons and about 2,200 gallons a day. Mayor Mike Coffman wrote on Facebook after the 1 October council meeting that the project received preliminary administrative approval because data centers are a permitted use, and that he would call it up for a public hearing and ask council for a no vote regardless of possible litigation. No formal action had been taken as of 6 October 2026. Per Sentinel Colorado (5 October 2026), the site is 23001 East 48th Avenue in the Airport District zone, where data centers are a use by right; the application was first submitted in August 2025 and the fourth review submission is due 26 October 2026. Coffman said he will call the project up for a council vote and ask colleagues to vote against it regardless of litigation risk, but a city spokesperson said he cannot do so until it is approved; the next council meeting is 12 October 2026. Under an agreement approved in June 2025, Vantage could receive up to $38.9 million in tax incentives over 10 years. The plans include 28 emergency generators and battery storage.
Prologis Trenton data center (Woodsdale Road industrial park)Trenton, OHn.a.250under constructionTrenton City Council voted to approve a 15-year, 75% property tax abatement for the Prologis data center, reported 9 July 2026. Prologis committed to 120 full-time jobs by 31 December 2035 with a $9 million annual payroll, plus $940,200 to schools, $59,800 to Butler Tech and $2.5 million to the city water works; the city expects about $1.3 million a year for the city and school district. WVXU reported in August 2026 that the project was under construction, with Amazon Web Services as tenant. A separate charter amendment to ban large data centers goes to Trenton voters on 3 November 2026
Digital Realty DFW45, Digital Garland campus (1602 Ferris Road)Garland, TX~$300M80under constructionDigital Realty registered a 672,000 sq ft hyperscale data center at 1602 Ferris Road near the George Bush Turnpike with the Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation on 8 September 2026. Work started in summer 2026 and is expected to finish by the start of 2029. Garland approved economic incentives for portions of the campus in 2024, including fee rebates up to $500,000 and 40% property tax rebates. Registered owner Digital Garland 2C, L.P.; the TDLR scope describes ten 8 MW DR800 suites for an ultimate capacity of 80 MW
Edged Project Outpost second building (southwest Fort Worth)Fort Worth, TX~$300MplannedEdged registered a nearly 486,000 sq ft data center at 9720 Team Rockbrook Parkway in southwest Fort Worth, the second building of its Project Outpost development, with work expected to start in November 2026 and finish by April 2028. Commercial building permits were filed with the city in early August 2026. The first building at 9999 Chapin School Road was registered with the state in May 2026. Registered owner EDC Fort Worth LLC; 485,947 sq ft per TDLR
CoreSite DA1, Irving (2701 E. Grauwyler Road)Irving, TX~$200MplannedCoreSite registered a two-story, 230,000 sq ft data center at 2701 E. Grauwyler Road in Irving with the state on 31 August 2026, with work expected from January 2027 to the end of 2028. Owners are listed as CanTex Grauwyler LLC and CoreSite Real Estate IRV LLC. Irving City Council approved plans for the campus in February 2026, per KERA as cited by the Dallas Morning News
Vantage Data Centers Project Latigo (Terry Ranch Road)South of Cheyenne, WY$20.0B480rezoning approvedThe Laramie County Board of County Commissioners approved rezoning the site 12 miles south of Cheyenne from Land Use to Planned Unit Development for Project Latigo, framing a campus with cooling plants, onsite generation and temporary workforce housing. Vantage said the project could bring up to 2,000 jobs and hopes to begin construction in 2027 with work continuing into 2030. Vantage described the rezoning as one of its first entitlement steps
STACK Infrastructure Berry Hill data center campus (Southern Virginia Megasite at Berry Hill)Near Ringgold, VA$100Bapproved (county support resolution)The Pittsylvania County Board of Supervisors approved a resolution on Tuesday 21 July 2026 supporting a proposed $100 billion data center campus at the Berry Hill Industrial Park, which county officials expect to create about 2,500 jobs over two decades. WSET identified STACK Infrastructure as the developer, with the project developed through the Danville-Pittsylvania Regional Industrial Facility Authority. RIFA Chairman Vic Ingram said on 27 July 2026 that a petition with more than 700 signatures would not change the plan and that the first STACK building is expected to be operational by July 2027
TerraWatt Armory data center (3728 Market Street, Midtown)St. Louis, MO~$3.1B120approvedThe St. Louis Board of Adjustment upheld the conditional use permit for the 120 MW data center on 30 July 2026 after an 11-hour meeting and added its own conditions. On Tuesday 15 September 2026 city leaders approved a community benefits agreement requiring at least 100 permanent jobs, a $15.8 million payment to the city in two installments, and penalties if projected tax revenue is not generated; a city consultant projected $430 million in local tax revenue over 10 years. The agreement lets the developer withhold the data center user identity, construction is expected to start by June 2027, and a group led by the Missouri Coalition for the Environment sued to stop the project in August 2026. On Wednesday 16 September 2026 TerraWatt sued the city over the Board of Adjustment's condition that it supply a minimum of 2.4 MW of renewable energy on site, arguing the mandate exceeds the board's authority and is practically impossible given the 11-acre site. The 3728 Market Street warehouse, owned of record by GS 3728 Market Investors LLC (a Green Street entity), was scheduled for a 6 October 2026 land-tax sale over more than $2.4 million in unpaid taxes, per STL.News on 23 September 2026 and a St. Louis Business Journal report of 22 September 2026. In July 2026 the same building was pulled from a sheriff's tax sale after a last-minute payment.
QTS data center campus on Lancium Clean Campus (near Turkey)Near Turkey, TX≥$10.0BannouncedQTS and Lancium announced a data center campus in unincorporated Hall County about five miles south of Turkey, with QTS designing, building and operating the buildings on Lancium land under an agreement with the county. The companies project up to 7,000 construction jobs at peak and 350 permanent jobs, closed-loop cooling with water from onsite wells or external sources rather than the Turkey system. Nexstar reported the project as a $10 billion, 465-acre, 11-building campus breaking ground in September 2026
Monolith Olive Creek data center (built by Crusoe)Hallam, NEn.a.35approvedThe Hallam village planning commission unanimously recommended approval of the Crusoe-built data center at Monolith's Olive Creek facility north of the village. Water use is estimated at 770,000 gallons a year including a one-time 500,000-gallon fill, and a sound study found compliance with the 55-decibel residential limit. The village board is scheduled to vote on 5 October 2026, when Crusoe is expected to present a community benefit agreement. On Monday 5 October 2026 the Hallam village board voted 5-0 to approve the special use permit for the 10-acre modular data center to be built by Crusoe at Monolith's Olive Creek site. The community benefit agreement provides $160,000 when construction starts ($150,000 to Hallam Volunteer Fire and Rescue), another $1 million once operational and $150,000 a year for 10 years, administered by the Nebraska Community Foundation. The center is capped at 35 MW.
DataNovaX Wichita Falls data center (2236 Airport Drive)Wichita Falls, TX~$1.0B12approved (conditional use)The Wichita Falls Planning and Zoning Commission voted on Wednesday 12 August 2026 to approve a conditional use request from Dallas-based DataNovaX to operate a data center in an existing building at 2236 Airport Drive. The approval is limited to the existing building, and the city said the 12 MW load is below the 75 MW threshold in the governor's data center directive. Any additional buildings would need separate approval
Silicon Foundry Warwood mixed-use data centerWheeling, WVn.a.mou approvedWheeling City Council on Tuesday 15 September 2026 approved a binding memorandum of understanding with Silicon Foundry Energy LLC under which the company will not seek high-impact data center status by staying below 90 MW. State law bars high-impact data centers from TIF districts, so the cap preserves the city's option to bond the tax increment. Residents opposed the project at the meeting
PAX-1 data center development (Country Club Road)Middlesex Township, PAn.a.1350final land development approved (phase 1-b)Middlesex Township supervisors voted 2-0 on Wednesday 2 September 2026 to approve Phase 1-B final land development plans for six data center buildings with more than 12 million gallons of water storage, plus side agreements on noise, emissions and water monitoring. PennLive described it as the first hyperscale data center to secure final plan approval in the Capitol region, qualifying it for state tax exemptions under the governor's GRID order. Opponents have filed a court challenge alleging illegal spot zoning and improper permitting
Colovore Reno 1 data centerNear Tahoe Reno Industrial Center, NV$30Mincentive approvedThe Nevada Governor's Office of Economic Development approved $4.08 million in tax abatements for Colovore Reno 1 LLC to establish a data center in Storey County east of Reno, announced Wednesday 5 August 2026. Colovore plans 10 jobs at an average hourly wage of $59 within five years, and the facility is projected to generate $16.8 million in new taxes over the abatement period
Leola Data CenterLeola, SDn.a.50utility service approved; county permit pendingThe South Dakota Public Utilities Commission unanimously approved a settlement letting Montana-Dakota Utilities serve the proposed Leola Data Center, near an MDU substation. The PUC chairman stressed the vote was not a permit to construct; McPherson County recently deferred action on the conditional use permit
Carrollton Industrial Campus data center (Greens Bottom Road)Carrollton, KY$9.6BannouncedPoe Companies and PowerHouse Data Centers announced a $9.6 billion hyperscale campus on a roughly 500 to 550-acre site east of I-71 in Carrollton, including 342 acres owned by Carrollton Utilities, with about 300 acres for the data center itself. The developers hold purchase options, project about 2,130 construction jobs and 320 permanent jobs, and cite $93.2 million in average annual local tax revenue, including an average $11.1 million a year to Carrollton over 20 years under a payment in lieu of taxes agreement. Construction timing was not announced
Beacon Data Centers Calvert Infrastructure HubCalvert, AL~$6.0Bplanned; construction expected to begin fall 2026Beacon Data Centers posted plans for the Calvert Infrastructure Hub in unincorporated north Mobile County, with closed-loop cooling, 7,500 gallons a day of public water and sewer allocation, up to 1,000 construction workers and 250 operations staff. Mobile County commissioners said in July 2026 they lack authority to rezone the property to stop it. Mobile Chamber estimates cited by AL.com project about $1.5 billion in sales tax revenue over two decades and nearly $100 million a year in new property tax revenue
Malachite One data centre and power plant (near Banshee Gas Plant)Near Robb, Albertan.a.1000proposedTourmaline subsidiary Emerald Energy Technologies proposed Malachite One on Crown land about 40 km southwest of Edson, adjacent to its Banshee Gas Plant, after a 23 June 2026 presentation to Yellowhead County council. Construction could begin as early as 2027 if approved by the Alberta Utilities Commission and other regulators, with 300 to 500 long-term data centre jobs and 40 to 60 permanent power plant positions projected. The developer has not yet secured a tech company to operate the facility
Project Red Clay data centerNear Hayneville, AL≥$1.5B1500proposedDevelopers of Project Red Clay, a hyperscale data center planned on 800 acres a few miles from the Lowndes County courthouse, have requested 1,500 MW from Alabama Power and estimate at least $1.5 billion in development-stage cost. The operator has not been disclosed because an agreement is not final. At the 24 August 2026 county commission meeting, residents organized as Protect Lowndes County presented a 350-signature petition seeking transparency and urged commissioners not to approve tax abatements. The developer is Cloverleaf Infrastructure, which in a 27 May 2026 update described the project as a minimum $1.5 billion investment and said it had not requested abatements or incentives from the county commission. Yellowhammer News reported on 1 October 2026, citing unnamed sources, that the commission is close to approving a tax incentive plan for the project; no vote has been taken and the reported figure is not confirmed.
Massena data center at former Alcoa East siteMassena, NYn.a.400under municipal reviewThe Massena Town Board approved a $100,000 escrow agreement in July 2026 to fund attorney and consultant review of plans for a large-scale data center at the former Alcoa East site, covering energy, noise and emergency response. On Wednesday 16 September 2026 the board voted 3-2 against a six-month data center moratorium, which WWNY said moves the town closer to construction. The developer says the project is exempt from the statewide hyperscale moratorium because it needs no additional discretionary DEC permits; studies must still be completed
Rubix Data Centers hyperscale campus at former AK Steel Ashland WorksRussell, KYn.a.2000proposedRubix Data Centers, a subsidiary of Barcelona-based Submer Group, proposed eight two-story buildings at the former AK Steel mill, according to company answers posted by the city of Russell, which passed a moratorium on data center applications in June 2026. The company projected thousands of construction jobs, 200 full-time jobs averaging $125,000, about 55 million gallons of water a year, and tens of millions of dollars in local property tax. The Herald-Leader said it would be double the size of the next-largest planned Kentucky site, also near Ashland
Meta Bowling Green data center (Middleton Township)Near Bowling Green and Haskins, OH≥$800Munder constructionOn 7 July 2026 Middleton Township trustees voted 2-1 to rezone 13 parcels totaling 31.82 acres to light industrial for Liames LLC on behalf of Meta's data center expansion, prompting a resident petition to put the rezoning to township voters. On 27 August 2026 trustees voted 2-1 to deny a further request to rezone 39.265 acres for construction worker parking. The facility is expected to support about 100 operational jobs and more than 1,000 construction workers at peak
Redcliff AI Data Centre CampusRedcliff, Albertan.a.1200proposed (no municipal application)A 66-page federal pitchbook prepared for the Canada Investment Summit in Toronto lists a Redcliff AI Data Centre Campus proposed by Norway-based BW Velora. Redcliff Mayor Chris Czember said nothing is approved and no application has been submitted or entered the permitting process, and he did not confirm whether BW Velora is actively pursuing the project
Beacon Data Centers Lorneville data centre (Spruce Lake Data Centre Hub)Saint John (Lorneville), New Brunswickn.a.390environmental impact assessment underwayAlberta-based Beacon AI and Texas-based VoltaGrid propose a 390 MW data centre in west Saint John that is in the provincial environmental impact assessment process begun in April 2026. Saint John council voted unanimously in May 2025 to allow the industrial park expansion, and residents have sought judicial review of the rezoning. On 14 September 2026 New Brunswick opened public comment on data centre guidelines through 2 October 2026 while this project, the only one proposed in the province, continues through review
Mihta Askiy Data Center and gas power plantNortheast of Peace River, Albertan.a.650proposedCree Ative Datacenter Corp GP proposes a 650 MW gas-fired plant about 40 km northeast of Peace River to power a new data centre for Mihta Askiy LP. The Impact Assessment Agency of Canada decided on 4 March 2026 that no federal impact assessment is required. Conservation groups raised cumulative power and water concerns as AESO data centre requests approach 12 GW
Natelli Holdings data center (former Triangle North Vance, US 158 and Poplar Creek Road)Near Henderson, NCn.a.900preliminary site plan filedNatelli Holdings filed a preliminary site plan with Vance County for a 900 MW data center, saying in a letter to commissioners that it reluctantly filed after seeing discussion of a moratorium. On Monday 14 September 2026 commissioners adopted a 60-day moratorium on new data center proposals, but the Henderson Daily Dispatch reports Natelli has secured permit choice, letting it choose which standards apply. Residents organized as Kerr Regional Citizen Voices oppose the project
Colovore Hutto AI data center (2401 Innovation Blvd)Hutto, TXn.a.40planned; construction to begin december 2026Colovore filed plans with the state for a $250 million liquid-cooled AI data center at the Hutto Crossing business park, about two years after announcing its entry to the Austin market. Construction is set to begin in December 2026 with completion anticipated by the end of 2028 per the TDLR filing
Texas Critical Data Centers (TCDC)Near Odessa, TXn.a.757construction permits receivedNew Era announced on 14 August 2026 that construction permits for Texas Critical Data Centers are in hand, including development structure and drive approach permits from Ector County, TCEQ approval of a notice of intent to begin grading, and a Phase 1 plat submitted to Ector County and the City of Odessa. The company closed a 54-acre corridor acquisition bringing the campus to 493 acres and is in advanced negotiations for a Phase 1 power purchase agreement. On 18 September 2026 New Era contracted Phase 1 power for Texas Critical Data Centers under a 20 year agreement with Luminant, a Vistra affiliate, for 200 MW to 207 MW from Vistra's adjacent 1,180 MW gas fired plant in Odessa, expected to be available in the third quarter of 2027, with Vistra to receive a 5 percent non voting interest in the powered portion of the project after deliveries begin.
Prologis North San Jose data center (326 Charcot Avenue)San Jose, CAn.a.99special use permit filedPrologis filed a special use permit with San Jose for a three-story data center at the corner of Charcot Avenue and Zanker Road. Prologis separately proposed a 516,000 sq ft data center on 15 acres at 5977 Silver Creek Valley Road in South San Jose. PG&E reported its proposed data center pipeline at 12.71 GW at the end of June 2026
Menlo Equities data center at Western Digital campus (Charlotte Drive)San Jose, CAn.a.99.7proposed (development plans filed)Development plans show Menlo Equities proposing a 444,400 sq ft data center on part of the Western Digital campus in South San Jose along Charlotte Drive between Lexington Avenue and Raleigh Road, with some public open space. The land-use consultant said the project is consistent with longstanding industrial zoning. Menlo Equities also owns 300 Holger Way in North San Jose, where city planners approved an interior data center conversion on 8 July 2026 that a labor-backed coalition appealed to the City Council
AWS Sidney data center campus (Millcreek Road)Sidney, OH$3.0Bsite work underwayDemolition began on Tuesday 4 August 2026 at the historic Joslin Barn to make way for the Amazon data center on the north side of Millcreek Road, which Sidney leaders approved in fall 2025. The Dayton Daily News reported that the city granted a 30-year Community Reinvestment Area 100% real property tax exemption per qualifying building, with $46 million in PILOT payments over 14 years plus a $4 million upfront payment split between the city and schools, 75 jobs by 31 December 2030 and up to $8 million from AWS for road and utility improvements. Residents have circulated recall and transparency petitions and the city allocated more money for related litigation
Kingston Technology Hub data center (Thor Equities)Kingston, GA~$1.0B150dri filed; rezoning requestedThor Equities filed a Development of Regional Impact with the Georgia Department of Community Affairs for a 350,000 sq ft data center east of Kingston off Ga. 293, with build-out targeted for 2030, and will ask Bartow County to rezone the agricultural-residential tract. The Center Square said it is the 17th new data center on the DCA regional impact list since 1 January 2026. The regional commission has up to 30 days to review, and DRI findings are not binding. The DRI form estimates about 50 full-time jobs and about 0.05 MGD of water demand, and DCA certified the submission complete on 10 September 2026
DC BLOX east side Indianapolis data center campus (305 Fintail Drive, former Ford plant)Indianapolis, INn.a.approved (use variance); judicial review pendingThe Indianapolis Metropolitan Development Commission voted 6-1 on Wednesday 15 July 2026 to approve a use variance for the DC BLOX campus near Irvington, after the developer cut one building and added commitments including up to two sound studies a year, 21 on-site jobs and a United Way-run community fund. IndyStar called it the last data center approved in the city before a countywide moratorium adopted in August 2026. Neighbors and school leaders filed a judicial review petition in August, and the city briefly issued, then withdrew, a stop-work order on the site in September 2026
PRL2 data center (411 Pegasus Parkway)LaGrange, GA~$1.0Bdri review completedLaGrange submitted a Development of Regional Impact for KDC's PRL2 project on 22 July 2026, describing an existing data center building on site and a subsequent phase of about 470,000 sq ft. The form estimates 40 to 60 full-time jobs, two to four million gallons a day of water demand from the City of LaGrange, and 0.2 to 0.6 MGD of sewage flow. The Chattahoochee Flint Regional Commission issued its finding on 12 August 2026 and the DRI process was marked completed with a 27 August 2026 completion date
Amazon Data Services Horizon Junction data center campus (County Road 241)Floydada, TXn.a.registered for constructionAmazon Data Services, Inc. registered a new data center building at 1752 County Road 241 in Floydada as CONFIDENTIAL DATA CENTER on 20 July 2026, followed by three Horizon Junction data center buildings at 1762, 1774 and 1782 County Road 241 on 5 August 2026, each with an estimated cost of $300 million and an estimated schedule of 1 August 2026 to 1 April 2027
Savannah River Site AI data center and energy generation projectAiken County, SCn.a.1000developer selected to negotiate a phased lease; no final leaseDOE's National Nuclear Security Administration selected Amentum to negotiate a phased lease for a 1 GW AI data center at the Savannah River Site, one of four DOE sites chosen for private AI and energy projects. DC BLOX is the digital infrastructure partner in the consortium, and NNSA said the end user has not been determined.
Microsoft MNZ07 Wellington Data Center (13490 University Boulevard, Gainesville)Gainesville, VAn.a.permittingMicrosoft filed an application with the US Army Corps of Engineers for its MNZ07 Wellington campus, two one-story data center buildings and an on-site substation on 123 acres at 13490 University Boulevard, affecting 955 linear feet of stream channels and 1.95 acres of wetlands. Microsoft bought the land in 2024 for $465.5 million
Microsoft ATL50 (5235 Stonewall Tell Road, Union City)Union City, GAn.a.permittingUnion City submitted a Development of Regional Impact filing (DRI #4843) to the Georgia Department of Community Affairs on 15 September 2026 for Microsoft's ATL50: two three-story buildings totaling 910,000 sq ft on 88.01 acres at 5235 Stonewall Tell Road, with overall completion in 2032
Midwest Digital GatewayCanton, OH$2.9B312proposedTexas-based developer Corscale introduced the Midwest Digital Gateway, a $2.9 billion, 312 MW hyperscale campus on 162 acres southeast of Millerton Street and Central Avenue SE in Canton, at a community meeting on 23 September 2026. Plans show about 1 million sq ft in four two-story data center buildings with a switchyard and substation, on land annexed from Canton Township into the city in 2025. Corscale executive vice president Erik Draaisma said the project is being developed with a likely tenant in mind, Amazon Web Services, and that construction could begin within months and run from 2026 to 2029, with about 3,000 construction jobs and about 150 permanent jobs. Peak water use on the hottest day was estimated at 400,000 gallons. It is the third hyperscale proposal within Canton city limits since July 2026.
Misty Hollow Energy and Data Campus (614 Prospect Road)Forward Township, PAn.a.proposed (preliminary plan filed)A preliminary plan for the Misty Hollow Energy and Data Campus proposes a 1 million sq ft data center building, an 80,000 sq ft wastewater treatment facility, a 23,800 sq ft office building, power station facilities spread over about 10 acres and a security building on two lots totaling 274 acres (the former 232.4-acre Misty Hollow Farm at 614 Prospect Road and an adjacent 41.9-acre parcel), with 416,000 sq ft designated for possible future expansion. The land is owned by 614 Prospect RD LLC. Allen Sherwood of Prospect RD LLC said in a statement through Bracewell LLP that the goal is final approvals early next year and completion as early as mid-2029, that the campus uses closed-loop cooling and will not draw from Connoquenessing Creek, and that no end user has been announced. The plan was discussed by the Butler County Planning Commission and was on the Forward Township Planning Commission agenda for 24 September 2026. Forward Township has no zoning ordinance; supervisors expect to vote in November on a subdivision and land development ordinance amendment that would not apply to this previously filed plan. At a meeting on Thursday 1 October 2026 attended by about 400 people, with 45 public speakers overwhelmingly opposed, the Forward Township Planning Commission voted to table consideration of preliminary approval until the developer answers a review letter from the township engineer. The developers presented a 274-acre site with a one million sq ft natural gas powered data center. The plan will not be on the supervisors' agenda the following week and is next expected before the planning commission on 22 October 2026.
Project Shelby (former Ford property, Marietta Avenue NE and Georgetown Road NE)Canton, OHn.a.320proposedPanattoni Development Co. hosted a community meeting on 18 August 2026 at the Canton Memorial Civic Center on Project Shelby, a proposed 320-plus MW data center on the former Ford property southeast of Marietta Avenue NE and Georgetown Road NE. Renderings show four buildings of roughly 250,000 sq ft each, a pump house and one substation, with construction on 52 percent of the property. A&J Urban Development bought the land for $10,000 in 2023. Developers estimated about 670 construction jobs and more than 100 permanent jobs; the City of Canton is expected to provide water. The project is in engineering, environmental review and permitting, and the mayor said incentive discussions were under way. The Repository called it the fourth hyperscale data center announced in Stark County.
Canton Orchard View Data CenterCanton, OH~$1.0BproposedDAMAC Digital, the data center arm of Dubai-based DAMAC Group, owns about 85 acres northeast of Trump Avenue SE and Orchard View Drive SE in southeast Canton, annexed by the city in 2025, and presented a plan for two buildings, substations and a detention pond at a 14 July 2026 community forum. A DAMAC spokesperson said total investment is expected to exceed $1 billion if the project proceeds, with groundbreaking targeted for 2026 and the first building fully operational by early 2028. Cooling is closed loop with a one-time fill of less than 1 million gallons per building, and the facility would employ at least 60 people full time.
Amazon data center, Faircrest Street SW (Perry Township and Canton JEDD)Perry Township, OHn.a.240under constructionA 240 MW Amazon data center developed by Panattoni is under construction south of Faircrest Street SW within a Joint Economic Development District between Perry Township and Canton, and could become the largest taxpayer in Stark County. Four residents sued Perry Township trustees, Stark County, the City of Canton, the Perry school board and the developers in Stark County Common Pleas Court, alleging the October 2025 noise ordinance and a March 2026 resolution consenting to a tax exemption agreement were adopted improperly, including under Ohio's Open Meetings Act. Panattoni said it has followed all applicable requirements.
Bitdeer Massillon mining facilityMassillon, OHn.a.221partially operationalThe Canton Repository reported in July 2026 that Bitdeer's 221 MW crypto mining facility in Massillon was partially operational and on track to be completed by fall 2026. It is counted by the Repository among Stark County's hyperscale-scale projects alongside the Amazon Perry Township site and the Canton proposals.
Wood Haven Technology Park potential data centerRoanoke County (Wood Haven Technology Park), VAn.a.proposed (land under purchase agreement, due diligence)The Western Virginia Regional Industrial Facility Authority confirmed on 22 September 2026 that its purchase agreement with Clearview Dynamics LLC for 94 acres at Wood Haven Technology Park is for a potential data center, citing Governor Spanberger's Executive Order 22 on data center disclosure. Water would come from Spring Hollow Reservoir, which runs at about 7.5 million gallons a day of 18 million available, and the buyer would pay for all water and power infrastructure. Due diligence is expected to run until March, with closing anticipated in October 2027. WSLS reported the agreement requires a $500,000 earnest deposit and 180 days for inspections, that the price and buyer signature are redacted or missing, and that Clearview Dynamics was formed on 13 January 2026 through a registered-agent firm. The Western Virginia Water Authority said it had not been contacted by the buyer.
Google data center campus, Botetourt Center at GreenfieldDaleville, VA$3.0B300site work underwayGoogle bought 312 acres at the Botetourt Center at Greenfield for $14 million (announced June 2025) and plans three data center buildings of about 300,000 sq ft each, three substations and a 28,000 sq ft office. Appalachian Power's 4 September 2026 application to the Virginia State Corporation Commission estimates $264 million to upgrade transmission lines and substations for the campus and gives a peak demand of about 300 MW, a figure not previously public. At the Western Virginia Water Authority board meeting on Thursday 17 September 2026, Executive Director Michael McEvoy said Google had told the authority 2 million gallons a day will be enough; the October 2025 utility services funding agreement commits 2 million gallons a day and lets Google request 6 million more. Google said in July 2026 that at least one of three buildings will be air cooled. Botetourt County issued a land disturbance permit reported 30 August 2026, and the county board voted 3-1 in July 2026 to create an independent commission to assess the project. Related water-records litigation is tracked in at-risk row 110.
Former Emerson campus technology hub and data centerFerguson, MO~$1.8BapprovedOn Tuesday 22 September 2026 the Ferguson City Council voted 4-3 to approve a revived redevelopment agreement for a $1.8 billion technology hub and data center on the 217-acre former Emerson campus, after the package failed 3-3 in May 2026. The agreement authorizes up to $1.5 billion in tax incentives and $22 billion in industrial revenue bonds, and includes $7.5 million over 10 years for neighborhood improvements, a $250,000 environmental mitigation fund, water-conserving cooling and compliance with city noise rules. Residents launched a referendum petition on 23 September 2026; the dispute is tracked in at-risk row 187.
Rhodes Technology ParkColleton County (off Mount Carmel Road, west of I-95), SC$6.0B1000proposedAt a Colleton County Economic Alliance information session reported 23 September 2026, Ken Loeber of Eagle Rock Partners described Rhodes Technology Park, a $6 billion, 1,000 MW single-user hyperscale campus of 10 data centers and two substations on more than 1,200 acres west of I-95 off Mount Carmel Road, inside the Digital Infrastructure Overlay District the county council adopted unanimously on 14 September 2026 (65-decibel noise cap, 200-foot buffers, closed-loop cooling). The developers project 500 permanent jobs and more than 1,000 construction jobs over five to seven years, with construction expected around 2028 or 2029. The county alliance projected tax revenue passing $100 million a year by year four. It may be the same project as the gigawatt ACE Basin proposal in at-risk row 83, but the fetched coverage does not say so. The Charleston City Paper reports that this 1,200-acre site is a new location Eagle Rock turned to after its earlier $6 billion, 850-acre proposal near the ACE Basin (at-risk row 83) was delayed by the county moratorium, and that the council lifted the moratorium west of I-95 on 14 September 2026; the campus would have 10 buildings.
Valara data center (former Kohler plant, Pine Street)Spartanburg, SC$2.8Bunder constructionNorthMark Strategies announced a $2.8 billion operation in Spartanburg County on 21 April 2025 at the former Kohler plant on Pine Street. The South Carolina Department of Environmental Services granted an air permit on 18 September 2026 for 11 natural gas turbines adding 408 MW to the 48 MW already permitted, for 457 MW, with 12-month limits of 250 tons each for VOCs and nitrogen oxides and 25 tons for hazardous air pollutants. On 21 September 2026 NorthMark revised its projected water use to an average of 1.2 million gallons a day with peaks up to 1.6 million, more than double the 459,000 gallons previously reported, saying the earlier figure was a Phase I projection. Litigation is tracked in at-risk row 107.
Alignment Engine data hall (Chilpaco division, former US Paper Mill, Eastern Avenue and Canal Street)Chillicothe, OHn.a.89proposedNorth Canton-based Alignment Engine plans a data hall and computing-device manufacturing operation inside an existing mill building on about 6.5 acres of the roughly 490-acre former US Paper Mill campus in Chillicothe. Company slides released after September 2026 council meetings list 89 MW anticipated use at capacity, reuse of the mill's permitted wells, Paint Creek intake and on-site wastewater treatment, about 240 permanent jobs and no tax abatement request. Chillicothe City Council struck down its 60-day moratorium 8-1 on 14 September 2026 (at-risk row 208). Volato Group completed its merger with Alignment Engine, valued at about $500 million, with Chris Ensey named CEO effective 11 September 2026; the merger materials describe Alignment Engine's Ohio powered industrial campus as having about 154 MW available and a path to at least 480 MW.
Colovore Alliance data center (14700 Heritage Parkway, AllianceTexas)Fort Worth, TX~$430MproposedColovore registered a one-story, 156,500 sq ft data center with an administrative area, four data halls and a 42,000 sq ft screened equipment yard at 14700 Heritage Parkway along Interstate 35W in Hillwood's AllianceTexas development, north Fort Worth (Denton County), with the Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation on 22 September 2026. The estimated cost is $430 million, with construction scheduled from 1 December 2026 to 1 December 2028. The owner of record is AIL Investment LP of Fort Worth and the design firm is Ci Design. The Dallas Morning News noted that Colovore's website lists a 32 MW DFW02 facility in Fort Worth, but the filing does not state capacity or link the project to DFW02.
QTS DFW2 campus, building DC7 (1341 Sunrise Road)Lancaster, TX~$290MproposedQTS Dallas I, LLC registered a new two-story, 363,500 sq ft building with office and shell data hall space, named QTS DFW2-DC7, at 1341 Sunrise Road, Lancaster, Dallas County, with the Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation on 22 September 2026. The estimated cost is $290 million, with an estimated schedule of 1 September 2026 to 1 December 2027. Corgan Associates is the design firm and no tenant is assigned. The DC7 designation implies earlier buildings on the DFW2 campus, which the filing does not describe. The Real Deal's weekly permit roundup (28 September 2026) reported the $290 million, 364,000 sq ft two-story QTS project at 1341 Sunrise Road, with construction from September 2026 to December 2027.
Data center site, southeast corner of 7th Avenue and Grant Street, PhoenixPhoenix, AZn.a.proposedA 5.43-acre data center site at the southeast corner of 7th Avenue and Grant Street, just south of downtown Phoenix, traded from Scottsdale-based LKY Development to GI Partners for $14,720,919 on 17 September 2026, according to Maricopa County property records cited by the Phoenix Business Journal. The project is moving ahead under a waiver the City of Phoenix granted in response to a Proposition 207 claim filed after the city's 2025 data center zoning ordinance. LKY had bought the land in 2012 for $3.15 million.
Volition data center, former Fingerhut warehouse (4000 E. U.S. 6), Spanish Fork CanyonSpanish Fork, UTn.a.250proposedProvo-based Volition plans a fuel cell powered data center inside the 1 million sq ft former Fingerhut warehouse at 4000 E. U.S. 6, at the mouth of Spanish Fork Canyon, promising 250 MW of computing power. On Monday 21 September 2026 the Spanish Fork City Council voted 3-2 at a special meeting to amend city code to allow data centers and self-generating facilities, with conditions including grid isolation, a 600,000-gallon cap on the initial closed-loop cooling fill, annual cooling and humidification water limited to half that amount, and independent noise, vibration and heat analysis. Volition must still submit a site plan and agree a development agreement; its CEO said engineering would take a couple more months before permitting.
C3ntro Telecom TIKVA data center, AguascalientesAguascalientes, MX-Aguascalientesn.a.operatingC3ntro Telecom announced MXN 300 million of investment in Aguascalientes under its TIKVA project, a planned 2,500 km high-capacity fiber network between Mexico and the United States, and opened a data center in the south of Aguascalientes city in the presence of Governor Tere Jimenez on 17 September 2026. The company described it as the first of 34 data centers in the TIKVA plan.
Barber Lake data centerColorado City, TXn.a.168under constructionCipher Barber Lake LLC signed a 10-year lease with Fluidstack USA II Inc. on 25 September 2025 for a 168 MW critical IT facility in Colorado City, Texas, with Google backstopping certain Fluidstack obligations; delivery was then expected by September 2026. On 24 September 2026 Cipher amended the lease and signed a binding commitment with an unnamed leading AI lab for a further 10-year lease after the Fluidstack term, taking contracted revenue from $3.8 billion to over $9 billion. Tenant change orders set a phased delivery of data halls between the fourth quarter of 2026 and the first quarter of 2027, with first rent expected in the fourth quarter of 2026.
Delta Forge 2 AI Factory campusBrookwood, AL≥$3.2B210approvedApplied Digital confirmed on 24 September 2026 that its Delta Forge 2 campus, first announced on 8 June 2026 with a 210 MW lease in an unnamed southern state, will be built on part of its roughly 1,300-acre Brookwood site: about 1.26 million square feet on a 160-acre footprint. The Tuscaloosa County Economic Development Authority unanimously approved the incentive package the same day. Initial operations are expected in the first quarter of 2028. This is a separate project from the Youngwoo & Associates rezoning in Brookwood (youngwoo-project-brookwood-al). At its first community town hall on Thursday 1 October 2026, Applied Digital said the campus will be a single AI factory building with generator buildings running up to 210 MW of computing capacity, built over 12 to 16 months with at least 1,000 construction workers and more than 100 permanent jobs. It described a closed-loop cooling system needing about 1.4 million gallons at the outset and about 750,000 gallons a year thereafter, and said it will pay for the power improvements serving the site. On Tuesday 6 October 2026 the Brookwood City Council voted to support a resolution backing the Tuscaloosa County Economic Development Authority's agreement with Applied Digital for Delta Forge 2 (Project Highlands). The Alabama Public Service Commission is still to vote on the power agreement between Applied Digital and Alabama Power.
Amazon Montgomery County data center campusMontgomery County, MO~$10.0BannouncedAmazon will build a data center campus in Montgomery County, Missouri, announced by Gov. Mike Kehoe on Monday 15 June 2026 at $10 billion. Amazon expects more than 400 full-time jobs and thousands of construction jobs, more than $7 million of community contributions, road improvements including a bridge over the Norfolk Southern Railway, and a water system to be donated to the local water district. No timeline was given.
Keel Scrubgrass data center (former Scrubgrass power plant)Scrubgrass Township (near Clintonville), PAn.a.1300proposedKeel Infrastructure, which bought the Scrubgrass Township power plant on the Allegheny River about 18 months ago and used it for bitcoin mining, plans to convert the plant to natural gas and build up to about 1,300 MW of data center capacity with up to 550 MW of new gas generation. Keel held three town halls in Clintonville on Tuesday 22 September 2026. No design or permit has been submitted; Keel hopes to break ground in 2027.
Jurassic Spark data center and power campusWellington (east of), UTn.a.proposedAltigen, which builds natural gas plants for data centers, selected about 1,200 acres east of Wellington, Utah for its 'Jurassic Spark' data center campus, per Carbon County Community Economic Development Board minutes. Commissioner Larry Jensen said the plan calls for a 250 MW gas plant initially, possibly growing to 3 GW. In May 2026 the county commission unanimously approved a preliminary agreement to take ownership of a pipeline right-of-way through BLM land for the project. Altigen did not comment.
Project Cannoli data center (east of Haggerty Road, north of the I-94 North Service Drive)Van Buren Township, MIn.a.1000proposedProject Cannoli is a 282-acre Google data center planned in Van Buren Township, with developer Panattoni proposing three data processing buildings of roughly 87,000 to 300,000 sq ft plus an administrative building and two network service buildings. The township Planning Commission gave preliminary approval in February 2026, Google confirmed it was behind the project in March 2026, and the township approved $125 million in tax incentives in late May 2026. The final site plan vote is expected 14 October 2026. On 25 September 2026 Wayne County Executive Warren Evans vetoed the county's tax incentives and community benefits agreement for the project (see at-risk). Residents have also launched a recall effort against nine township officials. On Thursday 1 October 2026 the Wayne County Commission voted 13-0 (two absent) to override the county executive's veto of the tax incentives, which Planet Detroit says save Google more than $125 million; commissioners noted the vote did not approve construction or a development agreement. The same day the Michigan Public Service Commission conditionally approved the DTE Electric contracts for the project (20-year term, 80% minimum billing demand, up to 1,600 MW of renewables and 480 MW of storage funded by Google).
Google Buffalo data center campus (Putnam County)Buffalo, WVn.a.announcedGov. Patrick Morrisey announced on 27 March 2026 that Google had purchased land at 22272 Charleston Road, at the north end of the town of Buffalo near the Kanawha River, and received approval as a multibillion-dollar High Impact Data Center Project; the Department of Commerce received Google's certification application that week. The Putnam County Development Authority said Google plans a data center campus there, and Google launched a project website in June 2026 saying the project is in early planning. On Tuesday 29 September 2026 the Putnam County Commission unanimously passed a resolution asking hyperscale developers to follow county rules as if House Bill 2014 (which removed county approval power) did not exist, including developer-funded water feasibility studies, light and sound mitigation, and payment of 100 percent of water, sewer and power upgrade costs; WCHS reported that the project already has state approval and that Google is working with the county planning commission. Residents' group Putnam United cites 128 evaporative cooling towers in Google's permit filings.
Google Project Raptor hyperscale data center (Three Way Road)Near Lakeside City (Three Way Road, south of FM 1954), TX$1.0BproposedGoogle's proposed hyperscale data center known as Project Raptor would occupy about 2,500 acres along Three Way Road in northern Archer County near Wichita Falls. Builder Dynamo Ventures LLC has applied to TCEQ for a wastewater treatment plant permit (WQ0017005001) to discharge up to a daily average of 95,000 gallons of treated wastewater toward Lake Wichita and a Texas Land Application Permit (WQ0016998001); TCEQ has approved a concrete batch plant permit for City Concrete Inc. at the site. On Monday 28 September 2026 the Archer County Commissioners Court passed two resolutions opposing the wastewater permits and asking TCEQ to reevaluate the batch plant permit, citing Gov. Abbott's 21 September 2026 directive to TCEQ; the county judge said the county has no authority to stop the permits. State Rep. James Frank said he opposes the site's location next to homes and plans legislation on data center setbacks.
Meta Tulsa Data Center (Project Anthem), Fair Oaks Industrial Innovation ParkTulsa, OK≥$1.0Bunder constructionMeta was revealed on 21 April 2026 as the company behind Project Anthem, a $1 billion data center of more than 2 million sq ft at the 2,000-acre Fair Oaks Industrial Innovation Park near 11th Street and the Creek Turnpike in east Tulsa, where it is the first anchor tenant. It is Meta's first data center in Oklahoma and is expected to create more than 1,000 construction jobs and 100 permanent jobs. Under a project plan approved by PartnerTulsa, Meta funds all site costs including $25 million of public infrastructure, and pays the City of Tulsa $62.5 million in lieu of taxes under a 25-year Tax Incentive District in which it pays 15% of its property tax bill. No MW figure was given in the fetched coverage. Meta's newsroom post of 21 April 2026 announced it was breaking ground on the Tulsa data center, its first in Oklahoma, 28th in the US and 32nd globally, with about 1,000 construction jobs at peak and 100 operational jobs.
Google Project Dazzler data center campus (Franklin Furnace, Green Township)Franklin Furnace, OHn.a.under constructionGoogle is developing a data center campus known as Project Dazzler through Tilted Gate LLC on approximately 792 acres in Green Township, south of Franklin Furnace and east of the Ohio River along U.S. 52. Scioto County commissioners confirmed Google as the developer in early 2026, and Google held a community open house at Green High School on Thursday 14 May 2026. Ohio EPA issued comment letters on 28 and 29 May 2026 requesting more information on stormwater, floodplain and wetland impacts for the isolated wetlands permit and Section 401 water quality certification. On 30 June 2026 Ohio EPA approved construction stormwater general permit coverage for Project Dazzler Mass Excavation Part 2 at 2868 Gallia Pike, covering about 453 acres of disturbance; the Section 404 permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers was still pending at that time. County commissioners have since described construction as progressing quickly, with hundreds of workers on site. Scioto County commissioners approved a tax abatement giving a 75% property tax exemption on new improvements for 15 years, with payments in lieu of taxes beginning at $500,000 a year; the first phase is described as a roughly 500,000 sq ft data center. Tilted Gate LLC has applied to Ohio EPA for a permit to install 197 emergency generators and 32 cooling towers at the Gallia Pike site; Ohio EPA set a public meeting for 16 September 2026 and took comments through 18 September 2026. At the Scioto County commissioners' meeting of Thursday 1 October 2026 a resident described hundreds of workers and heavy equipment at the site, while a labor representative said about 20 workers were on site, possibly reaching 50 at peak; commissioners said construction is progressing quickly but gave no completion timeline.
Muskie Data CampusGrayson, KYn.a.1000announcedTeraWulf closed the acquisition of Industrial Equity Partners LLC, which controlled about 308 acres in Grayson, Kentucky, effective 22 May 2026 for phased development as an AI and HPC campus. On 1 October 2026 its subsidiary executed amended agreements with Kentucky Power increasing contracted capacity from 500 MW to 1 GW and advancing the second 500 MW phase to 2029; TeraWulf announced the change on 5 October 2026. No tenant has been announced. TeraWulf's 26 May 2026 release describes the campus as about 285 owned and controlled acres within the 1,000-acre EastPark Industrial Park in eastern Kentucky; the Form 8-K gives about 308 acres in Grayson. The map point uses Grayson, per the filing.
AWS data center campus near R.M. Schahfer Generating Station (Wheatfield)Wheatfield, IN$7.0Bunder constructionJasper County commissioners unanimously approved development agreements on Monday 15 June 2026 for a $7 billion Amazon Web Services campus on a 304-acre NIPSCO-owned site near the R.M. Schahfer Generating Station in Wheatfield. By late August 2026 initial site work was under way and a group of residents was raising $10,000 for legal counsel to oppose it. Kankakee County IL board members have since begun reviewing Indiana Department of Environmental Management permit documents for a nearby power plant that would use Kankakee River water for cooling; Amazon says the data centers will use outdoor air cooling about 98% of the year.
Microsoft Granger data center campus (former St. Joe Farm)Granger, INn.a.proposedMicrosoft bought nearly 930 acres of St. Joe Farm land in Granger, near Currant and Cleveland roads, for $77.5 million in June 2024, per county recorder documents. The project was delayed more than a year by a dispute over water and sewer service, which Mishawaka will provide. In February 2026 the county said the campus would have five to six buildings, several hundred acres of green zone and up to 300 full-time jobs, with vertical construction planned for 2026 and some buildings online by mid-2027. The St. Joseph County Council has weighed expanding a TIF district of about 4,000 acres to capture Microsoft's property taxes; the August 2026 vote was tabled.
Microsoft La Porte data center (Radius Industrial Park)La Porte, IN$1.0BannouncedMicrosoft said in June 2024 it would invest $1 billion to build a 245,000 sq ft data center in the Radius Industrial Park in La Porte, creating up to 200 jobs by the end of 2032. The City of La Porte and NIPSCO approved additional incentives. As of January 2025 the project was in the entitlement phase.
AWS Mexico (Central) RegionQueretaro, MX-Queretaro≥$5.0BoperatingAWS launched the AWS Mexico (Central) Region in Queretaro on Tuesday 14 January 2025 with three Availability Zones, first announced in February 2024, and said it plans to invest more than $5 billion in Mexico over 15 years. AWS estimates the build and operation will add about $10 billion to Mexico's GDP and support about 7,000 full-time equivalent jobs a year in its supply chain, and it set up a $300,000 AWS InCommunities Fund in Queretaro.

Financing transactions — hyperscalers

TimingPartiesInstrumentAmountDetailSources
Announced 28 October 2025OpenAI · Microsoftother$250BUnder the restructured partnership announced 28 October 2025, OpenAI contracted to purchase an incremental $250B of Azure services, and Microsoft no longer has a right of first refusal to be OpenAI's compute provider.
Announced 28 October 2025Microsoft · OpenAI Group PBCother~$135BMicrosoft holds an investment in OpenAI Group PBC valued at approximately $135 billion, representing roughly 27 percent on an as-converted diluted basis.
Through 2042, with options to extendAmazon · Talen Energyppan.a.Talen entered a power purchase agreement to provide Amazon with 1,920 megawatts of carbon-free nuclear power through 2042 from the Susquehanna plant in Pennsylvania, at full quantity, with options to extend and exploration of SMR technology. Amazon's quote in the release ties it to the $20B Pennsylvania commitment and 1,250 jobs; Talen owns approximately 10.7 GW of power infrastructure including 2.2 GW of nuclear.
Announced November 2025 alongside the $15B Indiana expansionAmazon · NIPSCOothern.a.Amazon's November 2025 Indiana announcement included an energy agreement with NIPSCO expected to provide approximately $1 billion in cost savings to Indiana residents and businesses over 15 years.
June 2026Alphabetequity raise$49.6BIn June 2026 Alphabet issued a combination of Class A stock, Class C stock and mandatory convertible preferred stock for aggregate net proceeds of $49.6 billion, to be used for general corporate purposes, including capital expenditures.
December 2025Alphabet · Intersectacquisition$4.8BAlphabet agreed to acquire data center company Intersect for $4.75 billion in cash and the assumption of debt in December 2025.
First SMR online by 2030; additional reactor deployments through 2035Google · Kairos Powerppan.a.Google's Kairos Power agreement will enable up to 500 MW of new 24/7 carbon-free power to U.S. electricity grids, with the initial phase intended to bring Kairos Power's first SMR online by 2030 and additional reactor deployments through 2035.
Scheduled to begin operations in 2030Google · Kairos Power · TVAppan.a.Kairos Power's Hermes 2 Plant in Oak Ridge, Tennessee will deliver up to 50 MW to the TVA grid that powers Google data centers in Tennessee and Alabama, with output increased from 28 MW to 50 MW and operations scheduled to begin in 2030; Hermes 2 is the first deployment under the Kairos-Google deal to enable 500 MW of advanced nuclear capacity by 2035.
Joint venture agreement entered 21 October 2025Meta · Blue Owl Capitaljv equity~$27.0BMeta and funds managed by Blue Owl Capital entered a joint venture to develop and own the Hyperion data center campus, with the parties committing pro rata shares of approximately $27 billion in total development costs. Blue Owl made a cash contribution of approximately $7 billion, Meta received a one-time distribution of approximately $3 billion, leases have a four-year initial term with extension options, and Meta provided a residual value guarantee for the first 16 years of operations.
Announced alongside the December 2024 Hyperion announcementEntergy · Metaother$3.0BUtility Entergy is planning three new natural gas plants near the Hyperion site at a cost of $3 billion. This record describes the original 2024 plan. For the 5 GW expansion Entergy has proposed seven additional generating units, which are before the Louisiana Public Service Commission; see the Hyperion site record. A second Entergy Louisiana agreement with Meta, filed with the Louisiana PSC on 25 March 2026, adds seven combined-cycle gas units of more than 5,200 MW plus batteries and 500 kV transmission, paid for by Meta (recorded separately as entergy-meta-evest-seven-ccgt-2026).
Announced July 2026Meta · BlackRockjv equity≥$14.0BMeta and BlackRock committed to fund pro rata shares of approximately $14 billion in total El Paso development costs. At financial close Meta contributes land and construction-in-progress assets valued at approximately $2.3 billion, BlackRock makes a cash contribution of approximately $4.9 billion, Meta receives a one-time distribution of approximately $1 billion to align the 80/20 ownership split, and Meta provides residual value guarantees with an aggregate threshold of approximately $13 billion that decreases over time.
Announced July 2026 with the BlackRock venture; bond pricing reported 24 July 2026 by the Financial TimesBlackRockdebt facility$12.5BA portion of BlackRock's investment in the El Paso venture will be funded with proceeds from a $12.5 billion debt financing. Reported by the Financial Times (via GuruFocus on Yahoo Finance) on 24 July 2026: the BlackRock-owned vehicle's roughly $12 billion bond priced at yields above 7%, about 0.4 percentage points more than the Hyperion bonds, with maturity in 2048, rated A+ by S&P and AA- by Fitch and KBRA, and secured by 20 years of Meta rent payments beginning in 2028 Second source on pricing: IBTimes UK reported that the single tranche of amortizing notes, issued through the BlackRock-linked holding company Sopaipilla Investor, priced on 27 July 2026 at about $12.5 billion and a yield of about 7.5%, about 2.875 percentage points over 10-year Treasuries, with orders near $20 billion. JPMorgan and Morgan Stanley led the sale; the notes mature in 2048, are secured by 20 years of Meta rent beginning in 2028, and were rated A+ by S&P and AA- by Fitch. Meta contributed land and partly built assets worth about $2.3 billion and took a $1 billion distribution
Fiscal 2026 (year ended 31 May 2026)Oraclesenior notes$42.7BOracle's FY2026 included $42.7 billion of net proceeds from senior notes issuance, funding its AI data center build-out with debt rather than operating cash flow alone.
Fiscal 2026 (year ended 31 May 2026)Oraclepreferred$5.0BOracle raised $5.0 billion of cash proceeds from Mandatory Convertible Preferred Stock in FY2026, alongside $4.9 billion of cash proceeds from the sale of investments, primarily in Ampere.
Closed; part of the Stargate joint venture programOracle · PIMCO · Related Digital Infrastructure · Blackstoneproject bond~$16.3BOracle closed a $16.3 billion financing for the Saline Township, Michigan campus, the largest single-facility technology debt package on record, with bonds carrying a 7.5% coupon and 19.5-year maturity, structured with six years of interest-only payments followed by 13 years of amortisation.
Assembled across Michigan, Texas, Wisconsin, and New MexicoOracledebt facility$72.0BThe Saline Township financing is part of $72 billion in total data centre partner debt Oracle has assembled across Michigan, Texas, Wisconsin, and New Mexico for the Stargate joint venture.
Over the next five yearsOracle · OpenAIother≥$300BOracle and OpenAI entered an agreement to develop 4.5 gigawatts of additional Stargate data center capacity in the U.S., taking the pair to over 5 gigawatts under development running over 2 million chips, under a partnership exceeding $300 billion over five years.
Announced January 2025SoftBank · OpenAI · Oracle · MGXjv equityn.a.SoftBank, OpenAI, Oracle, and MGX are the initial equity funders in the Stargate Project, with OpenAI and SoftBank each reported at a 40% stake.
Reported after the Abilene expansion was droppedMeta · Crusoeother~$150MWith Oracle and OpenAI dropping plans to expand the flagship Abilene Stargate site, Meta is in talks to pick up Crusoe capacity and reportedly paid a $150 million deposit to Crusoe to secure the site.
Per summary tableAnthropic · SpaceXothern.a.More than 300 MW with SpaceX, per the summary table.
Per summary table; first chips online in a few weeks per DCD headlinexAIdebt facility$12.0BxAI seeks $12bn in debt to fund the Colossus 2 data center, per DCD.
Per summary tablexAIequity raise~$20.0BA $20 billion raise reported for xAI, per the summary table.
Announced 17 August 2026NVIDIA · SB Energy · OpenAIguarantee~$105BNVIDIA guaranteed SB Energy's PORTS-Pike Technology Campus in Pike County, Ohio to exclusively host NVIDIA AI compute. SB Energy will build, own and operate the campus under a 20-year lease to OpenAI, which has contracted for approximately 8 IT-GW: an initial 4.25 IT-GW plus a 3.75 IT-GW option. Capacity is expected to come online in phases from 2028. SB Energy's registration statement further discloses that the transmission expansion project enabling full planned campus capacity could alone require over $6 billion in credit support, in the form of guaranties or letters of credit.
Announced 17 August 2026; terms restated in Form S-1/A Amendment No. 2 filed 21 September 2026NVIDIA · SB Energyequity raise$1.5BAlongside the PORTS-Pike guarantee, NVIDIA made a $1.5 billion equity investment in SB Energy, the SoftBank-backed developer that will build, own and operate the campus. SB Energy's Form S-1/A Amendment No. 2 (21 September 2026) states that NVIDIA has prepaid $1.5 billion under a forward contract to buy non-voting Class N common stock at 90% of the IPO price, settling on completion of the offering, and has separately committed to buy a further $1.5 billion of Class N stock in a concurrent private placement at the IPO price, contingent on and closing with the IPO. In total NVIDIA will invest $3.0 billion in connection with the offering. The amount on this record stays at $1.5 billion; the additional $1.5 billion is contingent on an IPO that was reported delayed on 21 September 2026.
First announced 20 March 2026 by the U.S. Department of Energy, SB Energy and AEP Ohio; restated with the NVIDIA and OpenAI announcements of 17 August 2026SB Energy · SoftBank · AEP Ohioother≥$4.2BSB Energy and SoftBank committed at least $4.2 billion to new regional grid infrastructure in partnership with AEP Ohio to serve the PORTS-Pike Technology Campus, building power sources supporting 10 GW of energy. At the March 2026 announcement AEP Ohio said power should begin flowing to the campus in 2029, and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick called the plan, including 10 GW of new generation of which 9.2 GW is natural gas, a $33 billion power project.
Announced 20 September 2024Microsoft · Constellation Energyppan.a.Constellation signed a 20-year power purchase agreement with Microsoft to launch the Crane Clean Energy Center, restarting Three Mile Island Unit 1 in Pennsylvania, which was retired for economic reasons in 2019. The restart adds approximately 835 MW of carbon-free capacity, with Microsoft purchasing energy to match consumption at its PJM data centers. Constellation's release cited 3,400 direct and indirect jobs and more than $3 billion in state and federal taxes, with a 2028 restart target; the unit was later reported as tracking ahead of that schedule. Constellation reported on 5 August 2026 that FERC granted a waiver allowing existing Capacity Interconnection Rights to transfer to the Crane Clean Energy Center and that the NRC approved Crane's fuel license amendment, keeping restart on track for 2027. In the same release Constellation said it signed an additional 920 MW of 15 to 20 year nuclear PPAs with investment-grade customers starting 2029 to 2032.
Announced 3 June 2025Meta · Constellation Energyppan.a.Constellation and Meta signed a 20-year agreement giving Meta 1,121 MW from the Clinton Clean Energy Center in Illinois beginning June 2027. The agreement supports relicensing and continued operation of the plant as the state zero-emission credit expires in 2027, without ratepayer support, and funds a 30 MW uprate. Constellation cited 1,100 preserved jobs and $13.5 million in annual tax revenue.
Announced 16 October 2024Amazon · X-energy · Citadel · Ares Management · NGP · University of Michiganequity raise~$500MAmazon's Climate Pledge Fund led an approximately $500 million Series C-1 round in SMR developer X-energy, alongside Citadel founder Ken Griffin, affiliates of Ares Management, NGP and the University of Michigan. Amazon and X-energy stated a target of bringing more than 5 GW of new power projects online across the United States by 2039.
Announced October 2024; scope update October 2025Amazon · Energy Northwest · X-energyothern.a.Amazon is funding Energy Northwest's Cascade Advanced Energy Facility outside Richland, Washington, near the Columbia Generating Station. The project begins as a four-unit, 320 MW installation of X-energy Xe-100 reactors at 80 MW per module, with an option to expand to 12 units and 960 MW. Utility Dive reported in October 2025 that the plan had moved to the full 12-unit configuration, with construction expected at the end of the decade and operations in the 2030s.
Signed Q2 2026; disclosed in Chevron's 31 July 2026 resultsChevron · Microsoftppan.a.Chevron signed a 20-year power purchase agreement with Microsoft to provide 2.67 gigawatts of behind-the-meter power for a Microsoft data center in West Texas, disclosed in Chevron's second-quarter 2026 earnings release filed with the SEC. Chevron had previously announced plans for a West Texas power complex for data center load ahead of a final investment decision. The project is named Kilby: the seller is Chevron subsidiary Energy Forge One LLC with Engine No. 1 as investment partner, about 2.67 GW phased, using GE Vernova and Solar Turbines equipment, with a final investment decision expected by the end of 2026 and first power in 2028
Form S-1 filed 1 September 2026; Amendment No. 2 filed 21 September 2026; delay reported 21 September 2026 (Reuters citing The New York Times), not confirmed by the companySB Energy, Inc. · SoftBank · OpenAI · NVIDIAequity raisen.a.SB Energy, Inc. filed a Form S-1 registration statement for an initial public offering of Class A common stock on 1 September 2026. The filing discloses a Data Center Contracted Portfolio of 8.8 GW-IT, comprising 0.8 GW-IT under construction (the Cosmos Technology Campus and Milam County Buildings 1 and 2) and 8.0 GW-IT contracted but not under construction (the PORTS-Pike Technology Campus), against 5.5 GWac of power that is operating, under construction or contracted, of which approximately 2.2 GWac of solar and battery storage was in service at 30 June 2026. No data center capacity is in operation. The company reports approximately $439 billion of backlog ($430 billion data center segment, $10 billion power segment) and approximately $178 billion of backlog-associated capex ($174 billion data center, $4 billion power), and states that approximately $357 billion of the backlog is expected to be recognized beyond 96 months. SoftBank and OpenAI are strategic investors and customers; NVIDIA is a strategic investor and residual value guarantor at PORTS-Pike and is expected to become a holder of Class N common stock in connection with the offering, subject to closing of a concurrent private placement and settlement of a prepaid forward contract. Underwriters named on the cover include J.P. Morgan, Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC, Morgan Stanley, Citigroup and Mizuho. The registration statement records total revenue of $138.7 million and a net loss attributable to SB Energy, Inc. of $3,208.9 million for the six months ended 30 June 2026. SB Energy filed Amendment No. 2 to its Form S-1 on 21 September 2026, still leaving the offering size and price range blank and keeping the proposed Nasdaq and Nasdaq Texas symbol SBE. The amendment states that NVIDIA will invest $3.0 billion in total in connection with the offering, through a $1.5 billion private placement of Class N shares at the offering price and $1.5 billion already prepaid under a forward contract at 90 percent of that price, adds a Citibank agented revolving credit agreement whose $473.0 million initial borrowing is to repay the Hickory Facilities, and says the company targets up to 90 percent debt financing of $8 billion to $9 billion of capital expenditure per building at the PORTS-Pike Technology Campus. Reuters reported on 21 September 2026, citing The New York Times, that SB Energy had delayed its IPO; the company has not confirmed a postponement in any SEC filing.
Issued May 2026, disclosed in the Form S-1 filed 1 September 2026SB Energy · SoftBanksenior notes$999MSB Energy issued $999.0 million aggregate principal amount of 8.875% senior secured notes due 2031 in May 2026 to finance the Cosmos Technology Campus in Travis County, Texas, a facility of approximately 50 MW of critical IT capacity. One of the company's parent entities provided a completion guaranty for the benefit of the noteholders and the tenant. The campus is leased for a 15-year initial term to an affiliate of SoftBank on a triple-net basis with 100% operating expense pass-through and rent set as a percentage return on total project cost with annual escalators and limited tenant termination rights; expected aggregate rent over the initial term is approximately $2.5 billion.
Priced 18 September 2026 (purchase agreement); closed 25 September 2026 (Form 8-K filed 25 September 2026)CleanSpark, Inc. · CSDC Finance I, LLC (issuer) · CSRE Properties Sandersville, LLC (guarantor)project bond$2.3BCleanSpark subsidiary CSDC Finance I, LLC priced a Rule 144A / Regulation S private offering of $2.276 billion of 7.875% senior secured notes due 2031 at 98.500% of principal on 18 September 2026, up from the $2.227 billion proposed on 17 September 2026. Net proceeds are to finance the remaining build-out cost of the Sandersville Facility, reimburse CleanSpark for prior equity contributions and fund debt service reserves. The notes are guaranteed by CSRE Properties Sandersville, LLC and secured by first-priority liens on substantially all assets of the issuer and guarantor and on the issuer's equity; CleanSpark provides a customary completion guarantee. Closing is expected on 25 September 2026. The facility is leased for 20 years to an unnamed high investment-grade global technology company (lease announced 14 July 2026). The 17 September 2026 investor presentation filed with the proposed-offering 8-K identifies the tenant as Anviran, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Meta, with Meta guaranteeing rent and operating expenses, and shows a development cost of about $11.9 million per IT MW. As of 24 September 2026 no closing 8-K had been filed; closing remained expected on 25 September 2026. CleanSpark's Form 8-K filed 25 September 2026 reports that CSDC Finance I, LLC completed the offering on 25 September 2026: $2,276.0 million of 7.875% Senior Secured Notes due 2031 issued at 98.500% of principal under an indenture dated 25 September 2026 with U.S. Bank Trust Company, National Association as trustee and collateral agent, guaranteed by CSRE Properties Sandersville, LLC. Net proceeds finance the remaining cost of the Sandersville, Georgia data center facility, reimburse CleanSpark for prior equity contributions and fund debt service reserves. CleanSpark provides a customary completion guarantee for the facility.
Priced 18 September 2026; closed 22 September 2026 with the initial purchasers' option exercised in fullCoreWeave, Inc.convertible~$4.2BCoreWeave priced an upsized private offering of $3.7 billion of 2.875% convertible senior notes due 1 April 2033 on 18 September 2026, up from the $3.0 billion proposed on 17 September 2026. The initial conversion price is about $97.85 per share, a premium of about 22.50% to the 17 September 2026 closing price. Net proceeds are about $3.64 billion (about $4.14 billion if the option is exercised in full); about $498.8 million funds capped call transactions with a cap price of $199.70 per share, and the remainder is for general corporate purposes. The notes are guaranteed by the subsidiaries that guarantee CoreWeave's existing senior and convertible notes. CoreWeave completed the offering on 22 September 2026 at $4.2 billion aggregate principal amount, including $500 million from the initial purchasers' option exercised in full, under an indenture dated 22 September 2026 with U.S. Bank Trust Company, National Association as trustee. Net proceeds were $4,137.0 million after initial purchasers' discounts and before estimated offering expenses. The capped call transactions, entered on 17 September 2026 with additional capped calls on 18 September 2026 after the option exercise, cost approximately $566.2 million, with a cap price of $199.70 per share; the remainder of the proceeds is for general corporate purposes. Interest is payable on 1 April and 1 October from 1 April 2027.
Announced 14 September 2026 (closed)Vantage Data Centers · Evercore (lead arranger) · Wells Fargo Securities (lead arranger) · About a dozen unnamed insurance and institutional investorsdebt facility$2.0BVantage Data Centers closed a $2 billion development-stage financing facility to support early-stage development across its North American platform. It is structured as a five-year revolving credit platform including extension options, with an initial collateral pool of three undisclosed development assets and the ability to add assets over time. Evercore and Wells Fargo Securities were lead arrangers, with participation from insurance and institutional investors. Vantage said it has closed more than $40 billion of capital in 2026.
Fiscal Q1 2027 (quarter ended 31 August 2026) results and call, 10 September 2026Oraclecapex guidance≥$90.0BOracle reiterated fiscal 2027 capital expenditure guidance of $90 billion to $95 billion, with not more than $70 billion of net cash capex after customer prepayments. Capital expenditures for the quarter ended 31 August 2026 were $28,499 million, versus $8,502 million a year earlier. Management said it delivered 850 MW of AI capacity since the end of fiscal Q4 and reported remaining performance obligations of $664 billion. The 10-Q shows about $19,909 million of net proceeds from common stock issued under an at-the-market program during the quarter.
Reported by Bloomberg News, 11 September 2026Microsoftcapex guidancen.a.Reported: Bloomberg News reported that Microsoft plans to build data center capacity to about 38 GW by 2032, from about 12 GW today, of which about 2 GW is AI-specific. The capacity would combine self-built and leased capacity, including from neoclouds. Microsoft has not publicly confirmed the 38 GW figure.
Reported by Bloomberg News, 4 September 2026Blue Owl Capitalothern.a.Reported: Blue Owl Capital is planning a publicly traded data center REIT seeded with about $6.5 billion of its own data center assets, raising capital through an IPO and later share sales to acquire and build data centers. Deliberations were described as ongoing and details could change, and Blue Owl declined to comment.
Reported by Bloomberg News, 7 August 2026Switch, Inc.equity raisen.a.Reported: Switch has confidentially filed for a US IPO that could come as soon as November 2026, according to Bloomberg News citing people familiar with the matter, working with Bank of America, Citigroup, Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan Chase and Morgan Stanley. Bloomberg reported a valuation approaching $50 billion including debt, while Reuters had earlier reported, citing sources, a raise of up to $10 billion at close to an $80 billion valuation including debt. Switch has not confirmed the filing.
Issued August 2026; legal opinion exhibit to Form 8-K dated 10 August 2026Alphabetsenior notes$25.0BAlphabet sold a ten-tranche US dollar bond with maturities from 2028 to 2066. Reuters, citing Bloomberg News, reported on 6 August 2026 that Alphabet was seeking up to $25 billion to fund AI infrastructure and capital expenditures. The issue followed Alphabet's raise of its 2026 capex guidance to $195 billion to $205 billion on 22 July 2026
Closed 9 July 2026Amazonsenior notes~$24.9BAmazon closed an eight-tranche US dollar notes offering on 9 July 2026, maturing between 2029 and 2066. Amazon later raised its 2026 capital expenditure guidance to about $220 billion on 30 July 2026, mostly for AWS data centers
Closed per Form 8-K filed 14 September 2026Amazonsenior notesn.a.Amazon closed a four-tranche British pound notes offering under its February 2026 shelf registration. The filing does not mention data centers, and use of proceeds is not stated in the 8-K
Disclosed on the Q2 2026 earnings call, 22 July 2026Tesladebt facility~$30.0BTesla told analysts it is securing debt facilities that could provide up to $30 billion of borrowing capacity to support robotaxis, Optimus, semiconductors, solar manufacturing and AI compute infrastructure. Q2 2026 capital expenditures were $5.789 billion, up 142% year over year, and 2026 capex guidance is more than $25 billion. The company reported negative free cash flow of $1.092 billion for the quarter
Groundbreaking announced 14 July 2026Google · Cypress Creek Energyppan.a.Google will invest in and buy energy and storage from the Steel River Energy Center in Mississippi County, Arkansas, developed with Cypress Creek Energy and described by Google as its largest solar and battery project. The full three-phase project is 2.5 GWdc of solar and 2.9 GWh of storage, with initial phases of 1.6 GWdc and 1.9 GWh and completion expected in 2029. Google tied the project to nearby AI data centers and a Greater West Memphis Energy Impact Fund
Announced 6 July 2026TeraWulf · Anthropiclease≥$19.0BTeraWulf signed a 20-year data center lease with Anthropic for approximately 401 MW of critical IT load at its Justified Data Campus in Hawesville, Kentucky. Initial capacity is expected in the second half of 2027 and full capacity by early 2028. TeraWulf said the lease is expected to be supported by an investment-grade credit
Announced 6 July 2026; cash consideration disclosed 5 August 2026; closing date not disclosedTeraWulf · Fluidstackacquisition~$530MTeraWulf agreed to sell its 50.1% interest in the Abernathy joint venture to an investor group led by Fluidstack. The Abernathy campus in Abernathy, Texas, has 168 MW of critical IT load
Announced 28 July 2026Core Scientific · AMDlease≥$14.0BCore Scientific and AMD announced an infrastructure partnership anchored by 15-year agreements for approximately 530 MW across five sites, with deployments beginning in 2027. AMD received market-priced warrants to purchase Core Scientific common stock, subject to commercial conditions. Individual site allocations were not given in the company releases Core Scientific's 8-K states that on 27 July 2026 it signed leases with AMD for 377 MW of critical IT at Pecos TX, Muskogee OK and Hunt County TX, and leases with an undisclosed neocloud for 152 MW at Auburn AL and Dalton Phase 3 GA, each for 15 years with three five-year options. AMD holds a reservation right to lease up to an additional 1,925 MW through 28 December 2028. AMD received a warrant for up to 30 million shares at $23.47 vesting at 12,222 shares per MW leased, with about 6.5 million shares vested at signing, and entered credit support agreements for the neocloud leases
Executed after 30 June 2026; announced 10 August 2026Riot Platforms · Undisclosed frontier AI lablease~$9.1BRiot signed a 20-year data center lease (through June 2048) with a leading frontier AI lab for 191 MW of critical IT capacity at its Rockdale campus. Delivery of 96 MW is expected by December 2027 and the full 191 MW by June 2028. Riot also disclosed a non-binding letter of intent for a proposed lease at its Corsicana facility. Bloomberg reported on 11 August 2026, citing people familiar with the matter, that the frontier AI lab tenant is Anthropic; Riot will build to the tenant's specifications and provide the building, power, cooling and operations while Anthropic supplies its own servers and chips. Riot has not named the tenant.
Credit agreement dated 10 August 2026Riot Platforms · Riot DC Logistics, LLC · Morgan Stanley Senior Funding, Inc.debt facility$573MRiot subsidiary Riot DC Logistics, LLC entered a $573.0 million senior secured delayed-draw term loan with Morgan Stanley Senior Funding as administrative agent to fund long-lead equipment for the 191 MW Rockdale data center. The loan is secured by substantially all assets of the credit parties with no recourse to Riot Platforms. Riot described it as interim financing while an investment-grade credit backstop is finalized
Agreement signed and closed 2 July 2026; announced 9 July 2026; First Amendment signed 21 September 2026 (Form 8-K filed 25 September 2026)MARA Holdings · Volt Texas, LLC · HIF USA LLCacquisition$600MMARA subsidiary Volt Texas acquired MAT 1177 LLC from HIF USA, which holds land rights of more than 1,200 acres in Matagorda County, Texas and a utility power agreement for 2,000 MW. HIF retains a minority interest upon execution of a lease with an HPC tenant. MARA plans to develop the site with Starwood Digital Ventures. On 21 September 2026 Volt Texas, HIF USA and MARA USA Corporation signed a First Amendment to the purchase agreement. Volt Texas posted a $100.0 million security deposit with the electric utility for the site's power capacity, which it may elect to withdraw. The amendment restructures the regulatory milestone payments into two installments, due on successful conclusion of an audit of the data center project by Texas regulatory authorities and on the buyer's election to proceed after the interconnection study, and raises the maximum payments tied to the site being authorized to receive power. The maximum aggregate purchase price stays at $600 million. The return or reconveyance provisions are removed; if certain trigger events tied to the audit or a decision not to proceed occur, the parties will market the project to a third party, subject to a right of first offer for HIF.
Entered 4 August 2026; disclosed 6 August 2026MARA Holdings · Coinbase · Two Primedebt facility$600MMARA added $600 million of bitcoin-backed borrowing from Coinbase and Two Prime. Proceeds are intended to fund part of the cash consideration for the pending Long Ridge acquisition and assumption of existing indebtedness The facilities were initially collateralized by 18,750 bitcoin
Announced 14 July 2026CleanSpark · Anviran, LLC (Meta subsidiary) · Meta Platforms (guarantor)lease≥$6.6BCleanSpark signed a 20-year triple-net lease for 175 MW of critical IT load at Sandersville, Georgia, with deliveries expected to begin in Q4 2027. The tenant also executed a letter of intent and exclusivity arrangement covering CleanSpark's Texas portfolio of 718 acres and up to 885 MW. CleanSpark estimated landlord project costs of $10 million to $12 million per MW On 17 September 2026 CleanSpark disclosed the tenant as Anviran, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Meta, with Meta guaranteeing rent and operating expenses. The investor presentation shows development cost of about $11.9 million per IT MW, rent commencing 30 November 2027 and about $330 million of average annual NOI, and CleanSpark proposed a $2.227 billion senior secured notes offering to fund the remaining Sandersville build. The 17 September 2026 investor presentation states a 3.0% annual rent escalator, rent commencement on 30 November 2027 and one 12-month option in addition to the two five-year extensions
Announced 20 July 2026Hut 8 · Undisclosed high-investment-grade tenantlease~$9.8BHut 8 signed a second 15-year lease for 352 MW of IT capacity at Beacon Point, doubling the tenant's contracted capacity to 704 MW and fully commercializing the 1,000 MW campus. The initial Phase 2 data hall is expected in Q2 2028. Hut 8 reported expected average annual NOI of $655 million for the second lease
Announced 20 July 2026IREN · Undisclosed AI developersother$2.8BIREN reported $2.8 billion of new multi-year contracts with AI developers and raised its year-end 2026 AI Cloud annualized run-rate revenue target from $3.7 billion to over $4 billion. Customer prepayments cover approximately 45% of GPU capex on recent contracts. This is a customer contract total, distinct from the $2.8 billion GPU financing already recorded
Completed 4 August 2026IREN · Mirantisacquisition~$625MIREN completed its acquisition of Mirantis, a cloud software company serving more than 1,500 enterprise customers, to add orchestration, monitoring and support software to its AI Cloud platform
Announced 30 July 2026Crusoe · Aalo Atomicsothern.a.Crusoe and Aalo Atomics formed a partnership to deploy a Crusoe Spark modular data center powered by an Aalo reactor at Idaho National Laboratory in 2027, with Aalo Pods and a 50 MWe XMR power plant planned by the end of 2029
Closed 10 August 2026CoreWeave · JPMorgan · MUFGdebt facility≥$2.6BCoreWeave closed its DDTL 5.5 facility with JPMorgan and MUFG as joint lead arrangers and bookrunners. Proceeds support purchase and deployment of GPU infrastructure dedicated to customer contracts averaging about three years, secured by those contracts
Equity distribution agreement disclosed 17 September 2026CoreWeave · Deutsche Bank Securities · Goldman Sachs · J.P. Morgan Securitiesequity raisen.a.CoreWeave entered an equity distribution agreement with ten sales agents for up to 35 million shares, with commissions of up to 2.0%. It may also enter collared forward sales with Deutsche Bank AG, Goldman Sachs Bank USA, Morgan Stanley and Citibank. Proceeds are for general corporate purposes including debt repayment and migration toward an investment-grade credit profile
Disclosed 11 August 2026 for early Q3 2026CoreWeaveother≥$25.0BCoreWeave reported more than $25 billion of net new customer commitments in the early weeks of Q3 2026 and total contracted power of approximately 4.2 GW as of 11 August 2026. Individual customers and contract values were not disclosed
Announced 17 July 2026Nebius Group · MUFG · ABN AMRO · Bank of America · Deutsche Bank · HSBCdebt facility$775MNebius raised its first secured debt, backed by deployed GPU infrastructure and contracted cash flows from an agreement with an investment-grade customer. MUFG was structuring agent and sole bookrunner; Citi, Credit Agricole CIB, ING and Morgan Stanley were senior lead arrangers, with Goldman Sachs also participating
Closed 31 August 2026Nscale · J.P. Morgan · Goldman Sachsdebt facility$1.9BNscale closed a delayed draw term loan supporting approximately 200 MW of IT load at its Ward County, Texas deployment of NVIDIA GB300 and VR200 systems. J.P. Morgan was lead left arranger. The release did not name the offtaker
Closed 31 August 2026Nscale · Goldman Sachs · J.P. Morgandebt facility$1.2BNscale closed a delayed draw term loan for its deployment at a 96-acre colocation site in Madison, North Carolina with up to 40 MW of IT load. Goldman Sachs was lead left arranger
Announced 17 August 2026HIVE Digital Technologies · BUZZ HPC · Undisclosed investment-grade enterprise customer · Bell AI Fabricother≥$350MHIVE's BUZZ HPC signed a five-year AI cloud services agreement to deploy 2,016 NVIDIA GB300 NVL72 GPUs at the Bell AI Fabric facility in Merritt, British Columbia. The contract adds $70 million of annualized revenue
Reported by The Wall Street Journal 10 September 2026; talks, not signedFluidstack · US Department of Defense Office of Strategic Capitaldebt facility~$5.0BThe Pentagon's Office of Strategic Capital was reported to be in talks to lend about $5 billion to Fluidstack to strengthen US manufacturing capacity and supply chains for data center components. Neither party commented on the report
Announced 18 August 2026Flexential · GI Partners · Morgan Stanley Infrastructure Partners · TD Securities · RBC Capital Markets · J.P. Morgan · Goldman Sachs · ING · SMBC · Bank of America · KeyBanc · Flagstar · Citibank · Investecdebt facility$800MFlexential closed an $800 million credit facility to fund more than 130 MW of new capacity. Named projects are a 36 MW facility in Atlanta-Douglasville, Georgia, 36 MW in Portland-Hillsboro, Oregon, 22.5 MW in Denver-Parker, Colorado, and a 4.5 MW expansion in Atlanta-Norcross, Georgia. GI Partners and MSIP remain the equity sponsors
Reported 4 August 2026STACK Infrastructure · Blue Owl Capital · RACM (seller) · Greysteel (broker)acquisition~$66MBlue Owl's STACK Infrastructure bought the 71-acre Culpeper Technology Park at 15140 Keyser Road, Culpeper, Virginia, from RACM. The site sits in the county-designated Culpeper Tech Zone with by-right data center zoning. Planned MW was not disclosed
Announced 28 July 2026Aligned Data Centersabs~$1.2BAligned completed a $1.183 billion securitization, its first issuance since 2023, one week after the AIP, MGX and GIP acquisition closed. Collateral is four Aligned campuses with 14 customers, and more than 90% of annualized adjusted base rent comes from investment-grade counterparties. Proceeds fund the development pipeline, refinance upcoming maturities and fund reserve accounts
Marketed 17 August 2026, priced 18 August 2026QTS Realty Trust · Blackstone · QTS Fayetteville I DC1-2, LLC · Microsoft (tenant) · Citigroup · Goldman Sachs · JPMorgan · Morgan Stanleyproject bond≥$3.9BQTS sold investment-grade five-year secured notes, known as Project Odyssey, through a bankruptcy-remote SPV that owns two newly built hyperscale buildings with more than 300 MW at its Fayetteville, Georgia campus leased to Microsoft. Crypto Briefing reports Baa3 from Moody's and BBB- from Fitch. Proceeds fund construction and operation plus distributions to QTS unit QualityTech Resolution of the size conflict: MT Newswires (citing Bloomberg) put the financing at about $3.9 billion, around $1 billion more than initially floated, and BigGo reported a completed $3.9 billion issue at a 7.228% final yield with more than $8 billion of orders. The Investing.com wording that the deal was raised by about $1 billion refers to the increase to $3.9 billion, not to a $4.9 billion final size
Upsized loan reported 17 July 2026; KBRA rating 27 July 2026QTS Realty Trust · Blackstone · QTS Thunder Managing Issuer, LLC · JPMorgan · Morgan Stanley · Wells Fargo · KBRAdebt facility≥$3.2BQTS raised $3.25 billion of senior secured term loans under its master indenture structure, adding five newly built facilities totaling 214.5 MW in Dallas, Phoenix and Richmond. The pool now covers 12 contracted data centers totaling 493.5 MW in Richmond, Phoenix, Dallas, New Albany and Manassas with total senior secured debt of about $7.6 billion. Proceeds repay construction facilities and fund a debt service reserve
Priced 15 July 2026; closed 17 July 2026Csquare, Inc. · Brookfield · Morgan Stanley · TD Securities · Wells Fargo Securities · BofA Securities · BMO Capital Markets · Scotiabankequity raise~$1.1BBrookfield-backed Csquare priced its NYSE IPO under ticker CSQR. The company runs carrier-neutral colocation and interconnection data centers across U.S., Canadian and U.K. markets. Net proceeds go to repaying debt and offering costs The sale of 50,000,000 shares closed on 17 July 2026 with net proceeds of $1,010.0 million after underwriting discounts, per the company 8-K
Announced 20 July 2026CyrusOne · KKR · GIP · Kirkland & Ellis (counsel)cmbs$1.2BKirkland advised CyrusOne on a $1.25 billion SASB CMBS financing secured by a portfolio of six data centers in North Carolina, Ohio and Texas. Use of proceeds and property MW were not disclosed. This is a separate transaction from record cyrusone-cmbs-1050, which Kirkland announced on 20 May 2026 as a $1.05 billion loan secured by one property near Dallas (the DFW3 and DFW4 buildings in Allen, Texas, per Bisnow)
Reported by Private Equity Wire 11 August 2026CyrusOne · KKR · Global Infrastructure Partners · Goldman Sachs · Morgan Stanleyothern.a.KKR and GIP are preparing a possible U.S. IPO of CyrusOne as early as 2027 and have met banks including Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley. Plans are at an early stage
Reported by Bloomberg 2 July 2026Switch · Andreessen Horowitz · DigitalBridge · Goldman Sachs · JPMorgan Chaseequity raisen.a.Switch launched a private funding round led by Andreessen Horowitz. The report puts equity value at about $19 billion before the new money and a valuation approaching $50 billion including debt Switch hired JPMorgan Chase and Goldman Sachs to run the fundraise, per the Bloomberg report as relayed by Benzinga
Announced 19 August 2026Nexus Data Centers · Eagle Point Credit Management · Morgan Stanley · Google · Anthropic (anchor tenant) · Transition Equity Partnersdebt facility~$1.3BEagle Point led a $1.3 billion HoldCo loan for Nexus Data Centers' 2,900-acre campus in Hubbard, Texas, completing the first-phase capital structure and taking the project to final investment decision. The campus has its own gas-fired generation, and Anthropic is the expected anchor tenant. Nexus is backed by Transition Equity Partners
Reported by Reuters 16 September 2026, citing a sourceCrux AI · Blackstone · Google · Goldman Sachs · Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corp · Barclays · BNP Paribas · Bank of Nova Scotiadebt facility$22.0BBanks provided a $22 billion loan to Crux AI, the Blackstone and Google cloud venture, to buy Google TPUs. Blackstone provided $5 billion of initial equity, recorded as blackstone-google-tpu-jv-2026. The venture plans to bring its first 500 MW online in 2027
Priced 24 July 2026 per IFR headlineCompass Datacentersabs$413MCompass Datacenters priced a green $413 million ABS under series CMDC 2026-2. Only the headline could be read. Collateral, ratings and bookrunners were not visible in the fetched page
Announced 14 September 2026; expected to close Q4 2026Brookfield Asset Management · American Real Estate Partners (AREP) · Rothschild & Co (AREP adviser)acquisitionn.a.Brookfield affiliates agreed to buy a minority interest in AREP, a Washington DC-area investor with more than $30 billion deployed or committed. AREP has 32 million square feet of hyperscale data centers in development across the United States
Reported by Bloomberg 27 July 2026TPG · Netrality Data Centers · Macquarie (current backer)acquisitionn.a.TPG is in exclusive talks to buy Macquarie-backed Netrality Data Centers. The parties did not comment
Announced 8 July 2026; follow-on commitment announced Monday 5 October 2026 (GlobeNewswire)Ares Secondaries funds · Sabey Data Center Properties · Sabey Corporation · National Real Estate Advisors · Evercore · Citizens Capital Markets & Advisoryacquisition≥$500MAres Secondaries funds made a minority equity investment in Sabey Data Center Properties, jointly owned by Sabey Corporation and National Real Estate Advisors. The platform has six energized campuses, 251 MW of operating capacity including 76 MW of built powered shell, and over 4 million square feet. On 5 October 2026 Sabey Corporation and National Real Estate Advisors announced that Ares Secondaries funds expanded their investment in Sabey Data Center Properties, bringing Ares' total investment to more than $500 million. SDCP's campuses now total 275 MW, with an expansion pipeline expected to reach about 737 MW by 2033.
Approved 16 September 2026Sabey Corporation · Indianapolis Metropolitan Development Commissionincentive$240MThe Indianapolis Metropolitan Development Commission approved $240 million in tax breaks for Sabey's $4 billion data center in Decatur Township. Sabey is set to become the city's second-largest taxpayer. One commissioner opposed
Announced 15 July 2026ACS Group · Global Infrastructure Partners · BlackRock · Coraveljvn.a.ACS and GIP launched Coravel as a 50-50 data center platform with a 1.7 GW development portfolio (1.2 GW IT) across Europe, the United States and Australia. Its first long-term hyperscaler agreement covers about 140 MW across three facilities on a Dallas-Fort Worth campus, with rights to about 100 MW more and service dates through 2028
Announced 3 August 2026Yondr Group · Cerberus Capital Managementacquisitionn.a.Cerberus-managed funds and Yondr acquired 40 acres in Manassas, Virginia, for a 72 MW data center. Yondr will develop, own and operate the site, and operations are expected by 2029
Buyer reported 21 August 2026; sale closed 2 September 2026Digital Realty · Allimac 2023 LLC · Hawthorne Race Course (seller) · Hilco Real Estateacquisition$90MDigital Realty is the buyer, through Allimac 2023 LLC, of the 119-acre Hawthorne Race Course at 3501 South Laramie Avenue in Stickney, Illinois. The site is zoned heavy industrial, and a data center has not yet been formally proposed The $90 million sale closed on 2 September 2026. Digital Realty has not publicly confirmed it is behind Allimac
Reported 3 September 2026Digital Realty · Brennan Investment Group (seller)acquisition$82MDigital Realty bought the 40-acre Rolling Meadows Atrium Campus at 3800 Golf Road, Rolling Meadows, Illinois, and plans to convert it to data center use. Planned MW was not disclosed
Presale reported 8 July 2026; issuance announced 29 July 2026Cloud Capital · Realty Income · Unnamed global institutional investor · Guggenheim Securities · Deutsche Bank Securities · Morgan Stanley · Fitch · Morningstar DBRS · KBRA · S&P Global Ratingsabs$520MCloud Capital launched a new data center ABS master trust with a $520 million AAA issuance backed by a stabilized 80 MW hyperscale data center in Northern Virginia. The core joint venture includes Realty Income, linked to existing record realty-income-cloud-capital-nova-jv. ASR names the Ashburn deal Lohrasp Enterprise II 2026-1 with a single AA- tenant on a 15-year triple-net lease. Treated as the same transaction because amount, advisor and ratings match
Reported 10 August 2026Digital Realty · City of De Sotoincentiven.a.Digital Realty applied to use an existing 2021 tax increment financing district at Ad Astra Enterprise Park in De Soto, Kansas, for a nine-building campus on about 1,400 acres. Phase 1 construction is expected in 2027 to 2028 and Phase 2 in 2028 to 2031
Approved 11 August 2026Douglas County Board of County Commissioners · Flexentialincentive≥$19MDouglas County commissioners unanimously approved the rebate for Flexential's 22.5 MW, roughly $205 million Parker data center. The rebate covers equipment, machinery and certain leasehold improvements, not land and buildings
Disclosed on NRG's 4 August 2026 earnings call; reported 6 August 2026NRG Energy · Unnamed global cloud and AI hyperscalerother~$3.2BNRG said it is aligned on principal commercial terms with an unnamed global cloud and AI hyperscaler to develop a 1.2 GW combined-cycle gas plant in Texas, the initial phase of a potential 2.4 GW deal, targeting delivery in late 2029. Reported terms include a 15-year minimum term with a customer parent guarantee and more than 95% of cash flow from capacity payments. Utility Dive noted the deal is pending as Texas pauses data center interconnections
Disclosed with Southern Company second-quarter 2026 results; reported 17 and 18 August 2026OpenAI · Georgia Power · Southern Companytariff agreementn.a.Southern Company disclosed a 25-year agreement for Georgia Power to serve an OpenAI data center in Effingham County near Savannah, Georgia, of about 3.2 GW, with up to 1 GW available as flexible demand response, described as a first for Southern with a data center customer. Service is expected to begin in phases in 2028. Southern reported more than 17 GW of contracted large load by the mid-2030s Georgia Power announced on 26 August 2026 that its contract to serve OpenAI in Effingham County, filed with the Georgia PSC in July and covering 3,200 MW of new demand with up to 1,000 MW of flexible demand response, was approved in the PSC regulatory process; the utility said OpenAI will pay the full cost of the infrastructure needed to serve it.
Ownership disclosed through building permits filed August 2026; reported 11 August 2026Amazon · Pacifico Energyacquisitionn.a.Amazon confirmed ownership of the GW Ranch site in Pecos County, Texas, acquired from Pacifico Energy, when it filed building permits for three 189,000 sq ft data center buildings. Permits show 35 gas turbines capable of up to 7.65 GW, with up to 750 MW of solar and 1.8 GW of battery storage planned. Inside Climate News reported the project holds the largest air permit issued in the country this year, allowing about 33 million tons per year of emissions Amazon confirmed it is investing in a natural gas power plant to supply its planned Pecos County data center project, which The New York Times reported on 8 August 2026 could become the largest single source of climate pollution in the United States; Ars Technica described it as Amazon's first big investment in an off-grid data center.
Loan closed 8 September 2026US Department of Energy (Office of Energy Dominance Financing) · NextEra Energy · Googledoe loan$1.9BDOE closed a loan of up to $1.9 billion to NextEra Energy to restart the 615 MW Duane Arnold Energy Center in Linn County, Iowa, pending NRC licensing approvals. NextEra targets restart no later than the first quarter of 2029 and said the Iowa Utilities Commission issued a construction and operation certificate in June 2026. Neither DOE nor NextEra mentioned Google in the loan releases; mgrid.org reported that Google holds a 25-year agreement for the plant's output for its cloud and AI infrastructure
Loan closed 8 July 2026US Department of Energy (Office of Energy Dominance Financing) · AEP Texasdoe loan$3.3BDOE closed a loan of up to $3.26 billion to AEP Texas to finance about 100 transmission projects, including roughly 2,800 miles of rebuilt, reconductored or new lines. AEP Texas has signed letters of agreement supporting up to 41 GW of potential new load through 2030, and the upgrades are aimed at demand from data centers, advanced manufacturing and Permian Basin oil and gas development
Announced 31 August 2026One Nuclear Energy · Unnamed Louisiana landowner groupothern.a.One Nuclear Energy signed a binding letter of intent with a Louisiana landowner group for Project Cayman, a 2.88 GW gas-fired plant with a 700 MW / 2.88 GWh battery system for a data center campus in Ascension Parish near the RiverPlex MegaPark. One Nuclear's business combination with Hennessy Capital Investment Corp. VII is expected to close by year-end. ONE Nuclear's business combination with Hennessy Capital Investment Corp. VII closed on 23 September 2026; the combined company was renamed ONE Nuclear Energy Inc. and its common stock was expected to begin trading on Nasdaq under the symbol ONEN on 24 September 2026. In connection with the closing, holders of 13,809,029 Class A shares redeemed them for approximately $10.61 per share, an aggregate of approximately $146.5 million, leaving approximately $2.2 million in the trust account after redemptions and prepayments under a forward purchase agreement and before expenses. On 22 September 2026 the parties signed a prepaid forward purchase agreement with New Circle Capital Solutions LP covering up to 5,000,000 shares.
Reported 13 August 2026Blue Energy · GE Vernova Hitachi Nuclear Energyothern.a.Blue Energy and GE Vernova Hitachi signed an agreement to advance a 2.5 GW gas-plus-nuclear project in Victoria, Texas, to engineering, licensing and safety analysis. Phase 1 would add about 1 GW from two 7HA.02 gas turbines in 2030 and Phase 2 about 1.5 GW from up to five BWRX-300 SMRs in 2032, serving a nearby unnamed data center under a gas bridge financing model. Blue Energy submitted the first part of its NRC construction permit application for the first nuclear unit at the Port of Victoria site late on 15 September 2026 and announced it on 16 September 2026, including a request for limited construction activities and approval to build the gas-fired portion and shared balance of plant first, plus a 300-page environmental report
Announced 10 September 2026TAR (Transformative American Resources) · Spark Capitalother~$120MAustin-based TAR raised a $120 million Series A at a $1 billion post-money valuation to build off-grid solar and battery power systems for data centers, with gas backup for emergencies, and is executing a utility-scale deployment with one of the largest neoclouds in West Texas
Groundbreaking reported 27 July 2026Energy Vault · Crusoe · City of Snyderothern.a.Energy Vault broke ground on a battery-backed AI campus in Snyder, Texas, buying 10 Crusoe Spark modular data centers that Crusoe will lease back as powered shell. Phase 1 is 8 MW targeting commercial operation in the first quarter of 2027, with expansion potential to 25 MW In its Q2 2026 results on 11 August 2026 Energy Vault stated the Phase 1 commercial operation target as the first half of 2027
FERC approval 13 August 2026; acquisition completed 8 September 2026PowerTransitions · Partners Group · Castleton Commodities Internationalacquisitionn.a.FERC approved PowerTransitions' purchase of the 1,242 MW Roseton gas- and oil-fired plant in Newburgh, New York, from a Castleton Commodities subsidiary. PowerTransitions, owned by Partners Group, plans to develop an energy campus serving data centers and other energy-intensive industries at the site PowerTransitions announced on 8 September 2026 that it had completed the acquisition, lifting its operating fleet to about 1.8 GW across 8 plants
Final investment decision and EPC award announced 2 July 2026; in service expected in the second half of 2030Greenlight Electricity Centre Limited Partnership (Pembina Pipeline, Morgan Stanley Infrastructure Partners, Kineticor) · Aecon Group · Tecnicas Reunidas · Siemens Energyothern.a.A fixed-price EPC contract and Siemens Energy equipment and service agreements were reported for the Greenlight Electricity Centre in Sturgeon County, Alberta, a combined-cycle gas plant of 932 MW initially, expandable to 1,864 MW of permitted capacity, intended to serve data center development. About 85% of project costs are reported as secured under fixed-price agreements Pembina, Morgan Stanley Infrastructure Partners and Kineticor took a positive final investment decision, and the plant will supply the co-located data centre customer behind the meter under a long-term tolling agreement
Reported 30 July 2026 by the Wall Street Journal, confirmed by CNBC; plan to sell the debt into the bond market reported 4 to 5 August 2026Nexus Data Centers · Morgan Stanley · Google · Anthropicconstruction loan~$15.0BA Morgan Stanley-led bank group is lending about $15 billion to Nexus Data Centers for the Hubbard, Texas campus leased to Anthropic, with Google guaranteeing Anthropic's lease and power-payment obligations in exchange for a reported stake of about 20% in the project. DigitalToday, citing Cryptopolitan, reported the lenders planned to sell the debt into the bond market once funded, and Bloomberg reported Nexus may refinance the bank debt with high-yield bonds later in 2026 Eagle Point said on 19 August 2026 that its HoldCo loan completed the capital structure for the first Hubbard phase and allowed Nexus to reach final investment decision, and Bloomberg reported the $1.3 billion mezzanine piece sits within a roughly $16 billion package
Approved by the TVA Board of Directors 20 August 2026Tennessee Valley Authority · MZX Tech LLC (SpaceXAI) · Memphis Light, Gas and Waterpower supply agreementn.a.The TVA board approved a service agreement for a load of more than 100 MW for MZX Tech LLC, the SpaceXAI affiliate that owns the Colossus 2 site on Tulane Road in Memphis and the Stanton Road power plant in Southaven. MZX Tech becomes a direct TVA customer under a new data center rate that the board also passed, a 10% increase for data centers above 5 MW, and SpaceXAI will build the needed transmission lines and transformers. At the meeting a SpaceXAI executive said the company had invested over $60 billion in its data center expansion
Reported by the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette on 31 August 2026 from records obtained under the Arkansas FOIA; special rate contract approved by the Arkansas PSC in December 2025Google · Entergy Arkansasutility special rate contract≥$716MRecords reported by the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette show Google will pay Entergy Arkansas $526 million up front toward Cypress Solar, a 600 MW solar and 350 MW battery facility in Jefferson County that supports the grid serving Google's $4 billion West Memphis data center, plus $190 million for transmission upgrades. The terms sit within a special rate contract the Arkansas Public Service Commission approved in December 2025, and Entergy sought to stop further publication of the records. Entergy later characterized the full 20-year value at about $2.103 billion
Reported by The New York Times on 17 July 2026; CNBC confirmed very preliminary talks the same dayMeta · Anthropiccompute lease~$10.0BAnthropic held talks to lease AI computing capacity from Meta in a potential deal worth about $10 billion, according to The New York Times. A person familiar with the matter told CNBC the talks were very preliminary. The talks followed Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg's statement in May 2026 that Meta was considering entering the cloud computing business
Announced 27 August 2026ChronoScale Corporation · Microsoftgpu services agreementn.a.ChronoScale announced plans with Microsoft for a 50 MW AI compute deployment in North America using NVIDIA GB300 NVL72 systems with liquid cooling. The release named no site and disclosed no financing, and the 50 MW is a planned target rather than installed capacity
Reported by The Wall Street Journal on 22 July 2026OpenAIcapex guidance~$750BOpenAI raised its projected computing infrastructure spending to about $750 billion through 2030, reflecting new cloud provider agreements, according to a person with knowledge of the projections cited by The Wall Street Journal. The report came the day OpenAI announced Project Camellia, a $20 billion campus in Effingham County, Georgia with 3.2 GW contracted from Georgia Power between 2028 and 2032 and the first data center OpenAI will lead in designing and developing itself, and OpenAI hired former xAI executive Brent Mayo to lead data center build and delivery. The Journal reported the push followed slower-than-expected progress on Stargate
Reported 23 August 2026; 20-year contract starting November 2026Google · Lincoln Electric System · NextEra Energyppan.a.Lincoln Electric System and Google agreed a 20-year contract under which up to 202 MW of capacity from NextEra's 304 MW Panama Energy Center near Hallam, Nebraska, is sold to Google and then to LES to support resource adequacy for Google's data center north of Lincoln, operating since fall 2025. Google is also paying for 423 MW of wind energy from Bluestem Wind and Great Western Wind to support the new load. The City of Lincoln said it is not seeking more data centers for the foreseeable future
Announced 16 September 2026Generac Holdings · Amazonsupply agreement~$8.0BGenerac signed a long-term agreement to supply backup power generators for Amazon data centers worth up to $8 billion and issued warrants to an Amazon subsidiary that vest in stages as Amazon's purchase payments accrue, with full vesting at $8 billion of payments. 307,954 warrant shares became exercisable at signing and the warrants run through 16 September 2033
Announced 22 July 2026AMD · Anthropichardware supply and equity$5.0BAMD and Anthropic announced a partnership for Anthropic to deploy up to 2 GW of AMD Instinct MI450 Series GPUs in AMD Helios rack-scale systems, with the first gigawatt beginning deployment in the first half of 2027. The deal includes a multi-year engineering collaboration using Claude to optimize AMD software, and no deployment sites were named
Announced 8 July 2026Capital Power Corporation · Metaenergy supply agreementn.a.Capital Power entered a long-term energy supply agreement of more than 10 years for 250 MW of capacity and energy to support Meta's data center in Sturgeon County, Alberta, with the project load expected in service in the second half of 2028. The agreement includes capacity and energy payments backed by Capital Power's Alberta fleet and preserves options at its Genesee site
Credit agreement dated 25 August 2026; announced 27 August 2026Core Scientific · JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. · Morgan Stanley Senior Funding, Inc. · Goldman Sachs · TD Securities (USA) LLCrevolving credit facility and letter of credit facility$600MCore Scientific entered into $600 million of committed senior secured credit facilities with JPMorgan as administrative and collateral agent and Morgan Stanley as lead left arranger. Letters of credit may provide credit support for project obligations under utility agreements. The company said the facilities are expected to release approximately $300 million of restricted cash. Maturity is the third anniversary of closing, extendable to the fourth at the company's election
Completed 14 August 2026Core Scientific · Polaris DS LLCacquisition~$444MCore Scientific completed its acquisition of Polaris DS LLC, securing approximately 440 MW of in-service gross grid-connected power used by Polaris under electric service agreements with Oklahoma Gas & Electric. The company reiterated its plan to scale its Muskogee campus to approximately 1.5 GW of gross power, or approximately 1.0 GW of leasable power. It said the next approximately 82 MW at Muskogee is on track for delivery to its customer beginning in the second half of 2027
Reported 21 August 2026. Reported by Newcomer, based on a Poolside investor letter, and relayed by The Next WebNvidia · Poolsidetechnology license and acqui-hire~$6.0BNvidia agreed to pay Poolside $6 billion to license the software Poolside used to build AI models and to offer jobs to 109 of its staff, according to a letter Poolside sent investors. Poolside intends to distribute the $6 billion to investors by the end of 2027 and said the arrangement is not an acquisition. The Next Web described it as the third deal Nvidia has structured this way
Announced 11 August 2026IBM · Together AI · Nvidiainfrastructure capacity agreement$240MIBM agreed to deploy a large cluster of Nvidia HGX B300 systems for Together AI under a $240 million infrastructure deal. The hardware is expected to become available through IBM Cloud in the first half of 2027. Together AI will use the cluster to host workloads for customers of its public cloud
Announced 17 August 2026Groq · Disruptive · Nvidiaequity$350MGroq raised $350 million to fund its pivot from AI chip design to operating a cloud of Nvidia systems, following a $650 million round in June 2026. Groq said it operates 13 data centers across North America, Europe, the Middle East and Asia Pacific and intends to scale from 54 MW to more than 200 MW in 2027
Announced 14 July 2026Nebius Group · Reflectioncompute capacity agreement≥$1.0BAI startup Reflection signed a deal worth more than $1 billion to secure computing capacity from Nebius, including access to Nvidia's latest chips. The agreement builds on Reflection's June 2026 compute agreement with SpaceX. Contract term and data center locations were not disclosed
Announced 16 September 2026Blockfusion USA, Inc. · North East Data, LLC · CoreWeavelease≥$2.8BBlockfusion's subsidiary North East Data, LLC entered a definitive 15-year anchor lease with two five-year renewal options, plus a companion expansion agreement, with CoreWeave at its Niagara Falls, New York campus. The agreements convert a non-binding letter of intent announced 30 June 2026. Blockfusion is pursuing a business combination with Blue Acquisition Corp. that would list the combined company on Nasdaq. Blue Acquisition Corp.'s Form 8-K filed 22 September 2026 discloses a Series A common stock purchase warrant dated 4 September 2026 issued by Blockfusion to CoreWeave, Inc. for 2,786,624 Blockfusion Series A shares at an initial exercise price of $7.6898 per share. Under the Sixth Amendment to the business combination agreement, signed 21 September 2026, that warrant is cancelled immediately before the merger and replaced by a warrant for 2,870,813 shares of the listed company's Class A common stock at $7.4643 per share; the amendment also raises the earnout to up to 15,000,000 shares. The filing does not state the lease value or MW. An updated Blue Acquisition Corp. and Blockfusion investor presentation, furnished on Form 8-K on 25 September 2026, states the site has 50 MW energized with an expansion path to 300 MW or more, the CoreWeave expansion framework reaches up to 300 MW with CoreWeave holding first right to each increment, and CoreWeave committed $50 million as a non-recurring charge plus $30 million through the warrant purchase. Blockfusion is valued at $450 million pre-money in the business combination.
Announced 20 July 2026; closed 10 September 2026Vulcan Infrastructure and Power (formerly Greenidge Generation Holdings) · Machine Investment Group · Atlas Holdings · Conversant CapitalPIPE equity and senior secured convertible note~$39MGreenidge Generation renamed itself Vulcan Infrastructure and Power and closed a strategic investment led by affiliates of Machine Investment Group and Atlas Holdings to reposition as a powered-site platform for AI and HPC data centers. Net proceeds are primarily for redeeming approximately $33.1 million of 8.50% senior notes due October 2026, with the remainder for predevelopment in Dresden, New York and Columbus, Mississippi. Vulcan cites up to 104 MW of near-term capacity and a 654 MW development pipeline across owned sites
Entered 10 September 2026DigitalOcean · MUFG Bank, Ltd. · Axos Bank · BMO Bank N.A. · Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. · PNC Bank, N.A.equipment finance facility$725MDigitalOcean entered a $725 million equipment finance facility to acquire GPU, CPU and other equipment for its AI-native cloud platform, with capacity aimed at 2027 and 2028 demand. MUFG Bank served as sole administrative and collateral agent, with MUFG, Axos, BMO and Wells Fargo as joint lead arrangers
Prospectus supplement filed 10 August 2026Bitdeer Technologies Group · Barclays Capital Inc. · Cantor Fitzgerald & Co. · B. Riley Securities, Inc. · BTIG, LLCat-the-market equity program$1.0BBitdeer registered an at-the-market program of up to $1.0 billion of Class A ordinary shares through a syndicate of sales agents. The company said net proceeds, if any, would be used for datacenter expansion, HPC and AI cloud business expansion, and ASIC mining rig development and manufacture, as well as working capital. Bitdeer's North American AI/HPC development includes its Rockdale, Texas site
Reported by Bloomberg 28 August 2026; closing announced by Lambda 1 October 2026Lambda · JPMorgan Chase & Co. · Microsoft · Nvidiaprivate placement debt (short-dated)$1.0BBloomberg reported that Lambda raised about $1 billion of private short-dated debt, marketed to private placement investors, to buy Nvidia GPUs that will be leased by Microsoft under Lambda's 2025 agreement with Microsoft. JPMorgan declined to comment and Lambda, Nvidia and Microsoft did not respond. The deal followed Lambda's $926 million term loan that closed in August 2026. On 1 October 2026 Lambda announced the closing of a $1 billion investment-grade delayed draw term loan marketed to insurance companies and fixed income investors, its first US fixed rate financing. The facility was oversubscribed, is rated A (low) by Morningstar DBRS and Baa1 by Moody's, and carries a 6.78% fixed interest rate per the release. Proceeds fund the purchase and development of GPU infrastructure for three committed customer deployments with two investment-grade offtakers across multiple data centers; the release does not name the offtakers. J.P. Morgan acted as sole coordinating lead arranger, structuring agent and bookrunner.
Subscription Agreement entered 15 September 2026 (Form S-1 filed 18 September 2026); completion announced 25 September 2026; NVIDIA portion to close on or around 16 November 2026Nscale · Nvidia · Third Point · Goldman Sachsproposed convertible notes and strategic equity$3.4BNscale's Form S-1 states that on 15 September 2026 it entered into a Subscription Agreement for a minimum of $3.1 billion of pre-IPO capital: $2.1 billion of unsecured Convertible Loan Notes and a further $1.0 billion of unsecured convertible loan notes or Non-Voting Shares to be issued to NVIDIA. The notes convert automatically into ordinary shares (non-voting shares for NVIDIA) on completion of the IPO. The NVIDIA sale is to close on or around 16 November 2026. Reuters had reported on 4 September 2026 that Nscale was in talks to raise about $3.5 billion, with Third Point leading the convertible notes and Goldman Sachs working on the fundraising. On 25 September 2026 Nscale announced completion of the round at $3.36 billion, led by Third Point with investors including NVIDIA, Apollo, Citadel, Hudson Bay Capital, Abu Dhabi Investment Council and 8090 Industries; Goldman Sachs acted as placement agent. The notes convert into ordinary shares (non-voting shares for NVIDIA) on completion of the IPO.
Form S-1 filed publicly 18 September 2026; offering size and price range blank in the filingNscale · Goldman Sachsproposed initial public offering~$3.0BNscale Ltd filed a registration statement on Form S-1 with the SEC on 18 September 2026 for an initial public offering of ordinary shares, to be listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol NSCL, with Goldman Sachs, J.P. Morgan and Morgan Stanley reported as lead bookrunners. The filing describes the Monarch Compute Campus in Mason County, West Virginia (acquired with American Intelligence & Power Corporation in March 2026) as an approximately 2,250-acre site able to deliver up to 8 GW of gross behind-the-meter power, with up to 2 GW of gross generation expected by the first half of 2028. Earlier, Bloomberg reported on 21 August 2026 that Nscale was preparing a US IPO of as much as $3 billion. The Form S-1 cover names Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC, J.P. Morgan and Morgan Stanley as lead bookrunners; the filing fee exhibit uses a $100 million maximum aggregate offering price solely to calculate the registration fee, so the $3 billion size remains a press report.
Announced 27 July 2026Axe Compute Inc. · Undisclosed customerGPU cloud capacity contract≥$1.5BAxe Compute signed a five-year agreement to deploy a dedicated cluster of more than 9,200 Nvidia Blackwell B300 GPUs in the United States that it will design, deploy, own and operate. The company said it expects more than $534 million of customer prepayments within 30 days across this and earlier contracts and intends to pair them with project-level financing. Location in the US was not disclosed Axe Compute had received $317 million of customer prepayments by 31 August 2026, which its CEO told Investing.com covers about 30% to 35% of the roughly $3 billion build cost, with the rest to come from project financing
Announced 22 July 2026Axe Compute Inc. · Undisclosed customersGPU cloud capacity contracts≥$1.3BAxe Compute announced more than $1.3 billion of new customer contracts through its Build program, under which it designs, deploys, owns and operates dedicated GPU clusters. The agreements span the United States and Europe; customers, locations and terms were not disclosed. Must not be summed with later Axe Compute contract totals
Announced 17 August 2026Axe Compute Inc. · Duos Technologies Group, Inc.data center capacity agreements≥$500MAxe Compute and Duos Technologies entered agreements for up to 55 MW of AI data center capacity across multiple undisclosed US locations, in addition to a 10 MW deployment Duos is delivering in Georgia. Initial readiness is targeted from late 2026 into early 2027. The equity investments remain subject to definitive documentation
Agreements signed 4 September 2026; completed 11 September 2026AIB Data Centers Inc. · Undisclosed sellersreal property and membership interest acquisition~$17MAIB Data Centers acquired about 29.385 acres in Texas for data center development through two linked agreements. The first parcel of about 5 acres cost $8.25 million in cash and has 15 MW of existing primary electric service, and up to 40 MW is to be delivered to the second parcel when facilities are placed in service. The county was not disclosed in the filing
Announced 24 August 2026Nvidia · Lancium · Blackstonestrategic equity investment and partnershipn.a.Nvidia made a strategic investment in Lancium, a Blackstone portfolio company, alongside a collaboration to deploy Nvidia AI factory technology across Lancium's campuses. Lancium said it has 4 GW of capacity under lease and a development pipeline exceeding 15 GW of powered land, which will serve as deployment sites for Nvidia cloud partners and AI companies. Lancium plans to use Nvidia DSX reference designs, including DSX Flex for grid-responsive power consumption
Business combination agreement announced 22 July 2026; closing pendingTECfusions, Inc. · Apex Treasury CorpSPAC business combination with PIPE$35MTECfusions, a developer of AI-ready data centers using adaptive reuse of legacy industrial sites, agreed to combine with SPAC Apex Treasury Corp and list on Nasdaq under the proposed ticker TECF. TECfusions has operating and development activity in Clarksville, Virginia; Tucson, Arizona; and New Kensington, Pennsylvania, and targets hyperscaler, neocloud and enterprise AI tenants without owning GPUs
Disclosed 10 September 2026 at a Goldman Sachs conference; reported by Business Insider 11 September 2026SpaceX (xAI) · Undisclosed customercompute hosting agreementn.a.SpaceX CFO Bret Johnsen said the company closed another hosting deal in early September 2026 worth about $1.11 billion a month, without naming the customer. The deal follows agreements to rent capacity in SpaceX's Colossus data centers in Tennessee and Mississippi to Anthropic and Google. SpaceX acquired the data center capacity when it merged with xAI
Announced 16 July 2026Industrial Development Funding · Oaktree · Bloom Energy · Nebius Groupproject equity investment in behind-the-meter power$1.7BIndustrial Development Funding and Oaktree agreed to invest $1.7 billion to deploy Bloom Energy fuel cells supplying dedicated behind-the-meter power to Nebius AI cloud infrastructure. The specific Nebius sites were not named in the fetched coverage. Nebius later adopted Bloom fuel cells in the approved plan for its Vineland, New Jersey campus
Announced 15 September 2026Serverfarm · Manulifedebt facility$3.9BServerfarm increased its revolving credit facility by $895 million to $3.895 billion, with TD Securities as lead arranger and administrative agent for a syndicate of 22 banks and one institutional lender. The facility backs its North American development pipeline, with named campuses in Houston (HTX1, CTX1, CTX2), Clarksville, Arkansas (ARK1, ARK2) and Atlanta (ATL2). Serverfarm was founded by Red Sea Group in 2009 and acquired by Manulife in 2023
Reported by Bloomberg 21 July 2026, via The Real DealAligned Data Centers · AI Infrastructure Partnership · MGX · Global Infrastructure Partnersequity raise~$5.0BAfter closing the $40 billion acquisition of Aligned from Macquarie Asset Management, the AIP, MGX and GIP consortium plans to invest $5 billion in the company, primarily to expand capacity. Aligned has more than 6.4 GW of operational and planned capacity across the Americas, according to the report
Closed 31 August 2026; reported 10 September 2026Switchacquisition$196MSwitch bought 176.5 acres in North Las Vegas' Apex Industrial Park for $196 million. Since late 2025 Switch has purchased roughly 546 acres in Southern Nevada for about $463 million, including nearly 493 acres in Apex for $376.5 million, according to property records cited by the Las Vegas Review-Journal. KTNV reported on 23 September 2026, citing a Switch letter of intent, that Switch submitted plans for a campus on 14 parcels of about 175.8 acres near Apex Power Parkway and US-93 in North Las Vegas, with about 486,250 square feet of buildings: two data center buildings, a fire pump house, a substation with control house, a switching station and a logistics office. No investment or MW figure was given.
Reported by Bloomberg 28 July 2026Koch Real Estate Investments · Edged · Goldman Sachs · Newmarkothern.a.Koch is exploring a sale of Edged, the data center developer it cofounded, working with Goldman Sachs and Newmark and drawing multiple bids. Edged has US sites operating or in development in Missouri, Arizona, Texas, Georgia, Iowa, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Illinois. Edged US told DCD it is separately owned from Endeavour and Edged Energy. Bain Capital was reported on 29 September 2026 to be in talks to acquire Edged, which Crypto Briefing says operates more than 388 MW across Atlanta, Chicago, Dallas, Kansas City and Phoenix; no agreement has been announced.
Reported by Bloomberg 14 August 2026EdgeConneX · EQT · Natixis · BBVAdebt facilityn.a.EQT-backed EdgeConneX is in talks with lenders including Natixis and BBVA on a letter of credit facility to guarantee up to $2.5 billion of power costs. The facility would help the company secure power for data center sites
Reported by The Wall Street Journal, via CRE Daily 15 July 2026DataBank · EdgeCore Digital Infrastructure · Netrality Data Centers · Edgedothern.a.Netrality, DataBank, Edged and EdgeCore have engaged bankers to solicit offers for majority stakes in their operating platforms, according to The Wall Street Journal. The processes target private equity buyers for whole platforms, including development pipelines
Strategic review announced 11 August 2026; $750 million threshold announced 14 September 2026Hyperscale Data · Alliance Cloud Services · Sentinumothern.a.Hyperscale Data's board began a strategic review including a possible sale of its Michigan AI data center, a minority sale through an IPO of subsidiary Sentinum, or continued ownership. The campus has a 10-year master services agreement with a California-based neocloud for an initial 20 MW, expandable to 52 MW. The company said it had invested more than $70 million in the facility as of 15 September 2026
KBRA preliminary ratings published 11 August 2026Cologix · Cologix Canadian Issuer Limited Partnership · KBRAabsn.a.KBRA published preliminary ratings on Cologix Canadian Issuer Limited Partnership Series 2026-1/2, the issuer's third Canadian data center ABS. The notes are secured by 21 operating data centers in Montreal, Toronto and Vancouver generating about $234.2 million of annualized revenue and $150.2 million of annualized adjusted NOI as of 31 March 2026
Reported 9 September 2026GI Partners · DigiCo Infrastructure REIT (seller, HMC Capital managed)acquisition$750MGI Partners bought the fully leased 189,000 square foot data center at 800 East Devon Avenue in Elk Grove Village, Illinois, from a subsidiary of Australia's HMC Capital for $750 million. GI Partners already holds majority stakes in three Digital Realty data centers in Elk Grove Seller DigiCo Infrastructure REIT, spun off from HMC Capital in late 2024, announced the sale on 6 May 2026 without naming the buyer; Reuters reported the CHI1 facility at 32 MW, leased to a hyperscale customer under a 15-year agreement
Agreements signed 9 July 2026; disclosed 13 July 2026Stream US Data Centers · Plug Poweracquisition$76MStream agreed to buy Plug Power's former Limestone hydrogen project site in Graham, Young County, Texas, with 164 MW of grid interconnection assets. The same day Plug and Stream amended the February 2026 agreement for Plug's Genesee County, New York Gateway property, fixing the price at $142 million and extending the outside closing date to 31 March 2027. Stream is owned by Apollo
Announced 3 August 2026KKRother$19.2BKKR closed Global Infrastructure Investors V at $19.2 billion, its largest infrastructure fund. KKR said it manages about $120 billion of infrastructure equity, and cited digitalization and electrification demand in North America
Reported 27 July 2026CoreWeave · EdgeConneX · Bastrop Countyothern.a.CoreWeave will lease Building 1 at EdgeConneX's Cedar Creek campus in Bastrop County, Texas, according to county tax abatement records reported by Community Impact. State records list the building as AUS02 with an estimated cost of $440 million
Priced 30 July 2026; issued 6 August 2026Equinix · Equinix Europe 2 Financing Corporation LLCproject bond~$3.0BEquinix and a finance subsidiary sold $3.0 billion of senior unsecured notes in four tranches under underwriting agreements dated 30 July 2026. The 2031 notes were issued by Equinix Europe 2 Financing Corporation and guaranteed by Equinix
Entered 27 July 2026Equinix · Bank of America · BNP Paribas · Citibank · Goldman Sachs · HSBC · JPMorgan Chase · MUFGdebt facility$5.5BEquinix entered a $5.5 billion revolving credit agreement with Bank of America as administrative agent. Proceeds are available for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions and general corporate purposes
Announced 10 August 20265C Group · Brookfield Asset Managementdebt facility$605MAI data center developer 5C secured $605 million of debt led by Brookfield Asset Management. 5C said the money will fund acquisition and construction of a campus in Memphis, Tennessee, and development of campuses in Phoenix, Arizona, and Ohio. The company reports more than 1.5 GW in its pipeline
Term sheet 11 August 2026; amendment announced 10 September 2026Alpha Compute Corp.acquisition~$55MAlpha Compute amended its binding term sheet for a planned natural gas powered, 200 MW AI data center campus in northern Pennsylvania so that sellers finance $47 million of the $55 million price. The land covers about 350 surface and pore-space acres plus about 1,800 net unleased Marcellus mineral acres in Tioga County
Announced 4 September 2026MDC Data Centers · Columbia Capitalequity raisen.a.Columbia Capital made a minority investment in McAllen, Texas based MDC Data Centers to fund added capacity at its US border data centers and an interconnection hub in Queretaro, Mexico, plus cable landing hubs at Cancun and Veracruz. Founder Juan Salazar remains majority owner and CEO
Announced 22 June 2026; share resale registration filed 19 August 2026 after the shares were issuedDigital Realty · Columbia Capitalacquisition~$485MDigital Realty agreed to acquire investment firm Columbia Capital, which has over $9 billion of fund commitments, to scale its Strategic Private Capital platform. A 19 August 2026 Form 8-K registered resale of shares issued as consideration in the acquisition
Signed 13 August 2026; reported 14 August 2026QTS · City of Blakely · Early Countyincentive≥$29MBlakely and Early County, Georgia, signed an economic development agreement with QTS after two years of talks. The fund includes $5 million for wastewater upgrades and more than $12 million for workforce training. Officials said the campus could generate $60 million to $85 million a year for the county at full build-out
Approved by Clarksville City Council July 2026; reported 30 July 2026Serverfarm · City of Clarksvilleincentive$55.0BClarksville City Council approved two bond ordinances totaling $55 billion tied to Serverfarm's $6.6 billion data center, with an emergency clause making them effective immediately. Residents began collecting signatures in August 2026 to put the bonds on the November ballot. After petitions gathered enough valid signatures, the city council in a special meeting on Monday 28 September 2026 unanimously called a December 2026 special election on the two ordinances ($50 billion to Hatchbo LLC and $5 billion to SF ARK1 LLC, Serverfarm), pending approval of the date by the Johnson County Election Commission. Serverfarm says its $6.6 billion investment includes the major mechanical and electrical systems, and the first phase is scheduled for early 2028.
Reported by Bisnow, via The Real Deal 27 August 2026Mapletree Industrial Trust · JLLothern.a.Mapletree Industrial Trust hired JLL to market a 22-property US data center portfolio across 15 states, preferring a single sale but open to individual assets. The portfolio has a 6.8-year weighted average lease term and tenants including HP, Equinix, Bank of America and Vanderbilt University. It is a little under half of Mapletree's 54 US data centers
Announced Wednesday 5 August 2026Nevada Governor's Office of Economic Development · Colovore Reno 1 LLCincentive$4MGOED approved $17.6 million in abatements for nine companies, including $4.08 million for Colovore's Storey County data center. The abatements are performance-based and must be repaid if commitments are not met
Reported 23 July 2026Commonwealth of Kentucky (Kentucky Business Investment program) · Poe Companies · PowerHouse Data Centersincentive$4MCarroll County official Matthew Dusing said the $9.6 billion Carrollton Industrial Campus received $3.7 million in KBI funding. The developers also describe a payment in lieu of taxes arrangement projected to average $11.1 million a year to Carrollton over 20 years
Approved Tuesday 21 July 2026Effingham County Industrial Development Authority · OpenAIincentive≥$870MThe Effingham County Industrial Development Authority approved a 15-year, 50% property tax abatement for OpenAI's proposed data center at the Savannah Gateway Industrial Hub near Rincon, a 1,440-acre campus with four buildings totaling 720,000 sq ft. Minimum benchmarks are the $20 billion investment and an initial 400 full-time jobs, with OpenAI locked into the 2026 millage rate of 32.057. Effingham County said the related PILOT plan is still expected to yield $27 million a year for the county at full build-out in 2032
Contract documents reported 31 August 2026; Entergy full-term estimate reported 4 September 2026Google · Entergy ArkansasSpecial rate contract with upfront generation and transmission payments≥$526MPublic Service Commission records obtained through a Freedom of Information Act request show Google will pay Entergy Arkansas $526 million up front toward Cypress Solar, a 600 MW solar and 350 MW battery facility in Jefferson County that will feed the grid serving Google's $4 billion West Memphis data center. The Arkansas PSC approved the special rate contract in December. Entergy sued the publishers over the disclosure on 1 September 2026, a federal judge declined to block further reporting, and Entergy voluntarily dismissed the complaint without prejudice on 16 September 2026.
Shareholder approvals disclosed in SEC filings in early September 2026; expanded Virginia benefits package announced 14 September 2026; target close second half of 2027NextEra Energy · Dominion EnergyUtility merger (NextEra shareholders to own 74.5%, Dominion shareholders 25.5%)$67.0BShareholders of both companies approved the combination, with 98% of Dominion shares voted in favor, leaving review by the Virginia State Corporation Commission, which has until January to decide, and interventions by Virginia Governor Abigail Spanberger and Connecticut officials. On 14 September 2026 the companies proposed doubling residential bill credits to four years by redirecting credits that would otherwise go to large-scale data centers, and reaffirmed support for state efforts to protect residential and small business customers from data center service costs.
Announced 7 August 2026Energy Vault · Unnamed power generation EPC partner · Unnamed hyperscalerStrategic commercial agreement for integrated off-grid power infrastructuren.a.Energy Vault agreed to supply battery storage, grid-forming power conversion and control software for an initial 1.25 GW of integrated power infrastructure for hyperscaler AI data centers, paired with a partner's turnkey EPC and Caterpillar gensets. The company said the initial 1.25 GW is backed by a hyperscaler customer contract for deployment in Texas, with initial deployments expected over four to twelve months.
Luzerne County purchase reported 30 July to 1 August 2026; Lackawanna County purchase agreements (signed April and June 2026) reported 29 August 2026; Fell Township planning commission presentation Tuesday 29 September 2026PPL Corp. · Blackstone Infrastructure · Invitium EnergyLand acquisitions and purchase agreements for data-center-dedicated generation≥$40MInvitium Energy, the PPL (51%) and Blackstone Infrastructure joint venture formed to build power plants for Pennsylvania data centers under long-term supply agreements, bought land in Luzerne County and signed agreements for nearly 7,200 acres in northern Lackawanna County, with interconnection requests for gas plants of 1,500 MW and 750 MW in each county. PPL said the venture has reserved more than 5 GW of combined-cycle turbines and about 5 GW of projects in the PJM queue, and will not build without a signed agreement with a large customer. At a Fell Township planning commission meeting on Tuesday 29 September 2026, PPL, Blackstone Infrastructure and Invitium representatives said Invitium is under agreement to buy about 2,800 acres in the township, nearly 29% of its land, as part of memorandums signed in April and June 2026 for close to 7,200 acres across Archbald, Carbondale, Carbondale Township, Fell Township and Mayfield (a west campus of nearly 4,860 acres and an east campus of just over 2,200 acres). PPL treasurer Tadd Henninger said the venture would build only the power plants, with the prospect of on-site data centers owned and built by others, that no development plans exist yet and that not all of the land under contract is expected to be developable. At a Fell Township planning commission meeting on Tuesday 29 September 2026, Invitium representatives said the venture is under agreement to buy about 2,800 acres in the township, nearly 29 percent of its land, as part of memorandums signed in April and June 2026 covering close to 7,200 acres across Archbald, Carbondale, Carbondale Township, Fell Township and Mayfield, split into a west campus of nearly 4,860 acres and an east campus of just over 2,200 acres. Invitium said it would build only power plants and would not own, build or operate the data centers that could locate on site, and that it has no development plans to present yet.
Agreed March 2026; PUCO staff recommended approval July 2026; CFIUS approval received Thursday 27 August 2026 and disclosed 28 August 2026AES Corporation · Global Infrastructure Partners (BlackRock) · EQT Infrastructure · CalPERS · Qatar Investment AuthorityTake-private acquisition at $15 per share in cash~$10.7BA consortium led by BlackRock's Global Infrastructure Partners and EQT, with CalPERS and the Qatar Investment Authority, received CFIUS clearance to acquire AES, parent of AES Ohio, with closing expected in late 2026 or early 2027 subject to remaining approvals. Ohio lawmakers and consumer advocates asked PUCO for local hearings, citing BlackRock's data center investments as a potential conflict given AES's data-center-driven load growth.
Announced 11 August 2026Babcock & Wilcox · Siemens Energyequipment ordern.a.Babcock & Wilcox signed an agreement with Siemens Energy to commence work on 20 steam turbine generator sets of 50 MW each, totaling 1 GW, for use in its FastPower program for data center projects. The agreement is in addition to a previously announced B&W turbine order, and B&W cited demand from AI data center customers
Announced 17 September 2026; booked in the third quarter of 2026INNIO · Unnamed U.S. energy companyequipment ordern.a.INNIO secured a 450 MW firm order from an undisclosed U.S. energy company for Jenbacher J624 containerized gas engines to support behind-the-meter prime power for large-scale data center projects in North America, with delivery expected by 2028. INNIO said it is the customer's first order of this scale
Signed after the fiscal quarter ended 31 July 2026; disclosed 2 September 2026FuelCell Energy · Unnamed major data center operatorequipment ordern.a.FuelCell Energy signed its first data center power agreement, a Capacity Reservation Agreement with a major data center operator for a planned 75 MW project in Texas made up of six 12.5 MW units, backed by an upfront reservation payment
Disclosed 11 August 2026 in ERock's second quarter 2026 results (Form 8-K)ERock, Inc. · Anthropicequipment ordern.a.ERock executed a 470 MW equipment purchase order with Anthropic for utility-grade onsite power, extending its production commitments into 2028. ERock attributed its backlog growth primarily to demand from AI data center customers. No site was named
Announced 17 September 2026Oracle · Clearway Energy · ENGIE · RWE · Scout Clean Energyppan.a.Oracle signed wind energy supply agreements covering more than 1.7 GW across ten Texas wind projects with Clearway Energy, ENGIE, RWE and Scout Clean Energy, supporting its Abilene campus on the ERCOT grid. RWE's share is a 433 MW virtual power purchase agreement from its existing Panther Creek I, II and III wind farms in Sterling, Howard and Glasscock counties. Per-supplier volumes for the other three counterparties were not disclosed
Loans secured late 2025; secondary pricing reported 18 September 2026. Reported by the Financial Times via ReutersOracle (tenant) · Santander · Jefferiesdebt facility~$18.0BThe Financial Times reported, as carried by Reuters on 18 September 2026, that about $18 billion of loans secured late in 2025 for the Oracle-leased Project Jupiter campus on about 1,400 acres in Doña Ana County, New Mexico, were being quoted at 89 to 91 cents on the dollar by syndicate banks including Santander and Jefferies, and that efforts to sell the debt to a wider pool of investors had stalled. The reports cited S&P's July 2026 downgrade of Oracle to one notch above junk. Oracle, Santander and Jefferies did not comment. On 24 September 2026 Bloomberg News reported that Oracle had sent the developer a force majeure notice aimed at deferring payments if the campus does not come online in 2028 as planned; see the Project Jupiter at-risk record
Announced 16 September 2026 (Apex Clean Energy release); reported by trade press through 23 September 2026Meta Platforms · Apex Clean Energyppan.a.Apex Clean Energy announced a power purchase agreement giving Meta exclusive rights to all environmental attributes associated with energy from the 144 MW Starling Solar project in Gonzales County, Texas, including all renewable energy credits. Apex said the project adds new generation to the ERCOT grid that would not have been built without Meta's commitment. It is the seventh transaction between the two companies, whose combined portfolio totals about 1,200 MW across Texas, Virginia, Illinois, Kansas and Iowa. Commercial operation is expected in 2027.
Fitch presale report 22 September 2026; expected to close the week of 5 October 2026. Single outlet (CommercialSearch, citing Fitch)QTS Data Centers (Blackstone) · QTS Issuer ABS II LLC · Fitch Ratingsabs~$1.0BQTS Data Centers is marketing about $1 billion of data center asset-backed securitization debt through QTS Issuer ABS II LLC, according to a Fitch Ratings presale report dated 22 September 2026. The collateral pool is seven hyperscale data centers totaling 2.2 million square feet and 253.5 MW in Phoenix (PHX2DC2, PHX2DC3, PHX2DC5), Richmond, Virginia (RIC2DC3, RIC2DC5 in Sandston), Northern Virginia (ASH2DC2 in Sterling) and Dallas-Fort Worth (DFW1DC4 in Irving), with two properties contributed in this issuance. Four investment-grade tenants and three small network carriers fully occupy the portfolio, with a weighted average remaining lease term of 12.9 years. The financing comprises up to $719.8 million of fixed-rate loans and up to $305.3 million of floating-rate notes, structured as up to 10 interest-only loans with a 30-year legal final maturity. Proceeds are to repay existing debt, fund reserves and support general corporate needs; closing is expected the week of 5 October 2026. This is a refinancing, not new construction capital.
Reported by Nikkei Asia 20 September 2026 (Japan time; 19 September in the US). Plan, not a signed transaction; single outlet (Nikkei)Nippon Life Insuranceothern.a.Nikkei Asia reported that Nippon Life Insurance plans to invest 2 trillion yen, about $12.7 billion, in infrastructure financing, including the construction of data centers in the United States, as Japanese financial institutions step in to fill a growing AI funding gap. Other outlets rounded the figure to $13 billion or quoted $12.75 billion. The report describes an investment plan rather than a specific loan or project, and does not state how much is reserved for data centers.
Binding term sheet announced 21 September 2026; reported by World Nuclear News 22 September 2026; subject to regulatory approvalsSamsung C&T · Kairos Powerequity raise$100MKairos Power and Samsung C&T signed a binding term sheet under which Samsung C&T will provide up to $100 million through direct investment and in-kind engineering services, subject to regulatory approvals, to support delivery of the Hermes 2 demonstration plant in Oak Ridge, Tennessee. Samsung C&T also joins Kairos Power's integrated EPC team, initially on power-generation systems and balance of plant, and secured priority rights to perform EPC for Kairos Power's planned US commercial reactor. Hermes 2 is a grid-connected 50 MWe reactor that received NRC construction permits in December 2024 and broke ground in April 2026; its output is contracted to TVA for the grid serving Google data centers in Tennessee and Alabama (see google-kairos-tva-hermes2).
Announced 16 September 2026 (Business Wire release); reported by pv magazine USA 24 September 2026Rune · Spark Capital · Union Square Ventures · Lowercarbon Capital · Activate Capital · Committed Capital · Timeless Partners · Logos Fundequity raise$40MSan Francisco based Rune announced a $40 million Series A led by Spark Capital, with Union Square Ventures, Lowercarbon Capital, Activate Capital, Committed Capital, Timeless Partners and Logos Fund, bringing total funding to $53.5 million, alongside the launch of RELIC, a modular compute system installed behind the meter inside operating solar farms using clipped and curtailed power without a grid connection. pv magazine reports an active RELIC installation inside a 200 MW operating solar farm in Texas; the site and its compute capacity in MW are not disclosed. Proceeds are to secure more solar host agreements and scale the on-site compute footprint.
Named winning bidder 23 September 2026; on 30 September 2026 the bankruptcy court entered a supplemental auction order keeping the sale open, with a further auction set for 2 October 2026 (docket summary); no Hut 8 release foundHut 8 Corp. · Poolin Technology (Chapter 11 debtor) and two U.S. affiliatesacquisition$140MHut 8 was named the winning bidder on 23 September 2026 for two West Texas data center sites, Pyote and Tarbush, owned by bankrupt mining pool operator Poolin, with a bid of $140 million, nearly triple the $52 million stalking-horse offer from Thor CALAP LLC. Backup bids came from DigiPower X ($36.5 million for Pyote) and Pecos Industrial Development, reported as a designee of Fluidstack ($100.5 million for Tarbush). Poolin and two U.S. affiliates filed for Chapter 11 on 22 July 2026 with about $173 million of prepetition obligations; the two sites had roughly 100 MW of power allocation for Bitcoin mining before operations ceased in July 2026. The sale requires approval at a hearing scheduled for 29 September 2026. Instead of approving the sale, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of New Jersey entered a supplemental auction order on 30 September 2026 (Dkt. 272) that keeps the assets open for further bidding, with an auction on 2 October 2026 at which Hut 8, the proposed purchasers and Thor Equities are qualified to participate. Amended asset purchase agreements were filed 29 September 2026. Trade headlines of 1 October 2026 put the reopened auction at $180 million; that figure was not confirmed from a fetched source and is not recorded.
Announced 21 September 2026 (Kodiak release via Business Wire)Kodiak Gas Services · unnamed West Texas data center operator (contracted with an investment-grade hyperscaler; lease guaranteed by a GPU designer)power supply agreementn.a.Kodiak Gas Services agreed to provide 76 MW of behind-the-meter, baseload power capacity, including balance of plant, to a West Texas data center for a six-year term, deploying about 40 reciprocating natural gas generation units. The customer is a data center operator contracted with an investment-grade-rated hyperscaler, with a GPU designer as guarantor of the data center lease. Deployment is expected to begin in Q4 2026 and scale into Q1 2027, with revenue recognition starting in Q1 2027. Kodiak said it is its second long-term contract to supply primary power to a data center and that about half of its power portfolio is now under long-term contracts; it targets two gigawatts of power generation capacity by 2030.
Definitive agreements announced 22 September 2026 (company release via GlobeNewswire)Alpha Compute Corp. · unnamed seller (operating oil and gas business)acquisition≥$6MAlpha Compute executed definitive real estate and asset purchase agreements for more than 300 acres of surface, mineral and gas rights in Pennsylvania covering the Utica and Marcellus formations, including more than 75 existing oil and gas wells, pump jacks, maintenance facilities, heavy equipment and gathering infrastructure, for a stated $5.5 million. The company said a planned data center there will replicate the design planned for its Northern Pennsylvania (Tioga County) site. The county was not disclosed; Marcellus Drilling News described it as a second site elsewhere in Pennsylvania. This is separate from the $55 million Tioga County land and gas rights deal already recorded.
Announced 17 September 2026 (NeoVolta release)NeoVolta · Infinite Grid Capitalequipment order~$53MNeoVolta entered a binding $53 million capacity reservation agreement with Infinite Grid Capital for battery energy storage system equipment designated for Northern Ontario AI data center projects in 2027. It is the first commercial commitment under a previously announced framework with Infinite Grid covering about 1.1 GWh of potential deployments and about $200 million of potential supply. The data center projects were not named.
Formally selected by South Korea and the United States, announced at the White House 30 September 2026 (US time) and by Korea's industry ministry 1 October 2026; first reported to the National Assembly 22 September 2026Government of South Korea (Ministry of Trade, Industry and Resources; Ministry of Finance and Economy) · United States (bilateral investment package; Department of Commerce) · NextEra Energy Resources · Related Companies · Lewis Energy Groupother$22.3BSouth Korea named a natural gas combined-cycle power plant in Encinal, Texas, as the first project under its strategic US investment commitment, reported to the National Assembly on 22 September 2026. The project is planned at about 6.3 GW, starting with a 1.4 GW gas turbine facility and adding about 4.9 GW in stages, and is intended to supply nearby AI data centers and semiconductor plants. The Korea Herald reported that the selection takes effect if the decision is confirmed. The developer and offtakers were not named in the fetched sources. On 1 October 2026 Korea's Ministry of Trade, Industry and Resources said the two governments formally selected the project, dubbed Project Star, as the first under Seoul's $350 billion US investment commitment: a 6,472 MW plant for AI data centers in Encinal at a cost of $22.3 billion, led by companies including Related Companies and NextEra Energy, with first-phase commercial operation in 2029 and full operation targeted for 2032. In a joint statement of 30 September 2026, NextEra Energy Resources, Related Companies and Lewis Energy Group said the US Department of Commerce and the Republic of Korea selected them to develop Project Star, a more than $22 billion, 6.47 GW natural gas energy campus in Encinal built in phases, with initial generation as early as 2029 subject to permitting. NextEra Energy Resources and Related plan to develop, build and operate the generation; Lewis Energy Group will provide land, produced water and natural gas. The energy campus is to be jointly owned by the United States and South Korea. At full scale it is expected to power a privately funded 5 GW data center campus that Related Digital is developing on an adjacent site, with excess electricity sent to the Texas grid. The companies estimate 8,400 jobs at peak construction and about 170 permanent jobs at the power campus. In a joint statement of 30 September 2026 the companies said NextEra Energy Resources and Related Companies will develop, build and operate the gas generation, and Lewis Energy Group will provide land, produced water and natural gas in La Salle County. The energy campus is to be jointly owned by the United States and South Korea, with initial generation as early as 2029 subject to permitting. At full scale it is expected to power a privately funded 5 GW data center campus that Related Digital is developing on an adjacent site, with excess electricity sent to the Texas grid; the companies estimate 8,400 jobs at peak construction and about 170 permanent jobs.
Purchase agreement approved by the authority board 11 September 2026; confirmed as a potential data center 22 September 2026 (authority release); closing anticipated October 2027Clearview Dynamics LLC · Western Virginia Regional Industrial Facility Authority (Roanoke, Roanoke County, Salem)acquisitionn.a.The Western Virginia Regional Industrial Facility Authority confirmed on 22 September 2026 that its purchase agreement with Clearview Dynamics LLC for about 94 acres at Wood Haven Technology Park in Roanoke County is for a potential data center. The land is jointly owned by Roanoke and Roanoke County (44.2 percent each) and Salem (11.6 percent). The buyer will pay for all water, power and related infrastructure; water would come from Spring Hollow Reservoir. Due diligence is expected to run until March, with closing anticipated in October 2027. The price is redacted, Clearview Dynamics LLC was formed in 2026, and its backers have not been disclosed.
Application filed with the Virginia SCC 4 September 2026; reported 16 September 2026Appalachian Power (AEP) · Googleother~$264MAppalachian Power's 4 September 2026 SCC application estimates $264 million to upgrade transmission lines and substations to serve Google's Botetourt County campus, with peak demand of about 300 MW. The utility said other customers are not expected to pay more because the new load's revenue offsets the cost, and cited the Ratepayer Protection Pledge under which Google agrees to pay for delivery upgrades.
Approved by Ferguson City Council 4-3 on 22 September 2026City of Ferguson · Next Revolution Technologies LLCincentive$1.5BThe redevelopment agreement approved on 22 September 2026 authorizes up to $1.5 billion in tax incentives and up to $22 billion in industrial revenue bonds for the $1.8 billion former Emerson campus project and includes community commitments of $7.5 million over 10 years plus a $250,000 environmental mitigation fund.
Definitive agreement announced 26 August 2026; closed with CEO appointment effective 11 September 2026 (reported 17 September 2026)Volato Group (NYSE American: SOAR) · Alignment Engineacquisitionn.a.Volato Group merged with Alignment Engine, an AI infrastructure company whose Ohio powered industrial campus has about 154 MW of available power and a development path to at least 480 MW, in a transaction valuing Alignment Engine at about $500 million. Volato remains the listed parent, and Alignment Engine CEO Chris Ensey became Volato CEO effective 11 September 2026 immediately after closing.
Skanska release 22 September 2026 per RTTNews (MarketScreener lists it on 21 September); work begins November 2026, completion Q3 2028Skanska USA Building · Undisclosed existing clientother~$84MSkanska signed an $84 million contract with an existing client to build an approximately 22,700 square meter (244,730 sq ft) data center in Georgia with five colocation data halls and administrative space designed for 48 MW. Scope covers civil, structural, utilities, electrical, mechanical, security, fit-out and commissioning of major equipment. The client and exact location were not disclosed.
Recorded 17 September 2026 (Maricopa County property records); reported 22 September 2026; single outletGI Partners · LKY Developmentacquisition$15MGI Partners bought a 5.43-acre data center site at the southeast corner of 7th Avenue and Grant Street in Phoenix from LKY Development for $14,720,919 on 17 September 2026. The project had been threatened by Phoenix's 2025 data center zoning rules and is proceeding under a Proposition 207 waiver granted by the city.
Transfers registered 6 February 2026; first publicly reported in the current cycle; single outlet (The Realist)Vibro Information Services Ltd. (Meta) · 1598313 Alberta Ltd. · Pembina Pipeline Corporation · Suncor Energy Inc.acquisitionn.a.The Realist reported that three parcels totalling 1,753.80 acres at 56111 Range Road 223, Sturgeon County, the site of Meta's first Canadian data center, were acquired by Vibro Information Services Ltd. on 6 February 2026 for an aggregate C$300,093,144: 956.89 acres from 1598313 Alberta Ltd. for C$163,727,616, 160 acres from Pembina Pipeline for C$27,379,200 and 636.91 acres from Suncor Energy for C$108,986,328, based on Government of Alberta land records.
Backfill (not previously recorded). Credit agreement entered 4 March 2026 ($500 million drawn 5 March); upsized to $1.0 billion by Amendment No. 1 on 18 March 2026 (announced 23 March); repaid in full 6 May 2026Core Scientific, Inc. · Morgan Stanley Senior Funding, Inc. (agent) · JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (amendment no. 1 term lender)debt facility$1.0BOn 4 March 2026 Core Scientific entered a credit agreement with Morgan Stanley Senior Funding as agent for a $500.0 million senior secured term loan facility with a $500.0 million accordion, drawing the full $500.0 million on 5 March. Proceeds were for general corporate purposes related to data center development, including equipment purchases and deposits, energy deposits, real property acquisition and pre-development costs. On 18 March 2026 Amendment No. 1 added a $500.0 million commitment from JPMorgan Chase Bank, bringing the facility to $1.0 billion, fully drawn. On 6 May 2026 Core Scientific repaid all borrowings under this bridge facility with proceeds of the $3.3 billion 7.750% senior secured notes due 2031. This is a different facility from the $600 million JPMorgan-agented revolving and letter of credit facilities of 25 August 2026 (core-scientific-600m-credit-facilities-2026).
Backfill (not previously recorded). Upsized and priced 25 June 2026; issued 30 June 2026 (Form 8-K filed 1 July 2026)HIVE Digital Technologies Ltd. (guarantor) · HIVE Bermuda 2026 Ltd. (issuer) · U.S. Bank Trust Company, National Association (trustee)convertible~$130MHIVE priced an upsized $115 million private offering of 0% exchangeable senior notes due 2031 on 25 June 2026, issued by HIVE Bermuda 2026 Ltd. and guaranteed by HIVE. On 30 June 2026 the issuer issued $130 million including the full $15 million option. The initial exchange price is about $4.83 per share, a 27.5% premium to the 25 June Nasdaq close of $3.79, with capped calls at an initial cap of $8.5275. Net proceeds of about $124.5 million fund HIVE subsidiaries for general corporate purposes, capital investment including GPU purchases, and data center development; HIVE's AI data centers under BUZZ HPC are in Canada, and the release does not allocate proceeds by site or country.
Backfill (not previously recorded). Priced 20 February 2026 (upsized from $300 million); closed 24 February 2026; option notes issued 26 February 2026Bitdeer Technologies Group · U.S. Bank Trust Company, National Association (trustee)convertible~$375MBitdeer priced $325.0 million of 5.00% convertible senior notes due 2032 on 20 February 2026, up from $300.0 million, alongside a registered direct share offering; the initial conversion price is about $9.93 per share. The notes closed on 24 February 2026 and a further $50.0 million was issued on 26 February 2026 when the initial purchasers exercised their option in full. Proceeds paid about $29.2 million of capped calls and about $138.2 million to repurchase $135.0 million of the November 2029 convertible notes, with the remainder for data center expansion, HPC and AI cloud expansion, mining rig development and general corporate purposes. Bitdeer's data center footprint spans the United States and other countries; proceeds are not allocated by site.
Backfill (not previously recorded). Proposed $350 million announced 4 June 2026; priced 4 June 2026 (purchase agreement) and upsized to $400 million; issued 9 June 2026 (Form 8-K filed 10 June 2026)Keel Infrastructure Corp. · Bitfarms Ltd. (guarantor) · Computershare Trust Company, N.A. (trustee)convertible$458MKeel Infrastructure Corp. announced a proposed $350 million convertible notes offering on 4 June 2026, entered the purchase agreement on 4 June and issued $458 million of 1.250% convertible senior notes due 2032 on 9 June 2026, including the initial purchasers' full $58 million option, guaranteed on a senior unsecured basis by Bitfarms Ltd. Proceeds fund capped calls and general corporate purposes, which may include deposits for long-lead equipment and collateral for letters of credit to expand or accelerate data center projects. The company said existing liquidity is expected to be sufficient to develop Panther Creek, Sharon and Moses Lake through leasing, and that the proceeds improve flexibility across its developments (see keel-panther-creek-pa and keel-sharon-pa).
Backfill (not previously recorded). Announced 20 August 2026 (Skanska release); construction from Q3 2026 to Q3 2028Skanska · Unnamed existing clientother~$1.2BSkanska signed a contract with an unnamed existing client to build four new data centers in the southeastern United States, totaling about 75,000 square meters (808,000 square feet), including the shell and interior fit-out of technical spaces, support areas and offices. The contract is worth $1.2 billion, about SEK 11.2 billion, and will be included in US order bookings for the third quarter of 2026. Construction begins in the third quarter of 2026 with completion expected in the third quarter of 2028. It is a construction contract, not owner capital, and may overlap with an owner's campus figure already in the atlas once the client is known.
Amendment and binding commitment signed 24 September 2026; announced 25 September 2026 (Form 8-K)Cipher Digital (Cipher Barber Lake LLC) · Fluidstack USA II Inc. · Unnamed leading AI lablease≥$5.2BCipher amended its Barber Lake lease with Fluidstack and entered a binding commitment with an unnamed leading AI lab to lease the facility for 10 more years after the Fluidstack term, on economic terms substantially consistent with the existing lease, extending contracted term to 20 years. The amendment adds tenant change orders, a phased data hall delivery from the fourth quarter of 2026 to the first quarter of 2027 (the September 2025 filing had targeted delivery by September 2026), and a cost framework under which Cipher bears the first $359.3 million of overruns above the initial budget and the tenant reimburses 50% of costs above that amount as additional rent.
Announced 24 September 2026 (Form 8-K Exhibit 99.1)Akamai Technologies · Anthropiccompute lease≥$11.6BAkamai announced a $11.6 billion, seven-year commitment from Anthropic for Akamai Cloud distributed infrastructure and software to support Anthropic's CPU workload growth. Akamai issued Anthropic a warrant for non-voting convertible Series B preferred stock equal to 7.7 million common shares (up to about 5% of outstanding common stock) at $111.33 per share; about 2% is expected to vest with this commitment and about 1% vests with each further $3 billion of purchases. The release does not say where the capacity is located.
Announced 25 September 2026 (Form 8-K Exhibit 99.1)Atlas Energy Solutions · Unnamed leading frontier AI lab · Caterpillarequipment ordern.a.Two Atlas subsidiaries signed cost reimbursement agreements with an unnamed frontier AI lab alongside equipment purchase agreements for specific data center projects. The first covers balance-of-plant equipment (emissions controls, electrical distribution, battery storage) for Atlas's existing Caterpillar generator orders; the second supports an incremental 283 MW of Caterpillar power generation purchases for the initial power ramp of a separate data center project. Atlas also executed a purchase agreement for 328 MW of generating capacity for 2027 deliveries under its Global Framework Agreement. Atlas said the parties are working toward long-term power purchase agreements. Project locations are not disclosed.
Backfill (not previously recorded). Announced 8 June 2026; site named as Brookwood, Alabama on 24 September 2026Applied Digital · Unnamed U.S.-based high investment-grade hyperscalerlease≥$5.2BApplied Digital signed a 15-year take-or-pay lease for 210 MW of critical IT load at Delta Forge 2 with a U.S.-based high investment-grade hyperscaler, its third lease with that tenant, taking its contracted portfolio to about $36 billion across five campuses. Initial operations are anticipated in the first quarter of 2028. The company confirmed Brookwood, Tuscaloosa County, Alabama as the location on 24 September 2026.
Sales agreement entered 24 September 2026 (Form 8-K)New Era Energy & Digital · Mizuho Securities USA · B. Riley Securities · Northland Securities · Texas Capital Securities · BTIG · Roth Capital Partnersequity raise$100MNew Era Energy & Digital entered an at-the-market sales agreement for up to $100 million of common stock. The accompanying disclosure says the company is negotiating directly with multiple potential tenants, including one of the world's largest consumers of AI infrastructure, as anchor tenant for its flagship Texas Critical Data Centers project, and flags that the 21 September 2026 Texas directive halting TCEQ permits for data centers (at-risk row 769) may delay permits for TCDC.
Order announced 9 December 2025; ended per Boom CEO Blake Scholl's post on X, 25 September 2026Crusoe · Boom Supersonicequipment ordern.a.Crusoe was the launch customer for Boom Supersonic's Superpower natural gas turbine, ordering 29 units totaling 1.21 GW (42 MW each) for its AI data centers in December 2025. On 25 September 2026 Boom CEO Blake Scholl wrote on X that Crusoe and Boom are no longer launching the turbine together; Boom said it will deliver about 250 MW of turbines to other sites in 2027 and targets 1 GW in 2028.
Announced 23 September 2026 (GlobeNewswire)Crusoe · Thinking Machines Labcompute lease$65MCrusoe and Thinking Machines Lab announced a $65 million annual agreement for Crusoe Managed Inference to serve the lab's production workloads on a dedicated deployment of NVIDIA HGX B200 systems on Crusoe Cloud. Crusoe said Managed Inference has passed $100 million in contracted ARR. The release does not name the data center location.
Approved unanimously by the Tuscaloosa County Economic Development Authority 24 September 2026Tuscaloosa County Economic Development Authority · Applied Digitalother≥$314MThe TCEDA board unanimously approved incentives for Applied Digital's $3.2 billion Delta Forge 2 campus near Brookwood: a 20-year ad valorem abatement valued at $140.7 million and construction-period sales and use tax abatements of $173.8 million. Applied Digital agreed to $270 million of community benefit payments over 20 years to be shared by Brookwood, Tuscaloosa, Northport and Tuscaloosa County.
Cumulative investment announced 25 September 2026 (PR Newswire); purchase dates not statedAult & Company · Hyperscale Datapreferred$55MAult & Company, controlled by Milton 'Todd' Ault III, said it has invested $55 million of direct capital in Hyperscale Data through Series H convertible preferred stock and retains the right to buy up to an additional $96 million. Ault & Company and affiliates beneficially own about 62% of Hyperscale Data. The release cites Hyperscale Data's investment of more than $70 million in its Michigan AI data center operated by subsidiary Alliance Cloud Services.
Backfill (not previously recorded). Announced 27 April 2026 (Oracle release); Bloom said on 25 September 2026 that Oracle remains committed after the force majeure reportOracle · Bloom Energy · BorderPlex Digital Assetspower supply agreementn.a.Oracle and BorderPlex Digital Assets announced on 27 April 2026 that Project Jupiter in Dona Ana County, New Mexico will be fully powered by up to 2.45 GW of Bloom Energy fuel cells as part of Oracle and Bloom's expanded partnership, replacing previously planned gas turbines and diesel generators with a single microgrid. After Bloomberg reported Oracle's force majeure notice on 24 September 2026, Bloom said on 25 September that Oracle remains committed to the project and to its contract for 2.4 GW, and that the project remains on schedule; the gas pipeline and the fuel cell air-quality permit are still pending.
Announced 23 September 2026 (USD.AI release)USD.AI · Undisclosed publicly listed GPU cloud providerdebt facility$129MUSD.AI announced a $128.9 million asset-backed financing facility supporting the deployment of 32 NVIDIA GB200 NVL72 systems in British Columbia, Canada, for an undisclosed publicly listed GPU cloud provider that runs clusters across North America, South America and Europe under multi-year contracts with investment-grade counterparties. It exceeds USD.AI's previous record of $98.1 million from June 2026.
Announced 17 March 2026 (Google blog); DTE special contracts approved with conditions by the Michigan Public Service Commission on 1 October 2026 (Case No. U-22058)Google · DTE Energy (DTE Electric)power supply agreementn.a.Google announced plans for a new data center in DTE Energy's Michigan service territory, served by 2.7 GW of new clean resources under a Clean Capacity Acceleration Agreement with DTE (the same structure as Google's Clean Transition Tariff), plus a $10 million Energy Impact Fund; Google said it is evaluating a site in Van Buren Township. Planet Detroit reports the project is 1 GW, with DTE promising 1.6 GW of renewables, up to 480 MW of storage and demand response, a 20-year contract, and the first contested case for a hyperscale data center before the Michigan Public Service Commission. DTE's investor presentation lists the 1 GW Google agreement as executed and in the MPSC approval process, as upside to its capital plan. On Thursday 1 October 2026 the Michigan Public Service Commission unanimously approved, with conditions, DTE Electric's special contracts with Google LLC in Case No. U-22058: a primary supply agreement with a 20-year term, a minimum billing demand of 80% of contract capacity, an early termination payment ensuring at least 15 years of minimum monthly charges, and credit and collateral requirements; and a clean capacity accelerator agreement under which Google pays for DTE Electric to develop up to 1,600 MW of renewable energy and 480 MW of battery storage. DTE Electric expects service to begin in December 2027 and maximum load by December 2028. It is the first hyperscale data center contract in Michigan decided through a contested case; Attorney General Dana Nessel had sought a 90% minimum billing demand. No contract value was disclosed.
Announced Wednesday 30 September 2026 (Constellation release, reported by Maryland Matters)Amazon (Amazon Web Services) · Constellation Energyppan.a.Amazon signed a 20-year power purchase agreement with Constellation covering 690 MW from the Calvert Cliffs Clean Energy Center in Lusby, Maryland. Constellation said the revenue certainty supports about $3 billion of plant upgrades, a 20-year relicensing of the two reactors (licenses expire in 2034 and 2036) and about 190 MW of added output beginning between 2030 and 2032, and that it will evaluate small modular reactors at the site. The power stays on the PJM grid rather than flowing directly to Amazon data centers; the companies also signed a related retail supply agreement for Amazon operations in the 13-state PJM market. Amazon withdrew its own Calvert County data center campus plan in August 2026 (see capital at risk).
Backfill (not previously recorded). Priced 10 March 2026; final prospectus supplement filed 12 March 2026; settlement on or about 13 March 2026Amazon.com, Inc.senior notes~$37.0BAmazon sold $37.0 billion of senior unsecured notes in eleven tranches maturing from 2028 to 2076 under its shelf registration, for general corporate purposes. It was one of three Amazon note offerings in the first half of 2026 not previously in the atlas, alongside a euro offering the same week and a Canadian dollar offering in June.
Backfill (not previously recorded). Final prospectus supplement filed 13 March 2026; settlement on or about 16 March 2026Amazon.com, Inc.senior notesn.a.Amazon sold EUR 14.5 billion of senior unsecured notes in eight tranches maturing from 2028 to 2064, a day after pricing its $37.0 billion US dollar offering.
Backfill (not previously recorded). Priced 8 June 2026; final prospectus supplement filed 10 June 2026; settlement on or about 12 June 2026Amazon.com, Inc.senior notesn.a.Amazon sold C$14.0 billion of Maple bonds in five tranches maturing from 2029 to 2056, for general corporate purposes including capital expenditures.
Backfill (not previously recorded). Final prospectus supplement filed 11 February 2026; settlement on or about 13 February 2026Alphabet Inc.senior notes~$20.0BAlphabet sold $20.0 billion of senior unsecured notes in seven tranches maturing from 2029 to 2066, paired the same week with a sterling offering.
Backfill (not previously recorded). Final prospectus supplement filed 12 February 2026; settlement on or about 13 February 2026Alphabet Inc.senior notesn.a.Alphabet sold GBP 5.5 billion of senior unsecured notes in five tranches, including a 100-year tranche due 2126.
Backfill (not previously recorded). Final prospectus supplement filed 7 May 2026; settlement on or about 11 May 2026Alphabet Inc.senior notesn.a.Alphabet sold EUR 9.0 billion of senior unsecured notes in six tranches maturing from 2030 to 2063, alongside a Canadian dollar offering filed the same day.
Backfill (not previously recorded). Final prospectus supplement filed 7 May 2026; settlement on or about 11 May 2026 (interest accrues from 15 May 2026)Alphabet Inc.senior notesn.a.Alphabet sold C$8.5 billion of Maple bonds in four tranches maturing from 2031 to 2056.
Backfill (not previously recorded). Final prospectus supplement filed 18 May 2026; settlement on or about 21 May 2026Alphabet Inc.senior notesn.a.Alphabet sold JPY 576.5 billion of senior unsecured yen notes in seven tranches maturing from 2029 to 2066.
Backfill (not previously recorded). Preliminary supplement filed 30 April 2026; final prospectus supplement filed 1 May 2026; settlement on or about 4 May 2026Meta Platforms, Inc.senior notes$25.0BMeta sold $25.0 billion of senior unsecured notes in six tranches maturing from 2031 to 2066, for general corporate purposes. It is Meta's only SEC-registered note offering found in 2026 to date.
Announced Friday 2 October 2026 (Oracle and We Energies); subject to Public Service Commission of Wisconsin approvalOracle · We Energies (WEC Energy Group) · NextEra Energy (Point Beach owner)power supply agreementn.a.On Friday 2 October 2026 Oracle and We Energies announced an agreement under which Oracle would subscribe to between 10% and 20% of the generation We Energies buys from NextEra's Point Beach Nuclear Plant in Manitowoc County, to help supply the Port Washington campus (Project Lighthouse) that Oracle is developing with OpenAI. The Journal Sentinel reports the subscription at 125 to 250 MW, roughly 10% to 20% of the 1.3 GW campus's consumption. We Energies and Oracle say the arrangement would spare other customers about $300 million of fuel costs over five years; that is a ratepayer savings estimate, not a contract value. The agreement requires approval by the Public Service Commission of Wisconsin, and Oracle expects the proposal to be filed by the end of 2026.
Announced Friday 2 October 2026Amazon (Amazon Web Services)other≥$1.0BAmazon announced on Friday 2 October 2026 a community investment program pledging more than $1 billion over five years to towns and counties where it operates data centers. It covers community college tuition and fees not met by financial aid and an expansion of its Modular Training Centers from three to 25 by the end of 2028. Amazon said it had already contributed more than $1 billion to US data center communities over the prior three years, and also said it has stopped using nondisclosure agreements with government agencies on data center projects. This is community spending, not data center capital expenditure.
Completed 10 March 2026 (Alphabet Form 10-Q for the quarter ended 30 June 2026)Alphabet (Google) · Intersectacquisition$5.9BAlphabet completed its acquisition of Intersect, a developer of renewable energy, on 10 March 2026 for $5.9 billion after purchase price adjustments. Alphabet's Form 10-Q says the acquisition enables acceleration of data center capacity and energy development, that Intersect is a variable interest entity of which Alphabet is the primary beneficiary, and that its results are consolidated from closing.
Conditional commitment announced 5 October 2026 (DOE release)US Department of Energy (Office of Energy Dominance Financing) · Vistra · Metadoe loan$4.2BDOE's Office of Energy Dominance Financing announced a conditional loan commitment of up to $4.2 billion to finance nuclear uprates and modernization at Vistra's Beaver Valley plant in Pennsylvania and its Davis-Besse and Perry plants in Ohio, adding 433 MW of new capacity and preserving nearly 4 GW, with an option to finance future uprates at Comanche Peak in Texas. Vistra must satisfy technical, legal, environmental and financial conditions before definitive documents are signed and the loan is funded. The 433 MW of uprates matches the uprate energy and capacity Vistra contracted to Meta under 20-year PPAs disclosed in January 2026 (213 MW Perry, 80 MW Davis-Besse, 140 MW Beaver Valley); the DOE release does not name Meta.
Announced 9 January 2026 (Meta newsroom; Vistra Form 8-K filed 9 January 2026)Meta · Vistrappan.a.Vistra entered into 20-year power purchase agreements to supply Meta with 2,609 MW of power and capacity from its PJM nuclear plants: 1,268 MW from the operating Perry plant and 908 MW from the operating Davis-Besse plant in Ohio, plus 213 MW of uprate capacity at Perry, 80 MW at Davis-Besse and 140 MW at Beaver Valley in Pennsylvania. Delivery of operating capacity begins in late 2026 with full delivery by year end 2027; uprate deliveries begin by 2031 with full delivery by year end 2034. Meta said the power supports grids serving its operations, including the Prometheus supercluster in New Albany, Ohio.
Announced 9 January 2026 (Meta newsroom)Meta · TerraPowerpower supply agreementn.a.Meta's agreement with TerraPower provides funding supporting development of two new Natrium units capable of up to 690 MW of firm power, with delivery as early as 2032, and gives Meta rights to energy from up to six further Natrium units (2.1 GW) targeted for delivery by 2035. At eight potential units the agreement covers 2.8 GW of baseload capacity plus 1.2 GW of built-in storage. Meta described it as its largest support of advanced nuclear to date.
Announced 9 January 2026 (Meta newsroom)Meta · Oklopower supply agreementn.a.Meta agreed to provide funding for early procurement and development of an Oklo advanced nuclear campus in Pike County, Ohio, which may come online as early as 2030 and could add up to 1.2 GW of baseload power into the PJM market to support Meta's operations in the region. The agreement lays the foundation for multiple Oklo Aurora Powerhouse reactors.
Closed 22 May 2026; announced 26 May 2026 (Form 8-K); consideration detailed in the Q2 2026 Form 10-QTeraWulf · Industrial Equity Partnersacquisition$168MTeraWulf acquired 100% of Industrial Equity Partners LLC, which owned or controlled about 308 acres in Grayson, Kentucky, for a hyperscale AI and HPC campus planned for up to 1 GW. An initial 164-acre parcel was bought at closing and the optional 144 acres in August 2026. Electric service and transmission agreements with Kentucky Power were signed concurrently.
Announced 3 November 2025 (Cipher third quarter 2025 business update, Form 8-K exhibits)Cipher Mining (now Cipher Digital) · Amazon Web Serviceslease≥$5.5BCipher signed a 15-year lease with Amazon Web Services to provide turnkey space and power for AI workloads, delivering 300 MW of gross capacity with air and liquid cooling in two phases from July 2026 to the fourth quarter of 2026, with rent commencing in August 2026. Cipher's November 2025 investor presentation pairs the 300 MW Black Pearl facility with Amazon Web Services in its capacity chart; the Black Pearl site record describes the tenant as an undisclosed investment-grade hyperscaler.
Disclosed in Energy Transfer's third quarter 2025 results, 5 November 2025; first deliveries to the Abilene, Texas data center began January 2026 (fourth quarter 2025 results, 17 February 2026)Energy Transfer · Oraclepower supply agreementn.a.Energy Transfer executed multiple long-term agreements with Oracle to supply about 900 MMcf per day of natural gas to three US data centers, two of them in Texas, sourced from its intrastate pipeline network and including construction of a new pipeline lateral. Energy Transfer said it began deliveries to Oracle's data center near Abilene, Texas in January 2026 under the first of the agreements.
Announced 7 May 2025 (Elementl Power release)Google · Elementl Powerpower supply agreementn.a.Google committed early-stage development capital to Elementl Power to pre-position three US sites for advanced nuclear projects, each expected to generate at least 600 MW, with Google holding an option for commercial offtake once complete. Elementl, a technology-agnostic nuclear developer, said it aims to bring more than 10 GW online in the US by 2035. Elementl separately announced a project of up to 1.5 GW in Letart Township, Meigs County, Ohio in June 2026, but its project page does not tie that site to Google.
Announced Tuesday 6 October 2026 (Google and Constellation joint release; Chicago Tribune and Quartz via Yahoo Finance)Google · Constellation Energyppan.a.Google signed a 20-year power purchase agreement with Constellation Energy to bring 890 MW of new nuclear capacity onto the PJM grid through turbine, steam generator and digital control upgrades at 11 Constellation units in Illinois, Pennsylvania and New Jersey, with the first uprate expected by 2028. Constellation said it will invest more than $4.3 billion in the uprates. In a separate agreement Constellation will supply Google with 2,700 MW over 15 years through PJM, and the companies agreed a framework to evaluate new clean generation across the US. The deal follows Amazon's 690 MW Calvert Cliffs agreement of 30 September 2026.
Agreement announced by Entergy Louisiana in late March 2026; LPSC application filed 25 March 2026 (Docket U-37882); evidentiary hearing set for 7 to 9 October; LPSC decision expected 16 December 2026Entergy Louisiana · Meta (Evest LLC)power supply agreementn.a.Under a second agreement supporting Meta's Hyperion campus in Richland Parish, Entergy Louisiana plans, paid for by Meta, seven new natural gas combined-cycle units totaling more than 5,200 MW (about 5,278 MW, roughly 754 MW each; four near the Richland Parish campus and three near Big Cajun in Pointe Coupee Parish), three battery storage projects and about 240 miles of new 500 kV transmission. The customer entity is Evest LLC. The Louisiana PSC holds a three-day evidentiary hearing from 7 October; intervenors include the Alliance for Affordable Energy, Sierra Club, Union of Concerned Scientists, Louisiana Energy Users Group and Walmart. This is in addition to the three gas plants approved in 2025 (meta-entergy-gas-plants).
June 2024 (St. Joseph County recorder documents)Microsoft · St. Joe Farm (seller)acquisition$78MMicrosoft acquired nearly 930 acres of farmland from St. Joe Farm in Granger, St. Joseph County, Indiana, for $77.5 million, according to county recorder documents, for a planned data center campus.
Tariff and supply agreement filed with the PUCN in June 2024; PUCN approval reported 19 May 2025 (ThinkGeoEnergy); exact order date not in the fetched sourceGoogle · NV Energy · Fervo Energypower supply agreementn.a.The Public Utilities Commission of Nevada approved the Clean Transition Tariff agreed by Google, NV Energy and Fervo Energy, a first-of-its-kind rate under which NV Energy buys power from Fervo's 115 MW Corsac Station enhanced geothermal project, under development, and supplies it to Google's data centers in Nevada, with Google paying a premium so the cost of the new resource is not passed to other customers. Fervo said the project may be expanded given interest from other companies.
Agreements effective 30 September 2026; announced Tuesday 6 October 2026 (Black Hills release and Form 8-K)Black Hills Corp. · Googlepower supply agreement$1.8BBlack Hills signed a Large Power Contract Services Agreement and a Generation Facilities Agreement, effective 30 September 2026 with terms through 2048, to serve a planned Google data center in Cheyenne, Wyoming. The project is to be served by a total resource mix of 2.7 GW including reserve margins: up to 590 MW of grid-connected service from 564 MW of new gas generation that a non-regulated Black Hills affiliate will build at the Cheyenne Prairie Generating Station plus market energy, and about 2.1 GW of Wyoming-based third-party contracted resources managed through a private microgrid under Black Hills' Large Power Contract Service tariff. Energy service is planned to begin in late 2027 and ramp to peak load in 2030. Black Hills says Google bears all costs of serving the data center and expects the project to contribute about $150 million of net income in 2030. The release does not name the Google campus; the atlas tracks Google's 2.7 GW Project Tembo south of Cheyenne (google-project-tembo-laramie-wy).
Announced Wednesday 7 October 2026 (BKV release furnished on Form 8-K)BKV Corporation · Undisclosed Tier 1 equipment supplier · Undisclosed investment-grade hyperscalerequipment ordern.a.A BKV subsidiary signed an equipment supply contract with an unnamed Tier 1 supplier for about 1,200 MW of natural gas-fired power generation equipment (gas turbines, reheat steam turbines, heat recovery steam generators and a distributed control system) for BKV's prospective power generation project in Texas, with deliveries beginning September 2028. An unnamed investment-grade hyperscaler, which is also the intended off-taker, agreed to reimburse a portion of BKV's costs, covering about 90% of payments owed through 31 March 2027. If BKV and the hyperscaler have not agreed offtake terms by 31 March 2027, BKV may terminate the supply contract with no further payment obligations.
Backfill (not previously recorded). Announced 2 June 2026 (Latitude Media)Google · Voltuspower supply agreementn.a.Google became the first named customer of Voltus's bring-your-own-capacity program, under which a hyperscaler finances a virtual power plant of batteries, demand response and other distributed resources in the region where it needs data center power, and Voltus delivers the contracted capacity to the load-serving entity. Voltus will procure up to 100 MW of distributed flexible capacity for Google's data centers in PJM; the companies called it the first instance of a hyperscaler directly funding a VPP. Voltus launched the program in September 2025 with Cloverleaf Infrastructure and said its VPPs come online in 2027.
Financial close announced 7 October 2026Zelestra · Meta (PPA offtaker) · Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce · BBVA · Societe Generaledebt facility$350MIndependent power producer Zelestra closed a US$350 million green credit facility from CIBC, BBVA and Societe Generale for the 203 MW Reclamation Solar project on former coal mining land in Gibson County, Indiana, which will fulfil a power purchase agreement with Meta. The project is under construction with commercial operation expected at the end of 2027. Zelestra said the financing brings its 2026 US project financing to US$1.14 billion; it has seven US PPAs with Meta.
02

Frontier AI labs

The demand-side counterparties for most of the capacity in this atlas. Two are now infrastructure principals in their own right, and the third operates the only large self-powered merchant AI fleet in North America.

