SAVRN
Search Contact SAVRN

SAVRN Model Hub · Comparisons

Llama-3.2-1B-Instruct vs TinyLlama-1.1B-Chat-v1.0

Llama-3.2-1B-Instruct has 1.2B parameters and TinyLlama-1.1B-Chat-v1.0 has 1.1B parameters; Llama-3.2-1B-Instruct is released under llama3.2 and TinyLlama-1.1B-Chat-v1.0 under Apache License 2.0; at 16-bit, Llama-3.2-1B-Instruct needs about 3 GB (1x MI300X from $1.85 an hour) and TinyLlama-1.1B-Chat-v1.0 about 2.6 GB (1x MI300X from $1.85 an hour).

Published metadata for 2 models, each read from its own repository.
Field Llama-3.2-1B-Instruct
meta-llama/Llama-3.2-1B-Instruct
TinyLlama-1.1B-Chat-v1.0
TinyLlama/TinyLlama-1.1B-Chat-v1.0
Publisher Meta Llama TinyLlama
Task Text generation Text generation
Modality Text Text
Parameters, as reported 1.2B parameters 1.1B parameters
Architecture LlamaForCausalLM LlamaForCausalLM
Library transformers transformers
Context length Not stated 2,048 tokens
Repository size 5.0 GB 2.2 GB
Artifact formats safetensors, pytorch safetensors
License llama3.2 apache-2.0
Access Access requested at publisher Open weights, no gate
Memory at 16-bit (weights and margin) 3 GB 2.6 GB
Cheapest GPUs at 16-bit, per hour 1x MI300X, $1.85 1x MI300X, $1.85
Memory at 4-bit (weights and margin) 0.7 GB 0.7 GB
Cheapest GPUs at 4-bit, per hour 1x MI300X, $1.85 1x MI300X, $1.85
Revision viewed 9213176726f5 fe8a4ea1ffed
Downloads reported by the hub 6.8M 1.2M
Last observed 2026-10-13 2026-10-13

An evaluation row appears only where at least two of these models report the same benchmark with the same stated configuration, metric, unit and setup. Different evaluators stay named in each cell. Values are shown as reported: no unit conversion, no ranking.

Other Reported Results

These results are listed for each model on its own, because the conditions needed to compare them are not stated or do not match. Two results that leave a condition blank are not assumed to share it.

Llama-3.2-1B-Instruct

BenchmarkConditionsResultReported byRevisionDate
Idavidrein/gpqa Task diamondMetric diamondSetup GPQA DiamondComparison conditions not established 18.6869 EvalEval
Reported by a third party
Evaluated revision not stated 2026-04-16

SAVRN's Notes on Llama-3.2-1B-Instruct

1.2B parameters at 3.0 GB in 16-bit memory, 0.7 GB at 4-bit: cheap to run on the one 192 GB MI300X at $1.85 an hour we list as the cheapest setup — but access is gated, the llama3.2 license is Meta's own rather than Apache or MIT, and the page records no context length, so verify that with your own tests before promising anything.

Meta frames the 1B and 3B instruct pair as multilingual dialogue engines — English, German, French, Italian, Portuguese, Hindi, Spanish and Thai are listed — tuned with SFT and RLHF for agentic retrieval and summarization. The single evaluation on the page, GPQA Diamond at 18.6869, sets the quality ceiling. Weights ship as pth plus safetensors across 13 files totalling 5.0 GB; one attached paper covers SpinQuant quantization, worth reading before you run 4-bit.

SAVRN's Notes on TinyLlama-1.1B-Chat-v1.0

1.1B parameters, 2,048 tokens of context, 2.2 GB of weights — 2.6 GB of memory at 16-bit, 1.3 at 8-bit, 0.7 at 4-bit. Any GPU you already rent covers it; even the cheapest MI300X at $1.85 an hour is thousands of times more memory than the 4-bit build needs. The card's pitch is the training run itself: a 1.1B Llama pretrained on 3 trillion tokens in 90 days on 16 A100-40G cards.

Apache 2.0, fully permissive, no gate. But 2,048 tokens is tight for anything beyond short exchanges, and quality at 1.1B is what it is — the page offers head-to-head comparisons against gemma-3-1b-it and Llama-3.2-1B-Instruct, which is the right weight class to shop in. Use TinyLlama where the constraint is absolute size — on-device demos, cheap text classification — and step up a size when you have a GPU budget.

Questions

Which is larger, Llama-3.2-1B-Instruct or TinyLlama-1.1B-Chat-v1.0?

Llama-3.2-1B-Instruct (1.2B parameters) is larger than TinyLlama-1.1B-Chat-v1.0 (1.1B parameters), by the parameter counts their publishers report.

Which is cheaper to run, Llama-3.2-1B-Instruct or TinyLlama-1.1B-Chat-v1.0?

At 4-bit, Llama-3.2-1B-Instruct fits on 1x MI300X from $1.85 an hour and TinyLlama-1.1B-Chat-v1.0 on 1x MI300X from $1.85 an hour, at the lowest on-demand prices the SAVRN Index lists.

Can I use TinyLlama-1.1B-Chat-v1.0 commercially?

Yes. TinyLlama-1.1B-Chat-v1.0 is released under Apache License 2.0. The Apache License 2.0 is a permissive open-source license. It permits commercial use, modification and redistribution. It requires keeping the license and copyright notices and any NOTICE file, stating significant changes, and it includes an express patent grant from contributors.

Related Comparisons