Skip to page content
SAVRN
Search Plan a project

Open-weight model · Visual question answering

visual-question-answering-study

by Samuel Moore Moore-samuel/visual-question-answering-study

visual-question-answering-study is an open-weight model for visual question answering from Samuel Moore, released under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0. It has 33,088 parameters and a 512-token context. At 16-bit it needs about 0 GB of GPU memory, which fits on 1x MI300X from $1.85 an hour, at the lowest prices in the SAVRN Index.

This is an exploratory note for Visual Question Answering. It records the intended comparison, likely confounders, and reproducibility requirements before any benchmark result is reported.

Parameters33,088
Context512
Weights132.8 KB
Licensecc-by-4.0
AccessOpen weights
Monthly Downloads—

Runs On

What it takes to serve visual-question-answering-study (33,088 parameters): the memory its weights need at each precision, and the cheapest way to rent enough data-center GPUs to hold them.

PrecisionWeightsMemory neededCheapest setupPer hourAlso fits
16-bit 0.0 GB 0.0 GB 1x MI300X (192 GB)
Vultr
$1.85 1x H100 $1.99 · 1x MI325X $2.00
8-bit 0.0 GB 0.0 GB 1x MI300X (192 GB)
Vultr
$1.85 1x H100 $1.99 · 1x MI325X $2.00
4-bit 0.0 GB 0.0 GB 1x MI300X (192 GB)
Vultr
$1.85 1x H100 $1.99 · 1x MI325X $2.00

Memory is the weights at that precision plus 20% for the runtime and a short context; a long context needs more. Prices are the lowest on-demand hourly rates in the SAVRN Index, read Oct 18, 2026.

visual-question-answering-study on every accelerator the SAVRN Index prices, at every precision

Model Card

By Samuel Moore, published under cc-by-4.0, revision e99b74d7e91b.

This is an exploratory note for Visual Question Answering. It records the intended comparison, likely confounders, and reproducibility requirements before any benchmark result is reported. - the scope of the research question and likely confounders - a proposed comparison with matched baselines - concrete evaluation context such as VQAv2, GQA, and OK-VQA - reproducibility checks, failure modes, and open questions - topic-relevant references Start with review.md for the full note. Sections labeled as plans or hypotheses should not be interpreted as experimental results. If results are added later, they should include dataset versions, commands, seeds, hardware, and raw logs. The note is…

Read Samuel Moore's full model card

Notes on Visual Question Answering

Repository summary

This is an exploratory note for Visual Question Answering. It records the intended comparison, likely confounders, and reproducibility requirements before any benchmark result is reported.

What is covered

  • the scope of the research question and likely confounders
  • a proposed comparison with matched baselines
  • concrete evaluation context such as VQAv2, GQA, and OK-VQA
  • reproducibility checks, failure modes, and open questions
  • topic-relevant references

How to read this repository

Start with review.md for the full note. Sections labeled as plans or hypotheses should not be interpreted as experimental results. If results are added later, they should include dataset versions, commands, seeds, hardware, and raw logs.

Scope and limitations

The note is intentionally exploratory. It does not claim benchmark improvements, completed ablations, released code, or a trained checkpoint. References and proposed datasets provide a starting point for verification rather than evidence that the study has already been run.

Files

  • review.md — primary artifact
  • README.md — this documentation

License

Released under cc-by-4.0. Review the source-data terms separately when this repository is used with external datasets.

Configuration

Architecture
CustomResearchModel
Context length (tokens)
512
Layers
8
Hidden size
256
Feed-forward size
1,024
Attention heads
4
Model type
transformer

Identity and Version

Repository
Moore-samuel/visual-question-answering-study
Publisher
Samuel Moore
Task
Visual question answering
Modality
Other
Library
Not stated by the source
Parameters
33,088 parameters
Languages
Not stated by the source
Revision
e99b74d7e91b601b302b5cd4678c5e9b47845259
First published
2026-10-07
Last updated
2026-10-07

Files and Weights

6 files, 139.6 KB in total. The weights are 1 file totalling 132.8 KB in safetensors.

Weights1 file · 132.8 KB
Configuration2 files · 629 B
Documentation2 files · 4.6 KB
Repository1 file · 1.5 KB
Every file
FileTypeSizeSHA-256
model.safetensorsWeights132.8 KB e3990cda2590
config.jsonConfiguration441 B —
training_args.jsonConfiguration188 B —
README.mdDocumentation1.4 KB —
review.mdDocumentation3.2 KB —
.gitattributesRepository1.5 KB —

License and Download

License
cc-by-4.0
Access
Open weights, no gate
Download size
132.8 KB
Download from Samuel Moore

Released by Samuel Moore through its official repository on Hugging Face. Read the license.

Memory Requirements

PrecisionWeights in memory
As published132.8 KB
16-bit0.0 GB
8-bit0.0 GB
4-bit0.0 GB

Weights only, from the published parameter count; the key-value cache and runtime add to this.