3entities 18named sites 23transactions 20recorded facts
OpenAI (Stargate) logo

OpenAI (Stargate)Full profile →

Financingmulti-party JV equity (SoftBank/OpenAI/Oracle/MGX) plus partner-level debt and vendor purchase commitments

OpenAI launched the Stargate Project in January 2025 as a new company intending to invest $500 billion over four years building AI infrastructure in the United States, with $100 billion deployed immediately and SoftBank, OpenAI, Oracle, and MGX as initial equity funders. Planned capacity milestones grew from a 10 GW commitment at launch to over 8 gigawatts of planned capacity with more than $450 billion in investment over three years by October 2025. By 2026 the program showed retrenchment: the Abilene expansion was cancelled, projected compute spend was trimmed to around $600 billion by 2030 from an earlier $1.4 trillion by 2033 pledge, and OpenAI pulled back from a Stargate Norway deal.

PeriodKindAmountContextSources
2025-2029 (announced Jan 2025)guidance$500BCumulative multi-year: 'intends to invest $500 billion over the next four years building new AI infrastructure for OpenAI in the United States,' with 'We will begin deploying $100 billion immediately.'
Sep 2025 milestoneguidance$400BCumulative: 'over $400 billion in investment over the next three years' alongside 'nearly 7 gigawatts of planned capacity.' Overlaps the Jan 2025 $500B commitment; do not sum.
Oct 2025 milestoneguidance$450BCumulative: 'more than $450 billion in investment over the next three years' alongside 'over 8 gigawatts of planned capacity.' Supersedes the Sep 2025 figure; do not sum.
projected by 2030 (reported 2026)guidance$600B'OpenAI has around $600bn in projected compute spend by 2030, an apparent reduction on an earlier pledge to spend $1.4tn by 2033.' Reported figure, not a company disclosure in this passage.
earlier framing (Altman, 2025)guidance$1.40T'33 gigawatts of new computing power... $1.4 trillion in forthcoming commitments.' Later trimmed; do not sum with other lines.
Record
  • The initial equity funders in Stargate are SoftBank, OpenAI, Oracle, and MGX, with Arm, Microsoft, NVIDIA, Oracle, and OpenAI as key initial technology partners, and the buildout starting in Texas.
  • The January 2025 launch carried a 10 GW capacity commitment, growing to over 5 gigawatts and over 2 million chips with the Oracle 4.5 GW partnership in July 2025, nearly 7 gigawatts in September 2025, and over 8 gigawatts by October 2025.
  • The September 2025 announcement added five sites, with coverage identifying the new campuses across multiple states.
  • The Abilene expansion was cancelled, with the 2 GW ambition reduced to the built 1.2 GW, power unavailable for a year, and OpenAI preferring to deploy Vera Rubin silicon at a new campus.
  • Early scepticism about the program's pace was reported in 2025, and OpenAI later pulled back from a Stargate Norway deal.
  • Fellow Stargate backer SoftBank is turning to debt to fund OpenAI's expansion and is seeking $40bn in loans.
Anthropic logo

AnthropicFull profile →

Financingvendor/strategic equity (Amazon $4B to $8B, then $5B plus up to $20B), long-term purchase commitments (>$100B AWS, ~$200B Google Cloud), and third-party developer builds (Fluidstack)

Anthropic is a compute buyer that has become a direct infrastructure investor. It announced in November 2025 a $50 billion investment in American computing infrastructure, building data centers with Fluidstack in Texas and New York, and committed more than $100 billion over ten years to AWS technologies for up to 5 GW of capacity. On 18 November 2025 it committed to purchase $30 billion of Azure compute capacity and to contract up to one gigawatt more, with Microsoft investing up to $5 billion and NVIDIA up to $10 billion in the company. In August 2026 it added a platform partnership with Macquarie Asset Management and GIC, who own the platform and fund the majority of project equity with Anthropic as anchor tenant, and was reported to have agreed to spend approximately $45 billion over six years for roughly 460 MW at Nscale's West Virginia campus. These are separate commitments to different counterparties and are not summed here.

PeriodKindAmountContextSources
announced Nov 2025guidance$50.0B'a $50 billion investment in American computing infrastructure, building data centers with Fluidstack in Texas and New York, with more sites to come.' Multi-year own-build program; sites coming online throughout 2026.
announced 18 November 2025commitment$30.0B$30 billion of Azure compute capacity plus contracted capacity up to one gigawatt
reported 26 August 2026commitment$45.0Breported approximately $45 billion over six years for roughly 460 MW at Nscale's West Virginia campus; press-reported, not company disclosure
Record
  • The $50 billion own-build program with Fluidstack will create approximately 800 permanent jobs and 2,400 construction jobs, with sites coming online throughout 2026; Fluidstack was chosen for rapid delivery of gigawatts of power, with no numeric GW disclosed.
  • The April 2026 AWS expansion secures up to 5GW of new capacity, with nearly 1GW total of Trainium2 and Trainium3 capacity coming online by the end of 2026 and over one million Trainium2 chips currently in use.
  • The October 2025 Google Cloud deal, worth tens of billions, gives Anthropic access to up to one million TPUs and more than a gigawatt of capacity in 2026.
  • In April 2026 Anthropic signed a new agreement with Google and Broadcom for multiple gigawatts of next-generation TPU capacity expected to come online starting in 2027, with the vast majority of the new compute sited in the United States.
  • Run-rate revenue has surpassed $30 billion, up from approximately $9 billion at the end of 2025, and Anthropic is in talks with investors about raising cash at a valuation of $900 billion.
  • Anthropic expressed interest in working with SpaceX to develop multiple gigawatts of compute capacity in space; delayed or paused capacity is n.a. in the source.
  • Anthropic's disclosed compute commitments run to at least four separate counterparties (AWS, Microsoft Azure, Nscale, and its own Fluidstack-built sites). They are distinct agreements and must not be added into a single deployment figure.
  • Under the Macquarie Asset Management and GIC partnership announced 10 August 2026, Anthropic is the anchor tenant rather than the owner: the platform is owned by MAM funds and GIC, which fund the majority of the equity for each project. No dollar figure was disclosed.
xAI (now operating under SpaceX / "SpaceXAI") logo

xAI (now operating under SpaceX / "SpaceXAI")Full profile →

Financingventure/strategic equity rounds plus project debt for Colossus 2; self-powered merchant fleet now monetized via GPU rental and capacity contracts

xAI closed a $6 billion Series C on December 23, 2024, bringing total funding to over $12 billion, sought $12 billion in debt in July 2025 to fund Colossus 2, and reportedly raised a further $20 billion in equity in January 2026. The SpaceX combination valued SpaceX at $1 trillion and xAI at $250 billion, for a combined $1.25 trillion. It operates the Colossus 1 and Colossus 2 campuses in the Memphis area, providing on the order of 1 gigawatt of combined AI compute capacity by mid-2026, largely self-powered by gas turbines that have drawn permits, litigation, and regulatory friction. The fleet is now partly monetized as merchant capacity, with Google renting approximately 110,000 GPUs for $920 million per month and Anthropic contracting for more than 300 megawatts.

PeriodKindAmountContextSources
Series C, Dec 23 2024raise$6.0B'We have closed our Series C funding round of $6 billion' with participation from A16Z, Blackrock, Fidelity, Kingdom Holdings, Lightspeed, MGX, Morgan Stanley, OIA, QIA, Sequoia Capital, Valor Equity Partners and Vy Capital.
cumulative to Dec 2024raise$12.0BCumulative: 'making its total funding to date over $12 billion.' Includes the $6B Series C; do not sum with it.
Jul 2025debt sought$12.0BDebt sought, not closed in the source: 'xAI is working with a financier to secure $12 billion in debt to fund its Colossus 2 data center and its GPU compute,' working with Valor Equity Partners and following a $10bn raise; some lenders wanted repayment within three years and a cap on total debt.
Jan 2026raise$20.0B'A further US$20 billion equity raise was reported in January 2026.' Reported, per IFR.
Record
  • Colossus 1 was the world's largest AI supercomputer with 100,000 NVIDIA Hopper GPUs, fully operational in 122 days and running workloads 19 days after first server delivery, with plans to double to 200,000 Hopper GPUs; by mid-2026, 230k GPUs including 30k GB200s were operational for training Grok.
  • As of mid-2026 the combined Colossus campuses provided on the order of 1 gigawatt of AI compute capacity.
  • A permanent ~1.2 GW simple-cycle plant of 41 turbines received a Mississippi Prevention of Significant Deterioration permit in March 2026, with temporary units scheduled for phased removal by mid-2027 under a 2026 agreement with state regulators.
  • xAI won a permit for turbines to power the Memphis supercomputer and in 2026 won an air permit for its makeshift power plant despite backlash; The Guardian reported the datacenter was generating extra electricity illegally, Senator Whitehouse called for answers about a pattern of operating illegal data center gas plants, and Earthjustice and the NAACP have litigated.
  • Plans for an $80 million wastewater / greywater recycling plant near Colossus 1 were paused in 2026 while the company focused on completing and stabilizing Colossus 2, and a contractor publicly alleged non-payment on Colossus and Colossus II in August 2026; no cancelled xAI campus was identified, cancelled capacity n.a.
  • The Memphis complex now functions partly as merchant AI capacity, with Google renting approximately 110,000 GPUs for $920 million per month and Anthropic contracting for more than 300 megawatts of compute capacity.

Named sites — frontier ai labs

SiteLocationCapitalMWStatusDetailSources
Stargate site, Shackelford (announced)Shackelford, TXn.a.announcedListed in the summary table among the 7+ announced US Stargate sites. No site-level dollar or MW figure appears in this part.
Milam County Data Center (Stargate site)Burlington (County Road 133), TX~$470MconstructionListed in the summary table among the announced US Stargate sites. SB Energy's Form S-1, filed 1 September 2026, identifies the Milam County Data Center as one of the company's two data center projects under construction, alongside the Cosmos Technology Campus, and states that Milam County Buildings 1 and 2 sit within its 0.8 GW-IT of under-construction capacity. The filing records warrants issued on 9 January 2026 in connection with the Milam County data center facility lease arrangements with OpenAI, remeasurement of which drove a $2,573.1 million change in fair value of warrant liability for the six months ended 30 June 2026. No site-level dollar or megawatt figure is disclosed. A TDLR registration (TABS2026017746) filed in April 2026 lists 'Freebird Data Center Phase 1' (facility DC01) on County Road 133 in Burlington, Milam County: a single-story 548,950 sq ft building with four data halls, estimated cost $470,000,000, owner Milam County Data Center LLC and tenant OpenAI, with construction from October 2025 to October 2026. KCEN-TV traced quarry truck traffic through Temple to the project in August 2026, and an SB Energy spokesperson responded on the company's behalf.
Stargate site, Dona Ana (announced)Santa Teresa, NMn.a.announcedListed in the summary table among the 7+ announced US Stargate sites. No site-level dollar or MW figure appears in this part. Dona Ana County commissioners voted 4-1 on 19 September 2025 to approve up to $165 billion of industrial revenue bonds for Project Jupiter in Santa Teresa, developed by BorderPlex Digital Assets and STACK Infrastructure for lease to Oracle Cloud Infrastructure. The campus remains in press coverage in the week of 17 to 24 September 2026 over its $18 billion construction loans and permitting. Bloomberg News reported on 24 September 2026, citing people familiar with the situation, that Oracle sent a notice citing force majeure to the project's developer, which Bloomberg describes as a unit of Blue Owl Capital. The notice is intended to let Oracle put off payments if Project Jupiter is derailed and fails to come online in 2028 as planned, rather than to exit as the main tenant; Bloomberg said it is not certain the notice would release Oracle from its agreed financial obligations. Reuters, which carried the report, could not independently verify it, and Oracle and Blue Owl did not immediately comment. Oracle shares fell about 4 percent in premarket trading after the report, per Reuters. Oracle told El Paso Matters on 24 September 2026 that the project remains on schedule; Bisnow, citing Reuters, reported a one-year delay over power. Bisnow reports Blue Owl contributed $3 billion of equity alongside the $18 billion debt commitment and that Bloom Energy fuel cells are planned to power the 2.4 GW campus.
Stargate site, Lordstown (announced)Lordstown, OHn.a.announcedListed in the summary table among the 7+ announced US Stargate sites. No site-level dollar or MW figure appears in this part.
Colossus, MemphisMemphis, TNn.a.operatingPart of xAI's Memphis, Tennessee plus Southaven, Mississippi complex per the summary table. An $80M greywater plant was paused in 2026; no campus was cancelled.
Colossus 2, SouthavenSouthaven, MS~$35.8B946constructionColossus 2 in Southaven, Mississippi is estimated at 946 MW IT and $35.8 billion cumulative cost, projected to 1,531 MW and $58.0 billion by Q1 2027, per the summary table citing Epoch AI. xAI sought $12bn in debt to fund the buildout with first chips online in a few weeks per DCD.
Stargate AbileneAbilene, TXn.a.1200operatingFlagship Stargate campus of 1.2 GW across eight buildings and roughly 4 million square feet, with the first two buildings live in September 2025 carrying over 200MW of IT. The planned expansion from a 2 GW ambition was cancelled, leaving the built 1.2 GW, with OpenAI preferring to deploy Vera Rubin silicon at a new campus and Meta in talks to pick up Crusoe capacity.
Stargate Saline Township (Michigan)Saline Township, MI~$7.0B1000announcedStargate campus in Saline Township, Michigan, part of the 4.5GW Oracle partnership, a more than one gigawatt campus developed by Related Digital with construction expected to begin in early 2026 and more than 2,500 union construction jobs. AP reported it as a $7 billion, Michigan-first hyperscale campus.
Shackelford County Stargate AI CampusShackelford, TXn.a.announcedOne of the campuses identified in coverage of the September 2025 five-site expansion, the Shackelford County, Texas site was later designated an official Stargate AI Campus.
Anthropic-Fluidstack Texas data centersTXn.a.announcedTexas leg of Anthropic's $50 billion investment in American computing infrastructure, building data centers with Fluidstack, with sites coming online throughout 2026. Specific city and county sites and MW are n.a. in the source.
Anthropic-Fluidstack New York data centersNYn.a.announcedNew York leg of Anthropic's $50 billion investment in American computing infrastructure, building data centers with Fluidstack, with sites coming online throughout 2026. Specific city and county sites and MW are n.a. in the source.
Project Rainier (New Carlisle)New Carlisle, IN$11.0BoperatingAmazon and Anthropic built Project Rainier, activated October 2025 as one of the world's largest AI compute clusters, hosted at the $11 billion New Carlisle, Indiana campus.
Colossus 1Memphis, TNn.a.operatingWorld's largest AI supercomputer at launch with 100,000 NVIDIA Hopper GPUs, fully operational in 122 days, with plans to double to 200,000 Hopper GPUs. By mid-2026, 230k GPUs including 30k GB200s were operational for training Grok. In February 2025 an xAI affiliate purchased a large warehouse and adjacent parcels at 5420 Tulane Road in Whitehaven, Memphis for roughly $80 million. MLGW told the Memphis City Council on 1 September 2026 that a second 150 MW substation for SpaceXAI's Colossus data center at 3231 Paul R. Lowry Road would be completed by fall 2026, with a further 300 MW planned in the Pidgeon Industrial Park in early 2027 subject to TVA approval. The $80 million Colossus Water Recycling Plant, which broke ground in October 2025, has been paused since April 2026, and SpaceXAI uses less than 1 million gallons of MLGW water a day with a 1.82 million gallon peak
Colossus 2Memphis, TN$35.8B946operatingThe first major GPU cluster of roughly 110,000 Nvidia GB200-class processors at about 210 MW came online around January 2026 after a reported 91-day build, followed by a GB300-class cluster, with 300,000 to 350,000+ GPUs and several hundred megawatts of IT load by mid-2026. Epoch AI estimates 1,112k H100-equivalents on 946 MW of IT power at a capital cost of $35.8 B, and cites the company S-1 filing, page 76, for the first cluster figures. The source describes the combined campuses as xAI's Memphis complex; the permanent power plant was permitted in Mississippi. FOX13 reported on 30 July 2026 that Elon Musk disclosed a further Memphis facility called Minihard in Whitehaven, alongside the Macrohard and Macroharder facilities already under construction along Tulane Road. The TVA board approved a direct service agreement of more than 100 MW for MZX Tech on 20 August 2026; MLGW was supplying less than 160 MW across SpaceXAI's two Shelby County campuses, per the Commercial Appeal
Project Camellia (Savannah Gateway Industrial Hub)Rincon, GA$20.0B3200announcedOpenAI announced Project Camellia in Effingham County, Georgia in July 2026: four data center buildings at the Savannah Gateway Industrial Hub, a 2,600-acre campus just outside Rincon, with the data center buildings covering approximately 101 acres. Georgia Power is to supply 3.2 GW delivered in phases from 2028 to 2032. Reported commitments include $80 million in community benefits, a 50% property tax abatement for 15 years, and 400 long-term jobs initially. The site owner is the Effingham County Industrial Development Authority and the development entity was filed as Octans GA LLC. Georgia Power filed the fully redacted large-load contract with the PSC on 15 July 2026. On 13 August 2026 PSC utilities director Tom Bond said staff would object unless terms changed, and Georgia Power elected to extend the 30-day staff review period that was due to expire 14 August; the contract's filing date was changed to 22 July. On 26 August 2026 PSC staff and Georgia Power filed a joint statement approving the contract with added ratepayer protections, without a commission vote. The contract provides up to 3,200 MW in phases from 2028 through 2032, with up to 1,000 MW of flexible demand response and OpenAI paying the full cost of serving infrastructure. Effingham County canceled a scheduled site plan vote on 14 September 2026 at the applicant's request. A Yahoo Finance article of 23 July 2026 described the campus as a $30 billion project, which conflicts with OpenAI's stated investment of at least $20 billion
Nexus Data Centers Hubbard AI campus (Anthropic anchor tenant)Hubbard, TXn.a.under constructionNexus Data Centers is building a multi-phase data center and behind-the-meter power campus in Hubbard, Texas, about 70 miles south of Dallas, with Anthropic as primary tenant under four data center leases. Google agreed to guarantee Anthropic's lease and power-payment obligations to support the senior debt, and Anthropic plans to equip the site with Google TPUs financed separately with Broadcom. Eagle Point said on 19 August 2026 that its HoldCo loan completed the capital structure for phase one and allowed Nexus to reach a final investment decision. Bloomberg reported the campus at 2,900 acres
Cedar Creek data center and gas plant campus (382 Earl Callahan Road), Anthropic in lease talksCedar Creek, TXn.a.490proposedThe Austin Business Journal reported on 24 August 2026 that Anthropic is in talks to lease a planned data center on a 2,842-acre site near Cedar Creek in Bastrop County, backed by a gas-fired plant. The developers withdrew requests for Bastrop County and school district tax abatements, which the outlet attributed to Anthropic. Power plant construction could start in the third quarter of 2026 with completion tentatively in 2028. Axios reported that Anthropic had not finalized a deal and that county officials were reviewing development applications. On 22 and 23 September 2026 the Austin Business Journal, as relayed by KXAN, reported that the campus appears to be paused after Governor Greg Abbott ordered a halt to new state permits for data center projects on 21 September 2026. Neither the developers nor Bastrop County had publicly confirmed a pause, and no project-specific TCEQ action on the pending Pacifico air permit registration was found. Aqua Water Supply Corp.'s board has approved large-volume water service to Pacifico Energy Development for the 2,842-acre development; Pacifico must pay a $3,500 legal deposit by 30 November 2026 and enter a non-standard service agreement by 28 February 2027 or risk losing the approval (Community Impact, reported 25 September 2026).
SpaceXAI Minihard data center (adjacent to Colossus 2, Tulane Road)Memphis (Whitehaven), TNn.a.announcedElon Musk announced on X at the end of July 2026 a new SpaceXAI data center development called Minihard, adjacent to Colossus 2 in the Whitehaven neighborhood of Memphis, with operations similar to the company's Macroharder facility in Southaven. Local coverage described it as the third SpaceXAI data center in Memphis, alongside a fourth facility and a power plant across the state line in Southaven, and reported resident complaints about a lack of notice

Financing transactions — frontier ai labs

TimingPartiesInstrumentAmountDetailSources
January 2025OpenAI · SoftBank · Oracle · MGXplatform≥$500BStargate launched as a new company intending to invest $500 billion over four years building new AI infrastructure for OpenAI in the United States, starting in Texas, with SoftBank, OpenAI, Oracle, and MGX as initial equity funders.
January 2025 (reported)OpenAI · SoftBankjv equity$19.0BReported equity economics of the Stargate venture: OpenAI and SoftBank each investing $19 billion for 40% stakes each.
described in atlas §5.4debt facilityn.a.The debt package for the Saline Township, Michigan Stargate site is described in the atlas's §5.4.
approved December 2025DTE · Stargate (Saline Township data center)ppan.a.Michigan regulators approved a 19-year DTE contract for 1.4 GW serving the Stargate AI data center in Saline Township.
reported 2026SoftBankdebt facility$40.0BFellow Stargate backer SoftBank is turning to debt to fund OpenAI's expansion and is currently seeking $40bn in loans.
announced November 2025Anthropic · Fluidstackplatform$50.0BAnthropic announced a $50 billion investment in American computing infrastructure, building data centers with Fluidstack in Texas and New York with more sites to come, creating approximately 800 permanent jobs and 2,400 construction jobs.
initial September 2023 ('Last September'); completed March 2024Amazon · Anthropicequity raise$4.0BAmazon's equity investment in Anthropic reached $4 billion in March 2024, comprising an initial $1.25 billion and an additional $2.75 billion.
April 2026Anthropic · Amazon (AWS) · AWSother≥$100BAnthropic committed more than $100 billion over ten years to AWS technologies, securing up to 5GW of new capacity to train and run Claude, with nearly 1GW total of Trainium2 and Trainium3 capacity coming online by end of 2026.
April 2026Amazon · Anthropicequity raise$5.0BAmazon is investing $5 billion in Anthropic with up to an additional $20 billion in the future, building on the $8 billion previously invested.
October 2025Anthropic · Googleothern.a.A cloud deal worth tens of billions giving Anthropic access to up to one million TPUs and more than a gigawatt of capacity in 2026.
April 2026Anthropic · Google · Broadcomothern.a.Anthropic signed a new agreement with Google and Broadcom for multiple gigawatts of next-generation TPU capacity, with the vast majority of the new compute to be sited in the United States, described as a major expansion of the November 2025 $50 billion American infrastructure commitment.
referenced May 2026Anthropic · Google · Google Cloudother$200BCNBC referenced Anthropic's $200 billion commitment to Google Cloud in coverage of the SpaceX capacity deal.
May 2026Anthropic · SpaceX (xAI/Colossus fleet)leasen.a.Anthropic will get access to more than 300 megawatts of compute capacity from SpaceX's xAI/Colossus fleet, and expressed interest in working with SpaceX to develop multiple gigawatts of compute capacity in space.
reported May 2026Anthropicequity raisen.a.Anthropic is in talks with investors about raising cash at a valuation of $900 billion.
23 December 2024xAI · A16Z · Blackrock · Fidelity Management & Research Company · Kingdom Holdings · Lightspeed · MGX · Morgan Stanley · OIA · QIA · Sequoia Capital · Valor Equity Partners · Vy Capitalequity raise≥$6.0BxAI closed its Series C funding round of $6 billion with participation from key investors, bringing its total funding to date over $12 billion.
July 2025xAI · Valor Equity Partnersdebt facility$12.0BxAI worked with a financier to secure $12 billion in debt to fund its Colossus 2 data center and its GPU compute, working with Valor Equity Partners.
n.a. (per Wikipedia SpaceXAI entry)SpaceX · xAImergern.a.The SpaceX combination valued SpaceX at $1 trillion and xAI at $250 billion, for a combined total of $1.25 trillion; xAI now operates under SpaceX as SpaceXAI.
February 2025xAI affiliateacquisition~$80MAn xAI affiliate purchased a large warehouse and adjacent parcels at 5420 Tulane Road in Whitehaven, Memphis for roughly $80 million.
agreed June 5, 2026; term October 2026 through June 2029Google · SpaceXlease~$920MOn June 5, 2026, Google agreed to rent access to approximately 110,000 GPUs from SpaceX beginning October 2026 through June 2029 for $920 million per month, making xAI's Memphis complex function partly as merchant AI capacity.
Announced 1 September 2026Google · Fervo Energyppan.a.Fervo Energy and Google signed a 396 MW power purchase agreement for the Cape Station enhanced geothermal project in Utah, announced 1 September 2026 and reported by Fervo as the largest enhanced geothermal power purchase agreement signed to date. Google will purchase carbon-free energy described as a foundational building block for a potential data center in Utah; the facility is not named or located in the release. The agreement carries an option for Google to expand offtake by approximately 600 MW, for a total of nearly 1 GW, by June 2030. Cape Station is expected to come online in 2028.
Reported by Reuters 1 October 2026 from Anthropic's IPO prospectus, as carried by Yahoo Finance; the prospectus is not public on EDGARBroadcom · Anthropicconvertible~$42.0BReuters reported on Thursday 1 October 2026, citing Anthropic's IPO prospectus, that Broadcom has agreed to lend Anthropic up to $42 billion through convertible notes to help finance infrastructure spending. The notes are sized to cover about one-third of the $125.2 billion Anthropic has pledged under a five-year agreement for tensor processing unit computing capacity. Broadcom may bring in a financing partner, the notes could convert into Anthropic equity, and Anthropic does not expect any notes to be sold before its IPO completes. Anthropic placed funds in a restricted account for Broadcom's benefit in April 2026. The same report says the prospectus lists $518 billion of total cloud, compute and infrastructure obligations. No prospectus is publicly available on EDGAR, so the terms rest on the press account; Broadcom did not comment and Anthropic declined to comment.
Purchase confirmed by Elon Musk in early January 2026 (Tech Times, 7 January 2026, single outlet); Doosan announced orders for two units in October 2025 and three more in December 2025 without naming the buyerxAI · Doosan Enerbilityequipment ordern.a.xAI confirmed it bought five 380 MW natural gas turbines from South Korea's Doosan Enerbility to power its Colossus AI supercomputing expansion around Memphis. Doosan had reported a contract for two 380 MW turbines with an unnamed major US technology company in October 2025 and an order for three more in December 2025.
Round agreed early 2026 (TNW: SoftBank commitment agreed late February 2026; SBS: March 2026 round); SoftBank's third and final $10 billion tranche paid 1 October 2026 Japan time, completing its $30 billion; Nvidia's final $10 billion reported paid by The Information on 1 October 2026 (relayed by SBS)OpenAI · SoftBank Group (Vision Fund 2) · Nvidia · Amazonequity raise$122BOpenAI's $122 billion funding round, which valued the company at $852 billion, drew commitments of up to $50 billion from Amazon and $30 billion each from Nvidia and SoftBank. SoftBank paid its $30 billion in three $10 billion tranches due 1 April, 1 July and 1 October 2026, funding the last from an $11.1 billion high-yield bond sale announced 24 September 2026, which lifted its total OpenAI investment to $64.6 billion for about a 13% stake; it also repaid and closed its $40 billion bridge loan. SBS, citing The Information, reported that Nvidia also paid its final $10 billion and that Amazon's $50 billion was paid in full in July 2026. OpenAI is now reported to be seeking a further $30 billion at a $1.4 trillion valuation.
03

NeoClouds & GPU clouds

GPU cloud specialists financing capacity with venture equity and secured debt, with contracted backlogs that far exceed revenue and customer concentration that is extreme by any market's standard.

24entities 56named sites 132transactions 58recorded facts

CoreWeaveFull profile →

FinancingGPU-backed private-credit DDTLs plus public equity, convertibles, and customer-contract-secured loan facilities
CRWV

CoreWeave is the largest neocloud, listed on Nasdaq in March 2025 after a $1.5 billion IPO, with $35.1 billion of total debt at June 30, 2026 and a revenue backlog of approximately $104 billion. Its capital stack spans GPU-backed delayed-draw term loans ($2.3 billion and $7.5 billion), a $650 million revolver, a $3.1 billion term loan, $3.5 billion of convertibles, an $8.5 billion Meta-secured loan facility, and a $2 billion Nvidia equity investment. Anchor contracts include approximately $22.4 billion with OpenAI, approximately $21 billion with Meta, and a $6.3 billion Nvidia capacity backstop, against a target of more than 5GW of AI factory capacity by 2030 across 33+ data centers.

PeriodKindAmountContextSources
as of 6/30/26reported$35.1BTotal debt $35.1B at June 30, 2026, per Wikipedia summary alongside $3.5B April 2026 convertible notes
Q2 FY2026backlog$104BRevenue backlog of approximately $104 billion, with more than $25 billion of new commitments signed in the quarter
Q2 FY2026reportedn.a.Source renders quarterly revenue as '(626) million', an apparent transcription artifact; adjusted EBITDA $1,510 million
FY2024reported$1.9BS-1 disclosed $1.92 billion of 2024 revenue, 62% from Microsoft, and a $863 million net loss in 2024
as of Sep 2025reported$18.8BTechCrunch characterized the Nvidia investment against CoreWeave's $18.81 billion of debt as of September 2025
Record
  • CoreWeave targets more than 5GW of AI factory capacity by 2030 under its January 2026 collaboration with Nvidia, and operated 33 data centers at the time of the Kenilworth announcement.
  • Microsoft accounted for 62% of CoreWeave's 2024 revenue per the IPO documents; the dollar value of the Microsoft contract itself is n.a.
  • IBM contracted a GB200 NVL72 supercomputer from CoreWeave to train IBM's Granite models, announced January 15, 2025, with contract value not disclosed.
  • CoreWeave disclosed third-party data center delivery delays affecting Texas, Oklahoma and North Carolina sites on November 11, 2025, moving both CRWV and CORZ shares.
  • No CoreWeave-specific Virginia site capacity or investment figure was confirmable from a fetched primary source; the document records it as n.a.

Core ScientificFull profile →

Financingpost-restructuring public equity plus high-yield senior secured notes against take-or-pay HPC hosting contracts
CORZ

Core Scientific emerged from Chapter 11 on January 23, 2024, converting roughly $400 million of debt into equity and relisting on Nasdaq with 724MW of capacity across five states. Its pivot to HPC hosting is anchored by a CoreWeave contract ladder that grew to approximately $10.2 billion over 12 years across roughly 590MW at six sites, and in Q1 2026 it priced $3.3 billion of 7.750% senior secured notes due 2031 to fund an approximately 3GW expansion pipeline. A $9.0 billion all-stock acquisition by CoreWeave was announced in July 2025 but terminated on October 30, 2025 after shareholders voted it down.

PeriodKindAmountContextSources
FY2026 guidanceguidance$2.0BGuided to $2 billion of 2026 capex, targeting 450MW billable by summer 2026 and 590MW by early 2027
Q1 2026raise$3.3B$3.3 billion of 7.750% senior secured notes due 2031, approximately $2.9 billion net
Nov 2024guidance$4.0BMuskogee 100MW HPC groundbreaking described as part of more than $4 billion of capex
Record
  • Core Scientific emerged from Chapter 11 on January 23, 2024 with 724MW of capacity across five states, converting roughly $400 million of debt into equity.
  • The CoreWeave HPC hosting contract reached approximately $10.2 billion cumulative over 12 years, covering roughly 590MW across six sites after the February 26, 2025 Denton expansion.
  • Marble, North Carolina and Calvert City, Kentucky appear inside the six-site and five-state aggregates, but site-level MW and dollar figures were not confirmable from fetched primary sources; recorded as n.a.
  • The atlas flags that claims of a completed CoreWeave acquisition of Core Scientific are incorrect; the $9.0 billion all-stock deal was terminated on October 30, 2025 after a shareholder vote.

Lambda (Lambda Labs)Full profile →

FinancingGPU-backed SPV debt and syndicated facilities layered on venture equity, moving toward an IPO

Lambda has layered a $320 million Series C, a $500 million GPU-backed SPV facility led by Macquarie, a $480 million Series D, a Series E of more than $1.5 billion, and debt facilities including a $926 million term loan B, a $1 billion syndicated facility and a $275 million facility, with a $350 million pre-IPO round reportedly in talks ahead of a targeted H2 2026 IPO. Its anchor relationships include a multibillion-dollar Microsoft agreement covering GB300 NVL72 systems and a reported $1.5 billion Nvidia lease-back. Flagship US expansion is a Kansas City, Missouri deployment starting at 24MW and scaling above 100MW against a company-wide 3GW liquid-cooled ambition. On 31 August 2026 Bloomberg and The Wall Street Journal reported that Lambda had signed a $35 billion cloud agreement with Anthropic, with the capacity to run through Hut 8's Beacon Point campus in Nueces County, Texas on a lease held by Nvidia. The reports did not disclose the agreement's term, GPU count, payment schedule or computing capacity.

PeriodKindAmountContextSources
H2 2026 (reported)raise$350M$350 million pre-IPO round reportedly in talks with Mubadala Capital to lead; IPO reportedly targeted for H2 2026 with Morgan Stanley, J.P. Morgan and Citi engaged
Record
  • The atlas corrects the brief's '$400M Series C (Aug 2025)': the confirmed Series C is $320 million in February 2024, and the August 2025 event is a $275 million facility.
  • Lambda targets a company-wide 3GW liquid-cooled buildout, with named locations including San Francisco, Allen TX, Columbus OH, Chicago, Atlanta (EdgeConneX), Plano TX (Aligned) and Vernon CA.
  • Nvidia arranged a $600 million Supermicro 21MW Prime sublease routed to Lambda.

Nebius GroupFull profile →

Financingpublic equity plus large convertible note programs and strategic Nvidia equity
NBIS

Nebius Group has raised a $700 million strategic equity round, a $3.75 billion equity-plus-converts package, approximately $4.3375 billion and $5.0 billion convertible note offerings, and a $2 billion Nvidia equity investment tied to scaling more than 5GW by 2030. Anchor contracts include a $17.4 billion five-year Microsoft agreement expandable to up to $19.4 billion, anchored at Vineland, New Jersey, and Meta agreements of $3 billion and then $27 billion over five years. Contracted-power guidance has escalated to more than 4GW, with Q1 2026 group revenue of $399.0 million and capex of approximately $2.5 billion.

PeriodKindAmountContextSources
Q1 2026reported$2.5BQ1 2026 capex approximately $2.5 billion; $6.3 billion of capital secured in the quarter, $2.3 billion positive operating cash flow, $9.3 billion ending cash
Q3 2025reported$956MQ3 2025 capex of $955.5 million against revenue of $146.1 million
FY2026 guidanceguidance$3.2B2026 revenue guidance of $3.0B-$3.4B (midpoint recorded) and $7B-$9B ARR; contracted-power guidance escalated from >1GW (Aug 2025) to >2.5GW, >3GW and currently >4GW
Record
  • Q1 2026 group revenue reached $399.0 million (from $50.9 million a year earlier), with AI-cloud revenue of $389.7 million and group adjusted EBITDA of $129.5 million.
  • Nebius plans to deploy more than 100,000 GB300 units for the Microsoft agreement, and described available capacity as sold out while targeting 2.5GW contracted and 800MW-1GW connected by end-2026.

Crusoe EnergyFull profile →

Financingprivate-capital JV (Blue Owl / Primary Digital) project funding plus venture equity rounds

Crusoe anchors the Stargate buildout at Abilene, Texas through a joint venture with Blue Owl Capital and Primary Digital Infrastructure that began at $3.4 billion for a 206MW first phase and grew to a $15 billion JV funding a 1.2GW, eight-building campus, with a further 900MW Abilene campus announced in March 2026 for Microsoft bringing the site total to 2.1GW. Equity raises include a $600 million Series D at $2.8 billion and a $1.375 billion Series E first close at more than $10 billion, and a Series F of more than $3 billion at a roughly $30 billion post-money valuation reported closed on 3 September 2026, co-led by Atreides Management and Valor Equity Partners with Mubadala Capital participating. Bloomberg reported on the same day that Crusoe had signed a five-year AI cloud contract with Jane Street worth roughly $13 billion, its highest-profile cloud customer to date. Its pipeline spans 45GW, including 1.8GW in Wyoming.

PeriodKindAmountContextSources
to date (reported Jul 2026)raise$2.8BTotal funding raised to date put at $2.77 billion by SiliconANGLE, reporting on the Bloomberg-reported ~$3B round
Record
  • The Series E disclosure cited a 45GW pipeline, 1.2GW at Abilene and 1.8GW in Wyoming.
  • Meta reportedly contracted two Crusoe data centers under construction in Texas and Missouri.
  • No Abilene-specific delay was found; Crusoe publicly backed Governor Abbott's Texas data center audits and responsible growth standards in an August 8, 2026 item. Iceland and international expansion figures are n.a.
  • Press reporting places Jane Street at roughly $19 billion of contracted AI compute across Crusoe and CoreWeave combined. Neither counterparty has published the contract terms.

Applied DigitalFull profile →

Financingperpetual preferred facility plus project-level senior secured notes against take-or-pay hyperscaler and CoreWeave leases
APLD

Applied Digital's FY2026 Form 10-K reports 1,410MW of contracted critical IT load across five Polaris Forge and Delta Forge campuses, representing approximately $36.2 billion of take-or-pay, non-cancellable revenue, anchored by CoreWeave leases totaling about $11 billion at Ellendale, ND and hyperscaler leases of $5 billion and $7.5 billion. Financing combines a $5.0 billion Macquarie perpetual preferred facility, senior secured notes of $2.35 billion, $2.15 billion and $1.59 billion, and a $160 million private placement that included Nvidia. Nvidia later sold its entire APLD position, worth roughly $182 million.

PeriodKindAmountContextSources
FY2026 10-Kbacklog$36.2BApproximately $36.2 billion of take-or-pay, non-cancellable revenue across 1,410MW contracted critical IT load at five campuses (fiscal year ended May 31, 2026, filed July 29, 2026)
as of May 20, 2026backlog$31.0BApproximately $31 billion of contracted baseline revenue ($73 billion if all renewals are exercised) across four AI Factory campuses totaling 1,200MW net critical IT / ~1,670MW gross utility power
FQ2 2026reported$127MRevenue $126.6 million, $2.35 billion of notes outstanding, $900 million of preferred drawn, approximately $16 billion of aggregate lease revenue
Record
  • 1.2GW of leases were executed in eleven months as of May 20, 2026, with more than 1.7GW of grid-connected power being marketed.
  • Nvidia sold its entire APLD position, worth roughly $182 million, in the fourth quarter, alongside exits from Recursion and WeRide.

Cerebras SystemsFull profile →

Financinglate-stage venture equity plus customer working-capital loan, moving toward IPO with a Morgan Stanley revolver

Cerebras raised a $1.1 billion Series G at an $8.1 billion post-money valuation in September 2025 and $1 billion in February 2026 at a $23 billion valuation, identified as a Series H, and re-filed its S-1 on April 17, 2026 targeting a Nasdaq listing under CBRS at approximately a $23 billion valuation after withdrawing its first IPO following a 14-month CFIUS review. Its dominant contract is with OpenAI, valued by Cerebras at more than $20 billion with up to 750MW through 2028, plus a $1 billion OpenAI working capital loan. Remaining performance obligations stood at $24.6 billion at December 31, 2025.

PeriodKindAmountContextSources
as of 12/31/2025backlog$24.6B$24.6 billion of remaining performance obligations, only 15% expected to be recognized in 2026-2027
FY2025reported$510M2025 revenue of $510 million (+76%); GAAP net income $87.9 million (Futurum reports $237.8 million GAAP net income driven by a $363.3 million non-cash G42 liability restructuring gain, and a $75.7 million non-GAAP net loss)
FY2024reported$-483300K2024 net loss of $481.6-485 million (midpoint of the verbatim range recorded as a loss)
Record
  • Cerebras withdrew its first IPO in October 2025 after a 14-month CFIUS review of its largest customer's investment, then re-filed a Form S-1 on April 17, 2026 targeting a Nasdaq listing under CBRS at approximately a $23 billion valuation.
  • Customer concentration shifted from 87% of H1 2024 revenue from G42 to 24% from G42 plus 62% from MBZUAI in 2025; Amazon is able to buy approximately $270 million of Class N stock; the company had 708 employees.
  • An earlier CNBC report placed the OpenAI deal at more than $10 billion over 750MW through 2028, versus the later more-than-$20-billion valuation of the relationship.
  • 85% of the capacity from the six datacenters announced March 11, 2025 is in the US.
Vultr logo

VultrFull profile →

Financingprivate growth equity (LuminArx, AMD Ventures) funding balance-sheet AI cluster investment

Vultr announced a financing at a $3.5 billion valuation in December 2024 with LuminArx Capital Management and AMD Ventures, with the round size reported as $333 million. In December 2025 it said it would invest more than $1 billion in a 50MW AI cluster in Springfield, Ohio using 24,000 AMD MI355 chips. Anchor customer contract values are n.a.

PeriodKindAmountContextSources
Dec 2025guidance$1.0BMore than $1 billion investment in the Springfield, Ohio 50MW AI cluster
Record
  • The atlas notes the brief's '$3.5B Series A' conflates valuation with round size; the December 2024 round was reported at $333 million at a $3.5 billion valuation.
  • Anchor customer contract values are n.a. in the fetched record.

Voltage ParkFull profile →

Financingphilanthropic / nonprofit seeding (Navigation Fund, McCaleb grant) plus merger equity

Voltage Park was seeded when Jed McCaleb's nonprofit purchased approximately $500 million of Nvidia H100 GPUs (24,000 units) in October 2023, and later received a $900 million grant from McCaleb. In January 2026 it merged with Lightning AI in a deal valuing the combined company at more than $2.5 billion, with more than $500 million of ARR, 60MW, more than 35,000 Nvidia GPUs and six data centers across four states. It also acquired GPU marketplace TensorDock in April 2025.

PeriodKindAmountContextSources
Oct 2023raise$500MApproximately $500 million of Nvidia H100 GPUs purchased by Jed McCaleb's nonprofit; 24,000 H100s per the Navigation Fund's later description
reported Jan 2026raise$900M$900 million grant from McCaleb
Record
  • Voltage Park describes 36,000+ H100/B200/GB300 GPUs post-merger, across six data centers in four states with at least one facility in every US time zone.
  • Voltage Park acquired GPU marketplace TensorDock in April 2025.
  • Anchor customer contract values are n.a. in the fetched record.

Together AIFull profile →

Financingventure equity with strategic investors (Aramco Ventures, Nvidia, Vista)

Together AI raised a $305 million Series B in February 2025 led by General Catalyst with Prosperity7, reporting 200MW of secured capacity and a 36,000 GB200 NVL72 deployment with Hypertec, followed by an $800 million Series C in July 2026 with Aramco Ventures, Nvidia and Vista at an $8.3 billion valuation, citing more than 500MW of capacity commitments. Named anchor customer contract values are n.a.

Record
  • Together AI reported 200MW of secured capacity and a 36,000 GB200 NVL72 deployment with Hypertec at the Series B, rising to more than 500MW of capacity commitments at the Series C.
  • Named anchor customer contract values are n.a. in the fetched record.

FluidstackFull profile →

Financingventure equity plus hyperscaler lease backstops and lockbox-secured partner debt

Fluidstack raised an $830 million Series A at a $7.5 billion valuation in July 2026, led by Situational Awareness. Its anchor relationship is Anthropic's approximately $50 billion US data center program, starting with Fluidstack sites in Texas and New York: 168MW at Abernathy, Texas with TeraWulf, 244MW with Cipher Mining, and 360MW at Lake Mariner, plus a $1.4 billion Google lease backstop. It also signed a 245MW, 15-year capacity deal at Hut 8's River Bend worth $7 billion, up to $17.7 billion with extensions, inside a multi-gigawatt partnership of up to 2.295GW for Anthropic.

Record
  • TeraWulf's $3.2 billion senior secured notes name Fluidstack USA I Inc. in a designated lockbox securing the notes, and note Google LLC pledging warrants prior to completion of the expansion.
  • The Hut 8 partnership for Anthropic covers up to 2.295GW, beginning with the 245MW River Bend capacity deal.

SesterceFull profile →

Financingunconfirmed; European infrastructure investment program with no confirmed North American capital commitment

The brief's claimed $2 billion Sesterce commitment could not be confirmed; no fetched page states such a figure and it is recorded as n.a. The confirmable program is European-centric: 600MW of capacity by 2028 and 1.2GW by 2030, a Valence Data Center with 40,000 GPUs, EUR 450 million of infrastructure investment and EUR 1.8 billion including hardware, and a 1GW Sesterce SoftBank Bosquel campus in France. North American presence is limited to a listed EWR20 Datacenter in New York with no stated capacity, dollar figure, date, GPU count or customer.

PeriodKindAmountContextSources
n.a.raisen.a.n.a., no confirmed $2B commitment; no fetched page states a $2 billion Sesterce commitment
Record
  • Sesterce's stated European program includes 600MW by 2028, 1.2GW by 2030, 500,000 GPUs by 2028 and more than 1 million GPUs by 2030 across two Grand Est sites, and a 250MW / 200,000 GPU Southern France Supercomputer.
  • Sesterce's corporate site lists a 1GW 'Sesterce SoftBank Bosquel' campus in France, 2GW of clean energy under long-term PPAs in Europe, 150 kW/rack designs, and SoftBank under 'Trusted by'.

PoolsideFull profile →

Financingventure equity plus strategic Nvidia investment; campus lease structure collapsed with partner exit

Poolside partnered with CoreWeave in October 2025 on Project Horizon, a 2GW West Texas campus at Longfellow Ranch structured in eight 250MW phases with a 15-year lease on the initial 250MW phase and a 500MW expansion option. CoreWeave subsequently ended the 2GW deal, leaving a $2 billion funding gap, with power procurement challenges cited. Poolside was reported raising $2 billion at a $14 billion valuation after $500 million at $3 billion in 2024, and Nvidia separately agreed to invest up to $1 billion.

Record
  • Project Horizon called for more than 40,000 Nvidia GB300 NVL72 GPUs to be supplied from December 2025 on a 568-acre site.
  • The account of CoreWeave's exit notes CoreWeave's $8.5 billion loan facility secured by its Meta agreement and cites power procurement challenges at the 2GW campus.

GroqFull profile →

Financingventure equity plus sovereign (Saudi) commitment; assets acquired by Nvidia per CNBC

Groq raised $640 million in August 2024 at a $2.8 billion valuation, $750 million in September 2025 at $6.9 billion, and $650 million in June 2026, alongside a $1.5 billion Saudi commitment announced February 2025 tied to a Dammam data center. A later Reuters page renders the Saudi figure as $15 billion; the atlas treats $1.5 billion as the originally reported commitment. Nvidia agreed to acquire Groq's assets for about $20 billion in cash, its largest purchase on record, while Groq characterized it as a non-exclusive licensing agreement without disclosing a price. Groq operates 13 data centers with a 200MW target by end-2027.

Record
  • The two Reuters figures for the Saudi commitment conflict ($1.5 billion originally, '$15 billion' on a later page); the atlas flags the discrepancy in-line and treats $1.5B as originally reported.
  • Groq operates 13 data centers with a 200MW target by end-2027, following a December 2025 non-exclusive Nvidia licensing agreement; it had been targeting $500 million of revenue for the year, with approximately $500 million of Saudi contract revenue expected per Reuters.
  • Groq's North American data center-level MW and site names beyond the 13-facility/200MW aggregate are n.a.

SambaNova SystemsFull profile →

Financinglate-stage venture equity with strategic investors (Vista, Intel, General Atlantic)

SambaNova closed the first tranche of a $1 billion Series F at an $11 billion valuation led by General Atlantic in July 2026, after a $350 million round in February 2026 led by Vista that included Intel, and a $676 million round in April 2021 at more than $5 billion. Its deployment model is SambaManaged, a modular offering scaling to a 1MW token factory with 100 racks and 1,600 chips. North American site names and MW are n.a., and no customer contract value is disclosed.

Record
  • SambaManaged scales to a 1MW 'token factory' with 100 racks and 1,600 chips; each SambaRack holds 16 SN40L RDU chips at 10kW air-cooled, deployable in 90 days.
  • SambaNova claims a 'major US public company' customer running DeepSeek-class models, with no contract value disclosed; NA site names and MW are n.a.

NscaleFull profile →

Financingventure equity led by industrial strategics (Aker ASA) with Nvidia and Dell participation

Nscale raised a $1.1 billion Series B on September 25, 2025, led by Aker ASA with Nvidia, Dell, Nokia, Blue Owl Managed Funds, Fidelity, G Squared, Point72, T.Capital and Sandton Capital. Its expanded Microsoft agreement covers approximately 200,000 Nvidia GB300 GPUs, including about 104,000 at a roughly 240MW Texas campus starting Q3 2026, with Microsoft holding an option on a second 700MW Texas phase from late 2027 against a 1.2GW site target; the deal has been reported at approximately $14 billion.

PeriodKindAmountContextSources
reported 26 August 2026backlog$45.0Breported six-year Anthropic compute agreement for roughly 460 MW at the West Virginia campus; revenue backlog, not capex, and press-reported rather than company-disclosed
Record
  • The Microsoft agreement covers approximately 200,000 Nvidia GB300 GPUs, with ~104,000 at the ~240MW Texas campus and an option on a second 700MW Texas phase from late 2027.
  • Nscale Limited filed a Form S-1 on 18 September 2026 for an initial public offering of ordinary shares on the New York Stock Exchange under the proposed symbol NSCL, led by Goldman Sachs, J.P. Morgan and Morgan Stanley, with the price range and share count left blank. The filing reports $103.4 billion of active and contracted total contract value under take-or-pay contracts as of 31 August 2026, up from $38.0 billion at 31 December 2025, and $56.4 billion of remaining performance obligations at 30 June 2026. Microsoft statements of work signed between September 2025 and April 2026 provide for payments of up to approximately $43.8 billion through December 2033, and the Anthropic Services Agreements signed 25 August 2026 provide for up to approximately $44.6 billion. Nscale reports about 1.37 GW of active and contracted capacity across five active and twelve contracted sites and a net loss of $1,020.1 million for the six months ended 30 June 2026.

IRENFull profile →

Financingcustomer prepayment (20% from Microsoft) plus balance-sheet equipment purchases; supplemented by a $3.6 billion investment-grade GPU financing at 6.0% for the Microsoft contract and $2.8 billion of new GPU financings for non-investment-grade deployments, including $2.4 billion led by Blue Owl and PIMCO at a 9.0% fixed rate
IREN

IREN signed an approximately $9.7 billion, five-year AI cloud agreement with Microsoft on November 3, 2025 with a 20% prepayment, expected to generate roughly $1.94 billion of annualized run-rate revenue once fully commissioned. It is deploying Nvidia GB300 systems in four Horizon 1-4 phases totaling 200MW of critical IT load at its 750MW campus in Childress, Texas, backed by a 3GW secured North American power portfolio and approximately $5.8 billion of GPU and equipment purchases from Dell. In its FY26 results of 27 August 2026 IREN reported $4 billion of contracted annualized run-rate revenue for 2026 capacity against $1 billion of operating ARR, a new multi-year AI Cloud contract with an unnamed leading frontier AI lab, and $2.8 billion of new GPU financings for non-investment-grade customer deployments alongside a $3.6 billion investment-grade GPU financing for the Microsoft contract. Total FY26 revenue was $707.0 million, of which AI Cloud Services contributed $128.8 million, against a net loss of $702.6 million driven by $638.8 million of non-cash impairments on decommissioned Bitcoin mining hardware.

PeriodKindAmountContextSources
announced Nov 2025reported$5.8B~$5.8 billion of GPU and equipment purchases from Dell supporting the Microsoft deployment
FY26 (year ended 30 June 2026)reported$4.3B$4,333.1 million of combined property, plant and equipment and computer hardware investing outflows for the year ended 30 June 2026
Record
  • IREN holds a 3GW secured North American power portfolio backing its AI cloud buildout.
  • Recent three-year contracts were signed at more than $20 million of revenue per MW of IT capacity, representing an approximately two-year payback, with active discussions at approximately $25 million per MW. Recent customer prepayments represent 45-55% of GPU capex.
  • IREN targets cumulative delivery of approximately 0.3 GW-IT in 2026 and 0.8 GW-IT in 2027 across a data center pipeline it describes as exceeding 5 GW, with development progressing at Sweetwater (Texas), Kiowa (Oklahoma), Bundey (Australia) and Badajoz (Spain) and new liquid-cooled deployments planned at Mackenzie, Canal Flats and Prince George in 2027.

TeraWulfFull profile →

Financinghigh-yield senior secured notes with tenant lockbox and Google warrant pledge support

TeraWulf priced $3.2 billion of 7.750% senior secured notes due 2030 at par on October 16, 2025, closing October 23, 2025, with Morgan Stanley as sole bookrunner, to fund expansion at the Lake Mariner campus in Barker, New York. The notes name Fluidstack USA I Inc. in a designated lockbox securing the notes, and note Google LLC pledging warrants prior to completion of the expansion; the value of the Fluidstack lockbox arrangement is not stated.

PeriodKindAmountContextSources
Oct 2025raise$3.2B$3.2 billion of 7.750% senior secured notes due 2030, priced at par October 16, 2025, closing October 23, 2025
Record
  • The Fluidstack lockbox securing the notes has no stated value in the fetched record.

Hut 8 Corp.Full profile →

Financingnon-recourse, fully amortizing senior secured project bonds issued at wholly-owned project subsidiaries
HUT

Hut 8 Corp. (Nasdaq, TSX: HUT), which describes itself as an energy infrastructure platform integrating power, digital infrastructure, and compute at scale, has financed two data center projects in 2026 through fully amortizing, non-recourse project bonds issued by wholly-owned subsidiaries: a $3.25 billion offering of 6.192% senior secured notes due 2042 priced 27 April 2026 for a 245 MW critical IT turnkey data center and substation at its River Bend campus, and a $4.25 billion offering of 6.129% senior secured notes due 2042 priced 4 June 2026 for a six-data-hall, 352 MW critical IT facility on an approximately 521-acre property in Nueces County, Texas leased to a tenant rated AA- or higher.

PeriodKindAmountContextSources
priced 27 April 2026reported$3.2B$3.25 billion of 6.192% senior secured notes due 2042 for the River Bend Data Center Project
priced 4 June 2026reported$4.2B$4.25 billion of 6.129% senior secured notes due 2042 for the Beacon Point Data Center Project
Record
  • Both 2026 Hut 8 note offerings are described in the filings as fully amortizing project financings that are non-recourse to Hut 8 Corp.
  • The Beacon Point facility is to be leased to a tenant that the filing states was rated AA- or higher as of the pricing date; the filing does not name the tenant.

Galaxy Digital Inc.Full profile →

Financingsenior secured project notes at a ring-fenced subsidiary, secured by first-priority liens on substantially all project assets
GLXY

Galaxy Digital Inc. (NASDAQ: GLXY), which describes itself as a global leader in digital assets and data center infrastructure, priced a $3.507 billion private offering of 9.875% senior secured notes due 2031 on 23 July 2026 through its indirect wholly owned subsidiary Galaxy Helios Data Centers II LLC. Proceeds finance a portion of the development and construction of two buildings containing eight data halls with a combined 400 MW of utility capacity and 260 MW of critical IT capacity on an approximately 260-acre property in Dickens County, Texas, and fund debt service reserves.

PeriodKindAmountContextSources
priced 23 July 2026reported$3.5B$3.507 billion of 9.875% senior secured notes due 2031 issued by Galaxy Helios Data Centers II LLC
Record
  • The notes amortize at 4.00% per annum of the original principal amount, with the first amortization payment at least ten months after project completion.

Cipher Digital Inc.Full profile →

Financingsubsidiary-issued senior secured notes guaranteed by the project holding company
CIFR

Cipher Digital Inc. (NASDAQ: CIFR), which describes itself as a developer, owner, and operator of industrial-scale data centers, priced an $810.0 million offering of 6.000% senior secured notes due 2031 on 8 June 2026 at 99.750% of principal through its wholly-owned subsidiary Stingray Compute LLC. Proceeds finance the remaining cost of the Stingray Facility, reimburse approximately $61.5 million of prior equity contributions, and fund debt service reserves. The filing does not state the facility's location.

PeriodKindAmountContextSources
priced 8 June 2026reported$810M$810.0 million of 6.000% senior secured notes due 2031 issued by Stingray Compute LLC at 99.750% of principal
Record
  • The offering reimburses Cipher for approximately $61.5 million of prior equity contributions used to fund capital expenditures on the Stingray Facility.

Corvex, Inc.Full profile →

FinancingPublic-market equity and preferred private placement, deployed into leased capacity within third-party data centers
MOVE

Corvex, Inc. (Nasdaq: MOVE), an Arlington, Virginia based GPU compute platform, announced on 31 August 2026 a private placement of approximately $33 million of common stock and Series D Preferred Stock to fund an increase in critical IT power capacity from approximately 1.5 MW to approximately 8 MW by year-end 2026, across an existing Mid-Atlantic data center and a new deployment at an existing enterprise-scale Midwest data center. A right of first refusal on a further 12.5 MW at the Midwest site would take total capacity above 20 MW if exercised. Neither data center is named or located beyond region.

PeriodKindAmountContextSources
announced 31 August 2026equity$33MApproximately $33 million of gross proceeds from a private placement of common stock and Series D Preferred Stock
Record
  • Corvex leases capacity inside existing enterprise data centers with live utility power rather than developing greenfield sites, and states this shortens deployment timelines and reduces development risk.

Bitdeer Technologies GroupFull profile →

Financinglisted-company balance sheet; land purchased outright for cash to secure long-term control of powered land
BTDR

Bitdeer Technologies Group is a Singapore-headquartered, Nasdaq-listed operator converting bitcoin mining capacity to AI and high-performance computing infrastructure in North America. On 1 September 2026 it completed the purchase of approximately 200 acres of greenfield land in Milam County, Texas for approximately $100 million in cash, adjacent to its existing Rockdale facility on land formerly part of an Alcoa aluminum smelting plant. Following the transaction the company states it owns or operates approximately 255 acres and 742 MW of existing and pipeline power capacity in Milam County, against approximately 563 MW of interconnected grid capacity today.

PeriodKindAmountContextSources
1 September 2026reported$100MCash purchase price for approximately 200 acres of greenfield land in Milam County, Texas, stated as approximately $100 million
Record
  • The Milam County sites, including the newly acquired parcel, carry approximately 563 MW of interconnected grid capacity with existing plans expected to scale to 742 MW, plus a dedicated water supply.
  • The acquired parcel was formerly part of an aluminum smelting plant owned by Alcoa Corporation.

WhiteFiber, Inc.Full profile →

Financingpublic equity following August 2025 IPO, convertible senior notes, and contracted colocation revenue
WYFI

WhiteFiber, Inc. is a Nasdaq-listed AI infrastructure and GPU-cloud operator that completed its initial public offering on 8 August 2025 after Bit Digital contributed its high-performance computing business, including WhiteFiber AI, Inc., in exchange for 27,043,749 ordinary shares. Its flagship campus is NC-1 in Madison, North Carolina, with 24 MW of initial capacity that management states may support up to approximately 200 MW gross over an extended period subject to infrastructure upgrades. In August 2026 its Enovum Data Centers subsidiary agreed to acquire two Yadkin County, North Carolina properties, NC-2 and NC-3, for $60.0 million in cash, and the company closed a $310.0 million convertible senior note placement.

Record
  • Closed an upsized private placement of $310.0 million principal amount of 5.00% Convertible Senior Notes due 2032, with net proceeds of approximately $298.5 million, announced 21 August 2026.
  • Targets bringing more than 100 MW of additional capacity online across its development pipeline in 2027.
  • Enovum Data Centers Corp. agreed on 17 August 2026 to acquire the NC-2 and NC-3 properties in Yadkin County, North Carolina for a cash purchase price of $60.0 million, targeting initial ready-for-service capacity in the third quarter of 2027 and closing in the fourth quarter of 2026.

Named sites — neoclouds & gpu clouds

SiteLocationCapitalMWStatusDetailSources
Kenilworth data centerKenilworth, NJ~$1.8B250constructionAn approximately $1.8 billion project delivering 250MW across 392,600 sq ft, targeted online in early 2027. CoreWeave operated 33 data centers at the time of the announcement.
Plano data center (1000 Coit Road)Plano, TX$1.6BannouncedA $1.6 billion, 450,000 sq ft facility at 1000 Coit Road in Plano, Texas.
Douglasville (Flexential) siteDouglasville, GAn.a.operatingA CoreWeave site built in 2023 and leased from Flexential in the Flexential Douglasville building. Specific MW and dollar commitment are n.a.
Denton HPC data centerDenton, TX≥$1.2B260operatingCore Scientific hosts CoreWeave GPUs with OpenAI as end user at a 260MW site load. CoreWeave deployed more than 16,000 GPUs by end-December at the delayed site, with a $6.1 billion contract conversion involved. Core Scientific disclosed on 10 September 2026 that Denton's existing 297 MW was conditionally approved by ERCOT as longstanding existing Base Load not subject to Batch Zero allocation, and an additional 74 MW to be energized was already included in ERCOT's 2025 Regional Transmission Plan study cases Core Scientific registered a $110 million interior fit-out of an existing building at 8171 Jim Christal Road in Denton as a 27,678 sq ft data hall (DTO Building A) with the Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation on 19 August 2026, with work estimated from 1 September 2026 to 31 May 2027
Muskogee HPC data centerMuskogee, OKn.a.1500constructionGroundbreaking on a 100MW HPC data center on November 18, 2024, part of more than $4 billion of capex. On 6 May 2026 Core Scientific announced a plan to scale Muskogee to about 1.5 GW of gross power (about 1.0 GW leasable), including the acquisition of Polaris DS (about 440 MW contracted with Oklahoma Gas & Electric, completed August 2026), a second unleased 82.5 MW building under construction with initial delivery expected in the fourth quarter of 2027, about 250 acres of added land and a planned behind-the-meter power solution.
Kansas City deploymentKansas City, MOn.a.24announcedLambda targeted a Kansas City, Missouri deployment starting at 24MW and scaling above 100MW, hosting more than 10,000 Blackwell Ultra GPUs from early 2026, against a company-wide 3GW liquid-cooled ambition.
Vineland build-to-suit facilityVineland, NJn.a.300announcedNebius is adding up to 300MW at a New Jersey build-to-suit facility anchoring the $17.4 billion Microsoft agreement, for which it plans to deploy more than 100,000 GB300 units. The Vineland Planning Board voted 8-1 at its 17 August 2026 meeting to approve site plan changes for Phase 2 of DataOne's 2.6 million sq ft campus for Nebius, a phase of about 600,000 sq ft; NBC10 clarified that the approval covered adjustments to Phase 2 power supply, namely on-site Bloom fuel cells with an LNG backup. NJ.com reports 300 MW, a 27-million-gallon reservoir and a 1.5-million-gallon LNG tank, with at least three data halls already operating On 17 August 2026 Vineland's Planning Board approved DataOne's 587,980-square-foot Phase 2 AI data center expansion developed for Nebius. The full project is planned at roughly 2.6 million square feet, and Nebius has described the site as a 300 MW region expandable in phases. The approved plan includes multiple Bloom Energy fuel-cell areas, a chiller building, an LNG tank and a water-treatment plant Nebius said on its 12 August 2026 earnings call that it switched the planned 300 MW Vineland site from on-site gas engines to Bloom Energy solid oxide fuel cells. Vineland's Planning Board approved DataOne's 587,980 sq ft Phase 2 expansion on 17 August 2026, after city stop-construction orders on placement of the LNG tank and fuel cell units.
Kansas City colocationKansas City, MOn.a.announcedPhased colocation capacity in Kansas City alongside the New Jersey build-to-suit expansion. State inferred as listed in the source only as Kansas City; the source does not specify the state.
Abilene Stargate campus (Crusoe / Blue Owl / Primary Digital JV)Abilene, TX$15.0B1200constructionThe JV began with $3.4 billion for a 206MW first phase designed for 100,000 GPUs for a Fortune 100 tenant, then entered phase 2 of a $15 billion joint venture funding six additional buildings to reach 1.2GW. Phase 1 construction began June 2024 and phase 2 in March 2025, targeted to energize mid-2026. Oracle/OpenAI (Stargate) contract value is n.a.
Abilene 900MW AI factory campus (Microsoft)Abilene, TXn.a.900announcedOn March 27, 2026 Crusoe announced a new 900MW Abilene campus supporting Microsoft AI infrastructure, bringing the site total to 2.1GW, with 336MW of critical IT load per building.
Wyoming pipeline capacityWYn.a.1800announcedThe Series E first-close disclosure cited 1.8GW in Wyoming alongside 1.2GW at Abilene within a 45GW pipeline. No city or further detail is given. County 17 reported on 11 September 2026 that the 700-acre Laramie County project switched from Crusoe to Google earlier in summer 2026 and is now Google's Project Tembo, which Google representatives described as a $17 billion investment with four data center buildings
Polaris Forge 1Ellendale, ND~$11.0B400operatingPolaris Forge 1 holds 400MW contracted to CoreWeave: a first ~100MW building operational since October 2025, a 150MW second building partially operational, and a 150MW third building under construction with a calendar-2027 ready-for-service date. Applied Digital reported Ready for Service for Phase 1 of Building 2 (75 MW) at Polaris Forge 1, bringing live campus capacity to 175 MW, and an MOU to assign the Building 4 lease to a CoreWeave subsidiary upon CoreWeave achieving an investment-grade rating. It also upsized its revolving credit facility to $430 million committed with a $120 million accordion. On 2 October 2026 Applied Digital said three further 25 MW data halls in the second phase of Building 2 are ready for service, completing Building 2's 150 MW and bringing operational critical IT load at Polaris Forge 1 to 250 MW of the 400 MW contracted.
Polaris Forge 2Harwood, ND$5.0B200constructionPolaris Forge 2 near Harwood, ND broke ground August 18, 2025 with an initial 200MW anticipated in H2 calendar 2026 and full capacity in early 2027, backed by a $5 billion hyperscaler lease.
Santa Clara datacenterSanta Clara, CAn.a.operatingOne of six new North American and European datacenters announced March 11, 2025; Santa Clara was online at announcement.
Stockton datacenterStockton, CAn.a.operatingOne of six new datacenters announced March 11, 2025; Stockton was online at announcement.
Dallas datacenterDallas, TXn.a.operatingOne of six new datacenters announced March 11, 2025; Dallas was online at announcement.
Minneapolis datacenterMinneapolis, MNn.a.announcedOne of six new datacenters announced March 11, 2025, scheduled for Q2 2025.
Oklahoma City datacenterOklahoma City, OKn.a.announcedOne of six new datacenters announced March 11, 2025, scheduled for Q3 2025 with 300+ CS-3 systems.
Montreal datacenterMontreal, Quebecn.a.announcedOne of six new datacenters announced March 11, 2025, scheduled for Q3 2025.
Springfield AI clusterSpringfield, OH≥$1.0B50announcedOn December 2, 2025 Vultr said it would invest more than $1 billion in a 50MW AI cluster in Springfield, Ohio using 24,000 AMD MI355 chips. WYSO reported on 14 August 2026 that Canada-based 5C Group is retrofitting the former LexisNexis data center at Prime Ohio Corporate Park in Springfield into a $1.3 billion, 75 MW facility growing from 67,000 to 214,000 sq ft, with 25 MW expected to be fully operational by the end of September 2026 and Vultr and Crusoe as confirmed tenants. The Dayton Daily News reported on 28 August 2026 that the project has a 100% Enterprise Zone property tax abatement for 2028 to 2042, and that the Ohio Tax Credit Authority approved 50%, 10-year data center tax exemptions for The Constant Company ($900 million investment) and Crusoe ($444 million), estimated at nearly $49 million combined.
Quincy facilityQuincy, WAn.a.operatingOne of Voltage Park's six US sites, described as covering at least one facility in every US time zone.
Puyallup facilityPuyallup, WAn.a.operatingOne of Voltage Park's six US sites.
Salt Lake City facilities (two)Salt Lake City, UTn.a.operatingTwo of Voltage Park's six US sites are in Salt Lake City, Utah.
Fort Worth facilityFort Worth, TXn.a.operatingOne of Voltage Park's six US sites.
Allen facilityAllen, TXn.a.operatingOne of Voltage Park's six US sites.
Sterling facilitySterling, VAn.a.operatingOne of Voltage Park's six US sites.
Abernathy site (with TeraWulf)Abernathy, TXn.a.168announced168MW at Abernathy, Texas with TeraWulf, one of the initial Fluidstack sites in Anthropic's approximately $50 billion US data center program. TeraWulf agreed to sell its 50.1% interest in the 168 MW Abernathy joint venture to a Fluidstack-led investor group for approximately $530 million in cash, announced 6 July 2026 with consideration disclosed 5 August 2026
Lake Mariner campusBarker, NY$3.2B360expansionTeraWulf's Lake Mariner campus in Barker, New York hosts 360MW of Fluidstack capacity within Anthropic's US program. The $3.2 billion notes fund expansion at the campus.
EWR20 DatacenterNYn.a.announcedSesterce lists an EWR20 Datacenter in New York, but the page states no capacity, dollar figure, date, GPU count or customer; all are n.a.
Project Horizon (Longfellow Ranch)TXn.a.2000cancelledA 2GW West Texas campus at Longfellow Ranch structured in eight 250MW phases, with more than 40,000 Nvidia GB300 NVL72 GPUs to be supplied from December 2025. CoreWeave subsequently ended the 2GW deal, leaving a $2 billion funding gap.
Dammam data centerDammam, Saudi Arabia$1.5BannouncedThe $1.5 billion commitment from Saudi Arabia announced February 10, 2025 is tied to a Dammam data center. A later Reuters page renders the figure as $15 billion; the atlas treats $1.5B as originally reported.
Nscale Texas campus (Microsoft)Ward County, TXn.a.240announcedApproximately 104,000 of the roughly 200,000 Nvidia GB300 GPUs under the expanded Microsoft agreement deploy at a ~240MW Texas campus starting Q3 2026, with Microsoft holding an option on a second 700MW Texas phase from late 2027 against a 1.2GW site target. Nscale's Form S-1 filed 18 September 2026 places its Texas facility in Ward County, held under a net lease for which NVIDIA agreed on 14 October 2025 to guarantee up to $860.3 million of Nscale's obligations in exchange for warrants. The filing also describes a $1.85 billion delayed draw term loan entered in August 2026 to finance GPU infrastructure at the Ward County site, maturing in February 2033. Nscale's earlier Microsoft release states the roughly 240 MW Texas campus is leased from Ionic Digital. The S-1 does not itself state that the Ward County site is the Microsoft campus.
Childress campus (Horizon 1-4)Childress, TXn.a.750constructionIREN is deploying Nvidia GB300 systems in four Horizon 1-4 phases totaling 200MW of critical IT load at its 750MW campus in Childress, Texas, under the approximately $9.7 billion five-year Microsoft agreement. Horizon 1, the first of four 50 MW (IT) liquid-cooled deployments under the Microsoft contract, was delivered to and accepted by Microsoft, announced 13 August 2026 On 13 August 2026 IREN announced Horizon 1, the first of four 50 MW IT direct-to-chip liquid cooled deployments for Microsoft at Childress, had been delivered to and accepted by Microsoft, with Horizons 2 to 4 due later in 2026
Valence Data CenterValence, Francen.a.announcedA Valence Data Center in Valence Romans Agglo with 40,000 GPUs, within a European program of EUR 450 million of infrastructure investment and EUR 1.8 billion including hardware. Euro amounts are not converted to USD.
Sesterce SoftBank Bosquel campusBosquel, Francen.a.1000announcedSesterce's corporate site lists a 1GW 'Sesterce SoftBank Bosquel' campus in France, alongside 150 kW/rack designs and SoftBank under 'Trusted by'.
Applied Digital Delta Forge 1Boyce, LA≥$3.6B430announcedApplied Digital's Delta Forge 1 is a 430 MW AI factory campus near Boyce in Rapides Parish, Louisiana, the company's first Louisiana location, announced by Louisiana Economic Development on 26 May 2026 as a $3.6 billion investment. Its subsidiaries APLD AEX-01 LLC and APLD AEX-02 LLC signed leases on 20 and 22 April 2026 with a US hyperscaler for 300 MW of critical IT load, worth about $7.5 billion over about 15 years, with operations from mid-2027. The atlas previously placed this site in North Dakota; Applied Digital's 10-K lists its owned data centers in North Dakota and Louisiana and places Delta Forge 1 in its southern region. On Wednesday 16 September 2026 the Louisiana PSC unanimously agreed to hear Cleco's power-supply case for the campus, about 430 MW of load by 2028 starting with two facilities totaling 300 MW, without a final administrative law judge recommendation; this expedites the case and is not a final approval
Applied Digital Polaris Forge 3Center, NDn.a.300announcedA lease of roughly $7.5 billion base term, about $18.2 billion if all options are exercised, for 300MW of critical IT load with operations targeted for August 2027. Applied Digital's Form 10-Q filed 7 October 2026 places Polaris Forge 3 in Center, Oliver County, North Dakota, and discloses a 4 October 2026 PPA with Base Electron for an approximately 1,200 MW gas-fired plant in Center as dedicated generation for the campus (see apld-base-electron-ppa-2026).
Project Camellia (Savannah Gateway Industrial Hub)Rincon, GA$20.0B3200announcedOpenAI announced Project Camellia in Effingham County, Georgia in July 2026: four data center buildings at the Savannah Gateway Industrial Hub, a 2,600-acre campus just outside Rincon, with the data center buildings covering approximately 101 acres. Georgia Power is to supply 3.2 GW delivered in phases from 2028 to 2032. Reported commitments include $80 million in community benefits, a 50% property tax abatement for 15 years, and 400 long-term jobs initially. The site owner is the Effingham County Industrial Development Authority and the development entity was filed as Octans GA LLC. Georgia Power filed the fully redacted large-load contract with the PSC on 15 July 2026. On 13 August 2026 PSC utilities director Tom Bond said staff would object unless terms changed, and Georgia Power elected to extend the 30-day staff review period that was due to expire 14 August; the contract's filing date was changed to 22 July. On 26 August 2026 PSC staff and Georgia Power filed a joint statement approving the contract with added ratepayer protections, without a commission vote. The contract provides up to 3,200 MW in phases from 2028 through 2032, with up to 1,000 MW of flexible demand response and OpenAI paying the full cost of serving infrastructure. Effingham County canceled a scheduled site plan vote on 14 September 2026 at the applicant's request. A Yahoo Finance article of 23 July 2026 described the campus as a $30 billion project, which conflicts with OpenAI's stated investment of at least $20 billion
Beacon Point data centerNueces County, TXn.a.352constructionA turnkey data center comprising six data halls with a combined total of 352 MW of critical IT capacity, to be built on an approximately 521-acre property in Nueces County, Texas, together with a substation on the property. The facility is to be leased to a tenant that the filing states was rated AA- or higher as of the pricing date; the filing does not name the tenant. Press reporting on 31 August and 1 September 2026 identified Nvidia as the holder of the lease on the campus, with Lambda installing Nvidia systems there to serve a reported $35 billion cloud agreement with Anthropic. Hut 8's filings do not name the tenant, and the atlas records the tenant chain as press-reported rather than filing-confirmed. Second 15-year, 352 MW IT lease signed with the same investment-grade tenant, announced 20 July 2026, bringing contracted capacity to 704 MW and campus base-term value to $19.6 billion. 500 MW of Phase 2 utility capacity moved to under construction after 30 June 2026 Beacon Point DC LLC (also known as Lon Hill Infrastructure LLC) registered a 657,130 sq ft data center building with guardhouse, fire water tank and support yards at 4650 FM 1694 near Robstown, Nueces County, with the Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation on 9 September 2026, at an estimated cost of $398,985,153 and an estimated schedule of 28 September 2026 to 5 November 2027
Helios II data center (Dickens County)Dickens County, TXn.a.260constructionTwo buildings containing eight data halls with a combined total of 400 MW of utility capacity and 260 MW of critical IT capacity, to be built on an approximately 260-acre property in Dickens County, Texas. The July 2026 note offering finances a portion of development and construction and funds debt service reserves. Galaxy said on 8 September 2026 that Helios I (800 MW) and Helios II (830 MW) are classified as Batch Zero Base Load, while a 1,000 MW Helios III request and new projects Caspian (700 MW) and Selene (900 MW) were conditionally classified as Studied Load. Galaxy put its Texas pipeline at more than 5.7 GW across four sites, including Merlin in McGregor Galaxy's Q2 2026 results (5 August 2026) state that Helios Phase I delivered 200 MW gross, or 133 MW critical IT, to CoreWeave by quarter end, expected to generate about $80 million of quarterly leasing revenue, and that construction began on the 260 MW critical IT Phase II with HITT Contracting. Galaxy also executed a development agreement for 500 acres at McGregor Industrial Park (Merlin) and acquired the Caspian and Selene sites
Monarch Compute Campus (Nscale West Virginia campus)Mason County, WVn.a.460approvedNscale's flagship West Virginia data center campus, anchored by a reported six-year, approximately $45 billion Anthropic compute agreement covering roughly 460 MW. The West Virginia Governor's office publicized the agreement on 27 August 2026 while describing the figure as reported rather than confirmed. Press reports place the campus in Mason County; the state release does not name a county. Figure is press-reported and not confirmed by either company; the West Virginia Governor's office likewise describes it as a reported agreement, citing Bloomberg. West Virginia approved High Impact Data Center certification for Nscale, announced 3 September 2026, with Phase One described as a projected $69.2 billion investment requiring about 2 GW of power and supporting about 4,375 construction jobs and 645 permanent jobs. Nscale's Form S-1 filed 18 September 2026 identifies the campus as the Monarch Compute Campus in Mason County, West Virginia, an approximately 2,250 acre site acquired with American Intelligence & Power Corporation on 31 March 2026 for total consideration of $792.6 million. The filing expects an initial 2 GW of gross power capacity (1.37 GW of IT load) online by the first half of 2028 and expansion to approximately 8 GW gross planned for 2031. Anthropic Services Agreements signed 25 August 2026 provide for up to approximately $44.6 billion across four tranches of NVIDIA Vera Rubin NVL72 systems; the filing gives no megawatt figure for the Anthropic deployment and states that no binding commitments for the required financings had been obtained.
Rockdale AI/HPC campus (Milam County)Rockdale, TXn.a.563expansionBitdeer announced on 1 September 2026 the completed acquisition of approximately 200 acres of greenfield property in Milam County, Texas for approximately $100 million in cash, adjacent to its existing Rockdale data center on land formerly part of an Alcoa aluminum smelting plant. The company states that following the transaction it owns or operates approximately 255 acres and 742 MW of existing and pipeline power capacity in Milam County.
NC-1 campus, MadisonMadison, NCn.a.24operatingWhiteFiber's flagship North Carolina campus. On 18 December 2025 its Enovum Data Centers Corp. subsidiary signed a 10-year agreement with Nscale Global Holdings for 40 MW of critical IT load deployed in two 20 MW phases, carrying approximately $865 million of contracted revenue over the initial term including 3 percent annual escalators and required non-recurring installation services. Nscale closed an up to $1.2 billion investment-grade senior secured delayed draw term loan for its up to 40 MW deployment at the Madison, North Carolina site on 31 August 2026
NC-2 and NC-3 campuses, Yadkin CountyYadkinville, NC$60M60announcedWhiteFiber's subsidiary Enovum Data Centers Corp. entered a definitive agreement on 17 August 2026 to acquire two industrial properties in Yadkin County, North Carolina, roughly 55 miles from the NC-1 campus in Madison, to be retrofitted into data center campuses. WhiteFiber is targeting initial ready-for-service capacity in the third quarter of 2027, with the transaction expected to close in the fourth quarter of 2026. The company cited non-binding letters of intent with investment-grade credit support and did not name prospective customers.
Highridge Business Park AI factoryButler Township, PAn.a.1200announcedNebius is developing an approximately 600-acre AI factory at the Highridge Business Park in Butler Township, Schuylkill County, at the intersection of Interstate 81 and Gordon Mountain Road. It is the company's second gigawatt-scale United States campus alongside Independence, Missouri. Nebius states power is secured and paid for entirely by the company under a dedicated Energy Service Agreement with PPL Electric Utilities. Butler Township supervisors voted 2-1 (Kate Staudenmeier and David Kessler for, Patrick Coyle against) to adopt an ordinance allowing Nebius to expand its development plan at the roughly 600-acre Highridge Industrial Park campus and a separate ordinance lowering the allowable noise level from 75 to 65 decibels, as reported 1 September 2026. The Republican Herald reports a PPL agreement for 1.2 GW, construction expected to start in late 2026 over three years, and that Nebius must still submit a final expansion plan and complete its land purchase from the Schuylkill Economic Development Corporation
Independence AI factory campusIndependence, MOn.a.constructionNebius broke ground on 12 May 2026 on a multi-building AI factory across approximately 400 acres in eastern Independence, Jackson County, Missouri, described by the company as its first gigawatt-scale digital infrastructure project in the United States. Nebius projects approximately 1,200 construction jobs and 130 permanent positions, and committed to a workforce development agreement with Metropolitan Community College and a donation to eliminate school meal debt in the Independence and Fort Osage school districts.
Cameron County AI data center campusRio Hondo, TX$4.0B1500under constructionFluidstack received a site work permit on 10 September 2026 for a campus of more than 1,100 acres in unincorporated Cameron County, roughly four miles southwest of Rio Hondo, east of FM 509 and west of FM 106. Phase one is budgeted at $4 billion and targeted for completion in mid-2028, with more than 2,500 construction jobs expected. Water is supplied by the East Rio Hondo Water Supply Corporation at approximately 50,000 gallons a day during construction, falling to around 7,000 gallons a day in operation. Fluidstack broke ground on 10 September 2026 on a $4 billion project on more than 1,100 acres east of Valley International Airport and west of the Port of Harlingen near Rio Hondo, expecting more than 2,500 construction jobs. A week earlier Harlingen city commissioners tabled a drainage agreement to route stormwater into a city canal; Fluidstack said it received a worksite permit from Cameron County and is pursuing alternative plans for discharge. Fluidstack said on 21 September 2026 that it has begun construction on the $4 billion first phase of its AI data center campus in Cameron County, Texas, which it says is planned to support up to 1.5 GW of capacity. The company expects more than 2,500 construction jobs and several hundred permanent positions. It says it requested and received no local property tax abatements or county incentives, will pay for the campus's energy, infrastructure and water, will use closed-loop cooling supplied by East Rio Hondo Water Supply Corporation, and will limit sound at the property line to 60 decibels. The company did not name a customer or disclose financing.
Crusoe and Lancium Childress AI data center campusChildress, TXn.a.1000announcedCrusoe and Lancium announced a 1.0 GW AI data center campus on 270 acres in Childress, Texas, their second joint site after Abilene. Construction is scheduled to begin in Q3 2026, with thousands of construction jobs and more than 100 permanent positions expected. The tenant was not named. This is a separate project from the existing IREN Childress campus record Three Project Hyper - Childress buildings at 525 A, B and C County Road 23 were registered with the Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation on 11 September 2026 by Childress DC1, DC2 and DC3 LLCs, each a single-story data center of 806,359 sq ft with an estimated cost of $2.4 billion, designed by HKS, with estimated starts of 6 July, 1 September and 5 October 2026 and completions from 28 February to 31 May 2028. The owner contact on the filings, Nader Pakfar, is Crusoe's General Counsel, Real Estate. No tenant is listed
Digital Drive data center campusRichmond area, VAn.a.76announcedThe Digital Drive data center near Richmond, Virginia is planned for 76 MW of IT capacity, all contracted to CoreWeave under a 15 year agreement valued at $2.94 billion, and is sponsored by affiliates of Blue Owl Capital, Cedarwood Investment Group and PowerHouse Data Centers. A roughly $1.1 billion high yield construction bond was launched on 21 September 2026, with operations expected between 2027 and 2028. The $1.1 billion of five-year notes priced on 23 September 2026 at 98.5 cents on the dollar to yield 9.25%.
Bitdeer Massillon mining facilityMassillon, OHn.a.221partially operationalThe Canton Repository reported in July 2026 that Bitdeer's 221 MW crypto mining facility in Massillon was partially operational and on track to be completed by fall 2026. It is counted by the Repository among Stark County's hyperscale-scale projects alongside the Amazon Perry Township site and the Canton proposals.
Delta Forge 2 AI Factory campusBrookwood, AL≥$3.2B210approvedApplied Digital confirmed on 24 September 2026 that its Delta Forge 2 campus, first announced on 8 June 2026 with a 210 MW lease in an unnamed southern state, will be built on part of its roughly 1,300-acre Brookwood site: about 1.26 million square feet on a 160-acre footprint. The Tuscaloosa County Economic Development Authority unanimously approved the incentive package the same day. Initial operations are expected in the first quarter of 2028. This is a separate project from the Youngwoo & Associates rezoning in Brookwood (youngwoo-project-brookwood-al). At its first community town hall on Thursday 1 October 2026, Applied Digital said the campus will be a single AI factory building with generator buildings running up to 210 MW of computing capacity, built over 12 to 16 months with at least 1,000 construction workers and more than 100 permanent jobs. It described a closed-loop cooling system needing about 1.4 million gallons at the outset and about 750,000 gallons a year thereafter, and said it will pay for the power improvements serving the site. On Tuesday 6 October 2026 the Brookwood City Council voted to support a resolution backing the Tuscaloosa County Economic Development Authority's agreement with Applied Digital for Delta Forge 2 (Project Highlands). The Alabama Public Service Commission is still to vote on the power agreement between Applied Digital and Alabama Power.
BUZZ HPC Greater Toronto Area AI gigafactory (320 MW)Oakville (Greater Toronto Area), Ontarion.a.320proposedHIVE's BUZZ HPC announced an industrial-scale AI facility in the Greater Toronto Area with about 320 MW of utility capacity, targeting service in the second half of 2027 at a capital cost of about C$3.5 billion, on about 25 contiguous acres it bought for $58 million in two parcels. The Town of Oakville later adopted a one-year data centre moratorium in August 2026 (at-risk row 474, which names this Hive GTA site).
Lambda data center, MidAmerica Industrial Park (south section)Chouteau, OKn.a.announcedLambda announced plans to build a data center in the south section of MidAmerica Industrial Park in Mayes County, Oklahoma, within the Chouteau-Mazie Public Schools tax boundary. The company expects to pay about $500 million in taxes over 10 years and says the project could create up to 1,000 construction jobs and up to 100 permanent positions. Cloverleaf Infrastructure was selected by GRDA and MidAmerica to ready the site. Lambda said it will use closed-loop cooling and design the facility as a flexible grid customer. The site adjoins GRDA's Energy Center, and MidAmerica CEO Dave Stewart said Lambda is paying full market price for the land and receiving no incentives. No construction start, completion date, cost or capacity was announced.
FingerMotion Brooks Campus #1 (behind-the-meter AI compute site)Near Tilley, Albertan.a.9.9proposedFingerMotion (Nasdaq: FNGR) announced on 29 September 2026 a definitive share purchase agreement dated 23 September 2026 to buy 100 percent of Newbit Technology Inc. for US$2.3 million in cash, cash-free and debt-free, securing its previously disclosed 9.9 MW behind-the-meter site in the County of Newell, Alberta (Brooks Campus #1), about 3.6 km northeast of Tilley along Highway 1. Included are the Eastern Irrigation District surface lease, County of Newell Development Permit 2022055, pipeline right of way and gas infrastructure, the provincial environmental approval and AUC Rule 007 registration, and fixed civil works. Closing is targeted on or before 29 October 2026, subject to a new Pivotal gas supply agreement and Eastern Irrigation District consent. The Brooks Bulletin reported that no construction timeline has been announced and permitting, financing and customer agreements are not final.
Project Hyper data center campus (Spur Buildings 1 and 2), County Road 233, JaytonJayton, TX~$4.8BproposedTwo projects named Project Hyper were registered with the Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation on 1 October 2026: Spur Building 1 (TABS2027002494, owner Spur DC Owner 1 LLC, construction 31 January 2027 to 7 June 2029) and Spur Building 2 (TABS2027002499, owner Spur DC Owner 2 LLC, construction 13 January 2027 to 25 May 2029). Each is new construction of a single story data center of 759,262 sq ft with office and support space at County Road 233 and P2390, Jayton, Kent County, estimated at $2.4 billion, designed by HKS. The filings do not name Crusoe; Data Center Dynamics attributes the $4.8 billion campus to Crusoe in its headline (article walled), so the attribution rests on that single trade report.
DarkHorse Hopkinsville superintelligence factory (new 161 kV site)Hopkinsville, KYn.a.50proposedDarkHorse Technologies said on 6 October 2026 that its subsidiary Pennyrile Holdings signed a power contract with the Electric Plant Board of Hopkinsville for up to 50 MW for a new superintelligence factory in Hopkinsville, doubling its contracted power in the TVA region to about 100 MW. The contract has a 10-year initial term with automatic five-year renewals and an 18-month permit contingency period for local approvals. DarkHorse says the site will use closed-loop cooling only and seek no tax abatements.

Financing transactions — neoclouds & gpu clouds

TimingPartiesInstrumentAmountDetailSources
April 2023CoreWeave · Nvidiaequity raise$421MCoreWeave's April 2023 Series B included a $100 million investment from Nvidia.
December 2023CoreWeaveequity raise$642MA $642 million secondary sale in December 2023.
May 2024CoreWeave · Coatueequity raise$1.1BA $1.1 billion Series C led by Coatue in May 2024 at a $19 billion valuation.
priced March 27, 2025CoreWeave · Nvidiaequity raise$1.5BThe IPO listed CoreWeave on Nasdaq under CRWV; the stock opened at $39, implying roughly a $23 billion valuation.
May 17, 2024CoreWeave · Blackstone · Magnetar · Coatue · Carlyle · CDPQ · BlackRock · DigitalBridgedebt facility$7.5BBlackstone-led delayed-draw term loan with Magnetar, Coatue, Carlyle, CDPQ, BlackRock and DigitalBridge participating.
October 11, 2024CoreWeavedebt facility≥$650MRevolving credit facility to support ongoing growth.
Q2 FY2026CoreWeave · Jane Streetdebt facility≥$3.1BTerm loan disclosed with Q2 FY2026 results alongside a $1 billion Jane Street investment and more than $10 billion of unsecured notes and convertibles.
April 2026CoreWeaveconvertible$3.5BConvertible notes issued in April 2026 per the Wikipedia summary of CoreWeave's debt stack.
2026CoreWeave · Metadebt facility$8.5BLoan facility secured by CoreWeave's long-term Meta agreement.
March 10, 2025; expanded May 2025 and September 25, 2025CoreWeave · OpenAIother~$22.4BAI infrastructure agreement, expanded twice in 2025 to approximately $22.4 billion.
runs through December 2032CoreWeave · Metaother~$21.0BExpanded AI infrastructure agreement based on Nvidia's Vera Rubin platform, running through December 2032.
agreed July 7, 2025; terminated October 30, 2025CoreWeave · Core Scientificacquisition~$9.0BThe deal covered 1.3GW of gross capacity including 840MW of HPC and 500MW of mining across 10 facilities, and was terminated after Core Scientific shareholders voted it down.
January 23, 2024Core Scientificother~$400MCore Scientific emerged from Chapter 11 and relisted on Nasdaq with 724MW of capacity across five states.
Purchase agreement dated 22 April 2026; closed 6 May 2026 (8-K filed 6 May 2026); earlier recorded as priced Q1 2026Core Scientificsenior notes~$3.3BFinancing supporting an approximately 3GW expansion pipeline and $2 billion of 2026 capex.
June 3, 2024Core Scientific · CoreWeavelease≥$3.5BFirst step of the CoreWeave HPC hosting contract ladder, delivering approximately 200MW of infrastructure.
October 22, 2024Core Scientific · CoreWeavelease≥$8.7BCoreWeave exercised its final option to modify approximately 120MW, taking the relationship to roughly 500MW at six sites.
February 26, 2025Core Scientific · CoreWeavelease≥$10.2BA new 70MW contract at Denton took the CoreWeave relationship to approximately 590MW across six sites, with Denton site load of 260MW.
February 2024Lambdaequity raise$320MRecorded on the same Business Wire page as the GPU-backed facility.
announced April 2, 2024Lambda · Macquarie Group · Industrial Development Fundingdebt facility$500MGPU-backed special purpose financing to expand Lambda's cloud for AI.
February 2025 per DCDLambda · Andra Capital · SGW · Nvidia · ARK Invest · In-Q-Tel · Supermicroequity raise$480MSeries D co-led by Andra Capital and SGW, with Nvidia, ARK Invest, In-Q-Tel and Supermicro participating.
November 18, 2025Lambda · TWG Global · USITequity raise≥$1.5BSeries E led by TWG Global and USIT to build superintelligence cloud infrastructure.
Closed 27 August 2026Lambdadebt facility$926MLambda closed a $926 million senior secured term loan B, led by Morgan Stanley as lead left arranger and bookrunner with MUFG as joint bookrunner. The facility is rated Baa2 by Moody's, priced at SOFR plus 3.00% and issued at 99.5% of principal, and fully amortizes to a 31 December 2030 maturity. Proceeds fund the purchase and deployment of GPU infrastructure for a committed customer deployment with an investment-grade offtaker; Lambda does not name the GPU model or the customer. Lambda describes the facility as its first large-scale private cloud GPU asset-backed SPV financing and as the first broadly syndicated, investment-grade-rated term loan B completed by a private neocloud. Correction applied 10 September 2026: this record previously carried the date note 'recorded on April 2024 Business Wire page' with no terms. The issuer's own announcement dates the $926 million term loan B to 27 August 2026, and the terms are taken from that announcement.
recorded on April 2024 Business Wire pageLambdadebt facility$1.0BSyndicated facility recorded on the same page as the GPU-backed facility announcement.
August 2025Lambdadebt facility$275MFacility recorded on the same page as the GPU-backed facility announcement.
reported; IPO targeted H2 2026Lambda · Mubadala Capitalequity raise~$350MLambda reportedly targets an IPO in H2 2026, slightly later than a previously reported H1 target, with Morgan Stanley, J.P. Morgan and Citi engaged. Bloomberg reported on 25 August 2026 that Lambda was in talks to raise as much as $3 billion at a valuation of as much as $12 billion or more, had received multiple term sheets, and could go public as soon as 2027; terms were not finalized. Reported by Bloomberg. The Wall Street Journal reported on Tuesday 6 October 2026, citing unnamed sources, that Lambda is raising as much as $4 billion in a final round before its planned IPO, at a valuation of $14.5 billion excluding the new money. Reported, not closed; amount field unchanged.
November 3, 2025Lambda · Microsoftothern.a.Agreement covering GB300 NVL72 systems and tens of thousands of Nvidia GPUs.
December 2, 2024Nebius Group · Nvidia · Accelequity raise$700MStrategic equity financing to accelerate roll-out of full-stack AI infrastructure.
September 2025Nebius Groupconvertible$3.8BCombined stock offering and convertible notes raise.
closed March 20, 2026Nebius Groupconvertible~$4.3BPrivate offering of convertible senior notes with aggregate gross proceeds of approximately $4.3 billion.
Priced 19 August 2026; closed 24 August 2026Nebius Groupconvertible~$5.8BUpsized private offering of convertible senior notes. Closed 24 August 2026 with aggregate principal of $5.75 billion after initial purchasers exercised options: $3.45 billion of 0.50% notes due 2030 and $2.3 billion of 4.50% notes due 2034. Holders exchanged $400 million of 2029 notes and $400 million of 2031 notes for approximately 15.8 million Class A shares
September 2025Nebius Group · Microsoftother$17.4BAI infrastructure agreement anchored at the Vineland, New Jersey facility, with more than 100,000 GB300 units planned.
n.a. (reported alongside sold-out capacity commentary)Nebius Group · Metaother$3.0BInitial Meta compute agreement, signed as Nebius described current available capacity as sold out.
compute purchase beginning early 2027Nebius Group · Metaother$27.0BSecond, far larger Meta agreement following the initial $3 billion deal.
phase 1 construction began June 2024Crusoe Energy · Blue Owl Capital · Primary Digital Infrastructurejv equity$3.4BInitial joint venture funding the Abilene first phase.
May 21, 2025Crusoe Energy · Blue Owl Capital · Primary Digital Infrastructurejv equity~$11.6BPhase 2 funds six additional buildings to bring the Abilene campus to 1.2GW across eight buildings, each designed for up to 50,000 Nvidia GB200 NVL72s.
closed December 12, 2024Crusoe Energy · Founders Fund · Fidelity · Mubadala · Nvidia · Ribbit · Valor · Crusoeequity raise$600MSeries D led by Founders Fund.
October 24, 2025Crusoe Energy · Valor Equity Partners · Mubadala Capitalequity raise≥$1.4BSeries E co-led by Valor Equity Partners and Mubadala Capital, disclosed with a 45GW pipeline, 1.2GW at Abilene and 1.8GW in Wyoming.
Initial closing announced by Crusoe 17 September 2026; first reported by Bloomberg July 2026 and reported closed 3 September 2026Crusoe Energyequity raise≥$3.9BOn 17 September 2026 Crusoe announced the initial closing of its anticipated $3.9 billion Series F at a $30.9 billion post-money valuation, co-led by Atreides Management, Mubadala Capital and Valor Equity Partners, with investors including Founders Fund, GIC, NVIDIA, QIA, Radical Ventures, TPG, Fidelity, T. Rowe Price, Baillie Gifford, Altimeter, Tiger Global, Salesforce Ventures, StepStone and DPR Construction. Crusoe said proceeds will scale existing programs and support the build out of its own AI factories, and cited $140 billion of total contracted value, more than 6 GW of gross contracted capacity and 1 GW delivered and operational. Press reports on 3 September 2026 had described a raise of more than $3 billion at roughly $30 billion; the round was reported alongside a roughly $13 billion five-year cloud contract with Jane Street. The prior $1.375 billion Series E in October 2025 valued Crusoe at more than $10 billion
June 2, 2025Applied Digital · CoreWeavelease~$7.0BTwo 15-year lease agreements with CoreWeave at Ellendale, North Dakota.
August 29, 2025Applied Digital · CoreWeavelease≥$11.0BAdditional 150MW lease with CoreWeave, taking Ellendale to 400MW.
October 22, 2025Applied Digital · unnamed investment-grade hyperscalerlease$5.0BAI factory lease with a US-based, unnamed investment-grade hyperscaler at Polaris Forge 2.
April 23, 2026Applied Digital · undisclosed US hyperscalerlease≥$7.5BApplied Digital subsidiaries APLD AEX-01 LLC and APLD AEX-02 LLC signed leases on 20 and 22 April 2026 with a US hyperscaler for 300 MW of critical IT load at Delta Forge 1, a 430 MW campus near Boyce, Rapides Parish, Louisiana, worth about $7.5 billion over about 15 years, with operations from mid-2027
May 20, 2026Applied Digitallease~$7.5BPolaris Forge 3 lease announced as Applied Digital surpassed $31 billion of contracted baseline revenue; campus location is not stated in the source.
priced March 4, 2026Applied Digitalsenior notes$2.1BSenior secured notes funding Polaris Forge 2.
priced June 9, 2026Applied Digitalsenior notes$1.6BSenior secured notes funding the ELN-04 150MW building.
September 30, 2025Cerebras · Fidelity · Atreides Managementequity raise$1.1BSeries G led by Fidelity and Atreides Management.
February 2026Cerebrasequity raise$1.0BRaise preceding the April 2026 S-1 re-filing.
capacity from 2026 through 2028OpenAI · Cerebrasother≥$20.0BThe dominant Cerebras contract, calling for up to 750MW of capacity through 2028.
January 2026OpenAI · Cerebrasdebt facility$1.0BOpenAI extended a working capital loan to Cerebras tied to capacity delivery.
per April 2026 S-1Cerebras · Morgan Stanleydebt facility$250MMorgan Stanley revolving credit facility disclosed in the S-1.
December 2024Vultr · LuminArx Capital Management · AMD Venturesequity raise$333MFinancing with LuminArx Capital Management and AMD Ventures.
October 2023Voltage Park · Navigation Fund · Jed McCalebother~$500MThe GPU purchase that seeded Voltage Park's fleet.
reported January 2026Voltage Park · Jed McCalebother$900MGrant funding cited in the merger reporting.
January 2026Voltage Park · Lightning AImerger≥$2.5BMerger creating an entity with more than $500 million of ARR, 60MW, more than 35,000 Nvidia GPUs and six data centers across four states.
April 2025Voltage Park · TensorDockacquisitionn.a.Voltage Park acquired GPU marketplace TensorDock.
February 20, 2025Together AI · General Catalyst · Prosperity7equity raise$305MSeries B led by General Catalyst with Prosperity7, reporting 200MW of secured capacity and a 36,000 GB200 NVL72 deployment with Hypertec.
July 1, 2026Together AI · Aramco Ventures · Nvidia · Vistaequity raise$800MSeries C citing more than 500MW of capacity commitments.
July 2026Fluidstack · Situational Awarenessequity raise$830MSeries A led by Situational Awareness.
n.a.Google · Fluidstackbackstop$1.4BGoogle lease backstop supporting the Anthropic/Fluidstack buildout.
n.a.Hut 8 · Fluidstack · Anthropiclease$7.0BCapacity deal at Hut 8's River Bend; the source does not state the site's location.
2024Poolsideequity raise$500MPoolside's 2024 raise, per DCD's Project Horizon reporting.
reported October 2025Poolsideequity raise~$2.0BReported alongside the Project Horizon partnership announcement.
partnership October 2025; deal later endedPoolside · CoreWeaveleasen.a.CoreWeave ended the 2GW Project Horizon deal, with power procurement challenges cited at the campus.
August 2024Groq · BlackRock Private Equity Partners · Cisco · Samsung Catalystequity raise$640MRound led by BlackRock Private Equity Partners with Cisco and Samsung Catalyst.
announced February 10, 2025Groq · Saudi Arabiaother~$1.5BSaudi commitment tied to a Dammam data center, with approximately $500 million of Saudi contract revenue expected per the later Reuters page.
September 17, 2025Groq · Disruptive · BlackRock · Neuberger Berman · Samsung · Cisco · Altimeter · 1789 Capitalequity raise$750MRound led by Disruptive with BlackRock, Neuberger Berman, Samsung, Cisco, Altimeter and 1789 Capital participating.
June 22, 2026Groq · Disruptive · Infinitumequity raise$650MRaise to scale Groq's AI inference cloud business, with 13 data centers and a 200MW target by end-2027.
April 2021SambaNovaequity raise≥$676MSambaNova's 2021 round, per Reuters.
February 2026SambaNova · Vista · Intelequity raise$350MRound preceding the Series F.
first tranche closed July 8, 2026SambaNova · General Atlanticequity raise$1.0BSeries F led by General Atlantic.
September 25, 2025Nscale · Aker ASA · Nvidia · Dell · Nokia · Blue Owl Managed Funds · Fidelity · G Squared · Point72 · T.Capital · Sandton Capitalequity raise$1.1BSeries B with Nvidia, Dell, Nokia, Blue Owl Managed Funds, Fidelity, G Squared, Point72, T.Capital and Sandton Capital participating.
deployment starting Q3 2026Nscale · Microsoftother~$14.0BExpanded Microsoft agreement covering approximately 200,000 Nvidia GB300 GPUs, including ~104,000 at a ~240MW Texas campus, with an option on a second 700MW Texas phase from late 2027. Nscale's Form S-1 filed 18 September 2026 states that statements of work entered with Microsoft between September 2025 and April 2026 provide for payments of up to approximately $43.8 billion through December 2033, not including optional extensions and subject to delivery and availability requirements; the figure spans all Microsoft work, including the Sines, Portugal campus, rather than the Texas campus alone.
November 3, 2025IREN · Microsoftother~$9.7BAI cloud agreement deploying Nvidia GB300 systems in four Horizon 1-4 phases totaling 200MW of critical IT load at Childress, Texas.
announced with the Microsoft agreement, November 2025IREN · Dellother~$5.8BEquipment purchases backing the Microsoft deployment.
priced October 16, 2025; closing October 23, 2025TeraWulf · Morgan Stanley · Fluidstack · Googlesenior notes$3.2BNotes fund expansion at the Lake Mariner campus in Barker, New York.
Priced 23 July 2026; offering completed 28 July 2026Galaxy Digital · Galaxy Helios Data Centers II LLCproject bond~$3.5BGalaxy Digital's indirect wholly owned subsidiary Galaxy Helios Data Centers II LLC priced a $3.507 billion private offering of 9.875% senior secured notes due 1 August 2031. Proceeds finance a portion of the development and construction of two buildings containing eight data halls with a combined 400 MW of utility capacity and 260 MW of critical IT capacity on an approximately 260-acre property in Dickens County, Texas, and fund debt service reserves. The notes amortize at 4.00% per annum of original principal and are guaranteed by Galaxy Helios II LLC. Galaxy Helios Data Centers II LLC completed the $3.5 billion senior secured notes due 2031 offering on 28 July 2026 to fund construction of Helios I, Phase II
Priced 27 April 2026Hut 8 · Hut 8 DC LLCproject bond~$3.2BHut 8's wholly-owned subsidiary Hut 8 DC LLC priced a $3.25 billion private offering of 6.192% senior secured notes due 2042, described in the filing as a fully amortizing project financing that is non-recourse to Hut 8 Corp. Proceeds finance a turnkey data center with 245 MW of critical IT capacity and the related substation at Hut 8's River Bend campus, reimburse prior equity contributions, and fund debt service reserves. The filing does not state the campus location.
Priced 4 June 2026Hut 8 · Beacon Point DC LLCproject bond~$4.2BHut 8's wholly-owned subsidiary Beacon Point DC LLC priced a $4.25 billion private offering of 6.129% senior secured notes due 2042, described in the filing as a fully amortizing project financing that is non-recourse to Hut 8 Corp. Proceeds finance a turnkey data center of six data halls totaling 352 MW of critical IT capacity on an approximately 521-acre property in Nueces County, Texas, plus the substation on the property. The facility is to be leased to a tenant the filing states was rated AA- or higher as of the pricing date; the tenant is not named.
Priced 8 June 2026Cipher Digital · Stingray Compute LLCproject bond~$810MCipher Digital's wholly-owned subsidiary Stingray Compute LLC priced an $810.0 million offering of 6.000% senior secured notes due 2031 at 99.750% of principal. Proceeds finance the remaining cost of the Stingray Facility, reimburse the company for approximately $61.5 million of prior equity contributions to Cipher Stingray LLC, and fund debt service reserves. The notes are guaranteed by Cipher Stingray and secured by first-priority liens on substantially all assets of the issuer and guarantor. The filing does not state the facility's location.
Agreements entered 25 August 2026; disclosed in Nscale Form S-1 filed 18 September 2026Anthropic · Nscale · NVIDIAlease~$44.6BNscale's Form S-1 states that on 25 August 2026 it entered into a series of GPU Services Agreements with Anthropic PBC to provide dedicated GPU infrastructure services at its Monarch Compute Campus in Mason County, West Virginia, supporting NVIDIA Vera Rubin NVL72 GPUs, with aggregate payments of up to approximately $44.6 billion. Press reports in August 2026 described the deal as about $45 billion over six years for roughly 460 MW, with systems expected to begin coming online in late 2027
Announced 18 November 2025Anthropic · Microsoftother$30.0BUnder the strategic partnerships announced 18 November 2025, Anthropic committed to purchase $30 billion of Azure compute capacity and to contract additional compute capacity up to one gigawatt, with its initial allocation running on NVIDIA Grace Blackwell and Vera Rubin systems.
Announced 18 November 2025Microsoft · Anthropicequity raise$5.0BMicrosoft said it will invest up to $5 billion in Anthropic alongside the Azure compute commitment announced the same day. Recorded separately from Nvidia's investment; the two are not summed here.
Announced 18 November 2025NVIDIA · Anthropicequity raise$10.0BNVIDIA said it will invest up to $10 billion in Anthropic alongside Anthropic's commitment to up to one gigawatt of compute on NVIDIA Grace Blackwell and Vera Rubin systems. Recorded separately from Microsoft's investment; the two are not summed here.
Announced 10 August 2026Anthropic · Macquarie Asset Management · GICplatformn.a.Anthropic, Macquarie Asset Management and GIC announced a strategic partnership to develop dedicated data center infrastructure at scale, with an initial focus on the United States. Funds managed by Macquarie Asset Management will, together with GIC, own the platform and fund the majority of the equity for each project, with Anthropic leasing the facilities as anchor tenant under long-term agreements. Anthropic also committed to cover electricity price increases that consumers otherwise may face from these sites. No dollar or capacity figure was disclosed.
Disclosed 27 August 2026IREN · Blue Owl · Pacific Investment Management Company LLCdebt facility$2.8BIn its FY26 results release of 27 August 2026, IREN disclosed $2.8 billion of new GPU financings funding 90% of associated GPU capex for non-investment-grade customer deployments. The disclosed component is a $2.4 billion financing led by Blue Owl and Pacific Investment Management Company LLC at a 9.0% fixed rate for the Mackenzie air-cooled expansion in British Columbia; together with customer prepayments it provides funding in excess of GPU capex. Separately, a $3.6 billion investment-grade GPU financing at 6.0% supports the Microsoft contract and, with prepayments, funds 96% of associated GPU capex. Blue Owl's own announcement of 28 August 2026 describes the $2.4 billion component as an AI factory financing split into a $1.2 billion senior secured term loan and $1.2 billion of senior secured notes, both at 9%, maturing two and a half years after funding, structured to let IREN purchase Nvidia Blackwell Ultra GPUs in stages, supporting the Mackenzie campus in British Columbia.
Disclosed 27 August 2026IREN · Undisclosed frontier AI labothern.a.IREN disclosed a new multi-year AI Cloud contract with a leading frontier AI lab in its FY26 results release of 27 August 2026, alongside signings with Cohere, Prometheus, Perplexity, Figure AI, Fal AI and Higgsfield AI. The company reported $4 billion of contracted annualized run-rate revenue for 2026 capacity against $1 billion of operating ARR as at 26 August 2026, and described 2026 capacity as largely sold out. It also disclosed that recent three-year contracts were signed at more than $20 million of revenue per MW of IT capacity, representing an approximately two-year payback, with active discussions at approximately $25 million per MW, and that recent customer prepayments represent 45-55% of GPU capex.
Announced 31 August 2026, expected to close on or about 2 September 2026Corvex, Inc. · Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC · Morgan Stanley · Oppenheimer & Co.equity raise~$33MCorvex, Inc. (Nasdaq: MOVE) announced a private placement of common stock and Series D Preferred Stock generating approximately $33 million of gross proceeds, with Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC, Morgan Stanley and Oppenheimer & Co. as joint lead placement agents and 4.258 million as-converted common restricted shares priced at $7.75. Proceeds fund an expansion of critical IT power capacity from approximately 1.5 MW to approximately 8 MW by year-end 2026, across a doubling at an existing Mid-Atlantic data center and a new deployment at an existing enterprise-scale Midwest data center, supporting approximately 3,000 GPUs. Corvex holds a right of first refusal on a further 12.5 MW at the Midwest site, anticipated ready for service in the third quarter of 2027, which if exercised would take total critical IT capacity above 20 MW. Neither data center is named or located beyond region. The company stated the transaction would take pro forma cash and cash equivalents to approximately $55 million against $22 million reported at 30 June 2026.
Credit Agreement signed and closed 24 September 2026; announced 28 September 2026 (Form 8-K with Exhibit 99.1)Hut 8 Corp. · JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (administrative and collateral agent) · Citi · Goldman Sachs · Morgan Stanley · Syndicate of 12 lendersdebt facility$1.1BHut 8 entered a four-year senior secured revolving credit facility of up to $1.07 billion with JPMorgan Chase Bank as administrative agent, secured by a first-priority lien on substantially all assets of Hut 8 and guarantor subsidiaries. Borrowings bear interest at Term SOFR plus 150 to 200 basis points (175 basis points at closing). The release says the letter of credit sublimit supports site development collateral such as interconnection deposits and obligations to utilities and equipment vendors, and that the parent-level liquidity funds projects through development before long-term non-recourse financing like the $7.5 billion already raised for River Bend and Beacon Point.
Master Services Agreement signed 22 September 2026; announced 28 September 2026 (Form 8-K)Volato Group (Alignment Engine subsidiary) · Unnamed large AI customercompute lease~$1.2BAlignment Engine signed a Master Services Agreement and two initial 48-month orders to provide an unnamed large AI customer with dedicated, single-tenant AMD GPU clusters at its AI infrastructure campus in Ohio: MI355X GPUs from 31 December 2026 and MI455X GPUs from 30 June 2027. The company says the orders anchor the initial phases of the Ohio campus. The filing names the campus only as being in Ohio; it is linked to the atlas's Alignment Engine site in Chillicothe, the campus described in the Volato merger coverage.
Backfill (not previously recorded). Announced 29 July 2026; Minnesota campus acquisition completed 23 July 2026 (company Form 10-K for fiscal year ended 30 June 2026)Zone Frontier Inc. (formerly CleanCore Solutions) · Cerebras Systemslease≥$800MZone Frontier, which dropped its cleaning products and Dogecoin treasury businesses in June 2026 to build AI data centers, holds a binding ten-year lease with Cerebras Systems for its Minnesota campus, which is under construction. The company expects at least 55 MW of utility power and 40 MW of critical IT load online by the end of the second calendar quarter of 2027. The 10-K does not name the Minnesota town, so no site row is created.
Announced 30 September 2026 (HPE release, Form 8-K Exhibit 99.1)Vultr · Hewlett Packard Enterprise · AMDequipment order$1.2BHPE announced at its networking investor day that it secured a $1.2 billion order from Vultr, which it calls the world's largest privately held cloud infrastructure company, to deploy AMD Helios AI Rack by HPE systems with HPE networking hardware and software. The release does not say where the systems will be deployed.
Announced 30 September 2026 (AIB release via GlobeNewswire); contract value from AIB investor presentation furnished on Form 8-K 30 September 2026; ESA service scheduled to begin 1 October 2026AIB Data Centers Inc. (AIB CLT1 LLC) · Nebiuslease≥$1.3BAIB Data Centers signed a binding agreement with Nebius for 50 MW of critical IT capacity at its facility in the southeastern United States, delivered in two data halls and supported by AIB's 15-year Electric Service Agreement for 65 MW of utility load at the site. AIB's Form 10-Q identifies the 65,000 kVA agreement with its CLT-01 Campus in Spartanburg County, South Carolina, a former 40 MW bitcoin hosting facility being repurposed to about 65 MW. The release does not name the town. AIB's investor presentation says Nebius's guaranty backs the contract, rent commences hall by hall (two 25 MW halls targeted at about months 10 and 14), and the 12-year term runs from the first hall.
Backfill (not previously recorded). Reported by The Information and Reuters 19 February 2026; not confirmed by Crusoe or AMDAMD · Crusoe · Goldman Sachs (lender) · 5C (Ohio data center developer)guarantee~$300MThe Information reported, as carried by Reuters, that AMD would backstop a $300 million Goldman Sachs loan for Crusoe to buy and deploy AMD AI chips, by agreeing to lease the chips back if Crusoe cannot secure customers. The chips are being installed in an Ohio data center built by 5C, the Brookfield-backed Canadian developer. Crusoe declined to comment and AMD did not respond.
Reported 29 September 2026 (Pulse 2.0 summary of the company release); single outlet; no Form 8-K filed as of 30 September 2026Axe Compute Inc. (AGPU) · Unnamed customerscompute lease≥$266MAxe Compute, a Nasdaq-listed neocloud, said it signed more than $266 million of new dedicated AI infrastructure contracts for NVIDIA GB300-class clusters with CPU orchestration nodes, storage and dedicated networking, and has received more than $184 million of customer prepayments since its second-quarter report. Customers and deployment locations were not disclosed.
Backfill (not previously recorded). Amendment No. 2 to Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-298506) on file; offering not yet pricedBitari Inc.ipo~$34MBitari, a Texas Bitcoin hosting company with sites in Wheeler and Dumas, Texas, and a contracted site in Marion, Indiana, filed to list on Nasdaq under BIAI. The prospectus says it is pursuing conversion and expansion of its 20 MW Wheeler mining facility into an AI data center, and has a non-binding agreement with strategic partner Aleria Technology on a potential transaction for up to 1,300 MW of AI data center capacity at the Wheeler site.
Announced 1 October 2026 (GMI Cloud release, Mountain View dateline); first reported 30 September 2026 by The InformationGMI Cloud · ARCHIV (Series B lead) · NVIDIA · CTBC (credit facility lead) · DSC Investment · Trend Micro · KB Investment · Kyobo Life · KT Corporationequity raise$668MGMI Cloud, a Mountain View, California GPU cloud provider, raised $668 million to expand capacity in the United States, Taiwan and the rest of Asia-Pacific, grow its inference services and hire. The Series B was led by ARCHIV with participation from NVIDIA and Asia-Pacific investors; the credit facility is led by CTBC. The split of capacity between US and Asian sites was not disclosed.
Announced 29 September 2026 (company release); agreement dated 23 September 2026; closing targeted by 29 October 2026FingerMotion, Inc. · Newbit Technology Inc. shareholdersacquisition~$2MFingerMotion agreed to buy 100 percent of Newbit Technology Inc., holder of the surface lease, permits, gas pipeline and metering infrastructure and AUC Rule 007 registration for a 9.9 MW behind-the-meter site in the County of Newell, Alberta, which becomes Brooks Campus #1 of its 99 MW Alberta power and compute program. Generating equipment is excluded. Closing requires a new gas supply agreement with Pivotal Energy Partners and Eastern Irrigation District consent.
Announced 1 October 2026 (company release via PR Newswire)PaleBlueDot AI · ComputeCore · B Capitalequity raise$200MPaleBlueDot AI, a Palo Alto GPU cloud company founded in 2024, announced on 1 October 2026 the completion of a $200 million Series C led by ComputeCore at a $3.2 billion valuation, with existing shareholder B Capital participating. The round follows a $150 million Series B announced in January 2026. The company owns and operates dedicated GPU clusters in several regions (including an Nvidia B300 cluster in Japan), runs a GPU marketplace and serverless inference, and says it had signed more than $5 billion of customer contracts by the end of September 2026. The release gives no North American site or MW figures.
Completed 23 September 2026; announced 30 September 2026 (release filed by Aperture AC on Form 8-K)Atlantic HPC Group Inc. · Valley Oasis Development LLC · Aperture AC (SPAC merger partner)acquisitionn.a.Atlantic HPC Group, a bitcoin mining and computing facility operator that is merging with the SPAC Aperture AC, completed on 23 September 2026 the acquisition of 100% of Valley Oasis Development LLC, which holds two power contracts dated 3 September 2026 with Dyersburg Electric System (a TVA local power company) for 29 MW of aggregate contract demand and a one-acre land lease at 1 Bekaert Drive, Dyersburg, Tennessee. About 14.5 MW can be served on existing utility infrastructure once Atlantic funds utility construction; the other 14.5 MW needs transformer upgrades. The site is zoned heavy industrial and described as suitable for bitcoin mining and high-density AI compute. The purchase price was not disclosed. Atlantic puts its utility-approved capacity at 127 MW across Oklahoma, Arkansas, Ohio and Tennessee.
Priced 11 June 2025 (company release on Form 6-K)IREN Limitedconvertible~$500MIREN priced $500 million of 3.50% convertible senior notes due 2029 on 11 June 2025 in a Rule 144A offering, upsized from $450 million, at a 30% conversion premium. Estimated net proceeds were about $486.1 million, of which $48.9 million funded capped calls (initial cap price $20.98 per share) and about $92.5 million a prepaid forward, with the remainder for general corporate purposes and working capital. Corporate-level financing, not tied to one site.
Priced 8 October 2025; closed 14 October 2025 (Form 8-K)IREN Limitedconvertible~$1.0BIREN issued $1.0 billion of 0.00% Convertible Senior Notes due 2031 on 14 October 2025, including $125 million from the full exercise of the initial purchasers' option. Net proceeds were about $979.0 million; $56.7 million funded capped call transactions with Citibank, Santander, Mizuho and Wells Fargo, and the remainder is for general corporate purposes and working capital. Corporate-level financing, not tied to one site.
Priced 2 December 2025; closed 8 December 2025 (Form 8-K)IREN Limitedconvertible~$2.3BIREN issued $1.15 billion of 0.25% convertible senior notes due 2032 and $1.15 billion of 1.00% convertible senior notes due 2033 on 8 December 2025, each including $150 million from full exercise of the initial purchasers' options, for net proceeds of about $2,270.0 million. It used $201.0 million for capped calls and, together with a concurrent registered direct offering of 39,699,102 ordinary shares at $41.12 per share, repurchased about $227.7 million principal of its 2030 convertibles for about $608.2 million and about $316.6 million principal of its 2029 convertibles for about $1,024.2 million, leaving $2,068.0 million for general corporate purposes and working capital.
Priced 11 May 2026; closed 14 May 2026 (Form 8-K)IREN Limitedconvertible~$3.0BIREN issued $3.0 billion of 1.00% Convertible Senior Notes due 2033 on 14 May 2026 in a Rule 144A offering, including $400 million from the full exercise of the initial purchasers' option. Net proceeds were about $2.96 billion; $201.3 million funded capped call transactions (initial cap price $110.30 per share, a 100% premium to the $55.15 share price on 11 May 2026), and the remainder is for general corporate purposes and working capital. Corporate-level financing, not tied to one site.
Underwriting agreement 20 May 2025; option exercised in full 21 May 2025 (Form 8-K filed 22 May 2025)Cipher Mining Inc. (now Cipher Digital) · Morgan Stanleyconvertible$172MCipher Mining entered an underwriting agreement with Morgan Stanley on 20 May 2025 for 1.75% Convertible Senior Notes due 2030, with a $150 million base and a $22.5 million option that was exercised in full on 21 May 2025, for $172.5 million in total. Corporate-level financing by a bitcoin miner then moving into HPC hosting; not tied to one site in the filing text reviewed.
Issued 30 September 2025 (Form 8-K filed 1 October 2025)Cipher Mining Inc. (now Cipher Digital)convertible$1.3BCipher Mining issued $1.3 billion of 0.00% Convertible Senior Notes due 2031 on 30 September 2025 under an indenture with U.S. Bank Trust Company, including the full exercise of the initial purchasers' option for an additional $200 million. Corporate-level financing; the 8-K text reviewed does not tie proceeds to one site.
Initial $1.4 billion completed 13 November 2025; $333 million add-on completed 24 November 2025Cipher Compute LLC (Cipher Mining, now Cipher Digital) · Morgan Stanleysenior notes$1.7BCipher Compute LLC, a wholly owned indirect subsidiary of Cipher Mining, completed a Rule 144A and Regulation S offering of $1.4 billion of 7.125% Senior Secured Notes due 2030 on 13 November 2025, issued at par under a purchase agreement dated 5 November 2025 and guaranteed by Cipher Barber Lake LLC, to finance a portion of construction costs. On 24 November 2025 it completed a further $333 million of additional notes of the same series under a purchase agreement dated 20 November 2025, with Morgan Stanley as sole initial purchaser. The two issues total $1.733 billion of one series.
Purchase agreement 4 February 2026; completed 11 February 2026Black Pearl Compute LLC (Cipher Mining, now Cipher Digital) · Morgan Stanleysenior notes~$2.0BBlack Pearl Compute LLC, a wholly owned indirect subsidiary of Cipher Mining, completed a Rule 144A and Regulation S offering of $2.0 billion of 6.125% Senior Secured Notes due 2031 on 11 February 2026, issued at par and guaranteed by Cipher Black Pearl LLC and 11786 Wink LLC. Proceeds finance the remaining cost of the Black Pearl high-performance computing data center in Wink, Texas, reimburse Cipher about $232.5 million of prior equity contributions, fund debt service reserves and pay fees. The notes were already referenced in the site record; this adds the transaction itself.
$850 million issued 20 August 2025; $150 million option notes issued 22 August 2025TeraWulf Inc.convertible$1.0BTeraWulf issued $850 million of 1.00% Convertible Senior Notes due 2031 in a private offering on 20 August 2025 and a further $150 million on 22 August 2025 after the initial purchasers fully exercised their option, for $1 billion in total. It used $100.6 million for capped call transactions, with the remaining net proceeds allocated to data center expansion and general corporate purposes.
Purchase agreement 29 October 2025; completed 31 October 2025TeraWulf Inc. · Morgan Stanley · Cantor Fitzgeraldconvertible~$1.0BTeraWulf completed a Rule 144A offering of $1.025 billion of 0.00% Convertible Senior Notes due 2032 on 31 October 2025, including $125.0 million issued under the initial purchasers' option, at 100% of principal for net proceeds of about $999.7 million. The company said it intends to use the proceeds to fund a portion of the construction cost of a data center campus in Abernathy, Texas, among other purposes.
Purchase agreement 18 December 2025; completion announced 29 December 2025Flash Compute LLC · TeraWulf Inc. · Fluidstack (JV partner)senior notes$1.3BTeraWulf announced on 29 December 2025 the completion of a Rule 144A and Regulation S offering by Flash Compute LLC of $1.3 billion of 7.250% Senior Secured Notes due 2030, issued at par. Flash Compute sits under a joint venture holding company owned 50.1% by a TeraWulf subsidiary. Proceeds finance a portion of the construction cost of the Abernathy HPC Campus in Abernathy, Texas, and fund debt reserves, with the JV holding company providing a completion guarantee of up to $100 million. TeraWulf later agreed to sell its JV stake (see terawulf-abernathy-jv-stake-sale-fluidstack-2026).
Announced 16 January 2026 (Riot release, Form 8-K Exhibit 99.1)Riot Platforms · Advanced Micro Devices (AMD)acquisition~$96MRiot Platforms announced on 16 January 2026 the fee simple acquisition of the 200 acres in Milam County, Texas, on which it had operated under a ground lease, for total consideration of $96.0 million funded by selling about 1,080 bitcoin. It also signed a Data Center Lease and Services Agreement with AMD at Rockdale for an initial 25 MW of critical IT load delivered in phases from January to May 2026, with potential expansion to 200 MW. The Rockdale site has a 700 MW grid interconnection, and Riot cites 1.7 GW of approved power across Rockdale and Corsicana.
Purchase agreement 10 November 2025; completed 13 November 2025CleanSpark, Inc. · Cantor Fitzgeraldconvertible~$1.1BCleanSpark completed a Rule 144A offering of $1,150,000,000 of 0.00% Convertible Senior Notes due 2032 on 13 November 2025, issued at par for net proceeds of about $1.13 billion. It used about $460.0 million to repurchase shares from note investors and intends to use the remainder to expand its power and land portfolio, develop data center infrastructure, repay bitcoin-backed credit lines and for general corporate purposes.
Disclosed in Galaxy's third quarter 2025 results release, 21 October 2025Galaxy Digital · CoreWeave (tenant)debt facility$1.4BGalaxy said in its third quarter 2025 results that it secured a $1.4 billion project financing facility that fully funds the $1.7 billion Phase I build at its Helios data center campus in Texas. In the same period it executed the Phase II lease with CoreWeave, which also exercised its final option for an additional 133 MW of critical IT load, bringing its commitment to the full 800 MW of approved power capacity at Helios. Lenders are not named in the release.
Announced 10 October 2025 (per Galaxy's third quarter 2025 results release)Galaxy Digital · Unnamed large asset managerequity raise$460MGalaxy announced on 10 October 2025 a $460 million equity investment by one of the world's largest asset managers, which the release does not name. Net proceeds to Galaxy of $325 million are to drive the build-out of the Helios data center campus and support general corporate purposes.
Equity purchase agreement entered 29 April 2026; announced 30 April 2026; not yet closed as of 30 June 2026 (Form 10-Q); seller expected closing in the third quarter of 2026MARA Holdings · FTAI Infrastructure · Long Ridge Energy & Power LLC · Barclaysacquisition~$1.5BMARA Holdings, through a subsidiary, agreed to buy 100% of Long Ridge Energy & Power LLC from FTAI Infrastructure. Long Ridge owns a 485 MW combined-cycle gas plant in Hannibal, Ohio (expected to increase to 505 MW in the first quarter of 2027), working interests in natural gas wells and more than 1,600 contiguous acres on the Ohio River with water, fiber and rail access, adjacent to MARA's existing Hannibal data center operations. MARA says that with Long Ridge and its Matagorda County, Texas site its potential power portfolio would reach about 4.8 GW. FTAI Infrastructure said the sale eliminates $1.16 billion of Long Ridge debt. The power plant is recorded as a deal only, not a site. MARA's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended 30 June 2026 states the acquisition had not yet closed and remained subject to customary conditions and regulatory approvals.
Announced 1 October 2026 (company release); agreement executed 30 September 2026; closing 30 days after a 60-day due diligence periodFingerMotion, Inc. · BlueFlare Group Holdings Inc. · Undisclosed selleracquisitionn.a.Binding Agreement of Purchase and Sale for about 20.2 acres (8.18 hectares) at 409 Pioneer Trail S., Hanna, Alberta, to be held by Hanna Campus #1 Inc. Conditions cover title, environmental condition, zoning and permits, utilities and access, and financing.
Announced 3 August 2026; about $30 million outstanding as of 2 August 2026Hyperscale Data, Inc. · Morpho Protocol lendersdebt facility~$30MHyperscale Data said it had implemented a bitcoin-backed decentralized finance borrowing program through the Morpho Protocol, with about $30 million outstanding as of 2 August 2026 at a variable rate of about 4.9 percent. Proceeds support development of its Michigan AI data center campus under a master services agreement with a neocloud provider, plus working capital and general corporate purposes.
Closed 30 September 2026; announced 5 October 2026 (Axe Compute and Duos Forms 8-K)Axe Compute · Duos Technologies Groupacquisition~$131MAxe Compute acquired 100% of Duos Edge AI GPUaaS LLC, the special purpose vehicle owning the AI cluster at Duos' facility in Columbus, Georgia (288 servers, 2,304 Nvidia B300 GPUs), with no new equity issued. The customer agreement was extended from three to five years, through 2031, and Axe expects about $364.6 million of revenue over its life. Duos keeps ownership and operation of the facility and covers colocation and energy costs for the five-year term; Duos said the sale removes about $98.1 million of prospective equipment financing.
Signed 30 September 2026; disclosed in Form 8-K filed 6 October 2026Boost Run · Coherecompute lease≥$526MBoost Run LLC will provide Cohere with dedicated GPU cloud computing infrastructure; each rack runs about five years from acceptance, with initial acceptance expected to begin in the second quarter of 2027. Cohere may terminate and recover prepaid amounts if a minimum amount of infrastructure is not accepted by 15 July 2027; Boost Run Inc. guarantees refund of prepayments. Facility location not disclosed.
JV formed 2 October 2026; announced 5 October 2026 (Form 8-K)Forum Markets · Edge Node AI · SBA Communications · Tillman Infrastructurejv equity~$441MForum Markets (51%, manager) and Edge Node AI (49%) formed Forum Edge AI LLC to own and operate inference GPU capacity at powered sites: 2 MW of a 4 MW Dallas data center, a six-building 5-acre High Point, North Carolina campus with 9 MW of utility power (6 MW in Phase 0), and an initial 1 to 2 MW mobile tower site in Texas under agreements with SBA Communications and Tillman. Phase 0 totals about 11 MW and 4,376 Nvidia B300/GB300 GPUs at the meter by the second quarter of 2027; the two companies also agreed a 9.95% equity exchange on milestones.
Initial 15-year lease 28 March 2025; final option exercised and Phase II lease executed in the third quarter of 2025 (Galaxy releases of 5 August 2025 and 21 October 2025)Galaxy Digital · CoreWeaveleasen.a.CoreWeave signed a 15-year, 133 MW critical IT lease at Galaxy's Helios campus in Dickens County, Texas on 28 March 2025, then exercised options and executed a Phase II lease, committing to the full 800 MW of approved gross power: Phase I 133 MW critical IT (about 200 MW gross, first half 2026), Phase II 260 MW (about 400 MW gross, 2027) and Phase III 133 MW (about 200 MW gross, 2028), 526 MW critical IT in total. Galaxy said the leases are expected to produce more than $1 billion of average annual revenue.
Priced 6 August 2025 (underwriting agreement); closed 8 August 2025; over-allotment exercised 2 September 2025WhiteFiber · Bit Digital · B. Riley Securities · Needham & Companyipo~$183MWhiteFiber, Bit Digital's HPC and AI data center subsidiary (Enovum Data Centers), completed its initial public offering on the Nasdaq Capital Market under the symbol WYFI. Bit Digital retained about 74.3% of the shares after the base offering.
Completed 26 January 2026 (Form 8-K)WhiteFiberconvertible~$230MWhiteFiber completed a private offering of $230.0 million of 4.500% Convertible Senior Notes due 2031. In August 2026 it exchanged $198.15 million of these notes in connection with its 5.00% notes due 2032 (see whitefiber-convertible-notes-2032).
Agreement 10 April 2025; closed 20 May 2025 (Bit Digital Forms 8-K)WhiteFiber (Bit Digital) · Unifi Manufacturingacquisition$53MBit Digital's Enovum subsidiary agreed to buy an industrial building, land and certain equipment in Madison, North Carolina from Unifi Manufacturing for $53.2 million; WhiteFiber completed the acquisition on 20 May 2025 for its NC-1 HPC data center, which qualified as a North Carolina data center for sales and use tax exemptions.
Acquired 27 December 2024 (Bit Digital Form 8-K filed 6 January 2025)Bit Digital (Enovum Data Centers) · Alexandria Real Estate Equitiesacquisition~$23MBit Digital bought the 160,000 square foot former manufacturing building at 7300 Trans-Canada Highway, Pointe-Claire, Quebec from an Alexandria Real Estate Equities subsidiary for a build-to-suit 5 MW Tier-3 AI data center (MTL-2), funded initially with cash. In June 2025 WhiteFiber's Enovum subsidiaries signed an RBC credit agreement of up to about $43.9 million, non-recourse, primarily to refinance the MTL-2 buildout.
Announced Monday 5 October 2026 (Kentucky Power and TeraWulf); subject to Kentucky PSC approvalTeraWulf · Kentucky Power (AEP)power supply agreementn.a.Amended agreement doubles contracted demand at TeraWulf's Muskie Data Campus in Grayson KY to 1 GW and moves delivery of the second 500 MW phase from 2030 to 2029. TeraWulf covers estimated financing costs for Kentucky Power's proposed 760 MW Big Sandy combined-cycle plant plus service charges, posts collateral, and funds $100 million of winter bill credits for residential customers.
Announced 29 September 2026 (QumulusAI release, Business Wire)QumulusAI · Two unnamed AI inference customerscompute lease$241MAtlanta-based neocloud QumulusAI (Nasdaq: QMLS) signed two three-year take-or-pay agreements with AI inference customers covering more than 2,000 NVIDIA Blackwell B300 GPUs in two dedicated clusters, with capacity expected to be turned over in December 2026. One customer is a repeat client whose earlier $32 million two-year agreement was announced 23 July 2026. Cluster locations were not disclosed.
Closed Thursday 2 April 2026 (CoinMarketCap Academy, published 3 April 2026; single outlet)Soluna Holdings · Briscoe Wind Farm (seller not named)acquisition$53MSoluna Holdings closed a $53 million acquisition of the Briscoe Wind Farm in Briscoe County, Texas, with potential generation capacity of up to 300 MW, to supply power to its Project Dorothy data center campus.
Announced Tuesday 6 October 2026 (DarkHorse release)DarkHorse Technologies (Pennyrile Holdings, LLC) · Electric Plant Board of Hopkinsville (HES)power supply agreementn.a.Power contract for up to 50 MW for a new DarkHorse AI facility in Hopkinsville, Kentucky, served by a new DarkHorse-funded 65 MW substation on TVA's 161 kV system that HES will own. It doubles DarkHorse's contracted power in the TVA region to about 100 MW. Service is subject to permitting, utility construction and an 18-month permit contingency period.
Framework agreement announced 12 February 2025 (KALiNA release via CNW)Crusoe · KALiNA Distributed Power (KALiNA Power Limited)power supply agreementn.a.Multi-year framework agreement for Crusoe-owned and operated AI data centres co-sited with KALiNA's 170 MW near-zero-emission natural gas plants with carbon capture (Power-CCS) in Alberta, each to be developed under a separate project development agreement with an indicative tolling PPA of at least 15 years and Crusoe funding of certain interconnection security payments. Initial locations are KALiNA's Myers Energy Park, Alsike Energy Park and Crossfield Energy Park, all with AESO self-supply and export system access requests filed; Gilby and Clairmont are further sites.
Signed 4 October 2026; disclosed in Applied Digital's Form 10-Q and earnings release filed 7 October 2026Applied Digital · Base Electron Corporationppan.a.On 4 October 2026 Applied Digital entered into a Power Purchase Agreement and a related credit support agreement with Base Electron for capacity and energy from an approximately 1,200 MW natural gas-fired generation facility Base Electron is to develop in Center, North Dakota, as dedicated generation for the Polaris Forge 3 campus. The agreement has a 15-year delivery term and may be terminated by Base Electron if financial close for the plant has not occurred by 31 March 2027. Base Electron is a related party: Applied Digital owns about 10% and it is owned and managed by certain Applied Digital officers and directors, including Wes Cummins; Applied Digital also holds a demand promissory note from Base Electron of up to $100 million ($59.3 million outstanding at 31 August 2026).
Backfill (not previously recorded). Announced 18 June 2026 (HIVE release via Newsfile)HIVE Digital Technologies · BUZZ HPC · Bell AI Fabric (Bell Canada) · Coherecompute lease≥$220MHIVE's subsidiary BUZZ HPC executed a three-year GPU cloud contract worth about US$220 million in a sovereign AI deal with Bell Canada and Cohere. BUZZ HPC procured 2,304 NVIDIA Grace Blackwell GPUs in GB200 NVL72 rack-scale systems and will deploy them at Bell AI Fabric's purpose-built facility in Merritt, British Columbia, providing the compute on which Cohere runs its models for Canadian government and enterprise customers. A separate five-year, $350 million BUZZ HPC contract at the same Merritt facility followed in August 2026 (hive-buzz-hpc-350m-cloud-contract-2026).
04

The Nvidia web

One company sits at the center of the NeoCloud layer four ways at once: as supplier, investor, lessee, and credit enhancer.

2entities 1named sites 16transactions 9recorded facts
Nvidia logo

NvidiaFull profile →

Financingbalance-sheet equity stakes, capacity backstops and lease/residual-value guarantees that convert Nvidia's balance sheet into third-party debt capacity; financing-platform sponsor with asset managers
NVDA

Nvidia is the only entity in the atlas that appears simultaneously as equipment supplier, equity investor, capacity lessee, residual-value guarantor and financing-platform sponsor, making its balance sheet the effective credit enhancement behind a large share of the NeoCloud layer. It is named among the key initial technology partners of the Stargate Project but not among its equity funders. Its direct-investment ladder spans equity stakes, IPO orders, capacity backstops and lease guarantees across CoreWeave, Nebius, Lambda, Nscale, Together AI, Crusoe, Poolside and Groq, alongside a full exit from Applied Digital. On August 10, 2026 it announced financing platforms with Apollo, BlackRock, Blackstone, Brookfield, Goldman Sachs and KKR intended to mobilize over $500 billion of third-party capital over time.

PeriodKindAmountContextSources
to April 13, 2032backlog$6.3B$6.3B unsold-capacity order with CoreWeave; backstop runs to April 13, 2032. Multi-year commitment as stated, not annual spend.
as disclosedguarantee$860M$860M of partner data center lease obligations backstopped, $470M escrowed, across CoreWeave, Nebius, Nscale, Lambda and Crusoe. A guarantee commitment, not capex.
end-October (FY context per source)cash balance$60.6BNvidia held $60.6B cash at end-October per CNBC report on the Groq deal. Cash balance, not capex.
Record
  • Nvidia is named among Arm, Microsoft, NVIDIA, Oracle, and OpenAI as the key initial technology partners of the Stargate Project, though not among its equity funders, which are SoftBank, OpenAI, Oracle, and MGX.
  • Nvidia joined the AI Infrastructure Partnership on 19 March 2025, alongside xAI, when the platform was renamed and confirmed a target of $30 billion of equity scaling to up to $100 billion including debt.
  • Nvidia is a partner in KKR's approximately $10 billion Helix Digital Infrastructure vehicle with Kuwait Investment Authority and Vistra, and was named a founding investor in Helix alongside KKR.
  • Nvidia wrote $2 billion equity cheques into CoreWeave at $87.20 per share and into Nebius, each tied to partnerships to scale more than 5GW by 2030.
  • Nvidia is reported to be introducing a model guaranteeing a minimum GPU utilization floor for neocloud operators to de-risk GPU-backed loans by backing residual value.
  • In the same window as its CoreWeave and Nebius equity commitments, Nvidia sold its entire Applied Digital position, worth roughly $182 million, with the exit disclosed in a Q4 13F.
  • The $6.3 billion unsold-capacity order running to April 13, 2032 and the reported minimum-GPU-utilization floor for neocloud operators are the two mechanisms that most directly convert Nvidia's balance sheet into third-party debt capacity.
  • No dollar-denominated per-partner NCP program commitments were confirmable in the source (n.a.).

Groq (Nvidia position)Full profile →

Financingacquisition target; asset purchase / non-exclusive license funded from Nvidia's cash

Groq appears in this part as an AI chip startup that Nvidia agreed to buy for about $20 billion on December 24, 2025, described by the source as an approximately $20B asset purchase with a non-exclusive license and as Nvidia's biggest deal. The same report notes Nvidia held $60.6B cash at end-October.

Record
  • Nvidia is buying AI chip startup Groq for about $20 billion, structured as an asset purchase with a non-exclusive license, announced December 24, 2025.

Named sites — the nvidia web

SiteLocationCapitalMWStatusDetailSources
Abilene campus (Oracle tenancy, Stargate-adjacent)Abilene, TXn.a.operatingOracle's Abilene tenancy runs on GB200 racks, with Oracle beginning delivery of the first NVIDIA GB200 racks in June 2025. Crusoe announced the flagship Abilene data center is live. Nvidia's capital role in this Stargate-adjacent capacity is indirect but material.

Financing transactions — the nvidia web

TimingPartiesInstrumentAmountDetailSources
Series B (date n.a. in this part)Nvidia · CoreWeaveequity raise$100MNvidia made a $100M Series B commitment to CoreWeave, the first rung of its CoreWeave direct-investment ladder.
CoreWeave IPO (date n.a. in this part)Nvidia · CoreWeaveequity raise$250MNvidia placed a $250M order in CoreWeave's IPO.
Signed September 2025 per source URL context; backstop runs to April 13, 2032Nvidia · CoreWeavebackstop$6.3BNvidia signed a $6.3 billion cloud computing capacity order that backstops CoreWeave's unsold capacity, running to April 13, 2032. The atlas identifies it as one of two mechanisms that most directly convert Nvidia's balance sheet into third-party debt capacity.
January 26, 2026Nvidia · CoreWeaveequity raise≥$2.0BNvidia invested $2 billion of equity in CoreWeave at $87.20 per share on January 26, 2026, tied to a partnership to scale more than 5GW by 2030.
March 11, 2026; plus Dec 2024 round participationNvidia · Nebius · Nebius Groupequity raise$2.0BNvidia committed $2 billion of equity to Nebius on March 11, 2026, under a partnership to scale more than 5GW by 2030, having also participated in Nebius's December 2024 round.
Date n.a. in this partNvidia · Lambdaequity raisen.a.Nvidia participated in Lambda's Series D round. The source does not state Nvidia's dollar commitment.
Reported September 2025Nvidia · Lambdalease~$1.5BA $1.5 billion lease-back from Nvidia to Lambda, reported September 2025. Terms beyond the reported figure are not disclosed in the fetched sources.
Date n.a. in this partNvidia · Supermicro · Lambdalease$600MA $600M Supermicro 21MW Prime sublease was routed to Lambda as part of Nvidia's Lambda-related commitments.
Date n.a. in this partNvidia · Applied Digital · Related Companiesequity raise$160MNvidia participated in a $160M PIPE in Applied Digital before later exiting the position entirely.
Exit disclosed in Q4 13FNvidia · Applied Digitalother~$182MNvidia sold its entire Applied Digital position, worth roughly $182 million, with the exit disclosed in a Q4 13F. The atlas frames this as evidence Nvidia's support is selective rather than blanket.
Announced October 30, 2025Nvidia · Poolsideequity raise$1.0BNvidia announced an investment of up to $1 billion in AI startup Poolside on October 30, 2025.
December 24, 2025Nvidia · Groqacquisition~$20.0BNvidia agreed to buy AI chip startup Groq for about $20 billion, structured as an asset purchase with a non-exclusive license, an approximately $20 billion asset purchase. Nvidia held $60.6B cash at end-October per the same report.
Date n.a. in this partNvidia · CoreWeave · Nebius · Nscale · Lambda · Crusoeguarantee$860MNvidia backstops $860M of partner data center lease obligations, with $470M escrowed, across CoreWeave, Nebius, Nscale, Lambda and Crusoe.
Date n.a. in this partNvidia · KKR · Kuwait Investment Authority · Vistraplatform~$10.0BNvidia is a partner in KKR's approximately $10 billion Helix Digital Infrastructure vehicle with Kuwait Investment Authority and Vistra, and was later named a founding investor in Helix alongside KKR.
August 10, 2026Nvidia · Apollo · BlackRock · Blackstone · Brookfield · Goldman Sachs · KKRplatform≥$500BOn August 10, 2026 Nvidia announced strategic partnerships with Apollo, BlackRock, Blackstone, Brookfield, Goldman Sachs and KKR to establish AI compute infrastructure financing platforms intended to mobilize over $500 billion of third-party capital over time.
Reported; date n.a. in this partNvidia · neocloud operatorsguaranteen.a.Nvidia is reported to be introducing a model guaranteeing a minimum GPU utilization floor for neocloud operators to de-risk GPU-backed loans by backing residual value. Reported, not a company disclosure of a dollar commitment.
05

Private equity & infrastructure

Platform equity at a scale that presumes multi-year illiquidity. These balance sheets stand behind most non-hyperscaler capacity in this atlas.

19entities 28named sites 89transactions 59recorded facts

BlackstoneFull profile →

Financingsponsor fund equity plus large-scale private credit and CMBS refinancing

Blackstone entered data centers via the $10 billion take-private of QTS Realty Trust and by Q1 2026 reported a $150 billion data center portfolio with a $160 billion prospective pipeline on firm AUM of $1.3 trillion. It has deployed both equity (Digital Realty JV, AirTrunk in APAC) and large-scale private credit (CoreWeave debt facilities) and refinanced QTS assets through CMBS. Its QTS platform carries the sector's largest documented cancellation exposure, the PW Digital Gateway in Prince William County, Virginia.

PeriodKindAmountContextSources
Q1 2026aum$150B$150 billion data center portfolio
Q1 2026backlog$160B$160 billion prospective development pipeline
Q1 2026aum$1.30Ttotal firm AUM of $1.3 trillion, up from $1.24 trillion in October 2025; dedicated infrastructure platform of $84 billion
through Q1 2026reported$300Bcumulative investment into data centers and AI technology of $300 billion (multi-year cumulative figure as stated)
prior disclosureaum$70.0B$70 billion data center portfolio with a $100 billion prospective pipeline, up from $55 billion and $70 billion respectively in the prior quarter, alongside roughly 8x growth in leased capacity
Q2 2026aum$1.35Trecord AUM of $1.35 trillion
Record
  • QTS had roughly 400 megawatts of capacity at acquisition and has since grown to a platform of roughly 3 gigawatts.
  • BREIT's portfolio exposure to data centers stood at 23 percent.
  • The $5 billion Applied Digital perpetual preferred facility was executed with Macquarie Asset Management, not Blackstone; Blackstone's role in a $5 billion Applied Digital financing is n.a. on the evidence gathered.
  • Blackstone is planning a publicly traded AI-data-center vehicle sized in the "tens of billions".
  • At the AirTrunk announcement Blackstone cited an estimated US$1 trillion of US data center capex need over five years.

BlackRock / GIP / AI Infrastructure PartnershipFull profile →

Financingconsortium equity (AIP / MGX / GIP) scaled with debt financing

BlackRock closed its acquisition of Global Infrastructure Partners on October 1, 2024, creating an approximately $170 billion combined infrastructure platform. The AI Infrastructure Partnership (Microsoft, BlackRock, GIP, MGX, later NVIDIA and xAI) seeks $30 billion of equity scaling to up to $100 billion with debt. AIP, MGX and GIP acquired Aligned Data Centers at a $40 billion enterprise value, funded 100 percent with equity (about a $21 billion equity cheque), the largest North American data center transaction of the period, closing July 21, 2026.

