Colorado Data Center Moratorium Tracker
All 2 state-level data-center measures on record in Colorado have failed or been vetoed. 25 city and county measures are tracked here, 20 of them in force. Every entry below links to its primary source: a legislature page, a governor's office, a local government, or the reporting of record.
State-level measures in Colorado
Every statewide moratorium, pause, siting restriction, or tax-incentive rollback in Colorado we can verify against a primary source. Strongest status first.
| Measure | Status | What it does | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| HB 1030Colorado: In Colorado, HB 1030 would offer a 100% state sales and use tax exemption for 20 years (extendable to 30) for data center operators investing | Failed / vetoed 2026-02 | In Colorado, HB 1030 would offer a 100% state sales and use tax exemption for 20 years (extendable to 30) for data center operators investing at least $250M within five years. A fiscal analysis found the bill would reduce general fund revenue by $29M/year, triggering a $106M reduction in low-income tax credits. A broad coalition including Earthjustice and environmental groups objected to the bill as a 'handout,' while competing legislation (SB 24-168 successor) would impose proactive environmental protections instead. HB 26-1030 (pro-development 20-yr sales-tax exemption, opposed by community/enviro coalition) was postponed indefinitely by the House Energy & Environment Committee May 7, 2026. | |
| SB 26-102Large-load data-center conditions | Failed / vetoed 2026-05 | Would have imposed siting and operating conditions on data centers over 30 MW (new renewables by 2031, 15-year contracts, community benefit agreements, no rate discounts). Postponed indefinitely 9-0 at the sponsor's request. |
City and county moratoria in Colorado
Most of the movement is local, where a building pause or permit halt does not need a legislative session. 25 tracked measures in Colorado, each with its source.
Where Colorado stands
Across the whole tracker we hold 334 state-level measures in 49 states and 1253 city and county measures, against 1419 primary sources. Colorado accounts for 2 of the state-level measures and 25 of the local ones.
By total measures on record it is #24 of the 50 states and DC carrying any tracked action, and #18 by city and county measures alone. Ranking is by count of sourced entries in this dataset, so it measures documented activity, not the size of the buildout.
Sources for Colorado
24 citations behind the entries above. Each opens in a new tab.
- Statewide · HB 1030 — Colorado: In Colorado, HB 1030 would offer a 100% state sales and use tax exemption for 20 years (extendable to 30) for data center operators investing leg.colorado.gov →
- Statewide · SB 26-102 — Large-load data-center conditions leg.colorado.gov →
- Archuleta County — County moratorium on data centers through December 16, 2026 pagosasun.com →
- Boulder County and 2 other localities — 3 separate measures, cited together kunc.org →
- Broomfield — 18-month data center moratorium (Ordinance 2313) coloradopolitics.com →
- Commerce City and 1 other locality — Proposed city moratorium on data centers businessden.com →
- Denver — One-year data center moratorium 9news.com →
- Jefferson County — Jefferson County data center moratorium jeffco.us →
- Kiowa County — Six-month data center facility moratorium (Resolution 2026-4) kiowacountypress.net →
- Larimer County — Temporary data center facilities moratorium larimer.gov →
- Lochbuie — Local moratorium on data centers through July 21, 2031 rmpbs.org →
- Logan County — Logan County data center moratorium journal-advocate.com →
- Longmont — Longmont data center moratorium denver7.com →
- Loveland — 12-month suspension of large data center applications bizwest.com →
- Mead — 12-month data center moratorium berthoudsurveyor.com →
- Mesa County — One-year data center moratorium gjsentinel.com →
- Phillips County — County moratorium on data centers through December 31, 2026 phillipscounty.colorado.gov →
- South Fork — Local moratorium on data centers through June 18, 2027 alamosacitizen.com →
- Weld County — Weld County commissioners approve permit for Global AI data center coloradonewsline.com →
- Arvada — Proposed local moratorium on data centers arvadaco.gov →
- Colorado Springs — Four-year data center moratorium ballot initiative gazette.com →
- Grand Junction — One-Year Moratorium on Data Center Developments gjsentinel.com →
- Moffat County — Proposed six- or 12-month data center moratorium craigdailypress.com →
- Aurora — Rejected local moratorium on data centers denver7.com →
What does bind large loads in Colorado
A moratorium is only one way a data center gets stopped. The grid operator decides whether it can connect at all, and on what terms. Colorado sits in 2 footprints.
Xcel Colorado and Black Hills are non-RTO (WECC); Tri-State, Colorado Springs Utilities, Platte River, United Power, La Plata joined SPP RTO West 4/1/2026.
States next door
7 of the 7 states bordering Colorado have at least one data-center measure on record. Restrictions tend to travel between neighbors, so this is usually where the next one comes from.
Data centers in Colorado
The US Data Center Map identifies 65 facilities run by 37 operators in Colorado, each one placed from primary sources and listed by city and by operator, with the measures on this page beside them.
Open the Colorado data center map → · The US Data Center Map →
How to read this page
In force = a moratorium, siting restriction, or tax-incentive rollback that is currently enacted, by statute or executive order. Paused = a temporary hold on new incentives or applications. Proposed = introduced and still pending. Failed / vetoed = died in committee, was voted down, or was vetoed.
This page is generated from the same primary-sourced dataset as the national U.S. Data Center Moratorium Tracker and is re-checked on the same weekly cycle, whether or not anything changed. Legislative status changes quickly; it is informational, not legal advice. Spot something out of date in Colorado? Tell us.
Companion references: the Data Center Grid Operator Watchlist for the interconnection and curtailment rules that bind here, the Data Center Water Tracker for water mandates, and the Data Center Delay Watchlist for named projects.
Why Colorado is pushing back
The objections repeat from state to state: strain on the electric grid, water drawn for cooling, and the sense that a facility takes local resources without giving much back. SAVRN builds AI factories designed around those three objections: on-site power that does not lean on the public grid, direct-to-chip cooling that does not consume municipal water, and a training institute that puts local people to work inside the building.
See how a SAVRN factory works Talk to us about a Colorado site