SAVRN
Search Contact SAVRN

SAVRN Model Hub · Comparisons

NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-BF16 vs OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT

NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-BF16 has 31.6B parameters and OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT has 31.3B parameters; NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-BF16 is released under other and OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT under Apache License 2.0; at 16-bit, NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-BF16 needs about 75.8 GB (1x MI300X from $1.85 an hour) and OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT about 75.1 GB (1x MI300X from $1.85 an hour).

Published metadata for 2 models, each read from its own repository.
Field NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-BF16
nvidia/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-BF16
OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT
farbodtavakkoli/OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT
Publisher NVIDIA Farbod Tavakkoli
Task Text generation Text generation
Modality Text Text
Parameters, as reported 31.6B parameters 31.3B parameters
Architecture NemotronHForCausalLM Gemma4ForConditionalGeneration
Library transformers transformers
Context length 262,144 tokens 262,144 tokens
Repository size 63.2 GB 126.8 GB
Artifact formats safetensors, pytorch safetensors
License other apache-2.0
Access Open weights, no gate Open weights, no gate
Memory at 16-bit (weights and margin) 75.8 GB 75.1 GB
Cheapest GPUs at 16-bit, per hour 1x MI300X, $1.85 1x MI300X, $1.85
Memory at 4-bit (weights and margin) 18.9 GB 18.8 GB
Cheapest GPUs at 4-bit, per hour 1x MI300X, $1.85 1x MI300X, $1.85
Revision viewed bf77c3174f68 6d425c390399
Downloads reported by the hub 704.5k 7.2M
Last observed 2026-09-18 2026-09-18

An evaluation row appears only where at least two of these models report the same benchmark with the same stated configuration, metric, unit and setup. Different evaluators stay named in each cell. Values are shown as reported: no unit conversion, no ranking.

Other Reported Results

These results are listed for each model on its own, because the conditions needed to compare them are not stated or do not match. Two results that leave a condition blank are not assumed to share it.

NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-BF16

BenchmarkConditionsResultReported byRevisionDate
LiquidAI/ifstruct-v1.0 Task ifstruct_v1Metric ifstruct_v1Comparison conditions not established 86.8 Liquid AI — IFStruct v1.0 blog (Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B)
Reported by a third party
Evaluated revision not stated 2026-06-30

SAVRN's Notes on NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-BF16

Seventy-six gigabytes is the number that decides the hardware here. At 16-bit the 31.6B parameters need 75.8 GB, which fits on a single MI300X with 192 GB at $1.85 per hour, the cheapest setup the Index prices, with room left for the 262,144-token context. At 8-bit the need drops to 37.9 GB and at 4-bit to 18.9 GB, and all 128 routed experts are in that bill. NVIDIA trained it for reasoning and non-reasoning work: it writes a reasoning trace before its answer, and a chat template flag turns the trace off.

The license field says other and we have no summary of its terms on file, so read NVIDIA's license in full before any commercial deployment. Two more checks: the one reported score, 86.8 on Liquid AI's IFStruct v1.0, is third-party reported, and pre-training data stops at June 25, 2025. No Index host serves it by the token yet.

SAVRN's Notes on OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT

Post-trained from Gemma 4 31B-IT on roughly 440 billion telecom tokens, OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT is aimed at network operations, standards interpretation, configuration help and retrieval-backed answering. Its 31.3B parameters need 75.1 GB at 16-bit, 37.5 GB at 8-bit and 18.8 GB at 4-bit, and all three fit the 192 GB of one MI300X, the cheapest Index setup at $1.85 an hour. The 262,144-token context matters when the input is a standards document rather than a ticket.

Apache 2.0 allows commercial deployment, modification and redistribution, with the notice and change-statement duties kept. Two things to verify. The repository is 39 files and 126.8 GB, about twice the 62.5 GB of 16-bit weights, so confirm what those files hold before pulling them. And because Farbod Tavakkoli post-trained this from a Gemma 4 base, confirm the terms that travel with the base weights fit your plan; no Index host prices are listed.

Questions

Which is larger, NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-BF16 or OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT?

NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-BF16 (31.6B parameters) is larger than OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT (31.3B parameters), by the parameter counts their publishers report.

Which is cheaper to run, NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-BF16 or OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT?

At 4-bit, NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-BF16 fits on 1x MI300X from $1.85 an hour and OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT on 1x MI300X from $1.85 an hour, at the lowest on-demand prices the SAVRN Index lists.

Can I use OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT commercially?

Yes. OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT is released under Apache License 2.0. The Apache License 2.0 is a permissive open-source license. It permits commercial use, modification and redistribution. It requires keeping the license and copyright notices and any NOTICE file, stating significant changes, and it includes an express patent grant from contributors.

Related Comparisons