PeriodKindAmountContextSources
Oct 2024 (GIP close)aum$170Bcombined infrastructure platform with approximately $170 billion of client AUM; added over $100 billion to BlackRock's private-markets AUM and roughly $750 million of run-rate management fees
2025-2026raise$30.0BAIP seeks $30 billion of equity capital, scaling to up to $100 billion including debt financing
Record
  • AIP was launched in September 2024 and renamed on March 19, 2025, when NVIDIA and xAI joined Microsoft, BlackRock, GIP and MGX, with collaborations announced with GE Vernova and NextEra Energy.
  • AIP held its initial closing in October 2025 with Temasek as an anchor investor; Kuwait Investment Authority joined earlier, in June 2025.
  • The Aligned transaction was announced against the backdrop of New York's one-year moratorium on state environmental permits for new hyperscale data centers.
  • BlackRock is a named partner in NVIDIA's over $500 billion AI compute infrastructure financing-platform initiative.

Brookfield (BAM / Brookfield Infrastructure Partners)Full profile →

Financinglisted infrastructure vehicle and managed fund equity with pension co-investment

Brookfield acquired Compass Datacenters with OTPP in 2023 (about $5.5 billion per Reuters) and Cyxtera's assets for US$1.3 billion including real estate, combining Cyxtera with Evoque as Centersquare. BIP holds more than 485MW operating and 775MW contracted with a $9.6 billion capital backlog and $64 billion enterprise value. In Europe, Brookfield's French AI infrastructure commitment was raised to €30 billion (about $34 billion), and its thesis paper sizes the AI infrastructure opportunity at over $7 trillion over the next decade.

PeriodKindAmountContextSources
May 2026 disclosurebacklog$9.6BBIP capital backlog $9.6 billion; enterprise value $64 billion
2026aum$1.00TBAM AUM over $1 trillion (cited in NVIDIA financing-partner announcement and French commitment release)
next three years (per disclosure)guidancen.a.plans to build roughly 1GW of data center capacity over three years; more than 485MW operating plus 775MW contracted, exceeding 1.25GW
Record
  • Cyxtera had filed for Chapter 11 in June 2023; the combined Centersquare platform holds 400MW of capacity and 1.9 million sq ft, with 200MW of potential expansion, 320MW brought to market across more than 50 locations and 100MW of near-term under-roof expansion.
  • Brookfield's thesis paper sizes the AI infrastructure opportunity at over $7 trillion over the next decade, split $2T AI factories, $0.5T power and transmission, $4T compute and $0.5T adjacencies.
  • Ascenty is a Latin American joint venture with Digital Realty; figures n.a. (page not fetched in this session).
  • A specific $10B French AI campus at Cadarache is n.a. on the evidence gathered.
  • Compass is co-named on the cancelled PW Digital Gateway, valued at $24.7 billion in blocked/delayed capital.

KKRFull profile →

Financingfund equity plus warehouse credit, CMBS and dedicated-generation power partnerships

KKR has invested approximately $34 billion of equity in digital infrastructure across 24 investments and holds a 12GW data center pipeline. With GIP it took CyrusOne private at approximately $15 billion in 2022, followed by roughly $9.7 billion of new debt capital and Texas campuses anchored on dedicated Calpine and Constellation generation. It has committed capital to Global Technical Realty, Compass Datacenters, and the roughly $10 billion Helix Digital Infrastructure vehicle, alongside a $50 billion development program with Energy Capital Partners.

PeriodKindAmountContextSources
as of Jan 2026reported$34.0Bapproximately $34 billion of equity invested in digital infrastructure across 24 investments (cumulative); over $20 billion in power and renewables; 12GW data center pipeline
six years (KKR materials)reported$31.3BKKR's own materials cite $31.3 billion of equity deployed to digital infrastructure over six years (cumulative)
Record
  • CyrusOne is one of two private partners in the US Army's hyperscale data center program, at Dugway Proving Ground (1,201 acres, initial operating capability FY2029).
  • KKR is a named NVIDIA financing-platform partner.
  • No KKR-specific pause disclosed in fetched sources; a potential CyrusOne IPO was reported as possible as early as 2027.

StonepeakFull profile →

Financingfund equity, single-asset continuation vehicles and JV development capital

Stonepeak reports approximately $93bn of AUM as of March 2026 and has invested in 20 digital infrastructure platforms. Its North American data center positions include majority control of Cologix (recapitalized in a $3.0 billion continuation vehicle), a $2.5 billion-plus investment in CoreSite alongside American Tower including a Denver JV, and the $1.5 billion Montera Infrastructure launch. In APAC, Digital Edge raised over US$1.6 billion of new equity and debt in January 2025.

PeriodKindAmountContextSources
Mar 2026aum$93.0Bapproximately $93bn of AUM as of March 2026, inclusive of subsequent committed capital; up from approximately $71.2 billion in July 2024 and approximately $73 billion in April 2025
since 2017reported$1.0Bapproximately $1 billion of incremental capital provided to Cologix across a platform of 45+ data centers in 12 North American markets (cumulative)
Record
  • The firm has invested in 20 digital infrastructure platforms and 160,000+ fiber miles.
  • Montera was Stonepeak's fourth North American data center investment and eighth globally.
  • Pause exposure: n.a. No Stonepeak-specific freeze or delay disclosed in fetched sources.

DigitalBridgeFull profile →

Financingthird-party managed fund equity with portfolio-level debt and co-investment

DigitalBridge manages over $88 billion of infrastructure assets with 5.4GW of data center capacity lit or under construction, representing over $50 billion of total investment and more than $25 billion of equity. Portfolio companies include Vantage ($9.2 billion equity round co-led with Silver Lake), Switch ($11 billion take-private with IFM), DataBank, Yondr (with La Caisse), Scala and Zayo. SoftBank agreed to acquire DigitalBridge at an enterprise value of about $4.0 billion, expected to close in the second half of 2026.

PeriodKindAmountContextSources
Jan 2025aum$88.0Bover $88 billion of infrastructure assets managed on behalf of LPs and shareholders; approximately $100 billion cited in the La Caisse/Yondr release; the frequently cited $80 billion figure appears in the Vantage equity release
by end-2026guidance$43.0B$43bn of expected portfolio capex by end-2026 (just under $30bn DigitalBridge's share), and $50-plus billion to be put to work over the next few years; roughly $10bn is required to build one gigawatt, about half of it equity
2024raise$13.0BVantage secured over $13 billion of incremental funding in 2024, including a $3 billion Wells Fargo-led green loan covering at least eight North American sites (cumulative for the year)
Record
  • Portfolio capacity is 5.4GW lit or under construction, up 50 percent year over year, representing over $50 billion of total investment and more than $25 billion of equity.
  • Reuters reported Vantage exploring an IPO at about $100 billion valuation, potentially raising $10 billion, having raised roughly $11 billion since late 2023; a Switch IPO could raise $10 billion at roughly $80 billion valuation.
  • Pause exposure: n.a. at platform level in fetched sources.

Silver LakeFull profile →

Financingfund equity co-investment plus dedicated powered-land platform

Silver Lake co-led the $9.2 billion Vantage Data Centers equity investment, including the $2.8 billion upsize, while managing approximately $103 billion. It subsequently launched a $400 million digital infrastructure platform focused on powered land with more than 6GW planned. No fetched source supports a Silver Lake role in QTS or an NVIDIA-linked QTS transaction.

PeriodKindAmountContextSources
at Vantage investment (2024)aum$103BSilver Lake managed approximately $103 billion; portfolio revenue of approximately $254 billion cited at the powered-land platform launch
Record
  • QTS / NVIDIA involvement: n.a. No fetched source supports a Silver Lake role in QTS or an NVIDIA-linked QTS transaction; NVIDIA's disclosed financing-platform partners are Apollo, BlackRock, Blackstone, Brookfield, Goldman Sachs and KKR, and Silver Lake is not among them.
  • The $400 million powered-land platform, led by Adam Fisher and Peter Rumbold, plans more than 6GW.
  • Pause exposure: n.a.

Apollo Global ManagementFull profile →

Financinginsurance-backed private credit plus infrastructure equity

Apollo reported approximately $1.05 trillion of AUM as of June 30, 2026 and states it has deployed over $40 billion into next-generation infrastructure since 2022. Its data center positions include a majority stake in Stream Data Centers (4+GW pipeline) completed November 2025 and the acquisition of Argo Infrastructure Partners, which brought TierPoint. Apollo was reported to be leading talks to raise approximately $35 billion of data center financing for Meta and is a named NVIDIA financing-platform partner.

PeriodKindAmountContextSources
6/30/2026aum$1.05Tapproximately $1.05 trillion of AUM, against approximately $840 billion at June 30, 2025
since 2022reported$40.0Bdeployed over $40 billion into next-generation infrastructure since 2022 ($38 billion at the August 2025 announcement); cumulative multi-year figure
Record
  • Stream Data Centers has a 4+GW pipeline including 650MW of near-term capacity in Chicago, Atlanta and Dallas across 20+ campuses.
  • Argo's TierPoint investments totalled $320 million (2020) plus $500 million (2022), and its stake reached $700 million when it became majority shareholder; TierPoint has approximately 100MW of capacity coming online in 2026 and operates roughly 40 facilities.
  • Aligned debt exposure: n.a. No fetched source confirms Apollo lending to Aligned.

Ares ManagementFull profile →

Financingprivate credit facilities plus real-asset equity via Ada Infrastructure

Ares reported AUM over $595 billion as of September 30, 2025, with dedicated infrastructure AUM of $26.3 billion as of March 31, 2026. Its data center activity spans a US$2.4 billion debt facility for Vantage Data Centers, participation in a EUR 750 million Vantage EMEA financing, and through Ada Infrastructure the acquisition of two Leesburg, Northern Virginia data centers totalling 165MW plus a 314-acre Spotsylvania, Virginia site. Outside North America it closed an inaugural US$2.4 billion Japan data center development fund.

PeriodKindAmountContextSources
9/30/2025aum$595BAUM over $595 billion; approximately $428 billion total AUM as of March 31, 2024
3/31/2026aum$26.3Bdedicated infrastructure AUM of $26.3 billion
Record
  • Ada Infrastructure was acquired with GLP Capital Partners' international business.
  • Pause exposure: n.a. Northern Virginia assets sit in the market most affected by the Prince William County reversals.

Oaktree Capital ManagementFull profile →

Financingcontrol equity seeking minority co-investment; bank project debt at platform level

Oaktree's disclosed data center exposure is concentrated in Pure DC, a platform with more than 500MW live or under development, for which Oaktree sought a minority investor at $1.1 billion for a 20-40% stake, implying a valuation of $5.3-6.7 billion. Pure DC unveiled a $1.2 billion, 78MW Amsterdam project and secured €1.9 billion of financing from SMBC. No fetched source documents a North American Oaktree data center equity or credit position in 2023-2026.

PeriodKindAmountContextSources
at Pure DC stake-sale reportaum$180BOaktree AUM cited at approximately $180 billion
Record
  • North American data center investments 2023-2026: n.a. No fetched source documents a North American Oaktree data center equity or credit position in the period.
  • Pure DC secured €1.9 billion of financing from SMBC.
  • Pause exposure: n.a.

The Carlyle GroupFull profile →

Financingfund equity; government land partnership; power-platform build-and-exit

Carlyle reported AUM of $477 billion with 2025 distributable earnings of approximately $1.7 billion on $4.8 billion of revenue. It is one of two sponsors under the US Army's hyperscale data center initiative, developing approximately 1,384 acres at Fort Bliss, El Paso, Texas with initial operating capability in FY2027 and a stated path to 3GW by 2029. Its Copia Power platform, created in 2021, was agreed to be sold to EQT at approximately $2.6 billion, more than five times the original investment.

PeriodKindAmountContextSources
2025-2026 disclosureaum$477BAUM of $477 billion; 2025 distributable earnings of approximately $1.7 billion on $4.8 billion of revenue
cumulative into Copiareported$2.0Broughly $2 billion invested in Copia's 20,000-acre site west of Phoenix with 1.5GW of solar, in a market Carlyle sizes at $800-900 billion
Record
  • Copia Power holds more than 20 gigawatts of thermal and renewable generation opportunities, 9 gigawatts of data center opportunities across its campus portfolio, and has brought 2.6 gigawatts into operation or construction; its broader pipeline includes over 25 GW of solar and storage and about 7 GW of natural gas.
  • Carlyle participated in a $1 billion fund raise for Bharti Airtel's Nxtra data center business in India.
  • Fort Bliss water and electricity use has drawn local scrutiny; no formal pause disclosed.

Macquarie Asset ManagementFull profile →

Financingperpetual preferred and structured debt plus managed infrastructure fund equity

Macquarie Asset Management disclosed more than $17 billion of total capital across Applied Digital and Aligned Data Centers. It executed a $5 billion perpetual preferred equity facility for Applied Digital in October 2025 covering the Ellendale, North Dakota Polaris Forge campuses, and provided Aligned with more than $12 billion of new capital before leading the $40 billion enterprise-value sale of Aligned that closed July 21, 2026. With Anthropic and GIC it announced the Theseus Infrastructure US data center platform.

PeriodKindAmountContextSources
aggregate (Applied Digital + Aligned)reported$17.0Bmore than $17 billion of total capital across Applied Digital ($5B) and Aligned (>$12B); cumulative commitment figure. MAM AUM approximately $633.7 billion in the same release
3/31/2026aum$498BMAM AUM $497.6 billion as of March 31, 2026; approximately $588.1 billion at the Aligned sale announcement
Record
  • MAM entered Aligned via MIP IV in April 2018 (then 85MW across two facilities), with MIP V investing in July 2020; the platform grew to 50 data centers across the US, Mexico, Brazil, Chile and Colombia with more than 5GW.
  • Anthropic, MAM and GIC announced Theseus Infrastructure, a US-focused dedicated data center platform.
  • Aligned's sale documentation noted the New York one-year moratorium as a sector consideration.

Global Infrastructure Partners (as a distinct platform)Full profile →

Financingflagship infrastructure fund equity in consortium take-privates

GIP's data center franchise predates the BlackRock acquisition: with KKR it completed the roughly $15 billion CyrusOne take-private in March 2022 when it managed over $81 billion. Post-acquisition GIP AUM exceeds $200 billion, and GIP led the $40 billion Aligned acquisition (about $21 billion of equity) alongside AIP and MGX. It remains CyrusOne's co-owner, including in the $1.05 billion CMBS financing on a Dallas-area asset.

PeriodKindAmountContextSources
post-BlackRockaum$200BGIP AUM exceeds $200 billion; over $81 billion at the CyrusOne close
Record
  • Aligned's North American footprint under GIP ownership spans Northern Virginia, Chicago, Dallas, Ohio, Phoenix and Salt Lake City.
  • GIP is identified as CyrusOne's co-owner in the $1.05 billion CMBS financing.

IPI Partners / Blue OwlFull profile →

Financingnet-lease JV equity with residual value guarantees plus green project financing

Blue Owl Capital, not ICONIQ, acquired IPI Partners' business for approximately $1.0 billion (80% equity, 20% cash), completing January 6, 2025; the frequently cited $11 billion figure refers to IPI's AUM, not a purchase price. Blue Owl's digital infrastructure strategy totals $39 billion, including the $7 billion Digital Infrastructure Fund III and the Meta Hyperion joint venture in Louisiana with approximately $27 billion of total development costs. STACK Infrastructure is the core portfolio platform.

PeriodKindAmountContextSources
9/30/2024aum$11.0BIPI AUM over $11 billion as of September 30, 2024; approximately $10.5 billion as of June 30, 2024, with 82 data centers and more than 2.2GW leased
currentaum$39.0BBlue Owl's digital infrastructure strategy totals $39 billion, with a QIA-backed vehicle over $3 billion
Record
  • ICONIQ as acquirer: not supported. The correct acquirer is Blue Owl, which simultaneously entered a partnership with ICONIQ; ICONIQ managed over $80 billion and Iron Point $10.4 billion.
  • Reuters confirmed the approximately $1 billion price with Blue Owl AUM over $192 billion.
  • Pause exposure: n.a.

I Squared CapitalFull profile →

Financingfund equity platform build-up (edge colocation)

I Squared Capital manages $60 billion. On May 26, 2026 it agreed to acquire 10 data centers from Cogent Fiber for $225 million in cash, with up to $1 billion committed to the platform overall; the 53MW seed portfolio spans nine US cities. The platform was launched as Saragon on August 19, 2026.

PeriodKindAmountContextSources
2026aum$60.0BI Squared manages $60 billion
Record
  • The seed portfolio comprises 53MW across 259,000 sq ft in Chicago, Atlanta, Phoenix, Los Angeles, Kansas City, Baltimore, Houston, Nashville and Stockton, with closing expected in Q3 2026.
  • The platform was launched as Saragon on August 19, 2026.
  • Pause exposure: n.a.

EQTFull profile →

Financingflagship infrastructure fund equity with pension co-investment

EQT (total AUM EUR 270 billion) owns EdgeConneX, which has grown to 80 data centers across 50+ markets with CPP Investments committing US$1.75 billion to the EQT/EdgeConneX AI build-out. EQT Infrastructure VI closed at its EUR 21.5 billion hard cap in March 2025, and in April 2026 EQT introduced a dedicated AI Infrastructure strategy citing more than $100 billion of digital and energy assets and an EdgeConneX plan exceeding 10GW. It agreed to acquire Carlyle's Copia Power at approximately $2.6 billion and took Crown Castle's Small Cells business (Arium Networks) in the combined $8.5 billion Crown Castle transaction.

PeriodKindAmountContextSources
Apr 2026aumn.a.total AUM EUR 270 billion (EUR figure, no USD conversion given); global infrastructure AUM EUR 75 billion and total AUM EUR 269 billion at the March 2025 fund close
Apr 2026reported$100Bmore than $100 billion of digital and energy assets, more than 90 data centers, EdgeConneX plan exceeding 10GW (an approximately 20x scaling)
Record
  • EQT Infrastructure IV agreed to acquire EdgeConneX with closing expected in Q4 2020, when EdgeConneX operated 40+ facilities across 33 markets; Sixth Street took a minority stake in 2024.
  • EQT's involvement with Constellation is n.a. on the evidence gathered; Constellation appears in this dataset as CyrusOne's power counterparty following its $16.4 billion Calpine acquisition.
  • Pause exposure: n.a.

Antin Infrastructure PartnersFull profile →

Financingflagship fund equity (Europe-focused platforms)

Antin (AUM over €33 billion, Flagship Fund V €10.2 billion) agreed on December 11, 2025 to acquire NorthC, a European enterprise colocation platform with more than 140MW of secured grid capacity, from DWS, with closing expected in H1 2026. Press reporting indicated the sale could fetch approximately €2 billion / $2.31 billion. Its disclosed data center platforms (NorthC, Pulsant) are European; North American data center investments 2023-2026 are n.a.

PeriodKindAmountContextSources
currentaumn.a.firm AUM exceeds €33 billion; Flagship Fund V closed at €10.2 billion (EUR figures, no USD conversion given)
Record
  • North American data center investments 2023-2026: n.a. Antin's disclosed data center platforms (NorthC, Pulsant) are European, though its Flagship strategy targets Europe and North America.
  • The NorthC sale was contested between Antin and EQT and could fetch approximately €2 billion / $2.31 billion per press reporting.
  • Pause exposure: n.a.

Copenhagen Infrastructure PartnersFull profile →

Financingpension-backed fund equity (Europe)

CIP has raised approximately EUR 43 billion across 15 funds. With Thylander it began construction of the DDC1 energy-integrated 11.5MW data center in Denmark, backed by PensionDanmark, with construction starting August 2026 and commissioning in October 2027. North American data center investments are n.a.; its North American activity in the fetched evidence is generation-side.

PeriodKindAmountContextSources
cumulativeraisen.a.raised approximately EUR 43 billion across 15 funds (EUR figure, no USD conversion given)
Record
  • North American data center investments: n.a. CIP's North American activity in the fetched evidence is generation-side rather than data center equity, for example a reported 400MW delivery to AEP from the Panther Grove project (source not fetched in this session; treat as unverified).
  • Pause exposure: n.a.

Pensions & Sovereign Wealth Funds (CalPERS, CPPIB, CDPQ/La Caisse, OTPP, PSP, ADIA, GIC, Mubadala, MGX)Full profile →

Financingdirect minority equity and co-investment alongside sponsor funds

Pension funds and sovereign wealth funds appear throughout the sponsor landscape as direct and co-investors. Documented positions include ADIA and GIC's $1.6 billion into Vantage, CPPIB's C$225 million in Ontario, La Caisse's CAD 240 million to advance Cologix's AI-ready MTL8 data center, MGX's participation in the $500 billion Stargate program, and holdings across Vantage, Cologix, eStruxture, Compass, Aligned and Equinix xScale. CPP Fund stood at C$777.5 billion (9/30/25) and La Caisse at CAD 517 billion (12/31/25).

PeriodKindAmountContextSources
9/30/2025aumn.a.CPP Fund C$777.5 billion (CAD figure, no USD conversion given); La Caisse CAD 517 billion (12/31/25)
Record
  • Key portfolio companies across the group include Vantage, Cologix, eStruxture, Compass, Aligned and Equinix xScale.
  • OTPP co-acquired Compass Datacenters with Brookfield in 2023, with OTPP net assets at C$247.2 billion at announcement.
  • Mubadala invested $500 million into Cologix alongside Stonepeak.

Named sites — private equity & infrastructure

SiteLocationCapitalMWStatusDetailSources
QTS Van Wert mega-campusVan Wert, OH$10.0B500announcedQTS announced a $10 billion campus on a 902-acre site in Van Wert, Ohio, with about $200 million of projected local tax revenue over two decades. Groundbreaking is set for Q4 2026, first facility operational in Q1 2029 and full completion around 2032.
Blackstone / Digital Realty hyperscale JV campusesVA~$7.0B500constructionHyperscale development JV with campuses in Frankfurt, Paris and Northern Virginia; roughly 20% of capacity delivered through 2025 and the balance in 2026 and beyond. Digital Realty subsequently agreed to buy a larger stake in three Northern Virginia data centers from Blackstone for $3.5 billion.
PW Digital GatewayPrince William County, VA$24.7BcancelledQTS withdrew its appeals before the Virginia Supreme Court on July 2, closing out the 2,139-acre PW Digital Gateway corridor. Datacenterwatch attributes $24.7 billion of blocked/delayed value to the project led by QTS and Compass; this is an aggregator estimate, not a company disclosure.
QTS DeForest campus (dropped)Village of DeForest, WIn.a.withdrawnQTS dropped a campus in the Village of DeForest, Wisconsin near Madison after the village moved to deny an annexation request, deeming the project "not feasible in DeForest".
QTS McKinley Park riverfront projectChicago, ILn.a.blockedA QTS McKinley Park riverfront project hit a permit roadblock. The source does not state the city or state.
Compass Datacenters Meridian hyperscale campusMeridian, MS$10.0B500announcedCompass's largest disclosed North American project is a $10 billion single-tenant hyperscale campus in Meridian / Lauderdale County, Mississippi, comprising eight data centers over an eight-year construction period.
CyrusOne DFW10 campus (Thad Hill Energy Center)Bosque County, TX$1.2B190constructionCyrusOne's Texas development is anchored on dedicated generation: a $1.2 billion infrastructure investment and 190MW agreement with Calpine for the DFW10 campus adjacent to the Thad Hill Energy Center, announced July 30, 2025 and expected operational by Q4 2026.
ECP-KKR Bosque County campusBosque County, TX~$4.0B190constructionA separate approximately $4 billion, 190MW (144MW initial IT load) Bosque County campus sits under the $50 billion Energy Capital Partners-KKR partnership, targeted operational in Q4 2026.
US Army hyperscale program at Dugway Proving Ground (CyrusOne)Dugway, UTn.a.announcedCyrusOne is one of two private partners in the US Army's hyperscale data center program, developing at Dugway Proving Ground on 1,201 acres with initial operating capability in FY2029. The source does not state the US state.
US Army hyperscale program at Fort Bliss (Carlyle)El Paso, TXn.a.3000announcedCarlyle is developing on approximately 1,384 acres at Fort Bliss, El Paso, Texas, with initial operating capability in FY2027 and a stated path to 3GW by 2029. Water and electricity use has drawn local scrutiny; no formal pause disclosed.
Copia Power site west of PhoenixAZ~$2.0BconstructionCarlyle has described roughly $2 billion invested in Copia's 20,000-acre site west of Phoenix with 1.5GW of solar. Platform-wide, Copia has brought 2.6 gigawatts into operation or construction; site-specific status is not separately stated.
CoreSite DE3 (Stonepeak / American Tower JV)Denver, CO≥$250M18constructionStonepeak formed a JV with American Tower to build DE3 in downtown Denver, an 18MW facility in three 6MW phases, within a CoreSite platform of 28 facilities across 11 US markets.
Cologix TOR4-SToronto, Ontarion.a.15announcedThe $3.0 billion Cologix recapitalization included the 50,000 sq ft / 15MW TOR4-S facility in Toronto. Operational status of the facility is not stated in the source.
Vantage Frontier mega-campusShackelford County, TX≥$25.0B1400announcedVantage announced Frontier on August 19, 2025: over $25 billion, 1,200 acres in Shackelford County, Texas, 10 data centers, 3.7 million square feet, 1.4GW and 250kW+ rack density, with the first building delivered in 2H 2026.
Vantage Lighthouse campusPort Washington, WI~$15.0Bunder constructionVantage's Lighthouse campus in Port Washington, Wisconsin plans close to a gigawatt across four data centers, completing in 2028. The Wisconsin PSC declined in July 2026 to reopen We Energies' large-customer tariff, under which developers rated below A- must post collateral; the Financial Times reported Oracle could need a guarantee of about $7 billion costing more than $100 million a year. S&P cut Oracle to BBB- on 9 July 2026, and Oracle voluntarily dropped its Ozaukee County Circuit Court suit against the PSC on 17 August 2026, leaving the credit rules unchallenged. The campus first phase is expected to need 1.3 GW, with launch still scheduled for 2028. In September 2026 Vantage said the campus was roughly 20 to 25 percent complete, with 2,800 to 3,000 workers on site daily. The four buildings total about 2.5 million sq ft (the largest 759,000 sq ft; the first, about 550,000 sq ft, built by Weitz), each with a different general contractor, and Vantage expects staged deliveries to Oracle and OpenAI starting at the end of 2027. An Ozaukee County judge dismissed Great Lakes Neighbors United's challenge to Port Washington's TID No. 5, which funds about $175 million of infrastructure that Vantage pays upfront and recovers through the TID; the suit had said the TID would pay more than $458 million in reimbursements and interest over 18 years. A ruling on the voter-approved TID referendum ordinance is set for 19 October 2026. A research analysis by Vancouver-based Aterio, reported by BizTimes on 30 September 2026, said the campus is unlikely to be operational in the second half of 2027 as Oracle expects and is unlikely to carry meaningful load before mid-2028, because it cannot operate until American Transmission Co. builds a new high-voltage interconnection that awaits Wisconsin PSC approval after the PSC revoked the completeness finding in August and ATC refiled. Aterio's base case is full capacity around October 2028, with an extended PSC review pushing it to around April 2029. This is a third-party forecast, not a schedule change announced by Vantage or Oracle.
Vantage Ohio campusOHn.a.192announcedNamed among Vantage's 2024 growth: a 192MW Ohio campus, alongside a third Northern Virginia campus at 288MW and 11 new data centers.
Vantage third Northern Virginia campusVAn.a.288announcedVantage's 2024 growth disclosure names a third Northern Virginia campus at 288MW.
Switch Nevada AI campusNV$3.0BannouncedSwitch announced a $3bn AI campus in Nevada and has expanded credit facilities to $10bn since the take-private.
Applied Digital Polaris Forge 1Ellendale, ND$900M400constructionPolaris Forge 1 in Ellendale, North Dakota is a 400MW campus expandable to 1GW, leased to CoreWeave. The first tranche of MAM funding followed a $375 million February 2025 Ellendale financing; construction status is inferred from staged build financing rather than stated directly.
Ada Infrastructure Leesburg data centersLeesburg, VAn.a.165operatingThrough Ada Infrastructure, Ares acquired two Leesburg, Northern Virginia data centers totalling 165MW and 745,000 sq ft on 15-year triple-net leases.
Ada Infrastructure Spotsylvania siteSpotsylvania, VAn.a.announcedAres, through Ada Infrastructure, also acquired a 314-acre site in Spotsylvania, Virginia.
Pure DC Amsterdam projectAmsterdam, Netherlands$1.2B78announcedPure DC unveiled a $1.2 billion, 78MW Amsterdam project with construction starting January 2026.
Meta Hyperion campus (Blue Owl JV)Richland Parish, LA~$27.0BannouncedBlue Owl funds and Meta entered a joint venture on October 21, 2025 for the Hyperion campus in Richland Parish, Louisiana.
DDC1 energy-integrated data centerDenmarkn.a.11.5constructionCIP and Thylander began construction of the DDC1 energy-integrated data center in Denmark, an 11.5MW facility, with construction starting August 2026 and commissioning in October 2027.
Cologix MTL8Montreal, Quebecn.a.21announcedLa Caisse provided CAD 240 million of senior financing to advance Cologix's AI-ready MTL8 data centre, a 21MW facility at Technoparc Montreal. Amount is recorded as null in USD because the source states it in CAD only. Disclosed when La Caisse net assets were CAD 517 billion as of December 31, 2025.
Paducah American Energy HubPaducah, KY≥$100B1800announcedThe US Department of Energy selected Brookfield to develop and operate a 1.8 GW AI data center campus on approximately 600 acres leased at the government-owned Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant, a former uranium enrichment site in far western Kentucky. NextEra Energy will build and own 2 GW of natural gas-fired generation and up to 2.6 GW of battery storage. DOE stated a $100 billion total investment. The project is expected to create roughly 8,000 construction jobs and 600 permanent positions, with first components online as soon as 2028 and construction completion expected in 2031.
Digital Drive data center campusRichmond area, VAn.a.76announcedThe Digital Drive data center near Richmond, Virginia is planned for 76 MW of IT capacity, all contracted to CoreWeave under a 15 year agreement valued at $2.94 billion, and is sponsored by affiliates of Blue Owl Capital, Cedarwood Investment Group and PowerHouse Data Centers. A roughly $1.1 billion high yield construction bond was launched on 21 September 2026, with operations expected between 2027 and 2028. The $1.1 billion of five-year notes priced on 23 September 2026 at 98.5 cents on the dollar to yield 9.25%.
Mt. Comfort Technology Campus (northwest of County Roads 500 North and 500 West, Buck Creek Township)Buck Creek Township, INn.a.proposedEQT Real Estate sent Hancock County Commissioners a letter of intent in August 2026 for a multi-building data center campus north of Walmart's IND3 distribution center and Indianapolis Regional Airport. Commissioners took the letter under advisement and have not voted or set a vote date. The campus would occupy 130 acres, with more land to the northeast under contract. EQT held a day-long public open house on Wednesday 30 September 2026 attended by about 100 people. It proposes a $22.2 million upfront payment and about $22 million a year in lieu of taxes at full buildout around 2030, based on $11 per square foot of building, and says it would pay for $125 million of transmission improvements. A rezoning by the commissioners and county council approval of the agreement are still required.

Financing transactions — private equity & infrastructure

TimingPartiesInstrumentAmountDetailSources
announced; transaction closed with Blackstone reporting $684 billion of firm AUM at the timeBlackstone · QTS Realty Trustacquisition$10.0BBlackstone's take-private of QTS Realty Trust covered a portfolio of more than 7 million square feet of owned data center space across North America and Europe.
2024 (per summary table)Blackstone · AirTrunkacquisition≥$16.0BThe largest-ever Blackstone investment in Asia-Pacific, with more than 800MW of committed capacity and land for over 1GW more; noted for completeness.
roughly 20% of capacity delivered through 2025, balance in 2026 and beyondBlackstone · Digital Realtyjv equity~$7.0BHyperscale development JV across four campuses (Frankfurt, Paris, Northern Virginia) with ten planned data centers supporting approximately 500MW of IT load.
August 2023CoreWeave · Blackstone · Magnetar · Magnetar Capitaldebt facility$2.3BPredecessor facility to the $7.5 billion CoreWeave financing led by Blackstone and Magnetar.
maturing March 2032; took total raises to roughly $28 billion in twelve monthsCoreWeavedebt facility$8.5BCoreWeave later secured an $8.5 billion delayed-draw term loan to expand AI infrastructure.
n.a.Blackstone · QTS · QTS Realty Trustother$3.5BBlackstone has refinanced QTS assets through CMBS.
n.a.Blackstone · QTS · QTS Realty Trustother$1.5BA further QTS CMBS refinancing alongside the $3.5 billion issue.
IPO completed May 2026; Q2 2026 results reported 4 August 2026Blackstoneplatform$2.0BBlackstone is planning a publicly traded AI-data-center vehicle. The vehicle listed as Blackstone Digital Infrastructure Trust (NYSE: BXDC), described on its Q2 2026 call as the largest blind pool REIT IPO in history. BXDC targets newly built, stabilized data centers leased to investment-grade hyperscalers and held about $2 billion, effectively all cash, at 30 June 2026 with no data center assets yet
completed October 1, 2024BlackRock · Global Infrastructure Partnersacquisitionn.a.Created a combined infrastructure platform with approximately $170 billion of client AUM, around 600 employees and more than 300 investments.
announced October 16, 2025; closed July 21, 2026AIP · MGX · BlackRock GIP · Macquarie Asset Management (seller) · Macquarie Asset Management · Aligned Data Centersacquisition≥$40.0BThe largest North American data center transaction of the period, covering a platform of 6.4GW across 51 locations. Macquarie Asset Management led the sale as exiting sponsor.
Announced 20 May 2026CyrusOne · KKR · GIPother$1.1BCMBS refinancing for KKR- and GIP-owned CyrusOne secured by its DFW3 and DFW4 data centers on Chelsea Boulevard in Allen, Texas, 76.5 MW combined, appraised at nearly $1.6 billion (66.8% loan to value) per the presale report cited by Bisnow. Separate from the $1.25 billion six-property CMBS in record cyrusone-cmbs-1250-2026
asset purchase agreement dated November 1, 2023; completed January 16, 2024Brookfield Infrastructure · Cyxtera · Evoqueacquisition$1.3BBrookfield acquired substantially all of Cyxtera's assets through portfolio company Evoque after Cyxtera's June 2023 Chapter 11; the combined platform was rebranded Centersquare.
2023Brookfield · Data4acquisitionn.a.Brookfield acquired France's Data4, covering 31 data centers in six countries.
initial €20 billion commitment subsequently raised by €10 billionBrookfield · Data4platform~$34.0BBrookfield's French commitment sits within a global AI infrastructure initiative of $100 billion and a dedicated AI infrastructure fund of $10 billion; the €10 billion increase is corroborated by Baxtel.
completed March 25, 2022KKR · GIP · CyrusOne · Global Infrastructure Partnersacquisition~$15.0BKKR and GIP completed the acquisition of CyrusOne when GIP AUM was over $81 billion.
revolving credit facility completed in MayCyrusOnedebt facility~$9.7BPost-acquisition debt financing across a platform of over 55 data centers in the US and Europe.
announced July 30, 2025; expected operational by Q4 2026CyrusOne · Calpineppa$1.2BDedicated-generation agreement anchoring the DFW10 campus adjacent to the Thad Hill Energy Center in Bosque County, Texas.
reported February 9, 2026Constellation · CyrusOneppan.a.Calpine LLC, a Constellation business unit, signed a 380 MW agreement with CyrusOne on 9 February 2026 to connect and serve a new data center adjacent to the Freestone Energy Center in Freestone County, Texas, and entered an exclusive agreement to provide power, grid connectivity and site infrastructure for a Phase 2 of an additional 380 MW. The agreements are in addition to 400 MW of Calpine-CyrusOne agreements at the Thad Hill Energy Center in Bosque County, Texas.
2025Energy Capital Partners · KKRplatform$50.0BThe Energy Capital Partners-KKR partnership under which the roughly $4 billion Bosque County campus is being developed.
at GTR launchKKR · Global Technical Realtyplatform$1.0BKKR originally committed $1 billion to launch Global Technical Realty, a hyperscale builder.
January 7, 2026KKR · Oak Hill Capital · Global Technical Realtyequity raise~$1.9BAdditional commitments to the European data center platform Global Technical Realty.
agreed December 5, 2025KKR · Compass Datacentersequity raisen.a.KKR agreed to invest in Compass Datacenters, the Brookfield- and OTPP-backed platform.
cited as deal context in the KKR-Compass reportingCompass Datacentersother$326MAn asset-backed securitization by Compass Datacenters noted alongside its 2023 $5.5 billion value and the $10 billion Meridian campus.
2023KKR · Singtelacquisition$800MKKR's earlier APAC data center stake, cited in the Helix launch coverage.
n.a.Mubadala · Cologix · Stonepeakequity raise$500MMubadala invested $500 million into Cologix alongside Stonepeak for data center expansion.
2022Stonepeak · CoreSite · American Towerequity raise$2.5BStonepeak's initial investment into the American Tower-owned CoreSite platform.
completed October 20, 2022Stonepeak · CoreSite · American Towerequity raise$570MUpsize of Stonepeak's CoreSite investment.
formed July 31, 2024Stonepeak · American Towerjv equity≥$250MJV to build the DE3 data center in downtown Denver, Colorado.
launched April 23, 2025Stonepeak · Montera Infrastructureplatform≥$1.5BMontera was Stonepeak's fourth North American data center investment and eighth globally.
6 January 2025Stonepeak · Digital Edgeequity raise≥$1.6BDigital Edge raised new equity and debt capital across 21 data centers with over 500 MW of critical IT load in service, construction and development and another 300 MW held for future development.
completed June 13, 2024DigitalBridge · Silver Lake · Vantage Data Centersequity raise≥$9.2BDigitalBridge and Silver Lake co-led the completed equity investment in Vantage Data Centers.
2024Vantage Data Centers · Wells Fargodebt facility≥$3.0BGreen loan within Vantage's record 2024 incremental funding.
completed December 6, 2022DigitalBridge · IFM Investors · Switchacquisition~$11.0BDigitalBridge and IFM Investors completed the take-private of Switch.
since take-privateSwitchdebt facility$10.0BSwitch has expanded credit facilities to $10bn and announced a $3bn AI campus in Nevada.
announced October 2024DataBank · DigitalBridge · TJCequity raise$2.0BDataBank equity round across a platform of more than 65+ data centers, 20 interconnection hubs and 27+ markets; DigitalBridge received $59 million of gross cash proceeds with its remaining stake implied at $486 million.
alongside the October 2024 roundDataBankother~$600MSecondary sale accompanying the DataBank $2 billion equity round.
completedDigitalBridge · La Caisse · Yondr Groupacquisitionn.a.DigitalBridge and La Caisse completed the acquisition of Yondr Group.
agreed, then completedZayo · Crown Castle · EQT Active Core Infrastructureacquisition$8.5BZayo, a DigitalBridge portfolio company that has invested more than $35 billion in its network, acquired Crown Castle's Fiber Solutions business.
n.a.DigitalBridge · ArcLight · Takanockequity raise$500MDigitalBridge and ArcLight invested $500 million into Takanock.
Announced 29 December 2025; approved by stockholders 23 April 2026; completed 30 September 2026 (DigitalBridge Form 8-K, Item 2.01)SoftBank · DigitalBridgeacquisition~$4.0BSoftBank agreed to acquire DigitalBridge. The merger closed on 30 September 2026: a SoftBank Group subsidiary merged into DigitalBridge, which became an indirect subsidiary of Duncan Holdco LLC, wholly owned by SoftBank Group Overseas GK. Holders received $16.00 per Class A share in cash, the common stock was suspended from NYSE trading before the open on 30 September 2026, and Marc Ganzi remains a director. The aggregate consideration was funded through a SoftBank Group Overseas GK equity commitment and cash of DigitalBridge and its subsidiaries.
reported August 13, 2026Vantage Data Centersothern.a.Reuters reported Vantage exploring an IPO or sale, having raised roughly $11 billion since late 2023.
launched after the Vantage investmentSilver Lake · Adam Fisher · Peter Rumboldplatform≥$400MSilver Lake launched the platform citing AUM of approximately $103 billion.
agreed August 6, 2025; completed November 3, 2025Apollo · Stream Data Centersacquisitionn.a.Apollo funds acquired a majority stake in Stream Data Centers, which has a 4+GW pipeline including 650MW of near-term capacity in Chicago, Atlanta and Dallas across 20+ campuses.
deal set to close in Q2 2025; Apollo acquired Argo "at the turn of the year"Apollo · Argo Infrastructure Partnersacquisitionn.a.The acquisition brought TierPoint, in which Argo's investments totalled $320 million (2020) plus $500 million (2022), reaching $700 million as majority shareholder.
reported February 27, 2025Apollo · Metadebt facility~$35.0BApollo was reported to be leading talks to raise data center financing for Meta.
n.a.Ares · Vantage Data Centersdebt facility$2.4BAres provided the facility to Vantage, whose platform spans 17 campuses and 4GW+ of IT load.
n.a.Ares · CDPQ · Schroders Capital · Vantage EMEAdebt facilityn.a.Ares participated with CDPQ and Schroders Capital in a financing for Vantage EMEA.
n.a.Ares · Ada Infrastructureacquisitionn.a.Ada Infrastructure acquired two Leesburg, Northern Virginia data centers totalling 165MW and 745,000 sq ft on 15-year triple-net leases, plus a 314-acre site in Spotsylvania, Virginia.
n.a.Ares · CPP Investmentsequity raise$2.4BAres closed the fund outside North America.
sought (reported)Oaktree · Pure DCequity raise≥$1.1BOaktree sought a minority investor for Pure DC, a platform with more than 500MW live or under development.
n.a.Pure DC · SMBCdebt facilityn.a.Pure DC secured financing from SMBC.
completion expected by the end of 2026Carlyle (seller) · EQTacquisition≥$2.6BCarlyle agreed to sell its power and AI infrastructure platform Copia Power to EQT.
announced March 30, 2026Bharti Airtel · Carlyleequity raise$1.0BCarlyle participated in the fund raise for Bharti Airtel's Nxtra data center business.
executed October 7, 2025Macquarie Asset Management · Applied Digitalpreferred$5.0BExecuted with Macquarie Asset Management, not Blackstone (premise correction preserved from the source).
February 2025Applied Digital · Macquarie Asset Managementdebt facility$375MEarlier Ellendale financing referenced in the first-tranche coverage.
closed December 18, 2025Applied Digital · Macquarie Asset Managementdebt facility$100MDevelopment loan facility completed for Applied Digital's Polaris Forge 2.
closed March 26, 2026Aligned Data Centersdebt facility$2.6BClosed to fund continued US expansion.
announced (Business Wire release dated 2026-08-09 in URL)Anthropic · Macquarie Asset Management · GICplatformn.a.Theseus Infrastructure, a US-focused dedicated data center platform.
agreed October 7, 2024; completed January 6, 2025Blue Owl Capital · IPI Partners · ICONIQ (partnership)acquisition~$1.0BBlue Owl acquired IPI Partners' business and simultaneously entered a partnership with ICONIQ; the acquirer was Blue Owl, not ICONIQ.
n.a.Blue Owlequity raise~$7.0BFund close within Blue Owl's $39 billion digital infrastructure strategy.
entered October 21, 2025Blue Owl · Metajv equity~$27.0BJV for the Hyperion campus with a four-year initial lease term and a residual value guarantee covering the first 16 years of operations.
n.a.Blue Owl · STACK Infrastructuredebt facility$6.0BGreen financing within Blue Owl's digital infrastructure strategy.
agreed May 26, 2026; closing expected Q3 2026; platform launched as Saragon August 19, 2026I Squared Capital · Cogent Fiberacquisition$225MSeed portfolio of 53MW across 259,000 sq ft in Chicago, Atlanta, Phoenix, Los Angeles, Kansas City, Baltimore, Houston, Nashville and Stockton; US AI inference edge colocation platform.
closing expected Q4 2020EQT Infrastructure IV · EdgeConneX · EQTacquisitionn.a.EQT's entry into data centers via EdgeConneX, which has since grown to 80 data centers across 50+ markets.
Announced and closed 3 July 2026CPP Investments · EQT · EdgeConneXequity raise$1.8BCPP Investments commitment into the EdgeConneX build-out; Sixth Street took a minority stake in 2024. CPP Investments announced the investment on 3 July 2026 and said the transaction had closed following customary approvals. EdgeConneX plans more than 10 GW of additional data centers
final close March 28, 2025EQTequity raisen.a.EQT Infrastructure VI held its final close at its hard cap, when EQT's global infrastructure AUM was EUR 75 billion.
agreed December 11, 2025; closing expected H1 2026Antin · DWS (seller) · NorthCacquisition~$2.3BAntin agreed to acquire NorthC, a European enterprise colocation platform with more than 140MW of secured grid capacity, from DWS.
n.a.CPPIBequity raisen.a.CPPIB commitment in Ontario recorded in the private capital summary table.
n.a.La Caisse · Cologixequity raisen.a.La Caisse invested CAD 240 million to advance Cologix's AI-ready MTL8 data center.
Announced 21 August 2026NVIDIA · Cloverleaf Infrastructureequity raisen.a.NVIDIA took a minority investment in Cloverleaf Infrastructure, a Houston developer of powered data center sites founded in 2024 and backed by Sandbrook Capital and NGP Energy Capital. Cloverleaf will adopt the NVIDIA DSX platform to bring site, power, cooling, computing and facility decisions together earlier in project design, targeting shovel-ready sites under power, water and grid constraints.
Announced 29-30 July 2026US Department of Energy · Brookfield · NextEra Energy · Big Rivers Electric Power Corporation · Jackson Purchase Energy Cooperative · Paducah Power Systemplatform$100BThe US Department of Energy selected Brookfield to develop and operate a 1.8 GW AI data center campus on federally owned land at the Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant in western Kentucky, with NextEra Energy building and owning the generation and storage. Brookfield leases approximately 600 acres on the site. Reported as the largest economic development project in Kentucky's history.
Announced 13 October 2025Brookfield · Bloom Energyplatform~$5.0BBrookfield agreed to invest up to $5 billion to deploy Bloom Energy solid oxide fuel cell systems as onsite generation for AI data centers globally. Bloom stated it had deployed 1.5 GW across more than 1,200 installations at the time of announcement, with systems already operating at American Electric Power, Equinix and Oracle facilities.
Announced 28 October 2025United States Government · Westinghouse Electric Company · Brookfield Asset Management · Cameco Corporationplatform≥$80.0BThe United States Government announced a strategic partnership with Westinghouse and its owners Brookfield Asset Management and Cameco to deploy a fleet of AP1000 reactors, with a minimum aggregate value of $80 billion. Reporting on the terms describes a government participation interest entitling it to 20% of cash distributions above $17.5 billion following issuance. Westinghouse cited 45,000 manufacturing and engineering jobs per two-unit project across 43 states.
Announced 29 October 2025ENTRA1 Energy · NuScale Power · United States government · Government of Japanplatform$25.0BNuScale Power stated its support for an agreement making up to $25 billion of investment capital available to ENTRA1 Energy for large-scale power infrastructure assets across the United States, under the US-Japan Framework Agreement. ENTRA1 Energy is NuScale's exclusive global strategic partner for commercializing NuScale small modular reactors, and the two hold a 50/50 joint venture, ENTRA1 NuScale LLC.
Announced September 2025ENTRA1 Energy · Tennessee Valley Authority · NuScale Powerplatformn.a.ENTRA1 Energy and the Tennessee Valley Authority agreed to develop up to 6 GW of baseload capacity using NuScale small modular reactor technology, described as the largest planned US deployment of SMRs. ENTRA1 would finance and own the plants and sell output to TVA under future power purchase agreements, with the capacity aimed at energy-intensive load including data centers.
Reported 17 September 2026 from investor documents. Reported by BloombergNVIDIA · Brookfield Artificial Intelligence Infrastructure Fund · Kuwait Investment Authorityfund commitment$2.0BBloomberg reported on 17 September 2026 that investor documents show NVIDIA committed $2 billion to the Brookfield Artificial Intelligence Infrastructure Fund, revealing the size of a previously disclosed investment. The fund targets $10 billion, has NVIDIA and the Kuwait Investment Authority as anchor investors, and invests globally in AI factories, dedicated behind-the-meter power and compute infrastructure. The commitment is a fund pledge, not deployed North American capital
Proposed offering announced 22 September 2026; priced 22 September 2026 (upsized from $1.0 billion); closed 1 October 2026Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc. · Solaris Energy Infrastructure, LLCsenior notes~$1.2BOn 22 September 2026 Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc. announced that its subsidiary Solaris Energy Infrastructure, LLC intends to offer $1.0 billion of senior notes due 2032 in a Rule 144A and Regulation S private offering, guaranteed on a senior unsecured basis, with net proceeds for general corporate purposes, growth capital expenditures and offering fees. The offering had not priced as of the announcement. Investor materials filed the same day describe three contracts to supply power generation to AI data center customers: about 900 MW through the 50.1 percent owned Stateline Power joint venture, an approximately 660 MW turnkey plant for Hatchbo, LLC, an affiliate of an investment grade technology company, and about 640 MW for a third customer, with firm equipment orders scheduled to exceed 3,300 MW by the end of 2029. On 22 September 2026 Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc., its subsidiary Solaris Energy Infrastructure, LLC (the issuer) and the subsidiary guarantors signed a purchase agreement with MUFG Securities Americas Inc., as representative of the initial purchasers, for $1.25 billion aggregate principal amount of 7.000% Senior Notes due 1 April 2032 in a Rule 144A and Regulation S private placement, upsized from the original $1.0 billion. The notes are issued at par for net proceeds of approximately $1,227.2 million and are guaranteed on a senior unsecured basis by Solaris and the issuer's subsidiaries that guarantee certain issuer debt, including its revolving credit facility. Closing is expected on 1 October 2026, subject to customary conditions. Net proceeds are for general corporate purposes, growth capital expenditures and offering fees and expenses. The notes were issued on 1 October 2026 under an indenture of that date with U.S. Bank Trust Company as trustee, for net proceeds of approximately $1,227.2 million. The same day Solaris amended its 12 May 2026 senior secured revolving credit facility (MUFG Bank as agent), raising commitments by $200 million to $850 million through full exercise of the incremental feature and lifting the letter of credit sublimit from $150 million to $325 million.
Launched 21 September 2026; priced 23 September 2026. Reported by BloombergBlue Owl Capital (affiliates) · Cedarwood Investment Group · PowerHouse Data Centers · Goldman Sachs · Citigroup · Deutsche Bank · CoreWeave (tenant)project bond$1.1BA Goldman Sachs led bank group launched a roughly $1.1 billion high yield bond sale on 21 September 2026 to finance construction of the Digital Drive data center near Richmond, Virginia, backed by affiliates of Blue Owl Capital, Cedarwood Investment Group and PowerHouse Data Centers and leased to CoreWeave. CoreWeave has contracted the full 76 MW of IT capacity under a 15 year agreement valued at $2.94 billion, with operations expected between 2027 and 2028. Initial yield talk was reported in the low to mid 9 percent range, with pricing targeted for 23 September 2026; the bonds had not priced at the time of reporting. The deal priced on 23 September 2026: $1.1 billion of five-year notes sold at 98.5 cents on the dollar to yield 9.25%, about 2.7 percentage points above the average for similarly rated debt tracked by Bloomberg, according to a person familiar with the transaction. Goldman Sachs, Citigroup and Deutsche Bank led the sale, and the deal prospectus lists affiliates of Blue Owl Capital, Cedarwood Investment Group and PowerHouse Data Centers as sponsors. S&P Global Ratings rated the notes BB- and said exposure to a single speculative-grade tenant remains the key risk. The coupon and the issuer's legal name were not disclosed in the fetched coverage.
Signed 18 September 2026; announced and Form 8-K filed 21 September 2026New Era Energy & Digital (TCDC PowerCo LLC) · Luminant ET Services Company LLC (Vistra)ppan.a.On 18 September 2026 New Era Energy & Digital subsidiary TCDC PowerCo LLC signed a 20 year power purchase agreement with Luminant ET Services Company, a Vistra affiliate, for a minimum of 200 MW and up to 207 MW from Vistra's 1,180 MW gas fired plant in Odessa, Texas, to serve Phase 1 of the Texas Critical Data Centers project, with power expected in the third quarter of 2027. New Era must post a $116.0 million letter of credit and up to $82.8 million of additional security. Under a concurrent development framework agreement Vistra will receive a 5 percent non voting interest in the powered portion of the project once deliveries begin, a right of first refusal from April 2028 on future onsite generation at the site and a right of first offer on certain other New Era projects. The contract price was not disclosed.
Filed at the Georgia PSC and announced 21 September 2026; subject to PSC approvalGeorgia Power · Googletariff agreementn.a.Georgia Power and Google announced on 21 September 2026 an agreement, subject to Georgia Public Service Commission approval, under which Google will support extended power uprates on Georgia Power's owned portion of the nuclear units at Plants Vogtle and Hatch, adding about 96 MW of capacity. Google will subscribe to a new Nuclear Uprate (NU-1) tariff and receive Zero-Emission Credits for the carbon-free attributes of the uprated output. The filings, in Georgia PSC Dockets 44280 and 56002, also ask the commission to approve a new extended power uprate for Hatch Units 1 and 2; the Vogtle Units 1 and 2 uprate was approved in the 2025 Integrated Resource Plan. Georgia Power projects about $900 million of benefits to customers over the life of the units. Google's payment amount was not disclosed.
Announced 28 September 2026 (Helix and KKR release via Business Wire)Samsung (long-duration capital fund) · Helix Digital Infrastructure · KKRplatform≥$1.0BSamsung committed $1 billion to Helix, the AI infrastructure company formed by KKR and led by former AWS CEO Adam Selipsky, to fund data centers, power, connectivity and related infrastructure for hyperscalers. Helix plans projects across North America and international markets, and expects to explore Samsung's construction (Samsung C&T), cooling (FlaktGroup), energy storage (Samsung SDI) and data center capabilities.
Announced 9 June 2026 (Apollo release via GlobeNewswire)Apollo · Blackstone · Broadcom · Anthropicdebt facility≥$35.0BApollo announced on 9 June 2026 that Apollo-managed funds and affiliates are leading an initial $35 billion capital solution under Broadcom's new AI XPV Platform, in partnership with Blackstone and global banks. The platform is designed to enable more than 20 GW of compute capacity for frontier AI labs through 2028; the initial transaction provides committed capital across a multi-year draw schedule and facilitates Anthropic's previously announced expansion of more than 1 GW of compute for training and inference starting in mid-2026. Apollo called it the largest private financing ever executed. Wells Fargo is global coordinator on the A1 tranche with BNP Paribas, Citi and UBS as joint bookrunners; Goldman Sachs, Bank of America and Morgan Stanley are placement agents on the A2 tranche. The financing funds chips and compute systems rather than a named data center site.
Syndication reported by Bloomberg 2 October 2026; first reported as sought in August 2026; not announced by the companiesBroadcom · Blackstone · Anthropicdebt facility~$60.0BBloomberg reported on 2 October 2026 that Broadcom's bank syndicate has started gathering $60 billion of new AI chip financing to benefit Anthropic and other companies: banks are poised to send syndication letters for a $42 billion Class A senior secured tranche, and Blackstone is leading an $18 billion Class B junior tranche, committing $9 billion from its funds and syndicating the rest. The deal has not been announced and Broadcom declined to comment. Bloomberg first reported in August 2026 that Broadcom was seeking more than $60 billion. The package follows the $35 billion Apollo-led transaction of June 2026 and is separate from the up to $42 billion loan from Broadcom to Anthropic described in Anthropic's prospectus.
Signed 26 February 2026 (MARA Form 8-K)MARA Holdings · Starwood Capital Groupjv equityn.a.MARA USA Corporation and Starwood Capital agreed that Starwood will perform pre-development work (permits, power arrangements and hyperscaler tenant procurement) on all of MARA's US bitcoin mining properties outside existing third-party JVs. Where both parties proceed, each property is contributed to a new joint venture managed by Starwood in which MARA holds 10% to 50%; if only Starwood proceeds after securing a qualifying hyperscaler lease, MARA must sell its powered-land rights to Starwood. A decision is required within 24 months, extendable by 12 months. MARA keeps rent-free mining rights or is compensated to relocate. The Kearney, Nebraska Project Horizon already in the atlas is a Starwood Digital Ventures and MARA project.
Closing announced Monday 5 October 2026 (VoltaGrid release); investments first announced 11 May 2026VoltaGrid · Blackstone Tactical Opportunities · Halliburtonequity raise$775MVoltaGrid, a Houston behind-the-meter power generation company serving data centers, closed the equity investments first announced on 11 May 2026: $775 million of primary capital from Blackstone Tactical Opportunities funds and Halliburton, plus an $800 million secondary purchase from existing members (upsized from $225 million). The company said the capital supports its buildout of behind-the-meter generation capacity for data center, microgrid and industrial customers across North America. J.P. Morgan, Barclays and TD Securities were placement agents.
Closed 10 November 2025 (company release)VoltaGrid · Goldman Sachs (left lead bookrunner) · J.P. Morgan · BMO · TD Securities · Wells Fargosenior notes$2.0BVoltaGrid closed $2.0 billion of senior secured second lien notes due 2030, led by Goldman Sachs as left lead bookrunner, alongside a $3.0 billion asset-based revolving facility. Proceeds fund growth, refinance debt and support its 4.3+ GW fully contracted behind-the-meter power deployment plan for data centers through 2028.
Closed 10 November 2025 (company release)VoltaGrid · JPMorgan Chase Bank (administrative agent)debt facility$3.0BVoltaGrid closed a $3.0 billion asset-based revolving credit facility arranged with JPMorgan Chase Bank as administrative agent, alongside $2.0 billion of second lien notes, to fund its contracted behind-the-meter gas power deployments for data centers.
Entered 7 October 2026 (Form 8-K filed 8 October 2026)New Era Energy & Digital (TCDC PowerCo LLC, Texas Critical Data Centers LLC) · Macquarie Bank Limited · Macquarie Equipment Capital Inc.debt facility~$116MOn 7 October 2026 New Era subsidiaries TCDC PowerCo LLC and Texas Critical Data Centers LLC entered a Letter of Credit Reimbursement Agreement with Macquarie Bank Limited, which caused a $116.0 million standby letter of credit to be issued to Luminant ET Services to secure PowerCo's obligations under the 20-year Luminant PPA for the Texas Critical Data Centers project. Drawings bear 12% interest; fees are a 1.00% fronting fee and 2.00% a year. The collateral was funded partly by a $60.0 million draw under TCDC's existing Macquarie term loan, for which New Era issued the lender warrants for 413,055 shares at about $7.26; New Era expects to refinance the term loan borrowings soon. The filing also says New Era has begun pursuing leases with hyperscale tenants for the project.
Backfill (not previously recorded). Completion announced 14 May 2026 (Pulse 2.0 summary of the Goldman Sachs release)Goldman Sachs Alternatives (Infrastructure) · QScale · QScale founders and managementacquisitionn.a.Infrastructure at Goldman Sachs Alternatives completed its acquisition of QScale, a Quebec developer and operator of AI-ready data centers, with the founders and management reinvesting alongside it and continuing to run the business from Quebec. QScale's flagship Q01 campus in Lévis runs on Hydro-Québec's low-carbon grid with free cooling, and the company is expanding additional campuses across Canada. Former CoreSite and EdgeCore chief executive Tom Ray joined the board. Macquarie Capital and National Bank Capital Markets advised Goldman Sachs Alternatives; Scotiabank and TD Securities advised QScale.
06

Pensions & sovereigns

Pension funds, sovereign wealth funds, and state investors supplying the permanent capital behind the platform layer.

12entities 4named sites 20transactions 35recorded facts

CalPERSFull profile →

FinancingLP fund commitments; climate/infrastructure allocation without named data center assets

CalPERS' only confirmed dedicated data center vehicle in the fetched evidence is the $500 million TechCore fund with GI Partners, dating from when CalPERS managed approximately $235 billion. Its June 2026 investment committee materials disclose a private-infrastructure NAV of $24.4 billion, a pledge to invest $100 billion in climate solutions by 2030, and a $2.6 billion NAV increase in 2025 from climate-solutions deployment, citing demand for AI, data centers and associated power infrastructure, but name no data center assets. Named North American data center investments 2023 to 2026: n.a.

PeriodKindAmountContextSources
at TechCore commitmentaum$235BCalPERS managed approximately $235 billion when it invested in the $500 million TechCore fund with GI Partners
quarter ending March 31, 2026aum$24.4Bprivate-infrastructure NAV of $24.4 billion disclosed in June 2026 investment committee materials
by 2030guidance$100Bpledge to invest $100 billion in climate solutions by 2030; not a data-center-specific commitment
2025reported$2.6B$2.6 billion NAV increase in 2025 from climate-solutions deployment, citing 'unprecedented demand for AI, data centers, and associated power infrastructure'
Record
  • CalPERS' only confirmed dedicated data center vehicle in the fetched evidence is the $500 million TechCore fund with GI Partners.
  • Named North American data center investments 2023 to 2026 are n.a. in the source; the June 2026 committee materials name no data center assets.

CPP Investments (CPPIB)Full profile →

Financingdirect construction lending, fund commitments and JV equity

CPPIB acts as a direct construction lender and JV principal in data centers. It committed C$225 million of construction financing for a 54MW hyperscale data center in Cambridge, Ontario, US$1.75 billion to the EQT/EdgeConneX AI build-out, $1.3 billion to Ares' US$2.4 billion Japan data center fund, and formed a greater than $15 billion Equinix xScale JV with GIC on October 1, 2024. On December 23, 2025 it launched an A$14 billion (€8 billion) European data centre partnership with Goodman with an initial A$3.9 billion (€2.2 billion) commitment.

PeriodKindAmountContextSources
as of March 31, 2025aumn.a.CPP Fund totalled C$714.4 billion (Canadian dollars, no USD figure given)
as of September 30, 2025aumn.a.CPP Fund totalled C$777.5 billion (Canadian dollars, no USD figure given)
Record
  • CPPIB committed C$225 million of construction financing for a 54MW hyperscale data center in Cambridge, Ontario developed with Related Digital, TowerBrook and Ascent.
  • CPPIB committed US$1.75 billion to the EQT/EdgeConneX AI data center build-out.
  • CPPIB committed $1.3 billion to Ares' US$2.4 billion inaugural Japan data center development fund.
  • CPPIB formed a greater than $15 billion Equinix xScale JV with GIC on October 1, 2024.
  • On December 23, 2025 CPPIB and Goodman launched an A$14 billion (€8 billion) European data centre partnership with an initial A$3.9 billion (€2.2 billion) commitment, 435 MW of primary power and 282 MW of IT load.

CDPQ / La CaisseFull profile →

Financingsenior project debt plus platform equity co-investments

CDPQ (La Caisse) is active as a direct data center lender and equity co-investor. It committed USD 75 million (CAD 103 million) of a USD 130 million facility for Vantage's QC2 campus in Québec City, participated in the CoreWeave $7.5 billion facility, committed new capital to eStruxture with Fengate, and provided CAD 240 million of senior financing for Cologix's MTL8 in Montréal. It also co-acquired Yondr Group with DigitalBridge (420MW committed, more than 1GW potential) and joined the EUR 750 million Vantage EMEA financing with Ares and Schroders.

PeriodKindAmountContextSources
as of December 31, 2025aumn.a.net assets of CAD 517 billion (Canadian dollars, no USD figure given)
at Yondr acquisition releaseaumn.a.net assets CAD 473 billion at that release (Canadian dollars, no USD figure given)
Record
  • CDPQ committed USD 75 million (CAD 103 million) of a USD 130 million facility for Vantage's QC2 campus in Québec City, adding 16MW for a total of 86MW across 925,000 sq ft.
  • CDPQ participated in the CoreWeave $7.5 billion facility.
  • CDPQ and Fengate committed new capital to eStruxture, which operates data centers in Montréal, Vancouver and Calgary.
  • La Caisse provided CAD 240 million of senior financing for Cologix's MTL8 (21MW, Technoparc Montréal).
  • La Caisse co-acquired Yondr Group with DigitalBridge, with 420MW committed and more than 1GW potential.
  • La Caisse joined the EUR 750 million Vantage EMEA financing with Ares and Schroders.

Ontario Teachers' Pension Plan (OTPP)Full profile →

FinancingJV equity co-acquisition of a development platform

OTPP co-acquired Compass Datacenters with Brookfield Infrastructure in June 2023, when its net assets were C$247.2 billion. Reuters put the deal at approximately $5.5 billion. Through Compass, OTPP's exposure includes the $10 billion Meridian, Mississippi campus and the cancelled PW Digital Gateway.

PeriodKindAmountContextSources
June 2023aumn.a.net assets of C$247.2 billion at the Compass acquisition (Canadian dollars, no USD figure given)
Record
  • OTPP co-acquired Compass Datacenters with Brookfield Infrastructure in June 2023, from RedBird Capital Partners and Azrieli Group.
  • Reuters put the Compass Datacenters deal at approximately $5.5 billion.
  • OTPP's exposure through Compass includes the cancelled PW Digital Gateway project.

PSP InvestmentsFull profile →

Financingdirect platform equity, majority stake exited in 2024

PSP completed the sale of the majority of its Vantage Data Centers investment on June 13, 2024, generating cumulative proceeds of approximately US$2.3 billion. During PSP's ownership Vantage grew from three campuses to 34. PSP reported net AUM of $243.7 billion as of March 31, 2023.

PeriodKindAmountContextSources
as of March 31, 2023aum$244BPSP reported net AUM of $243.7 billion
Record
  • PSP completed the sale of the majority of its Vantage Data Centers investment on June 13, 2024, generating cumulative proceeds of approximately US$2.3 billion.
  • During PSP's ownership Vantage grew from three campuses to 34.

ADIA (Abu Dhabi Investment Authority)Full profile →

Financingdirect minority equity investment alongside co-investors

ADIA, together with GIC, agreed to invest $1.6 billion into Vantage Data Centers in September 2025, with closing expected in Q4 2025.

Record
  • ADIA and GIC agreed to invest $1.6 billion into Vantage Data Centers in September 2025, with closing expected in Q4 2025.

GICFull profile →

FinancingJV equity and platform partnerships

GIC, together with ADIA, agreed to invest $1.6 billion into Vantage Data Centers in September 2025. GIC also formed the greater than $15 billion Equinix xScale JV with CPP Investments and joined Anthropic and Macquarie Asset Management in the Theseus Infrastructure US platform.

Record
  • ADIA and GIC agreed to invest $1.6 billion into Vantage Data Centers in September 2025, with closing expected in Q4 2025.
  • GIC formed the greater than $15 billion Equinix xScale JV with CPP Investments.
  • GIC joined Anthropic and Macquarie Asset Management in the Theseus Infrastructure US platform.

MubadalaFull profile →

Financingdirect equity investments alongside sponsors

Mubadala invested in Aligned Data Centers on August 2, 2023, amount not disclosed, when Aligned planned more than 2.5GW across 40 plus data centers at full build-out. Its related digital investments include $350 million into Princeton Digital Group in 2022 and £800 million into CityFibre. Mubadala also invested $500 million into Cologix alongside Stonepeak.

Record
  • Mubadala invested in Aligned Data Centers on August 2, 2023, amount not disclosed, when Aligned planned more than 2.5GW across 40 plus data centers at full build-out.
  • Mubadala's related digital investments include $350 million into Princeton Digital Group (2022) and £800 million into CityFibre.
  • Mubadala invested $500 million into Cologix alongside Stonepeak.

MGXFull profile →

Financingfounding equity in mega-programs, consortium partnership and platform acquisition

MGX sits at the intersection of the three largest structures in the atlas. It is one of the initial equity funders of Stargate alongside SoftBank, OpenAI and Oracle, a program targeting $500 billion of US AI infrastructure investment over four years with $100 billion deployed immediately, beginning in Texas. It is a founding partner of the AI Infrastructure Partnership ($30 billion equity, up to $100 billion with debt) and a co-acquirer of Aligned Data Centers at a $40 billion enterprise value, closed July 21, 2026, covering 51 campuses and 6.4GW. It also participated in xAI's $6 billion Series C.

Record
  • MGX is one of the initial equity funders of Stargate, alongside SoftBank, OpenAI and Oracle, a program targeting $500 billion of investment in US AI infrastructure over four years with $100 billion deployed immediately, beginning in Texas.
  • MGX is a founding partner of AIP, seeking $30 billion of equity scaling to up to $100 billion including debt financing.
  • MGX is a co-acquirer of Aligned Data Centers at $40 billion enterprise value, closed July 21, 2026, covering 51 campuses and 6.4GW.
  • MGX participated in xAI's $6 billion Series C.
  • SoftBank's Stargate disclosures cite more than $400 billion of investment over three years across five new US sites totalling nearly 7 gigawatts, plus an additional $22.5 billion SoftBank investment in OpenAI completed Dec. 26.
  • No other single investor appears in the equity stack of the largest lab programme, the largest sponsor consortium and the largest platform acquisition simultaneously.

Kuwait Investment AuthorityFull profile →

FinancingLP participation in sponsor consortia and platforms

Kuwait Investment Authority joined the AI Infrastructure Partnership (AIP) in June 2025 and is a partner in KKR's approximately $10 billion Helix Digital Infrastructure.

Record
  • Kuwait Investment Authority joined AIP in June 2025.
  • Kuwait Investment Authority is a partner in KKR's approximately $10 billion Helix Digital Infrastructure.

TemasekFull profile →

Financinganchor LP investment in sponsor consortium

Temasek made an anchor investment in the AI Infrastructure Partnership (AIP) at its October 2025 initial closing.

Record
  • Temasek made an anchor investment in AIP at its October 2025 initial closing.

Qatar Investment AuthorityFull profile →

Financinganchor LP backing of a sponsor capital vehicle

Qatar Investment Authority backs a Blue Owl vehicle of over $3 billion.

Record
  • Qatar Investment Authority backs a Blue Owl vehicle of over $3 billion.

Named sites — pensions & sovereigns

SiteLocationCapitalMWStatusDetailSources
Cologix MTL8Montreal, Quebecn.a.21announcedLa Caisse provided CAD 240 million of senior financing to advance Cologix's AI-ready MTL8 data centre, a 21MW facility at Technoparc Montreal. Amount is recorded as null in USD because the source states it in CAD only. Disclosed when La Caisse net assets were CAD 517 billion as of December 31, 2025.
Cambridge, Ontario hyperscale data centerCambridge, Ontarion.a.54constructionCPPIB committed C$225 million of construction financing for a 54MW hyperscale data center in Cambridge, Ontario, developed with Related Digital, TowerBrook and Ascent. The commitment was disclosed when the CPP Fund totalled C$714.4 billion as of March 31, 2025.
Vantage QC2 campusQuébec City, Quebec$75M86expansionCDPQ committed USD 75 million (CAD 103 million) of a USD 130 million facility for Vantage's QC2 campus in Québec City. The financing adds 16MW for a total of 86MW across 925,000 sq ft.
Compass Datacenters Meridian campusMeridian, MS$10.0BannouncedOTPP's exposure through its Compass Datacenters co-acquisition with Brookfield Infrastructure includes the $10 billion Meridian, Mississippi campus in Lauderdale County.

Financing transactions — pensions & sovereigns

TimingPartiesInstrumentAmountDetailSources
n.a. in source; described as when CalPERS managed approximately $235 billionCalPERS · GI Partnersplatform$500MCalPERS' only confirmed dedicated data center vehicle in the fetched evidence is the $500 million TechCore fund with GI Partners.
disclosed with CPP Fund at C$714.4 billion as of March 31, 2025CPP Investments · Related Digital · TowerBrook · Ascentdebt facilityn.a.CPPIB committed C$225 million of construction financing for a 54MW hyperscale data center in Cambridge, Ontario developed with Related Digital, TowerBrook and Ascent.
n.a. in sourceCPP Investments · Ares Managementplatform$1.3BCPPIB committed $1.3 billion to Ares' US$2.4 billion Japan data center fund.
launched December 23, 2025CPP Investments · Goodmanjv equityn.a.CPPIB and Goodman launched an A$14 billion (€8 billion) European data centre partnership with an initial A$3.9 billion (€2.2 billion) commitment, covering 435 MW of primary power and 282 MW of IT load. Disclosed when the CPP Fund totalled C$777.5 billion as of September 30, 2025.
n.a. in sourceCDPQ · Vantage Data Centersdebt facility$75MCDPQ committed USD 75 million (CAD 103 million) of a USD 130 million facility for Vantage's QC2 campus in Québec City, adding 16MW for a total of 86MW.
n.a. in sourceCDPQ · CoreWeavedebt facilityn.a.CDPQ participated in the CoreWeave $7.5 billion facility.
n.a. in sourceCDPQ · Fengate · eStruxturejv equityn.a.CDPQ and Fengate committed new capital to eStruxture, which operates data centers in Montréal, Vancouver and Calgary.
disclosed with net assets of CAD 517 billion as of December 31, 2025La Caisse · Cologixdebt facilityn.a.La Caisse provided CAD 240 million of senior financing for Cologix's MTL8, a 21MW data centre at Technoparc Montréal.
completed; disclosed with net assets CAD 473 billion at that releaseLa Caisse · DigitalBridge · Yondr Groupacquisitionn.a.La Caisse co-acquired Yondr Group with DigitalBridge. Yondr has 420MW committed and more than 1GW potential.
n.a. in sourceAres Management · CDPQ · Schroders Capital · Vantage Data Centersdebt facilityn.a.La Caisse joined the EUR 750 million Vantage EMEA financing with Ares and Schroders.
June 2023Brookfield Infrastructure · Ontario Teachers' Pension Plan · RedBird Capital Partners · Azrieli Group · RedBird Capital Partners (seller) · Azrieli Group (seller)acquisition~$5.5BOTPP co-acquired Compass Datacenters with Brookfield Infrastructure from RedBird Capital Partners and Azrieli Group in June 2023. Reuters put the deal at approximately $5.5 billion.
completed June 13, 2024PSP Investments · Vantage Data Centersacquisition~$2.3BPSP completed the sale of the majority of its Vantage Data Centers investment on June 13, 2024, generating cumulative proceeds of approximately US$2.3 billion. During PSP's ownership Vantage grew from three campuses to 34.
agreed September 2025; closing expected Q4 2025ADIA · GIC · Vantage Data Centersjv equity$1.6BADIA and GIC agreed to invest $1.6 billion into Vantage Data Centers in September 2025, with closing expected in Q4 2025.
n.a. in sourceAnthropic · Macquarie Asset Management · GICplatformn.a.GIC joined Anthropic and Macquarie Asset Management in the Theseus Infrastructure US platform, a strategic partnership to develop dedicated data center infrastructure at scale.
August 2, 2023Mubadala · Aligned Data Centersjv equityn.a.Mubadala invested in Aligned Data Centers on August 2, 2023, amount not disclosed, when Aligned planned more than 2.5GW across 40 plus data centers at full build-out.
2022Mubadala · Princeton Digital Groupjv equity$350MMubadala's related digital investments include $350 million into Princeton Digital Group in 2022.
n.a. in sourceMubadala · CityFibrejv equityn.a.Mubadala's related digital investments include £800 million into CityFibre.
n.a. in source; KIA joined June 2025, Temasek anchored October 2025 initial closingMGX · BlackRock · Kuwait Investment Authority · Temasek · Nvidia · xAI · Microsoft · AI Infrastructure Partnership · GIPplatform$30.0BMGX is a founding partner of the AI Infrastructure Partnership (AIP), seeking $30 billion of equity scaling to up to $100 billion including debt financing. Kuwait Investment Authority joined in June 2025 and Temasek made an anchor investment at the October 2025 initial closing.
completed Dec. 26SoftBank · OpenAIequity raise$22.5BSoftBank's Stargate disclosures cite more than $400 billion of investment over three years across five new US sites totalling nearly 7 gigawatts, plus an additional $22.5 billion SoftBank investment in OpenAI completed Dec. 26.
n.a. in sourceQatar Investment Authority · Blue Owl · QIAplatform≥$3.0BQatar Investment Authority backs a Blue Owl capital vehicle of over $3 billion for the hyperscale AI era.
07

REITs & developers

The landlords. Data center REITs and private developers whose pipelines are functionally sold before they are built, at vacancy rates the brokerages call the tightest ever recorded.

23entities 130named sites 52transactions 54recorded facts

Digital Realty TrustFull profile →

Financingbalance-sheet capex plus ATM equity programs, LP-equity hyperscale fund, and development JVs
DLR

Digital Realty reported $3.0B of net development capex in 2025 against guidance of $3.0-3.5B, delivered 289 MW, and carried 769 MW under construction at an 11.9% yield, with a gross development pipeline exceeding $10B. It runs a $3B LP-equity US Hyperscale Fund supporting roughly $10B of development capacity, unwound its $7B Blackstone JV by buying Blackstone's 64% blended interest in three Northern Virginia data centers for $3.5B in June 2026, and formed a $200M build-to-suit JV with Realty Income in Northern Virginia. Two completed Santa Clara buildings stand unenergized waiting on utility power.

PeriodKindAmountContextSources
FY2025reported$3.0B$3.0B of net development capex in 2025; delivered 289 MW; 769 MW under construction at a 11.9% yield
FY2025guidance$3.2Bguidance of $3.0-3.5B; midpoint recorded, verbatim range $3.0-3.5B
Q3 2025backlog$10.0Bgross development pipeline exceeded $10B; recorded at the stated floor
Q2 2025backlog$9.0B$9B development pipeline, a 5 GW total runway, and a 3.7 GW land bank
2025raise$3.0BUS Hyperscale Fund raised $3B of LP equity supporting roughly $10B of development capacity
Record
  • The brief's premise of a $3B Realty Income JV is not supported by the fetched record; the actual structure is $200M for an 80% interest in 16-48 MW.
  • A $3.0B ATM agreement established in December 2024 saw $1.1B issued during 2025, and a new $7.5B ATM was established in May 2026; the brief's ~$7B forward equity is best matched to the $7.5B ATM, and a discrete $7B forward-sale tranche was n.a. in fetched filings.
  • Digital Realty says it serves over 315 companies in the Bay Area and will bring Santa Clara capacity online as soon as utility infrastructure allows.
  • Silicon Valley Power's enabling $450M system upgrade, explicitly serving Digital Realty and Stack, is scheduled for completion in 2028.

EquinixFull profile →

Financingbalance-sheet capex plus xScale hyperscale JV with sovereign and pension capital
EQIX

Equinix guided to $4-5B of capex per year through 2029, up from $3.3B in 2025, exceeding the $3-4B per year framing in the brief. It agreed to form a greater-than-$15B xScale joint venture with GIC and CPP Investments on a 37.5%/37.5%/25% split targeting more than 1.5 GW in the United States, with $15B planned, roughly $6B invested and 750+ MW committed as of its 2025 Analyst Day. It remains one of two developers still pursuing three proposed mega data centers in Seattle City Light territory that were captured by Seattle's one-year moratorium.

PeriodKindAmountContextSources
2026-2029guidance$4.5Bsuperseded: guided to $4-5B per year through 2029 per S&P (June 2025); Equinix's own Q2 2026 release gives the prior outlook as $3-4B per year and raises it to $5-7B for 2027-2029
2027-2029guidance$6.0BTotal capital expenditures annual range $5,000-7,000 million for 2027-2029, excluding M&A, real estate acquisitions and xScale JV investments; midpoint recorded; 2026 guided at $5.0-6.0 billion (Q2 2026 results, 29 July 2026)
FY2025reported$3.3B$3.3B in 2025
2025 Analyst Dayaum$15.0BxScale: $15B planned, ~$6B invested, and 750+ MW committed
Record
  • Equinix and Prologis are the two remaining developers still pursuing three of five originally proposed mega data centers in Seattle City Light territory after two developers withdrew.
  • The Seattle projects sat inside the 369 MW that four companies asked Seattle City Light about in April 2026, and were captured by Seattle's one-year moratorium on data centers above 20 MVA, adopted 9-0 on June 9, 2026 with an option to extend six months.
  • Site-level Virginia, Texas and Chicago delay disclosures were n.a. in the fetched record.

Iron MountainFull profile →

Financingbalance-sheet / operating cash flow REIT capex
IRM

Iron Mountain's data center capex was $1,767.5M in full-year 2025, up from $1,441.8M in 2024, with first-half 2025 alone at $961.2M. At Q2 2025 it reported 450 MW operating at 96% leased, 202 MW under construction at 60% pre-leased, 628 MW held for development, and roughly 1.3 GW total developable across 30 data centers. The brief's $10B pipeline claim is not confirmed; the company's own materials state ~1.3 GW developable capacity rather than a $10B figure.

PeriodKindAmountContextSources
FY2025reported$1.8B$1,767.5M in full-year 2025 ($1,747.0M growth + $20.6M recurring)
FY2024reported$1.4Bup from $1,441.8M in 2024
1H2025reported$961Mfirst-half 2025 alone was $961.2M vs. $576.8M in 1H 2024
1H2024reported$577M$576.8M in 1H 2024
n.a.backlogn.a.n.a. The $10B pipeline claim is not confirmed; Iron Mountain's own materials state ~1.3 GW developable capacity rather than a $10B pipeline figure
Record
  • At Q2 2025 Iron Mountain reported 450 MW operating and 96% leased, 202 MW under construction and 60% pre-leased, 628 MW held for development, and ~1.3 GW total developable across 30 data centers, framed by management as nearly tripling capacity.
  • By mid-2026 roughly 85 MW of new capacity had come online against ~450 MW operating.
  • Iron Mountain added 100+ acres supporting 350+ MW across Richmond and Manassas, toward 1.2 GW globally.
  • Phoenix and Frankfurt site-level figures were n.a. in the fetched record.

Vantage Data CentersFull profile →

Financingprivate equity platform funding led by DigitalBridge and Silver Lake plus large incremental debt and equity raises

Vantage completed a $9.2B equity investment led by DigitalBridge and Silver Lake, part of a record $13B in incremental 2024 funding enabling roughly $30B of development. Its North American footprint by campus is Ashburn 590 MW, Santa Clara 216 MW, Phoenix 176 MW, and Quincy, WA 89 MW. Its Ashburn position sits inside Loudoun County, which eliminated by-right data center development in March 2025, and it is a named participant in the $15B Vantage/OpenAI/Oracle campus in Madison, Wisconsin, subject to a one-year moratorium adopted January 13, 2026.

PeriodKindAmountContextSources
2024raise$9.2B$9.2B equity investment led by DigitalBridge and Silver Lake
2024raise$13.0Brecord $13B in incremental 2024 funding enabling roughly $30B of development; the $9.2B equity investment is part of this total, do not sum
Record
  • Loudoun County eliminated by-right data center development on March 18, 2025 by a 7-2 vote under CPAM-2024-0001 / ZOAM-2024-0001, newly requiring a special exception, with grandfathering cut off at February 12, 2025.
  • Loudoun County's data center electricity consumption reached 5.33 GW in 2025, up 166% from 2.0 GW in 2021.

QTS Realty Trust (Blackstone)Full profile →

FinancingBlackstone private ownership with CMBS refinancings and BREIT capital

Blackstone acquired QTS for $10B in 2021 and reported 8x lease growth since; its data center platform reported a $70B portfolio plus a roughly $100B prospective pipeline in late 2024, and BREIT separately valued QTS's development potential at $92B. QTS financing included $3.5B and $1.5B CMBS refinancings. QTS was co-developer of the $24.7B, 2 GW Prince William Digital Gateway, the largest single documented cancellation, terminating on July 2, 2026 after the rezonings were voided, and its Hillsboro, Oregon host city later adopted the first Oregon data center moratorium.

PeriodKindAmountContextSources
late 2024aum$70.0BBlackstone's data center platform reported a $70B portfolio
late 2024backlog$100B~$100B prospective pipeline on top of the $70B portfolio
n.a.aum$92.0BBREIT separately valued QTS's development potential at $92B ($22B planned plus $70B potential); overlaps the platform figures, do not sum
Record
  • Prince William Digital Gateway timeline: comprehensive plan amendment November 2022; rezonings approved December 2023 (4-3); rezonings voided August 2025; voiding affirmed March 31, 2026; county dropped its appeal April 2026; Compass withdrew April 29, 2026; QTS terminated July 2, 2026, foregoing an estimated $400M/yr in county tax revenue.
  • Prince William Digital Gateway is catalogued as the largest single cancellation at $24.7B, with 1.5 million gallons/day projected water use and 15,000+ petition signatures.
  • Hillsboro became the first Oregon city to adopt a data center moratorium, 120 days adopted July 27, 2026, expiring November 24, 2026, extendable six months, covering data center and BESS land-use applications with primary use defined at >20% or 20 MW; the city also approved a 180-day pause on Strategic Investment Program agreements on July 21, 2026.
  • Fayetteville GA, Ashburn, Manassas, Phoenix and Groveport OH site-level delay data were n.a. in the fetched record.

Aligned Data CentersFull profile →

Financingprivate platform: Macquarie-led equity plus large debt raise

Aligned completed a $12B+ capital raise, approximately $5B of equity led by Macquarie Asset Management plus roughly $7B of debt, supporting 5+ GW across the Americas, with Patrizia and CenterSquare as additional investors. The brief's $12B build plan is more precisely a $12B capital raise. Its Ashburn asset is a 2019-built, 60 MW facility served by Dominion Energy.

PeriodKindAmountContextSources
2025raise$12.0B$12B+ raise: approximately $5B of equity led by Macquarie Asset Management plus ~$7B of debt, supporting 5+ GW across the Americas; the brief's $12B build plan is more precisely a $12B capital raise
Record
  • Patrizia and CenterSquare are additional investors in Aligned Data Centers.
  • Salt Lake City, Phoenix, Dallas and Utah site-specific delay disclosures were n.a. in the fetched record.

CyrusOneFull profile →

FinancingKKR and Global Infrastructure Partners private ownership with ABS securitization financing

CyrusOne was acquired by KKR and Global Infrastructure Partners for $15B in 2021. Its 2025-1 ABS raised $575M against 13 data centers with $4.4B of appraised value, 61.7% concentrated in Northern Virginia. Its $500M+, 600 MW Sangamon County, Illinois campus was deferred by the county board in late 2025 before a conditional permitted use was approved in April 2026, its Aurora, Illinois facility drew resident noise complaints in the record supporting Aurora's moratorium, and it announced a roughly $2B, 1,200-acre US Army data center site in Utah in spring 2026.

PeriodKindAmountContextSources
2025raise$575M2025-1 ABS raised $575M against 13 data centers with $4.4B of appraised value, 61.7% concentrated in Northern Virginia
Record
  • Activists meeting at Springfield's Lincoln Library on October 28 called for a six-month moratorium on zoning votes for the Sangamon County proposal, whose stated capacity is 600 MW.
  • CyrusOne's Aurora, Illinois facility at Eola and Diehl roads drew resident noise complaints, including extended backup-generator operation during April repairs, in the record supporting Aurora's moratorium.

DataBankFull profile →

Financingprivate platform funding allocated across named campuses

DataBank raised $2B of funding to support 850 MW, allocated as Dallas 480 MW, Culpeper, VA 192 MW, and Atlanta 120 MW, and broke ground in Culpeper on a 1.3M sq ft hyperscale-ready development. Culpeper County is one of 23 Virginia jurisdictions with tracked siting actions, with a September 2025 action recorded.

PeriodKindAmountContextSources
n.a.raise$2.0B$2B of funding to support 850 MW, allocated Dallas 480 MW, Culpeper, VA 192 MW, and Atlanta 120 MW
Record
  • Culpeper County is one of the 23 Virginia jurisdictions with tracked siting actions, with a September 2025 action recorded.

Compass DatacentersFull profile →

Financingprivate developer with asset-level refinancing (Wilmington Trust and KeyBank)

Compass closed a $326M refinancing on five Red Oak, Texas facilities totaling 180 MW, with full build-out at 10 buildings and 360 MW served by Oncor. It was co-developer of the $24.7B Prince William Digital Gateway and formally withdrew on April 29, 2026. Its Hoffman Estates, Illinois brownfield project is catalogued as one that avoided cancellation, and it is a named target of organized opposition in Statesville, North Carolina.

PeriodKindAmountContextSources
n.a.raise$326M$326M refinancing on five Red Oak, Texas facilities with Wilmington Trust and KeyBank, maturing 2050
Record
  • Compass formally withdrew from the $24.7B Prince William Digital Gateway on April 29, 2026.
  • Compass is a named target of organized opposition in Statesville, North Carolina.

EdgeConneXFull profile →

FinancingEQT private ownership with Sixth Street minority strategic stake

EdgeConneX was acquired by EQT in 2020 for approximately $2.5-3B, and Sixth Street took a minority strategic stake in September 2024. North American delay-specific disclosures were n.a. in the fetched record.

PeriodKindAmountContextSources
n.a.reportedn.a.n.a. North American delay-specific disclosures: n.a.
Record
  • Sixth Street took a minority strategic stake in EdgeConneX in September 2024.

STACK InfrastructureFull profile →

Financingprivate platform with project-level debt facilities and green financing

STACK reports 2.5 GW built plus a 4 GW pipeline, with a footprint of 7 Northern Virginia sites at 2,400 MW, 2 Phoenix sites at 500 MW, and 2 Dallas-Fort Worth sites at 580 MW, and raised over $6B of green financing in 2025. Its NVA05 campus in Manassas at 200 MW is financed by a $900M facility and it holds a 500-acre, 1 GW Stafford County site. A Santa Clara facility completed in late 2025 cannot operate for lack of power, with full operation expected around 2027.

PeriodKindAmountContextSources
2025raise$6.0Bover $6B of green financing raised in 2025; recorded at the stated floor. Aggregator analysis, not company filing
Record
  • Company-reported totals are 2.5 GW built plus a 4 GW pipeline.
  • Footprint: Northern Virginia 7 sites / 2,400 MW; Phoenix 2 sites / 500 MW; Dallas-Fort Worth 2 sites / 580 MW.
  • STACK is one of two named beneficiaries of Silicon Valley Power's $450M upgrade scheduled for 2028 completion.
  • STACK's Manassas and Stafford positions sit in Prince William County, where a zoning text amendment (DPA2026-00006) to curtail by-right data center development was initiated March 3, 2026.

Prime Data CentersFull profile →

Financingprivate developer; platform-level financing disclosure incomplete

Prime reports 13 campuses and a 4+ GW pipeline. Named projects are PHX01 in Avondale, Arizona at $3B and 240 MW announced May 2026, SMF01 in Sacramento at 26 MW served by SMUD, and SMF02 at 18 MW and 150,000 sq ft, on which Prime broke ground in May 2026. Platform-level financing disclosure is limited; the part notes private developer disclosure is voluntary and incomplete at Prime in particular.

PeriodKindAmountContextSources
n.a.reportedn.a.n.a. Private developer disclosure is voluntary and incomplete, producing n.a. entries at Prime in particular
Record
  • Prime reports 13 campuses and a 4+ GW pipeline.

TractFull profile →

Financingland-banking developer model

Tract's land-banking model is documented at Morris Technology Park, Illinois (343 acres, 1 GW), Caldwell County, Texas (1,515 acres, 2 GW), and Pole Canyon, Utah (844 acres, 1,700 MW). Two of the largest documented losses in the dataset are Tract's: a $14B project in Goodyear/Buckeye, Arizona withdrawn in May 2024, and the $30.0B, 1.5 GW Mooresville, North Carolina project cancelled during due diligence after Mooresville Public Utilities denied capacity allocation, the single largest dollar figure in the cancellation dataset.

Record
  • Tract's Buckeye position remained active as the company shifted focus toward Arizona, despite the withdrawn Goodyear/Buckeye project.
  • Morris Technology Park carries a ComEd transmission service agreement.

Novva Data CentersFull profile →

Financingbank-led project financing (JPMorgan, Starwood) on CIM Group equity backing

Novva secured $2B of financing led by JPMorgan with Starwood participation for a 175 MW West Jordan, Utah campus, following an earlier $355M CIM Group equity round.

PeriodKindAmountContextSources
n.a.raise$2.0B$2B of financing led by JPMorgan with Starwood participation, for a 175 MW West Jordan, Utah campus
earlierraise$355Mearlier $355M CIM Group equity round

Sabey Data CentersFull profile →

Financingprivate developer; financing disclosure incomplete

Sabey operates more than 4 million sq ft across six US sites, including Quincy, Seattle and East Wenatchee, Washington, Ashburn, Virginia, and New York. Its Quincy campus completed a two-building, 85 MW expansion in 2023, and in Ashburn it broke ground on the final building of the 38-acre Intergate.Ashburn campus at 54 MW total. As of July 2026 it had roughly 8 MW available now across three sites and more than 70 MW coming online through 2027. The part notes Sabey is among the private developers with voluntary and incomplete disclosure.

PeriodKindAmountContextSources
n.a.reportedn.a.n.a. Private developer disclosure is voluntary and incomplete, producing n.a. entries at Sabey in particular
Record
  • Sabey operates more than 4 million sq ft across six US sites, including Quincy, Seattle and East Wenatchee, Washington; Ashburn, Virginia; and New York.
  • As of July 2026, Sabey had ~8 MW available now across three sites and more than 70 MW coming online through 2027, with 14 MW at SDC Ashburn available for pre-leasing by Q3 2026.

H5 Data CentersFull profile →

Financingprivate acquirer; sale-leaseback structures; platform financing undisclosed

Denver-based H5 acquired Yahoo's Lockport, New York facility in a sale-leaseback estimated at $49M, closing December 30, with Yahoo signing a five-year lease. It had earlier acquired the 225,000 sq ft, 18-floor 505 Marquette Hotel in Albuquerque, New Mexico on June 23, 2022. 2025 platform-level financing was n.a. in the fetched record.

PeriodKindAmountContextSources
2025raisen.a.n.a. 2025 platform-level financing: n.a.
Record
  • H5 acquired the 225,000 sq ft, 18-floor 505 Marquette Hotel in Albuquerque, New Mexico on June 23, 2022.

CologixFull profile →

FinancingStonepeak continuation-vehicle equity plus multi-asset development debt facility

Cologix was recapitalized by Stonepeak at a $3.0B equity value, the largest single-asset continuation vehicle raised in digital infrastructure to that date, after Stonepeak's initial 2017 investment of $500M in a platform then at 24 data centers in nine markets including Montreal, Toronto and Vancouver. In July 2026 Cologix raised $1.5B, a $1B multi-asset development debt facility plus $500M of equity from new and existing investors, across a 40+ data center platform.

PeriodKindAmountContextSources
July 2026raise$1.5B$1.5B: a $1B multi-asset development debt facility plus $500M of equity from new and existing investors, across a 40+ data center platform
Record
  • Stonepeak's initial 2017 investment was $500M across a platform then at 24 data centers in nine markets including Montreal, Toronto and Vancouver.

FlexentialFull profile →

FinancingGI Partners continuation-vehicle equity with Morgan Stanley Infrastructure Partners co-control and Hamilton Lane anchor funds

Flexential raised approximately $1B of primary equity on August 20-21, 2025, via a GI Partners single-asset continuation vehicle plus a strategic investment from GI Data Infrastructure, anchored by funds managed by Hamilton Lane. Morgan Stanley Infrastructure Partners had joined GI Partners as co-control investor in October 2024, when Flexential held more than 40 data centers and 325 MW built and under development.

PeriodKindAmountContextSources
August 2025raise$1.0Bapproximately $1B of primary equity, August 20-21, 2025, via a GI Partners single-asset continuation vehicle plus a strategic investment from GI Data Infrastructure, anchored by funds managed by Hamilton Lane
Record
  • As of October 2024 Flexential held more than 40 data centers and 325 MW built and under development.

Rowan Digital InfrastructureFull profile →

Financingprivate developer; green-labelled project debt raised under a Green Finance Framework

Rowan Digital Infrastructure is a private hyperscale data center developer. Its flagship documented North American project is the 300 MW Project Temple campus on roughly 700 acres in Temple, Bell County, Texas, which broke ground in January 2026 for a single unnamed global technology tenant, is served by Oncor, and is expected to be operational in 2027 on a minimum $700 million investment. Rowan closed nearly $3 billion of debt financing for the campus on 27 May 2026, the largest in the company's history, bringing the total raised under its Green Finance Framework to $4.4 billion across three projects in the preceding year.

PeriodKindAmountContextSources
2026raise$3.0BNearly $3 billion of debt financing for the 300 MW Temple, Texas campus, closed 27 May 2026 under Rowan's Green Finance Framework
Record
  • Rowan's Green Finance Framework total reached $4.4 billion across three projects in the year to May 2026; the framework is rated Strong by Morningstar Sustainalytics.

Cloverleaf InfrastructureFull profile →

Cloverleaf Infrastructure is a Houston, Texas developer of powered data center sites, founded in 2024 with backing from Sandbrook Capital and NGP Energy Capital. On 21 August 2026 the company announced a strategic partnership with NVIDIA under which NVIDIA took a minority investment in the company, with the size and terms not disclosed. Cloverleaf will adopt the NVIDIA DSX platform to bring site, power, cooling, computing and facility decisions together earlier in project design. The company states it has delivered multiple gigawatt-scale projects to customers across North America; it did not disclose a total pipeline figure in the announcement.

PeriodKindAmountContextSources
2026raisen.a.NVIDIA took an undisclosed minority investment in Cloverleaf on 21 August 2026. Neither company disclosed the amount. The Wall Street Journal reported, via TechCrunch, that the investment would likely total several hundred million dollars; that is a reported estimate, not a company disclosure, and no dollar value is recorded here.
Record
  • Founded in 2024; initial founding investors Sandbrook Capital and NGP Energy Capital.
  • Neither Cloverleaf nor NVIDIA disclosed the size or terms of NVIDIA's minority investment announced 21 August 2026.
  • Cloverleaf did not disclose a total development pipeline figure in the NVIDIA announcement, describing only multiple GW-scale projects delivered across North America (specific gigawatt figure n.a.).

SB EnergyFull profile →

FinancingDeveloper capital plus a $1.5 billion NVIDIA equity investment, NVIDIA credit support on land, power and shell buildout for the initial phase, and a 20-year OpenAI lease as the contracted revenue base. Project-level financing to date includes $999.0 million of 8.875% senior secured notes due 2031 for Cosmos with a parent completion guaranty; the company had $3.9 billion of borrowings, net, from financial institutions at 30 June 2026 and states it plans to fund its capex with cash on hand, operating cash flow, newly raised corporate-level equity and newly raised project-level debt.

SB Energy is the SoftBank-backed developer of the PORTS-Pike Technology Campus in Pike County, Ohio, on the former Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant, a 5.4 square mile Department of Energy site. On 17 August 2026 SB Energy, NVIDIA and OpenAI announced that SB Energy will build, own and operate the campus under a 20-year lease to OpenAI, with NVIDIA as the exclusive AI compute provider and NVIDIA taking a $1.5 billion equity stake in SB Energy. OpenAI has contracted for approximately 8 IT-GW at the campus, of which 4.25 IT-GW is the initial deployment and 3.75 IT-GW an option. SB Energy and SoftBank committed at least $4.2 billion to new regional grid infrastructure with AEP Ohio. First capacity is expected to come online in phases beginning in 2028. On 1 September 2026 SB Energy, Inc. filed a Form S-1 registration statement for an initial public offering, disclosing a Data Center Contracted Portfolio of 8.8 GW-IT across the Cosmos Technology Campus in Travis County, Texas, the Milam County Data Center in Texas and the 8.0 GW-IT PORTS-Pike Technology Campus in Ohio, approximately $439 billion of backlog and approximately $178 billion of backlog-associated capex. No data center capacity is in operation.

PeriodKindAmountContextSources
2026equity$1.5BNVIDIA equity investment in SB Energy announced 17 August 2026
2026build$4.2BAt least $4.2 billion committed by SB Energy and SoftBank to new regional grid infrastructure in partnership with AEP Ohio
as of the S-1 dated 1 September 2026planned$178BBacklog-associated capex of approximately $178 billion, measured on a cash basis from 30 June 2026, of which approximately $174 billion is attributable to the data center segment and $4 billion to the power segment. This is the company's own estimate of capital expenditure required to build its contracted projects and is not a committed or financed amount; it overlaps with the PORTS-Pike and Cosmos figures recorded elsewhere in this atlas and must not be added to them.
May 2026debt$999M$999.0 million of 8.875% senior secured notes due 2031 financing the Cosmos Technology Campus
Record
  • SB Energy will build, own and operate the PORTS-Pike campus under a 20-year lease to OpenAI, with NVIDIA as the exclusive AI compute provider.
  • OpenAI has contracted for approximately 8 IT-GW at PORTS-Pike: an initial 4.25 IT-GW plus a 3.75 IT-GW option, with first capacity expected in phases from 2028.
  • SB Energy reports a Data Center Contracted Portfolio of 8.8 GW-IT, comprising 0.8 GW-IT under construction (Cosmos and Milam County Buildings 1 and 2) and 8.0 GW-IT contracted but not under construction (PORTS-Pike), with no data center capacity in operation as of the S-1.
  • Backlog of approximately $439 billion, comprising approximately $430 billion in the data center segment and $10 billion in the power segment, with a weighted average remaining contract length of 19.6 years for data center projects and 16.6 years for power projects. The company describes the backlog as a hypothetical estimate based on management's assumptions and not necessarily indicative of future revenue; approximately $357 billion of it is expected to be recognized beyond 96 months.
  • Borden County and Scurry County, Texas together represent approximately 1.7 GW-IT of near-term critical IT capacity in ERCOT with secured interconnection, and are excluded from both the Data Center Contracted Portfolio and the backlog.
  • The company operates under a Foundation Agreement dated 9 January 2026 among OpenAI Infra Holdings, LLC, SB Energy Global and SoftBank Group Corp., amended and restated in its entirety on 17 August 2026.

CRG (Clayco)Full profile →

Financingprivate developer balance sheet; municipal development agreement with a five-year tax abatement

CRG is the real estate development arm of St. Louis-based Clayco. Its principal disclosed North American data center commitment is a $6 billion hyperscale campus on approximately 361 acres in Festus, Jefferson County, Missouri, for which the Festus City Council approved a development agreement 6-2 on 30 March 2026 and annexed three additional parcels 5-2 on 24 August 2026. The project is the subject of a suit filed 8 April 2026 in St. Louis County Circuit Court seeking to invalidate the rezoning and the development agreement. No megawatt figure has been released by the developer.

Record
  • Festus City Council approved the development agreement for the $6 billion project by a 6-2 vote on 30 March 2026; the agreement provides $3 million a year for community development in years one through five and $5 million a year in years six through ten.
  • No official megawatt figure or site plan has been released; a public information page for the project describes a circulated ~902 MW four-building estimate as an unofficial LinkedIn analysis that is speculative until CRG releases an official site plan.

Fermi Inc. (Fermi America)Full profile →

Financingpublic equity and convertible notes at the parent, with campus equipment and turbines financed through non-recourse and secured equipment facilities
FRMI

Fermi Inc. is a Nasdaq-listed developer, classified by the SEC under real estate investment trusts, building the HyperGrid campus in the Texas Panhandle on land leased from Texas Tech University. Its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended 30 June 2026 reports property, plant and equipment of $1,547.9 million, of which $1,539.2 million is construction in progress, against $62.5 million of cash and $29.2 million of restricted cash, total debt of $536.9 million and a net loss of $214.5 million for the six months. The company reported no signed customer leases at 30 June 2026 and disclosed its first tenant lease, with TensorWave, as a subsequent event dated 9 August 2026. Its FY2025 shareholder letter describes approximately $1.8 billion of capital assembled across an initial public offering, preferred units, convertible notes and four equipment and turbine financings.

PeriodKindAmountContextSources
H1 2026reported$626MCash used for investments in property, plant and equipment of $626,157 thousand for the six months ended 30 June 2026; gross property, plant and equipment of approximately $1.55 billion at quarter end
FY2025reported$570MCash used in investing activities of $570.3 million, with approximately $569 million of cash invested in property and equipment and approximately $935 million of property and equipment on the balance sheet at year end; net loss $486.4 million
Record
  • The first tenant lease, with TensorWave, covers 222 MW of total facility power on a 15-year term for approximately $6.5 billion of contracted revenue over the life of the contract. Fermi entered the definitive lease on 9 August 2026 and announced it on 11 August 2026.
  • Fermi reports approximately 8,400 acres secured or under long-term lease in the Texas Panhandle, with generation capacity the company describes as expandable up to approximately 17 gigawatts.
  • The company states it has landed 1.5 gigawatts of generation assets and targets approximately 200 MW of initial commercial power within six months of its Q2 2026 report and approximately 1.5 GW within 18 to 24 months.
  • Permitting: the FY2025 shareholder letter cites a Clean Air Permit of approximately 6 GW and an application filed 27 March 2026 for approximately 5 GW of additional generation on the east side of the campus. Firm gas commitment of 300,000 MMBtu per day and water supply of up to 18.5 MGD, including 2.5 MGD from the City of Amarillo.
  • Fermi Inc. trades on Nasdaq under FRMI and is classified in EDGAR under SIC code for real estate investment trusts. It filed its Form 10-Q for Q2 2026 on 14 August 2026.

Named sites — reits & developers

SiteLocationCapitalMWStatusDetailSources
Digital Realty SJC37, 641 Walsh Ave.Santa Clara, CAn.a.built, not energizedA four-story facility whose construction began six years before reporting stands with a finished exterior and no equipment installed, waiting on power, and could be years from operation.
Digital Realty Santa Clara four-story building (completed 2024)Santa Clara, CAn.a.built, not energizedA separate DLR four-story Santa Clara building completed in 2024 is not operating for lack of power and is expected to be fully operational only around 2027.
Digital Realty / Realty Income Northern Virginia build-to-suit data centersVA$600M16announcedTwo Northern Virginia build-to-suit data centers, initially 16 MW expandable to 48 MW. The brief's premise of a $3B Realty Income JV is not supported by the fetched record; the corrected figure is $200M for 80% and 16-48 MW.
Equinix proposed SoDo data center (nine-story, 54 MW)Seattle, WAn.a.54proposedEarlier recorded as two Equinix proposals in Seattle City Light territory, captured by Seattle's one-year moratorium on data centers above 20 MVA, adopted 9-0 on June 9, 2026 with an option to extend six months. The Seattle Times reported on 3 October 2026 that Equinix is advancing a single nine-story, 54 MW data center in SoDo that is vested under the rules in place before the moratorium and is not subject to it. The same report attributes the other SoDo proposal (120 MW) to Prologis, not Equinix.
Prologis proposed Tukwila data center (75 MW, Seattle City Light territory)Tukwila, WAn.a.pausedOne of three large data center proposals in Seattle City Light territory, earlier attributed to Equinix, captured by Seattle's one-year moratorium on data centers above 20 MVA adopted June 9, 2026. The Seattle Times reported on 3 October 2026 that the 75 MW Tukwila proposal, within Seattle City Light's service area, is a Prologis project and that Prologis has neither submitted a service request nor withdrawn; City Light calls it exploratory.
Iron Mountain Manassas holdingsManassas, VAn.a.400announcedIron Mountain holds 142 acres in Manassas supporting 400+ MW, and added 100+ acres supporting 350+ MW across Richmond and Manassas, toward 1.2 GW globally.
Iron Mountain VA-9VAn.a.28announcedVA-9 is a 28 MW Northern Virginia facility targeted for Q4 2026.
Vantage Ashburn campusAshburn, VAn.a.590operatingVantage's 590 MW Ashburn position sits inside Loudoun County, which on March 18, 2025 eliminated by-right data center development by a 7-2 vote, newly requiring a special exception, with grandfathering cut off at February 12, 2025.
Vantage Santa Clara campusSanta Clara, CAn.a.216operatingSanta Clara campus listed at 216 MW on Vantage's North America locations page.
Vantage Phoenix campusPhoenix, AZn.a.176operatingPhoenix campus listed at 176 MW on Vantage's North America locations page.
Vantage Quincy campusQuincy, WAn.a.89operatingQuincy, WA campus listed at 89 MW on Vantage's North America locations page.
Vantage/OpenAI/Oracle Madison campusMadison, WI$15.0BpausedVantage is a named participant in the $15B Vantage/OpenAI/Oracle campus in Madison, Wisconsin, subject to a one-year moratorium adopted January 13, 2026.
Prince William Digital GatewayPrince William, VA$24.7B2000cancelledThe $24.7B, 27M sq ft, 2 GW Prince William Digital Gateway is catalogued as the largest single cancellation. Rezonings approved December 2023 were voided August 2025 and the voiding was affirmed March 31, 2026; Compass withdrew April 29, 2026 and QTS terminated July 2, 2026, foregoing an estimated $400M/yr in county tax revenue.
QTS Hillsboro campusHillsboro, ORn.a.4.5operatingAnnounced in 2018 with Phase 1 opening fully leased. Hillsboro subsequently became the first Oregon city to adopt a data center moratorium, 120 days adopted July 27, 2026, expiring November 24, 2026, extendable six months.
QTS East Windsor campus, 159 Princeton-Hightstown RoadEast Windsor, NJn.a.70delayedQTS proposed a second building on its 52-acre East Windsor campus; the East Windsor Township Planning Board postponed its decision on April 27, 2026 because public testimony was incomplete.
QTS PiscatawayPiscataway, NJn.a.operatingQTS operates in Piscataway, NJ.
Aligned Ashburn facilityAshburn, VAn.a.60operatingA 2019-built, 26-acre, 370,000 gross sq ft, 60 MW facility served by Dominion Energy at 1.15 PUE.
CyrusOne Sangamon County campus (Talkington Township)Sangamon, IL≥$500M600announcedThe 280-acre, ~1.5M sq ft, six-building, $500M+ campus southwest of Springfield was deferred by the Sangamon County Board in late 2025 amid activist calls for a six-month moratorium; the county approved a conditional permitted use in April 2026.
CyrusOne Aurora facility (Eola and Diehl roads)Aurora, ILn.a.operatingThe existing facility drew resident noise complaints, including extended backup-generator operation during April repairs, in the record supporting Aurora's moratorium.
CyrusOne US Army data center site, UtahUT~$2.0BannouncedCyrusOne announced a ~$2B, 1,200-acre US Army data center site in Utah in spring 2026.
DataBank Dallas allocationDallas, TXn.a.480announcedDallas received a 480 MW allocation of DataBank's $2B funding supporting 850 MW. DataBank registered a $425 million, nearly 450,000 sq ft two-story DFW15 building on Batchler Road in Red Oak with the Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation, reported 16 September 2026, with work expected from February 2027 to July 2029. It follows a $325 million DFW14 registration the prior month; the 300-acre Red Oak campus is planned for eight buildings, DFW9 through DFW16
DataBank Culpeper developmentCulpeper, VAn.a.192constructionDataBank broke ground in Culpeper on a 1.3M sq ft hyperscale-ready development. Culpeper County is one of 23 Virginia jurisdictions with tracked siting actions, with a September 2025 action recorded.
DataBank Atlanta allocationAtlanta, GAn.a.120announcedAtlanta received a 120 MW allocation of DataBank's $2B funding supporting 850 MW.
Compass Red Oak facilitiesRed Oak, TX$326M180operatingCompass closed a $326M refinancing on five Red Oak, Texas facilities across 5 data centers and 180 MW, with full build-out at 10 buildings and 360 MW served by Oncor.
Compass Hoffman Estates brownfield projectHoffman Estates, ILn.a.announcedCompass's Hoffman Estates, Illinois brownfield project is catalogued as one that avoided cancellation; project status is otherwise not stated in the source.
Compass Statesville projectStatesville, NCn.a.announcedCompass is a named target of organized opposition in Statesville, North Carolina; project details are otherwise not stated in the source.
STACK NVA05, ManassasManassas, VA$900M200announcedNVA05 in Manassas at 200 MW is financed by a $900M facility. It sits in Prince William County, where zoning text amendment DPA2026-00006 to curtail by-right data center development was initiated March 3, 2026. Development status not stated in source.
STACK Stafford County siteStafford, VAn.a.1000announcedA 500-acre, 1 GW Stafford County site reported among STACK's company totals.
STACK Santa Clara facilitySanta Clara, CAn.a.built, not energizedA Santa Clara facility completed in late 2025 cannot operate for lack of power, with full operation expected around 2027.
Prime PHX01, AvondaleAvondale, AZ$3.0B240announcedPHX01 in Avondale, Arizona, a $3B, 240 MW project announced May 2026.
Prime SMF01, SacramentoSacramento, CAn.a.26SMF01 in Sacramento at 26 MW served by SMUD; operational status is not explicitly stated in the source, which describes SMF02 as expanding the regional campus footprint.
Prime SMF02, SacramentoSacramento, CAn.a.18constructionSMF02 at 18 MW and 150,000 sq ft, on which Prime broke ground in May 2026.
Tract Morris Technology ParkMorris, ILn.a.1000announcedA 343-acre, 1 GW, 2.9M sq ft campus in greater Chicago with a ComEd transmission service agreement, part of Tract's land-banking model.
Tract Caldwell County technology parkCaldwell, TXn.a.2000announcedTract closed the acquisition of 1,515 acres in Caldwell County, Texas for a multi-gigawatt data center technology park at 2 GW.
Tract Pole Canyon technology tractUTn.a.1700announcedPole Canyon, Utah: 844 acres supporting 1,700 MW, part of Tract's documented land-banking model.
Tract Goodyear/Buckeye projectAZ$14.0BwithdrawnTract withdrew a $14B project in Goodyear/Buckeye, Arizona in May 2024, though Tract's Buckeye position remained active as the company shifted focus toward Arizona.
Tract Mooresville projectMooresville, NC$30.0B1500cancelledA $30.0B, 1.5 GW project in Iredell County cancelled during due diligence after Mooresville Public Utilities denied capacity allocation, the single largest dollar figure in the cancellation dataset.
Novva West Jordan campusWest Jordan, UT$2.0B175constructionNovva secured $2B of financing led by JPMorgan with Starwood participation for the 175 MW West Jordan, Utah campus, following an earlier $355M CIM Group equity round.
Sabey Quincy campus, 2200 M St NEQuincy, WAn.a.85operatingThe Quincy campus at 2200 M St NE, Grant County, launched in 2011 and completed a two-building, 85 MW expansion in 2023.
Sabey Intergate.Ashburn Building AAshburn, VAn.a.54constructionSabey broke ground on Building A, the third and final facility on the 38-acre, 490,000 sq ft Intergate.Ashburn campus. 14 MW at SDC Ashburn was available for pre-leasing by Q3 2026.
H5 Lockport facility (former Yahoo)Lockport, NY~$49MoperatingH5 acquired Yahoo's Lockport, New York facility, built 2009, in a sale-leaseback estimated at $49M, closing December 30, with Yahoo signing a five-year lease.
H5 505 Marquette, AlbuquerqueAlbuquerque, NMn.a.operatingH5 acquired the 225,000 sq ft, 18-floor 505 Marquette Hotel in Albuquerque, New Mexico on June 23, 2022; operational status not stated in the source.
Project Temple data center campusTemple, TX$3.0B300constructionRowan broke ground on Project Temple in January 2026 on approximately 700 acres in Temple, Bell County, Texas, for a single unnamed global technology tenant, with operations expected in 2027, roughly 600 construction jobs and more than 40 permanent positions. The company closed nearly $3 billion of debt financing for the campus on 27 May 2026 under its Green Finance Framework. Rowan says its Temple footprint of six buildings across Project Temple, Project Stampede and Project Ranger represents at least $4.2 billion of investment, with five buildings approved or under construction. The sixth, the Lasso Building, the third and final Project Temple building at about $700 million, was moved to a replacement site after the city needed the original land for a landfill expansion; the City Council was scheduled to take up its second zoning reading on 17 September 2026. Rowan said it has no further Temple data centers planned (reported 12 August and 13 September 2026) Rowan Digital Infrastructure registered AUS02 (Building 2) at 1855 Bob White Road in Temple with the Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation on 24 July 2026: a one-story, 500,000 sq ft data center with an estimated cost of $780 million, estimated start 28 August 2026 and completion 27 August 2027. On 17 September 2026 Temple City Council approved annexation and PD-LI zoning for Phase 1B (Project Lasso), the Project Lasso development agreement, and an infrastructure agreement across all three phases under which Rowan funds $38,545,796 (about $25 million for the South Temple water program and $13 million in contributions), with water-use caps of 13,800, 8,200 and 10,100 gallons per day for Phases 1, 2 (Stampede) and 3 (Ranger)
PORTS-Pike Technology CampusPiketon, OHn.a.4250announcedAnnounced 17 August 2026 by SB Energy, NVIDIA and OpenAI. The campus redevelops the former Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant, a 5.4 square mile Department of Energy site historically used for uranium enrichment. Capacity is expected to come online in phases beginning in 2028. OpenAI states the project will support 35,000 construction jobs over a six-year buildout through 2032 and 2,500 long-term operating jobs, and committed $40 million to a community grant fund alongside SB Energy's earlier $40 million, with an additional $80 million initial fund described by NVIDIA. SB Energy's Form S-1, filed 1 September 2026, states that a definitive lease for the campus has been executed but that the campus is not yet under construction, that the 8.0 GW-IT PORTS-Pike campus constitutes the entirety of the company's contracted-but-not-under-construction data center capacity, and that a substantial majority of its data center segment backlog derives from PORTS-Pike related contracts.
Richmond data center campus (RCH-1 to RCH-4)Sandston, VA≥$1.0B200constructionIron Mountain began construction on RCH-1 in June 2026 at White Oak Technology Park. RCH-1 is a 364,860 sq ft, 48 MW facility across six data halls. The full campus of RCH-1 through RCH-4 is planned at more than 200 MW and more than $1 billion on 66 acres.
Cosmos Technology CampusAustin, TX$999M50constructionSB Energy's first data center campus, in Travis County, Texas, disclosed in the Form S-1 registration statement filed 1 September 2026. Cosmos and the Milam County data center are the company's two projects under construction; no SB Energy data center capacity is in operation. SoftBank is both a strategic investor and the tenant at Cosmos.
Borden County campus (pipeline)Borden County, TXn.a.announcedNamed in SB Energy's Form S-1 filed 1 September 2026 as part of the near-term data center pipeline, where the company has secured land and is actively pursuing development and lease negotiations. Neither county site is currently included in the Data Center Contracted Portfolio or in the backlog calculation.
Scurry County campus (pipeline)Scurry County, TXn.a.announcedNamed in SB Energy's Form S-1 filed 1 September 2026 as part of the near-term data center pipeline, where the company has secured land and is actively pursuing development and lease negotiations. Neither county site is currently included in the Data Center Contracted Portfolio or in the backlog calculation.
Project Latigo campusCheyenne, WY$20.0B480announcedThe Laramie County Board of County Commissioners approved a zone change from Land Use to Planned Unit Development on 1 September 2026 for 1,835 acres about 12 miles south of Cheyenne, near Terry Ranch Road between Interstate 25 and U.S. Highway 85. Vantage Data Centers described an investment of up to $20 billion at completion and up to 2,000 jobs, across four data center buildings with staging areas, access routes and modular worker housing. Vantage must submit a site plan to the county for approval before construction. First-phase construction is slated to begin as early as 2027, with phase one completion targeted in 2030.
CRG Festus hyperscale campusFestus, MO~$6.0BannouncedThe Festus City Council approved the development agreement 6-2 on 30 March 2026 for a campus on approximately 361 acres north of Highway 67 and west of Highway CC. On 24 August 2026 the council voted 5-2 to annex three additional parcels totalling 6.55 acres. As of 12 June 2026 the mayor stated no construction plans or permit requests had been submitted. City Attorney Brian Malone said the deal is expected to generate $1.3 billion for the city, and that the project could produce $80 million a year for Festus and nearby taxing districts even with the five-year abatement.
CyrusOne Freestone County campus (Freestone Energy Center)Fairfield, TX~$1.5B380under constructionConstellation announced on 9 February 2026 that Calpine LLC signed a 380 MW agreement with CyrusOne to connect and serve a new data center adjacent to the Freestone Energy Center in Freestone County, Texas, and that Calpine had entered an exclusive agreement to provide power, grid connectivity and site infrastructure for a Phase 2 of an additional 380 MW. Constellation stated the arrangement is structured so electricity continues to flow to the regional grid. The agreements are in addition to 400 MW of Calpine-CyrusOne agreements at the Thad Hill Energy Center in Bosque County, Texas. CyrusOne filed with the Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation for three buildings on FM 488 in Fairfield for the 760 MW project next to Calpine's Freestone Energy Campus. Construction had started on two buildings, with the third due to start the following month and completion expected by the end of August 2027. No tenants were listed in the filings (reported 31 July 2026). On 23 July 2026 CL Freestone 1 LLC, using CyrusOne's 2850 N. Harwood Street Dallas address and Corgan as designer, registered three one-story data center buildings, DFW20A, DFW20B and DFW20C, at 1354 to 1360 FM 488 in Fairfield with the Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation, each 306,216 sq ft with an estimated cost of $500 million and completions estimated between March and August 2027. Interior fit-outs of each building were registered on 4 August 2026 at an estimated $100 million each.
HyperGrid campus, AmarilloAmarillo, TX$1.5B1500constructionFermi Inc. is building the HyperGrid campus on land leased from the Texas Tech University System in the Texas Panhandle. The company reports approximately 8,400 acres secured or under long-term lease, 11.3 miles of perimeter fencing, 4.6 miles of on-campus gas pipeline and 7.2 miles of water line, with 300,000 MMBtu per day of firm gas and up to 18.5 MGD of water supply. Its first tenant lease, with TensorWave, covers 222 MW of total facility power over 15 years for approximately $6.5 billion of contracted revenue, entered 9 August 2026 and announced 11 August 2026. On 18 September 2026 Fermi announced that three Siemens Energy SGT6-5000F gas turbines, the first power generation assets to reach the site, had arrived at Project Matador after landing at the Port of Houston in July. Fermi's 21 July 2026 release rated the three units at up to 780 MW together in simple-cycle mode and said they will anchor the second phase of the power buildout. Fermi did not report installation or give a new first-power date.
QTS Fayetteville campus (Project Odyssey buildings DC1-2)Fayetteville, GAn.a.300operationalCampus leased to Microsoft. Commercial operations began in late 2025 per AFII, and the SPV issued investment-grade secured notes in August 2026 to fund expansion. QTS also has $4.6 billion of 5.7% notes due April 2036 on this campus per NordSip
Sabey Decatur Township data centerIndianapolis (Decatur Township), IN$4.0BapprovedIndianapolis approved $240 million in tax breaks on 16 September 2026. The site also appears in the at-risk list under a March 2026 moratorium entry
Digital Realty Hawthorne Race Course siteStickney, ILn.a.announced119-acre former racetrack at 3501 South Laramie Avenue bought out of bankruptcy. The Chicago Sun-Times headline reports the Stickney mayor and board oppose a data center there Stickney trustees passed a six-month moratorium on data center development after the purchase
Digital Realty Rolling Meadows Atrium CampusRolling Meadows, ILn.a.announced40-acre office campus with a 485,000-square-foot building at 3800 Golf Road planned for data center conversion
Digital Realty Ad Astra Enterprise Park campusDe Soto, KSn.a.approvedNine-building campus on about 1,400 acres in two phases (281 acres and about 1,155 acres) near the Panasonic EV plant. No tenant identified. On 22 September 2026 the De Soto Planning Commission approved Digital Realty's Phase One site plan for Project Jayhawk, a two-story 450,000 sq ft building on about 300 acres next to the Panasonic EV battery plant; construction is expected to start in 2027 and site preparation has begun. Residents are circulating a petition to put high-impact data center development to a public vote. The Kansas City Business Journal reported on 23 September 2026 that Digital Realty scaled back its Kansas plans after a build-to-suit client fell through (paywalled; details not verified).
CyrusOne Castroville data centerCastroville, TX~$500Munder constructionOne-story facility at 3397 U.S. 90 West, CyrusOne's sixth San Antonio-area facility and first in Castroville. CyrusOne owns at least 244 acres in Medina County. Completion expected June 2027 CyrusOne's project page says early earth-moving and grading are under way and puts expected capital investment at about $4 billion to $6 billion across multiple phases, using closed-loop cooling
Tract Tuckahoe Creek Technology ParkGoochland County (eastern, near West Creek), VAn.a.900announced871-acre proposed campus. Most residents at a 23 July 2026 community meeting opposed it
STACK Culpeper Technology ParkCulpeper, VAn.a.announced71-acre site at 15140 Keyser Road in the Culpeper Tech Zone with by-right data center zoning
Project Red Clay data centerNear Hayneville, AL≥$1.5B1500proposedDevelopers of Project Red Clay, a hyperscale data center planned on 800 acres a few miles from the Lowndes County courthouse, have requested 1,500 MW from Alabama Power and estimate at least $1.5 billion in development-stage cost. The operator has not been disclosed because an agreement is not final. At the 24 August 2026 county commission meeting, residents organized as Protect Lowndes County presented a 350-signature petition seeking transparency and urged commissioners not to approve tax abatements. The developer is Cloverleaf Infrastructure, which in a 27 May 2026 update described the project as a minimum $1.5 billion investment and said it had not requested abatements or incentives from the county commission. Yellowhammer News reported on 1 October 2026, citing unnamed sources, that the commission is close to approving a tax incentive plan for the project; no vote has been taken and the reported figure is not confirmed.
Host Digital Project Facility (Northeast Oklahoma)OKn.a.43developmentHost Digital's initial project is a 45+ MW data center campus in Northeast Oklahoma leased for 15 years to a large private cloud infrastructure company for 43 MW of critical IT load, with delivery expected in Q1 2027. The filings do not name the county or city, so the site is shown in the tables only
Zone Frontier West Texas data center campus (Potter County)Near Amarillo (Potter County substation), TXn.a.200proposedA Zone Frontier subsidiary signed a long-term ground lease on about 4,077 acres in Potter County, Texas, securing land, water and development rights for the West Texas campus it is developing with HST Technologies. Zone may designate 200 to 800 acres for data center facilities. The company says it is now focused on tenants, permitting and interconnection studies.
AIB Data Centers CLT-01 CampusNot disclosed, SC~$800M65proposedAIB, through its subsidiary One Blockchain, is repurposing its existing 40 MW bitcoin hosting facility in Spartanburg County into an AI and HPC campus of about 65 MW, and signed Nebius for 50 MW of critical IT capacity in two data halls. AIB's Q3 2026 investor presentation (furnished 30 September 2026) sizes the CLT-01 build at about $800 million and schedules electric service to begin 1 October 2026.
Project Lightning data center, Wildwood Commerce ParkWildwood Commerce Park (off Interstate 77), VA$11.0BproposedGrayson County publicly confirmed for the first time that the project known as Project Lightning is a data center planned for Wildwood Commerce Park, the industrial park of more than 200 acres off Interstate 77 in Carroll County owned by BRCEDA, the authority formed by Carroll County, Grayson County and the City of Galax. County Administrator Stephen Boyer said the investment is north of $11 billion, with revenues close to or over $1 billion over 10 years for the three localities, and that the end user cannot yet be disclosed. Records show the company secured an option on the land by January 2026. The project is not final: all three localities must approve amendments to the 16-year-old Wildwood agreement shifting negotiating authority to BRCEDA. On Monday 5 October 2026 the Carroll County Board of Supervisors voted down the amendment shifting negotiating power to the Blue Ridge Crossroads Economic Development Authority, the only one of the three localities to do so, and agreed to explore leaving the authority.
Black Bear power plant and data centre campusAbout 19 km south of Swan Hills, Albertan.a.466proposedTeton Digital is developing the Black Bear Power Project, a 466 MW natural gas combined-cycle plant about 19 km south of Swan Hills and about 200 km northwest of Edmonton, together with about 1,500 acres of adjacent Crown land for data centre use. The plant was first proposed in 2024 by Kiwetinohk Energy. Teton says data centre operations could begin as early as 2027 on grid power before the plant is complete, and that the site could eventually support about 3 GW. Alberta Major Projects lists the plant as proposed with 2028 completion.
Project Beehive nuclear-powered data center campusNear Price, UTn.a.9600proposedValar Atomics has applied to the Bureau of Land Management to use more than 9,000 acres of federal land near Price, Utah for Project Beehive, which would combine data centers with about 456 small nuclear reactors producing around 9.6 GW, a nuclear fuel production facility and waste storage, according to documents reviewed by NPR. Valar has also sought about 650 acres of state land for the project. BLM's Utah office confirmed it received the application and is reviewing it for completeness before NEPA review. The timeline calls for non-nuclear construction as early as the end of 2026, first reactors in 2028 and full completion by 2032. Valar did not respond to NPR.
Prime Data Centers AUS01 and AUS02 (1395 Bob White Road)Lockhart, TX~$400MproposedA TDLR registration lists 'Prime Data Center AUS-01', two new 380,000 sq ft shell buildings (760,000 sq ft in total) for future data center use at 1395 Bob White Road, Lockhart, Caldwell County, with an estimated cost of $400 million. The owner of record is Lockhart Property, LLC; no tenant is assigned. Scheduled construction runs from 1 June 2026 to 30 September 2027.
BT Gateway Data Center (4989 County Road 2656)Royse City, TX~$384MproposedHouston-based Giga Energy plans the BT Gateway Data Center, an AI computing facility on about 30 acres along County Road 2656 outside Royse City, with about 20 acres to be developed and a main building of about two acres. The TDLR registration lists a 100,000 sq ft new data center with an estimated cost of $384 million, owned by Giga AFM LLC. The company cited closed-loop cooling, about 300 construction workers, 20 to 24 permanent jobs and about $7.2 million a year in county property tax, with completion targeted for mid-2027.
CyrusOne DFW8 (9501 Asphalt Drive)Fort Worth, TX~$257MproposedCyrusOne registered with TDLR the 'CyrusOne DFW8 Fit Out', an interior fit-out of data halls, support spaces and tenant office space in an existing 82,997 sq ft core-and-shell precast concrete building at 9501 Asphalt Drive, Fort Worth, including exterior generators. Estimated cost is $257.1 million, with work scheduled from 1 October 2026 to 30 October 2027; no tenant is assigned.
Stratos Project AI data center campus (MIDA project area)Hansel Valley, north of the Great Salt Lake, UTn.a.9000approvedKevin O'Leary's O'Leary Digital proposed the Stratos Project, pitched as a 40,000-acre AI data center campus drawing up to 9 GW near the Great Salt Lake in Box Elder County. Utah's Military Installation Development Authority approved the project area in April 2026 and Box Elder County commissioners approved it unanimously in May 2026 by two resolutions; the county's later 180-day moratorium exempted Stratos. Opposition cost Senate President Stuart Adams and two commissioners who backed it their June 2026 primaries, and O'Leary said in August 2026 that his team 'really screwed this up' and pledged to shrink the project. The citizen group BEAR is suing to force a referendum on the county's approval; O'Leary Digital and the county argue MIDA consent is irrevocable. O'Leary Digital CEO Paul Palandjian told KSL (1 October 2026) that the project is not on hold and is in pre-development, with engineering, environmental and economic impact studies under way under Utah and MIDA guidelines, and that a revised water rights application prepared by Loughlin Water Associates was expected to be filed with the Division of Water Rights that week. He said the first phase of power generation will be limited to 1.5 GW, with total generating capacity of up to 9 GW over the long term, and that the campus will use under 900,000 gallons of water a day on average at full buildout after recycling. Three lawsuits over the proposal remain in court.
Rhea Data Center (BLM land south of Boise)South of Boise, IDn.a.600proposedRhea Data, a subsidiary of Nevada-based Arevia Power, has applied to the Bureau of Land Management to build a multi-building data center of about 4 million sq ft with 600 MW of data-processing capacity on roughly 3,200 to 3,700 acres of federal land south of Boise, with an on-site natural gas generation facility. BLM said the details are preliminary and subject to change and that an environmental review with public comment would follow. Boise Mayor Lauren McLean and the Idaho Sierra Club oppose the proposal.
Project Barracuda energy park and co-located data center (La. 1)Along La. 1 near the Ascension-Iberville parish line, LAn.a.1000proposedONE Nuclear Energy's Project Barracuda, the largest of its three Louisiana projects at about 2,700 acres stretching across La. 1 in Iberville Parish, pairs a 1.2 GW natural gas energy park and battery storage with a co-located 1 GW data center. The company, which describes itself as data-center-adjacent and plans to secure land and permits before landing a hyperscale tenant, holds letters of intent to buy about 4,000 acres near the Ascension-Iberville line for Barracuda, Cayman and the Amberjack SMR campus. Chief development officer Chris Hansmeyer pitched the Iberville Parish Council on a Tuesday before the 28 September 2026 report; no reactor vendor, NRC review or LPSC filing has begun.
PointOne / CyrusOne data center, 4015 Lower Moncure Road (Phase I)Sanford, NC≥$900M90approvedThe Sanford-Lee County Planning Department issued a building permit dated 25 September 2026 for a data center of more than 300,000 sq ft at 4015 Lower Moncure Road, valid until 24 March 2027. PointOne announced the 90 MW project with developer Helix Ventures on 8 June 2026; it will sit on 56 acres and be owned and operated by CyrusOne. The permit values the structure at $185.4 million; PointOne said CyrusOne's equipment brings Phase I to roughly $900 million and customer IT equipment would bring the total to about $3.6 billion. The site is Phase I of a development planned to total 430 acres.
Tonopah film studio, retail and data center complex (data center and technology campus)Tonopah (unincorporated), AZn.a.1000approvedArizona Land Consulting plans a 1,350-acre complex in Tonopah that includes a 355-acre film production studio, a golf course, an amusement park and a roughly 300-acre data center and technology campus that CEO Anita Verma-Lallian says will draw about a gigawatt. Maricopa County supervisors approved the zoning earlier in September 2026; final site plans are expected within six months and construction could begin within two years. Power and water plans remain unclear.
Edged Prichard data center (Telegraph Road)Prichard, AL$93MapprovedEdged Energy's proposed $93 million data center on Telegraph Road in Prichard received a building permit on 30 July 2026, before the city's six-month moratorium of 4 August. After the council questioned the permit because site plan review had been skipped, the Planning Commission granted site plan approval on 29 September 2026. The developer's attorney said construction should last 18 months and the site is about eight acres.
Harmony Energy Park data center (near the Bison Substation)Harmony Township, north of Mapleton, NDn.a.540proposedMinnesota-based Geronimo Power has filed for a conditional use permit for a data center at its Harmony Energy Park in Harmony Township, Cass County, near the Bison Substation north of Mapleton. The company says the campus would use 540 MW at peak, nearly twice Applied Digital's 280 MW Polaris Forge II near Harwood, on about 640 acres, with construction taking two to four years, closed-loop cooling and peak water use of 20,000 gallons a day. Township officials are awaiting a legal opinion on whether a former supervisor's undisclosed land sale to Geronimo could nullify earlier zoning changes.
Merkle Standard data center, former Ponderay Newsprint papermillUsk, WAn.a.225proposedMerkle Standard, owned by Irvine, California-based Allrise Capital, has been in discussions since 2024 with the Pend Oreille County PUD about raising the electricity load at the former Ponderay Newsprint papermill in Usk, a 927-acre property with 29 buildings, for a data center. Records obtained by The Spokesman-Review show talks on a power study for upgrades that could eventually deliver 225 MW, more than seven times the load of the county's residential and small business customers. Nothing has been formally presented to county commissioners or the Kalispel Tribe. The same owner earlier promoted the mill as a cryptocurrency mining site.
Clive-area gas-fired power and modular data centre (Haynes Road)About 5.5 km southeast of Clive (Haynes Road, south of Highway 12), Albertan.a.19.8proposedArmada Nowlit Energy Ltd. is seeking to redesignate about 1.78 hectares (4.4 acres) of agricultural land on Haynes Road southeast of Clive for a 19.8 MW integrated natural gas-fired power generator and modular data processing centre. The application is in the preliminary stage of Lacombe County's approval process, and redesignation alone would not authorize construction. A developer-led public information meeting was set for 30 September 2026 at the Tees Community Hall.
Vantage Data Centers Oregon campus (Corduroy and Wynn roads)Oregon, OH~$1.1BproposedVantage Data Centers seeks permits for two or three data center buildings plus ancillary buildings on about 213.8 acres near Corduroy and Wynn roads in Oregon, Ohio, according to a draft term summary posted by council member Kathleen Pollauf and presented to council on 28 September 2026. The draft projects about 1,500 construction jobs per building and about 30 Vantage employees after construction. A citizen charter amendment that would cap data centers at 25 MW is on the 3 November 2026 ballot (see capital at risk). Not linked to the earlier vantage-ohio-192mw-campus record, whose location is not stated.
Wave Infrastructure AI research lab and HPC facility (Junction 42 Business Park)Near Penhold (Junction 42 Business Park), Albertan.a.5proposedRed Deer County announced on 29 September 2026 that Wave Infrastructure has made an offer to buy Lot 24, a nearly 13.5-acre lot on the west edge of the county-owned Junction 42 Business Park off Highway 42 just west of Highway 2 near Penhold, for a high-performance computing facility supporting an artificial intelligence research lab with an estimated value of C$300 million. Under the purchase agreement the county must apply to rezone the lot to Medium Industrial, which requires a public hearing; a data centre would then be a permitted use, but a development permit, Alberta Utilities Commission approvals and Alberta Environment and Protected Areas water approvals would still be needed. The developer plans at least one public open house. rdnewsnow reported on 1 October 2026 that the developer's website describes a 5 MW data centre on a 12-acre site; the county says rezoning would make a data centre a permitted use but would not itself approve one.
Eagle Rock Partners digital infrastructure campus (Jefferson Davis County)Near Bassfield (Gum Swamp Road, at the Covington County line), MS~$6.0BproposedEagle Rock Partners plans an AI digital infrastructure campus on 800 acres near Gum Swamp Road and the Covington County line in Jefferson Davis County, Mississippi, an estimated $6 billion capital investment with a projected 200 full-time operational jobs and more than 1,000 construction jobs. The developer held a public hearing on Tuesday 29 September 2026 where residents raised water, power rate, noise and traffic concerns and some asked for a public vote. Construction is set to begin in 2027. Eagle Rock's Ken Lober said the company will work with the economic development agency, county supervisors and county engineer to validate its commitments.
QTS Eagle Mountain data center campus (SLC1)Eagle Mountain, UT$6.0Bunder constructionQTS is building its SLC1 campus in Eagle Mountain, Utah, west of Meta's Eagle Mountain facility. ABC4 reported that the five buildings represent a $6 billion investment by QTS on more than 193 acres. Work began in September 2025 with an official groundbreaking in October 2025, and Layton Construction and QTS topped out the third building in April 2026. QTS says the campus uses a closed-loop cooling system that does not draw from local water resources or consume water for cooling once operational, and cites more than 2,000 construction jobs and more than 100 permanent roles.
Equinix DA12 data center (1550 West Mockingbird Lane)Dallas, TX≥$836Munder constructionEquinix registered two Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation projects for DA12 at 1550 West Mockingbird Lane, Dallas, near the Medical District: DA12-1 (TABS2026006348), a four-story 372,517 sq ft data center with twenty generators, estimated at $542.8 million with construction from 19 February 2026 to 12 October 2027; and DA12-2 (TABS2026006556), a $293.7 million interior fit-out of the first and second floors scheduled from 29 September 2027 to 30 March 2028. The owner of record, DA12, uses Equinix's 1 Lagoon Drive, Redwood City address. The Dallas Business Journal reported that the nearly billion-dollar data center from the Infomart owner has begun to rise.
Temple Data Center TTX03 (2230 Eberhardt Road)Temple, TX~$197Munder constructionPolmer LLC registered a new single-story 145,177 sq ft data center building, facility TTX03, at 2230 Eberhardt Road in Temple, Texas, with the Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation (TABS2026008019), at an estimated cost of $197 million, with construction scheduled to start 15 December 2025 and finish at the end of the third quarter of 2026. The Eberhardt Road corridor in northwest Temple also hosts Meta's Temple campus and Oppidan's Connect Temple facility. The end user is not identified in the filing.
Oppidan Connect Temple data center (2313 Eberhardt Road)Temple, TX~$80M14under constructionMinnesota-based Oppidan Investment Company is building the Connect Temple data center at 2313 Eberhardt Road near Meta's northwest Temple campus. KDH News (Temple Daily Telegram) reported in June 2026 that the project represents a 14 MW, $80 million investment, versus the 5 MW, $31 million building cost in its TDLR filing; the Temple EDC said the difference is about $49 million of servers and equipment. The developer said the facility creates 12 permanent jobs and 150 to 200 construction jobs and received no local tax incentives; completion was expected in October.
Skybox Hutto data center campus (3399 County Road 132)Hutto, TX≥$550Munder constructionHutto Data Center Campus, LLC registered Skybox Hutto 4 with the Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation on 30 September 2026 (TABS2027002367): site improvements and a new one-story core and shell building of about 844,300 sq ft for future data center use, plus a 20,000 sq ft office, at 3399 County Road 132, Hutto, estimated at $550 million, with construction scheduled from 20 January 2027 to 30 October 2028. TDLR shows earlier Skybox Hutto registrations for Building 1 (core, initial improvements and fit-out, $398 million combined, 2023 to 2024), Building 2 (core and shell and fit-out, $673.3 million combined, 2024 to 2025) and Building 3 core and shell ($283.0 million, 2024). No tenant is assigned in the filing. On 1 October 2026 the Hutto City Council approved Skybox's request to rezone a 140-acre parcel in the Hutto Megasite for a data center and power station, with stipulations requiring closed-loop cooling, compliance with Hutto land development codes and payment of local sales taxes on construction and power generation. Skybox Chief Development Officer Haynes Strader told the council there is no tenant yet, that securing power from ERCOT has become more challenging and may take another two years, and that the next phase would be the fifth and sixth data centers in the Megasite. Skybox's agreement with the Hutto Economic Development Corp. expires in February 2027. Skybox's chief development officer told the Austin Business Journal (reported by The Real Deal on 5 October 2026) that the company plans to close on the 140-acre Project Sequel property in February 2027 and, with Prologis, market it as a build-to-suit industrial site while pursuing power for two data centers on about half the land; because of the statewide pause on data center grid connections, Skybox does not expect to know its available power capacity until 2028, so the data centers are likely to be delayed. Its first Hutto-area project, PowerCampus Austin, has leased its four planned buildings to tenants including Google.
Hanna Campus #1 (FingerMotion and BlueFlare)Hanna, Albertan.a.6announcedFingerMotion and BlueFlare signed a binding agreement, fully executed on 30 September 2026 and announced 1 October 2026, to acquire about 20.2 acres at 409 Pioneer Trail S. in Hanna, Alberta, for Hanna Campus #1, an AI inference compute campus with a contemplated 6 MW (3 MW of local grid supply and 3 MW of behind-the-meter natural gas generation). Title is expected to be held by Hanna Campus #1 Inc.; BlueFlare is to design, build and operate the power and infrastructure after closing and permits. The project is separate from FingerMotion's 99 MW Alberta program. No purchase price was given in the fetched report.
Global AI data center, former Carestream Health siteWindsor (unincorporated Weld County), COn.a.35approvedThe Weld County Board of Commissioners voted 5-0 on Wednesday 9 September 2026 to approve a Use by Special Review permit for Global AI, a New York-based company, to build a data center on 41 acres at the former Carestream Health property at 2000 Howard Smith Avenue W, in unincorporated Weld County between Windsor and Greeley. Coverage says it could become the largest data center in Colorado. Global AI said Poudre Valley Rural Electric Association is prepared to deliver 35 MW and provided a will-serve letter; conditions include closed-loop cooling (about 65,000 gallons initial fill), noise limits and a decommissioning bond. The company cited 1,500 construction jobs and 200 long-term jobs. Greeley approved a pre-annexation agreement the day before. Neighbors questioned power and water delivery, and the county had cited the site for construction code violations. No investment figure was given in the fetched coverage.
Related Digital data center campus (adjacent to Project Star energy campus)Encinal, TXn.a.5000announcedIn a joint statement of 30 September 2026, NextEra Energy Resources, Related Companies and Lewis Energy Group said the Project Star energy campus in Encinal is expected, at full scale, to power a privately funded 5 GW data center campus that Related Digital is developing on an adjacent site. The companies said the adjacent data center is expected to create hundreds of permanent jobs. No tenant, data center cost or construction schedule was given in the fetched source.
Grande Valley Industrial Data Center CampusCasa Grande, AZn.a.approvedThe Casa Grande Planning and Zoning Commission approved a conditional use permit for the Grande Valley Industrial Data Center Campus by a 6-1 vote on Thursday 1 October 2026, the first hearing under the city's rules making data centers a conditional industrial use. The 954-acre site lies southwest and southeast of the intersection of Maricopa-Casa Grande Highway and Montgomery Road, about 8 miles from downtown. Plans include multiple buildings, closed-loop cooling, on-site Bloom Energy fuel cells (the company's first Arizona installation) and battery storage. The permit needs no City Council vote. The end user, investment and power demand were not disclosed.
Digital Realty Kokomo data center campus (Industrial Park North)Kokomo, INn.a.proposedKokomo Mayor Tyler Moore announced in his State of the City address on Thursday 1 October 2026 that Digital Realty is proposing a three-building data center campus of about 3 million sq ft on about 476 acres at Industrial Park North, near U.S. 31 and County Road 400 North. The city projects $1.3 billion to $1.7 billion in taxable assessed value and $44 million to $55 million in annual property tax revenue once the campus is complete in 2033, with no tax abatement. The campus would use closed-loop cooling with air-cooled chillers and must meet a 50 decibel property line noise limit. A Digital Realty community open house is set for 10 October 2026.
Aerotropolis Logistics Center data centerAurora, COn.a.proposedA development application by Aerotropolis Industrial Development envisions a 1 million sq ft, 11-building data center on a 500-acre site south of East 48th Avenue, north of 26th Avenue, east of Aerotropolis Parkway and west of Monaghan Road, part of the Aerotropolis Logistics Center master plan of more than 1,200 acres near the Aurora Highlands. The city said the application was determined to be incomplete and had not been accepted for review. The county is inferred from the location and is not stated in the source.
Cox Ranch data center campusCheyenne, WYn.a.approvedThe Cheyenne City Council voted 8-2 on third and final reading on Monday 28 September 2026 to annex Cox Ranch, an agricultural site west of Roundtop Road and adjacent to Happy Jack Road, and approved the zoning that lets Skybox Datacenters and ViaWest Group proceed with a planned data center campus. The annexation was introduced in April 2026, met public backlash and was postponed until September. The end user has not been named. Council members Lawrence Wolfe and Mark Moody voted no.
Digital Realty downtown Seattle data center (six-story)Seattle, WAn.a.proposedDigital Realty submitted a land-use permit application for a six-story data center in downtown Seattle at the end of May 2026, less than two weeks before the City Council approved the one-year moratorium on large data centers. The Seattle Department of Construction and Inspections says the proposal is vested to the previous regulations and is not subject to the moratorium. The street address was not given in the report.
Project Fighting Pike data center (southwest of U.S. Highway 2 and U.S. 85 Bypass)Williston, ND$10.0BannouncedCritical Data House originally said it would operate a $10 billion, 450-acre data center in Williston by January 2027. The Williston City Commission approved the subdivision plat on 25 March 2025, but the lot has sat vacant because the company has not obtained clear title: more than 1,100 investors, mainly in Malaysia and Singapore, put $18 million into an abandoned master planned community on the land and must be served under Hague Convention procedures. CEO Chris Hardin and local representative Dale Haugen told the Herald the project is still planned, with a 20 to 24 month build once title is in hand, and is not expected to be operational until late 2028 or early 2029.
Taylor Technology Campus (formerly Project Mustang), between FM 112 and U.S. 79Taylor (unincorporated, east of city limits), TXn.a.500proposedSouth Dakota-based Big Watt Digital LLC and Virginia-based PowerHouse Data Centers plan a data center campus with on-site gas generation on about 665 acres just east of Taylor. The City of Taylor announced the proposal and a negotiated voluntary annexation in early August 2026; after resident opposition and a 1,400-signature petition the developers withdrew the annexation and zoning application in early September 2026 and said the project would proceed in unincorporated Williamson County, where the city has no authority. On 2 October 2026 the city said it had reached a proposed agreement to annex the site, renamed Taylor Technology Campus, with standards on noise, water use, setbacks and community benefits; the City Council is set to vote on 8 October 2026. No incentives are offered. Reporting on 5 October 2026 put the campus at 500 MW of data center load with on-site power generation, with a possible further 500 MW for an unidentified tenant. A developer-commissioned RCLCO study projects $1.38 billion in gross tax revenue for Taylor over 20 years (2027 to 2046), about $4.8 billion in regional economic impact, 320 permanent jobs and $28.2 million in community benefit funding, including $13 million to the city and $12.7 million to Taylor ISD programs. The agreement sets 700-foot setbacks along FM 112, a 65 dB(A) noise limit at the property line and a closed-loop cooling system using reclaimed water. The developers do not yet own the site. No capital investment figure has been disclosed. The council vote is set for 8 October 2026. The Taylor Press reported on 5 October 2026 that the companies are co-creating a 500 MW data center with on-site generation, that developers cite a $4.8 billion regional economic impact (developer estimate, not capital) and that the City Council will vote on the new annexation and development agreement on 8 October 2026; the agreement includes 700-foot setbacks along FM 112. A resident coalition is in court seeking to put a data center permitting ban on the 3 November 2026 ballot.
Slate Belt Holdings data center campus (former River Pointe property)Upper Mount Bethel Township, PAn.a.2000proposedSlate Belt Holdings, a joint venture of Talen Energy and the team behind River Pointe Logistics Center, has proposed a hyperscale data center complex on the industrially zoned former River Pointe property in Upper Mount Bethel Township, bordered by Route 611, Potomac Street and River Road. No formal plan has been filed; a zoning validity challenge application shows 23 data center pads. On 25 August 2026, with more than 300 people attending, supervisors voted 2-3 against rejecting a memorandum of understanding that included a $50 million pledge tied to reaching two gigawatts, then tabled a revised MOU 3-2. On Monday 21 September 2026 the supervisors adopted the township's own ordinance making data centers a conditional use in the I-2 and I-3 districts with disclosure, noise, cooling and water standards, and rejected the ordinance proposed by Slate Belt Holdings. On Monday 28 September 2026 they discussed hiring an outside consultant to negotiate a community benefits agreement and tabled the matter. River Pointe has a separate open lawsuit against the township over the disbanded municipal authority.
Project Hercules data center campus (267 Industrial Park Lane)Appomattox, VA$3.0BapprovedAVAIO Digital plans a $3 billion data center campus, Project Hercules, on a 436-acre property about a mile north of the town of Appomattox. The Appomattox County Economic Development Authority reached an agreement with AVAIO in December 2024, and the by-right project needed no special approval or public hearing. On Monday 31 August 2026 the Board of Supervisors approved a performance agreement with the developer, with one supervisor opposed, in the face of resident opposition. An AVAIO subsidiary, ADP Appomattox Data Hub LLC, applied in April 2026 for a Virginia DEQ air permit for backup generators, with a decision scheduled by mid-December 2026. AVAIO says the site plan is approved and power from Dominion Energy will be energized in 2027. Cardinal News reported on 5 October 2026 that construction has not started but is expected by the end of the year, according to the county's economic development authority chair; the build is set to last about 10 years with at least 500 construction jobs and six or seven data centers. The county administrator said the site has 50 MW available now, DEQ has approved the stormwater plan, and attorneys are finalizing the performance agreement language. The town of Appomattox will supply up to 45,000 gallons a day of water and of wastewater service.
Infrakey hyperscale data center campus (Ross area, proposed Lacy Lakeview annexation)Near Ross, TX$10.0BproposedInfrakey and the City of Lacy Lakeview are pursuing a $10 billion hyperscale data center on a 520-acre site in the Ross area north of Waco, which Lacy Lakeview would annex through a three-mile corridor and which city officials say could bring $50 million a year in tax revenue. The plan relies on reclaimed wastewater for cooling, up to about 2 million gallons a day, and needs the cooperation of Waco, which owns the regional sewer system and holds water service rights to the site. Waco officials said they lacked basic information and some oppose the project; the engineering feasibility study was not complete as of May 2026. On 2 May 2026 Lacy Lakeview voters elected a data center opponent to the city council, and the incoming McLennan County judge said he would oppose tax abatements.
White Cloud Acres data center and co-located gas plant (U.S. Highway 71, south of Maryville)About eight miles south of Maryville, MO≥$6.3BproposedScale Microgrids, formerly ReLoad Energy, presented the White Cloud Acres project at an open house reported on 3 June 2026: an artificial intelligence data center and a co-located 600 MW natural gas plant along U.S. Highway 71 about eight miles south of Maryville. Project documents put the total investment at $6.3 billion over a 35-year useful life, with 445 local construction jobs and about 591 ongoing local jobs. No tenant has been announced. The developer's timeline showed permitting by the second quarter of 2027, construction from the fourth quarter of 2027 and operation by the fourth quarter of 2028. County commissioners approved a six-month data center moratorium on 21 July 2026, and the developer holds an option on the land but has not purchased it.
Keystone Data Center (265 Keystone Avenue)Reno, NVn.a.7under constructionCentra's 91,200-square-foot downtown data center at 265 Keystone Avenue was submitted in November 2024 and approved by the Reno Planning Commission in January 2025. The city lists planned use of 7 MW of power and 2 acre-feet of water a year. Building permits were issued and the project is under construction; Centra's website says it will be ready to deliver 4.4 MW in the fourth quarter of 2026. As an already permitted project it is not affected by the Reno citywide moratorium.
Webb Data Center (9710 and 9730 N. Virginia Street, North Valleys)Reno, NVn.a.28.5under constructionThe Webb Data Center application reached the City of Reno in October 2024. The 82,000-square-foot building was approved by the Planning Commission in December 2024, appealed to the City Council and upheld in January 2025. The city lists 28.5 MW of power and 2 acre-feet of water a year. Building permits were issued and the project is under construction; Colovore lists pre-leasing for the project from 2026 to 2027 on its website.
Oppidan Data Center (9630 N. Virginia Street, North Valleys)Reno, NVn.a.8under constructionThe Oppidan Data Center application was submitted in November 2024 and approved in March 2025. The 61,500-square-foot building sits on North Virginia Street near Stead Boulevard, down the street from the Webb Data Center. The city lists 8 MW of power and 8 acre-feet of water a year. Building permits were issued and the project is under construction; no opening date has been announced.
Hendricks Group data center campus and gas plant (Henderson Road, Fiore Property)Elizabeth Township, PAn.a.1000proposedRight-to-Know records obtained by Pittsburgh's Public Source show New Hope PA developer Tim Hendricks (Hendricks Group Developers) proposing a 1 GW, 3.7 million sq ft data center campus with a combined-cycle gas plant on a 549-acre former U.S. Steel landfill parcel on Henderson Road near the Youghiogheny River. No plans or permits have been filed; the township commission president disclosed the approach on 15 September 2026 and a town hall is set for 13 October 2026. Local group Protect Elizabeth Township and state Rep. Andrew Kuzma voiced opposition. Hendricks also has an agreement to buy 705 acres in Penn Forest Township for another data center.
Sagebrush Infrastructure Partners hyperscale campus land (west of Hallam)Hallam, NEn.a.proposedSagebrush Infrastructure Partners, acquired by Stark Power in June 2026, signed purchase agreements between December 2025 and March 2026 with at least 11 landowners covering 21 parcels (about 1,700 acres) in Hallam and Lancaster County jurisdictions, valued at about $10.35 million by the county assessor. Stark said it is exploring a data center there and no final decision has been made; it declined to give energy, client or cost details.
Project Bluestem hyperscale data centerTonganoxie, KSn.a.1200proposedCloverleaf Infrastructure first brought Project Bluestem to Leavenworth County commissioners in March 2026 and later resubmitted it with a larger footprint seeking up to 1.2 GW plus a new on-site gas power plant. Commissioners held a special meeting in Tonganoxie on 16 September 2026 to hear residents; three commissioners had earlier voted not to extend a county data center moratorium, and the planning commission advanced new data center regulations. Residents organized as Citizens Against Bluestem oppose the project over noise, water, air quality and proximity to schools.
CloudHQ Queretaro campus (six data centers)Queretaro, MX-Queretaro~$6.0B1000under constructionCloudHQ is building a campus of six data centers on 52 hectares in Queretaro, presented by the Mexican federal government in September 2025 as a $4.8 billion investment with power secured for the first 200 MW of up to 900 MW of load. In September 2026 CloudHQ's Mexico country head Luis Lugo said land conversion added about two years and electrical infrastructure about three years to the schedule, that the first 400 kV substation is finished and a second is 36 percent built, and that the campus could reach 920 MW. At a meeting with Governor Mauricio Kuri reported 4 to 5 October 2026, CloudHQ said it is raising the campus energy capacity from 250 MW to nearly 1,000 MW, fully at its own cost, and overall project financing from $4.8 billion to nearly $6 billion, with work on schedule.
ODATA QR03 campusEl Marques, MX-Queretaro$3.0B300operatingODATA, an Aligned Data Centers company, began building the QR03 hyperscale campus in El Marques, Queretaro, announced on 28 February 2024 as Mexico's largest data center campus at 150 MW. BNamericas reported in April 2026 that ODATA launched the first phase in 2025 and that at completion QR03 will have five buildings, 300 MW of IT capacity and investment above $3 billion.
ODATA QR04San Miguel de Allende (near), MX-Guanajuaton.a.24announcedThree months after QR03 entered operation, ODATA announced QR04, a hyperscale data center near San Miguel de Allende, about 70 km from Queretaro, designed for cloud and AI demand with 24 MW of total IT capacity (BNamericas, April 2026).
KIO MEX8Mexico City, MX-Ciudad de Mexico$70M4under constructionKIO announced construction of MEX8, a new Mexico City data center with a $70 million investment adding 4 MW and an expected 3,000 jobs during construction. KIO also inaugurated QRO2 in Queretaro at the end of 2025, bringing its installed capacity in the state to almost 19 MW (BNamericas, April 2026).
Equinix MO2 MonterreyMonterrey, MX-Nuevo Leon$250MoperatingEquinix opened its MO2 data center in Monterrey in October 2025 with an initial $81 million first phase and total planned funding of $250 million, and is also expanding MX2 in the Mexico City region (BNamericas, April 2026).
Scala SMEXTP01Tepotzotlan, MX-Mexico~$80MannouncedScala Data Centers announced in 2023 its first Mexican data center site, SMEXTP01 in Tepotzotlan, with an initial investment of about $80 million (BNamericas, April 2026).
Wonder Valley AlbertaGrande Prairie (near), Albertan.a.7500proposedO'Leary Digital is permitting Wonder Valley Alberta, a powered compute campus in the Greenview Industrial Gateway near Grande Prairie planned for 7.5 GW of power generation with phased powered buildings. In a 17 February 2026 release it said permitting was under way, that it controls about 26,000 acres across Alberta and Utah under a 15 GW plan, and that no construction timeline or anchor tenant had been set. A First Nation's judicial review of the project's water licence is recorded in at_risk (Wonder Valley AI data centre water licence judicial review).
Beltline Energy Yukon data centerYukon, OK$1.0BproposedAtlanta-based renewable developer Beltline Energy is pursuing a $1 billion hyperscale data center on 184 acres along Route 66 just west of Yukon's commercial center, land the City of Yukon sold to it after a 4-1 council vote in August 2025, months after a former city manager signed a non-disclosure agreement for the city. The mayor says the project would bring the city $8 million to $12 million a year. The deal prompted a recall petition against Mayor Brian Pillmore and former Vice Mayor Jeff Wooten in June 2026, the vice mayor's resignation, and certification of the mayoral recall petition (more than 1,449 signatures) announced Tuesday 4 August 2026. Beltline Energy is also pursuing data center projects in Piedmont and Luther.
Project Indo (218 Industrial Park Road)Cartersville, GA~$2.4B200proposedThe City of Cartersville filed a Development of Regional Impact for Project Indo, developer DataBank Holdings Ltd, on 19 June 2026: a data center of about 200 MW of critical IT load with about 1.1 million sq ft of floor area on about 69 acres at 218 Industrial Park Road (parcel C059-0001-001). The filing estimates a build-out value of $2.4 billion, about $23 million a year in local tax revenue and about 60 full-time jobs. The Coosa Valley Regional Commission issued its finding on 15 July 2026 and the DRI review is marked completed. The filing does not state the local approval sought or a schedule.
Wallace Jackson Data Center Campus (I-75)Spalding County, GA$3.6BapprovedSpalding County filed a Development of Regional Impact (DRI 4599) on 6 January 2026 for the Wallace Jackson Data Center Campus: 10 data center buildings totaling 4,986,000 sq ft on about 189.64 acres in Land Lots 25 and 40 of the 2nd District, with an estimated build-out value of $3.65 billion and about $51.7 million a year in estimated local tax revenue. On Thursday 22 January 2026 the Spalding County Board of Commissioners unanimously approved the campus along Interstate 75, which FOX 5 Atlanta reported as a $3.9 billion project, over residents' objections about pollution and the loss of farmland.
ATL2 East (west of Veterans Parkway)Fayetteville, GA~$3.0BproposedThe City of Fayetteville filed a Development of Regional Impact (DRI 4603) on 13 January 2026 for ATL2 East, developer QTS Eastwood, LLC: an approximately 2 million sq ft data center west of Veterans Parkway on about 313 acres, with an estimated build-out value of $3 billion, about $29 million a year in local tax revenue and about 100 jobs. The Atlanta Regional Commission review was completed with a projected completion date of 24 April 2026. The filing does not state a power load (TBD, dependent on customer usage). It is separate from the existing QTS Fayetteville campus record (qts-fayetteville-ga, Project Odyssey buildings DC1-2); the filing does not say whether it is an expansion of that campus.
Project Arrowhead data center campusIrwin County, GA~$6.0B1250proposedIrwin County filed a Development of Regional Impact (DRI 4689) on 10 April 2026 for Project Arrowhead, developer Premier Data Center Development, LLC: a data center campus on five properties totaling about 1,066 acres with about 4.22 million sq ft, an estimated peak connected load of 1,250 MW served by Georgia Power, an estimated build-out value of $6 billion, about $20 million a year in local tax revenue and about 200 jobs. The South Georgia Regional Commission review is marked completed (projected completion 20 May 2026). No local approval is recorded in the filing.
Project Azelea (Randall Hunt Road)Thomson, GA~$1.0B400proposedMcDuffie County filed a Development of Regional Impact (DRI 4602) on 10 January 2026 for Project Azelea, a six-building data center on about 200 acres at 2660 to 2358 Randall Hunt Road, Thomson. The filing lists an estimated peak connected load of 400 MW from Jefferson Energy, an estimated build-out value of $1 billion, about $25 million a year in local tax revenue and about 125 jobs. The Central Savannah River Area Regional Commission review is marked completed (projected completion 26 February 2026). The applicant is listed as an individual; no corporate developer is named.
Scale Datacenter campus (former Chesapeake Energy campus)Oklahoma City, OKn.a.operatingScale Datacenter, launched about two years earlier, is reusing buildings on the former Chesapeake Energy campus in Oklahoma City for its data center operations. CEO Trevor Francis told an Oklahoma legislative interim study in late September 2026 that the company is building a 100 MW power plant in the heart of Oklahoma City designed to be inconspicuous, and that it employs 450 people and is also building a facility in southeast Oklahoma. Oklahoma's Senate Bill 480 authorizes large loads to build their own generation.
Prometheus Hyperscale data center campus (Falls Ranch, south of Interstate 25)near Evansville, WYn.a.1500proposedPrometheus Hyperscale founder Trenton Thornock pitched a 1.5 GW data center campus on about 940 acres of the Falls Ranch, owned by Russell Gordy, south of Interstate 25 with access planned from a new I-25 interchange west of Big Muddy Creek, and asked Natrona County for an industrial park zoning designation that would bypass review by the Wyoming Industrial Siting Council. On Tuesday 6 October 2026 commissioners reviewed 15 draft conditional use permit conditions modeled on Uinta County, where Prometheus has a permitted campus; Commissioner Peter Nicolaysen said he will recuse himself because the site borders family property. Residents and conservation groups have objected to generator noise, air pollution, water use and the bypass of state review. No vote has been taken.
Prometheus Hyperscale flagship campus near Evanstonnear Evanston, WYn.a.1250approvedThe Uinta County Board of Commissioners unanimously approved a conditional use permit on 16 June 2026 for Prometheus Hyperscale's flagship data center campus near Evanston, a 506-acre site designed for 1.25 GW of initial capacity with a path to 5 GW. On 15 September 2026 the commissioners approved a separate conditional use permit for the independent power production facility, which the June permit did not cover, and rezoned a 644-acre subdivision with access from County Road 180 from agricultural to business industrial. Bernard Looney was named Prometheus Hyperscale chief executive in March 2026.
Lost Cabin data center (67 Lost Cabin Road, Lysite area)Lysite (Lost Cabin), WYn.a.under constructionA small prototype data center has been built at Lost Cabin in Fremont County, on a parcel listed to Contango Resources, whose Wyoming assets Aethel Energy acquired in 2025. County Planning Director Steve Baumann toured the building, which has state fire marshal approval and a Wyoming DEQ air quality approval for its backup generators, and said the developer hopes to build several buildings in phased campuses powered by about 500 MW of on-site gas generation, which would likely require Industrial Siting Council approval. Commission Chair Larry Allen said the planned project would total $66 billion. Fremont County has no zoning and limited control over the project; commissioners discussed whether to adopt regulations.
Telus sovereign AI data centre cluster (Kamloops expansion; former Hootsuite HQ, Mount Pleasant; 150 West Georgia Street)Vancouver and Kamloops, British Columbian.a.150under constructionOn 11 May 2026 federal AI Minister Evan Solomon and Telus announced a sovereign AI data centre cluster that expands Telus's existing Kamloops facility and adds two Vancouver data centres: one at the former Hootsuite headquarters in Mount Pleasant and a second at 150 West Georgia Street planned for 2029. Telus said the Kamloops expansion and the Mount Pleasant site would come online later in 2026, starting at 85 MW and scaling to 150 MW by 2032, with 90 percent less water use than a conventional data centre. A Vancouver council motion for a regulatory framework covering the Telus downtown and Mount Pleasant sites was defeated on 15 July 2026 (at_risk 486).
5C MEM01 data center (former Fred's headquarters, 4300 Getwell Road)Memphis, TN≥$575Munder constructionOhio-based AI infrastructure developer 5C Group, through 5C MEM01, bought the former Fred's Inc. corporate headquarters at 4300 Getwell Road in Memphis to convert it into a data center. On Monday 5 October 2026 5C MEM01 filed a $575 million permit with the Memphis and Shelby County Division of Planning and Development for the fourth phase, one day before the City Council was to vote on a data center moratorium (the vote was postponed to 20 October 2026). In 2025 an official said the project would create more than 250 jobs with an investment of more than $500 million. The company did not seek tax incentives, per the Daily Memphian.
Childersburg Industrial Park data center (former Alabama Ordnance Works site)Childersburg, AL≥$6.0B500proposedIn January 2026 the Childersburg City Council unanimously approved a zoning change allowing data centers in a planned unit development, and Mayor Ken Wesson described a $6 billion project with a 500 MW data center on industrial park land, with a purchase service agreement for 486 acres at about $17 million (agreement in principle). On 6 October 2026, acting as the Childersburg Land Redevelopment Authority, the council voted to surplus 1,337.10 acres in the Industrial Park to Old Town #109, LLC under a purchase and sale agreement (Resolution 2025-26). WHP's Wes Self said the company has invested over $2 million in due diligence and $6 million with Alabama Power; less than 10 percent of the land will house the data center, with about 1,000 construction jobs and more than 300 permanent jobs. The developer name WHP has not been publicly expanded by the company.
Flexential Henderson Grove Church Road data centerSalisbury, NCn.a.55approvedThe Salisbury City Council unanimously approved the conditional district rezoning for a 296,000 sq ft data storage facility at 1477 Henderson Grove Church Road on about 95 acres on Tuesday 6 October 2026. Trammell Crow owns the property and Flexential is the developer; the multi-tenant facility requests 55 MW, which would be the largest in Flexential's published portfolio. Conditions cap power at 60 MW and set noise (65 dB, quarterly inspections), setback and cooling limits. The rezoning application was filed 30 April 2026 after a June 2026 text amendment creating data storage facility standards. The developers said it is not a hyperscale AI data center.
Cook Inlet Subsea-Compute and Infrastructure Hub (East Foreland corridor)Offshore Nikiski (landing in the Nikiski industrial corridor), AKn.a.100proposedDeepGreen Cook Inlet SPV LLC applied to FERC for a preliminary permit on 11 February 2026 (supplemented 26 June 2026) to study a tidal energy and underwater computing development in Upper Cook Inlet; FERC published notice accepting the application on 4 September 2026, opening public comment and competing applications. The plan places about 330 to 350 marine hydrokinetic turbines alongside 66 modular data center pods cooled passively by seawater. The Alaska Energy Authority said it would intervene and oppose, and fishing and wildlife groups have raised concerns. A preliminary permit does not authorize construction. DeepGreen's separate Western Passage project in Maine is at_risk row 141.
Project Catalyst data center (across from Osawatomie State Hospital)Osawatomie, KS~$10.0B500proposedAlcove Development proposes Project Catalyst, a data center in Osawatomie that has grown from 115 acres to 283 acres, directly across the street from the state-run Osawatomie State Hospital. The city amended its pre-development agreement to cut expected water use from 1 million to 800,000 gallons a day, reduce city-supplied power from 50 to 150 MW to 0 MW, and remove Industrial Revenue Bonds and a property tax abatement of up to 50 percent. MDH Partners said the project could use 500 MW and yield the city about $30 million a year. Miami County's three-year moratorium in unincorporated areas (row 727) excludes the in-city site. KDADS has said there is no plan to close or relocate the hospital.