Questions About visual-question-answering-study

How much GPU memory does visual-question-answering-study need?

About 0 GB at 16-bit and 0 GB at 4-bit: the weights (33,088 parameters) plus a working margin. A long context needs more.

What is the cheapest GPU to run visual-question-answering-study on?

At 16-bit, 1x MI300X from $1.85 an hour; at 4-bit, 1x MI300X from $1.85 an hour, at the lowest on-demand prices the SAVRN Index lists.

Can I use visual-question-answering-study commercially?

Yes. visual-question-answering-study is released under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0. CC BY 4.0 permits sharing and adapting the work, including commercially, provided the creator is credited and changes are indicated.

What is visual-question-answering-study's context length?

512 tokens, from the maximum position embeddings in its published configuration.

Similar Models

Model · Visual question answering

visual-question-answering-warmup

Caleb JONES

A structured set of research notes on Visual Question Answering, with concrete evaluation references and open questions. Plans and hypotheses are kept separate from completed results. - the scope of the research question and likely confounders - a proposed comparison with matched baselines - concrete evaluation context such as VQAv2, GQA, and OK-VQA - reproducibility checks, failure modes, and open questions - topic-relevant references Start with summary.md for the full note. Sections labeled as plans or hypotheses should not be interpreted as experimental results. If results are added later, they should include dataset versions, commands, seeds, hardware, and raw logs. The note is…

Open weights cc-by-4.0 33,088 parameters 256 tokens

Model · Visual question answering

SnapVL

akesh Kumar

1. Pre-Convergence Checkpoint: The metrics reported in this document were evaluated on an intermediate experimental checkpoint where training was paused early to analyze representation dynamics. These numbers do not represent fully converged final weights. 2. Closed-Schema Evaluation Protocol: Unlike generative vision-language models that decode answers token-by-token from an open vocabulary, SnapVL operates as a closed-schema decision classifier. Questions are framed either as Boolean verification (True/False) or multiple-choice candidate selection (N-choice). Direct numerical comparison with generative LLM decoders should take this protocol difference into account. 3. Scope: SnapVL is…

Open weights apache-2.0

Model · Visual question answering

rsi-jev-v4.0-vl-qwen3.5-2b

Gasvn

trained option-scoring head. It answers choice / noul / score questions about a document and up to four images in one forward pass, and speaks the Images need the vision extra (Pillow, torchvision): pip install "rsi-jev[vision] @ git+https://github.com/Shanghua-Gao/RSI-Jev". The vision encoder and image processor are read from the base model. This checkpoint (seed 17, one seed): Re-computed from these exact files after upload-time reload. Kernel stack fla-0.5.2/torch-2.7.1+cu128; full recipe in meta.json. loadrelease applies calibration.safetensors when the checkpoint carries one, so the probabilities are the calibrated ones this card reports. A loader that skips those files returns the raw…

Open weights apache-2.0

Model · Visual question answering

vlm-calibration-prefix-vqav2

Bhaskar C

A small non-autoregressive yes/no visual question answering model built for research on calibrated decisions. It answers a yes/no question about an image in one forward pass, with no generation and no verbalised confidence. The confidence is the softmax over two token logits followed by a single post-hoc temperature. - Image. A frozen SigLIP2-base encodes the image into its pooled vector (pooleroutput, 768-d). - Prefix token. That vector becomes one prefix token, prepended to the input embeddings of ModernBERT-base: - anchor is a learned token, initialised from the " image" embedding. - alpha is a scalar gate, initialised to 0, so the model starts as exactly the text-only model. - gmax caps…

Open weights apache-2.0 150M parameters pytorch

Model · Visual question answering

DeepSeekVL-1.3B-Chat-fire

HappyBoy

https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s10694-026-02000-3 Existing vision-based methods suffer from high false alarm rates in urban flame detection. Applying Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) for secondary filtering shows great potential in reducing false alarms, yet they have high inference latency and are prone to reasoning collapse on negative samples without explicit Chain-of-Thought (CoT) guidance. To overcome these challenges, this study proposed Flash-Cascade, the first sub-second MLLM-based firewall to leverage CoT to efficiently filter false alarms. We deconstructed the flame detection process into four logical stages (planning, observation, analysis, and judgment), which informed the…

Open weights apache-2.0 2B parameters 16,384 tokens

Model · Visual question answering

Qwen2VL-2B-Instruct-fire

HappyBoy

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-026-02000-3 Existing vision-based methods suffer from high false alarm rates in urban flame detection. Applying Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) for secondary filtering shows great potential in reducing false alarms, yet they have high inference latency and are prone to reasoning collapse on negative samples without explicit Chain-of-Thought (CoT) guidance. To overcome these challenges, this study proposed Flash-Cascade, the first sub-second MLLM-based firewall to leverage CoT to efficiently filter false alarms. We deconstructed the flame detection process into four logical stages (planning, observation, analysis, and judgment), which informed the…

Open weights apache-2.0 2.2B parameters 32,768 tokens