SAVRN
Search Contact SAVRN
SAVRN Index · Comparison

Nebius Group vs Crusoe Energy

Compared on what each company has disclosed: named sites, capacity, capital, GPU prices and listing, with a source beside every figure in the profiles.

Nebius Group
1,500 MW
4 named sites
Crusoe Energy
4,900 MW
4 named sites
Data as of October 2, 2026Every figure traces to a source on its company or site record

Side by side

MeasureNebius GroupCrusoe Energy
Index categoryNeoCloudNeoCloud
ListingNASDAQ:NBISPrivate
Named sites (Capital Atlas)44
Disclosed capacity, all sites1,500 MW4,900 MW
Operating or buildingnot stated1,200 MW
Disclosed site capitalnot stated$15.0B
States with named sitesMO, NJ, PATX, WY
GPU prices tracked83
Accelerators priced43
Lowest H100 list price, per GPU-hour$3.85$3.90
Lowest B200 list price, per GPU-hour$7.15not published
Sources cited in the Index22

Nebius Group

Nebius Group has raised a $700 million strategic equity round, a $3.75 billion equity-plus-converts package, approximately $4.3375 billion and $5.0 billion convertible note offerings, and a $2 billion Nvidia equity investment tied to scaling more than 5GW by 2030. Anchor contracts include a $17.4 billion five-year Microsoft agreement expandable to up to $19.4 billion, anchored at Vineland, New Jersey, and Meta agreements of $3 billion and then $27 billion over five years. Contracted-power guidance has escalated to more than 4GW, with Q1 2026 group revenue of $399.0 million and capex of approximately $2.5 billion.

Full profile: Nebius Group →

Crusoe Energy

Crusoe anchors the Stargate buildout at Abilene, Texas through a joint venture with Blue Owl Capital and Primary Digital Infrastructure that began at $3.4 billion for a 206MW first phase and grew to a $15 billion JV funding a 1.2GW, eight-building campus, with a further 900MW Abilene campus announced in March 2026 for Microsoft bringing the site total to 2.1GW. Equity raises include a $600 million Series D at $2.8 billion and a $1.375 billion Series E first close at more than $10 billion, and a Series F of more than $3 billion at a roughly $30 billion post-money valuation reported closed on 3 September 2026, co-led by Atreides Management and Valor Equity Partners with Mubadala Capital participating. Bloomberg reported on the same day that Crusoe had signed a five-year AI cloud contract with Jane Street worth roughly $13 billion, its highest-profile cloud customer to date. Its pipeline spans 45GW, including 1.8GW in Wyoming.

Full profile: Crusoe Energy →
Questions this page answers
Which is larger, Nebius Group or Crusoe Energy?

By capacity disclosed at named sites, Crusoe Energy, with 4,900 MW across 4 sites. Nebius Group has 1,500 MW at 4 sites.

Which publishes the lowest H100 price?

Nebius Group, at $3.85 per GPU-hour on its published list price. Crusoe Energy lists $3.90.

Where do these figures come from?

Sites, capacity and capital come from the SAVRN Capital Atlas, which keeps a source link beside every figure. Prices come from the SAVRN price tracker, which reads each provider's own page or feed. The company profiles linked above carry every source.

Keep going
The SAVRN reference set

Seven references, one system

Capital, delay, policy, water, grid, permits and scarcity are one system seen from seven sides. Each reference is primary-sourced, refreshed on a schedule, and links into the others, so a project can be followed from the money committed to the docket that stopped it.

Have a specific address? Site Intelligence reads all seven references against one location, county, utility and grid operator included, and cites every finding.
Check this address →