Financing transactions — reits & developers

TimingPartiesInstrumentAmountDetailSources
not dated in sourceRealty Income · Digital Realtyjv equity$200MRealty Income and Digital Realty formed a Northern Virginia build-to-suit JV covering two data centers, initially 16 MW expandable to 48 MW.
June 29, 2026Digital Realty · Blackstoneacquisition$3.5BDigital Realty purchased Blackstone's 64% blended interest in three Northern Virginia data centers totaling 288 MW for $3.5B, unwinding the 2023 JV.
established December 2024Digital Realtyequity raise$3.0BA $3.0B at-the-market equity agreement established in December 2024, with $1.1B issued during 2025.
established May 2026Digital Realtyequity raise~$7.5BA new $7.5B at-the-market equity program established in May 2026.
as of Q2 2025 reportingDigital Realty · LP investorsequity raise~$3.0BDigital Realty's US Hyperscale Fund raised $3B of LP equity supporting roughly $10B of development capacity.
agreement announced; as of 2025 Analyst Day $15B planned, ~$6B investedEquinix · GIC · CPP Investmentsjv equity$15.0BEquinix agreed to form a greater-than-$15B xScale joint venture with GIC and CPP Investments targeting more than 1.5 GW in the United States, with 750+ MW committed as of the 2025 Analyst Day.
completed; Reuters dated January 15, 2025Aligned Data Centers · Macquarie Asset Management · Patrizia · CenterSquareother≥$12.0BAligned completed a $12B+ capital raise supporting 5+ GW across the Americas; Patrizia and CenterSquare are additional investors.
2025CyrusOneproject bond$575MThe 2025-1 ABS raised $575M against 13 data centers with $4.4B of appraised value.
not dated in sourceDataBankother$2.0BDataBank raised $2B of funding to support 850 MW, allocated Dallas 480 MW, Culpeper, VA 192 MW, and Atlanta 120 MW.
maturing 2050Compass Datacenters · Wilmington Trust · KeyBankdebt facility$326MCompass closed a $326M refinancing on five Red Oak, Texas facilities with Wilmington Trust and KeyBank, across 5 data centers and 180 MW.
September 2024Sixth Street · EQT · EdgeConneXequity raisen.a.Sixth Street took a minority strategic stake in EdgeConneX in September 2024.
not dated in sourceSTACK Infrastructuredebt facility$900MSTACK's NVA05 campus in Manassas at 200 MW is financed by a $900M facility.
not dated in sourceNovva Data Centers · JPMorgan · Starwooddebt facility$2.0BNovva secured $2B of financing led by JPMorgan with Starwood participation for a 175 MW West Jordan, Utah campus.
earlier than the $2B financingNovva Data Centers · CIM Groupequity raise$355MAn earlier $355M CIM Group equity round backed Novva's national expansion.
closing December 30H5 Data Centers · Yahooacquisition~$49MH5 acquired Yahoo's Lockport, New York facility in a sale-leaseback estimated at $49M, with Yahoo signing a five-year lease.
June 23, 2022H5 Data Centersacquisitionn.a.H5 acquired the 225,000 sq ft, 18-floor 505 Marquette Hotel in Albuquerque, New Mexico.
WSJ coverage dated 2022Cologix · Stonepeakequity raise$3.0BCologix was recapitalized by Stonepeak at a $3.0B equity value via a single-asset continuation vehicle.
2017Stonepeak · Cologixequity raise$500MStonepeak's initial 2017 investment in Cologix was $500M, when the platform had 24 data centers in nine markets including Montreal, Toronto and Vancouver.
July 2026Cologix · new and existing investorsother$1.5BCologix raised $1.5B in July 2026, a $1B multi-asset development debt facility plus $500M of equity, across a 40+ data center platform.
August 20-21, 2025Flexential · GI Partners · GI Data Infrastructure · Hamilton Laneequity raise~$1.0BFlexential raised approximately $1B of primary equity via a GI Partners continuation vehicle and a GI Data Infrastructure strategic investment.
October 2024Morgan Stanley Infrastructure Partners · GI Partners · Flexentialequity raisen.a.Morgan Stanley Infrastructure Partners joined GI Partners as co-control investor in Flexential in October 2024, when Flexential held more than 40 data centers and 325 MW built and under development.
Closed 27 May 2026Rowan Digital Infrastructuredebt facility$3.0BRowan Digital Infrastructure closed nearly $3 billion of debt financing to support construction of its 300 MW turnkey hyperscale campus in Temple, Texas, under a Green Finance Framework rated Strong by Morningstar Sustainalytics. Lenders and arrangers were not named in the release.
Announced 30 June 2026Realty Income · Cloud Capital · unnamed global institutional investorjv equity≥$1.4BRealty Income formed a programmatic joint venture with Cloud Capital and an unnamed global institutional investor to invest in hyperscale data centers. Realty Income is acquiring a 45% equity stake in a three-asset Northern Virginia portfolio let to investment-grade hyperscale tenants on 15 to 20 year triple-net leases with annual rent escalators. Tenants were not disclosed.
Announced 18 December 2024Oklo · Switchppan.a.Oklo and data center developer Switch signed a non-binding master power agreement to deploy 12 GW of Oklo Aurora powerhouse projects through 2044, described at announcement as one of the largest corporate clean power agreements signed. The agreement is a framework, with individual binding agreements expected as project milestones are reached.
Lease signed 7 August 2026; disclosed at merger close 17 September 2026Host Digital Inc. (formerly Healthy Choice Wellness Corp.) · Host Digital Infrastructure LLC · unnamed privately held cloud infrastructure company (tenant)lease≥$1.2BHost Digital Infrastructure LLC signed a 15-year take-or-pay lease on 7 August 2026 with one of the world's largest privately held cloud infrastructure companies for 43 MW of critical IT load at a planned 45+ MW campus in Northeast Oklahoma, expected to be backstopped by an investment-grade technology company, with renewals to a 30-year total term and delivery expected in the first quarter of 2027. On 17 September 2026 Healthy Choice Wellness Corp. completed its merger with Host Digital Infrastructure LLC, renamed itself Host Digital Inc. and began trading as HOST on NYSE American on 18 September 2026. A preliminary prospectus supplement filed 17 September 2026 proposed a $17.5 million Class A share offering, not yet priced, and described a possible second Northeast Oklahoma site under a 12-year lease for about 16 MW (about $391 million base-term rent) that is not under contract. Project financing had not closed. Host Digital Inc. priced its underwritten offering of 2,187,500 Class A shares at $8.00 per share on 17 September 2026 and completed it on 21 September 2026 for gross proceeds of about $17.5 million, with Cantor Fitzgerald as lead book running manager; the company plans to use the net proceeds for data center investments and general corporate purposes without naming a project.
Backfill (not previously recorded). Priced 11 August 2026 (company Form 10-K)Zone Frontier Inc. (formerly CleanCore Solutions)equity raise$100MZone Frontier says it raised $100 million in August 2026 to fund its equity commitment to the Minnesota data center project leased to Cerebras. The company also closed on a West Texas campus on 9 July 2026 with development partner HST Technologies, planned for an initial 200 MW of critical IT load by early 2029 and potential expansion above 500 MW by 2030.
Backfill (not previously recorded). Business Combination Agreement signed 19 November 2025 and amended six times in 2026; closing assumed for November 2026 in the company's investor presentationBlockfusion USA, Inc. · Blue Acquisition Corp. · Blockfusion Digital Infrastructure, Inc. (Pubco)othern.a.Blockfusion, owner of the Niagara Falls, New York campus leased to CoreWeave, plans to go public through a business combination with the SPAC Blue Acquisition Corp. The latest amendment raises the earnout to up to 15 million shares at $13, $15 and $17 price thresholds and excludes a CoreWeave warrant for 2,786,624 Blockfusion shares from certain calculations. The investor presentation models about $200 million of proceeds to Blockfusion from $100 million of financing plus retained trust cash, which is an assumption, not a commitment.
Announced by Mapletree Industrial Trust's manager 29 September 2026; acquisition announced as completed by DataBank 1 October 2026DataBank Properties · Mapletree Industrial Trustacquisition~$10MDataBank, the sole tenant, exercised its option under a 2014 lease to buy the single-storey data center at 3255 Neil Armstrong Boulevard, Eagan, Minnesota (about 87,402 sq ft on about 343,253 sq ft of freehold land, completed 1998). Mapletree bought the building in July 2021 as part of a 29-property US data center portfolio and says net proceeds may repay debt. DataBank announced on 1 October 2026 that it has acquired the building, which houses its MSP2 data center and was previously leased; the release gives no price.
Announced 23 September 2026 (2G Energy release via PR Newswire and EQS disclosure); deliveries scheduled from the fourth quarter of 2027 to the third quarter of 2028Energy Vault Holdings · 2G Energy AGequipment ordern.a.Energy Vault ordered 275 MW of plug-and-play containerized power generation systems from 2G Energy for its powered land and powered shell AI energy infrastructure in the United States, aimed at AI and data center customers including hyperscalers. The units will be built and tested in Heek, Germany and serve as the dispatchable generation layer alongside Energy Vault's battery storage and controls. No project site is named.
Announced 1 October 2026 (Enerflex release, furnished on Form 6-K)Enerflex Ltd. · Unnamed North American data center developerequipment ordern.a.Enerflex Ltd. said on 1 October 2026 that it has been contracted to design, engineer, fabricate and assemble approximately 450 MW of behind-the-meter natural gas-fired power generation units for a North American data center developer, which it did not name. The project runs through Enerflex's North American manufacturing operations, with deliveries scheduled to begin in 2027 and finish in 2028. No contract value was disclosed. Enerflex separately authorized about $85 million of investment in its Engineered Systems facilities, mostly in 2027, which is the supplier's own capital spending and not the contract value.
Announced 22 June 2026 (company release)Digital Realty · Seller not disclosedacquisition~$475MDigital Realty announced the purchase of about 1,440 acres at Astra Enterprise Park near Kansas City for $475 million, a powered land site it said would support 600 MW by early 2028 and 2 GW at full delivery. The three transactions announced that day were funded mainly by issuing 6.3 million common shares and operating partnership units at a weighted average of $197.54. The release does not name the seller or state a closing date.
Asset purchase agreement dated 27 February 2026; completion announced 2 March 2026 (company release)Carrier Connect Data Solutions · PureColo Inc. · Carbon60 Operating Co.acquisitionn.a.Carrier Connect Data Solutions, through its subsidiary PureColo Inc., completed the purchase of the principal business assets of the Saint John, New Brunswick data center operation from Carbon60 Operating Co. The company said the deal brought it to five data centers under management, with markets in Vancouver, Ottawa and Saint John.
Definitive agreement announced 9 June 2026 (company release); closing was expected 15 August 2026 and has not been confirmedCarrier Connect Data Solutions · PureColo Inc. · Rochester Colo, LLCacquisition≥$250KCarrier Connect Data Solutions, through its subsidiary PureColo Inc., signed a definitive agreement to acquire the data center business assets of Rochester Colo, LLC, a carrier-neutral colocation facility in Rochester, New York. The company described it as its first US data center and its sixth overall, generating about C$885,000 of annual recurring revenue with more than 60% of capacity available. Closing was subject to TSX Venture Exchange acceptance.
Priced 28 September 2026; closed 6 October 2026 (Form 8-K and closing release filed 6 October 2026)Digital Realty · Digital Constellation B.V.senior notesn.a.Digital Realty finance subsidiary Digital Constellation B.V. priced three tranches of guaranteed Swiss franc notes, guaranteed by Digital Realty Trust, its operating partnership and Interxion holding company Digital Intrepid Holding B.V. Proceeds are to temporarily repay global revolving credit facility borrowings, acquire properties or businesses, fund development and for general corporate purposes. Digital Realty announced on 6 October 2026 that Digital Constellation B.V. closed the CHF 510 million offering; it said an amount equal to net proceeds is to be allocated to projects under its Green Bond Framework, including development and redevelopment.
Offering commenced and priced 6 October 2026 (Form 8-K filed 6 October 2026); closing expected 9 October 2026Digital Realty · Digital Euro Finco, LLCsenior notesn.a.Digital Euro Finco, LLC, a Digital Realty finance subsidiary, commenced a Regulation S offering of euro-denominated guaranteed notes, guaranteed by Digital Realty Trust and its operating partnership. An amount equal to net proceeds is to be allocated to eligible green projects, including green building development and redevelopment; pending allocation, proceeds may repay global revolving credit borrowings or fund acquisitions and development. On 6 October 2026 Digital Realty announced pricing of EUR 1 billion of 5.125% Guaranteed Notes due 2036 at 99.289%, with closing expected 9 October 2026; the notes are sold outside the United States under Regulation S.
Announced 10 February 2025 (cited as 'yesterday' in Energy Transfer's fourth quarter 2024 results of 11 February 2025)Energy Transfer · CloudBurst Data Centerspower supply agreementn.a.Energy Transfer entered a long-term agreement to supply natural gas through its Oasis Pipeline to CloudBurst's flagship AI-focused Next-Gen Data Center campus in central Texas, subject to CloudBurst reaching a final investment decision with its customer.
Closing announced 14 April 2026 (Switch release via PR Newswire)Switchabs~$768MSwitch closed its Series 2026-1 asset-backed securities offering, adding a Reno, Nevada data center of about 1.4 million square feet and more than 52 MW to its master trust, which now holds 11 data centers across five US markets. Net proceeds repay existing debt and fund general corporate purposes. Switch said it has raised about $4.2 billion through five ABS issuances since 2024, all secured green bonds.
Announced 24 September 2025 (DataBank release via PR Newswire)DataBankabs$1.1BDataBank issued $1.1 billion of secured notes into a new master trust, its first for hyperscale facilities and fifth securitization since 2021, bringing its securitized portfolio to $3.23 billion. Proceeds refinance construction loans on its ATL4, IAD3 and LGA3 facilities, which are leased almost entirely to hyperscale and emerging hyperscale providers, and fund further US development.
Issued February 2024 (as stated in DataBank's release of 24 September 2025)DataBankabs$456MDataBank completed a $456 million green bond securitization in February 2024, its fourth securitization after issues of $658 million (March 2021), $330 million (October 2021) and $715 million (March 2023).
Incentive agreement approved by Aurora City Council in October 2025; reported 29 September 2026 (single outlet, Sentinel Colorado)NTT Global Data Centers · City of Auroraother≥$14MAurora City Council approved an incentive agreement in October 2025 for a planned NTT Global Data Centers facility of about 300,000 sq ft on a 76-acre site in the Aerotropolis Logistics Center. NTT has not submitted a development application, and the city could not confirm that NTT is part of the separate Aerotropolis Logistics Center data center plan filed in 2026 (aerotropolis-logistics-center-aurora-co). New city data center rules could apply because neither project has been accepted for review.
Purchase agreement signed September 2026 per property records; reported Sunday 4 October 2026 (Lincoln Journal Star); single outlet fetchedCoffee Grounds Data LLC (signed by Arevia Power's Ricardo Graf) · Larry Coffey (landowner)acquisition~$3MCoffee Grounds Data LLC, a Delaware entity whose agreement was signed by Arevia Power chief development officer Ricardo Graf, agreed in September 2026 to a purchase agreement for about 560 acres off U.S. 34 and Nebraska 79 northwest of Lincoln in Lancaster County. Arevia, through its Rhea Data subsidiary, has proposed a 600 MW data center on public land in Idaho. The landowner confirmed he optioned the land for a data center. No data center application or MW figure has been filed. Lancaster County has formed a 13-member data center task force to review a proposed moratorium.
Definitive agreement announced 8 June 2026 (Stark Power release)Stark Power Ltd. (TASE: STRK) · Sagebrush Infrastructure Partners, LLCacquisitionn.a.Israel-based Stark Power agreed to acquire 100% of Sagebrush Infrastructure Partners, a developer of hyperscale data centers with co-located natural gas power plants. Sagebrush's portfolio is five hyperscale campuses in active development across the Central U.S. totaling about 5.6 GW of IT capacity, anchored by Sagebrush 1, which Stark says has a phased pathway to more than 1.5 GW of IT capacity.
Announced Monday 5 October 2026 (Wartsila release); order booked in Q3 2026Wartsila · Unnamed major US independent power producerequipment ordern.a.Wartsila will supply a 282 MW onsite power plant of 15 Wartsila 50SG engines for a data center project being developed by a major US independent power producer. Equipment delivery is scheduled for 2028 and full operation for 2029. Wartsila said it is its seventh US data center related order, taking capacity sold for US data center applications above 3 GW.
Announced 29 June 2026; expected to be booked by Wartsila in Q3 2026Liberty Energy · Wartsilaequipment ordern.a.Denver-based Liberty Energy placed a EUR 292 million order for Wartsila 34SG natural gas engines for a power plant supplying large-scale data center development in the US, as part of Liberty's integrated power platform. Equipment delivery to site is scheduled to begin in 2029 and continue through 2030.
MSA previously disclosed by the company; potential contract value restated in the company release of Monday 5 October 2026Hyperscale Data (Sentinum) · Undisclosed California-based neocloud providercompute leasen.a.Master services agreement with an undisclosed California-based neocloud for an initial 20 MW of critical AI compute capacity at Hyperscale Data's Michigan campus in Dowagiac, with rights to a further 32 MW (52 MW total). On 5 October 2026 the company said it will hold an investor day on 12 November 2026 to discuss the campus and strategic alternatives, including a possible sale of the Michigan campus or an IPO of its Sentinum subsidiary, and reiterated 2027 guidance of $300 million to $350 million in revenue.
Backfill (not previously recorded). Announced 9 August 2026 (HD Hyundai release via PR Newswire)HD Hyundai Heavy Industries · Corban Energy Groupequipment order$674MHD Hyundai Heavy Industries signed a $673.8 million contract with US energy infrastructure developer Corban Energy Group to supply power generation systems built on its 9.6 MW HiMSEN medium-speed engines, totaling 1,000 MW, to power data centers operated by a major US technology company, which was not named. It is the company's largest-ever power generation engine order. HD Hyundai said it had earlier signed a $425 million agreement in April 2026 with US developer AEG to supply data center power generation equipment.
Backfill (not previously recorded). Announced 7 April 2026 (Stark Power release via PR Newswire)Stark Power · Alpha Opportunities Fund · Harel Insurance · Phoenix Insurance Company · More Investment House · Noked Capital · Arkin Capitalequity raise~$45MTel Aviv-listed Stark Power, a US-focused energy infrastructure and data center development company, secured commitments of about NIS 215 million (about $70 million) in its inaugural equity raise from Israeli institutions, comprising about NIS 140 million of shares plus short-term warrants at NIS 7.50 that expired at the start of the fourth quarter of 2026, and long-term warrants at NIS 10.00 through 1 October 2029. Proceeds go to its US strategy at the intersection of power infrastructure and large-scale data center development.
Backfill (not previously recorded). Announced 15 July 2026 (Stark Power release via PR Newswire); subject to shareholder approvalStark Power · Migdal Insurance · Mor Investment House · Harel Insuranceequity raise~$21MStark Power announced an equity raise of up to about NIS 146 million (about $48 million) anchored by Migdal Insurance (about NIS 40 million), with existing holders participating. Proceeds follow its acquisition of Sagebrush Infrastructure Partners, which is advancing five hyperscale data center campuses in the US Midwest totaling about 5.6 GW with co-located generation, and are expected to be used primarily to fund power generation assets complementary to that data center portfolio.
Backfill (not previously recorded). Agreement disclosed in a Form 8-K filed 4 August 2026; closed 8 September 2026 (Form 8-K filed 14 September 2026)Z Squared Inc. · Paradox Infrastructure LLC · Paradox Energy LLCacquisition$5MNasdaq-listed Z Squared completed its acquisition of Paradox Data LLC, whose principal asset is the Union County Campus in El Dorado, Arkansas: about three acres with an existing building, a contract to buy about 10 adjacent acres, and rights under a Power Access Agreement to an interruptible Entergy Arkansas service agreement of up to about 8 MW (assignment requires Entergy's consent, not yet obtained). Z Squared plans up to about 150 MW of AI-ready colocation capacity over time from utility power and on-site generation, subject to new power arrangements, customers, financing and permits. The seller's bitcoin mining continues temporarily under a lease. Z Squared's CTO holds an indirect minority interest in the seller, so the deal was approved as a related person transaction.
Announced 30 September 2026 (Latitude Media); single outlet fetchedVirtus Solis Technologies · Brae Systemsppan.a.Michigan-based Virtus Solis Technologies signed a 20-year power purchase agreement to supply startup Brae Systems with 100 MW of space-based solar power beamed by radio waves to a receiver station in Illinois, where Brae plans to submerge its first data centers in the cooling ponds of a retiring coal-fired power plant and use the power behind the meter. Virtus Solis expects first power around 2030; the agreement carries technical and financial milestones on both sides, including a 100 kW pilot in orbit within 24 months and project financing for the first 100 MW plant. Neither company has demonstrated the technology at commercial scale. Some outlets reported the deal as 250 MW, which is the option ceiling.
Backfill (not previously recorded). Disclosed with BCE's Q2 2026 results; reported 9 August 2026 (Pulse 2.0)BCE (Bell Canada)capex guidancen.a.BCE said 2026 capex will increase by about $1.3 billion over 2025, primarily because of construction of Bell AI Fabric's 300 MW data center in Saskatchewan, and guided free cash flow of $2.1 billion to $2.3 billion. Q2 2026 capex rose 41.5% year over year to $1.08 billion, reflecting Bell AI Fabric data center investment in Canada plus $163 million of US investment in Ziply Fiber. BCE also cited progress on the Bell AI Fabric expansion in Merritt, British Columbia.
CEO remarks to an Oklahoma legislative interim study in late September 2026; DEQ air permit applications filed September 2026; single outlet (KGOU/StateImpact)Scale Datacenterothern.a.Scale Datacenter CEO Trevor Francis told Oklahoma lawmakers in late September 2026 that the company is building a 100 MW power plant in the heart of Oklahoma City to run its data center facilities behind the meter, using generators imported from decommissioned power plants in Bulgaria. The company submitted air quality permit applications for the natural gas units to the Oklahoma DEQ in September 2026, which is conducting a technical review. Francis said the company employs 450 people and is also building a facility in southeast Oklahoma.
08

Market intelligence

The firms that measure the market. Their vacancy, absorption, and deal-volume series are the market statistics this atlas cites, and they do not all measure the same universe.

9entities 2named sites 4transactions 26recorded facts

JLLFull profile →

Financingbrokerage research and advisory, no principal capital position stated

JLL's brokerage research tracks North American colocation supply and vacancy across 2025 and 2026. Its Midyear 2025 report put inventory at 15.5 GW with record-low 2.3% vacancy, its Year-End 2025 report tracked 39 GW of active capacity at 1% vacancy with a 35 GW construction pipeline, and its Midyear 2026 update held vacancy at 1% for a third consecutive year with more than 66 GW under construction. JLL frames the market as one where new demand cannot be served for roughly three years, with most tenants contracting for 2028 deliveries.

Record
  • JLL's Midyear 2025 report put North American colocation inventory at 15.5 GW, vacancy at a record-low 2.3% (down from 3.0%), with 2.2 GW of H1 absorption, 1.6 GW of completions, 7.8 GW under construction at 73% preleased, and a 31.6 GW planned pipeline.
  • At Year-End 2025 JLL tracked 39 GW of active North American capacity, roughly half leased and half hyperscaler-owned, vacancy at 1% for a second consecutive year, and a 35 GW construction pipeline of which 64% sits outside traditional mature markets.
  • At Midyear 2026 JLL reported vacancy held at 1% for a third consecutive year, likely to remain near zero through 2028, with more than 66 GW under construction and available capacity limited to small, fragmented blocks, with most tenants contracting for 2028 deliveries.
  • The atlas describes JLL's Midyear 2026 framing as the closest thing in the brokerage record to explicit frozen pipeline language, a market where new demand cannot be served for roughly three years.
  • The four firms differ on vacancy because they define inventory differently: CBRE's 1.6% (H1 2025) and JLL's 2.3% cover colocation in primary or tracked markets, while Cushman's 4.2% covers a broader 43.4 GW Americas base including secondary markets. All four converge on the same conclusion: pre-commitment rates of 73% to 89% mean the pipeline is functionally sold before it is built, so any delay converts directly into unserved contracted demand.

CBREFull profile →

Financingbrokerage research and advisory, no principal capital position stated

CBRE's H1 2025 research reported record primary-market supply of 8,155 MW alongside a record-low 1.6% vacancy, with 74.3% of new capacity preleased. Its full-year 2025 Northern Virginia data showed 1,102 MW of net absorption, 0.5% vacancy, and just 21.5 MW of available supply in a 4,039.6 MW market, which the atlas characterizes as a functional freeze. CBRE also reported global vacancy falling to a record-low 6.6% in Q1 2025.

Record
  • In H1 2025, CBRE reported primary-market supply reached a record 8,155 MW, up 17.6% from H2 2024 and 43.4% year over year, while vacancy fell to a record-low 1.6%.
  • 74.3% of new capacity was preleased in H1 2025; Northern Virginia posted 538.6 MW of net absorption with an 80% surge in under-construction capacity, Atlanta added nearly 1 GW, and Dallas-Fort Worth was on pace to double in size by 2026.
  • For full-year 2025 Northern Virginia, CBRE reported 1,102 MW of net absorption, up 144% year over year; vacancy of 0.5%, the lowest of any primary US market; inventory of 4,039.6 MW, up 37%; more than 1 GW delivered in 2025; and available supply at year-end of just 21.5 MW.
  • CBRE reported global vacancy fell 2.1 percentage points year over year to a record-low 6.6% in Q1 2025.

Cushman & WakefieldFull profile →

Financingbrokerage research and advisory, no principal capital position stated

Cushman & Wakefield's H2 2025 Americas update reported operational capacity of 43.4 GW, 93.6% of it in the United States, with 25.3 GW under construction at nearly 89% pre-committed and vacancy of 4.2%. Its December 2025 power report notes global operational capacity surpassed 49 GW by H1 2025 and that AI facilities consume 200-400 MW per site versus 10-25 MW for conventional facilities. An explicit C&W powered land moratorium formulation was n.a. in the fetched documents.

Record
  • C&W's H2 2025 Americas update reported operational Americas capacity of 43.4 GW, 93.6% of it in the United States; 25.3 GW under construction at nearly 89% pre-committed; 4.0 GW of new colocation supply delivered in 2025; and vacancy of 4.2%.
  • C&W's Data Centres & The Power Challenge (No. 3, December 2025) notes global operational capacity surpassed 49 GW by H1 2025, that conventional facilities need 10-25 MW while AI facilities consume 200-400 MW per site, that GPU white-space power density can exceed 50x standard industrial, and that data centres consumed 415 TWh in 2024, or 1.5% of global electricity.
  • An explicit C&W powered land moratorium formulation was n.a. in the fetched documents.

NewmarkFull profile →

Financingadvisory and debt structuring for third-party JVs and construction loans, no principal capital position stated

Newmark is the most transaction-active broker in this part, closing almost $17B in data center deals in 2024 and over $25B in trailing-twelve-month data center transaction volumes by Q3 2025. It advised on a $2.3B loan financing a Texas data center tied to OpenAI's Stargate and structured the $7.1B construction loan for the 1.2 GW Abilene, Texas AI campus inside a $15B JV with Crusoe, Blue Owl Capital and Primary Digital Infrastructure. Its 2025 market outlook reported $31.5B in annualized new data center construction spending, an all-time high, and expects data center power demand to exceed utility supply by 50%.

PeriodKindAmountContextSources
2025 outlook (published February 13, 2025)reported$31.5B$31.5B in annualized new data center construction spending, an all-time high. Market-wide construction spending measured by Newmark, not Newmark's own capex.
Q4 2024reported$9.2BQ4 2024 industrial volumes across Leasing and Capital Markets were $9.2B, an all-time quarterly best, led by data centers. Transaction volume, not capex.
FY2024reported$17.0BNewmark closed almost $17B in data center deals in 2024. Advisory transaction volume, not capex.
trailing twelve months as of Q3 2025reported$25.0BOver $25B in trailing-twelve-month data center transaction volumes; Capital Markets revenue up 59.7%, total debt volumes up 129%, investment sales up 67%. Transaction volume, not capex.
Record
  • Newmark's 2025 U.S. Data Center Market Outlook reported a development pipeline of nearly 50 million sq ft at year-end 2024, hyperscalers accounting for over 10% of all commercial development site purchases in 2024, and an estimated 24% of all industrial-zoned development site acquisitions over 24 months going to data centers.
  • Newmark's headline constraint is that data center power demand is expected to exceed utility supply by 50%.
  • Newmark structured the $7.1B construction loan for the 1.2 GW Abilene, Texas AI campus inside a $15B JV with Crusoe, Blue Owl Capital and Primary Digital Infrastructure, eight buildings targeting 1.4 GW by 2026.

ColliersFull profile →

Financingbrokerage research and advisory, no principal capital position stated

Colliers reported US data center deal volume of $57B in 2024 versus $26B in 2023, with $29B pending. It subsequently reported global data center investment exceeding $580B in 2025, up 27%, beating oil and gas investment for the first time, and forecasts US 2026 investment of $500B.

PeriodKindAmountContextSources
FY2024reported$57.0BUS data center deal volume reached $57B in 2024 versus $26B in 2023, with $29B pending. Market-wide deal volume tracked by Colliers, not Colliers' own capital.
FY2025reported$580BGlobal data center investment exceeding $580B in 2025, up 27%, beating oil and gas investment for the first time. Global market-wide investment tracked by Colliers.
FY2026 forecastguidance$500BUS 2026 forecast of $500B in data center investment. Market forecast, not company guidance for Colliers itself.
Record
  • US data center deal volume reached $57B in 2024 versus $26B in 2023, with $29B pending.
  • Colliers reported global data center investment exceeded $580B in 2025, up 27%, beating oil and gas investment for the first time, with a US 2026 forecast of $500B.

Avison YoungFull profile →

Financingbrokerage research using datacenterHawk data, no principal capital position stated

Avison Young, using datacenterHawk data, reported US colocation inventory of 18.5 GW existing and 0.9 GW under construction in Q1 2025, rising to 20.04 GW existing and 1.25 GW under construction in Q2 2025. It described Northern Virginia as power-constrained with severe power constraints limiting growth, and attributed slowed Q2 deliveries to absorption of recent supply, tariff disruptions, and preparation for higher capital costs, explicitly not demand-driven.

Record
  • Avison Young, using datacenterHawk data, reported US colocation inventory of 18.5 GW existing and 0.9 GW under construction in Q1 2025, rising to 20.04 GW existing and 1.25 GW under construction in Q2 2025.
  • Avison Young described Northern Virginia as power-constrained with severe power constraints limiting growth; Q2 deliveries slowed on absorption of recent supply, tariff disruptions, and preparation for higher capital costs, explicitly not demand-driven.

TranswesternFull profile →

Financingn.a.

The source records no data center capital markets disclosures for Transwestern. Data center capital markets disclosures: n.a.

PeriodKindAmountContextSources
2024-2026reportedn.a.n.a. Source states: 'Transwestern. Data center capital markets disclosures: n.a.' No source link given for this line in the document.
Record
  • Data center capital markets disclosures for Transwestern are n.a. in the source; the nearest links in the same section are the Colliers and Avison Young citations.

Green StreetFull profile →

Financingindependent research and data provider, subscription-gated, no principal capital position stated

Green Street published its second annual Global Data Center Report on February 6, 2025, alongside 2025 U.S. Sector Outlooks covering 10 property sectors, and launched expanded US Data Centers & Lodging Intelligence on June 26, 2025. It identifies the industry's largest challenges as access to power, transmission of electricity, and obsolescence. Specific Green Street vacancy or absorption series are n.a. in the source, as they are subscription-gated.

Record
  • Green Street published its second annual Global Data Center Report on February 6, 2025, alongside 2025 U.S. Sector Outlooks covering 10 property sectors, and launched expanded US Data Centers & Lodging Intelligence on June 26, 2025.
  • Green Street identifies the industry's largest challenges as access to power, transmission of electricity, and obsolescence.
  • Head of Global Data Center and Tower Research David Guarino contrasts hyperscaler leases of 15 years or longer with one-year apartment and five-year office leases, describing tenants as AAA-caliber.
  • Specific Green Street vacancy or absorption series: n.a. (subscription-gated).

datacenterHawkFull profile →

Financingdata provider, no principal capital position stated

datacenterHawk is a data provider whose 1Q 2025 recap reported Northern Virginia planned development of 9.6 GW with utility limitations creating a bottleneck, North American market growth of 40% year over year, and vacancy below 1% in many North American markets with limited tenant optionality. Its 2Q 2025 recap reported non-major markets absorbing about 1,600 MW in 1H 2025 versus 1,425 MW in major markets, with Phoenix at 2.8 GW and Atlanta at 2.3 GW of planned capacity. Its data also underpins Avison Young's US colocation inventory figures.

Record
  • datacenterHawk reported Northern Virginia planned development of 9.6 GW with utility limitations creating a bottleneck in delivering space and power, North American market growth of 40% year over year, and vacancy below 1% in many North American markets with limited tenant optionality.
  • In 1H 2025, non-major markets absorbed about 1,600 MW versus 1,425 MW in major markets, with Phoenix at 2.8 GW and Atlanta at 2.3 GW of planned capacity.

Named sites — market intelligence

SiteLocationCapitalMWStatusDetailSources
Abilene, Texas AI campusAbilene, TX$7.1B1200constructionNewmark structured the $7.1B construction loan for the 1.2 GW Abilene, Texas AI campus inside a $15B JV with Crusoe, Blue Owl Capital and Primary Digital Infrastructure. The project comprises eight buildings targeting 1.4 GW by 2026.
Texas data center tied to OpenAI's StargateTX$2.3BNewmark advised on a $2.3B loan financing a Texas data center tied to OpenAI's Stargate. The source does not name the specific city or capacity; status not stated in the source.

Financing transactions — market intelligence

TimingPartiesInstrumentAmountDetailSources
reported with Newmark's 2024 resultsNewmark (advisor) · OpenAI Stargate-tied Texas data centerdebt facility$2.3BNewmark advised on a $2.3B loan financing a Texas data center tied to OpenAI's Stargate.
reported in Newmark 2025 outlook coverageNewmark (structuring) · Crusoe · Blue Owl Capital · Primary Digital Infrastructuredebt facility$7.1BNewmark structured the $7.1B construction loan for the 1.2 GW Abilene, Texas AI campus, eight buildings targeting 1.4 GW by 2026.
reported in Newmark 2025 outlook coverageCrusoe · Blue Owl Capital · Primary Digital Infrastructurejv equity$15.0BThe Abilene, Texas AI campus construction loan sits inside a $15B JV with Crusoe, Blue Owl Capital and Primary Digital Infrastructure.
Reported 30 September 2026 (The Real Deal, citing the Mercury News); closing expected by year end; single outlet fetchedBlackstart Digital (affiliate) · IBM (seller)acquisitionn.a.An affiliate of Blackstart Digital is under contract to buy IBM's former research campus at 650 Harry Road in the hills of San Jose, California, by the end of the year. The property includes multiple generations of data center infrastructure and an existing 25 MW power station; Blackstart lists advanced R&D, incubators, academic partnerships and quantum computing among possible uses and plans to keep the buildings. The San Jose City Council rezoned the campus as an industrial park in August 2026, and Blackstart has filed for environmental review with a hearing targeted for July 2028. Cushman & Wakefield marketed the property.
Section 04 · The wall

Capital at risk: the documented wall

1117 project-level records of capital blocked, delayed, cancelled, or held by courts across 49 states and 7 Canadian provinces (Alberta, British Columbia, Manitoba, New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, Ontario, Saskatchewan). The $955B sum of the rows that disclose a dollar figure is a floor, not a census: most blocked projects never disclose capex, and roughly two-thirds of entries carry either a dollar figure or a megawatt figure but not both.

How to read this: every brick is one stopped project. The wider the brick, the more announced money was on the table; the thinnest bricks never disclosed a figure. Click any brick for the project and its sources.

