SAVRN
Search Contact SAVRN

SAVRN Model Hub · Comparisons

Qwen3.5-27B vs Qwen3.6-27B

Qwen3.5-27B has 27.8B parameters and Qwen3.6-27B has 27.8B parameters; both are released under Apache License 2.0; at 16-bit, Qwen3.5-27B needs about 66.7 GB (1x MI300X from $1.85 an hour) and Qwen3.6-27B about 66.7 GB (1x MI300X from $1.85 an hour).

Published metadata for 2 models, each read from its own repository.
Field Qwen3.5-27B
Qwen/Qwen3.5-27B
Qwen3.6-27B
Qwen/Qwen3.6-27B
Publisher Qwen Qwen
Task Image and text to text Image and text to text
Modality Image and text Image and text
Parameters, as reported 27.8B parameters 27.8B parameters
Architecture Qwen3_5ForConditionalGeneration Qwen3_5ForConditionalGeneration
Library transformers transformers
Context length 262,144 tokens 262,144 tokens
Repository size 55.6 GB 55.6 GB
Artifact formats safetensors safetensors
License apache-2.0 apache-2.0
Access Open weights, no gate Open weights, no gate
Memory at 16-bit (weights and margin) 66.7 GB 66.7 GB
Cheapest GPUs at 16-bit, per hour 1x MI300X, $1.85 1x MI300X, $1.85
Memory at 4-bit (weights and margin) 16.7 GB 16.7 GB
Cheapest GPUs at 4-bit, per hour 1x MI300X, $1.85 1x MI300X, $1.85
Revision viewed fc05daec18b0 6a9e13bd6fc8
Downloads reported by the hub 1.9M 2.3M
Last observed 2026-10-10 2026-10-10

An evaluation row appears only where at least two of these models report the same benchmark with the same stated configuration, metric, unit and setup. Different evaluators stay named in each cell. Values are shown as reported: no unit conversion, no ranking.

Other Reported Results

These results are listed for each model on its own, because the conditions needed to compare them are not stated or do not match. Two results that leave a condition blank are not assumed to share it.

Qwen3.5-27B

BenchmarkConditionsResultReported byRevisionDate
Idavidrein/gpqa Task diamondMetric diamondSetup GPQA DiamondComparison conditions not established 81.8182 EvalEval
Reported by a third party
Evaluated revision not stated 2026-04-20
Idavidrein/gpqa Task diamondMetric diamondComparison conditions not established 85.5 Model Card
Reported by a third party
Evaluated revision not stated 2026-02-25
MMMU/MMMU_Pro Task mmmu_pro_visionMetric mmmu_pro_visionComparison conditions not established 75 Model Card
Reported by a third party
Evaluated revision not stated 2026-04-28
MathArena/aime_2026 Task MathArena/aime_2026Metric MathArena/aime_2026Comparison conditions not established 90.83 Official MathArena Evaluation
Reported by a third party
Evaluated revision not stated 2026-03-17
MathArena/hmmt_feb_2026 Task MathArena/hmmt_feb_2026Metric MathArena/hmmt_feb_2026Comparison conditions not established 81.06 Official MathArena Evaluation
Reported by a third party
Evaluated revision not stated 2026-03-17
SWE-bench/SWE-bench_Verified Task swe_bench_%_resolvedMetric swe_bench_%_resolvedComparison conditions not established 72.4 Model Card
Reported by a third party
Evaluated revision not stated 2026-02-03
TIGER-Lab/MMLU-Pro Task mmlu_proMetric mmlu_proComparison conditions not established 86.1 EvalEval
Reported by a third party
Evaluated revision not stated 2026-06-30
cais/hle Task hleMetric hleSetup with toolsComparison conditions not established 48.5 Model Card
Reported by a third party
Evaluated revision not stated 2026-02-25
cais/hle Task hleMetric hleSetup chain of thoughtComparison conditions not established 24.3 Model Card
Reported by a third party
Evaluated revision not stated 2026-02-25
harborframework/terminal-bench-2.0 Task terminalbench_2Metric terminalbench_2Comparison conditions not established 41.6 Model Card
Reported by a third party
Evaluated revision not stated 2026-02-25
likaixin/ScreenSpot-Pro Task overallMetric overallComparison conditions not established 70.3 Model Card
Reported by a third party
Evaluated revision not stated 2026-03-18

