Alabama Data Center Moratorium Tracker
Alabama has 1 state-level data-center restriction in force. 1 more bill is pending. 18 city and county measures are tracked here, 17 of them in force. Every entry below links to its primary source: a legislature page, a governor's office, a local government, or the reporting of record.
State-level measures in Alabama
Every statewide moratorium, pause, siting restriction, or tax-incentive rollback in Alabama we can verify against a primary source. Strongest status first.
| Measure | Status | What it does | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| HB 399Alabama HB 399, sponsored by Rep. Hulsey (R-Helena), is the House companion to SB 265. | In force 2026-02 | Alabama HB 399, sponsored by Rep. Hulsey (R-Helena), is the House companion to SB 265. Limits tax abatements for data center projects over $200M to 20 years, down from the current 30-year maximum. Requires data centers consuming 100+ MW to pay state sales and use taxes allocated to the General Fund, effective January 1, 2027. Passed House 103-0; Senate unanimously passed amended version (April 9, 2026); House concurred and bill was sent to Gov. Ivey's desk. Gov. Ivey publicly supports the legislation as part of a package to lower costs for families. | |
| SB 270PSC review of large-load data center contracts | Proposed 2026 | Would require the Public Service Commission to ensure that utility contracts with data centers of 150 MW or more provide for cost recovery and demonstrable ratepayer benefit. Introduced; pending. | |
| SB 354Alabama: In Alabama, SB 354 would impose a one-year moratorium on construction of new large-scale solar power facilities, Prompted by opposition | Failed / vetoed 2026-03 | In Alabama, SB 354 would impose a one-year moratorium on construction of new large-scale solar power facilities, Prompted by opposition to a 4,500-acre solar project in Stockton meant to power Meta's Montgomery data center expansion. Exempts TVA solar capacity and projects already under construction. Opposition was led by Stockton Area Residents Against Solar. Key concerns driving this action include environmental impacts and loss of farmland. The outcome remains pending. SB 354 passed the Alabama Senate 27-4 but died on a procedural transmission deadline in early April. |
City and county moratoria in Alabama
Most of the movement is local, where a building pause or permit halt does not need a legislative session. 18 tracked measures in Alabama, each with its source.
Where Alabama stands
Across the whole tracker we hold 334 state-level measures in 49 states and 1253 city and county measures, against 1419 primary sources. Alabama accounts for 3 of the state-level measures and 18 of the local ones.
By total measures on record it is #28 of the 50 states and DC carrying any tracked action, and #26 by city and county measures alone. Ranking is by count of sourced entries in this dataset, so it measures documented activity, not the size of the buildout.
Sources for Alabama
21 citations behind the entries above. Each opens in a new tab.
- Statewide · HB 399 — Alabama HB 399, sponsored by Rep. Hulsey (R-Helena), is the House companion to SB 265. legiscan.com →
- Statewide · SB 270 — PSC review of large-load data center contracts afslaw.com →
- Statewide · SB 354 — Alabama: In Alabama, SB 354 would impose a one-year moratorium on construction of new large-scale solar power facilities, Prompted by opposition alreporter.com →
- Anniston — Twelve-month moratorium on data center permitting and licensing wbrc.com →
- Birmingham — Six-month pause on large data center applications birminghamwatch.org →
- Chelsea — One-year moratorium on data center licenses and permits 280living.com →
- Cullman — One-year data center moratorium yellowhammernews.com →
- Fairfield — Local moratorium on data centers thecooldown.com →
- Foley — Six-month moratorium on data center applications utv44.com →
- Fort Payne — Data center moratorium followed by conditional-use ordinance waff.com →
- Harpersville — Six-month data center moratorium abc3340.com →
- Helena — 180-day development moratorium that includes data centers abc3340.com →
- Homewood — Twelve-month moratorium on new data center applications wbrc.com →
- Leeds — One-year moratorium on data center development wbrc.com →
- Lowndes County — County moratorium on data centers through October 25, 2026 x.com →
- Pinson — One-year moratorium on data centers trussvilletribune.com →
- Prichard — Local moratorium on data centers through February 4, 2027 utv44.com →
- Springville — Moratorium on data centers newsaegis.com →
- Tarrant — City moratorium on data centers through September 8, 2027 abc3340.com →
- Westover — Six-month moratorium on data centers wbrc.com →
- Northport — Data center moratorium not pursued abc3340.com →
What does bind large loads in Alabama
A moratorium is only one way a data center gets stopped. The grid operator decides whether it can connect at all, and on what terms. Alabama sits in 1 footprint.
Vertically integrated Southeast: Alabama Power (Southern Co) most of state; TVA serves north Alabama. No RTO territory.
States next door
4 of the 4 states bordering Alabama have at least one data-center measure on record. Restrictions tend to travel between neighbors, so this is usually where the next one comes from.
Data centers in Alabama
The US Data Center Map identifies 32 facilities run by 14 operators in Alabama, each one placed from primary sources and listed by city and by operator, with the measures on this page beside them.
Open the Alabama data center map → · The US Data Center Map →
How to read this page
In force = a moratorium, siting restriction, or tax-incentive rollback that is currently enacted, by statute or executive order. Paused = a temporary hold on new incentives or applications. Proposed = introduced and still pending. Failed / vetoed = died in committee, was voted down, or was vetoed.
This page is generated from the same primary-sourced dataset as the national U.S. Data Center Moratorium Tracker and is re-checked on the same weekly cycle, whether or not anything changed. Legislative status changes quickly; it is informational, not legal advice. Spot something out of date in Alabama? Tell us.
Companion references: the Data Center Grid Operator Watchlist for the interconnection and curtailment rules that bind here, the Data Center Water Tracker for water mandates, and the Data Center Delay Watchlist for named projects.
Why Alabama is pushing back
The objections repeat from state to state: strain on the electric grid, water drawn for cooling, and the sense that a facility takes local resources without giving much back. SAVRN builds AI factories designed around those three objections: on-site power that does not lean on the public grid, direct-to-chip cooling that does not consume municipal water, and a training institute that puts local people to work inside the building.
See how a SAVRN factory works Talk to us about a Alabama site