Blocked or cancelled
181 projects · $347B disclosed
Denied, rejected, withdrawn, or terminated outright. 109 of these disclose no dollar figure.
Delayed or paused
746 projects · $302B disclosed
Tabled, paused, or held; capital immobilized, not yet destroyed. 707 of these disclose no dollar figure.
Courts & litigation
98 projects · $218B disclosed
Halted by a judge or contested in active litigation. 71 of these disclose no dollar figure.
Restarted
18 projects · $28.6B disclosed
Blocked first, then revived; trackers rarely net these out. 12 of these disclose no dollar figure.
Other actions
74 projects · $60.7B disclosed
Moratorium exposure and actions outside the main classes. 68 of these disclose no dollar figure.
1117 projects across 49 states and 7 Canadian provinces. The $955B total of the rows that disclose a figure is a floor, not a census: most blocked projects never publish what they would have cost.
Second-order losses from the 2025 cancellation cohort total 187,000 construction job-years, 14,600 permanent jobs, 22,000 supplier jobs, and $4.2B of lost tax revenue over ten years. Causal attribution splits $42.2B to community opposition (49% of value), $26.0B to regulatory or zoning failure (27%), and $21.5B to failed incentives (24%).
#ProjectDeveloperJurisdictionStScaleActionDateSources
1 Prince William Digital Gateway QTS + Compass Prince William County VA $24.7B / 2 GW / 27M sq ft
terminatedRezoning voided Aug 2025, affirmed Mar 31 2026; Compass withdrew Apr 29 2026; QTS terminated Jul 2 2026
2022-2026
2 Culpeper Brandy Station n.a. Culpeper County VA $12B
deniedDenied 6/12/2024
Jun 2024
3 King George campus Amazon King George County VA $6B
delayedDelayed In late August 2026 AWS changed course on water supply for its planned King George data center campus at the 869-acre Birchwood Drive tech campus after its application to renew a groundwater permit for up to 6.4 million gallons a year from the Potomac aquifer drew opposition from state Sen. Richard Stuart and followed a DEQ report warning of declining groundwater east of Interstate 95. Part of the project remains tied up in court proceedings
2024-25
4 Midlothian/Powhatan Province Group Powhatan County VA $3B / 300 MW
delayed
2024-25
5 Richmond campus DC Blox Richmond VA $500M / 50 MW
blocked
2024-25
6 Catlett Station Headwaters Fauquier County VA $400M
blocked
2024-25
7 Plaza 500 Starwood Alexandria VA $165M
delayed
2024-25
8 Warrenton site Amazon Warrenton / Fauquier VA $39M / 42 acres / 220,000 sq ft
court haltCourt-ordered 1-year stall; Warrenton then adopted a permanent ban July 2025
2024-Jul 2025
9 Ashton Amazon Manassas VA n.a.
delayed
2024-25; dollar value n.a.
10 Pittsylvania MegaCampus Balico LLC Pittsylvania County VA 3,500 MW co-located gas plant; US$8.85B at full build per Relae white paper
denied
Apr 2025
11 Chesapeake rezoning n.a. Chesapeake VA 350,000 sq ft / 200 MW
deniedRecommended denied 6-1
May 2025
12 1500 Gateway n.a. Fredericksburg VA 2.1M sq ft
rejectedRejected 7-0
Dec 11 2025
13 Three-campus program (New Albany, Heath, Hebron) Microsoft Licking County OH $1B / 200+ acres
pausedCancelled Apr 8 2025; restarted 2026 (~869 MW). Construction paused again June 2026 while Microsoft reassesses cloud and AI infrastructure needs.
Apr 2025; paused again Jun 2026
14 West Jefferson campus Sentinel West Jefferson OH $1B
cancelledCancelled over power limits
Oct 2025
15 Ohio generation buildout multiple statewide OH 6 GW
cancelledGeneration cancelled
2025
16 Harper Road Diode Ventures Missouri (adjacent cohort) MO $1.5B
blocked
2024-25; listed in the source's Ohio table as Missouri (adjacent cohort)
17 Project Rainier / New Carlisle AWS St. Joseph County IN $11B -> $26B / 1,200 acres / 2.2 GW / 32 buildings
otherApproved and building; ~half built by May 2026
2024-26; capital grew from $11B to $26B per source
18 Chesterton campus Provident Chesterton / Porter County IN $1.3B
withdrawnApplication withdrawn
Jun 2024
19 Project Flo, Franklin Township Google Marion County IN $1.0B / 300 MW
deniedRezoning denied 7-0; investment shifted to New Carlisle
Jun-Sep 2025
20 Hancock County MegaSite undisclosed hyperscaler Hancock County IN $1.0B / 250 MW
cancelledCancelled after legislature declined a $180M incentive
Jul 2025
21 Shelbyville site Prologis Shelby County IN 429 acres
delayed
Jan-Feb 2026
22 Burns Harbor Provident Porter County IN n.a.
blocked
2024-25; dollar value n.a.
23 Marshall County proposal Amazon Marshall County IN 2,250 MW
moratoriumCounty moratorium (Feb 2025, expired); Marshall County ban active Apr 2026
2025-26
24 Fulton County campus n.a. Fulton County IN 500 MW / 300 acres
moratoriumMoratorium active
Mar 2026
25 Lebanon LEAP campus Meta Boone County IN $10B
otherExempt from county moratorium (annexed)
Jun 2026
26 River Ridge Meta Jeffersonville IN n.a.
otherExempt from one-year citywide moratorium
Aug 3 2026; dollar value n.a.
27 Caledonia campus Microsoft Racine County WI $4.0B (est) / 500 MW / 1,200 acres / 7M gal/day water
withdrawnZoning denied Apr 2025; Microsoft withdrew Sep 2025
2025; $4.0B marked as estimate in source
28 Brookfield project n.a. Brookfield WI $600M
cancelled
2025
29 Waukesha project n.a. Waukesha WI $500M
cancelledWater utility denial; cancelled
2025
30 West Allis project n.a. West Allis WI $500M
cancelledZoning board rejection; cancelled
2025
31 Madison campus Vantage / OpenAI / Oracle Madison WI $15B
moratoriumOne-year moratorium to study impacts
Jan 13 2026
32 Tract Mooresville Tract Iredell County NC $30.0B / 1.5 GW
cancelledCancelled after Mooresville Public Utilities denied capacity allocation
Q4 2024 (impact 2025)
33 Apex project Natelli Apex / Wake County NC 250 MW
withdrawnWithdrawn after opposition; one-year moratorium enacted
Apr 28 2026
34 232 Car Farm Road n.a. Lincolnton NC $600M
moratoriumProposed one-year moratorium delayed; hearing rescheduled
Aug 10 2026
35 Project Delta Engineered Land Solutions Stokes County NC About 1,800 acres near the Belews Creek power plant and Dan River; expected to use several hundred megawatts
approved after delayJan rezoning voided by court; six-month moratorium proposal rejected Stokes County commissioners voted 3-2 on 14 September 2026 to approve the Project Delta rezoning of about 1,800 acres of farmland near Walnut Cove for developer Engineered Land Solutions. It was the board's second vote, after the January 2026 approval was voided following a legal challenge Stokes County commissioners rejected a proposed six-month data center moratorium on 13 July 2026, and the Project Delta rezoning was refiled in July 2026. The Stokes County Planning Board voted 5-2 on 13 August 2026 to recommend denying the refiled Project Delta rezoning. On 14 September 2026 the Board of Commissioners voted 3-2 to rezone roughly 1,800 acres in Walnut Cove for developer Engineered Land Solutions, the same margin as its January 2026 approval, which had been voided over a procedural issue. Chairman Wayne Barneycastle and Commissioner Brad Chandler voted no. A Southern Coalition for Social Justice attorney would not say whether another lawsuit is planned.
January 2026 rezoning voided; moratorium rejected July 2026; Planning Board recommended denial 5-2 on 13 August 2026; rezoning reapproved 3-2 on 14 September 2026
36 Goodyear/Buckeye campus Tract Maricopa County AZ $14B
withdrawn
May 2024
37 Project Blue Beale Infrastructure (AWS-linked) Tucson / Pima County AZ $3.6B / 290 acres / up to 10 buildings / $97M projected 10-yr city revenue
rejectedCity Council voted unanimously to end annexation negotiations Aug 5-6 2025
Aug 2025; project continued outside city limits per source narrative
38 Rock Creek n.a. Fort Worth TX $750M
delayed
2024-25
39 RCM Hill project RCM Hill LLC Hill County TX n.a.
otherCounty adopted then rescinded a one-year rural ban after the developer sued in federal court
Suit May 27 2026; rescinded Jun 4 2026; dollar value n.a.
40 ~1,800 projects in ERCOT interconnection multiple statewide TX statewide pause
pausedGov. Abbott ordered PUCT and ERCOT to audit all data centers in the interconnection process before further approvals; non-compliant projects to be denied connection
Aug 3 2026
41 Project Sail n.a. Coweta County GA $17B
moratorium180-day moratorium; 1,750-signature petition
Jun 16 2026
42 Ellenwood facility n.a. DeKalb County GA 1M sq ft
moratoriumMoratorium extended Jul 7 2026 through early 2027 DeKalb County commissioners voted 5-2 to extend the county's data center moratorium by 100 days, to 26 September 2026. WSB Radio reported on 10 September 2026 that DeKalb County's data center moratorium, extended multiple times, currently runs through the end of March 2027.
Dec 2025-2027
43 Calhoun facility n.a. Calhoun / Gordon County GA 250 MW / 11 acres
moratoriumMoratorium extended from 90 days to Jan 1 2027; proposal pending
Apr 27 2026
44 Haye's Station n.a. Augusta / Richmond County GA n.a.
otherExempt from ~4-month moratorium
Jun 2 2026; dollar value n.a.
45 Sangamon County campus CyrusOne Talkington Twp / Sangamon County IL $500M+ / 280 acres / 1.5M sq ft / 600 MW
approved after delayBoard deferred vote Nov 2025; moratorium demanded; approved Apr 2026
2025-26; capital stated as $500M+ (floor)
46 Naperville facility Karis Critical Naperville IL n.a.
rejectedScaled back, then rejected 6-1. The Real Deal reported on 5 October 2026 that PulteGroup proposes the 262-unit Towns at Naper Commons townhome development on the site at the northwest corner of Naperville and Warrenville roads where Karis Critical's data center was rejected, with Planning and Zoning Commission review set for the following week.
Jan 2026; dollar value n.a.
47 WGN site n.a. Elk Grove Village IL 102 acres
delayedConstruction deadline extended to Sept 30, 2027 due to power delivery difficulties
Aug 2026
48 Aurora pipeline (4 existing DCs, 5+ in works) incl. CyrusOne Aurora IL n.a.
moratorium180-day data center + warehouse moratorium adopted Sep 25 2025 (+30-day option)
Sep 2025-Mar 2026; dollar value n.a.
49 Cascade Locks Roundhouse Cascade Locks OR $100M / 10 MW
blocked
2024-25
50 Hillsboro pipeline (incl. QTS 250 MW campus) multiple Hillsboro OR DC + BESS applications
moratoriumFirst Oregon city moratorium: 120 days adopted Jul 27 2026, expires Nov 24 2026, extendable 6 months; plus 180-day SIP pause approved Jul 21 2026
Jul 2026
51 Verrus data center Verrus Salem OR Citywide; applies to all data centers as a primary use and accessory data centers above 2 MW. Verrus filed a land use application for a 600,000 square foot data center in late July 2026. No MW or dollar figure for the project stated
moratoriumSalem City Council voted unanimously on 3 August 2026 to move toward a temporary moratorium on AI data centers and to begin updating zoning and land use rules. On 21 September 2026 the council voted unanimously to adopt the moratorium, effective immediately through 19 January 2027, with state law allowing extensions of up to 300 days with additional findings. It covers all data centers as a primary use and accessory data centers above 2 MW. The city attorney said the Verrus application filed in late July must be reviewed under the rules in place when filed, but construction can be prohibited while the moratorium is in effect; the city cited water supply risk from the deep drawdown of Detroit Reservoir.
Initial vote 3 August 2026; moratorium adopted 21 September 2026, in effect through 19 January 2027
52 2805 Bowers GI Partners Santa Clara CA $79M
delayed5-month delay
2024-25
53 SJC37 (641 Walsh Ave.) Digital Realty Santa Clara CA 4-story, shell complete, no equipment
delayedAwaiting power; "could be years"
2025-26
54 Santa Clara pipeline DLR, STACK, others Santa Clara / Silicon Valley Power CA 500 MW of additional requested load vs. 720 MW existing peak
moratoriumSVP capped new data center approvals; moratorium on new power connections; approvals stopped after June 2025
2025-26
55 Saturn Park hyperscale facility n.a. Monterey Park CA n.a.
moratoriumMoratorium extended from 45 days to one year; permanent-ban ballot measure pending; city enacted a ban Jun 2026
2026; dollar value n.a.
56 Coachella Valley Technology Campus (400+ acres, six data centers) n.a. Coachella CA n.a.
moratoriumCampus shelved; moratorium extended to ~one year; permanent-ban draft approved by Planning Commission On 26 August 2026 the Coachella City Council unanimously adopted Ordinance No. 1231, a permanent ban on data centers within city limits, after approving a first reading on 12 August. Accessory server rooms are exempt. The ordinance takes effect 30 days after adoption. KESQ described the campus site as 240-plus acres near Fillmore Street and Avenue 52.
45-day moratorium and developer agreement cancellation 4 June 2026; permanent ban (Ordinance No. 1231) adopted 26 August 2026
57 All new hyperscale DCs ≥50 MW n.a. New York (statewide) NY statewide, no fixed expiration
moratoriumExecutive Order 62 - DEC to hold in abeyance all discretionary permits for construction or expansion of data centers until DPS files a final GEIS; first statewide moratorium in the nation; ~12 GW of DC load in the NYISO queue as of May 2026, >8 GW added in 2025
Jul 14 2026
58 Riverview Innovation & Technology Campus Riverview Town of Tonawanda, Erie County NY $2B / 500,000 sq ft / 300 MW
pausedApplication "on hold" due to NYISO backlog The Town of Tonawanda approved a one-year moratorium on 4 August 2026 blocking permits for data centers with 20 MW or more of peak demand.
Paused 3 June 2026; town one-year moratorium 4 August 2026
59 Millville Energy & Data Center Campus n.a. Millville NJ 2.6M sq ft / 1.4 GW
blockedPermanent ban; application blocked
May 19 2026
60 East Windsor second building QTS East Windsor Twp NJ 52 acres, 70+ MW existing
delayedPlanning Board postponed decision
Apr 27 2026
61 Kenilworth project CoreWeave Union Township NJ n.a.
otherPermanent-ban proposal; first reading passed CoreWeave is building a $1.8 billion, nearly 400,000 square foot AI data center at the former Merck campus in Kenilworth, expected to use up to 250 megawatts and begin operating in early 2027, according to NJ Advance Media. Residents of the borough and neighboring towns have packed public meetings and held weekly rallies in opposition. Gov. Mikie Sherrill signed the End Data Center Tax Credits Act, reported 2 September 2026, blocking the state from awarding the remaining $250 million under the Next New Jersey Program AI; CoreWeave's approved award of up to $250 million remains in place
May 12 2026; dollar value n.a.
62 100 Jersey Avenue AI data center n.a. New Brunswick NJ 27,000 sq ft
rejectedCity Council unanimously rejected
Feb 18 2026
63 AWS Susquehanna co-location AWS / Talen Energy (Susquehanna Nuclear LLC) Luzerne County PA 480 MW requested vs. 300 MW already approved behind-the-meter, at a 2,494-2,520 MW plant
rejectedFERC rejected the amended ISA 2-1 on Nov 1, 2024; Talen sought rehearing Nov 21, 2024
2024
64 Project Hazelnut (1,300 acres, 15 buildings) n.a. Hazle Township PA n.a.
moratorium180-day curative-amendment moratorium
Jul 6 2026; dollar value n.a.
65 Pacifico Energy DC + power plant Pacifico Energy Muhlenberg Township, Pickaway County OH n.a.
moratorium12-month moratorium. The township is Muhlenberg Township in Pickaway County, Ohio (Darbyville). Trustees signed the 12-month moratorium at their regular Monday meeting in the first week of February 2026 after Pacifico Energy requested a zoning change application for a data center and accompanying power plant; a trustee said nothing can be done until 3 February 2027.
Signed 2 February 2026; runs to 3 February 2027
66 Saline Township campus Related Digital / Oracle (Green Chile Ventures LLC) / OpenAI Washtenaw County MI $7B-$16B / 1,383-1,400 MW / 575 acres
otherMPSC conditionally approved DTE special contracts (Case U-21990) Dec 18 2025; residents voted against; construction began weeks later. Oracle, OpenAI and Related broke ground on the campus, described as a $16 billion project that would eventually use more than a gigawatt, on 1 June 2026.
Oct 2025-2026
67 Howell Township campus Meta Livingston County MI $1B
moratoriumSix-month moratorium (expired)
Nov 21 2025
68 U. Michigan / Los Alamos DC UM / LANL Ypsilanti MI $1.2B / 100 MW planned
moratorium60-day emergency moratorium; renewed 2026. Ypsilanti City Council passed a resolution opposing the $1.2 billion project, and the Ypsilanti Community Utilities Authority passed a yearlong halt on water and sewer connections for data centers in April 2026.
Mar 2025-2026; the $100M figure is a state grant, not total project capital
69 Springfield Township campus (84 acres, 2-3 buildings) n.a. Oakland County MI n.a.
moratorium180-day moratorium
Jan 7 2026; dollar value n.a.
70 Five proposed "mega" data centers (Equinix, Prologis + 2 withdrawn) Equinix, Prologis, 2 unnamed Seattle (SoDo, Tukwila) WA 369 MW requested; 2 of 4 developers withdrew
moratoriumOne-year moratorium on DCs >20 MVA approved 9-0, extendable 6 months. The Seattle Times reported on 3 October 2026 that two large projects are moving forward despite the moratorium because their permit applications predate it: a nine-story Equinix data center in Sodo (54 MW; environmental permits submitted to the state in June 2026) and a six-story Digital Realty data center downtown (40 MVA requested; land-use application filed at the end of May 2026), together nearly 100 MW of peak demand. The Seattle Department of Construction and Inspections said both are vested under the earlier rules. Seattle City Light said Prologis has neither submitted a service request nor withdrawn its interest in its 120 MW Sodo and 75 MW Tukwila proposals, which remain exploratory.
Proposals April 2026; one-year moratorium approved 9 June 2026; vested Equinix and Digital Realty projects reported moving forward 3 October 2026
71 Bullfrog Flats DC Blue Fern Development Cle Elum WA 20 MW / 100,000 sq ft / ~$200M / 1,100-acre master plan
moratoriumSix-month emergency moratorium after proposal surfaced
Jul 31 2026; capital stated as ~$200M
72 Avista-related project Avista Spokane WA 125-500 MW
moratoriumOne-year citywide moratorium on new computer data center permits
Jun 22 2026
73 Unincorporated Skagit County n.a. Skagit County WA DCs >2,000 sq ft
moratoriumSix-month moratorium approved Jun 1, extendable
Jun 2026
74 Landover project n.a. Prince George's County, MD MD $5B
moratorium180-day moratorium led to regulations; two-year countywide hyperscale moratorium approved Jul 7, 2026 On 8 July 2026 the Prince George's County Council adopted a two-year moratorium on hyperscale data centers, sponsored by Council Chair Krystal Oriadha, with the proposed Landover Mall server farm conversion cited as the trigger.
County moratorium September 2025; two-year moratorium adopted 8 July 2026
75 Great Falls campus Ardent Tech Great Falls, MT MT 600 MW
withdrawn
Nov 2025
76 Project Cumulus / CRG proposal CRG St. Charles, MO MO $1B
blockedOne-year moratorium made permanent; DCs prohibited in all districts
May 19 2026
77 Water Street DC n.a. Holyoke, MA MA $200M
blockedPermanent zoning ban adopted
Jun 17 2026
78 Markley facility Markley Lowell, MA MA n.a.
moratoriumOne-year moratorium, +180-day option. Residents appealed the Massachusetts DEP air permit, which allowed up to eight more diesel generators (27 in total), in April 2026. On 10 August 2026 Superior Court Judge William Barrett allowed a stay of the permit for the four backup diesel generators not yet installed, while Markley may operate the four already installed. Markley said it expects the court to find for DEP and Markley once the full record is before it.
Moratorium 10 March 2026; permit appeal April 2026; partial stay 10 August 2026
79 Google-led port project Google Little Rock, AR AR $1B
otherMoratorium proposed to Jan 1 2027; measure deferred Jul 7 2026 On 4 August 2026 the proposed 18-month Little Rock moratorium on large-scale data centers failed on a 4-4 vote with two members absent; six votes were needed. The Google facility at the Port of Little Rock is expected to need 100 MW and about 1 million gallons of water per day.
Moratorium failed 4 August 2026 on a 4-4 vote
80 EU-3 large-scale DC rezoning (~3,500 acres) n.a. Linn County, IA IA 18-month moratorium
moratoriumBoard of Supervisors voted 2-1
Jul 2026
81 Adair County proposal Applied Digital Adair County, IA IA 200 MW
moratoriumIndefinite moratorium
Mar 25 2026
82 Mercer County campus (530+ acres) NextEra / Boulevard Associates Mercer County, ND ND n.a.
moratoriumOne-year moratorium
Mar 4 2026; dollar value n.a.
83 ACE Basin proposal n.a. Colleton County, SC SC 1 GW
moratoriumSix-month moratorium proposed; zoning reconsidered. The Charleston City Paper identifies the proposal as a $6 billion, 850-acre project by Eagle Rock Partners and Thomas and Hutton on the headwaters of the Ashepoo River, which the Southern Environmental Law Center has challenged in court. After the county moratorium delayed it, Eagle Rock shifted to a new 1,200-acre site in the western part of the county, and on 14 September 2026 the Colleton County Council lifted its moratorium in the portion of the county west of I-95 (see the Rhodes Technology Park site record). Residents Miles Crosby and Jennifer Singleton, represented by the Southern Environmental Law Center, sued Colleton County in state court over the zoning ordinance that allows data centers in rural areas by special exception, in a complaint reported 9 January 2026. The complaint says Eagle Rock Partners applied under the new rule for an 859-acre, 1,000-megawatt data center complex in the ACE Basin, and asks the court to overturn the ordinance and block approvals under it. On Monday 5 October 2026 the Southern Environmental Law Center and Colleton County announced a settlement of the lawsuit filed in January 2026 by landowners Miles Crosby and Jennifer Singleton, which challenged zoning changes allowing data centers in rural areas by special exception. Under the agreement the county will establish a Data Center Exclusion Area in its Comprehensive Plan prohibiting data centers across most of the ACE Basin in Colleton County, including lands along the Ashepoo, Combahee and Edisto rivers and the roughly 850-acre tract where the Eagle Rock campus was proposed.
Moratorium 5 May 2026; landowner lawsuit reported 9 January 2026; moratorium lifted west of I-95 on 14 September 2026; settlement creating a Data Center Exclusion Area announced 5 October 2026
84 Hixson Data Center (Nvidia GB200) Hixson McMinnville, TN TN 25 MW / 96,000 sq ft
moratorium18-month moratorium requiring impact studies
Jun 3 2026
85 EastPark project TeraWulf Greenup & Boyd Counties, KY KY 1 GW
otherExempt from six-month county moratoriums
Jul 2026
86 Project Jupiter (10,000-acre Green Data Center) n.a. Socorro County, NM NM $165B IRB package / 10,000 acres
moratoriumOne-year moratorium after 2+ months of opposition. A resident suit alleges $165 billion in industrial revenue bonds were issued for the Oracle/OpenAI development before the Planning and Zoning Commission voted; a judge has allowed an amended complaint to proceed.
Jun 10 2026; dollar value n.a.
87 Sedgwick County campus (1,000+ acres) n.a. Sedgwick County, KS KS n.a.
moratoriumMoratorium active, extended twice. The county's interim development control on hyperscale data centers, in place since 14 January 2026, was extended for a third time on Wednesday 2 September 2026, by three months to at least 25 December 2026; proposed zoning rules were to be released 24 September 2026 and commissioners plan to consider continuing the pause into 2027 on 2 December 2026.
Adopted January 2026; third extension 2 September 2026, to at least 25 December 2026; next decision 2 December 2026
88 Paradox Data crypto expansion Paradox Data / Z Squared Union County, AR AR 8 MW
moratoriumExpansion on hold; one-year moratorium
Jun 30 2026
89 Wrightsville project AVAIO Digital Pulaski County, AR AR n.a.
otherMoratorium rejected, project unregulated
Jul 28 2026; dollar value n.a.
90 Project Tango PBA Holdings Palm Beach County, FL FL $2B; about 4M sq ft on 200 acres; about 600 MW requested; retains approvals for >2M sq ft under a 2016 plan
deniedDenied 5-1 without prejudice. The expansion, which requested about 600 MW, was denied in July 2026. PBA Holdings formally challenged the denial under the Florida Land Use and Environmental Dispute Resolution Act, reported 19 August 2026, asking the county to send the dispute to a special magistrate; it alleges commissioners applied standards outside the zoning code and says its losses could reach hundreds of millions of dollars. The county's one-year moratorium adopted 24 September 2026 does not undo a 2016 approval for two 100,000 sq ft data center buildings on the site, and the developer has said it can pursue that smaller plan.
Denied 15 July 2026; FLUEDRA challenge reported 19 August 2026; 2016 approval for a smaller plan remains in place
91 Deltona 800-acre AI campus The Deltona Corporation Citrus County, FL FL 800 acres
withdrawnCommissioners voted 5-0 to freeze all AI data centers; on hold ≥1 year Citrus County's Planning and Development Commission voted down Deltona Corporation's request to convert almost 800 acres to heavy industrial use and expand Holder Industrial Park from about 557 acres to about 1,300 acres (reported 18 June 2026). Deltona then withdrew its comprehensive plan amendment and zoning applications, and the county canceled the public hearings set for the 14 July 2026 commission meeting (announced on a Tuesday, reported 23 and 24 June 2026). The county's one-year moratorium on data centers, adopted in May 2026, remains in effect
May 26 2026
92 Roan Street-area project n.a. DeSoto County, FL FL 1,000-2,000+ acres
otherExempt from one-year county moratorium
Jul 29 2026
93 Unnamed Maine project n.a. Maine ME n.a.
withdrawnDeveloper backed out after LD 307 was vetoed Apr 24 2026
2026; dollar value n.a.
94 40,000-acre / 9 GW campus n.a. Utah UT 9 GW
otherApproved; referendum underway needing 5,422 signatures in 45 days
2026
95 Colossus 1 xAI Memphis, TN TN 33 unpermitted gas turbines (+6 added after notice)
otherNAACP lawsuit; entrance blockade
May 2026
96 Portfolio-wide lease pullback Microsoft US and Europe US ~2 GW (incl. ~200 MW of outright lease cancellations reported Feb 2025)
cancelledCancellations and deferrals; Google and Meta absorbed some freed capacity
Feb-Mar 2025; multi-jurisdiction row, not a single US state
97 Lighthouse campus (Port Washington) Oracle / Vantage Data Centers Port Washington, Ozaukee County WI $15.0B / 1000 MW
litigationNearly 1GW Stargate-partnership campus. The Wisconsin PSC's April 2026 order set financial guarantee requirements for hyperscale customers (see the Wisconsin PSC jurisdiction note). On 6 August 2026 the Wisconsin PSC told American Transmission Co. to resubmit its application for the roughly 100-mile power line project serving the $15 billion Port Washington campus, citing about 564 changes made after the application was deemed complete. ATC refiled on 14 September 2026 at an estimated $2.5 billion to $2.7 billion, up from $1.6 billion, with Oracle paying most of the cost; Vantage says the campus remains on track for 2028. Ozaukee County Circuit Judge Adam Gerol dismissed Great Lakes Neighbors, Inc. v. City of Port Washington Joint Review Board, a challenge to the creation of Tax Incremental District No. 5 for the project, on Wednesday 16 September 2026 on pleading grounds, without ruling on whether the district complied with Wisconsin law; the group said it will pursue other avenues.
Jul 10 2026
98 New Carlisle $13B campus Amazon (reported) New Carlisle, St. Joseph County IN $13.0B
deniedSt. Joseph County Council voted 7-2 after a 10-hour, marathon meeting to deny rezoning ~1,000 acres of farmland off Chicago Trail.
Jul 16 2026
99 QTS DeForest / Vienna campus QTS Data Centers DeForest / Town of Vienna, Dane County WI $12.0B
cancelledQTS's $12B proposal required annexing 1,600 acres from the Town of Vienna into DeForest. On Jan 27, 2026 village staff determined the project 'not feasible in DeForest' after ~7 months of undisclosed talks and recommended the village president reject the annexation petition; scheduled Feb 3 board vote and Feb 9 public hearing were rendered moot.
Jan 27 2026
100 Imperial Valley Computer Manufacturing campus Imperial Valley Computer Manufacturing, LLC Imperial County (near city of Imperial) CA $10.0B / 950,000 sq ft / 330 MW load, a 330 MW substation and an 862 MWh battery energy storage system, plus a natural gas generator bank for backup / 750,000 gallons per day of water requested
court haltThe project would be the largest data center in California at roughly 950,000 square feet, with a power draw that KPBS reports as approaching double Imperial County's entire 2024 electricity consumption, its own substation, a large battery system and a natural gas generator bank for backup, and a water demand of 750,000 gallons per day. It was promoted as producing 2,500 construction jobs and $28.7M a year in tax revenue, and the developer states the county's economic study found $100 million a year in county-directed public benefits. The developer, Imperial Valley Computer Manufacturing LLC of Huntington Beach, sought to avoid environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act in order to begin construction quickly. On 7 April 2026 the Board of Supervisors approved a lot merger for the project by 4-1, with Supervisor Martha Cardenas-Singh dissenting. County planners described the lot merger as the only step where the county has discretion over whether the project moves forward, and stated that the project cannot receive a certificate of occupancy until the developer secures confirmed power and water supplies. County officials restricted residents from entering the hearing citing fire safety limits, and deputies removed at least three protesters. Opponents raised grid strain, water depletion, air quality and the absence of environmental analysis; the group NIMBY Imperial began a recall effort against Supervisor Peggy Price and collected signatures for a November ballot measure to ban data centers on unincorporated county land. The City of Imperial sought an emergency court order to halt the April vote and is suing the county. Supervisors had earlier approved a parcel merger and then imposed a moratorium after public outcry. The developer has separately sued the City of Imperial in federal court. On 1 September 2026 Imperial County Superior Court Judge L. Brooks Anderholt issued a tentative decision finding that the county prejudicially abused its discretion by approving the lot merger without first completing the CEQA review required for the whole project, writing that the grading, lot merger, road vacation, electrical facilities, water systems and related infrastructure serve one objective, the construction and operation of the data center campus. County planners must restart the approval process and complete a full Environmental Impact Report addressing energy demand, water supply and drainage, the battery system, and the pollution and greenhouse gas potential of the natural gas generators. The decision is tentative and both parties may comment before a final ruling. The developer said it would seek a hearing to contest the findings. Alene Taber, counsel for the City of Imperial, said the decision vindicates residents' concerns. Separately, Judge Jeffrey Jones issued a preliminary decision in August 2026 indicating he would strike down the county's emergency data center moratorium for want of evidence of an immediate threat to public health or safety, and the county has confirmed it was directed to set the moratorium aside. KPBS notes that Anderholt's documentation of environmental risk may strengthen the county's case for reimposing moratorium protections. On 9 September 2026 the ruling became final: Judge Anderholt set aside the lot merger approval granted by the Imperial County Board of Supervisors in April 2026, and county planners must restart the approval process and complete a full CEQA environmental review before the project can proceed. The suit was brought by the City of Imperial and the San Diego and Imperial Counties chapter of the Sierra Club. KPBS reports the developer, identified as Sebastian Rucci of Huntington Beach, said he plans to appeal the decision and to explore alternative project locations further from residential areas. On Tuesday 6 October 2026 the Board of Supervisors adopted an urgency ordinance repealing and setting aside moratorium Ordinances 1616 (adopted 16 June 2026) and 1618 (adopted 14 July 2026), complying with the peremptory writ of mandate issued 11 September 2026 after Superior Court Judge Jeffrey B. Jones ruled on 4 September 2026 for Imperial Valley Computer Manufacturing that the county had not made the findings state law requires for an urgency ordinance. At the same meeting the board held a hearing and adopted a new interim moratorium on data center approvals in unincorporated areas under Government Code section 65858, replacing the old one (term not stated in the fetched report), and discussed placing a data center measure before voters; a special election would cost about $500,000. The separate CEQA case still requires a full environmental impact report.
Parcel merger approved and moratorium imposed April 2026; lot merger approved 4-1 on 7 April 2026; moratorium ruling 4 September 2026 and writ 11 September 2026; tentative CEQA ruling 1 September 2026; old moratorium repealed and new interim moratorium adopted 6 October 2026
101 301 Digital Crossroads (Hammond) CoreWeave / Decennial Group Hammond IN $7.0B
terminatedCity of Hammond announced the expiration of the $7B Development Agreement at 301 Digital Crossroads after required milestones were not met by the June 30, 2026 deadline; two prior extensions had already been granted. Parties: City of Hammond, Hammond Redevelopment Commission, Decennial Group, CoreWeave.
Jul 1 2026
102 STAMP campus (Stream) Stream U.S. Data Centers (via Genesee County Economic Development Center) Town of Alabama, Genesee County (STAMP industrial park) NY $19.46B / 500 MW / 2.2M sq ft
litigation2.2M sq ft facility; $1.46B in requested state/local sales tax breaks ($716M state + $716M local); Hochul had previously called it a 'local decision' she wouldn't override (March 2026) before reversing via executive order. The Batavian described Stream's STAMP data center, Project Double Reed, as a $19.46 billion project with North and South campuses. The town of Alabama was awaiting revised plans as of 14 September 2026 after the state DEC took the position that STAMP development is no longer grandfathered from new wetland rules, which the Genesee County EDC contested in a 24 August 2026 letter. Separately, Plug Power and Stream amended their Gateway land sale on 9 July 2026, fixing the price at $142 million, allowing an interim land closing and extending the outside closing date to 31 March 2027 The Genesee County Economic Development Center board voted on 2 July 2026 to prepare resolutions approving the State Environmental Quality Review for the Stream data center, with a vote planned for a July special meeting ahead of a 3 August Alabama Planning Board meeting. GCEDC never called that meeting, the planning board meeting was canceled, and no approval vote appeared on the agendas for its late July meetings. Gov. Kathy Hochul signed an executive order on 14 July imposing a yearlong moratorium on new hyperscale data centers and has criticized GCEDC's plan to provide Stream with $1.44 billion in subsidies The $6.3B and 250 MW figures are superseded. Stream's revised application to the Genesee County EDC in March 2026 raised the Project Double Reed investment from $11.1 billion to $19.461 billion for a 500 MW, 2.2 million square foot, three-building facility and raised the requested tax abatements from $774 million to about $1.4 billion (The Daily News, 5 and 12 March 2026). The July 2025 lawsuit coverage described the earlier plan at 250 MW and 900,000 square feet. The Batavian still cited $19.46 billion with North and South campuses on 14 September 2026
Lawsuit filed 1 July 2025; revised GCEDC application March 2026; town awaiting revised plans as of 14 September 2026
103 Farmington Technology Park (Tract) Tract Farmington, Dakota County MN $5.0B / 708 MW
litigationDenver-based Tract's 340-acre, up-to-12-building, 2.5M-sq-ft campus (~$5B at full buildout) on former golf-course/school land. Residents sued on technical and later environmental grounds; MCEA joined as party. On 9 September 2026 the Coalition for Responsible Data Center Development announced it is withdrawing its lawsuit against the city of Farmington, the Farmington School District and Tract Land Development, with chair Cathy Johnson stating that the merits remain valid but the ongoing high costs of litigation are no longer sustainable by the few residents who have personally shouldered the legal costs. Castle Rock Township's companion lawsuit against Farmington, challenging a breach of the Orderly Annexation Agreement, is unaffected and continues. This is a withdrawal on cost, not a ruling on the merits, and it removes one of the two challenges facing the project.
Nov 29 2025; resident coalition withdrew its suit 9 September 2026, township suit continues
104 Penzance Bedington campus Penzance Management Bedington, Berkeley County WV $4.0B
delayedGov. Patrick Morrisey announced the $4B, 500+ acre Penzance data center near the Potomac River on Feb 26, 2026; more than 300 residents packed a March 20 county commission town hall raising transparency, water, drought, noise and light-pollution concerns amid new state law (HB 2014) stripping local zoning control.
Mar 20 2026
105 Sabey Decatur Township campus Sabey Data Centers Decatur Township, Indianapolis (Marion County) IN $4.0B
moratoriumMetropolitan Development Commission approved the $4B Sabey project in March 2026; one of the three flashpoint projects behind Indianapolis's moratorium debate. Indianapolis Metropolitan Development Commission approved about $240 million in tax breaks for Sabey's $4 billion Decatur Township data center on 16 September 2026, with Commissioner Schumacher voting against. Community commitments reported include $29.8 million to $39.8 million of investment, aquatic center financing, $5 million for nearby roads, and $50,000 for The Arts Council of Indianapolis. The Metropolitan Development Commission had approved the 250 MW, 130-acre project's variance 6-2 on 18 March 2026, and it is one of three previously approved projects exempt from the Marion County moratorium adopted 10 August 2026
Mar 1 2026
106 Westfield data center Undisclosed developer Westfield MA $4.0B
delayedCase highlights retroactive political risk even for previously-approved projects as statewide sentiment on data centers shifts. The Planning Board voted unanimously to postpone deciding on Servistar Realties LLC's request for a three-year extension of its November 2021 special permit and to ask the Law Department whether the permit remains valid, because it was never registered at the Registry of Deeds and the required site plan and environmental review were never submitted. Servistar said no construction has started and no land has been bought. No new meeting date was set.
Permit extension decision postponed, reported 17 September 2026
107 NorthMark / Valara computing center NorthMark Strategies (Valara Holdings) Spartanburg County SC $2.8B / 450 MW
litigation$2.8B conversion of a former Kohler kitchen/bath plant (also a longtime bitcoin-mining site) into a computing center. State regulators initially approved ~50MW; company sought to expand to 450MW (five 17MW plus six 54MW natural gas turbines, atop 24 existing 2MW generators). On 27 August 2026 the South Carolina Public Service Commission ruled unanimously, with Commissioner David Britt recused, that the Utility Facility Siting and Environmental Protection Act does not apply to NorthMark's 457 MW on-site power station on Pine Street in Spartanburg because it generates power for internal use rather than export to the grid, and that only the Office of Regulatory Staff can enforce the Act. The Southern Environmental Law Center opposed the ruling and may seek reconsideration or appeal. Concerned Citizens of Spartanburg County filed a further suit in the Seventh Judicial Circuit Court asking the court to require the county to apply its land development ordinance and to make Valara obtain a major land development permit before the full planning commission; a hearing was held Thursday 17 September 2026. The South Carolina Department of Environmental Services granted NorthMark and Valara an air permit on 18 September 2026 to build 11 natural gas turbines at the Pine Street data center in Spartanburg, adding 408 MW to the 48 MW already permitted, for 457 MW in total. The permit sets rolling 12-month limits of 250 tons for volatile organic compounds, 250 tons for nitrogen oxides and 25 tons for hazardous air pollutants, with no single hazardous pollutant above 10 tons, and requires quarterly reporting in the first year of operation. The Southern Environmental Law Center criticized the permit. The separate lawsuit over the county land development permit remains pending. SELC, for Concerned Citizens of Spartanburg County and the Southern Alliance for Clean Energy, has asked the Public Service Commission to reconsider its August decision not to review the power plant under the Siting Act; SELC says the commission has 30 days to decide (Herald-Journal, 24 September 2026). The Southern Environmental Law Center is challenging the South Carolina Department of Environmental Services air permit approved on 18 September 2026, arguing that SCDES relied on new information and a revised formaldehyde emissions calculation (potential controlled emissions raised from 9.39 tons a year in the draft to 10.58 tons in the final permit) that came after the public comment period closed; SELC has demanded that SCDES publish the information and reopen public comment. SCDES says the figure assumes continuous operation and that the permit requires formaldehyde testing on the new turbines at different loads (WYFF, 6 October 2026). FOX Carolina reports the SELC letter asking SCDES to reopen the public comment period on the air permit was sent on 1 October 2026; SCDES says it reviewed the application, supplemental information and public comments before issuing the 18 September 2026 permit and that it must issue a permit when an application shows compliance. On Tuesday 6 October 2026 a judge dismissed the Southern Environmental Law Center's suit on behalf of Concerned Citizens of Spartanburg County, which argued the $3 billion, 270-acre Valara project on the former Kohler plant site should have been reviewed as a Major Land Development, and denied the requested injunction. The court found the group had not exhausted administrative remedies such as an appeal to the Board of Zoning Appeals and lacked standing. The SELC challenge to the air permit continues.
PSC ruling 27 August 2026; circuit court hearing 17 September 2026; SCDES air permit 18 September 2026; land development suit dismissed 6 October 2026; air permit challenge pending
108 Lex Pocatello data center Lex Developments Pocatello (Bannock County) ID $2.6B
deniedProposed at a former polysilicon plant site; Idaho Conservation League highlighted unprecedented cumulative energy use concerns, comparing water use to an 18-hole golf course or large alfalfa field. On Thursday 16 July 2026 the Pocatello City Council, acting in a quasi-judicial role, voted to affirm hearing examiner Kathleen Lewis's June 2026 denial of a conditional use permit for Lex Developments' AI data center at the former Hoku site. Councilman Dakota Bates cast the lone no vote, and Councilwoman Ann Swanson was absent. On 17 September 2026, on Lex Developments' reconsideration request, the council again affirmed the denial. A motion to reverse and approve the permit with five conditions failed 3-2 (Paulsen, Mangum and Swanson against); a second motion affirming the denial but removing the standard 12-month reapplication bar passed 3-2, letting Lex reapply immediately. The decision is expected to become official at the 1 October 2026 council meeting, which starts Lex's 28-day window to petition for judicial review in Bannock County's 6th Judicial District Court; the Idaho State Journal called a lawsuit the likely next step. The site is about 59 acres at 1800 River Park Way.
Hearing examiner denial June 2026; council affirmed 16 July 2026 and again 3-2 on 17 September 2026 on reconsideration; formal adoption expected 1 October 2026, then a 28-day judicial review window
109 Amazon Sunbury campus Amazon Sunbury, Delaware County OH $2.0B
moratoriumSunbury has a data-center development moratorium in place until Jan 31 (2027); residents fear council could approve the $2B Amazon facility once it expires and are collecting signatures for a fall ballot charter amendment to cap data centers at 25MW peak load.
Jun 26 2026
110 Google Botetourt County campus Google Botetourt County VA $1.0B
litigationWestern Virginia Water Authority stated it will not supply the 10-million-gallons/day Google sought; a FOIA lawsuit forced disclosure of secret water-use contracts (judge ordered release Nov 5, 2025), and the Water Authority is appealing to the Virginia Court of Appeals while a related water pipeline permit split the Planning Commission in August 2026. Botetourt County issued a land disturbance permit for the 312-acre Google site in the Botetourt Center at Greenfield, reported 30 August 2026, with night construction noise limits; DEQ environmental permits remain under review. In July 2026 Google announced air cooling for the first building
Nov 5 2025
111 Gotion Green Township plant Gotion Green Township, near Big Rapids MI $715M
cancelledGotion abandoned its planned Green Township facility after legal challenges, environmental issues, and backlash over the company's China ties; Michigan had committed a $715M incentive package ($175M grants plus a 30-year tax exemption valued at $540M), which the state is now working to recover.
Jan 1 2026
112 T5 @ Chicago IV (Grayslake) T5 Data Centers Grayslake, Lake County IL $18B campus of 18 data center buildings on 472 acres within the 641-acre Cornerstone development; about 1,550 MW electrical demand from ComEd
litigationUp to 472 acres within the $750M, 641-acre Cornerstone mixed-use development; ~1.55GW electrical demand from ComEd. Village Board approved between Sept 2024-May 2025. The Lake County Data Center Opposition Coalition's lawsuit seeking to block the T5 project, alleging residents were not given a chance to comment, is due to be heard in November 2026; the village cancelled a 6 October 2026 meeting at which residents planned to speak. T5 cites an estimated $18 billion of private investment on 473 acres over seven to ten years.
Jul 31 2026; court hearing expected November 2026 (reported 7 October 2026)
113 Meta Rosemount (UMore Park) Jimnist LLC (Meta subsidiary) Rosemount, Dakota County MN $700M
pausedPlanning Commission approved the site plan, but the City Council paused final action until after Dec 20 pending completion of a required 5-year Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) update. Board of Regents approved a $39.7M land sale to Jimnist LLC; Xcel Energy filing put Meta's minimum investment at $700M.
Oct 31 2025
114 Tract Northern Nevada portfolio Tract Storey County / Washoe County NV $1.0B
litigationTract has purchased more than 12,000 acres across northern Nevada; company says it never sought subsidized costs and committed nearly $1B toward NV Energy infrastructure. Related to Tract's earlier land dispute victory against Switch in Reno. Washoe County District Judge Scott Freeman heard arguments on Tract's motion to disqualify NV Energy attorney Adam Hosmer-Henner from the utility's lawsuit against Tract; Tract claims the attorney's firm previously obtained its confidential data. No ruling was reported.
2026; disqualification motion argued before Judge Scott Freeman, reported 30 September 2026 (single outlet), no ruling yet
115 Microsoft / Franklin Partners Covenant Park Microsoft / Franklin Partners Township adjacent to Lowell (Kent County) MI $1.0B
pausedEstimated $500M-$1B investment over 3-5 years. Site needs rezoning from industrial PUD to light industrial.
Dec 1 2025
116 Jefferson County data center moratorium n.a. Louisville Metro / Jefferson County KY no project-level dollar figure disclosed
moratoriumMetro Council voted 24-1 on 13 August 2026 to adopt a six-month moratorium barring city planners from approving new data center proposals, running until the council adopts comprehensive zoning rules. An amendment extended the pause to the rezoning of an existing building for data center use. A one-year version failed. Local proposals cited in the debate were a Dermody Properties data center in a 350,000 sq ft warehouse on Kramers Lane and a hyperscale facility already under construction on Camp Ground Road.
Aug 13 2026
117 Marion County data center moratorium (Proposal 238) n.a. Indianapolis / Marion County IN no jurisdiction-wide dollar figure disclosed
moratoriumCity-County Council voted 23-1 on 10 August 2026 to pause new data center approvals in Marion County until at least 31 December 2027. Three previously approved projects are exempt: DC Blox in Warren Township approved July 2026, Metrobloks in Martindale-Brightwood approved May 2026, and Sabey's $4 billion Decatur Township campus approved March 2026. The measure advanced to the Metropolitan Development Commission for final approval on 19 August 2026.
Aug 10 2026
118 Greensboro data center moratorium n.a. Greensboro NC no jurisdiction-wide dollar figure disclosed
moratoriumCity council enacted a six-month data center moratorium in August 2026 following a 17 August public hearing. The ordinance taken to hearing covered data centers with electrical demand above 10 MW. WFDD reported the moratorium adds uncertainty for the long-delayed ImpactData Dream Center at Gateway Research Park, whose site plan had already expired and which had received more than half a million dollars in city incentives.
Aug 2026
119 Alamance County data center moratorium n.a. Alamance County NC no jurisdiction-wide dollar figure disclosed
moratoriumCounty commissioners voted 5-0 on 17 August 2026 to adopt a one-year moratorium on consideration of data center proposals, extending the six-month version taken to public hearing. The county attorney described the pause as time to research local effects. The proposal covered developments requiring 10 MW or more.
Aug 17 2026
120 Independence County data center moratorium n.a. Independence County AR no data center project known to be planned in the county
moratoriumThe quorum court approved a five-year moratorium on commercial data centers on 10 August 2026, running through 31 August 2031, the longest pause recorded in Arkansas. No data center project was known to be planned in the county. Reporting on the vote date varies: KAIT8 and the Data Center Moratoriums tracker record 10 August, UALR Public Radio recorded 11 August.
Aug 10 2026
121 Madison County data center moratorium n.a. Madison County AR no data center project known to be planned in the county
moratoriumThe quorum court approved a three-year moratorium on data centers on 17 August 2026, the second-longest pause in Arkansas after Independence County. No data center project was known to be planned in the county.
Aug 17 2026
122 Carroll County data center moratorium n.a. Carroll County AR no jurisdiction-wide dollar figure disclosed
moratoriumThe county adopted a one-year data center moratorium in June 2026, one of a cluster of Arkansas counties outside Little Rock that paused approvals while Little Rock and Pulaski County adopted regulations instead.
Jun 2026
123 Russellville data center moratorium n.a. City of Russellville AR no jurisdiction-wide dollar figure disclosed
moratoriumThe city adopted a six-month data center moratorium in July 2026.
Jul 2026
124 Bayonne citywide data center ban n.a. City of Bayonne NJ no jurisdiction-wide dollar figure disclosed
moratoriumThe city council voted 5-0 to prohibit data centers citywide. A savings clause preserves three data center permissions granted before the ordinance. Hudson County View dated the vote 13 August 2026.
Aug 13 2026
125 Charlestown data center and battery storage ban n.a. Town of Charlestown RI no data center proposed in the town
moratoriumThe town council voted unanimously on 11 August 2026 to prohibit data centers and battery energy storage systems, the second municipal data center ban in Rhode Island and the first ban on battery energy storage projects. No data center had been proposed in the town; officials described the ordinance as preventative.
Aug 11 2026
126 Westerly data center moratorium n.a. Town of Westerly RI no jurisdiction-wide dollar figure disclosed
moratoriumThe town council adopted a one-year moratorium blocking all data centers on 27 July 2026 by voice vote, while the planning board drafts zoning rules. The town manager said data centers were not covered by the existing ordinance.
Jul 27 2026
127 Revity Energy business park and data center, Hanton City Revity Energy LLC Town of Smithfield RI dollar value n.a.
litigationRevity Energy proposed a business park including a data center at Hanton City in March 2026. After public opposition, Smithfield's planning board and town council voted to ban such development in early May 2026, the first municipal data center ban in Rhode Island. Single-sourced from a secondary account in the Charlestown reporting; the Smithfield record has not been confirmed from a Smithfield source. Developers Hanton City Investments LLC and ROK LLC are appealing the town administrative officer's 11 June 2026 decision that their major land development application for the Smithfield Corporate Complex at 364 George Washington Highway was incomplete. The application was filed a day before the Town Council adopted a data center ban. The Zoning Board of Review hearing on the appeal, postponed from 2 September 2026, was rescheduled for 7 October 2026, according to a Town Council member. The Smithfield record is now confirmed from local sources: the Town Council adopted the zoning amendment listing data centers as not permitted in every district 4-1 on 5 May 2026, effective 4 June 2026, and described it as a precautionary interim control. Hanton City Investments LLC and ROK LLC say they filed a substantially complete application on 4 May 2026; the town issued certificates of incompleteness on 29 May and 11 June 2026. The developers have filed two Superior Court lawsuits, one submitted 15 September 2026, arguing that the ban is inconsistent with the comprehensive plan, amounts to an unlawful moratorium, and that the application was wrongly found incomplete. The town says it will defend the ban. The zoning board appeal remains set for 7 October 2026. The Zoning Board of Review did not hear the developer's appeal of the town planner's incomplete-application ruling on 7 October 2026; the agenda moved it to January 2027, and the developer's counsel said the postponement was due to two pending lawsuits against the town.
Ban adopted 5 May 2026, effective 4 June 2026; Superior Court suit filed 15 September 2026 (reported 1 October 2026); zoning board appeal hearing moved from 7 October 2026 to January 2027
128 Pahrump Valley data center ban (Nye County Bill No. 2026-11) n.a. Nye County NV no jurisdiction-wide dollar figure disclosed
moratoriumCounty commissioners voted 5-0 on 18 August 2026 to adopt Bill No. 2026-11, amending Nye County Code Title 17 to prohibit data center development in the Pahrump Valley and Hydrographic Basin 162, an over-appropriated basin. A separate motion setting a 14 September 2026 public hearing on land use standards for data centers elsewhere in the county passed 4-1. A proposal to put the ban to a special election died without a motion. Earlier in September 2026 CDDC, LLC and 9 of a Kind, LLC, which own nearly 911 acres along Carpenter Canyon Road and State Route 160 planned for the Manse Technology Campus (MTC Project), petitioned the Nye County district court to reverse the ban (Ordinance No. 631), allow the project to proceed and award attorney's fees, arguing the ordinance disregarded their investment made in reliance on existing zoning and violated their property rights. Commissioner Ian Bayne, who proposed the ban, said he remained confident in it. No initial court date had been scheduled as of 25 September 2026.
Adopted 18 August 2026; developer petition for judicial review filed September 2026 (reported 24 and 25 September 2026)
129 Larimer County data center moratorium n.a. Larimer County CO no jurisdiction-wide dollar figure disclosed
moratoriumLarimer County adopted a temporary moratorium on new land use applications for data center facilities in the unincorporated county on 27 January 2026. The county extended it on 9 February 2026, then extended it again on 13 July 2026 to 25 February 2027. The county is developing land use code definitions and standards covering water consumption, power usage, nuisances and suitable zoning before the moratorium expires. Vote counts not disclosed on the county page.
Jan 27 2026; extended Jul 13 2026 to Feb 25 2027
130 Calvert Technology Center (AWS) Amazon Data Services (AWS) Calvert County MD about 2.4 million sq ft; reported ~500 MW
withdrawnAmazon Data Services formally withdrew its Calvert Technology Center Conceptual Site Development Plan application on 4 August 2026, having submitted it in May 2026 for a campus near the Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant at Lusby. The county confirmed Amazon has decided not to pursue the project. Amazon attributed the decision to development timelines, operational requirements and its ability to deliver for customers rather than to local opposition. The Board of County Commissioners held a hearing on 18 August 2026 on a temporary six-month moratorium on data center approvals.
Withdrawn 4 August 2026
131 Project Jupiter permitting stay (Oracle campus) Oracle and project partners Doña Ana County NM MW and campus capital cost not disclosed
delayedThe New Mexico Supreme Court unanimously granted two stays reported 24 August 2026. It halted the New Mexico Environment Department air quality permit hearing set to open 14 September 2026 in Sunland Park on the campus's on-site methane fuel-cell microgrid, and it ordered the Office of the State Engineer to pause emergency authorization of water from a newly constructed well used for construction. New Energy Economy petitioned on the air permit, arguing the department cannot hold a hearing before the project's fuel source is established; the Center for Biological Diversity petitioned on the water authorization. The designated hearing officer withdrew from the case, and a replacement will be appointed after the stay is lifted. Site work continued after the New Mexico Supreme Court order pausing the air quality permit process and the State Engineer water permit, with 2,105 construction workers on site as of 30 June 2026 per Oracle records reported by Searchlight New Mexico. On 8 September 2026 Oracle issued an RFP for 2 GW of new New Mexico renewable generation deliverable between 2027 and 2031, tied to 100% carbon-free matching for Project Jupiter by 2031, and offered up to $1 million for carbon capture research on the Bloom fuel cells On Thursday 17 September 2026 the New Mexico Supreme Court unanimously denied, without comment, New Energy Economy's air-permit petition and the Center for Biological Diversity's air-permit and emergency-well petitions and lifted both stays, so the air permit and State Engineer proceedings can resume; no replacement hearing officer or hearing date had been named. Separately, the FT reported via Reuters on 18 September 2026 that about $18 billion of loans tied to the campus were quoted at 89 to 91 cents on the dollar. As of 25 September 2026 the New Mexico Environment Department had not appointed a new hearing officer for the air quality permit; the department said the new officer will set the hearing schedule once appointed and that 23 November 2026 remains its deadline for a permit decision. On Friday 2 October 2026 New Mexico Environment Secretary James Kenney filed the appointment of retired U.S. District Judge James O. Browning as hearing officer for the Project Jupiter air quality permit proceeding, replacing attorney Max Shepherd, who recused himself in August 2026. No new hearing schedule has been set, and the Santa Fe New Mexican reported that the decision by November sought by the developers now appears unlikely.
Stays ordered August 2026; lifted by the New Mexico Supreme Court 17 September 2026; new hearing officer (retired Judge James O. Browning) appointed 2 October 2026; hearing schedule not yet set; NMED decision deadline 23 November 2026
132 Aligned Data Centers Pataskala campus Aligned Data Centers City of Pataskala OH 200 MW across three buildings; more than $5B of investment promised by the developer
under appealPataskala City Council voted at its 25 August 2026 meeting to accept the Planning and Zoning Commission's recommendation and deny the site plan for a 200 MW, three-building campus. Council President Brandon Galik cited unresolved power questions and incomplete design. A citizen petition carrying more than 500 signatures places a potential data center ban before Pataskala voters at the November 2026 election. Separately, the Pataskala City Council voted on 3 August 2026 to place a citizen-petitioned charter amendment banning data centers larger than 25 megawatts on the 3 November 2026 ballot, and the Licking County Board of Elections certified it on 17 August 2026. Aligned Data Centers has filed court documents seeking judicial review of the City Council's unanimous 25 August 2026 denial of the 200 MW center on 89 acres at Broad and Mink streets, asking the city to file transcripts and records of meetings from December 2025 through August 2026 (reported 8 October 2026; filing date not stated).
Denied 25 August 2026; appeal filing reported 8 October 2026
133 Durham County data center moratorium n.a. Durham County NC n.a.
moratoriumCounty commissioners voted 4-1 on 24 August 2026, after a public hearing at which 63 residents signed up to speak, to adopt a nine-month moratorium on new large-scale data centers running through May 2027 and aligned with the City of Durham's parallel pause. The measure does not apply to facilities under 100,000 sq ft that use closed-loop cooling and no diesel backup generation. The dissenting vote came from a commissioner who judged the measure insufficient.
Adopted 24 August 2026
134 Jackson Township data center ban (Ordinance 2026-25) n.a. Jackson Township, Ocean County NJ n.a.
moratoriumThe Township Council adopted Ordinance 2026-25 on final reading by a 4-1 vote on 25 August 2026, amending the township's Land Use and Development Regulations to prohibit data centers. The ordinance was introduced 11 August 2026 and passed first reading 3-2. The sponsoring council member and supporting advocates cited grid load, water supply and proximity to the Pinelands National Reserve. A press release circulated by supporters describes Jackson as the 38th New Jersey municipality to adopt such a prohibition; that count is the advocates' own and is not independently verified here.
Adopted 25 August 2026
135 Orangetown data center and battery storage moratorium n.a. Town of Orangetown NY n.a.
moratoriumThe town board approved a six-month moratorium on applications for new data centers and battery energy storage systems, reported 25 August 2026. The town supervisor stated the moratorium does not apply to DataBank's proposed expansion, which was already in the town's environmental review. Residents raised emissions, water use and proximity to Lake Tappan.
Reported 25 August 2026
136 Anniston data center moratorium n.a. City of Anniston AL n.a.
moratoriumThe city council adopted a resolution on 18 August 2026 establishing a 12-month moratorium on data centers within the city's regulatory jurisdiction, subject to extension or shortening by council. The Planning Commission must study and recommend standards for siting, electrical demand, water consumption, stormwater, noise and neighborhood compatibility within six months. The resolution cites the growth of US data center electricity consumption from 58 TWh in 2014 to 176 TWh in 2023.
Adopted 18 August 2026
137 Palm Springs data center moratorium n.a. City of Palm Springs CA n.a.
moratoriumThe city council voted unanimously on 26 August 2026 to adopt a 45-day moratorium on large-scale data centers, in effect through 10 October 2026, to study impacts before deciding whether further regulation is needed. Council members referenced the possibility of a longer comprehensive zoning process. Residents raised water use, electricity demand and the supplemental cooling required in a desert climate. On Wednesday 30 September 2026 the city council extended the moratorium on accepting, processing or approving data center applications and permits by 22 months and 15 days, through 25 August 2028, for a total of two years, carrying the four-fifths vote state law requires to extend an urgency ordinance. Planning Director Chris Hadwin said the time will be used to write data center standards, permitted uses and locations into the ongoing zoning code update; the moratorium is meant to be rescinded when the new code is adopted.
Adopted 26 August 2026 (45 days, to 10 October 2026); extended 30 September 2026 through 25 August 2028
138 Garfield Township data center and crypto mining moratorium n.a. Garfield Township, Grand Traverse County MI n.a.
moratoriumTownship trustees voted unanimously on 25 August 2026 to impose a one-year moratorium on data centers and cryptocurrency mining facilities, with an option to extend six months for a maximum of 18 months, while the township updates its zoning ordinance. The moratorium places on hold a small-scale data center proposed on Sybrandt Road. The township board chair stated that no data center regulations have yet been drafted and that the measure was written with legal counsel to be defensible after other Michigan communities saw restrictions challenged in court.
Adopted 25 August 2026
139 Westover data center moratorium Swift Willow Property City of Westover, Shelby County AL proposed site of nearly 450 acres along Highway 280 and Cheshire Drive, with at least two buildings on 124 acres; no MW or dollar figure disclosed
moratoriumThe city council voted unanimously on 18 August 2026 to adopt a six-month moratorium on data centers while it studies the industry and considers zoning changes. The pause follows a proposal by Swift Willow Property for a campus of nearly 450 acres along Highway 280 and Cheshire Drive, with at least two buildings on 124 acres. The city held a town hall on 20 August 2026 with the developer, Shelby County Water Services and Alabama Power.
Adopted 18 August 2026
140 Bellevue data center moratorium n.a. Village of Bellevue, Brown County WI n.a.
moratoriumThe village board voted 5-0 on 12 August 2026 to amend chapter 500 of the village zoning code and block development or construction of data centers for 12 months, expiring in August 2027, to give trustees time to review effects on public health, land use, environmental constraints and general welfare.
Adopted 12 August 2026
141 Eastport data center moratorium (DeepGreen Western Passage) DeepGreen Western Passage City of Eastport ME subsea data center; capacity and capital cost not disclosed
moratoriumCity councilors unanimously adopted a 180-day moratorium on 12 August 2026 barring approval of any permit, license or application for industrial data centers or computing facilities and associated infrastructure, on land or underwater. On 27 August 2026 the Planning Board unanimously recommended that the city adopt a permanent ban. The measures respond to DeepGreen Western Passage's February 2026 application to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission for a preliminary permit to study a tidal-powered subsea data center in Passamaquoddy Bay; federal regulators accepted that application in the week after the moratorium took effect. A separate citizen petition from the Eastport Coalition for Healthy Oceans seeks an ordinance prohibiting data centers larger than 25,000 sq ft in the city and its coastal waters. The city held a public hearing on citizen-initiated ordinances in September 2026 while residents sought intervenor status in the FERC preliminary permit proceeding for the DeepGreen project. On Tuesday 29 September 2026 the City of Eastport filed a formal motion to intervene at the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission in DeepGreen Western Passage's application for a 48-month preliminary permit, and in a letter posted 30 September asked FERC to deny it. The letter states that on 9 September 2026 the City Council unanimously enacted ordinance provisions prohibiting large-scale data centers, including underwater data centers, in the areas those provisions cover. The 60-day FERC intervention window that opened with the August acceptance of the application closes in October 2026.
Moratorium adopted 12 August 2026; ordinance prohibiting large-scale data centers enacted 9 September 2026; city motion to intervene filed at FERC 29 September 2026
142 Harrington conditional-use ordinance rejection n.a. City of Harrington, Kent County DE 24 MW proposed facility at the former Harrington Logistics building
rejectedCity council members voted unanimously on 17 August 2026 to reject an ordinance that would have added data centers as a conditional use in the city's manufacturing zone. Without the amendment, data centers cannot be built in Harrington, including a proposed 24 MW facility at the former Harrington Logistics building. Residents cited water, sewer and electrical infrastructure capacity and noise. Reporting notes the developer had offered the city $1 million.
Rejected 17 August 2026
143 Volusia County large-scale data center prohibition n.a. Volusia County FL applies to facilities expected to use at least 50 MW at peak monthly demand, per Florida law
moratoriumThe county council voted unanimously on 17 August 2026 to direct staff to draft an ordinance prohibiting large-scale data centers on land under county jurisdiction, choosing an outright prohibition over a proposed six-month moratorium. The prohibition would apply only to unincorporated Volusia County; incorporated cities retain their own authority. The county states that new applications for large-scale data centers will not be accepted in unincorporated areas while the ordinance moves through the Planning and Land Development Regulation Commission and two council public hearings. Under Florida law a large-scale data center is one expected to use at least 50 MW at peak monthly demand. Spectrum News 13 reported on 6 October 2026 that the prohibition ordinance was scheduled for first reading before the County Council that morning, with a Planning and Land Development Regulation Commission discussion on 15 October and a second and final council reading on 20 October 2026; under the ordinance the county would not review or approve applications, permits, rezonings or amendments for the construction or expansion of a large-scale data center, effective once filed with the Florida Department of State.
Council direction 17 August 2026; ordinance first reading 6 October 2026; final reading scheduled 20 October 2026
144 Cherokee Nation hyperscale data center ban n.a. Cherokee Nation Reservation (tribal and trust land) OK covers roughly 46,000 acres of restricted land, more than 62,000 acres of tribal trust land and more than 5,100 acres of tribal fee land within a 7,000 sq mi reservation
moratoriumPrincipal Chief Chuck Hoskin Jr. announced on 10 August 2026 that the Cherokee Nation is barring hyperscale data center development on tribally owned and trust land, following the report of the Principal Chief's Task Force on Data Centers. The task force surveyed nearly 1,600 citizens, of whom 64% opposed hyperscale data centers on the reservation and 14% favored them. For non-tribal land within the reservation, the Nation stated it will not support projects absent consultation with the tribal government and citizenry addressing cultural and natural resource concerns and including community engagement.
Announced 10 August 2026
145 Wrightstown advisory referendum on data center support n.a. Village of Wrightstown, Brown County WI n.a.
otherVillage voters rejected an advisory referendum on 11 August 2026 asking whether the village should support or help build municipal infrastructure for large-scale data center development in or near the community. The result was 1,033 to 151 against, about 87%. The referendum is advisory and non-binding, and the village board is not required to act on it. The village board placed it on the ballot after residents raised concerns about the Cloverleaf project. The trade association NetChoice sought to keep the question off the ballot, arguing it violated state law.
Advisory referendum 11 August 2026
146 Elkhart data center and battery storage moratorium n.a. City of Elkhart IN No project-level dollar or MW figure disclosed
moratoriumThe Elkhart City Council voted 9-0 on 27 August 2026 to adopt a moratorium on data centers and battery storage facility projects running until December 2027. The city will not accept applications for either use during that period while it develops regulations addressing noise, water use and electricity demand. The moratorium applies to the City of Elkhart only, not to Elkhart County or surrounding jurisdictions.
Adopted 27 August 2026, runs to December 2027
147 Wixom data center moratorium (ended early) and Midwinds Park proposal Wixom Industrial One, LLC (Sansone Group) City of Wixom MI 519,400 sq ft across three buildings (Midwinds Park proposal); no dollar figure disclosed
restartedWixom's six-month data center moratorium ended early. On 26 August 2026 the city council adopted data center restrictions in its zoning ordinance, requiring a 1,500-foot setback from residential areas, parks and K-12 schools, prohibiting the use of well water, and requiring a 48-hour Monday-to-Friday sound study as part of an application. The council then passed a resolution making the restrictions effective no later than 6 September 2026, ending the moratorium roughly two and a half weeks before its scheduled expiration. Wixom Industrial One, LLC, operating under the Missouri-based Sansone Group, has sued the city, claiming the moratorium is illegal and was intended to permanently kill its proposed Midwinds Park data center of three buildings totaling 519,400 square feet at 30625 S. Wixom Road.
Restrictions adopted 26 August 2026, effective no later than 6 September 2026
148 Pinson one-year moratorium on data centers n.a. Pinson AL Jurisdiction-wide measure with no named project; no dollar or megawatt figure disclosed
moratoriumThe City Council approved a 12-month moratorium at its first meeting of August 2026, following a first reading on July 16. No data center had been proposed in Pinson; Mayor Hoyt Sanders said the pause gives the council time to research zoning and confirm that infrastructure costs would fall on applicants rather than homeowners.
Adopted August 2026
149 Tulare County 45-day data center moratorium n.a. Tulare County CA Jurisdiction-wide measure with no named project; no dollar or megawatt figure disclosed
moratoriumThe county adopted a 45-day moratorium covering unincorporated areas while it considers longer-term rules; local organizers are pushing for a permanent ban. The original 45-day moratorium was adopted on 18 August 2026 and covers acceptance, processing, approval or issuance of land entitlements for new data centers in unincorporated areas. On Tuesday 22 September 2026 the Board of Supervisors voted 5-0 to extend it by 10 months and 15 days, the maximum under the urgency ordinance before another extension would be needed, and then voted 3-2 to adopt a position opposing data center development in the county with an exception for enterprise facilities.
Adopted 18 August 2026; extended 5-0 on 22 September 2026 by 10 months and 15 days
150 Washington County one-year moratorium on data center applications n.a. Washington County FL Jurisdiction-wide measure with no named project; no dollar or megawatt figure disclosed
moratoriumThe Board of County Commissioners approved a one-year moratorium on accepting, processing, reviewing and approving applications for data centers and large-scale data processing facilities in unincorporated Washington County at its Aug. 20, 2026 meeting. The county will study impacts and update its Land Development Code and Comprehensive Plan.
Adopted August 2026
151 Cherokee County data center moratorium extended by 180 days n.a. Cherokee County GA Jurisdiction-wide measure with no named project; no dollar or megawatt figure disclosed
moratoriumThe Board of Commissioners voted unanimously on Aug. 20, 2026 to add 180 days to the county's data center moratorium, which began as a 30-day pause in July 2026 and now runs into February 2027. Commissioners said staff need the time to research and draft data center regulations.
Adopted August 2026
152 Savannah 155-day moratorium on large-scale data centers n.a. Savannah GA Jurisdiction-wide measure with no named project; no dollar or megawatt figure disclosed
moratoriumThe City Council voted unanimously on Aug. 27, 2026 to pause new development or conversion activity for large-scale data centers inside city limits for 155 days. The ordinance covers facilities with electrical capacity of 10 MW or greater and industrial buildings of 200,000 square feet or more being built or converted for data center use. Staff are to study grid, water, wastewater, stormwater and road impacts along with zoning and noise rules.
Adopted August 2026
153 Louisville-Jefferson County Metro six-month moratorium on new data centers n.a. Louisville-Jefferson County Metro KY Jurisdiction-wide measure with no named project; no dollar or megawatt figure disclosed
moratoriumMetro Council voted 24-1 on Aug. 13, 2026 to bar planners from approving new data center proposals for six months or until comprehensive zoning rules are adopted; amended on the floor to also cover conversions of existing buildings.
Adopted August 2026
154 Nicholasville six-month data center moratorium n.a. Nicholasville KY Jurisdiction-wide measure with no named project; no dollar or megawatt figure disclosed
moratoriumThe city commission passed a six-month moratorium on data centers on Aug. 10, 2026, citing utility cost, property tax and water-consumption concerns in the surrounding farming community.
Adopted August 2026
155 Kalamazoo one-year data center moratorium n.a. Kalamazoo MI Jurisdiction-wide measure with no named project; no dollar or megawatt figure disclosed
moratoriumThe City Commission approved a resolution pausing data center development for one year in August 2026; some residents pressed for a permanent ban instead. On 21 September 2026 the commission took up for first reading zoning code changes that write the moratorium into the city's zoning and development code, and set a public hearing and final vote for its next meeting. Assistant City Planner Bobby Durkee said the earlier action was only a resolution and the code change makes the pause enforceable under the zoning code and the state enabling act. WKZO reported that the moratorium is in effect and City Hall is not accepting data center applications. On Monday 5 October 2026 the City Commission held the final public hearing and vote on the zoning code amendment establishing the one-year moratorium on data centers and large battery energy storage systems; Assistant City Planner Bobby Durkee said the one-year clock begins with that approval, and staff will set up a working group to help draft regulations. WZZM reported on 6 October 2026 that Kalamazoo paused data center planning and development for one year.
Resolution adopted August 2026; zoning code moratorium given final approval 5 October 2026; one year from 5 October 2026
156 Ypsilanti Township 180-day moratorium on major electric utility infrastructure n.a. Ypsilanti Township MI Jurisdiction-wide measure with no named project; no dollar or megawatt figure disclosed
moratoriumThe Board of Trustees voted unanimously on Aug. 18, 2026 for a six-month moratorium on major electric utility infrastructure serving high-energy-demand uses, expressly including hyperscale and mid-sized data centers and AI computing facilities. The township, which had already paused water service for data centers, is seeking to slow a proposed University of Michigan and Los Alamos computing project and an associated 110 MW DTE substation.
Adopted August 2026
157 Town of Waxhaw 12-month data center moratorium n.a. Town of Waxhaw NC Jurisdiction-wide measure with no named project; no dollar or megawatt figure disclosed
moratoriumThe Board of Commissioners voted unanimously on Aug. 11, 2026 for a 12-month halt on accepting, processing or approving applications for data centers, crypto-mining facilities and related digital infrastructure. No project had been proposed.
Adopted August 2026
158 East Brunswick ordinance banning data centers n.a. East Brunswick NJ Jurisdiction-wide measure with no named project; no dollar or megawatt figure disclosed
moratoriumThe Township Council unanimously adopted an ordinance prohibiting data centers on Aug. 25, 2026, after a clerical correction changing 'primary use' to 'principal use' to match the land use code. East Brunswick acted the same night as North Brunswick and Stafford Township.
Adopted August 2026
159 Jersey City municipal ban on data centers n.a. Jersey City NJ Jurisdiction-wide measure with no named project; no dollar or megawatt figure disclosed
moratoriumListed among the New Jersey municipalities that have adopted data center bans in a Climate Revolution Action Network New Jersey compilation reported by Patch in August 2026.
Adopted August 2026
160 North Brunswick ordinance banning data centers n.a. North Brunswick NJ Jurisdiction-wide measure with no named project; no dollar or megawatt figure disclosed
moratoriumThe Township Council adopted an ordinance prohibiting data centers on Aug. 25, 2026, the same night East Brunswick and Stafford Township adopted their own bans. The three became the 35th, 36th and 37th New Jersey municipalities to ban the use.
Adopted August 2026
161 Stafford Township ordinance banning data centers n.a. Stafford Township NJ Jurisdiction-wide measure with no named project; no dollar or megawatt figure disclosed
moratoriumThe Township Council unanimously adopted Ordinance No. 2026-22 on Aug. 25, 2026, adding data centers to the Additional Prohibited Uses section of the township code and barring them anywhere in Stafford. The ordinance defines a data center as a facility used to store and manage digital data.
Adopted August 2026
162 Town of Mohawk six-month moratorium on data center permitting n.a. Town of Mohawk NY Jurisdiction-wide measure with no named project; no dollar or megawatt figure disclosed
moratoriumThe Town Board adopted a local law imposing a six-month moratorium on permitting or installing data centers, running through Feb. 13, 2027, while officials draft zoning laws. Town officials acted after concluding the state's hyperscale threshold of 50 MW did not reach the scale of project they were concerned about.
Adopted August 2026
163 Cherokee Nation (tribal and trust lands) ban on hyperscale data centers n.a. Cherokee Nation (tribal and trust lands) OK Jurisdiction-wide measure with no named project; no dollar or megawatt figure disclosed
moratoriumPrincipal Chief Chuck Hoskin Jr. announced on Aug. 10, 2026 that the Cherokee Nation will not permit hyperscale data centers on tribally owned or trust lands, and will not consider reservation projects without tribal consultation. A task force survey found 64% of ~1,600 citizens opposed.
Adopted August 2026
164 Gregg Township (Union County) 180-day moratorium on data center applications n.a. Gregg Township (Union County) PA Jurisdiction-wide measure with no named project; no dollar or megawatt figure disclosed
moratoriumSupervisors adopted Resolution 2026-03 at a special meeting on Aug. 20, 2026, barring the acceptance, processing and approval of new data center or 'technical development' applications for a period not to exceed 180 days or until the board terminates it. The pending PNK Group application is excluded and continues to be processed separately.
Adopted August 2026
165 Anderson County six-month data center moratorium n.a. Anderson County SC Jurisdiction-wide measure with no named project; no dollar or megawatt figure disclosed
moratoriumCounty Council passed the third and final reading of a six-month data center moratorium on Aug. 20, 2026.
Adopted August 2026
166 Spokane County four-month data center moratorium n.a. Spokane County WA Jurisdiction-wide measure with no named project; no dollar or megawatt figure disclosed
moratoriumThe Board of County Commissioners approved a four-month moratorium unanimously on Aug. 19, 2026, replacing an earlier nine-month proposal that had split the board 3-2, to give staff time to draft zoning rules.
Adopted August 2026
167 Bulloch County data center moratorium n.a. Bulloch County GA No dollar or megawatt figure; county-wide restriction on unincorporated areas
moratoriumMoratorium barring data center applications runs through 31 December 2026. On 1 September 2026 commissioners rejected an outright ban on data centers in unincorporated areas by 4-3, with the chairman casting the deciding vote after a 3-3 split, and unanimously approved a 21-member resident working group.
Moratorium in force through 31 December 2026; ban rejected 1 September 2026
168 Rowan County two-year data center moratorium n.a. Rowan County KY No dollar or megawatt figure; no project pending at adoption
moratoriumThe Rowan County Fiscal Court approved a two-year moratorium on large-scale data centers, adopted before any developer approach so the county can set a review framework. The judge-executive stated that no one had approached the county for a data center.
Approved September 2026, reported 2 September 2026
169 Winchester one-year data center moratorium n.a. Winchester KY No dollar or megawatt figure; city-limits restriction
moratoriumThe Winchester Board of Commissioners voted unanimously on 1 September 2026 for a one-year moratorium on data center development within city limits, citing the absence of specific zoning rules. The planning director told commissioners that communities from Lexington to London had moved to slow or halt new data center proposals.
Approved 1 September 2026
170 Bow data center (former Merrimack Station site) Granite Shore Power State of New Hampshire NH Size and capital cost not disclosed
otherGovernor Kelly Ayotte said on 2 September 2026 that she opposes the proposed Bow hyperscale data center and any data center in New Hampshire, and that she will include a multi-year moratorium in her next state budget proposal, which would not take effect before July 2027. She said an executive order could impose a ban sooner. State House Democrats separately announced plans to file 24-month moratorium legislation for the 2027 session. The project is at feasibility-study stage: Eversource Energy is conducting a study at Granite Shore Power's request for a hyperscale data center tied to the Bow coal plant that ceased operating in 2025. No moratorium has been enacted and no formal application has been filed. FERC filings describe a preliminary Eversource study, requested by Merrimack Station owner Granite Shore Power, on the viability of connecting a 350 MW project to the grid, while an Eversource executive mentioned a developer considering a data center of up to 200 MW in Bow. On 2 September 2026 Gov. Kelly Ayotte said she opposes the potential Bow data center and plans to propose a statewide moratorium on data centers.
2 September 2026
171 Trenton data center ban charter amendment Amazon Web Services (proposed annexation); Prologis (under construction) City of Trenton, Butler County OH Charter amendment would prohibit data centers over 25 MW; AWS annexation covers 601 acres; dollar figures not disclosed
litigationFive residents petitioned for a charter amendment prohibiting construction of data centers over 25 megawatts in city limits. The Butler County Board of Elections verified 336 signatures; the city council refused to certify the petition, reading its charter to require signatures from 10% of all electors rather than the lower Ohio Constitution standard of 10% of those who voted in the last municipal election. On 1 September 2026 the Ohio Supreme Court granted a writ of mandamus directing the council and Mayor Ryan Perry to certify the petition to the board of elections. On 3 September 2026 the council passed an emergency ordinance placing the ban on the 3 November 2026 general election ballot. An Amazon Web Services proposal to annex 601 acres from Madison and St. Clair Townships drew formal objections from both townships, with a merits hearing set for 15 September 2026. A Prologis data center on the south side of the city remains under construction. On Thursday 1 October 2026 the Trenton City Council gave first reading to a package that would take effect only if voters reject Issue 17 (the charter amendment barring data centers above 25 MW) and the proposed Amazon data center proceeds: a one-year holiday from the city's general fund inside property tax millage for tax year 2026, a bar on certain new police, streets and fire and EMS levies until at least 2035, and a 30 percent discount on YMCA memberships once construction begins. Nothing was adopted.
Ohio Supreme Court decision 1 September 2026; council ordinance 3 September 2026; council benefits package first reading 1 October 2026; ballot 3 November 2026
172 Ashville EdgeConneX campus referendum EdgeConneX Village of Ashville, Pickaway County OH Two single-story data centers and a natural gas power plant; capital cost and megawatts not disclosed
litigationAshville village council adopted a preliminary agreement with EdgeConneX in April 2026 as an emergency resolution, making it effective immediately and waiving the standard 30-day period before a referendum could be sought. Residents submitted referendum signatures in May 2026; the village fiscal officer refused to forward the petition in June 2026. On 7 August 2026 the Ohio Supreme Court decided State ex rel. McNamara-Smith v. Grube, 2026-0906, 6-1, holding that the emergency resolution did not explain why a 30-day delay would obstruct the project, and directed fiscal officer April Grube to submit the petition to the Pickaway County Board of Elections for placement on the 3 November 2026 ballot. The court noted the board of elections may still determine whether the resolution was an administrative action not subject to referendum.
Ohio Supreme Court decision 7 August 2026; ballot 3 November 2026
173 Zeeland Township moratorium and PA 233 challenge RWE Americas (Silver Maple Solar) Zeeland Township, Ottawa County MI Capital cost and megawatts not disclosed
moratoriumThe Zeeland Township board unanimously approved a one-year moratorium on data centers and energy facilities, repealing and replacing an earlier moratorium at the same meeting, to allow the township to review and update its master plan. Supervisor Kerri Bosma said the township had no pending data center or energy facility applicants. The township sued in July 2026 challenging Michigan's PA 233 siting law as unconstitutional; RWE Americas filed a notice of removal in August 2026 transferring the case from Ottawa County Circuit Court to the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Michigan, and the township moved to remand. RWE's Silver Maple Solar application before the Michigan Public Service Commission was suspended in July 2026 at the company's request.
Moratorium reported 1 September 2026; PA 233 suit filed July 2026, removed to federal court August 2026
174 CRG Festus campus litigation CRG (Clayco) City of Festus, Jefferson County MO $6B / 361 acres; megawatts not disclosed
litigationWake Up Jeffco LLC, Sherman Doyle, Vernon Valish, Sharon Valish and Rozilyn Daniels filed suit on 8 April 2026 in St. Louis County Circuit Court against the City of Festus and CRG Acquisition LLC, seeking to stop the project by invalidating the city's rezoning decisions and its development agreement. The suit followed the council's 6-2 approval of the development agreement on 30 March 2026. Motions to dismiss had been filed and answered as of mid-June 2026, and as of 12 June 2026 no construction plans or permit requests had been submitted. The council separately voted 5-2 on 24 August 2026 to annex three additional parcels for the project. On 24 August 2026 the Festus City Council voted 5-2 to annex three more parcels totaling 6.55 acres along Hwy. 67 for the CRG data center project, which the Leader describes as a hyperscale data center on 361 acres that CRG, the data center development arm of Clayco, estimates will cost US$6 billion. The council approved a development agreement with CRG Acquisition on 30 March 2026, and CRG's president hopes construction starts in November 2026. The St. Louis Post-Dispatch reports data center opponents were in Jefferson County court over whether a recall of four Festus officials should go before voters.
Suit filed 8 April 2026
175 Oregon state-owned land pause for data centers n.a. (statewide administrative action) State of Oregon OR No dollar figure or megawatt figure disclosed; scope is all state-owned property
moratoriumGovernor Tina Kotek directed state agencies to immediately pause all unapproved land transactions and permits for new data center projects on state-owned property. The pause covers requests for easements, leases, rentals, land-use permits, and sales or transfers of state-owned property for data centers, and runs through 1 July 2027 or until further direction from the Governor's Office or the legislature. The stated purpose is to allow a statewide evaluation of long-term impacts including infrastructure capacity, environmental sustainability, water usage, job creation and effects on surrounding communities, and to ensure that data center growth does not shift utility and infrastructure costs onto Oregon ratepayers. Reporting notes that Oregon does not currently have authority to impose a statewide moratorium on data center development on private land, and that this action reaches only the state's own property. On the same day, at an anti-data-center rally outside the Capitol in Salem, Kotek said she now supports a statewide moratorium on new data centers and that the legislature should pass a temporary ban when it convenes next year, a shift from her previous position. Republican gubernatorial candidate Christine Drazan also called for a moratorium. No statewide moratorium has been enacted; what is in force is the state-land pause recorded here.
Announced 8 September 2026; in effect through 1 July 2027
176 Crux AI (Google-Blackstone venture) Cheyenne site Crux AI (Blackstone and Google joint venture) Cheyenne WY No site-level dollar figure or megawatt figure disclosed for the Cheyenne project
delayedBloomberg reported on 8 September 2026 that the Google and Blackstone cloud venture has hit delays at major data center locations intended to run Google's chips, among them a data center being developed in Cheyenne, Wyoming. Executives involved with the venture, reported internally as Project Braid, are described as having accepted that data center projects now carry roughly a 50% chance of meeting delivery dates, against about 90% three years ago, with organized opposition, switchgear supply shortages and skilled labor constraints cited as causes. The venture, publicly named Crux AI, was launched with an initial $5 billion equity commitment from Blackstone and targets a first 500 MW in 2027. This record captures a reported schedule delay, not a cancellation, and the parties have not confirmed a revised delivery date.
Reported 8 September 2026
177 Project Camellia zoning ordinance challenge OpenAI Effingham County GA $20B / 1,400 acres / up to 3.2 GW of electricity requested
litigationThree Effingham County residents filed a complaint in Effingham County Superior Court on 2 September 2026 challenging Ordinance 2026-352, which county commissioners gave final approval on 4 August 2026 and which zoned the 1,400-acre property planned for OpenAI's Project Camellia data center campus. The residents allege the county was required to hold two public hearings before making that change, one before the planning board and one before the county commission, under state law and the county's own rules, and that it held neither. The complaint also cites a non-disclosure agreement signed by County Manager Tim Callanan with OpenAI that it says forbade him from sharing information about Project Camellia with residents. The suit asks the court to throw out the ordinance and bar the county from using it unless the required zoning procedures are followed. The campus is reported at up to 3.2 GW of electricity demand, which local reporting compares to roughly three cities the size of Atlanta. No court ruling has issued and the project is not stopped; this record captures a filed challenge to the zoning instrument. The capital figure is left blank because the $20 billion attached to the project in press coverage is not disclosed in the complaint.
Ordinance 2026-352 approved 4 August 2026; complaint filed 2 September 2026
178 Mona area data center approval process challenge Not identified in reporting Juab County UT $10B / roughly 3 million square feet
under appealResidents of the Mona area are challenging how a proposed data center of roughly 3 million square feet, described in reporting as a $10 billion project and the largest in Juab County's history, was approved with little public input. County commissioners did not approve the project themselves: planning officials cleared it through a zone change and a conditional use permit, and the public hearing on 15 April 2026 lasted about four minutes with only the county, the selling landowners and the developers present. Residents say they learned of the project only recently and are asking how the zone change was presented to the public and how the conditional use permit was approved, and are demanding a public hearing before any further decision rather than after it is final. No approval has been rescinded and no litigation is recorded here; this is a live challenge to the process. The capital figure is left blank because the $10 billion is a press characterization, not a disclosed commitment. On Tuesday 15 September 2026 the community group Mona Cares filed an appeal asking the Juab County Commission to overturn the conditional use permit, arguing the county did not give residents adequate and actual notice. Commission Chair Clint Painter said the county followed state notice requirements and warned that reversing the approval could expose the county to costly developer lawsuits. Appeals are normally due within 30 days; the group argues the August posting of the meeting minutes supports accepting it. Whether the commission will accept the appeal had not been decided.
Conditional use permit approved at a 15 April 2026 hearing; resident challenge reported 8 September 2026; appeal filed with Juab County Commission 15 September 2026
179 Dauphin Highlands Golf Course data center Not identified in reporting Dauphin County PA No dollar figure or megawatt figure disclosed
pausedPlans for a data center at the Dauphin Highlands Golf Course site were put on hold indefinitely to allow for more community input, after residents raised concerns at a township meeting. The pause was reported on 5 August 2026. A separate $10 billion Corscale proposal sits about two miles away in Swatara Township and is not affected by this hold.
Reported on hold indefinitely 5 August 2026
180 Townsite Data Center Townsite Solar 2 LLC Boulder City area, Clark County NV 88.5 acres on federal public land; no dollar figure or megawatt figure disclosed
court haltThe Interior Board of Land Appeals stayed construction of the Townsite Data Center on 1 September 2026, an 88.5-acre facility the Bureau of Land Management approved on public land roughly 25 miles southeast of Las Vegas near Boulder City, and reported as the first AI data center approved on federal public land. The board found BLM likely acted unlawfully when it amended an existing right-of-way grant in June 2026 to permit a data center without a project-specific environmental review. Opponents cited projected electricity and water demand, soil disruption, light pollution and habitat loss for the Mojave desert tortoise. BLM had until 21 September 2026 to respond. This is an interim stay, not a final decision, and no capital figure has been disclosed. In a filing on Monday 21 September 2026, BLM asked Interior Board of Land Appeals Administrative Judge David Gunter, who granted the stay, to set aside its approval of the right-of-way amendment so the agency can conduct additional review of the application. Townsite Solar 2 LLC supports the motion, the Center for Biological Diversity and the Sierra Club are neutral, and Boulder City opposes it, with its response due 5 October 2026; the city said the motion does not commit BLM to an environmental assessment or public involvement and its approval would lift the stay.
BLM right-of-way amendment approved 26 June 2026; IBLA stay issued 1 September 2026; BLM motion to set aside and remand filed 21 September 2026; Boulder City response due 5 October 2026
181 Unincorporated Lake County data center moratorium n.a. (county-wide land use action) Lake County IL No dollar figure or megawatt figure disclosed; applies to all unincorporated county land
moratoriumThe Lake County Board approved an eight-month moratorium on data center applications and development in unincorporated Lake County, running to 11 May 2027 or earlier if the board adopts regulations, and extendable by a further four months. The county states the purpose is to evaluate data centers as an emerging land use, review best practices and assess infrastructure and environmental considerations before enacting development restrictions. The adoption process included a public hearing that generated more than 1,200 public comments in person and online.
Approved 8 September 2026; runs to 11 May 2027, extendable by four months
182 La Osa Energy Center Vermaland Pinal County AZ 3,300 acres, 11 data center buildings and a 500 MW natural gas plant with battery storage; 1 GW of total energy demand capacity. No capital figure disclosed.
rejectedThe Pinal County Board of Supervisors rejected the rezoning 4-1 on 26 August 2026. Vermaland had cut the project to roughly 80 percent of an earlier proposal of 59 data center buildings and 3 GW of energy demand, moved buildings several miles from neighbors, offered 22 additional development conditions between May and August 2026, and proposed a 600 acre-foot cap on fresh water, roughly 200 million gallons, with potential offset through effluent purchases from the Central Arizona Irrigation and Drainage District. Supervisor Jeff Serdy said he voted the will of the residents. Neighbors raised aquifer depletion, air quality, noise, wildlife and property value concerns and questioned whether power could be sourced reliably from more than 100 miles away.
Rejected 4-1 on 26 August 2026
183 Clinton Township data center campus Linde Corporation Clinton Township PA 682 acres, 20 buildings of approximately 118,000 sq ft each, with generator yards at each building, two customer substations, two natural gas generation facilities and a water treatment facility, off Route 247 and Flat Rock Road. No megawatt or dollar figure disclosed.
rejectedClinton Township supervisors voted unanimously to reject Linde Corporation's preliminary land development plan after roughly six months of review, reported 10 September 2026. A township engineer concluded the plan was not environmentally sound, and the board chairman said the application was incomplete. The township planning commission had accepted the resubmitted application in early July 2026, starting a 90-day review period that ran to 28 September 2026. Attorneys were to meet the developer within 15 days to review the deficiencies, leaving open the possibility of a revised submission. A township supervisor resigned in July 2026 after residents questioned ties to the developer.
Rejected September 2026; reported 10 September 2026
184 Former Hynix site data center n.a. (prospective buyer, not publicly named) City of Eugene OR No square footage, megawatt figure or dollar figure disclosed.
deniedThe City of Eugene planning department determined in a letter dated 8 September 2026 that the data center described by the prospective buyer of the former Hynix plant is prohibited in the site's E-1 Campus Employment zone, reasoning that data centers are almost self-operating with little human presence at the site. The buyer's attorney had argued the use qualified under information technology services permitted in E-1. A city planner stated the decision can be appealed to the Oregon Land Use Board of Appeals, which could uphold it, seek more information or overturn it.
Decision letter 8 September 2026; appealable to the Oregon Land Use Board of Appeals
185 Levy County data center moratorium (Ordinance 2026-05) n.a. (county-wide land use action) Levy County FL Applies to facilities with anticipated monthly peak electric demand of at least 50 MW. No dollar figure disclosed.
moratoriumThe Levy County Commission adopted Ordinance 2026-05 on 8 September 2026, a temporary moratorium on data centers, large-scale data centers and large load customer facilities in unincorporated areas, defined as facilities with anticipated monthly peak electric demand of at least 50 MW. The moratorium halts processing of new submissions and of pending applications not yet deemed complete, and runs from 1 October 2026 through 30 September 2027, taking effect on the later of 1 October or filing with the Florida Department of State. Exemptions cover ordinary server rooms supporting other uses, public telecommunications infrastructure, certain government facilities and previously approved projects. Commissioners directed staff to prepare the ordinance on 30 June 2026, citing electricity, water and infrastructure demands and impacts on the Floridan Aquifer.
Adopted 8 September 2026; runs 1 October 2026 to 30 September 2027
186 Springhill Township application bar and data center ordinances Nadara Springhill Township PA Nadara holds a right-to-purchase agreement with the Fay-Penn Economic Council for 800 acres near Gans. No megawatt or dollar figure disclosed.
moratoriumSpringhill Township supervisors approved a resolution on 4 September 2026 prohibiting anyone from applying for a data center or power plant in the township until the next meeting, and tabled two ordinances regulating data centers and fossil fuel power plants to satisfy state notice requirements. The final vote was scheduled for 17 September 2026. As drafted, the ordinances would treat data centers and accompanying power plants as conditional uses in the heavy and light industrial districts, require data centers to sit 200 feet from property lines and 400 feet from occupied homes and power plants 500 feet and 1,500 feet respectively, and cap noise at 55 decibels by day and 45 at night measured at the nearest property line. The township began drafting the ordinances after being approached by Nadara.
Application bar approved 4 September 2026; ordinance vote scheduled 17 September 2026, outcome not yet reported as of 17 September 2026
187 Former Emerson campus technology hub and data center Next Revolution Technologies City of Ferguson MO 217-acre former Emerson Electric campus; reported as a $1.8 billion technology hub and data center development, with a $1.5 billion tax incentive package and industrial revenue bonds of up to $22 billion. No megawatt figure disclosed.
approved after delayThe Ferguson City Council rejected the tax incentive package in May 2026 on a 3-3 vote with one abstention. On 10 September 2026 council members Nick Kasoff and LaMika Covington introduced legislation reviving it, with a final vote expected later in September 2026. The revived plan keeps a 75 percent abatement for the first ten years and adds a $7.5 million commitment to the Ferguson Neighborhood Improvement Program over ten years, $250,000 for an environmental mitigation fund and $700,000 for community impact mitigation and emergency services. Opposition continued from residents, the St. Louis County NAACP and the Ferguson-Florissant School District; the mayor said he would vote against the plan. On 22 September 2026 the Ferguson City Council approved the revived redevelopment agreement 4-3. Residents launched a petition drive on 23 September 2026 to force a referendum on the agreement, and opponents said they are exploring legal options. KSDK reported on 2 October 2026 that opponents are gathering signatures for a referendum petition that would force the council to repeal the approving ordinance or put it to a public vote, with a signature deadline later in October 2026, and that a recall effort is also underway. KSDK describes the project (Project Butterfly, developer Jim Onder of SSL Investments LLC, 217 acres at 8000 West Florissant Avenue) as a Chapter 100 package that could scale to $22 billion over time, with an initial investment above $175 million.
Rejected May 2026 on a 3-3 vote; revived legislation introduced 10 September 2026; approved 4-3 on 22 September 2026; referendum petition launched 23 September 2026, signature drive continuing as of 2 October 2026
188 Burgin hyperscale campus annexation Panattoni Data Centers City of Burgin KY More than 1,000 acres. No megawatt or dollar figure disclosed
delayedBurgin's earlier attempt to annex more than 1,000 acres for a Panattoni Data Centers hyperscale campus was declared null and void. The city restarted the process in September 2026 with adjusted boundary lines, and the city council was scheduled to vote at a special meeting on 8 September 2026 to begin drafting a new annexation ordinance for the revised land. Residents opposing the project called for basic protections and third-party expertise during the drafting. At the 8 September 2026 special meeting, the council passed the first reading of an ordinance to rejoin the joint planning and zoning commission on Mayor Joseph Monroe's tie-breaking vote. Council member Melinda Wofford then left the meeting, leaving the council without a quorum, so no vote was taken on the annexation measure. The zoning ordinance still needs a second reading, state review and a final council vote; the mayor said rejoining makes development harder but does not end the project. The Harrodsburg Herald reported on 17 September 2026 that the council had approved the data center annexation of 10 properties at a July special meeting but a later special meeting for second reading was canceled, and that the 8 September vote was only to have the city attorney draft a new annexation ordinance. The interlocal agreement to rejoin the Harrodsburg-Burgin-Mercer County Joint Planning and Zoning Commission still needs second readings by all three bodies and Kentucky Department of Local Government approval
Prior annexation void; 8 September 2026 meeting lost quorum before the annexation vote; planning and zoning rejoin agreement passed first reading on the mayor's tie-break; no new annexation vote scheduled as of 17 September 2026
189 Escambia County large-scale data center ban n.a. (county-wide land use action) Escambia County FL Applies to unincorporated Escambia County outside the City of Pensacola and the Town of Century. No dollar figure disclosed.
moratoriumThe Escambia County Commission approved an ordinance on 7 August 2026 banning large-scale data centers in the unincorporated areas of the county outside the City of Pensacola and the Town of Century, with small data centers permitted as an accessory use at institutions such as Navy Federal, the University of West Florida and hospitals. The county attorney noted the ordinance was acceptable but not required because the Land Development Code already did not include data centers as a permitted use. In September 2026 the commission considered advertising hearings for a further 12-month moratorium covering facilities with anticipated monthly peak load of at least 10 MW but less than 50 MW, then took no action, saying the existing ban already applies.
Ordinance approved 7 August 2026; further moratorium considered and no action taken in September 2026
191 Woodford County permanent data center ban n.a. (county-wide land use action) Woodford County KY County-wide permanent prohibition. No dollar figure or megawatt figure disclosed.
moratoriumThe Woodford County Fiscal Court passed an ordinance unanimously on Tuesday 8 September 2026, reported 10 September 2026, permanently banning construction of landfills, data centers and large battery storage systems within the county. It is the first Kentucky county to adopt a permanent ban rather than a temporary moratorium. Judge-Executive James Kay said no developer had pitched a specific data center proposal in the county but that developers were looking everywhere, and cited the divisive debate over the proposed hyperscale campus in Burgin, Mercer County, as the reason for choosing a permanent ban. The measure follows a years-long effort to preserve farmland, including Thoroughbred horse farms.
Ordinance passed unanimously Tuesday 8 September 2026; reported 10 September 2026
192 Chatham County large-scale data center moratorium n.a. (county-wide land use action) Chatham County GA Applies to data centers of 10 MW or larger and to conversion of warehouses and industrial space for data center use. No dollar figure disclosed.
moratoriumChatham County commissioners enacted a 155-day moratorium on 11 September 2026 covering data centers of 10 MW or larger and the conversion of warehouse and industrial space to data center use in unincorporated parts of the county. It expires 16 February 2027 and may be extended by up to 60 further days. The county will conduct a study during the moratorium to set conditions for future development. Commissioner Dean Kicklighter, who proposed the measure, said the county has nothing addressing the relationship between residential areas and this scale of commercial development and needs to look at electricity and water usage.
Enacted 11 September 2026; expires 16 February 2027, extendable by 60 days
193 Trumbull two-year data center moratorium n.a. (town-wide land use action) Town of Trumbull CT Applies to all new data centers town-wide and explicitly excludes the existing $200 million modernization of the former Nasdaq data center at 80 Merritt Boulevard by 365 Data Centers.
moratoriumThe Trumbull Town Council approved a two-year moratorium on new data centers unanimously by voice vote on 11 September 2026, effective immediately. The resolution reaches only newly built data centers and expressly does not apply to work under way at Trumbull Corporate Park on Merritt Boulevard, where 365 Data Centers of Norwalk is carrying out a $200 million modernization of the former Nasdaq facility at 80 Merritt Boulevard under a 15-year tenant commitment. Residents had expected the measure to halt that project, which they regard as an AI-ready pipeline rather than a modernization, and that gap between expectation and effect became the central controversy. The record here is that the moratorium did not stop the capital already committed in the town.
Approved unanimously 11 September 2026; two years, effective immediately
194 Clearfield 180-day data center moratorium n.a. (city-wide land use action) City of Clearfield UT City-wide, adopted with no data center project proposed in the city. No dollar figure or megawatt figure disclosed.
moratoriumThe Clearfield City Council voted 4-0 on 8 September 2026 to freeze all data center development in the city for 180 days, although no such project had been proposed there. City staff proposed the moratorium to study land use and infrastructure questions before a developer applies; the city's code does not currently define a data center. Mayor Mark Shepherd pointed to the grandiose scale of the Stratos campus taking shape in Box Elder County during the discussion. Logan adopted a 180-day moratorium on data center and power plant development on 30 June 2026 and Iron County commissioners passed one on 26 May 2026.
Approved 4-0 on 8 September 2026; 180 days
195 Box Elder County data center moratorium (Stratos exempt) n.a. (county-wide land use action) Box Elder County UT 180-day pause on new data center development. The Stratos project, which involves a data center and up to 9 GW of power generating capacity, was already approved and is exempt.
moratoriumBox Elder County commissioners approved a 180-day halt on new data center development on 10 June 2026 to study guidelines and address concerns raised by the Stratos controversy. The county stated the ordinance does not permanently prohibit data centers but establishes a temporary planning period for research, analysis, public participation and policy development. The Stratos project, described as a data center with up to 9 gigawatts of power generating capacity and already approved, is exempt from the moratorium. The Military Installation Development Authority approved the Stratos project area in April 2026 and the project area was later reduced. The record here is that the county's pause did not reach the capacity already entitled.
Approved 10 June 2026; 180 days, Stratos exempt
196 Global AI Windsor data center (Weld County) Global AI Weld County CO Approximately 41 acres on part of the former Carestream Health and Eastman Kodak campus. No megawatt figure or dollar figure disclosed; reported as what could become Colorado's largest data center, on a basis the reporting does not state.
approved after delayThe Weld County Board of Commissioners voted 5-0 on Wednesday 9 September 2026, after an eight-hour hearing and hours of objections, to approve the zoning permit for Global AI's data center on roughly 41 acres of the former Carestream Health site in unincorporated Weld County near Windsor. Commissioners attached conditions requiring a closed-loop cooling system, noise limited to established ambient levels with continuous monitoring, and a decommissioning plan and bond within six months. The proposal had faced sustained community opposition over noise, power and transparency. This entry records an approval reached over opposition rather than a block, and is carried in this table so the record shows both directions. On Monday 28 September 2026 the Weld County Clerk and Recorder approved two petitions for circulation, backed by the citizens group Protect Our Water and Energy Resources (POWER). One would force a referendum on the commissioners' 9 September approval; the other is an initiative barring the county from issuing an occupancy permit to any data center unless approved by a majority of voters. Each needs 9,103 valid signatures, and opponents have 45 days to collect them for the referendum. Colorado Newsline reports the facility's initial capacity as 27.5 MW, served by Poudre Valley REA, with long-term plans for up to 1 GW.
Approved 5-0 on 9 September 2026; referendum and initiative petitions approved for circulation 28 September 2026 (9,103 signatures each, 45 days)
197 Statesville 180-day data center moratorium n.a. City of Statesville NC Citywide pause on data center applications. No megawatt or dollar figure; previously approved data centers, including the Compass Data Center project on Stamey Farm Road approved the prior year, are not affected
moratoriumStatesville City Council unanimously approved the second reading of a 180-day moratorium on data centers on 14 September 2026, and the moratorium took effect that day. It covers the acceptance, processing and approval of development applications for data centers and does not affect previously approved data centers. The original proposal called for 150 days and was lengthened to 180 days; council approved the first reading unanimously in August 2026. The pause gives staff time to review development regulations, which do not currently address data centers.
Second reading approved unanimously on 14 September 2026; effective immediately; runs 180 days
198 Clarendon County data center moratorium (Project 59) n.a. Clarendon County SC Countywide pause. Project 59 in the county industrial park has no building and no confirmed operator; a Santee Electric Co-op proposal on co-op land would use closed-loop cooling. No megawatt or dollar figure disclosed
moratoriumClarendon County Council passed the third and final reading of a moratorium pausing future data center development unanimously, with no one opposed, at its meeting on 14 September 2026. Council said the measure closes existing loopholes before a new project can proceed and that research on data centers will continue during the pause. Council members said an outright ban would be discriminatory and is not planned. Public concern centered on Project 59 and a Santee Electric Co-op proposal, along with tourism, environmental and water-use impacts. The duration was not stated in the reporting.
Third and final reading passed unanimously on 14 September 2026; duration not published
199 Lima 18-month data center and outside-water moratorium n.a. City of Lima OH Citywide pause on new data center construction and on new requests for city-supplied water to developments in outside municipalities. The existing agreement to supply water to the Google data center under construction in American Township is not affected. No megawatt or dollar figure
moratoriumLima City Council approved an ordinance at its Monday meeting (14 September 2026) enacting an 18-month moratorium on data center construction in the city and on new requests for city-supplied water to developments in outside municipalities. The vote was 6-0 with one abstention (Third Ward Councilor Jesse Lowe) and one member absent. The city said the ordinance does not affect its agreement to supply water to the Google data center being developed in American Township. Development directors will evaluate standards on land use, setbacks, electric demand, community benefits and infrastructure costs, and the moratorium can end early if council adopts standards.
Approved 6-0 with one abstention at the 14 September 2026 meeting; runs 18 months unless standards are adopted sooner
200 Pioneer six-month moratorium (former AquaBounty site data center) Cervenka Development Partners Village of Pioneer OH Proposed 20 MW data center on property owned by AquaBounty Technologies near the Ohio-Indiana line. No dollar figure disclosed
moratoriumPioneer Village Council voted 6-0 on 14 September 2026 to adopt a six-month moratorium on data centers. Tom Cervenka of Cervenka Development Partners had told the planning commission he intended to buy the former AquaBounty Technologies property to build a 20 MW data center. The village will conduct studies during the pause, including a new electrical study, and council members said they did not want anything fast-tracked.
Adopted 6-0 on 14 September 2026; runs six months
201 Richmond 45-day data center moratorium n.a. City of Richmond CA Citywide pause; Richmond has no data centers and no pending data center applications. No megawatt or dollar figure
moratoriumRichmond City Council voted 6-1 on Tuesday 15 September 2026 to adopt a 45-day moratorium on new data center development, making Richmond the third Bay Area city to do so after Oakley and Gilroy. As amended, the city may continue accepting applications during the moratorium but may not approve them or issue permits. Staff outlined a timeline that includes a moratorium report and extension within the 45 days. There are no pending data center applications in the city.
Adopted 6-1 on 15 September 2026; runs 45 days, extension contemplated
202 Gilroy 45-day data center moratorium Amazon (exempt project); second pre-application unnamed in one report City of Gilroy CA Citywide pause. The Amazon data center under construction on a 56-acre site at 8050 Camino Arroyo is exempt; a second project at Highway 152 and Camino Arroyo was only at pre-application and would be subject to the pause. No megawatt or dollar figure
moratoriumGilroy City Council voted unanimously on 14 September 2026 to adopt a 45-day interim urgency ordinance barring the city from accepting, processing or approving applications and entitlements for new data centers. The moratorium expires 29 October 2026 unless renewed and can be extended to a total of two years under California Government Code Section 65858. It does not apply to the Amazon data center under construction on a 56-acre site at 8050 Camino Arroyo, approved in 2025 by the community development director. Staff will return with objective zoning, development and operational standards covering water, grid capacity, backup generator emissions and noise.
Adopted unanimously on 14 September 2026; expires 29 October 2026 unless extended (maximum two years)
203 Marysville 12-month data center moratorium n.a. City of Marysville KS Citywide pause on data center applications. No specific project, megawatt or dollar figure reported
moratoriumMarysville City Council unanimously adopted a 12-month moratorium on data center development at its Monday meeting (14 September 2026). No applications for data center development will be accepted or processed during the moratorium. The pause gives the Planning Commission and city staff time to examine zoning changes and hear from residents and stakeholders. The ordinance defines data centers broadly to include cloud computing and AI infrastructure.
Adopted unanimously on 14 September 2026; runs 12 months
204 Woodburn 120-day data center moratorium n.a. City of Woodburn OR Citywide pause; the city has no pending or active data center applications. No megawatt or dollar figure
moratoriumWoodburn City Council adopted Resolution 2267 on 14 September 2026 declaring a 120-day moratorium on the acceptance, review and approval of city permits and development proposals for new data centers. Other industrial development is not affected. During the pause the city will review zoning and siting criteria and study water, energy, noise and environmental impacts. The vote count was not published in the sources reviewed.
Adopted 14 September 2026 (Resolution 2267); runs 120 days
205 Loudoun County 12-month pause on legislative data center applications n.a. Loudoun County VA County hosts 233 data centers. Pause would apply to new legislative data center and substation applications, not projects already in the pipeline. No megawatt or dollar figure
otherThe Loudoun County Board of Supervisors voted 7-1-1 on 15 September 2026 directing staff to draft a resolution pausing data center applications for 12 months while new regulations are written. Supervisor Kristen Umstattd voted against and Supervisor Caleb Kershner abstained. As described, each application would be paused for one year from its submission date. Board Chair Phyllis Randall said the measure is not a ban or a moratorium. A separate vote is still required to adopt the resolution. Loudoun Now reported that staff will bring the resolution back in October 2026 for a final board decision, that County Attorney Leo Rogers advised a moratorium is not legal in Virginia so the measure relies on the 12-month review deadlines for legislative applications, that by-right applications (an estimated 18.2 million sq ft of data center space) are not affected, and that new data center regulations are expected to be completed in July 2027
Direction to draft approved 7-1-1 on 15 September 2026; staff to return with the resolution and board to make a final decision on 13 October 2026
206 Texas enforcement directive on data center water-use reporting n.a. State of Texas TX Statewide. The Texas Water Development Board surveyed 329 data centers in 2025 and about 30% responded; 22.5% of 267 new facilities responded. No megawatt or dollar figure
otherGov. Greg Abbott announced on 14 September 2026 that he directed the Texas Water Development Board to use its enforcement authority against data centers that fail to complete the state's mandatory water use survey, both for past failures and future noncompliance. Existing law makes failure to respond a Class C misdemeanor, and the directive includes referring violations to county or district attorneys. Response rates were 32% of 22 surveyed data centers in 2023, 28% of 67 in 2024 and about 30% of 329 in 2025. Abbott asked the board for a compliance and enforcement update by 14 October 2026.
Directive announced 14 September 2026; update due 14 October 2026
207 QLevr Carmen Avenue data center (moratorium carve-out) QLevr LLC City of Inver Grove Heights MN 54,000-square-foot data center on Carmen Avenue East
approved after delayInver Grove Heights City Council voted 3-1 at its Monday meeting (14 September 2026) to exempt QLevr LLC's proposed data center from the one-year citywide moratorium the council adopted 3-2 in June 2026. QLevr had sued the city in Dakota County District Court in July 2026 calling the moratorium unlawful, and its attorneys offered to dismiss the suit without damages if the project was carved out; the city attorney cited potential liability of at least $20 million against $1 million of insurance. The council is set to vote on the major site plan on 28 September 2026. The moratorium remains in place for all other data center projects. The underlying one-year citywide moratorium was approved 3-2 on 26 June 2026, after QLevr had threatened legal action if the project was put on hold. Residents also filed a petition with more than 700 signatures seeking an environmental assessment worksheet. On Monday 28 September 2026 the City Council approved the major site plan for the data center, which KARE 11 describes as 55,000 square feet, covering architecture, landscaping, light output and parking. The one-year moratorium remains in effect for all other data center projects in the city.
Carve-out approved 3-1 on 14 September 2026; major site plan approved 28 September 2026
208 Chillicothe moratorium repeal (Alignment Engine former paper mill data hall) Alignment Engine City of Chillicothe OH Proposed data hall in the Chilpaco division of the former US Paper Mill site at Eastern Avenue and Canal Street. No project megawatt or dollar figure disclosed
restartedChillicothe City Council voted 8-1 on Monday 14 September 2026 to reconsider and strike down the 60-day data center moratorium it had adopted unanimously on 24 August 2026. Council members cited a newly surfaced city letter from earlier in 2026 telling the paper mill owner that the Unified Development Code did not prevent a data center on the property. The vote clears a hurdle for Alignment Engine's proposed data hall, which the company says will not seek tax abatements or draw more power or water than the former mill. A companion report says a revised moratorium grandfathering the project and setting standards, including a 100 MW cap, will be redrafted and returned to council.
Moratorium struck down 8-1 on 14 September 2026 (adopted 24 August 2026)
209 Former Star Tribune printing facility data center (North Loop) Legacy Investing City of Minneapolis MN Proposed 20 MW data center at the former Star Tribune Heritage Printing Facility. No dollar figure or square footage disclosed
withdrawnVirginia-based Legacy Investing withdrew its land use application for a 20 MW data center at the former Star Tribune printing facility in Minneapolis's North Loop, a city spokesperson confirmed on 11 September 2026. The proposal drew heavy opposition from North Loop residents over environmental impacts and doubts about job creation. Minneapolis City Council had passed a six-month ban on data centers larger than 350,000 square feet in May 2026. The Star Tribune still owns the site.
Withdrawal confirmed by the city on 11 September 2026
210 DC Rapids former paper mill data center DC Rapids LLC City of Wisconsin Rapids WI Redevelopment of the former paper mill site into a data center. No megawatt, acreage or dollar figure disclosed
otherThe Wisconsin Rapids Plan Commission voted 7-0 on 16 September 2026 to recommend that the Common Council deny DC Rapids LLC's conditional use and site review applications to redevelop the former paper mill site as a data center. Staff identified 33 shortcomings, including missing electric utility approval, employment and shift projections and construction traffic details. The recommendation goes to the Common Council, reported for 20 October 2026, and the company may reapply. The city is separately drafting a data center moratorium. This is a recommendation, not a final denial.
Denial recommended 7-0 on 16 September 2026; Common Council action pending
211 Diode Ventures Cedar Creek Lake data center Diode Ventures Henderson County TX 12-year build-out; water use of 5 million gallons per day by year five (Texas Tribune); MW and capital not disclosed
withdrawnKansas-based Diode Ventures withdrew its proposed data center near Cedar Creek Lake in Henderson County on 23 July 2026, saying it would not advance the site beyond preliminary planning. The Governor's office said the project did not meet the five data center standards Gov. Greg Abbott set in June 2026 directives to the PUC and ERCOT. A volunteer Save Cedar Creek Lake coalition had gathered thousands of petition signatures over water supply concerns. Henderson County has no zoning rules, so the county had no approval to deny.
Withdrawn 23 July 2026
212 Spring Valley Technology Park Active Infrastructure Loudoun County VA 325 acres / 3.54M sq ft / 780 MW
otherThe Loudoun County Planning Commission voted 5-0 on 23 July 2026 to recommend denial of Active Infrastructure's rezoning (LEGI-2024-0074) for a 780 MW, 3.54 million sq ft campus on 325 acres near Beaverdam Reservoir. County staff had also recommended denial, calling the rezoning a fundamental departure from planned land uses. More than 500 residents attended the hearing. As of September 2026 the application awaits a final Board of Supervisors decision.
PC denial recommendation 23 July 2026; Board decision pending as of September 2026
213 Dulles South Innovation Center (Dulles Cloud South) Sanders Lage Assemblage I LLC Prince William County VA ~1,940 acres / 252 parcels / 43M sq ft
deniedThe Prince William Board of County Supervisors voted 8-0 on 7 July 2026 to deny the rezoning for roughly 43 million sq ft of data centers on about 1,940 acres along Sanders Lane near the Loudoun County line. The site lies outside the county's Data Center Opportunity Zone Overlay District. Supervisors cited conflict with the 2040 Comprehensive Plan, emissions from roughly 6,000 planned diesel generators, and Occoquan watershed protection. The vote followed the collapse of the Prince William Digital Gateway.
Denied 7 July 2026
214 Mountain Road Technology Park Tract Hanover County VA ~430 acres
deniedThe Hanover County Board of Supervisors voted 4-3 on 28 May 2026 to deny Tract's rezoning for a data center park on nearly 430 acres. Opponents cited estimated water use of 600,000 gallons per day, described as about 90 percent of the zone's water supply, along with power demand, noise and rural character. Tract had offered a $15 million commitment toward county water infrastructure.
Denied 28 May 2026
215 Pine Island data center (Project Skyway) Ryan Companies (developer); Google (end user) Goodhue County District Court / City of Pine Island MN Up to 3M sq ft / up to 2,700 MW
court haltThe Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy sued the City of Pine Island and Ryan Companies in October 2025, arguing the Project Skyway environmental review covered a generic technology center rather than the Google data center. On 22 May 2026 Goodhue County District Judge Patrick Biren enjoined all construction and pre-construction activity, finding MCEA likely to succeed on the merits, with a $2,000 bond. The court also denied the city and developer's request to rule the review adequate. The case has moved to discovery, and the next hearing is reported for 22 February 2027. Separately, on Thursday 1 October 2026 Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison filed comments with the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission arguing that Xcel Energy has not shown its agreement to power Google's Pine Island data center is reasonable, in the public interest or compliant with the state law that assigns all costs of very large customers to those customers, and that other ratepayers could bear millions of dollars, and possibly more than a billion dollars, in extra costs.
Suit October 2025; injunction 22 May 2026; Attorney General comments on the Xcel and Google agreement filed with the PUC 1 October 2026
216 Hexa Builders data center, 3043 Black Horse Pike Hexa Builders LLC Monroe Township NJ 1M sq ft data center plus warehouse
litigationMonroe Township adopted ordinances in April 2026 removing data centers as a permitted use on Hexa's redevelopment site and banning them townwide. Hexa Builders sued the township in New Jersey Superior Court on 5 June 2026 seeking $300 million in damages. The case was moved to federal court, where the township filed a motion to dismiss on 28 July 2026. As of early August 2026 no ruling had been issued. Monroe Township moved Hexa Builders' $300 million complaint from state to federal court and, on 28 July 2026, its attorney filed a letter asking that the suit be dismissed, rejecting the First Amendment and equal protection claims. Hexa's attorney then asked U.S. District Judge Edward Kiel to send the non-constitutional land-use claims back to New Jersey state court and to reject the dismissal request. The judge had not acted as of early August 2026
Ban April 2026; suit 5 June 2026
217 Former Newton Airport data center site National Land Developers LLC Andover Township NJ ~97 acres at 248 Stickles Pond Road
moratoriumAndover Township had amended zoning to allow data centers in September 2025, then moved to ban them townwide in May 2026 after heated public meetings. National Land Developers LLC sued in New Jersey Superior Court on 10 July 2026 to overturn the ban for its roughly 97-acre former Newton Airport property. The suit argues nothing changed in the five days between the township introducing data center standards and reversing to a full prohibition. Township officials announced on Thursday 1 October 2026 that National Land Developers LLC was dismissing its suit against Ordinance 2026-13, the townwide data center prohibition, with prejudice, after the township moved in August to dismiss it. The developer had sought to build a data center at 248 Stickles Pond Road in the Route 206 Economic Development Zone. The ban stands.
Ban May 2026; suit 10 July 2026; suit dismissed with prejudice, announced 1 October 2026
218 DC Blox Nashville Zoo-area data center DC Blox Metro Nashville-Davidson County TN 23+ acre former Asurion office and data center site
litigationMetro Nashville adopted a temporary data center moratorium and new regulations in July 2026, and DC Blox's permits were put on hold. On 5 August 2026 Metro Council authorized the city to negotiate for or potentially acquire the property through eminent domain. DC Blox filed a federal lawsuit on 11 August 2026 alleging the moratorium is a targeted attack that violates due process, equal protection and takings protections, and seeks to block enforcement plus damages. U.S. District Judge Eli Richardson dismissed DC BLOX's federal lawsuit against Metro Nashville over the data center permit moratorium (in effect until 1 December 2026), and with it the request for an injunction, in a ruling reported 7 October 2026. The court gave DC BLOX 21 days to amend three claims, saying the company had not clearly pleaded protected property interests. DC BLOX paid $23 million for the zoo-area property in late July 2026, and Metro has advanced eminent domain legislation for the site.
Moratorium July 2026; suit 11 August 2026; dismissed with 21 days to amend, reported 7 October 2026
219 Eagan Capital data center moratorium challenge Eagan Capital LLC City of Eagan MN Moratorium covers new data centers over 20 MW or within 500 ft of homes
litigationThe Eagan City Council adopted an interim data center moratorium on 17 February 2026, running through 17 February 2027. Eagan Capital sued the city on 15 June 2026, arguing only the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission may regulate electricity demand, and seeks to void the moratorium plus damages over $50,000. The city said it will defend the moratorium, noting the company had installed trailer-mounted chillers without permits, which led to denial of an interim use permit.
Moratorium 17 February 2026; suit 15 June 2026
220 Bristow Campus (NVA02 expansion) STACK Infrastructure Prince William County VA 58 acres
deniedSTACK Infrastructure sought to rezone 58 acres of agricultural land near Nokesville Road for a campus outside the county's Data Center Opportunity Zone. The Board of County Supervisors hearing was deferred several times starting in November 2024, most recently 24 June 2025. On 9 September 2025 the board voted 4-2 to deny the rezoning.
Deferred November 2024 to June 2025; denied 9 September 2025
221 Oaklawn data center rezoning Oaklawn, LLC Town of Leesburg VA 145-acre Oaklawn site; up to 450,000 sq ft of data center use sought
litigationLeesburg Town Council denied Oaklawn LLC's application in late January 2025, which sought up to 450,000 sq ft of data center use alongside affordable housing units. In February 2025 Oaklawn LLC and Oaklawn Development Partners sued the town in Loudoun County Circuit Court seeking a declaratory judgment. The town attorney said the council followed the zoning ordinance standards. A trial outcome has not been confirmed in the reporting reviewed.
Denied January 2025; suit February 2025
222 Gigaland data center campus GigaLand LLC Fauquier County VA Original: 202 acres / 2.2M sq ft; revised plan ~847,000 sq ft
withdrawnGigaland sought to rezone land near Remington for a large data center campus. After the Planning Commission recommended denial, the developer withdrew in August 2025 and a scheduled September 2025 Board of Supervisors hearing was canceled. A scaled-down resubmission followed, and in August 2026 the developers withdrew their comprehensive plan amendment, rezoning and special exception requests again, acknowledging they lacked the votes. The applicant could return as soon as January 2027.
First withdrawal 29 August 2025; second August 2026
223 Cabin Field Road data center site MESH Capital LLC Campbell County VA ~57 acres
deniedOn 7 October 2025 the Campbell County Board of Supervisors voted 5-2 to deny MESH Capital's request to remove a protective proffered site plan from 2000 on about 57 acres, and a motion to require special use permits for data centers failed 6-1. MESH then submitted three scaled-back concept plans that county staff found consistent with the original proffer, keeping a by-right path open. An adjacent owner petitioned for review on 25 November 2025, and the board scheduled a hearing for 20 January 2026. The outcome of that hearing was not confirmed in the reporting reviewed.
Denied 7 October 2025; petition hearing 20 January 2026 (outcome unconfirmed)
224 New Kent Technology Overlay District n.a. (county-initiated overlay) New Kent County VA 1,800-acre proposed overlay
rejectedNew Kent County staff spent more than a year drafting a 1,800-acre Technology Overlay District along the Route 33 corridor where data center applications could be approved without public hearings. On 14 July 2026 the Board of Supervisors ended the overlay effort after widespread public opposition. The same night the board voted 3-2 to rezone about 343 acres for The Curtis Group's Eltham Business Park, described as commercial and light-industrial use. Staff were directed to draft a data center ordinance with strict performance standards.
Overlay ended 14 July 2026
225 Frederick County data center application pause (Quantum Frederick expansion context) n.a. (county-wide action) Frederick County MD Quantum Frederick campus expanded from ~1,600 to ~2,600 acres by December 2025 ordinance
moratoriumThe Frederick County Council passed an ordinance in December 2025 expanding the Quantum Frederick campus by about 1,000 acres, and a citizen committee gathered over 21,000 signatures to put it to referendum. The Maryland Supreme Court blocked the referendum, and in a 28 July 2026 opinion held that zoning ordinances are not subject to referendum under the county charter. County Executive Jessica Fitzwater paused new applications for data centers and related substations through 31 December 2026, exempting projects approved before 17 June 2025 and those under construction. On Monday 14 September 2026 County Executive Jessica Fitzwater announced she had rejected a $110 million community benefits agreement proposed by Catellus Real Estate Development, after hearing concerns from residents. The offer included $30 million each for Carroll Manor Elementary School renovations and a new Adamstown park, $14.5 million for workforce development and $10 million for youth recreation. She also extended the pause on new data center applications, previously set to expire 31 December 2026, to 1 July 2027.
Court order 30 June 2026; opinion 28 July 2026; pause extended on 14 September 2026 to 1 July 2027
226 Charles County Zoning Text Amendment 25-187 n.a. (county-initiated amendment) Charles County MD Would have permitted data centers in general and heavy industrial zones
withdrawnZTA 25-187 would have defined and permitted data centers under conditions in Charles County's industrial zones. The Planning Commission recommended against it twice, most recently after a 1 June 2026 hearing where opponents chanted no data centers. On 21 July 2026 the county commissioners reached consensus not to move forward and asked staff for a task force and outside consultant framework. Data centers remain a non-permitted use in the county.
Pulled 21 July 2026
227 Pennhurst data center Pennhurst Holdings LLC East Vincent Township PA 125-acre parcel / 1.9M sq ft
deniedThe East Vincent Township Board of Supervisors unanimously rejected the conditional use application for a 1.9 million sq ft data center with power generation and battery storage on the former Pennhurst State School site. The vote came in May 2026 at the second conditional use hearing. The developer's attorney said the company would appeal to the Chester County Court of Common Pleas, arguing Pennsylvania law requires zoning accommodation for data centers. State Sen. Katie Muth is proposing a data center moratorium.
Denied May 2026
228 King of Prussia data center campus Brian O'Neill (MLP Ventures) Upper Merion Township PA Five data centers, more than 4.5M sq ft
litigationDeveloper Brian O'Neill sued Upper Merion Township, its supervisors and planning commission seeking review extensions, and a Montgomery County judge enjoined township action on his applications on 12 August 2026. The judge vacated the injunction the next day. On 13 August 2026 the Board of Supervisors denied two extension requests and several preliminary land development plans, citing missing architectural, traffic and engineering information. O'Neill said he will appeal. On Wednesday 16 September 2026 O'Neill filed suits in the Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas challenging the board's rejection of the roughly 4.6 million sq ft campus, arguing township officials had said data centers qualify as warehouses permitted under the zoning code. In the Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas, O'Neill, represented by attorney Marc Kaplin, is asking the court to grant preliminary approval and appoint an independent referee to oversee further review.
Denied 13 August 2026; developer suits filed 16 September 2026
229 Triangle Innovation Park West (TIP West) ECO TIP West LLC Chatham County NC 750 MW
restartedChatham County adopted a 12-month countywide moratorium on new data centers on 11 February 2026. ECO TIP West, which says it received a zoning permit in October 2025 confirming a data center as a use by right and had spent $11 million on the project, sued the county in Chatham County Superior Court seeking to invalidate the moratorium, confirm vested rights and recover damages and fees. On Thursday 17 September 2026 Superior Court Judge John Morris granted summary judgment to ECO TIP West, finding no genuine issue of material fact, which allows the 750 MW, five-building campus on the Moncure megasite to proceed despite the moratorium unless the county appeals. Damages and legal fees are to be set at a later hearing
Moratorium 11 February 2026; summary judgment for developer 17 September 2026
230 Clinton County data center, precast plant and hydroponic farm rezoning Not named in reporting Clinton County IN ~714.55 acres
deniedThe Clinton County Board of Commissioners voted 3-0 on 20 January 2026 to deny rezoning about 714.55 acres from A-1 agricultural to I-1 light industrial for a combined data center, precast plant and hydroponic farm. Commissioners cited the lack of signed, matching commitments from the developer and landowner and impacts on nearby property owners. The parcels remain agricultural.
Denied 20 January 2026
231 Madison County data center moratorium extension n.a. (county-wide action) Madison County IN County-wide
moratoriumMadison County commissioners unanimously approved a one-year extension of the county's data center moratorium on 4 August 2026. A new committee of planning commissioners and citizen appointees will draft zoning rules, which could include a permanent ban. Residents cited resource use, utility bills and noise.
Extended 4 August 2026 for one year
232 Minneapolis data center moratorium n.a. (city-wide action) City of Minneapolis MN City-wide; downtown projects under 350,000 sq ft exempt
moratoriumThe Minneapolis City Council approved a six-month interim moratorium on new data center development in May 2026, which does not require the mayor's signature. Downtown data centers with less than 350,000 sq ft of new or expanded space are exempt. Council supporters said the pause allows the city to write permanent regulations.
Approved May 2026, six months
233 Alterra Marshall data center (Brooks Industrial Park) Alterra Development City of Marshall MI 270 acres; originally ~1 GW with gas plant, now ~400 MW without it
moratoriumAlterra Development bought 270 acres in Marshall's Brooks Industrial Park in October 2025 for a data center originally planned at about 1 GW with an on-site gas plant, later cut to about 400 MW without the plant. The Marshall City Council approved a 365-day moratorium on 3 August 2026, delaying any approval until at least August 2027. The council cited electricity and water uncertainty, heat discharge, low-frequency noise and proximity to wetlands and a lake.
Moratorium 3 August 2026, 365 days
234 Project Cardinal Pioneer Development LLC City of Yorkville IL 1,034 acres / 14 buildings / 17M sq ft
litigationYorkville approved Project Cardinal on 10 March 2026. On 29 April 2026 Preserve Our Yorkville & Community LLC and several neighbors sued the city, alleging it failed to notify nearby residents before annexing and rezoning the land. A separate suit by resident John Bryan, filed in late 2025, was in settlement talks as of April 2026.
Approved 10 March 2026; suit 29 April 2026
235 Project Steel (Eldamain Corridor) Not identified in reporting City of Yorkville IL Not specified
litigationPreserve Our Yorkville and Community filed a second lawsuit in Kendall County Court in May 2026, this time over the rezoning for Project Steel. The suit alleges the city failed to mail proper notice to residents and that the rezoning conflicts with the comprehensive plan, and asks the court to void it. A case management hearing was set for August 2026.
Suit May 2026
236 Meyer data center rezoning Yorkville Nexus V LLC (Green Door Capital) City of Yorkville IL ~80 acres as originally proposed; later redesigned
withdrawnThe Yorkville Planning and Zoning Commission unanimously voted down Green Door Capital's rezoning for a data center near the Caledonia subdivision. The developer redesigned the plan but withdrew it on 14 April 2026 before a City Council vote. Mayor John Purcell said the council had no support for data centers at that location, citing proximity to homes and the three projects already approved.
Withdrawn 14 April 2026
237 Douglas County I-20 data center permit denial Not identified in reporting Douglas County GA Not specified
deniedDouglas County commissioners voted 4-1 to deny a permit for a proposed data center near I-20 and the Carroll County line, reported 8 July 2026. The county already has 8 operating data center buildings and 6 under construction. Earlier, in March 2025, the commission voted 4-1 for a 90-day moratorium after an application for 11 buildings and three warehouse data centers in western Douglas County.
Moratorium March 2025; permit denied July 2026
238 Sarasota County hyperscale data center moratorium (XF Group, Cattlemen Road) XF Group Sarasota County FL Applies to data centers of 50 MW or more
moratoriumSarasota County commissioners voted in July 2026 to halt hyperscale data centers of 50 MW or more for at least one year, following XF Group's proposal along Cattlemen Road. Commissioners cited water use, grid strain, contamination risk and noise. Staff were to return in August with recommendations for permanent measures, and at least one commissioner said he opposes such projects permanently.
Moratorium July 2026, to at least July 2027
239 Meade County data center rezoning (Joe Prather Highway) Not identified in reporting Meade County KY ~135 to 138 acres
deniedThe Meade County Planning and Zoning Commission voted unanimously in October 2025 against rezoning a roughly 138-acre site on Joe Prather Highway from agricultural to light industrial for an AI data center. The Fiscal Court then unanimously upheld that recommendation. More than 150 speakers registered, and a petition opposing the project gathered over 2,500 signatures.
Denied 14 October 2025
240 xAI Southaven data center power plant xAI DeSoto County / Mississippi DEQ MS 27 turbines initially, 59 per court filings; permit for 41 permanent turbines
litigationxAI's Southaven site runs gas turbines to power its Memphis-area data centers, and the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality issued an air permit for 41 permanent turbines. The NAACP filed a challenge in April 2026 alleging significant pollutant emissions and contesting the permit. Three Southaven residents filed suit in June 2026 alleging near-constant noise and vibration harming their health. The plant continues to operate. On 30 July 2026 the Mississippi Commission of Environmental Quality and MZX Tech LLC entered an Agreed Order covering the 69 mobile turbines at the Stanton Road facility, setting a retirement schedule after supply chain delays pushed back some of the 41 permitted stationary turbines. SpaceXAI said all temporary turbines would be removed by July 2027 as its 1.2 GW permanent plant comes online, and announced on 31 August 2026 that 11 of the 69 turbines had been powered down. A class action over turbine noise is pending in the US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi On 30 July 2026 SpaceX announced an agreement with the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality setting a timeline to remove all 69 temporary mobile turbines at the Southaven power site, starting as early as August and finishing by July 2027, as the 1.2 GW permanent plant of 41 turbines permitted in March 2026 comes online. On 23 September 2026 Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein and Greer Injury Lawyers filed a federal class action in Tennessee against X.AI Corp and MZX Tech LLC on behalf of southern Memphis residents, alleging noise ordinance violations, private and public nuisance, negligence, negligence per se and trespass from the data centers and gas-turbine plant on the Tennessee and Mississippi border. It seeks damages, abatement and an injunction to cease operations unless they can run without harming the community. Earlier, on 6 May 2026, the NAACP, represented by the Southern Environmental Law Center and Earthjustice, asked the federal court for a preliminary injunction to stop operation of the unpermitted turbines, saying xAI and MZX Tech had added six turbines after the February 2026 notice, bringing the total to 33.
NAACP challenge April 2026; resident suit June 2026; Memphis residents' federal class action filed 23 September 2026
241 Western Newspaper Union building data center tower Revitalization Unlimited City of Kansas City MO 384 ft / 20 stories
deniedMiami-based Revitalization Unlimited proposed a 384-foot, 20-story data center on the historic Western Newspaper Union building in Quality Hill. The Kansas City Plan Commission voted 6-0 to deny it on 5 August 2026. The developer could ask City Council to override, but Mayor Quinton Lucas said reversal was highly unlikely. The developer had placed a preservation easement on the building on December 31 before proposing its demolition in March 2026. TechRadar Pro reported on 7 October 2026, via Data Center Knowledge, that the tower, designed by Skidmore, Owings and Merrill, would provide 24 MW of IT capacity on about 0.23 acres, with only two of its 20 floors holding servers, at a total development cost of $183 million (about $167 million of hard costs), and would rely on 30 MW of Bloom fuel cells for primary power. A related development ordinance was listed as pending at the City Council until 13 October 2026.
Denied by the Plan Commission 5 August 2026; related development ordinance listed as pending until 13 October 2026 (reported 7 October 2026)
242 Project Liberty Stream Data Centers Marion County SC 400 acres / 600,000 sq ft / 400 MW
cancelledMarion County Council approved Project Liberty in January 2026 after council members signed non-disclosure agreements, drawing criticism over secrecy. Stream Data Centers announced in June 2026 it would not proceed, citing utility timing constraints. The cooperative MPD Electric said power could not be secured in a timely, cost-effective way.
Approved January 2026; cancelled June 2026
243 Greenwood County data center moratorium n.a. (county-wide action) Greenwood County SC County-wide
moratoriumGreenwood County Council approved a one-year moratorium on new data center approvals 4-3 on third and final reading on 21 July 2026. At second reading on July 7 the council also rejected a separate ordinance that would have permitted data centers in designated areas. Council members said three companies had approached the county, though no deals were under negotiation.
Final reading 21 July 2026, one year
244 Nebius Oxmoor Valley data center Nebius Jefferson County Circuit Court / City of Birmingham AL 80-acre site
litigationNeighbors sued Nebius, Hoar Construction and the City of Birmingham, alleging the city issued permits for a hyperscale data center on land not zoned for that use. On 10 July 2026 Circuit Judge Javan Patton Crayton ruled the case can proceed without first going to the Zoning Board of Adjustment. On 14 August 2026 the judge granted the plaintiffs' request to skip the preliminary injunction and go to the merits, with the next hearing set for 8 March 2027. Construction continues, with completion projected for 2028. Additional suits filed: the Greater Birmingham Humane Society sued the City of Birmingham, Alabama ADC Holdings LLC and 201 Milan Birmingham LLC in Jefferson County Circuit Court on 10 July 2026, seeking review of permits and approvals for the project next to its planned animal campus. On 5 September 2026 Regions Bank shareholder James Anderson filed a derivative suit alleging Nebius affiliates defrauded the bank of $66.3 million in the 30 September 2025 sale of 201 Milan Parkway. Former school board member Terri Michal sued (filed on a Thursday afternoon, reported 11 September 2026) Birmingham's Industrial Development Board, its chairman and Nebius, asking a judge to cancel the $3.2 billion in 30-year tax abatements approved 29 May 2026 under the Open Meetings Act; AL.com described the project as $36 billion and 300 MW on about 75 acres. On Thursday 17 September 2026 Judge Javan Patton Crayton consolidated three existing suits, including the residents' suit and the Humane Society's; the 8 March 2027 hearing stands. In filings between 16 and 22 September 2026 the plaintiffs gave notice of subpoenas to 10 parties, including U.S. Steel, Alabama Power, Regions Bank and a real estate firm founded by the mayor's wife; the city objected on 1 October 2026 and Regions Bank objected on 30 September 2026. The judge set a hearing on the objections for Monday 5 October 2026. AL.com reports that three suits have been consolidated into this case.
Ruling 10 July 2026; merits hearing 8 March 2027
245 750 N. Nash Street data center Eight Form City of El Segundo CA 160 ft / 5 stories with dedicated substation
withdrawnEight Form proposed replacing a Hyatt Place hotel at 750 N. Nash Street with a 160-foot, five-story data center and dedicated substation. The developer withdrew the proposal on 9 July 2026 at a contentious Planning Commission hearing. Opposition centered on the project's electricity demand.
Withdrawn 9 July 2026
246 Chandler AI data center (Queen Creek and Dobson roads) Not named in reporting City of Chandler AZ 40 acres / $2.5B
rejectedThe Chandler City Council voted 7-0 on 11 December 2025 against a proposed $2.5 billion AI data center on 40 acres near Queen Creek and Dobson roads. Neighbors cited noise already heard from existing data centers in the Price corridor. Former U.S. Sen. Kyrsten Sinema had lobbied the council for the project in October 2025.
Rejected 11 December 2025
247 Wildflower Yaphank data center Wildflower Town of Brookhaven NY 176 MW / $1B, in warehouses on Expressway Drive North
moratoriumThe Brookhaven Town Board unanimously approved an 18-month data center moratorium on 16 July 2026, running to about January 2028. The pause covers the proposed 176 MW, $1 billion Wildflower project in Yaphank warehouses, which also falls under New York's statewide moratorium on data centers of 50 MW or more announced two days earlier. Opponents cited water use, emissions from 78 proposed generators and noise.
Moratorium 16 July 2026, 18 months
248 Nottingham Business Park data center Thomas Moulton Town of Nottingham NH Vacant warehouse conversion; size not disclosed
withdrawnDeveloper Thomas Moulton withdrew his proposal to convert a vacant Route 4 warehouse into a data center on 27 May 2026, hours before a planning board meeting where a large turnout was expected. More than 25,000 people signed a petition against it, citing water, energy costs, noise and the Lamprey River watershed. The withdrawal letter said the applicant would study whether the use is appropriate, leaving a possible return open.
Withdrawn 27 May 2026
249 Bates Mill No. 3 data center Bill Johnson City of Lewiston ME $300M
rejectedA developer proposed a $300 million data center in Bates Mill No. 3 in Lewiston, with the public notified six days before the council vote. The Lewiston City Council unanimously rejected it on 16 December 2025. Councilors cited limited notice and engagement, environmental concerns near the riverfront, about 30 jobs, and a requested 90 percent tax break for 10 years.
Rejected 16 December 2025
250 Blueprint Data Centers Taylor facility Blueprint Data Centers Williamson County District Court / City of Taylor TX 135,000 sq ft
litigationFive Taylor residents sued to stop a 135,000 sq ft Blueprint data center, arguing a 1999 deed restriction required the land to be held as parkland. The judge had paused work during the case, but on 8 October 2025 District Judge Ryan Larson dismissed the suit for lack of standing. The residents' group said it was filing an appeal. On 17 September 2026 Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton announced an investigation into whether the 1999 deed restriction holding the land in trust for future use as parkland was modified, released or terminated before the Taylor Economic Development Corporation sold the site to NCP Travis TPP Project, LLC for $10 million in April 2025, and said he may seek court intervention. The city said it would cooperate fully.
Suit 2025; dismissed 8 October 2025; Attorney General investigation announced 17 September 2026
251 Project Patriot (Knox Ranch) Bilateral Energy LLC City of Granbury TX ~2,000 acres
litigationGranbury annexed the roughly 2,000-acre Knox Ranch from Hood County and rezoned it for Bilateral Energy's power generation and data center plan known as Project Patriot. Four Hood County property owners sued, alleging a Texas Open Meetings Act violation through a walking quorum during a data center tour, and the suit remained unresolved as of July 2026. On 8 July 2026 residents presented a no-confidence petition with more than 800 signatures against the city manager and city attorney. On 17 August 2026 Granbury residents petitioned the Second Court of Appeals in Fort Worth for a writ of mandamus ordering the city to validate five recall petitions against the mayor, mayor pro tem and three council members, citing Project Patriot approvals. The city had verified only 26 of more than 5,000 signatures. The court set an expedited schedule that could put recalls on the November 2026 ballot. On Tuesday 6 October 2026 Mayor Jim Jarratt, Mayor Pro Tem Bruce Wadley and Councilman Skip Overdier, all subject to the recall, filed a lawsuit against the city through Houston attorney Andy Taylor alleging fraud, forgery and other defects in the recall petition; the suit put scheduling of the recall election on hold.
Annexation January 2026; suit by April 2026; recall mandamus petition 17 August 2026; officials' suit against the city filed 6 October 2026
252 Project Red and Project Yellow National CRE Holdings LLC; Greenland Capital LLC Hood County TX Two proposed campuses; size not specified
litigationThe developers of two proposed Hood County data center campuses sued, arguing their plans were automatically approved because the county missed a 30-day statutory deadline. District Judge Bryan Bufkin granted the county's plea to the jurisdiction and dismissed the suit with prejudice in July 2026, finding the projects were not development plans under state law. The companies indicated in filings that they will appeal.
Dismissed July 2026
253 Airport Drive data center rezoning Data Nova X City of Wichita Falls TX Not specified
rejectedThe Wichita Falls City Council unanimously rejected the rezoning for a data center on Airport Drive on 5 May 2026. The item had been tabled in February 2026 and a revised offer addressed light, sound and traffic. Council members cited proximity to homes, construction traffic, 24-hour operations and uncertainty about the developer.
Rejected 5 May 2026
254 Highlander SM One data center Highlander SM One LLC City of San Marcos TX ~200-acre property / 2.2M sq ft / 380 MW / $1.5B
rejectedHighlander SM One's first map amendment failed in August 2025 without the required supermajority. A second application reached City Council in early 2026, and on 17 February 2026 the council voted 5-2 to deny it after a nearly nine-hour meeting. The applicant could reapply after six months, on or after 17 August 2026; no new application had been filed as of April 2026.
First denial August 2025; final denial 17 February 2026
255 Oklo mixed-technology power project for Meta Oklo PJM Interconnection OH 750 MW (150 MW advanced nuclear, 300 MW fuel cells, 300 MW gas), part of a planned 1.2 GW power campus for Meta under a January 2026 agreement
withdrawnPJM withdrew the project from its interconnection study cycle on 3 August 2026; Oklo filed an emergency complaint at FERC on 28 August 2026
Withdrawn from study cycle 3 August 2026; FERC complaint 28 August 2026
256 PowerHouse Hillwood Joliet data center campus PowerHouse Hillwood Holding ComEd service territory (FERC dispute) IL 1.8 GW, $20 billion
litigationComEd cancelled the project's transmission security agreement and retail service agreement over security deposit timing; the developer raised the dispute at FERC. On 22 September 2026 FERC issued an order in Docket ER26-3257-000 rejecting ComEd's notice of cancellation of the transmission security agreement for the 1.8 GW, $20 billion Joliet campus. PowerHouse Hillwood contends it met the agreement's initial credit requirement with a $1 posting. FERC declined to assert primary jurisdiction over the contract dispute, which is pending in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. Chairman Laura Swett and Commissioner Lindsay See filed a joint concurrence, and Commissioners David Rosner and David LaCerte also concurred; LaCerte called the $1 letter of credit an embarrassing legal fiction.
FERC protest filed 14 August 2026; FERC order rejecting ComEd's notice of cancellation issued 22 September 2026 (ER26-3257-000); contract dispute pending in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
257 Ridgeline gas, solar and data center complex Fundamental Data LLC West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection WV Phase 1 about 800 MW gas plus 1.3 GW solar and more than 2 GW of computing load; Phase 2 adds 3.1 GW of gas
otherWVDEP Director Laura M. Crowder determined on 13 August 2026 that permit site control requirements are satisfied, clearing a contested question on air permit R13-3713; community appeals remain ongoing The Charleston Gazette-Mail identifies Laura Crowder as director of the WVDEP Division of Air Quality, not WVDEP director; her 13 August 2026 letter accepted a largely redacted July 2024 purchase and sale agreement for about 291 acres, submitted 11 August 2026, as meeting the site-control requirement.
Site-control determination 13 August 2026
258 West Mahanoy Township 180-day data center and solar farm moratorium n.a. West Mahanoy Township PA No specific project named; size, capital, and capacity not applicable; township solicitor said no data center application has been filed
moratoriumWest Mahanoy Township supervisors voted unanimously to approve a resolution invoking a six-month moratorium on data centers and solar farms. The township used the curative amendment process to declare its zoning ordinance deficient on those uses. Siana Law was hired as special counsel to draft ordinance updates covering noise, buffers, power sources, and community benefits.
Approved unanimously; reported 15 September 2026; 180 days
259 Colquitt County data center moratorium extension n.a. Colquitt County GA No specific project named; size, capital, and capacity not applicable
moratoriumColquitt County commissioners extended the county's moratorium on data center development for another 180 days after a discussion on 1 September 2026. Residents raised water use and environmental concerns. The county administrator said the board would use the period to draft zoning regulations, potentially modeled on Floyd County's ordinance.
Extended 1 September 2026; 180 days
260 Dougherty County data center moratorium extension n.a. Dougherty County GA No specific project named; size, capital, and capacity not applicable
moratoriumDougherty County commissioners voted unanimously to extend the county's data center moratorium by another 180 days. County officials said there is no limit on how many times the pause can be renewed. Residents planned to press for noise, setback, and water-use rules at a 3 September planning and zoning meeting.
Extension reported 31 August 2026; 180 days
261 Kings Mountain data center moratorium extension n.a. City of Kings Mountain NC Citywide moratorium; HB2K has proposed a 150 MW AI data center in Kings Mountain
moratoriumKings Mountain extended its existing data center moratorium by one year on 25 August 2026. The original moratorium ran 182 days. The North State Journal listed the extension in its count of North Carolina local pauses.
Extended by 6-1 vote reported 25 August 2026; one year
262 Whiteville 12-month data center and cryptocurrency mining moratorium n.a. City of Whiteville NC No specific project named; size, capital, and capacity not applicable
moratoriumWhiteville approved a 12-month moratorium on data centers and cryptocurrency mining on 25 August 2026. The vote count was not reported in the fetched source.
Approved 25 August 2026; runs to 25 August 2027 or until a zoning text amendment is adopted
263 Edgecombe County two-year data center moratorium n.a. Edgecombe County NC No specific project named; size, capital, and capacity not applicable
moratoriumEdgecombe County commissioners approved a two-year data center moratorium in August 2026, running through 3 August 2028. The Rocky Mount Telegram later cited it as a precedent for Nash County's pause.
Approved 3 August 2026; two years
264 Yadkin County two-year data center moratorium n.a. Yadkin County NC No specific project named; size, capital, and capacity not applicable
moratoriumYadkin County commissioners unanimously approved a two-year data center moratorium on 17 August 2026. The pause applies to unincorporated areas only.
Approved 5-0 on 17 August 2026 (Monday public hearing, reported 18 August 2026); two years; unincorporated areas only
265 Tarrant 12-month data center moratorium n.a. City of Tarrant AL No specific project named; size, capital, and capacity not applicable; mayor said no developer has approached the city
moratoriumTarrant city officials approved a 12-month moratorium on data centers. Mayor Tracie Threadford said the decision was made out of caution. She noted several buildings for sale in the city could fit a smaller data center project.
Reported 8 September 2026; 12 months
266 Foley six-month data center and cryptocurrency mining moratorium n.a. City of Foley AL No specific project named; size, capital, and capacity not applicable; mayor said no data centers have been proposed
moratoriumThe Foley City Council approved on final reading an ordinance establishing a six-month moratorium on accepting, processing, or approving applications for data centers, cryptocurrency mining facilities, and server farms. The vote was held Tuesday, 8 September 2026. Mayor Ralph Hellmich said the city-owned utility already has some protections on water, noise, and electricity use.
Final reading approved 8 September 2026; six months
267 Southeast Raleigh data center annexation (Jones Sausage Road) n.a. City of Raleigh NC 100,000 square feet, three stories, about $180 million, on a nearly 14-acre site at 3101 Jones Sausage Road; capacity not disclosed
withdrawnAn annexation request for a proposed data center of nearly 100,000 square feet in southeast Raleigh was withdrawn before City Council consideration. More than 130 people had signed up to speak against it. Charlotte-based Beacon Partners, a partial owner of the property, said it was not involved in the project. The developer was not identified. WUNC reported the developer ended its annexation request on Friday 14 August 2026 for a three-story, 100,000-square-foot, $180 million data center at 3101 Jones Sausage Road.
Annexation request withdrawn Friday 14 August 2026; reported 17 and 18 August 2026
268 Edgewater permanent AI data center ban n.a. City of Edgewater FL No specific project named; size, capital, and capacity not applicable
moratoriumThe Edgewater City Council unanimously approved a permanent ban on artificial intelligence data centers on 14 September 2026. The ordinance took effect immediately. Voters will decide in November whether to add the prohibition to the city charter as Charter Amendment 4. The Daytona Beach News-Journal reported that the ordinance, described by the city as a permanent moratorium, carries a 12-month sunset and bars accepting, processing or approving development orders and permits for data centers, hyperscale data centers and cryptocurrency mining facilities.
Approved 5-0 on second reading 14 September 2026; effective immediately; ordinance carries a 12-month sunset; charter vote November 2026
269 Orange County proposed AI data center moratorium n.a. Orange County FL No specific project named; size, capital, and capacity not applicable
otherOrange County commissioners expressed support on 15 September 2026 for a temporary moratorium on large AI data centers, but no formal moratorium vote was reported. The proposal calls for a pause of at least one year on prospective applications while staff study water, electric load, noise, and zoning impacts. The commission could take up the item again in early December.
Commission support expressed 15 September 2026; no adoption vote; possible return early December 2026
270 Gorham 180-day data center moratorium n.a. Town of Gorham ME No specific project named; size, capital, and capacity not applicable; councilor said no data centers are planned
moratoriumThe Gorham Town Council voted 7-0 to adopt a 180-day moratorium on large-scale data center proposals, with an option to extend another 180 days. In September 2026 the council voted unanimously to send a proposed permanent ban to the planning board for a public hearing.
Adopted June 2026 (reported 4 June 2026); permanent ban referred to planning board September 2026
271 Gray 180-day data center moratorium n.a. Town of Gray ME No specific project named; size, capital, and capacity not applicable
moratoriumThe Gray Town Council unanimously approved a 180-day data center moratorium on 4 August 2026, retroactive to 14 July 2026. The action followed Governor Janet Mills' veto of LD 307, a statewide measure.
Approved 4 August 2026; retroactive to 14 July 2026; 180 days
272 Hendersonville 12-month data center moratorium n.a. City of Hendersonville NC No specific project named; size, capital, and capacity not applicable; city officials said no data centers were seeking approval
moratoriumHendersonville City Council unanimously adopted a 12-month moratorium on data center development after a public hearing scheduled for 3 September 2026. The pause covers city building, zoning, and special use permits for data centers. Staff presented a research plan for the year.
Adopted 3 September 2026; up to 12 months
273 Quiet Data Centers Halifax AI data center (301 Industrial Site) Quiet Data Centers Halifax Halifax County NC About 251 acres of county-owned property off Trestle Road in Enfield Township, sold for $1.7 million; at least $250 million taxable investment in years 1 to 10 and 50 jobs required; company described an 88 MW ceiling
approved after delayHalifax County commissioners voted 5-1 to schedule a 19 October 2026 legislative hearing on a possible data center moratorium. The county previously approved a $1.7 million land sale to Quiet Data Centers Halifax for an 88 MW AI data center on 251 acres. The county attorney cautioned that a moratorium before site plan submission could expose the county to interference claims. No moratorium has been adopted.
Amended agreement failed 3-3 six days before; approved 5-1 on Monday 14 September 2026
274 Charlotte 150-day data center moratorium n.a. City of Charlotte NC No specific project named; size, capital, and capacity not applicable
moratoriumCharlotte City Council passed a 150-day moratorium on new data centers in early June 2026, expiring 5 November 2026. A staff study submitted 1 September found impacts vary by facility type, and on 8 September 2026 the council's Transportation Planning and Development Committee approved a staff request to seek an extension of up to nine months. WFAE reported a full council vote was scheduled for 14 September 2026, but WSOC reported that the full council must approve the committee recommendation, hold a public hearing and then vote. On 16 September 2026 WCNC reported the pause was still scheduled to expire 5 November 2026 and that city leaders had discussed a nine-month extension; no adoption of the extension was reported. On Monday 28 September 2026 the council set a public hearing for 12 October 2026 on extending the moratorium by 11 months, through 11 October 2027; the council will vote after the hearing.
150-day moratorium enacted June 2026, expires 5 November 2026; 11-month extension through 11 October 2027 proposed, public hearing set 28 September 2026 for 12 October 2026; not adopted
275 Southport 15-month data center moratorium n.a. City of Southport NC No specific project named; size, capital, and capacity not applicable; no active proposals
moratoriumThe Southport Board of Aldermen voted unanimously on 10 September 2026 to bar new data center approvals for 15 months. The Planning Board had requested the pause in July so staff could develop land-use standards.
Approved 10 September 2026; 15 months
276 Nash County data center and cryptocurrency mining moratorium n.a. Nash County NC No specific project named; size, capital, and capacity not applicable
moratoriumThe Nash County Board of Commissioners voted unanimously to adopt a temporary moratorium on data centers, data processing facilities, cryptocurrency mining, and similar uses in unincorporated areas. It took effect immediately and runs until 30 June 2027 or until new zoning rules are adopted. Staff will prepare recommendations for the county's Unified Development Ordinance update.
Adopted September 2026 (reported 9 September 2026); through 30 June 2027
277 McDowell County six-month data center moratorium n.a. McDowell County NC No specific project named; size, capital, and capacity not applicable; county said no project has been approved or denied
moratoriumMcDowell County commissioners unanimously approved a six-month pause on data center development after a 31 August 2026 public hearing. Staff had suggested up to 12 months. The county manager said the action is a temporary pause, not a denial of data centers.
Approved 31 August 2026; six months
278 Montgomery County 18-month data center moratorium and hyperscale prohibition n.a. Montgomery County MD No specific project named; size, capital, and capacity not applicable
moratoriumThe Montgomery County Council approved Expedited Bill 19-26, an 18-month moratorium on data center permits, on 28 July 2026. It also approved ZTA 26-01, which defines hyperscale data centers and prohibits them in the county for now, including pending applications and approved projects without building permits. The 18-month term was a compromise between six-month and two-year proposals.
Approved 28 July 2026; 18 months
279 Harford County data center ban (Bill 26-011) n.a. Harford County MD No specific project named; size, capital, and capacity not applicable
moratoriumThe Harford County Council voted 7-0 on 9 June 2026 to pass Bill 26-011, prohibiting data centers in all zoning districts. The Maryland Tech Council called the bill vague and legally dubious and warned of legal challenges.
Passed 9 June 2026; permanent prohibition
280 Calvert County six-month data center site plan moratorium n.a. Calvert County MD No specific project named; size, capital, and capacity not applicable
moratoriumThe Calvert County Board of County Commissioners unanimously passed a six-month moratorium on site plan approvals for data center projects on 18 August 2026. It took effect 28 August 2026, and no data center site plan applications will be accepted during the period. The action followed the withdrawal of the Calvert Technology Center (AWS) proposal. On 22 September 2026 the commissioners, by consensus rather than a recorded vote, directed staff to advertise a two-year extension of the moratorium for a vote on 15 December 2026, to remove data centers as a permitted use in the zoning ordinance, and to rezone heavy industrial land, which requires a comprehensive plan amendment. No extension has been adopted; a public commenter noted the ordinance requires a public hearing before any extension.
Passed 18 August 2026; effective 28 August 2026; six months; two-year extension to be advertised for a vote on 15 December 2026 (directed by consensus 22 September 2026)
281 Queen Anne's County 12-month data center moratorium n.a. Queen Anne's County MD No specific project named; size, capital, and capacity not applicable
moratoriumQueen Anne's County commissioners approved a 12-month temporary moratorium on data center applications on 4 June 2026, effective immediately.
Approved 4 June 2026; 12 months
282 Howard County data center moratorium (CB31-2026) n.a. Howard County MD No specific project named; size, capital, and capacity not applicable
moratoriumThe Howard County Council unanimously passed CB31, a moratorium on new data center development, on 1 June 2026, and created a task force to study impacts. The moratorium runs until 2 November 2027 or ends sooner if task force recommendations are adopted.
Passed 1 June 2026; through 2 November 2027
283 Town of Highland large-scale data center moratorium (Local Law No. 1 of 2026) n.a. Town of Highland NY No specific project named; size, capital, and capacity not applicable
moratoriumThe Town of Highland adopted Local Law No. 1 of 2026 on 18 June 2026, a temporary prohibition on approval, permitting, and construction of large-scale data centers. The moratorium lasts 12 months and may be extended up to 24 months while the town reviews zoning.
Adopted 18 June 2026; 12 months, extendable to 24
284 Newport data center and cryptocurrency mining moratorium n.a. Town of Newport NC No specific project named; size, capital, and capacity not applicable
moratoriumThe Newport Town Council approved a moratorium of at least one year on data centers, data processing facilities, cryptocurrency mining, and associated uses. Officials said the town's Unified Development Ordinance does not address data centers. They said the action does not permanently prohibit them. The Carteret County News-Times reported four of five council members, with Timmy Quillen absent, approved the moratorium on Thursday 10 September 2026; it covers the town and its extraterritorial jurisdiction.
Approved 4-0 on 10 September 2026 (one member absent); reported 16 September 2026; at least one year
285 Manatee County 12-month data center moratorium n.a. Manatee County FL No specific project named; size, capital, and capacity not applicable
otherManatee County commissioners unanimously approved a 12-month moratorium on data center applications while the county studies environmental and residential impacts. The motion passed without public discussion. WUSF reported the Board of County Commissioners first voted unanimously in favor of the moratorium on large-load customers, including AI facilities and cryptocurrency mining, at its 28 July 2026 meeting. The moratorium ordinance itself had not been finally adopted in the window: the Planning Commission reviewed the draft on 17 September 2026 and the County Commission held its first reading on 22 September 2026. As drafted it would bar large-load customers and facilities with substantial utility demands from applying for building permits, site plans, rezones or comprehensive plan amendments for 12 months starting 22 September 2026. The Bradenton Herald reported that the 22 September 2026 meeting was the first public hearing, held without discussion, and that the ordinance is on the 6 October 2026 agenda for final approval.
Direction to draft 28 July 2026; first public hearing 22 September 2026; final hearing scheduled 6 October 2026
286 Paulding County data center moratorium n.a. Paulding County GA No specific project named; size, capital, and capacity not applicable; county has four technology park overlay districts
moratoriumPaulding County commissioners unanimously approved a moratorium on data center applications on 28 July 2026, running until 1 January 2027. The county has four technology park overlay districts, including one near Bethel Church Road and Highway 92. Applications filed before the vote are not covered.
Approved 28 July 2026; through 1 January 2027
287 Walker County data center application moratorium n.a. Walker County GA No specific project named; size, capital, and capacity not applicable
moratoriumThe Walker County Board of Commissioners approved a 30-day moratorium on accepting data center applications in July 2026 and scheduled a 6 August public hearing on a 180-day extension. Staff will propose zoning amendments on districts, setbacks, noise, lighting, and utility demand, expected early next year. On Thursday 6 August 2026 Walker County commissioners unanimously approved a 180-day moratorium on new data centers and created a citizen study group; the study committee first met 27 August 2026, and county officials said an outright ban is not legally viable.
30-day moratorium approved July 2026; 180-day moratorium approved unanimously 6 August 2026
288 Hamilton County one-year rural data center moratorium n.a. Hamilton County TN No specific project named; size, capital, and capacity not applicable; existing projects exempt
moratoriumHamilton County commissioners approved a one-year moratorium on new data centers in rural areas on 15 July 2026. Existing projects are exempt. Mayor Weston Wamp said the pause will allow zoning changes that would stand up to legal challenge.
Approved 15 July 2026; one year
289 Smithville 18-month data center and cryptocurrency mining moratorium (Ordinance 543) n.a. City of Smithville TN No specific project named; size, capital, and capacity not applicable; no applications filed
moratoriumThe Smithville Board of Aldermen adopted Ordinance 543 on second and final reading on 3 August 2026. It imposes a moratorium on data centers and cryptocurrency mining for 18 months or until permanent zoning amendments are adopted.
Adopted 3 August 2026; 18 months
290 Albany 12-month data center moratorium n.a. City of Albany GA No specific project named; size, capital, and capacity not applicable
moratoriumAlbany city commissioners voted unanimously on 28 July 2026 to halt new data center development for 12 months. The pause can be extended six months or end early if a new ordinance is adopted.
Approved 28 July 2026; 12 months, extendable six months
291 Cherry Hill large-scale data center ban n.a. Cherry Hill Township NJ No specific project named; size, capital, and capacity not applicable
moratoriumCherry Hill Township Council unanimously passed an ordinance on 28 July 2026 listing large-scale AI and cloud data centers as a non-permitted land use. Small server rooms for business file storage remain allowed. The Inquirer also reported bans in Medford, Mansfield, and Chesterfield Townships in June and July 2026. 70and73.com reported the council adopted the ordinance unanimously at its Monday meeting, which was 27 July 2026.
Adopted unanimously 27 July 2026; reported 28 July 2026
292 Red Bank data center ban n.a. Borough of Red Bank NJ No specific project named; size, capital, and capacity not applicable
moratoriumRed Bank officials voted unanimously to ban data centers and passed a measure urging the state to halt approvals until stronger rules exist. No projects were publicly known in the borough.
Approved mid-June 2026; reported 22 June 2026
293 Warren Township AI data center ban n.a. Warren Township NJ No specific project named; size, capital, and capacity not applicable
moratoriumThe Warren Township Committee voted 5-0 to approve an ordinance banning AI data centers in mid-June 2026. No projects were mentioned. News 12 reported the Township Committee voted on Thursday night, 18 June 2026; Committeeman Daniel Croson, who introduced the ordinance, called for a statewide moratorium.
Approved 5-0 on Thursday 18 June 2026; reported 22 June 2026
294 Knox County one-year data center moratorium n.a. Knox County TN No specific project named; size, capital, and capacity not applicable
moratoriumThe Knox County Commission voted 10-0, with one commissioner recused, to adopt a one-year moratorium on data centers through 30 June 2027. The resolution allows the county to extend or end the pause early if regulations are adopted. WATE reported the Knoxville-Knox County Planning Commission also approved the one-year moratorium on Thursday 13 August 2026, sending zoning recommendations back to the county commission.
Adopted June 2026 (reported 22 June 2026); through 30 June 2027
296 Virginia Technology Park (Clear Brook) Equus Capital Partners Ltd. Frederick County VA 220-acre data center campus in the Clear Brook area
otherThe Frederick County Planning Commission voted 10-0 on 3 June 2026 to recommend denial of the Virginia Technology Park rezoning. Commissioners cited insufficient enforceable proffers, and residents raised water use of up to 120,000 gallons per day and noise concerns. The Board of Supervisors was scheduled to consider the case on 8 July 2026; that outcome was not confirmed in fetched sources.
Planning Commission denial recommendation 3 June 2026; Board of Supervisors hearing not set as of 3 September 2026
297 Homewood 12-month data center moratorium n.a. City of Homewood AL Applies to data centers larger than 1 MW; no pending applications
moratoriumThe Homewood City Council unanimously approved a 12-month moratorium on data centers larger than one megawatt on 22 June 2026, with an option to extend six months. The city said there were no pending applications.
Approved 22 June 2026; 12 months, extendable six months
298 Cullman data center application moratorium (Resolution 2026-116) n.a. City of Cullman AL No specific project named; size, capital, and capacity not applicable
moratoriumThe Cullman City Council adopted Resolution 2026-116 on 22 June 2026 to pause new data center applications. The council will study zoning, infrastructure capacity, and community character before permanent decisions. WBRC reported the council vote was unanimous and the temporary moratorium runs 12 months.
Adopted unanimously 22 June 2026; 12 months
299 Scarborough Technology Park Daniel Dickinson Town of Scarborough ME 52 acres; capital and capacity not disclosed
moratoriumThe Scarborough Town Council unanimously enacted a 180-day data center moratorium on 3 June 2026, retroactive to applications submitted on or after 1 April 2026. The proposed Scarborough Technology Park by developer Daniel Dickinson on 52 acres was the project cited in coverage.
Enacted 3 June 2026; retroactive to 1 April 2026; 180 days
300 Brunswick 180-day data center moratorium n.a. Town of Brunswick ME Applies to new or expanded data centers with electrical capacity of 1 MW or more; no specific project named
moratoriumThe Brunswick Town Council unanimously passed a 180-day data center moratorium in early June 2026, running until December. Existing smaller facilities in town include Enable IT and FirstLight. The Portland Press Herald reported the council approved the pause on Monday 1 June 2026; the town will not process applications for new or expanded data centers of 1 MW or more during the 180 days.
Passed 1 June 2026; 180 days
301 Leeds data center moratorium n.a. City of Leeds AL No specific project named; size, capital, and capacity not applicable; duration not confirmed in fetched primary source
moratoriumThe Leeds City Council passed a moratorium on data centers, according to WBRC. The Cullman Tribune later described Leeds' measure as a one-year moratorium.
Reported 8 June 2026
302 Prince William County data center overlay and by-right overhaul n.a. Prince William County VA No specific project named; size, capital, and capacity not applicable
otherThe Prince William County Planning Commission recommended on 9 September 2026 that the Board of Supervisors narrow the data center overlay and end by-right development, with a 120-day eligibility window and a 500-foot separation from homes and schools for qualifying projects. The Board was scheduled to consider the restrictions on 22 September 2026. The Prince William Times reported the Planning Commission vote on 9 September 2026 was 5-3, after commissioners deadlocked on motions for a 180-day window and for no window. On 22 September 2026 the Board of County Supervisors voted 8-0 to approve the zoning text amendment ending by-right data center development countywide, with a 90-day grace period rather than the 120 days the Planning Commission recommended; a substitute motion for no grace period failed 3-5. WUSA9 reported the Data Center Opportunity Zone Overlay District shrinks by roughly 62 percent, from about 9,700 acres to about 3,500 acres, and new data centers outside the remaining overlay will generally need a special use permit. Data centers already built, under construction or holding a site plan that has passed the quality control threshold are not affected. The 500-foot setback was not taken up; county staff are targeting a Planning Commission hearing in November and a Board hearing in January. The same night the Board unanimously denied Dominion Energy's Vint Hill gas-insulated switching station.
Planning Commission recommendation 9 September 2026; Board of County Supervisors adopted 8-0 on 22 September 2026 with a 90-day grace period; setback hearing targeted for November 2026 (Planning Commission) and January 2027 (Board)
303 Jackson 183-day data center moratorium n.a. City of Jackson MS No specific project named; size, capital, and capacity not applicable
moratoriumThe Jackson City Council approved a 183-day moratorium on data center development by a 5-2 vote, described as Mississippi's first. Council members said the capital city was not ready for a data center.
Imposed July 2026; 183 days
304 Forest Park 90-day data center moratorium n.a. City of Forest Park GA No specific project named; size, capital, and capacity not applicable
moratoriumThe Forest Park City Council approved a 90-day pause on data centers to draft zoning changes. Digital Realty was referenced in coverage as an example operator; no specific application was reported.
Approved 31 August 2026 at a Monday special called meeting; 90 days
305 Powers Ferry Place data center rezoning Prime Group Holdings City of Marietta GA 11-acre data center on Powers Ferry Place off Delk Road near I-75; capital and capacity not disclosed
approved after delayMarietta City Council postponed a rezoning decision on the proposed Powers Ferry Place data center after heavy opposition. The council also approved a temporary moratorium on data centers through 31 December 2026.
Tabled and six-month moratorium July 2026; approved 5-2 on 12 August 2026
306 East Fishkill data center freeze n.a. Town of East Fishkill NY Townwide; triggered by a Treetop Companies proposal for an 800,000-square-foot, 1,000 MW data center off I-84 and Lime Kiln Road that had not been formally filed
moratoriumEast Fishkill enacted a freeze on data centers on 2 July 2026 that runs through 2029, according to the datacenterbans.com New York tracker.
Enacted 2 July 2026; through 2029
307 Fort Payne six-month data center moratorium and conditional use rule n.a. City of Fort Payne AL No specific project named; size, capital, and capacity not applicable
moratoriumFort Payne adopted a six-month data center moratorium on 16 June 2026. On 2 September 2026 the council unanimously approved an ordinance classifying data centers as conditional uses requiring zoning board review and public hearings.
Six-month moratorium about three months before 1 September 2026; conditional use ordinance approved unanimously 1 September 2026
308 Rural Hall data center rezoning n.a. Forsyth County NC 129-acre site per earlier coverage; capital and capacity not disclosed in fetched sources
rejectedForsyth County commissioners voted 5-2 to deny a rezoning request that would have allowed a hyperscale data center in Rural Hall after months of deliberation. Commissioners said they received nearly 400 individual comments, with opponents citing environmental impacts, noise, water use and quality of life. Supporters pointed to the tax base and landowner rights.
Rezoning denied 5-2; reported 30 July 2026
309 Reno citywide data center moratorium n.a. City of Reno NV Citywide pause on new data center approvals; already permitted data centers, including one under construction on Keystone Avenue, are exempt; no MW or dollar figure stated
moratoriumThe Reno City Council voted 6-1 to adopt a pending moratorium at a 14 May 2026 special meeting, then approved the final moratorium 6-1 in early June 2026. The moratorium runs through 31 August 2027 and cannot be lifted until new regulations are adopted. Council directed staff to draft rules on water and energy use, noise, air quality, community benefits and allowed locations. Already permitted data centers are not affected.
Final moratorium approved 6-1, reported 1 June 2026; runs through 31 August 2027
310 Henderson 180-day data center moratorium proposal (declined) n.a. City of Henderson NV Proposed 180-day pause on new applications was declined; no pending applications or MW stated
otherOn 21 July 2026 the Henderson City Council declined a proposed 180-day moratorium on new data center applications. Council instead directed staff to strengthen the development agreement framework so future applicants must address water consumption, electrical demand, noise and site-specific concerns. Officials noted new projects could see effective delays while the framework is developed.
Moratorium declined 21 July 2026
311 Federal Way 12-month data center moratorium Industrial Realty Group / Podium I-5 site owners referenced (neither proposing a data center) City of Federal Way WA Applies to facilities above 1 MW of planned capacity or 4,000 square feet of gross floor area; no application pending
moratoriumThe Federal Way City Council voted unanimously on 7 July 2026 to impose a 12-month moratorium on data centers. The measure followed public concern that the planned 1,033,680-square-foot Podium I-5 industrial building on the former Wild Waves site could become a data center; the developer said he had no interest in building one. A public hearing on the moratorium was set for 1 September 2026.
Adopted unanimously 7 July 2026; 12 months
312 Renton one-year large data center moratorium n.a. City of Renton WA Covers new applications and permits to site, establish or expand large data centers; applications filed before the effective date exempt; no MW threshold stated in source
moratoriumThe Renton City Council unanimously approved a moratorium of up to one year on large data centers on 17 August 2026. It halts filing, acceptance, processing and approval of new applications and permits for siting, establishment or expansion. The ordinance cites impacts on electrical and water utility capacity, utility rates, land use, traffic, noise and air quality.
Approved unanimously 17 August 2026; up to one year
313 Port Angeles six-month data center moratorium n.a. City of Port Angeles WA Halts acceptance, processing and approval of facilities whose principal use is digital data processing, storage or transmission; no project named
moratoriumThe Port Angeles City Council adopted a data center moratorium on 2 September 2026, effective immediately, with one member excused. It runs six months initially with potential renewal. Staff will spend the first 60 days developing a work plan covering utility and industrial-land impacts, and a public hearing is required within 60 days. Both the Peninsula Daily News and My Clallam County reported the council vote took place on Tuesday night, which was 1 September 2026, not 2 September.
Adopted Tuesday 1 September 2026; six months, renewable
314 Broomfield 18-month data center moratorium (10 MW and above) n.a. City and County of Broomfield CO Applies to new data centers or expansions using at least 10 MW; the city's largest existing facility is designed for 20 MW
moratoriumThe Broomfield City Council unanimously approved an 18-month moratorium on land-use approvals for new data centers and expansions using 10 MW or more. It runs until December 2027 or until council adopts regulations, and does not apply to data centers already operating. The 10 MW threshold was set at half the designed capacity of the city's largest data center.
Approved unanimously at the Tuesday council meeting reported 8 July 2026; runs to December 2027
315 Aurora six-month data center moratorium proposal (rejected) n.a. City of Aurora CO Nine data centers established and five in development per source; new rules apply to future projects only; no MW stated
otherOn 10 August 2026 the Aurora City Council rejected a six-month moratorium on new data centers proposed by Councilmember Amy Wiles, with Mayor Mike Coffman casting the tie-breaking vote. Council instead approved 7-4 a resolution to set development standards, including a prohibition on evaporative cooling and setbacks and landscape buffers near residences. The city manager was given 35 days to recommend further changes.
Moratorium rejected and regulations resolution approved 10 August 2026
316 Mead 12-month data center moratorium n.a. Town of Mead CO Pause on data center applications while staff study infrastructure, water and setbacks; no project named
moratoriumMead trustees voted 4-2 on 31 August 2026 to impose a 12-month moratorium on data center applications, which may end sooner if staff finish an impact study. Staff cited substantial demands on electrical power, utility infrastructure and water supply. The proposed Global AI data center near Windsor was cited as an example of rising Front Range interest.
Approved 4-2 on 31 August 2026; 12 months
317 Lysander six-month data center moratorium (Renalli Super DC proposal) Renalli Super DC, LLC Town of Lysander NY Proposed 300 MW hyperscale data center on a 124-acre site at Hencle Boulevard and Oswego Road; land listed for sale at $60 million (not project capital)
moratoriumThe Lysander Town Board voted on 7 May 2026 to adopt Local Law 4 of 2026, a six-month moratorium on data storage facilities, after the Planning Board recommended it 5-0 on 27 April. The action followed resident concern over a proposed 300 MW hyperscale data center by Renalli Super DC, LLC. Violations carry a $1,000 per day penalty. Reporting on 29 August 2026 said the state's one-year hyperscale moratorium does not halt local review of the proposal at 22 Hencle Boulevard.
Adopted 7 May 2026; six months; state moratorium status reported 29 August 2026
318 San Marcos citywide data center zoning ban n.a. City of San Marcos TX Data centers made ineligible in all zoning districts; follows denial of the 200-acre Highlander SM One proposal; no MW stated
moratoriumOn 16 June 2026 the San Marcos City Council voted 4-3 to adopt a zoning ordinance that defines data centers and makes them ineligible in every zoning district in the city. State Sen. Paul Bettencourt said he would challenge the ban as a violation of state law, including HB 2559. The city had earlier rejected the Highlander SM One LLC annexation request.
Adopted 4-3 on 16 June 2026; reported 4 July 2026
319 Fort Worth 90-day data center moratorium process n.a. City of Fort Worth TX Would halt rezoning and permit decisions for data centers not already filed or approved; no MW stated
otherOn 11 August 2026 the Fort Worth City Council voted unanimously to start the process for a 90-day moratorium on data center rezonings and permits. A Data Center and Infrastructure Committee must report by 3 November 2026, with public hearings on 10 November 2026 and 5 January 2027. Adoption is scheduled for 16 February 2027, with the moratorium ending 17 May 2027. Projects with zoning applications already submitted or approved are excluded. The moratorium itself has not yet been adopted. FOX 4 reported the unanimous vote at the 11 August 2026 meeting came after midnight, early on 12 August 2026.
Process approved 11 August 2026; adoption scheduled 16 February 2027
320 Circle T Data Center (Westlake) PowerHouse Data Centers Town of Westlake / 342nd District Court, Tarrant County TX About 88 acres; developer to contribute $914,000 to pump station renovations (not project capital); MW not stated
litigationOn 17 August 2026 Judge Kimberly Fitzpatrick of the 342nd District Court issued a temporary restraining order, sought by The Lakes at Marshall Ridge Homeowners Association in Keller and two residents, blocking the Westlake Town Council from approving the Circle T Data Center development agreement. At a 26 August hearing the restraint was extended through 8 September 2026. Plaintiffs allege the site plan lacked required setbacks and that building height was raised from 45 to 80 feet without proper notice. Separately, the Keller City Council approved a motion to begin a 90-day moratorium process within its own limits. On 26 August 2026 Judge Kimberly Fitzpatrick of the 342nd District Court extended the temporary restraining order barring a Westlake vote on the data center development plans until a 10 a.m. hearing on 8 September 2026. The Fort Worth Star-Telegram describes the project as a 1.1 million-square-foot complex on 87.9 acres at 13580 Denton Highway, 506 feet from homes in Keller's Lakes at Marshall Ridge neighborhood, and reports the Keller City Council passed a resolution opposing the project and authorizing legal action. On 15 September 2026 the Westlake Town Council voted unanimously not to renew its police services agreement with Keller, which expires in 2028, amid the dispute. The Dallas Morning News describes Circle T as eight buildings on 88 acres. The Fort Worth Star-Telegram reported on 16 September 2026 that the judge has extended the temporary restraining order against a Westlake vote twice to allow more time to study evidence, and that the latest hearing is scheduled for 25 September 2026. On Friday 25 September 2026 Judge Kimberly Fitzpatrick dissolved the temporary restraining order that had kept Westlake from voting to approve the data center, after criticizing both sides for filing about 1,000 pages of documents the night before, and set a 23 October 2026 hearing on the Lakes at Marshall Ridge Homeowners Association lawsuit, in which the city of Keller is an intervener. Westlake said it was pleased and would continue to follow Governor Abbott's directives on data center development; Keller's mayor and an intervening resident said the suit continues. The Dallas Morning News reported on 28 September 2026 that the parties met for mediation before the 25 September hearing without reaching a settlement, and a status report said the plaintiffs' claims reached an impasse while Keller, Westlake and Circle T continue a settlement dialogue. At the 23 October 2026 hearing the judge is to decide whether the plaintiffs have standing to continue the suit. Westlake says the site has been zoned commercial and industrial since 1998, making the data center allowable by right.
TRO issued 17 August 2026, extended twice, dissolved 25 September 2026; lawsuit hearing set for 23 October 2026
321 Crusoe Technologies Leon County data center tax abatement Crusoe Technologies, LLC Leon County Commissioners Court TX Stated investment $34 billion; MW and acreage not stated
rejectedOn 13 July 2026 Leon County commissioners rejected Crusoe Technologies' initial tax abatement application for its proposed data center because the submission was incomplete. The company was expected to submit a new application. A public hearing was scheduled for 27 July 2026 in Marquez.
Application rejected 13 July 2026
322 Flint one-year data center moratorium n.a. City of Flint MI Citywide; no permits, site plans or construction plans for data centers accepted or approved; no project named
moratoriumThe Flint City Council passed a one-year moratorium on data centers on 8 June 2026. During the moratorium permits cannot be issued for a data center, and the council required an independent study with public input on its findings. Planning and legal staff are to recommend data center regulations.
Passed 8 June 2026; one year
323 Haring Township six-month data center moratorium n.a. Haring Charter Township MI Township-wide construction pause; no project named
moratoriumThe Haring Township Board of Trustees unanimously approved a six-month moratorium on data center construction in July 2026. Legal consultants advised that an outright exclusionary ban is not allowed in Michigan. The board directed the planning commission to work with counsel on permanent standards such as decommissioning requirements and environmental impact studies.
Approved unanimously, reported 14 July 2026; six months
324 Miamisburg nine-month data center moratorium (former Hutchings Power Station) Frontier Industrial Corp. (site owner) City of Miamisburg OH Citywide; former DP&L Hutchings Power Station site referenced; no MW or dollar figure stated
moratoriumMiamisburg City Council voted 6-0 on 1 September 2026 to impose a nine-month moratorium on data center development. The city said the pause gives time to evaluate potential impacts and consider regulations and development standards. The city's announcement referenced the former DP&L Hutchings Power Station, bought by Frontier Industrial Corp. in 2021.
Approved 6-0 on 1 September 2026; nine months
325 Newton Falls 12-month data center moratorium n.a. Village of Newton Falls OH Pause on data center permits; no project named
moratoriumNewton Falls council voted 4-0 to enact a 12-month moratorium on data center permits to allow research on zoning, environmental factors and preparation guidelines. A councilman said the measure is intended to prepare the village rather than oppose data centers.
Enacted 4-0 at a Wednesday meeting reported 4 September 2026; 12 months
326 Conneaut one-year data center moratorium (failed) and 25 MW charter amendment n.a. City of Conneaut OH Feasibility study reported for Conneaut East Industrial Park; proposed charter amendment would cap data centers at 25 MW
otherConneaut City Council voted 2-4 against a one-year data center moratorium on third reading. A separate charter amendment to limit data centers in the city to 25 MW moved to third reading. No official proposal has been made to the city, though a firm is studying a site at Conneaut East Industrial Park. After residents gathered enough signatures, Conneaut City Council approved placing the charter amendment capping data centers at 25 MW on the November 2026 ballot at its Monday 24 August 2026 meeting.
Moratorium failed 2-4, reported 12 August 2026; council placed the 25 MW charter amendment on the November 2026 ballot on 24 August 2026
327 Crane Data Centers Pierce Township concept (moratorium through May 2027) Crane Data Centers Pierce Township OH Concept for 300 MW, three buildings of roughly 200,000 to 300,000 square feet on about 300 acres near U.S. 52 across from the former Beckjord station; not a filed application
moratoriumCrane Data Centers presented a concept to the Pierce Township Zoning Commission on 1 September 2026 for a 300 MW campus. The township has a data center moratorium in effect through 31 May 2027, so projects cannot receive zoning permits while it is active. A trustee said the township is not currently entertaining data centers. On 9 September 2026 Pierce Township trustees extended the moratorium, previously set to end in February 2027, through 31 May 2027; trustee chair Allen Freeman said the township is not considering a data center.
Concept presented 1 September 2026; trustees extended moratorium on 9 September 2026 to 31 May 2027
328 Dodge County 18-month data center moratorium Meta (Beaver Dam project referenced) Dodge County Board of Supervisors WI Countywide pause while an ordinance is developed; prompted by Meta's 700,000-square-foot, $1 billion Beaver Dam facility, which is already permitted
moratoriumDodge County supervisors voted 29-2 in June 2026 to adopt an 18-month moratorium on new data centers while ordinance guidelines are developed. The action followed resident complaints tied to construction of Meta's $1 billion, 700,000-square-foot data center in Beaver Dam Commerce Park, including dried creeks and wells. The Meta project is expected online in 2027. The June 2026 vote was an advisory resolution, not a moratorium, according to County Administrator Cameron Clapper; after a Land Resources and Parks Committee recommendation and public hearing, the Board of Supervisors approved the 18-month moratorium ordinance on Tuesday 18 August 2026, covering unincorporated areas in the 13 towns under county zoning.
Advisory resolution 29-2 in June 2026; 18-month moratorium ordinance approved 18 August 2026
329 Sheboygan 12-month data center moratorium n.a. City of Sheboygan WI Applies to data centers over 10,000 square feet; no project named
moratoriumThe Sheboygan Common Council unanimously passed a 12-month moratorium on data centers exceeding 10,000 square feet. The pause gives the council time to develop zoning code for data center uses. The Sheboygan Press reported the Common Council passed the moratorium 9-0 on 20 July 2026 with one alder excused; it bars zoning approvals and building permits for data centers larger than 10,000 square feet and exempts server rooms within properties that have other primary uses.
Passed 9-0 on 20 July 2026; 12 months
330 Jackson County 180-day data center and battery storage moratorium n.a. Jackson County Legislature MO Applies to new data center and BESS land-use applications; projects already in the works not affected
moratoriumThe Jackson County Legislature voted 8-0, with one member excused, on 22 June 2026 to pass a 180-day moratorium on data center and battery energy storage land-use applications. The county will develop regulatory standards and public notification requirements during the pause. The county executive had 10 days to sign or veto.
Passed 8-0 on 22 June 2026; 180 days
331 Springfield 120-day data center administrative delay n.a. City of Springfield MO Citywide delay on processing data center applications; no project named
litigationSpringfield City Council passed a 120-day administrative delay on data center projects 8-0 on 29 June 2026 (Ordinance 28306), expiring 17 November 2026. Staff will evaluate land use compatibility, electric, water and wastewater impacts, and noise and air impacts, and hold public open houses before reporting to the Planning and Zoning Commission and council; City Manager David Cameron has indicated staff will seek an extension. On Thursday 17 September 2026 NSI A.1 LLC, affiliated with developer Trent Overhue, filed a 31-page, six-count petition in Greene County Circuit Court before Judge Nathan Taylor to invalidate the delay. The petition argues the measure is interim zoning adopted without the required public hearing and 15 days' published notice, that it was filed as a resolution in conflict with the City Charter, and that the city violated the Sunshine Law. Overhue's pre-development application proposes a high-performance computing facility in the basement of a former medical office building at 2900 S. National Ave.; an electric service application to City Utilities listed anticipated demand of 9.9 MW and was not processed because of the delay. On Thursday 1 October 2026 the rezoning application for 2900 S. National Ave. (to C-MX2 for a veterinary clinic, with no mention of a data center), which had been postponed to the 15 October Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, was withdrawn. Overhue said he had only authorized a conditional allowance for a veterinary tenant while pursuing his original basement data center plan. The News-Leader reports the City Council is likely to extend the pause beyond mid-November; Overhue's suit against it remains pending.
Passed 29 June 2026; 120 days to 17 November 2026; developer suit filed 17 September 2026; related rezoning application withdrawn 1 October 2026
332 St. Joseph data center application pause (6321 Pickett Road rezoning withdrawn) n.a. City of St. Joseph MO Rezoning application for a data center at 6321 Pickett Road was withdrawn; no MW or dollar figure stated
pausedAt a 13 July 2026 work session the St. Joseph City Council decided to pause acceptance of new data center applications and seek outside expertise to update the zoning code. The rezoning application for a proposed data center at 6321 Pickett Road had been withdrawn. On 17 August 2026 council rejected 3-6 a proposal to create a citizen data center advisory committee.
Pause decided 13 July 2026; advisory committee rejected 17 August 2026
333 Lawrence two-year large-scale data center moratorium n.a. City of Lawrence KS Applies to large-scale data centers; includes an exception process; no project named
moratoriumThe Lawrence City Commission unanimously approved a two-year moratorium on large-scale data centers on 14 July 2026, doubling the initially proposed duration. The measure includes an exception process to limit liability. Staff will study longer-term code changes and draft regulations.
Approved unanimously 14 July 2026; two years
334 Emporia digital infrastructure district and citizen data center ban petition n.a. City of Emporia KS Three ordinances creating a digital infrastructure district; validated citizen petition to ban high-impact data centers; no MW stated
litigationOn 22 July 2026 the Emporia City Commission voted 5-0 to approve three ordinances establishing a digital infrastructure district. It did not act on a validated citizen petition to ban high-impact data centers. If commissioners did not approve the petition within three weeks, it was to go to the November 2026 general election ballot. The city did not adopt the petition ordinance and sought judicial review; in August 2026 Senior Judge Glenn Braun of Lyon County District Court ordered the question onto the November 2026 ballot without deciding whether the petition is legislative or administrative, so its legal status remains pending. The Kansas City Star reported on 22 September 2026 that the Emporia judge ruled the ordinance's legal effect stays pending a final ruling regardless of the election result, and that no further hearing had been scheduled. Separately, three landowners (Amanda Mendoza, Kenneth Bruner and Ann Bruner) filed suit against the City of Emporia in Lyon County District Court on 19 August 2026 asking the court to declare the 22 July approvals (Ordinances 26-21, 26-22 and 26-23: the Digital Infrastructure Overlay District, the rezoning of 11 tracts and their placement in the overlay) unlawful and unreasonable. They allege the city applied the overlay before the ordinance creating it took effect and set no adequate standards for development agreements. A clerk's order of 18 September 2026 extended the city's time to respond to 8 October 2026; there has been no ruling on the merits. The Emporia Gazette describes the citizen question on the November 2026 ballot as a 10-year ban.
Ordinances approved 5-0 on 22 July 2026; landowner suit filed 19 August 2026 (reported 2 October 2026); petition placed on November 2026 ballot by court order in August 2026
335 Broken Bow six-month data center moratorium n.a. City of Broken Bow NE Citywide; ends early if a data center ordinance is approved; no project named
moratoriumBroken Bow's city council enacted a six-month data center moratorium on 14 July 2026, extendable by up to 12 additional months. It ends early if a data center ordinance is approved. The mayor said the city had nothing on the books to regulate data centers.
Enacted 14 July 2026; six months, extendable 12 months
336 Santa Fe County 18-month data center moratorium n.a. Santa Fe County Commission NM Countywide pause on new data center development; no project named
moratoriumSanta Fe County adopted an 18-month moratorium on new data center development on 1 July 2026. Officials plan to use the pause to develop land-use and environmental rules. It was described as the second New Mexico county to impose a data center moratorium in 2026.
Adopted 1 July 2026; 18 months
337 Tucson large-scale data center ordinance n.a. City of Tucson AZ Applies to facilities over 25,000 square feet or 20 MW; half-mile residential setback and 50-foot height cap
otherThe Tucson City Council approved 6-1 its first large-scale data center rules. Facilities over 25,000 square feet or 20 MW need mayor and council approval and must sit half a mile from residential areas and 1,000 feet from office or commercial uses, with a 50-foot height cap. The rules also require electricity availability verification, energy source disclosure and compliance with potable water limits.
Approved 6-1, reported 10 August 2026
338 Indio data center moratorium extension n.a. City of Indio CA Citywide pause on new data center projects; extension length not stated; no project named
moratoriumThe Indio City Council voted unanimously to extend its temporary moratorium on new data center developments, first adopted as a 45-day urgency ordinance the previous month. The city is reviewing land use, infrastructure, water, energy demand and community compatibility before deciding whether a permanent ban is appropriate. On Wednesday 7 October 2026 the City Council unanimously approved a final one-year extension of the moratorium on new data center development applications, keeping it in effect through 16 October 2027. The original 45-day urgency ordinance was adopted unanimously on 3 June 2026 and extended for 90 days in July 2026.
Adopted 3 June 2026; extended July 2026; final extension approved unanimously 7 October 2026, in effect through 16 October 2027
339 Escondido 45-day AI data center moratorium n.a. City of Escondido CA Prohibits new data centers and expansion of existing ones; no active or pending applications
moratoriumThe Escondido City Council unanimously approved a 45-day urgency moratorium on 26 August 2026 prohibiting new data centers and the expansion or intensification of existing facilities. It can be extended by 10 months and 15 days and then up to another year. Staff are to return with findings by 10 October 2026. The city said the measure was proactive and not prompted by a proposal.
Approved unanimously 26 August 2026; 45 days, extendable
340 Mendocino County data center urgency moratorium n.a. Mendocino County Board of Supervisors CA Covers hyperscale, colocation, AI, HPC and crypto mining facilities; all permit types; existing approvals remain valid; no applicant named
moratoriumThe Mendocino County Board of Supervisors voted 5-0 on 1 September 2026 to adopt an urgency ordinance barring new data centers in unincorporated areas. It runs 45 days, through 16 October 2026, and can be extended up to two years under state law. It applies to use, variance, grading and building permits, with exemptions for server closets, office computers and utility facilities. On Tuesday 6 October 2026 supervisors voted 4-1 (Supervisor Maureen Mulheren opposed) to extend the moratorium by 22 months and 15 days, to 21 August 2028, the longest period state law allows, and to exempt facilities drawing less than 3 MW.
Adopted 5-0 on 1 September 2026; extended 4-1 on 6 October 2026 to 21 August 2028
341 Fresno proposed 10-year data center ban n.a. City of Fresno CA Proposed ban would cover current city land and future annexations for 10 years; no project named
otherOn 3 September 2026 the Fresno City Council unanimously directed staff to draft a text amendment banning data centers for 10 years. The ban would apply to current city land and future annexations, and council must be notified immediately of any data center use application. The planning director said the amendment could take a few months to a year. The ban itself has not been adopted.
Staff directed 3 September 2026; ban not yet adopted
342 Salix Google data center (moratorium rejected) Google (customer) with MidAmerican Energy City of Salix IA About 900 acres of annexed farmland south of Sioux City; rezoning still required; MW and capital not stated
otherThe Salix City Council voted 3-2 on 22 August 2026 to reject a one-year moratorium on data center development, allowing the Google-linked project to proceed. One council member changed her vote after Google's involvement was disclosed. The land still requires rezoning, and Woodbury County is challenging the annexation in court. KCAU reported the council voted 3-2 against the moratorium on Thursday night, 20 August 2026, after voting 3-2 in July to have attorneys draft it; the vote came a week after a meeting was cancelled over threats. In September 2026 the Salix Guardian Alliance petitioned a court for a declaratory judgment that the council had already approved a one-year moratorium in July 2026.
Moratorium rejected 3-2 on Thursday 20 August 2026
343 Maquoketa South Highway 61 Industrial Park data center talks (ended) n.a. City of Maquoketa IA Potential data center in South Highway 61 Industrial Park; developer and size not stated
cancelledOn 18 August 2026 Maquoketa city leaders and development consultant Gronen ended preliminary discussions on a potential data center in the South Highway 61 Industrial Park. The city said it will review Heavy Industrial District regulations before future proposals, including data centers.
Discussions ended 18 August 2026
344 AWS 18-building campus, Trenton annexation of 601 acres from Madison and St. Clair townships Amazon Web Services City of Trenton and Butler County Board of Commissioners OH 601 acres; 18 buildings of about 220,000 sq ft each
withdrawnTrenton, Duke Energy Ohio and Kentucky, Watson Gravel Inc. and two landowners filed an expedited annexation petition on 27 July 2026 to bring 601 acres into the city for a proposed 18-building AWS data center. Madison Township trustees voted unanimously on 24 August 2026 to reject the petition and St. Clair Township rejected it the next day, despite Amazon offering each township $5 million. On 14 September 2026 the petitioners withdrew the petition hours before a Butler County commissioners hearing, reserving the right to refile after Trenton voters decide a 3 November 2026 charter amendment banning data centers above 25 MW. Butler County's six-month data center moratorium for Madison and five other townships runs to December 2026. The annexation petitioners asked for postponement until after 10 November 2026.
Annexation petition withdrawn 14 September 2026; withdrawal acknowledged by county commissioners 15 September 2026; $5 billion value Reported by the Cincinnati Business Courier
345 American Transmission Co. power line project serving the Port Washington (Lighthouse) campus for Vantage, Oracle and OpenAI American Transmission Co. (for Vantage Data Centers, Oracle and OpenAI) Public Service Commission of Wisconsin WI About 100 miles of high-voltage lines and up to five substations; campus first phase 1.3 GW
delayedOn 6 August 2026 the three-member Wisconsin PSC voted unanimously to revoke the December 2025 completeness determination for ATC's transmission application and ordered it resubmitted, citing about 564 amendments to route, scope, costs and environmental studies. The commission said the decision did not reject the project but reset review, jeopardizing ATC's late-2027 completion target. ATC refiled on 14 September 2026 with a revised cost of $2.5 billion to $2.7 billion, up from $1.6 billion, and estimated about 17 months of construction after a six- to 12-month approval process. Oracle will pay for most of the project, and ATC said the campus will not be served until the transmission facilities are in service. Research firm Aterio said in a report of 30 September 2026 that the campus could miss Oracle's target of delivering capacity in the second half of 2027 because ATC cannot start building until the PSC approves the refiled application: its base case puts partial grid power in December 2027 and full supply in October 2028, and an extended review could push those to June 2028 and April 2029. This is a third-party estimate, not a regulator or company statement; The Register said Oracle had been asked for comment.
Completeness revoked 6 August 2026; application refiled 14 September 2026
346 Green Chile gas pipeline route for Project Jupiter (Oracle, Doña Ana County) Energy Transfer (Transwestern Pipeline) for Oracle, STACK Infrastructure and BorderPlex Digital Assets New Mexico State Land Office NM 17-mile gas pipeline including a 0.6-mile state trust land segment, up to 400 million cubic feet per day, serving a planned 2.5 GW fuel-cell-powered campus
deniedNew Mexico Land Commissioner Stephanie Garcia Richard denied, in a letter dated 14 July 2026, Energy Transfer's renewed request to route 0.6 miles of the 17-mile pipeline serving Project Jupiter across state trust lands, after first rejecting applications in March 2026. She said the request was not in the best interest of the state trust. Energy Transfer's Transwestern unit then told federal regulators the Green Chile Project's in-service date had moved from 15 August 2026 to 1 February 2027. Oracle's 8 September 2026 release said its commitments assume the air permit and pipeline are approved as originally planned. In a filing with FERC on Monday 5 October 2026, New Mexico Attorney General Raul Torrez called the commission's environmental review of the Green Chile Project inadequate because it excludes the emissions of Project Jupiter itself, arguing the pipeline has no purpose other than fueling the campus and that NEPA requires a full environmental impact statement rather than an environmental assessment.
Route denied by letter dated 14 July 2026; in-service date moved to 1 February 2027 per a filing reported 14 August 2026; Attorney General's FERC filing challenging the environmental review Monday 5 October 2026 (reported 6 October 2026)
347 Nebius Independence AI factory (Bly Road) Nebius Group (Missouri ADC Holdings LLC) City of Independence MO 400-acre site; reported as a $150 billion hyperscale AI data center
litigationFour residents affiliated with the Independence Guard Alliance filed a lawsuit on 13 August 2026 asking a Jackson County judge to halt construction of the Nebius data center on Bly Road. The suit names Missouri ADC Holdings LLC and challenges City Council actions before its 2 March 2026 vote approving more than $6 billion in tax breaks and other funding mechanisms. Plaintiffs allege violations of the Independence City Charter and the Missouri Sunshine Law. Nebius broke ground in May 2026 and construction was continuing when the suit was filed. A motion hearing on a temporary restraining order to halt construction, sought by the Independence GUARD Alliance and residents who allege permit violations, is set for Thursday 22 October 2026 in the Eastern Jackson County Courthouse.
Lawsuit filed 13 August 2026; TRO hearing set for 22 October 2026
348 Edgecombe County AI data center (Kingsboro) Energy Storage Solutions Edgecombe County NC $19.2 billion; initial 300 MW, with reports of up to 900 MW on about 300 acres
withdrawnDeveloper Energy Storage Solutions withdrew its proposed $19.2 billion AI data center in the Kingsboro development area, according to the county manager at the 6 July 2026 commissioners meeting. The county board had denied a special use permit for an eight-phase, 300 MW campus on a 52-acre parcel late in 2025, which the developer appealed. At the same meeting commissioners discussed a 24-month moratorium on new data centers, with a public hearing planned for August 2026
Withdrawal disclosed 6 July 2026; reported 15 July 2026
349 AWS Cosgray campus fuel cell facility (Hilliard permit appeal) Amazon Web Services Hilliard OH 72.9 MW solid oxide fuel cell facility at an existing data center campus
otherThe City of Hilliard withdrew its appeal, filed in 2025 with the Environmental Review Appeals Commission, of an Ohio EPA permit for a natural-gas-powered fuel cell facility at the Amazon data center off Scioto Darby Road. City Council President Emily Cole said the withdrawal is not an endorsement and that state law gives local communities limited authority over such facilities. The city had appealed in November 2025 after AWS withdrew its local application for 228 fuel cells, arguing state approval was sufficient because AEP Ohio could not supply the load for several years. The city plans air quality testing once the fuel cells operate.
Appeal withdrawn Tuesday 15 September 2026; reported 16 and 17 September 2026
350 Synapse Olds data centre campus and 1.4 GW gas plant Synapse Real Estate Corp. Alberta Utilities Commission Alberta 10-building campus with a 1,400 MW combined-cycle gas plant and 1.8 GW of backup diesel generation; no capital figure in fetched sources
rejectedThe Alberta Utilities Commission denied Synapse's application for a 1,400 MW natural gas plant that would have supplied a data centre campus inside the town of Olds, about 80 km north of Calgary. The commission said the project is too close to the surrounding community, with the site boundary about 30 metres from homes, and that Synapse gave no compelling justification for the location. The AUC received about 1,500 applications to participate and granted standing to more than 900, and noted it does not itself regulate data centres.
Decision published 17 August 2026
351 Large-scale AI data centre applications over 50 MW Multiple proponents City of Sault Ste. Marie Ontario Applies to data centre applications above 50 MW of power consumption
moratoriumSault Ste. Marie city council voted unanimously to pause large-scale data centre applications above 50 MW until staff develop a municipal framework after public consultation. The vote came three weeks after council rejected a similar motion, with councillors citing limited information on environmental impact and fresh water demand.
Approved at the council meeting of Monday 31 August 2026; reported 2 September 2026
352 Project Washington data center (Delaware City) Starwood Digital Ventures State of Delaware (Coastal Zone Act) DE Largest data center proposed in Delaware; plan included 516 backup diesel generators and 2.5 million gallons of stored diesel; capital not disclosed in fetched source
withdrawnDelaware Environmental Secretary Greg Patterson ruled the Project Washington plans would violate the Coastal Zone Act, and a state board upheld the decision. Starwood appealed to Delaware Superior Court but voluntarily withdrew the appeal in early July 2026, two days after the legislature passed stricter data center bills. With no remaining challenge, the project cannot proceed under its current design. A Starwood spokesman said the company is still seeking a pathway forward.
Appeal withdrawn early July 2026; reported 28 August 2026
353 White Clay Center data center campus (Newark) Shelbourne New Castle County DE Three-building campus of about 850,000 square feet replacing the White Clay Center office and industrial buildings; capital and capacity not disclosed
pausedNew Castle County Councilman Tim Sheldon said he brokered a nonbinding handshake deal under which developer Shelbourne agreed to pause the data center plan and consider other uses for the site. An email dated 10 June 2026 from the developer's attorney agreed to the pause, conditioned on county approval of an exploratory plan that would grandfather the land under prior zoning rules. The developer retains the legal right to build a data center.
Pause agreed by email 10 June 2026; reported 2 July 2026. Reported by Spotlight Delaware
354 Caddo Parish data center moratorium referral (Resolution 53) Amazon Web Services (area projects) Caddo Parish Commission LA Parish-level policy item; no single project size
otherCaddo Parish commissioners voted 6-4, with two members absent, against Resolution 53, which would have asked the parish Planning and Zoning Commission to consider recommending a moratorium on data center construction in commercially and industrially zoned parts of unincorporated Caddo Parish. The measure was introduced by Commissioner John-Paul Young after public concern over data center development in the region. An earlier effort to enact a parishwide moratorium directly had stalled after the parish attorney said it required an ordinance.
Referral rejected 6-4 on 31 August 2026
355 Nottingham 12-month data center moratorium n.a. Town of Nottingham NH Townwide moratorium; no project size
moratoriumNottingham voters approved a 12-month moratorium on any data center development within town limits by 1,335 votes to 143. The moratorium gives town officials time to consider permanent zoning changes. A Merrimack County Superior Court judge dismissed a lawsuit arguing the ballot question was misleading and too confusing to go before voters.
Approved by town vote 8 September 2026; reported 9 September 2026; 12 months
356 Fundamental Data Ridgeline Facility (Tucker County) Fundamental Data West Virginia Intermediate Court of Appeals WV Phase one of about 800 MW of gas generation, nearly 1.3 GW of solar and 14 data center buildings using more than 2 GW of computing load, with a second phase adding 3.1 GW of gas-fired capacity; proposed development could span about 10,000 acres; capital not disclosed
litigationThe West Virginia Intermediate Court of Appeals dismissed two appeals by Tucker United, the West Virginia Highlands Conservancy, Friends of Blackwater and the Sierra Club challenging the state air quality permits for the Fundamental Data project. The court ruled that the final permit appeal belongs before the state Supreme Court and that it lacked jurisdiction over the draft permit challenge, which it found moot. The groups said no court has yet heard the merits and they plan to refile. Separately, on 13 August 2026 the West Virginia Division of Air Quality determined that Fundamental Data held legal site control when its August 2025 air permit was issued, resolving a procedural challenge raised by community groups in July 2026.
Site control determination 13 August 2026; appeal dismissals reported 28 August 2026
357 Dixfield 180-day data center moratorium n.a. Town of Dixfield ME Townwide moratorium; no permits requested and no project filed
moratoriumDixfield residents voted 35-3 by secret ballot at a town meeting to enact a 180-day moratorium on data centers, effective immediately. The Select Board said no one had requested permits for a data center despite local rumors. The planning board will research data centers and draft an ordinance during the moratorium.
Approved 14 September 2026; 180 days
358 Agawam data center moratorium n.a. Agawam City Council MA Citywide moratorium; duration not stated in fetched source
moratoriumThe Agawam City Council voted to temporarily block data centers through a moratorium, following a public hearing on 3 August 2026. Councilor Robert Rossi sought an amendment that would outright ban data centers larger than 12 MW, but no councilor seconded the motion after the council president said a moratorium and a ban cannot be combined in one ordinance. The vote came the same day Gov. Maura Healey signed an executive order giving municipalities authority over data center approvals.
Approved 8 September 2026
359 Shetland Park data center building permit (Salem) Prime Group Holding City of Salem Building Department and Zoning Board of Appeals MA 12,000-square-foot building at the Shetland Park office complex; capital and capacity not disclosed
deniedSalem issued a building permit on 18 May 2026 for a building initially described as housing an IT services company, then revoked it in late June 2026 after detailed construction documents showed what the city classifies as a data center, a use not allowed under zoning. Developer Prime Group Holding appealed the revocation to the Zoning Board of Appeals, with a vote expected on 16 September 2026, and argues the facility is not a data center. Mayor Dominick Pangallo urged the board to uphold the revocation and has separately proposed a citywide data center ban that the City Council has not passed. On 16 September 2026 the Salem Zoning Board of Appeals voted unanimously to uphold the revocation of the permit for the 12,000 sq ft building it deemed a data center at Shetland Park. Mayor Pangallo's citywide ban ordinance had not been passed by the City Council. The Salem News reported on 1 October 2026 that the City Council's Committee on Ordinances, Licenses and Legal Affairs, meeting 30 September 2026, recommended the mayor's zoning amendment banning data centers for final approval by the full council, with clarified language so that routine data processing accessory to uses such as hospitals and telecommunications is not prohibited. Final passage by the full council had not been reported.
Permit revoked late June 2026; appeal denied unanimously by the ZBA 16 September 2026; citywide ban recommended by council committee 30 September 2026, final council vote pending
360 Federalsburg data center ban (Ordinance 2026-07) Wright Road LLC (prospective developer) Federalsburg Town Council MD Townwide ban; proposed data center size not stated in fetched source
moratoriumThe Federalsburg Town Council passed Ordinance 2026-07 banning data centers within town limits by a 4-0 vote, with the mayor absent. The council overrode a 3-2 Planning Commission recommendation against the ordinance as written. The council had passed a three-year data center moratorium on 3 August 2026 after a proposal tied to Wright Road LLC drew public outcry, and the ban is the first on Maryland's Eastern Shore. WBOC reported the ordinance passed on Wednesday 9 September 2026.
Three-year moratorium 3 August 2026; ban (Ordinance 2026-07) passed 9 September 2026; reported 10 September 2026
361 Attleboro two-year data center moratorium n.a. Attleboro City Council MA Citywide moratorium; no project size
moratoriumThe Attleboro City Council unanimously passed a two-year ban, which the council refers to as a moratorium, on data centers. The measure was first proposed in July 2026 by Councilor Diana Holmes as a one-year ban to give the city time to study whether it could accommodate a data center with current resources, and was lengthened before passage.
Passed on a Thursday evening; reported 21 August 2026; two years
362 Convergent Technology Park Jeffrey Price (Convergent Technology Park) Fauquier County VA Six data centers totaling 1.584 million square feet on more than 100 acres; capital and capacity not disclosed
withdrawnConvergent Technology Park withdrew its application to rezone more than 100 acres south of Remington for a six-building data center campus. Developer Jeffrey Price told the county he will pursue housing on the property instead. The withdrawal came just over a week after the nearby Gigaland project also withdrew, leaving Remington Technology Park as the only one of three proposed Remington-area data center projects still moving forward.
Withdrawn 27 August 2026; reported 2 September 2026
363 Potomac Creek Campus data center n.a. Stafford County Board of Supervisors VA Three data center buildings plus a substation; capital and capacity not disclosed
delayedThe Stafford County Board of Supervisors voted 4-3 to defer rezoning and conditional use permit applications for the Potomac Creek Campus data center project pending an archaeological investigation of a family cemetery on the site. The deferral includes a time extension to 31 October 2026. The board directed that the report be shared with the Historical Commission, Planning Commission and supervisors.
Deferred 7 July 2026; time extension to 31 October 2026
364 Project Industry data center (Wellington Road) Industrial Park Court, LLC Prince William County Board of County Supervisors VA Two data center buildings and a six-acre electric substation on just over 42 acres in the Data Center Opportunity Zone Overlay District; capital and capacity not disclosed
delayedThe Prince William Board of County Supervisors voted to defer the Project Industry rezoning and proffer amendment, which would raise allowed building height to 85 feet and permit a substation up to 110 feet. The Planning Commission had deadlocked 3-3 on 20 May 2026 on a motion to recommend denial, which county staff treated as no action. The Coalition to Protect Prince William County said the deferral showed the applicant lacked the votes.
Deferred 1 September 2026; reported 10 September 2026
365 Stonebridge Associates Powder Mill Works data center (North Beaver and Mahoning townships) Stonebridge Associates (S.S. Penn LLC) North Beaver Township and Mahoning Township zoning hearing boards PA 16-building data center on 569 acres at the former Powder Mill Works property, adjacent to the Hickory Run Energy plant; capital and capacity not disclosed
deniedThe North Beaver Township Zoning Hearing Board voted 4-0 and the Mahoning Township Zoning Hearing Board voted 2-0 to deny appeals by Stonebridge Associates affiliate S.S. Penn LLC, which challenged the townships' rejection of its June 2026 preliminary land development applications as incomplete. The rulings mean the project faces the stricter data center ordinances the townships adopted after the filing. A Lawrence County judge ruled against Stonebridge's related lawsuit in July 2026, and that decision is on appeal to Commonwealth Court. The company has 30 days to appeal the zoning board rulings to county court.
North Beaver appeal denied on a Thursday, reported 11 September 2026; Mahoning appeal denied on a Tuesday, reported 15 and 17 September 2026
366 DANKO Holdings Muncy Township data center DANKO Holdings II, LP / FISHLIPS, LLC Lycoming County Court of Common Pleas PA Three data center buildings (two 14-pod facilities and one eight-pod facility), water storage tanks, a water treatment facility and a substation near Yetter Road and John Brady Drive; capital and capacity not disclosed
litigationTwo Muncy Township residents filed a land use appeal in Lycoming County Court of Common Pleas against the township supervisors and the developer, challenging the deemed approval of a data center conditional use application and related curative zoning amendment. They argue the township failed to hold a hearing or act within the 60-day period required by state code, and that the developer-drafted amendment amounts to spot zoning. The developer filed its application in late April 2026, hours before supervisors passed a nine-month moratorium on high-intensity data centers, and is contesting the appeal. The appeal was filed 14 August 2026 by neighbors Rae-Ellah and Sean Tetreault. Danko Holdings II, LP and Fishlips, LLC (owned by The Liberty Group) filed a motion to quash on 28 August 2026, arguing the appeal targets the deemed-denied curative amendment rather than the deemed-approved conditional use. The township asked for a remand for a conditional use hearing. Judge William P. Carlucci scheduled argument for 6 November 2026. On Friday 25 September 2026 Green Amendments for the Generations, with residents including neighbors Sean and Rae-Ellah Tetreault, filed a separate appeal in Commonwealth Court arguing that the Municipalities Planning Code provision under which the conditional use application was published as deemed approved, after the township held no hearing within 60 days, is unconstitutional and violates environmental rights and due process. The application covers three data center buildings (two 14-pod and one eight-pod), water storage and treatment and a substation near Yetter Road and John Brady Drive.
Appeal filed 14 August 2026; motion to quash 28 August 2026; Commonwealth Court constitutional appeal filed 25 September 2026; argument on the county appeal 6 November 2026
367 Dickson City Development Bell Mountain data centers Dickson City Development LLC (Kriger Construction affiliate) Dickson City Borough and Lackawanna County Court of Common Pleas PA Four data centers on Bell Mountain, paired with a proposal for three natural gas plants projected at 600 MW combined; capital not disclosed
litigationDickson City Development filed an amended consolidated land use appeal on 4 August 2026 and a new appeal on 7 August 2026 seeking to void the borough's data center zoning regulations. The Dickson City Zoning Hearing Board had denied the developer's validity challenge on 20 May 2026 and four appeals of denied zoning permits on 27 May 2026, after the zoning officer denied the four permit applications on 17 February 2026.
Appeals filed 4 and 7 August 2026; reported 13 August 2026
368 TECfusions Keystone Connect Building J land development appeal TECfusions Westmoreland County Court of Common Pleas PA 1,400-acre campus that could reach up to 3 GW of computational power at full buildout; the appeal concerns the Building J land development plan; capital not disclosed
litigationProtect PT and two New Kensington residents filed a land use appeal in Westmoreland County Court of Common Pleas challenging the Upper Burrell Township supervisors' 5 August 2026 approval of a land development plan for TECfusions' Building J. The plaintiffs argue the developer should first have been required to obtain a special exception from the zoning hearing board. The township's 180-day moratorium on new data center development, adopted in May 2026, did not cover permits already granted for Building J and ends on 2 November 2026. TribLIVE reported the appeal was filed on 25 August 2026 in Westmoreland County Court by Protect PT and Upper Burrell residents Allen Uhler and Guy Fuller, arguing a data center is not an authorized use and TECfusions should have gone to the zoning hearing board.
Plan approved 5 August 2026; appeal filed 25 August 2026; moratorium ends 2 November 2026
369 Cumberland County six-month data center moratorium n.a. Cumberland County Board of Commissioners NC Countywide moratorium; no project size
moratoriumCumberland County commissioners adopted a six-month data center moratorium that expires in December 2026. In Fayetteville, the city council held a public hearing on proposed data center rules on 10 August 2026 but could not reach consensus on a moratorium and scheduled a special meeting on data centers by the end of October. CityView reported the Board of Commissioners voted 7-0 for the moratorium, which covers unincorporated areas through 15 December 2026. On 10 August 2026 the Fayetteville City Council voted 7-3 to have staff revise proposed data center regulations for reconsideration by late October and voted against reconsidering a moratorium.
Adopted 7-0 on 15 June 2026; runs through 15 December 2026
370 Winchester Gateway data center campus Winchester Gateway LLC Frederick County Planning Commission VA Nearly 72-acre campus with three 60-foot buildings, a substation and diesel generators; megawatts not provided by the applicant; capital not disclosed
otherThe Frederick County Planning Commission unanimously recommended denial of a conditional use permit for the Winchester Gateway data center campus, citing unresolved transmission needs, undisclosed power demand, building height and viewshed concerns for the Kernstown Civil War battlefield. The county's Historic Resources Advisory Board had recommended denial in April 2026. The same night the commission recommended an ordinance amendment removing data centers as a permitted or conditional use in all county zoning districts, which would not apply to pending applications. The Board of Supervisors set public hearings for 23 September 2026.
Planning Commission denial recommendation on a Wednesday, reported 3 September 2026; Board of Supervisors hearing scheduled 23 September 2026
371 Lightstone Group data center, 300 Jones Road The Lightstone Group Spartanburg County Board of Zoning Appeals SC 200,000-square-foot data center; capital and capacity not disclosed
deniedThe Spartanburg County Board of Zoning Appeals voted unanimously to uphold county planning staff's denial of the Lightstone Group's proposed data center at 300 Jones Road. Lightstone applied on 28 April 2026, and staff denied the plan in late June 2026 for noncompliance with the county's unified land management ordinance, then required a new application after Lightstone submitted revisions. Staff said new applications after 22 June 2026 would not be approved because a county moratorium was pending, while Lightstone argued the county had earlier confirmed a data center was allowed on the site. WSPA reported the county denied the application on 26 June 2026 and the Board of Zoning Appeals rejected the appeal unanimously on Tuesday 25 August 2026; WSPA identified the applicant representative as Lighthouse Data Centers, while The Post and Courier names the Lightstone Group.
Staff denial 26 June 2026; appeal denied unanimously 25 August 2026
372 Pollard data center rezoning (Whitetown Road) Pollard Land Company McCormick County Council SC Rezoning of roughly 1,000 acres plus a natural gas pipeline from Lincoln County described by a councilman as a $200 million component; data center capital and capacity not disclosed; 300,000 to 500,000 gallons of water per day estimated
approved after delayThe McCormick County Planning Commission recommended denial of the Pollard Land Company rezoning and a nine-month data center pause on 30 July 2026 after a packed hearing. On 10 September 2026 the county council voted 3-2 to reject the nine-month pause on first reading, 5-0 to approve first reading of data center regulations, and 3-2 to approve the rezoning of roughly 1,000 acres. Deputies intervened when audience members approached the dais after the vote.
Planning Commission denial recommendation 30 July 2026; council approved rezoning 3-2 on 10 September 2026
373 Laurens County one-year data center moratorium n.a. Laurens County Council SC Countywide moratorium in unincorporated areas; does not apply to the cities of Laurens or Clinton
moratoriumLaurens County Council voted 6-0 on third and final reading to approve a one-year moratorium on new data center development in unincorporated areas, after unanimous votes on the first two readings. Vice Chairman Matthew Brownlee sponsored the measure to allow time to evaluate public health effects and draft siting rules.
Final reading approved 14 September 2026; one year
374 Fairfield County 12-month data center moratorium n.a. Fairfield County Council SC Countywide moratorium; no project size
moratoriumFairfield County Council approved a 12-month moratorium on data centers at its 10 August 2026 meeting, becoming the second Midlands county to halt new construction, and plans to research data centers through town halls, expert work sessions and site visits. The State later described the August vote as initial approval, so final adoption status should be confirmed. Fairfield County Council gave the moratorium final approval as Ordinance 856 on 14 September 2026; during the 12 months the county will not negotiate with data center developers.
Initial approval 10 August 2026; Ordinance 856 approved 14 September 2026; 12 months
375 Panhandle Road data center (Lovejoy) Stillwater Development City of Lovejoy GA 3.5 million-square-foot, 15-building site between two schools, described as a 1.2 GW facility; capital not disclosed
withdrawnThe Lovejoy City Council announced at a special called meeting that a proposal for a large data center on Panhandle Road had been withdrawn after resident opposition, and the developer pivoted to a residential plan. Mayor Marci Fluellyn said the city will begin updating zoning to prohibit data centers. Lovejoy is not covered by Clayton County's moratorium on data center applications. At the Thursday 6 August 2026 special called meeting the council voted unanimously to begin rescinding the permit for the proposed 1.2 GW data center, and the mayor said a withdrawal from the Development of Regional Impact review would follow. On Monday 28 September 2026 the city approved an ordinance banning data center construction within city limits. Atlanta News First reported the Stillwater Development plan as 3.5 million sq ft in 15 buildings with 1.25 GW at full build-out, filed in December 2025.
Council voted unanimously to begin rescission 6 August 2026; reported 8 August 2026; citywide ban approved 28 September 2026
376 Lowndes County 60-day data center permit moratorium n.a. Lowndes County Board of Commissioners GA Countywide moratorium on permit applications in unincorporated areas; no projects planned per county
moratoriumLowndes County commissioners approved a 60-day moratorium on accepting permit applications for data centers in unincorporated parts of the county. County leaders said they had not approved any data center projects, had none planned and had not signed nondisclosure agreements, and want time to set permanent guidelines.
Approved Tuesday 25 August 2026; 60 days
377 Atlas Development Battey Business Complex data center Atlas Development Rome-Floyd County Development Authority GA About 100 acres of the former Northwest Georgia Regional Hospital campus under a preliminary $5.7 million land agreement; project capital and capacity not disclosed
terminatedAtlas Development ended its preliminary $5.7 million agreement with the Rome-Floyd County Development Authority for about 100 acres at the Battey Business Complex, and the authority chair confirmed the data center project is no longer active. Neither party explained the termination. Nearby residents had opposed the project, including a petition with more than 2,200 signatures. Rome city commissioners later discussed, but took no action on, a citywide data center moratorium.
Termination reported 13 and 14 August 2026; Rome moratorium deferred, reported 17 September 2026
378 Carter County one-year data center and crypto mining moratorium n.a. Carter County Commission TN Countywide moratorium; no project size
moratoriumThe Carter County Commission voted to approve a one-year moratorium on data centers and cryptocurrency mining. WJHL reported the motion by Commissioner Keith Range passed 20-1, with Commissioner Aaron Frazier voting no.
Approved 20-1 on Monday 17 August 2026; one year
379 Cave City data center moratorium lawsuit (2001 Doyle Avenue) Kentucky Industrial Alliance, LLC City of Cave City, Joint City-County Planning Commission and Cave City Council KY Proposed 600-acre, 1.2 GW AI and cloud computing campus north of downtown at 2001 Doyle Avenue; company says it invested more than $2 million; capital not stated
litigationKentucky Industrial Alliance filed a lawsuit against Cave City, its city council and the joint planning commission, arguing the city's data center moratorium violated KRS 100 and should be declared invalid. The council rejected a data center zoning amendment and passed the moratorium on 11 May 2026, with final reading approved 4-1 on 20 May 2026, after packed meetings over impacts near Mammoth Cave National Park. The company claims vested rights because it filed a development plan on 11 May 2026 and says the moratorium was rushed and passed in bad faith. The Lexington Herald-Leader reported the developer outlined a 600-acre, 1.2 GW campus and filed a second lawsuit challenging the 2024 ordinance that annexed the property into city limits, seeking to place the land outside the moratorium.
Moratorium final reading 20 May 2026; lawsuit filed 8 June 2026; reported 25 July 2026
380 Mercer County one-year data center application moratorium Panattoni (Project Bluegrass, proposed via Burgin annexation) Mercer County Fiscal Court KY Countywide moratorium in unincorporated areas; does not reach land annexed into the city of Burgin
moratoriumThe Mercer County Fiscal Court unanimously passed an ordinance for a one-year moratorium on applications to build new data centers in unincorporated areas. The moratorium would not apply if the city of Burgin annexes land for Panattoni's proposed Project Bluegrass hyperscale data center; Burgin has no planning and zoning rules. The same evening Burgin's council did not take up the annexation proposal while residents voiced opposition. The Fiscal Court first approved a motion for the moratorium on 28 July 2026, with a second reading required before formal adoption. On Monday 28 September 2026 the Fiscal Court unanimously voted down a proposed zoning ordinance that would have created a new district for large-scale data centers and set siting and operating rules. Shaker Village of Pleasant Hill said the ordinance would have allowed a data center within 2,000 feet of the landmark's border. Panattoni continues to pursue a 950-acre data center despite the moratorium.
Passed Tuesday 11 August 2026; one year; data center zoning ordinance rejected 28 September 2026
381 Hawkins County data center and crypto mining ban resolution ExoticRidge Crypto Company LLC (plaintiff) Hawkins County Commission and federal court TN Countywide ban on data centers and cryptocurrency mines; no single project size
litigationThe Hawkins County Commission passed a resolution banning data centers and cryptocurrency mines by 12 votes, with two commissioners absent, after earlier similar measures. The county's ban is the subject of a federal lawsuit filed by the Beacon Center of Tennessee on behalf of ExoticRidge Crypto Company LLC, which claims the ban is unconstitutional, arbitrary and enacted in violation of state law. A ruling for the company would invalidate the new resolution. ExoticRidge Crypto Company filed a supplemental complaint on 11 September 2026 alleging the county's 2023 'constitutional sanctuary' resolution conflicts with the bans, that it should be grandfathered under state law, and that the county violated the County Zoning Act and Open Meetings Act. The case is set for a jury trial in January 2028.
First ban September 2025; second ban July 2026; federal suit March 2026; supplemental complaint 11 September 2026; trial January 2028
382 Charleston 12-month data center moratorium n.a. Charleston City Commission TN Citywide moratorium; triggered by a possible data center and power station on Wright Brothers Construction land off Lower River Road outside city limits
moratoriumThe Charleston City Commission unanimously passed a 12-month moratorium on second reading, under which the city will not accept rezoning requests, site plans, building permits or other land use approvals that would attract a data center. The measure responds to a possible data center and power station on property west of Charleston that is being presented to the City of Cleveland for annexation. The proposal it responds to is Project River, recorded separately; it sits outside Charleston's city limits.
Passed on second reading on a Tuesday evening; reported 12 September 2026; 12 months
383 Virginia Beach 12-month data center application moratorium n.a. Virginia Beach City Council VA Citywide pause on new data center applications; no single project size
moratoriumThe Virginia Beach City Council voted unanimously to pause new data center applications for at least a year or until an ordinance regulating data centers is adopted. Council members said they want to ban large-scale data centers but setting the threshold is a challenge, and a planning commissioner had urged closing the by-right path for data centers on industrial parcels. The same day neighboring Chesapeake ended by-right data center development, requiring council approval.
Approved unanimously Tuesday 18 August 2026; 12 months or until an ordinance is adopted
384 Surry County two-year data center moratorium n.a. Surry County Board of Commissioners NC Countywide moratorium; no project size
moratoriumSurry County commissioners unanimously approved a two-year moratorium on data center development, extending an earlier 60-day pause. The extension requires the board to appoint a steering committee to research data centers and advise commissioners.
Approved Monday 20 July 2026 (reported 21 July 2026); two years
385 Amazon Louisa County second data center campus nuisance lawsuit Amazon U.S. District Court for the Western District of Virginia (Charlottesville) VA Planned 10-building campus with multiple substations, completion expected in 2031; capital and capacity not disclosed in fetched source
litigationA judge allowed a private nuisance claim by neighboring homeowner Austin Newsom against Amazon to proceed. Newsom sued in August 2025, alleging construction of Amazon's second Louisa County data center has cracked his foundation, turned his well water brown, disrupted drainage and reduced his property value. A preliminary hearing was scheduled for 19 August 2026. The case is in federal court: U.S. District Judge Jasmine H. Yoon allowed the private nuisance claim to proceed but dismissed the separate claim for injunctive relief, and a preliminary hearing was set for 19 August 2026 according to U.S. District Court for the Western District of Virginia records.
Suit filed August 2025; ruling allowing the claim reported 31 July 2026; hearing scheduled 19 August 2026
386 Shadowbox Studios data center (International Park Drive) Shadowbox Studios DeKalb County Zoning Board of Appeals and DeKalb County Superior Court GA More than 1 million-square-foot data center on the studio's roughly 155-acre property; studio says it spent $37 million preparing the land; capacity not disclosed
litigationThe DeKalb County Zoning Board of Appeals voted to affirm the county's refusal to process Shadowbox Studios' application to convert its land development permit from a film studio to a data center, which the county said was barred by its data center moratorium. Board members said the dispute belongs in court. Shadowbox filed a civil lawsuit against DeKalb County in August 2026, reported as seeking $30 million, arguing the planning department confirmed in writing three times that a data center was allowed and that the repeatedly extended moratorium is defective. The county moratorium currently runs through the end of March 2027.
Lawsuit filed on a Friday, reported 10 August 2026; appeal denied 9 September 2026
387 75 South Data Center Campus (Tomochichi Road) n.a. Spalding County GA Estimated $6B value at build-out and 450 MW per the Development of Regional Impact filing; Central Georgia EMC as power provider
withdrawnSpalding County's zoning attorney said the rezoning and special exception applications for the 75 South Data Center Campus on Tomochichi Road were withdrawn and the developers do not plan to return. County officials said no progress has been reported on three other data center campuses approved in 2025 and January 2026, and a commissioner attributed the lack of activity to the county's strict data center rules, including a closed-loop water requirement.
Withdrawal reported 2 September 2026
388 Chamblee 180-day data center application moratorium n.a. Chamblee City Council GA Citywide pause on data center applications; no project size
moratoriumThe Chamblee City Council approved a 180-day moratorium on accepting data center applications so the city can review its codes on energy, water, tree canopy, stormwater and noise impacts. Councilman Jimmy Furst sponsored the measure, which expires on 16 January 2027.
Approved on a Tuesday, reported 22 July 2026; expires 16 January 2027
389 Jackson County one-year data center moratorium n.a. Jackson County Board of Commissioners NC Countywide moratorium in the county's planning and development jurisdiction; no project size
moratoriumJackson County commissioners approved a one-year moratorium barring zoning, development, building and demolition permits for data centers, acceptance of related site plans and rezonings for data center use. County planners said the pause allows study before a data center arrives under existing rules.
Approved 18 August 2026; through 18 August 2027
390 Town of Franklin one-year data center moratorium n.a. Franklin Town Council NC Townwide moratorium; no project size
moratoriumFranklin's Town Council approved a one-year moratorium on development of new data centers after a public hearing at which commenters overwhelmingly supported the pause. The council will use the time to explore controls such as requiring developers to power and cool facilities without stressing local utilities. Macon County later chose to amend its ordinance rather than adopt a moratorium.
Approved 6 July 2026; one year
391 Asheville one-year data center moratorium n.a. Asheville City Council NC Citywide moratorium; no project size
moratoriumThe Asheville City Council imposed a one-year moratorium on construction of data centers after council members and speakers raised questions about water and power use, neighborhood impacts and utility rates. Buncombe County had earlier restricted data center construction after its own moratorium.
Imposed at a council meeting the week before 2 July 2026 (June 2026); one year
392 Cary 18-month data center moratorium n.a. Cary Town Council NC Townwide moratorium on all data center development; no project size
moratoriumThe Cary Town Council unanimously approved an 18-month moratorium on all data center development so staff can study power demand and grid capacity, water use, noise and vibration, and site design, and draft an ordinance. It is the longest data center pause in the Triangle, and leaders expect to reconsider data center development in February 2028. Raleigh leaders on 15 September 2026 directed the city attorney to draft a six-month moratorium for discussion on 6 October 2026.
Approved 27 August 2026; 18 months
393 Putnam County medium and large data center moratorium n.a. Putnam County Board of County Commissioners FL Countywide temporary ban on medium and large scale data center projects; no project size
moratoriumPutnam County commissioners established a definition for data center sites and unanimously approved the second reading of a temporary ban on medium and large scale data center projects. The ordinance took effect immediately after the second of two required public hearings on 8 September 2026 and remains in place until at least 30 August 2027.
Second reading approved unanimously 8 September 2026; in effect until at least 30 August 2027
394 Orangeburg County one-year data center moratorium n.a. Orangeburg County Council SC Countywide moratorium; no project size
moratoriumOrangeburg County Council voted unanimously to impose a moratorium barring development or construction of data centers in the county for at least a year. Councilwoman Latisha Walker, who sponsored the measure, said it gives the county time to establish protections for residents' homes, health and quality of life.
Approved unanimously 8 September 2026; at least one year
395 Chester County six-month data center moratorium n.a. Chester County Council SC Countywide pause on data center applications; no proposed or approved data centers per council chair
moratoriumChester County Council unanimously approved a six-month, countywide pause on accepting, processing and approving data center applications, directing staff to prepare development standards and invoking the pending ordinance doctrine. Workshops with experts were scheduled for 13 August and 28 September 2026.
Approved Monday 20 July 2026; six months
396 Iron Horse data center campus (Hanover-Ashland line) WestDulles Properties Hanover County Planning Commission VA 77.6 acres on the Hanover side plus 101 acres approved by Ashland in 2024; up to 2.44 million square feet and two substations with 600 MW combined capacity; capital not disclosed
delayedThe Hanover Planning Commission unanimously deferred consideration of the revised Iron Horse data center rezoning in mid-June 2026. On 20 August 2026 the commission voted 5-2 to recommend approval of a scaled-down version with fewer homes, lower buildings and more open space, sending it to the Board of Supervisors, which rejected an earlier version in 2024. The final decision rests with supervisors.
Deferred mid-June 2026; Planning Commission recommended approval 5-2 on a Thursday, reported 20 August 2026; supervisors' vote pending
397 Chesterfield County halt on new data center approvals n.a. Chesterfield County VA Countywide policy on future zoning requests; at least 10 data center buildings built or under construction, including Google campuses, are unaffected
otherChesterfield Deputy County Administrator Jesse Smith said at a press conference that the county has enough data centers and the Board of Supervisors will not approve zoning requests for new projects beyond those already approved. Developers can still apply through the conditional use permit process, but staff would not recommend it because the board has indicated it has no appetite for more. Google's planned and under-construction campuses in the county continue.
Policy announced at a Wednesday press conference, reported 27 August 2026
398 Brown Farm Road data center rezoning (west of Cartersville) n.a. Bartow County (sole commissioner Steve Taylor) GA Farmland site; size, capital and capacity not stated in fetched source
withdrawnThe builder of a proposed data center on farmland along Brown Farm Road west of Cartersville withdrew its zoning requests late on a Monday, days before sole County Commissioner Steve Taylor was due to decide the case. Bartow County's seven-member Planning Commission had voted against the project earlier in August 2026 after resident opposition citing an endangered species, drinking water and cropland.
Planning Commission recommended against it August 2026; withdrawn Monday 31 August 2026
399 Meta Stanton Springs data center well water lawsuit Meta Gwinnett County court GA Two campuses of 416 acres and more than 566 acres; AJC describes a more than $1 billion campus; capacity not disclosed
litigationFour families living near Meta's Stanton Springs data center filed a lawsuit in Gwinnett County against Meta and county development officials. They allege that tree clearing, blasting and excavation disturbed the shared aquifer, contaminating their private wells with silt and sediment, damaging property and lowering home values. The east campus sits across the street from the plaintiffs' homes.
Filed Monday 31 August 2026; reported 1 and 2 September 2026
400 Bear Creek Township industrial zone expansion for data centers n.a. Bear Creek Township Board of Supervisors PA Proposed expansion of the industrial zone from 66 acres to 534 acres across more than 101 parcels to accommodate data centers; no named project, capital or capacity
rejectedBear Creek Township supervisors rejected a proposed ordinance that would have expanded the industrial zone into residential areas to accommodate data centers, with no supervisor making a motion to advance it and the chairman declaring the proposal dead. Two smaller alternative expansions remain under consideration at a 30 September 2026 hearing, ahead of a 16 October 2026 deadline to adopt a curative amendment regulating data centers.
Rejected at a Thursday special meeting, reported 3 and 4 September 2026
401 Air Products former headquarters data center campus Air Products Upper Macungie Township Zoning Hearing Board PA 2.6 million square feet of buildings on the 194-acre former headquarters site; capital and capacity not disclosed
cancelledAir Products confirmed it is abandoning plans for a data center campus at its former global headquarters and let the deadline lapse to appeal the township zoning hearing board's May 2026 unanimous decision rejecting its argument that the use should be permitted. Residents had organized against the plan, and the company cited its deep roots in the community.
Zoning hearing board denial 27 May 2026 (written decision 6 July 2026); decision not to appeal confirmed 11 August 2026
402 Salem 3 data center overlay (Salem Township) 4-3 Glennbrook Group Luzerne County Court of Common Pleas and Salem Township Planning Commission PA About 4,000 acres involving more than 200 landowners; 4-3 Group describes a $1.4 billion land sale; project capital and capacity not disclosed
litigationLuzerne County Judge Lesa S. Gelb ruled that the Salem Township Planning Commission violated the Sunshine Act at a July 2026 meeting on a data center zoning overlay for the Salem 3 project, after eight residents sued without a lawyer, and ordered a new meeting. The commission voted 4-0-1 on 27 August 2026 to again recommend the overlay, but that vote was later also found invalid under the judge's written order, and the commission planned a third vote. Township supervisors are expected to take up the overlay in October 2026. On Thursday 24 September 2026 the Planning Commission approved the overlay expansion for the third time, 4-0 with Susan Lynn abstaining as a landowner in the project area. The expansion covers more than 4,000 acres for 4-3 Glennbrook Group's Salem 3 project, which the Times Leader describes as a $1.4 billion data center project. The developer agreed to larger setbacks and a 65-foot maximum height. The Board of Supervisors is scheduled to take it up in October 2026.
Ruling 25 August 2026; repeat vote 27 August 2026; third recommendation 24 September 2026; supervisors in October 2026
403 Bernards Township data center ban n.a. Bernards Township Committee NJ Municipal zoning prohibition barring data centers in all township zones, and removing data processing centers from the permitted uses in the E-1 through E-5 office zones; no specific project named
moratoriumThe Bernards Township Committee unanimously adopted an ordinance banning data centers on 23 June 2026 by a 4-0 vote, with one member absent. The ordinance bars data centers in all township zones and removes data processing centers from the uses permitted in the E-1 through E-5 office zones, which are mostly developed office sites near Interstate 287 and Route 202. It was introduced on 26 May and the Planning Board found on 16 June that it was not inconsistent with the master plan. The mayor cited noise, sewer capacity and environmental concerns.
Adopted 23 June 2026
404 Lebanon Township data center prohibition (all zoning districts) n.a. Lebanon Township Committee NJ Township-wide non-permitted use covering data centers, AI processing, cloud computing and cryptocurrency mining facilities; no specific project named
moratoriumThe Lebanon Township Committee unanimously approved an ordinance on 8 July 2026 amending zoning to make data centers a non-permitted use in all zoning districts. The definition covers traditional data centers, AI processing facilities, cloud computing facilities and cryptocurrency mining operations. The sponsoring committeewoman said the change would force any application to go through the Board of Adjustment rather than the Planning Board.
Approved 8 July 2026
405 Rockaway Borough data center ban ordinance (failed vote, reintroduced) n.a. Rockaway Borough Council NJ Proposed borough-wide prohibition; revised version targets facilities over 20,000 square feet of building coverage or more than 2,000 servers
otherThe Rockaway Borough Council voted 4-2 on 9 July 2026 against an ordinance that would have made data centers a prohibited use in all zones. After residents protested, the council voted on 23 July to reintroduce the measure, and in August it unanimously introduced a revised ordinance barring data centers and large-scale data processing facilities, defined as more than 20,000 square feet of building coverage or more than 2,000 servers. A second reading and adoption vote was pending; the 27 August meeting was cancelled for lack of quorum and the next meeting was set for 10 September.
Ban rejected 9 July 2026; revised ordinance introduced August 2026, adoption pending
406 Mansfield Township data center zoning prohibition n.a. Mansfield Township Committee NJ Township-wide zoning revision banning data centers by name; no specific project named
moratoriumMansfield Township committee members unanimously adopted an ordinance at their 15 July 2026 meeting revising local zoning to prohibit data centers by name. Data centers were already not technically permitted because they were not listed as a permitted use. The ordinance was introduced on 16 June by a 4-0 vote and adds a definition of data centers. The deputy mayor also called for a statewide moratorium.
Adopted 15 July 2026
407 Howell Township data center ban n.a. Howell Township Council NJ Township-wide prohibition on all data centers; no developer had approached the town
moratoriumThe Howell Township Council voted unanimously on 18 August 2026 to ban data centers. The ordinance was introduced on 14 July. A councilman said the intent was to ban AI hyperscale data centers but all data centers were included because specifications are changing quickly, and the township manager said no developer had approached the town and the ban was meant to get ahead of the issue.
Adopted 18 August 2026
409 Bell Works data center application (Holmdel ban adopted after filing) Somerset Development (Bell Works owner) Holmdel Township Committee; Holmdel Planning Board NJ Two-story, 108,000 gross square foot data center proposed on the 472-acre Bell Works property, replacing an existing building
otherThe Holmdel Township Committee introduced an ordinance banning data centers township-wide on 21 July 2026 and unanimously adopted it on 11 August 2026. Somerset Development, owner of Bell Works, submitted a site plan on 24 July for a 40-megawatt, 108,000 square foot data center, citing a redevelopment agreement that lists data centers as a permitted use. The township attorney said on 11 August that an applicant is generally entitled to the zoning in effect when a complete application is filed, and the application sits before the Holmdel Planning Board. Residents organized against the project over water, power and noise concerns.
Ban introduced 21 July 2026 and adopted 11 August 2026; Bell Works application filed 24 July 2026 and pending before the planning board
410 Stavola quarry redevelopment plan data center provision (Manchester) Prospective redeveloper of the Stavola mining site (unnamed) Manchester Township Council NJ 224-acre former sand and gravel quarry on the Jackson-Manchester border; no data center application had been filed
blockedThe Manchester Township Council voted on 14 September 2026 to remove a provision from the redevelopment plan for the 224-acre former Stavola quarry that could have allowed a large-scale data center. The provision dated to Ordinance 2025-27, passed in August 2025, and a prospective redeveloper had asked township officials about building a data center there. The repeal ordinance, introduced in late August, states that data centers are not permitted anywhere in the township. The township administrator said the existing redeveloper plans warehouses on the property.
Repeal introduced late August 2026; adopted 14 September 2026
411 Caroline County one-year data center moratorium (unincorporated areas) n.a. Caroline County Commissioners MD Countywide pause on processing applications and site plans in unincorporated areas; excludes Federalsburg and other towns
moratoriumThe Caroline County Commissioners approved a one-year moratorium on data centers in unincorporated areas of the county on 21 July 2026. The county attorney said it directs staff not to process applications or review site plans connected to data center approvals while the county studies safety, noise, energy and water impacts. The moratorium does not apply inside Federalsburg or other incorporated towns, where a separate data center proposal had drawn opposition.
Approved 21 July 2026; one year
412 Dorchester County one-year data center moratorium n.a. Dorchester County Council MD One-year pause in unincorporated areas of the county; no specific project named
moratoriumThe Dorchester County Council passed a resolution adopting a one-year moratorium on data centers, effective immediately, according to a Star Democrat report published 10 August 2026 that said the vote came the previous week. The moratorium applies only to unincorporated areas, and staff are to return in spring 2027 with findings and recommendations. The council also hired a lobbying firm and plans a stakeholder committee.
Passed the week before 10 August 2026 (reported 10 August 2026); one year
413 Cambridge one-year data center moratorium n.a. Cambridge City Council (commissioners) MD Citywide one-year pause on processing, review and approval of data center applications and permits
moratoriumCambridge commissioners unanimously passed a one-year moratorium on data centers on 24 August 2026. The resolution pauses processing, review and approval of any data center applications or permits while the city drafts zoning rules, and an amendment requires staff to produce draft recommendations within the 12 months. Data centers are not currently a defined use in the city's zoning code.
Passed 24 August 2026; one year
414 Ridgely one-year data center moratorium n.a. Ridgely Town Commissioners MD Town-wide one-year pause; no specific project named
moratoriumRidgely commissioners passed a one-year moratorium on data centers within town limits, according to a Star Democrat report published 11 August 2026. Commissioner Brad Sears proposed the pause so the town could research the effects of data centers. The action followed a data center proposal in nearby Federalsburg and similar pauses across the Mid-Shore.
Passed shortly before 11 August 2026 (reported 11 August 2026); one year
415 Hurlock three-year data center moratorium n.a. Hurlock Town Council MD Town-wide three-year pause; no specific project named
moratoriumThe Town of Hurlock approved a three-year moratorium on data centers at its 10 August 2026 council meeting. The measure was introduced by Council President Russell Murphy. The mayor said three years would give the town time to research impacts, monitor Dorchester County's work and decide how to proceed without needing extensions.
Approved 10 August 2026; three years
416 Globalinx cable landing station near Ocean City (Worcester County one-year moratorium) Globalinx Data Centers Worcester County Commissioners MD Roughly 25,000 square foot cable landing station on about seven acres; moratorium covers cable landing stations and data centers countywide
moratoriumThe Worcester County Commissioners voted 6-0 on a Tuesday, reported 7 July 2026, to advance a one-year moratorium on cable landing stations and data centers while staff rewrite zoning rules, after a motion to prohibit data centers in every zoning district failed 2-4. The Baltimore Sun reported on 22 July 2026 that the county approved the one-year moratorium on a Tuesday, freezing the Globalinx proposal. On 2 June the county's permitting director had rejected Globalinx's request to classify the facility as a public utility, and Globalinx appealed to the Board of Zoning Appeals while also seeking a special exception. On Thursday 1 October 2026 the Worcester County Planning Commission tabled, for revisiting in 60 days, a zoning text amendment tied to an Amazon Web Services subsea cable between Ireland and the United States that would land at the Ocean City Airport. The amendment would allow a single building of no more than 1,200 square feet on a 3,500 square foot plot of county airport land, with no water or sewer connection and an equipment list distinguishing it from a data center or cable landing station, both of which are covered by the county moratorium.
Advanced on a Tuesday (reported 7 July 2026); approved on a Tuesday (reported 22 July 2026); one year; related AWS cable text amendment tabled 1 October 2026 for 60 days
417 Neptune Township data center and detention center prohibition n.a. Neptune Township Committee NJ Land development ordinance amendment prohibiting data centers and federal detention centers township-wide; no specific project named
moratoriumThe Neptune Township Committee voted 3-1 at its 13 July 2026 meeting to amend the land development ordinance to prohibit data centers and Department of Homeland Security detention centers. Mayor Kevin McMillan voted no because he wanted the two prohibitions split into separate ordinances and said he could support data centers in the township's office park. One committeeman was absent.
Adopted 13 July 2026
418 Talbot County 12-month data center application moratorium n.a. Talbot County Council MD Countywide 12-month pause on new data center applications; county attorney said no developers were proposing data centers
moratoriumThe Talbot County Council unanimously approved a 12-month moratorium on new data center applications at its 8 September 2026 meeting while the county considers how to regulate the facilities. The resolution had been introduced 3-1 in August, with one council member voting not to introduce it and another absent. The county attorney described the measure as proactive because no developers were proposing data centers in the county.
Approved 8 September 2026; 12 months
419 Androscoggin Mill data center (Jay) Sentinel Data Centers with mill owner JGT2 Redevelopment Town of Jay ME Planned co-location data center at the former Androscoggin paper mill
withdrawnJay's town manager said on 11 June 2026 that Sentinel Data Centers had advised it does not intend to move forward with the planned $550 million data center at the former Androscoggin Mill. The information came from mill owner JGT2 Redevelopment, which had planned to partner with Sentinel and said it was pursuing talks with other parties while the project is on hold. Gov. Janet Mills had vetoed a statewide data center moratorium in April because it did not exempt the Jay project.
Reported 11 June 2026; project on hold after developer exit
420 Sanford Woods data center (Sanford emergency moratorium extension) Sanford Woods Industrial and Technical Campus (primary developer Randy Gibbs) Sanford City Council ME Proposed data center within the Sanford Woods campus, which developers said would cover more than 1,000 acres near the Mousam River
moratoriumThe Sanford City Council voted unanimously on a Tuesday, reported 5 August 2026, to extend an emergency data center moratorium for 180 days, to expire 31 January 2027. The extension replaces an initial 91-day emergency moratorium, born of a citizen initiative, that would have ended 18 August. The moratoriums halted a data center proposed as part of the Sanford Woods Industrial and Technical Campus while a city task force drafts development standards.
Extended on a Tuesday (reported 5 August 2026); expires 31 January 2027
421 Warren 180-day data center moratorium n.a. Town of Warren special town meeting ME Town-wide 180-day moratorium, extendable in 180-day increments; no applications received
moratoriumAbout 60 residents at a special town meeting on 8 July 2026 nearly unanimously approved a 180-day moratorium on data centers, with one resident voting against. The Select Board can extend the moratorium in 180-day increments after public hearings if progress is made on ordinances. Town officials said no data center applications had been received.
Approved 8 July 2026; 180 days
422 North Berwick data center ban referendum (November ballot) n.a. North Berwick Select Board ME Proposed zoning amendment defining and prohibiting data centers with 25,000 square feet or more of aggregate data center area
otherThe North Berwick Select Board approved on a Tuesday, reported 19 August 2026, a November ballot question asking voters whether to enact a zoning amendment that defines and permanently prohibits data centers. The ban would apply to facilities with 25,000 square feet or more of aggregate data center area. Town officials had decided in June to skip a temporary moratorium and let voters decide. The outcome is pending the November vote.
Ballot question approved on a Tuesday (reported 19 August 2026); vote pending in November 2026
423 Lincoln data center ban (all zoning districts) n.a. Lincoln Town Council RI Zoning amendment listing data centers as a prohibited use in every zoning district; no specific project named
moratoriumThe Lincoln Town Council unanimously approved a zoning amendment on 18 August 2026 that bans data centers throughout the town. The ordinance lists data centers as a prohibited use in every zoning district. A councilor said the town wanted to act before a developer submitted a proposal, citing limited land, water supply and utility resources, and councilors said the restriction could be reconsidered later.
Approved 18 August 2026
424 Perth one-year data center moratorium n.a. Town of Perth Town Board NY Town-wide one-year moratorium, extendable by resolution; no specific project named
moratoriumThe Perth Town Board adopted a one-year moratorium on data centers by a 3-0 vote on a Thursday, reported 4 June 2026, with two members absent, after a public hearing at which one person spoke. The supervisor said the pause gives the town time to regulate data centers while it drafts a new comprehensive plan, and the law allows extension by simple resolution. The town already had a moratorium on battery energy storage systems.
Adopted on a Thursday (reported 4 June 2026); one year
425 Canton data center development moratorium n.a. Town of Canton Town Board NY Town-wide moratorium on data center development; duration not stated in the source
moratoriumThe Town of Canton enacted a moratorium on data center development on 8 July 2026. The town board later formed a Data Center Committee, led by councilors Randy Brown and Greg Kiah, to research how other municipalities regulate data centers and what local rules may be needed. Potential data center development was also under discussion in nearby Massena and Potsdam.
Enacted 8 July 2026; length not reported
426 NCCS Massena data center (town moratorium rejected) North Country Colocation Services (NCCS) Town of Massena Town Board NY Data center proposed near the former Alcoa East plant; developer's latest plan calls for 400 megawatts from the New York Power Authority
otherThe Massena Town Board voted 3-2 against a six-month moratorium on data center development after a public hearing on a Wednesday night, reported 17 September 2026. Developer NCCS has eyed land near the former Alcoa East plant and said its latest plan would draw 400 megawatts from the New York Power Authority with closed-loop cooling. An NCCS representative said the project is exempt from the statewide moratorium because it does not need additional discretionary state environmental permits. Studies funded partly through a developer escrow account must be completed before construction.
Moratorium rejected 3-2 on 16 September 2026
427 Islip 18-month data center moratorium n.a. Town of Islip Town Board NY Townwide pause on construction of large-scale data centers with no size threshold, in place until 28 February 2028
moratoriumThe Islip Town Board voted unanimously on a Tuesday, reported 11 August 2026, to ban construction of large-scale data centers for at least 18 months. The moratorium runs until 28 February 2028 and, unlike the state's 50-megawatt threshold, does not exclude facilities below a certain size. A councilman said the town needs to investigate data centers and amend its code.
Adopted unanimously 11 August 2026; through 28 February 2028
428 Clarkstown six-month building moratorium including AI data centers n.a. Town of Clarkstown Town Board NY Six-month moratorium restricting approvals for multifamily developments, large subdivisions and certain commercial and industrial projects, including proposed AI data centers
moratoriumThe Clarkstown Town Board enacted a six-month building moratorium, reported 17 September 2026, that temporarily restricts approvals for multifamily developments, large-scale subdivisions and certain commercial and industrial projects, including proposed AI data centers. The pause can be extended by up to six more months by board resolution. The town plans to review land-use rules, appoint a Community Preservation Board and survey residents.
Enacted shortly before 17 September 2026 (reported 17 September 2026); six months, extendable six months
429 DataOne Vineland AI data center campus (neighbor noise class action) DataOne USA LLC (Nebius Group to operate AI equipment) Cumberland County Superior Court; Vineland Planning Board NJ 2.6 million square foot campus under construction; NJ Advance Media reports it is expected to draw about 300 megawatts and The Guardian describes it as 350 megawatts
litigationThree Vineland residents filed a lawsuit in Cumberland County Superior Court on 15 June 2026 alleging excessive noise from the DataOne campus and seeking class action status, according to the Press of Atlantic City, which in July had separately reported that two residents filed a noise complaint in federal court in late May. On 27 August DataOne asked the court to dismiss the suit or deny class certification, and Judge James Swift said the motion will be decided on 25 September. Separately, the Vineland Planning Board voted 8-1 on 17 August to approve the campus's next phase, which includes an onsite natural gas power system and a 1.5 million gallon liquefied natural gas tank. The New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection said it had issued no permits for generators at the site, which it noticed during a 29 July inspection, and had not made a compliance determination. On 22 September 2026 the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection fined DataOne $1.07 million for operating 62 natural gas-powered generators without permits, which the DEP called the largest enforcement action it has taken against a data center. A DEP spokesperson told Floodlight the company must obtain the permits or cease operating the generators and has 45 days to do so, during which the generators may keep running. DataOne said the engines are temporary until Bloom Energy fuel cells are operational.
Suit filed 15 June 2026; dismissal motion filed 27 August 2026, decision set for 25 September 2026; next phase approved 17 August 2026
430 Grandview Industrial Center, former Johnson & Johnson campus (Montgomery data center ban lawsuit) E. Kahn Development Montgomery Township Committee; Somerset County Superior Court NJ 256-acre former Johnson & Johnson campus on Grandview Road owned by Kenvue; preliminary plans call for nine buildings and name no tenants
litigationThe Montgomery Township Committee unanimously adopted an ordinance on 18 June 2026 banning data centers and detention centers in all zoning districts, after the developer's attorney asked for a delay. E. Kahn Development, contract purchaser of the former Johnson & Johnson campus, filed suit in Somerset County Superior Court on 31 July 2026, arguing the ban lacks a planning basis and that the site is ideal for a data center. New Jersey Monitor reported that the company is seeking to have the ordinance declared invalid and $300 million in damages, and that its site plan application was declared complete on 9 June. No Planning Board hearing date had been set.
Ban adopted 18 June 2026; suit filed 31 July 2026
431 Greymark property colocation data center, 1200 Route 22 (Bridgewater data center regulations) Treetop Companies (1200 Route 22 LLC) Bridgewater Township Council NJ Former office complex site where a 2025 redevelopment plan permits a single principal use including a data center; developer considering a non-hyperscale colocation facility with no plans filed
otherBridgewater dropped a proposed data center ban in August 2026 and instead pursued regulations aimed at the Greymark redevelopment site on Route 22, where a 2025 plan lists a data center as a permitted use. The Township Council unanimously introduced the ordinance after a Treetop Companies official asked on 20 August for a delay, saying the company was considering a colocation data center. The council unanimously adopted the ordinance at its 3 September 2026 meeting, placing strict standards on any future data center proposal rather than an outright ban. Nearby residents had opposed a data center at the site.
Ban proposal dropped August 2026; regulations adopted 3 September 2026
432 Hamilton Township (Atlantic County) data center moratorium n.a. Hamilton Township Committee NJ Township moratorium ordinance while officials draft permanent data center rules; no operators had approached the township
moratoriumThe Hamilton Township Committee adopted an ordinance placing a moratorium on data centers on a Monday, reported 7 July 2026, after delaying a June vote over concerns about the definition of data centers raised in a Planning Board review. The mayor said officials would research data centers and aim to have a permanent ordinance that can withstand legal challenges ready by the end of the year. Officials said no data center operators had approached the township.
Adopted on a Monday (reported 7 July 2026); length not reported
433 Chesapeake Beach data center ban (all zones) n.a. Chesapeake Beach Town Council MD Town code amendment prohibiting data centers in all zones; no evidence the town was being eyed as a site
moratoriumThe Chesapeake Beach Town Council voted 4-0 on 20 August 2026, with two members absent, to pass an ordinance amending the town code to prohibit data centers in all zones. A Calvert County environmental commission member told the council the ban was needed to protect the bay environment, while a councilman said the town's geography would not accommodate such a facility. The vote came days after Calvert County commissioners adopted a six-month data center moratorium.
Passed 20 August 2026
434 Ellsworth 180-day data center moratorium n.a. Ellsworth City Council ME Citywide 180-day moratorium on data center development, effective immediately; no specific project named
moratoriumThe Ellsworth City Council voted 4-1 on 17 August 2026 to adopt a 180-day moratorium on data center development with an immediate effective date, with two members absent. The pause gives the city time to study impacts and decide whether to amend ordinances, which currently contain no specific data center standards. Councilor Steve O'Halloran voted against it.
Adopted 17 August 2026; 180 days
435 Jackson County data center ban ordinance n.a. Jackson County Board of County Commissioners FL Countywide prohibition on data centers and associated facilities in unincorporated areas; no specific project named
moratoriumJackson County commissioners unanimously approved a permanent ban on data centers on 9 June, and later held the required second reading and public hearing, adopting an ordinance that prohibits data centers and associated facilities in the county's unincorporated area. The ordinance takes effect upon filing with the Florida Department of State. Florida Politics reported the commission acted despite a warning from the county attorney that a permanent ban carried more legal risk than a temporary moratorium.
Ban approved 9 June 2026; ordinance adopted at second reading on a Tuesday, reported 23 June 2026
436 Wakulla County permanent data center ban n.a. Wakulla County Board of County Commissioners FL Countywide ban on data centers; no specific project named
moratoriumWakulla County commissioners voted unanimously to put a permanent ban on data centers in the county. The board's attorney cautioned that an indefinite ban put the county on riskier legal footing than a temporary moratorium. Residents who spoke cited water use and the county's springs, including Wakulla Springs, and commissioners pointed to SB 484, which reaffirms local authority to restrict data center development through planning and land development rules. At its final public hearing on Monday 21 September 2026 the commission unanimously adopted the ordinance, amending the definitions in Section 2-4 of the Land Development Code and creating Section 6-40, which states that data centers are prohibited within all unincorporated areas of the county.
Commission voted to pursue a permanent ban in June 2026 (reported 15 June 2026); ordinance adopted unanimously 21 September 2026
437 Springville one-year data center moratorium n.a. Springville City Council AL Citywide one-year pause on consideration and approval of data center projects; no project pending
moratoriumThe Springville City Council imposed a one-year moratorium that pauses consideration and approval of data center projects while the planning and zoning commission studies the issue and drafts regulations. City officials described the move as proactive and said no project is in the pipeline. It followed community concern about whether future development at Commerce Park might include a data center.
Adopted 6 July 2026; one year
438 Harpersville six-month data center moratorium n.a. Harpersville Town Council AL Townwide six-month moratorium on data centers; no proposal received
moratoriumThe Harpersville Town Council adopted a six-month moratorium on data centers after the Planning and Zoning Board had recommended a longer pause. The town said the pause gives the council, planning board and water board time to study economic and infrastructure effects, with monthly informational sessions and a 30-day public comment period planned. Mayor Theoangelo Perkins said no developer has approached the town, but that nearby Wilsonville, Westover and Childersburg have been approached.
Adopted 3 August 2026; six months
439 Olive Branch data center zoning restrictions (conditional use only) n.a. Olive Branch Board of Mayor and Aldermen MS Citywide zoning change; tiered rules with Tier 3 above 250,000 sq ft or more than 50 MW requiring a 2,000-foot setback
otherThe Olive Branch Board of Mayor and Aldermen unanimously approved an ordinance, effective immediately, that allows data centers in the M-1 and M-2 industrial zones only as a conditional use instead of by right. The rules bar data centers without closed-loop cooling, restrict generator use between 2 and 5 p.m., set nighttime and daytime noise limits for hyperscale sites and require developers to pay full decommissioning costs. The city's planning director said Olive Branch could not adopt a moratorium, citing litigation risk.
Approved 18 August 2026; effective immediately
440 DeSoto Innovation District data center component (Church Road and Craft Road) n.a. Olive Branch Planning Commission; Board of Mayor and Aldermen MS 562-acre industrial rezoning request along Church Road and Craft Road; data center conditional use removed
delayedThe Olive Branch Planning Commission unanimously voted to deny the DeSoto Innovation District rezoning, and the data center conditional use was removed from the plan at the commission's 9 June meeting, according to the city's planning director. On 4 August the Board of Mayor and Aldermen tabled the 562-acre project after a three-hour hearing where many of the more than 100 residents present opposed it, some citing concern that a data center could return in later phases. A motion to approve only the first-phase landfill expansion and deny the industrial rezoning failed 4-3.
Data center use removed 9 June 2026; aldermen tabled project 4 August 2026
441 Lakeland one-year moratorium on data centers and 50 MW loads (Project Swan) n.a. Lakeland City Commission FL Citywide pause on data centers and other users of at least 50 MW, including Lakeland Electric service requests from outside city limits; prompted by Project Swan, a proposed 600,000 sq ft data center in west Lakeland
moratoriumLakeland commissioners voted 4-3 to impose a one-year moratorium on new data centers and other businesses expected to use at least 50 megawatts, effective immediately, stopping the city from accepting or reviewing applications while staff drafts permanent rules. The measure grew out of public opposition to Project Swan, a proposed 600,000-square-foot data center near Old Tampa Highway and Wilkinson Road, and applies to that proposal. Because it covers service from Lakeland utilities, it also reaches projects outside the city seeking Lakeland Electric service; existing data centers may operate but not expand.
Approved 3 August 2026; one year
442 Walton County data center and large load center prohibition n.a. Walton County Board of County Commissioners FL Outright prohibition on data centers and on large load centers above 50 MW in all land use categories and zoning districts; no applications pending
moratoriumWalton County commissioners unanimously approved, 5-0, an ordinance creating what it calls a complete and outright prohibition on large load centers, specifically data centers, in all land use categories and zoning districts. The county attorney said the county had no zoning or land use language addressing data centers and that the ordinance was written to hold up after a new state law took effect 1 July, though it may be refined. WEAR-TV reported the rule took effect immediately and covers large load centers requiring more than 50 megawatts; the county had no data center applications at the time.
Adopted at a commission meeting; reported 10 June 2026
443 Pensacola one-year moratorium on data centers above 50 MW n.a. Pensacola City Council FL Citywide one-year moratorium on constructing or converting buildings into data centers drawing more than 50 MW; no project pending in the city
moratoriumThe Pensacola City Council voted 7-0 to approve Councilman Charles Bare's one-year moratorium barring construction or renovation of any building into a data center that would draw more than 50 megawatts. The News Journal reported the 16 July vote was the first of two required votes to make the ban official. Some residents said the 50-megawatt threshold was too high, and Council President Allison Patton said she was reluctant because of uncertainty over which other businesses it could affect.
First of two votes approved 16 July 2026; final vote not confirmed in fetched sources
444 Indiantown data center moratorium vote (Project Growler and Silver Fox 606) Rory Greenberg (Project Growler); Silver Fox 606 LLC Village of Indiantown Village Council FL Proposed one-year villagewide moratorium; Project Growler is a 1.7 million sq ft, four-building data center site plan at 18300 SW Warfield Blvd
otherThe Indiantown Village Council voted 4-1 against the moratorium language drafted by the former village attorney, opting to seek a new legal opinion and language that could survive a legal challenge, after nearly three hours of public comment. An attorney for Silver Fox 606 LLC, whose 2-million-square-foot proposal was withdrawn, threatened to sue if the village enacted a pause. Council members said the moratorium would come back, while property owner Rory Greenberg said his Project Growler site plan, filed the day after the 18 August election, is vested and should be processed under existing rules. After the newly elected council majority replaced the village manager and village attorney, the council voted unanimously on 10 September 2026 to direct counsel to draft a moratorium ordinance and a transparency ordinance. The interim village attorney plans Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board review on 1 October, first reading on 8 October and second reading and adoption on 22 October 2026.
Moratorium language voted down 1 September 2026; drafting of a new moratorium directed 10 September 2026; first reading planned 8 October and adoption 22 October 2026
445 Martin County proposed one-year data center moratorium and Hobe Sound Business Park rezoning Hobe Sound Business Park Martin County Board of County Commissioners FL Proposed one-year countywide pause on large-scale data centers; separate rezoning of about 108 acres along SE Powerline Avenue and Bridge Road to limited industrial
otherMartin County commissioners voted to have staff bring back a proposal for a one-year pause on large-scale data center development after residents urged action. On 15 September the commission voted 3-2 to rezone about 108 acres in Hobe Sound to limited industrial, a category that allows a data center, though the owner's representatives said no data center is planned and any future proposal would face the moratorium and commission approval. TCPalm reported the first of two required moratorium votes is expected 13 October and the second 27 October.
Staff directed on a Tuesday, reported 26 August 2026; rezoning approved 15 September 2026; moratorium votes expected 13 and 27 October 2026
446 Palm Beach County one-year moratorium on large-scale data centers (first reading) n.a. Palm Beach County Board of County Commissioners FL Proposed one-year countywide moratorium on facilities using 50 MW or more at peak, measured across an entire property; prompted by the 600 MW Project Tango request
moratoriumPalm Beach County commissioners voted 7-0 to approve the first reading of a one-year moratorium on large-scale data centers, defined as facilities expected to use 50 megawatts or more at peak demand, with power evaluated across an entire site to prevent splitting projects. WLRN reported the freeze was prompted by Project Tango, which requested 600 megawatts, and that a second hearing and potential adoption is scheduled for 24 September. Commissioners also discussed a task force and decommissioning requirements. On Thursday 24 September 2026 the Board of County Commissioners gave unanimous final approval to the moratorium (CBS12 reported the vote as 6-0). The county may not accept, process or approve zoning requests or related comprehensive plan amendments for data centers with an anticipated peak load of 50 MW or more in unincorporated areas. The pause ends on 24 September 2027 or earlier if the county adopts permanent rules. Applications deemed sufficient before the moratorium can continue under prior rules, and facilities under 50 MW may apply if a Florida-licensed engineer certifies the load. Commissioners rejected a nine-member advisory committee and asked staff to bring back a consultant contract.
First reading 7-0 on 27 August 2026; final approval 24 September 2026; runs to 24 September 2027 or until permanent rules are adopted
447 North Port 18-month data center moratorium (North Port Holdings 300 application) North Port Holdings 300, LLC North Port City Commission FL Proposed 18-month freeze on new data center applications and final approvals; pending 896,000 sq ft data center within a roughly 282-acre mixed-use concept
moratoriumAfter hours of public comment, the North Port City Commission voted 4-1 on first reading for an 18-month moratorium that would freeze new data center applications and bar final approval of the pending 896,000-square-foot project by North Port Holdings 300, LLC. Under the approach adopted, city staff could keep reviewing the pending application but could not grant final approval during the pause. Commissioner Demetrius Petrow voted no because he wanted the pending application stopped entirely; the second and final vote is scheduled for 22 September. On second and final reading on 22 September 2026 the commission adopted the 18-month moratorium 3-2, with Mayor Pete Emrich, Vice Mayor Barbara Langdon and Commissioner Phil Stokes in favor and Commissioners Demetrius Petrow and David Duval opposed because they wanted the pending application stopped entirely. The ordinance freezes new data center applications and bars final approval of the pending Deep Park application (seven buildings, about 896,000 square feet on about 112.7 acres) during the moratorium, while allowing it to continue through processing and technical review.
First reading approved 4-1 on 1 September 2026 (31 August meeting); adopted 3-2 on second reading 22 September 2026; 18 months
448 Fairfield data center moratorium (Patmos project exempt) Patmos Fairfield City Council AL Citywide moratorium on future data center projects; Patmos colocation proposal in the former Walmart Supercenter exempt
moratoriumThe Fairfield City Council voted to place a moratorium on future data center projects after residents and council members pressed for details, and the mayor then named Missouri-based Patmos as the company proposing a colocation data center. The Patmos project was left in place because it was under consideration before the moratorium passed. Patmos has proposed converting the former Walmart Supercenter into a data center and technology campus, and the mayor said design plans would still need City Council approval.
Adopted 20 July 2026
449 Chelsea one-year moratorium on data center permits n.a. Chelsea City Council AL Citywide one-year pause on permits for new data centers and residential rental units
moratoriumThe Chelsea City Council voted to implement a one-year moratorium on permits for new data centers and residential rental units while the city evaluates its zoning regulations. Mayor Cody Sumners said the city will use the year to review its zoning ordinances and make adjustments.
Adopted on a Tuesday evening; reported 21 July 2026; one year
450 Project Marvel residents' rezoning lawsuit (Rock Mountain Road, Bessemer) TPA Group / Logistics Land Investments Jefferson County Circuit Court AL Planned 4.5 million sq ft, 18-building data center campus on rezoned timberland off Rock Mountain Road
litigationA Jefferson County senior circuit judge dismissed the lawsuit brought by residents David Havron, Ronnie Buchanan and Becky Morgan against the City of Bessemer over the rezoning for Project Marvel; the residents and the city requested the dismissal together. The suit, filed in April 2025, alleged Bessemer failed to give proper public notice when rezoning the initial 700 acres. AL.com reported it was unclear why the case was dismissed; the council later rezoned another 900 acres for the project's expansion.
Dismissed on a Monday afternoon; reported 25 June 2026
451 Santa Rosa County 12-month data center moratorium n.a. Santa Rosa County Board of County Commissioners FL Countywide 12-month ban on data centers; no project pending
moratoriumSanta Rosa County commissioners voted at a special meeting to ban data centers for 12 months, with the possibility of adopting a permanent plan before the period ends. The vote came the same day Escambia County passed a resolution stating data centers are not permitted under its land development code. Navarre Press reported earlier that Commissioner Ray Eddington voted against the proposed 12-month measure at an earlier stage because it did not go far enough, and that the pause could run until June 2027.
Adopted at a special meeting on a Thursday; reported 24 July 2026; 12 months
452 Pasco County one-year moratorium on data centers above 2.5 MW n.a. Pasco County Board of County Commissioners FL One-year countywide pause on server and computer rooms exceeding 2.5 MW in unincorporated Pasco
moratoriumPasco County commissioners approved a one-year moratorium on large-scale data centers, covering server rooms and computer rooms exceeding 2.5 megawatts in unincorporated areas. Chair Jack Mariano noted an earlier proposal would have set the threshold at 10 megawatts and called the board-initiated moratorium rock solid. Several residents told commissioners a permanent ban was needed.
Approved on a Tuesday; reported 15 July 2026; one year
453 Zephyrhills one-year data center moratorium n.a. Zephyrhills City Council FL Citywide one-year suspension on accepting data center applications; no proposals submitted
moratoriumThe Zephyrhills City Council held its final vote to put a one-year moratorium on data centers, under which the city's planning department cannot accept data center applications. The city clerk said no proposals had been submitted but the moratorium responds to local and national debate over the facilities. A separate WUSF story on Pasco County described the Zephyrhills measure as six months, so the duration is taken from the dedicated WUSF report.
Final vote 22 June 2026; one year
454 Lake County 90-day pause on large-scale data center applications n.a. Lake County Board of County Commissioners FL 90-day pause on accepting applications for large-scale data centers in unincorporated Lake County
moratoriumThe Lake County Commission voted unanimously to approve an ordinance pausing acceptance of applications for large-scale data centers in unincorporated areas for 90 days while it writes new zoning and development rules. Commissioners are considering a conditional use permit requirement that would make clear companies have no right to build the facilities, citing local authority under SB 484. In June, Florida Politics reported Commissioner Anthony Sabatini had led the county's push for a 12-month moratorium.
Approved on a Tuesday evening; reported 9 September 2026; 90 days
455 Clay County 12-month data center moratorium n.a. Clay County Board of County Commissioners FL 12-month countywide moratorium on applications, permitting and rezoning for large-scale data centers
moratoriumClay County commissioners approved a 12-month moratorium on large-scale data centers that prohibits applications, permitting and rezoning while the county studies the issue. Residents at the meeting raised water, energy, noise and environmental concerns, and one criticized a commissioner for saying data centers can be good neighbors. WUSF later listed Clay among Florida counties that had enacted temporary bans.
Approved on a Tuesday; reported 23 June 2026; 12 months
456 Hernando County 12-month data center moratorium n.a. Hernando County Board of County Commissioners FL 12-month countywide moratorium on applications, permitting and rezoning for large-scale data centers
moratoriumHernando County commissioners approved a 12-month moratorium on large-scale data centers covering applications, permitting and rezoning. Many residents urged a permanent ban, but the county attorney cautioned, citing federal case law, that a moratorium longer than a year could infringe property rights and increase legal liability. Commissioner Steve Champion said the county needed to study the issue and set regulations rather than refuse outright.
Approved on a Tuesday; reported 23 June 2026; 12 months
457 Nassau County 12-month data center moratorium n.a. Nassau County Board of County Commissioners FL 12-month moratorium on new AI data centers
moratoriumFirst Coast News reported that Nassau County had recently enacted a 12-month moratorium on new AI data centers, citing it as neighboring St. Johns County commissioners weighed their own pause. WUSF also listed Nassau among Florida counties that had enacted temporary bans on data centers. The exact adoption date was not stated in the fetched reports.
Reported as recently enacted on 18 June 2026; 12 months
458 Franklin County one-year moratorium on large-scale AI data centers n.a. Franklin County Board of County Commissioners FL One-year countywide moratorium on large-scale AI data center proposals
moratoriumFranklin County commissioners voted unanimously to approve a one-year moratorium on large-scale AI data center proposals. More than one commissioner said the county's end goal is a ban, and residents asked why a full ban was not enacted immediately as in other Panhandle counties. County attorneys and commissioners said they could act further before the year ends.
Approved on a Wednesday morning; reported 15 July 2026; one year
459 Bay County six-month data center moratorium (5 MW threshold) n.a. Bay County Board of County Commissioners FL Six-month moratorium covering data centers of 5 MW or more, lowered from the 50 MW state definition; extendable six months
moratoriumBay County commissioners approved a temporary six-month moratorium on data centers, effective immediately, to give staff time to evaluate land development regulations. The draft followed SB 484's 50-megawatt definition of a large-scale data center, but the board lowered the threshold to 5 megawatts to cover smaller facilities. Commissioners can extend the moratorium another six months.
Approved on a Tuesday morning; reported 7 July 2026; six months
460 Gulf County one-year AI data center moratorium n.a. Gulf County Board of County Commissioners FL One-year countywide moratorium on AI data centers
moratoriumGulf County commissioners voted 4-1 on a motion by Commissioner Phil McCroan, seconded by Commissioner Randy Pridgeon, for a one-year moratorium on AI data centers. McCroan said neighboring jurisdictions' restrictions are narrowing available sites and pushing developers elsewhere. Commissioner Jack Husband voted no, citing possible jobs and tax revenue, while saying any data center should not draw on the county's groundwater.
Approved on a Monday; reported 27 July 2026; one year
461 Holmes County temporary moratorium on large-scale data centers n.a. Holmes County Board of County Commissioners FL Temporary moratorium on accepting, reviewing or issuing permits or approvals for large-scale data centers
moratoriumAfter dozens of residents opposed a possible data center at a standing-room-only meeting, Holmes County commissioners approved a motion placing a temporary moratorium on accepting, reviewing or issuing permits or approvals for large-scale data centers. A resident petition against data centers had gathered about 1,200 signatures in under a day. Commissioners said they planned a permanent ordinance by the next board meeting, with public hearings starting 16 June.
Motion approved on a Tuesday night; reported 2 June 2026
462 Taylor County data center moratorium motions (failed) n.a. Taylor County Board of County Commissioners FL Proposed countywide moratorium through 31 December, later proposed as 12 months; no data center proposed
otherTaylor County commissioners rejected Commissioner Pam Feagle's motion for a data center moratorium through 31 December after dozens of residents spoke in opposition to data centers, and scheduled a 25 August workshop instead. At a later meeting Feagle proposed a 12-month moratorium but did not have support, with Chairman Jamie English saying a moratorium would send the wrong message. Commissioners instead voted to bring an engineering firm to help add data center rules to the land development code.
Motion failed on a Monday, reported 7 July 2026; 12-month proposal lacked support on a Tuesday, reported 9 September 2026
463 Leon County proposed 18-month moratorium on large-load facilities n.a. Leon County Board of County Commissioners FL Proposed 18-month pause on permits, development orders, rezonings and site plans for large-load facilities including large-scale data centers; no pending applications
otherLeon County commissioners voted unanimously to begin the process of enacting an 18-month moratorium on large-scale data centers in unincorporated Leon County, with staff to spend 12 months drafting regulations. The proposed ordinance would halt acceptance, review and approval of development permits, orders, rezonings and site plans for large-load facilities. The first of two required public hearings was set for 15 September, with staff recommending a final hearing on 13 October. Commissioners held the first of two public hearings on 15 September 2026, were supportive of moving forward, and plan the second and final public hearing for 13 October 2026
Process approved on a Tuesday, reported 14 July 2026; first public hearing held 15 September 2026; final hearing scheduled 13 October 2026
464 Stonebridge Fort Meade hyperscale data center (residents' lawsuit and recall) Stonebridge Polk County circuit court; City of Fort Meade FL 4.4 million sq ft hyperscale campus on about 1,300 acres of former phosphate mine land; development agreement includes a $10 million advance on future property taxes
litigationFort Meade residents, including Polk County businessman Michael Bennett, filed a civil lawsuit in Polk County court against the city over the commission's unanimous April approval of Stonebridge's hyperscale data center, alleging negligence and failure to follow a state-mandated review process and asking a higher court to review the decision. A citizen recall effort launched in July against three commissioners over the approval, and Commissioner Matthew Taylor then filed suit seeking an injunction to stop the recall. WUSF reported the approved deal at $2.6 billion for a 4.4-million-square-foot data center.
Residents' lawsuit reported 24 June 2026; commissioner's anti-recall suit filed on a Tuesday, reported 10 September 2026
465 Morgan County 12-month data center moratorium (Union Road bitcoin mining site near Somerville) Sovereign Gazelle (named VoltCore by WAFF) Morgan County Commission AL Proposed 50 MW bitcoin mining data center at 369 Union Road on a 15-acre property
moratoriumMorgan County commissioners adopted a resolution imposing a 12-month moratorium on data centers in unincorporated Morgan County after more than 450 residents petitioned against a proposed bitcoin mining data center on Union Road near Somerville. In August the county attorney said the moratorium cannot be enforced because the county has no zoning laws, and the commission chairman said it was meant to signal support for the neighborhood. The Decatur Daily reported the company was exploring an underground route for power lines to serve the 50-megawatt facility.
Approved on a Tuesday; reported 23 June 2026; 12 months, described by county as unenforceable in August 2026
466 Ormond Beach 18-month data center moratorium n.a. Ormond Beach City Commission FL Citywide 18-month moratorium on accepting applications and approving development items related to data centers
moratoriumThe Ormond Beach City Commission voted 5-0 to enact an 18-month moratorium on accepting applications and approving development items related to data centers. The pause gives the city time to change its development regulations; the Planning Board was scheduled to review Comprehensive Plan changes on 10 September and the commission to take up the ordinance on first reading on 20 October. The Planning Board review was described by Observer Local News as amendments to ban data centers.
Approved 25 August 2026; 18 months
467 Flagler County one-year data center moratorium n.a. Flagler County Board of County Commissioners FL One-year countywide moratorium on data centers in unincorporated Flagler County
moratoriumThe Flagler County Commission approved a one-year moratorium on data centers to give county officials time to consider regulation changes. Under existing county rules, data centers are not permitted by right in any zoning district but could be approved in any district as a Special Use after review by the Technical Review Committee, the Planning and Development Board and the County Commission.
Approved 3 August 2026; one year
468 Pinellas Park one-year data center moratorium (American Tower Belcher Road proposal) American Tower Corporation Pinellas Park City Council FL Citywide one-year moratorium; American Tower had proposed a 17,000 sq ft data processing facility east of Belcher Road
moratoriumThe Pinellas Park City Council voted unanimously to impose a one-year moratorium on new data center development after American Tower Corporation proposed a 17,000-square-foot data processing facility east of Belcher Road on the city's northwestern edge. An attorney for American Tower spoke against the moratorium and asked for a continuance to work with staff on regulations. City staff recommended approval, and many residents who spoke opposed the facility, citing noise, pollution and economic effects.
Approved 11 August 2026; one year
469 Prichard six-month data center moratorium n.a. Prichard City Council AL Citywide six-month moratorium on data centers
moratoriumThe Prichard City Council approved a six-month moratorium on data centers, days after the city issued a building permit on 30 July for Edged's proposed data center on Telegraph Road. The council attorney later said the moratorium would not apply to the Edged project because the developer applied before the council acted. AL.com listed Prichard among Alabama cities with data center moratoriums.
Approved 4 August 2026; six months
470 Edged Energy Prichard data center (Telegraph Road) building permit dispute Edged Energy Prichard City Council AL Proposed data center on Telegraph Road; building permit issued 30 July 2026 with $224,000 in application fees
approved after delayAt its 20 August meeting the Prichard City Council moved toward invalidating the building permit for Edged's proposed $93 million data center and refunding $224,000 in fees, with the council attorney saying the permit was issued without required Planning Commission site plan review. An attorney for Edged Energy then sent a letter threatening a lawsuit if the city tries to block the permit, and the council voted unanimously to refer the matter to its attorney. The council attorney said the city has no real way to stop this project but that the Planning Commission review step must be followed, while Mayor Carletta Davis said the project will move forward. On Tuesday 29 September 2026 the Prichard Planning Commission approved the site plan, completing the review step the council attorney said had been skipped before the 30 July 2026 building permit. Edged's attorney said the building permit predates the city's 4 August 2026 six-month moratorium, so the moratorium does not apply; the site is about eight acres, construction is expected to take 18 months and groundbreaking could come at any time.
Permit challenge raised 20 August 2026; litigation threat referred to council attorney, reported 11 September 2026; site plan approved by the Planning Commission 29 September 2026; single outlet for the approval
471 Decatur data center special exception ordinance n.a. Decatur City Council AL Citywide rules requiring a council overview hearing and a Board of Zoning Adjustment special exception permit with water, power, noise and fire studies; no developer proposals pending
otherThe Decatur City Council approved an ordinance requiring any data center developer to present a project overview to the council in public, after which the council recommends to the Board of Zoning Adjustment whether to grant a special exception permit through a public process. Projects must also address water and power consumption and on-site generation and complete studies on fire protection, noise, hazardous materials and waste. The city said no developers were seeking to build and that limited land makes hyperscale campuses unlikely.
Approved 17 August 2026
472 Cielo Digital Infrastructure Haines City data center (State Road 544 East and Marion Road) Cielo Digital Infrastructure City of Haines City FL Proposed data center requesting 150,000 gallons of water per day; no formal development application filed
pausedHaines City officials said the city lacks sufficient permitted water capacity to meet Texas-based Cielo Digital Infrastructure's request for 150,000 gallons per day for a proposed data center near State Road 544 East and Marion Road, leaving the project on hold. The interim city manager said the request was folded into the city's pending Water Use Permit modification with the Southwest Florida Water Management District, which the city has pursued since June 2022. No development application, site plan, zoning request or development agreement had been filed, and no timeline was set for the project to return.
City statement reported 24 June 2026
473 Mississauga one-year data centre interim control bylaw (Prologis Tenth Line proposal) Prologis (affected proposal) City of Mississauga Ontario Citywide freeze on new digital infrastructure with peak power demand of 10 MW or greater; Global News reports a 40 MW Prologis data centre proposal in the city's northwest is put in limbo
moratoriumMississauga City Council unanimously approved a one-year interim control bylaw at its 16 September 2026 meeting, pausing new data centres with peak power demand of 10 MW or greater while staff study land-use, water, heat, noise, backup power emissions and grid impacts. Existing and approved facilities may keep operating but cannot expand to 10 MW or more. The Toronto Star reports staff may extend the pause by an additional year. The freeze followed resident opposition to a two-storey data centre proposed on Tenth Line north of Argentia Road, and Prologis said it was disappointed and considering its next steps.
Approved unanimously 16 September 2026; one year, extendable by one year
474 Oakville one-year data centre moratorium (Hive Digital GTA site) Hive Digital Technologies (land owner via subsidiary) Town of Oakville Ontario Townwide one-year moratorium on new data centres; Hive Digital announced a 320 MW AI facility in the Greater Toronto Area and a Hive subsidiary bought property in Oakville; the town had no formal applications
moratoriumOakville Town Council voted unanimously at a special meeting to enact a one-year moratorium on new data centres, which Global News described as the first in Ontario. Council also directed staff to study whether town regulations need updating for noise, vibration, emissions and land use. Officials said there were no formal data centre applications, although Hive Digital Technologies had announced a 320 MW AI facility for the Greater Toronto Area and a Hive subsidiary purchased Oakville property. Hive said it respected the town's right to develop a planning framework.
Approved unanimously at a special meeting on Tuesday 11 August 2026 (reported 12 August 2026); one year
475 Almaguin Data AI data centre (Armour Township) Almaguin Data Township of Armour Ontario Two-megawatt AI data centre planned to expand to 10 MW over up to five years on about three hectares in a township industrial park; C$15 million to C$20 million planned investment (not converted)
withdrawnAlmaguin Data withdrew its plan for an AI data centre in Armour Township in a 1 June 2026 letter to council, citing public opposition. The company said it did not own the industrial park land and so would lack recourse at the Ontario Land Tribunal if approvals were refused. It had planned to invest C$15 million to C$20 million to grow the site to 10 MW. An online petition against the project gathered more than 1,800 signatures.
Withdrawal letter dated 1 June 2026; reported 18 June 2026
476 Slate Asset Management Steelport land severance (potential hyperscale data centre) Slate Asset Management City of Hamilton Committee of Adjustment Ontario Application to split a roughly 324-hectare lot; one listed possible use of the smaller parcel was hyperscale and enterprise data centres; no MW or dollar figure stated
deniedHamilton's Committee of Adjustment denied Slate Asset Management's application to sever a roughly 324-hectare waterfront lot after a day-long hearing on 4 June 2026. Slate's application listed hyperscale and enterprise data centres as a possible use of the smaller parcel. City staff said 1,688 people submitted comments, possibly a record.Slate appealed the denial to the Ontario Land Tribunal, which scheduled a case management conference for 21 October 2026.
Denied 4 June 2026
477 Hamilton one-year data centre moratorium (rejected) n.a. City of Hamilton Ontario Proposed blanket one-year pause on new data centres; no MW or dollar figure stated
otherHamilton City Council rejected a proposed one-year moratorium on new data centres by a 10-6 vote on Wednesday 15 July 2026, after a closed session with city lawyers. Mayor Andrea Horwath voted against, saying it would hold back the city, and several councillors suggested the measure was vulnerable to legal challenge. The pause had earlier advanced at committee. City staff will continue a previously directed study of data centre issues.
Moratorium rejected 10-6 on 15 July 2026
478 Saskatoon interim data centre land-use restriction n.a. City of Saskatoon Saskatchewan Citywide interim bylaw to restrict land use for data centres pending a study; no current application; no MW or dollar figure stated
moratoriumSaskatoon City Council voted unanimously on Wednesday 29 July 2026 for a motion by Coun. Scott Ford directing administration to study the risks and benefits of data centres. The motion also requires an interim bylaw restricting the use of land for data centres until the study is complete. Ford said the motion was not prompted by a current data centre request. The Greater Saskatoon Chamber of Commerce called the move prudent.
Approved unanimously 29 July 2026; until the study is complete
479 Miramichi data centre and battery storage zoning amendment (paused) n.a. City of Miramichi New Brunswick Proposed amendment to zoning bylaw 110 setting conditions for data centres and battery storage, including a 250-metre residential setback; two prospective developers had visited; no MW or dollar figure stated
pausedMiramichi City Council paused a proposed zoning bylaw amendment for data centres and battery energy storage facilities at its 21 July 2026 meeting after public concerns. Councillors asked staff to seek expert advice and consult provincial and federal governments before proceeding. The amendment would have required environmental approvals, NB Power approval for connections and a 250-metre setback from residential areas. City economic development staff said two prospective developers had visited Miramichi.
Paused 21 July 2026; reported 24 July 2026
480 Jet.AI and Consensus Core Ile des Chenes hyperscale AI data centre Jet.AI and Consensus Core Technologies Province of Manitoba Manitoba Natural gas turbine powered data centre on about 141 to 142 hectares of farmland; The Canadian Press says it could scale into the hundreds of megawatts or gigawatts; no firm MW or dollar figure
rejectedManitoba Premier Wab Kinew said on 4 June 2026 that the province would say no to a hyperscale AI data centre proposed by Jet.AI and Consensus Core Technologies near Ile des Chenes, south of Winnipeg. Kinew cited the project's size, energy use and community impact against limited economic benefit. Consensus Core said it was reviewing the comments and still sought engagement with the province. An online petition against the project had more than 13,500 signatures.
Provincial rejection announced 4 June 2026
481 Rocky View County temporary moratorium on data centre redesignations n.a. Rocky View County Alberta Pause on new applications to redesignate land for data centre use; county has approved zoning for a Beacon AI Centers project near Indus; no MW or dollar figure stated
moratoriumRocky View County council voted 5-2 on 21 July 2026 to direct administration to place a temporary moratorium on new applications to redesignate land for data centre use. The pause lasts until the county completes its Emerging Sector Strategy and approves a new regulatory framework, expected in fall 2026. Council received many resident letters opposing data centres, including in the Langdon area. The county had earlier approved zoning for a Beacon AI Centers project near Indus.
Approved 5-2 on 21 July 2026; until the Emerging Sector Strategy and framework are approved
482 Wonder Valley AI data centre (O'Leary Digital) water licence judicial review O'Leary Digital Limited Alberta Court of King's Bench Alberta Proposed C$70 billion AI data centre project (not converted); municipality approved to withdraw six million cubic metres of water a year from the Smoky River; no MW figure stated in source
litigationOn 13 August 2026 Justice Parminder K. Johal dismissed O'Leary Digital's application to strike Sturgeon Lake Cree Nation's judicial review of the water licence for the proposed Wonder Valley data centre. The court found the company's connection to the licence speculative and also refused its bids for intervenor or respondent status. The First Nation argues it was not adequately consulted, and it expects the judicial review to be heard in December 2026. O'Leary Digital said it was disappointed and disagreed with continuation of the proceeding.
Strike application dismissed 13 August 2026; judicial review expected December 2026
483 Vulcan County AI data centre campus rezoning near Travers Reservoir Eric Steeves (applicant) Vulcan County Alberta About 340 hectares rezoned to rural industrial; applicant says the campus would likely reach 1,000 MW of IT load over several phases; StrathmoreNow reports the rezoned area as nearly 595 acres
litigationVulcan County council rezoned about 340 hectares from rural general to rural industrial in June 2026 to allow an AI data centre campus. A group of residents, the Little Bow AI Data Centre Committee, then sought a judicial review of the decision in the Alberta Court of King's Bench, citing the reservoir's environmental significance, irrigation use and proximity to a resort community and bible camp. The county reeve said the municipality would answer the challenge in court. The applicant said he would continue working on the project. CTV News reported on 5 October 2026 that the group of Vulcan County residents had been awarded a judicial review of the rezoning; residents want the rezoning rescinded and a more transparent process for major industrial projects. CTV describes the rezoned area as 238 hectares for a 400 MW build. The Little Bow AI Data Centre Committee announced it has been awarded a judicial review of Vulcan County's June 2026 redesignation of about 595 acres near Travers Reservoir from Rural General to Rural Industrial; the committee expects the one-day Special Chambers hearing to be scheduled in 2027 (HighRiverOnline, 7 October 2026).
Rezoning June 2026; judicial review application filed August 2026; judicial review granted, reported 7 October 2026, hearing expected 2027
484 Cumberland six-month data centre development permit moratorium (first reading) n.a. Municipality of the County of Cumberland Nova Scotia Proposed six-month moratorium on data centre development permit applications; prompted by a 108-acre farmland purchase in Upper Malagash by 3Sha Infotech Inc.; no application filed
otherCumberland council unanimously passed first reading of a bylaw on Tuesday 25 August 2026 that would impose a six-month moratorium on data centre development permit applications. Staff said the municipality cannot accept data centre applications after first reading while the bylaw process continues. A public hearing was expected in September 2026 before second reading. The issue arose after residents raised concerns about a 108-acre land purchase in Upper Malagash by Mississauga-based 3Sha Infotech Inc.
First reading passed unanimously 25 August 2026; second reading pending after a public hearing
485 Burlington one-year data centre moratorium motion (rejected; two-storey data centre application under review) n.a. City of Burlington Ontario Proposed one-year moratorium; city staff were reviewing a developer's application for a two-storey data centre; no MW or dollar figure stated
otherBurlington City Council voted against pursuing a one-year moratorium on new data centres, a motion Ward 2 Coun. Lisa Kearns presented at the 21 July 2026 council meeting. Radio-Canada reports the city was reviewing a developer's request to build a two-storey data centre. Council instead asked staff to review data centre rules and asked the federal and provincial governments to work with municipalities on regulations. The vote count was not reported.
Moratorium motion defeated at the 21 July 2026 council meeting (reported 26 July 2026)
486 Vancouver AI data centre regulatory framework motion (Telus downtown and Mount Pleasant sites) Telus (affected sites) City of Vancouver British Columbia Motion sought assessment criteria for data centres, prompted by two Telus AI data centres planned downtown and in Mount Pleasant; no MW or dollar figure stated
otherVancouver City Council defeated a motion by One City Coun. Lucy Maloney on Wednesday 15 July 2026 that would have set criteria for assessing AI data centres, covering noise, water use and job impacts. The motion followed a May federal and Telus announcement that includes two data centres in Vancouver. About two dozen speakers supported the motion, but the ABC majority voted against it, with Coun. Mike Klassen citing unnecessary red tape.
Motion defeated 15 July 2026
487 Lyon County data center and battery storage moratorium n.a. Lyon County Board of County Commissioners KS Countywide halt on receipt, review, hearing or granting of applications for data centers and battery energy storage systems (Resolution No. 12-26); separate solar moratorium to 1 December 2026; no MW or dollar figure stated
moratoriumLyon County commissioners approved two moratorium resolutions on Thursday 23 July 2026. Resolution No. 12-26 halts applications for data centers and battery energy storage systems until 22 January 2027, and Resolution No. 13-26 halts commercial solar applications until 1 December 2026. Both may be extended, amended or ended by the commission. The vote came a day after the Emporia City Commission approved data center resolutions at a heated 22 July meeting.
Approved 23 July 2026; data center moratorium runs to 22 January 2027
488 St. Charles County six-month large-scale data center moratorium n.a. St. Charles County Council MO Countywide six-month ban on approval of new or expanded large-scale data centers, defined as over 100,000 square feet or over 5 MW of electricity demand
moratoriumThe St. Charles County Council unanimously approved a six-month moratorium on large-scale data center developments on Monday 13 July 2026. The ordinance bars approval of new or expanded data centers larger than 100,000 square feet or with electricity demand above 5 MW while the county studies health, water, energy bill and quality-of-life impacts. The county followed the City of St. Charles, which adopted a one-year moratorium and then a data center ban in May 2026. One councilman argued for a longer or permanent pause.
Approved unanimously 13 July 2026; six months
489 Ottawa citizen initiative to ban data centers over 25 MW (Lightfield Energy Proximity Park) Lightfield Energy LLC (Proximity Park buyer) Franklin County District Court / City of Ottawa KS Proposed ordinance bans data centers using more than 25 MW within Ottawa city limits; relates to a proposed 300-acre Proximity Park development that may include data centers and a gas-fired plant, sold under a US$5.3 million city agreement
litigationFranklin County District Court Judge Eric W. Godderz ruled on Thursday 3 September 2026 that a citizen-initiated ordinance banning data centers using more than 25 MW in Ottawa will go on the November 2026 ballot. Ottawa United Inc. had sued the city, alleging it ignored a petition verified on 7 August with the required 658 signatures, after commissioners took no action on legal advice. The court still must decide whether the ordinance is legislative or administrative. The measure targets a proposed 300-acre Proximity Park development that Lightfield Energy agreed to buy in December 2024. The Kansas City Star reported on 22 September 2026 that the ordinance's legal effect stays pending a final ruling regardless of the vote, with the next hearing on 20 October 2026.
Ballot ruling 3 September 2026; next hearing 20 October 2026; election November 2026; final legal ruling pending
490 Milton 18-month data center moratorium n.a. City of Milton Common Council WI Citywide 18-month moratorium on data centers framed as a review-process change to the zoning code; no project, MW or dollar figure stated
moratoriumThe Milton Common Council approved an 18-month data center moratorium at a Tuesday meeting after Alderperson Ken Smith proposed extending a 12-month draft prepared in July. City officials said state law limits development moratoriums to 12 months, but described this measure as strictly for the review process. The ordinance cites concerns about noise, air and other impacts. State Sen. Mark Spreitzer spoke in support before the vote.
Approved at a Tuesday council meeting, reported 18 August 2026; 18 months
491 La Crosse 18-month data center moratorium n.a. City of La Crosse Common Council WI Citywide 18-month freeze on permits for data centers over 1 petabyte of data or over 2 MW of electricity; La Crosse County adopted its own 18-month unincorporated-area pause in June 2026
moratoriumThe La Crosse Common Council approved a temporary 18-month freeze on new data centers, barring permits for projects involving more than 1 petabyte of data or more than 2 MW of electricity. The freeze took effect immediately and runs 18 months unless lifted or replaced by zoning changes. Concerns cited included power demand, electromagnetic fields, noise, fire hazards and air quality. La Crosse County put its own 18-month pause for unincorporated areas in place in June 2026 and formed a study panel the city plans to join. The Common Council approved the moratorium on Thursday 13 August 2026.
Approved 13 August 2026; effective immediately; 18 months
492 Gage County 12-month data center moratorium n.a. Gage County Board of Supervisors NE Countywide 12-month moratorium on data center permits, replacing an existing eight-month moratorium; no project, MW or dollar figure stated
moratoriumGage County supervisors approved a 12-month moratorium on data center permits on Wednesday 16 September 2026 while the county develops regulations. The county already had an eight-month moratorium, and the Planning and Zoning Commission had recommended 18 months. Supervisors said they heard from residents seeking the full 18 months, including some opposed to any data center in the county. Supervisor Emily Haxby said the county has no data center regulations in place.
Approved 16 September 2026; 12 months
493 Marshalltown data center moratorium (Swarm Systems Edgewood Industrial Park proposal) Swarm Systems (proposal) City of Marshalltown IA Citywide freeze on data center permits, applications and zoning amendments; Swarm Systems proposed buying 21 acres of city land for a 150,000-square-foot data center, which Storm Lake Radio reports as a US$350 million proposal
moratoriumThe Marshalltown City Council approved a four-month data center moratorium motion 5-2 at a 13 July 2026 meeting, after a six-month pause failed 4-3 about three weeks earlier. The moratorium ordinance was adopted on 24 August 2026 and halts acceptance, processing and issuance of data center permits, applications and zoning amendments until 23 November 2026, with a possible 60-day extension. Swarm Systems CEO Amir Atefi presented a plan to buy 21 acres in the Edgewood Industrial Park for a 150,000-square-foot data center, and said he would wait out the moratorium. Records made public after the offer expired show Swarm Systems offered the city $1,113,200 on 21 July 2026 for about 29.33 acres, then about a month later the same amount for 21.77 acres (about $51,135 an acre), with closing by 31 March 2027 and contingencies requiring the moratorium to lapse and zoning acceptable to the buyer. The council deadlocked on acting on the offer after the 24 August 2026 presentation and it expired on 11 September 2026. CEO Amir Atefi said the company is also looking at other sites in Iowa and other states but has not moved on from Marshalltown.
Motion approved 5-2 on 13 July 2026; ordinance adopted 24 August 2026; land offer expired 11 September 2026; moratorium runs to 23 November 2026, extendable 60 days
494 Boone County data center moratorium n.a. Boone County Board of Supervisors IA Countywide moratorium of up to one year on establishment, construction or permitting of new data centers; no project, MW or dollar figure stated
moratoriumThe Boone County Board of Supervisors adopted a moratorium of up to one year on the establishment, construction or permitting of new data centers on Wednesday 9 September 2026. Supervisor Shawn Bryant said the pause allows time to study and adopt data center ordinances. WOI noted other Iowa pauses in Marshalltown, Linn County and Woodbury County.
Adopted 9 September 2026; up to one year
495 Clinton data center moratorium (declined; QTS 1,100-acre site under contract) QTS (land under contract) City of Clinton IA Moratorium declined; QTS was under contract as of 2 September 2026 to buy about 1,100 acres of M3 heavy industrial land for what would be Iowa's largest data center; no proposal filed as of 3 September
otherThe Clinton City Council, in a split vote at its 9 June 2026 meeting, declined to implement a moratorium on data center development, with members saying it could signal the city was closed for business. Residents packed the meeting with concerns about a potential QTS site. The city has no data center zoning rules and is drafting an ordinance on setbacks, water, grid needs and noise. The mayor expects a QTS proposal after the ordinance is in place.
Moratorium declined 9 June 2026 (split vote); QTS land contract reported 2 September 2026
497 Project Taurus (Raeden data center at former Intel plant, Garden of the Gods Road) Raeden City of Colorado Springs CO AI data center redevelopment of the former Intel microchip plant off Garden of the Gods Road and Centennial Boulevard; no MW or dollar figure stated in sources
delayedColorado Springs planning staff approved Raeden's development plan for Project Taurus in June 2026, and residents filed appeals. On Thursday 23 July 2026 the Planning Commission rejected the appeals 6-2 after a session lasting nearly 15 hours, adding four conditions, with more than 100 people signed up to speak in opposition. Two groups then appealed to City Council, which scheduled a special session vote on the appeals for Thursday 17 September 2026. The developer says the site is zoned for a data center and the plan met code. The City Council special meeting on the appeals began at 9 a.m. on 17 September 2026 at the Pikes Peak Center, moved for expected attendance, with public comment capped at 120 speakers; the appeals concern a development plan modification at 1565 High Tech Way. After a disrupted meeting at which police made arrests, the council voted 7-2 on 17 September 2026 to postpone its decision on the appeals to 13 April 2027, with members citing the need for a large-load contract with Colorado Springs Utilities and city rules for future data centers; Kimberly Gold and Nancy Henjum voted no. Raeden said it was evaluating whether the partnership is right for it. The Gazette describes the project as 50 MW.
Planning Commission denied appeals 23 July 2026; council decision postponed 17 September 2026 to 13 April 2027
498 Butte-Silver Bow data center voter-approval ballot initiative (406 People First) n.a. Montana Second Judicial District Court / Montana Supreme Court MT Initiative would let voters approve or reject data center development or expansion; prompted by a proposal for a large data center in Butte; no MW or dollar figure stated
under appeal406 People First collected signatures for a Butte-Silver Bow initiative letting voters approve or reject data center development, after county officials told organizers the deadline was 14 August 2026. On 10 August the election administrator said state law required submission by 13 July, and the group sued on 12 August. In a 28 August 2026 ruling, District Judge Frank Joseph rejected the constitutional challenge and denied certification for the November ballot. The plaintiffs appealed to the Montana Supreme Court. On Tuesday 22 September 2026 the Montana Supreme Court granted an injunction, which the county did not oppose, barring Butte-Silver Bow from rejecting the initiative over the missed deadline while the appeal proceeds, so it can appear on the November ballot; the justices noted the result could still be invalidated if they later rule it was improperly placed. The initiative would require approval by two-thirds of all registered voters in a special election before the county could authorize a data center's construction or expansion. On 23 September the county said ballots had already been printed, and some mailed and returned, without the measure and asked the court for direction, proposing modified or supplemental ballots. On Thursday 24 September 2026 the Montana Supreme Court vacated its own 22 September injunction, less than 48 hours after issuing it, so the initiative will not appear on the November ballot. The court said it stood by its earlier reasoning but would not have granted the injunction had it known ballots were already printed and mailed, with some returned, and that Montana election law provides no process for adding an initiative or issuing supplemental ballots after ballots are prepared. The proponents, 406 People First, asked the court to reconsider; KBZK reported on 26 September 2026 that the court denied the rehearing petition, finding no exceptional circumstances.
Suit filed 12 August 2026; district court ruling 28 August 2026; Supreme Court injunction 22 September 2026, vacated 24 September 2026; rehearing denied (reported 25 and 26 September 2026); initiative off the November 2026 ballot
499 Missoula County interim data center moratorium n.a. Missoula County Commission MT Interim zoning pausing new or expanding data centers for up to a year in zoned and unzoned areas countywide, excluding the City of Missoula; no project, MW or dollar figure stated
moratoriumMissoula County commissioners unanimously approved an interim zoning moratorium on data centers on Thursday 9 July 2026. It pauses new or expanding data centers for up to a year while the county updates regulations on public health, safety and natural resources. The measure applies countywide in zoned and unzoned areas but not within the City of Missoula, whose new zoning map has no districts allowing data centers. All 30 public commenters supported the moratorium.
Approved unanimously 9 July 2026; up to one year
500 Arizona three-year pause on data center sales tax exemptions n.a. State of Arizona (Governor and Legislature) AZ Three-year pause on tax exemptions for new data centers; existing recipients unaffected; exemption required minimum investment of US$25 million or US$50 million depending on county population; the governor had called it a US$38 million corporate handout
pausedGov. Katie Hobbs and legislative leaders announced a budget deal on Tuesday 9 June 2026 that includes a three-year pause on tax exemptions for new data centers. The exemption, enacted in 2013, lasts up to 10 years for qualifying projects. The pause does not affect data centers already receiving the breaks, and companies can still build without them. Senate Majority Leader John Kavanagh said canceling existing incentives would have led to litigation.
Budget deal announced 9 June 2026; pause runs three years
501 Illinois pause on new data center tax incentives n.a. State of Illinois (Governor JB Pritzker) IL Pause on new data center tax incentives created under 2019 law; no dollar figure for the pause stated
pausedGov. JB Pritzker imposed a pause on new data center tax incentives in late spring 2026 that began 1 July 2026, according to a Chicago Tribune column. Pritzker said in August that the state had taken away existing data center tax credits pending legislation to protect residents from higher electric and water rates. House Speaker Emanuel Welch objected, and Climate Jobs Illinois and the Illinois AFL-CIO urged the governor to reverse it. The Tribune reported at least six Illinois counties and nine cities were slowing data center construction.
Pause effective 1 July 2026
502 Yankton County six-month data center and bitcoin mining moratorium n.a. Yankton County Commission SD Countywide six-month halt on permits for data centers and bitcoin mining facilities, extendable six months; no project, MW or dollar figure stated
moratoriumYankton County commissioners voted unanimously on Tuesday 21 July 2026 to pass a six-month moratorium on data center and bitcoin mining facility permits, shorter than the 12 months on the agenda. The commission may extend it another six months if no ordinance is drafted. The pause gives the county time to study economic and environmental effects and write regulations. The vote followed nearly an hour of public comment.
Approved unanimously 21 July 2026; six months, extendable six months
503 Pine County six-month data center moratorium n.a. Pine County Board of Commissioners MN Interim ordinance imposing a six-month countywide moratorium on data center developments; no project, MW or dollar figure stated
moratoriumThe Pine County Board of Commissioners adopted an interim ordinance on 7 July 2026 authorizing a six-month moratorium on data center developments. The ordinance directs the county Zoning Board to study data center regulations and make recommendations. Commissioner Roger Nelson proposed cutting the length from 12 months to six, saying it could be extended if needed. The board had held an informational session on data centers on 30 June.
Adopted 7 July 2026; six months
504 Hastings one-year data center moratorium n.a. City of Hastings City Council MN Interim ordinance stopping the city from accepting, reviewing or issuing permits for data centers for one year; no project, MW or dollar figure stated
moratoriumThe Hastings City Council approved a one-year moratorium on data center development after a public hearing at its Monday 17 August 2026 meeting. The interim ordinance stops the city from accepting, reviewing or issuing data center permits while staff study the facilities and prepare regulations on location and operation. Community Development Director John Hinzman said the zoning code does not define data centers or address their impacts.
Approved 17 August 2026; one year
505 Wingville Township two-year data center moratorium (blocked by county) Unnamed developer (300-acre site inquiry) Grant County Board of Supervisors WI Township sought a two-year data center moratorium; a developer has inquired about a roughly 300-acre site in the Wingville area; no MW or dollar figure stated
otherThe Grant County Board of Supervisors on Tuesday 21 July 2026 blocked Wingville Township's attempt to adopt a two-year data center moratorium. County leaders said a data center developer had been knocking on doors in the rural township near Montfort. The Telegraph Herald reports the developer is eyeing a 300-acre site.
Township moratorium blocked by county board 21 July 2026 (reported 22 July 2026)
506 Klickitat County six-month data center moratorium motion (failed; former Columbia Gorge Aluminum site) n.a. Klickitat County Board of Commissioners WA Proposed six-month moratorium; a proposed data center site adjacent to John Day Dam on the former Columbia Gorge Aluminum plant is in an industrial park zone where data centers are allowed outright; no MW or dollar figure stated
otherCommissioner Todd Andrews moved for a six-month data center moratorium at a 3 September 2026 Klickitat County workshop, but neither of the other two commissioners seconded the motion. At the 8 September meeting Chair Ron Ihrig said the county has time to write an ordinance instead, and Commissioner Lori Zoller cited the time and cost of a moratorium. Both said no data center proposal would be ready to apply before an ordinance is adopted. A proposed site sits on the former Columbia Gorge Aluminum plant next to John Day Dam, where data centers are allowed outright.
Moratorium motion died for lack of a second 3 September 2026; explained at 8 September 2026 meeting
507 Edmond temporary data center moratorium n.a. City of Edmond OK Citywide temporary moratorium on data center construction through 31 December 2026; no project, MW or dollar figure stated
moratoriumThe Edmond City Council voted unanimously to adopt a temporary moratorium on data center construction and to study how data centers could affect the city. The moratorium took effect immediately and ends 31 December 2026. Vice Mayor Barry Moore said he had seen data center fights divide other communities. Council members said they wanted more research time rather than a permanent ban.
Approved unanimously 8 June 2026; through 31 December 2026
508 Shawnee temporary data center moratorium n.a. City of Shawnee OK Citywide hold on new data center proposals through the end of 2027; no project, MW or dollar figure stated
moratoriumShawnee city commissioners approved a temporary moratorium on new data centers that took effect immediately and runs through the end of 2027. Officials said the pause gives time to study potential data center developments and update city regulations before accepting proposals. The vote count was not reported.
Approved, reported 19 August 2026; through end of 2027
509 Kittitas County data center application moratorium (extended) n.a. Kittitas County Board of Commissioners WA Moratorium on accepting and processing land-use applications for data centers in unincorporated Kittitas County, extended to one year; no project, MW or dollar figure stated
moratoriumKittitas County commissioners approved an emergency six-month moratorium on data center land-use applications in August 2026, then on Tuesday 15 September 2026 approved a six-month extension, making it a year-long ban. Community Development Services Director Chad Bala said the county's codes do not adequately define or classify data centers. The pause covers siting, construction, expansion, conversion and operation of data centers in unincorporated areas while the county writes review criteria and mitigation measures.
Emergency moratorium 10 August 2026; six-month extension approved 15 September 2026 (total one year)
510 Logan 180-day data center and data center power plant moratorium n.a. Logan Municipal Council UT Citywide 180-day moratorium (Ordinance 26-12) on applications or permits for data centers or data center power plants; no project, MW or dollar figure stated
moratoriumAt a special meeting on 30 June 2026, the Logan Municipal Council unanimously approved Ordinance 26-12, a 180-day temporary land use moratorium on data centers and data center power plants. The city will not accept, process, approve or issue any application or permit authorizing their construction during the pause. Council Chair Mike Johnson said the delay gives staff time to write regulations, and the city scheduled a 28 July open house for resident input.
Approved unanimously 30 June 2026; 180 days
511 Cache County temporary data center moratorium n.a. Cache County Council UT Temporary moratorium (Ordinance 2026-32) on proposed data centers in unincorporated areas; county has not been approached by a developer; no MW or dollar figure stated
moratoriumThe Cache County Council unanimously approved Ordinance 2026-32 at its 23 June 2026 meeting, establishing a temporary moratorium on proposed data centers in unincorporated areas. The ordinance cites a compelling public interest in protecting grid capacity, water resources and zoning integrity. Council Chair Sandi Goodlander said no utility-scale data center developer had approached the county. The vote followed controversy over a data center campus in neighboring Box Elder County.
Approved unanimously 23 June 2026; 180 days
512 Carbondale one-year data center moratorium n.a. City of Carbondale IL Citywide one-year moratorium on data center development adopted by resolution; no project, MW or dollar figure stated
moratoriumThe Carbondale City Council adopted a resolution imposing a one-year moratorium on data center development at its regular meeting on Tuesday 23 June 2026. The resolution passed 4-1, with Nancy Maxwell voting against and Clare Killman absent. Speakers supported the city acting before the Illinois General Assembly sets data center regulations.
Approved 4-1 on 23 June 2026; one year
513 Ottawa (Illinois) data center moratorium extension n.a. City of Ottawa City Council IL Citywide moratorium on data centers in all zoning districts, extended through 25 August 2027; no project, MW or dollar figure stated
moratoriumThe Ottawa, Illinois, City Council voted unanimously to extend its temporary data center moratorium through 25 August 2027. The city first paused data centers while the state considered the POWER Act, which stalled in the spring legislative session. Mayor Robert Hasty said the city is drafting its own ordinance but wants to see the state's direction first. The moratorium applies across all zoning districts.
Extension approved unanimously 18 August 2026; through 25 August 2027
514 Trammell Crow Bentonite Avenue data center complex (Henderson) Trammell Crow Co. City of Henderson NV Five-building data center complex on a 157.3-acre parcel at Bentonite Avenue and Whidbey Road near US 95 and I-11; no MW or dollar figure stated
withdrawnHenderson officials said a data center complex approved by the Planning Commission in November 2025 is no longer moving forward. Trammell Crow Co. had received a conditional use permit and design review with a six-year approval period for five buildings on 157.3 acres. The city said a real estate agent told it in March 2026 that the project was off and the owner, Eldorado Hills LLC, was looking to sell for traditional industrial development. No further data center applications have been filed for the site.
City notified March 2026; reported 3 August 2026
515 Butte-Silver Bow temporary data center moratorium (drafting directed) n.a. Butte-Silver Bow Council of Commissioners MT Direction to the county attorney to prepare a temporary moratorium on data center development; no project, MW or dollar figure stated
otherThe Butte-Silver Bow County Commission voted at its 2 September 2026 meeting to allow the county attorney to prepare a temporary moratorium on data center development, at the request of Commissioner Michelle Shea. Shea said a pause would allow public engagement and evaluation of infrastructure, economic, environmental and quality-of-life impacts. About half a dozen residents spoke in favor. The moratorium itself had not yet been adopted.
Drafting approved 2 September 2026; moratorium adoption pending
516 Quantica Broadview data center and power plant (Yellowstone County initiative lawsuit) Quantica Yellowstone County MT Proposed data center and gas-fired power plant connecting to the substation near Broadview; no MW or dollar figure stated in fetched sources
litigationYellowstone County filed a lawsuit on Wednesday 8 July 2026 challenging the legality of a proposed citizen initiative that would let voters approve or deny data center projects before they develop. The initiative was prompted by Quantica's plan for a data center and power plant near the Broadview substation. The county asked a court to rule before signature gathering. The Billings Gazette later reported the county said the signature deadline had passed weeks earlier. The first initiative missed its signature deadline after volunteers collected 14,980 signatures. On Tuesday 6 October 2026 commissioners voted 3-0 to file a new validity lawsuit in District Court against Kassi Solberg's revised initiative aimed at a spring 2027 vote, which would require two-thirds voter approval before any data center in the county starts or resumes operations, require interim zoning that would pause the Broadview project, and require disclosure of county communications with the data center industry. The county argues counties lack authority to condition permits on an election.
First county suit filed 8 July 2026; second validity suit filed 6 October 2026
517 Oshkosh 12-month data center moratorium n.a. City of Oshkosh Common Council WI Citywide 12-month moratorium (Ordinance 26-38) on receiving, processing or approving permits and zoning approvals for data centers; no project, MW or dollar figure stated
moratoriumThe Oshkosh Common Council unanimously approved Ordinance 26-38 on Tuesday 8 September 2026, establishing a 12-month moratorium on data centers. The ordinance bars the city from receiving, processing, approving or issuing permits, licenses, zoning approvals, conditional use permits or site plans for data centers. It lasts 12 months after publication unless ended earlier. The council cited the rapid growth of hyperscale AI facilities in Wisconsin.
Approved unanimously 8 September 2026; 12 months after publication
518 Plymouth 12-month moratorium on data centers over 50,000 square feet n.a. City of Plymouth City Council MN Interim ordinance prohibiting location, establishment and operation of data centers larger than 50,000 square feet for 12 months; one existing data center in the city since 1991
moratoriumThe Plymouth City Council unanimously approved an interim ordinance on 8 September 2026 prohibiting the location, establishment and operation of data centers larger than 50,000 square feet for 12 months. The moratorium fills a gap in city zoning while staff study data centers. Council had directed staff to draft the ordinance at an August work session. The city has one data center, operating since 1991.
Approved unanimously 8 September 2026; 12 months
519 Oppidan Connect former McDonald Steel site data center (village moratorium) Oppidan Connect Village of McDonald Council OH Village-wide 12-month moratorium; Minnesota-based Oppidan Connect has been in talks to build a data center on the former McDonald Steel site; no MW or dollar figure stated
moratoriumMcDonald Village Council unanimously passed a 12-month moratorium on data centers at a special meeting on Wednesday 16 September 2026 to address data centers in its zoning language. The vote came a day after Oppidan Connect, a Minnesota-based developer, publicly pitched a data center on the former McDonald Steel site. Some residents opposed the project over electricity and water use and noise.
Approved 5-0 16 September 2026; 12 months
520 DAMAC Digital Edgerton data center (citizen ban petition) DAMAC Digital Johnson County District Court / City of Edgerton KS US$860 million data center, DAMAC Digital's first in the US; petition would classify large data centers as industrial nuisances
litigationIn mid-July 2026 the Edgerton City Council voted to deny a data center moratorium and overrode a planning commission rejection to approve final site plans for DAMAC Digital's US$860 million data center. Residents then filed a petition with 208 signatures to ban large data centers, which county officials validated, but the city sued to stop it. On Thursday 3 September 2026 Johnson County District Judge Stephanie Goodenow ruled the city's suit violated the Kansas Public Speech Protection Act and that the petition can move forward for now. On Thursday 24 September 2026 petition organizers Carrie Schmidt and Kim Twente argued for a writ of mandamus ordering the city to submit the ban referendum to the Johnson County Election Office; attorneys for Edgerton and DAMAC argued the plan is not subject to a referendum. Briefs are due 9 October 2026, after which Judge Stephanie Goodenow will issue a written opinion. Organizers said the timeline rules out the November ballot and they hope for a special election.