Qwen3.6-27B

BenchmarkConditionsResultReported byRevisionDate
Idavidrein/gpqa Task diamondMetric diamondComparison conditions not established 87.8 Model Card
Reported by a third party
Evaluated revision not stated 2026-04-22
MMMU/MMMU_Pro Task mmmu_pro_visionMetric mmmu_pro_visionComparison conditions not established 75.8 Model Card
Reported by a third party
Evaluated revision not stated 2026-05-15
MathArena/aime_2026 Task MathArena/aime_2026Metric MathArena/aime_2026Comparison conditions not established 94.1 Model Card
Reported by a third party
Evaluated revision not stated 2026-04-22
MathArena/hmmt_feb_2026 Task MathArena/hmmt_feb_2026Metric MathArena/hmmt_feb_2026Comparison conditions not established 84.3 Model Card
Reported by a third party
Evaluated revision not stated 2026-04-22
SWE-bench/SWE-bench_Multilingual Task swe_bench_multilingual_%_resolvedMetric swe_bench_multilingual_%_resolvedComparison conditions not established 71.3 Model Card
Reported by a third party
Evaluated revision not stated 2026-08-10
SWE-bench/SWE-bench_Verified Task swe_bench_%_resolvedMetric swe_bench_%_resolvedComparison conditions not established 77.2 Model Card
Reported by a third party
Evaluated revision not stated 2026-04-22
ScaleAI/SWE-bench_Pro Task SWE_Bench_ProMetric SWE_Bench_ProComparison conditions not established 53.5 Model Card
Reported by a third party
Evaluated revision not stated 2026-04-22
TIGER-Lab/MMLU-Pro Task mmlu_proMetric mmlu_proComparison conditions not established 86.2 Model Card
Reported by a third party
Evaluated revision not stated 2026-04-22
benchflow/skillsbench Task skillsbench_v1_1Metric skillsbench_v1_1Setup SkillsBench Avg5. Evaluated via OpenCode on 78 tasks (self-contained subset, excluding API-dependent tasks); avg of 5 runs. Mapped to the Hub's benchflow/skillsbench task skillsbench_v1_1.Comparison conditions not established 48.2 Qwen3.6-27B model card — Benchmark Results (Language > Coding Agent)
Reported by a third party
Evaluated revision not stated 2026-04-21
cais/hle Task hleMetric hleComparison conditions not established 24 Model Card
Reported by a third party
Evaluated revision not stated 2026-04-22
harborframework/terminal-bench-2.0 Task terminalbench_2Metric terminalbench_2Setup Harbor/Terminus-2 harness; 3h timeout, 32 CPU/48 GB RAM; temp=1.0, top_p=0.95, top_k=20, max_tokens=80K, 256K ctx; avg of 5 runs.Comparison conditions not established 59.3 Model Card
Reported by a third party
Evaluated revision not stated 2026-06-23
internlm/WildClawBench Task avg_costMetric avg_costComparison conditions not established 20.91 WildClawBench
Reported by a third party
Evaluated revision not stated 2026-08-11
internlm/WildClawBench Task avg_timeMetric avg_timeComparison conditions not established 421 WildClawBench
Reported by a third party
Evaluated revision not stated 2026-08-11
internlm/WildClawBench Task overallMetric overallComparison conditions not established 43.2 WildClawBench
Reported by a third party
Evaluated revision not stated 2026-08-11

SAVRN's Notes on Qwen3.5-27B

27.8B parameters in a dense multimodal body, released February 2026: it reads images and text over a 262,144-token context. Memory runs 66.7 GB at 16-bit, 33.3 GB at 8-bit and 16.7 GB at 4-bit — the cheapest listed setup is one 192 GB MI300X at $1.85 an hour, and at 4-bit a single workstation card holds it. The repo is 11 safetensors shards totalling 55.6 GB, and downloads run 1.9M a month.

Apache 2.0 permits commercial use with notices kept. The card states compatibility with Transformers, vLLM, SGLang and KTransformers. Reported results on the page include SWE-bench 72.4, MMLU-Pro 86.1, Terminal-Bench 2.0 41.6 and ScreenSpot-Pro 70.3, plus HLE at 48.5 with tools against 24.3 chain-of-thought — a gap that says tool access is not optional for this model's harder tasks. None of these is a SAVRN measurement.

If you would rather rent by the token, the Index observes DeepInfra at $0.26 in and $2.60 out per million tokens and Novita at $0.30 and $2.40, both read Oct 1, 2026. Against $1.85 an hour for self-hosting, hosted inference wins at low volume and loses quickly at sustained load — run the arithmetic at your actual traffic before committing to a card.

SAVRN's Notes on Qwen3.6-27B

Two Index hosts sell this one by the token, so the rent-or-own math is explicit: DeepInfra at $0.32 in and $3.20 out per million tokens, OVHcloud at $0.47 and $3.19, against one MI300X at $1.85 an hour that holds the full 16-bit working set of 66.7 GB — or 16.7 GB at 4-bit, leaving most of the 192 GB for the 262,144-token context. Third-party-reported evals top its MoE sibling on this list: 87.8 GPQA-diamond, 94.1 AIME 2026, 77.2 SWE-bench Verified.

Apache 2.0 permits commercial use, modification and redistribution, notices kept and changes stated, so a fine-tune is yours to ship. One naming trap: the configuration architecture reads Qwen3_5ForConditionalGeneration with model type qwen3_5 despite the 3.6 name — confirm your serving stack loads it before committing. No base model or paper is on record. Dense 27.8B parameters, image-and-text in, text out, released April 2026.

Questions

Which is larger, Qwen3.5-27B or Qwen3.6-27B?

Qwen3.5-27B (27.8B parameters) is larger than Qwen3.6-27B (27.8B parameters), by the parameter counts their publishers report.

Which is cheaper to run, Qwen3.5-27B or Qwen3.6-27B?

At 4-bit, Qwen3.5-27B fits on 1x MI300X from $1.85 an hour and Qwen3.6-27B on 1x MI300X from $1.85 an hour, at the lowest on-demand prices the SAVRN Index lists.

Can I use Qwen3.5-27B commercially?

Yes. Qwen3.5-27B is released under Apache License 2.0. The Apache License 2.0 is a permissive open-source license. It permits commercial use, modification and redistribution. It requires keeping the license and copyright notices and any NOTICE file, stating significant changes, and it includes an express patent grant from contributors.

Can I use Qwen3.6-27B commercially?

Yes. Qwen3.6-27B is released under Apache License 2.0. The Apache License 2.0 is a permissive open-source license. It permits commercial use, modification and redistribution. It requires keeping the license and copyright notices and any NOTICE file, stating significant changes, and it includes an express patent grant from contributors.

Related Comparisons