Site plans approved mid-July 2026; ruling for petitioners 3 September 2026; mandamus hearing 24 September 2026, briefs due 9 October 2026
521 Lincoln County data center moratorium amendment (failed; Gemini Sioux Falls data center) Gemini (Sioux Falls data center) Lincoln County Commission SD Proposed amendment to schedule a hearing on a data center moratorium; context is the Gemini hyperscale data center approved by the Sioux Falls City Council; no MW or dollar figure stated
otherAt a joint meeting with the Sioux Falls City Council on Tuesday 25 August 2026, the Lincoln County Commission voted 3-2 against Commissioner Joel Arends' amendment to schedule a hearing on a data center moratorium, attached to adoption of the Sioux Falls 2050 comprehensive plan. A companion amendment barring non-disclosure agreements on zoning proposals also failed. The commission instead approved a public hearing on data center regulation for 27 October 2026. The Sioux Falls City Council had approved the controversial Gemini data center.
Moratorium amendment failed 3-2 on 25 August 2026; regulation hearing set for 27 October 2026
522 Marina 45-day data center urgency moratorium n.a. City of Marina City Council CA Citywide 45-day urgency ordinance barring acceptance of data center applications; no current application; no MW or dollar figure stated
moratoriumThe Marina City Council voted unanimously on Tuesday 15 September 2026 to enact a 45-day urgency moratorium on new data centers. No data center applications will be accepted during the pause. The ordinance was not prompted by a current application but is meant to give time to assess resource impacts and develop policy.
Adopted unanimously 15 September 2026; 45 days
523 San Joaquin County data center study and proposed 45-day moratorium n.a. San Joaquin County Board of Supervisors CA Board directed staff to study large-scale AI data centers and a possible moratorium (about six months of study); an initial 45-day pause could be formalized in October 2026; no project, MW or dollar figure stated
moratoriumAt its Tuesday 1 September 2026 meeting the San Joaquin County Board of Supervisors directed the Community Development Department to study large-scale AI data centers and research a possible moratorium, with a vote on an initial 45-day pause expected in October 2026. The county code has no definition of a data center, and staff said they need at least six months. Supervisor Robert Rickman said the county has no active applications and should set policy first. The board could formalize the 45-day pause in October after staff share initial findings. On Tuesday 6 October 2026 the Board of Supervisors approved an interim urgency ordinance establishing a 45-day moratorium on land use approvals for new data center development in unincorporated San Joaquin County, while staff study whether the General Plan, zoning and infrastructure standards address large-scale AI data centers (vote count not reported).
Study directed 1 September 2026; 45-day moratorium approved 6 October 2026
524 Project Tomahawk Prosper data center (rezoning denied by Planning and Zoning Commission; withdrawn) n.a. Town of Prosper Planning and Zoning Commission TX Project Tomahawk: rezoning of 37.3 acres at Parvin Road and FM 1385 for a proposed US$580 million data center by White Rose Partners; no MW figure stated
withdrawnThe Prosper Planning and Zoning Commission unanimously denied a zoning change request for a proposed data center at a Tuesday night meeting after hours of public opposition, including from neighboring Aubrey residents. Commissioners cited the lack of net benefit to the town, electricity use, environmental impacts and noise, and noted data centers are not a defined use in the future land use plan. The commission also unanimously denied related amendments. The project, White Rose Partners Project Tomahawk, a US$580 million data center on 37.3 acres at Parvin Road and FM 1385, was scheduled for the Town Council on Tuesday 8 September 2026, but the developer withdrew both items hours before the meeting and the town closed the application; a revised plan would need a new application and a new Planning and Zoning hearing.
Denied 7-0 by Planning and Zoning Commission 1 September 2026; application withdrawn before 8 September 2026 Town Council meeting
525 Yakima County six-month data center moratorium n.a. Yakima County Board of Commissioners WA Six-month moratorium on land use or building permits for data centers in unincorporated Yakima County; county has no data centers; no MW or dollar figure stated
moratoriumYakima County commissioners voted unanimously on a Tuesday to adopt a six-month moratorium preventing the county from accepting land use or building permits for data centers in unincorporated areas. The county has no data centers and no data-center-specific rules. The vote followed a work session at which dozens of residents opposed data centers over water, power rates and environmental impacts. Commissioner LaDon Linde said the pause gives time to gather information.
Approved unanimously at a Tuesday meeting, reported 12 August 2026; six months
526 Sierra County 18-month data center moratorium (Spaceport America area) n.a. Sierra County Commission NM Countywide 18-month moratorium on large-scale data centers amid resident protests over a Spaceport-area proposal; no MW or dollar figure stated
moratoriumThe Sierra County Commission unanimously approved an 18-month data center moratorium at a meeting in Truth or Consequences on Tuesday 21 July 2026. The item began as a resolution opposing large-scale data centers and sending concern letters to state leaders, but Commissioner Sandy Jones proposed amending it into a county moratorium. Source NM reports residents were protesting a data center proposal linked to Spaceport America.
Approved unanimously 21 July 2026; 18 months
527 Warrick County 180-day data center moratorium (Project Zora) Unnamed (Project Zora) Warrick County Board of Commissioners IN Countywide 180-day pause on data center development; Project Zora is a potential data center on about 1,200 acres of mostly reclaimed mine land in the northern county; no MW or dollar figure stated
moratoriumThe Warrick County Board of Commissioners voted unanimously at a special meeting on Tuesday 11 August 2026 to pause data center development for 180 days. The Area Plan Commission had forwarded the moratorium ordinance the evening before. The pause lets a study committee review a proposed data center ordinance, which the plan commission was set to discuss on 9 November. Commissioners had met in executive session in late July about Project Zora, a potential data center on about 1,200 acres of reclaimed mine land.
Approved unanimously 11 August 2026; 180 days
528 St. Croix County 12-month data center moratorium n.a. St. Croix County Board of Supervisors WI Countywide 12-month moratorium on data centers; a small-scale data center had been proposed in the Village of Hammond; no MW or dollar figure stated
moratoriumThe St. Croix County Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to enact a 12-month moratorium on data centers, according to a statement from state Rep. Rob Kreibich. The pause gives the county time to study long-term effects and develop guardrails before data centers can be proposed. Residents had raised concerns at packed county Community Development Committee and Hammond Village Board meetings about a small-scale data center proposed in Hammond. The Hudson Star-Observer reported that the moratorium does not apply to the Village of Hammond, where Metered Mining holds a conditional use permit, or to the towns of Forest, Hudson, St. Joseph and Troy.
Approved 18-0 on 1 September 2026; 12 months
529 Lawrence County two-year data center moratorium n.a. Lawrence County Board IL Countywide two-year moratorium on data center facilities exceeding 10,000 square feet; modeled on neighboring Crawford County; no project, MW or dollar figure stated
moratoriumThe Lawrence County Board voted unanimously to approve a two-year moratorium on data centers larger than 10,000 square feet, pausing new development across the county. Chairman Jim Brewer said the pause lets the board and residents learn about the problems or benefits of data centers. Officials modeled the ordinance on a moratorium enacted in neighboring Crawford County.
Approved unanimously, reported 17 September 2026; two years
530 Santa Cruz County voter approval requirement for AI data centers (rejected) n.a. Santa Cruz County Board of Supervisors CA Proposed ordinance and March 2028 ballot measure requiring majority voter approval for General Plan amendments allowing AI data centers; no project, MW or dollar figure stated
otherThe Santa Cruz County Board of Supervisors on Tuesday 15 September 2026 rejected Supervisor Justin Cummings' proposal to draft an ordinance and March 2028 ballot measure requiring voter approval for AI data centers in unincorporated areas. Board Chair Monica Martinez and supervisors Manu Koenig and Kim De Serpa voted no, saying it was too early for sweeping decisions. The measure would have required majority voter approval before General Plan amendments allowing zoning, permitting, construction or operation of AI data centers.
Proposal rejected 15 September 2026
531 Washington Township (Macomb Co.) data center moratorium n.a. Washington Township (Macomb Co.) MI No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumWashington Township (Macomb Co.), Michigan, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated May 2026. 6-month pause or until zoning ordinance amendments take effect; passed after Prologis withdrew a 312-acre 'technical campus' application. The measure runs to 23 November 2026.
Enacted May 2026
532 Rockford data center moratorium n.a. Rockford IL No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumRockford, Illinois, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated August 2026. 6-month pause passed 14-0. Does not cover the Edson Road parcel Monarch Energy is pursuing, an existing annexation agreement already permits data centers there. The measure runs to 3 February 2027.
Enacted August 2026
533 Desert Hot Springs data center moratorium n.a. Desert Hot Springs CA No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumDesert Hot Springs, California, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated June 2026. 45-day urgency ordinance extended unanimously on Jul 7 by 22 months 15 days, the full two years California law allows. The measure runs to 17 June 2028.
Enacted June 2026
534 Athens data center moratorium n.a. Athens OH No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumAthens, Ohio, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated August 2026. 1-year permit pause inside city limits; the mayor or service-safety director may extend it a second year. Does not reach the site that prompted it, that parcel is in Athens Township, outside the city. The measure runs to 4 August 2027.
Enacted August 2026
535 Lochbuie data center moratorium n.a. Lochbuie CO No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumLochbuie, Colorado, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated July 2026. 5-year pause approved 6-1, the longest active moratorium in Colorado. Residents cited drought as the driving concern. The measure runs to 21 July 2031.
Enacted July 2026
536 Logan County data center moratorium n.a. Logan County KY No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumLogan County, Kentucky, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated July 2026. 12-month pause in unincorporated areas, adopted specifically to study local water supply capacity against high-consumption users. The measure runs to 30 July 2027.
Enacted July 2026
537 London data center moratorium n.a. London KY No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumLondon, Kentucky, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated August 2026. 2-year pause passed 5-1, running to 30 September 2028 and extendable a further year by council. The measure runs to 30 September 2028.
Enacted August 2026
538 Merrillville data center moratorium n.a. Merrillville IN No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumMerrillville, Indiana, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated June 2026. 1-year moratorium (1 June 2026 to 31 May 2027) adopted at the Town Council's 26 May 2026 meeting, citing four developers who had already approached the town. Council President Rick Bella said the town is watching the AWS/"Hobart Devco" campus under construction in neighboring Hobart before writing its own rules. A widely syndicated report of a further 6-month extension (~July 2026) could not be traced to a verifiable source. The measure runs to 31 May 2027.
Enacted June 2026
539 Vienna Township (Trumbull Co.) data center moratorium n.a. Vienna Township (Trumbull Co.) OH No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumVienna Township (Trumbull Co.), Ohio, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated August 2026. Rolling moratorium originally enacted 2025, extended 60 days from Aug 16 to 16 October 2026 while the county planning commission reviews the township's draft data center zoning, including noise and power limits. Bitdeer (Singapore-based) has plans in the area. The measure runs to 16 October 2026.
Enacted August 2026
540 Morris data center moratorium n.a. Morris CT No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumMorris, Connecticut, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated May 2026. 2-year moratorium covering data centers and battery storage, passed unanimously by the PZC. Driven by farmland and rural character concerns. The measure runs to 20 May 2028.
Enacted May 2026
541 Farmville data center moratorium n.a. Farmville NC No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumFarmville, North Carolina, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated August 2026. 12-month moratorium on data-center development, approved unanimously by the town's Board of Commissioners to allow staff time to research impacts and draft ordinance language, after East Energy Renewables (headquartered in Farmville) pitched a data-center network to town leaders in February. The measure runs to 3 August 2027.
Enacted August 2026
542 Newberry County data center moratorium n.a. Newberry County SC No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumNewberry County, South Carolina, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated July 2026. 12-month moratorium on accepting new data-center permits, confirmed unanimously after the council unanimously denied the 'Project Altair' land-sale ordinance in June. Staff directed to research appropriate locations for future data-center development. The measure runs to 16 July 2027.
Enacted July 2026
543 Rochester Hills data center moratorium n.a. Rochester Hills MI No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumRochester Hills, Michigan, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated August 2026. 180-day moratorium adopted March 2026, extended through mid-March 2027; studying noise, vibration, light pollution, water, electricity demand. The measure runs to 15 March 2027.
Enacted August 2026
544 Chesterfield data center moratorium n.a. Chesterfield NJ No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumChesterfield, New Jersey, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated July 2026. Ban on data centers in all zones, adopted alongside Mansfield Township. The measure has no end date by design.
Enacted July 2026
545 Fayette County data center moratorium n.a. Fayette County IN No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumFayette County, Indiana, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated May 2026. Commissioners approved the ordinance 5 May 2026, effective May 18, contingent on the City of Connersville adopting the same measure (the county and city share an Area Plan Commission) at its own May 18 meeting. Economic-development CEO Brad Colter told commissioners there was no data-center deal, NDA or discussion in place for the county, and backed the pause so the APC could commission an impact study and draft zoning standards; Commissioner Dale Strong said it "will give the Planning Commission time to develop appropriate zoning regulations." Preemptive, no local data-center policy existed before this. The measure runs to 18 May 2027.
Enacted May 2026
546 Grant County data center moratorium n.a. Grant County IN No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumGrant County, Indiana, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated March 2026. Ordinance 4-2026: 24-month moratorium on improvement-location permits for data centers in unincorporated Grant County, unanimous (3-0), or until the Area Plan Commission's data center zoning amendments are adopted, whichever comes first. Does not bind Marion, Gas City or other incorporated towns. An APC subcommittee finished its first review of a draft ordinance in August 2026. The measure runs to 16 March 2028.
Enacted March 2026
547 Cass County data center moratorium n.a. Cass County IN No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumCass County, Indiana, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated April 2026. Board of Commissioners adopted Ordinance Comm-Ord-2026-08 on 21 April 2026, on the Plan Commission's favorable recommendation from an Apr 7 hearing. The ordinance amends the zoning ordinance's district-use table to mark "Data Processing" a prohibited use in every district, Agricultural, Residential, Business, Industrial and Commercial General, a permanent ban, not a time-limited pause. All three commissioners (Ruth Baker, president; Mike Deitrich; Roger Spencer) signed it, 3-0. No named company or project triggered it. "Cass County" + "data center" news searches are dominated by an unrelated fight in Cass County, Michigan, do not conflate the two. The measure has no end date by design.
Enacted April 2026
548 Athens-Clarke County data center moratorium n.a. Athens-Clarke County GA No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumAthens-Clarke County, Georgia, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated March 2026. Moratorium adopted December 2025, extended 3 months in March 2026 while an ordinance is drafted. Waiting on state-level legislation before finalising local rules. The measure runs until a condition is met rather than to a date.
Enacted March 2026
549 Palmetto data center moratorium n.a. Palmetto GA No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumPalmetto, Georgia, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated March 2026. Permanent ban, city council unanimously rewrote the industrial zoning code to exclude data centers entirely. The measure has no end date by design.
Enacted March 2026
550 North Plainfield data center moratorium n.a. North Plainfield NJ No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumNorth Plainfield, New Jersey, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated July 2026. Ordinance 26-10 adopted on second reading, banning data centers in all zoning districts borough-wide. First reading 6-0 on Jun 22. The measure has no end date by design.
Enacted July 2026
551 Waterford Township (Camden Co.) data center moratorium n.a. Waterford Township (Camden Co.) NJ No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumWaterford Township (Camden Co.), New Jersey, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated April 2026. Ban on data centers in all zoning districts; cited heightened concerns as a Pinelands Community. The measure has no end date by design.
Enacted April 2026
552 Columbia data center moratorium n.a. Columbia MO No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumColumbia, Missouri, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated May 2026. 1-year moratorium pausing data center permits and conditional-use applications, 6-0. Council approved data center definition and zoning criteria simultaneously. The measure has a stated duration whose end date is not recorded.
Enacted May 2026
553 Lexington (Fayette County) data center moratorium n.a. Lexington (Fayette County) KY No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumLexington (Fayette County), Kentucky, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated June 2026. Moratorium on permits, development plans, and zone changes, unanimous. Expires Oct 31; Planning Division drafting Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment proposals. The measure runs to 31 October 2026. On Tuesday 6 October 2026, after a nearly four-hour hearing, the Urban County Council voted unanimously to move forward an extension of the moratorium to October 2027 and to send the data center zoning text amendments back to the Planning Commission; the extension still needs a first reading and a final vote later in October 2026. The moratorium has put on hold DartPoints' data center on the Lexmark property.
Enacted June 2026; expires 31 October 2026; extension to October 2027 advanced 6 October 2026, readings pending
554 Carver data center moratorium n.a. Carver MN No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumCarver, Minnesota, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated April 2026. 1-year moratorium, unanimous. Proactive, no pending data center project at time of vote. The measure runs to 6 April 2027.
Enacted April 2026
555 Wright County data center moratorium n.a. Wright County MN No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumWright County, Minnesota, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated May 2026. Emergency 1-year moratorium (Ord. 26-2), unanimous. Applies to unincorporated areas only. Moratorium Workgroup formed Jun 16 to evaluate environmental, fiscal, infrastructure, and land use considerations. The measure runs to 19 May 2027.
Enacted May 2026
556 Ida County data center moratorium n.a. Ida County IA No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumIda County, Iowa, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated June 2026. Indefinite moratorium, unanimous. Supervisors want more information before allowing development. The measure runs until a condition is met rather than to a date.
Enacted June 2026
557 Allen County data center moratorium n.a. Allen County KY No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumAllen County, Kentucky, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated June 2026. 2-year moratorium (Ord. 26-03). Proactive, Judge-Executive observed 'headaches' in nearby Simpson County with hyperscale proposal. The measure runs to 10 June 2028.
Enacted June 2026
558 Clarke County data center moratorium n.a. Clarke County IA No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumClarke County, Iowa, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated January 2026. Temporary moratorium while permanent rules are developed. The measure runs until a condition is met rather than to a date.
Enacted January 2026
559 Boardman Township data center moratorium n.a. Boardman Township OH No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumBoardman Township, Ohio, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated April 2026. 1-year moratorium, unanimous. Pause for zoning regulation development. The measure runs to 28 April 2027.
Enacted April 2026
560 East Whiteland Township data center moratorium n.a. East Whiteland Township PA No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumEast Whiteland Township, Pennsylvania, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated March 2026. 180-day moratorium, board declared parts of data center zoning 'substantively invalid' and launched curative amendment. Developer Green Fig withdrew 1.7M sq ft application in May after sustained public opposition. The measure has a stated duration whose end date is not recorded. On Thursday 24 September 2026 the Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to approve a 32-page data center ordinance, after holding a moratorium for months while it re-examined zoning. The ordinance sets separation from homes, schools, daycares, parks and churches and addresses noise, water, cooling and power; it does not affect the 1.5 million sq ft project under construction at the former Cyprus Foote Mineral site.
Moratorium March 2026; permanent ordinance adopted 24 September 2026
561 Painesville Township data center moratorium n.a. Painesville Township OH No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumPainesville Township, Ohio, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated May 2026. 12-month moratorium on new data center permits, unanimous. The measure has a stated duration whose end date is not recorded.
Enacted May 2026
562 Town of Cassville data center moratorium n.a. Town of Cassville WI No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumTown of Cassville, Wisconsin, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated April 2026. 2-year moratorium, unanimous. 36 sq mi in Grant County. Residents mobilized against a \$1B proposed project. The measure has a stated duration whose end date is not recorded.
Enacted April 2026
563 Dearborn County data center moratorium n.a. Dearborn County IN No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumDearborn County, Indiana, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated February 2026. Up to 1-year moratorium on processing rezoning applications for commercial solar, battery storage (BESS), and data centers, adopted Feb 25 and effective 26 February 2026. Prompted by 1,700+ petition signatures against Linea Energy's roughly 1,200-acre solar proposal for Manchester Township; no data center application had been filed. The county is drafting a solar ordinance first and has paused data-center/BESS ordinance work until that's done; a 7-member citizen advisory committee (26 applicants for 6 seats) formed in May 2026 to advise on the solar rules. The measure runs to 25 February 2027 and covers rezoning requests.
Enacted February 2026
564 Putnam County data center moratorium n.a. Putnam County IN No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumPutnam County, Indiana, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated November 2025. 1-year moratorium on data centers, solar, wind, and SMRs in unincorporated areas, adopted 2-1 (Beck and Helmer for; Woodall opposed, his stated reasoning wasn't individually reported). ~100 residents packed the meeting after EnergyRe's revised application for a 150 MW solar farm near Cloverdale (cut from 200 MW / ~2,000 acres, with 500-ft setbacks added). Commissioner Beck framed the pause as a chance to rewrite the county's Unified Development Ordinance. Primarily a solar fight, no distinct data-center proposal has surfaced for Putnam County, with data centers, wind and SMRs bundled in preemptively. EnergyRe subsequently withdrew the solar filing. The measure runs to 17 November 2026 and applies at a threshold of 150 MW.
Enacted November 2025
565 Miami County data center moratorium n.a. Miami County IN No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumMiami County, Indiana, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated May 2026. Moratorium on accepting, processing and approving all data center applications and permits, adopted 4 May 2026 on the Plan Commission's Apr 8 favorable recommendation. No named company drove it, an earlier, unnamed proposal "fell through" per the county's own account, and residents' stated concern was mainly proximity to Boone County's Meta campus. A permanent zoning ordinance (draft standards: 2.5-mile setback from residences, 5,000-ft general setback, per Plan Administrator Corey Roser) was set for final consideration 20 July 2026, but no source confirms whether commissioners adopted, revised or tabled it, the ordinance's terms and the moratorium's current status are unconfirmed pending that. The measure has no documented term and covers all data center uses.
Enacted May 2026
566 Pulaski County data center moratorium n.a. Pulaski County IN No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumPulaski County, Indiana, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated February 2026. 12-month moratorium, unanimous, after the Advisory Plan Commission recommended it 5-0 on 26 January 2026. Preemptive, no proposal had been submitted as of the vote. Commissioner Jennifer Knebel cited the strain of the ongoing Mammoth Solar project as a reason for the pause; Commissioner Don Street said he'd hear a proposal if one came and wants the eventual ordinance to cover setbacks, power and water. A search-engine claim of a July 2026 extension vote could not be traced to any real article or county record and is not included here, treat the moratorium as running through approximately 2 February 2027 absent primary-sourced confirmation otherwise. The measure runs to 2 February 2027.
Enacted February 2026
567 White County data center moratorium n.a. White County IN No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumWhite County, Indiana, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated October 2025. 12-month moratorium on new data center development in unincorporated White County, adopted 2-1 (Davis and Pass for; Smolek dissenting, saying a development agreement wasn't imminent and the county still owed follow-up on an earlier wind/solar pause). Prompted by Blue Ladder Development's proposed data center at Mid-America Commerce Park in Wolcott (roughly 184-300 acres, up to four data halls), which had seen repeated rezoning delays; residents cited water, land-use and transparency concerns. A same-named "White County" moratorium with different commissioner names found in search is almost certainly a different state's White County, not this one. The measure runs to 20 October 2026, applies at a threshold of 300 acres and covers rezoning requests.
Enacted October 2025
568 New Albany data center moratorium n.a. New Albany IN No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumNew Albany, Indiana, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated July 2026. Up to 1-year moratorium on data center campuses over 100,000 sq ft, citywide and in the 2-mile fringe planning jurisdiction. Proposed by Mayor Jeff Gahan on 9 June 2026, advanced by the Plan Commission Jun 23, and adopted unanimously by the Common Council Jul 16. Study covers infrastructure, utility costs, environmental effects and neighborhood character, feeding into the city's Comprehensive Plan. No company had applied in New Albany at adoption, proactive, driven by regional pressure from the Louisville-area boom (Meta's ~700,000 sq ft facility at River Ridge in neighboring Jeffersonville, and a proposed Shadow Lake Business Park project in Charlestown). The measure runs to 16 July 2027 and applies at a threshold of 100,000 sq ft.
Enacted July 2026
569 Burien data center moratorium n.a. Burien WA No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumBurien, Washington, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated June 2026. 12-month emergency moratorium, unanimous, effective immediately. The measure runs to 29 June 2027.
Enacted June 2026
570 Marysville data center moratorium n.a. Marysville WA No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumMarysville, Washington, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated July 2026. 6-month moratorium on buildings/facilities whose principal use is data management/transmission, unanimous. Mayor urged surrounding counties to follow suit. The measure runs to 14 January 2027.
Enacted July 2026
571 Pasco data center moratorium n.a. Pasco WA No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumPasco, Washington, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated July 2026. 6-month moratorium, 6-0. Extendable if officials don't have satisfactory answers. Developing data-center-specific land-use regulations. The measure runs to 20 January 2027.
Enacted July 2026
572 Front Royal data center moratorium n.a. Front Royal VA No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumFront Royal, Virginia, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated July 2026. 90-day moratorium on land-use applications for data centers, 6-0. Planning Commission drafting language to prohibit data centers in every town zoning district. The measure runs to 4 October 2026.
Enacted July 2026
573 Jefferson County data center moratorium n.a. Jefferson County IA No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumJefferson County, Iowa, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated August 2026. 12-month moratorium adopted unanimously alongside a new data center ordinance; second and third readings waived so it took effect at once. County attorney recommended 1 year over the 24 months residents asked for, as more likely to survive a legal challenge. The measure runs to 11 August 2027.
Enacted August 2026
574 Shawnee County data center moratorium n.a. Shawnee County KS No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumShawnee County, Kansas, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated August 2026. 2-1: no final action on data center land use applications until 17 February 2027. Applications may still be filed, Compass Datacenters can resubmit, they just cannot be decided. The measure runs to 17 February 2027.
Enacted August 2026
575 Chippewa County data center moratorium n.a. Chippewa County WI No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumChippewa County, Wisconsin, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated August 2026. 12-month moratorium, 19-0, first and second readings the same night (extended from the 10 months committee proposed). Applies only to the six towns under county zoning, Anson, Eagle Point, Hallie, Lafayette, Wheaton, Woodmohr. Coverage puts the effective date in September without naming it, so the end date is not derivable. The measure has a stated duration whose end date is not recorded.
Enacted August 2026
576 Atlanta data center moratorium n.a. Atlanta GA No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumAtlanta, Georgia, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated September 2024. Zoning ban on data centers along the BeltLine and within a half-mile of MARTA stations, later extended to neighborhood commercial districts with special use permits required elsewhere. A geographic ban, not a citywide one. The measure has no end date by design.
Enacted September 2024
577 Mount Vernon data center moratorium n.a. Mount Vernon WA No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumMount Vernon, Washington, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated August 2026. 6-month moratorium, 4-1, with no data center yet proposed. Planning staff to draft rules on electricity and water demand, stormwater and building in the Skagit River floodplain. The measure runs to 12 February 2027.
Enacted August 2026
578 Howard County data center moratorium n.a. Howard County IN No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumHoward County, Indiana, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated August 2026. 1-year permit moratorium in unincorporated Howard County, adopted unanimously (3-0) after the Plan Commission's nearly unanimous favorable recommendation. County Attorney Alan Wilson introduced it, saying the zoning ordinance doesn't cover data centers and stating plainly at adoption: "No one is coming. There are no applications pending." Commissioner Brad Bray volunteered to chair a study committee after public pressure; the pause may lift early once rules are drafted or be extended if needed. Separate from the City of Kokomo's own track, where the Common Council rejected a moratorium and is instead advancing a zoning ordinance for a 700-acre annexed industrial park (final vote expected 14 September 2026). The measure runs to 18 August 2027.
Enacted August 2026
579 East Lansing data center moratorium n.a. East Lansing MI No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumEast Lansing, Michigan, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated August 2026. 6-month extension, unanimous, running to 17 March 2027. Extends the moratorium adopted March 2026, which would have lapsed September 2026. Preemptive, no data center has been proposed in the city; the city's zoning ordinance does not address data centers at all and staff expect to bring draft language in Sep/October 2026. The measure runs to 17 March 2027.
Enacted August 2026
580 Woodford County data center moratorium n.a. Woodford County IL No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumWoodford County, Illinois, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated August 2026. 6-month moratorium on data center applications, extendable once by another 6 months, while the county holds public hearings and drafts an ordinance. Unanimously approved at Aug 18 board meeting. The measure runs to 18 February 2027.
Enacted August 2026
581 Fairfax County data center moratorium n.a. Fairfax County VA No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumFairfax County, Virginia, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated September 2024. Not a pause, a standing zoning ordinance amendment, adopted 10 September 2024 and effective Sep 11, that requires Board of Supervisors special-exception approval for nearly all new data centers (by-right only in I-5/I-6 industrial districts), 200-ft setbacks from residential lot lines (300 ft for backup generators), a one-mile buffer from Metro stations, full enclosure or screening of mechanical equipment, and pre- and post-construction noise studies. A companion substation amendment adopted 9 December 2025 (unanimous) adds 100-ft residential setbacks, 12-ft solid walls, a 50-ft planted buffer and a 55 dBA nighttime noise limit, but leaves substations by-right in industrial zones, which is why the Plaza 500 (Lincolnia) fight runs through a 2232 public-facility review rather than a rezoning. Applications pending on 11 September 2024 were grandfathered. The measure has no end date by design and covers rezoning requests.
Enacted September 2024
582 Spotsylvania County data center moratorium n.a. Spotsylvania County VA No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumSpotsylvania County, Virginia, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated August 2026. Resolution adopted 4-2 (Mullins and Frazier opposed) backing Sen. Sturtevant's call for the governor to 'issue a statewide moratorium on data centers to determine whether development should be permitted and, if so, under what conditions'. Sits on two standing local rules: a February 2026 vote requiring a special use permit for every data center, ending by-right siting even on industrial land, and an 25 August 2026 comprehensive plan amendment (3-2) capping data centers at 45% of the county's industrial-zoned land, with two supervisors voting no because they wanted a lower cap. The county had earlier welcomed some $35B in data center investment. The measure has no end date by design.
Enacted August 2026
583 Stafford County data center moratorium n.a. Stafford County VA No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumStafford County, Virginia, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated October 2025. Standing ordinance, not a pause. Phase 2 data center rules (Ordinance O25-29 and Comprehensive Plan amendment R25-208, adopted 21 October 2025; O25-29(R) on 2 December 2025 grandfathered five approved projects, Stafford Technology Campus, Potomac Church Tech Center, Centreport Gateway/Pemberton, Vantage VA-4 and Cranes Corner, 31 buildings and 8.7M sq ft) on top of the October 2023 Phase 1 rules: by-right only in M-2 and the ICTP overlay, 100/200-ft setbacks from non-commercial zoning (a 500-ft residential setback was recommended), sound mitigation with post-occupancy noise checks at 90 days and annually, 30% open space outside the urban service area. The county reports 11 applications still under review and none filed since September 2025. On 1 September 2026 the board directed staff to draft letters asking Gov. Spanberger for a special session on data center rules and, failing quick legislation, a temporary pause on new large-scale approvals; Chair Diggs calls the ordinance 'the strictest in Virginia'. The measure has no end date by design.
Enacted October 2025
584 Lyon County data center moratorium n.a. Lyon County KY No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumLyon County, Kentucky, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated August 2026. Data center moratorium ordinance passed unanimously by the fiscal court, which will form a committee on environmental impact and utility use; reported as delaying inquiries for up to two years, modelled on Allen County's 2-year ordinance. Magistrates and Judge-Executive Jaime Green-Smith said the Lake Barkley area may be unsuitable for a data center. No outlet gave the vote date or an end date, so none is recorded here. The measure has a stated duration whose end date is not recorded.
Enacted August 2026
585 Luther data center moratorium n.a. Luther OK No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumLuther, Oklahoma, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated June 2026. Town board ordinance pausing new rezoning applications and specific-use permit requests for data centers through 31 December 2026, and restricting approvals of applications already filed, while the town revises zoning for data centers and battery storage. Aimed at Beltline Energy's proposed development, which the board discussed the same night without acting on it. The meeting drew a crowd large enough to be moved outdoors. The measure runs to 31 December 2026 and covers rezoning requests.
Enacted June 2026
586 Braceville Township data center moratorium n.a. Braceville Township OH No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumBraceville Township, Ohio, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated June 2026. Six-month moratorium on issuing any data center permits or applications, unanimous and effective immediately. Trustee chairman Todd Garland cited noise, electricity and water use, and said the consensus among Trumbull County townships was to halt development while they study it. Reported as a Tuesday meeting, matching Jun 2. The measure runs to 2 December 2026.
Enacted June 2026
587 Grafton data center moratorium n.a. Grafton OH No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumGrafton, Ohio, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated May 2026. The measure runs to 19 May 2031.
Enacted May 2026
588 Howland Township data center moratorium n.a. Howland Township OH No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumHowland Township, Ohio, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated June 2026. Six-month moratorium, renewable for a further six months and extendable beyond that, on all applications for zoning certificates, conditional use permits, variances or rezonings for a data center, across every zoning district. Applies to applications filed after the effective date. Reported as a Wednesday meeting, matching Jun 10. The measure runs to 10 December 2026 and covers rezoning requests.
Enacted June 2026
589 Hubbard data center moratorium n.a. Hubbard OH No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumHubbard, Ohio, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated June 2026. 12-month moratorium on the construction, placement or operation of a data center in the city, requested by Councilwoman Robin Zambrini after residents raised concerns about a potential project. Hubbard CITY, Hubbard Township acted separately. Reported as a Monday regular meeting, matching Jun 1. The measure runs to 1 June 2027. City residents will vote on 3 November 2026 on a citizen-initiated ordinance permanently prohibiting data center construction in the city; WFMJ reports the petition collected more than double the required signatures. The 12-month moratoriums in the city and in Hubbard Township remain in place. WFMJ says both measures respond to Project Milo, for which Mayor Ben Kyle signed a non-disclosure agreement in 2024.
Moratorium enacted June 2026, runs to 1 June 2027; permanent ban on the 3 November 2026 ballot (reported 1 October 2026)
590 Canton Township data center moratorium n.a. Canton Township OH No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumCanton Township, Ohio, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated April 2026. Resolution 04-03-2026, moratorium on any new data center operating or locating in the township. Unanimous 3-0 vote. Third Stark County jurisdiction to freeze after Plain Township and Massillon. The measure has a stated duration whose end date is not recorded.
Enacted April 2026
591 Cortland data center moratorium n.a. Cortland OH No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumCortland, Ohio, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated June 2026. One-year emergency moratorium on data center zoning permits and applications. Council President Picuri cited electricity and water concerns. Trumbull County jurisdiction. The measure has a stated duration whose end date is not recorded.
Enacted June 2026
592 El Monte data center moratorium n.a. El Monte CA No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumEl Monte, California, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated March 2026. Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 3063 (45-day moratorium); extended Apr 22 by Ordinance No. 3065 (7-0) for 10 months 15 days under Gov. Code 65858. Prohibits accepting or processing new data center land use applications. The measure runs to 2 February 2027.
Enacted March 2026
593 Phillips County data center moratorium n.a. Phillips County CO No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumPhillips County, Colorado, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated February 2026. Moratorium on data center facility applications in unincorporated areas; extended Aug 20 through 31 December 2026. The measure runs to 31 December 2026.
Enacted February 2026
594 Mitchell County data center moratorium n.a. Mitchell County IA No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumMitchell County, Iowa, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated January 2025. Resolution #1336-25; moratorium on data centers until 31 December 2026. Voted 4-1 (Frein, Marzen, Hartogh, Wherry yes; Hendrickson nay). The measure runs to 31 December 2026.
Enacted January 2025
595 Big Rapids Charter Township data center moratorium n.a. Big Rapids Charter Township MI No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumBig Rapids Charter Township, Michigan, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated February 2026. One-year moratorium on permitting, consideration, approval, location, construction, and installation of data center facilities. The measure runs to 23 February 2027.
Enacted February 2026
596 Parma Township data center moratorium n.a. Parma Township MI No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumParma Township, Michigan, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated February 2026. Ordinance 2026-3, data center moratorium. Jackson County township. The measure has no documented term.
Enacted February 2026
597 Independence data center moratorium n.a. Independence MO No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumIndependence, Missouri, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated January 2026. 180-day moratorium on new data center and battery energy storage permits. Does not affect previously approved Nebius project. The measure runs to 2 January 2027. On Monday 5 October 2026 the Independence City Council voted 6-0 to require council approval of major data centers (electrical load above 5 MW), with a 1,000-foot setback from homes, schools, parks and other sensitive uses, closed-loop cooling and limits on generator testing. KCTV reports the six-month moratorium was passed by the council in July 2026 and remains in effect through 2 January 2027. The rules do not affect the Nebius campus.
Moratorium passed July 2026 per KCTV (tracker date January 2026), in effect through 2 January 2027; major data center rules adopted 6-0 on 5 October 2026
598 Defiance data center moratorium n.a. Defiance OH No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumDefiance, Ohio, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated September 2026. Six-month moratorium on acceptance and processing of data center applications. Originally proposed as 12 months, amended 5-2 to six. Companion referendum on November 2026 ballot would cap data centers at 25 MW. The measure has a stated duration whose end date is not recorded and applies at a threshold of 25 MW.
Enacted September 2026
599 Findlay data center moratorium n.a. Findlay OH No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumFindlay, Ohio, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated April 2026. Ordinance 2026-42, 12-month moratorium on establishment or conversion of buildings into data centers, city-wide. Passed 9-1. Draft follow-on ordinance would allow data centers only as Conditional Use in I-3 zones with 1,000-ft residential setback. The measure runs to 22 April 2027.
Enacted April 2026
600 Girard data center moratorium n.a. Girard OH No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumGirard, Ohio, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated July 2026. Ordinance No. 53-36, one-year moratorium on AI data center construction permits. Emergency measure passed 7-0. Council cited solidarity with neighboring Mahoning Valley communities (Niles, Ellsworth, Lordstown, Cortland, Hubbard). The measure runs to 13 July 2027.
Enacted July 2026
601 Lake Township (Wood Co.) data center moratorium n.a. Lake Township (Wood Co.) OH No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumLake Township (Wood Co.), Ohio, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated March 2026. One-year moratorium. Part of broader Wood County trend, 7 of 19 townships adopted moratoriums, 8 more discussed. Enacted after a potential data center site was listed for sale. The measure runs to 3 March 2027.
Enacted March 2026
602 New Carlisle data center moratorium n.a. New Carlisle OH No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumNew Carlisle, Ohio, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated February 2026. Ordinance 2026-06, 12-month moratorium. Study period for planning, zoning, and business regulation decisions. The measure runs to 17 February 2027.
Enacted February 2026
603 Vermilion data center moratorium n.a. Vermilion OH No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumVermilion, Ohio, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated April 2026. Ordinance 2026-17, moratorium on consideration, approval, or authorization of data center development across all zoning districts. Bars building permits, COOs, development plans, and special use permits. The measure runs to 23 March 2027 and covers permits.
Enacted April 2026
604 Hamblen County data center moratorium n.a. Hamblen County TN No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumHamblen County, Tennessee, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated January 2026. One-year moratorium on data centers, crypto mining, and high-performance computing with 5+ MW peak demand; exempts First Civil District industrial zone. The measure runs to 7 July 2027.
Enacted January 2026
605 Milford data center moratorium n.a. Milford UT No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumMilford, Utah, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated June 2026. Ordinance 04-2026: 180-day moratorium on data centers, data center power plants, and solar energy facilities; 5-0 unanimous. Council determined data centers are not appropriate land use within city limits. The measure runs to 13 December 2026.
Enacted June 2026
606 Pierce County data center moratorium n.a. Pierce County WA No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumPierce County, Washington, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated August 2026. Emergency ordinance prohibiting new/expanded data centers over 10 MW in unincorporated Pierce County; one year unless extended or lifted. The measure runs to 25 August 2027 and applies at a threshold of 10 MW.
Enacted August 2026
607 Town of Hampden data center moratorium n.a. Town of Hampden WI No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumTown of Hampden, Wisconsin, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated May 2026. Data center temporary moratorium (Chapter 18 ordinance). Columbia County. The measure has no documented term.
Enacted May 2026
608 Clayton County data center moratorium n.a. Clayton County IA No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumClayton County, Iowa, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated February 2025. Clayton County Board of Supervisors approved a temporary moratorium on rezoning requests and conditional use permits for digital asset mining/data centers in February 2025. The moratorium was originally set to expire 31 December 2025, but supervisors extended it to 31 December 2026 to allow more time for research and policy development. County officials and the Planning and Zoning Board are studying potential concerns including noise, visual impact, water use, and effects on surrounding properties.
Enacted February 2025
609 Dexter Township data center moratorium n.a. Dexter Township MI No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumDexter Township, Michigan, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated February 2026. Dexter Township adopted a 180-day moratorium on data center applications via Resolution #26-705, joining at least 19 Michigan communities that have paused data center development. Residents and officials raised concerns about massive water and energy demands, potential cost increases for existing ratepayers, and industrialization of rural landscapes. The moratorium gives the township time to study impacts and draft appropriate zoning regulations.
Enacted February 2026
610 City of Portage data center moratorium n.a. City of Portage MI No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumCity of Portage, Michigan, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated February 2026. In City of Portage, Michigan, Portage enacted a temporary moratorium on data centers and battery energy storage facilities through end of year to allow the city to review zoning rules and potential impacts. A public hearing on new ordinance amendments was scheduled for March 2026, Part of a broader trend of at least 27 Michigan communities pausing data center development.
Enacted February 2026
611 Maumee data center moratorium n.a. Maumee OH No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumMaumee, Ohio, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated February 2026. Resolution No. 005-2026, 12-month emergency moratorium on establishment or conversion of structures into data centers. Passed 6-0. Precautionary measure while city studies impacts. The measure runs to 2 February 2027.
Enacted February 2026
612 Richfield Township data center moratorium n.a. Richfield Township OH No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumRichfield Township, Ohio, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated February 2026. Resolution 021726-01, 12-month emergency moratorium on data centers, energy-producing/storage facilities, and high-energy-use facilities in all zoning districts. Cited lack of zoning inspector. The measure runs to 17 February 2027.
Enacted February 2026
613 Scioto Township data center moratorium n.a. Scioto Township OH No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumScioto Township, Ohio, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated March 2026. 12-month moratorium pausing all new data center applications while township updates zoning codes. Trustee Wasmus introduced; Trustee Wolfe proposed 6 months but was overruled. The measure runs to 6 March 2027.
Enacted March 2026
614 Sprigg Township data center moratorium n.a. Sprigg Township OH No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumSprigg Township, Ohio, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated February 2026. 12-month moratorium. Followed pushback over proposed data center at former Stuart power plant site that would consume 31x the energy of the entire county. The measure runs to 24 February 2027.
Enacted February 2026
615 Springfield data center moratorium n.a. Springfield OH No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumSpringfield, Ohio, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated July 2026. Ordinance 159-26, 6-month moratorium on high-density computing facilities with energy demand > 25 MW. Passed 5-0 by City Commission. Could be extended if state does not act. The measure runs to 14 January 2027 and applies at a threshold of 25 MW.
Enacted July 2026
616 Tallmadge data center moratorium n.a. Tallmadge OH No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumTallmadge, Ohio, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated April 2026. Ordinance 2026-38, 6-month moratorium on data center proposals. Passed 7-0. Proactive, no pending applications. Includes hardship appeal process under ORC Chapter 2506. The measure runs to 10 October 2026.
Enacted April 2026
617 Tiffin data center moratorium n.a. Tiffin OH No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumTiffin, Ohio, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated April 2026. Resolution 2026-42, 12-month moratorium barring establishment or conversion of structures into data centers. Passed 6-0, declared emergency. Preemptive, no project proposed. The measure runs to 20 April 2027.
Enacted April 2026
618 Washington Township (Butler Co.) data center moratorium n.a. Washington Township (Butler Co.) OH No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumWashington Township (Butler Co.), Ohio, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated April 2026. 360-day moratorium on zoning permits for new data center uses. Preemptive, no one had contacted the township about a project. The measure runs to 16 April 2027.
Enacted April 2026
619 Williamsburg data center moratorium n.a. Williamsburg OH No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumWilliamsburg, Ohio, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated March 2026. Ordinance 1249-26, emergency moratorium on authorization or establishment of data centers within the village. Applies to all pending applications without a final permit. The measure runs to 13 March 2027.
Enacted March 2026
620 Yellow Springs data center moratorium n.a. Yellow Springs OH No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumYellow Springs, Ohio, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated May 2026. Ordinance 2026-08, 12-month moratorium on data centers with demand > 2 MW. Exempts auxiliary data centers under 10% of primary structure. Council member Pearce cited misalignment with community scale and values. The measure runs to 18 May 2027 and applies at a threshold of 2 MW.
Enacted May 2026
621 Carlton County data center moratorium n.a. Carlton County MN No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumCarlton County, Minnesota, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated August 2026. One-year interim ordinance, unanimous, effective immediately; bars approval of new data center development in every county township, including crypto mining and AI compute. Directs the planning commission to study whether county regulation is needed, with a progress report due back to the board by February 2027. The measure runs to 24 August 2027.
Enacted August 2026
622 Mantua Township data center moratorium n.a. Mantua Township NJ No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumMantua Township, New Jersey, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated May 2026. Township's own public-records page confirms adoption of an ordinance banning data centers; no duration or sunset clause stated. The measure has no end date by design.
Enacted May 2026
623 Madison data center moratorium n.a. Madison NJ No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumMadison, New Jersey, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated June 2026. Ordinance 27-2026, unanimous council vote; amends Chapter 195 to prohibit data centers as a use. Planning board found it consistent with the master plan. The measure has no end date by design.
Enacted June 2026
624 Old Bridge data center moratorium n.a. Old Bridge NJ No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumOld Bridge, New Jersey, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated January 2026. Township Council directed the drafting of an ordinance prohibiting data centers in every zoning district at its 9 June 2026 meeting; the Pinelands Preservation Alliance lists Old Bridge among municipalities with an enacted ban as of 27 August 2026. Confirm the adoption date with the township clerk. The measure has no documented term.
Enacted January 2026
625 Pennsville data center moratorium n.a. Pennsville NJ No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumPennsville, New Jersey, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated July 2026. Ordinance A-13-2026, introduced May 21 with final passage scheduled 2 July 2026, per the township's own ordinances page. The measure has no end date by design.
Enacted July 2026
626 Grand County data center moratorium n.a. Grand County UT No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumGrand County, Utah, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated July 2026. 180-day temporary land use regulation, unanimous: pauses acceptance, processing and approval of applications, permits and licenses for data centers, data center power plants and associated digital infrastructure. Pre-emptive. nothing was in the queue. The measure runs to 3 January 2027.
Enacted July 2026
627 Wayne County data center moratorium n.a. Wayne County UT No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumWayne County, Utah, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated July 2026. Resolution 2026-04: immediate 180-day moratorium on all land use applications for data centers, data center power plants (explicitly including nuclear) and supporting digital infrastructure, unanimous. County code did not address data centers at all. The measure runs to 17 January 2027.
Enacted July 2026
628 Humboldt County data center moratorium n.a. Humboldt County NV No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumHumboldt County, Nevada, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated July 2026. Temporary moratorium on data center applications through 13 July 2027 while the county updates land-use rules on water, power and infrastructure; multiple developers had approached the county and its code did not address data centers. The measure runs to 13 July 2027.
Enacted July 2026
629 White Pine County data center moratorium n.a. White Pine County NV No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumWhite Pine County, Nevada, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated July 2026. Resolution 2026-18: 180-day moratorium on accepting, processing or approving land-use applications for data center development while staff draft zoning standards; renewable. End date is 180 days from adoption. The measure runs to 18 January 2027.
Enacted July 2026
630 Harlingen data center moratorium n.a. Harlingen TX No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumHarlingen, Texas, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated May 2026. 120-day moratorium on data center development within city limits, adopted in May 2026 after public hearings, running to mid-October; commissioners approved first reading of a 60-day extension to December in August, second reading pending. City hired Ambiotec Engineering to study water, wastewater and power impacts. The measure has a stated duration whose end date is not recorded.
Enacted May 2026
631 Broken Arrow data center moratorium n.a. Broken Arrow OK No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumBroken Arrow, Oklahoma, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated June 2026. 6-month moratorium on accepting land use development applications for data centers, unanimous, to 31 December 2026 with an option to extend six more months; includes an appeal route to the Board of Adjustment. City studying power, water, noise, traffic and state tax exemptions. The measure runs to 31 December 2026.
Enacted June 2026
632 Norman data center moratorium n.a. Norman OK No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumNorman, Oklahoma, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated June 2026. One-year moratorium on approving permits for data centers within city limits, unanimous; press reports the suspension runs to 9 June 2027. Mayor said no specific proposal prompted it. The measure runs to 9 June 2027.
Enacted June 2026
633 Pike County data center moratorium n.a. Pike County GA No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumPike County, Georgia, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated January 2025. Moratorium enacted September 2025; Commissioner James Jenkins motioned because county lacks building codes and zoning ordinances for data center facilities. One of four GA counties to pass moratoriums that month (with Lamar, Troup, Clayton). Duration and expiration not documen... The measure has no documented term.
Enacted January 2025
634 Roswell data center moratorium n.a. Roswell GA No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumRoswell, Georgia, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated January 2026. 90-day emergency moratorium enacted unanimously Jan 12. Extended 95 days on Mar 23 (to Jun 26), then extended 90 days on Jun 22 (to 20 September 2026). City staff developing use regulations for data centers. The measure runs to 20 September 2026.
Enacted January 2026
635 Bristol data center moratorium n.a. Bristol TN No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumBristol, Tennessee, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated January 2025. Two-year moratorium on data processing centers, approved unanimously; effective 24 October 2025. The measure runs to 24 October 2027.
Enacted January 2025
636 Cedar Hill data center moratorium n.a. Cedar Hill TN No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumCedar Hill, Tennessee, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated January 2026. Two-year moratorium on data centers and cryptocurrency mining; first Robertson County city to act. The measure runs to 1 June 2028.
Enacted January 2026
637 Clinton data center moratorium n.a. Clinton TN No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumClinton, Tennessee, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated January 2026. Six-month moratorium on new data centers, approved unanimously; applies within city limits only. The measure runs to 22 December 2026.
Enacted January 2026
638 Grundy County data center moratorium n.a. Grundy County TN No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumGrundy County, Tennessee, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated January 2026. Two-year moratorium on data centers, crypto mining, and high-impact data processing in unincorporated areas; approved unanimously by county commission. The measure runs to 18 May 2028.
Enacted January 2026
639 Morgan County data center moratorium n.a. Morgan County TN No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumMorgan County, Tennessee, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated January 2026. Two-year moratorium on data centers capable of 10+ MW peak demand; county commission proactive measure, no proposals pending. The measure runs to 12 June 2028.
Enacted January 2026
640 Shelbyville data center moratorium n.a. Shelbyville TN No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumShelbyville, Tennessee, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated January 2026. Moratorium on data centers and cryptocurrency mining plants; duration not specified in available sources. The measure has a stated duration whose end date is not recorded.
Enacted January 2026
641 White County data center moratorium n.a. White County TN No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumWhite County, Tennessee, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated January 2026. Ban on data centers and data mining facilities; did not go through formal zoning process; enforcement challenged by 4.9 MW crypto proposal. The measure has no end date by design and applies at a threshold of 4.9 MW.
Enacted January 2026
642 McPherson County data center moratorium n.a. McPherson County KS No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumMcPherson County, Kansas, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated January 2026. Resolution 2026-21; permanent ban on data centers and utility-scale battery storage in unincorporated areas. Voted 3-0. Replaced earlier moratorium from summer 2025. The measure has no end date by design.
Enacted January 2026
643 Brookville data center moratorium n.a. Brookville PA No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumBrookville, Pennsylvania, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated January 2026. 180-day moratorium on data centers and borough water use for data centers. Two potential data center projects prompted action. Unanimous vote. The measure runs to 14 December 2026.
Enacted January 2026
644 Center Township data center moratorium n.a. Center Township PA No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumCenter Township, Pennsylvania, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated January 2026. 180-day curative amendment halting data center and power generation plant development in Butler County. Unanimous vote. The measure runs to 7 December 2026.
Enacted January 2026
645 Muncy Township data center moratorium n.a. Muncy Township PA No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumMuncy Township, Pennsylvania, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated January 2026. 9-month moratorium on data centers in Lycoming County township; prompted by Danko Holdings/Fishlips LLC proposal for 100-acre, 3-building facility. The measure runs to 1 February 2027.
Enacted January 2026
646 Archuleta County data center moratorium n.a. Archuleta County CO No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumArchuleta County, Colorado, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated January 2026. Resolution 2026-47; 6-month moratorium on data centers. Unanimous vote. County infrastructure and water cannot support data centers. The measure runs to 16 December 2026.
Enacted January 2026
647 South Fork data center moratorium n.a. South Fork CO No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumSouth Fork, Colorado, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated January 2026. 1-year moratorium on data center site development plans and zoning permits. No data center applications received; preemptive action. The measure runs to 18 June 2027.
Enacted January 2026
648 Madison County data center moratorium n.a. Madison County FL No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumMadison County, Florida, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated January 2026. 1-year moratorium on construction and permitting of large-scale data centers. Unanimous vote. The measure runs to 22 July 2027.
Enacted January 2026
649 Oakley data center moratorium n.a. Oakley CA No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumOakley, California, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated January 2026. Initial 45-day urgency ordinance Apr 15; extended May 16 for 10 months 15 days (through ~April 2027). Working toward permanent ban. Voted 5-0 on extension. The measure runs to 14 April 2027.
Enacted January 2026
650 Delta County data center moratorium n.a. Delta County MI No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumDelta County, Michigan, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated January 2026. 12-month moratorium on data centers and cryptocurrency mining; county board approved unanimously after planning commission forwarded recommendation; county to develop zoning standards during pause. The measure runs to 23 July 2027.
Enacted January 2026
651 Forsyth Township data center moratorium n.a. Forsyth Township MI No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumForsyth Township, Michigan, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated January 2026. 12-month moratorium on data center construction; board passed at crowded meeting; township lacks data center zoning regulations and has no pending applications. The measure runs to 25 June 2027.
Enacted January 2026
652 Houghton data center moratorium n.a. Houghton MI No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumHoughton, Michigan, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated January 2026. One-year moratorium on permitting, approval, or installation of data center facilities; city council voted unanimously; no proposals pending but city acted proactively to develop regulations. The measure runs to 9 July 2027.
Enacted January 2026
653 Huron County data center moratorium n.a. Huron County MI No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumHuron County, Michigan, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated January 2026. Three-year (36-month) moratorium on data centers; planning commission unanimously extended original 6-month proposal to 36 months at April 1 hearing after public demand; county commissioners approved in May; concerns center on farmland preservation and resource use. The measure runs to 27 May 2029.
Enacted January 2026
654 Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians data center moratorium n.a. Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians MI No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumSault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians, Michigan, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated January 2026. Indefinite moratorium prohibiting development, approval, or operation of AI data centers on tribal lands; board of directors voted unanimously; remains in effect unless lifted by subsequent resolution; concerns about resource strain and long-term land use impacts. The measure has no end date by design.
Enacted January 2026
655 Waite Park data center moratorium n.a. Waite Park MN No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumWaite Park, Minnesota, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated January 2026. 1-year moratorium on data center development, unanimous. Exempts telecom shelters under 300 sq ft. Staff to study impacts and draft regulations. The measure runs to 4 May 2027 and applies at a threshold of 300 sq ft.
Enacted January 2026
656 Seminole Nation of Oklahoma data center moratorium n.a. Seminole Nation of Oklahoma OK No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumSeminole Nation of Oklahoma, Oklahoma, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated January 2026. General Council voted 24-0 for indefinite moratorium on AI data center development on tribal lands. Bars any inquiries or development concerning data centers of any size. Triggered by startup NDA request. The measure has no end date by design.
Enacted January 2026
657 Lycoming County data center moratorium n.a. Lycoming County PA No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumLycoming County, Pennsylvania, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated January 2026. Curative amendment under PA MPC Section 609.2; county zoning declared invalid for lack of data center standards. 180-day window. Covers 19 municipal partners. Separate from Muncy Township moratorium. The measure runs to 15 December 2026.
Enacted January 2026
658 Door County data center moratorium n.a. Door County WI No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumDoor County, Wisconsin, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated January 2026. 1-year moratorium on data centers and battery energy storage in unincorporated areas; board retains option to extend. The measure runs to 26 May 2027.
Enacted January 2026
659 Allendale Township data center moratorium n.a. Allendale Township MI No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumAllendale Township, Michigan, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated June 2026. Ordinance 2026-07, one-year moratorium on data centers, battery storage, large-scale solar, and wind farms. Township board voted to study and implement ordinance revisions. The measure runs to 8 June 2027.
Enacted June 2026
660 Lincoln Township data center moratorium n.a. Lincoln Township MI No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumLincoln Township, Michigan, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated June 2026. 10-month moratorium on data center development. Allows planning commission time to study noise, water and electrical consumption, and community impacts. The measure runs to 11 April 2027.
Enacted June 2026
661 Lyndon Township data center moratorium n.a. Lyndon Township MI No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumLyndon Township, Michigan, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated May 2026. Resolution 26-06, 12-month moratorium on issuance of permits, licenses, or approvals for data centers, or until permanent regulations adopted. The measure runs to 22 May 2027.
Enacted May 2026
662 Porter Township data center moratorium n.a. Porter Township MI No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumPorter Township, Michigan, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated May 2026. 12-month moratorium on data center development, unanimous vote. Enacted to establish data center guidelines before developers arrive. Multiple Cass County townships have enacted similar moratoriums. The measure runs to 19 May 2027.
Enacted May 2026
663 Texas Township data center moratorium n.a. Texas Township MI No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumTexas Township, Michigan, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated June 2026. Resolution 26-12, 12-month moratorium on data center developments including AI and cryptocurrency mining facilities. Planning commission to evaluate impacts on farmland preservation, infrastructure capacity, and environmental factors. The measure runs to 5 July 2027.
Enacted June 2026
664 Ralls County data center moratorium n.a. Ralls County MO No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumRalls County, Missouri, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated January 2026. Commissioners signed a one-year moratorium on economic development projects and data centers after learning a property owner may have signed a deal to sell 53 acres to a data center company. Commissioners want voters to decide on the April ballot whether the county should allow data centers. The measure runs to 20 August 2027 and applies at a threshold of 53 acres.
Enacted January 2026
665 Cranford data center moratorium n.a. Cranford NJ No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumCranford, New Jersey, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated January 2026. Township Committee unanimously approved ordinance removing data centers as a permitted use in all commercial zones. Prompted by CoreWeave data center under construction in nearby Kenilworth. The measure has no end date by design.
Enacted January 2026
666 LeRay data center moratorium n.a. LeRay NY No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumLeRay, New York, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated January 2026. Town board approved one-year moratorium on data centers after public hearing. Prompted by a broker marketing hundreds of acres for a data center near Watertown/Fort Drum. The measure runs to 1 August 2027.
Enacted January 2026
667 Lake Elsinore data center moratorium n.a. Lake Elsinore CA No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumLake Elsinore, California, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated August 2026. Emergency ordinance establishing 45-day moratorium on new data center applications. Unanimous vote. Requested by Councilmember Steve Manos after resident concerns. City zoning code does not specifically address data centers. The measure runs to 9 October 2026.
Enacted August 2026
668 Morgan Hill data center moratorium n.a. Morgan Hill CA No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumMorgan Hill, California, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated August 2026. 45-day urgency moratorium covering data centers AND grid-scale battery energy storage. Unanimous vote. City has no zoning standards for either use. Extendable up to 2 years under CA Gov. Code 65858. The measure runs to 10 October 2026.
Enacted August 2026
669 Patterson data center moratorium n.a. Patterson CA No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumPatterson, California, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated July 2026. Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 889 (initial 45-day). Extended unanimously Aug 18 via Ordinance No. 890 for 10 months 15 days. Data centers were previously permitted by right in industrial zones. Key concern is water, city faces state requirements to reduce groundwater pumping. The measure runs to 15 July 2027.
Enacted July 2026
670 Alhambra data center moratorium n.a. Alhambra CA No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumAlhambra, California, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated June 2026. Ordinance O2M26-4863 (effective 1 August 2026) prohibits data centers in office and industrial zones. Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval (Resolution 26-07). Measure DB on the 3 November 2026 ballot would extend the ban to all zones and lock it into the city charter, requiring voter approval to reverse. If passed, Alhambra would be the second CA city after Monterey Park to enact a voter-approved permanent ban. The measure has no end date by design.
Enacted June 2026
671 Benton County data center moratorium n.a. Benton County Commission MO No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumThe Benton County, Missouri, Commission signed a six-month data center moratorium on 10 August 2026, running to 10 February 2027. Developer Trent Overhue, through NSI6 LLC, challenged it in court; he testified he chose the county because it has no planning and zoning. A temporary restraining order was granted on 8 September 2026, Overhue closed on a roughly 12-acre site on old Highway 65 on 9 September and began clearing it, and on 21 September 2026 the judge extended the restraining order while considering a preliminary injunction (see the separate litigation row). A preliminary injunction granted on 6 October 2026 in the NSI 6 lawsuit (row 767) bars the county from enforcing the moratorium until a final judgment.
Signed 10 August 2026; six months to 10 February 2027; enforcement enjoined 6 October 2026
672 Newark data center moratorium n.a. Newark NJ No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
otherThe Newark Municipal Council adopted Resolution 26-1288, a non-binding resolution of support for a temporary data center moratorium sponsored by North Ward Councilman Anibal Ramos Jr., which the city's Legistar record shows as adopted as of 9 September 2026; the resolution does not itself impose a moratorium, and SAVRN's moratorium tracker had recorded it as an enacted moratorium, which this record corrects. South Ward Councilman Patrick Council's ordinance for a one-year moratorium on applications, permits and certificates of occupancy for data centers over 5,000 sq ft was introduced but returned to the administration so it can first be referred to the Central Planning Board for review; Patch reported on 29 September 2026 that it is still moving through that process.
Resolution of support adopted as of 9 September 2026 (Legistar); moratorium ordinance introduced and returned for Planning Board referral; not adopted as of 29 September 2026
673 Allentown data center moratorium n.a. Allentown PA No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumAllentown, Pennsylvania, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated August 2026. Allentown Ordinance 15-8508 on data center zoning: Bill 52 Amending Part II General Legislation, Chapter 660 Zoning, Article 5 Uses, Table 660-4 Use Table and Section 660-38 Manufacturing & Industry Group, adding public notice requirements and amendin Status Passed as of 2026-08-05.
Enacted August 2026
674 West Haven data center moratorium n.a. West Haven CT No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumWest Haven, Connecticut, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated January 2026. City Council unanimously approved a 12-month moratorium on establishment and development of data centers; proposed by Mayor Dorinda Borer; defines data centers as facilities primarily used for storage, processing, and distribution of digital data; exempts incidental server rooms; city to review zoning and licensing rules. The measure runs to 8 June 2027.
Enacted January 2026
675 Anchorage data center moratorium n.a. Anchorage AK No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumAnchorage, Alaska, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated March 2026. AO 2026-27: defines data centers (20+ MW) in zoning code, restricts to commercial/industrial zones, bans from residential, requires conditional use review, utility capacity statement, landscaping buffers and enclosed power equipment. The measure has no end date by design.
Enacted March 2026
676 New Castle County data center moratorium n.a. New Castle County DE No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumNew Castle County, Delaware, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated March 2026. Council voted 12-0 for zoning regulations: 1,000-foot residential buffer (500 ft with noise study), closed-loop cooling required, energy-efficient backup generators, decommissioning funds; existing projects exempt. The measure has no end date by design.
Enacted March 2026
677 Canterbury data center moratorium n.a. Canterbury NH No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumCanterbury, New Hampshire, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated March 2026. Voters approved zoning amendment banning data centers in all zones, 322-63; Planning Board proposed marking 'Data Centers' as 'Not Allowed' in every zone. The measure has no end date by design.
Enacted March 2026
678 Rochester data center moratorium n.a. Rochester NH No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumRochester, New Hampshire, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated September 2026. City Council enacted ordinance prohibiting data centers in every zoning district except Recycling Industrial zone (conditional use permit required); Waste Management owns most land in that zone, making construction effectively impossible. Two hours of resident testimony at Aug 18 public hearing. The measure has no end date by design.
Enacted September 2026
679 Madison County data center moratorium n.a. Madison County GA No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumMadison County, Georgia, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated January 2025. One-year moratorium on construction and permitting of large-scale data centers; unanimous vote; extended 180 days as of 1 September 2026. The measure has no documented term.
Enacted January 2025
680 Decatur County data center moratorium n.a. Decatur County GA No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumDecatur County, Georgia, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated April 2026. Indefinite moratorium on data center development; commissioners want to have a plan ready before any proposals arrive. The measure has no documented term.
Enacted April 2026
681 Hart County data center moratorium n.a. Hart County GA No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumHart County, Georgia, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated January 2026. 180-day moratorium on data centers; unanimous vote; insufficient information on potential impacts on local resources and environment. The measure has no documented term.
Enacted January 2026
682 Franklin County data center moratorium n.a. Franklin County GA No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumFranklin County, Georgia, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated September 2026. Moratorium on data center activities in unincorporated areas through 31 December 2028; unanimous vote; longest moratorium in Georgia. The measure runs to 31 December 2028.
Enacted September 2026
683 Athens data center moratorium n.a. Athens TX No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumAthens, Texas, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated August 2026. City Council voted 3-2 to permanently ban data centers within city limits. Defines data center as any facility over 500 sq ft used primarily to house servers. Not a moratorium. a standing zoning ban. The measure has no end date by design and applies at a threshold of 500 sq ft.
Enacted August 2026
684 El Paso data center moratorium n.a. El Paso TX No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumEl Paso, Texas, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated January 2026. Council unanimously approved data center policy: 300-ft buffer from residential/ecological sites, special use permit, no more tax breaks. Developers must submit resource use, emissions, noise, and water treatment plans. The measure has no end date by design.
Enacted January 2026
685 Lewisville data center moratorium n.a. Lewisville TX No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumLewisville, Texas, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated January 2026. Council voted unanimously to require Special Use Permit for data centers; banned in all residential areas. Each proposal needs two public hearings. The measure has no end date by design.
Enacted January 2026
686 Milam County data center moratorium n.a. Milam County TX No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumMilam County, Texas, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated January 2026. Resolution calling for stricter statewide standards on data centers: public disclosure of electrical demand, water consumption, cooling technologies, and infrastructure impact. Non-binding. The measure has no documented term.
Enacted January 2026
687 Princeton data center moratorium n.a. Princeton TX No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumPrinceton, Texas, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated January 2026. City amended regulations to require a Specific Use Permit for data centers, updated definitions, and established per-project public review. The measure has no end date by design.
Enacted January 2026
688 Crossville data center moratorium n.a. Crossville TN No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumCrossville, Tennessee, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated August 2026. Two-year moratorium on data centers and high-density computing, passed on third reading; halts new permits for server farms and crypto mining. Mayor chose moratorium over permanent ban to avoid lawsuits. The measure runs to 12 August 2028 and covers new applications.
Enacted August 2026
689 Loudon County data center moratorium n.a. Loudon County TN No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumLoudon County, Tennessee, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated January 2026. Six-month moratorium on new data centers with 50+ MW peak demand; covers permits, zoning, building approvals, utility extensions, and development agreements. The measure runs to 30 December 2026.
Enacted January 2026
690 Maury County data center moratorium n.a. Maury County TN No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumMaury County, Tennessee, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated January 2026. 12-month moratorium on data centers in unincorporated areas; 24-month amendment rejected on county attorney advice. Hard end date 19 July 2027. The measure runs to 19 July 2027.
Enacted January 2026
691 Ashwaubenon data center moratorium n.a. Ashwaubenon WI No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumAshwaubenon, Wisconsin, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated January 2026. 12-month moratorium on hyperscale data centers (>100,000 sq ft and >20 MW); Plan Commission voted 7-0. The measure runs to 2 June 2027 and applies at a threshold of 100,000 sq ft.
Enacted January 2026
692 Grant County data center moratorium n.a. Grant County WI No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumGrant County, Wisconsin, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated January 2026. Board of Supervisors voted 15-0 for 12-month moratorium on hyperscale data center zoning permits in unincorporated areas. Related to collapsed $1B data center proposal. The measure runs to 18 June 2027.
Enacted January 2026
693 Monroe County data center moratorium n.a. Monroe County WI No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumMonroe County, Wisconsin, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated January 2026. 18-month moratorium on medium/large data centers and all battery storage; passed 10-3. Small-scale DCs (<500 kW, no crypto) exempt. Environmental concerns include trout streams in driftless area. The measure runs to 21 January 2028 and applies at a threshold of 500 kW.
Enacted January 2026
694 Shawano County data center moratorium n.a. Shawano County WI No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumShawano County, Wisconsin, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated January 2026. 12-month moratorium on data centers in unincorporated towns under county zoning; does not affect cities, villages, or self-zoning towns. The measure runs to 24 June 2027.
Enacted January 2026
695 Oneida County data center moratorium n.a. Oneida County WI No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumOneida County, Wisconsin, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated August 2026. 1-year moratorium on data centers; unanimous vote; preemptive action with no known proposals. Excludes un-zoned areas of Sugar Camp, Monico, Enterprise, and City of Rhinelander. The measure runs to 19 August 2027.
Enacted August 2026
696 Town of Beetown data center moratorium n.a. Town of Beetown WI No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumTown of Beetown, Wisconsin, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated May 2026. Interim zoning ordinance blocking large data centers. Grant County; related to collapsed $1B data center proposal. The measure has no documented term.
Enacted May 2026
697 Collier County data center moratorium n.a. Collier County FL No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumCollier County, Florida, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated January 2026. Zoning-in-progress measure preventing new data center applications while county develops regulations. The measure runs until a condition is met rather than to a date.
Enacted January 2026
698 Wicomico County data center moratorium n.a. Wicomico County MD No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumWicomico County, Maryland, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated August 2026. County Council unanimously imposed a 1-year moratorium on construction of data centers. The measure runs to 6 August 2027.
Enacted August 2026
699 Butler Township data center moratorium n.a. Butler Township PA No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumButler Township, Pennsylvania, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated May 2026. 180-day curative amendment moratorium on data center applications; proposing 2,000-foot residential setback. The measure runs to 8 November 2026.
Enacted May 2026
700 Little Britain Township data center moratorium n.a. Little Britain Township PA No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumLittle Britain Township, Pennsylvania, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated January 2026. 180-day moratorium on data center applications while developing zoning ordinance. The measure runs to 6 December 2026.
Enacted January 2026
701 Smithfield Township data center moratorium n.a. Smithfield Township PA No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumSmithfield Township, Pennsylvania, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated May 2026. Curative amendment process pausing data center applications for 180 days; adopted new H-1 Heavy Industrial zoning on Aug 12, completing moratorium early. The measure runs to 2 November 2026.
Enacted May 2026
702 Buchanan County data center moratorium n.a. Buchanan County IA No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumBuchanan County, Iowa, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated January 2026. Temporary moratorium on data centers. The measure has a stated duration whose end date is not recorded.
Enacted January 2026
703 Scott County data center moratorium n.a. Scott County KY No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumScott County, Kentucky, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated March 2026. Fiscal court approves six-month moratorium to allow time for siting ordinance and zoning changes; proactive, no DC currently proposed. The measure runs to 13 September 2026. On Thursday 24 September 2026 the Scott County Fiscal Court voted to extend the moratorium, which was set to expire in December, until March so the Georgetown-Scott County Planning Commission can finish data center rules.
Enacted March 2026; extended 24 September 2026 to March 2027
704 Avon Lake data center moratorium n.a. Avon Lake OH No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumAvon Lake, Ohio, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated June 2026. Ordinance 26-60, an emergency measure effective on the mayor's approval Jun 23 and running through 22 June 2027, extendable once by up to six months. Bars consideration, approval or authorization of any data center as a permitted, conditional or accessory use, including zoning permits, building permits and certificates of occupancy, and tolls the clock on pending applications so nothing is approved by default. Excludes a data center incidental to a permitted principal use. Section 4 bars any data-center zoning framework reaching council until the city completes fiscal, infrastructure and community-impact analyses and at least two publicly noticed hearings. The measure runs to 22 June 2027 and covers permits.
Enacted June 2026
705 Plain Township (Stark Co.) data center moratorium n.a. Plain Township (Stark Co.) OH No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumPlain Township (Stark Co.), Ohio, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated March 2026. 12-month moratorium on data center permits. Third Stark County jurisdiction to freeze (after Canton Township and Massillon). Concerns over noise, electricity, water, and aesthetics. The measure runs to 24 March 2027.
Enacted March 2026
706 Archbold data center moratorium n.a. Archbold OH No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumArchbold, Ohio, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated April 2026. Emergency resolution, 6-month moratorium on data centers, advanced manufacturing, and technology storage facilities. Passed 5-0. Extended another 6 months to ~April 2027 due to uncertainty around HB 646 and state study commission. The measure has a stated duration whose end date is not recorded.
Enacted April 2026
707 Webster Township data center moratorium n.a. Webster Township MI No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumWebster Township, Michigan, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated January 2026. Ordinance 26-02: 1-year moratorium on data centers and battery energy storage systems (BESS). Washtenaw County township. The measure runs to 21 April 2027.
Enacted January 2026
708 Warrington Township data center moratorium n.a. Warrington Township PA No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumWarrington Township, Pennsylvania, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated January 2026. Resolution 2026-09: curative amendment under PA MPC Section 609.2. York County (not Bucks). Administrative pause since Mar 11; formally ratified May 13. The measure runs until a condition is met rather than to a date.
Enacted January 2026
709 Town of Westport data center moratorium n.a. Town of Westport WI No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumTown of Westport, Wisconsin, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated April 2026. 1-year moratorium restricting new data centers and telecom centers to max 10,000 sq ft; voted 4-1. Catalyst was QTS Data Centers proposal in nearby DeForest. Dane County. The measure runs to 6 April 2027 and applies at a threshold of 10,000 sq ft.
Enacted April 2026
710 Georgetown data center moratorium n.a. Georgetown KY No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumGeorgetown, Kentucky, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated July 2026. City council backs moratorium on data centers through end of year; directs Georgetown-Scott County Planning Commission to recommend zoning regulations. The measure runs to 31 December 2026. The Georgetown City Council voted unanimously on Tuesday 29 September 2026 to ask legal counsel to prepare an ordinance banning data centers and defining hyperscale data centers; the ban would also need Planning and Zoning Commission approval. Scott County extended its own moratorium to March 2027.
Enacted July 2026
711 Boone County data center moratorium n.a. Boone County Board of Commissioners IN One-year pause on new data center development in unincorporated Boone County, Indiana; no project megawatt or dollar figure attached
moratoriumThe Boone County, Indiana, Board of Commissioners unanimously approved an ordinance on Monday 15 June 2026 establishing a one-year moratorium on new data center development in unincorporated areas of the county, effective 16 June 2026 through 15 June 2027. The Boone County Area Plan Commission had recommended the moratorium by 6-0 votes on 6 May and 3 June 2026. The county said it will use the pause to study data center impacts while updating its 2009 Comprehensive Plan and 1998 Zoning Ordinance.
Approved unanimously 15 June 2026; effective 16 June 2026 through 15 June 2027
712 Butler County data center moratorium n.a. Butler County KY No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumButler County, Kentucky, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated June 2026. Fiscal court approves one-year moratorium; no DCs currently proposed. The measure runs to 26 June 2027.
Enacted June 2026
713 Pacific data center moratorium n.a. Pacific MO No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumPacific, Missouri, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated August 2026. Board of Aldermen unanimously approved 12-month moratorium on data center applications; followed opposition to proposed 500-acre data center near Crooked Creek Farm. The measure runs to 4 August 2027.
Enacted August 2026
714 Apple Valley data center moratorium n.a. Apple Valley MN No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumApple Valley, Minnesota, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated July 2026. One-year moratorium on new data center development; follows denial of 1M sq ft proposal. The measure runs to 9 July 2027.
Enacted July 2026
715 Oak Grove data center moratorium n.a. Oak Grove MO No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumOak Grove, Missouri, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated August 2026. Board of Aldermen enacted one-year moratorium on data center proposals; preemptive, no active proposals. The measure runs to 5 August 2027.
Enacted August 2026
716 Chesterfield County data center moratorium n.a. Chesterfield County SC No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumChesterfield County, South Carolina, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated June 2026. Ordinance 25-26-23 imposing moratorium on data centers, data processing, and crypto mining in unincorporated areas until 1 January 2028. The measure runs to 1 January 2028.
Enacted June 2026
717 La Conner data center moratorium n.a. La Conner WA No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumLa Conner, Washington, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated July 2026. Six-month moratorium on data center permit applications within town limits; no applications received; town reviewing whether any form of data center is appropriate. The measure runs to 29 January 2027 and covers permits.
Enacted July 2026
718 Bourbonnais data center moratorium n.a. Bourbonnais IL No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumBourbonnais, Illinois, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated June 2026. 180-day moratorium on data center applications; ~100 residents attended June 1 meeting raising concerns. The measure runs to 31 January 2027.
Enacted June 2026
719 Lincoln County data center moratorium n.a. Lincoln County WA No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumLincoln County, Washington, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated September 2026. Six-month moratorium on data centers and battery energy storage systems; covers facilities over 2,000 sqft or 2+ MW. The measure runs to 10 March 2027 and applies at a threshold of 2,000 sqft.
Enacted September 2026
720 Moses Lake data center moratorium n.a. Moses Lake WA No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumMoses Lake, Washington, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated January 2026. Moratorium on new data center development; listed by MRSC (WA state municipal research service) among cities with moratoriums. The measure has a stated duration whose end date is not recorded.
Enacted January 2026
721 Logan County data center moratorium n.a. Logan County IL No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumLogan County, Illinois, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated May 2026. 12-month moratorium (6-4 vote) on large-scale data centers; declared procedurally invalid by state's attorney June 18 for skipping ZBA advisory vote; county redrafting as of August 2026. Related to proposed $5B Hut 8 Logan Prairie Data Center. The measure runs to 19 May 2027.
Enacted May 2026
722 Lowndes County data center moratorium n.a. Lowndes County AL Moratorium responds to the proposed $1.5B Project Red Clay data center (1,050 acres)
moratoriumLowndes County, Alabama, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated August 2026. County commissioners unanimously approved 60-day moratorium on data center permits; response to proposed 1,050-acre "Project Red Clay" hyperscale data center; county lacks formal zoning authority, legal standing uncertain. The measure runs to 25 October 2026.
Enacted August 2026
723 Kickapoo Tribe of Oklahoma data center moratorium n.a. Kickapoo Tribe of Oklahoma OK No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumKickapoo Tribe of Oklahoma, Oklahoma, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated July 2026. Business Committee formally declared opposition to construction and operation of data centers on tribal lands; not compatible with long-term vision for sustainable development. The measure has no end date by design.
Enacted July 2026
724 Choctaw data center moratorium n.a. Choctaw OK No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumChoctaw, Oklahoma, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated July 2026. 12-month moratorium on data centers; preemptive, no developers had submitted plans; only one nay vote "out of principle". The measure runs to 21 July 2027.
Enacted July 2026
725 Kingman County data center moratorium n.a. Kingman County KS No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumKingman County, Kansas, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated February 2026. Resolution No. 2026-R9 imposing temporary moratorium on data centers in unincorporated county. The measure has no documented term.
Enacted February 2026
726 South Hutchinson data center moratorium n.a. South Hutchinson KS No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumSouth Hutchinson, Kansas, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated May 2026. One-year moratorium on large-scale data centers and battery energy storage systems; revised after original draft would have halted even small-scale container-sized data centers. The measure runs to 26 May 2027.
Enacted May 2026
727 Miami County data center moratorium n.a. Miami County KS No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumMiami County, Kansas, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated January 2026. Three-year moratorium restricting data centers, battery storage, and similar technologies in unincorporated areas; excludes Osawatomie's in-city Project Catalyst site. The measure has a stated duration whose end date is not recorded.
Enacted January 2026
728 Westbrook data center moratorium n.a. Westbrook ME No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumWestbrook, Maine, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated June 2026. 180-day moratorium on siting, permitting, construction and operation of data centers regardless of MW; unanimous vote. The measure runs to 28 November 2026.
Enacted June 2026
729 Rio Communities data center moratorium n.a. Rio Communities NM No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumRio Communities, New Mexico, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated August 2026. 365-day moratorium on uses not defined in the zoning code exceeding 20,000 sq ft in commercial, industrial, and manufacturing zones, 4-0 vote; prompted by CBRE marketing 365+ acres as premier data center development site; council also directed staff to draft data center zoning definitions. The measure runs to 26 August 2027 and applies at a threshold of 20,000 sq ft.
Enacted August 2026
730 Fallon Paiute-Shoshone Tribe data center moratorium n.a. Fallon Paiute-Shoshone Tribe NV No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumFallon Paiute-Shoshone Tribe, Nevada, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated May 2026. First tribe in Northern Nevada to ban data centers on tribal lands; resolution brought by tribal council secretary Philip Johnson. The measure has no end date by design.
Enacted May 2026
731 Pyramid Lake Paiute Tribe data center moratorium n.a. Pyramid Lake Paiute Tribe NV No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumPyramid Lake Paiute Tribe, Nevada, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated August 2026. Tribal Council passed permanent ban on data centers on tribal homelands; Chairman Steven Wadsworth cited water sovereignty and protecting endangered cui-ui fish. Part of Water Over Data Alliance tribal coalition demanding free, prior, and informed consent for data centers in Truckee River watershed. The measure has no end date by design.
Enacted August 2026
732 Wells data center moratorium n.a. Wells NV No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumWells, Nevada, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated June 2026. Small rural city (Elko County) approved moratorium on data center approvals pending staff recommendations. The measure has no documented term.
Enacted June 2026
733 Nehawka data center moratorium n.a. Nehawka NE No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumNehawka, Nebraska, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated August 2026. Indefinite ban on data centers, crypto mining, blockchain computing, and power plants to run them; first municipality in Nebraska to pass an outright ban. Cited as blueprint by residents of Union, Murray, and Plattsmouth. The measure has no end date by design.
Enacted August 2026
734 Buffalo Township data center moratorium n.a. Buffalo Township PA No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumBuffalo Township, Pennsylvania, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated August 2026. 180-day moratorium on data center development in Butler County township; supervisors voted unanimously. The measure runs to 8 February 2027.
Enacted August 2026
735 Hualapai Indian Reservation data center moratorium n.a. Hualapai Indian Reservation AZ No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumHualapai Indian Reservation, Arizona, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated August 2026. Tribal Council passed resolution opposing data center construction on reservation land, citing water scarcity on the Colorado River, light pollution, and wastewater concerns. Tribal sovereignty makes this effectively a ban on all reservation land. The measure has no end date by design.
Enacted August 2026
736 Clarksville data center moratorium n.a. Clarksville IN No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumClarksville, Indiana, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated July 2026. Permanent ban on data centers; town council updated ordinances to prohibit data center facilities. The measure has no end date by design.
Enacted July 2026
737 Palmyra data center moratorium n.a. Palmyra MO No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumPalmyra, Missouri, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated September 2026. City council approved moratorium on data centers; residents also petitioned for audit of city finances. The measure has no documented term.
Enacted September 2026
738 Fort Peck Reservation data center moratorium n.a. Fort Peck Reservation MT No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumFort Peck Reservation, Montana, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated August 2026. Fort Peck Tribal Executive Board (Assiniboine and Sioux) voted to ban all future discussions between tribal government and data center developers, effectively blocking development on the reservation. Chairman Floyd Azure said three companies approached in the past year. Primary concern is water contamination, 'Fort Peck historically struggled with acquiring clean, drinkable water.'. The measure has no end date by design.
Enacted August 2026
739 Morristown data center moratorium n.a. Morristown VT No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumMorristown, Vermont, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated September 2026. Selectboard unanimously approved two-year moratorium on data centers and 'high-impact uses', businesses consuming over 10 MW, 57,600 gal/day water, or emitting over 70 dB persistent noise, or adding over 10 acres impervious surface. Exempts small data centers for administrative/operational support. Third Vermont community to pass data center restrictions. The measure has no documented term, applies at a threshold of 10 MW and covers all data center uses.
Enacted September 2026
740 South Burlington data center moratorium n.a. South Burlington VT No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumSouth Burlington, Vermont, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated August 2026. Planning Commission amended Land Development Regulations to ban data centers with footprint exceeding 20,000 sq ft. Facilities under 5,000 sq ft classified as general commercial and exempt. Small-scale (5,000-20,000 sq ft) permitted in mixed industrial-commercial and industrial zones only. Adopted after Gov. Scott vetoed state-level H.727. The measure has no end date by design and applies at a threshold of 20,000 sq ft.
Enacted August 2026
741 Shelby County data center moratorium n.a. Shelby County KY No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumShelby County, Kentucky, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated July 2026. Fiscal court implements temporary moratorium on new data centers through 31 December 2026; assessing impacts on infrastructure, water, and emergency services. The measure runs to 31 December 2026.
Enacted July 2026
742 Minnetrista data center moratorium n.a. Minnetrista MN No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumMinnetrista, Minnesota, enacted a local data center moratorium or ban, recorded in SAVRN's moratorium tracker as dated August 2026. One-year moratorium and study on data centers; preemptive, no applications received. The measure runs to 3 August 2027.
Enacted August 2026
743 Hildebran 12-month data center moratorium (DigiPower X site) DigiPower X Town of Hildebran NC DigiPower X owns about 40 acres near a large electrical switchyard and plans about 75 MW in 2029 and another 75 MW in 2030, up to 150 MW; no dollar figure disclosed
moratoriumHildebran Town Council unanimously imposed a 12-month moratorium on development approvals for Critical Digital Infrastructure Facilities on 24 August 2026, after a public hearing, while town leaders study data center costs and benefits. The pause temporarily blocks DigiPower X's planned AI data center campus on about 40 acres near a major electrical switchyard; in a 14 August 2026 investor report the company said it was advancing development planning for the site, with about 75 MW planned for 2029 and another 75 MW for 2030. The town had replaced its cryptocurrency mining rules in March 2026 with a conditional zoning ordinance for critical digital infrastructure facilities, and residents presented a petition seeking a moratorium in July 2026
Moratorium adopted 24 August 2026; 12 months
744 Gary one-year data center moratorium (executive order) n.a. City of Gary IN Citywide; no project named
moratoriumMayor Eddie Melton signed an executive order on 16 September 2026 imposing a one-year moratorium on new data center development, covering data centers that directly or indirectly connect to or add demand on anything the City of Gary owns or provides. The city has no operating data centers.
Executive order signed 16 September 2026; one year
745 Statesboro data center rezoning (6539 Burkhalter Road) 4 AM Development LLC Bulloch County Superior Court / City of Statesboro GA About 27 acres, 99 MW, about 230,000 sq ft
litigationCity Council approved a 3-2 rezoning from R-4 to O for 4 AM Development LLC on 18 August 2026. On 17 September 2026 Coastal Communities United and 11 citizens filed a petition for review and request for declaratory judgment in Bulloch County Superior Court against the City of Statesboro and 4 AM Development LLC, the parcel's owner. The petition alleges the city disregarded its own procedures and state law, that the decision was arbitrary and capricious, and that it violated the petitioners' substantive and procedural due process rights under the Georgia Constitution; it also argues the 99 MW project sits one megawatt under the city's hyperscale definition. The Statesboro Herald reported on 2 October 2026 that an informal citizens group, Protect Statesboro, has started a petition drive for a referendum to repeal the city's Technological Facilities and Data Centers Ordinance (adopted 3-1 on 2 June 2026), separate from the court challenge. The developers have submitted a preliminary sound study and water use plan toward the special use permit, which requires another council vote. The planned building is two stories and about 230,000 square feet on roughly 27 acres.
Rezoning 18 August 2026; challenge filed 17 September 2026; repeal petition drive reported 2 October 2026
746 Project River ($11.3 billion campus) Wright family (land owned by Wright Brothers Construction; Wright Industrial Group per its president, Lukas Salyer) City of Cleveland TN 850 acres, up to 1,500 MW
pausedOn 18 September 2026 the developers asked the City of Cleveland to temporarily delay further action on Project River while they bring in third-party technical experts, after community backlash and while the city's PUD rules were pending. The family had accepted guardrails earlier that week. The same day the city said it was suspending all direct meetings on the project pending the independent engineering review and cancelled the special Planning Commission meeting set for Monday 21 September 2026. Also on 18 September the Southern Environmental Law Center sent a nine-page letter to the mayor, City Council and Planning Commission arguing the roughly 850-acre parcel does not meet the requirements of T.C.A. 6-58-118 for annexation, including contiguity and consent of an easement holder, and objecting to the 500 MW biomass and 1,000 MW natural gas plants. The land is outside Charleston's city limits, so Charleston's separate 12-month moratorium, adopted in response to this proposal, does not apply to it directly.
Pause requested 18 September 2026; city suspended meetings and cancelled 21 September Planning Commission meeting
747 Loop Road data center campus (Granville Township) PA Data Center Partners (Lewistown Development LLC) Granville Township Zoning Hearing Board PA 1.54 million sq ft, six buildings, 245.5 acres
under appealThe township returned the application as incomplete in July 2026 because it lacked a traffic study certification, and the developer appealed. The Zoning Hearing Board set the appeal hearing for 1 October 2026. The Granville Township Zoning Hearing Board postponed the 1 October 2026 hearing on the appeal by PA Data Center Partners (through Lewistown Development LLC) after a large crowd turned out, moving it to 26 October 2026 at the Granville Fire Co. Event Center. The proposed campus is six buildings and 1.54 million sq ft on about 245.5 acres on either side of the Mifflin County Industrial Park.
Application returned as incomplete July 2026; appeal hearing set for 1 October 2026, postponed that day to 26 October 2026
748 PAX-1 data center (Middlesex Township) Carlisle Development Partners Cumberland County Court of Common Pleas PA $15 billion, 700 acres
litigationResidents led by Kyler Gerber appealed the township's approval. Judge Matthew Smith heard arguments on Friday 18 September 2026 and is reviewing a 21,000-page record, with no ruling timeline announced. The project is under construction. On Tuesday 22 September 2026 Judge Smith denied the appellants' request to halt work while their appeal of the township's 6 May preliminary land development approval proceeds, writing that it does not appear from the record that the appellants have a strong likelihood of prevailing on the merits. The case was not dismissed and the judge will continue to take argument; a separate suit challenging the 2025 zoning map change remains alive, and a DEP permit appeal is pending before the Environmental Hearing Board. PennLive reports the project at full buildout would be 16 buildings with a maximum computing power of 1.35 GW. PennLive reported on 1 October 2026 that the five neighboring property owners filed a new motion asking the Cumberland County court to stay construction and further plan review. They argue that state law and township ordinances require a pause while their substantive validity (spot zoning) challenge to the May 2025 data center overlay, filed with the township zoning hearing board on 13 May 2026, remains pending because the board never acted on it; in the alternative they ask for a discretionary stay. The requested stay would not apply to a PPL substation planned on the site. No court date had been set on the motion. In a ruling on Monday 5 October 2026, Cumberland County Judge Matthew Smith declined to order construction stopped, finding that a mandatory stay applies only to hearings pending before the zoning board, but scheduled a hearing for 13 November 2026 on whether to grant a discretionary stay; at the same hearing he will consider whether the challenge is a frivolous appeal under Pennsylvania law. Township supervisors gave final approval to PAX-1 in September 2026.
Arguments heard 18 September 2026; stay denied 22 September 2026; mandatory stay refused 5 October 2026; discretionary stay hearing 13 November 2026
749 Montgomery County data center Sunshine Law suit n.a. Cole County Circuit Court MO No project size reported
litigationPreserve Montgomery County, LLC sued Montgomery County and the Missouri Department of Economic Development in February 2026 in an effort to halt the Amazon data center east of New Florence, alleging inadequate public notice and disclosure of water and electricity use and tax abatement terms. Cole County Circuit Judge Cotton Walker denied the defendants' motion to dismiss most of the case, finding the group has standing, but dismissed its claim that the department failed to monitor an American Rescue Plan Act grant agreement and removed the department as a party. The case continues against Montgomery County. KOMU dates the order Friday 18 September 2026; ABC17 dates it Monday 14 September 2026.
Suit filed February 2026; motion to dismiss largely denied and state dismissed as a party (order dated 14 September 2026 by ABC17 and 18 September 2026 by KOMU)
750 Sauk County 18-month data center moratorium n.a. Sauk County Board WI Countywide; no projects planned
moratoriumThe County Board approved an 18-month moratorium on new data centers 27-1 on 15 September 2026.
Approved 27-1 on 15 September 2026; 18 months
751 Tigerton data center moratorium Blake Simpson (proposal pending) Village of Tigerton WI Villagewide
moratoriumThe Village Board passed a resolution on 15 September 2026 for a one-year moratorium on data centers, or until zoning policies are set, while a developer proposal is pending.
Resolution passed 15 September 2026; one year
752 Elgin proposed one-year data center moratorium n.a. City of Elgin IL Citywide
otherAt its Committee of the Whole on 9 September 2026 the Elgin City Council voted 9-0 to advance a one-year moratorium on data center development proposed by Councilmembers Powell and Steffen; the same night's regular council agenda carried no data center item, and no final adoption vote had been posted as of 19 September 2026.
Committee of the Whole vote 9-0 on 9 September 2026; final adoption pending
753 Calexico permanent data center ban n.a. City of Calexico CA Citywide
moratoriumCity Council adopted a permanent citywide data center ban on second reading 3-0 on Wednesday 16 September 2026, adding Article XII to Chapter 17.11; it takes effect 30 days after adoption. It is the third such ban in California after Monterey Park and Coachella.
Permanent ban adopted 16 September 2026; effective 30 days later
754 Los Angeles County ban on large-scale data centers (unincorporated areas) n.a. Los Angeles County Department of Regional Planning CA Large-scale AI data centers; no threshold stated
moratoriumRegional Planning Director Amy Bodek used her authority on 17 September 2026 to immediately prohibit large-scale data centers in unincorporated areas while a permanent zoning amendment, to be brought by Supervisor Hilda Solis, proceeds. On Tuesday 6 October 2026 Supervisor Hilda Solis' motion directing Regional Planning to draft the permanent zoning amendment prohibiting large-scale data centers in unincorporated areas was referred back to her office, with no date set for its return to the board.
Effective 17 September 2026; no end date stated; permanent zoning motion referred back 6 October 2026
755 Iron County 180-day data center and solar moratorium n.a. Iron County UT Data centers, data center power plants and solar plants
moratoriumThe Iron County Commission unanimously adopted a 180-day moratorium on 26 May 2026 covering data centers, data center power plants and solar plants; it ends 22 November 2026 and cannot be extended. A replacement ordinance limiting water use, noise and light and raising permit fees goes to a Planning Commission hearing on 8 October 2026.
Adopted unanimously 26 May 2026; ends 22 November 2026
756 Orchard Hills data center rezoning (Trammell Crow) Trammell Crow City of Cheyenne WY 162 acres
otherThe Planning Commission recommended denial of the land-use map and rezoning amendments on 8 September 2026; the council held first reading and a public hearing without a vote on 14 September 2026, and the first annexation vote is set for 28 September 2026. On Monday 21 September 2026 the council's Public Services Committee recommended approval of the annexation and initial agricultural zoning on second reading, voted to amend the zoning map and to overrule the Planning Commission's denial of the future land-use map amendment, and postponed the land-use map item to align with the annexation process. The 162-acre site adjoins Meta's Cheyenne campus. The council did not take final action on 28 September 2026; Cowboy State Daily reported on 29 September 2026 that final votes on the 162-acre Orchard Hills annexation are scheduled for 12 October 2026. At the same 28 September meeting the council approved, 8-2 on third reading, the separate 1,260-acre Cox Ranch annexation and business park rezoning for a Skybox Data Centers and ViaWest Group data center. The Wyoming Tribune Eagle reported on 1 October 2026 that at the Monday 28 September 2026 meeting the council approved on second reading the annexation of the 162-acre site, its initial agricultural zoning and the change to light industrial zoning, and voted to overrule the Planning Commission's unanimous denial of the related future land-use map; the resolution changing the land-use designation was postponed to 12 October 2026 to align with the annexation.
Denial recommended by Planning Commission 8 September 2026; council approved annexation and zoning on second reading and overruled the commission 28 September 2026; final votes scheduled 12 October 2026
757 Remington Innovation Campus rezoning SDC Capital Partners (Ron Meyer); applicants include Supervisor Daron Culbertson Fauquier County VA About 182 of 210.7 acres; 2.2 million sq ft; 900 MW per the Piedmont Environmental Council
withdrawnThe applicants withdrew the rezoning application on Thursday 17 September 2026, hours before a Planning Commission work session; Ron Meyer of SDC Capital Partners emailed the withdrawal at 7:16 a.m. and the county confirmed it at 7:21 a.m. Lee District Supervisor Daron Culbertson is among the applicants. The 900 MW figure comes from the Piedmont Environmental Council, an advocacy group that recommended denial, and is not stated by the applicant.
Withdrawn 17 September 2026
758 Glassboro data center and battery storage ban (Ordinance 26-24) n.a. Borough of Glassboro NJ Boroughwide; all zoning districts
moratoriumBorough Council unanimously adopted Ordinance 26-24 at its 8 September 2026 public hearing, prohibiting data centers and battery energy storage in all zoning districts; the numeric vote count is not published.
Adopted 8 September 2026; permanent
759 Salt Lake County pause pending data center rules (unincorporated areas) n.a. Salt Lake County Council UT Countywide in unincorporated areas
pausedOn Tuesday 15 September 2026 the County Council voted unanimously for a resolution directing staff to draft data center rules for unincorporated areas; no new data centers will be considered until the rules are adopted, expected next spring, with a council review of the draft ordinance by mid-February 2027.
Resolution adopted 15 September 2026; rules expected spring 2027
760 Spartanburg County one-year data center moratorium n.a. Spartanburg County Council SC Countywide one-year freeze on new data centers larger than 65 MW; no project size, capital or capacity attached
moratoriumSpartanburg County Council voted 5-1 on Monday 21 September 2026 on third and final reading to adopt a one-year moratorium on new data centers, with Councilwoman Jessica Coker voting no. Council adopted four amendments before the vote. Applications for new data centers received after first reading are held in abeyance. Data centers of 65 MW or less may still be built if they are in an established industrial park or on a former industrial site, do not generate their own electricity except for emergency backup, have storing, managing and processing data as their primary function, and are not on the same parcel as, in the same industrial park as, or within one mile of another data center. The moratorium does not apply to data centers that received a development permit within the 12 months before adoption, so the Valara data center under construction on South Pine Street is not affected. Ancillary business server rooms and cryptocurrency mining, which is regulated separately, are also exempt. After adjourning on 21 September 2026, council reconvened without public notice and voted to reconsider third reading; the county then posted a slightly more restrictive summary, attributed the difference to a scrivener's error, and said council will formally re-adopt the online version at its October meeting. South Carolina Press Association attorney Jay Bender said the reconvening was an illegal meeting, so the version passed on third reading remains in effect.
Adopted 5-1 on third reading 21 September 2026; reconsideration vote the same night disputed; re-adoption planned for October 2026
761 Jasper County one-year data center moratorium n.a. Jasper County Council SC Proposed one-year pause on applications for data centers, data processing facilities and cryptocurrency mining in unincorporated Jasper County; no project size attached
otherJasper County Council approved first reading of a one-year moratorium on 8 September 2026, covering applications for rezoning, site plans, building permits and economic incentives for data centers, data processing facilities and cryptocurrency mining in unincorporated areas. After a public hearing on Monday 21 September 2026, the council voted unanimously to approve the moratorium; Bluffton Today reported that meeting as the second reading, with a third reading to be scheduled at a future meeting. Staff said current zoning allows data centers by right in several commercial and industrial districts, and the Planning Commission recommended approval on 11 August 2026 invoking the pending ordinance doctrine.
First reading 8 September 2026; approved unanimously after public hearing 21 September 2026 (second reading); third reading pending
762 Normal data center moratorium extension n.a. Normal Town Council IL Townwide pause on receipt, processing and approval of data center applications and permits; no project named
moratoriumThe Normal Town Council voted 6-1 on Monday 21 September 2026 to extend the town's data center moratorium, adopted in May 2026, through 31 May 2027; it had been set to expire 30 November 2026. Council member Andy Byars voted no. The moratorium pauses the receipt, processing and approval of data center applications and the issuance of permits. Staff said they were not ready to recommend regulations and cited possible state legislative action and coordination with the City of Bloomington.
Extended 6-1 on 21 September 2026; now runs through 31 May 2027
763 Galesburg 180-day data center moratorium n.a. Galesburg City Council IL Citywide 180-day bar on accepting data center permit applications; city says no applications are pending
moratoriumGalesburg City Council voted 6-1 on Monday 21 September 2026 to move the ordinance directly to final reading, with Ward 2 Council Member Wendel Hunigan opposed, then voted 7-0 to approve a 180-day moratorium on data center permit applications running through 3 April 2027. The city described the measure as proactive, said there are no pending applications, and cited expected state legislation.
Adopted 7-0 on 21 September 2026; 180 days, through 3 April 2027
764 Fayette County (Ohio) data center moratorium n.a. Fayette County Board of Commissioners OH Pause on data center applications, reviews, zoning approvals and permits in seven unincorporated townships; no project named
moratoriumOn Monday 21 September 2026 the Fayette County, Ohio, Board of Commissioners approved a data center moratorium running from 21 September 2026 through 1 June 2027. Commissioner Donnie Fleak moved the measure and Chairman Jim Garland seconded; Commissioner Tony Anderson was recorded as voting present in absentia, and two of the three commissioners signed the resolution that afternoon. It covers Concord, Green, Jasper, Madison, Marion, Paint and Perry townships and excludes Jefferson, Wayne and Union townships, which have their own zoning. The county zoning officer said no data center or farmland rezoning applications had been submitted. A county land use plan is expected in mid-2027.
Approved 21 September 2026; runs through 1 June 2027
765 Project Camellia Effingham IDA open meetings and open records suit OpenAI (Octans GA, LLC) Effingham County Superior Court GA 3.2 GW, 1,440 acres, 4.4 million sq ft per the complaint as reported by WTOC; WSAV describes a $20 billion project; nearly $900 million in tax abatements
litigationOn Monday 21 September 2026 the Southern Environmental Law Center filed suit in Effingham County Superior Court on behalf of One Hundred Miles, Inc. and residents Amy Collins, Robert Collins, Elizabeth Fisher, Crystal Hayes and Manjusha Sheobaran against the Effingham County Industrial Development Authority and OpenAI affiliate Octans GA, LLC. The complaint alleges violations of Georgia's Open Meetings Act and Open Records Act, including a July meeting rescheduled without required notice, an agenda listing only 'Project Gateway', discussion of the tax abatement in closed session, and the sale of roughly 1,440 acres to Octans without a public vote on terms. It asks the court to declare the abatement agreement and land sale documents void and to order release of the May and July purchase and sale agreements. This is separate from the 2 September 2026 zoning suit against the county (row 177).
Complaint filed 21 September 2026
766 Project MidSpan (Hiwassee River Industrial Park) SDCL Tennessee Propco LLC Bradley County Chancery Court TN About 306 acres; closest proposed building about 1,700 feet from Walker Valley High School; land bought 28 April 2025 for $19,904,950; capacity not disclosed (site has access to at least 300 MW per the complaint)
litigationSDCL Tennessee Propco LLC filed suit against Bradley County in Chancery Court on 17 September 2026, and County Mayor Gary Davis disclosed the project and the suit to the County Commission on Monday 21 September 2026. The company asks the court to declare invalid the data center rules commissioners adopted 14-0 on 20 April 2026, which allow data centers only in the I-2 district and require a 3,000-foot setback from homes, schools and churches, and to bar their enforcement against its site. It alleges the adopted version differed materially from the one reviewed by the Regional Planning Commission, lacked proper notice, violated the Open Meetings Act, and violates equal protection and due process. Davis said the county will defend the rules.
Suit filed 17 September 2026; disclosed 21 September 2026
767 Benton County data center moratorium lawsuit (NSI6 LLC) NSI6 LLC (Trent Overhue) Benton County Circuit Court MO About 12 acres; two buildings of about 20,000 sq ft each; no MW or dollar figure reported
litigationDeveloper Trent Overhue's NSI6 LLC sued the Benton County, Missouri, commissioners over the county's six-month data center moratorium signed 10 August 2026. A temporary restraining order was granted on 8 September 2026, and Overhue closed on the roughly 12-acre site on 9 September and began clearing land. At a hearing on Monday 21 September 2026 on a preliminary injunction to keep the county from enforcing the moratorium, the judge extended the temporary restraining order and urged caution about construction until a final decision. The county argues the moratorium is valid because the company was not formed until 13 August 2026, three days after the moratorium. On Tuesday 6 October 2026 Senior Judge Jacqueline Cook granted a preliminary injunction barring the Benton County Commission from enforcing the moratorium until final judgment, finding the ordinance relied on no findings or data that data centers pose a health risk and that NSI 6 has a sufficient probability of success. NSI 6 plans a data center on a 12-acre site at U.S. Route 65 and Dam Access Road in Warsaw. No further hearings were scheduled.
TRO granted 8 September 2026; extended 21 September 2026; preliminary injunction granted 6 October 2026
768 Wilmington campus (AWS) data center zoning initiative Amazon (AWS) Supreme Court of Ohio / City of Wilmington OH Citizen zoning initiative covering data centers citywide; AWS campus is 471 acres at about $4 billion per the site record
otherOn 18 September 2026 the Supreme Court of Ohio, in State ex rel. Kidd v. Clinton County Board of Elections, held that a citizen initiative to add data center regulations to Wilmington's zoning code cannot appear on the 3 November 2026 ballot because it would create a private cause of action, which a municipality cannot enact. Five justices joined the per curiam opinion, Justice Jennifer Brunner concurred, and Justice Patrick F. Fischer dissented. The initiative, filed by Quintin Koger Kidd and Susan Croutwater, would have set standards for noise, lighting, emissions, generator testing, water use and heat. The ruling removes a regulatory measure; it does not approve or block the AWS project.
Initiative kept off ballot 6-1 on 18 September 2026
769 Texas statewide halt on TCEQ permits for data centers pending ERCOT and TWDB audits n.a. State of Texas (Office of the Governor; Texas Commission on Environmental Quality) TX Statewide; covers all permits sought by data center projects from TCEQ, and the release says no state agency shall move forward with regulatory approvals related to data center development until the audit information is acquired. No MW or dollar figure stated
pausedOn 21 September 2026 Gov. Greg Abbott directed the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality to halt all permits sought by data centers until ERCOT completes its audit, in a letter to TCEQ Executive Director Kelly Keel. The governor's release says that because the PUCT, ERCOT and the Texas Water Development Board need the audit information to make informed decisions, no state agency shall move forward with regulatory approvals related to data center development until it is acquired. TCEQ must report on its compliance by Monday 19 October 2026. The directive follows the 3 August 2026 order for the PUCT and ERCOT to audit all data centers in ERCOT's interconnection process and the 14 September 2026 water-use reporting directive to the TWDB. Houston Public Media reported that the August pause reached only ERCOT connections of at least 75 MW, while TCEQ permits for river water use or on-site power plants now also stop, and that ERCOT and the TWDB are surveying more than 400 data centers for the audit. The governor also said he will work with the Legislature next session to eliminate financial incentives for data centers. The San Antonio Current reported on 29 September 2026 that Samuel Short, director of TCEQ's Air Permits Division, wrote in an email to Bastrop County residents that, at the direction of Governor Abbott, TCEQ has paused the issuance of all air and water permits and authorizations related to the construction or development of infrastructure directly supporting data centers while ERCOT completes its audit, that the Pacifico Energy campus near Cedar Creek (row 823) is on hold, and that TCEQ will give the Governor's Office a full compliance update by 19 October 2026. Public Citizen's Texas office told the outlet that TCEQ has previously said it lacks authority to halt all permits for an entire industry. At a stop in Hemphill reported on 29 September 2026, Abbott said new data centers must provide their own power and that local communities should have authority to decide whether to allow them; KTRE reported that state permits for two proposed Angelina County projects, AmpZ and Hyper Data Grid, remain on hold.
Directive issued 21 September 2026; TCEQ compliance update due 19 October 2026; runs until the ERCOT and TWDB audits are complete
770 Vantage Westover Hills data center campuses (Rogers Road and Omicron Drive) and VoltaGrid on-site gas plants Vantage Data Centers; VoltaGrid (power supplier) Federal court in San Antonio TX Two campuses near SeaWorld in the Westover Hills industrial area; co-located gas plants total 405 MW per the complaint, plus 151 backup diesel generators the plaintiffs put at 455 MW. No capital figure stated
litigationOn Monday 21 September 2026 the Environmental Integrity Project, the Sierra Club and Public Citizen filed a federal Clean Air Act lawsuit in San Antonio against Vantage and VoltaGrid over two Vantage data center campuses and the co-located gas-fueled power plants VoltaGrid built and manages. The groups allege the facilities should have obtained major source permits, with best available control technology, monitoring and public participation, before construction, instead of minor source permits, in an area that fails federal smog standards. The groups sent a notice of intent to sue in July 2026. The Rogers Road facility was partly operational before the first public hearing. The case is Public Citizen, Inc. and Sierra Club, Inc. v. Vantage Data Centers Management Company, LLC, Vantage Data Centers TX11, LLC, Vantage Data Centers TX21, LLC and VoltaGrid LLC, No. 5:26-cv-06032 in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas, San Antonio Division (Judge Jason K. Pulliam, referred to Magistrate Judge Elizabeth S. Chestney), filed under the Clean Air Act citizen suit provision. With the complaint the plaintiffs filed a motion for a preliminary injunction. On 29 September 2026 the Vantage entities and VoltaGrid each filed opposed motions for more time to respond to the preliminary injunction motion, and Vantage also sought more time to answer the complaint; answers had been due 14 and 15 October 2026. The TX11 entity named in the suit is a San Antonio registration, not the Vantage Frontier campus in Shackelford County.
Suit and preliminary injunction motion filed 21 September 2026; defendants' opposed motions for extension of time filed 29 September 2026; notice of intent sent July 2026
771 Sedro-Woolley six-month data center moratorium n.a. Sedro-Woolley City Council WA Citywide; no pending application, MW or dollar figure stated
moratoriumAfter required public hearings, the Sedro-Woolley City Council on 9 September 2026 passed six-month moratoriums on data center projects and on accepting permit applications for major utility developments. The council can renew or extend them while staff draft permanent regulations, including possible land use map and zoning code amendments, for Planning Commission review.
Adopted 9 September 2026 (reported 21 September 2026); six months
772 Dubuque six-month moratorium on hyperscale data centers n.a. Dubuque City Council IA Applies to facilities over 100,000 square feet, over 75 MW of electrical demand, using 50 gallons per minute or more of water, or with 5,000 or more servers; any one threshold triggers it
moratoriumThe Dubuque City Council approved a temporary six-month moratorium on hyperscale data centers, placing an immediate hold on large facility applications and utility requests while the city drafts permanent rules, after delaying action at an earlier meeting to refine the ordinance. The city attorney said the pause preserves the status quo while the city evaluates whether and under what conditions land proposed for hyperscale data centers could be annexed or connected to public utilities. Staff will complete water, energy and infrastructure studies during the six months, and the council can extend it.
Approved; reported by KCRG 21 September 2026; six months
773 North Mankato 12-month data center moratorium n.a. North Mankato City Council MN Citywide; no pending project, MW or dollar figure stated
moratoriumAfter a public hearing on Monday 21 September 2026, the North Mankato City Council unanimously adopted a 12-month moratorium on data centers, during which no new data centers may be built and the city will not accept, review, process or approve applications. The ordinance authorizes a study of local impacts and of how other communities regulate data centers, and can be renewed for another year. The council had tabled the item on 3 August 2026.
Adopted 21 September 2026; 12 months, renewable for one year
774 Marathon County 12-month data center moratorium (18 county-zoned towns) n.a. Marathon County Board WI Applies where data center operation is a primary use or data center floor area exceeds 5,000 square feet; no project, MW or dollar figure stated
moratoriumThe Marathon County Board approved on 25 August 2026 a zoning ordinance amendment imposing an at least 12-month pause on data center approvals in the 18 towns under county zoning. During the pause the county will not accept, process or issue land use, zoning or conditional use permits, or text amendments, for new data centers or expansions, while staff and the Environmental Resources Committee draft regulations; a progress report is due six months after passage. Previously issued approvals, ordinary maintenance and emergency actions are exempt.
Adopted 25 August 2026 (reported 21 September 2026); at least 12 months
775 Sabey Data Centers land purchase at Montana Connections Business Development Park, Butte Sabey Data Centers Butte-Silver Bow Council of Commissioners MT 606 acres the county agreed in 2025 to sell to Sabey; REC Silicon bought just over 627.8 acres for $1,255,606 ($2,000 per acre). No MW or project capital figure stated
terminatedButte-Silver Bow commissioners had agreed in 2025 to sell 606 acres at the Montana Connections Business Development Park to Sabey Data Centers and in February 2026 extended the closing deadline to 11 August 2026. During title work Sabey found that REC Silicon, a tenant at the park, held a 1996 right of first refusal over much of the land; REC notified the county in April 2026 that it would exercise it. On Wednesday 16 September 2026 commissioners voted 8-1 to approve selling just over 627.8 acres to REC Silicon, which says it is buying the land as a safety buffer with no immediate plans to develop or sell it. The Montana Standard reports there will be no development on the property once earmarked for Sabey in the near future. Neither source reports a formal cancellation by Sabey; the land sale did not close and went to the right-of-first-refusal holder
Sale to REC Silicon approved 8-1 on 16 September 2026 (reported 17 and 18 September 2026)
776 Marion County 12-month moratorium on large-scale data centers n.a. Marion County Board of County Commissioners FL Countywide pause on large-scale data centers; no project, MW or dollar figure attached
moratoriumThe Marion County Board of County Commissioners voted 4-1 at its 15 September 2026 Planning and Zoning meeting to place a 12-month moratorium on large-scale data centers, with Commissioner Kathy Bryant voting no. The county held a public workshop on data center rules on 21 September 2026, after which Ocala-News reported the county was likely to lower the moratorium threshold to 20 MW.
Adopted 4-1 on 15 September 2026; 12 months
777 Baltimore County data center moratorium (extended through 2027) n.a. Baltimore County Council MD Countywide pause on development plans and zoning petitions for data centers; no specific project named; no dollar or megawatt figure
moratoriumThe Baltimore County Council unanimously passed Bill 3-26 in January 2026, barring approval of development plans or zoning petitions for data centers until 1 January 2027 or 90 days after the Planning Board submits a required study report. On 22 September 2026 the council voted unanimously, with all seven members as sponsors, to extend the moratorium through 31 December 2027. An amendment to add battery storage facilities was withdrawn, with plans to introduce it as separate legislation.
Original moratorium passed January 2026 (Bill 3-26); extended unanimously 22 September 2026 through 31 December 2027
778 Panama City one-year data center moratorium (Ordinance 3313) n.a. Panama City City Commission FL Citywide pause on new large-scale data center proposals; no specific project named and no developers seeking to build, per commissioners
moratoriumPanama City commissioners approved a one-year ban on new large-scale data center proposals, giving staff 12 months to study impacts and develop permanent zoning rules; it does not apply to existing facilities or routine maintenance. The first of two required public hearings on Ordinance 3313 was held on 8 September 2026. This is a city action separate from Bay County's six-month moratorium (row 459).
First hearing 8 September 2026; approved at the second hearing reported 22 September 2026; one year
779 New Haven 12-month data center moratorium n.a. New Haven Board of Alders CT Citywide pause on new data centers; exempts quantum computing and life sciences research facilities tied to the New Haven Quantum and Life Sciences Innovation Cluster; no data center bids received
moratoriumOn Tuesday 22 September 2026 the New Haven Board of Alders unanimously approved a one-year moratorium on new data centers, authored by Majority Leader Richard Furlow. City Plan staff will use the period to review zoning, under which data processing centers are otherwise allowed as of right in light and heavy industrial zones and the transit oriented community zone. The city has not received any AI data center proposals.
Approved unanimously by the Board of Alders 22 September 2026; 12 months
780 Dearborn six-month data center moratorium n.a. Dearborn City Council MI Citywide pause on new data centers; no specific project named
moratoriumThe Dearborn City Council voted 7-0 on 22 September 2026, on second and final reading, to adopt a six-month moratorium on new data centers while the city writes permanent regulations. It is expected to take effect in October and run through the end of March 2027. Applications will still be accepted but forwarded to the legal department, and applicants will be told they must reapply.
Planning Commission recommended after 10 August 2026 hearing; first reading 8 September 2026; adopted 7-0 on 22 September 2026; expected effective October 2026 through end of March 2027
781 Raeden data center at former McLouth steel mill site (Gibraltar moratorium lawsuit) Raeden Acquisitions, LLC (with property owner CAL Realty, LLC) U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan MI Reuse of existing industrial buildings at the former McLouth steel mill site; Raeden's president told a March town hall it would initially require 100 MW
litigationRaeden submitted a site plan on 17 February 2026, and on 9 March 2026 the Gibraltar City Council unanimously adopted a one-year moratorium on data centers by resolution. Raeden and CAL Realty sued the city on 17 August 2026 in federal court (CAL Realty, LLC et al v. Gibraltar, 2:26-cv-12893), alleging the moratorium was adopted to defeat review of their pending application and seeking to have it declared invalid and the site plan approved. Law360 reported on 21 September 2026 that the city told the court the suit is premature.
Moratorium adopted 9 March 2026; suit filed 17 August 2026; city response reported 21 September 2026
782 St. Joseph County hyperscale data center ban process ("data center balance" resolution) n.a. St. Joseph County Council IN Would affect new hyperscale data centers in unincorporated areas; does not halt the Amazon (New Carlisle) and Microsoft (Granger) developments already underway
otherOn 22 September 2026 the St. Joseph County Council voted 6-3 for a resolution sponsored by Amy Drake directing the Area Plan Commission to define terms and draft zoning ordinance amendments to prohibit new hyperscale data centers in unincorporated St. Joseph County. Council President Bryan Tanner said the vote is an initiating action, not a ban. Council members Diana Hess, Mark Catanzarite and Dan Schaetzle voted no. WSBT reported the Area Plan Commission has 60 working days to return a recommendation to the council.
Resolution passed 6-3 on 22 September 2026; Area Plan Commission recommendation due within 60 working days
783 Zionsville one-year data center moratorium (also wind, solar and battery storage) n.a. Zionsville Town Council IN Townwide pause; no specific project named
moratoriumThe Zionsville Town Council approved a one-year moratorium on 21 September 2026 covering data centers, solar and wind farms and battery energy storage systems, and directed the planning department and Plan Commission to review the zoning code, which has no permitted land use for them. Council attorney Heather Harris said the pause was partly driven by neighboring actions, including Boone County's one-year data center moratorium in June.
Approved 21 September 2026; one year
784 Project Gravity data center campus (Archbald) Archbald 25 Developer LLC (formerly Western Hospitality Partners, Jermyn LLC); US Gravity Purchaser LLC Lackawanna County court PA Seven data centers on a 186-acre site between Eynon Jermyn Road and Business Route 6
litigationThe Valley View School District filed suit in county court on Friday 18 September 2026 against Archbald Borough, its council, Archbald 25 Developer LLC and US Gravity Purchaser LLC, arguing Project Gravity is not entitled to proceed under the borough's March 2023 zoning and must meet the November 2025 data center amendment, which limits data centers to four overlay districts that exclude the site. The district cites the campus's proximity to its schools on Columbus Drive and asks the court to rule that the developers have no vested rights under the legacy zoning. The Times-Tribune reported the suit could halt development of the seven data centers.
Complaint filed 18 September 2026; reported 22 September 2026
785 Brighton Township data center moratorium n.a. Brighton Township Board MI Townshipwide pause on new data center applications; no project proposed
moratoriumBrighton Township adopted a moratorium on new data center applications. Township Manager Brian Vick said it was a housekeeping item, with no project proposed, requested for a six-month period to review an ordinance that does not specifically mention data centers, following Michigan Townships Association guidance.
Adopted, reported 21 September 2026; six-month review period requested
786 Pima County 120-day data center moratorium (unincorporated areas) n.a. Pima County Board of Supervisors AZ Countywide pause on new data center projects in unincorporated areas; Project Blue and Project Gravel exempt
moratoriumOn Tuesday 22 September 2026 the Pima County Board of Supervisors voted 3-2 for a resolution barring new data center projects in unincorporated areas from moving forward for 120 days, with a possible extension, while the county writes zoning requirements and studies air, water, land use and cumulative impacts. An amendment limited it to projects that had not yet submitted permits, which exempts Beale Infrastructure's Project Blue and the proposed 160-acre Project Gravel south of Tucson. This is separate from the City of Tucson's August 2026 data center ordinance (row 337). On 28 September 2026 the Goldwater Institute, a libertarian legal advocacy group, sent the Board of Supervisors a demand letter asking it to rescind the moratorium immediately, arguing that Arizona law allows county moratoria only for a shortage of essential public facilities or a compelling need defined as a clear and imminent danger to public health and safety, and that the pause raises claims under the state's Private Property Rights Protection Act. The supervisors who voted against the moratorium had cited legal concerns. No lawsuit had been reported as of 30 September 2026.
Approved 3-2 on 22 September 2026; 120 days, extendable; Goldwater Institute demand letter to rescind sent 28 September 2026
787 Walls industrial rezoning of about 1,200 acres (possible data center use) n.a. Town of Walls Planning Commission MS About 1,200 acres, Agricultural Residential to M-1 Light Industrial
otherAfter a public hearing on 22 September 2026, the Walls Planning Commission voted to deny a request to rezone roughly 1,200 acres from Agricultural Residential to M-1 Light Industrial, which would have opened the land to possible data center construction. Residents cited proximity to Lake Cormorant schools, a historic site and the xAI plant in Southaven. The Board of Aldermen has the final say, and no date had been set.
Planning Commission denial 22 September 2026; Board of Aldermen vote not scheduled
788 El Dorado citizen initiative banning high-impact data centers and Tier 2 and Tier 3 battery storage for 10 years n.a. City of El Dorado; Butler County District Court KS Citywide 10-year ban question; no specific data center proposal pending
otherProtect the Heartland submitted a petition with more than 700 signatures to ban high-impact data centers and Tier 2 and Tier 3 battery energy storage systems in El Dorado, and the city sought a declaratory judgment that it was not a proper initiative, heard on 14 August 2026. A district judge ruled for the petitioners on Friday 21 August 2026, and the City Commission voted 5-0 at a special meeting on 25 August to place a 10-year ban on the November 2026 ballot. The Kansas City Star reported on 22 September 2026 that the judge ruled the vote's outcome will be binding.
Court ruling 21 August 2026; ballot resolution 5-0 on 25 August 2026; election November 2026
789 Commerce City six-month data center moratorium n.a. Commerce City City Council CO Citywide; no new data center applications accepted
moratoriumOn Monday 21 September 2026 the Commerce City City Council voted 7-1 for a six-month moratorium barring acceptance of new data center applications while the city writes rules; Council Member Rocky Teter voted no. It took effect immediately. The city currently allows data centers through a conditional use permit.
Approved 7-1 on 21 September 2026; six months, effective immediately
790 Thornton one-year data center moratorium (over 50,000 square feet) n.a. Thornton City Council CO Applies to data centers larger than 50,000 square feet
moratoriumOn Tuesday 22 September 2026 the Thornton City Council voted 5-3 for a one-year moratorium on new data centers larger than 50,000 square feet, effective immediately. The interim city attorney said the city has one data center operating and no pending applications.
Approved 5-3 on 22 September 2026; one year, effective immediately
791 Berthoud one-year data center moratorium n.a. Berthoud Board of Trustees CO Town-wide pause on data center applications
moratoriumOn Tuesday 22 September 2026 the Berthoud Board of Trustees voted 5-2 for a year-long moratorium on data center applications.
Approved 5-2 on 22 September 2026; one year
792 Loveland 12-month suspension of large-scale data center applications (10 MW and above) n.a. Loveland City Council CO Data centers with 10 MW or more of electrical demand or industrial-scale cooling
moratoriumOn Tuesday 15 September 2026 the Loveland City Council voted 7-2 to suspend acceptance, processing, approval, permitting, rezoning and site plan review of large-scale data centers with 10 MW or more of demand or industrial-scale cooling for 12 months, lengthened from staff's proposed nine months on a 5-4 amendment. It took effect immediately and can end sooner if regulations are adopted. The city has no data center applications, though a company has expressed interest.
Approved 7-2 on 15 September 2026; 12 months, effective immediately
793 Denver one-year data center moratorium n.a. Denver City Council CO Citywide pause on new data center construction; projects under construction continue
moratoriumOn Monday 18 May 2026 the Denver City Council unanimously approved a one-year moratorium on new data center construction while a working group of community advocates and experts recommends regulations. The city has about 50 data centers; projects already under construction, including one in north Denver, were allowed to proceed.
Approved unanimously 18 May 2026; one year
794 Jefferson County data center moratorium (to March 2027) n.a. Jefferson County Board of County Commissioners CO Freeze on new rezoning and development applications for data centers
moratoriumJefferson County commissioners froze new rezoning and development applications for data centers for 10 months, as reported by the Denver Post on 19 May 2026. Westword describes it as an extension of the county's moratorium to March 2027. Commissioner Rachel Zenzinger cited wildland-urban interface, water supply, environmental and public health concerns.
Reported 19 May 2026; 10 months, to March 2027
795 Longmont ban on hyperscale data centers over 100 MW n.a. Longmont City Council CO Data centers consuming more than 100 MW
moratoriumIn June 2026 the Longmont City Council approved a ban on hyperscale data centers consuming more than 100 megawatts.
Approved June 2026
796 Boulder County six-month data center moratorium n.a. Boulder County CO Unincorporated county; new data centers
moratoriumIn early June 2026 Boulder County enacted a six-month moratorium on new data centers.
Enacted early June 2026; six months
797 Project Jupiter force majeure notice (Oracle, Doña Ana County) Oracle (tenant); developer described by Bloomberg as a Blue Owl Capital unit (county records list BorderPlex Digital Assets and STACK Infrastructure) Contract between Oracle and the Project Jupiter developer NM About 1,400-acre Oracle-leased campus planned to come online in 2028; financed with about $18 billion of construction loans (see the financing record)
otherBloomberg News reported on 24 September 2026, citing people familiar with the situation, that Oracle sent a notice citing force majeure to the project's developer, which Bloomberg describes as a unit of Blue Owl Capital. The notice is intended to let Oracle put off payments if Project Jupiter is derailed and fails to come online in 2028 as planned, rather than to exit as the main tenant; Bloomberg said it is not certain the notice would release Oracle from its agreed financial obligations. Reuters, which carried the report, could not independently verify it, and Oracle and Blue Owl did not immediately comment. Oracle shares fell about 4 percent in premarket trading after the report, per Reuters. The notice follows the Financial Times report on 18 September 2026 that the roughly $18 billion of construction loans for the campus were quoted at 89 to 91 cents on the dollar, the New Mexico Supreme Court permitting stays (row 131) and the July 2026 denial of the Green Chile gas pipeline route (row 346). The Wall Street Journal reported on 25 September 2026 that Oracle delivered the notice earlier that week to Stack Infrastructure, the Blue Owl-owned developer, to push back the date at which it pays full rent; the lease, on hell-or-high-water terms per people familiar with it, lets Oracle do so for up to three years, with the lease term extended correspondingly. The first phase had been expected in the third quarter of 2028. Oracle said Project Jupiter remains on its planned schedule and that such notices are commonplace; Blue Owl said the notice does not change the financial commitments. The WSJ also reported that Oracle removed one of its land and power partners, identified by the Daily Caller as BorderPlex Digital Assets, and that about 20 banks provided $18 billion of construction financing with Blue Owl funds contributing about $3 billion of equity. A New Mexico Environment Department spokesman told the Daily Caller News Foundation that no replacement hearing officer had been appointed for the air permit and that 23 November 2026 remains the department's decision deadline. ENR reported on 28 September 2026 that Oracle sent the force majeure notice on 24 September; Oracle Vice President Michael Egbert said in a written statement that Project Jupiter remains on its planned schedule and that such notices do not, by themselves, establish a project delay or change delivery expectations. STACK said it, Blue Owl and Oracle remain fully aligned, and Bloom Energy said Oracle remains committed to its 2.4 GW fuel-cell contract. Oracle said more than 3,600 construction workers are on the campus. The 2,462 MW Yucca Growth Infrastructure fuel-cell microgrid still awaits its NMED air permit (decision deadline 23 November 2026) and the supply pipeline's reported in-service target is February 2027. In a joint statement on 30 September 2026, during flooding across southern New Mexico, Oracle and STACK Infrastructure said floodwater reached the Project Jupiter campus but no critical infrastructure was damaged, and Oracle said the planned timeline is unchanged (American Bazaar, single outlet).
Notice delivered the week of 21 September 2026 and reported 24 September 2026; WSJ detail 25 September 2026; NMED air permit decision deadline 23 November 2026
798 St. Bernard 12-month data center moratorium (former P&G Ivorydale site proposal) CAI Investments (property owner of the Ivorydale proposal) Village of St. Bernard Council OH Village-wide 12-month pause; pending proposal is a 150,000 sq ft, 24 MW data center at the former St. Bernard Soap Co. building in Ivorydale
moratoriumSt. Bernard Village Council voted unanimously on Thursday 24 September 2026 to approve a 12-month moratorium on data centers, effective immediately, so officials can study infrastructure, utility capacity and zoning. The village will not process new applications. A proposal by CAI Investments for a 150,000 sq ft, 24 MW data center at the former Procter & Gamble Ivorydale building will still get a Board of Zoning Appeals hearing because it applied before the moratorium; the owner's attorney called the moratorium a targeted response to that proposal.
Approved 24 September 2026; 12 months, effective immediately
799 Americus 30-day data center moratorium n.a. Americus City Council GA Citywide 30-day moratorium while an ordinance amendment is drafted
moratoriumThe Americus City Council voted 5-1 to enact a 30-day moratorium on data centers to allow time to craft an ordinance amendment regulating them. Council Member Frank Ceresoli voted against. The Americus Times-Recorder reported the vote on 24 September 2026; the meeting date is not stated in the article.
Reported 24 September 2026; 30 days
800 Troy data processing center moratorium (extended) n.a. Troy City Council IL Citywide moratorium on data processing centers; first six months from 16 March 2026, extended six months
moratoriumThe Troy City Council approved a six-month moratorium on data processing centers on 16 March 2026 while the city rewrites its ordinance. At its 21 September 2026 meeting the council approved another six-month moratorium, extending the pause until March 2027, so the city can see what the Illinois legislature does in its fall veto session and with Senate Bill 25. The city attorney considers six-month moratoriums more defensible than a 12-month ban.
Adopted 16 March 2026; extended 21 September 2026 to March 2027
801 Greenfield one-year data center moratorium n.a. Greenfield City Council MA Citywide one-year moratorium; council may extend by 180 days
moratoriumGreenfield City Council voted unanimously by roll call on Wednesday 16 September 2026 to adopt a one-year moratorium on data centers, brought by Precinct 7 Councilor Sarah Bolduc. The Planning Board will review zoning and research impacts on public safety, infrastructure, wildlife and natural resources. If the Planning Board has not produced recommendations within the year, the council may extend the moratorium by 180 days.
Adopted 16 September 2026; one year, extendable 180 days
802 Rubix 2 GW data center, former AK Steel Ashland Works (Russell moratorium) Rubix Data Centers (Submer Group) City of Russell KY 2 GW proposed on a roughly 500-acre brownfield (about 300 acres in Russell); $55 million purchase agreement with Cleveland-Cliffs
delayedRussell and Boyd County each have six-month moratoriums on data center construction that run to the end of 2026; Russell's 180-day moratorium expires in December. Rubix, which has a $55 million agreement to buy the former AK Steel Ashland Works from Cleveland-Cliffs for a 2 GW facility, needs Russell to lift its moratorium before closing. Cleveland-Cliffs moved the closing deadline from 31 August to 25 September and then to 15 October 2026 to give Russell time to adopt zoning rules; city officials said zoning will come first.
Russell moratorium passed June 2026, expires December 2026; closing deadline extended to 15 October 2026 (reported 26 September 2026)
803 Hyperscale data center and natural gas plant on BLM land near Henderson (Paradise Hills area) Skylar Opportunities LLC (affiliate of Skylar Capital Management) Bureau of Land Management / City of Henderson NV 1,000 MW data center with natural gas plant on 680 acres of federal land; the November 2025 application estimated construction at $1.5 billion to $2 billion (range, so capital_usd_m left null)
withdrawnA Texas-based developer canceled a proposed 1,000 MW hyperscale data center and natural gas plant on 680 acres of BLM land near the southeastern tip of Henderson, close to the Paradise Hills community. In a statement on Thursday 24 September 2026 the developer said it had consulted with the city and BLM and withdrew its application because of the city's planned urban development in the same area. Skylar Opportunities LLC is an affiliate of Skylar Capital Management, the company behind the Boulder City Townsite project on BLM land (row 180).
Application filed November 2025; withdrawal announced 24 September 2026
804 Microsoft Highlands data center campus annexation (about 3,460 acres, south Cheyenne) Microsoft Laramie County District Court / City of Cheyenne WY About 3,460 acres annexed in July 2026 for a proposed 2.7 GW campus (Cowboy State Daily); no dollar figure stated
litigationLaramie County homeowner Heather Madrid Donis filed two petitions in Laramie County District Court in September 2026 challenging the city's approval of the roughly 3,460-acre annexation for Microsoft's proposed 2.7 GW Highlands campus. One, filed 3 September, asks the court to void the 13 July annexation because the ordinance names U.S. Sen. Cynthia Lummis as landowner although Microsoft said it closed on the property 26 June; the other alleges the council violated the Open Meetings Act on 10 August when, after an executive session, it voted 8-1 to seek a court ruling on whether the annexation is subject to a referendum instead of acting on a petition with more than 3,000 signatures. The city declined to comment on ongoing litigation.
Annexation approved 13 July 2026; petitions filed September 2026 (one on 3 September); reported 25 September 2026
805 Project Blue energy service agreement with Tucson Electric Power (rehearing suit) Project Blue developers; Tucson Electric Power counterparty Maricopa County Superior Court / Arizona Corporation Commission AZ 10-year energy service agreement between TEP and Project Blue; no MW or dollar figure stated in the source
litigationArizona Attorney General Kris Mayes sued to force a rehearing of the 10-year energy service agreement between Tucson Electric Power and Project Blue about a month after the Arizona Corporation Commission approved it in December 2025, arguing the city of Tucson and others were denied due process, cost-shifting risks were ignored and the contract lets TEP and Project Blue set future rates without commission approval. Judge Randall H. Warner heard another round of arguments on 24 September 2026, discussed adding a stipulation making commission approval of rate changes explicit, and did not rule on the rehearing request.
ACC approval December 2025; suit filed about a month later; hearing 24 September 2026, no ruling
806 Woodbury one-year data center moratorium n.a. Woodbury City Council MN Citywide; covers new data centers and expansion beyond existing approvals, plus the largest water and sewer users; no pending applications
moratoriumThe Woodbury City Council approved a moratorium on 23 September 2026 on new data centers and expansion beyond existing approvals, giving the city up to a year to study water use, electricity demand, noise and zoning. The ordinance blocks related rezonings, comprehensive plan amendments, conditional use permits, variances and applications, and the council broadened it to building, electrical and right-of-way permits. The city said it has no active data center applications; existing facilities include two IronGate sites and a Medtronic facility.
Approved 23 September 2026; up to one year
807 Winlock six-month data center moratorium n.a. Winlock City Council WA Citywide; no project named
moratoriumThe Winlock City Council unanimously enacted a six-month moratorium on data center development at a special meeting on Wednesday 23 September 2026. Mayor Victoria Marincin said the pause is meant to let the Planning and Park Commission draft updated commercial and industrial building codes covering water supply and noise, not to stop data centers entirely.
Enacted 23 September 2026; six months
808 Marshall County six-month data center moratorium (unincorporated areas) n.a. Marshall County Board of Supervisors IA Applications for data centers, AI computing facilities, data mining and cryptocurrency mining in unincorporated areas; no project named
moratoriumThe Marshall County Board of Supervisors voted 3-0 on Wednesday 23 September 2026 to adopt a resolution imposing a six-month moratorium on applications for data centers, AI computing facilities, data mining facilities and cryptocurrency mining operations. The final text removed the limit on how long the moratorium can be extended, and the Zoning Commission will hold monthly work sessions to draft an ordinance.
Adopted 23 September 2026; six months, extendable
809 Peosta data center moratorium (extended) n.a. Peosta City Council IA Citywide; no project named in the report
moratoriumThe Peosta City Council voted unanimously the week of 21 September 2026 to extend the city's six-month data center moratorium by six months, to 18 June 2027. The original moratorium, passed earlier in 2026, was due to end in December; Mayor Russ Pfab said leaders felt that timeframe was not long enough.
Original six-month moratorium adopted earlier in 2026; extension approved the week of 21 September 2026 (reported 25 September 2026); runs to 18 June 2027
810 Lubbock 90-day large-scale data center moratorium process n.a. Lubbock City Council TX Citywide; large-scale data centers; no project named
otherThe Lubbock City Council voted 5-2 on 22 September 2026 to adopt a resolution starting the process for a 90-day moratorium on large-scale data centers, after the Save Lubbock group's petition for an 18-month moratorium, which organizers said was not feasible under Texas law. Planning staff are to develop guidelines on water use, power reliability, zoning, noise and lighting while the ordinance is drafted, and a work session will be held within 90 days. The moratorium ordinance itself had not been adopted.
Resolution adopted 5-2 on 22 September 2026; moratorium ordinance pending
811 Google Project Cannoli county tax incentives and community benefits agreement (Van Buren Township) Google (Panattoni developer) Wayne County Executive MI 282-acre campus, about 1 GW; $125 million in township tax incentives approved in late May 2026
approved after delayOn 25 September 2026 Wayne County Executive Warren Evans vetoed the tax incentives and community benefits agreement the Wayne County Commission had approved for Google's Project Cannoli data center, saying Google pressed the county to act within about two weeks and the process did not allow public input or independent analysis. The veto covers the county incentive and benefits package, not the project itself. Commission Chair Alisha Bell called the package lucrative and said the commission would take it up again the following week. The township's final site plan vote is expected 14 October 2026. On 30 September 2026 Commission Chair Alisha Bell said the commission would take up the Project Cannoli agreements at its 1 October 2026 meeting, without saying what action it would take; overriding the veto of the $125 million in local tax incentives needs a two-thirds vote of the 15-member commission. The county had approved the packages on 15 September 2026. Van Buren Township's planning commission is scheduled to vote on final site approval in October. On Thursday 1 October 2026 the Wayne County Commission overrode County Executive Warren Evans's veto by 13-0, with two commissioners absent (FOX 2 Detroit), giving final county approval to the tax incentive and community benefits package. Commissioners said the vote was not an approval of the data center itself. The Van Buren Township Planning Commission is expected to review the final site plan on 14 October 2026.
Veto announced 25 September 2026; overridden 13-0 by the Wayne County Commission on 1 October 2026; township final site plan review expected 14 October 2026
812 AWS Hobart data center campus (Hobart Tech Park and Ewen Farm) fill permit lawsuit Amazon Web Services Lake Superior Court (suit against the Hobart Plan Commission and Common Council) IN 723-acre site: the 555-acre Hobart Tech Park parcel owned by AWS and the 168-acre Ewen Farm parcel to be leased by AWS; no dollar or MW figure in the fetched coverage
litigationFour Eagle Creek subdivision residents have sued the Hobart Plan Commission and Common Council in Lake Superior Court seeking a preliminary injunction to nullify the fill permit the Plan Commission approved, without findings of fact, for mass grading of the AWS site, aiming to restart the plat and site plan approval process. The city has moved to dismiss; a possible ruling on 22 September 2026 slipped when a plaintiffs' attorney could not appear, and an attorney conference was set for 30 September 2026. Grading continues meanwhile; the Plan Commission granted preliminary plat approval in May and tabled final plat approval on 4 September 2026.
Suit pending in Lake Superior Court (filing date not stated); court appearance postponed 22 September 2026; reported 27 September 2026
813 Janesville 12-month data center moratorium n.a. Janesville City Council WI Citywide 12-month pause on data center applications; the debate began over the former GM/JATCO site, where the council earlier declined to extend a letter of intent with hyperscale developer Viridian Partners
moratoriumThe Janesville City Council voted unanimously on Monday 28 September 2026 to approve a 12-month moratorium on data centers. The ordinance bars the city from accepting, processing, reviewing or approving data center applications, including rezoning requests, permits and annexation actions, while officials work on zoning and regulatory changes. Before the final vote the council removed recitals that referred specifically to the GM/JATCO site and the November referendum on that site, so the pause applies citywide.
Approved 28 September 2026; 12 months
814 Crestview large-scale data center ban (Ordinance 2033) n.a. Crestview City Council FL Citywide prohibition of large load centers in all land use categories; no data center had been proposed in the city
moratoriumThe Crestview City Council voted unanimously on Monday 28 September 2026 to ban large-scale data centers within city limits, adopting Ordinance 2033 on second reading after a public hearing. The ordinance removes large load centers from all land use categories in the city; it does not affect projects proposed just outside the city. Mayor JB Whitten described it as precautionary and said a later council vote could revisit it. Okaloosa County voted on 15 September 2026 to regulate rather than ban data centers.
Adopted 28 September 2026 (second reading); permanent ban
815 Lovejoy citywide data center ban n.a. Lovejoy City Council GA Citywide prohibition; follows the withdrawn Stillwater Development Panhandle Road proposal (3.5 million sq ft, 15 buildings, 1.25 GW at full build-out)
moratoriumThe City of Lovejoy approved an ordinance on Monday 28 September 2026 banning data center construction within city limits. The ordinance prohibits data centers, repeals an article governing special administrative permits and sets standards for high-density housing. It follows the fight over Stillwater Development's Panhandle Road campus near two schools, which the developer withdrew in August 2026 in favor of a residential plan. Lovejoy is not covered by Clayton County's moratorium.
Ordinance approved 28 September 2026; permanent ban; single outlet
816 Saco temporary data center moratorium n.a. Saco City Council ME Citywide temporary moratorium; no project named
moratoriumSaco enacted a 61-day data center moratorium in August 2026 to give staff time to write data center rules into the city code. On Monday 28 September 2026 the City Council voted to extend it by 60 days, to 28 November 2026. The city administrator said the city will likely keep extending it until the Maine Data Center Advisory Task Force reports in December.
Enacted August 2026 for 61 days; extended 28 September 2026 to 28 November 2026; single outlet
817 Wilderness Crossing mixed-use and data center rezoning n.a. Orange County Board of Supervisors; Orange County Circuit Court VA About 2,600 acres; up to 5,000 homes plus large-scale data centers; no MW or dollar figure disclosed
litigationThe Orange County Board of Supervisors approved the Wilderness Crossing rezoning in 2023, and the American Battlefield Trust, Central Virginia Battlefield Trust, Friends of Wilderness Battlefield and nearby homeowners sued the county that year. The Orange County Circuit Court partially denied the county's motion to dismiss in September 2025, letting parts of the case proceed. On Tuesday 29 September 2026 the board voted 5-0 to adopt a resolution acknowledging that ZA 18-05, the 2018 text amendment creating the Planned Development-Mixed Use district that the project relies on, was not initiated as Virginia Code 15.2-2286(A)(7) requires; the county said the resolution does not repeal the district or decide the validity of later land use actions, which remain before the court.
Rezoning approved 2023; suit filed 2023; motion to dismiss partially denied September 2025; board resolution on the zoning district defect 29 September 2026
818 Metered Mining (Metered North) data center conditional use permit, Village of Hammond Metered Mining Village of Hammond Village Board v. Village Board of Appeals (circuit court certiorari) WI Small-scale data center in the village industrial park next to the U.S. Army Reserve Center; no MW or dollar figure disclosed
litigationThe Hammond Village Board voted 5-0 to deny a conditional use permit for Metered Mining's data center, but the village Board of Appeals approved the permit with conditions on 8 June 2026. The village board then hired new counsel and filed a writ of certiorari in circuit court contesting its own appeals board's decision. Metered Mining intervened and has moved to strike letters from state Rep. Rob Kreibich, a village trustee and residents from the record, arguing review is limited to the appeals board record. St. Croix County's 12-month moratorium does not reach the village.
CUP approved by the Board of Appeals 8 June 2026; certiorari suit by the village board pending (filing date not stated); single outlet
819 Amazon Richmond County data center diesel generator air permits challenge Amazon (Duke Energy holds the temporary generator permit) North Carolina Office of Administrative Hearings (appeal of NC DEQ air permits) NC $10 billion Amazon hyperscale campus next to Duke Energy's gas plant; permits cover 588 Amazon backup diesel generators and 57 Duke temporary diesel generators
litigationNC DEQ issued two air quality permits on 28 August 2026: one to Amazon for 588 backup diesel generators and one to Duke Energy for 57 generators to power the data center temporarily until it is connected to the grid. The Southern Environmental Law Center, on behalf of the Richmond County Coalition for Justice and Black Empowerment, then filed two petitions with the North Carolina Office of Administrative Hearings asking that both permits be revoked, arguing that splitting the roughly 645 generators into two permits evades Clean Air Act requirements; SELC cites a Duke and Amazon contract giving Amazon some control over when Duke's generators run. DEQ has said the permits serve different purposes on different time horizons and belong to different companies.
Air permits issued 28 August 2026; SELC contested case petitions filed Friday 25 September 2026 (News & Observer, 26 September 2026); pending
820 Port Huron Township data center moratorium n.a. Port Huron Township Board MI Townwide pause on new applications for data centers and other high-demand power users; no applications on file
moratoriumThe Port Huron Township Board unanimously passed a temporary moratorium blocking new applications for data centers and other high-demand power users while it writes rules on noise, lighting and safety. Officials said no applications are on file. The pause lasts up to 12 months or until permanent zoning rules take effect, and the board may extend it.
Adopted the week of 21 September 2026 (reported by the Times Herald 22 September and WGRT 24 September 2026); up to 12 months
821 Sterling 180-day data center and battery storage application moratorium n.a. Sterling City Council IL Citywide 180-day moratorium on processing and approving applications for data centers and battery energy storage systems; no data center request received
moratoriumThe Sterling City Council voted unanimously on 7 September 2026 to impose a 180-day moratorium on processing and approving applications for data centers and battery energy storage systems while the Plan Commission drafts rules. City officials said Sterling, a non-home-rule municipality, cannot permanently ban a lawful business, and that it has had inquiries from battery storage companies but none from data center developers.
Adopted unanimously 7 September 2026; 180 days; single fetchable outlet
822 Mesa County 12-month data center moratorium (unincorporated areas) n.a. Mesa County Board of County Commissioners CO Countywide in unincorporated Mesa County; no project named. The county says it has no pending data center applications
moratoriumMesa County commissioners unanimously approved a 12-month moratorium at a public hearing on 29 September 2026, pausing the acceptance, processing and approval of land use applications for data center facilities in unincorporated Mesa County, effective immediately. The county says data centers are not addressed in its land use code, last updated in 2020, and the pause gives staff time to finish the land development code update and gather public input on data center regulation. The county has no pending data center applications.
Approved unanimously 29 September 2026; effective immediately; 12 months
823 Cedar Creek data center and gas plant campus (Pacifico Energy and BlackChamber Partners; Anthropic in lease talks) Pacifico Energy and BlackChamber Partners Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (statewide data center permit pause) TX 2,842-acre site; 710 MW site-rated on-site gas turbines supporting 490 MW of data center load (public documents per the site record). Pacifico proposes investing about $2.24 billion in the power facility per its Texas Comptroller JETI application (Community Impact, 15 July 2026); the data center investment is not disclosed. The San Antonio Current's '$2.2 billion hyperscale campus' refers to this power facility figure
pausedTCEQ Air Permits Division director Samuel Short told Bastrop County residents by email, as reported by the San Antonio Current on 29 September 2026, that the Pacifico project is on hold because TCEQ has paused all air and water permits and authorizations for infrastructure directly supporting data centers under Governor Abbott's 21 September 2026 directive (row 769). The campus's on-site gas plant air permit was pending. The pause runs until the ERCOT and Texas Water Development Board audits are complete, with a TCEQ compliance update due 19 October 2026. Anthropic is reported to be in lease talks for the campus; no lease has been finalized.
TCEQ email confirming the hold reported 29 September 2026 (single outlet); runs until the ERCOT and TWDB audits are complete, TCEQ compliance update due 19 October 2026
824 Project Open Sky data center (Cloverleaf Infrastructure) Cloverleaf Infrastructure City of Piedmont OK About 633 acres off Richland Road requiring annexation and rezoning; the developer later secured options on additional land in neighboring Kingfisher County. No MW or dollar figure in the fetched sources
delayedOn Monday 28 September 2026 the Piedmont City Council postponed its decision on the rezoning for Cloverleaf Infrastructure's Project Open Sky for the fifth time in nearly five months, after Mayor Kurt Mayabb broke a 2-2 tie to continue the item because a council member was absent. The council had also delayed the vote two weeks earlier. Cloverleaf has expanded its offer of voluntary buyouts to homeowners within a quarter mile of the site, up from 500 feet, amid opposition from nearby residents. KOCO reports the council will revisit the zoning at its next meeting on 26 October 2026.
Fifth postponement 28 September 2026; next consideration 26 October 2026 (KOCO)
825 Serverfarm Clarksville data center bond ordinances referendum Serverfarm (SF ARK1 LLC) and Hatchbo LLC City of Clarksville / Clarksville voters AR $6.6 billion Serverfarm campus off Arkansas Highway 123 near Johnson Regional Medical Center; bond ordinances authorize up to $55 billion of taxable industrial revenue bonds (up to $50 billion to Hatchbo LLC, up to $5 billion to SF ARK1 LLC), an authorization ceiling, not project capex
otherOn Monday 28 September 2026 the Clarksville City Council, at a special meeting, unanimously called a special election on the two July 2026 bond ordinances for Serverfarm's data center after referendum petitions against each ordinance were certified with enough valid signatures (352 and 354 accepted of 425 submitted each). Voters will decide whether to approve or reject the ordinances, which carry a 65% property tax abatement structure; the vote is not directly on whether the data center can be built. Serverfarm said construction will continue during the referendum process.
Special election called 28 September 2026 for December 2026 (5NEWS: 8 December; KNWA: 1 December, pending Johnson County Election Commission approval)
826 Centre Wellington one-year interim control by-law on data centres n.a. Township of Centre Wellington Ontario Township-wide in lands zoned Industrial (M1), General Industrial (M2) and Industrial Business Park (M2.BP). Spur Innovation has pitched a data centre campus (10 MW first phase per the Wellington Advertiser) on the former Wolverine Tube site in Fergus but has filed no formal plan with the township
moratoriumCentre Wellington council approved an interim control by-law on 28 September 2026 temporarily prohibiting new data centres in the M1, M2 and M2.BP industrial zones for one year from that date, with a possible extension of up to one more year. The township will complete a planning study on grid, water and land-use impacts and expects to report back in the third quarter of 2027.
Approved 28 September 2026; in effect one year from 28 September 2026, extendable by up to one year
827 Amazon west Shreveport data center special-use permit (appeal) Amazon Louisiana Second Circuit Court of Appeal / City of Shreveport LA Site zoned I-1 light industrial within 200 feet of residential zoning; records cited by opponents show water use of up to 7.5 million gallons a day. No MW or dollar figure given in the fetched coverage
under appealOn Tuesday 29 September 2026 the Louisiana Second Circuit Court of Appeal heard opponents' challenge to the Shreveport City Council's unanimous approval of a special-use permit for an Amazon data center in west Shreveport, which the Metropolitan Planning Commission had initially denied. Opponents' attorney Clay Garside argued the council approved the permit without a detailed operational plan on noise, light and water impacts or a Louisiana DEQ water withdrawal permit; the city argued the application met requirements. The judges did not rule at the hearing.
Appeal argued 29 September 2026; no ruling yet
828 Bangor data center moratorium n.a. Bangor City Council ME Citywide ban on data center construction; staff proposed it after a Kratos AI developer approached the city in March 2026 about a possible data center; no MW or dollar figure disclosed
moratoriumThe Bangor City Council first approved a 180-day data center moratorium in April 2026, fast-tracked after a developer with San Francisco-based Kratos AI approached the city in March about building a data center. On Monday 28 September 2026 the council voted 8-0 to extend the moratorium by another 180 days so staff and consultants can draft zoning rules on infrastructure, environmental and neighbor impacts.
Adopted April 2026 for 180 days; extended 28 September 2026 by 180 days
829 Leominster one-year data center moratorium n.a. Leominster City Council MA Citywide; no data center proposal on file. A companion battery storage moratorium exempts two storage projects already underway
moratoriumThe Leominster City Council voted 8-0 on Monday 28 September 2026 to approve a one-year moratorium on developing data centers, together with a separate moratorium on battery energy storage sites; both are in effect until 31 July 2027. Council President Claire Freda, who introduced them, said the pause gives the city time to study impacts and prepare rules before any proposal arrives.
Approved 28 September 2026; in effect until 31 July 2027
830 Saginaw data center moratorium n.a. Saginaw City Council MI Citywide; no data centers in development in the city
moratoriumThe Saginaw City Council approved a moratorium on data center development spanning all of 2026 in January 2026 and directed staff to draft regulations. On Monday 28 September 2026 the council unanimously approved the resulting ordinance, which makes data centers special land uses in light and general industrial districts, requires reports on water, wastewater, energy and noise, sets 500-foot residential setbacks and a 55-decibel limit near homes, and takes effect 9 October 2026. The moratorium remains in place through the end of 2026.
Moratorium approved January 2026, runs through 31 December 2026; regulating ordinance approved 28 September 2026, effective 9 October 2026
831 Oregon charter amendment capping data centers at 25 MW (Vantage Data Centers project) Vantage Data Centers City of Oregon voters (3 November 2026 ballot); Oregon City Council OH About 213.8 acres for two or three data center buildings; first building expected to cost about $1.1 billion per the draft economic development agreement (WTOL); no MW figure disclosed
otherUnited Neighbors of Oregon gathered enough signatures to place a citizen-led charter amendment limiting data centers to 25 MW on the 3 November 2026 ballot, and the city council voted unanimously in August 2026 to accept the board of elections' certification. Vantage Data Centers, confirmed as the prospective developer, presented its draft economic development agreement to council on Monday 28 September 2026, asking for approval by 26 October; the draft offers a 15-year, 100% property tax abatement with payments in lieu of taxes capped at $14 million a year per building. Mayor Steven Salander said at the meeting that he will not approve any timeline until residents vote.
Ballot certification accepted August 2026 (reported 19 August 2026); mayor's statement 28 September 2026; vote 3 November 2026
832 Dover-Foxcroft 180-day data center moratorium n.a. Town of Dover-Foxcroft ME No pending proposal; townwide pause on data center applications and projects
moratoriumThe Dover-Foxcroft Select Board passed a resolution on Monday 28 September 2026 temporarily banning data center applications and projects for 180 days while officials review whether existing ordinances are sufficient. Select Chair Steve Grammont said no data center proposal is pending. The resolution defines data centers broadly, including server farms, cryptocurrency mining operations and AI training or processing facilities.
Resolution passed Monday 28 September 2026; 180 days
833 Sugarloaf Township data center curative amendment appeal (Tomhicken Road, 185 acres) Sugarloaf Industrial and Logistics Holding, L.P. (originally LBT Investment Group LLC) Sugarloaf Township / Luzerne County Court of Common Pleas PA Six-building data center complex on 185 acres along Tomhicken Road
litigationTownship supervisors rejected zoning amendments proposed by Chicago-based LBT Investment Group for a six-data-center complex, and LBT appealed to the Luzerne County Court of Common Pleas in June 2025. In court on Thursday 24 September 2026 attorneys said LBT had backed out, while the landowner and prospective buyer Sugarloaf Logistics continue to seek a curative amendment allowing data centers. In a ruling reported 30 September 2026, Judge Lesa S. Gelb let Sugarloaf Logistics continue as plaintiff and denied intervention by the landowner partnership; the zoning question remains undecided. Supervisors tabled a resolution to write data center rules earlier that week while the case is pending.
Appeal filed June 2025; LBT withdrew, disclosed 24 September 2026; ruling allowing Sugarloaf Logistics to continue reported 30 September 2026; single outlet
834 Logistix hyperscale data center (1380 University Blvd, Hamilton) Logistix Property Group City of Hamilton OH City-owned wooded site; developer requested a study of 240 MW of power; Enquirer headline calls it a $1 billion data center (article walled)
pausedLogistix asked Hamilton to study delivering 240 MW of power to a proposed data center on city-owned land at 1380 University Blvd. In January 2026 the city manager said an impact study found it would take at least 24 months to deliver 45 MW, and the developer asked the city to pause a further feasibility study while it weighed next steps amid resident opposition. The Cincinnati Enquirer reported on 28 September 2026, under the headline 'How a $1 billion data center fell apart in Ohio', that the Hamilton project is not moving forward; the article is paywalled, so the reason and the dollar figure could not be confirmed and the row stays typed as paused.
Feasibility study paused January 2026 (WOSU, WCPO); reported not moving forward 28 September 2026 (Cincinnati Enquirer headline; article walled)
835 Pontiac data center moratorium (second six-month term) n.a. City of Pontiac MI Citywide pause; no known data center proposal
moratoriumPontiac is under its second six-month moratorium on data centers, which expires in January 2027, according to WXYZ. A special council committee on data centers is drafting an ordinance covering utilities, backup generators, water, air quality and noise before the pause lapses. There are no known plans for a data center in the city.
First moratorium adopted early 2026; second six-month term in effect, expiring January 2027; adoption date of the second term not confirmed
836 Warren County six-month data center moratorium n.a. Warren County Board of Commissioners OH Pause on data center development in unincorporated, county-zoned areas; no developer requests on file
moratoriumThe Warren County Commissioners unanimously approved a six-month moratorium on data center development in county-controlled areas while local and state zoning codes are reviewed. The pause also allows time for a water impact study by the Ohio EPA and the Ohio-Kentucky-Indiana Regional Council of Governments expected in November. The deputy county administrator said no developer has requested a data center in the unincorporated areas; Clearcreek and Hamilton townships already have yearlong moratoriums.
Approved unanimously, reported 30 September 2026; six months; single outlet
837 Guilderland one-year data center moratorium n.a. Town of Guilderland NY Townwide pause on new data centers of any size (state EO 62 covers only 50 MW and above); existing INOC facility of about 3 MW unaffected
moratoriumGuilderland adopted a one-year moratorium under which the town will not accept, process or approve applications for new data centers of any size, going beyond New York's statewide pause on projects of 50 MW or more. Town Supervisor Peter Barber said the town originally proposed six months but extended it to a year, citing energy costs, grid strain, water use and water pressure for firefighting. Existing data centers are not affected.
Adopted by the Town Board (Altamont Enterprise, walled, two weeks before WTEN reported it on 30 September 2026); one year
838 Dixon 45-day data center and battery storage moratorium n.a. Dixon City Council CA Citywide; covers new land-use applications for data centers and battery energy storage systems; no data center project proposed or operating in Dixon
moratoriumAt a special meeting on Wednesday 30 September 2026 the Dixon City Council voted unanimously to impose a 45-day urgency moratorium on approving new land-use applications for data centers, also covering battery energy storage systems, while staff review impacts on water, air, noise and the tax base. There are no data center projects proposed or established in the city. Council members said the moratorium will likely be extended; state law allows two further extensions with a four-fifths vote.
Adopted unanimously 30 September 2026 at a special meeting; effective immediately for 45 days, extendable
839 Winneshiek County 12-month data center moratorium (unincorporated areas) n.a. Winneshiek County Board of Supervisors IA Countywide moratorium on data centers in rural, unincorporated areas; the county's eight cities are not covered; no specific project named
moratoriumOn Monday 28 September 2026, after a public hearing on the item, the Winneshiek County Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to approve a 12-month moratorium on data centers. It applies only to rural, unincorporated areas; the county's eight cities may act on their own, and the City of Decorah has approved the first reading of an updated zoning ordinance regulating data centers.
Approved unanimously 28 September 2026 after a public hearing; 12 months (single outlet for the vote, Decorah Leader; hearing confirmed by the county agenda)
840 Washington County 12-month data center moratorium (unincorporated areas) n.a. Washington County Board of County Commissioners MD Countywide pause on accepting, processing, reviewing and approving data center applications in unincorporated areas; no specific project named
moratoriumOn 30 June 2026 the Washington County Board of County Commissioners approved a 12-month moratorium on the acceptance, processing, review and approval of applications, plans or requests for data centers, effective immediately, with Commissioner Neil Parrott the only vote against. Under state law it applies only to unincorporated areas, so Hagerstown and the eight incorporated towns may still consider data centers on their own. In a later county statement the commissioners said draft standards going to the Planning Commission include limiting data centers to Planned Industrial zoning by special exception, a 1,000-foot setback from homes, a 50 dBA noise cap at the property line, self-generated power with a possible ban on gas turbines, and water recycling plans.
Approved 30 June 2026; effective immediately for 12 months unless modified or extended by majority vote
841 Cox Ranch data center annexation and rezoning (Skybox Datacenters and ViaWest Group) Skybox Datacenters and ViaWest Group Cheyenne City Council WY About 1,260 acres west of Roundtop Road (about 1,198 acres per the Wyoming Tribune Eagle); no dollar or MW figure disclosed; end user not named
approved after delayThe Cox Ranch annexation for a data center campus was introduced in April 2026, drew public backlash and was unanimously postponed by the Cheyenne City Council until September. On Monday 28 September 2026 the council approved the annexation 8-2 on third and final reading and approved the accompanying zoning, allowing Skybox Datacenters and ViaWest Group to proceed. Residents criticized the city's handling of data center expansion at the meeting.
Postponed April 2026; approved 8-2 on Monday 28 September 2026
842 County of Grande Prairie AI data centre development permit (Emerson Trail area near Sexsmith) n.a. County of Grande Prairie No. 1 / Alberta Land and Property Rights Tribunal Alberta Permit allows five buildings of 80 by 180 feet and 15 accessory structures of 8 by 20 feet; developer not named by the county; no dollar or MW figure disclosed
under appealThe County of Grande Prairie issued a development permit through its administrative process for an AI data centre in the Emerson Trail area near Sexsmith, after land-use changes heard on 10 August 2026. Following resident objections about the lack of notice, the county said future data centre permits will go to its municipal planning commission and that it will review its 2003 Land Use Bylaw. Nearby residents have filed appeals of the permit with the Alberta Land and Property Rights Tribunal. An Alberta government spokesperson said the Land and Property Rights Tribunal received 107 appeals of the permit, which was approved administratively on 4 September 2026 for a data processing establishment, five accessory buildings, 15 generators and 15 cooling units applied for by Tower Services and Contracting Ltd. in December 2025; the tribunal must schedule a hearing within 30 days. The county reeve said council cannot revoke the permit and that council would meet on 5 October 2026 to consider removing data processing as a permitted use in industrial zones.
Permit approved 4 September 2026; appeals reported 1 October 2026; 107 appeals confirmed 4 October 2026 (CBC)
843 Tulsa nine-month data center moratorium (Project Anthem exempt) n.a. Tulsa City Council OK Citywide pause on processing and approving new data center building permits; phases one and two of Meta's Project Anthem exempt, Project Clydesdale unaffected
moratoriumOn Wednesday 25 March 2026 the Tulsa City Council voted unanimously to pause new data center construction for nine months, through 31 December 2026. Councilor Laura Bellis had sought a one-year moratorium and amended it to nine months. The measure pauses processing and approval of new data center building permits within city limits while the planning office reviews how data centers are classified in the zoning code. It exempts the first and second phases of Project Anthem in east Tulsa and does not affect Project Clydesdale, already under construction in north Tulsa.
Approved unanimously 25 March 2026; runs through 31 December 2026
844 Project Fighting Pike data center (Critical Data House) Critical Data House City of Williston (title acquisition under Hague Convention service) ND 450 acres; $10 billion as stated by the developer; MW not disclosed
delayedCritical Data House originally said its $10 billion, 450-acre Williston data center would operate by January 2027. No work has started since the city approved the subdivision plat on 25 March 2025, because the company cannot take clear title until more than 1,100 foreign investors in an abandoned development on the land, mostly in Malaysia and Singapore, are served under Hague Convention procedures. The company told the Williston Herald it now expects operations in late 2028 or early 2029, with a 20 to 24 month build once it holds title.
Plat approved 25 March 2025; delay to late 2028 or early 2029 reported 17 September 2026; single outlet
845 Urbana Technology Hub data center (Thor Equities) Thor Equities City of Urbana / US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio OH $1 billion, 460,000 sq ft data center at Ohio 55 and US 68; Thor says it invested over $19 million
litigationUrbana City Council passed an emergency 12-month moratorium on new data centers in March 2026 and in June 2026 repealed the zoning amendment that had allowed data centers on the site. Thor Equities then sued the city, the council and the Building and Zoning Appeals Board in federal court (reported 19 June 2026), saying it had invested over $19 million and filed a site plan in February. On 4 August 2026 the council sent a citizen-initiated charter amendment banning data center construction (with an exemption under 7.5 MW for single-organization facilities) to the 3 November 2026 ballot. Court-ordered mediation sessions on 21 and 25 September 2026 produced a settlement proposal from Thor that must be approved by the city council and the court; the next council meeting is 6 October 2026. On 5 October 2026 Mayor Bill Bean released the terms of the mediated proposal, set out in a memorandum of understanding that is not final and needs City Council approval of a settlement agreement and consent decree plus federal court sign-off; council was to review it in executive session on 6 October 2026. Thor would waive damages claims the city estimates at over $115 million, pay the city up to $50 million over the life of the project (starting at the Phase One building permit, then tied to each certificate of occupancy), forgo a Community Reinvestment Area tax abatement, fund an independent environmental study including impacts on Cedar Bog and water and sewer capacity before construction, subsidize needed water and wastewater upgrades, and provide emergency management and decommissioning plans. The project would still go through site plan review, and any expansion beyond the proposal would need council's written agreement. At the 6 October 2026 meeting, attended by roughly 100 residents urging 'no deal', the City Council took no action on the proposed settlement.
Moratorium March 2026; zoning repealed and federal suit filed June 2026; charter ban sent to the ballot 4 August 2026; mediation 21 and 25 September 2026; settlement terms released 5 October 2026; council took no action 6 October 2026; ballot 3 November 2026
846 Sayreville 18-month data center moratorium (Ordinance 15-26) n.a. Borough of Sayreville NJ No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumThe Sayreville Borough Council introduced Ordinance 15-26 on 15 June 2026 and adopted it on second reading on 20 July 2026. It prohibits the development of data centers in all zones of the borough for 18 months from adoption, adds a definition under which any use with a power density of 2 to 4 MW or more per acre is treated as a data center, and expressly applies the prohibition to the Hercules Redevelopment Plan area. The ordinance takes effect on publication and mayoral approval; the posted copy does not show the mayor's signature date.
Introduced 15 June 2026; adopted on second reading 20 July 2026; 18 months; single source (borough ordinance)
847 East Rutherford data center prohibition (Ordinance 2026-12) n.a. Borough of East Rutherford NJ No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumThe governing body of East Rutherford adopted Ordinance 2026-12 on second and final reading on 16 June 2026. It amends Chapter 389 (Zoning) of the borough code to confirm that data centers are prohibited uses and structures in all zoning districts, except those within the jurisdiction of the Hackensack Meadowlands Development Commission, where the borough's zoning does not govern.
Adopted on second and final reading 16 June 2026; permanent; excludes land under Meadowlands commission jurisdiction; single source (borough notice of adoption)
848 AWS Wilmington data center emergency rezoning (Cosler Farm) Amazon Web Services City of Wilmington OH $4 billion project; about 1.9 million sq ft on the 471-acre Cosler Farm parcel along South U.S. 68
litigationOn Thursday 3 September 2026 the Wilmington City Council passed ordinances as emergency measures rezoning the 471-acre Cosler Farm parcel to light industrial for a proposed $4 billion Amazon Web Services data center; emergency ordinances take effect immediately and are not subject to referendum under Ohio law. The vote was a redo after a federal judge found the city had violated open meeting rules. Resident Rachel Mary Brooks sued the city in Clinton County Common Pleas Court, arguing the declared emergency is illusory and was used to prevent a referendum; at a temporary restraining order hearing on 4 September the city agreed not to act on the rezoning for a week and not to interfere with signature gathering, and the local judge recused himself. WLWT reported that the case was set for trial at 1 p.m. on Friday 2 October 2026, and that Clinton County Citizens for Responsible Development announced on 1 October that it had gathered enough signatures for a referendum, whose fate depends on the court. No ruling was found. In a ruling issued Sunday 4 October 2026, Clinton County Judge Jonathan Hein held that the emergency clauses in the two replacement ordinances (data centers as a permitted use in light industrial zones, and the rezoning of more than 470 acres of Amazon-owned farmland) gave sufficient reasons, found the ordinances legally valid and dismissed Rachel Brooks' lawsuit. The ruling clears a legal hurdle for the $4 billion AWS project and is a setback for the referendum effort; Brooks' attorneys said they plan to appeal.
Emergency rezoning 3 September 2026; suit filed by 4 September 2026; trial 2 October 2026; dismissed 4 October 2026 (reported 6 October 2026); appeal planned
849 Ardent/TAC data center rezoning referendum (Wilmington) Ardent / TAC (as named by WCPO) City of Wilmington OH Rezoning of four parcels from rural residential to light industrial; would take land zoned for data centers in the city from about 500 acres to over 1,000
otherWilmington Residents for Responsible Development secured a referendum on the city's rezoning of four parcels from rural residential to light industrial for the Ardent/TAC data center project, which is separate from the Amazon Web Services project. Organizer Jessica Sharp said the group turned in 1,529 signatures in about 25 days. WCPO reported on 17 April 2026 that the measure will be on the November 2026 ballot for Wilmington voters; the mayor said the matter was under legal review.
Referendum qualified, reported 17 April 2026; vote at the November 2026 general election; single outlet
850 Marana data center rezoning referendum petitions (Beale Infrastructure) Beale Infrastructure (Fremont Peak Properties) Town of Marana; Arizona Court of Appeals, Division Two AZ Two adjacent parcels of agricultural land rezoned for a data center; size and capital not stated in the fetched sources
litigationThe Marana Town Council unanimously rezoned two adjacent agricultural parcels for a data center in January 2026. In February 2026 the town clerk rejected two referendum petitions because the copies circulated to voters lacked required exhibits with the legal descriptions, and a Pima County Superior Court judge later upheld the rejection and denied a request by Beale subsidiary Fremont Peak Properties to compel the town to accept the petitions' withdrawal. A three-judge panel of the Arizona Court of Appeals, Division Two, unanimously affirmed the judgment for the town, leaving the zoning approvals in place with no ballot vote.
Rezoning January 2026; petitions rejected February 2026; Superior Court arguments 27 April 2026; Court of Appeals affirmance reported 1 October 2026 (ruling date not stated; single outlet for the appellate ruling)
851 Fluidstack Okmulgee data center floodplain development permit Fluidstack (applicant Three Rivers Manufacturing) Okmulgee County Floodplain Administration OK Proposed data center on S. Madison Avenue; size and capital not stated in the fetched sources (see site fluidstack-okmulgee-ok)
deniedThe Okmulgee County Floodplain Administration denied without prejudice a floodplain development permit application for the proposed Fluidstack Okmulgee Data Center, citing missing information and conflicting conclusions in the engineering documents. The county said the determination is not a rejection of the project on its merits; the application was returned as incomplete so that applicant Three Rivers Manufacturing can address six identified deficiencies and resubmit. County Emergency Management Director Jeffrey Moore explained the decision to the Board of Commissioners on 31 August 2026.
Denial reported 28 August 2026; explained to county commissioners 31 August 2026; resubmission not confirmed
852 Project Jade (Crusoe and Tallgrass Cheyenne campus) Crusoe (data center) and Tallgrass (power); now Google as Project Tembo Laramie County WY Planned 1.8 GW campus, scalable to 10 GW; 900 MW of Bloom Energy fuel cells had been planned
restartedOn Tuesday 9 June 2026 Crusoe said that, at the request of its customer, it had paused development activities on Project Jade, the 1.8 GW campus it was developing with Tallgrass; Tallgrass confirmed Crusoe had demobilized and left the site months earlier and said its power work continued. Bloomberg, as relayed by TechRadar, reported that customers including Google had raised concerns over cost and construction time. The campus has since moved forward as Google's Project Tembo with Tallgrass, with four data center buildings instead of five (see site google-project-tembo-laramie-wy).
Crusoe pause statement 9 June 2026; campus presented by Google as Project Tembo 9 September 2026
853 Sulphur Springs Thermo mine data center campus City of Sulphur Springs with MSB Global (phased out June 2026); CyrusOne evaluating the site City of Sulphur Springs; Hopkins County district court TX Former Luminant Thermo mine land conveyed to the city in 2019; CyrusOne said a potential multi-building campus could bring a $2.6 billion investment (potential, not committed)
litigationThe City of Sulphur Springs sued Vistra to remove a deed restriction barring power generation on former Luminant mine land where it planned a large data center campus with MSB Global; Vistra countersued, and a resident separately sued the city under the Open Meetings Act over its developer agreements. On 2 June 2026 the mayor said MSB Global would be phased out, and the council re-adopted the letter of intent and Chapter 380 agreement to address the open-meetings claims. On 7 July 2026 Judge Dan Moore heard Vistra's Rule 91a motion to dismiss six of the city's 11 counts; the September 2026 trial date was vacated and trial is likely in 2027. CyrusOne held a community meeting on 24 September 2026 about a potential self-powered, natural gas campus on the site and said the project is not a done deal.
Land conveyed 2019; lawsuits pending through 2026; developer change announced 2 June 2026; dismissal hearing 7 July 2026; CyrusOne community meeting 24 September 2026; trial likely 2027
854 Arcata 45-day data center moratorium n.a. Arcata City Council CA No project pending; citywide moratorium
moratoriumThe Arcata City Council voted 5-0 on Wednesday 16 September 2026 to adopt an interim urgency ordinance halting the receipt, processing or approval of land-use applications for data centers for 45 days, effective immediately. Staff said the city code has no definition or regulatory framework for data centers. The council may extend the moratorium for up to 10 months and 15 days, and then for a further 12 months.
Adopted 5-0 on 16 September 2026; 45 days, extendable; single outlet
855 Calaveras County 45-day data center moratorium n.a. Calaveras County Board of Supervisors CA No project pending; countywide moratorium
moratoriumThe Calaveras County Board of Supervisors approved a 45-day moratorium on data center construction by 4-0 on 25 August 2026, with Board Chair Benjamin Stopper absent. The moratorium covers all data centers, including those under 5,000 square feet, and can be extended for up to two years. Planning Director Bret Sampson said county ordinances do not address data centers; the board directed staff to study allowing smaller data centers as a secondary use.
Approved 4-0 on 25 August 2026; 45 days, extendable up to two years; single outlet
856 Brawley temporary data center moratorium n.a. Brawley City Council CA No project pending; applies to large-scale data centers
moratoriumThe Brawley City Council voted 3-2 on Tuesday 19 May 2026 to approve a temporary moratorium on large-scale data centers within city limits, with Councilmembers Kelley and Grass dissenting. Council members described a one-year pause to define data centers in the city code and study environmental, fiscal and infrastructure impacts. The vote followed a similar pause in neighboring Calipatria.
Approved 3-2 on 19 May 2026; described as one year; single outlet
857 Eureka 45-day data center moratorium n.a. Eureka City Council CA No application pending; city manager reported inquiries
moratoriumThe Eureka City Council voted unanimously on Tuesday 1 September 2026 to adopt an urgency ordinance establishing a 45-day moratorium on data center siting in the city's inland and coastal zones, effective immediately. City staff will develop zoning standards and regulatory controls, and the council can extend the moratorium for up to two years. City Manager Miles Slattery said the city has no applications but has had inquiries about properties within city limits.
Adopted unanimously 1 September 2026; 45 days, extendable up to two years; single outlet
858 Logan County six-month moratorium on data center, battery, solar and wind permits (Granite Renewables site) Granite Renewables Logan County Board of Commissioners CO Up to $15B stated by the county economic development board; 4,198 acres
moratoriumLogan County commissioners voted unanimously on Tuesday 21 October 2025 to impose a six-month moratorium on permits for data centers, battery energy storage, community solar and wind facilities so the county could write regulations. The county economic development board objected, citing Granite Renewables' plan for a large-scale data center it described as a potential $15 billion investment. On Tuesday 17 February 2026 the commissioners approved data center and battery storage regulations 3-0, lifting the moratorium; no permit application had been filed at that time.
Imposed 21 October 2025; lifted 17 February 2026 on adoption of regulations
859 NE Edge data center at Millstone Power Station NE Edge (with Dominion Energy) Connecticut Siting Council / Town of Waterford CT 300 MW; two buildings of roughly 1.5 million sq ft on the 526-acre Millstone site; dollar value not stated
deniedNE Edge proposed two data center buildings of roughly 1.5 million square feet at Dominion Energy's Millstone nuclear station in Waterford, drawing 300 megawatts directly from the plant. In January 2024 the Connecticut Siting Council denied Dominion's petition arguing that the data centers and switchyard were unrelated to its generating operations and so not subject to council approval. A CT Mirror opinion piece by a member of the residents' group, published 15 April 2026, states that the host fee agreement between NE Edge-Waterford LLC and the Town of Waterford has ended due to a default and expired by its terms.
Siting Council petition denied January 2024; host fee agreement reported ended April 2026 (opinion piece by project opponent)
860 Springbank data center rezoning (Barnsley Gardens Road, Adairsville) Atlas Development Bartow County GA Six buildings, 2,274,000 sq ft; 588 acres (Fox 5) or 630 acres (Daily Tribune News); dollar value not stated
withdrawnAtlas Development sought to rezone farmland on Barnsley Gardens Road near Adairsville from agricultural use for a six-building, 2,274,000-square-foot data center campus referred to as Springbank, with completion estimated for December 2031. Almost 1,700 residents signed a petition against it, and the Bartow County Planning Commission voted 6-1 on 28 April 2025 to recommend denial. The developer's attorney formally withdrew the rezoning application on 13 May 2025, the day before the county commissioner's meeting.
Planning Commission recommended denial 6-1 on 28 April 2025; application withdrawn 13 May 2025
861 Camden County six-month data center moratorium n.a. Camden County Board of Commissioners GA No county application pending
moratoriumThe Camden County Board of Commissioners voted on Tuesday 5 May 2026 to adopt a six-month moratorium on data centers in the unincorporated county, described by WABE as the first on the Georgia coast. The ordinance was adopted with sections 4, 5, 6 and 7 excluded and does not apply inside the cities. A rezoning request tied to businessman Kirk Tovey for nearly 700 acres along Interstate 95 in and next to Kingsland was rescinded the day before the vote.
Adopted 5 May 2026; six months; single outlet
862 Crow Holdings data center (Highway 85 North, Fayetteville) Crow Holdings Development / CHI/Acquisitions, LP City of Fayetteville GA Size and dollar value not stated on the city page
withdrawnThe Fayetteville Planning and Zoning Commission denied the site plan for a new data center north of the Fayette Pavilion shopping center on Highway 85 North at its 27 January 2026 meeting. Crow Holdings Development and CHI/Acquisitions, LP appealed to the City Council for a hearing on 19 March 2026, then officially withdrew the appeal on 18 March 2026, according to the city.
Site plan denied 27 January 2026; appeal withdrawn 18 March 2026
863 White Oak Business Park and Pumpkin Center data center rezonings (resident lawsuits) n.a. Columbia County Superior Court / Georgia Court of Appeals GA Two data center rezonings; size and dollar value not stated
under appealHarlem resident Gregory P. Guido Jr. filed judicial review petitions on 25 February 2026 challenging the Columbia County Board of Commissioners' early February approvals of the White Oak Business Park and Pumpkin Center data center rezonings, alleging procedural defects and conflicts with the comprehensive plan. The Superior Court dismissed the cases with prejudice in March 2026 and later denied reconsideration. Guido filed notices of appeal on 13 April 2026, and the appeals were docketed at the Georgia Court of Appeals on 16 June 2026.
Petitions filed 25 February 2026; dismissed March 2026; appeals docketed 16 June 2026
864 Lamar County data center moratorium n.a. Lamar County GA Follows Amazon Web Services' $270M purchase of a 985-acre site (land price, not project value)
moratoriumLamar County passed a data center moratorium in September 2025, one of several Georgia counties to do so that month, according to GPB. The county planning and zoning director said the pause was meant to allow an update of industrial and commercial zoning rather than data center rules alone. The county learned in July 2025 that Amazon Web Services had bought a 985-acre development site for $270 million. The length of the moratorium is not stated in the source.
Enacted September 2025; duration not stated; single outlet
865 Columbus technology overlay district (Upatoi residents' lawsuit) n.a. Columbus City Council / Muscogee County GA Size and dollar value not stated
litigationA group of Upatoi landowners organized as Keep It Rural LLC filed a lawsuit to block a technology overlay district that the Columbus City Council approved on 16 June 2026 amid protests against a data center. The overlay sets standards for technology companies, including data centers, seeking to locate in the Columbus area. Mayor Skip Henderson said the council is researching water use, utility costs and noise.
Overlay approved 16 June 2026; lawsuit reported 26 June 2026; single outlet
866 Rockdale County data center and battery energy storage moratorium n.a. Rockdale County Board of Commissioners GA Countywide; no project named
moratoriumRockdale County enacted a 180-day moratorium on applications for data centers and battery energy storage systems in March 2026 (Resolution 2026-01). On 12 May 2026 the Board of Commissioners extended it through 8 September 2026 (Resolution 2026-12) while the county rewrites its Unified Development Ordinance. On 22 September 2026 the board adopted most of the new ordinance but deferred the data center section and extended the moratorium again.
Enacted March 2026; extended 12 May 2026 through 8 September 2026; extended again 22 September 2026
867 Social Circle 90-day moratorium on new data center applications n.a. Social Circle City Council GA Two applications already filed (Fairplay Road and Cannon Drive) were not covered
moratoriumThe Social Circle City Council voted unanimously in September 2025 to bar new data center applications and approvals for 90 days so that staff and the council could process two applications already submitted. Public hearings on those applications and their rezoning requests, at Fairplay Road and Cannon Drive, were held at the same meeting.
Reported 18 September 2025; 90 days; single outlet
868 Thomas County 12-month data center moratorium n.a. Thomas County Board of Commissioners GA Countywide; no project named
moratoriumThe Thomas County Board of Commissioners unanimously approved a 12-month moratorium on permits for artificial intelligence data centers at a special meeting on Tuesday 20 January 2026. Commission Chair Mark NeSmith said the board is not opposed to data centers but lacks the information to regulate them and wants community input before drafting rules.
Approved unanimously 20 January 2026; 12 months; single outlet
869 Villa Rica data center annexation and rezoning (residents' petition) Embry Development Company Carroll County Superior Court / City of Villa Rica GA More than 200 acres annexed and rezoned; reported 400-acre data center plan; dollar value not stated
litigationMore than 30 Carroll County residents filed a petition in Carroll County Superior Court challenging the City of Villa Rica's annexation and rezoning of more than 200 acres between Hickory Level Road and South Van Wert Road, naming the city, Embry Development Company and another property owner. The petitioners, adjoining landowners, seek to stop reported plans for a 400-acre data center. The outcome of the case is not stated in the source.
Petition filed the week of 10 February 2025; outcome not confirmed; single outlet
870 Dickinson County six-month moratorium on data centers, bitcoin mining, solar and battery storage n.a. Dickinson County Board of Supervisors IA Countywide zoning permits; no project named
moratoriumThe Dickinson County Board of Supervisors voted 4-1 on Tuesday 12 May 2026, after a public hearing, to approve a six-month moratorium on zoning permits for data centers, bitcoin mining, solar and battery storage installations. Chairman Bill Leupold cast the only no vote. Supervisors said the pause can be extended and gives the county time to write specific ordinances.
Approved 4-1 on 12 May 2026; six months
871 Henry County moratorium on data centers, battery arrays and data mining n.a. Henry County Board of Supervisors IA No proposals received
moratoriumThe Henry County Board of Supervisors adopted a moratorium halting development of data centers, large battery arrays and data mining sites, effective at noon on Thursday 14 May 2026 and running until 31 December 2026. Supervisor Chad White said the county wants zoning policy in place before any project arrives; the county has not received any offers to build.
Effective 14 May 2026; runs to 31 December 2026; single outlet
872 Barrington Hills data center proposal (Penny Road) Brennan Investment Group Village of Barrington Hills IL $2B proposal
withdrawnChicago-based Brennan Investment Group withdrew a $2 billion proposal for a data center on land south of Penny Road and west of Pond Gate Drive in Barrington Hills, village officials announced in late January 2026. The developer decided not to go ahead with a public presentation scheduled for a special plan commission meeting on 2 February 2026, citing initial feedback, and the village said it considers the matter closed. A petition opposing the project had 1,303 signatures.
Withdrawal reported 27 to 28 January 2026
873 Plum Farms rezoning for data center (Higgins Road and Route 59) Karis Critical Village of Hoffman Estates IL 186 acres bought for $45M in January 2025 (land price); project size not stated
withdrawnKaris Critical withdrew its request to rezone the 186-acre Plum Farms property at Higgins Road and Route 59 from residential and commercial mixed-use districts to a manufacturing district, a step toward a possible data center. The Hoffman Estates Plan Commission had voted 4-2 on 3 June 2026 to recommend against the rezoning after a crowded hearing, and the Village Board vote was cancelled. The company said it would take time to prepare a more specific plan and may bring a proposal forward in the future.
Plan Commission recommended against rezoning 4-2 on 3 June 2026; withdrawal reported 1 July 2026; single outlet
874 CloudCenters data center at former Lockformer site (711 Ogden Avenue) CloudCenters LLC Village of Lisle IL 256,000 sq ft; dollar value not stated
withdrawnCloudCenters LLC proposed a 256,000-square-foot data center in January 2026 at the former Lockformer Company site at 711 Ogden Avenue in Lisle, a property with a history of trichloroethylene contamination. A January public hearing drew more than 120 registered objectors and was postponed because of the crowd. Village officials said on Wednesday 11 March 2026 that the developer had withdrawn its application.
Application withdrawn; announced 11 March 2026
875 Pekin data center on Lutticken Farm property Western Hospitality Partners City of Pekin IL 321 acres of the city's 1,000-acre Lutticken property; dollar value and MW not stated
cancelledWestern Hospitality Partners proposed a data center on about 321 acres of the 1,000-acre Lutticken Farm property owned by the City of Pekin, over the Mahomet Aquifer, drawing large crowds of opponents at council meetings from January 2026. Mayor Mary Burress announced on Monday 9 March 2026 that the city would no longer consider a data center. On Monday 11 May 2026 the city said the developer had given notice terminating its agreement during the due diligence period, and the council approved refunding its $85,000 fee; the city attorney called it a clean break.
City ended consideration 9 March 2026; developer terminated agreement, announced 11 May 2026
876 Plainfield 180-day data center moratorium n.a. Plainfield Village Board IL No project named
moratoriumPlainfield village trustees unanimously approved a 180-day moratorium on applications for data centers and warehouses primarily used to store computing infrastructure at the Village Board meeting on Monday 20 April 2026. The pause is meant to give the village time to adopt a new Unified Development Ordinance addressing data centers. Mayor John Argoudelis cited the rush of data center approvals in neighboring communities such as Joliet and Yorkville.
Approved unanimously 20 April 2026; 180 days
877 Tazewell County pause on data center zoning petitions n.a. Tazewell County Board IL Countywide; no project named
pausedThe Tazewell County Board approved a resolution, rather than a formal moratorium, stating that the county zoning department will not accept petitions for data center projects until the board finishes drafting a data center ordinance. The board also amended the zoning code so that any land use not explicitly allowed is prohibited, instead of being treated like the most similar listed use; one member, Greg Sinn, voted against the amendment.
Reported 6 May 2026; in place until a data center ordinance is adopted; single outlet
878 Clark County one-year data center moratorium n.a. Clark County Commissioners IN No project named
moratoriumThe Clark County Commissioners unanimously approved an ordinance on Thursday 27 August 2026 imposing a one-year moratorium on data center construction in the unincorporated county. The county plan commission had earlier voted to recommend the measure.
Approved unanimously 27 August 2026; one year; single outlet
879 Prologis data center rezoning near Leesburg Prologis Kosciusko County Commissioners IN 554 acres of farmland; dollar value and MW not stated
deniedThe Kosciusko County Commissioners voted 3-0 on Tuesday 22 April 2025 to deny rezoning 554 acres of farmland near Leesburg from agricultural to industrial for a data center planned by Prologis. The vote upheld the Area Plan Commission's 8-0 recommendation of 2 April 2025, made after nearly three hours of public comment.
Plan commission 8-0 against on 2 April 2025; commissioners denied 3-0 on 22 April 2025
880 American Tower data center rezoning (7701 Walnut Drive, Pike Township) American Tower Corp. Indianapolis Metropolitan Development Commission IN 20,000 sq ft on 7 acres; dollar value not stated
withdrawnAmerican Tower Corp. withdrew its rezoning petition for a 20,000-square-foot data center on 7 acres of its property at 7701 Walnut Drive in Pike Township by an attorney's email on 2 February 2026, ahead of a 12 February hearing before the Metropolitan Development Commission hearing examiner. The company said it withdrew after learning Indianapolis is revising its zoning regulations and would review the project once that process is complete. Residents and environmental groups had opposed the plan.
Petition withdrawn 2 February 2026; single outlet
881 Outrigger Industrial data center (I-69 and US 50, Washington) Outrigger Industrial Washington City Council IN Peak water request of 1,000,000 gallons a day; dollar value and MW not stated
rejectedThe Washington City Council voted unanimously on Monday 11 May 2026 to stop all dealings with Outrigger Industrial, developer of a proposed data center at the southeast corner of I-69 and US 50, instead of taking up a draft will-serve letter for city water and electricity. Council member Darin Lunsford said the developer had not answered the city's questions. The council also voted unanimously to ask the city attorney to look into a temporary moratorium on future data center developments.
Council vote 11 May 2026; single outlet
882 Bourbon County 365-day moratorium (data centers, crypto mining, utility-scale power, waste disposal) n.a. Bourbon County Commission KS Countywide; three named commercial solar projects exempt
moratoriumThe Bourbon County Commission enacted a 365-day moratorium on utility-scale power generation, crypto mining, data center and waste disposal operations under Resolution 24-26 on Monday 15 June 2026. The vote was 3-0, with Commissioners Joe Allen and Gregg Motley abstaining; a previous moratorium had expired the day before. Solar projects of Tennyson Creek Solar LLC, Tennyson Creek Solar II LLC and Hinton Creek Solar LLC are exempt, and the county hired a consultant to write a comprehensive plan and zoning regulations.
Enacted 3-0 on 15 June 2026; 365 days; single outlet
883 Beale Infrastructure data center application (Gardner) Beale Infrastructure City of Gardner KS Size and dollar value not stated in the source
withdrawnThe City of Gardner announced on Wednesday 6 May 2026 that Beale Infrastructure had withdrawn its data center application. According to the city's press release, Gardner told the developer it would not offer tax incentives for the project, and Beale then withdrew. About 200 people from three counties had turned out at the City Council meeting two days earlier to oppose the proposal; Beale said it would not move forward with the project at this time.
Withdrawal announced 6 May 2026; single outlet
884 Harvey County data center moratorium (through 2028) n.a. Harvey County Commission KS No application filed
moratoriumThe Harvey County Commission unanimously approved a resolution on Tuesday 13 January 2026 placing a moratorium on construction of data centers in unincorporated parts of the county through the end of 2028. The county said no application had been submitted and that the pause gives its planning and zoning bodies time to write regulations; the commission can rescind or extend it at any time.
Approved unanimously 13 January 2026; runs through the end of 2028; single outlet
885 Project Lincoln: Oldham County data center Western Hospitality Partners Oldham County Fiscal Court KY $6B; 600 MW as first announced, later a 100 MW application at a second site
withdrawnWestern Hospitality Partners announced in March 2025 a 600-megawatt hyperscale data center on agricultural land in Oldham County, then in June 2025 dropped that site and applied for a smaller 100-megawatt facility at the site of a drive-in theater. On Tuesday 1 July 2025 the Oldham County Fiscal Court passed a 150-day moratorium on data center applications by 4-2, striking language that would have exempted the pending application. On Thursday 3 July 2025 the company said it was withdrawing the application and that the project, described by WLKY as a $6 billion data center, would not proceed. WLKY reported on 24 August 2026 that the county's moratorium on data centers remained in effect while proposed data center regulations went back to the planning commission.
Moratorium passed 4-2 on 1 July 2025 (150 days); project withdrawn 3 July 2025
886 Ann Arbor Township 12-month data center moratorium n.a. Ann Arbor Township Board of Trustees MI No project proposed; 12 months
moratoriumThe Ann Arbor Township Board of Trustees passed a 12-month moratorium on data centers on Monday 16 February 2026. Supervisor Diane O'Connell said no developer had approached the township and the pause is to study water and electricity impacts. A subcommittee will review the master plan and zoning ordinance, with a report expected in about nine months.
Passed 16 February 2026; 12 months; single outlet
887 Elmwood Township (Tuscola County) nine-month data center moratorium n.a. Elmwood Township Board MI No project proposed; nine months
moratoriumThe Elmwood Township Board adopted an ordinance enacting a temporary moratorium on data centers at its regular meeting on 18 February 2026. The proposal called for 12 months, and trustees amended it to nine months before a unanimous roll call vote. The board had tabled the measure at its 21 January 2026 meeting.
Adopted 18 February 2026; nine months; single outlet
888 Filer Charter Township one-year data center moratorium n.a. Filer Charter Township MI No project proposed; one year
moratoriumFiler Charter Township adopted a one-year moratorium on data center development on 2 June 2026, according to township records cited by the Ludington Daily News. Neighboring Stronach Township separately adopted a six-month moratorium after a landowner discussed a possible data center on about 150 acres.
Adopted 2 June 2026; one year; reported 10 August 2026; single outlet
889 Hart six-month moratorium on data centers and digital mining n.a. Hart City Council MI No project proposed; six months
moratoriumThe Hart City Council unanimously adopted a six-month moratorium on data centers and digital mining uses on 26 May 2026, according to city records cited by the Ludington Daily News. City officials described the action as proactive rather than a response to a specific proposal.
Adopted 26 May 2026; six months; reported 10 August 2026; single outlet
890 Genoa Township data center and cryptocurrency mining moratorium (extended) n.a. Genoa Township Board of Trustees MI No project named; six-month moratorium plus six-month extension
moratoriumThe Genoa Township Board of Trustees on Monday 17 August 2026 approved a one-time, six-month extension of its temporary moratorium on accepting, processing and approving applications for data centers and cryptocurrency mining facilities. The board had earlier adopted a six-month moratorium whose resolution allowed a single six-month extension. Township staff said the extra time is needed to finish a noise study and draft enforceable sound provisions in the zoning ordinance.
Six-month extension approved 17 August 2026; original adoption date not stated in source; single outlet
891 Lyon Township six-month data center moratorium (Project Flex not affected) n.a. Lyon Township Board of Trustees MI Six months, through 8 September 2026
moratoriumLyon Township trustees voted on Monday 2 March 2026, after nearly three hours of public comment, to enact a six-month moratorium on new data center applications through 8 September 2026. Officials said the pause is to study zoning changes on land, water and energy consumption. WHMI reported the moratorium is unlikely to affect Project Flex, which had already received preliminary approval from the township Planning Commission.
Enacted 2 March 2026; six months to 8 September 2026; single outlet
892 New Buffalo Township one-year data center moratorium (Kluver Road parcel) n.a. New Buffalo Township Board MI 114-acre parcel at 19701 Kluver Road; no application filed; one year
moratoriumNew Buffalo Township officials approved a one-year moratorium on data center development by resolution at a special meeting on 8 April 2026, halting permits, licenses and approvals while the township reviews its zoning ordinance. The move followed the sale of a 114-acre parcel at 19701 Kluver Road to an entity tied to the investment group behind the Project Maize data center in Michigan City, Indiana. Township officials said no formal proposal has been submitted for the site and its intended use is unclear.
Approved 8 April 2026; one year; single outlet
893 Penn Township (Cass County) one-year data center moratorium n.a. Penn Township Board MI No application filed; 30 days, then one year
moratoriumThe Penn Township Board approved a 30-day moratorium on data center projects on Monday 11 May 2026, with Trustee Scott Peters casting the only no vote because he favored a longer pause. Supervisor Oli Olafsson said multiple developers had contacted the township about data centers. On 21 May 2026 the Planning Commission unanimously recommended, and the Township Board approved, a one-year general law (non-zoning) moratorium that stops new data center applications while zoning amendments are drafted.
30-day moratorium 11 May 2026; one-year moratorium approved 21 May 2026
894 Amazon Becker data center (near Sherco) Amazon City of Becker MN About 350 acres near Xcel Energy's Sherco plant; dollar value and MW not stated
pausedBecker City Administrator Greg Lerud said on Friday 23 May 2025 that Amazon told the city it was suspending its development activities in Minnesota, including the roughly 350-acre site it bought in 2024 near the Sherco coal plant. An Amazon spokesperson said the company continues to evaluate the Becker location but is redirecting resources to projects that can deliver capacity more quickly, citing uncertainty. Amazon plans to keep owning the property. The pause came as Minnesota lawmakers debated added regulation of large data centers and their sales tax exemption on electricity.
Pause disclosed 23 May 2025
895 Elk River one-year data center moratorium (zoning amendment rejected, applications withdrawn) n.a. Elk River City Council MN Applicant not named in source; one year
moratoriumThe Elk River City Council unanimously approved a one-year moratorium on new data center development on 3 August 2026, prohibiting all data center applications while staff draft regulations. On 6 July 2026 the council had unanimously rejected a zoning amendment that would have allowed data centers as a conditional use in Light Industrial districts, and the applicant then formally withdrew its requests for the zoning amendment and a conditional use permit. Staff said the council can end the moratorium early once regulations are ready.
Zoning amendment rejected 6 July 2026; moratorium approved 3 August 2026; one year; single outlet
896 Le Sueur County 12-month data center moratorium (townships and unincorporated areas) n.a. Le Sueur County Board MN No project proposed; 12 months
moratoriumLe Sueur County announced at the end of May 2026 a moratorium on new data center proposals in its townships and unincorporated communities. County Administrator Joe Martin said the moratorium lasts 12 months, that no data center has been proposed and that the board wanted to be proactive on water and electricity impacts.
Announced late May 2026 (reported 4 June 2026); 12 months; single outlet
897 Lonsdale one-year data center moratorium n.a. Lonsdale City Council MN No project proposed; one year
moratoriumThe Lonsdale City Council passed an ordinance on Thursday 30 April 2026 restricting the location, establishment or construction of data centers within the city for one year. City staff said the interim ordinance, recommended by the city attorney, also bars applications for zoning amendments for data centers. Council members cited unanswered questions on water and energy use and developers asking officials to sign nondisclosure agreements.
Passed 30 April 2026 (the Thursday eight days after a 22 April Capitol hearing); one year; single outlet
898 Monticello Industrial Area data center environmental review lawsuit (Monticello Tech LLC) Monticello Tech LLC Wright County District Court / City of Monticello MN Proposed 550-acre industrial site; AUAR estimates 250 to 300 million gallons of water a year; no site application filed
litigationThe Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy filed suit on 25 February 2026 in Wright County District Court (Case No. 86-CV-26-1130) against the City of Monticello and Monticello Tech LLC, the developer behind a proposed 550-acre industrial site in Monticello Township. The suit challenges the city's approval of an Alternative Urban Areawide Review tied to possible data center development and asks the court to reverse the approval and require more environmental review. MCEA said it did not seek an injunction and the filing does not pause city processes. No formal data center site application had been submitted.
Suit filed 25 February 2026; single outlet
899 Geronimo Power data center campus (agricultural preservation zoning change denied) Geronimo Power Nobles County Board of Commissioners MN US$4 billion; about 950 acres of farmland
deniedThe Nobles County Board of Commissioners voted 3-2 on Tuesday 21 April 2026 to reject a zoning text change that would have allowed data centers as a conditional use on agricultural preservation land. The vote blocks, for now, Geronimo Power's US$4 billion data center complex planned on about 950 acres of farmland east of Reading and north of Worthington. The Planning and Zoning Commission had recommended against the change on 8 April 2026. Geronimo's president said the company would step back and consider other options in the region.
Planning Commission recommendation 8 April 2026; County Board denial 21 April 2026
900 St. Joseph (Minnesota) one-year data center moratorium n.a. City of St. Joseph MN No project proposed; one year
moratoriumThe city of St. Joseph is placing a one-year moratorium on data centers, Mayor Adam Scepaniak told WJON in a report published 11 May 2026. He said the city's industrial park is in a wetland area and the city will use the pause to research data centers. The vote date and ordinance number are not given in the source.
Reported 11 May 2026; one year; adoption date not stated; single outlet
901 Camdenton AI data center moratorium (opportunity zone support rescinded) n.a. Camdenton Board of Aldermen MO Up to 12 months
moratoriumThe Camdenton Board of Aldermen approved a temporary moratorium on Tuesday 5 May 2026, giving the city up to 12 months to decide how to regulate AI data centers. At the same meeting the board rescinded its letter of support for an opportunity zone that residents had linked to a data center. Police turned away about 25 people because the room had reached its occupancy limit.
Approved 5 May 2026; up to 12 months; single outlet
902 Northampton County 32-month data center moratorium n.a. Northampton County Board of Commissioners NC No project named; 32 months
moratoriumNorthampton County commissioners unanimously approved a 32-month moratorium on data centers at their 4 May 2026 meeting. The agenda had proposed a 12-month pause, and commissioners lengthened it after residents delivered a petition with about 300 signatures and a Southern Environmental Law Center attorney spoke in favor. Commissioners also backed an advisory committee that includes residents.
Approved 4 May 2026; 32 months; single outlet
903 Wiscasset data center proposal (Old Ferry Road town-owned property) n.a. Wiscasset Select Board ME Described by the Daily Yonder as a US$5 billion data center on a town-owned parcel along the Back River; end user not disclosed
pausedThe Wiscasset Select Board voted 5-0 on 4 November 2025 to pause review of any proposals involving tax-acquired town properties until an evaluation process is in place, which covers a party's interest in the town's Old Ferry Road property for a possible data center. Residents had formed the group Protect Wiscasset after the idea became public on 16 September 2025. The town manager told the Daily Yonder in February 2026 that the pause was ongoing with no timeline.
Pause voted 4 November 2025; still in place February 2026
904 Erie Township (Monroe County) limited data center moratorium n.a. Erie Township MI No project named in source
moratoriumWKAR's Michigan data center tracker lists Erie Township as having enacted a limited moratorium on 10 February 2026. The source gives no duration, vote count or project.
Enacted 10 February 2026 per WKAR tracker of 27 February 2026; single outlet; term not stated
905 Rocklocker Kalkaska data center (state land near Island Lake and South River roads) Rocklocker (Matt Rine) with Kalkaska Go Kalkaska County / Michigan DNR land MI 1,440 acres of state land; described as multi-billion-dollar; no MW stated in source
withdrawnRocklocker's Matt Rine said on Thursday 20 November 2025 that his company and Kalkaska Go would end their pursuit of a data center proposed on 1,440 acres of state land, and cancelled a community forum set for that night. An overflow crowd had opposed the project at the first forum that Monday, and several legislators said it would not happen on DNR land. Rocklocker said concerns about developing on public lands were decisive.
Withdrawn 20 November 2025; single outlet
906 Krambu Bonner data center (former UFP Edge building, Bonner Mill Industrial Park) Krambu, Inc. Missoula County MT About 7 MW initially, up to 100 MW per the application
withdrawnBonner Mill Industrial Park general manager Mike Heisey notified Missoula County on Monday 6 July 2026 that he was withdrawing his signature from Krambu's application for a data center in the former UFP Edge building, citing public concern about environmental impacts. Montana Free Press reported the proposal stalled as a result. The county had deemed the special exception application complete in May 2026 and scheduled a hearing for 1 July 2026. Missoula County commissioners separately took up an interim moratorium on new data centers that week.
Property owner withdrew from the application 6 July 2026
907 Project Accelerate data center (East John Street near I-485) Crosland Southeast (development team) Town of Matthews NC 123 acres; dollar value and MW not stated in sources
withdrawnMatthews Mayor John Higdon said on Tuesday 7 October 2025 that the developer had withdrawn its rezoning application for the 123-acre Project Accelerate data center near I-485 and East John Street. A Crosland Southeast spokesperson said the development team requested withdrawal of the rezoning petition to allow additional time to explore options, and a community meeting set for 9 October 2025 was cancelled. The withdrawal followed a contentious community open house.
Rezoning petition withdrawn 7 October 2025
908 Morton County data center and cryptocurrency facility moratorium n.a. Morton County Commission ND No project in county jurisdiction
moratoriumMorton County scheduled a public hearing for 12 September 2024 on a moratorium on data centers, following a July 2024 moratorium on direct air capture facilities. The Bismarck Tribune reported that the county's moratorium on data centers and cryptocurrency facilities, adopted by resolution, was still in place when the commission approved a data center ordinance 4-1 on 10 September 2026. The commission considered lifting the moratorium that day, but staff said a notice period was required and expected it at the next meeting.
Hearing 12 September 2024 (adoption date not stated in sources); still in place 10 September 2026 when a data center ordinance passed 4-1; lifting pending
909 Phillipsburg data center ban (Ordinance 2026-08) n.a. Phillipsburg Town Council NJ No project named; permanent prohibition in all zones
moratoriumThe Phillipsburg Town Council approved an ordinance on Tuesday 14 April 2026 amending local zoning to prohibit data centers and related uses in all zones. Mayor Randy S. Piazza Jr. credited Warren County Commissioner James Kern III, who circulated a model ordinance to the county's municipalities. TAPinto reported the measure as Ordinance 2026-08 and that the Land Use Board later took up a master plan reexamination to embed the ban.
Adopted 14 April 2026; permanent ban
910 Butler County (Ohio) six-month data center moratorium (six county-zoned townships) n.a. Butler County Board of Commissioners OH No application filed; six months
moratoriumButler County commissioners approved a six-month moratorium on data centers in the six townships under county zoning control: Hanover, Lemon, Madison, Milford, Oxford and Ross. The measure bars acceptance or processing of any permit, zoning, building or land use application for a data center or data processing center in those townships. Commissioner Don Dixon proposed it after township trustees asked for help, and the county has retained Taft Stettinius and Hollister to advise on data center regulation.
Approved mid-June 2026 (reported 16 June 2026); six months; single outlet
911 Box Butte County (Nebraska) data center moratorium n.a. Box Butte County Board NE No project named in source
moratoriumNebraska Public Media reported on 16 July 2026 that Box Butte County was one of eleven Nebraska counties that already had a data center moratorium in place when Logan County approved a 12-month moratorium on 15 July 2026. The source does not give the adoption date, vote or duration for Box Butte County.
In place by 16 July 2026; adoption date and term not stated; single outlet
912 Butler County (Nebraska) data center moratorium n.a. Butler County Board NE No project named in source
moratoriumNebraska Public Media reported on 16 July 2026 that Butler County was one of eleven Nebraska counties that already had a data center moratorium in place when Logan County approved a 12-month moratorium on 15 July 2026. The source does not give the adoption date, vote or duration for Butler County.
In place by 16 July 2026; adoption date and term not stated; single outlet
913 Dundy County (Nebraska) data center moratorium n.a. Dundy County Board NE No project named in source
moratoriumNebraska Public Media reported on 16 July 2026 that Dundy County was one of eleven Nebraska counties that already had a data center moratorium in place when Logan County approved a 12-month moratorium on 15 July 2026. The source does not give the adoption date, vote or duration for Dundy County.
In place by 16 July 2026; adoption date and term not stated; single outlet
914 Furnas County (Nebraska) data center moratorium n.a. Furnas County Board NE No project named in source
moratoriumNebraska Public Media reported on 16 July 2026 that Furnas County was one of eleven Nebraska counties that already had a data center moratorium in place when Logan County approved a 12-month moratorium on 15 July 2026. The source does not give the adoption date, vote or duration for Furnas County.
In place by 16 July 2026; adoption date and term not stated; single outlet
915 Harlan County (Nebraska) data center moratorium n.a. Harlan County Board NE No project named in source
moratoriumNebraska Public Media reported on 16 July 2026 that Harlan County was one of eleven Nebraska counties that already had a data center moratorium in place when Logan County approved a 12-month moratorium on 15 July 2026. The source does not give the adoption date, vote or duration for Harlan County.
In place by 16 July 2026; adoption date and term not stated; single outlet
916 Hayes County (Nebraska) data center moratorium n.a. Hayes County Board NE No project named in source
moratoriumNebraska Public Media reported on 16 July 2026 that Hayes County was one of eleven Nebraska counties that already had a data center moratorium in place when Logan County approved a 12-month moratorium on 15 July 2026. The source does not give the adoption date, vote or duration for Hayes County.
In place by 16 July 2026; adoption date and term not stated; single outlet
917 Johnson County (Nebraska) data center moratorium n.a. Johnson County Board NE No project named in source
moratoriumNebraska Public Media reported on 16 July 2026 that Johnson County was one of eleven Nebraska counties that already had a data center moratorium in place when Logan County approved a 12-month moratorium on 15 July 2026. The source does not give the adoption date, vote or duration for Johnson County.
In place by 16 July 2026; adoption date and term not stated; single outlet
918 Kearney County (Nebraska) data center moratorium n.a. Kearney County Board NE No project named in source
moratoriumNebraska Public Media reported on 16 July 2026 that Kearney County was one of eleven Nebraska counties that already had a data center moratorium in place when Logan County approved a 12-month moratorium on 15 July 2026. The source does not give the adoption date, vote or duration for Kearney County.
In place by 16 July 2026; adoption date and term not stated; single outlet
919 Shutesbury data center moratorium (Special Town Meeting Article 10) n.a. Town of Shutesbury Special Town Meeting MA No application filed; moratorium to 20 June 2026
moratoriumShutesbury's Special Town Meeting on 30 September 2025 passed Article 10 by 48 votes to 16, amending the zoning bylaw to establish a moratorium on applications for and building of data centers and listing data centers as a prohibited use in all districts. The moratorium took effect on adoption and ran until 20 June 2026, to give the Planning Board time to draft regulations for the spring 2026 town meeting. The Planning Board had voted 6-1 to bring the article forward after an inquiry to the town about how data centers are regulated.
Adopted 30 September 2025; in place until 20 June 2026
920 Hagar Township (Berrien County) data center moratorium n.a. Hagar Township Board MI No project named in source
moratoriumThe Tri-City Record reported that the Hagar Township board approved a data center moratorium at its meeting on Monday 13 July 2026. The article is behind a paywall, and the duration and vote are not available in the accessible text.
Approved 13 July 2026 (reported 16 July 2026); term not stated; single outlet, paywalled
921 Oppidan Hampton data center Oppidan City of Hampton MN Dollar value and MW not stated in sources
pausedExcelsior-based Oppidan paused work on data center projects in Hampton and North Mankato, citing the time required for the state to permit backup generators, the Minnesota Star Tribune reported in November 2025. The company continued to advance a separate data center in Apple Valley.
Reported mid-November 2025
922 Summit AI data center ban (former Bristol Myers Squibb campus cited) n.a. Summit Common Council NJ No application filed; June ordinance barred facilities of 20 MW or more
moratoriumThe Summit Common Council adopted an ordinance on Tuesday 16 June 2026 prohibiting AI data centers, defined in part as facilities drawing 20 MW or more or with a significant impact on municipal water use. After residents objected that the threshold left room for smaller facilities, the council on 7 July 2026 unanimously introduced a revised ordinance prohibiting dedicated data centers outright and capping accessory data processing space at 20% of a building or 1,000 square feet, with a final hearing and vote scheduled for 28 July 2026. The outcome of the 28 July vote was not confirmed from a news or city page; the Pinelands Preservation Alliance, an advocacy group, lists Summit among New Jersey municipalities that have banned data centers.
First ban adopted 16 June 2026; revised full ban introduced 7 July 2026, final vote scheduled 28 July 2026 (result not confirmed)
923 Alpha Borough data center ban n.a. Alpha Borough NJ No project named in source; permanent ban
moratoriumAlpha Borough is listed by the Pinelands Preservation Alliance, an advocacy group, among 97 New Jersey municipalities that had banned data centers as of 30 September 2026. The listing gives no adoption date, ordinance number or vote. Warren County Commissioner James Kern said in a 2 September 2026 release that 14 of the county's 22 municipalities had adopted the county's model data center ordinance.
Listed as banned as of 30 September 2026; adoption date not stated; advocacy group listing, single source
924 Bass River Township data center ban n.a. Bass River Township NJ No project named in source; permanent ban
moratoriumBass River Township is listed by the Pinelands Preservation Alliance, an advocacy group, among 97 New Jersey municipalities that had banned data centers as of 30 September 2026. The listing gives no adoption date, ordinance number or vote.
Listed as banned as of 30 September 2026; adoption date not stated; advocacy group listing, single source
925 Berkeley Township data center ban n.a. Berkeley Township NJ No project named in source; permanent ban
moratoriumBerkeley Township is listed by the Pinelands Preservation Alliance, an advocacy group, among 97 New Jersey municipalities that had banned data centers as of 30 September 2026. The listing gives no adoption date, ordinance number or vote.
Listed as banned as of 30 September 2026; adoption date not stated; advocacy group listing, single source
926 Carneys Point Township data center ban n.a. Carneys Point Township NJ No project named in source; permanent ban
moratoriumCarneys Point Township is listed by the Pinelands Preservation Alliance, an advocacy group, among 97 New Jersey municipalities that had banned data centers as of 30 September 2026. The listing gives no adoption date, ordinance number or vote.
Listed as banned as of 30 September 2026; adoption date not stated; advocacy group listing, single source
927 Delaware Township data center ban n.a. Delaware Township NJ No project named in source; permanent ban
moratoriumDelaware Township is listed by the Pinelands Preservation Alliance, an advocacy group, among 97 New Jersey municipalities that had banned data centers as of 30 September 2026. The listing gives no adoption date, ordinance number or vote.
Listed as banned as of 30 September 2026; adoption date not stated; advocacy group listing, single source
928 Downe Township data center ban n.a. Downe Township NJ No project named in source; permanent ban
moratoriumDowne Township is listed by the Pinelands Preservation Alliance, an advocacy group, among 97 New Jersey municipalities that had banned data centers as of 30 September 2026. The listing gives no adoption date, ordinance number or vote.
Listed as banned as of 30 September 2026; adoption date not stated; advocacy group listing, single source
929 Elsinboro Township data center ban n.a. Elsinboro Township NJ No project named in source; permanent ban
moratoriumElsinboro Township is listed by the Pinelands Preservation Alliance, an advocacy group, among 97 New Jersey municipalities that had banned data centers as of 30 September 2026. The listing gives no adoption date, ordinance number or vote.
Listed as banned as of 30 September 2026; adoption date not stated; advocacy group listing, single source
930 Frelinghuysen Township data center ban n.a. Frelinghuysen Township NJ No project named in source; permanent ban
moratoriumFrelinghuysen Township is listed by the Pinelands Preservation Alliance, an advocacy group, among 97 New Jersey municipalities that had banned data centers as of 30 September 2026. The listing gives no adoption date, ordinance number or vote. Warren County Commissioner James Kern said in a 2 September 2026 release that 14 of the county's 22 municipalities had adopted the county's model data center ordinance.
Listed as banned as of 30 September 2026; adoption date not stated; advocacy group listing, single source
931 Hainesport Township data center ban n.a. Hainesport Township NJ No project named in source; permanent ban
moratoriumHainesport Township is listed by the Pinelands Preservation Alliance, an advocacy group, among 97 New Jersey municipalities that had banned data centers as of 30 September 2026. The listing gives no adoption date, ordinance number or vote.
Listed as banned as of 30 September 2026; adoption date not stated; advocacy group listing, single source
932 Kingwood Township data center ban n.a. Kingwood Township NJ No project named in source; permanent ban
moratoriumKingwood Township is listed by the Pinelands Preservation Alliance, an advocacy group, among 97 New Jersey municipalities that had banned data centers as of 30 September 2026. The listing gives no adoption date, ordinance number or vote.
Listed as banned as of 30 September 2026; adoption date not stated; advocacy group listing, single source
933 Knowlton Township data center ban n.a. Knowlton Township NJ No project named in source; permanent ban
moratoriumKnowlton Township is listed by the Pinelands Preservation Alliance, an advocacy group, among 97 New Jersey municipalities that had banned data centers as of 30 September 2026. The listing gives no adoption date, ordinance number or vote. Warren County Commissioner James Kern said in a 2 September 2026 release that 14 of the county's 22 municipalities had adopted the county's model data center ordinance.
Listed as banned as of 30 September 2026; adoption date not stated; advocacy group listing, single source
934 Liberty Township data center ban n.a. Liberty Township NJ No project named in source; permanent ban
moratoriumLiberty Township is listed by the Pinelands Preservation Alliance, an advocacy group, among 97 New Jersey municipalities that had banned data centers as of 30 September 2026. The listing gives no adoption date, ordinance number or vote. Warren County Commissioner James Kern said in a 2 September 2026 release that 14 of the county's 22 municipalities had adopted the county's model data center ordinance.
Listed as banned as of 30 September 2026; adoption date not stated; advocacy group listing, single source
935 Mannington Township data center ban n.a. Mannington Township NJ No project named in source; permanent ban
moratoriumMannington Township is listed by the Pinelands Preservation Alliance, an advocacy group, among 97 New Jersey municipalities that had banned data centers as of 30 September 2026. The listing gives no adoption date, ordinance number or vote.
Listed as banned as of 30 September 2026; adoption date not stated; advocacy group listing, single source
936 Oldmans Township data center ban n.a. Oldmans Township NJ No project named in source; permanent ban
moratoriumOldmans Township is listed by the Pinelands Preservation Alliance, an advocacy group, among 97 New Jersey municipalities that had banned data centers as of 30 September 2026. The listing gives no adoption date, ordinance number or vote.
Listed as banned as of 30 September 2026; adoption date not stated; advocacy group listing, single source
937 Pilesgrove Township data center ban n.a. Pilesgrove Township NJ No project named in source; permanent ban
moratoriumPilesgrove Township is listed by the Pinelands Preservation Alliance, an advocacy group, among 97 New Jersey municipalities that had banned data centers as of 30 September 2026. The listing gives no adoption date, ordinance number or vote.
Listed as banned as of 30 September 2026; adoption date not stated; advocacy group listing, single source
938 Plumsted Township data center ban n.a. Plumsted Township NJ No project named in source; permanent ban
moratoriumPlumsted Township is listed by the Pinelands Preservation Alliance, an advocacy group, among 97 New Jersey municipalities that had banned data centers as of 30 September 2026. The listing gives no adoption date, ordinance number or vote.
Listed as banned as of 30 September 2026; adoption date not stated; advocacy group listing, single source
939 Upper Pittsgrove Township data center ban n.a. Upper Pittsgrove Township NJ No project named in source; permanent ban
moratoriumUpper Pittsgrove Township is listed by the Pinelands Preservation Alliance, an advocacy group, among 97 New Jersey municipalities that had banned data centers as of 30 September 2026. The listing gives no adoption date, ordinance number or vote.
Listed as banned as of 30 September 2026; adoption date not stated; advocacy group listing, single source
940 Washington Borough data center ban n.a. Washington Borough NJ No project named in source; permanent ban
moratoriumWashington Borough is listed by the Pinelands Preservation Alliance, an advocacy group, among 97 New Jersey municipalities that had banned data centers as of 30 September 2026. The listing gives no adoption date, ordinance number or vote. Warren County Commissioner James Kern said in a 2 September 2026 release that 14 of the county's 22 municipalities had adopted the county's model data center ordinance.
Listed as banned as of 30 September 2026; adoption date not stated; advocacy group listing, single source
941 Washington Township (Gloucester County) data center ban n.a. Washington Township (Gloucester County) NJ No project named in source; permanent ban
moratoriumWashington Township (Gloucester County) is listed by the Pinelands Preservation Alliance, an advocacy group, among 97 New Jersey municipalities that had banned data centers as of 30 September 2026. The listing gives no adoption date, ordinance number or vote.
Listed as banned as of 30 September 2026; adoption date not stated; advocacy group listing, single source
942 Woodstown Borough data center ban n.a. Woodstown Borough NJ No project named in source; permanent ban
moratoriumWoodstown Borough is listed by the Pinelands Preservation Alliance, an advocacy group, among 97 New Jersey municipalities that had banned data centers as of 30 September 2026. The listing gives no adoption date, ordinance number or vote.
Listed as banned as of 30 September 2026; adoption date not stated; advocacy group listing, single source
943 TeraWulf Cayuga Data Campus (former Cayuga/Milliken power plant) TeraWulf (Lake Hawkeye LLC) Town of Lansing Zoning Board of Appeals / New York State Supreme Court, Tompkins County NY AI data center at the former coal-fired Cayuga (Milliken) power plant on Cayuga Lake; initial capacity reported as 150 MW in June 2026 (50 MW in an earlier report); no dollar figure used
litigationThe Lansing code enforcement officer found the project did not comply with town zoning; the Zoning Board of Appeals ruled on 23 December 2025 that the data center is a permitted use in the industrial zone. Cayuga Lake Environmental Action Now (CLEAN) and FLX Strong filed an Article 78 petition in New York State Supreme Court on Thursday 29 January 2026 seeking to annul that decision; TeraWulf called the suit without merit. The Town Board had considered a one-year land-use moratorium in fall 2025 and withdrew it after TeraWulf threatened litigation. A petition against the project passed 20,000 signatures in June 2026, and Tompkins and Seneca counties asked the state DEC to reject a modified water withdrawal permit for the site. At a special meeting on Tuesday 29 September 2026, attended by roughly 200 people, the Lansing Town Board directed town attorney Megan Doherty to draft a local law that would prohibit data centers, with Supervisor Ruth Groff saying she favors a total ban. The board did not introduce or enact the law, has not scheduled a public hearing, and has not rejected the TeraWulf project.
ZBA decision 23 December 2025; Article 78 petition filed 29 January 2026; Town Board directed drafting of a data center prohibition 29 September 2026 (not introduced or adopted)
944 Newfield one-year moratorium on data centers and cryptocurrency mining n.a. Newfield Town Board NY No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumThe Newfield Town Board unanimously approved a one-year townwide moratorium on data center and cryptocurrency mining operations at its 9 July 2026 meeting. The measure was proposed on 11 June 2026. No data center has been proposed in the town, which has no zoning; the supervisor called the pause preventative.
Approved unanimously 9 July 2026; one year
945 North Tonawanda moratorium on new or expanded data centers and crypto mining (Digihost site) Digihost (Digi Power X), existing operator affected North Tonawanda Common Council NY Citywide; bars new operations and expansion of existing data centers, including the Digihost crypto mine at the former Fortistar gas plant on Erie Avenue. No dollar or MW figure stated
moratoriumThe North Tonawanda Common Council voted unanimously on Tuesday 16 July 2024 for a two-year moratorium on new or expanded data centers, defined to include cryptocurrency mining and AI processing, after years of noise complaints about the Digihost facility. In June 2026 the council unanimously approved a one-year extension, as the operator, now Digi Power X, proposed converting the site to an AI data center.
Two-year moratorium adopted 16 July 2024; one-year extension approved June 2026
946 Town of Oneonta 12-month moratorium on AI data centers and crypto mining (Eco-Yotta site, County Road 9) Eco-Yotta Inc. Oneonta Town Board NY Eco-Yotta sought to rezone about 150 acres of farmland at 357 County Road 9; no dollar or MW figure stated
moratoriumThe Oneonta Town Board introduced a 12-month moratorium on 11 March 2026, held a public hearing in April, and voted unanimously for it in mid May 2026 (reported 15 May 2026). Supervisor Will Rivera cited a petition of more than 700 residents and said the board hopes to ban data centers after the pause. WKTV reported the local law still needed filing approval from the Department of State to take effect.
Approved unanimously, reported 15 May 2026; introduced 11 March 2026; 12 months
947 Barberton open-ended data center moratorium n.a. Barberton City Council OH No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumBarberton City Council approved an indefinite moratorium on data centers at its 10 November 2025 meeting, after resident opposition to Quantum HPC's since-abandoned data center plan at the former PPG limestone mine in neighboring Norton. The sponsor said the city would finish its new development code first, then add data center rules and cancel the moratorium.
Approved 10 November 2025; indefinite
948 Cleveland three-month pause on new standalone data centers Lakeland Equity Group (Slavic Village proposal affected) Cleveland City Council OH Citywide for standalone, principal-use data centers. Lakeland Equity Group's proposed Slavic Village data center was reported at $1.6 billion
moratoriumIn May 2026 the city rejected the construction permit application for Lakeland Equity Group's proposed $1.6 billion Slavic Village data center as incomplete, and Council Member Charles Slife proposed a moratorium of up to a year. On Wednesday 15 July 2026 City Council approved, 14-1, a shorter three-month pause during which the city will not review or issue permits or approvals for new standalone, principal-use data centers or expansions of existing ones; council may extend it for up to three more months. The city says it has no hyperscale standalone data centers and existing facilities are unaffected.
Three-month pause approved 14-1 on 15 July 2026; permit application rejected May 2026
949 Ellsworth Township data center moratorium n.a. Ellsworth Township OH No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumEllsworth Township passed and enacted a one-year data center moratorium on Wednesday 10 June 2026, with an option to renew, according to the township zoning inspector. No data center zoning applications had been received. The pause is for a review of township zoning.
Enacted 10 June 2026; one year; single outlet
950 Grove City data center moratorium n.a. Grove City Council OH No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumGrove City Council passed a data center moratorium 6-1 on Monday 1 June 2026 (ordinance C-22-26), pausing new data center applications for up to a year. Amendments added a task force and a six-month review.
Passed 6-1 on 1 June 2026; up to one year; single outlet
951 Ironton one-year data center moratorium n.a. Ironton City Council OH Citywide; adopted after Strata Expanse's AI Center of Excellence data center was announced at 1476 County Road 1A in Haverhill, outside city limits. No dollar or MW figure stated
moratoriumAt a special meeting on Thursday 8 January 2026, Ironton City Council passed a one-year moratorium on data centers being built in the city while it reviews zoning. The council has no authority over the Strata Expanse site in Haverhill, which lies in an unzoned township.
Passed 8 January 2026; one year; single outlet
952 Lordstown data center moratorium (Bristolville 25 Developer dispute) Bristolville 25 Developer LLC Lordstown Village Council OH Villagewide; no dollar or MW figure stated
moratoriumLordstown Village Council passed an emergency ordinance in early January 2026 placing a 180-day moratorium on new data center permits. Bristolville 25 Developer LLC, which began its site plan process before the moratorium, says it should be excluded and has a lawsuit pending at the Ohio Supreme Court. WFMJ reported the council voted unanimously, as of 16 June 2026, to extend the moratorium by a further 180 days.
Enacted early January 2026 (180 days); extension voted by 16 June 2026
953 Monroe Township (Adams County) moratorium on data centers and small modular reactors n.a. Monroe Township Trustees OH No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumMonroe Township trustees unanimously passed a 12-month moratorium on new proposals and development of data centers and small modular nuclear reactors in the week of 2 March 2026, according to Food & Water Watch, an advocacy group that supports moratoriums. It is the second Adams County township to act after Sprigg Township in late February 2026.
Passed in the week of 2 March 2026 (advocacy group release of 9 March 2026); 12 months
954 Mount Orab six-month data center moratorium (State Route 32 mega site) DB STU LLC (site owner) Mount Orab Village Council OH Nearly 1,200-acre site along State Route 32 valued at more than $43 million (WLWT); residents cited a 2,000 MW request to PJM, a figure not confirmed by the developer
moratoriumTwo ordinances for a 180-day data center moratorium passed first reading on 3 February 2026, and village leaders voted on 3 March 2026 to impose a six-month moratorium on data center projects. The pause followed weeks of protest over non-disclosure agreements signed by village officials about the site. In late March the village was weighing repeal of 2024 zoning changes that made way for the project.
Imposed 3 March 2026; six months; first reading 3 February 2026
955 Preble County Data Center Project rezoning (Zoning Case #1630) n.a. Preble County Board of Commissioners OH About 298.32 acres of agricultural land on the north side of Orphans Road; no dollar or MW figure stated
withdrawnThe applicants for Preble County Zoning Case #1630, known as the Data Center Project, formally withdrew their rezoning request on Monday 29 September 2025, two days before the county commissioners were due to hear it on 1 October 2025. The property owners said the process requires a different approach and will be re-evaluated in the future. County staff said any new application must start again at the planning commission.
Withdrawn 29 September 2025
956 Shawnee Township (Allen County) 18-month moratorium on data centers and energy projects n.a. Shawnee Township Trustees OH No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumShawnee Township trustees voted on Monday 13 April 2026 to approve an 18-month moratorium on development of data centers, battery energy storage systems and solar energy fields, following a recommendation from the township zoning board. The source is an archived copy of a WLIO report.
Approved 13 April 2026; 18 months; single outlet (archived copy)
957 Upper Sandusky six-month data center moratorium n.a. Upper Sandusky City Council OH No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumUpper Sandusky City Council enacted a six-month moratorium on new data center development in July 2026. The Planning Commission is reviewing rules for what the city calls high resource demand development and may propose zoning changes.
Enacted July 2026 (reported 26 August 2026); six months; single outlet
958 Berea data center permit moratorium (Ordinance 6-6) n.a. Berea City Council OH No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumBerea City Council suspended the three-reading rule and adopted Ordinance 6-6 as an emergency measure at its 15 June 2026 regular meeting, with all seven members voting yes. It imposes a temporary moratorium, not to exceed one year, on granting or issuing permits for data centers and on receiving and processing applications. Sponsors cited open questions on power supply, water supply and utility costs; the mayor noted the city has its own water source.
Adopted 7-0 on 15 June 2026; up to one year
959 Clay Township (Montgomery County) data center moratorium n.a. Clay Township Trustees OH No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumClay Township trustees approved a resolution imposing a 12-month moratorium on accepting and processing applications to establish or expand data centers, reported 20 April 2026. Chair Angela Howell said the zoning commission needs time to write data center rules; the moratorium can be extended. The township offices are in Brookville, Montgomery County.
Approved, reported 20 April 2026; 12 months; single outlet
960 Project Cosmos data center (K-Nova II, Rickenbacker Exchange extension) K-Nova II, LLC (end user Amazon Data Services, Inc.) Village of Commercial Point / Supreme Court of Ohio OH Two parcels zoned in May 2024 as a Planned Industrial District limited to data centers; site plan application fee of $534,121.85. No project dollar or MW figure stated
litigationThe village denied an initial major site plan on 31 March 2026; K-Nova refiled on 1 April 2026 naming Amazon Data Services as end user. On 4 May 2026 the village council passed an emergency ordinance imposing an 18-month moratorium on processing or approving data center applications and suspended review of the application. K-Nova filed for a writ of mandamus at the Supreme Court of Ohio on 19 May 2026 to compel a vote on its site plan, and on 20 May 2026 residents filed a separate suit claiming the 2024 data center zoning was never lawfully adopted because the three-reading waiver lacked enough votes.
18-month moratorium 4 May 2026; mandamus petition 19 May 2026; residents' suit 20 May 2026
961 Twinsburg data center moratorium (Ordinance 2026-065) n.a. Twinsburg City Council OH No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumTwinsburg passed Ordinance 2026-065, an emergency measure establishing a moratorium of up to 12 months on accepting or issuing zoning and occupancy permits for data centers as a principal use. The ordinance notes that city code does not currently permit data centers as a principal use and bars existing businesses from expanding into that use during the pause. News 5 Cleveland listed Twinsburg among communities that had passed moratoriums by 20 May 2026.
Passed spring 2026 (reported as passed by 20 May 2026); up to 12 months
962 JRE Strategies Ardmore data center JRE Strategies LLC City of Ardmore OK 10 MW data center on 6.74 acres; no dollar figure stated
withdrawnThe Ardmore planning and zoning commission voted 7-0 in February 2026 against rezoning 6.74 acres from single family residential to light industrial, after neighbors and the Noble Foundation objected. The developer then withdrew its application before the city commission vote, as reported on 16 March 2026.
Withdrawal reported 16 March 2026; planning commission 7-0 against in February 2026; single outlet
963 Project Atlas data center (Coweta) Beale Infrastructure City of Coweta OK Proposed data center along Highway 51 west of downtown; no dollar or MW figure in the fetched sources
withdrawnBeale Infrastructure confirmed on Monday 30 March 2026 that it was withdrawing its Project Atlas data center in Coweta after months of resident opposition; the planning commission had earlier voted against the project. The city said no data center item would be on the 6 April 2026 council agenda. Beale said it would continue to pursue projects elsewhere in Oklahoma.
Withdrawn 30 March 2026
964 Mvskoke Technology and Innovation Park (Looped Square Ranch data center) Muscogee (Creek) Nation (tribal legislation NCA 25-077) Muscogee (Creek) Nation National Council OK Data center proposed on the tribe's Looped Square Ranch; no dollar or MW figure stated
rejectedNCA 25-077, the bill to establish the Mvskoke Technology and Innovation Park and develop a data center at Looped Square Ranch, failed 4-11 at the National Council's 15 November 2025 regular session. It had passed a joint committee 8-1 on 19 August 2025 and was postponed from the 25 October session. Critics called the bill vague on resource use; citizens protested outside before the vote.
Failed 4-11 on 15 November 2025
965 Blakely Borough data center n.a. Blakely Borough PA No dollar or MW figure in the fetched source
withdrawnThe developers withdrew their application for a zoning change for a data center in Blakely Borough days before a scheduled hearing, after heavy resident opposition, WOLF reported on 15 September 2025. The developers said the data center is not moving forward but that tree clearing and a material storage pad would proceed, which the borough manager said residential zoning does not allow.
Withdrawal reported 15 September 2025; single outlet
966 Project Gold data center campus (Clifton and Covington townships) 1778 Rich Pike LLC (property owner JCO LLC) Lackawanna County Court of Common Pleas / Clifton Township Zoning Hearing Board PA Roughly 1,000-acre site along Interstate 380; first proposed as nearly three dozen data centers, later five buildings in Clifton Township. No dollar or MW figure in the fetched source
litigation1778 Rich Pike filed a substantive validity challenge on 17 April 2025 claiming Clifton Township zoning unlawfully excluded data centers, then a procedural challenge on 20 June 2025 to the township's May 2025 data center ordinance. The zoning hearing board unanimously denied the challenge on 19 November 2025 and the developer appealed on 1 December 2025. Supervisors settled on 2 January 2026, but Judge Mark Powell vacated his approval of the settlement on 30 January 2026 after the zoning hearing board objected and Covington Township sought to intervene, letting an amended land use appeal proceed.
Challenge filed 17 April 2025; settlement vacated 30 January 2026
967 Conshohocken data center at former Cleveland-Cliffs steel mill Brian O'Neill Plymouth Township Zoning Hearing Board PA 2 million sq ft across 10 existing buildings on 66 acres along the Schuylkill River; no dollar or MW figure stated
withdrawnThe township planning board unanimously declined to recommend the proposal in October 2025. At the zoning hearing on Monday 17 November 2025 the developer withdrew the application less than an hour in, after it emerged that the agreement of sale with the property owner was not final and the applicant lacked legal standing, according to the zoning board solicitor.
Withdrawn 17 November 2025
968 Hollenback Township data center rezoning (landowner curative amendment) n.a. (31 property owners; attorney Daniel Karpowich) Hollenback Township Supervisors / Luzerne County Court of Common Pleas PA 31 township property owners agreed to sell land for data center use; no dollar or MW figure in the fetched source
deniedA curative amendment that would permit data centers on the land of 31 property owners was deemed denied at a public hearing on Sunday 1 March 2026, after the applicants' attorney objected to the hearing notice and refused a continuance and the supervisors closed the hearing. The Citizens' Voice reported the rezoning request is heading to Luzerne County Court of Common Pleas.
Deemed denied 1 March 2026; headed to county court; single outlet
969 Mount Carmel Township 180-day data center moratorium n.a. Mount Carmel Township Supervisors PA No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumMount Carmel Township supervisors voted 3-0 on Monday 18 May 2026 to enact a moratorium of up to 180 days on data center proposals while they further amend a zoning ordinance to regulate the facilities. More than 100 residents attended and more than 30 had spoken against data centers at a hearing the previous week.
Enacted 3-0 on 18 May 2026; up to 180 days; single outlet
970 Scranton Materials data center campus (819 Newton Road) Scranton Materials LLC Ransom Township Board of Supervisors / Lackawanna County Court of Common Pleas PA 251-acre property; six buildings, each with a 156,648 sq ft footprint. No dollar or MW figure stated
under appealScranton Materials filed a curative amendment in November 2025 to create a data center district on its quarry property. At a 20 January 2026 hearing the supervisors voted 2-1 to dismiss it for lack of testimony and evidence. The company appealed in the week of 16 February 2026, arguing the township must provide for data centers somewhere and that the supervisors acted improperly.
Dismissed 2-1 on 20 January 2026; appeal filed February 2026
971 South Annville Township data center (1235 Martina Drive Owner LLC) 1235 Martina Drive Owner LLC (Inch & Co. and Eastern Land & Resources Co.) South Annville Township PA $1.7 billion; five buildings of about 150,000 sq ft each on a 99-acre site near Mount Pleasant Road and U.S. 422
withdrawnThe developer withdrew its petition for zoning changes on Tuesday 12 May 2026, with its attorney writing that it will no longer pursue a data center in South Annville Township. The township planning commission had voted unanimously on 5 May 2026 against recommending the rezoning of about 58 acres, and more than 500 residents had signed an opposition petition.
Withdrawn 12 May 2026
972 Cumberland zoning prohibition on data centers (Ordinance 26-22) n.a. Cumberland Town Council RI No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumThe Cumberland Town Council voted 6-1 on Wednesday 16 September 2026 to adopt Ordinance 26-22, listing data centers as a prohibited use under the town zoning ordinance. Three residents spoke at the public hearing, all in favor. The sponsor cited electricity prices and water use and another Rhode Island town's experience with a data center proposal.
Adopted 6-1 on 16 September 2026; permanent zoning prohibition; single outlet
973 Applied Digital Toronto data center campus Applied Digital Deuel County / State of South Dakota SD Described by KELOLAND as a multibillion-dollar project; no exact dollar or MW figure in the fetched sources
pausedApplied Digital told KELOLAND News on 13 March 2026 that its proposed data center near Toronto, South Dakota, is unlikely to go forward, after the 2026 Legislature declined to pass a sales and use tax exemption for data center equipment (House Bill 1005 failed in committee). CEO Wes Cummins said later in March that he does not expect any projects in the state for now.
Company statement 13 March 2026 that the project is unlikely to go forward
974 Anderson County (Tennessee) two-year data center moratorium n.a. Anderson County Commission TN No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumWVLT reported that the Anderson County Commission unanimously approved a two-year moratorium on future data centers at its meeting on Monday 15 June 2026; commissioners said the time would be used to research and write regulations. The station's headline describes the measure as proposed, so the legal form of the action should be read with that caution.
Approved unanimously 15 June 2026; two years; single outlet
975 Warren County (Tennessee) 12-month data center moratorium n.a. Warren County Commission TN Countywide outside McMinnville; does not affect the data center proposed inside the McMinnville city limits. No dollar or MW figure attached
moratoriumThe Warren County Commission passed a 12-month moratorium on data centers on the recommendation of its Economic and Agriculture Committee, reported 23 June 2026. The county executive said the county will seek a private act from the legislature in January to set permanent controls and that the measure does not affect the data center proposed within McMinnville.
Passed June 2026 (reported 23 June 2026); 12 months; single outlet
976 Bell County (Kentucky) two-year data center construction moratorium (Murray Industries site) Murray Industries Bell County Fiscal Court KY Countywide; halts a Murray Industries data center project that had begun clearing land. No dollar or MW figure stated
moratoriumBell County officials voted on Thursday 2 July 2026 to approve a two-year moratorium on data center construction on second reading, without opposition, with Judge Executive Albey Brock presiding. The vote, moved up from 14 July, halts a Murray Industries project that had already begun clearing land. WYMT said it was unclear whether the moratorium would be challenged in court.
Approved on second reading 2 July 2026; two years; single outlet
977 Zydeco Development Hutto data center (450 Ed Schmidt Boulevard) Zydeco Development City of Hutto Planning and Zoning Commission TX About 40 acres at Ed Schmidt Boulevard and Limmer Loop, described by the developer as a midscale data center; no dollar or MW figure in the fetched sources
withdrawnZydeco Development formally withdrew its request to rezone the site and amend the future land use map ahead of a special Planning and Zoning Commission meeting set for 20 April 2026, which was canceled. City staff had recommended against approval on 7 April 2026, and residents were organizing a formal protest that would have required a three-fourths council vote. KUT reported the withdrawal effectively ends the project.
Withdrawn before the 20 April 2026 commission meeting (reported 20 April 2026)
978 B+F Timpanogos Tech data center (1507 S. 180 East, East Bay) B+F Timpanogos Tech Provo City Council UT Two-story, 130,000 sq ft facility on the former Novell campus; 5 MW initially, could increase to 50 MW. No dollar figure stated
deniedThe Provo City Council voted unanimously on Tuesday 10 March 2026 to deny the developer's request to apply the city's data center overlay zone to the property, the first application under that overlay. The planning commission had recommended approval on 11 February 2026. Council members cited noise, environmental and energy cost concerns and said they want results from an economic development study first.
Denied unanimously 10 March 2026
979 Royalton five-year moratorium policy on AI and crypto data centers n.a. Town of Royalton (Town Meeting) VT No project proposed; preemptive. No dollar or MW figure
otherVoters at Royalton's Town Meeting on Tuesday 3 March 2026 approved, by show of hands, an article for the town to adopt a policy placing a five-year moratorium on construction of AI and crypto data centers. The Planning Commission must now write the policy into the town plan for Selectboard approval, so the vote is recorded as a preliminary step. About 154 voters attended.
Town Meeting vote 3 March 2026; policy still to be written into the town plan; single outlet
980 Menomonie data center (Balloonist LLC) Balloonist, LLC City of Menomonie WI $1.6 billion; on land annexed by the city. No MW figure stated
pausedIn September 2025 Mayor Randy Knaack halted city support for the project, writing to Balloonist that the city was not interested in negotiating incentives, after resident pushback over secrecy, water and energy use. Civic Media reported in July 2026 that the paused tax increment negotiations had stalled development and that the city, which could not otherwise block a use that fell under its warehousing definition, was preparing a data center zoning ordinance for introduction on 4 August 2026.
Paused by the mayor in September 2025; zoning rewrite under way in mid 2026
981 Dane County 18-month pause on hyperscale data center permits n.a. Dane County Board of Supervisors WI Applies to hyperscale data centers, defined as at least 5,000 servers and at least 10,000 sq ft, in towns subject to county zoning; cities, villages and towns with their own zoning are not covered
moratoriumOn Thursday 4 June 2026 the Dane County Board of Supervisors approved Sub 1 to 2026 RES-039, which bars receiving applications for or granting zoning permits for hyperscale data centers for 18 months. The Zoning and Land Regulation Committee had narrowed the measure to hyperscale facilities. The county will use the time to write zoning regulations.
Approved 4 June 2026; 18 months
982 Manitowoc County 18-month data center moratorium Cloverleaf Infrastructure (reported approaching landowners in three towns) Manitowoc County Board WI Countywide; Cloverleaf Infrastructure had approached landowners in the towns of Two Creeks, Two Rivers and Mishicot near the Point Beach nuclear plant. No dollar or MW figure stated
moratoriumThe Manitowoc County Board voted unanimously on Tuesday 28 April 2026 to place an 18-month moratorium on data centers while the county researches and drafts zoning rules. The towns of Two Creeks, Two Rivers and Mishicot had passed identical resolutions in February 2026 asking the county for a one-year moratorium after Cloverleaf Infrastructure approached property owners.
Approved unanimously 28 April 2026; 18 months
983 Sawyer County 18-month moratorium on large data centers n.a. Sawyer County Board WI No project megawatt or dollar figure attached to the measure
moratoriumThe Sawyer County Board voted to adopt an 18-month temporary moratorium on development of large data centers and associated infrastructure, giving staff time to review zoning and propose setback, permitting and performance standards. The only fetched source is a Citizen Portal meeting summary dated 20 August 2026.
Adopted, reported 20 August 2026; 18 months; single outlet (meeting summary service)
984 Sentinel Grove Technology Park (Project Jarvis) n.a. St. Lucie County FL Up to $13.5B / up to 1 GW / nearly 15M sq ft on about 1,200 acres
withdrawnThe St. Lucie County planning and zoning board voted 4-2 in October 2025 against recommending the land use change for the campus on agricultural land along Orange Avenue. The developers withdrew the land use application in February 2026 after Governor Ron DeSantis proposed state legislation giving local governments more power to block large data centers. Heatmap Pro described it as the largest data center project canceled after local opposition in the first quarter of 2026.
Planning board vote October 2025; application withdrawn February 2026
985 Bolingbroke Technology Center Mayfield-PSH (LLC structure) Monroe County GA About $6B; more than 900 acres proposed for rezoning
deniedThe Monroe County Board of Commissioners voted unanimously on 5 August 2025 to deny the rezoning of more than 900 acres near Bolingbroke for a data center, about a week after the planning and zoning board unanimously recommended denial. Nearly 900 people attended the meeting to oppose the project. Property owners filed suit against the county over the denial on 3 September 2025.
Denied 5 August 2025; property owners' suit filed 3 September 2025
986 Beltline Energy data center (Highway O site) Beltline Energy City of Pacific Planning and Zoning Commission MO Proposed $16B data center off Highway O, south of the Pacific city limits
approved after delayBeltline Energy pulled its rezoning request for a proposed $16 billion data center from the agenda of a special Pacific Planning and Zoning Commission meeting on 25 February 2026, minutes into the meeting, citing an inability to finalize a funding agreement. Residents who had filled a high school auditorium to speak against the project were not able to address the commission. The city later adopted a 12-month data center moratorium (separate row). First Alert 4 describes the city request as tabled. The Franklin County Commission approved rezoning for the same Highway O site, the Meramec Valley Technology Park, on 15 September 2026.
City rezoning request tabled 25 February 2026; county rezoning approved 15 September 2026
987 Slavic Village hyperscale data center Lakeland Equity Group City of Cleveland OH $1.6B; two-story, 300,000 sq ft facility on a 35-acre site between East 49th and East 55th Streets
rejectedThe City of Cleveland rejected a permit application, filed 5 May 2026, for a $1.6 billion data center in Slavic Village, saying the application failed zoning review. Mayor Justin Bibb's office cited serious concerns about hyperscale, standalone data centers in residential neighborhoods. Lakeland Equity Group said it was considering its options, and City Council later approved a temporary pause on new standalone data center projects.
Permit filed 5 May 2026; rejection reported 14 May 2026
988 Microsoft Fairwater data center noise class action Microsoft Mount Pleasant / Sturtevant, Racine County WI $7.3B Fairwater data center; class covers households within 1.5 miles, reportedly more than 1,000 homes
litigationThree Sturtevant residents filed a class action against Microsoft on 1 July 2026 over noise, construction dust and light pollution from the Fairwater data center. The complaint says Microsoft did not install adequate acoustic barriers. Microsoft said on 18 June 2026 that engineering changes had resolved cooling-fan noise and that further mitigation was planned.
Class action filed 1 July 2026; single outlet
989 TerraWatt Midtown (Armory) data center TerraWatt City of St. Louis MO $3B campus; 120 MW data center in the former Famous-Barr warehouse on Market Street
litigationSt. Louis approved the Midtown data center with a community benefit agreement that lets the city fine the developer for tax revenue and job shortfalls and revoke permits for uncorrected noncompliance. TerraWatt's chief executive then sued the city, arguing the requirements exceed its powers and would make construction impossible, and several opponents separately sued the city to stop the development.
Developer and opponent suits reported 29 September 2026; developer suit filed the week of 21 September 2026; single outlet
990 Red Wolf hyperscale data center (Parallel Parkway) Red Wolf DCD Properties Unified Government of Wyandotte County and Kansas City, Kansas KS $12B; six buildings totaling 1.8M sq ft on the north and south sides of Parallel Parkway; about 400 acres per Data Center Watch
litigationThe Unified Government approved zoning for the $12 billion campus in May 2025, but protest petitions triggered a supermajority requirement and on 31 July 2025 the north side rezoning failed that threshold on a 7-3 vote. Landowners then sued over the rezoning, and KCUR reported in November 2025 that the petition and lawsuit had put the project on hold. Data Center Watch reported that on 29 October 2025 a Wyandotte County judge let the south tract case proceed.
North tract rezoning failed 31 July 2025; lawsuit reported on hold November 2025
991 TenKey LandCo Franklin data center TenKey LandCo Simpson County Fiscal Court / City of Franklin KY $5B data center off I-65 with on-site natural gas turbines; end user undisclosed
litigationFranklin's city council and planning commission voted unanimously in 2025 to reject a zoning change sought by the developer, and in December 2025 the Simpson County Fiscal Court passed an ordinance requiring heavy industrial zoning and a conditional use permit for data centers. TenKey LandCo sued the fiscal court in Simpson Circuit Court on 20 January 2026 seeking to strike down the ordinance. The Franklin planning commission also tabled a vote on TenKey's preliminary development plan in January 2026.
County ordinance December 2025; developer suit filed 20 January 2026; single outlet
992 Crooked Creek Technology Park Eagle Rock Partners / Thomas & Hutton Engineering Jones County GA 1.8M sq ft data center on more than 600 acres; developer investment estimate of $5B to $7B per Data Center Watch
withdrawnEagle Rock Partners and Thomas & Hutton Engineering withdrew their application to rezone more than 600 acres for the Crooked Creek Technology Park on 20 October 2025, less than 24 hours before the planning and zoning hearing, after organized opposition under the banner No Data Centers in Jones County. The planning and zoning board then recommended that commissioners restrict data centers to heavy industrial districts.
Rezoning application withdrawn 20 October 2025
993 Pine Ridge Technology Park rezoning lawsuit Eagle Rock Partners Twiggs County Superior Court GA About 300 acres (Weyerhaeuser land); up to nine buildings and three substations; developer estimates taxable value of about $2B once developed
litigationThe Twiggs County commission voted unanimously on 18 September 2025 to rezone about 300 acres for the data center. Neighboring residents sued the county in Twiggs County Superior Court on 26 September 2025, alleging it ignored its own zoning and public notice rules, and asked the court to cancel the decision.
Rezoned 18 September 2025; suit filed 26 September 2025
994 Project West n.a. City of LaGrange / Troup County GA Reported as a $9.7B campus on more than 513 acres targeting nearly 600 MW (Fox 5 Atlanta); described as a $6B project by LaGrange Daily News
deniedProject West was proposed on more than 513 acres of unincorporated Troup County near LaGrange and sought annexation into the city. The City of LaGrange denied the annexation, and Troup County adopted a 90-day moratorium on data center applications effective 16 September 2025, which it later renewed twice.
County moratorium effective 16 September 2025; city annexation denial date not stated in the fetched sources
995 Rochelle data center (Steward Drive) Midwest Power Investors LLC / LFF Industrial City of Rochelle IL At least 48 MW initially, expandable to 150 MW in later phases
rejectedThe Rochelle City Council voted 0-7 on 27 April 2026 against the agreement for a data center along Steward Drive, after delaying the decision on 23 March 2026. The mayor urged the council to vote the contract down. City staff had worked on the agreement since early 2025.
Vote delayed 23 March 2026; rejected 0-7 on 27 April 2026; single outlet
996 La Pine Industrial Park data center Boxminer.io City of La Pine OR 20 MW data center on 19.5 acres; described by the local economic development group as an $800M investment
rejectedThe La Pine City Council voted unanimously on 27 May 2026 against pursuing a land sale in the La Pine Industrial Park to the developer of a 20-megawatt data center, after hours of resident testimony against it. Opponents cited groundwater, air quality and the capacity of the rural grid.
Rejected 27 May 2026; single outlet
997 Midtown Business Park data center land sale Priority Power Management City of College Station TX Up to 200 acres in the Midtown Business Park; dollar and megawatt figures not stated in the fetched pages
rejectedThe College Station City Council voted unanimously on 11 September 2025, after nearly six hours of discussion, to reject the sale of city land for a data center of up to 200 acres. More than 75 people registered to speak and a petition with 5,047 signatures was delivered to the council.
Land sale rejected 11 September 2025
998 AWS third Louisa County data center campus (Northeast Creek Reservoir) Amazon Web Services Louisa County VA 7.2M sq ft of buildings on 1,370 acres; no dollar or megawatt figure in the fetched source
withdrawnAmazon Web Services withdrew its request to build a third data center campus in Louisa County in July 2025, with its lawyer writing that the company had heard the community and was reevaluating the project. Residents had objected at a late June 2025 town hall over noise, traffic, water use and energy bills, and the Board of Supervisors chairman had said he would vote no.
Withdrawal reported 25 July 2025; single outlet
999 ONMINE computing and energy research annex (6509 S. Fort Hood Street) ONMINE City of Killeen TX $30 million facility on about 2.6 acres
withdrawnThe Killeen Planning and Zoning Commission voted 4-1 on 27 April 2026 against a conditional use permit for ONMINE's proposed $30 million facility, despite a staff recommendation for approval, after nearly 30 residents spoke in opposition. The city listed the project as a computing and energy research annex, similar to a data center at a smaller scale. The city confirmed on 12 May 2026 that the applicant had withdrawn the request before a city council hearing set for 2 June 2026, where it would have needed six votes.
Planning and Zoning Commission vote 27 April 2026; withdrawal confirmed 12 May 2026
1000 Google Hermantown data center (Project Loon) Google (Mortenson Development) St. Louis County District Court / City of Hermantown MN $1.2 billion to $1.5 billion on about 200 acres per MPR News; up to four buildings
litigationThe citizens' group Stop the Hermantown Data Center sued the City of Hermantown in St. Louis County District Court on 29 April 2026, alleging the city improperly amended its 2045 comprehensive plan and rezoned the Adolph neighborhood for the data center, and violated the open meeting law by closing three meetings. The group asks the court to vacate the plan and undo the rezoning the council approved in October 2025. A separate suit filed in November 2025 with the Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy alleges the project's environmental review was inadequate. No ruling in either case was found in the sources reviewed, and the project still needs city council approval. The Hermantown City Council voted unanimously, as reported on 5 October 2026, to adopt the updated Alternative Urban Areawide Review for the proposed data center, which was first adopted in October 2025 and redone and finalized in August 2026. The Stop the Hermantown Data Center group said residents had asked for a full Environmental Impact Statement instead.
Environmental review suit filed November 2025; zoning and open meeting suit filed 29 April 2026; updated AUAR adopted, reported 5 October 2026
1001 Nodaway County six-month data center moratorium (White Cloud Acres) Scale Microgrids (formerly ReLoad Energy) Nodaway County Commission MO Moratorium on construction and operation of data centers and supporting facilities in unincorporated Nodaway County; affects the proposed $6.3 billion White Cloud Acres campus with a 600 MW co-located gas plant
moratoriumNodaway County commissioners unanimously approved a six-month moratorium on building data centers at their 21 July 2026 meeting, after 30 minutes of public comment. The order covers the construction or establishment of a data center or any supporting or ancillary facility in unincorporated areas, and the county may seek cease and desist orders for violations. The commission said the pause allows time to study the issue and to consider adopting planning or zoning. The proposed White Cloud Acres site has no announced occupant, and the developer holds an option on the land but has not bought it.
Approved unanimously 21 July 2026; six months; single outlet for the vote (KXCV-KRNW)
1002 Project Cornmaze data center campus (Towns of Turtle and Beloit) Panattoni Development Co. Town of Turtle and Town of Beloit WI $1 billion, 2 million sq ft campus along Prairie Avenue
moratoriumOn Wednesday 29 July 2026 the Town of Turtle Board of Supervisors unanimously rejected a revised cost-reimbursement agreement with Panattoni Development for a proposed $1 billion, 2 million sq ft hyperscale data center campus spanning the towns of Turtle and Beloit, and passed a resolution starting the process for a 12-month moratorium on developments of more than 10,000 sq ft. The Town of Beloit board unanimously took the same two actions on Friday 31 July 2026. The Beloit Daily News later reported that the Turtle board has approved the 12-month moratorium (adoption date not stated). Turtle board chair Roger Anclam, who had voted for the original agreement in early July 2026, faces a recall election over it. Panattoni said it would review the actions and determine a path forward.
Cost agreements rejected and moratorium process started 29 July 2026 (Turtle) and 31 July 2026 (Beloit); Turtle 12-month moratorium since approved, adoption date not stated
1003 Waterville six-month data center moratorium n.a. Waterville City Council OH Citywide; no project, dollar or megawatt figure attached to the measure
moratoriumThe Waterville City Council voted unanimously on Monday 8 December 2025 to place a six-month moratorium on data centers in the city. The original proposal sought 12 months; the six-month term was a compromise backed by Mayor Timothy Pedro, who said the city needed time to study data centers and their potential impact.
Approved unanimously 8 December 2025; six months; single outlet
1004 Warren 12-month data center moratorium n.a. Warren City Council MI Citywide; no project pending; excludes server rooms under 2,500 square feet tied to another permitted use
moratoriumThe Warren City Council unanimously approved a 12-month moratorium on data centers at its 25 August 2026 meeting, giving the city time to define the facilities in its zoning ordinance and decide where and under what conditions they should be allowed. Council Secretary Mindy Moore had called for a pause after July storms knocked down more than 60 power lines in the city. The moratorium does not affect existing facilities or previously approved uses, and excludes server rooms of less than 2,500 square feet that are related to another permitted use. The council's attorney said he was not aware of any hyperscale data center operating in Warren.
Approved unanimously 25 August 2026; 12 months
1005 Warren one-year data center moratorium n.a. Warren City Council OH Data center projects larger than 1,000 square feet; no project pending
moratoriumWarren City Council unanimously approved a one-year moratorium on data center projects larger than 1,000 square feet on Wednesday 9 September 2026. The legislation directs Mayor Doug Franklin to appoint a Data Center Review Committee, which must give council written recommendations within nine months, and it expires after one year unless extended, repealed or replaced. It does not stop the operation or ordinary maintenance of existing data centers. A permanent ban proposed by Councilwoman Helen Rucker was tabled in July 2026.
Approved unanimously 9 September 2026; one year
1006 ServerFarm data center and VoltaGrid temporary power plant (Newton County air permits) ServerFarm; VoltaGrid Georgia Environmental Protection Division GA No dollar or MW figure stated
approved after delayIn July 2026 ServerFarm and the adjacent VoltaGrid temporary gas power plant were told to stop construction after residents reported generators being built before the required air permits were issued. Under separate consent orders the Georgia EPD assessed penalties of $31,000 against ServerFarm and $11,500 against VoltaGrid, and both now hold construction permits under a combined permit that limits generator operation. The Georgia PSC could also act but its process is at an early stage.
Stop-work reported July 2026; consent orders and permits reported 5 October 2026 (WSB-TV); single outlet
1007 Beaufort County one-year data center moratorium n.a. (county-wide action) Beaufort County Board of Commissioners NC No data center currently proposed in the county; no dollar or MW figure
moratoriumBeaufort County commissioners voted 6-1 on Monday 5 October 2026 for a one-year moratorium under which the county will not accept, process or approve applications for the establishment, construction, expansion or operation of a data center. Commissioner Hood Richardson voted against. Commissioners said they intend to write an ordinance addressing noise and electricity during the pause.
Adopted 6-1 on Monday 5 October 2026; one year
1008 Logan County (Nebraska) 12-month data center moratorium n.a. Logan County Board of Commissioners NE Countywide 12-month ban that also bars wind and solar energy systems and cryptocurrency mining facilities; no project named
moratoriumThe Logan County Board of Commissioners voted on Wednesday 15 July 2026 to approve a 12-month moratorium on data centers, making Logan the 12th Nebraska county to halt data center construction. The ban also covers wind and solar systems and cryptocurrency mining while the county rewrites its comprehensive plan and zoning regulations.
Approved Wednesday 15 July 2026; 12 months; single outlet
1009 Custer County (Nebraska) data center moratorium n.a. Custer County Board NE No project named in source
moratoriumNebraska Public Media reported on 16 July 2026 that Custer County was one of eleven Nebraska counties that already had a data center moratorium in place when Logan County approved a 12-month moratorium on 15 July 2026. The source does not give the adoption date, vote or duration for Custer County.
In place by 16 July 2026; adoption date and term not stated; single outlet
1010 Aberdeen data center permit moratorium n.a. Aberdeen City Council SD Citywide pause on building and zoning permits for new data centers; no project named in the source
moratoriumAberdeen passed a moratorium on data center building and zoning permits in July 2026, under which city officials may not issue permits authorizing construction, expansion or operation of a data center within city limits; it runs to 18 November 2026. The council's Monday 5 October 2026 agenda set a public hearing for 19 October 2026 on Resolution 26-07-04R, which would extend it to 1 July 2027, citing water supply and noise.
Passed July 2026 (exact date not stated); runs to 18 November 2026; extension to 1 July 2027 set for a hearing on 19 October 2026 at the Monday 5 October 2026 council meeting
1011 Project Alpaca data center (Midway Green Industrial Park) n.a. (undisclosed; code name Project Alpaca) Union County Council SC More than $400 million investment, over 50 high-wage jobs and over 500 construction jobs
pausedOn 28 April 2026 Union County Council voted to table the first reading of a fee in lieu of tax (FILOT) ordinance for Project Alpaca, a proposed data center of more than $400 million in the Midway Green Industrial Park. The council said it will no longer consider the project for now and cancelled the 12 May 2026 public hearing; if the project is reintroduced it will hold a public information forum before deciding on the tax agreement.
First reading tabled 28 April 2026; council statement reported 5 May 2026
1012 Bernalillo three-month data center moratorium n.a. Town of Bernalillo Town Council NM Pause on development approvals and permits for data centers within town limits; no project named
moratoriumThe Bernalillo Town Council approved a resolution on 28 September 2026 establishing a three-month moratorium on development approvals and development permits for data centers within town limits, citing potential impacts on water and energy resources, so the town can update its ordinances and processes. Mayor Jack Torres said the town would not be in a good position to address community concerns if a proposal arrived now.
Approved 28 September 2026; three months; single outlet (Sandoval Signpost)
1013 Moore County (Metropolitan Lynchburg-Moore County) two-year data center pause n.a. Metropolitan Lynchburg-Moore County Council TN Countywide pause on data centers while siting rules are written; no project named
moratoriumThe Metro Council approved a two-year pause on data centers in April 2026 to give Moore County time to decide where such projects should be allowed and what rules should apply. Planning commissioners have discussed keeping large data centers away from schools and Lynchburg's tourism core while considering areas such as the industrial park.
Approved April 2026 (day not stated); two years; single outlet (Moore County Observer)
1014 Anne Arundel County data center moratorium (Bill 63-26) n.a. Anne Arundel County Council MD Countywide; projects already in the development process generally allowed to continue
moratoriumOn Monday 5 October 2026 the Anne Arundel County Council voted 7-0 to approve an amended Bill 63-26, a temporary moratorium on new data center development that runs until 31 January 2028 or until the county adopts comprehensive data center legislation, whichever comes first. The bill as introduced would have banned new privately operated data centers; the council amended it in September to a moratorium. Projects already in the development process, including future phases of existing data centers on adjacent or adjoining properties, can generally continue, and a county work group will recommend permanent rules. The bill also repeals a personal property tax assessment reduction for qualified data storage centers.
Approved 7-0 on 5 October 2026; runs to 31 January 2028 or until comprehensive legislation is adopted
1015 Old Town six-month data center ban (industrial zones) n.a. Old Town City Council ME Citywide industrial zones; no named project
moratoriumThe Old Town City Council unanimously passed a six-month ban on data center development in the city's industrial zones on Monday 5 October 2026, retroactive to 8 September 2026, when the council first discussed it. Data centers are already not allowed in the city's other zones. The ban is set to expire in March 2027 with a possible extension to June 2027; councilors have said a long-term zoning ban would go to a public referendum.
Passed unanimously 5 October 2026; six months, retroactive to 8 September 2026; single outlet
1016 Cascade data center moratorium (Simple Mining industrial park project) Simple Mining City of Cascade IA Land already purchased in the Cascade industrial park; size not stated
moratoriumThe City of Cascade, Iowa, has paused data center development under a moratorium set to end in June 2027 while it writes regulations; neither Cascade nor Peosta had specific data center rules. Cedar Falls-based Simple Mining, which has bought land in the city's industrial park and has an initial agreement with the Cascade Economic Development Corp., cannot move forward until the city adopts regulations. The company's CEO said he welcomes clear restrictions.
Moratorium in place, reported 2 October 2026; runs to June 2027; adoption date not stated; single outlet
1017 Cheyenne and Arapaho Tribes three-year data center ban on tribal lands n.a. Cheyenne and Arapaho Tribal Council OK Tribal lands; no named project
moratoriumAt its annual tribal council meeting on Saturday 3 October 2026, the Cheyenne and Arapaho Tribal Council, open to any enrolled member over 18, voted 261-83 for a resolution banning data center facilities on tribal lands until October 2029 so the tribe can study their impacts. Gov. Reggie Wassana had argued for data centers on tribal property, saying developers had pitched sites and per capita payments could follow. Cherokee Nation, the Seminole Nation of Oklahoma and the Kickapoo Tribe of Oklahoma have imposed similar bans.
Approved 261-83 on 3 October 2026; ban runs to October 2029
1018 Cass County (Nebraska) 12-month data center moratorium n.a. Cass County Board of Commissioners NE Countywide (unincorporated); no named project
moratoriumAfter a public hearing, the Cass County Board of Commissioners voted 5-0 on 11 August 2026 to approve a 12-month moratorium on permits for data centers, and tabled proposed data center regulations to 22 September 2026. The county moratorium stops at the edge of Nehawka's extraterritorial zoning jurisdiction.
Approved 5-0 on 11 August 2026; 12 months
1019 Otoe County (Nebraska) one-year data center moratorium n.a. Otoe County Board of Commissioners NE Countywide (unincorporated); no named project
moratoriumOtoe County commissioners passed a one-year moratorium on data centers at their Tuesday 19 May 2026 meeting, and the board chairman appointed a committee to update the decade-old comprehensive development plan, which defines data centers but does not place them on the land use map. Power plants, which data centers are being required to have alongside them, are within the committee's scope.
Passed 19 May 2026; one year
1020 Seward County (Nebraska) one-year data center moratorium n.a. Seward County Board of Commissioners NE Countywide (unincorporated); no named project
moratoriumSeward County commissioners unanimously approved a moratorium on data center construction on Tuesday 30 June 2026, with two members absent. It lasts one year, unless extended, or until the county drafts and finalizes data center regulations.
Approved 30 June 2026; one year or until regulations are adopted
1021 Delphos 18-month moratorium on data centers and renewable energy projects n.a. Delphos City Council OH Citywide; no named project
moratoriumDelphos City Council voted on Monday 5 October 2026 to impose an 18-month moratorium on data centers and renewable energy projects. Officials said they want to see what Ohio lawmakers do on data center rules before setting local regulations. Nearby Lima and Shawnee Township have similar 18-month pauses.
Approved 5 October 2026; 18 months; vote count not reported; single outlet
1022 Evansville 180-day data center moratorium n.a. Evansville City Council IN Citywide; no named project
moratoriumThe Evansville City Council approved a 180-day moratorium on new data center development, pausing data center applications, on Monday 5 October 2026 while officials study effects on infrastructure, utilities and neighborhoods and finalize zoning rules. The moratorium can be extended. Council President Ben Trockman said the decision followed sustained public concern.
Approved 5 October 2026 (second reading); 180 days, extendable; vote count not reported
1023 West Seneca one-year data center moratorium (20 MW and above) n.a. Town of West Seneca Town Board NY Townwide; applies to data centers of 20 MW or more; no named project
moratoriumThe West Seneca Town Board voted 4-0 on Monday 28 September 2026 to adopt a local law imposing a one-year moratorium on the construction of data centers of 20 MW or more, a lower threshold than the state's 50 MW moratorium. Supervisor Gary Dickson said no one had approached the town about a data center. The moratorium expires at the end of August 2027 and may be extended.
Adopted 4-0 on 28 September 2026; expires end of August 2027
1024 Menasha one-year data center moratorium n.a. City of Menasha Common Council WI Citywide; no named project
moratoriumThe Menasha Common Council voted 6-2 on Monday 5 October 2026 to approve a one-year moratorium on data centers, giving the city time to update its zoning code before any proposal arrives. Mayor Austin Hammond described it as a pause to put guardrails in place; an alder voting no said staff should focus on tornado recovery.
Approved 6-2 on Monday 5 October 2026; one year; single outlet
1025 Wisconsin Rapids 12-month data center development moratorium n.a. City of Wisconsin Rapids Common Council WI Citywide; no named project
moratoriumOn Monday 5 October 2026 the Wisconsin Rapids Planning Commission held three public hearings and voted unanimously to recommend a 12-month development moratorium on rezonings and land divisions that would enable data center development, plus zoning amendments creating a Data Center Overlay District, outside which data centers may not be built. The Common Council met in special session immediately afterward and approved all three items unanimously. The city attorney said the moratorium takes effect the day after legal publication.
Adopted unanimously by the Common Council on Monday 5 October 2026; 12 months from publication; single outlet
1026 York County nine-month data center moratorium n.a. York County Council SC Countywide on new proposals; does not stop the existing $8 billion QTS Lake Wylie project
moratoriumYork County Council voted unanimously on Monday 13 July 2026 to start a nine-month moratorium on new data center proposals while it revises land use and zoning rules. The pause runs to about mid-April 2027 and does not stop the QTS campus already in development at Lake Wylie. County staff have since said an extension will likely be needed because an independent impact study, expected to cost $200,000 or more, could run until April and new rules would not be ready before fall 2027.
Adopted unanimously Monday 13 July 2026; nine months to about mid-April 2027; extension under discussion
1027 Oklahoma City data center moratorium n.a. Oklahoma City Council OK Citywide; two pending rezoning cases exempted
moratoriumThe Oklahoma City Council unanimously approved a temporary moratorium that halts the acceptance of new applications and the processing and issuance of rezonings and permits for the construction or expansion of data centers, announced by the city on 21 April 2026. It took effect immediately and runs until 31 December 2026, or earlier if the council approves zoning code amendments on data centers. Two pending data center rezoning cases were exempted.
Approved unanimously, announced 21 April 2026; in effect until 31 December 2026 or earlier on adoption of zoning amendments
1028 Project Lightning data center, Wildwood Commerce Park (Carroll County rejects agreement amendment) Undisclosed end user (Blue Ridge Crossroads Economic Development Authority negotiating) Carroll County Board of Supervisors VA More than $11 billion per Grayson County administrator
delayedOn Monday 5 October 2026 the Carroll County Board of Supervisors voted down an amendment to the 16-year-old Wildwood Commerce Park agreement that would have shifted decision-making to the Blue Ridge Crossroads Economic Development Authority for an $11 billion data center proposal. Carroll was the only one of the three localities (with Grayson County and Galax) to reject it; Grayson's administrator had said all three must approve the change before the project moves forward. The authority now cannot negotiate with an end user without returning to the localities, and the board agreed to explore leaving the authority.
Amendment rejected Monday 5 October 2026; single outlet
1029 City of South Fulton data center moratorium (expired) n.a. City of South Fulton City Council GA Citywide; no named project
otherThe City of South Fulton adopted a moratorium on new data center development in December 2025. In August 2026 the city approved an ordinance replacing its data center regulations with new permitting requirements and performance standards, and the moratorium expired on 9 September 2026. Mayor Carmalitha Gumbs has since said publicly that the city welcomes data centers as an economic necessity.
Adopted December 2025; replacement ordinance August 2026; expired 9 September 2026
1030 Black Mountain southeast Fort Worth data center site plan (EdgeConneX) Black Mountain; EdgeConneX (developer and operator) Fort Worth City Council TX $10 billion; 187 acres; just over 1 million sq ft (revised from about 3 million)
approved after delayFort Worth City Council votes on the site plan for the $10 billion campus south of Lon Stephenson Road were postponed in May and June 2026 after resident and council opposition. The developer cut the land footprint by about half and added buffers of more than 300 feet. On Tuesday 25 August 2026 the council approved an amended site plan with four buildings and a dedicated substation, and EdgeConneX said it is the developer and operator.
Postponed May and June 2026; amended site plan approved Tuesday 25 August 2026
1031 Osceola County pause on large-scale data center applications n.a. Osceola County Board of County Commissioners FL Countywide; applies to large-scale data centers (state law defines these as 50 MW or more of anticipated monthly peak load); no specific project named
pausedOsceola County said in a statement reported on 3 October 2026 that no applications for large-scale data centers will be considered for review until the state-mandated study under Florida's CS/CS/SB 484 (Chapter 2026-65) is delivered to state leaders. Commissioners unanimously agreed at a June 2026 workshop to defer action on large-scale data center proposals until that report, which the Office of Program Policy Analysis and Government Accountability must commission and which is due by 1 July 2027. The county said commissioners could wait beyond that date while they evaluate the findings. The pause rests on board consensus and a county statement rather than an adopted moratorium ordinance.
Board consensus at a June 2026 workshop; county statement reported 3 October 2026 (single outlet); state study due 1 July 2027
1032 Newburyport ban on water-cooled data centers n.a. City of Newburyport MA Citywide prohibition on data centers that use water for cooling, regardless of size or water source
moratoriumThe Newburyport City Council on Monday 5 October 2026 unanimously approved an ordinance banning data centers that obtain water for cooling purposes, regardless of size and regardless of water source. Sponsor Councilor Ben Harman cited Governor Healey's September 2026 executive order giving local boards a say over data centers. No specific project was pending.
Approved 5 October 2026 (Monday); permanent prohibition, no end date reported; single outlet
1033 Kennesaw six-month data center moratorium n.a. City of Kennesaw GA Citywide temporary moratorium on data centers
moratoriumThe Kennesaw City Council unanimously approved a six-month moratorium on data centers while staff develop definitions, land use and zoning standards for the facilities; a public hearing is planned later. The city attorney recommended six months rather than a year as easier to justify legally. No project or developer was named.
Approved early in the week of 5 October 2026 (reported Tuesday 6 October 2026); six months; single outlet
1034 Bitdeer Shalersville data center (Turnpike Commerce Center) Bitdeer (with Geis, Shalersville Holdings) Shalersville Township OH 15 modular buildings on 257 acres; 150 MW first phase plus 600 MW second phase, 750 MW total
moratoriumBitdeer proposes a 750 MW data center (non-mining) in 15 modular buildings on 257 acres at State Route 44 and Beck Road. The township has a data center moratorium that is scheduled to expire in November 2026, and trustees say the application was never accepted. On 6 October 2026 trustees unanimously adopted a zoning amendment classifying uses of 25 MW or more as heavy industry, a zone no township property carries; developer counsel called it unlawful and said the application was filed under the old rules. Further hearings are set for 14, 15 and 20 October 2026.
Zoning amendment adopted 6 October 2026; township moratorium in force, expires November 2026 (adoption date not reported)
1035 Lakeshore one-year interim control bylaw on AI data centres n.a. Municipality of Lakeshore Ontario Municipality-wide one-year prohibition on new AI data centres
moratoriumLakeshore council approved a one-year interim control bylaw prohibiting new AI data centres while the County of Essex studies the issue and develops planning recommendations for local municipalities. The measure passed at council's final meeting of the 2022 to 2026 term on Tuesday night. Mayor Tracey Bailey cited electricity, water, infrastructure, noise and land use concerns. No project was named.
Approved Tuesday 6 October 2026 (reported 8 October 2026); one year; single outlet
1036 Roxbury Technology Park (Diode Ventures) Diode Ventures Charles City County VA Data center campus on about 515 acres; no MW or dollar figure confirmed from a fetched page
withdrawnKansas-based Diode Ventures withdrew its application to rezone about 515 acres for the Roxbury Technology Park data center campus, notifying the Board of Supervisors on 18 August 2025, after months of resident opposition. The Planning Commission had recommended approval in May 2025 and supervisors deferred a decision in June 2025. Diode said it has no plans to resubmit on the site or elsewhere in the county.
Withdrawal notified 18 August 2025; reported 21 to 22 August 2025
1037 Topeka 12-month data center and battery storage moratorium n.a. City of Topeka KS Citywide one-year moratorium on data centers and battery storage facilities, later extended to utility connections inside and outside city limits
moratoriumThe Topeka City Council unanimously approved a 12-month moratorium on data centers within the city on Tuesday 14 July 2026, amending it before the vote to include battery storage facilities. On 11 August 2026 the council amended the moratorium to restrict city utility connections for data centers inside and outside city limits, preventing staff from extending service to a data center outside the city. The measure followed Compass Datacenters' proposed 10-building campus southwest of Topeka in Shawnee County, which has its own moratorium (row 574).
Approved 14 July 2026; 12 months; utility-connection amendment 11 August 2026
1038 Cloverleaf Infrastructure data center proposal (Village of Greenleaf) Cloverleaf Infrastructure Village of Greenleaf WI Described by the village board president as a multi-billion-dollar project; no MW, acreage or dollar figure confirmed from a fetched page
withdrawnOn Monday 12 January 2026 Cloverleaf told Village Board President Bonnie Crossman that the Village of Greenleaf was no longer being considered for its data center project, a decision she said was due mostly to community opposition. A Facebook group opposing the project had about 3,000 members in a village of about 900 residents.
Developer withdrew the site 12 January 2026; announced 13 January 2026
1039 Rowan County one-year data center moratorium n.a. Rowan County Board of Commissioners NC Countywide moratorium on zoning or rezoning for data center purposes; does not apply to the Long Ferry Road data center development already in process
moratoriumRowan County commissioners passed a one-year data center moratorium on Monday 20 April 2026 that prohibits any zoning or rezoning for data center purposes; because one commissioner left before the vote it required a second approval. The moratorium runs to 4 May 2027, with planning board recommendations due by 8 February 2027. Under North Carolina law it does not apply to the Long Ferry Road data center development already in process.
Passed 20 April 2026 (second approval required); expires 4 May 2027; Carolina Public Press (11 June 2026) reports the moratorium as passed
1040 Hillsborough two-month data center moratorium n.a. Town of Hillsborough NC Townwide two-month (60-day) moratorium; no data center requests had been received
moratoriumThe Town of Hillsborough passed a two-month moratorium on data centers to allow time to adopt planning ordinances that specifically define them, although the town had received no data center requests. Mayor Mark Bell said the town's constrained water and sewer capacity could not support a hyperscale data center.
Passed by late May 2026 (reported 29 May 2026 by Chapelboro, not fetched; confirmed by Carolina Public Press 11 June 2026); two months, so likely expired by August 2026 unless extended
1041 Boiling Spring Lakes one-year data center moratorium n.a. City of Boiling Spring Lakes NC Citywide one-year moratorium; no prior proposals from developers
moratoriumThe coastal town of Boiling Spring Lakes in Brunswick County adopted a year-long data center moratorium despite having no prior proposals from developers, as reported by Carolina Public Press. A moratorium had been proposed in May 2026.
Adopted Monday 8 June 2026 (Carolina Public Press, Thursday 11 June 2026, 'on Monday'); one year; single outlet
1042 Amazon data center campus on former GWU Virginia Science and Technology Campus (Bridgefield Tech Center) Amazon Data Services Loudoun County VA Four data center buildings with 84 backup generators; up to 217.4 MW of electricity per county documents; campus bought for about $427 million
otherAmazon filed a by-right data center application for the former George Washington University campus, which falls under the 1972 zoning ordinance through the Route 28 Tax District. On 6 October 2026 Loudoun Zoning Administrator Teresa Miller told supervisors that, under her 30 July 2026 advisory opinion, a data center is not a permitted use of the property and Amazon must obtain Board of Supervisors approval; staff will say so in comments on the application. Covenants restrict three of the 10 parcels to higher education use, the tax district expires 5 December 2026, and a pending resolution of intent to amend the zoning would make approval very difficult, per the county attorney.
Zoning administrator statement to supervisors 6 October 2026 (advisory opinion 30 July 2026); application still under staff review; single outlet
1043 LightEdge data center on city-owned land near the Ames airport LightEdge City of Ames IA 100,000 sq ft colocation data center; no MW or dollar figure disclosed
delayedDes Moines-based LightEdge proposed a 100,000 sq ft data center on city-owned land near the Ames airport. After weeks of review and significant public opposition, the Ames City Council voted to delay a decision until 1 May 2027 and created a study committee on environmental impacts, with meetings from late September through December 2026. LightEdge then signed a letter of intent, announced 10 September 2026, to buy 10 acres in the Boone Business Park instead.
Decision delayed to 1 May 2027 by a council vote in August 2026 (reported by KCCI 26 August 2026); Boone letter of intent announced 10 September 2026
1044 Humboldt County 45-day data center moratorium (unincorporated areas) n.a. Humboldt County CA Countywide pause on new data center applications; exemption for facilities under 15 MW on 100% renewable power with closed-loop cooling
moratoriumThe Humboldt County Board of Supervisors approved a 45-day urgency moratorium on new data center developments in unincorporated areas by a 4-1 vote on Tuesday 6 October 2026, with Supervisor Rex Bohn dissenting. The motion was amended to exempt facilities using less than 15 MW sourced from 100% renewable energy and operating a closed-loop system. The moratorium took effect immediately and can be extended up to two years while staff draft zoning standards; the county has received no data center applications.
Approved 4-1 on 6 October 2026; 45 days, extendable up to two years
1045 San Francisco 45-day citywide data center moratorium n.a. City and County of San Francisco CA Citywide pause on new data centers and expansions; covers the NOVVA 400 Paul Avenue expansion (9 MW to 36 MW by 2028) and a permitted 160,000 sq ft data center at 1215 Michigan Street
moratoriumThe San Francisco Board of Supervisors voted unanimously on Tuesday 6 October 2026 to pass a 45-day moratorium on new data centers citywide, including permit applications to expand existing facilities, effective immediately. The measure was introduced by District 10 Supervisor Shamann Walton. It pauses the planned expansion of NOVVA's 400 Paul Avenue data center in Bayview from 9 MW to 36 MW and a proposed 160,000 sq ft data center at 1215 Michigan Street in Dogpatch. It can be extended for up to 22 months while permanent controls are considered.
Passed unanimously 6 October 2026; 45 days, extendable up to 22 months
1046 Oakland 45-day data center moratorium n.a. City of Oakland CA Citywide pause on new data center approvals
moratoriumThe Oakland City Council unanimously approved a 45-day moratorium on new data centers on the night of Tuesday 6 October 2026, sponsored by Councilmember Carroll Fife. The pause gives the city time to study effects on water supply, the power grid and air quality and to draft a regulatory framework; it can be extended after 45 days.
Approved unanimously 6 October 2026; 45 days, extendable
1047 Northeast Brighton data center campus rezoning (County Road 4 and 50th Avenue) Alberta Development Partners; planning firm Dewberry City of Brighton CO 2.5 million sq ft campus of eight two-story data centers of about 315,000 sq ft each
withdrawnDevelopers withdrew the rezoning application for a 2.5 million sq ft, eight-building data center campus near County Road 4 and 50th Avenue after residents learned of the plans through open records requests and opposition grew. Denver7 reports the application was pulled on Monday 5 October 2026 and announced at the Tuesday 6 October council meeting; the city says it has no indication of a resubmission. The same night the City Council gave initial approval to a one-year moratorium on new data centers while it drafts zoning rules.
Rezoning application withdrawn 5 October 2026, announced 6 October 2026; one-year moratorium given initial approval 6 October 2026 (final adoption not yet reported)
1048 Raleigh six-month large-scale data center moratorium n.a. City of Raleigh NC Citywide pause on approvals for larger data centers; exempts small standalone facilities of 10,000 sq ft or less with peak demand of 5 MW or less and no on-site staff
moratoriumThe Raleigh City Council voted 7-1 on Tuesday 6 October 2026, with Councilmember Christina Jones opposed, to impose a six-month moratorium on approvals for certain large-scale data centers while the city studies effects on utilities, the environment and neighborhoods. Small standalone facilities with no on-site personnel, a footprint of 10,000 sq ft or less and peak demand of 5 MW or less are exempt, as are qualifying internal server facilities. Advocates had sought a 32-month pause. As drafted, the moratorium runs through 6 April 2027.
Approved 7-1 on 6 October 2026; six months, through 6 April 2027 as drafted
1049 Columbus County 120-day data center moratorium n.a. Columbus County NC Countywide pause on data centers and similar high-intensity data processing facilities outside municipal planning areas
moratoriumColumbus County commissioners unanimously approved a 120-day moratorium on certain data center development on Monday 5 October 2026 after a public hearing. The pause applies to data centers and similar high-intensity data processing facilities outside municipal limits and municipal extraterritorial planning areas, while the county studies effects on utilities, natural resources and nearby properties.
Approved unanimously 5 October 2026; 120 days; single outlet
1050 Baldwin County 180-day moratorium on rezonings, data centers and renewable energy projects n.a. Baldwin County Commission AL Countywide 180-day pause on zoning change requests, renewable energy projects and data center development
moratoriumThe Baldwin County Commission unanimously passed a resolution enacting a 180-day moratorium on zoning change requests, renewable energy projects and the development of data centers throughout the county; Commissioner Skip Gruber was absent. The commission had earlier asked the Alabama Attorney General's Office whether it could impose such a pause.
Passed unanimously, reported 6 October 2026; 180 days; single outlet (fetched)
1051 Charleston (Illinois) one-year moratorium on data centers and battery energy storage systems n.a. City of Charleston IL Citywide pause on data centers, battery energy storage systems and related battery uses
moratoriumThe Charleston City Council approved 5-0 on Tuesday 6 October 2026 an ordinance establishing a temporary moratorium on data centers and battery energy storage systems while the city researches and updates its Unified Development Code, which has no data center rules. The Board of Zoning Appeals and Planning recommended it after a 24 September 2026 hearing. WAND reports the moratorium lasts through October 2027.
Approved 5-0 on 6 October 2026; through October 2027
1052 Blaine County 182-day emergency data center moratorium n.a. Blaine County Board of Commissioners ID Countywide pause on receipt, processing and approval of data center construction permits
moratoriumThe Blaine County Board of Commissioners voted 3-0 on Tuesday 6 October 2026 to enact a 182-day emergency moratorium on the receipt, processing and approval of development permits for data centers, the maximum period allowed by law, finding that data centers could pose an imminent threat to residents' health, safety and welfare. The county has received no data center applications; planning staff are drafting zoning amendments.
Approved 3-0 on 6 October 2026; 182 days
1053 Ellensburg six-month emergency data center moratorium n.a. City of Ellensburg WA Citywide pause on new data center proposals, including AI computing and cryptocurrency mining facilities
moratoriumThe Ellensburg City Council voted unanimously to establish a six-month emergency moratorium on new data center proposals within city limits, effective immediately and in place until 5 April 2027, while staff evaluate zoning, permitting and environmental review rules. It follows six-month moratoriums in Cle Elum and Kittitas County.
Approved unanimously the week of 5 October 2026 (reported 7 October 2026); in place until 5 April 2027
1054 Clean Cloud Energy data center campus proposal (Mahomet) Clean Cloud Energy Village of Mahomet IL Proposed data center campus in a rural area west of Champaign; no MW or dollar figure stated
cancelledOn Monday 5 October 2026 Mahomet officials announced they had ended discussions with Clean Cloud Energy about a data center campus, one week after disclosing the developer's approach; talks had run since December 2025. Mayor Jason Tompkins cited overwhelming resident opposition and said data centers do not align with community priorities. The Champaign County data center task force is moving forward on a county ordinance.
Talks ended 5 October 2026
1055 Project Rock Forge data center campus n.a. Rockdale County Board of Commissioners GA Data center campus on nearly 300 acres of mostly residentially designated land; no MW or dollar figure in fetched sources
deniedThe Rockdale County Board of Commissioners voted on Tuesday 6 October 2026 to deny four land-use and rezoning applications tied to Project Rock Forge, a proposed data center campus on nearly 300 acres of mostly residentially designated land that drew months of resident opposition. Commissioner Doreen Williams recused herself on all four items. A 24 September 2026 zoning hearing had ended without a decision.
Denied 6 October 2026; single outlet
1056 Johnson County (Iowa) data center moratorium n.a. Johnson County Board of Supervisors IA Pause on rezoning, subdivision and site plan approvals and building permits for data centers in unincorporated Johnson County
moratoriumThe Johnson County Board of Supervisors first approved a moratorium on 6 November 2025 that prevents approval of rezoning, subdivision and site plan applications and issuance of building permits related to data centers in unincorporated areas, while staff draft a data center ordinance. It is scheduled to expire 8 November 2026. The Planning and Zoning Commission voted 5-0 on 14 September 2026 to recommend a nine-month extension to 8 August 2027, which supervisors are weighing.
Approved 6 November 2025; expires 8 November 2026; extension to 8 August 2027 recommended 5-0 by the Planning and Zoning Commission on 14 September 2026, board vote pending
1057 Skybox Wichita Falls data center Skybox Datacenters City of Wichita Falls TX No MW or dollar figure in fetched source
delayedSkybox told the Wichita Falls City Council on Tuesday 6 October 2026 that groundbreaking on its planned data center, originally expected by the end of 2026, is pushed back to the first quarter of 2027 following the statewide data center audits ordered by Gov. Greg Abbott. Skybox said the project meets the state's requirements and that it was submitting the last tranche of audit information that day.
Delay disclosed 6 October 2026; groundbreaking now expected Q1 2027
1058 Mandan large-scale data center ban (citizen petition, special election) n.a. City of Mandan ND Citizen-petitioned measure to ban large-scale data centers
otherFollowing a citizen petition, Mandan voters will decide in a special election on Tuesday 15 December 2026 whether to ban large-scale data centers, City Administrator Jim Neubauer said; the measure cannot share a date with a separate special election for a vacant City Commission seat.
Special election set for 15 December 2026 (reported 7 October 2026); single outlet
1059 Colfax County one-year data center moratorium n.a. Colfax County Commission NM One-year pause on data centers in unincorporated Colfax County
moratoriumThe Colfax County Commission voted in August 2026 to adopt a one-year moratorium on data centers in unincorporated parts of the county, the fourth New Mexico county to do so after Santa Fe, Sierra and Socorro counties. The City of Raton, the county seat, voted 3-2 on 22 September 2026 against its own one-year moratorium.
Adopted August 2026 (day not stated); one year; single outlet
1060 Niles Charter Township 12-month data center moratorium n.a. Niles Charter Township Board of Trustees MI Township-wide 12-month pause on data center permits
moratoriumOn Monday 5 October 2026 the Niles Charter Township Board of Trustees approved an amendment to the township zoning ordinance establishing a 12-month data center moratorium. An earlier Herald-Palladium report says trustees had approved a 12-month moratorium on data center permits on 1 June and the planning commission began the zoning amendment on 9 June (year not shown on that page).
Zoning ordinance amendment approved 5 October 2026; 12 months; single outlet
1061 Coventry Mall data center (85,987 sq ft) PGOB Coventry Holdings LLC and PennMark Management Company Inc. North Coventry Township PA 85,987 sq ft data center in part of the former Coventry Mall
withdrawnThe developers withdrew their application to redevelop part of the former Coventry Mall with an 85,987 sq ft data center by a letter dated 6 October 2026, and the township cancelled the 22 October 2026 zoning hearing. The application, filed 13 August 2026, claimed the use was a public service facility allowed by special exception; the zoning officer found the use not permitted in the C-1 district. In February 2026 township supervisors had voted 3-2 against a separate 120,000 sq ft data center proposed off Route 724 before any application was filed.
Application filed 13 August 2026; withdrawn 6 October 2026
1062 Middleburg Heights data center moratorium (Ordinance 2026-42) n.a. City of Middleburg Heights OH Citywide moratorium on accepting, considering or issuing zoning or occupancy permits for any building, structure or use involving data centers
moratoriumMiddleburg Heights Ordinance No. 2026-42, introduced by Mayor Matthew J. Castelli, establishes a moratorium of up to 12 months on accepting for filing, considering or issuing zoning or occupancy permits for any building, structure, use or change of use involving data centers, and declares an emergency. The city lists it among its approved legislation, dated 23 June 2026.
Ordinance 2026-42 dated 23 June 2026 in the city's approved legislation (posted 25 June 2026); up to 12 months; single source (city website)
1063 Rose Hill citizen initiative banning data centers and battery energy storage (kept off ballot) n.a. City of Rose Hill KS Petitioned ordinance banning certain data centers and battery energy storage systems; 230 signatures
otherOn Monday 5 October 2026 the Rose Hill City Council passed Resolution 719 declaring that a citizen petition (230 signatures, almost 100 more than required) for an ordinance banning certain data centers and battery energy storage systems is administrative rather than legislative and so exempt from the initiative process, keeping it off the ballot. The council authorized the city attorney to defend the decision in court, distinguishing the El Dorado ruling that sent a similar initiative to the ballot.
Resolution passed 5 October 2026
1064 LD 307 Moratorium Amendment LiquidCool (seeking exemption for Loring data center) Maine (statewide) ME 26 MW
deniedGovernor Janet Mills VETOED LD 307 on April 24, 2026, "An Act to Establish the Maine Data Center Coordination Council and Place a Temporary Limitation on Certain Data Centers."
April 24, 2026
1065 Digital Gateway QTS Realty Trust / Compass Prince William County (Digital Gateway voided) VA $7,500M
litigationPrince William County (VA) Digital Gateway rezoning was voided by court order in August 2025.
July 2, 2026
1066 Project Range Tract Maricopa County AZ $14,000M / 1,800 MW
cancelledTract withdrew its $14B 'Project Range' application for a 30-building, 5.6M sq ft data center campus on ~1,000 acres near Yuma and Perryville roads in unincorporated Maricopa County.
May 1, 2024
1067 NE Edge Waterford / East Lyme NE Edge Waterford / East Lyme CT $231M / 300 MW
deniedCT Siting Council denied Dominion Energy's petition to modify Millstone Power Station boundaries for NE Edge's 1.5M sq ft hyperscale data center (300MW, ~15% of reactor output).
January 9, 2024
1068 Brennan Investment Group Barrington Hills Brennan Investment Group Barrington Hills IL $2,000M
cancelledBrennan Investment Group withdrew its $2 billion data center proposal for land south of Penny Road and west of Pond Gate Drive in Barrington Hills, Illinois, a suburb northwest of Chicago (110 acres).
January 29, 2026
1069 Cloud Centers Lisle Cloud Centers Lisle IL 50 MW
cancelledIn Lisle, Illinois, Cloud Centers proposed a 256,000 sq ft, 50MW data center on the former Lockformer toxic-contaminated site (18 acres).
March 12, 2026
1070 Karis Data Center (Nokia/Lucent Campus) Karis Critical Naperville IL $250M / 36 MW
deniedNaperville, Illinois, City Council voted 6-1 to deny Karis Critical's proposal for a 145,000 sq ft data center on the former Nokia/Lucent campus (36 MW, $250M, 40 acres).
January 21, 2026
1071 Brassie Golf Course Data Center Provident Realty Advisors Town of Chesterton IN $1,300M
cancelledProvident Realty Advisors proposed a $1.3B data center on the 200-acre former Brassie Golf Course site along Pearson Road.
June 1, 2024
1072 Project Flo Google Franklin Township (Indianapolis) IN $1,000M / 400 MW
cancelledGoogle withdrew its 468-acre 'Project Flo' data center in Franklin Township, Indianapolis on September 22, 2025, hours before the City-County Council was expected to vote it down.
September 22, 2025
1073 Provident Realty Advisors Town of Burns Harbor Provident Realty Advisors Town of Burns Harbor IN $1,300M
cancelledProvident Realty Advisors, after being rejected in Chesterton, proposed a seven-building, 102-acre data center campus at the corner of S. Babcock and Haglund Roads on the Worthington Steel property.
May 5, 2025
1074 Poe Companies / PowerHouse Data Centers (approved project) Louisville Poe Companies / PowerHouse Data Centers (approved project) Louisville KY 400 MW
moratoriumOne 525MW data center project in southwest Louisville has been cleared to proceed, built by Poe Companies and PowerHouse Data Centers (starting at 100MW, expanding to 400MW).
September 11, 2025
1075 Project Lincoln: OC Data Center Western Hospitality Partners Oldham County KY $6,000M / 600 MW
moratoriumWestern Hospitality Partners proposed 'Project Lincoln: OC Data Center,' a $6B, 600MW facility initially planned for 267 acres at 3557 North Highway 53.
July 2, 2025
1076 Amazon/AWS Caddo Parish Amazon/AWS Caddo Parish LA $12,000M
moratoriumFollowing Governor Jeff Landry's announcement of Amazon's $12 billion investment in three interconnected data center campuses across Caddo, Louisiana, and Bossier parishes, Commissioner Chris Kracman proposed a one-year
February 2, 2026
1077 Servistar Realties Westfield Servistar Realties Westfield MA $4,000M
delayedA $3-4 billion, 2.7M sq ft hyperscale data center campus proposed at 199 Servistar Industrial Way.
November 1, 2024
1078 Meta Howell Township Meta Howell Township MI $1,000M
moratoriumTownship enacted a unanimous six-month moratorium on Nov. 20, 2025 after ~2 hours of public comment.
November 20, 2025
1079 Amazon/AWS City of Becker Amazon/AWS City of Becker MN $1,000M / 600 MW
cancelledAmazon planned a multibillion-dollar data center near the Xcel Sherco coal-fired power plant in Becker, proposing 250 diesel backup generators.
May 23, 2025
1080 Geronimo Power Nobles County Geronimo Power Nobles County MN $4,000M
deniedNobles County (MN) Board of Commissioners voted 3-2 on April 21, 2026 to deny a zoning change that would have allowed Geronimo Power's proposed $4 billion, ~640-acre data center campus on farmland near Worthington
April 21, 2026
1081 Harper Road Technology Park Diode Ventures City of Peculiar MO $1,500M / 750 MW
cancelledPeculiar originally added a 'data center' definition to its light industrial zoning, enabling Diode Ventures' proposed $1.5B Harper Road Technology Park, a 500-acre campus with multiple buildings next to homes
October 1, 2024
1082 Nebius Independence Nebius Independence MO $6,600M / 1,200 MW
litigationIndependence City Council approved $6.26 billion in tax breaks over 20 years for Nebius on March 2, 2026, including a 98% real property tax abatement, 90% personal property tax abatement
February 10, 2026
1083 Atlas Power / Sabey Data Center Properties Butte Atlas Power / Sabey Data Center Properties Butte MT $1,750M / 250 MW
cancelledSabey Data Centers proposed two 500,000 sq ft buildings (1M sq ft total) on over 600 acres at Montana Connections Industrial Park in Butte, MT (Silver Bow County), requiring 325 MW of power and water-based cooling.
June 18, 2026
1084 Mooresville data center Tract Mooresville NC 1,500 MW
cancelledDenver-based Tract proposed the $30B Mooresville Technology Park on 400 acres of undeveloped land owned by Teresa Earnhardt, widow of NASCAR champion Dale Earnhardt.
August 13, 2025
1085 New Hill Digital Campus Natelli Investments LLC Wake County NC $1,000M / 300 MW
moratoriumNatelli Investments LLC withdrew its annexation and rezoning applications for the New Hill Digital Campus on March 5, 2026, a 190-acre, 250-300 MW data center on Shearon Harris Road near Apex, NC.
August 1, 2025
1086 Project Atlas Beale Infrastructure Coweta OK $800M / 400 MW
cancelledIn Coweta, Oklahoma, Beale Infrastructure's $800M Project Atlas proposed 295 acres for an Amazon/AWS data center with 400MW capacity.
January 19, 2026
1087 Intel / Stack Infrastructure Hillsboro (SB 1586) Intel / Stack Infrastructure Hillsboro (SB 1586) OR $700M
moratoriumSB 1586, which would have brought 373 acres of rural land into Hillsboro's UGB for tech industries, was shelved.
February 17, 2026
1088 Cleveland Cliffs Steel Plant Data Center Brian O'Neill (developer) Conshohocken / Plymouth Township PA $9,000M
cancelledA developer attempted to convert the Cleveland Cliffs steel plant on 66 acres of Plymouth Township's riverfront corridor into a data center for undisclosed Big Tech tenants.
October 1, 2025
1089 Kriger / Alpesh 'Al' Patel Blakely Kriger / Alpesh 'Al' Patel Blakely PA 1,500 MW
cancelledDevelopers proposed a data center campus offering up to 1.5GW of capacity on 209 acres in Blakely Borough, requiring power equivalent to the entire output of the nearby Lackawanna Energy Center gas-fired power plant.
September 12, 2025
1090 EagleRock Partners Colleton County (ACE Basin lawsuit) EagleRock Partners Colleton County (ACE Basin lawsuit) SC $6,000M / 1,000 MW
litigationLandowners Miles Crosby and Jennifer Singleton sued Colleton County, South Carolina, challenging a new zoning ordinance allowing 'special exception' approval for data centers in rural areas.
February 5, 2026
1091 Project Spero TigerDC (HG Tiger DC I LLC) Spartanburg County (NorthMark/Project Spero) SC $3,140M / 400 MW
cancelledTigerDC formally withdrew its $3 billion 'Project Spero' AI data center from Tyger River Industrial Park after Spartanburg County Council unanimously voted down two Fee-In-Lieu-Of-Tax (FILOT) agreements
February 27, 2026
1092 Applied Digital Toronto Applied Digital Toronto SD $16,000M / 430 MW
cancelledApplied Digital confirmed its proposed $5B, 430MW data center campus near Toronto, SD is 'unlikely to go forward' after the legislature rejected tax incentives.
January 6, 2026
1093 Sioux Falls Hyperscale Data Center Gemini Data Center SD LLC (Gemini Capital) Lincoln County SD $1,900M / 500 MW
moratoriumLincoln County Commissioner Joel Arends proposed a one-year moratorium on hyperscale data centers requiring 100+ MW, calling it an opportunity to 'press pause and further research' the impacts of projects like Gemini
February 24, 2026
1094 Bitcoin Mining Data Center Red Dog Technologies Franklin County TN $70M / 35 MW
deniedFranklin County Commission denied rezoning for Red Dog Technologies' proposed Bitcoin mining data center near Tullahoma.
April 1, 2022
1095 CloudBurst Data Centers / Highlander SC One LLC Hays County CloudBurst Data Centers / Highlander SC One LLC Hays County TX $1,200M / 1,200 MW
moratoriumWater advocates identified 5 data centers proposed for the Hays County, Texas, region during historic drought (proposed by CloudBurst Data Centers / Highlander SC One LLC) (1.2GW, $1.2B, 200 acres).
February 17, 2026
1096 Highlander SC One LLC San Marcos Highlander SC One LLC San Marcos TX $1,500M / 380 MW
deniedSan Marcos, Texas, City Council voted 5-2 at 2:14 AM on February 18, 2026 to deny zoning amendments for a $1.5 billion, 380 MW data center by Highlander SC One LLC (Fort Worth) on 200 acres on Francis Harris Lane.
February 17, 2026
1097 Balico Pittsylvania County Balico Pittsylvania County VA 3,500 MW
cancelledThe Pittsylvania County Board of Supervisors voted to deny a massive 2,200-acre datacenter campus proposal that would have included 84 datacenter buildings and a 3,500MW natural gas power plant.
April 1, 2025
1098 Hunting Hawk Technology Center HHHunt Hanover County VA 900 MW
cancelledIn Hanover County, Virginia, HHHunt's proposed Hunting Hawk Technology Park, a 10-building, 400-acre data center campus near the Wyndham community capable of supporting up to 900 MW, was rejected by Hanover's Planning
January 28, 2026
1099 Menomonie Data Center Balloonist LLC Menomonie WI $1,600M / 750 MW
cancelledMenomonie signed an NDA with Balloonist LLC in February 2024, over a year before announcing the $1.6B data center proposal in July 2025.
September 24, 2025
1100 Project Nova Microsoft Village of Caledonia WI $7,000M / 900 MW
cancelledMicrosoft cancelled its 244-acre, 900 MW Caledonia data center (Project Nova) after a 2,000-signature petition and strong community opposition forced a rethinking of the plan.
October 9, 2025
1101 Stargate / The Barn Related Digital / Oracle Saline Township Planning Commission MI 1,400 MW
deniedAfter an August 5, 2025 first public hearing dominated by opposition, the Saline Township Planning Commission tabled Related Digital's 'conditional rezoning' application for 575 acres from A-1 Agricultural to I-1
August 12, 2025
1102 gas turbine proposal near Amazon data center Duke Energy NC regulators NC n.a.
denieddenied Duke Energy’s $584 million gas turbine proposal
Sep 18, 2026
1103 Oppidan City of North Mankato Oppidan City of North Mankato MN 500 MW
litigationOppidan halted its data center project citing lengthy permitting for diesel generators.
August 1, 2025
1104 American Tower Corporation Pike Township (Indianapolis withdrawal) American Tower Corporation Pike Township (Indianapolis withdrawal) IN 4 MW
cancelledAmerican Tower Corporation withdrew its rezoning petition for a proposed 20,000-square-foot data center near W. 79th Street and Township Line Road in Pike Township, Indianapolis, after sustained pushback
February 2, 2026
1105 Gigaland Fauquier County (Gigaland) Gigaland Fauquier County (Gigaland) VA $3,067M / 600 MW
withdrawnGigaLand withdrew its original datacenter application in Fauquier County, Virginia, after significant community opposition, but resubmitted a scaled-down proposal in early 2026, reduced by 55% to 998,000 sq ft and 600
July 16, 2026
1106 NOVEC Prince William County (Diamond Hill substation) NOVEC Prince William County (Diamond Hill substation) VA 300 MW
deniedPrince William County, Virginia, Planning Commission voted 5-3 on March 11, 2026 to deny the Diamond Hill substation, a proposed 300 MW electric utility substation with a collocated Dominion Energy switching station
March 11, 2026
1107 Penzance Development / 1500 Gateway LLC Fredericksburg Penzance Development / 1500 Gateway LLC Fredericksburg VA 600 MW
cancelledPenzance Development / 1500 Gateway LLC proposed a 600 MW data center on 84 acres in Fredericksburg, Virginia.
December 11, 2025
1108 Google / Microsoft Minnesota (Statewide) Google / Microsoft Minnesota (Statewide) MN $650M
cancelledBipartisan bill HF4077/SF4379 to ban local government officials from signing NDAs with data center developers is advancing through both chambers.
March 12, 2026
1109 JRE Strategies LLC Ardmore JRE Strategies LLC Ardmore OK 10 MW
cancelledJRE Strategies LLC withdrew its data center proposal after the Ardmore, Oklahoma, Planning Commission voted 7-0 against rezoning 6.74 acres from single-family residential to light industrial.
March 16, 2026
1110 Rocklocker LLC Kalkaska County Rocklocker LLC Kalkaska County MI 1,000 MW
cancelledRocklocker LLC (headed by Traverse City geologist Matt Rine) proposed a gigawatt-scale hyperscale data center on 1,440 acres of state-owned land near Island Lake and South River roads, with its own natural gas power
November 1, 2025
1111 PW Digital Gateway QTS Realty Trust / Compass Prince William County VA $24,700M
litigationCircuit Court Judge Kimberly Irving voided the December 2023 rezoning of 2,133 acres for the Prince William Digital Gateway, a multi-gigawatt data center hub by QTS Realty Trust and Compass near Manassas National
January 12, 2024
1112 Project Scott Provident Realty Advisors Archbald Borough PA $2,100M
deniedCouncil voted down Provident Realty Advisors' application to build a giant data center after months of growing outcry.
March 27, 2026
1113 Green Chile Project (gas pipeline for Project Jupiter) Energy Transfer / Transwestern Pipeline Company Dona Ana County (Project Jupiter pipeline) NM $60M
deniedOn March 20, 2026, New Mexico Commissioner of Public Lands Stephanie Garcia Richard denied Energy Transfer's application to build a segment of a 17-mile natural gas pipeline across state trust lands in Dona Ana County
March 20, 2026
1114 Project Washington Starwood Digital Ventures Delaware (Coastal Zone Appeal) DE $10,000M / 1,200 MW
deniedDelaware Coastal Zone Industrial Control Board unanimously upheld DNREC Secretary's decision that 'Project Washington' data center is not allowed under the Coastal Zone Act.
March 26, 2026
1115 Project Hutto Zydeco Development Hutto TX 70 MW
cancelledOn April 17, 2026, Zydeco Development withdrew its rezoning application for a proposed 950,000-square-foot data center at the southeast corner of County Road 119 and Limmer Loop in Hutto, Texas
April 17, 2026
1116 KRAMBU, Inc. Bonner (Missoula County) KRAMBU, Inc. Bonner (Missoula County) MT 3 MW
cancelledKRAMBU, an Idaho-based company, applied to install an AI data center at Bonner Mill Industrial Park at the confluence of the Clark Fork and Blackfoot rivers (the 'A River Runs Through It' location).
June 1, 2026
1117 Project Aquila RCM Hill, LLC Hill County (RCM Hill files $100M federal suit challenging data center moratorium), TX TX 1,235 MW
litigationOn May 28, 2026, RCM Hill, LLC sued Hill County, County Judge Shane Brassell, and Commissioners Jim Holcomb and Larry Crumpton in U.S. District Court (Western District of Texas, Waco Division)
June 4, 2026
1118 Powers Ferry Place Prime Group Holdings Marietta City Council GA 18 MW
moratoriumAfter a Planning Commission 4-3 recommendation to approve, Marietta City Council tabled Prime Group Holdings' Powers Ferry Place rezoning -- a proposal to convert part of a 90,000 sq ft self-storage facility
July 8, 2026
1119 Amazon Web Services n.a. Wilmington, Ohio OH n.a.
deniedThe Ohio Supreme Court rejected a proposed ballot question that would change the zoning code and expand residents' lawsuit powers regarding data center developments.
Sep 21, 2026
1120 Roxbury Technology Park Diode Ventures Charles City County VA $1,000M
cancelledKansas-based Diode Ventures withdrew its $1B rezoning application for the 515-acre Roxbury Technology Park in Charles City County on August 18, 2025, after 8 months of resident organizing.
August 1, 2025
1121 Energy Storage Solutions Town of Tarboro Energy Storage Solutions Town of Tarboro NC $6,400M / 300 MW
deniedThe Tarboro Town Council rejected a Special Use Permit for Energy Storage Solutions' proposed 300MW, eight-phase data center on a 52-acre site near Anaconda and McNair roads by a 7-1 vote.
September 15, 2025
No entries match the current filters.

Scroll the table sideways for the full record. Action text is trimmed to two lines; open Sources on any row for the full entry and its citations.

Reading note. The 'Paused MW' and '$ at risk' columns are floors, not estimates of total exposure. They aggregate only figures that a fetched source attached to a specific named project or jurisdiction. Most blocked projects never disclose capex. Of the 96 project-level entries in section C.1, roughly two-thirds carry either a dollar figure or an MW figure but not both, because local rezoning dockets disclose acreage and square footage while investment figures come from economic-development announcements that a withdrawn project never makes. Moratoriums have no denominator. A 180-day pause in a county with an active pipeline forecloses applications that were never filed. The 116 municipal moratoriums and 483 tracked state-level actions have no per-action MW attached in any source fetched for this report. Queue positions are not projects. Dominion's ~45 GW under study with no connection date and ERCOT's ~474 GW contain heavy duplication from developers filing at multiple points of interconnection. They cannot be summed into the '$ at risk' column, which is why they are reported separately in section C.2 rather than folded into jurisdiction totals. The national aggregates in C.0 ($64B → $98B → $156B → ~$130B) are not additive across periods. They are successive, overlapping snapshots from the same tracker family, each with a different window and a different blocked/delayed/cancelled definition. The one internally consistent, non-overlapping figure in this report is the cancellation-only cohort: $89.7B across 17 facilities in 10 states, average $5.3B per facility (Bommarito). An independent tracker counts 225 moratoriums and restrictions across 30 states as of August 4, 2026, explicitly a floor rather than a census (ElectricChoice). The AEP Ohio tariff outcome, anticipated demand cut from 30,000 MW to ~5,700 MW, is described by the source as the single most instructive datapoint in the dataset on the difference between queue volume and real demand. Claims that roughly half of 2026 US capacity is delayed or cancelled circulated widely and were explicitly contested by SemiAnalysis ('Stop Saying Half of 2026 US Datacenter Capacity Is Canceled'), a genuine analytical dispute that the source says should be flagged rather than resolved.
Section 05 · Queues & federal

Queues, tariffs, and the federal layer

Where announced capacity actually waits. Interconnection queues are options, not assets: roughly three-quarters of all capacity that entered queues between 2000 and 2020 had withdrawn by the end of 2025.

Capacity entering queues, 2000–2020100%
Withdrawn by end of 2025~75%
Still in queue, built, or building~25%
61 mo median wait from request to commercial operation for 2025 in-service projects, up from 22 months in 2008
>750 GW withdrew in 2025; >700 GW withdrew in 2024; ~75% of capacity entering queues 2000-2020 had withdrawn by YE2025.
  • Berkeley Lab national series: active queue 2,598 GW (YE2023 peak) → 2,290 GW (YE2024, -12%) → 2,061 GW (YE2025, -10% y/y, -21% from peak) across ~10,300 projects.
  • Median request-to-COD for 2025 in-service projects: 61 months (~5.1 years), n=294, vs. 22 months in 2008.
  • >750 GW withdrew in 2025; >700 GW withdrew in 2024; ~75% of capacity entering queues 2000-2020 had withdrawn by YE2025.
  • Cross-ISO tracker: 44,020 interconnection queue requests tracked 1995-2026; county map contains 8,586 requests totaling 1.92 TW.
  • Berkeley Lab notes FERC Order 2023 reforms took effect in 2024 in most regions, yet median request-to-COD still lengthened to 61 months for the 2025 in-service cohort.
PJM

PJM projects summer peak growth of 70 GW to 220 GW over 15 years, with roughly 30 GW of the 32 GW of 2024-2030 growth attributable to data centers. A 6.8 GW capacity shortfall triggered a one-time backstop auction, and PJM's own FERC testimony states it has no load interconnection process of its own.

  • Capacity auction fell 5.6% short of required reserve margin; 6.8 GW shortfall triggered a one-time backstop auction starting September for the delivery year beginning mid-2028.
  • New large loads without their own supply will be curtailed near emergency conditions and excluded from demand forecasts.
  • Data centers accounted for $6.3B, or 38%, of the $16.4B most recent capacity-auction cost.
  • 140,000 MW processed under 2022 queue reform with 46,000 MW at signed IAs.
  • PJM's VP of Planning testified that PJM does not presently have a load interconnection process; load interconnection is administered through retail tariffs by EDCs and LSEs even where data centers connect at transmission level.
ERCOT474 GW requested

ERCOT's large-load queue grew from 63 GW in December 2024 to about 474 GW by mid-2026, roughly 90 percent data centers and more than five times ERCOT peak demand. Following the governor's August 3, 2026 audit order, ERCOT suspended Batch Zero large-load classification notifications.

  • 225 new large-load requests in 2025 vs. 152 across 2022-24.
  • The ~474 GW mid-2026 figure is more than five times ERCOT peak demand and more than doubled in under six months.
  • ERCOT issued Market Notice M-A080326-01, suspending delivery of Batch Zero Large Load classification notifications to Transmission/Distribution Service Providers that had been scheduled for August 7, 2026.
CAISO

CAISO reported that interconnection requests skyrocketed in Clusters 14 and 15, with the queue exceeding three times needed capacity and high volumes in areas not identified for new capacity in state resource plans.

  • With Cluster 15 the ISO queue exceeded three times the capacity needed.
NYISO12 GW requested

NYISO carried roughly 12 GW of data center load requests as of May 2026, with more than 8 GW added in 2025. A named $2B, 300 MW Erie County project is on hold citing the NYISO backlog.

  • More than 8 GW of data center load requests added during 2025.
  • A named $2B / 300 MW project (Riverview Innovation & Technology Campus, Town of Tonawanda) sits "on hold" citing NYISO backlog.
  • Potential New York data centers are seeking more than 9,000 MW of new electricity, described as about one-third of the state's annual energy use, against 148 existing and six planned facilities statewide.
ISO-NE

The source records no queue-specific data center MW figure for ISO-NE. Its inclusion in the record is as a named recipient of FERC's June 18, 2026 show cause order.

  • One of six ISOs/RTOs receiving FERC Federal Power Act Section 206 show cause orders on June 18, 2026 over inadequate large-load tariff rules.
MISO / SPP / CAISO / PJM (queue rationing)

An ACORE/Grid Strategies report reviewed queue-acceleration reforms at MISO, SPP, CAISO and PJM and concluded they may speed capacity additions at the cost of fairness, transparency, and open-access principles.

  • Queue-acceleration reforms at MISO, SPP, CAISO and PJM may speed additions but sacrifice fairness, transparency, and open-access principles, per an ACORE/Grid Strategies report.
Dominion (utility-level, PJM zone, Virginia)70 GW requested

Dominion's contracted data center pipeline grew from 21 GW in July 2024 to more than 48 GW by December 2025, while its large-load delivery-point queue reached 70 GW by February 2026 with roughly 45 GW under study and no connection date. A shareholder resolution cautions that nearly 30 GW rests on preliminary engineering paperwork without firm take-or-pay obligations.

  • Of the 47 GW contracted pipeline, only ~9 GW had executed construction letters of authorization and 28 GW sat at substation-engineering LOA stage.
  • A 2026 shareholder resolution notes 47 GW is roughly twice Dominion's current peak system capacity and that nearly 30 GW rests on preliminary engineering paperwork with no firm take-or-pay obligations, allowing customers to delay, downsize, or cancel with minimal consequence.
  • Dominion raised its five-year capital plan 30% to $65B, with >90% of the increase inside Dominion Energy Virginia, and was awarded more than $5B of PJM projects with in-service dates through 2032.
AEP Ohio (utility-level)

After PUCO approved AEP Ohio's take-or-pay tariff, anticipated data center demand fell from 30,000 MW to about 5,700 MW. The source calls this the single most instructive datapoint in the dataset on the difference between queue volume and real demand.

  • AEP Ohio halted new data center service requests in March 2023 with 50+ data centers awaiting service.
  • PUCO approved the data center tariff in Case 24-508-EL-ATA on July 9, 2025: 85% take-or-pay over 12 years for loads ≥25 MW, effective July 23, 2025, with the next study tranche opening March 2, 2026.
APS / Arizona Corporation Commission (utility-level)

Arizona's data center queue of 19 GW to 30,000 MW compares against an APS peak load of roughly 8,200 to 8,700 MW, with average requests of 400 to 500 MW. APS told the ACC's April 2026 large-load workshop that interest exceeds its capacity to serve.

  • The ACC opened docket E-00000A-25-0069 in 2025 and held a large-load workshop on April 16, 2026, where APS said interest exceeds its capacity to serve.
PSEG (utility-level, New Jersey)9 GW requested

PSEG's large-load pipeline, overwhelmingly data centers, reached 9.4 GW. New Jersey residential electric bills rose about 20 percent in 2025 with AI data centers accounting for about 70 percent of new state power demand.

  • PSEG Nuclear owns 3,758 MW at a 95.8% capacity factor, ~40% of NJ electricity; New Jersey lifted its nuclear-build moratorium in early April 2026.
  • Residential electric bills rose ~20% in 2025 with AI data centers accounting for ~70% of new state power demand; more than 80 data centers operate or are under construction in New Jersey.
DTE (utility-level, Michigan)8 GW requested

DTE's identified data center opportunity is 8.4 GW, composed of the 1.4 GW Oracle contract, 3 GW in advanced discussions, and 3 to 4 GW in the pipeline. The total is essentially unchanged from 2024, meaning a year of activity converted pipeline into contract without expanding the total.

  • A year of activity converted pipeline into contract without expanding the total, per the source's reading of DTE disclosures.
Silicon Valley Power (municipal utility, Santa Clara, CA)0 GW requested

Silicon Valley Power faced 500 MW of additional requested load against a 720 MW existing peak and capped new data center approvals after June 2025. Around 60 data centers already represent 55 percent of SVP power use.

  • SVP's director told a January 28, 2026 California Assembly joint hearing that ~60 data centers operate in SVP territory at typically 50-100 MW each, representing 55% of SVP power use, against a current peak of ~740 MW rising to ~1,300 MW in five to ten years.
  • Santa Clara had 57 active or under-construction data centers as of a May city council presentation, and Silicon Valley Power's $450M upgrade is scheduled for 2028; an earlier account put major SVP upgrades at 2029.

Federal actions

ActionTimingWhat it doesSources
FERC Order 2023 (generator interconnection reform)Issued July 2023; reforms took effect in 2024 in most regions.Order 2023 replaced first-come-first-served serial study with first-ready, first-served cluster studies, imposed financial penalties for missed study deadlines, and established co-location standards letting storage share a single interconnection request with generation. Despite the reforms, median request-to-COD lengthened to 61 months for the 2025 in-service cohort. Order 2023 does not cover load.
DOE directive to FERC and FERC ANOPR on large-load interconnectionDOE directive October 2025; FERC responded with the ANOPR in roughly eight months after receiving more than 3,500 pages of comments.DOE directed FERC in October 2025 to establish rules for data center interconnection. The resulting ANOPR, "Ensuring the Timely and Orderly Interconnection of Large Loads," proposed aligning large-load and hybrid-facility procedures with the pro forma generator interconnection procedures and studying load and hybrid facilities together with generating facilities to enable "efficient siting" and minimize "costly network upgrades".
FERC show cause orders to six ISOs/RTOsJune 18, 2026; rehearing requests dismissed 21 September 2026; responses due mid-November 2026 per Utility Dive (originally 60 days)FERC issued six Federal Power Act Section 206 show cause orders, one each to PJM, MISO, SPP, CAISO, NYISO and ISO-NE, preliminarily finding their tariffs inadequate for lack of clear and consistent large-load rules. Each had 60 days to defend or revise and 30 days to report how it will ensure sufficient generation to serve large loads. On 21 September 2026 FERC issued orders dismissing requests for rehearing and clarification in Dockets EL26-67 (PJM), EL26-69 (NYISO), EL26-70 (MISO), EL26-71 (CAISO) and EL26-72 (ISO-NE); no SPP order appeared in the eLibrary search. Utility Dive reported on 23 September 2026 that RTOs and ISOs have until mid-November to respond to the show cause orders.
PJM Behind-The-Meter Generation compliance filingFiled February 23, 2026, requesting a July 31, 2026 effective date, in response to a December 2025 FERC order on co-located load.PJM filed a compliance filing revising Behind-The-Meter Generation tariff provisions in response to FERC's December 2025 order on co-located load, ahead of the June 2026 show cause orders.
DOE Resource Adequacy ReportJuly 7, 2025, issued under Executive Order 14262 (April 8, 2025).The report concluded the grid cannot sustain the combined impact of plant closures, overreliance on intermittent resources, and data center load growth, that growth is concentrated in PJM, ERCOT and the West, and that it cannot be met with existing approaches to load addition and grid management.
DOE 2024 National Transmission Planning Study and the transmission build gapStudy from 2024; construction data for 2023 and 2024.DOE's study indicated roughly 5,000 miles per year of high-capacity regional transmission is needed and did not incorporate current load growth, against actual construction of 888 miles of 345 kV+ in 2024 and 322 miles in 2023. The build rate is roughly 18 percent of the identified requirement, before accounting for data center load.
FERC rejection of the Talen-Amazon Susquehanna amended ISARejected 2-1 on November 1, 2024; Talen sought rehearing November 21, 2024; AEP and Exelon protested under docket ER24-2172 on June 24, 2024.FERC rejected the amended interconnection service agreement for AWS co-location at Talen's Susquehanna nuclear plant, where 480 MW was requested versus 300 MW already approved behind-the-meter at a 2,494-2,520 MW plant. The rejection turned on PJM failing to show that non-pro forma ISA provisions were needed for "specific reliability concerns," "novel legal issues," or "other unique factors". Commissioners Christie and See were in the majority and Chairman Phillips dissented.
SEC staff guidance on data center securitizations (Exchange Act ABS status)July 29, 2026.SEC staff in the Office of Structured Finance endorsed the view that securities issued in data center securitizations structured around direct ownership of the data center are not asset-backed securities within the meaning of Section 3(a)(79) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The reasoning turns on whether the issuing entity's assets are self-liquidating financial assets: a data center is a tangible facility that endures beyond the tenor of the securities and may appreciate, rather than a pool of third-party originated loans that converts to cash by its terms. Qualifying structures include bankruptcy-remote issuers owning or controlling data centers together with infrastructure and operational contracts, and master-trust structures supporting refinancings and asset-pool modifications, where investors look principally to the securitized assets rather than to the sponsor or operator. Before the guidance, classification uncertainty led market participants to comply voluntarily with Exchange Act ABS rules out of caution. The guidance removes those compliance steps for qualifying transactions, and commentary frames it as lowering the cost of executing data center financings. This is a change in the regulatory treatment of a financing structure, not a change in the demand for or buildability of capacity, and the atlas records it as such. Practitioner analysis published after the letter states the practical effect concretely: sponsors of qualifying data center securitizations no longer have to comply with the 5% risk retention rule, and Rules 15Ga-1 and 15Ga-2, which required periodic disclosure of repurchase activity and third-party due diligence reports, no longer apply.
Interior Board of Land Appeals stay on the first data center approved for federal public landStay issued 1 September 2026; BLM moved on 21 September 2026 to set aside its approval and remand; Boulder City response due 5 October 2026An administrative judge of the Interior Board of Land Appeals issued a stay halting construction of the Townsite Data Center, an 88.5-acre facility the Bureau of Land Management approved on public land roughly 25 miles southeast of Las Vegas near Boulder City, Nevada, and reported as the first AI data center approved on federal public land. The board found BLM likely acted unlawfully in approving an amendment to an existing right-of-way grant, allowing a data center on the land in place of the previously permitted use, without a project-specific environmental review. BLM approved that change in June 2026. Opponents cited projected electricity and water demand, construction-related soil disruption, light pollution and habitat loss for the Mojave desert tortoise, listed as threatened under the Endangered Species Act. The stay is an interim ruling on likelihood of success, not a final decision on the merits. On 21 September 2026 BLM asked the administrative judge to set aside its approval of the right-of-way amendment to allow additional review of the application; the developer supports the motion, the Center for Biological Diversity and Sierra Club are neutral, and Boulder City opposes it.
EPA guidance excluding islanded generation from the Clean Air Act Acid Rain ProgramIssued 27 July 2026.EPA issued clarifying guidance concluding that the Clean Air Act Acid Rain Program applies to facilities that sell electricity or are required to report as a generating unit to the Department of Energy, and that islanded power generation facilities not connected to public grids therefore fall outside it because they neither sell electricity nor carry that reporting obligation. The exemption is conditional: a facility later connected to the grid becomes subject to the programme. Behind-the-meter and islanded generation is an increasingly common way to power data centers, so the guidance removes a federal air-programme obligation from that configuration. Separately reported EPA proposals would let data centers begin construction before receiving pollution permits and would make state public-notice and comment requirements for minor-source air permits optional rather than mandatory; those remain proposals rather than final rules.
FERC order directing NERC reliability standards for computational loadsIssued 16 July 2026 in Docket RD26-7-000FERC directed NERC to file new or modified mandatory reliability standards for computational loads such as data centers and crypto mining by 31 December 2026, to propose Rules of Procedure changes including registry criteria for computational-load entities, and to submit a Phase II work plan by 1 March 2027. FERC did not set a size threshold, registration category or compliance obligations, leaving those to NERC. Chairman Laura Swett cited rapid demand swings causing voltage stability issues
White House Ratepayer Protection Pledge expansionLaunched 4 March 2026; expanded 23 July 2026The voluntary, non-binding pledge launched with Amazon, Google, Meta, Microsoft, OpenAI, Oracle and xAI and was expanded on 23 July 2026 to 187 organizations including utilities, cooperatives, data center developers and 23 governors. Signatories commit to build or buy additive generation for data center demand, cover new delivery upgrades, pay separate negotiated rates whether or not they use the power, hire locally, and make backup generation available during scarcity events
PJM reliability backstop procurement and Interim Resource Adequacy Service filings at FERCBoard proposal 27 July 2026; backstop filed 31 July 2026; IRAS framework filed 13 August 2026 in Docket ER26-3515-000 requesting approval by 12 October 2026; FERC order of 29 September 2026 accepted the backstop but suspended it to an effective date of 28 February 2027, so PJM did not open the procurement on 30 September 2026PJM filed a Reliability Backstop Procurement framework to procure up to 6,831.3 MW, matching the 2028/2029 auction shortfall, with costs capped at $555/MW-day and eligible resources required online by 1 June 2032. It then filed Interim Resource Adequacy Service, under which new large loads without their own capacity can connect but become curtailable ahead of existing emergency procedures, plus a large load registry and a Bring Your Own New Capacity option requiring 10 consecutive delivery years. From 2029/2030 uncovered new large-load demand would be excluded from capacity auction demand curves. On 29 September 2026 FERC issued an order accepting PJM's Reliability Backstop Procurement but suspending it for five months, to an effective date of 28 February 2027, subject to refund and a paper hearing on unresolved issues. FERC approved the $555/MW-day offer cap and supplier collateral rules but found the cost allocation, transmission owner exit rules and load-serving entity collateral requirements may be unjust and unreasonable, suggested allocating costs on updated load forecasts, and encouraged PJM to refile quickly, which could shorten the delay. Chairman Laura Swett wrote that the commission would not be forced into accepting a deeply flawed, eleventh-hour mechanism. PJM had planned to take offers from 30 September to 21 October 2026; it said the procurement will not begin on 30 September, that the timeline is to be determined, and that it will update the Market Implementation Committee on 7 October 2026.
MISO large-load filings at FERC: zero-injection generator interconnection and reliability requirementsZero-injection proposal filed 18 August 2026 (accession 20260818-5152); reliability requirements filed 28 August 2026 (accession 20260828-5278) with a requested 4 December 2026 effective date; Large Load Addition Resource Study proposal filed Friday 2 October 2026 with a requested FERC decision by 2 December 2026MISO proposed a Zero Injection Generator Interconnection Agreement offering 90-day reviews for generation serving co-located large loads that does not exceed the served load's nameplate or require network upgrades beyond the substation; Google and Xcel Energy filed support while the Sierra Club and NRDC opposed. A separate filing sets visibility, phasor measurement, ramp and ride-through requirements for large loads above 50 MW and computational loads with at least 25 MW of IT demand. Both follow FERC's June 2026 show cause orders. On Friday 2 October 2026 MISO asked FERC to approve a 120-day Large Load Addition Resource Study (LARS) for loads above 200 MW paired with new generation in the same local resource zone. MISO would study up to 10 LARS applications in each of three annual study periods, with non-refundable deposits; the generator's commercial operation and the load's in-service date must fall within three years of application, and the load and generation must stay paired for at least 15 years. MISO asked for a decision by 2 December 2026 so the first study period can open early in 2027, citing FERC's June 2026 finding that its large-load rules are inadequate.
Executive order declaring a national emergency to secure the bulk power systemSigned 26 August 2026; DOE rules due within 120 daysThe order directs DOE to develop rules within 120 days to block utilities from connecting certain foreign-made transformers, batteries, inverters and associated software to the bulk power system, and lets the Energy Secretary impose conditions on installed foreign equipment. The White House fact sheet cited the growth of data centers and AI as increasing dependence on reliable electricity. BloombergNEF said the order is likely to cause energy storage delays and cancellations
House passage of H.R. 9340, the Ratepayer Protection ActPassed the House 417-3 under suspension on 16 September 2026; Senate unanimous consent blocked 17 September 2026; placed on the Senate calendar 24 September 2026 (Calendar No. 684); cloture on the motion to proceed rejected 57-43 on 30 September 2026 (Senate roll call vote 254; 60 votes required); separate Senate permitting bill with a data center transmission cost provision introduced 30 September 2026, vote expected after the 3 November 2026 electionThe bill, led by Reps. Gabe Evans and Kathy Castor, amends PURPA to require state utility commissions to consider standards ensuring data centers and other large loads cover the cost of necessary grid upgrades, including proceedings on large-load rates and rules for data centers drawing more than 100 MW. Sen. Jon Husted sponsors the Senate version, and Majority Leader John Thune indicated pre-election passage would likely require unanimous consent. On 17 September 2026 Sen. Martin Heinrich objected to Sen. Jon Husted's request to pass the bill by unanimous consent, saying it only makes states consider cost-recovery standards rather than requiring them, so a pre-recess floor vote became uncertain. The bill was placed on the Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders on 24 September 2026 (Calendar No. 684). On 28 September 2026 a motion to proceed was made and a cloture motion on the motion to proceed was presented (Congressional Record S5065), and the motion to proceed was made again on 29 September. MS NOW reported that the Senate was poised to hold the procedural vote on Wednesday 30 September 2026, with Senate Democrats expected to block it; Sen. Martin Heinrich said he is seeking language in a bipartisan permitting reform bill requiring data centers to bear the full incremental cost of grid connection, generation and transmission. On Wednesday 30 September 2026 the Senate rejected cloture on the motion to proceed to H.R. 9340 by 57-43 (roll call vote 254), three votes short of the three-fifths threshold. Four Democrats, Maggie Hassan, Amy Klobuchar, Jon Ossoff and Raphael Warnock, voted with Republicans; Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer called the bill toothless because it only requires state regulators to consider, not adopt, large-load cost recovery standards, and Sen. Martin Heinrich called it a messaging bill. With the vote, Congress has adopted no new federal protection on data center grid costs before the election recess. Also on 30 September 2026 Sens. Shelley Moore Capito, Sheldon Whitehouse, Mike Lee and Martin Heinrich introduced the Bipartisan American Affordability and Jobs Act, a permitting reform bill that would expand federal authority over transmission permitting, set a 150-day window for certain challenges to federal permitting decisions and require data centers to pay their associated transmission costs rather than shift them to other customers. The Senate is expected to take it up after the 3 November 2026 election; it has not been voted on, and the House has passed a different permitting bill, the SPEED Act.
FERC disputes over large-load service agreements: Microsoft and ATC in Wisconsin, PowerHouse Hillwood and ComEd in IllinoisReported 24 August 2026; FERC order rejecting ComEd's notice of cancellation 22 September 2026 (ER26-3257-000); FERC deficiency letter to ATC 22 September 2026 (ER26-3265-000)Microsoft told FERC that four amended Large Load Project Commitment Agreements and a Minimum Transmission Charge Agreement filed by American Transmission Co. and Wisconsin Electric Power for its Mount Pleasant campus lack adequate ratepayer protections, contain errors, and include an early termination fee it called an unjustified windfall, and were negotiated without its input. Separately, PowerHouse Hillwood told FERC that ComEd cancelled its transmission security and retail service agreements for a 1.8 GW, $20 billion Joliet project over security deposit timing. Single-outlet report. On 22 September 2026 FERC rejected ComEd's notice of cancellation of the PowerHouse Hillwood transmission security agreement (Docket ER26-3257-000), declining to take primary jurisdiction over the credit-support dispute, which is pending in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois; PowerHouse Hillwood says a $1 posting met the initial credit requirement. Swett and See wrote that the case shows the need for pro forma cost recovery agreements with strong ratepayer protections, and LaCerte called the $1 letter of credit an embarrassing legal fiction. The same day FERC staff told American Transmission Co. that its 24 July 2026 filing of the amended ATC and WEPCo Large Load Project Commitment Agreements and Minimum Transmission Charge Agreement (Docket ER26-3265-000) is deficient and requested more information within 30 days.
EPA proposed rule ending the federal public-notice mandate for minor-source air permitsDraft rule dated 1 July 2026; EPA expects to finalize it in 2027EPA proposed to drop the federal requirement that states and tribes provide public notice and take comment before permitting minor pollution sources under Clean Air Act New Source Review. States could still offer comment periods. Critics said states could issue air permits for data centers and on-site power without informing communities; EPA said the rule does not specifically identify data centers and applies to all minor sources.
NNSA selection of Amentum for the Savannah River Site AI data center leaseAnnounced 20 July 2026The National Nuclear Security Administration chose Amentum to negotiate a phased lease for a 1 GW AI data center with about 2 GW of on-site gas-to-nuclear generation at the Savannah River Site in South Carolina. It follows DOE's April 2025 identification of 16 federal sites and the selection of Idaho National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Paducah and Savannah River for private AI and energy projects, with separate NNSA requests for proposals issued in September 2025.
DOE memorandums with five states for Nuclear Lifecycle Innovation CampusesAnnounced 28 July 2026DOE signed memorandums of understanding with Utah, Tennessee, Oklahoma, Louisiana and Idaho, selected from 28 applications from 26 states, to explore hosting campuses covering the nuclear fuel lifecycle that could also host advanced reactors, power generation and co-located data centers. DOE said the campuses could attract up to $50 billion of capital investment, with initial facilities targeted for 2027 and hosting agreements to follow.
TVA board data center rate class and SpaceXAI direct-serve approvalApproved at the TVA board meeting of 20 August 2026; new rate effective 1 October 2026The Tennessee Valley Authority board placed data centers using more than 5 MW in a separate rate class that raises their power costs by about 10% phased over three years, while adopting a budget with no residential rate increase. The board also approved a load request above 100 MW for MZX Tech LLC, a SpaceXAI affiliate that owns the Colossus 2 site, to become a directly served TVA customer paying the new rate and funding all dedicated transmission and interconnection. On 23 September 2026 the Nashville Electric Service Electric Power Board moved to align its retail rates with TVA's data center rate class from 1 October 2026, phased in at about 5% a year over the next two years. In August the NES board signed the federal Ratepayer Protection Pledge and required data centers to pay more construction costs upfront.
DOE Speed to Power (SPARK) grid upgrade selectionsAnnounced 24 September 2026 (DOE release); selections for award negotiation, no completion dates givenThe Department of Energy's Office of Electricity announced its intention to help fund 31 grid improvement projects in 26 states under the Speed to Power through Accelerated Reconductoring and other Key Advanced Transmission Technology Upgrades (SPARK) initiative: $5.25 billion in total, of which $1.9 billion is federal funding and $3.35 billion recipient cost share. Recipients are expected to reconductor or rebuild more than 1,500 miles of transmission lines and deploy grid-enhancing technologies across nearly 21,000 miles, which DOE says will make more than 23 GW of additional capacity available. The Washington Examiner reported that some selected projects explicitly aim to unlock capacity for data center demand, and framed the program as a response to concern that data center growth will raise electricity bills.

Thresholds and instruments by jurisdiction

JurisdictionLevelThreshold or instrumentDetailSources
New York (Executive Order 62)NYstateApplies to hyperscale data centers of 50 MW and above; no fixed expiration; DEC to hold in abeyance all discretionary permits for construction or expansion until DPS files a final GEIS. Exempts projects already under construction, modifications of previously issued approvals, and renewals.Signed July 14, 2026, EO 62 is the first statewide data center moratorium in the nation, against a NYISO queue of roughly 12 GW of data center load requests. New York data centers contributed $49 billion of GDP and $5.1 billion of taxes in 2024. The order holds DEC permits in abeyance until DPS completes a final Generic Environmental Impact Statement; the atlas source characterizes the duration both as having no fixed expiration and as pending that review. On 15 September 2026 Empire State Development issued the Host Community Investment Framework required by EO 62: a voluntary recommendation of $1 million per MW of utility demand in host-community investment, negotiated locally, plus Good Neighbor commitments on water, noise and lighting, prevailing wages and local hiring, annual reporting and limits on NDAs.
New York (legislative measures beyond EO 62)NYstateS10642: 12-month moratorium with labor standards, awaiting the Governor. A separate legislature-passed bill would bar projects of 20 MW or more and impose near-total renewable-energy requirements by 2050 on projects larger than 1 MW. A February 2026 bill would freeze state and local approvals for any new data center above 20 MW for three years.The Legislature passed a more expansive 12-month moratorium than EO 62, and additional bills target 20 MW and even 1 MW thresholds. IBEW Third District VP Frank Muia warned a blanket moratorium "risks sending billions of dollars in private investment… to neighboring states".
New York local actionsNYcityn.a.Local New York actions include Newfield (Jul 2026), East Fishkill (Jun 2026), Perth one-year moratorium (Jun 4, 2025), Oneonta (May 2026), Lysander six-month pause (May 7, 2026), and a Dryden ban (Feb 2026). The C.4 summary records 12 to 13 tracked New York actions.
SeattleWAcityOne-year moratorium on data centers >20 MVA, approved 9-0, extendable 6 months (Apr-Jun 9, 2026).Five proposed mega data centers in SoDo and Tukwila (Equinix, Prologis, and two unnamed developers) had requested 369 MW; two of four developers withdrew before the moratorium passed.
Skagit CountyWAcountySix-month moratorium covering data centers >2,000 sq ft in unincorporated Skagit County, approved June 1, 2026, extendable.County commissioners approved a six-month pause on data centers larger than 2,000 square feet in unincorporated areas.
Washington (statewide summary)WAstateC.4 floors: 369 MW (Seattle) + 500 MW (Spokane, high end) + 20 MW (Cle Elum) paused or at risk; ~$200M identified; 4 named projects; 7 tracked actions.Washington actions include the Seattle >20 MVA moratorium, a Spokane one-year citywide moratorium (Jun 22, 2026, Avista-related 125-500 MW), a Cle Elum six-month emergency moratorium (Jul 31, 2026), and the Skagit County pause. A source headline states a Washington statewide data center bill was killed before Seattle acted.
TucsonAZcityNew rules gate any project >25,000 sq ft or >20 MW, while the city explores ban options; restrictive zoning proposed April 2026.Tucson adopted new data center rules with square-footage and megawatt gates after unanimously ending Project Blue annexation negotiations in August 2025.
PhoenixAZcityn.a.Eleven landowners are suing the city of Phoenix for $753 million, claiming property value losses from data center restrictions passed the prior summer.
ChandlerAZcityOrdinance 5033, effective January 5, 2023, restricts data centers to PAD zoning.Chandler's ordinance predates the 2024-2026 wave and confines data centers to Planned Area Development zoning.
Arizona (statewide)AZstateStatewide FY2027 budget tax-break pause and HB 2756 (Jun 2026); proposed 45% data center rate increase before the ACC; C.4 floors: queue 19-30 GW vs. APS peak ~8.2-8.7 GW; $17.6B at risk ($14B Tract + $3.6B Project Blue); 5 tracked actions.Arizona enacted a statewide FY2027 budget tax-break pause and HB 2756 in June 2026, while the ACC considers data-center-specific rates. The governor supported removing industry tax incentives.
Loudoun CountyVAcountyEliminated by-right data center development 7-2 on March 18, 2025, requiring special exceptions. On 2 September 2026 the Board of Supervisors took up a proposal to revoke the 2025 grandfathering resolution covering approximately 22 in-development projects, and amended it to first obtain a county attorney legal opinion.Loudoun County, the largest data center market, ended by-right development and now requires special exceptions for data center projects. Supervisors Juli Briskman and Laura TeKrony introduced a measure to eliminate the grandfathered exemptions, which would force roughly 22 in-development data center projects that were exempted when the county ended by-right development to go through the newly required public hearings. The board did not vote on the measure. It amended the resolution to secure a legal opinion from the county attorney and compile details on the exempted projects first, with Board Chair Phyllis Randall calling for the legal opinion to be shared publicly at an October 6 meeting while the official memo remains confidential. No project has been blocked by this action and no dollar or megawatt figure is attached to it. Separately, Virginia DEQ proposed a $2.5 million consent order, signed by Microsoft on 3 September 2026 and open for comment to 14 October 2026, over 62 generators run for seven days at 19515 Compass Creek Parkway in Leesburg during the summer 2025 Cochran Mill substation outage, the largest civil penalty DEQ has assessed a data center.
Prince William CountyVAcountyInitiated ZTA DPA2026-00006 on March 3, 2026 to curtail by-right development.Prince William County began a zoning text amendment to curtail by-right data center development following the Prince William Digital Gateway collapse.
WarrentonVAcityPermanent data center ban adopted July 2025, following a court-ordered one-year stall of an Amazon site.After a court-ordered one-year stall on Amazon's 42-acre, 220,000 sq ft, $39M site, Warrenton adopted a permanent ban in July 2025.
Virginia (statewide)VAstateStatewide moratorium bill HB 1515 failed; Governor Spanberger declined a statewide moratorium in August 2026, citing the $67B Dominion/NextEra merger. C.4 floors: 2 GW (PWDG) + 300 MW (Powhatan) + 200 MW (Chesapeake) + 50 MW (DC Blox) + 3,500 MW (Pittsylvania gas) paused/at risk; 45 GW in Dominion queue with no connection date; $47.8B+ identified; 12 projects; 23 tracked siting actions.Dimetrics tracks 23 Virginia siting actions spanning 2023-2026, including the Warrenton ban and county-level restrictions from Fauquier to Fairfax. A statewide moratorium failed and the governor declined to impose one by order. On Thursday 1 October 2026 Gov. Abigail Spanberger released the 2026 Virginia Energy Plan, a planning document that models four pathways to net-zero by 2050 and recommends demand flexibility for data centers, including battery fleets financed by data centers in place of on-site fossil generation. The plan cites a PJM forecast of up to 68.8 GW of peak demand for Dominion Energy and Appalachian Power, and a Dominion connection queue of 25 GW with an energization date plus 75 GW without one. Many of its recommendations need legislation or State Corporation Commission action; it imposes no new requirement by itself.
Texas (statewide audit-gated pause)TXstateGov. Abbott ordered PUCT and ERCOT on 3 August 2026 to audit all data centers in the interconnection process before further approvals; non-compliant projects to be denied connection; ~1,800 projects affected. On 21 September 2026 he directed TCEQ to halt all permits sought by data centers until the ERCOT audit is complete, with a TCEQ compliance update due 19 October 2026, and said no state agency shall move forward with regulatory approvals related to data center development until the audit information is acquired. SB6, signed June 20, 2025, sets a 75 MW threshold and co-location rules for pre-September 1, 2025 generation.Texas paused grid approvals statewide pending audits of roughly 1,800 projects in the ERCOT interconnection process. Local actions include Harlingen (May 2026), San Marcos restrictive zoning (Feb 2026), a proposed Denton pause (Jun 2026), and Fort Worth and Taylor proposals; Hood County rejected a construction pause while Hill County paused rural construction for a year before rescinding under a federal suit. On 21 September 2026 the governor extended the pause to environmental permits, directing TCEQ to issue no permits sought by data center projects until the ERCOT and Texas Water Development Board audits are complete. Houston Public Media reported that the August pause had reached only ERCOT connections of 75 MW or more, leaving out smaller projects and those building their own power plants, and that the TCEQ halt covers permits such as river water use and on-site power plants. On 24 September 2026 Attorney General Ken Paxton announced an ongoing investigation of hundreds of data center developments that have not responded to the Texas Water Development Board's mandatory water use survey, with initial investigations in Harris, Montgomery, Travis, Dallas, Tarrant, Smith, Bexar, Tom Green, Potter, Randall, Lubbock, Midland, Ector, Wichita, Victoria, Brazos, Nueces and El Paso counties. Under state law, entities that fail to submit the survey lose eligibility for TWDB financial assistance and water rights permits. A TCEQ Air Permits Division email reported by the San Antonio Current on 29 September 2026 says the agency has paused all air and water permits and authorizations related to construction or development of infrastructure directly supporting data centers until the ERCOT audit is complete, and confirms the Pacifico Energy campus near Cedar Creek in Bastrop County is on hold. On 14 September 2026 ERCOT issued a State and Community Impact Request for Information (Market Notice M-B091426-01) to developers of data centers of 25 MW or more pursuing interconnection to the ERCOT system, including Batch Zero projects not yet energized, covering public financial assistance and tax benefits, grid dependency and on-site generation, water sources and consumption (developed with the Texas Water Development Board), cooling technology, noise, light and traffic, and ownership. Responses are due 12 October 2026, and ERCOT and the PUCT plan to publish a report on or before 10 December 2026.
Ohio (statewide)OHstateAEP Ohio data center tariff (PUCO Case 24-508-EL-ATA, approved July 9, 2025): 85% take-or-pay over 12 years for loads ≥25 MW, effective July 23, 2025. Statewide TCA tax-credit pause (May 2026). C.4 floors: ~24,300 MW of anticipated demand removed (30,000 → 5,700 MW post-tariff); 6 GW generation cancelled; $2B+ cancelled; 38 tracked actions.Ohio's take-or-pay tariff at a 25 MW threshold collapsed anticipated data center demand from 30,000 MW to about 5,700 MW. Dimetrics tracks 38 Ohio actions including Cleveland, Cincinnati, Butler County, and a statewide tax-credit pause. The Ohio Capital Journal counted at least 138 Ohio municipalities and townships with active data center moratoriums as of 17 September 2026, 23 communities that have effectively banned data centers and at least 23 more across seven counties considering proposals; a Bowling Green State University poll released 16 September 2026 found 78% of Ohioans support moratoriums.
North Carolina (statewide)NCstateDuke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress operate under an NCUC proceeding on large-load integration at a 100 MW threshold; Duke's response filed July 24, 2025 to the commission's June 6, 2025 request; first semiannual major-load-addition report filed May 15, 2025. C.4 floors: 1.5 GW (Tract Mooresville) + 250 MW (Apex); $30.6B; 4 projects; 31-32 tracked actions.North Carolina's regulatory threshold for large-load integration review is 100 MW under an NCUC proceeding. Dimetrics tracks 31 to 32 state actions including Charlotte, Durham, Asheville, a Weaverville ban, and multiple county measures. On 18 September 2026 the Utilities Commission denied Duke Energy's $584 million gas turbine at the Smith Energy Complex near Amazon's Richmond County campus for want of demonstrated need and Ratepayer Protection Pledge compliance. The denied unit was a 255 MW hydrogen-capable F-class simple cycle combustion turbine. The order said much of Duke's projected load growth appears to be based on anticipated data center customer additions and is insufficiently reliable for the Commission to act, and that the record did not establish how far the unit was meant to serve data center demand or how Duke would honor the Ratepayer Protection Pledge. Duke said it is reviewing the order and assessing next steps. On 7 October 2026 Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress announced a settlement with the North Carolina Public Staff, joined by Amazon, Google, Meta, Microsoft, the Carolina Industrial Group for Fair Utility Rates and the U.S. Department of Defense, on large-load service. If approved by the Utilities Commission, it applies to customers of 50 MW or more at an 80% load factor that sign electric service agreements after 1 June 2026 (Duke's prior contract protections applied at 100 MW): new large loads, including data centers, must take service under a separate High Load Factor rate schedule, make nonrefundable upfront payments for grid facilities serving only them, and post deposits and security for shared grid upgrades such as transmission. Duke said a Commission decision is expected by mid-November 2026.
Montgomery CountyMDcounty18-month moratorium on permits for large-scale data centers, unanimously approved, defining large as "an aggregate monthly electricity demand of at least 25 megawatts".The Montgomery County Council unanimously approved an 18-month permit moratorium for large-scale data centers at a 25 MW aggregate monthly demand threshold.
Prince George's CountyMDcountyTwo-year countywide moratorium on hyperscale data center development, approved July 7, 2026, following a 180-day moratorium that led to regulations.The Prince George's County Council passed a two-year moratorium on hyperscale data center development, extending an earlier 180-day pause tied to the $5B Landover project.
Maryland (statewide summary)MDstateC.4 floors: paused/at-risk MW n.a.; $5B (Landover); 1 named project plus 2-year countywide moratorium; 12 tracked actions.Maryland's documented capital at risk centers on the $5B Landover project and the Prince George's County hyperscale moratorium, with 12 tracked actions statewide.
Georgia (statewide)GAstateStatewide HB 1192 was vetoed and SB 476 failed; HB 1059 would forbid local permitting until December 2028. C.4 floors: 250 MW (Calhoun); $17B (Project Sail); 4 named; 29-31 tracked actions.Dimetrics tracks 29 to 31 Georgia actions including a Fayetteville outright ban in March 2026, directly relevant to QTS's Fayetteville position, plus restrictive zoning in Bartow, Forsyth, Jones, Lumpkin and Atlanta. The PSC meanwhile approved the 2025 IRP contemplating ~8,500 MW of load growth and, on December 19, 2025, 9,885 MW of new energy resources by a 5-0 vote.
Illinois (statewide)ILstateStatewide DCEO incentive suspension (Jul 2026); statewide HB 4172 failed. C.4 floors: 600 MW (CyrusOne Sangamon); $500M+; 4 named; 11 tracked actions.Illinois tracks 11 actions including the DCEO incentive suspension, Bloomington and Normal (May 2026), Champaign County (Apr 2026), Carbondale (Jun 2026), Logan County (lifted May 2026), and a proposed Naperville measure (Jan 2026). ComEd reported on 16 September 2026 that it signed transmission security agreements with two more data center developers, for six active agreements backed by more than $1 billion in letters of credit, and that its large-load queue fell from about 39 GW to 25 GW.
California (statewide)CAstateStatewide AB 93 (water restriction) was vetoed. C.4 floors: 500 MW requested vs. 720 MW peak (Santa Clara); $79M identified; 5 named; 10 tracked actions.California tracks 10 actions including Coachella, Imperial, Indio, and Monterey Park (Jun 2026), with Calipatria and Imperial County proposals. The statewide water-restriction bill AB 93 was vetoed.
Santa ClaraCAcitySilicon Valley Power capped new data center approvals with a moratorium on new power connections; approvals stopped after June 2025.Santa Clara's municipal utility stopped approving new data center power connections after June 2025, with 500 MW of additional requested load against a 720 MW existing peak and 57 active or under-construction data centers.
New Jersey (statewide)NJstateStatewide rate measure enacted (A-5462 / S-4307, Jul 2026); nuclear-build moratorium lifted early April 2026; bans in Sparta (Jun 2026), Andover and Millville (May 2026), Phillipsburg (Apr 2026), Pemberton (Feb 2026). C.4 floors: 1.4 GW (Millville) + 70 MW (QTS East Windsor); PSEG pipeline 9.4 GW; project-level dollars n.a.; 4 named; 10 tracked actions.New Jersey enacted a statewide rate measure and multiple municipal bans while lifting its nuclear-build moratorium. More than 80 data centers operate or are under construction in the state.
Pennsylvania (statewide)PAstateMoratoriums in Brookville Borough and Center Township (Jun 2026); a statewide measure proposed. C.4 floors: 480 MW (AWS/Susquehanna, FERC-rejected); dollars n.a.; 3 named; 5 tracked actions.Pennsylvania's exposure centers on the FERC-rejected Talen-Amazon Susquehanna ISA plus township moratoriums in Hazle (180-day curative amendment, Jul 6, 2026) and Muhlenberg (12-month, Feb 3, 2026).
Michigan (statewide)MIstateMost heavily restricted state in the country with 73 tracked actions. C.4 floors: 1,383 MW (Saline, conditionally approved); $8.1B-$17.1B ($7-16B Saline + $1B Howell + $0.1B Ypsilanti); 4 named projects.Michigan carries 73 tracked actions, the most of any state, spanning Detroit (proposed), Flint, and dozens of townships. The Saline Township campus was conditionally approved by the MPSC (Case U-21990) on December 18, 2025 despite residents voting against it.
Indiana (statewide)INstateCounty-level moratoriums span Putnam (Nov 2025), White (Oct 2025, expired), Starke (Dec 2025), Marshall (ban, Apr 2026), Fulton (Mar 2026), Dearborn and Pulaski (Feb 2026), Merrillville (Jun 2026), Boone (proposed May 2026), Indianapolis (pause proposed May 2026); 13 tracked actions. C.4 floors: 2,250 MW (Marshall) + 500 MW (Fulton) + 300 MW (Franklin Twp) + 250 MW (Hancock); $3.3B blocked/cancelled; $10B exempted (Meta Lebanon); $26B proceeding (AWS).Indiana's 13 tracked actions include an Indianapolis development committee vote of 10-3 to advance a moratorium pausing approvals through the end of 2027.
Wisconsin (statewide summary)WIstateC.4 floors: 500 MW (Caledonia); $5.6B cancelled plus $15B under moratorium; 5 projects.Wisconsin's 2025 cancellation wave totals $5.6B across four projects, and Madison placed the $15B Vantage/OpenAI/Oracle campus under a one-year moratorium on January 13, 2026.
Oregon (statewide summary)ORstateC.4 floors: 10 MW (Cascade Locks) + Hillsboro DC/BESS pipeline; $100M identified; 3 named; 2-4 tracked actions. Hillsboro adopted the first Oregon city moratorium: 120 days from July 27, 2026, expiring November 24, 2026, extendable 6 months, plus a 180-day SIP pause approved July 21, 2026.Hillsboro's moratorium covers a pipeline that includes a QTS 250 MW campus, Salem halted new applications for 120 days on August 3, 2026, and Wasco County carries restrictive zoning from June 2025.
Maine (statewide)MEstateLD 307, a statewide moratorium, was vetoed April 24, 2026.Maine's governor vetoed the statewide moratorium bill LD 307, after which a developer backed out of an unnamed Maine project.
Other states with documented capital at risk (MT, MO, MA, AR, IA, ND, SC, TN, NM, KS, FL, ME, UT, KY)stateC.4 floors: 600 MW (MT) + 1 GW (SC) + 200 MW (IA) + 25 MW (TN) + 8 MW (AR) + 9 GW (UT referendum) + 1 GW (KY, exempt); $2.2B+ ($1B MO + $1B AR + $0.2B MA); 20 named projects.The C.4 summary aggregates 20 named projects across 14 additional states, including the St. Charles, MO permanent prohibition, the Holyoke, MA zoning ban, the Utah 9 GW referendum, and the TeraWulf EastPark exemption in Kentucky.
National totals (C.4 summary row)federal≥3.5 GW in Q1 2026 cancellations alone; ~4.7 GW across ≥25 cancellations in 2025; $64B (to Mar 2025) → $98B (Q2 2025) → $156B (FY2025) → ~$130B (Q1 2026); 483 actions / 47 states (Dimetrics); 225 actions / 30 states (ElectricChoice); 116 municipal moratoriums; 833 opposition groups / 49 states.The national totals row aggregates successive tracker snapshots of blocked, delayed, and cancelled capital plus action and opposition-group counts. The source states these snapshots are not additive across periods.
United States (statewide legislative landscape)federalLawmakers in 14 states are considering banning data center development, including Georgia HB 1059, which would forbid local permitting until December 2028. Moratorium proposals have surfaced in Maine, Maryland, Georgia, Oklahoma, Virginia, Vermont, Michigan, California and Wisconsin, and Senator Bernie Sanders has called for a national pause.State legislatures in 14 states are weighing bans, and a US senator has floated a nationwide moratorium, against $650 billion of planned hyperscaler capex over the coming year and $6 billion of forfeited state revenue from sales-tax exemptions over five years.
United States (moratorium and restriction counts)federalA Bipartisan Policy Center report released July 29 identified 54 local data center moratoriums nationwide and said at least 15 states have considered statewide moratorium legislation. One tracker counts 10 active state bans/moratoriums, 8 with legislation advancing, 16 under discussion, and 18 of 50 states restricting or considering restrictions, against 8 with incentives.Independent trackers disagree on counts by definition and window. The DataCenterBans tally and the BPC report use different units, so counts should not be merged.
New OrleansLAcityn.a.New Orleans passed a one-year moratorium, part of a broader wave of political exposure that also includes Madison, Wisconsin and a complete moratorium passed by the Seminole Nation in March.
Seminole Nationstaten.a.The Seminole Nation passed a complete moratorium in March 2026. In the same period Maine's governor vetoed a statewide moratorium and Senator Bernie Sanders floated a nationwide one.
California (seven data center laws signed 21 September 2026)CAstateSigned 21 September 2026: AB 1577 (data centers: reporting), AB 2383 (electricity: data centers), AB 2469 (data centers: water use disclosures), AB 2619 (water resources: data center), SB 886 (California Technology Innovation and Ratepayer Protection Act), SB 887 (CEQA environmental leadership development projects: data centers) and SB 1168 (data centers: rate structures). AB 2383 tariffs apply to new large load customers taking service on or after 1 January 2027; the CPUC has until 1 July 2027 to finalize them. Conditions on development, not a moratoriumGov. Gavin Newsom signed seven data center bills on 21 September 2026. SB 886 and AB 2383 require the California Public Utilities Commission to create new rates for data centers covering the cost of connecting them to the grid and serving them, and the governor's office says the laws require data centers to pay for grid upgrades, comply with state energy procurement requirements, bring new clean supply onto the grid and avoid cost shifts to low-income customers. AB 2469 bars local approval of a data center until the developer discloses projected water use, and the water measures require proposed data centers to give local governments and water suppliers information on water use, supply, efficiency and drought planning, with any water upgrades paid by the data center. SB 887 makes data centers ineligible for blanket environmental exemptions, requiring them to show no cost shift to ratepayers and compliance with state energy, water and fuel standards before judicial streamlining. The bills passed largely on party-line votes over opposition from the Data Center Coalition. Newsom vetoed a water reporting bill in 2025.
Imperial CountyCAcountyEmergency moratorium on final county approvals for data center facilities in unincorporated areas, adopted June 2026 for 45 days and extended in July 2026 by ten months and fifteen days. Set aside by court order in August 2026.The Imperial County Board of Supervisors adopted a 45-day moratorium on final county approvals for data center facilities in unincorporated areas in June 2026 and extended it by ten months and fifteen days after a July 2026 public hearing. The Imperial County Superior Court subsequently found that the findings supporting the moratorium did not sufficiently address all applicable requirements under state law and directed that the moratorium be set aside. The county states that it respects the ruling, is reviewing next steps, and intends to bring a new proposed moratorium before the board in the near term. This is a recorded reversal of a restriction, and the atlas carries it alongside the separate court ruling requiring full CEQA review of the Imperial Valley Computer Manufacturing project. On 15 September 2026 the Imperial Irrigation District board unanimously adopted a large-load tariff for loads above 20 MW requiring a 15-year service commitment, minimum charges of at least 85% of contracted usage, customer-paid substation, distribution and transmission, cash deposits and payment for renewable procurement, with large loads curtailed first in demand surges.
New Hampshire (statewide)NHstateNo moratorium enacted. Governor Kelly Ayotte said on 2 September 2026 she will propose a multi-year moratorium in her next state budget, effective no earlier than July 2027, and raised the possibility of an earlier executive order. State House Democrats plan 24-month moratorium legislation for the 2027 session. No project-level dollar or megawatt figures disclosed.New Hampshire enters the atlas as a proposed-restriction jurisdiction rather than an enacted one. The governor stated opposition to siting any data center in the state on energy-price grounds, in the context of a Granite Shore Power hyperscale proposal at the retired Bow coal plant for which Eversource Energy is conducting a feasibility study.
Massachusetts (Executive Order 658)MAstateApplies to data centers above 25 MW. Such projects must meet 100% of electricity demand with clean energy, by generating clean power on site, funding new clean generation nearby, or paying into a Ratepayer Protection Fund that flows back to electricity customers. Community benefits agreements with host communities must be struck before state permitting begins, and non-disclosure agreements between state agencies and data centers are barred.Governor Maura Healey signed Executive Order 658 on 8 September 2026, establishing a bring-your-own-clean-energy framework for data centers above 25 MW and requiring local community approval before state permitting starts. The clean energy requirement is stricter than the state clean energy standard applying to other industries. The order also bars non-disclosure agreements between state agencies and data centers, which the administration frames as ensuring a transparent approval process. The order sets conditions on development; it is not a moratorium, and the atlas records it as a jurisdiction condition rather than as a blocked project. EO 658 builds on the 25 June 2026 Statement of Expectations for Responsible Data Center Development; MassDEP clean-energy protocols, the Ratepayer Protection Fund and an EEA municipal guidance document are due 31 December 2026, with annual reporting from September 2027.
Nebraska (Executive Order 26-17)NEstateApplies to any data center, large or small, going forward; ends eligibility for ImagiNE Nebraska Act incentives and creates a task force under the Department of Water, Energy and Environment. The governor said it is not a moratoriumGovernor Jim Pillen signed Executive Order 26-17 on 20 July 2026 (the governor's release is dated 21 July), ending access to ImagiNE Nebraska Act tax incentives for data centers and requiring the Departments of Economic Development, Revenue, and Water, Energy and Environment to jointly review proposals. Local reporting cited an estimated $519 million in property tax exemptions on $15 billion of exempted personal property for data centers from 1 January 2021 to 30 June 2026
Oklahoma (HB 2992 and SB 259)OKstateHB 2992 signed 11 May 2026, effective 1 July 2026; SB 259 signed 20 May 2026, effective 1 November 2026; ceremonial signing 6 August 2026. No MW threshold stated in the House releaseThe Data Center Customer Ratepayer Protection Act of 2026 protects existing utility customers from infrastructure costs created by large users including data centers and requires developers to notify adjoining landowners, county commissioners and the Oklahoma Corporation Commission within 60 days of acquiring land. The Groundwater Modernization Act requires annual water-use reporting and bars data centers from using groundwater in open-air evaporative cooling without recirculation, requiring low-consumptive cooling such as closed-loop or immersion systems
New Jersey (End Data Center Tax Credits Act and BPU reporting law)NJstateSigned 27 August 2026. Eliminates the remaining $250 million of the $500 million Next New Jersey Program allocation for AI and data center projects; the $250 million already awarded to one project is unaffected. A companion law requires semiannual water and electricity reporting to the BPUGovernor Mikie Sherrill signed the End Data Center Tax Credits Act, effectively ending the Next New Jersey data center and AI incentive program and redirecting freed credit capacity to other programs, together with a law requiring data centers to report water and electricity consumption to the Board of Public Utilities every six months with public summaries
Pennsylvania (Executive Order 2026-05 and PUC data center proceedings)PAstateEO 2026-05 signed 18 August 2026 applies to data centers above 25 MW peak demand: bring new power and pay its full cost, firm clean energy of 10% in 2027 rising to 32% by 2035, removal from the PA Permit Fast Track Program, and annual reporting from 1 July 2027. PUC voted 10 September 2026 to open curtailment, cost allocation and ratemaking reviews, with a tentative order on 1 October and a final vote targeted for 28 January 2027Governor Josh Shapiro's order creates a GRID compliance path giving certified projects rolling-basis DEP review, while non-compliant applicants must obtain all local permits before state review; Shapiro called the standards legally binding. On 10 September 2026 the PUC unanimously directed staff to propose emergency curtailment updates, hold a technical conference on data center cost allocation, and form a ratemaking working group including return on equity. At its public meeting on 1 October 2026 the PUC voted 4-0 to issue a tentative order for comment (Docket No. M-2026-3064961) on how Pennsylvania should implement PJM's proposed Interim Resource Adequacy Service (Tariff Attachment DD-4) and on requiring all electric distribution companies to update their pre-emergency and emergency load control procedures so that data centers are not classified as critical load exempt from curtailment. Chairman Stephen DeFrank said the order carries out the curtailment part of the 10 September motion and that large-load cost allocation will be taken up at a technical conference in November 2026. At the same meeting the PUC approved a $56.16 million Mid-Atlantic Interstate Transmission reliability project near the Crane Clean Energy Center (Docket No. A-2026-3064369), whose cost goes into the transmission rate base.
Virginia (SCC order on Dominion transmission cost assignment)VAstateOrder issued 31 July 2026 in Dominion's Rider T-1 proceeding. Mandatory contribution in aid of construction for direct-connect facilities and the substations and lines connecting them; GS-4 covers customers of at least 500 kW, and the SCC flagged possible future review of a GS-5 class for 25 MW and aboveThe SCC ordered Dominion Energy to directly assign certain transmission costs to large-load facilities such as data centers that require them, and said a coming docket may weigh extending direct assignment to more upstream transmission costs. Dominion sought about $1.5 billion through Rider T-1, and the SCC cut the proposed residential monthly increase from $2.90 to $0.94. . The SCC's 31 July 2026 decision directs Dominion to file, within 90 days in a new docket, an amended line extension policy requiring a mandatory contribution in aid of construction for defined transmission facilities such as direct-connect facilities. Microsoft filed a notice of appeal with the Supreme Court of Virginia on 28 August 2026; a spokesperson said the company has not appealed the decision itself and filed the notice to preserve its right to challenge how the decision is put into rates. Utility Dive said Microsoft has until November to formally appeal.
Texas (PUCT co-location ruling and Batch Zero continuation)TXstatePUCT approved net metering for a 260 MW data center co-located with a roughly 265.5 MW wind farm in Hutto on 23 July 2026 (Docket 59220), conditioned on curtailing full load within 30 minutes in grid emergencies. On 20 August 2026 the PUCT approved exceptions letting ERCOT continue Batch Zero under a revised schedule; ERCOT targets a 10 December 2026 audit filingThe co-location approval covers a Crusoe-developed facility operated by Ensign, bars participation in paid demand response tied to the arrangement, and allows physical breaker disconnection if needed. Following the governor's 3 August audit directive, ERCOT said about 300 data centers of 75 MW or more are in Batch Zero, the study will miss its 9 April 2027 deadline, and operators including Skybox, Mara, Digital Realty, QTS, Compass, Montera and Hut 8 committed to the governor's standards
Florida (SB 484 large-load tariff compliance, Duke Energy Florida)FLstateSB 484 enacted May 2026 requires utilities to provide specific tariff and service requirements for large load customers. Duke Energy Florida proposes a 20-year minimum term and full advance of service extension costs, and asked in August 2026 to defer a separate large-load rateDuke Energy Florida asked the PSC to delay setting a large-load-specific rate, arguing its tariff provisions protect other customers. Florida Public Counsel Walt Trierweiler said the proposal does not comply with the most basic provisions of SB 484. Single-outlet report. Tampa Electric said on 30 September 2026 that it filed its SB 484 large-load tariff with the Florida Public Service Commission; the tariff would require large-load customers such as data centers to pay for the infrastructure that serves them and part of the cost of operating the broader system. Tampa Electric said it serves no large-load customers today and expects a commission decision in late 2026 or early 2027. Florida Power & Light filed with the Florida Public Service Commission on Thursday 1 October 2026 stating that the rate structure approved in November 2025 for 2026 through 2029 already complies with SB 484. FPL said that structure requires data center applicants to fund an engineering study, fund 100% of the new generation needed to serve them, build, own and operate their own substation, pay up front for new or upgraded facilities, accept a minimum bill, sign a 20-year minimum contract and pay an exit fee for early termination. The PSC must still review the compliance filing. Single-outlet report (News Service of Florida). Tampa Electric's 30 September 2026 filing defines a large-load customer as any new customer expecting peak demand of 50 MW or more, which would pay for new generation, transmission, storage, distribution and certain fuel transportation costs so that each bears its full cost of service.
Louisiana (PSC vote on Meta Hyperion records)LAstateApplies to discovery in Entergy Louisiana's applications to build generation for Meta's Hyperion campus in Richland ParishThe Louisiana Public Service Commission voted 3-1 on 12 August 2026, along party lines with one commissioner absent, to overturn an administrative law judge's order that would have required Meta to disclose how it calculated job projections and electricity needs for Hyperion. Advocacy groups sought the records before the commission approves Entergy's additional generating units for the 5 GW expansion. According to an Earthjustice release of 28 September 2026, the Alliance for Affordable Energy and the Union of Concerned Scientists, represented by Earthjustice, have appealed the commission's decision to the Civil District Court for the 19th Judicial District, asking it to reverse the vote and reinstate the subpoena the administrative law judge granted in July, which would require Meta to substantiate Hyperion's job and electricity load projections in the review of Entergy Louisiana's proposed seven additional gas plants (advocacy group release).
Wisconsin (PSC financial guarantee rule for hyperscale customers)WIstateData center customers with credit ratings below A- must post cash or letters of credit under We Energies' approved large-customer rate structureThe Wisconsin PSC let a We Energies rehearing petition expire on 9 July 2026 without any commissioner moving to reopen the case, leaving in place financial guarantees, approved in April 2026, that Oracle said would cost about $100 million a year. Oracle, which is developing the $15 billion Port Washington campus with OpenAI and Vantage, filed a notice of voluntary dismissal of its June lawsuit in Ozaukee County Circuit Court on 17 August 2026, and the PSC said it stands behind its decision.
Arizona (ACC large-load review process for AEPCO member cooperatives)AZstateCovers very large customer arrangements at Graham County, Duncan Valley, Sulphur Springs Valley, Trico and Mohave electric cooperativesThe Arizona Corporation Commission approved on 12 August 2026 an Arizona Electric Power Cooperative filing that routes every case involving a very large power customer through a single review track with standard disclosures, so that serving data centers and other large loads is not shifted to residential and small retail members.
Delaware (data center ratepayer and clean energy laws)DEstateApplies to hyperscale data centers in Delmarva Power territory; also bars data centers from job-creation tax creditsGovernor Matt Meyer signed a package on 26 August 2026 requiring Delmarva Power to create a separate, higher rate for hyperscale data centers, assigning them transmission, distribution and capacity costs where possible, requiring load reduction at peak, and requiring data centers to generate their own renewable-portfolio-eligible power over a 10-year period with cleaner backup power.
Ohio (PUCO 180-day notice order and State Agreement Approach request for PORTS-Pike)OHstateAEP Ohio data center customers must give at least 180 days' notice before connecting and pay all incremental supply costsPUCO granted AEP Ohio's request for relief and ordered the 180-day notice so the utility can procure supply through stand-alone auctions or short-term purchases, with the data center customer covering the full cost. Separately, PUCO asked PJM to initiate the FERC Order 1000 State Agreement Approach to interconnect the PORTS-Pike Technology Campus, a 10 GW data center with co-located gas generation.
Kentucky (Executive order on data centers)KYstateApplies to prospective data center projects statewide; local approval decisions remain with communitiesGovernor Andy Beshear issued an executive order on 6 August 2026 requiring developers to show before approval that projects will not raise utility rates, barring utilities from raising rates to recover data center costs, and directing the Energy and Environment Cabinet to deny permits that would harm air or water. On 27 August 2026 he said he would support repealing the state's data center sales and use tax incentives, which the legislature extended to all 120 counties in 2025.
Texas (ERCOT Batch Zero conditional classification and first 765-kV approval)TXstateBatch Zero covers large-load interconnection requests in ERCOT; the 765-kV lines are part of the Permian Basin Reliability PlanERCOT completed a conditional classification of 362 large-load interconnection requests totaling 191.8 GW, listing 204 projects and 66.4 GW as base load eligible for Batch Zero. On 28 August 2026 the PUCT approved Oncor's applications and final routes for the state's first two 765-kV lines, from Somervell County to Howard County and from Howard County to near the Culberson-Reeves county line, projected at $14 billion as the first part of a planned $33 billion statewide expansion, over landowner opposition and calls from lawmakers to pause transmission planning; it delayed a decision on a Hill Country line.
Oregon (PUC approval of PGE data center rate increase under the POWER Act)ORstatePOWER Act rate class applies to loads above 20 MW in Portland General Electric territoryThe Oregon Public Utility Commission unanimously approved on 7 July 2026 a 29.7% rate increase for data centers, cryptocurrency operations and other large industrial users in PGE territory, the first significant increase under the 2025 POWER Act, effective 8 July 2026. Residential customers received a 1.3% decrease. The Data Center Coalition appealed the PGE allocation to the commission, which rejected the appeal; the Citizens' Utility Board expects the coalition to take the case to the Oregon Court of Appeals (reported 23 September 2026).
Ontario (Data Centre Playbook)OntariostateProposed framework for new large data centres; open for 30 days of public consultation from 13 August 2026Premier Doug Ford's government released a data centre playbook on 13 August 2026 requiring data centres to recover all costs of their power consumption, possibly through a new rate class above other large industrial users, ruling out financial incentives, encouraging self-generation, and requiring community benefits and closed-loop cooling. It builds on a 2025 law letting the energy minister prioritize or deny large data centre connections, as Oakville adopted a one-year moratorium.
North Dakota (special session vote on data center nondisclosure agreements)NDstateSenate Bill 2406 would have banned NDAs between government entities and developers of data centers and other industrial projectsThe North Dakota Senate voted 32-15 on 3 September 2026, during a three-day special session, to reject SB 2406, which carried penalties for companies entering NDAs with government agencies. Governor Kelly Armstrong testified that existing transparency laws are sufficient, and the committee chair said the bill needed full hearings.
Virginia (Executive Order 22)VAstateBinding now for state executive-branch agencies; legislative proposals for the 2027 General Assembly would require local approval above 25 MW. Not a moratoriumGovernor Abigail Spanberger signed Executive Order 22 on 18 September 2026. It bars state executive-branch agencies and employees from entering or enforcing NDAs on data center projects, directs a local planning and community engagement toolkit, faster noise regulation and a review of backup generators, sets energy-affordability and workforce directives, and creates a three-member AI Task Force. Proposed for the 2027 General Assembly: ending by-right approval with local approval above 25 MW, a statewide NDA ban for commercial projects, ending state site-development subsidies and fast-track permitting for large data centers, fairer allocation of transmission, generation and PJM interconnection costs, efficiency, water and land-use standards, limits on on-site gas generation, and local hiring. The order does not end the sales tax exemption
Nevada (Executive Order 2026-005)NVstateConditions on new tax abatement applications not yet reviewed by the GOED Board; existing abatements unchanged. Not a moratoriumGovernor Joe Lombardo signed Executive Order 2026-005, setting the Nevada Standard for Responsible Data Center Development, on 17 September 2026 bars GOED abatement applications from going to the Board unless the developer pays the Local School Support Tax in full and signs a Nevada Community Support Commitment covering local water standards, paying the full cost of service without shifting it to ratepayers, and curtailing load in grid emergencies. GOED is to publish standard terms by 6 November 2026 and the Nevada Office of Energy a Responsible Speed to Power Plan by 31 December 2026. The Nevada Independent reported $236 million in missed school support taxes and $461 million in expected breaks over 11 years
Texas (PUCT large load interconnection standards, 16 TAC 25.194)TXstateApplies to large loads of 75 MW or more. Order adopting new 16 TAC 25.194 filed 18 September 2026 in Project No. 58481 (rulemaking to implement large load interconnection standards under PURA 37.0561); Texas Register acknowledgement lists an effective date of 8 October 2026. Conditions interconnection, not a moratoriumThe Public Utility Commission of Texas adopted final large load interconnection standards at its 18 September 2026 open meeting. Compared with the March 2026 proposal, the final rule drops the proposed non-refundable interconnection fee of $50,000 per MW of contracted peak demand and replaces tiered study fees with a flat $100,000 study fee. Reporting from Hearst Texas says developers must post a security deposit of $50,000 per MW of requested capacity before an interconnection study begins, show site control through ownership or lease, and disclose load-ramping schedules and expected water use; if a request is withdrawn after capacity is allocated, 20% of the security is retained. Utility Dive reports the final rule lengthens the trigger for notifying ERCOT of non-utilized capacity to 24 months behind the energization schedule as a whole (from six months per milestone in the proposal), after which the utility applies the security to amounts owed and returns the balance. Utility Dive puts ERCOT's large load queue at 474 GW, about 90% data centers.
Maryland (Executive Order 01.01.2026.16)MDstateApplies to data centers of 25 MW or more that seek any state permit, incentive or letter of support after signing on 23 September 2026. Not a moratorium: projects receive a public determination of Aligned, Conditionally Aligned or Not Aligned; permits and incentive certifications already issued are not affected.Gov. Wes Moore signed Executive Order 01.01.2026.16 on 23 September 2026, creating the Maryland Data Center Accountability Task Force, staffed by the Governor's Office, to review large data center proposals against five principles: ratepayer and grid protection, economic benefits, community voice, environmental protections, and transparency and accountability. For a Not Aligned project, agencies are to withhold facilitation, letters of support and advocacy, the Department of Commerce is not to approve a discretionary state incentive, and agencies are to defer substantive review until the developer documents its local approvals, all to the extent the law allows; the order states it does not authorize denying, delaying or conditioning a permit on grounds not already in law. It creates a public Data Center Dashboard updated monthly with location, developer, parent company, disclosed anchor tenant and projected power and water use, and bars state employees from entering nondisclosure agreements with data center developers. Moore also called on the General Assembly to repeal the 2020 data center sales and use tax exemption, which requires legislation. WYPR reported 13 Maryland jurisdictions with temporary moratoriums and Harford County with a ban at signing.
Oregon (Pacific Power data center cost-assignment settlement under the POWER Act)ORstatePacific Power data center rate class under the 2025 POWER Act; applies to future data centers, and existing data center customers are to be addressed next springLast week Pacific Power reached a settlement with Oregon Public Utility Commission staff, the Citizens' Utility Board and advocacy groups that assigns the cost of new generation, storage, wires, market power and a share of shared lines needed for new data centers to the data center operators. The Citizens' Utility Board called it the strongest deal yet from a for-profit utility under the POWER Act. The three-member commission is expected to act on 13 November 2026, and the Data Center Coalition is expected to try to appeal. The coalition's appeal of PGE's July 2026 cost allocation was rejected by the commission, and the Citizens' Utility Board expects it to go to the Oregon Court of Appeals.
Philadelphia (Mayor Parker data center executive order)PAcityNo moratorium; creates a task force of city departments (Planning and Development, Sustainability, Public Health, Water, Licenses and Inspections, Clean and Green) with a report due by 30 June 2027.Mayor Cherelle Parker signed an executive order on 16 September 2026 creating a Data Center Task Force to study the benefits and harms of data centers, including environmental, energy and economic impacts, and to recommend building requirements, fiscal measures and rules to limit pollution and noise. The order directs the task force to work with state and federal agencies to apply Governor Shapiro's GRID standards. It does not include a moratorium; the No Data Centers in Philly coalition and more than 2,600 petition signers have asked City Council for a temporary ban.
Alabama (large-load data center contract law effective 1 October 2026)ALstateApplies to data centers needing 150 MW or more at peak in Alabama Power's service territory; effective 1 October 2026. Conditions on cost recovery, not a moratorium. Act number not given in the fetched sourceA state law taking effect on 1 October 2026 sets the standard the Alabama Public Service Commission must use to approve large-load contracts between Alabama Power and data centers of 150 MW or more: the contract must be expected to pay the extra costs of serving the customer, including generation, transmission, fuel and taxes, and to benefit other customers. APSC President Cynthia Almond said the law largely codifies protections the commission already applied. Public versions of the contracts are heavily redacted, with pricing, contract length and minimum billing terms blacked out, and there is no public hearing or vote; the APSC and the Attorney General's Office receive unredacted copies. In a proceeding opened in July 2026 the commission extended its review window for data center contracts from 10 to 45 days and has proposed 60 days going forward. Three large-load contracts have been filed since July: ADC Holdings, LLC, tied to the Nebius Oxmoor Valley project, was deemed approved, while Wooster, LLC and APLD BHM-01 LLC, tied to Applied Digital in Tuscaloosa County, remain under review. On Tuesday 6 October 2026 the Alabama PSC unanimously adopted a new process for contracts between Alabama Power and data centers: Alabama Power must publish a public summary listing the facility location, the company and the maximum electricity the data center will consume, and file non-public versions with contract terms and its cost and capacity analysis with the PSC and the Attorney General's Office. Under an amendment by President Cynthia Almond, the commission must vote on each agreement in a public meeting within 90 days of the filing or it takes effect automatically. Previously, staff-recommended contracts were approved unless commissioners intervened within 10 days. The process applies only to Alabama Power.
Texas (Xcel Energy large-load tariff filing at the PUCT)TXstateProposed tariff for data centers and other large loads in Xcel Energy's Texas Panhandle and South Plains territory (outside ERCOT); filed 28 September 2026, pending PUCT approval; MW threshold not stated in the fetched sourceOn 28 September 2026 Xcel Energy submitted a large-load tariff proposal to the Public Utility Commission of Texas setting terms under which data centers and other large users would pay for the transmission, substations, interconnection upgrades and new generation needed to serve them. It would require long-term commitments, typically 15 years or more, backed by financial security if a project is delayed, scaled back or not completed, minimum monthly payments while usage ramps, and exit fees to recover project-specific infrastructure costs. Xcel said it expects to file a similar tariff with the New Mexico Public Regulation Commission soon.
Maryland (BGE, Pepco and Delmarva Power large-load tariff filing at the PSC)MDstateProposed tariff for large new customers, including data centers, in the BGE, Pepco and Delmarva Power territories; announced 29 September 2026, pending Maryland Public Service Commission review; MW threshold and charges not stated in the fetched sourcesOn Tuesday 29 September 2026 the three Exelon utilities in Maryland, Baltimore Gas and Electric, Pepco and Delmarva Power, announced measures to protect customers from the costs of large energy users such as data centers. BGE said a large load tariff filing was submitted to the Maryland Public Service Commission under which large new customers, including data centers, would pay their share toward the grid, and said the filing is intended to give clear accountability for the costs that growth creates. The Baltimore Sun reported that the utilities want large electricity users, including data centers, to cover more of the costs of connecting to the grid. Patch reports a PSC hearing on the filing later in the fall, with further hearings from 8 to 11 December 2026. The tariff terms and any MW threshold were not available in the fetched coverage, and nothing has been approved. The filings implement the Next Generation Energy Act (SB 937 / HB 1035), signed by Gov. Wes Moore on 20 May 2025, which requires every investor-owned utility and cooperative to submit for PSC approval a specific rate schedule for large-load customers, defined as commercial or industrial customers with aggregate monthly demand of at least 100 MW and a load factor above 80%, so that residential customers do not bear the financial risks of large loads interconnecting. On 25 June 2025 the PSC opened administrative docket PC 72 on large-load customer regulations and tariffs, convening a public conference and a work group.
Indiana (IURC order on Indiana Michigan Power large-load tariff)INstateApplies to new or expanded facilities of at least 70 MW contract capacity, or 150 MW aggregated across a company, in I&M's Indiana territory. In force since February 2025. Conditions on service, not a moratoriumThe Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission approved, with one modification, a settlement among Indiana Michigan Power (AEP), the Indiana Office of Utility Consumer Counselor, Citizens Action Coalition, Amazon Data Services, Google, Microsoft and the Data Center Coalition that amends I&M's industrial tariff for large loads (I&M release dated 19 February 2025). New large-load customers must make long-term financial commitments proportional to their size: a 12-year minimum contract term, an 80% minimum monthly billing demand, increased collateral and an exit fee. The commission added that any mutually agreed reduction of more than 20% in a customer's contracted peak capacity must be submitted to the IURC for review and approval. Cost allocation was deferred to later trackers or rate cases. I&M expects Indiana peak load to rise from 2,800 MW to more than 7,000 MW by 2030.
Kansas (KCC order on Evergy Large Load Power Service tariff)KSstateApplies to new facilities above 75 MW in Evergy's Kansas territories; approved Thursday 6 November 2025. Conditions on service, not a moratoriumThe Kansas Corporation Commission approved on Thursday 6 November 2025 a settlement among Evergy's Kansas utilities, the Data Center Coalition, the Sierra Club, the Natural Resources Defense Council, Google and others creating a large load power service rate plan for new facilities over 75 MW. Customers may ramp up over as long as five years, must then take service for at least 12 years, pay a minimum monthly bill based on 80% of contract demand and pay for transmission upgrades needed to serve them. KCC staff estimated large-load customers will pay 7% to 10% more than existing industrial customers. The plan includes four clean energy options. Evergy had cited more than 20 prospective large-load customers totaling over 6 GW in Kansas.
Michigan (MPSC order on Consumers Energy large-load tariff)MIstateApplies to new data centers and other loads above 100 MW in Consumers Energy's territory; approved Thursday 6 November 2025. Conditions on service, not a moratoriumThe Michigan Public Service Commission approved on Thursday 6 November 2025 Consumers Energy's rules for new data centers and other loads above 100 MW: a 15-year minimum contract term, a minimum bill of 80% of expected monthly demand regardless of use, and a ramp-up period of up to five years. The commission required Consumers to show that costs caused by each new large load are not subsidized by other customers, saying it aimed to make large loads fully pay for the costs to serve them and to guard against stranded assets if load fails to materialize. CMS Energy cited a 9 GW pipeline of potential data center, semiconductor and manufacturing projects.
Georgia (PSC large-load rule for Georgia Power)GAstateApplies to new Georgia Power customers above 100 MW; approved unanimously 23 January 2025; contracts must be filed with the PSC for review. Conditions on service, not a moratoriumThe Georgia Public Service Commission voted unanimously on Thursday 23 January 2025 to approve a Georgia Power rule letting the utility bill new customers using more than 100 MW, chiefly data centers, under terms beyond standard service to address their risks. Beyond site-specific costs, such customers pay for upstream generation, transmission and distribution costs incurred as their projects progress; contract terms may run 15 years instead of 5, with minimum billing requirements; and every new Georgia Power contract in the 100 MW category must be submitted to the PSC for review. The rule derives from the interim IRP decision of April 2024 (Docket 55378).
Minnesota (2025 data center law, Special Session Chapter 12)MNstateQualified large-scale data centers: at least 25,000 sq ft and $250 million of construction and IT investment within 60 months after 30 June 2025; special water permit conditions above 100 million gallons a year of consumptive use; effective 15 June 2025 except where noted. Conditions and fees, not a moratoriumMinnesota's 2025 data center law (SSHF16/SSSF19, 2025 First Special Session Chapter 12; passed the House 85-43 and the Senate 40-26 in the one-day special session ending 10 June 2025 and took effect 15 June 2025) directs the Public Utilities Commission to create a new customer class of very large customers and to approve any electric service agreement between such a customer and a utility, ensuring that none of its costs, including stranded costs, fall on other customers and that its supply meets the state's renewable, solar and carbon-free standards. Each utility must offer a voluntary clean energy and capacity tariff to commercial and industrial customers that pays the full cost of new resources. Large-scale data centers pay an annual fee scaled to forecast peak demand into an energy conservation account used for low-income utility programs. Permitting is coordinated through DEED's Business First Stop program, consumptive water use above 100 million gallons a year triggers special permit conditions, and construction workers must be paid prevailing wage. The law extended the sales tax exemption on IT equipment and software to 35 years while ending the exemption on electricity, and requires green building certification within three years or repayment of the exemption.
Louisiana (PSC large-load fast-track directive)LAstateLarge-load applications that meet the criteria (15-year electric service agreement, demonstrated capacity need, customer paying at least half the cost of new infrastructure, Louisiana Economic Development letter of support) get an eight-month commission timeline and may skip market-based testing for new generation. Adopted 16 December 2025. An acceleration measure, not a moratoriumAt its monthly meeting in Natchitoches on Tuesday 16 December 2025 the Louisiana Public Service Commission voted 3-2 to adopt Commissioner Jean-Paul Coussan's directive, aligned with Gov. Jeff Landry's Lightning Speed Initiative executive order of September 2025, letting utilities bypass the market-based mechanism used since the 1980s to show they are pursuing least-cost power when serving qualifying large loads such as data centers. Applications meeting the criteria get commission action within eight months. Commissioner Davante Lewis and consumer advocates objected that it weakens consumer protections; Lewis's separate proposal for a broader review of large-load interconnection and cost allocation was deferred to January 2026 on a 4-1 vote.
Utah (SB 132 large-load service law)UTstateLarge loads of 100 MW or more within five years in Rocky Mountain Power's territory; signed at the end of March 2025, effective the following month per Latitude Media. Creates supply pathways, not a moratoriumUtah's SB 132, sponsored by Sen. Scott Sandall and signed by Gov. Spencer Cox at the end of March 2025, modifies Rocky Mountain Power's duty to serve large loads. The utility has 90 days to evaluate a large-load request and decide whether it can serve it without significant investment; if it cannot, or no agreement is reached, the customer may contract with one or more large-scale generation providers using the utility's transmission (registering with the Public Service Commission and using generation that meets NERC and WECC standards and can serve the whole load), or build a closed private generation system entirely behind the meter. The stated aim is to keep existing ratepayers from bearing the cost of large new loads. An early requirement that wind and solar be fully backed by storage was dropped, but backup supply arrangements must be specified.
Missouri (SB 4 and PSC large-load tariffs)MOstateSB 4 (signed 9 April 2025) requires large-load schedules for customers projected to exceed 100 MW of annual peak demand at utilities with over 250,000 customers, and 50 MW at smaller utilities. Ameren Missouri and Evergy tariffs approved; Liberty case ET-2026-0184 pending. Conditions on service, not a moratoriumGov. Mike Kehoe signed the utility omnibus bill SB 4 on 9 April 2025, requiring the Missouri Public Service Commission to adopt large-load rates, including for data centers, that reflect those customers' share of the costs to serve them and keep other customers from bearing unjust or unreasonable costs. The PSC has approved large-load tariffs for Ameren Missouri and Evergy: customers must take service for at least 12 years with an optional five-year ramp-up (up to 17 years), meet creditworthiness and liquidity tests and post collateral equal to two years of minimum bills, give 24 months' notice to exit or pay an early termination fee on top of the exit fee, and pay a monthly demand charge of at least 80% of the contracted level, with optional customer-funded clean and nuclear capacity programs. Liberty Utilities' large-load tariff case (ET-2026-0184) is in progress.
Section 06 · Findings

What the combined record shows

Twelve findings that emerge only when the corporate, lab, NeoCloud, private-capital, REIT, and capital-at-risk records are read against one another. Each is stated with the evidence that supports it, including the places where the evidence disagrees with itself.

1%

JLL reports North American data center vacancy at 1% for a third consecutive year, with more than 66 GW under construction.

The same market
~$130B

~75 projects blocked or delayed in the first quarter of 2026 alone.

Demand was never the constraint. Every one of the 1117 projects in the wall was stopped by a vote, a utility denial, a queue position, a tariff, a court order, or a state executive order, not by an absence of tenants.
X.14 data points

Reported capex has stopped being a clean measure of physical buildout

Headline capex figures no longer map cleanly to physical construction.

  • Microsoft's calendar-2026 capex figure fell from $190B to $175B purely because it extended lease amortisation from 15 to 25 years, with management explicitly saying its calendar year 2026 CapEx investment expectations remain unchanged.
  • Meta and Oracle are moving real capacity off the balance sheet into JVs and partner debt, with $27B (Blue Owl), $14B (BlackRock), and $72B (Oracle partner debt), so headline capex increasingly understates deployed capital.
  • A $15 billion reduction in Microsoft's calendar-2026 reported figure and the $27 billion, $14 billion, and $72 billion migration of Meta and Oracle capacity into joint ventures and partner debt are movements in accounting presentation, not in concrete poured.
  • Applied Digital carries approximately $36.2 billion of take-or-pay, non-cancellable revenue across 1,410MW of contracted critical IT load that appears on no hyperscaler capex line at all.
X.210 data points

Financing structures have bifurcated into four distinct regimes

Financing has split into four regimes.

  • Amazon, Google and Microsoft remain overwhelmingly self-funded from operating cash flow, though Alphabet raised $49.6B of equity and mandatory convertibles in June 2026.
  • Oracle uses senior notes plus site-level project bonds, with US banks stepping back and PIMCO taking roughly $10B of a roughly $14B tranche at a 7.5% coupon.
  • xAI funds its buildout with venture equity plus secured debt.
  • CoreWeave's debt moved from $2.3B (2023) to $7.5B (2024) to a $35.1B total debt balance at June 30, 2026.
  • Nebius funded roughly $13B of convertible notes in twelve months.
  • Applied Digital and Core Scientific each priced multi-billion secured note tranches.
  • Aligned was acquired at a $40 billion enterprise value funded 100% with equity.
  • Vantage completed a $9.2 billion equity investment inside $13 billion of 2024 incremental funding.
  • Macquarie provided a $5 billion perpetual preferred facility for Applied Digital.
  • Blue Owl made a $7 billion cash contribution at Hyperion, an instrument that cannot be unwound on a quarterly guidance cycle.
X.36 data points

Site-level scope inflation is the dominant pattern, not contraction

Announced projects systematically grow rather than shrink.

  • Meta's Richland Parish went $10B to $27B to more than $50B and 2 GW to 5 GW in nineteen months.
  • Amazon's New Carlisle went from $11B to $26B.
  • Microsoft's Wisconsin project went from $3.3B to more than $7B.
  • Meta's El Paso went from $1.5B to more than $10B.
  • Applied Digital's contracted position moved from roughly $7B and 250MW in June 2025 to roughly $11B and 400MW by August 2025 to approximately $31 billion of contracted baseline revenue by May 2026.
  • Crusoe's Abilene position moved from a 206MW first phase to 1.2GW to 2.1GW with the addition of a 900MW Microsoft campus.
X.42 data points

The demand-driven pull-backs are concentrated in Microsoft and Oracle/OpenAI

The pull-backs that exist are concentrated in two entities.

  • Microsoft is the only entity with a large, independently quantified retrenchment, roughly 2 GW of leases and LOIs and 1.5 GW of self-build, and Oracle/OpenAI is the only one with a specific cancelled expansion, the Abilene 1.2 GW to 2 GW expansion dropped.
  • Of the 96 project-level entries in Part IX, entry 96, Microsoft's roughly 2 GW portfolio-wide lease pullback, is the only one attributable to a builder's own capacity decision at scale, and even that attribution is contested; every other entry was stopped by a land-use vote, a utility capacity denial, a queue position, a tariff, a court order or a state executive order.
X.514 data points

The three failure modes, ranked by capital destroyed

The Bommarito cancellation analysis attributes the 2025 cohort's $89.7B as $42.2B to community opposition (49% of value), $26.0B to regulatory and zoning failure (27%), and $21.5B to failed incentives (24%).

  • The Bommarito cancellation analysis attributes the 2025 cohort's $89.7B as $42.2B to community opposition (49% of value), $26.0B to regulatory and zoning failure (27%), and $21.5B to failed incentives (24%).
  • Prince William Digital Gateway, $24.7B, 2 GW, 27M sq ft, had its rezoning voided in August 2025 and affirmed on appeal March 31 2026, with Compass withdrawing April 29 2026 and QTS terminating July 2 2026, extinguishing four years of entitlement work and the largest single data center rezoning in US history through litigation over procedural defects, not market conditions.
  • Consent risk also produced Project Blue in Tucson, $3.6B on 290 acres rejected unanimously August 6 2025, Google in Franklin Township, Indiana, $1.0B / 300 MW denied 7-0, and Fredericksburg's 1500 Gateway, 2.1M sq ft rejected 7-0 in December 2025.
  • Loudoun County removed by-right data center development on a 7-2 vote March 18 2025, converting what had been a ministerial permit in the largest data center county on earth into a political contest.
  • Opposition capacity grew from 142 groups in 24 states to 833 groups in 49 states in about fourteen months.
  • Berkeley Lab data shows median request-to-COD of 61 months for 2025 in-service projects versus 22 months in 2008, with more than 750 GW withdrawing during 2025 and roughly 75% of all capacity that entered queues between 2000 and 2020 having withdrawn by year-end 2025.
  • PJM's VP of Planning testified that PJM does not presently have a load interconnection process at all, with transmission-connected data centers administered through retail EDC and LSE tariffs.
  • Dominion has a 70 GW delivery-point queue with roughly 45 GW under study carrying no connection date.
  • ERCOT's queue grew from 63 GW to roughly 226 GW to roughly 474 GW, roughly 90% data centers and more than five times peak demand.
  • DOE's own planning study implied roughly 5,000 miles/year of high-capacity regional transmission without incorporating current load growth, against 888 miles of 345 kV+ built in 2024 and 322 miles in 2023, about 18% of the identified requirement.
  • PUCO approved AEP Ohio case 24-508-EL-ATA on July 9 2025, imposing 85% take-or-pay minimum demand charges over 12-year terms on large data center loads.
  • After the AEP Ohio tariff, anticipated data center demand in AEP Ohio's territory fell from roughly 30,000 MW to approximately 5,700 MW, meaning roughly 81% of the stated pipeline evaporated when speculative interconnection requests were forced to carry a financial commitment.
  • Texas legislated the same take-or-pay logic in SB 6, signed June 20 2025, with a 75 MW threshold, and Duke Energy set a 100 MW large-load threshold in North Carolina.
  • Data centers accounted for $6.3B, or 38%, of the $16.4B most recent PJM capacity auction cost, against New Jersey residential bill increases of about 20% in 2025.
X.611 data points

Power, not capital, is now the binding constraint

Every large 2025 to 2026 announcement pairs capacity with firm-power procurement, including Amazon's 1,920 MW Susquehanna PPA to 2042, Google's 500 MW Kairos SMR program and 6,200 MW of Texas PPAs, Meta's Entergy gas build in Louisiana, Michigan's 1.4 GW DTE contract for Stargate, and xAI's self-built 1.2 GW plant with 41 turbines.

  • Amazon signed a 1,920 MW Susquehanna PPA running to 2042.
  • Google has a 500 MW Kairos SMR programme and 6,200 MW of Texas PPAs.
  • Meta paired its Louisiana buildout with an Entergy gas build.
  • Michigan regulators approved a 1.4 GW DTE contract for Stargate.
  • xAI self-built a 1.2 GW plant with 41 turbines.
  • Where power is unavailable projects move, as at Abilene, where power will also not be ready at the site for a year.
  • Newmark states that data center power demand is expected to exceed utility supply by 50%.
  • CyrusOne's answer was dedicated generation, a $1.2 billion investment and 190-megawatt Calpine agreement, followed by a 380-megawatt Constellation agreement with a second phase of another 380 MW.
  • Silver Lake launched a $400 million powered-land platform with more than 6GW planned.
  • KKR's Helix vehicle is explicitly built to deliver hyperscale data centers with secured power.
  • The Poolside/CoreWeave 2GW Texas campus collapsed with power procurement challenges cited.
X.712 data points

Compute is fungible across labs, clouds and landlords in a way it was not in 2024

Labs are becoming landlords' counterparties and each other's suppliers.

  • Anthropic simultaneously buys from AWS (more than $100B / 5 GW), Google (multi-GW TPUs, roughly $200B), SpaceX/xAI (more than 300 MW) and builds its own with Fluidstack ($50B).
  • Google rents roughly 110,000 GPUs from SpaceX for $920M/month.
  • Meta is reportedly negotiating to absorb Crusoe capacity abandoned by OpenAI.
  • CoreWeave has a roughly $104B backlog on $2.575B quarterly revenue.
  • Applied Digital holds roughly $36.2B of take-or-pay on 1,410MW.
  • Cerebras has $24.6B RPO with only 15% expected in 2026 to 2027.
  • Microsoft was 62% of CoreWeave's 2024 revenue.
  • G42 was 87% of Cerebras' H1 2024 revenue, with MBZUAI at 62% in 2025.
  • Core Scientific's HPC business is effectively a single-counterparty roughly $10.2B CoreWeave contract.
  • Nvidia is simultaneously supplier, investor, lessee and credit enhancer, with $2B equity checks into CoreWeave and Nebius, a $6.3B capacity backstop, $860M of partner lease guarantees, a roughly $20B Groq transaction, and a $500B third-party financing platform.
  • Nvidia's complete exit from its Applied Digital position shows the support is selective, not blanket.
  • The $9.0B CoreWeave and Core Scientific merger failed at the shareholder vote, while the Voltage Park and Lightning AI merger closed at more than $2.5B.
X.89 data points

The vacancy paradox

Part B and Part C describe the same market and appear to contradict each other, but they do not.

  • JLL reports 1% vacancy at year-end 2025, a record low and the second consecutive year at that level, against 39 GW of active North American capacity and 35 GW under construction, with 1% vacancy persisting into midyear 2026 for a third year and more than 66 GW under construction.
  • CBRE independently measured 1.6% record-low vacancy across 8,155 MW of primary-market supply in H1 2025, with 74.3% of under-construction capacity preleased.
  • Cushman & Wakefield put 25.3 GW under construction in the Americas at roughly 89% pre-committed.
  • Northern Virginia ran 0.5% vacancy with 21.5 MW available out of 4,039.6 MW of inventory after 1,102 MW of absorption in 2025, up 144% year over year.
  • Part C shows roughly $130B of projects blocked or delayed in Q1 2026 alone and cancellations rising from 2 in 2023 to 6 in 2024 to 25 in 2025.
  • Newmark states quantitatively that power demand exceeds available utility supply by approximately 50%.
  • datacenterHawk's Northern Virginia read holds that against 9.6 GW of planned capacity, utility limitations are the bottleneck.
  • Green Street's sector work identifies power, transmission, and obsolescence as the biggest challenges rather than absorption.
  • Digital Realty's SJC37 at 641 Walsh Avenue in Santa Clara is physically constructed and cannot be energized, because Silicon Valley Power serves roughly 60 data centers representing 55% of municipal load, faces peak growth from 740 MW toward roughly 1,300 MW within five to ten years, and is mid-way through a $450M upgrade program running to 2028.
X.96 data points

The veto migrated from county to state to federal during 2026

The chronology in Part C shows a clear vertical migration of veto authority during 2026, which changes the diversification math for any multi-site portfolio.

  • Through 2025 essentially all documented actions were municipal or county, including Loudoun's by-right repeal, Warrenton's permanent ban in July 2025, Aurora's 180-day pause on September 25 2025, and Tucson's rejection; that risk was diversifiable across counties.
  • New York Executive Order 62, July 14 2026, established the first statewide moratorium in the United States, covering data centers of 50 MW or greater, holding DEC permits in abeyance until DPS completes a final Generic Environmental Impact Statement, with no fixed expiration date.
  • Texas Governor Abbott halted new data center grid approvals on August 3 2026 pending a PUCT and ERCOT audit, and ERCOT issued Market Notice M-A080326-01 suspending Batch Zero Large Load notifications; the two state actions removed the country's largest deregulated market and one of its largest regulated markets from the buildable set within a single month and are not diversifiable by site selection within those states.
  • FERC issued six Section 206 show cause orders on June 18 2026 to PJM, MISO, SPP, CAISO, NYISO and ISO-NE simultaneously, preliminarily finding every one of those tariffs inadequate for lack of clear and consistent large-load rules, with responses due within 60 days (August 17 2026).
  • FERC rejected the Talen-Amazon Susquehanna interconnection service agreement 2-1 on November 1 2024, where 300 MW had been approved and 480 MW was sought at a 2,520 MW plant, establishing the precedent for what an adverse ruling costs.
  • Fourteen states are now considering outright bans, including Georgia HB 1059, which would forbid local permitting until December 2028.
X.1023 data points

What the capital stack did in response

Part A shows the response to the failure modes was not retreat but a decisive shift toward powered land, scale, and permanent capital, the three attributes that survive the failure modes.

  • Digital Realty paid $3.5B for Blackstone's 64% interest in three Northern Virginia data centers totaling 288 MW, a $7.8B gross transaction, in June 2026, roughly $27M per gross MW for operating capacity in a 0.5%-vacancy market, a price only rational if greenfield entitlement in the same county is understood to be unreliable.
  • Iron Mountain disclosed 450 MW operating at 96% leased, 202 MW under construction, and 628 MW held for future development, roughly 1.3 GW total, with the held bank larger than the operating fleet and its value set by whether it can be powered.
  • Vantage completed a $9.2B equity investment led by DigitalBridge and Silver Lake atop $13B of 2024 funding.
  • Aligned completed a $12B capital raise.
  • Equinix agreed to form a greater-than-$15B xScale joint venture with GIC and CPP Investments, alongside capex rising to $4-5B annually through 2029 from $3.3B in 2025.
  • Cologix raised $1.5B comprising a $1B debt facility and $500M of equity.
  • DataBank launched a $2B program targeting 850 MW.
  • Novva secured $2B from JPMorgan and Starwood with CIM Group.
  • Flexential secured a roughly $1B convertible from GI Partners with Hamilton Lane on August 20 2025.
  • Digital Realty's $7.5B ATM program in May 2026 provides the listed-market equivalent of the same optionality.
  • Blackstone holds a $70B data center portfolio with a $100B prospective pipeline.
  • Tract holds entitled, powered land rather than buildings343 acres for a 1 GW campus at Morris Technology Park in greater Chicago, 2 GW in Caldwell County, Texas, and 1,700 MW at Pole Canyon, Utah.
  • STACK holds seven Northern Virginia sites totaling 2,400 MW.
  • Vantage's North American footprint runs Ashburn 590 MW, Santa Clara 216 MW, Phoenix 176 MW, Quincy 89 MW.
  • Iron Mountain assembled 142 acres for 400+ MW in Manassas.
  • Tract's Mooresville, North Carolina project, $30B and 1.5 GW, was cancelled after the utility denied capacity, and its Goodyear/Buckeye, Arizona project, $14B, was withdrawn, but the losses are option premiums rather than sunk construction.
  • CyrusOne's $2B, 1,200-acre project on a US Army site in Utah in spring 2026 and Iron Mountain's underground and government-adjacent portfolio point at the insight that the reliable way to eliminate a discretionary county vote is to site where no county vote exists.
  • Newmark reported capital markets revenue up 59.7% with more than $25B of trailing-twelve-month data center volume, against roughly $17B of data center deals in 2024, and arranged the $7.1B construction loan for a 1.2 GW Abilene campus.
  • Colliers measured US data center deal volume at $57B in 2024 versus $26B in 2023, and global data center investment above $580B in 2025, exceeding oil and gas investment for the first time.
  • Newmark's $31.5B annualized construction spend across a roughly 50M sq ft pipeline is the flow that the Part C frictions are metering.
  • Blackstone's QTS platform grew from roughly 400 megawatts at acquisition to roughly 3 gigawatts, while the firm simultaneously refinanced $3.5 billion and $1.5 billion of CMBS and planned a publicly traded AI-data-center vehicle sized in the tens of billions.
  • Carlyle and CyrusOne took the federal-land route directly, at roughly 1,384 acres at Fort Bliss with initial operating capability in FY2027 and at Dugway Proving Ground (1,201 acres, IOC FY2029) respectively.
  • DigitalBridge quantified the equity intensity of the whole exerciseRoughly $10bn is required to build one gigawatt, about half of it equity.
X.117 data points

The five underwriting tests this evidence implies

Read against the 96 project failures in C.1, five distinctions separate the projects that proceeded from those that did not.

  • Consent risk destroyed $42.2B, 49% of the 2025 cancellation value, making by-right or as-of-right status the highest-value entitlement attribute.
  • Loudoun's 7-2 repeal of by-right development shows by-right status can be removed retroactively from a jurisdiction, not merely denied to a project.
  • With roughly 75% of 2000-2020 queue entrants withdrawn by YE2025 and median request-to-COD at 61 months, a queue position should be underwritten as an option, not an asset.
  • Dominion's 9 GW of construction letters of authorization against a 70 GW delivery-point queue gives the approximate conversion ratio.
  • The AEP Ohio tariff eliminated roughly 81% of anticipated demand, 30,000 MW to roughly 5,700 MW, through 85% take-or-pay over 12 years, so any project whose economics require avoiding a minimum-demand commitment should be treated as speculative.
  • Cushman reports roughly 89% of 25.3 GW under construction pre-committed and CBRE 74.3% preleased; speculative construction is now the exception, and at 1% vacancy the reason is supply-side, not demand-side, discipline.
  • New York's EO 62 with no fixed expiration and Texas's August 3 2026 halt with ERCOT Market Notice M-A080326-01 demonstrate that statewide and ISO-wide pauses can arrive with weeks of notice and cannot be mitigated by in-state site diversification.
X.128 data points

Contradictions and unresolved questions in the evidence

Intellectual honesty requires flagging where the fetched sources disagree or fall short.

  • Aggregate capital-at-risk figures are not reconcilableThe progression $64B to $98B to $156B to roughly $130B mixes windows and definitions across trackers, no fetched source publishes a reconciliation, and none should be inferred.
  • Moratorium counts differ by a factor of twoDimetrics reports 483 actions across 47 states while ElectricChoice reports 225 across 30 states and explicitly calls it a floor; the gap is definitional, proposed versus adopted and restriction versus moratorium, and neither publishes a crosswalk.
  • JLL and CBRE measure different universesJLL's 39 GW active North American capacity is not comparable to CBRE's 8,155 MW of primary-market supply or Cushman's 43.4 GW Americas operational, 93.6% US, because the sets include or exclude self-build hyperscale differently, and Data Center Frontier's side-by-side treatment confirms the two lenses are not interchangeable.
  • Reversals are real and under-trackedMicrosoft's $1B Licking County, Ohio project was cancelled April 8 2025 and restarted in 2026, and CyrusOne's $500M / 600 MW / 280-acre Sangamon County, Illinois project was delayed in November 2025 and approved in April 2026; trackers count the block, few net out the restart, so cumulative totals likely overstate permanent loss.
  • Whether Microsoft's lease pullback was demand or supply remains unresolvedReports of roughly 2 GW of cancelled leases across the US and Europe are consistent both with softening AI demand and with a shift toward self-build, no fetched source settles it, and record-low vacancy argues against the demand reading.
  • Private developer disclosure is structurally thinSection A carries n.a. for capex and delayed-site specifics at several private operators, notably H5, Sabey, Prime, and Compass, because they file no periodic reports; their exposure is real but unquantifiable from public evidence.
  • The claim that roughly half of 2026 US capacity is delayed or cancelled circulated widely and was explicitly contested by SemiAnalysis; the more defensible tracked figure is that of 777 AI factories and large data centers above 50 megawatts representing approximately 190 gigawatts announced since 2024, roughly 16 GW was scheduled to begin operations during 2026 while only about 5 GW was under construction, with 30% to 50% of 2026 capacity expected to slip.
  • The two independent readings of Microsoft's retrenchment remain unreconciledTD Cowen's 2GW of cancellations and deferrals against SemiAnalysis's position that the figure covers non-binding LOIs, not firm contracts, while Microsoft has roughly 5GW of pre-leased capacity under binding contracts.
X.136 data points

The tax-incentive era is reversing, and the reversals are retroactive to the pipeline

States that competed to exempt data center equipment from sales tax are now pausing, narrowing or repealing those exemptions, in several cases after the cost ran far past the original estimate.

  • Ohio paused new applications for its data center sales tax exemption in May 2026 while lawmakers study the industry's impact. The exemption, enacted more than a decade ago, cost more than $1.5 billion in 2025, more than ten times the state's original estimate.
  • New Jersey enacted the End Data Center Tax Credits Act in August 2026, eliminating the remaining $250 million available for AI and data center projects.
  • Washington eliminated its sales and use tax exemption for server equipment and power infrastructure for urban data centers effective 1 July 2026.
  • Minnesota rolled back part of its data center tax break in 2025, repealing the sales tax exemption for electricity used by qualified data centers.
  • More than ten states have paused or cancelled data center tax exemptions, with reporting attributing the shift to electricity and water demands and to questions about whether taxpayers should subsidise the buildout.
  • Monroe County, Georgia shows the countervailing structure still in useA development authority owns the facility and leases it back to Google, replacing private property taxes with contractual payments of more than $1.2 billion over construction plus two decades.
X.144 data points

Lenders and insurers have begun moving data center risk off their own books

The financing story has a second layer that site-level tallies miss: the banks and insurers carrying AI infrastructure exposure are now buying protection against it.

  • Deutsche Bank is working on a significant risk transfer tied to approximately EUR 2 billion of project finance debt including data center loans, its first SRT tied to a project finance portfolio, joining European and North American lenders using the SRT market to hedge AI infrastructure exposure.
  • Aon is targeting $10 billion of capacity for a new Operational Property Data Center Lifecycle Program covering owners and operators for core, shell and infrastructure equipment and extending to tenants insuring their own GPUs, after expanding its construction-phase program in stages through 2026.
  • The SEC staff guidance of 29 July 2026, holding that directly-owned data center securitizations are not Exchange Act asset-backed securities, lowers the execution cost of moving these assets into capital markets structures in the first place.
  • Lambda's $926 million term loan B of 27 August 2026 is described by the issuer as its first large-scale private cloud GPU asset-backed SPV financing and the first broadly syndicated investment-grade-rated term loan B completed by a private neocloud, extending rated capital markets treatment to GPU collateral.
X.156 data points

The constraint has moved from the state house to the county board, and it is not moving in one direction

Early September 2026 produced a dense cluster of local moratorium actions across many states in a single week.

  • Oregon Governor Tina Kotek paused all state-land transactions for data centers through 1 July 2027 and, at a Capitol rally the same day, said she now supports a statewide moratorium and that the legislature should pass a temporary ban, a shift from her prior position. Republican gubernatorial candidate Christine Drazan also called for a moratorium.
  • Lake County, Illinois approved an eight-month moratorium on data centers in unincorporated areas running to 11 May 2027, extendable by four months, after a public hearing that drew more than 1,200 comments.
  • Massachusetts Governor Maura Healey's Executive Order 658 of 8 September 2026 requires data centers above 25 MW to meet all electricity demand with clean energy or pay into a Ratepayer Protection Fund, and requires community benefits agreements before state permitting begins.
  • Against the trend in the same week, the Coalition for Responsible Data Center Development withdrew its lawsuit against Farmington, Minnesota and Tract Land Development, stating that the merits remain valid but litigation costs were no longer sustainable for the few residents personally carrying them. A companion township suit continues.
  • The federal layer moved in the restrictive directionThe Interior Board of Land Appeals stayed construction of the Townsite Data Center near Boulder City, Nevada on 1 September 2026, finding BLM likely acted unlawfully in permitting the first data center approved on federal public land without a project-specific environmental review.
  • Reading the direction from restriction counts alone is unsafeThe atlas records approvals after delay and restarts alongside blocks, and the taxonomy carries a restarted category precisely because trackers systematically over-count permanent loss when reversals go unrecorded.
Section 07 · The durability test

The durability test

A project scores as durable in the SAVRN framework when it holds at least three of the four control positions: contracted firm power, secured equipment, permanent capital, and non-discretionary entitlement.

Boundary casepowerequipmentcapitalentitlementOutcome
Abilene ✓✓✓✓ built
Prince William Digital Gateway ✕✓✓✕ $24.7 billion extinguished
Santa Clara ✕✓✓✓ complete and dark
Hold at least three of the four and the record says the project gets built. Abilene held all four. Prince William Digital Gateway held two, and $24.7 billion was extinguished. Santa Clara holds three, lacks power, and sits complete and dark.
power
  • xAI. Built its own generation: a permanent ~1.2 GW simple-cycle plant of 41 turbines permitted in Mississippi in March 2026, alongside temporary turbines and Tesla Megapacks.
  • Amazon. Contracted 1,920 megawatts of carbon-free nuclear power through 2042 from Talen's Susquehanna plant. The co-location structure was rejected 2-1 by FERC on November 1, 2024, which the atlas calls the clearest demonstration that private-grid control is a regulated privilege rather than a purchased one.
  • Google. Contracted up to 500 MW of Kairos SMR capacity by 2035 and more than 6,200 megawatts of Texas generation.
  • CyrusOne. Co-located against Calpine and Constellation generation.
  • Carlyle (Copia Power). Copia platform held more than 20 gigawatts of generation opportunity before its ~$2.6 billion sale to EQT.
equipment
  • Nvidia. Position described in Part IV: $6.3 billion of unsold-capacity backstop to 2032, $860M of guaranteed partner lease obligations, $2 billion equity stakes in CoreWeave and Nebius, and a ~$20 billion Groq asset purchase.
  • Anthropic. Counter-position: multiple gigawatts of next-generation TPU capacity with Google and Broadcom.
  • Amazon. Counter-position: nearly 1GW total of Trainium2 and Trainium3 capacity coming online by the end of 2026.
  • IREN. Counter-position: ~$5.8 billion of GPU and equipment purchases from Dell.
capital
  • Blackstone. $150 billion portfolio and $160 billion pipeline.
  • BlackRock / GIP and AIP. BlackRock/GIP holds more than $200 billion AUM, and AIP carries a $30 billion mandate scalable up to $100 billion.
  • Brookfield. More than $1 trillion AUM and a $9.6 billion capital backlog.
  • KKR. Approximately $34 billion of digital-infrastructure equity across 24 investments and a 12GW pipeline.
  • Blue Owl. $39 billion digital-infrastructure strategy. Together with the other four managers, the atlas says these balance sheets stand behind most non-hyperscaler capacity it records.
  • Nvidia (financing platform). Third-party financing platform of over $500 billion that names six of the major capital holders.
delivery
  • Crusoe. Abilene: 2.1GW across two campuses, phase 1 energized September 2025. Delivery control is defined as entitled land, a signed interconnection agreement and a general contractor.
  • Vantage. Frontier: over $25 billion, 1,200 acres, 1.4GW in Shackelford County, Texas.
  • Applied Digital. Five campuses with 1,410MW contracted critical IT load.
  • STACK. Seven Northern Virginia sites totaling 2,400 MW.
  • Tract. Pure land-bank optionality: 1 GW Illinois, 2 GW Texas, 1,700 MW Utah. Tract also demonstrates the limit of that model: $30.0B / 1.5 GW cancelled at Mooresville and $14B withdrawn at Goodyear/Buckeye are option premiums paid, not buildings lost.
Abilene
built

Held all four positions and was built.

powerequipmentcapitalentitlement
Prince William Digital Gateway
$24.7 billion extinguished

Held capital and equipment demand but neither power certainty nor durable entitlement.

capitalequipment powerentitlement
Santa Clara
complete and dark

Holds entitlement, capital and equipment but lacks power, and sits complete and dark.

entitlementcapitalequipment power
Section 08 · Method

Method, limits, and what we could not confirm

609082885
Dollar and megawatt figures · 60 Dollar figure only · 90 Megawatt figure only · 82 Neither disclosed · 885
Of 1117 capital-at-risk records, only 60 disclose both a dollar and a megawatt figure. Local rezoning dockets disclose acreage and square footage; investment figures come from economic-development announcements a withdrawn project never makes. That is why every dollar total on this page is a floor, and why the atlas records n.a. instead of estimating. 5,622 citations across 98 entities back what is disclosed.

The grounding rule. Every numeric value, date, vote count, megawatt figure, and dollar figure in the report was taken from a web page fetched during the research session that produced it, and carries a markdown link to the specific URL that states it. Where a requested value could not be confirmed from a fetched page, the cell reads n.a. rather than an estimate. No figures were supplied from model memory, including for well-known public companies.

Source hierarchy. Company filings and investor materials were preferred for consolidated and segment financials (Part A financials); issuer press releases and IR pages were preferred for site-level and transaction-level figures. Regulatory dockets, executive orders and ISO/RTO filings were preferred for interconnection and moratorium actions (Part C), and brokerage research reports were preferred for market statistics (Part B). Trade press and tracker aggregations were used where primary documents were unavailable or where the tracker itself is the only entity publishing the aggregate.

What capex means here. Company-reported capex is global, not North America specific, and none of the nine entities discloses a clean North American data center capex line. The report therefore separates (a) audited or reported consolidated capex, (b) forward capex guidance, and (c) the sum of announced site-level North American commitments, which are typically multi-year and overlapping, and flags this distinction explicitly in the summary table. Announced multi-year site commitments across Parts I through VII overlap with one another and with consolidated capex and must never be summed into a single deployment figure; Apple's $500B to $600B total US commitment in particular is not a data center capex figure and should never be added to hyperscaler data center capex.

Evidence base. Research proceeded in two search waves totaling 121 queries and four extraction waves against the resulting URL set, with dedicated aggregator passes for national trackers (Data Center Watch, Dimetrics, ElectricChoice, DataCenterBans, Bommarito, Interconnected Capital), regulatory primary sources (FERC, PUCO, MPSC, ACC, ERCOT, CAISO, PJM, DOE, NY Governor's office), issuer primary sources (SEC filings, investor presentations, supplemental reporting packages, press releases, earnings call transcripts), and brokerage research (JLL, CBRE, Cushman & Wakefield, Newmark, Colliers, Avison Young/datacenterHawk, Green Street). For the NeoCloud section, evidence was gathered in five fetch batches over 98 URLs prioritizing issuer press releases and IR pages, SEC-derived filings summaries, and wire and trade reporting; intermediate extracts (fetch_coreweave.json, fetch_batch2.json through fetch_batch5.json, search1.json through search4.json) are preserved in the workspace alongside the report. The transaction record was compiled from a fourteen-part extraction of the source document, and the same event was in several cases recorded separately in more than one part. On 1 September 2026 those entries were consolidated, reducing 93 records in 44 groups to 44 and taking the transaction count from 320 to 271. The consolidation merged rather than deleted: each surviving record carries the union of its duplicates' citations and counterparties and lists the ids it absorbed, and the number of unique source URLs was 743 both before and after, so no citation was lost. Two candidate groups were left unmerged after review because the records describe different events that share a dollar figure. The change lowers the mean disclosed transaction size from $24.4 billion to $17.2 billion and leaves the median unchanged at $3.0 billion, the expected signature of duplicate records concentrated among the largest commitments. This page carries 5,622 source citations; all of them are listed on one page.

Known limitations

  1. Part C (Part IX) dollar and megawatt totals are floors, for the three reasons set out in section C.4 and the reading note to the jurisdiction summary table: most blocked projects never disclose capex, moratoriums have no denominator, and queue positions are not projects.
  2. Aggregate capital-at-risk figures from different trackers ($64B, $98B, $156B, approximately $130B) are successive overlapping snapshots with different windows and definitions; they are not additive and no published reconciliation exists.
  3. Interconnection queue volumes contain substantial duplicate requests and cannot be converted into project counts or capital figures.
  4. Private developer and private-fund financial disclosure is voluntary and incomplete, producing the n.a. entries catalogued in the confirmed-gaps sections (Part A and elsewhere).
  5. Reversals of blocked projects are under-tracked relative to blocks, biasing cumulative loss figures upward.
  6. The report reflects evidence available as of its research date; several matters were unresolved at that time and will change the picture materially: the FERC show cause proceedings due August 17, 2026, the Texas PUCT/ERCOT audit, the New York DPS Generic Environmental Impact Statement, the SoftBank acquisition of DigitalBridge expected in H2 2026, and the reported Vantage and Switch IPO processes.
  7. Announced multi-year site commitments across Parts I through VII overlap with one another and with consolidated capex, and must never be summed into a single deployment figure.
  8. Apple's $500B to $600B total US commitment is not a data center capex figure and should never be added to hyperscaler data center capex.
  9. In Part IX section C.1, roughly two-thirds of the 96 project-level entries carry either a dollar figure or an MW figure but not both, because local rezoning dockets disclose acreage and square footage while investment figures come from economic-development announcements that a withdrawn project never makes.
  10. Duplicate records were consolidated on 1 September 2026 using an amount-plus-counterparty match followed by record-by-record review. The match only catches duplicates that share an identical dollar figure, so entries describing one event with two different disclosed amounts may still be recorded twice.

Confirmed gaps

Fields that could not be confirmed from any fetched page are recorded as n.a. rather than estimated. These are the open gaps, by section:

Hyperscalers
  • Microsoft: Iowa (West Des Moines) 2024-2026 dollar commitment; Atlanta Fairwater capex; a current (2024-2026) Virginia dollar commitment distinct from the historic Boydton/Mecklenburg $499M.
  • Amazon: MW capacity for New Carlisle from a primary source; MW-quantified delayed or paused capacity.
  • Google: a discrete 2024-2026 Virginia dollar commitment; MW-quantified delayed capacity.
  • Meta: Georgia (Social Circle / Newton County) dollar and MW figures; any 2024-2026 North American cancellation.
  • Oracle: site-level MW for campuses other than Abilene and Saline Township.
  • Apple: any Apple-owned North American data center dollar or MW figure; Houston square footage from Apple's own newsroom.
  • OpenAI: per-site dollar figures for the five September 2025 Stargate sites.
  • Anthropic: named city/county sites and MW for the Fluidstack Texas and New York builds.
  • xAI: an audited or company-confirmed cumulative Memphis capex figure (the $35.8B is Epoch AI's modelled estimate, not a company disclosure).
Neoclouds
  • Sesterce: the $2 billion commitment in the brief is unconfirmed; NA site capacity/dollars unconfirmed (source: Sesterce EWR20, https://www.sesterce.com/project/ewr20).
  • CoreWeave: Virginia site MW (only lease-from-Flexential and 2023 build year confirmed) (source: Baxtel, https://baxtel.com/data-center/coreweave-douglasville-ga).
  • Core Scientific: Marble NC and Calvert City KY site-level MW and dollar figures.
  • Groq and SambaNova: North American site-level MW and named anchor contract values.
  • Vultr and Together AI: anchor customer contract values.
  • Crusoe: Iceland/international expansion figures; the value of the Oracle/OpenAI Abilene tenancy.
  • Nvidia NCP program: per-partner commitment dollar amounts.
  • Kaleidescape: no matching GPU-cloud entity found.
Private Capital
  • Blackstone role in the Applied Digital $5 billion financing not confirmed (the counterparty is Macquarie Asset Management).
  • Any Silver Lake position in QTS or an NVIDIA-QTS transaction: n.a.
  • Apollo lending to Aligned: n.a.
  • Oaktree North American data center holdings: n.a.
  • Antin North American data center holdings: n.a.
  • Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners North American data center equity: n.a.
  • EQT-Constellation: n.a.
  • Brookfield's Ascenty financial metrics and a $10B Cadarache campus: n.a.
  • ODATA transaction values: n.a. (ODATA is referenced in this dataset only as part of the Aligned Latin American platform).
  • CalPERS-named North American data center assets beyond the GI Partners TechCore fund: n.a.
  • IPI Partners premise corrected: the 2024 acquirer was Blue Owl Capital at approximately $1.0 billion, with ICONIQ as a partner, and $11 billion refers to IPI's AUM.
Reits Cre
  • Digital Realty: a discrete $7B forward-sale equity tranche distinct from the $7.5B ATM was n.a. in fetched filings.
  • Equinix: site-level Virginia, Texas and Chicago delay disclosures: n.a.
  • Iron Mountain: the $10B pipeline claim is unconfirmed; Phoenix and Frankfurt site-level figures: n.a.
  • QTS: Fayetteville GA, Ashburn, Manassas, Phoenix and Groveport OH site-level delay data: n.a.
  • Aligned: Salt Lake City, Phoenix, Dallas and Utah site-specific delay disclosures: n.a.
  • EdgeConneX: North American delay-specific disclosures: n.a.
  • H5 Data Centers: 2025 platform-level financing: n.a.
  • Cushman & Wakefield: an explicit 'powered land moratorium' formulation was n.a. in the fetched documents.
  • Green Street: specific vacancy or absorption series: n.a. (subscription-gated).
  • Transwestern: data center capital markets disclosures: n.a.
  • ISO-NE: queue-specific data center MW: n.a.
  • Part IX section C.1: roughly two-thirds of the 96 project-level entries carry either a dollar figure or an MW figure but not both, because local rezoning dockets disclose acreage and square footage while investment figures come from economic-development announcements that a withdrawn project never makes.
Section 09 · Questions

Questions this atlas answers

How much capital is committed to North American data centers?

Announced multi-year commitments across hyperscalers, frontier AI labs, NeoClouds, private capital sponsors, and REITs exceed $1.5 trillion on an announced basis. That figure is a scale marker, not a sum: site commitments overlap one another and overlap reported capital expenditure, so the atlas presents them side by side and never adds them into a single deployment number.

How much data center investment has been blocked or delayed?

Independent trackers measured $64 billion blocked or delayed from May 2024 through March 2025, $98 billion in the second quarter of 2025 alone, $156 billion for full-year 2025, and roughly $130 billion across about 75 projects in the first quarter of 2026. The windows and definitions differ between trackers, so the atlas shows the snapshots side by side rather than summing them.

Who finances data centers?

Four financing regimes now coexist. Amazon, Google, and Microsoft fund construction mainly from operating cash flow. Meta uses private-credit joint ventures with residual value guarantees, with Blue Owl and BlackRock. Oracle uses senior notes and site-level project bonds. NeoClouds and xAI use venture equity plus secured debt. Behind all four sits platform equity from sponsors such as Blackstone, BlackRock's GIP, Brookfield, KKR, and Blue Owl.

What is the largest cancelled data center project?

The largest cancelled dollar figure documented is Tract's Mooresville, North Carolina campus, at $30.0 billion and 1.5 gigawatts, cancelled after the municipal utility denied capacity allocation. The largest single loss overall is the Prince William Digital Gateway in Virginia, at $24.7 billion and 2 gigawatts, whose rezonings were voided in 2025 and whose developers withdrew and terminated in 2026.

How often is the Capital Atlas updated?

The atlas runs on a recurring research cycle with no fixed publication schedule: each published update is re-verified against its sources and carries a dated update note recording what changed. The Updated date at the top of this page is the dataset's actual as-of date (2026-10-08). Every figure links to the public page that states it; where a value could not be confirmed, the entry reads n.a. rather than an estimate.

How is this different from the Delay Watchlist and the Moratorium Tracker?

The three references cover one system from three sides. The Capital Atlas records who committed capital, in what structure, at which site. The Nationwide Data Center Delay Watchlist tracks project-level slippage, queues, and filings. The Moratorium Tracker maps state and local policy measures. Each links into the others.

Section 10 · State by state, company by company

Data center investment, state by state

One page per state and DC: who is investing there, the named sites and their disclosed capital, every project blocked, delayed or restricted, and the policy that governs a site. The figures beside each state are named sites and at-risk projects.

Capital providers, one page each

Reported and guided spending, named sites by state, financing transactions and the sourced record for each provider the atlas tracks.

The SAVRN reference set

Seven references, one system

Capital, delay, policy, water, grid, permits and scarcity are one system seen from seven sides. Each reference is primary-sourced, refreshed on a schedule, and links into the others, so a project can be followed from the money committed to the docket that stopped it.

Have a specific address? Site Intelligence reads all seven references against one location, county, utility and grid operator included, and cites every finding.
Check this address →

North American Data Center Capital Atlas

Get these tracker updates by email

A short introduction on days 3, 7 and 14, plus updates for this tracker. Unsubscribe at any time.

We use your address to send the introduction and updates described above. See our Privacy Policy.

You’re on the list. Your subscription is saved.